#paleontology
1 messages · Page 123 of 1
I thought the current consensus is that it exists we just dont know what its fate is right now
It exists, it’s just the holotype now, which is tiny
It exists(again)
It isn't necessarily THAT Tiny, if you talk about the skeletal that I think you are talking, that one is not scaled properly and.should be a bit bigger
can some one till me how to read this
Sooooo, it's basically saying Argent is 70 Tons and Patagotitan is 52 yet Puetrasaurus is 80 Tons. So according to this, Pue would be the largest?
Did I get that right?
Puerta should be 66 tonnes
Puerta's vertebrae are dwarfed by Argent's, it is definitely not 80 tons
guys do u think theri or pcyno was so violent that it. Would spawn camp baby dinosaurs
Ignore it
K
Spawn camping doesn't exist in the real world

That explains so much especially about sasquash
I'm sure they don't mean that literally, rather I imagine they mean would those animals deliberately kill babies of other species or something
Must have also been scary as hell cause If ppl before cilvle rights couldn't get along with other races imagine how genuinely frighting it would have been to accidentally come across a group of different species of human that weren't to fawned of you cause you mistaked them for you thinking now all those stories of Bigfoot stealing wemon and children or ppl who strayed a little to far might have been real at some point
Maybe that's were we got are distrust or fear for other races back then that's just my theory tho what do yall think 🤔
Considering how we made the Neanderthals go "extinct", I don't think it was in reaction to them LMAOOO
The theory I've heard, that makes more sense than "muh racism", is that it came about to allow healthy individuals to better distinguish sick individuals so they can avoid them better
Yeah I think we gave em death by snu 😭
Ima lover not a fighter 🗣🔥🔥🔥
they died because they could not match our freak.
we simply bred them into extinction (also killing them a few times, through direct and indirect competition)
L on there part 💅
no as in if there was a nest of baby dinosaurs and the parent werent around they go there and kill the baby like in real life most bird do it and. And because theri was so violent would kill bay dinosaurs jist to advoid more predator and would pcyno just kill other babys of it own species becUse it was that violent
Animals don't kill for sport
We don't kill for sport?
Humans are an exemption to any animal based laws
Man where in the conversations of paleochat the past couple weeks gave the impression we would know the behaviors of these dinosaurs like this anyway
Orcas aren't recorded killing for sport?
Wasted energy! Though I wouldn't write that possibility off, typically as I see it the stuff people call "killing for sport/fun" and "playing with their food" is more teaching their young
Or killing for a very very specific part of their prey
In any case, orcas are not dinosaurs
not sport just in general like pcyno would find a nest kill the baby and eat then leave a there would kill of the baby just to no have any more predators and dont most any animal do that just so they dont have more predators like baboon or rabbit killing there children to make more
How would we have any idea if pycno did that? We don't even really know what it looked like
No, BUT, several herbivores are known to kill baby predators when they encounter them to prevent them from growing into a potentially dangerous animal
i was told pycno were violent in that y and may have cannbilzid young
There’s zero evidence for that whatsoever, whoever told you that made it up lmao. Pycno is known from a few fragments of tail and leg bones, we have no way of inferring behavior
That was probably majunga
also i just realized i been spell pycno wrong this whole time but what made us say theri was so violent
Majunga may have cannibalized adults but tmk there’s no evidence that they did so to young and no evidence that they actually killed one another, it’s quite possible one Majunga was simply scavenging on another’s corpse
Also nothing, there’s zero evidence for that lmao.
see so y this every thing make seem like that
Made up
And certainly not everything makes them look violent. In fact, first time I ever saw Theri in media was Chased By Dinosaurs, and it was depicted as very docile, except in the presence of Tarbosaurus.
wait is it true tarbo most likly hunted saurpods
I believe there’s some evidence of Tarbo hunting Nemegtosaurus and Opisthocoelicaudia, but keep in mind they were relatively small for sauropods
in size but wat about weight
Probably roughly the same weight as tarbo, but I’m not sure, lemme find some estimates
i found 9-10 toms for Nemegtosaurus
I’m seeing 4.5-5 for tarbo, I can’t find anything for nemegto, and opistho estimates seem to vary wildly, anywhere from 8.4 - 25.4
So long story short idk, @stiff osprey you wouldn’t happen to know the most reliable estimates for these guys?
The Reaping Lizard SLICES the competition!!!!
Also seems from what I can find that we just have evidence of Tarbo feeding from sauropods, not necessarily hunting them, though it isn’t out of the question
The reason i heard of that was because it jaw may have had a locking in place like
I feel like unless one subscribes to the idea that sauropods die in high enough numbers that the local predator never has to hunt them
It might be safe to say the local predator actively predated upon them to some degree
Alioramus does too, last I was aware
Take that as you will 
Definitely, but I wanted to clarify that there wasn’t evidence of active predation, which is what I had implied earlier
true buttttttt if it had a jaw like that it would have been able to hold on or drag the larger prey woth something like that
wait is tarbo the asisan version of trex
True, but inversely it could be used to hold on to struggling prey. Though it seems that we are fairly sure that tarbo would have fed on and, as can be reasonably implied, hunted mainly large animals. Also to answer your question yes, they are quite closely related, to the point that some have suggested Tarbosaurus may be a species of Tyrannosaurus, but that’s still up in the air
Because it lived in a area that was something like asia so does that mean it would have tried to hunt a theri
I’m not sure, I think it mainly preyed on hadrosaurs and sauropods. Theri’s claws, while not primarily a weapon, would still make a predator think twice
what was it primarily weapon
Whaddya mean? I’m sorry but the way you write is kinda hard to understand sometimes lol
Laser-guided, shoulder-mounted missile launchers
What was theri mean weapon to fight with
If you mean to ask what its primary weapon would have been, then the claws would probably be the first line of defense. But the claws themselves likely evolved to help with feeding, the defensive function would probably have been a side effect.
wiuld it us it beak
Yes
Probably, I don’t see any reason it wouldn’t
Wasn’t a study done showing that the claws were not built for any sort of combat? I was gonna say useless, but not being built for combat doesn’t mean they’re entirely useless. They still look like something you wouldn’t want hitting you in combat.
No idea if they’ve found theriznosaurs with damaged claws or not that wasn’t post-mortem.
Isotope signatures in tooth enamel indicate Tarbosaurus was feeding on both hadrosaurs and sauropods
Accurate?
Yeah they def weren’t suited for full time combat use, but in a pinch they could give a predator a nasty scratch, or even just scare one away
orcas:
but yeah, most animals arent intelligent enough to do it for fun
The top of its back would be more about shoulder height I think?
Its a bit oversized there
Biggest Anky atm is 4.5 tons
Largest Anky is also not much longer than the one in the pic, the smaller Scale Bar iirc is for the biggest Anky
everyone acts like anky is like 8 tons
Fr
Fadeno did Anky fans to much dmg
Btw here same Anky skeletal as before just with a human
is a andonton different from ankylsaur
Yeah
Another difference other than size is tail club shape
is anky in the game or andon in the game
Anodontosaurus is the one ingame
Isn’t the Trike ingame oversized too?
I mean, lets not act like Fadeno's recon wasn't the most resourceful for the time. Lets not act like Lancian's always existed. Put some fault on people who also tunnel vision to largest estimates as if that is the only thing to go off of
Man finding mates must have been hella awkward
I'd also like to point out Lancian made theirs months (a year+?) after Fadeno's so he had the headstart of being the only (good) Anky for a while
Ye. But it also isn't trike, its Eotriceratops
What kind of dinosaur was scelidosaurus?
It's armored like an ankylosaur but can walk on 2 legs like a hadrosaur
A primitive thyreophoran so ancestral to stegosaurs and ankylosaurs
However, I think the bipedalism is disputed?
@hallow spear Cmere and stegosaur all over the place Idk
Its face does kind of look like a stegosaur
It's from the early Jurassic so it's got a while to go lol
Is eoraptor considered the earliest known dinosaur?
I don’t believe so no
From what I’m seeing online Nyasaurus may be the earliest known dinosaur but it’s position within the group is disputed
I think there's a group of creatures that look like dinosaurs but are technically not.
The Nanotarbus and Nanoankylus...???
poposauridae and various dinosaurimorpha species come to mind
I mean there are several, you’ll have to be more specific lol
If silesaurids are in fact ornithischians then one of those may be the oldest known dinosaur but I’m not sure
They are some quite neat creatures.
Yes?
I just forgot how massive allo can be
its funny cause for their size a lot of dinosaurs arent that heavy
Yh ik allo is abt 2600 kg and cerato IS abt 980-1100 kg from what i heard.
It should be quadrupedal because it looks better as a quadruped
That's because they mostly would have had saggy ball sack skin like elephants or not just only enough muscle and bone strength to hold there weight
anyone got any updates on this giant thing?
We found him
It's not accurately scaled and iirc some random vertebrae
i thought dinosaurs didnt have that kind of skin
aw man :( will it still be large tho?
It’s very large lol
i know, but they said it wasnt accurately scaled
It still is large. Just not sauropod sized lmfao.
he wants an apology
ok so I notice people talking about Priconodon
Lion victim
and the only evidence I'm seeing they have for it is teeth?
Does anyone remember early iguanodon depictions
would saltasaurus be a lion victim?
A fibula as well
what the hell did you do to the neotype 😭
i mean hmmmm
maybe? idk, lions dont tend to go for prey of that size solo
a tiger yeah, but not a lion
"Hm the only proof of this creature we have is teeth... Let's see what we can come up with..."
Also a partial fibula not just teeth.
even if ur basing this off lizards its still so wrong 😭
For the most part no if you're looking at some of the ones thing like a sorapod or plated dinosaurs or lightly built like abellysaurids but your stegos edmontosaurs and mega therapods would have likly had some roles on them cause agile moving plus large with tight skin like some ppl put on trike and rex leads to tearing if they move a little to fast
^
The super fat one looks like an obese chuckwella
were dinosaur hybrid possible like if we forsed breed a tarbo and a trex would i nake a hybrid
redboss never change
Anytime I see red boss I know it’s gonna be a great time in here.
between the members of a genus probably, but like ligers and mules it would probably be infertile, or just die prematurely
so we could make a hybrid of t macraensis and trex, but not of tarbosaurus and trex.
Loved the aggressive pycnonemosaurus conversation btw.
hes finally real
i like people like red, they ask questions that i enjoy answering
what jack horner theory was the most correct
This takes me back to simpler times.
dinosaurs being more social than we thought
that was his theory?
i thought his theorys were like, trike is a growth stage of torosauurs, i didnt expect them to be smart
Dinosaur hybrids is surprisingly likely now that I think abt it
realist goji?
ESPECIALLY ceratopsians, less genetically varried theropods, and maybe smaller hadrosaurs
I could definitely see a muttaburrasaurus iguanodon hybrid possible but yeah like you said it would be infertile
Among his hypotheses was also Dracorex and Stygimoloch being synonymous with Pachycephalosaurus and representing growth stages
wasnt that correct kinda?
do think large apex hadrosaurs and saurpod donu think they mated for life or mated then left but they still cared for thr babys like ti was there own
bro had so many hits and had to ruin it with the biggest miss in human history
That's what i found i just scaled It to the cerato and that's what i came up with
Being too intelligent can make you the biggest goof
nanotyrannus too
giant animals are often k selective for offspring, meaning they take good care of a few offspring, but sauropods actually had a lot of offspring, suggesting minimal parental care
hadrosaurs probably were in the middle
But then i found this other allo
Nanotyrannus was Bakker not Horner
And was also 40 years ago
nano isnt as much of a fumble as scavenger trex, if u use other formations
Neotype might be a little bigger but shouldn't tower over allosaurus
With so much megafauna around I don’t know why someone would think a dinosaur with the strongest bite force would be a scavenger, like I just don’t see how you can make the correlation lol
wdym this other allosaurus these should be the same skeletal, you just didn't scale it right
guys do u think saurpod where very aggressive and if frightintthey try to kill on sight a predator
Nanotyrannus might actually exist, so hold onto y'all's butts
The hyper-aggressive herbivore trope lost its charm when used unironically within the first time
if it did, wouldnt it be in competetion with younger rexes?
The Alioramus-Tarbosaurus in question
There can also be multiple predators within a niche
@umbral kite I love you
Perhaps falcon will break embargo?
I feel like sauropods would be very flighty animals tbh
Perhaps I should reduce you into a puddle?
For the record, redboss is probably younger fella. Try not to make it weird lol
it was featured in the highly respected jurassic fight club, cementing its place as a dinosaur
More research is required
Me too
correct
i mean, maybe, not hyper aggresive, but it probably did lash out at predators that got too close
but a certain size that kinda just becomes a waste of energy, unless being directly hunted
Anyways, bla bla "if we remove nanomorphs from the T. rex growth equation, it becomes less of an anomaly compared to Tarbosaurus, but we'll need to wait for a little bit to see how to do so best"
Yea i actually enjoy the conversations, he’s in the right place to get the best information he can receive. All is just a little bit of fun.
what would've been the closet relative to nanotyrannus if it was real? would it be a Alioramini or whatever their called?
from waht ive seen its easier an alioraminid, an albertosaurine, or a close relative of trex
Based on Asiatyrannus, a tyrannosaurine outside of alioramini is likely
The Asiatyrannosaurines................
Welcome to the family, asiatyrannini
Perhaps due to its North American location, the nanotyrant belongs to the nanotyrannosaurinae
Consisting of the nanostyrant and stygivenator
Can anyone tell me how big edmonto was average and the biggest please
They are pretty similar
Good question
Can someone please give me a list of the best studied big sauropods I already got
Camarasaurus
Diplodocus
Supersaurus
And dreadnoughtus
Apatosaurus
giraffiatitan?
apatosaurus or brontosaurus?
Definitely add Omeisaurus, Dicraeosaurus and Amargasaurus
Opinions on Nanotyrannus
Don khalia solos
nvm not big
prior extinction moderator steg
Did shonisaurus really weigh 30 tons?
Is Shunosaurus well studied
Tried to look up things about it, didn't find much
Only found one source with a rough size estimate putting it at 8 tons
I said apatosaurus and you didn't add it smh
My fault, yes apatosaurus getting added!
Fun fact: If you include Mapusaurus to the Giganotosaurus Average the average becomes significantly less then Tyrannosaurus!👍
Wait, what're we talking about rn😵💫
Nothing! its just paleo chat rambling!
Why would you do that tho?
The span between the 2 is less then 3 million years, its practically the same time Tyrannosaurus existed totatlly
Aha
One may be an extremely close offshoot of the other but I'm doubtful they aren't similar in mass or much anatomically different
But it's still classified as a carcharadontosaurid?
Yes
Specimens do vary in appearance but the time frame between the 2 could suggest individual variation between Large Carchardontosaurids
That’s still enough of time to have significant changes occur. I just wouldn’t be comfortable lacing mapusaurus into gigantosaurus with how little material there is for gigantosaurus.
https://x.com/starpredator247/status/1855777174109987109?s=46 how accurate is this 🤓
They could be true, but the differences could be a minimal as a difference in Skull Morphology instead of mass which is what I'm going for here. Its not as if I'm lacing Meraxs and Carchardontosaurus, these 2 are way closer
very accurate, and the Tyrannosaur at that size is losing 9.5/10 out of ten
Imagine dino sized bugs lol
There are dino sized bugs
What, giga's got a fairly healthy amount of material, more than mapu if I recall correctly
Horrid description tho
Yeah we don't really got a lot on mapu, we only have rough (very rough) size estimates
We have a decent amount of Mapu from bonebeds
We actually have a lot of giga material, but no one’s actually described it yet so it can’t be studied sadly
Lumping Mapu into Giga doesn't mean it still can't be its own animal. A Giganotosaurus roseae if you will
Looks like I was misinformed
Yeah but we still don't really know much about its size, only estimates putting it at 4,7 - 5,9 tons. And that's what we got from using a femur circumference regression, which isn't exactly the most reliable method
That's from 2006 tho...
Can I get a study on a 5.9t estimate for Mapu?
Man that says 2019 what
Anyone care to send me the skeletal for all the material we got of gigantosaurus
Something about theropod femur circumference or density being undervalued or something and like the mass gets bigger? I need a reminder
2024 and we can't read skeletals 😭 , come on man, 12yos are finally understanding mass estimates
Here's a couple.
As to why they're all a little different: idk garbage descriptioné will do that
But it does show you that it's not just some scraps
Giganotosaurus was described in the late 20th century; Rex was found in the early 20th Century, and we only have 4 10t individuals, this is going to take a while
A, I was looking at the top left😂😂
I'm currently sick and my cognitive functions ain't really functioning
Top left is a citation of Mapu's description paper
Yes I know, wasn't thinking straight
I have to ask if the bertha paper still exist 
This is a really random question. But do yall think spino was a semi aquatic or terrestrial carnivore (or both). Had a debate against someone who believes spino only hunted on land, and I disagree
Semi Aquatic
Whatever anyone tells you, ask yourself if Spinosaurus was built to fend off/compete with a similarly sized predator
Most derived member of its family known for their fisher adaptations, I reckon it hung around the water to snatch some fish haha
As far as megatheropods coexisting in the same environments, is Spinosaurus and carcharodontosaurus the only example of that?
Deinocheirus and Tarbosaurus 😄
Bahariasaurus doing whatever with Spino and Carch too
I'm still wondering why reconstructions of spino has such short legs, if it really was a semi aquatic predator, wouldn't it be more plausible if it had long legs? Like sucho
What size even is Bahariasaurus to be considered in megatheropod range?
Yep , wish sarcosuchus was also in that era would of just made that more interesting
What do even consider to be megatheropod range?
Like 3t?
Sooooo there were 3 (possibly 4) apex carnivores in the same area
Then it definitely was a Megatheropod. I think current estimates hover around 3-7 tons based off the fragments we have, but exact affinity is borderline fictional and unknown
Why is there no dinosaur called Dinosaurus yet
Does anyone have a good explanation as to why spino had such short legs??
Because Dinosaurus was a Rubidgean and even cooler
He was on his way to become W H A L E
😂😂
Spinofaarus moment
Nah but fr, if it was a semi aquatic hunter, why the heck would it have short legs? Wouldn't long legs be more beneficial??
not really
Why?
Legs are less efficient for swimming than a tail and forelimbs
Long legs for terrestrial animals to run
True, true
Long legs = more surface area for drag
Also long limbs create drag
Because its legs were found, and they were short haha.
Sucho doesn't have especially long legs either, not compared to most other theropods.
Crocodilians, Hippos, besides any member of Ursus have short legs
Whales no longer even have their legs
We do see a shift in the anatomy of the legs when you look at kaprosuchus or something, but it's a bit more terrestrial
Are we assuming that spino had short legs because of its lifestyle or do we have actual evidence?
We only have Kapro's skull so Idk what limbs you're talking about
Have I been mislead? I swear I remember seeing more of it then a skull
Blub literally just said the leg material was found and they were short
My man, we've had spino's legs for 10 years
Personally, I think Spino's lifestyle was more of a wet version of a stork
Instead of flying, it swims across the surface of the water with ease to find ideal fishing grounds, between the tail and the buoyancy, picking off fish in shallower waters, and using its massive sail to intimidate Carch or other threats into not attacks
The mfers Mapusaurus, Taurovenator and Meraxes
(Art by Grasher2002 on tw)
It goes where it wants, does what it wants, and just chills
I love seeing a Theropod that's robust (that's not named Rex)
The oversized Taruovenator in question
May be thinking of its relative Mahajangasuchus
Wait i'm curious now, would those 3 actually have been contemporaries and overlapped for a significant amount of time? I know they were all found in different layers of the same fm
Shi, I apparently can't read. Man I feel lost today lol
Dw dw, we all have those days
I have to be honest I'm just hearing about the family group
If height measurements were based on the position of the head instead of the hip, would spino be the tallest carnivorous dino?
No
Would be Giga or Rex
Whaaat
That Spine is misleading you heavily
The head isn't that far from the spine tho?
Grab a Gdi of Rex or Giga, compare it with a up to date skeletal of Spinosaurus, and tell me what you see
This is sick artwork
Man
That's not what I meant
Oh I misread lmao. Thought you said not far from the hip
Oooh, it's fine😂
Misinformed
Spino STILL isn't the tallest head height
Damn
Deltadromeus peak
Do we have multiple fossil evidence that spino had short legs or are we basing it around one discovery? Read somewhere online that it was based off of one fossil
Bro.........
Ey, I was just asking🤷♂️
We base it off that find and its relatives. The Spinosaurs with "longer" legs aren't even as aquatic as Spinosaurus
Tbf spino is still a big mystery. If only those a holes in WWII didn't destroy the most complete fossil of spino we had 😭
We still know alot about it
Alot is a bit of an overstatement
For a mega theropod its size and that old we know alot
Lot of mysteries about spinosaurus
The length of its legs on the other hand are not one of those
😂😂🙏
I have to ask if we can check the isotopic remains of Spinosaurus to see what it ate
Since 2014, spinosaurus has been reshaped drastically in our minds with discoveries about it, most notably its legs and its tail
I just hope we find out more about it, it's my fav theropod
It's so hard to find reliable sources when it comes to paleo when you don't live in the US. Lots of links that are blocked by our government
We know one thing for sure about spinosaurus , it was a dinosaur
Ehhhh idk about this
Feels more like a bird to me
Is spinosaurus lived in a place that was near Africa or North America and did stay near a coast or a swamp like place and who would win a carch or a spino i think spino if it near water because it would try and drag or push it in the water but if on fry land car h would win
Ima be honest, Spino isn't as big of an enigma as people make it out to be
This is an animal which had functionally 0 skeleton until ~2014
Of course we're gonna have a bunch of studies surrounding it going back and forth
Perhaps the Spinosaurus was late surviving phytosaur
This is not a channel for AVA debates
Wat ava
Thank you, couldn't have said it any better
Yeah I've seen that pic
Would honestly not be suprised if this was true😭🙏
Dragons confirmed lmao
I would be considering the amount of skeleton we have
I posted the colorcoded skeletal for a reason
Dragons are just pteradons with teeth but alright
no dragon are insect wyverns are pterosaurs
you meant "insects"?
wat ava
Aren't wyverns dragons
no a like not the same
Not the dragon/wyvern topic again…
wat is ava
They are dragons that got wings that's also functioning as their front limbs. Basically a dragon but without the front limbs
there fromt limb are the wings
I know this might be quite inappropriate to ask but are you 12 or something?
Ruh roh
That's what I said
u said they dont have front limb when the front limb are the wings
"They are dragons that got wings that's also functioning as their front limbs". The wings aren't actual front limbs bro, they just serve the same purpose when grounded
Wings in vertebrates are limbs.
Limbs yes, but not front limbs, as in it having arms
This is definitely off topic but the wings of wyverns are the front limbs. The flippers of whales are front limbs. An elephant's front legs are its front limbs
Our arms are our front limbs
Arms and wings are both considered to be front limbs. They share the same skeletal structure but are modified differently.
wat is ava
Why do you keep asking that
Fr, starting to get a bit annoying
Redboss is back
Don’t think it’s a question. Just another way of saying whatever
No its a question, and I know the answer but I found it weird that they responded to Limitless asking that
Why are we discussing dragons in paleontology
Ah. My bad.
Someone wanted to know the difference between a wyvern and a dragon
Dragons=arms+legs+wings
Wyverns=legs+wings
Nuh uh
Tyrannosaurus slayer is here.
Aaaaanyway, paleontology
Andrewsarchus
Fun fact about basilosaurus, there is two species of it and the other one is not as noodly
Actually I change my pick to perucetus
The people’s champ.
Basilosaurus isis. Still a noodle in its own right but not as noodle
I like basilosaurids
Horribly large
If perucetus ever has zero fans it’s because I have died. 🐋
i dont like the tail
Miracinonyx. Only animal in North America that could keep up with the pronghorn.
Wait was spino in North America or in a africa or somewhere around those places
yes, Montanaspinus
yes
is this a relative to a spino or is the spino we knew
close close relative
so is this like a tarbosaurus with trex different becuase of environmental adaptation
yea
i cant find a size comparison for them
Is that an icthyomimus? Or Irritator?
i must ascend, goodbye
no Montanaspinus
bye. Bye
That ain't even a real dino
idk i looked it up and that wat i got quinnz told me that north america spinosaurus idk really knew
it not a real dinosaurs
Huh??
That exists??
Probably no
megatherium (i like big sloths)
Sivatherium
What Dromeosaurs are bigger than Deinonychus? (Excluding the BIG raptors like Utahraptor, Achillobator, Austroraptor etc)
The unnamed one
Patagomaia
Based
Pardon?
What do you like about this taxon aside from its size 
funny haha name
it's ok to like it for that. It is a really impressive mammal by mesozoic standards
So what’s the big ankylosaur thing I keep seeing going around? Haven’t seen much about it but my guess off the bat is fragmentary ah remains or like footprints or something lol
fragmentary remains being attributed to a taxon known from even worse remains: teeth
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/forget-rex-a-new-type-of-tyrannosaurus-has-been-discovered/ar-AA1tWXgf lol i like the title because usually everyone kissing up to rex... however they still used rex in their title for clicks 😭
do not commission from this person
why?
ok i definitely missed so much in here
the hell happened???
hyaenadon
yuty is more related to trex than to a utahraptor the. Would be the dinosaur that start to devolop in to bird also in the articule it said yuty was the biggest theropod and i dont really belove that but is it true
It’s the biggest confirmed feathered theropod
If you could have a dinosaur as a pet, what would it be? I'll go first:
Either Yutyrannus or Allosaurus
Next thing we know we find evidence of a feathered Tyrannosaurus
Triceratops
Good luck having a 7 ton lawnmower
Hi
Sure, id have a carnivore that would probably eat me if it has the chance BUT I LOVE THEM
Hi

Hi
You ok
Just need some acres for it to graze, ez
True, I just need to buy like 500 kg of food a day
Science, give me my triceratops
I R E Q U I R E Y U T Y
para or tarbo
Prob couldn't be a big one
So some sort of small ornithopod or a dromaeosaurid
Psittaco, Dryo, Microraptor or Velociraptor would prob be my choices
But if I had tons and I mean TONS of resources avaiable, then some gigantic sauropod
Like Brachiosaurus
Dude, all you need are some trees and there you go, Brachi food
Being honest, where I live would be a Sauropod buffet
any pachycephalosaurid because i need to know how they behaved
Would they be able to eat broad leafed trees tho
Since afaik, they didn't eat any of that stuff
Sounds like they need to broaden their diet 
Hello, working on a sub-adult Tyrannosaurus running animation. How does this look? I know adults probably couldn't properly run but I figured something like this could be reasonable for a sub-adult?
admitted to plagiarism multiple times and has been ignoring my messages for the last couple of months
guys do u think if a raptor were like ravens and where smart
"Ubirajara"
Fuzzy little buddy, at a reasonable size to keep and maintain
I always thing Moros but it might be a tad too big
Unless it's JW moros
Sinosauropteryx could be cute
Can Anyone tell me the bite force of mosa and or Tylo
Searched 3 sites
“estimated bite force of Mosasaurus and Tylosaurus”
bing.com
A-Z Animals — Mosasaurus vs Megalodon: Who Would Win In A Fight? - A-Z Animals
a-z-animals.com
Discover Magazine — The Megalodon's Forceful Bite Was 10 Times More Powerful Than a Great White Shark's | Discover Magazine
discovermagazine.com
Dino Digest — Liopleurodon Vs. Mosasaurus: Underwater Predators
dinodigest.com
The bite force of Mosasaurus is estimated at around 16,000 pounds per square inch (psi), which is comparable to some of the strongest modern predators, giving it a powerful advantage for hunting large prey in the Late Cretaceous seas. By comparison, Liopleurodon, another large marine reptile from an earlier period, had a bite force closer to 7,700 psi—about half of Mosasaurus's force but still very powerful. This difference reflects their adaptations for different hunting strategies and prey sizes, with Mosasaurus relying more on brute force to catch and crush its food, while Liopleurodon, though smaller, was highly maneuverable and had a strong sense of smell to detect prey from afar.
You can find more detailed comparisons and background information on these reptiles at sources like Dino Digest and Earth Archives. Here are links to further details:
DINO DIGEST
ps:
A-Z ANIMALS
hives on ancient marine reptile bite forces](https://a-z-animals.com/blog/mosasaurus-vs-megalodon-who-would-win-in-a-fight/) Look it up if u dont belive it idk really knew
Bot reply
parrot
if i really has to be realist i chose deinonychus
Weird armpit quills though?
That's what the fossil indicates
Sexual selection be weird sometimes.
if males fought for females what would that look like just a pure fight or would i be like a king cobra thing where it a chest pushing thing or is it looks like how would sauropods act
Possibly necking, which is what giraffes do?
No, they wouldn't because giraffe skulls are reinforced to do so
Sauropod skulls were not
So what would they do huh
Prehistoric Planet minus the neck balloons
do u think they theri or theropod that are like theri (dont knew the name ) fight and like kicking or biting
I thought it was just slapping each others necks.
Anyways, don’t some sauropods have spiky feet or something? Those that could rear up could have fought using those.
Theres a lot of room for interpretation here, they could have involved some sort of shoving or pushing fights, but theres probably a lot of display too.
oh a theri that just want to dap me up wat thr worst that can happen
Dap you up? What does that mean?
you don’t know what dapping someone up is???? google it lol
Even if theris claws weren’t built for combat, I still wouldn’t want to get swiped by those.
its like to the same effect as a handshake kinda
it lile high fiving some one
Chat is this real cause 16,000 psi is crazy
Considering it's from a website named "A-Z animals" and a MosaVSMegalodon post, I doubt it
You think dinosaurs got silly with each other or with other species when they were yong ? Like how a group of friends fool around causing trouble or habg out in there high-school years?
PSI is a dumb measurement because it depends on the shape and number of the teeth more than the force of the jaw
How would desmostylians have walked?
Which dinosaur you think would have been as heartless as dolphins
They'd have to actually in contact with one another and in the wild, that almost never happens. Interspecies friendships do happen though
Whether dinosaurs did mammalian level play is unknown though. Raptors are sometimes depicted that way and the more social dinos could have engaged in some level.
Heartless to others or their own kind?
Honestly I'd say therizinosaurs would've been hostile to everything, even their own kind.
Large herbivores be like that
idk i just use chat gpt and made it find website just check if u want idk
also wat chade is theri is theri in not theropod but i forgot what it in also i it in the same clade as struthi
Someone dap me up
Ok
ChatGPT isn't a good way to get answers for things like this... people are using it like it's a search engine but its only job is to generate an answer to a prompt. It's incapable of fact checking anything, so it could return with a whole lot of nonsense and it wouldn't know any different. It also can't distinguish between sources because to answer a question like the one above you really want to be reading scientific literature, but ChatGPT has just drawn from random media sites that are rarely up to date or have correct information.
yea i did and a common answer was 13k-16k psi and i said check or verify it becuase it was ai
but i dont really knew of psi is a good way to check how atrong a bite force is because it said a piranha bite for was 20k so
art by who
David Bonadonna
wait so let me get this right, you asked an AI to fact check itself?
no u should alway check of the ai is wrong but the so far the bite for. Mosa that was 16k psi through multiple sites
alternatively skip out of the AI step and just read the information yourself? 😛
whyyyyyyy
guys do u knew what the food trigle is i forgot what it is it call but primary consumer are at the bottom and apex consumer at the top but there are alway mor primary consumer then the one on top so and so on and so forth so in a eniverment would there be a at least a small 1million small herb and a apex would have a population of 50 in a area
the reason i use used ai becuase it just gave me the info and the site and then i just facted checked it also ai just gave me the same results but with site woth the info just the same thing but with multiple site backing it up it the smae thing basically
plus i really dont care how u find information just that u fact check the information
my point is, if you have to put effort into checking if the answer the AI generated is correct by reading around, you could save time by skipping the AI step and just reading around to start with 🤷 plus the websites that the AI is sourcing from generally aren't the most informed and aren't the place you want to get information from, if you want reliable answers you go to a reliable source like peer-reviewed papers
I despise AI
ai is a tool that it use it like a tool not to do ur job
What
The best source is reading yourself on trusted sources
It’s really easy and you don’t have anything misinterpreted with text from ai 👍
also how come there is app or just a true website with a bunch of facted check or even paleontolist check verifying information as will like just a think that may update every month an just as facts or ecology theorys and facted based from a bunch of check and verified info about the dino in one website and if u have a question it could be asked and u get a answer within a day pr two by gather info i feel like that has some much potential
guys how trusted is https://dinosaurpictures.org
Has some good pictures but wouldn't say its 100% accurate (their dromieceiomimus)
what a good website that more than roght or accurate 75% of the time
That is quite a lovely piece though
literally what basis does that have
I'm pretty sure there's evidence against this, I think there is a therizinosaur nesting colony iirc?
and I don't think dinosaurs were in a particularly large amount of interspecies relationships, this isn't land before time
From what I can see that website is overall accurate, but it def has some bad ones
See when it come to large apex theropod i feel they didnt have pack or hers because sush would be tomany large month to feed and protect and cause to may problems but a pair and some offspring they have a good amount and most of the offspring may die so it would have a good poplation plus it not like a large group of raptors to take a large prey they have food for at least 6 raptor but a large prey for a theropod trex would probably only feed 2 and some children so having a large group of them would most like be bad for them
therizinosaurus is a therizinosaur ( used to be called segnosaur ) which is in maniraptora which is in coelurosauria
thx
I agree that the art is beautiful, just not the most up to date one
ornithomimids, dromeosaurs and birds are also maniraptors
also do u think we could domsicate smale theropods or hadrosaurs like deinoychus or a dryo as a pet
"too many large mouths too feed" well that didn't stop the several other huge animals that group up.
Elephants and their extinct relatives, centrosaurines, hadrosaurs, etc. etc.
not to mention there was usually no shortage of plants where therizinosaurs lived
probably but it would be pretty difficult. tmk only placental mammals have been domesticated to the point of dogs, horses etc
don't hens count as domesticated?
they aren’t really much use beyond food though
Rock pigeons were domesticated
oh right I forgot abt the messenger pigeons
true but they are still technically domesticated no?
yup
and a other reason is if a large theropod like a trex has a colony of then would a other trex would be happy to have a free meal of baby rex chicks to eat plus dinos liek theri and deinochues maybe but it would have to be more of the eniverment of the animal in i
How much do we know about dinosaur reproduction cause I feel like that has the answer
we know what kinds of eggs different dinosaur groups laid ( soft and hard )
gonna need to write that down, however is there anything about like the time it takes for the eggs to form or anything similar to that?
iirc thats very important when it comes to domestication
Dinosaur eggs would take a very long time to incubate, up to 3 months for the largest species iirc
Worth pointing out therizinosaurs and ornithomimids (including deinocheirus) were herbivores so that wouldn’t really apply to them even if it were a valid issue
Also could you please take the time to edit your messages and make them easy to read? It’s incredibly difficult to try and figure out what you’re trying to say
see saurpods laid a lot of eggs and had lot of kid to make sure they had a enought to make sure they survived some saurpod youngling didn’t survive to adult hood and had a small herd in general feed a good amount stabilitizing the eniverment. Now if a group of saurpod that had as much as a bull herd do u think there be enough food for all of those them no and hadrosaur and theropod have the same logic to it
what
Except we know for a fact that many hadrosaurs and sauropods lived in massive herds. Some with possibly over 100 individuals
also the term “bull” isn’t really applicable to most dinosaurs since we know very little about their behaviour
Yes herd sizes are constrained by food availability, but the Cretaceous was in general an incredibly lush place with quite a lot of available food. Not to mention animals like bison used to, before Europeans began hunting all of them, form massive herds hundreds strong in the relatively arid plains of NA
The only argument I can possibly think of for therizinosaurs having small groups is that their closest modern analogues, ground sloths, tmk didn’t form large groups. But even then it’s not a very strong argument
I genuinely have no idea what you’re saying. Please write in proper sentences. Please.
Although it has no bearing on gregarious behaviour for Therizinosaurs, most of them lived in either relatively cold, arid, or seasonal environments thus access to vegetation would have definitely fluctuated in these environments
ok the conditions would have to be good for a large group to survive
In all likelihood yes, but we really just don’t know. They could have lived in small groups, they could have lived in big groups, they could have lived alone, we just don’t know
Wasn't there a massive Allo bonebed?
Cleveland-Lloyd is a dried lake durign a drought iirc
I wouldn’t be surprised if allosaurus was relatively social but I don’t think we have much evidence one way or the other
it is yeah
so u think raptor or ceratopsain where more social
ceratopsians were absolutely more social than raptors
For sure, as a rule herbivores are generally more social than carnivores. And ceratopsians in particular are known to be highly social
200 god-damn
I find that highly suspect tbh, I’d like to see more context
I mean I could see it if it was a hyena type clan
Mind you there's way more evidence for social behavior on large predators (Mapusaurus, Albertosaurus, Daspletosaurus for example) than on dromaeosaurids
A trend that's also seen today. Most pack animals you can think of are top order predators rather than smaller ones (worth noting that trend≠rule, and that i might be wrong)
Merab sons
domestic ball pythons are very tame, but they are reptiles so we dont truly know whats going on up there
is it true that spino and carch where in the same eniverment do u think they fought and if they did i say spino would win but it would be under some conditions like spino would win only by dragging or pushing the carch in water but in a normal fight carch wins
Ok so, carch and spino coexisted yes, but they have no reason to fight each other. What would they gain? They inhabit different parts of the environment and fulfill different niches so conflict seems unlikely
True but it was likly but in general spino may lose any incounter or they would good away or try to scare of one from the other territory beciase it would want a apex like that near it
also they probably avoid or do some type of intimidation to scare them off to avoid actually conflict becuase that inst a fight they would really want
Is SpinoInWonderland good for skeletals or nah? he seems to have become a bit bias over the past couple months
Tbh, when it comes to his stuff, it's usually a skeletal of an animal already done by Random, Hartman or Dan, so then I just stick to them
as long as it’s recent SIW does nice work
^
Alright thanks
Guys is it true that .8 % of any population of species yhe there were some that grow twice as large
If I said no would you believe me
not really becuase there some that grow larger than it regular size but i don really knew
Why ask a question if you're not going to believe the answer
🥀
if i ask question it more of a very complex question like if i just want to knew what the biggest ankyariad was i look that up but when it come to this i ask question i can get from easy search on google
How would desmostylians have walked given their weird posture
I'm pretty sure they weren't able to walk on land actually
They quite literally had fully fledged arms and legs so they probably did.
So does nothosaurus, and yetttt lol
look would this thing ever cause u bodily harm
Not really, with flimsly teeth like that I would be stupid not to just body the thing with a bat
Yes, quite easily?... it may have more gracile teeth than say, monitor lizards (I don't recommend looking up the aftermath of a monitor bite) but so do things like moray eels and I'm still not putting my hand anywhere near their mouths 😂 and when you then consider that the larger species were getting to the size of some saltwater crocodiles, not something to mess with
Oh boy I sure do love generic campanian canadian formation
No because size variation depends on the species
guys do u think most dinosaur had vemon or bacteria fulled teeth
Neither?
Venomous
Me looks up the aftermath of a monitor bite , can be worse than the aftermath of a cookie cutter shark bite
whos that dinosaur a tryanntarid of some kind
Adult Nanotyrannus
You can see where the researcher is pointing out the placement of the venom sacs to their two subordinates
Never seen a person who likes dinosaurs not know what that dinosaur is.
i dont recognize fossil off the back of my mind ok
Not to sound aggro but I'm sure I can show pretty much anyone that skeleton and they'd be able to know that one, even if they don't know dinosaurs much
Mainly bc its the only dinosaur everyone knows lol
Suchomimus my beloved
Truuuuue
^^
like that is so obviously a coelophysis skeleton
And yet all their fossils are known from open water environments/submerged shorelines
wait we don't think desmostylians walked? at all?
I thought they were just kinda bad at it like seals lol
Currently, it's only supported for a specific smaller genus, the others didn't have the required rib strength for land movement supposedly
which genus?
Desmostylus itself actually
Neo and Paleoparadoxia both failed the test
interesting
Honestly i much prefer the idea of them awkwardly shuffling around on land, and Paleoparadoxia is in my 5 favorite herbivores list
Desmostylians are very underrepresented in general in media.
You'd think people would love funny marine Hippo things
But then you realize they aren't even related to hippos and they are their own thing.
I can't think of a single occurrence of desmostylians appearing in media. At least, no good media lol
I love the freak. If I was better at modeling fat, I'd give it a try
I don't even think of them as hippos they're just whimsical silly sea creatures
Definitely very unique.
Reaching up to nearly 4 tons
don't they have actual evidence for being outcompeted by sirenians
WHAT!?!?
I don't see how that would be the case.
I do. They fed on the same thing lol
Lemme find the source
Sure but did they even live in the same waters?
yes
I also find it interesting that these creatures lived in saltwater, not freshwater.
we lost a silly creature only for another silly creature to replace it
How would they have stayed hydrated though living in saltwater.
the same way every other saltwater animal does???
I was a bit off, been a while sorry
Question for the hardcore paleos, are dinosaur babies still considered ‘chicks’
it's good lol, I thought that sounded off
That doesn't answer my question.
Fun fact, it lived with Pontolis, a pinniped of also about 3.5 tons
But yeah 3200kg is still COLOSSAL
that is completely subjective.
and yes it does answer your question gwas. Specialized kidneys that prioritize getting rid of salt + expelling it manually
Now it answers my question.
99% of marine tetrapods do it the same way afaik
I don't see why desmostylia would differentiate
So would sirenians have eaten everything the desmostylians have ate leaving them starving?
But man I love that fat blob
Things name is Ancient Paradox, how cool is that
from what I know they might've just been more efficient at harvesting it?
I imagine you'll see "hatchling, immature, juvenile, etc" used for baby dinos over chick usually, and chick, when used, probably would refer to specific theropods
From what I've seen, they were worse at being aquatic but still unable to go on land, while being less efficient at feeding on marine plants, overall being just worse as a whole
I think they would've at least been able to sleep on shore.
yeah kinda sad this is the one time the narrative of an animal group outcompeting another is actually true
another group people should appreciate more
they look likethere anklysairid but with flat osteoderms
they're more than that to me
are they related then
not even close. Ankylosaurs are dinosaurs, aetosaurs are pseudosuchians
where ankylosaurs had bare bellies, aetosaurs DID have armor underneath them. There was also a carnivorous member, neoaetosauroides
Typothorax going so far as to evolve spikes around the cloaca too 😛 aetosaurs are great, and as much as I love Desmatosuchus I wish people paid attention to other members of the group too
If large pterosaur where alive to day do u think they would hunt humans
wait i thought bird inly had closcas
no, birds are far from the only animals to have cloacas
wait what that is nasty lol, those predators must've really put the pressure on them
also yeah I'd say most animals have cloacas.
eh maybe hatz but probably none of the others
what about quetz
yep, not sure what kind of selection pressure ends up with cloaca spikes 😛 and yeah cloacas are found in most vertebrates that aren't placental mammals
probably not, the neck is too spindly. It hunted small prey
with if it hunted thing that where human size but just ripes parts off
braincase slightly larger than walkeri type, billions rejoice
Then it's spindly neck would be an even bigger problem
a human is like half the weight of quetz. I think quetz could hunt a person but it wouldn't be optimal at all
Why it look so… different
it has sad stupid crest because the paper vaugely implies juvenile parasaurolophus crests might reflect the more basal condition
But that ain’t look like a juvenile buddy
no it's a fetus
well its not identical cause that'd just be boring
it's adult size is bigger then Zilla form Godzilla 1998
does anyone know what species is NMMNH 26083 assigned to
so am i getting the wrong information
cuz ur using google
like is this really that absurd speculation 
allosaurus
what should i use then
i think so
it say it weights 250kg
i tried it didnt work for me
you weren't trying hard enough
gimme link pls
what link just search it up yourself
I’ve literally told you multiple times, it’s Allosaurus
IK THAT I ASKED WHAT FOOKING SPECIES
And I’ve said, multiple times it’s referred to Allosaurus sp. And Allosaurus fragilis
alr im gonna use it as fragilis
it's just sad how many times he seemingly forget the most simplest responses sometimes
dude i have a fooking exam tomorrow of where i have to study for biology 😭 + i have to memorize a shi load to pass
dawg what does that have to do what stego said, multiple times and espeically in this server alongside theropoda he mentioned what in 26083 is classified as and if not that it's either epanterias or saurophaganax
you having a exam is on you if you can't memorize information you think you should actually takes note of then idk what to tell you but you're lost cause
ladies ladies
how long did the chad chasmosaurus exist for again
died
How many dinosaurs have now been classified as a dubious genus?
Gl
quizlet 
He is ‘stiff lizard great belly’ and he is my spirit animal
Wait this is an interesting idea actually. Like, both the throat and stomach would be too small to swallow anything roughly human sized (iirc there was an SVP abstract from a paper suggesting it mainly preyed on 5 to 7kg stuff).
Now, what if large azhdarchids (not named Hatzegopteryx) did hunt slightly larger game but instead of eating it whole were pickier and only ate some specific parts/organs?
how accurate is the new silesaurus critter being added to PoT?
I wonder if rex dreamed about chasing edmontosaurus in its sleep
do u think the kid is okay
prob
do we know if they had the capability of dreaming on the same level we do
There's a lot of things we don't know and can't know
Were there have been dinosaurs that were just naturally rare?
Bro I feel like y’all be trolling with some of these questions
Don't gotta be a paleo snob
Fair play I just read it and was like what 🤣
how hard exactly fossil cleaning does?
dramatic 😒
what if the strong neck was for ripping apart its prey into smaller chunks it could swallow
yea what if quetz just grabbed babys or thing like dryo and dropped it on its head or spear it body or slammed it in the ground
It would most certainly just shallow animal small enough it can be our without choking, spearing or slamming it's prey in the ground would be too much work
Did quetz coexist with Dryo? No?
No, they were millions of years apart. Dryo was in the Late Jurassic while Quetz was in the very end of the Late Cretaceous
Probably, yeah. Sauropods in their youth were likely easy pickings for predators, and any that couldn’t meet their insane dietary needs likely never made it to adulthood. Truly enormous sauropods, amongst other herbivores[but not all!], were probably rare amongst their species, and possibly altogether.
Does anyone have the paper of Ampelosaurus new weight? The 2022 study that was based on MDE-C3-174 femur
guys do u think spino may have hunted small herbivores or thing and not just fish because it may have been easier at certain times
I doubt spino would actively hunt herbivores, but I imagine it wouldn’t pass up the chance to scavenge on one if it was already dead
also do u think spino killed or fought crocodilian that where in it waters
No
I can see younger ones doing that.
I think Dryosaurus was meant as an example here.
C.Acutus solos
i looked up but why do u call it c acutus and not just American crocodiles and also where did u get that name from do all animal or dinosaur have that name
also in spinosauris territroy do u think they fought for there territory or they just coexist
I'm to lazy to say American croc. Also c acutus is cooler name
Me and my bf legitimately
do all animal have that type of name or what
Yes, Genus followed by species
American croc don't existed while spino did. But if u talk ab spino v spino territory. Idk
It's the scientific name. Crocodilus Acutus, and for alligators (Chinese alligator) it would be Alligator sinensis
so if i got this right R.Buteos Is a red tail hawk right
No, the binomial name for the Red-tailed Hawk is Buteo jamaicensis so the shortening would be B. jamaicensis - the capital letter is the capital of the genus name
AHEM you capitalized the species 🤓
I doubt Spino fought with crocodilians in its territory unless it had to.
Speaking of species name here’s my poorly made anky, please tell me my mistakes
Who even did this rule/thing to capitalize it lol
I mean, it’s not going to go out of its way to get itself injured for no reason.
@tulip gyro Linnaeus (that’s a person btw, even if his name does sound taxonomic)
Just make spino have 1on1 Nile croc behavior
so would a para be called P.ornithopod
No, very much no
Those are utterly different animals with different priorities.
Could check if it did coexist with any large crocodilians.
@umbral kite Orithinopod isn’t a species level name……
Parasaurolophus is the genus, and then there are multiple species, but an example would be Parasaurolophus walkeri which we would shorten to P. walkeri
P.walkeri Then i just looked it up before u typesd
Large crocodylians spawned about 90 or 80 million years ago. Idk
I kid dw
When talking about different species of one genus they shorten the genus because that part will not change when talking about species of that genus, but it’s important to fully write the species as some genus can have hundreds of species
I don’t recall when Spino evolved, but there could still have been some large animals filling the niche? Unless Spino was filling that.
Still, as I said, Spino wouldn’t attack anything large in its territory unless it had to
Basically, it's just a shortcut
Spinosaurus Aegypticus is too long for you to spell or write?
Then you just can Say S.Aegypticus
There’s usually a space between S. and Aegypticus (as an example).
But in general it’s 10x faster to use common names unless talking about a lot of paleontological details
but how can people know that im very smart if i dont call modern animals by their binomials?
i'm very smart I only call gorillas and iguanas by their genus
And rat (black rat specifically I think) is rattus rattus, heh.
yeah there's a bunch of them haha
who up bison bison bison
Is this relatively accurate? I took a few liberties with the curvature of the tail bc my actual artistic planning was bad and I still wanted the tail visible but otherwise I think it’s decent
is a tarbosaurus a tarbosaurus or a tryannasaurus bataar
doesn't really matter
Body seems kinda short, but I can go with visual angle plus the amount of space there being the cause.
Tarbosaurus
Yeah my proportions were kinda garbage bc I planned the page poorly
There's enough distinctions for it to be a separate genus
Can’t comment on the accuracy of head ornamentation and scutes though.
IAnd the feet 
I'm not saying American crocodile if I just can use a shortened version😹🙏
I’m definitely going to do better research next time I didn’t realize till after I drew the head that I totally blew off the fact that we have concrete evidence of the ornamentation of the face
Mhm
american crocodile aint that long to type though
I'm lazy so it is long to write.
Still, I’d say it’s relatively accurate and you’ve acknowledged it’s a learning process, so, it’s all good I think.
ong fr
I will say Croc or Gator any day
W
Anyways time for my semi-daily question
What is y'all's opinion on Brontosaurus?
What about it that you want an opinion on?
What do y'all think about Brontosaurus
I've literally published papers on pseudosuchians but my coauthors and I will still just say "crocs" in normal conversations so this is very valid
i used to think lil foot was a brontosaurs
Do you like it or nah?
it ok it look like apato though
They're related I'm pretty sure
one was sank into the other for decades so yeah they’re related
i just realized how large that trex was in land before time it was the same size as a apato
Osama bin Laden
Apatosaurus is kind of an average sauropod isn’t it?
The series also had a brachiosaurus (I think, it was one of those with more upright necks) lone wanderer at one point in the valley.
Anyways, the Rex was definetly oversized for drama.
I think there were feathered raptors at one point? I definitely recall there being raptors of some kind.
I forgot Land Before Time was brought up and was very confused at first
Land before time goated series
Guys!! GUYS!!!! IT HAPPENED!! JUST LIKE I SAID IT WOULD EVENTUALLY!! A FROZEN MUMMIFIED SABERCAT HAS BEEN FOUND! HOMOTHERIUM CUB FROM YAKUTIA!!!! WHAAAAAT!!!!!https://t.co/FeDJ0lejXR
the prophecy has been fulfilled
Was only a matter of time
We did it boys
yeah bro, all these mfs acting like a bunch of ovis ares
I'd rather we all use colloquialisms like normal humans
good news
Why does prehistoric planet have so many unnamed dinosaurs
Wonder what the use of such massive toe beans was
some of the popular ones didnt need introduction, the others were probably just not the focus and werent described in show
Well, it’s a kitten…
So is the comparison. Those are toes from a lion kitten
grip
homotherium was more cursorial than other large cats iirc, the big toe beans would be good for grip
But it's like they intentionally avoided saying their actual name.
Instead of saying "anadontasaurus" they just kept saying "this ankylosaur"
i mean, you are more likely to remember, an ankylosaur, vs anodontosaurus
the only ankylosaur most people have heard of is ankylosaurus, so saying random genera that arent going to be majorly focused on is going to be a waste of time
tarchia is an exception cause iirc it a decent amount of scren time
It's like a national geographic calling a pride of lions "this group of large cats"
I disagree, because they also mention other obscure ankylosaurs such as antarctopelta and tarchia. No one has heard of these things.
Deinosuchus riograndensis
i mean yeah they shouldve done, but at the same time its not really that serious, most people who dont care about paleontology arent going to remember the random genus names, so it doesnt do much harm
when dealing woth raptor just drop and roll or scrape them pff
lol a triceratops would kill itself drop and rolling
raptors probably wouldnt mess with a fully grown trike in the first place, even in a pack
Probably not but it makes for good artwork.
yeah, hell creek dromaeosaur pack vs subadult trike when???
eo or pt
It's more like calling an elephant ''elephant'' instead of ''this Loxodonta africana''. Which is what all documentaries do, no one is going to say the full binomial name when a simplified or common name suffices
What do you mean pt
ohhhh
triceratops
there two type or trike so eo or pw idk what its really called
in some cases (but not all) those were animals whose presence is only speculated, or based on fragmentary remains that weren't described yet (an example being the "Velociraptors" which are basically Velociraptorinae indet., though there are arguments for it being what we now know as Shri) or animals just being non-descript members of a group without being an exact species, like the "elasmosaurs" that journey upriver in one of the freshwater episodes, which aren't based on any one taxon
No disrespect but its really hard to understand what you are trying to say.
eotriceratops was another genus, I think its a sister genus to triceratops
the two type of triceratop in game are eo and pb or pw idk really knew
Yea there is, Triceratops Horridus, the smaller species.
And Triceratops prorsus, the bigger species
The discussion is not about the playables in the game.
Anyways does anyone own the PNSO Camarasaurus?
Eo trike is smaller but larger head Normal trike is larger but smaller head
also was it comfromed if triceratops had quills
smaller members have them, so its speculated
iirc there isnt evidence for it on triceratops itself
Trike most likely didn't have any, we have large sections of skin from its head and body without any quills present
Isn't psittacosaurus the only one with evidence of quills?
is this true
That is an article from 2010. Its very outdated and bogus. Plus, you shouldn't fully trust the suggested searches and answers Google gives you like that.
The first highlight is vaguely correct
Second is not
hasn't even been a conversation for a loooong time, they aren't synonymous (and even if they were, it'd have been Torosaurus sunk into Triceratops... not the other way around)
Doesn't Archaeoceratops Have Tail Quills On One or Some of its fossils? Didn't Stenopelix also have Quills running down it's back and tail like many heterodontosaur fossils and maybe might have been fluffy as it is a very basal ceratopsian?
Dunno. Unforunately I am not a paleo nerd
So when classifying thing does it go like a branch reptile -> dinosaur -> theropoda-> Ornithopoda-> tyrannaird-> tyrannus-tyrannus rex and that how u classifies dinosaurs right
What's a Orniorapod?
Anyways Is Qantassaurus Having feathers Likely as It lived in a part of Australia that at the time was part of the antarctic circle and It has relatives like Leaellynasaura that most likely had Feathers and was Either Bigger or Smaller? (I don't really know what sizes compared to a human are accurate for Qantassaurus)
No because one: Tarbosaurus is still considered separate from Tyeannosaurus at the moment, and two: you misspelled like half of those, and put ornithopoda in theropoda for some reason lmfao
It would go something like reptilia - ornithodira - dinosauria - saurischia - theropoda - neotheropoda - averostra- tetanurae - coelurosauria - tyrannosauroidea - eutyrannosauria - tyrannosauridae - tyrannosaurinae - tyrannosaurini - Tarbosaurus - T. bataar. But obviously you can be more or less specific if you want
I think in general for small ornithopods we have no reason to think they wouldn’t have feathers, so based on species like kulindadromeus I’d say it’s fairly likely. Worth noting though that while Australia was further south than it was now, the earth back then was much warmer than it is today so it would still be a fairly warm environment. But that doesn’t have a ton of bearing on feathering for smaller species
i mean, if the feathering is sparse it can increase surface area for cooling down
ok is this correct Kingdom → Phylum → Class → Order → Family → Genus → Species or is it missing somethings
Not entirely sure, but it’s worth noting that this mainly applies to living species, for things like dinosaurs the distinction between different classifications breaks down a bit, so for example a family can have several smaller families within it
That’s why I prefer to refer to anything outside of genus and species as just a clade, it’s a lot simpler
it is, in traditional linnaean taxonomical heirarchies, but it's not the most useful system for describing the evolutionary history of taxa so we tend to refer to cladistics instead especially for extinct animals
technically we are all still just a weird group of lobe finned fish
Mhm
which means that the blue whale is the largest fish to ever live
Blue whale is my grandpa
my uncle is a elephant
my godfather is a beluga
The Torosaurus = Triceratops theory is just one of the complete crap theories that came from a certain person who shall not be named
trex was a scavenger.
I think it’s very likely. That region during the early Cretaceous fluctuated from boreal to periglacial environments and histological analysis of an Ornithopod femur from that fm indicates they were active year round despite the frigid conditions
Ok, time for the meat grinder
Fairly warm I think is a poor description of the Wonthaggi fm where Qantassaurus comes from. Sedimentary proxies indicate periglacial environments which so far in the geologic record are only associated with extremely cold environments
Anyways what do you all think the "Polar Allosaur" was supposed to be in WWD?
Funnily enough it also comes from the wonthaggi formation. A Megaraptor ankle bone originally referred to allosaurus
hello chat have you heard about the homotherium cub
Yes
oh it was already posted
i shall now retreat back into my hole for the coming months. but i'm glad the news has reached here 
I hated that part of it, feels like they said so few names
Fair, it’s absolutely cold, but just probably not to the level of the modern arctic circle
No it was probably comparable to the modern Arctic circle
Most other papers mentioning periglacial sedimentation from the cenozoic predating the Pleistocene are from the Miocene-Pliocene of Antarctica
Huh, I’ve heard otherwise
Periglacial environment threshold today usually amounts to an average annual temperature below 0 degrees which do exist today outside of the Arctic circle, it seems the lower end of these climate types tend not to be recorded in the geologic record
Walking on snow
If Google said so it’s legit
It currently sits as a Rubidgean
do u think raptor packs or large herbivore had one lead male like a bull that got all the females
Raptors have very little evidence if any of pack hunting, but male dominant harems aren't exactly uncommon in the modern world among mammals
Dang I wish I was a mammal
Dang I wish I was a Eukaryote
Anyways aside from the random stuff, Could Spinosaurus possibly have hunted smaller Crocodylomorphs like how Those african storks hunt baby crocodiles? That was be Best Modern Animal I could Quickly Think of To use as an Example For Spinosaurus hunting smaller not crocs
dang i wish i was a living thing
Maybe but would u go for a babg croc that bearly feed u of go for a large fish that can feed you
I mean Maybe a Very Young Adult Stomatusuchus Or a Older Juvenile/Adolescent Stomatosuchus for an Example?
maybe ask @wary junco
There's no reason why it couldn't hunt crocodylomorphs, or any other animal that lived near water and was slow moving on land
well, unless they were giant
guys make any dinosaur in a front view and it look like it never cause u bodily harm at all
Is this true
how fast is a giraffe compared to a allosaurus?
Faster
I see a giraffe is faster but in a head on fight it lose badly
Possibly, but it’s not certain
I personally wouldn’t be surprised if they had a fan and wings and no body feathers, cause they could help with shading nests and display without impacting heat too much
i feel like it missing somethings like TREX or something maybe even quetz could havw been on there
Quetz? No not even close bro.
Quetz was only like what 200-250 kg?
T. rex is big to be sure but not really a contender for largest non-sauropod. Even the largest individuals we have of it are only really comparable to average-sized Shantungosaurus specimens. As for Quetz, it was tall I guess? By mass it was close to two orders of magnitude smaller than what is shown in the chart.
yeah quetz is like human weight lol
I wouldn’t call 400-500lbs average human weight
ah right I mean that is a little bigger
still a weight attainable by a human
Not really attainable, comparing a predator in its natural environment to a human who is overly obsessed and can not function properly. If a Quetz sat around all day and ate junk 24/7 it could be 900lbs.
funnily enough, so could a human
What was likely to be the biggest feline?
They found a Smilodon cub y’all
not smilodon, it was homotherium
Both of them are still machairodonts
arisotnectes is ~10 meters long , right ? or am i crazy
https://x.com/GaelCasart/status/1857188517798953447?t=XqAIqJK5wrg7R13Le9TgUw&s=19
not even a single thoughts behind those eyes dawg 💀🙏
idk why but its making me feel so many emotions, it makes me sad, it makes me happy, i wanna punch it, i wanna hug it, i dont know what to feel
Cute aggression
acinonyx pleistocaenicus
A cheetah?
it's an extinct species. IIRC it is larger than miracinonyx
(modern cheetah is acinonyx jubatus)
I was thinking of panthera atrox rather or smilidon
those aren't felines
They are cats.
if by "cats" you mean felids, then yes.
felinae is just one subfamily. Panthera atrox comes from pantherinae, and smilodon from machairodontinae
Yeah I'm talking about the entire felidae family
ok if you wanted the largest cat you coulda just said that lol
but I think panthera atrox might be slightly larger than the largest species of smilodon? (smilodon populator)
the ngandong tiger is also close up there too I think
Also, what do you think desmostylians are related to? Because they seem so different from anything else.
I don't think we really know, but they're usually at least in afrotheria
I know this is an irrelevant question but are you in a prehistoric mammals server by any chance?
I mean that's very niche, just general paleo servers though yeah. I like paleostream a lot
lots of helpful cool nerds over there
I remember being in one that had a few hundred members that was hecka exclusive. Like you could only be invited by someone else in the server.
oof. Yeah I've heard of those I think
And it wasn't some casual server either, I got removed from the server because I wasn't "actively contributing to knowledge'
💀 yeah then you probably shouldn't have been there anyways, that's really dumb lol
It didn't help that I was a Christian either and had some different beliefs so I think that was another reason.
But I still like learning about extinct animals.
w
How closely related are megatherium and thalassaconus
kinda close imo as they're both Megatherioidea that's what i can tell
I mean, probably someone featured on My 600 Pound Life would probably come close to their weight, just being honest.
Anyways opinions on Supersaurus?
One of my favorite sauropods
Yes, quite possibly the longest dinosaur
guys do you think non large saurpod stomped or kick to fight thing like a trex stomping something to pin it down
Mid
Add purussauros in game
it look like deinosuchus with a rectangle head and is fatter
it looks cool and if you get hit by it tail ur getting with a giant wipe
Peak
Its a Caiman vs an Alligaitorid??
Skull is different Enough, doesn't has a Tail as Long too(deinosuchus has a longer tail)
Its Visually different from Deinosuchus
unlike the sarcosuchos, the purussaurus is an alligator, while the sarco is a gharial... what changes is the bite force of the purussaurus, which is much greater due to the shape of the skull, it's like the difference in the bite between a tyrannosaurus and a spinosaurus due to the way designed to generate more serious and deadly damage.
Isn't Purussaurus more of a caiman ?
Yes
KTO Deinosuchus mod has a variant already that looks great
gharial isn't a good analogy for sarco
ok what came before a deinosuchu or a sarcosuchu amd who was the better parent
we don't know anything about their parental strategies compared to other crocodylomorphs
I know you're out their SynchroLight
Has the time finally come for the new Aerosteon skeletal?
It'll be on the ArtStation page once that's all done
👀 I can't wait
My favorite dinosaur finally getting a new look, tis exciting
but we can guess based of there closet relative right so if a deinosuchus is Alligaitorid then they are mostly not Caring mothers and if sarcosuchus was mostly likly related to caime then they may have been very good parent but untill they get to a certain age but that all theory
sarco is not closely related to caimens at all, it's outside of Crocodilia
deinosuchus is also a very basal alligatoroid, iirc so basal it was before the split of caimens and alligatorines
My favorite one of these "not a gharial" images is the one with sarco's head lined up next to rex
Why are some people so obsessed with making every dinosaur covered with fluffy feathers?
Sure I get some therapods and dromeosaurs but making sauropods, ceratopsians, ankylosaurs covered with feathers?
I dont think I've ever seen a fluffy sauropod or ankylosaur
Yeah feathers dont belong on them