#paleontology
1 messages Ā· Page 127 of 1
Did sorapods have rist spikes?
Around the wrist no, at least none we have found
I think amarga did
The wrist no, but a speculative take on it would be interesting
One I think that would more than likely have it if we found one would be some short of ankylosaur
Oooo
Those are thumb spikes, not wrist spikes
And have grounds in real life as a few sauropods/titanosaurs have these
yeah most sauropods have a big (relatively) claw on their thumb, not wrist
Oh cool
So does that mean they also
š
More like crush you under its weight but yeah I guess that is correct
Wouldn't really be useful to stab theropods because what theropod is gonna stand in front of a sauropod waiting for it to rear up
Fair
They probably used them at a earlier point in evolution but they grew not so my useful later on
But they could be used in ritualistic fighting members of the same species
or just like holding onto a tree while they eat
Oh history loved repeating itself on that neash
I'm surprised some animals today don't have this role š
you could add chalicotheres, pandas, therizinosaurs, and gorillas to that as well
herbivores just really want to hold a tree in their hands
Oh nvm then I completely forgot about those
Actually the Therizinosaur clearly didnāt use its claw to aid in foraging, as its neck too long. Probably a combat device, utilised to slice up tyrannosaurs who were too dumb to be dissuaded by the mighty Therizinosaur threat display
They probably dug up grubs and other goodies that hide in mounds or trees to
True, the herbivore mustāve been looking for protein supplements as well
Yeah herbivores do love insects
Except gorillas there TERRIFIED of caterpillars
Like I'm not joking they really are it's so funny š
There was a study that it wasnt strong enough to actually be used for defense, the claws
So the foraging might be not to far off again
Yeah a theri doing that would break it's nails now. only thing I can possibly see that happening if the predator was small
could it grow back?
Nail? Yes. Bone core? No.
Only thing I could see the bone being broken if a tarbo bites onto it or the theri falls or hits onto something hard
well, would its bone break if it did that?
Therizinosaurs are actually rlly close to ground sloths ecologically tmk
They couldnāt swing with much force but even a gentle slice would hurt, and dissuade an attack fairly well
Well definitely but I meant against something around it's size, the impact will hurt the theri aswell
If it's something smaller it wouldn't have much issue doing so
Depends. A forwards strike it could probably handle without tremendous risk, but any sideways struggle would be bad
Its like a fork, effective in a forward strike but both useless and risky when trying to cut or commit to any sideways motion with them.
i think the broader point with theri's claws is less that they outright couldn't be used in any capacity but moreso that there wasn't any significant selective pressure driving them to handle serious mechanical loads given how much poorly they handle stress relative to anything else
400 kg for a dilo? Is It that thin?
400kg lighter than cerato, not 400kg total
giga is 8.8-10.2 tons, yes?
what abt their length?
12,7-12,8m for holotype, 13,5-13,6m for dentary specimen
BRRRRRRRRRRR
I totally did not make that
I'm just imagining their doing the ark finger wiggle to not break it's nails lol
Wait so giga better then rex
Why would it be better
considering the genus tyrannosaurus lasted longer than giganotosaurus that isnt true anyway
I meant bigger (autocorrect)
Biggest rex (BHI 6248) is 10.6-11 t
rex is more reliably larger than giga
to be fair that's only because giga has a sample size of 2
But yes at the moment the largest known theropod is rex
@cloud badger
Wait is this in pounds cause I thought rex was at a 7000kg average
Or is this like the high end estimate
Average is around 7500-8000kg but the largest specimens are 10-11000kg
from @pearl briar
oh shi wait i forgor their account got hacked
lololol useless ping 
Unfortunate for that guy
I like the character used for scale
I love how these days they use weird model for scale like TF2 medic or ow junkrat lol
yet till nowadays nobody uses Doomguy/Doom Slayer (whatever, they're still the same person anyway) as scales š
Because he WAYY taller than a human we need a scale for just him
everyone just scales the character to 6ft anyways
way too much effort
curious for galeamopus is a size range of about 7 tonnes okay?
I still use them, but I just havenāt had the ability to make more for a while
This is correct, our model was made alongside the original skeletal Henry did which was before everyone started adding cartilage to things so our Torvo is a bit too short in terms of height. I do have an edit of the JFD model with cartilage but I do not like it for Tall Torvo is an ugly beast and should not be blessed with the light of the sun.
What if I like Tall Torvo, will you show him? 
does this one count
That's Gurneyi right?
K
Rip
How heavy IS Utah?i heard 300-400kg and 1.000+
WHAT THE HELL no, utahraptor is 350-500kg
anything wrong wit this design?
No but It has kinda a weird hump and It has quill knobs on the head
Hm
Most accurate jw model ever
I don't believe we have anything against quills/ feathers on the nape
the feet lack enough soft tissue padding
The hands also seem incredibly large
^ another than that it's a solid nodel
I think it's enough it's should be a problem for it only weights 400kg
no, we know the amount it had for certain
it's abit distorted etc but it had quite significant foot padding
Heh Vivid...these are theme park monsters............
how many times must I kill you
I think a few more times, I can feel it
The 'sail' being over the sacrals rather than in front of them, the secondary 'sail' not going far enough down the tail, legs too skinny from the front, arms and hands too large, crests far too prominent.
There's a lot wrong with it but as far as a JP-Style Concavenator it's honestly roughly what I'd want, I'd just move the sail up so it's not directly over the hips is all.
Ah also the fact that it has quills at all is probably not right either, the 'quill knobs' are highly debated to this day and if they are quill knobs then they indicate wing feathers not standalone quills.
Clearly the Concavenator would have quill spikes and use them similar to the ninjas of retro-Japan to slice their foes to pieces (I saw it on anime once)
Jwa conc was based off the one in Lockwood Manor, looked more JW
Hold up
So if those are actual quill knobs, Conc would have wings?
Not just Conca
Possible, however it's worth noting the 'quill knobs' do not look like quill knobs and are not in the place you'd expect quill knobs to be
I never figured that they be much but I dislike this find
guys how do u think dinosaurs fought each other
I'm going back to making temnospondyl Gill (filaments), this is heavily Distressing to me.
Assuming they'd be between a fish and an axolotl gill
as much as any other animal
I feel like all you ask here are questions with unknowable answers
^
They asked how
That's fairly knowable to the point it's in their skeleton (Ceratopsian horns, theropod bites, etc)
I think the only weird one I can think of is Kicking Megaraptors
Huh
Look at their teeth and skull if their long and thin they don't take much risk
If not they do
Look at the shoulders if they are proportionally big they engage in wrestling ,with long arms adding a bonus to that
If they have strong heads they ram into each other
If they have front legs or arms with enough range they to hit with them they hit with them
If they are able to kick without falling they probably kick
If they posses the ability to bite they bite(whatever it's is herbi or carni)
That's as much info as you can get from looking at something although it's not a guarantee
Long femurs means runner
Exact opposite
You're right, Dr Napoli must be a liar then
Y u hate rexs
What the sigma
Please remain polite and respectful towards each other and do not provoke or antagonize other users. Refer to our #rules
i think large theropod stomped there prey to stop them from moving then Bite them
Hunting methods definitely varied from species to species
When you tell someone a bird relative would have feathers

How are Chilantaisaurus and Datanglong classified?
some had feathers not all if them
@warped peak It probably rarely did it
It looks stable enough but risky for a front kick kinda like with ostrich
It probably only did back kicks on a regular tho
I see it more of a browler (strong elbows from illustrations I saw )
@umbral kite depends on what length of legs they had not necessarily size so shorter would rather just bite and choke or peck longer legs would definitely stomp medium would do both like secretary bird and cassowary short legs would be like house Sparrows and crows middle would be something like chicken and pigeon (I know they don't look like they do but they are packing those quads)
like a trex if just bite something it could kill with one bite but what if like a mircle happened and it survived and it could try to us it weight and stomp it to stop it or to stomp a smaller animal like a lambo and hust did to stop it from moving
Not possible it's waaay to heavy to do that reliability in hunting especially since it wasn't fast either so not on something like a lambeosaurus
Itād probably shatter its leg if it tried to stomp in the way they do ingame.
no it cant stomp it kicks
Yeah that and there legs are to prepositionally stubby there only a few inches taller than a iguanadon
To big to kick
It may have , weight is not a big factor it's more balance and range
But yeah short legs mean it probably was a choker like a lot of our predators
Just like elephants can stomp and kick but generally won't
really can u show me becuase i believe it hilarious
This is straight up a iguanadon next to scotty I know right š
I wouldnāt call them short legged, but they arenāt long legged eithet.
also if dinosaur turn in to fossil fuels and that is oil and oil make plastic does that mean my old plastic dinnosaurs where actually reall dinosaur but dead
More like a proportionally large kiwi š„
You have plankton and plants to thank for that. Not dinosaurs.
T rex have slightly longer legs but yeah proportionally slightly small lol
They are like under average
Definitely could kick and stomp but why would it do it it's risky and not as rewarding as other methods
it could us it to pin thing down
Well there like 10-8 tons and the tail was not stable for standing on unless it's shooing away something like a smaller dinosaur (I don't think they could even stan on 1 leg for long) trying to kick prey they hunted is like a elephant trying to hand stand
That's just stepping on them or pounce per say predators do it to pray smaller then them all the time if they knocked them over
Thats certainly plausible if its a smaller animal or something knocked down.
yes
do u think argent tail was like a wip and if u get hit by it u get knocked back far
Thinking about it they likely only did such to sertant amounts of prey like they already only got 2 legs to work with leaving your groinds exposed to a attack like that would have been unsafe
Nevermind the knockback, you wouldnāt want to get hit by it at all.
Argent was the type of dinosaur to just step on you or 1 kick you at that size but yeah tails HURT
Also, ingame physics =/= real world physics.
Yes it was like a wip
Tho it did not knock other far
It was more like get hit loose an arm or at least some meat
Just like irl wipes
@river plinth rex didn't have groins but I get what you mean the risk of falling over is certain dangerous it probably prefers wrestling when hunting at a stupidly slow 18km/h
I just imagined it again I think it's so funny how slow rex are
it would pin some where like it chest area of it rib crushing it
Thatās not the most efficient way of doing it.
Rex more likely suffocated most of the time considering large dinosaurs themselves have extremely strong bones
Neck it goes for neck
Like all predators normally would and should
Why go for ribs who are stronger than neck with a guaranteed kill
It's the strategic I adopted with smilodon when fighting moded argent (it works so well a skilled person could solo it because of attack hut box doest reach there )
Alot of the large dinosaurs around hell creek were pretty slow to
Most big things were slow
But like just imagine the chase bro yet you could outrun it
Yeah would have been hilarious to watch for me
It feels equaly as slow in game lol
Props to the devs for realism
Isnāt rex supposed to be able to top 30 or 45 mph when it wanted to? Probably ran slower most of the time.
no 12mph
No 
They'd shatter there shins at the first 2 steps
Not sure where i heard those numbers though. Probably misremembering something.
it at best it 10-20mph
who else do u think human should be in path of titan i want to beat a trex with my bear hand
I'm completely all for that
Youād have to be Superman or One Punch Man to do that.
Estimates generally put rex at a 16 to 25km/h
40km/h is the max they can go before breaking there bones (similar to elephants)
How do think will win a giant bull trex or human with the undoable human spirit
If they got a gun there's straight if not good luck buddy
Human
The ability to throw rocks accurately is just so op
š the trex after a dust particle was thrown at it
Rocks hit hard no matter the size it'll die from repetitive small wounds after like 3 days or maybe exhaustion or starvation
if a rat throw a pebble at u would u die after three days
assuming the trex didnt just run straight at the human and maul them before they had the chance to get their distance
One pebble, no, a thousand, maybe.
Id probably die if a small gremlin kept throwing pebbles at me like it might be small but it hurt
@pliant cedar yeah no you gotta be really unathletic to get caught by a rex
it could keep up with an average human runner at top speed.
and this doesnt factor in stamina
Average human can run at 25km/h that high end rex speed estimates
I heard juvie were faster so them maybe
I run way faster that 5 or 12mph on a sleeper build just saying
what the hell are we talking about
idk, heard about how a human would kill a trex after pelting it with small rocks for several days, not accounting for the fact that trexes can move
Thats an Old Rex skeletal
Rex has pretty long Legs actually, Giga has shorter Legs
What if the tres just swat the pebble back at u never though if that
should just use this rex
Nah, Sue Better
also i doubt a small rock is going to do much to the bulky and dense skull of a trex, if it just charged towards you ur cooked
I used scotty
I know am just saying you should've used a non extremely different specimen like scotty to compared to something like iguanodon
Iggy is also like
Huge
This scotty is better
Like this guy?
Tmk this is a good specimen to argue Rex average size
Rip lol
Tbf the 5027 doenst have any cartilage
would want to live in the Jurassic or the triassic or cretaceous era in time
None of the above
Knock you back ? At the most it will knock you to whichever side it was swinging to. Something with that much weight would kill you.
cretaceosu
Oooh ok
fine then u get post extinction Cretaceous. For not choosing
I'll be fine
Wrinkly brain and all
wait if dinosaurs where dying a lot would that not give some small dinosaur corpses to eat, and that would the land as well
Yes I think at that time scavengers THRIVED to
would u rather get hunted by a pack of 3 utah raptor or 1 quetz
1 quetz because quetz can't psychically shallow or eat you
I could easily hide from 1 quetz inside a house
the smaller dinosaurs that survived the intial carnage probably chilld for a few years until the corpses ran out
instead it would bludgeon you to death with its beak, which would probably be more painful
Hello guys
it just bite u breaking something or just ripe u limb from limb
what
hi
How's everyone
if it hunted human sized prey it would probably just bludgeon it with its beak till it died, then broke up the pieces with its beak
On the first time trying to bludgeon something it would break its beak
It's 90% air
or it could land on u then take it beak to grab ur head or u upper body breaking something
english pls
Shame ppl still think it was smaller than maiasaura or smaller than carnotarus 
what would it do then
not attack
what did it hunt, in weight class
land on u and take it beak to bite u
If it wanted to kill a human, peck you in the gut and wait for you to bleed out
or bite ur head
it's not biting your head
maybe it could break a human's neck by grabbing the head and shaking but i'm not sure
y
Can I debate here?
sure
because pecking would just be an easier option rather than trying to actively waste more energy biting
well look at Maip Size Comparison
The cooler maip
That's Aerosteon
it's a joke š
let play game guess the dinosaur from poor adaptation whos this dinosaur
Tarbosaurus
Tarbosaurus, it's too obvious
Guess this Dino
alpkarakush
no that tarbosaurus ugly cousin
Fatalis is right, this is the art of Alpkarakush made by Joschua Knuppe for the paper
Correct
no i was talking about the my picture of the wannabe tarbo guess this dino
Alioramus?
no it is a in the tyrannus genus
Fr(its literally 2-2.5)x Carnos weight
Giraffatitan Or apato
maiasaura is literally the same weight as carno š
The downgrade is crazy
Nope, it's Lavocatisaurus
u sure
Literally(has a Bulkier Torso than Maip therefore its cooler)
Yes but that picture is Omeisaurus not Lavocatisaurus, Lavocatisaurus is a Rebbachisaurid
Anyone have the size stats for mansourasaurus
oh really?
well all of them are Lavocatisaurus except this is a Omeisaurus
how many time do u have to spin it neck till the neck breaks
Bro what?
if u spin the dinosaur neck around how mang time would u have to do it for it to break in self defense of course
yes both are 2,000kg with maiasaura having a smaller size range
@stiff osprey sorry to ping but I tried to draw a giganotosaurus based on Dan's and I was wondering did I do good
Okay, also can we debate about Dinos more?
It could be accurate but I believe he mewed a bit too much
That bottom jaw is really something
Probably looking forward to the meal
š
I mean can we debate in dms
Looks pretty good, though the teeth seem to be too uniform for a living animal but the linework and how it's done is nice
Tho maybe the upper skull could do with some thickening
am not in the mood right now
Look good u could add morr detail in to it eye or it gums and it teeth but that up to u but look good
Oh why?
am just not in mood right okay
Also maybe it's the angle, but the lower jaw seems longer than the upper?
ok, so are you in a bad mood?
no
alr
Yeah maybe idk, I kept looking back and forward on the reference and am just so confused whether the lower jaw looks longer than the upper
You can use your pencil or ruler by lining it up with the lower jaw lip and then adjusting it to the upper
OH damn I forgot about that
us a boxs for the head and add to point and a line connecting the points and then draw the jaws at the points
Yeah am not doing all of that but am just gonna fix it anyways
just us a box draw to point an line the point up to get the jaw right -_-
Just take a ruler and q pencil and make the jaw the same length as the upper part of the mouth
Birds drool , pterosaurs rule.
dang bro got shrunk???
Yeah
most of them look like aliens
ye I thought they said how often lol
will there even be a day where random stops shrunks any random dinos at all?
This is awesome!
That looks like a hyena.
That was what i was just about to say
Which theri is more scientifically accurate? (Don't bring up feathers, they aren't DIRECTLY tied to theri)
one of those looks more like theri despite the lack of feathers
actually I'm questioning why you asked tbh, one of them is Jurassic World
that alone should give you an answer
I just wanna know if the head shape ended up changing or something, I don't know how much JP wants to double down on being a bad franchise mb
I don't believe we have its head, it's reconstructed from relatives iirc
Ye, iirc we only have it's arms
I think the body of the JP one looks better.
Deinocheirus for a while moment
The image on the left would be I think a very reasonable speculative Therizinosaur head reconstruction
Unfortunately, itās less accurate and the one on the left would be the best overall
Pretty sure Paleo Pines has the hunchbacked version too.
Perhaps, but the CBD one is more accurate overall, Theri was quite hefty, with a massive chest
Wide boy
Live laugh wide Theri
Fr
This image makes me think what a quadrupedal theri would look like, donāt know why
This is beautiful
Um, actually that's JW theri š¤
Here's JP theri, chonky boi
i think i may have found charonosaurus bonebed measurements
perhaps a downsize is in order...?
Whatās that stuff in its chest called ?
Just a speculative bit of tissue, thatās all. Prolly for display
besides location, whats the difference between charonosaurus and para?
the crest i think
dino discuss her now
What the hell is that
ammonite-theropod hybrid
Sir that is a plushie that fell in an oil spill
That doesn't sound very accepting....
Is Evan Johnson Spinosaurus paper good?
I got into a debuts with someone about some of the more recent spinosaurus papers and I was wondering does there comment hold any weight, as my argument was that for much of the latter half of the year from 2022-2024 some of these papers seem to be more biased from what I've seen
*black ichor
Curious, could abelisaurs actually tolerate the trauma from if they were to headbutt something full force
The emotional trauma from such an action would cripple them
Ok lets say they just got out of therapy and now are emotionally strengthened
AFAIK it isn't the best idea, but shoving each other during competition is possible (for Carno, at least)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edn9ZW2s7zw
paleoaccurate
spino and rex models made by me, everything done in Blender
took inspiration from multiple animes and tf2 animations
song: Judas by Lady Gaga
Charon is larger(?) Usually clades more basal. The crest Has not been found yet
if i high fived a theri would I survive
No, unless youre very lucky
but it just i high five what the worst that can happen
breaks your arm cus it pushes it the wrong way. if its sharp and forceful enough, accidentally cuts into your skin
if it was "just a high five" why'd you ask if you'd survive in the first place
do u think if theri fought for mate they high five each other till they one stops
No
š„²
Their claws were too brittle for attacking
what would it have done
Used it for threshing foliage for food
it was a robust animal, so even without the claws it could probably hold its own against large predators
People forget that mass is a weapon
A whole five tonnes of mass to use against the Tarbosaurusās⦠5 tonnes of massā¦.
The therizinosaur would use its mighty 10 newton bite force to scare off the tarbosaurus
lol
well, being 5 tons would still be a deterient, what would you rather go after, the 5 ton theri or the smaller anyklosaurids?
although icl a tarbosaurus probably still has the edge against a 5 ton therizinosaur
true, i could see herding behavior in therinosaurus for more protection
tyrannosaurs are the bigcats of theropods, they can really punch above their weight
would you say sauropod was on the menu for tarbo?
the ones in the nemegt? probably yeah. people think that tyrannosaurs are bad at sauropod hunting due to their powerful bite, but they had serrated teeth just like other theropods. compared to rex tarbo wouldve been better due to its thinner jaw allowing it to take more rapid bites
everything would be bad at hunting adult megasauropods, tarbo lived with a more reasonably sized one and juveniles wouldāve still been common though
Gotta be the first time Iāve see rhinos make elephants back up
Also Therizinosaurus solos
they probably didnt want to risk getting the baby injured
?
the herd has a calf thatās what they mean
look at how close the rhinos were getting to the baby
Usually elephants will circle around the baby when danger is around, they were completely submissive.
these also look like relatively young females and they probably had no real reason to try and push the rhino away, you can see what looks like a few older ones in the background
How did Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus live at the same time and place without being in heavy competition of each other?
Yeah that make sense as well, definitely didnāt see no Bull Elephants around.
How much is known about ankylosaur parenting?
Who said they didnāt compete ?
none to my knowledge, but due to Ankylosaurs being found alone I would assume they would do the turtle method
Wouldn't one go exinct after a little while? Specificially Brontosaurus as it was smaller and probably was pushed around more?
Pinacosaurus has been found in a creche of at least 4 young individuals iirc, but I cannot recall if there was a situation like Psittaco with one older "sibling" or they were all the same size
No because in a healthy, non-human touched ecosystem, you can have quite a few large animals together (as well as the fact the Morrison stretched millions of years, not all animals were contemporary)
from what I could find on google Apato and Bronto lived at the same time and the same place
It's Google
Unless you mean Wikipedia, then it's not the best
^
so what source should I use then?
competition doesnt usually result in extinction unless one species is vastly superior in that niche, or the environment changes in a way that strains resources
I feel like ankylosaurs occasionally killed each other by accident from swinging their club tails.
1 swing to the head and it's all over.
probably
Its not entirely black and white regarding species competition, they could've lived in different regions of the Morrison, they could've had slight diet differences, they could've been separated by a few thousand years, etc
To reinforce this a lot of similarly-sized Tyrannosaurs are found in the same formations together, and many similar species coexist today- for example there's quite a bit of overlap between where different Hyena species are found. Often niches are separated by small behavioral traits that simply are not and often cannot be preserved by fossils.
yeah, they might compete in one aspect of their diet, but avoid intense competition by being good at other things too (lions with very large prey, hyenas with bone marrow, leopards with hunting arboreal prey)
Daspletosaurus and Gorgosaurus are possibly the most famous example of two similarly sized tyrannosaurs being present in the same general area in the same general time frame
Probably Google Scholar if you're looking for proper scientific publications, but if you're not that interested you can use Wikipedia, just keep in mind it's usually more of a quick summary than a full understanding and can be mistake prone (though at least you can always check the cited sources for more details if anything doesn't add up).
There are also some decent Paleo channels on YouTube, but there's a ton of slop content you have to be weary of and even the better channels are more like Wikipedia- just a summary.
What was the smartest dinosaur
probably on purpose too
nah. They have helmet like head armor specifically for this
would take a few swings
From a study by Arbour, they used their tails to hit the flanks of their opponents, I don't think there was any noticeably high amount of head injuries to ankylosaurs from each other
atm it's rex, although it's not chimp-level. recent study places them as smart as monitor lizard/crocodiles (still smarter than some other theropods)
i could be wrong so cmiiw
Intellgience is a bad measurement, never use it if you value your moral integrity
speak that to urself falcon
i am an intelligent gorilla and nothing could stop me
Interesting
do we know what the largest prehestoric freshwater fish was?
and is it larger then the beluga sturgeon?
Aināt it Leeds?
i dont think leeds was freshwater....
Oop just saw fish and automatically went Leeds skipped over freshwater
also it still isnt the biggest fish, wouldnt megalodon be bigger?
phylogenetically it'd be the blue whale
but yeah megalodon would count as the biggest fish ever if weāre using the usual definition of fish
https://x.com/seasaver/status/1790669431414075718?s=46 speaking of Leeds ā¦
This ancient fish was bigger than a whale sharkāand faster than scientists ever imagined
Leedsichthys problematicus could overturn the bony fish paradox.
So glad we are getting close to Leeds being released in path of titans
like rhizodus maybe?
the mighty tyrannosaur hunting edmusthosaurus
Lythronax eating a diabloceratops while the caption talks about albertosaurus being hunted by edmontosaurus
Saurophaganax is taking notes as we speak
guys was theri featherless or did have did theri have feathers becuade featherless theri haunt me
Featherless
what do u measure it by
noooooo
Well womp womp
if you had to make therizinosaurus feathered something like this I feel would be more likely
This is wat i see
ā ļø
Hey Paleontology Chat, how fast could a Quetzalcoatlus fly? The current estimate is a staggering 80 mph (~130 kph). I personally think this estimate is quite farfetched unless I'm proven wrong. What would y'all think?
It the fastest thing iimc
It makes sense, the larger an object is, the faster you have to move it in order to produce enough lift to raise it off the ground. Bigger birds tend to fly faster than smaller ones
AFAIK that was only powered flight
see it would have to be fast becuase for large thing to fly it need to very fast or have very large wings im missing something but yea
Though Quetzals were around 500 pounds
yes so for it to fly it would need to have very large wing to fly or be very fast but so far i found it 80-128 mph
The 128 is in kilometers, not miles
Dinosaurs Speed Comparison | Fastest Dinosaurs 3d comparison
In this video we made 3d Comparison of fastest man made objects and this is true comparison of fastest man made objects.
#comparison #3d #speed #animation #fastestdinosaurs
Check this amazing video - https://youtu.be/L2peSDb3jHg
Do not use that video as a reference
60+mph isnāt uncommon for soaring birds to hit and quetz is huge, 80 or higher isnāt entirely unreasonable
for thing to fly it need to balance weight = to wings size and speed so if u do math and then we could try to find it weight and wing then us that to fond x the speed or soemthing idk
just lookk up aerodynamic
Leeds my beloved!
after leeds we will just need giga!
tylo:
Nah they're gonna make that thing able to crawl on land.
I guess smaller predators that hunted the juveniles don't exist
People usually only think about the biggest few animals in an ecosystem ig
at what stage of its life does triceratops develop the frill
I think they always had a frill it just got continuously bigger and more developed as they aged
ok that is very minimalist
theri could've very well had a slower metabolism, and nemegt got pretty cold sometimes
Would juvenile Tyrannosaurus have feathers?
I read somewhere that you cannot have both feathers and scales in the same spot, even at different life stages. Would a juvenile Tyrannosaurus maybe have feathers grow in between scales or are feathers on babies out of the question?
idk man theri was pretty big and chunky
Spiders tend to be lumped in with other bugs and although most people know they are a different group of animals sometimes it is understated quite how distantly related and different they are as animals and strangely almost every difference that spiders have with the other arthropods seems to have just made them creepier.
To support me on Patre...
Theyre descendants from trilobites right
I think
Trilobites need to return
MERCH!!! https://lindsaynikole.com/
New collection is preorder until December 8th; previous collection is 15% off!
The Paleogene Period! The dinosaurs are OVER!!! Well actually...not quite. I'm going to introduce you to the animals that existed after the asteroid wiped out 75% of life on Earth. As you will see, it came with some grotesque and u...
trilobites are just overhyped detritovores
no
How fast is giganotosaurus supposed to be
And how smart it is?
at one point i remember someone puts them in iguana level
Doesn't it have a bigger brain?
bigger brain ā smarter
Yeah but as I know dinosaurs were like birds that had more neurons for a smaller brain and if Gigas brain is bigger than the iguana one should have a lot more neurons so smarter, tell me if I am wrong
So, whale is smarter than us?
Whale is not correlated with birds
There isn't any relation between brain size and intelligence. Even then, I think the relation between brain size/body size ratio is also quite questionable as whales and elephants are very intelligent yet their brain mass is quite neglectable. So we don't really know any correlation that goes with intelligence (and we don't know how to quantify intelligence anyway).
we arenāt intelligent enough to know
So true
As I know birds (crows especially) have very compacted neurons and they are very smart and dinosaurs are supposed to have bigger brain than a crow
We can't say for sure that adult Tyrannosaurus were not feathered, the skin impressions are not detailed enough and cover too small of an area. But if the adults were fully scaly, then yes, the babies would have been scaly as well
hey Random you gonna a minute
That is something that evolved far down the bird line to accommodate the mental demands of flight. Nonavian dinosaurs have much more conservative neurology in line with other reptiles
When we say Giganotosaurus had a brain the size of an iguana we mean that if we scaled the iguana to the size of the giga their brains would be the same size. It's about proportional brain size, which does give some idea of behavioral flexibility & complexity aka intelligence
This is way too fast, giga is similar to Rexās speed around 26kmh
Trilobites were hella diverse though.
You're an opp if you don't remember that period
Cool vid.
looks like precambrian, ediacara?
Whats an opp? ||And definetly Edicarian.||
slang for opposition
I just got my last comment auto deleted for saying d*ckinsonia
bigger body = needs bigger brain to control bigger body
most of an elephants brain is for locomotion and coordination iirc
elephants have a large cerebellum, the part of the brain responsible for coordination, but it's still only 18% of total mass
ours is about 10%
brainpower
blows u up with my mind
You canāt lose ancestral traits can you? There has to be at least some remnant of that trait unless Iām wrong?
Because then thereās the ankylosaurids/nodosaurids and stegosaurids
Or large ornithopods since there arenāt many ornithopod reconstructions with feathers
Sure you can. Snakes lost their legs entirely and there's dozens of animals that lost their eyes
It just takes a long time
like all amniotes losing their gills
I guess it depends on if its beneficial for how the way they live to lose something, like snakes were clearly going down the path of being slithery boys so losing their legs made it beneficial for them to truly become a snake. Same thing with some animals losing their eyes, they live in areas where eyes are not needed so losing eyes was just beneficial
But nearly all mammals have hair, even the biggest mammal today which could reach some dinosaur sizes still have small amounts of hair. Now there were groups of dinosaurs like I listed above that might've lost feathers as they weren't beneficial for it but what's the benefit in losing all feathers for example in theropods.
I still think itās very possible for a young tyrannosaur to shed most of their body hair through ontogeny. Itās definitely observed in Elephas today
But they still don't lose it completely.
They just became less noticeable because the hair that is left is very miniscule and wouldn't be spotted at first sight on such a large animal.
^
Perhaps I worded my comment to described a partial loss of hair? Asian elephants do infact shed body hair
It can happen in part during ontogeny, but the shed hair (or feathers) would be replaced by naked skin, not scales as we see in tyrannosaur mummies
Why would it be replaced by naked skin
As far as I know I don't think you can grow scales out of the blue.
Because that is what happens in animals that lose hair or feathers
Birds also without feathers are covered in skin not scales.
You can have a coexistence of scales and feathers canāt you
Is that not the condition we observed in Juravenator and Kulindadromeus
In different areas of the body, yes
Is there a clear transition between naked skin and scalation in Juravenator?
the underside of the tail is scaly while the dorsal side is feathered iirc
So would that mean that in theropods at younger stages they wouldn't have feathering all over but only on the dorsal?
Iām pretty sure the feathers growing between scales in Juravenator. I know for certain they are in Kulindadromeus
Kulindadromeus allegedly has feathers growing out of its scales, but I don't know if that interpretation is correct
But yes, scales can be spread out with feathers growing in areas not covered by them
Theropods are too broad of a clade to generalize like that, some probably had fully scaly tails while others (like Sinosauropteryx) had fully feathered tails
I think they observed both scales with filament growing out of them and in between them
Hey Random I forgot to add but I was talking to 7shots in regarded to saurophaganax and he said your saurophagnax with drepy.stego edit has some issues as it is scaled to previous placeholder for the largest specimen OMNH 2149 and I was just wondering with what he said was correct?
It's scaled to the largest published material. I don't work with unpublished stuff and neither should you
Okay I was just making sure cause 7shots himself has been just well kind of informing people on saurophaganax with 99% of it being like you said unpublished and I was just really REALLY suspicious about it all yk
Does 7shots have exclusive access to saurophaganax material or something? Or is it just unpublished material as mentioned? Unpublished can still be legit tho right. ?
7shots has exclusive access to it but not well legeally wise as stated by prior people here the method he used to get in was by no means acceptable
That makes sense, I figured because his name is always tied to sauro.
7Shots should not be trusted. He has no understanding of anatomy and lied to the institution to get access to Saurophaganax material.
think you again Paleodude for informing about it,it's too sad yk cause he seems like a very tursting dude on the soruce material but why would he lie to do it š
How accurate?
I for one do not have a tail but I won't discriminate if you do.
Spinosaurus rexš„
literally how are they overhyped they're so cool
Spinosaurus before all the nerfs
omg so much diversity and cool-ness!!!!!!!!
bro thinks trilobites are a breed of carp
yes they are cool, or are you one of those people who only cares about apex predators
I just donāt really think little bugs in the sediment are that cool
ok but other people do so shut up when they're enjoying them
Would it be a loss?
Mammals do lose their hair and become bald. In Tyrannosaurus, theoretically, feathers wouldn't be lost, they would become scales instead
- Yes.
- trilobites are a lot more diverse than carp
so you just like big theropods or something???? can't appreciate cool sea bugs??
trilobites got all kinds of spikes and weird structures
ddinodan is making art of several of them
not when there are cooler sea bugs ( all aquatic chelicerates )
yeah sure
chelicerates are cool but some trilobites had spears sticking out of their heads
having preferences is fine but I don't think any animal is overrated or overhyped so I dislike disregarding any type of animal as unworthy of interest just because you have a preference towards another
^ I like all animals by default at least in a way
Oh so he's actively lying now great
As I was directly at the same institution and know what went down
wdym nerfs Spino way better now than before
you cant nerf something that never had thoses powers
There are HUNDREDS of Trilobite taxon.
Dang I even underestimated it myself : there are 5000 genera and 25k species.
crazy
You wanna know what's underrated? Extinct annelids.
looks ediacrian
They are not !
Hello I am new
Hi new, I'm Wes
delighted and what are you doing this Server?
I'm a modder, paleoartist, and paleo-enthusiast
This channel is uses to discuss funner paleo matters like how Edmontosaurus in musth can hunt Tyrannosaurus, at what point a Dinosaur can be considered a bird, and David Peters.
Bismark isn't that 7's alt?
Hi Wes i am Carcharodontosaurus.
if so i won't take anything they say without a huge grain of salt
ha you got blown up in WWII
he whaaaaaaaaaa
Yes
Regardless of 7Shots there are multiple teams currently working on Saurophaganax that don't corroborate his results as tenuous as they are. I recommend waiting.
New dinosaur unlocked
Holy Shi+ that looks cool
Can you move the baryonyx's jaws and arms?
If we ever find a mummified Spinosaurus, I will be so happy
The entire world wins the lottery that day
only you can prevent giant para footprint scaling
what would a female triceratops be called?
a doe or a cow
Thank you
Ah yes, allosaurus crests, tyrannosaurus arms, megalosaurus snout and small chonky legs
A dinosaur you would find in Jurassic world alive
As a jw alive player I agree with this
I do be a jwa enjoyer tho
Trikette
Omfg
https://x.com/haolonggood/status/1863465464304697818?s=46 next purchase for me
Only the jaw, sorry for the late reply.
I'll take 12
I need some good references of the conc to draw? People in Any good for that?
The new most accurate Tyrannosaurus rex ever reconstructed? The Eofauna T. rex is a faithful reconstruction of the individual Tyrannosaurus known as Sue. A great deal of research went into creating this model, giving us the closest look yet at what the face of this iconic animal may have been like.
Check out the Eofauna Sue the T. rex here: ht...
I have a question about this video, why these parts of tyrannosaurus skulls are different?
ask it themself ||/j||
What if it's just a sexual dimorphism of tyrannosaurus?
Or are the skulls just fossil like models made by someone? Those pics have more differences than just that part
Second one is a model
how accurate is this
Not accurate!
This one
alright thanks
Iāve been living in Colombia a majority of my life and I somehow didnāt know there was a Dinosaur from there. (Also how accurate is this size estimate?
This one is fine
im trying to figure out how fast a quetz could fly and and it weight = wing span +speed so if u do the reverse to find the it would be around 550ib and a wing span of 36 feet so subtraction it would have a speed of 514 mph but im doing something wrong here idk wat
Yea, no, not how that works
Habib et al suggests 130 km/h, Witton suggests 90 km/h, both values are for sustained level flight. Witton estimates a maximum speed of 174 km/h in very short bursts.
Damn, 130 km/h for such a large thing is impressive.
All of these are pretty fast yeah
Interesting, perhaps PoT and PT should update their azhdarchid flight speeds...?
If you dive beforehand, Hatz is pretty fast
I like my quetz at mach 2 speed.
Being realistic how many concavenators would be needed to take down a cerato (cera being 1.100kg and concave 630kg)
I'd say 2-3, as despite the relatively small difference in size, Cerato is Armored and has one of the meanest bites relative to size of any theropod
Why would they be attacking a cerato anyway? Realistically.
Discrimination
Idk say protecting babys for example
Meanest as strong or delivering deep slashes?
Both
Oh damn.
Admittedly most theropods inflicted deep gashes when biting
Considering the "armor" is predominantly along the spine (and maybe a row along the flank), I don't think it's doing much armor...ing š š
I mean cera IS pretty massive so they would mostly try biting and running away It could be similar to a group of wolfs VS a bear
Uh a question how Big are their skulls?
Yeah, it's not like he is an ankylo or something lol.
It would offer some portection but a concave bite would hurt It anyways
Provided one of the concs wasn't taken out immediately, 2 of them would suffice
Btw when doing line detail on beaked theropods, is something like this okay?
Sucho are you okay
Thatās not a beaked theropod.
How
It does look rather emaciated too.
What is it? Paraxenisaurus?
Looks like extreme shrink wrap route.
Paraxenisaurus with a fake head
Oh, it's another weird looking dino apparently.
Silly conc on Madrid
Arriba EspaƱa
True!
Siempre
Enchufla doblešŗ
citipata struthi maybe theri
and Deinocheirus
also y do we not call all marine reptiles something like thalassiosavros or ydrovisavros
Because they're non-important
because marine reptiles arenāt an actual group, weāve had this discussion before
Also marine reptile's rolls off the tongue better
Generally the keratin should not cover the sinuses
The what
The beak, itās made of keratin
Cause not all marine reptiles are related. Some are sauropterygians, some are lizards, some are archosaurs of some variety, etc
So the reason we call all dinosaurs dinosaurs is becuase they all come from one ancestor and the same thing of pterosaurs
Yep
then y not just call it something else becuase all marine reptiles by what they are actually are becuase when u hear the word marine reptile u think it would in imply they where the same thing
No? It doesnāt imply theyāre the same group at all. Itās just a simple statement of what they are. They are all marine, I.E. they live in marine environments, and they are all reptiles. Itās like saying we shouldnāt call things carnivores cause that implies theyāre in the same group lmfao
ok then is a deinosuschus a marine reptile or a crocodilian becuase it live in the water nearly it whole life and is adapted for the water
Marine Reptile isnāt the name of a group. If you say something is a marine reptile youāre just saying itās a reptile that happens to be marine. As for Deinosuchus, I believe it lived in the WIS, which was a marine environment, so yes I suppose so
Marine does not mean any water btw. Marine means an ocean or a sea
I feel like considering it's a giant gator with functional legs (thus meaning it was semi-aquatic) makes it not a marine reptile because it didn't live its whole life in the ocean
AFAIK it can be compared to salties (maybe a bit more marine-leaning though, I will admit)
Oh yeah true. I will say some people describe marine iguanas as marine reptiles even though they spend a considerable amount of time on land. But yeah prolly best not to include them then as marine reptile, for the most part, implies they lived most if not all of the time in water
Yeah. Plus context matters too, and usually in the context of every day paleo chat "marine reptile" generally refers to certain groups
As in like, marine reptile meaning reptile that lives in marine environment vs marine reptile as it generally means in the context of chat here
Mhm, mosasaurs, plesiosaurs, and ichthyosaurs being the main ones, but more broadly you have sauropterygians and placodonts as well
Wait placodonts are sauropterygians, lmfao
Hell depending on how you stretch the definition hesperornis would count too lol
what
if polar bears can be marine mammals i can live with deinosuchus being a marine reptile
If TableSeating can be defenestrated, I can live without Deinosuchus being a marine reptile
Well, cornified tissues composing beaks are, on extant beaked animals, only on the premaxilla, so your theropod there would only have the very tip of their jaws beaked.
Nvm only in birds : turtles have the maxilla covered.
Hesperornis is a dinosaur, dinosaurs are reptiles, it spent most of its life in the WIS, therefore it is a reptile that is marine. Itās a marine reptile
mhm I understand
(No I donāt)
Let me explain
The WIS is the Western Interior Seaway, a marine environment that used to cut through the middle of NA
The Hesperornis is actually terrestrial! Hope this helps!
Do not listen to the sharl, he lies
Hesperornis was a terrestrial pursuit predator trust /j
Perhaps this is why we don't find non-avian dinosaur fossils in nearby formations...the Hesperornis pursuit predator'ed them all........
"Birds" are a group of diapsid (fall within Sauropsida, more or less equal to "Reptilia" but includes birds), which are characterized by having 2 set of holes on their skull (the lateral temporal fenestrae and supratemporal fenestrae). That's the same condition that's seen among Lepidosaurs (tuataras and squamates) and crocodiles (it was however lost among turtles) so birds are within the same group as other "reptiles".
Bird, which usually is synonymous with Aves, can also be defined by Avialae (so the animals considered as "birds" gets broader). By extending "birds" as Avialae, you can find avian dinosaurs as ancient as Anchiornis and consider them as "birds". More derived species include stuffs like Hesperornithiforms, and so Hesperornis.
So, as you see birds can be considered as "reptiles" (but note that reptiles isn't a true group that contains all the animals descending from their common ancestor) and Hesperornis mostly had a marine lifestyle, which means it principally fed on marine resources such as cephalopods and saltwater "fish" (but Hesperornis was also found in freshwater deposits iirc. So, you can technically say that Hesperornis is a "marine reptile". Personally, I'd prefer to say marine avian dinosaurs.
Should have done another line with non avian dinosaurs thinking about it but this is fine @broken shale
They are reptiles as defined by the fact that they are members of reptilia. They are reptiles in a taxonomic sense
Did mans just give the lore
Though, I'd like to point out one thing : Reptiles are defined as ectothermic tetrapods with amniotic development. By this definition, reptiles rules out birds as reptiles but we know that they are within the same group as crocodiles. Thus make it reptile paraphyletic, which means that it is a group that does not regroup all the descendants of one common ancestor (that is the same problem with "fish" and even among what you'd call a "fish" you cannot give a morphology, physiological or ecological definition).
Today, most people use the groupd Sauropsid, which is defined by the terrestrial amniotes closer to crocodiles and sand lizard than mammals, which would be the equivalent of "Reptilia".
Reptilia is or is not a monophyletic clade based on the definition, but I prefer to use the monophyletic definition
It used to be paraphyletic, but some have started describing it in such a way that makes it monophyletic
What about the legs and neck and anything else.
I don't typically see "reptile" being often used in taxonomy so I go with Sauropsida.
As unfortunately there are non diapsid Sauropsids.
If anything i'm fine with "reptiles" being relegated to an informal physical/ecological description like "mole"
Do be aware the 1:20 statues tend to be in the hundreds of dollars
Which means that yes, dinosaurs wouldn't be considered reptiles
Well, it's not even right ecologically tbf.
There isn't a "reptile" ecology.
Sauropsida is eh. Is it more accurate from a scientific standpoint? Possibly. But no one knows what youāre talking about. I think the much better option is to redefine reptilia as a group based on common ancestry
One could define reptiles as having scales, which applies to at least all living reptiles lol
Mammals have scales.
Yeah, scratch that
True, I think any descriptive definition is gonna be flawed for that same reason, thereās always gonna be an outlier that breaks the rules
A reptile is cool
A mammal is lame
If you ask me we should move closer to proper cladistic definitions for all groups
Your a mammal lmao
Yea and?
"Fully scaled ectothermic bs with non erect limbs" kinda works ngl
That's what you think buddy...
Besides, even if reptiles weren't cool, we're still awesome
I absolutely second this
Birds are reptiles, everything is a fish, you cannot convince me otherwise
You canāt evolve out of a clade, no matter how hard you try, we are all, at the end of the day, incredibly derived lungfish
Everything went downhill when mammals started growing over 15kg
So what are we yapping about?
Itās over for patagomaiabrosā¦.
How to define reptiles in a paraphyletic way ig
Btw is this pink color okay
Shouldn't the word be phylogenetic?
No, paraphyletic
Without including borbs
That's why by going with cladistic definition (using synapomorphies) you cannot really define a reptilian group.
Paraphyletic means a group that includes multiple unrelated clade
Wouldn't that be polyphyletic?
No because not all reptiles are and were ectothermic (Plesiosaurs, Ichthyosaurs, early pseudosuchians and birds).
Oop, I misspoke there, I mean a definition based on common ancestry. Not sure what the word for that would be
No, that's polyphyletic. Paraphyletic means that you exclude one part of the descendants.
But like common ancestor of the American alligator and ball python or smthn like that. (And all descendants ofc)
There's a lot of P words I see
That's what is currently for Sauropsida as far as I know. It's stuffs closer to crocs and lizards than humans.
Oh yeah, but reptiles as traditionally defined would still be paraphyletic as they exclude birds
Indeed. Reptiles are basically all these guys but not birds.
That's just a naked stork
Yeah it ate the soul of the innocents
Which is why if you ask me it should be redefined
If we say that Sauropsida = Reptile then ye it works.
Would this guy have even had keratin around the eye
Also never seen a deinocheirus depicted with keratin there
Because that's not deinocherius
Yeah but it is a deinocheirid
Because the skull I used does depict it
Not the skull used like I said
Who made that. Is it an edit of Barrera's or did he update it somewhere I didn't notice
Edit
What was used for the skull even
The skull is of a fictional recon of a deinocheirid by Manu
I asked a friend of my to head swap it on Barrera's paraxeni
let bro eat damn
Bro has already eaten a family meal
It looks like it got it's innocents taken 
guys if dinosaur where close enough in genus could they make a hybrid dinosaur like a trex with nano or a trike with a Nedoceratops
I wanna say no, but hybridization is weird so best I can say is probably no
Iād be insanely surprised if dinosaurs never had offspring with another close relative of itās species
If the offspring were viable or not idk but it must have happened
no because nanotyrannus and nedoceratops are invalid genuses of the former 2
Well Nedo is, Nano has a bit more validity to it thanks to the Napoli paper.
If they were the same Genus then maybe. If so, we could have the equivalent to a Liger or a Wholphin
problem nor hybirds can happen in nature
True, but there is the case of Mules, which can be found in the wild IF BOTH Horses and Donkeys are in the same environment
Def not true sorry kuit
Even if they didn't have hybrid offspring together, HYPOTHETICALLY, there could be actual hybrid dinosaurs. Just not as drastic as the Jurassic franchise made them.
Anyways, time for my daily question:
What are y'all's opinions on Pterodactylus? The actual genus.
This lil man for reference
narlugas and grolar bears:
I mean theyāre really weird and rare but they do happen
American paddlefish and Russian sturgeon can hybridize, when they really shouldnāt be able to
Beishanlong?
We gotta put an end to these hybrid names, itās getting out of hand
nonsense, I think Iāll make 5 more right now
I was referring to the liger and wholphin
We know triceratops would fight against Tyrannosaurus rex and sometimes win. Can the same be said for Torosaurus?
I wouldn't be shocked if closely related dinosaurs hybridized at least once in history. Sometimes they don't even have to be in the same genus for modern animals to hybridize in a few cases
if triceratops is locked in yes
I'm sure toro won every now and then
but as long as the rex knows what it's doing most of the time rex wins
Not necessarily, I canāt think of any predator that succeeds in more than 50% of hunts, I imagine a ceratopsian would be especially hard, so unless itās a young or weak individual Iād say the ceratopsian has the upper hand
Curious to know how big we think the biggest torosaurus specimens got
I also wonder how did triceratops get so much popular in media compared to Torosuarus.
š„
I mean realistically a rex would be going after a young or weak individual yeah
against a full healthy adult they're at least pretty even I think
this is literally peak why is there not more art of trike and toro interacting
Behold the arid desert of the hell creek
Agreed, I have yet to see anyone do Quetz and Hatz interacting and I know they were in different areas but surely they met at some period of time crossing paths.
Around this big (shameless plug)
I'd imagine a majority of failed hunts would just be the T. rex backing down because it got noticed too soon or something, the biggest advantage a hunter has is deciding the terms of the fight and most predators will probably avoiding taking fights unless they feel confident they can win. The issue with comparing animals in combat is that most fights in nature are rarely "fair"
The mighty seahorses with their 90% success rate
Exactly. A fight doesnāt always end cause one animal defeats the other, often time the prey escapes or the predator decides the meal aināt worth it. I imagine if a rex failed to catch a trike by surprise it would in all likelihood give up. A meal isnāt worth the risk of getting gored.
Iirc thereās been some evidence of quetz in Africa, though Iām not sure how well that holds up. If itās true, the distance between Europe and Africa isnāt that farā¦
I just wanna stress this is completely off the top of my head and I could be totally wrong here
Wrong its arambourgiania
There is a miniscule āquetzalcoatlus spā from ouled abdoun
Aff. Quetz but yeah
Aināt Aram a mid Cretaceous species?
Nvm it is maast
Ohhh I mixed it up with Alanqa lol, mb
Would a less derived coelurosaur like ornitholestes have the fused fingers found in dromaeosaurs?
Just saw this and gonna just say Dragonflies have a 95 percent success rate with hunting. Making them the most deadly predators. š Its cool, but a moot point, cause I dont think we could find one that would be willing to futz with a Triceratops lmaoooo
If Tyrannosaurus hunted in groups, the chances of success could vary even more
Hold on is that laphtor, I haven't seen that name in a hot minute
I remember someone bringing up the fact that Torosaurus has a less unique name which led to it getting overshadowed by the cooler sounding Triceratops, even tho Toro is prolly more well researched and (imo) cooler
like when people are looking for dinosaurs to include in media theyre prolly gonna go for the one that sounds cooler huhuuu
I could def be very wrong but that's why I think it isn't as popular sadly
same reason why the Utahraptors were renamed to be Velociraptors when adapting the Jurassic Park novel into a movie iirc
Velociraptor just sounded cooler even tho they're still modelled after Utahraptor
what abt this?
nah, probably a common misconception. Utahraptor wasn't even described yet. They were actually based on Deinonychus
which, actually, when you look at life restorations of the time it's pretty apparent
ooohh okay I see, I knew it was one of the 2 I just forgor lol
the boy
okay this raises Triceratops up the coolness list for me instantly, sorry Toro fans
I've long been a torosaurus fan, courtesy of WWD
Clearly Stan Winston traveled forward in time to discover Dakotaraptor!
don't say that name.
shouldve been a giant evil Halszkaraptor smh
even AI knows
That's a common misconception actually, Deinocheirus is actually the largest theropod dinosaur according to my bathroom scales.
ok duck
Perhaps we've found fossils of hybrid dinosaurs and we don't even know of them.
I'd imagine a giga and mapusaurus hybridizing
what
Giga lived before Mapu
...
NOT SCIENTIFICALLY POSSIBLE
JP velos were based on deino
I love the cycle of "JP raptor based off Utah" on the internet
š
Utahs size yeah
I hate it
Utahraptor is a very unique animal but to the general public (and therefore media) it's already tagged as "the real life JP raptor"
So I just learned that there was a fossil squid with ink that was still able to be written with? How?
So in every piece of paleomedia ever, every time Utahraptor shows is just a generic raptor or an oversized Deinonychus
I don't know about the written with part, but wouldn't be surprised if ink was found given how some other molecules like melanin have survived under certain conditions.
Modern squids are renowned for their ability to squirt āinkā to distract predators, and this behavior probably existed in the Cretaceous. The ink can be used for writing. Some researchers in the UK found an even older Jurassic ink sac and were able to create a writing fluid by mixing the particles with an ammonia solution.
āErm ackshually š¤ā
Ye someone already corrected me dw
Bro asked a question in a paleontology channel and is annoyed they got an answer 
That lower jaw has something going on
That is some incredible preservation, looks like it belongs to Coleoidea
what clade of dinosaurs is a theri and this dinosaur
robust
Theropoda
ok wait i said it wrong i meant what genus is it
Well Therizinosaurus is in the genus Therizinosaurus, and Nothronychus is in the genus Nothronychus lol. But theyāre both within the clade Therizinosauridae if thatās what you mean
ye, that's the family they're in
within the larger clade maniraptora
New drop? š
no like how a trex dasp and ugly torvo are in the tyrannus genus that wat i meant
so what is the therizinosaurus genus name
Therizinosaurus
Yeah therizinosaurus is a therizinosaurid
@dreamy lance how do i make a suggestion
Mhm
I seen they releasing a Styra too
No, they arenāt lmfao. Genus is something like Tyrannosaurus and Daspletosaurus. I think you have genus mixed up with smthn else. Tyrannosaurus, Dasp, and Torvo arenāt in the same genus at all
I also looked up their 1/20 scale dinosaurs and you werenāt lying about the prices. Iām going to pass on that. š
Therizinosaurus, the species name is cheloniformis, so that makes the full name Therizinosaurus cheloniformis
Mhm, theyāre hand painted resin models as opposed to mass produced pvc figures
They hand paint all of them? Jeez.
An artist named Black Mamba does it I believe, but I could be wrong
Tyrannus is a real genus, but it's a genus of tyrant flycatchers and nothing to do with tyrannosaurs lmao
behold, Tyrannus tyrannus
Tyrannus Tyrannus >>> T Rex
They're not even in the same clade š
Mhm, Iām assuming when he said ugly torvo he was referring to some other species that is a tyrannosaur but Iām not sure tbh
Idk why would you refer it as a torvo though cause know of them look like one
too many (north american) hadrosaurs
This has to be like the 4th time they've been told what genus and family are
They have to either be too young for discord or the most tenacious troll
or they're both, which I always had a suspension on
Unlucky for you : it is : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingbird
yoy should label these,,
They're all growth stages of Edmontosaurus
Am aware
paleoaccurate rex
Have we considered that T. rex didn't actually exist and that it was simply the musth morph of Edmontosaurus? š¤
names tableau
- Edmontosaurus annectens
- Magnapaulia
- Williams Fork Kritosaur
- Fruitland(?) Saurolophine(?)
- Cerro del Pueblo Lambeosaur
- Kaiparowits Parasaurolophus
- Parasaurolophus tubicen
- Edmontosaurus regalis
- Anasazisaurus
- Gryposaurus? alsatei
- "Sabinasaura"
- Hypacrosaurus altispinus
- Brachylophosaurus canadensis
- Saurolophus osborni
- Parasaurolophus walkeri
- Coahuilasaurus
- Gryposaurus monumentensis
- Hypacrosaurus stebingeri
- Kritosaurus navajovius
- Gryposaurus latidens
- Parasaurolophus cyrtocristatus
- Gryposaurus notabilis
- Ornatops
- Adelolophus
- Angulomastacator
- Corythosaurus casuarius
- Corythosaurus intermedius
- Lambeosaurus magnicristatus
- Tlatolophus
- Lambeosaurus lambei
- Lambeosaurus clavinitialis
- Maiasaura
- Acristavus
- Velafrons
- Latirhinus
Magnapaulia >>> everyone here
Magnapaulia inferior edmontosaurus superior
Seems youāve left out Edmontosaurus japonicus subsp. Wapitiensis Edmontosaurus Kuukpikensis and the Augustynolophus morrisi
eeeerrrm edmontosaurus kuukpikensis isn't real
Oh yeah you forgot my beloved August, how could you
this is true however i gave up finishing it 45 minutes ago
also what level of rot are you at where you notice kamuysaurus wapitiensis is missing but not prosaurolophus
Consumed by the rot
Heh..
could ceratopsians gallop
perhaps but it'd be pretty limited
Like a rhino gallop, only with even less spine movement
That is family, not genus
What is deinosuchus placement in the croc family
I read Deinocheirus at first and was very confused
but Deinosuchus is considered an Alligatoroid I believe
so Alligator?
I'm not sure if that term applies to the whole superfamily (since it also includes Caimans), but you could maybe get away with calling it that
Alligator would apply to Alligators only I'd say. But you might see someone refer to em collectively as "gators" here and there casually. I know I have done that lol
It always freaks me out how absurdly huge some hadrosaurs were
Imagine sniping a dinosaur.
Some Hadrosaurs have a similar hip height as even fairly large sauropods like Apatosaurus, although the sauropods still win out in weight due to their greater bulk
Nuh uh
We respect shantungo but we solo him too
worse saurolophus repose
they really took the lophus out of saurolophus
what would the outline of the legs and arms within the sillhouette for this be ?
also wtf is going on with the bottom jaw
all i imagined when seeing this type of art is the T. rex ghost roaming around this modern world, confused while wandering without any clear purpose
"66 million years after my death, yet i still feel confused. the world is changing, and it's getting more & more inunderstandable... i have seen everything"
which species is that?
Opinions on Gremlin slobodorum?
The pro-Saurolophus
maximus
Wasn't north america at the time absent of Alvarezsaurids? (I know the art is meant to just be artistic)
Replying to this btw
No, they ranged throughout the Americas & Asia. Plenty of overlap with tyrannosaurs
Thought the post said Tyrannosaurus, mb. But what dinosaur would this skull belong to?
The artist doesn't specify, so it's nonspecific lol
T. rex has one in Hell Creek lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trierarchuncus
Trierarchuncus (meaning "captain hook," after its single-clawed hands) is a monotypic genus of alvarezsaurid theropod which includes a single species, Trierarchuncus prairiensis, which is known from fossils found in deposits of the Hell Creek Formation in Montana. It is the youngest known alvarezsaurid and one of the last non-avian dinosaurs, go...
It just looks distinctive and has a weird rounded further back crest that looks familiar
Oh nvm I'm actually dumb it's just a Rex skull
CAPTAIN HOOK is an amazing name
Btw how accurate is the Saurian hell creek guide book? (Ignoring Dakotaraptor)
Ehhhhhhhhhhh
AFAIK environmentally it's alright, but for specific dinosaurs, it gets sketchy (Keratin frill Trike)
What happened to the Wiki art š
I haven't had a chance to look through it completely but Tom Parker is a good source on paleobotany so I trust that side of it is pretty sound
Idk but depending, I might make one
Someone has to fix it immediately
This is probably my favorite page of the book
I just love the way the sub adult (I think) Tyrannosaurus is portrayed
.
The ones not shaded
Those would be the ones in neutral assumedly, yes
no like what would the outline be
Of the muscles?
Could you word it more descriptively so my sleep deprived, tiny, smooth koala brain can under the question more?
(Unless you're talking about the pitch black part which is theorized muscles and other soft tissues)
would it look like this?
No
Using a trackpad so it's hard
These are the muscle attachments for all dinosaurs so
thank you
What happened to tarbosaurus mummy
bro has gamer spine
We need it back 
I don't think you understand the meaning of āIt became clear that in the Western Sayr (named by the Polish expedition team) [sub-locality of the Nemegt locality], the articulated postcranial skeleton of Tarbosaurus with skin impression that had been discovered and left in field in 1992 [ wrong year? 1991?] had been destroyed by someone.ā
I understand
Did charanosaurus live with tarbo or am I getting lied to
Reading the paper Wiki lists as the source and it mentions a whole lot of theropod teeth near the carcass so I assume it's a tooth referral to Tarbosaurus
Yo hi
I watch your videos since you had like 5k subscribers
I'm kind of a big fan
tarbosaurus is so cool
Man I wish it wasn't destroyed
Such a cool discovery
Even I think you did the arm too muscular ngl
I was gonna mention that I think I mightve overbeefed the arm, but I had to go to class
Which is why I mentioned me using my laptop trackpad
Here it is for crocs, though crocs are quadrupedal animals that rely on their forelimb for locomotion so ofc they are going to be more muscular than those of a dinosaur.
Here it is in birds, the 2 first drawing represents a crow's musculature and the third a pheasant's.
But the most important part is that you see where the muscles attach/go.
All terrestrial vertebrates share the same muscle attachments as they all inherited their arms from a common ancestor. You can even use a human's arm as a reference.
So. What would y'all think is the most controversial theory in the paleontology field? I'd love to rabbit hole today, lol
But please keep thoughts civil, of course
Guys how paleo accurate is this
Probably stuffs going on with neocolonialism such as specimens stolen from their native countries by their colonizers. Most people I discuss with are all for these fossils to be returned but it still is a topic that's quite very much on going with Germany owning a lot of South American fossils. Another thing is of course fossil brought or transported illegally out of their countries (that's something that happens a lot in Morocco unfortunately). Some researchers take advantage of them to do quite a bunch of publication by buying fossils in the market (Longrich being an example).
Private collection owning fossils from a high scientific interest is also quite a topic that has to be brought up. I am fine with people owning small fossils like local shark tooth, ammonites or dinosaur tooth but stuffs like almost complete fossils that are unique and could help us to understand Earth's biodiveristy through time is a big no no to me.
Another thing that goes on in the paleontological field when it comes to job availability is that most big groups that captivate the public have a huge majority of men working on them, while smaller less spectacular animals or organisms mostly have women working on them.
There is also the stuffs going on with Jack Horner who apparently married one of his student that's like 20 years younger than him. Pretty disgusting if you may ask me but that's only a personal's man life.
Within the field of study itself without being too much of etical :
- The origin of Angiosperms
- The origin of animals
- What the hell were Ediacaran animals
- Are Silesaurs dinosaurs
- The origin of filter feeding in whales
- Was Thescelosaurus digging
- Theropod lips
- Are Ctenophora more basal than Porifera
- The classification of Tullimonstrum
- When did sharks actually first appear in the fossil record
- The origin of wings in Insects
- Did Eugeneodonts have pelvic fins and so claspers
Not sure what species itās supposed to be but a few odd things pop up
wtf megaraptorans are
lbt is not accurate in any way bro
on jack horner: he was 65 at the time, she was 19. they're since divorced but still, yikes.
another controversial theory in paleontology is horner's "trex was 100% a scavenger" theory, where he claims it probably couldn't run or hunt. most scientists disagree with this nowadays though
he also claimed torosaurus and triceratops were the same animal
I'd hardly call that controversial. Flawed maybe but not controversial. No more than claiming stygimoloch, dracorex and pachycephalosaurus were the same animal which he also did
how is it not controversial it's literally been disproven
Next to all of this?
Including other things Horner's been up to, a hypothesis that Triceratops and Torosaurus represent growth stages in the same vein as Pachy, Stygi and Dracorex doesn't really constitute.
the rex one isn't as controversial now as it used to be, but i guess everyone pretty much hated horner for a while lol. i think there's an interview where he mentions elementary school kids booing and throwing things at him when he went to speak at their school
Iād argue controversial means thereās still argument about it. If thereās a clear consensus itās no longer controversial
ok we don't have to be pedantic about this, it was controversial
I think itās worth pointing out that the pachy comparison has actual weight behind it too, the trike toro debate never really did
Yeah but even so, I don't consider it to be in the same conversation as the other things mentioned. And even so, a hypothesis is hypothesis. It's not like it was a completely illogical thought when you have Pachycepholosaurus on the brain too
Bruh, WWD Anky looks so offended for no reason
The top right always makes me laugh
Meme potential
I remember the theropod lip debate going around a few years ago.
I've never understood why people get so heated about either side.
They either did or they didn't. Unless you're betting money, no harm if you're wrong, so why get mad??? 
Because a dinosaur can literally only be cool if it makes a reference to/is cooler than a tyrannosaurus
argggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Yea, that's...how the media cycle works???
People like being correct and also like making assumptions about why others believe what they do. At least that's why I used to take things more seriously than I do now.
The issue is that's not correct because saying dinosaurs didn't have lips is like saying 2+2 =/= 4
It only became a thing to justify nostalgia
Hmm.
I don't get it, lol.
The goal of a science field should be to make sure the info you are spreading is actually correct. Not just spread it because you want it to be correct. That's not science then, just propoganda
Unfortunately most people aren't scientists and don't necessarily care about that. I've even heard of actual scientists acting like that. It can be really challenging for a lot of people to get away from their egos.
Oh I understand it from the general public.
But if you put your ego before the facts, or aren't willing to admit something could go either way until more evidence for either is discovered, then you ain't really a scientist. In my probably unpopular and possible harsh opinion.
I mean I know they're human too. But eh. š¤·
The only scientist who was really that invested in it was Carr, I'd hardly call the rest scientists