#paleontology
1 messages · Page 90 of 1
how did hadrosaurs walk?
Mfw a solid portion of all known mega theropods are from that area, not accounting for the several Abelisaurids, Allosauroids, Noasaurids, Megaraptorans, etc that potentially those environments
with they legs
true derived hadrosaurs primarily moved quadrupedally but could rear up and walk on two legs as well, probably while running
with more basal things like iguanodonts it’s more of a case by case thing, some of them were totally bipedal
Sorry, maybe I should've been more specific. What did the hadrosaur walking gait look like?
Eh not quite true. Ornithopods are ancestrally biped but became more quadropedal as time progressed. Hadrosaurs in particular might've looked around and foraged high areas bipedally but they likely walked and ran quadropedally.
I’m not sure how what I said contradicts that
I was meaning things that are just slightly more basal than hadrosaurs where posture gets variable as it shifts to quadrupedalism, not going all the way back to basal ornithopods
to answer this though it generally just ends up being assumed to be similar to the “elephant gait” where both legs swing on one side
thank you
Question, since mosasaurus is related to modern day squamata (especially to the members of the varanidae) would it have looked more streamlined like modern day cetaceans or would it have been more rough and scaly and have a lizard like head
Lizard like depictions
Probably somewhere inbetween
Modern cetaceans, we have mosasaur scale impressions and they are teeny tinyyy
Ah okay 👌 thanks
talkin about mosasaurs
those are extreme measurements
seems a lil larger than what I usually see for it
well those are the size depiction i saw
I've not seen a weight estimate over 10 tons for mosa for a good while
10t and like 13m is more accurate I’m plausible sure
Finall I have an easy rebuttal to the next person who tries to tell me mosa was 20 tons 
Bunker bonker Mensa Penza why can’t you lizard people be normal
so how heavy should mosasaur be?
like 10t
and tylo?
prolly more than that for the largest
TYLOSAURUS IS HEAVIER THAN MOSASAURUS?
Tylosaurus was in fact 4 gazillion tonnes
🤫 🧏
Tylosaurus weighed 5
5 tons ok
No, not tons
then 5 what?
5x your mother
funny
lightyears
what
This, ladies and gentlemen, might be the single worst therizinosaurus ever
Its fingers has like 5 joints 😭
Its hand looks broken
that's why he's screaming at the sky
Insert "Big Enough" screaming guy
Pronation nation lads
Hot take: Therizinosaurus has had a rough time in the palaeomedia ringer
Like I get that it’s physiology is freaking weird but. MAN. They keep massacring my boy.
Theri has been in like...2 big media things (Chased by Dinosaurs and JWD)
It does not help that it's hands were broken in it's latest incarnation-
I wish it got more screen time in Prehistoric Planet
Yeah that's probably going to be the most respect Theri will only get in paleomedia ;-;
I am a Theri enjoyer this Theri mistreatment breaks my heart. I demand justice!
Ohhh haha right, it appeared in PP didn't it 
For like…30 seconds.
Anyways, I wouldn't hold my breath for "Therizinosaurus justice" because assumedly, you're looking for paleo-accuracy and if done, the creator would likely be aware of the study where Therizino's claws were found to be terrible at anything
Then how on Pangea could Theri even grow to massive sizes if it couldn't defend itself ;-;
Spite
interesting answer indeed, then again it's in a much better position than Spino. Who keeps suffering every time a paper is made on it
Ehh not really haha
Theri hasn't had any new fossils since the holotype (which is an incomplete arm) while Spino has a significantly more complete skeleton found "recently" and thus has become a study victim. The issue is that it's really only like 2 camps of people studying the skeleton/animal so it's become a war between two opinions and neither want to change 
Ah, it's so fun to be a dinosaur and paleolover nowadays. /J
Well...I mean people should be expecting change in a field that deals with things that usually can be understood better
It's like groaning and complaining when an early access game gets an update
Cough the state of the entire dinosaur survival genre Cough-
I mean yea
This,…..
But seriously the entire genre is at it's infancy at this point- [like our timeline equivalent is when the original Doom game came out]
Gotta let em cook,….
Incorrect, logic dictates an herbivore must be capable of effortlessly gutting any contemporary large carnivore
Wtf...so true...
Comes in, breaks branches, leaves
refuses to elaborate
gigachad theme
It was insulting,……. To say the least
I really hope that BotM makes a theri maybe. Just as a standalone model because while I do appreciate they’re going to be releasing armourless versions too I think the Cyberzoic is a bit silly
Therizinosaurus by safari ltd is gas
Pot rex?
Huh
that's not POT rex but okay
..i think it was a question. categorized by the question mark.
Yes, I know but the "Huh" is "How did you reach that conclusion"
^^^
looks Vaguely PoT rex shaped ? idk im guessing they're asking if that's the skeletal PoT used
I'm fairly certain the skeletal came out after PoT's rex
The T.rex looks like the T.rex? 
it did
(it totally did but let's pretend)
why?
For the meme
i started to do the cenozoic era, heres megalania
thoughts on my tyranosaur model
Btw it would be V. priscus in the species box
Ill fix that
i find your tyrannosaur model good but its just the teeth size/shape and hand position that kinda make it derpy
Is anyone else having a bunch of network errors every 5 minutes cause that’s not fun lol
it says megalodon weighed 50 tons, is that correct? it seems a bit exageratted
megalodon could get even bigger 👁️
definitely not exaggerated. there are estimates for even larger
5 mosasaurus weigh as much as 1 megalodon...
yeah, mosasaurus are puny next to megalodons
gosh i didnt realise that the size of the megalodon in meg is accurate...
it's a whale hunter
Still couldnt hold a candle to the greatest whale hunter of all time, H.Sapiens.
💪
boom!
Megalania is around 600 kg
imma fix that
We also basically have the whole size range of megalodon due to the sheer amount of teeth and better modern methods of determining size. Adult megalodon seem to range from 14 meters and 35 tons to 20 meters and 100+ tons. The typical size people go with to represent them in general tends to be 15-16 meters and 50-60 tons. Whatever you wanna go with really.
PNSO Theri is also very gud
Is the 50 ton estimate for Meg, after the newly adjusted body plan? I saw a paper recently stating that it was probably proportionally longer than great whites, which are what were usually used as a comparison. 🤔🦈
That paper isn't really good. It's based on an anatomical assumption with sharks that wasn't correct.
Hi guyw
your name looks like calcium
you gotta face it,Spinosaurus was the apex of the aquatic dinosaurs
If it even was
uh
no
ok boy give me some info for your different conclusion
“boy” is crazy
We don't really know if spinosaurus was aquatic or not. I think it makes sense but paleontologists seem to be too busy arguing over stuff that's basic common sense.
I love people spending thousands of thousands of dollars to answer the real questions like "Can spinosaurus SWIM?"
to be honest if the skeletons is resembling more that to a croc than a rex it is more presumably for it to be a some what semi aquatic
doesn’t this all trail back to Ibrahims’ false statements about spinosaurus
I thought we concluded that, it infact, could not swim
It literally has a long snout and an axolotl like tail how the hell could it not swim
we can only know a bit of how it looks kid but we will never know how it behaves.If only Jurassic park were real in a near future
Ahoy there shashbuckler
It clearly has physical adaptations FOR swimming, it looks like an aquatic so like how is it not
exactly,if it looks like a swimmer its a swimmer.Havent you guys seen the latest bone uncovering from the spinosaurids?
In a nutshell. You have the two "teams" who are making different arguments. Team Ibrihim argues that spinosaurus is an aquatic pursuit predator while Team Sereno is arguing that it's a terrestrial wader. The problem with the current argument between these two groups is that both sides are failing at basic common sense. For Team Ibrihim, let's just say for argument sake that spinosaurus is aquatic. Why would it be a pursuit predator? The original study that suggested it was semi-aquatic showed that spinosaurus probably wasn't as good of a swimmer as crocodiles were, who themselves are notably bad at pursuit predation. They're ambush predators. Why would spinosaurus be a pursuit predator in that case. For Team Sereno....it's like........ Spinosaurus lived around water. Spinosaurus hunted aquatic prey that lived in said water. Most animals can swim, let alone those that regularly integrate with that evironment like spinosaurus. This is basic common sense. Why would such an animal being able to swim be so controversial?
The “axolotl like tail” isn’t 100% accurate.
Also @bright veldt yeah 💀
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298957
The lifestyle of spinosaurid dinosaurs has been a topic of lively debate ever since the unveiling of important new skeletal parts for Spinosaurus aegyptiacus in 2014 and 2020. Disparate lifestyles for this taxon have been proposed in the literature; some have argued that it was semiaquatic to varying degrees, hunting fish from the margins of wat...
You cannot tell us how it behaves young sprout,you can only imagine and give opinions as all of us.Its just that you need to look at the BONES!
Calm yourself old bean
For reference discord is bugging I meant to reply to this message, sorry table. #paleontology message
It just goes to show that, like. Paleontologists study dinosaurs but that doesn't mean that they understand basic ecological concepts. It's how you get such golden ideas like "T. rex was exclusively a scavenger" and "Terror birds were outcompeted by mammals".
We cannot say what is the truth,understood! It is the human in Wich puts the limitations
Beautifully put
“Trex was a scavenger” mfs after I explain how much food would be required to sustain an animal of that caliber:
thank you distinguished,gentle and kind being
The pleasure is mine
This paper is a prime example on why I think the whole argument is stupid. The paper in a nutshell says "There is no way of really knowing what they actually were due to the lack of data and a lot of it is deductions with little evidence". This is a very reasonable assumption to make. But then the paleontologists that published this went on twitter and started saying that they disproved spinosaurus was aquatic. YOU. DID. NOT. That is not the same thing.
It's ok to make accidents.We learn from them don't we?
not really
it shows
Incorrect! The SUPERIOR mammals wiped out the pitiful birds with their highly advanced mammalian cunning and warm blooded superiority….
(Ignore that birds are warm blooded)
Wtf…so true…
https://twitter.com/SlvrHwk_paleo/status/1773954712276258906 new unique stegosaurid dropped that could've had ankylosaur like defenses ( from what i understood )
So hard to understand what Thyreosaurus would have been like with the paper's description not providing visual representations.
Here is Dan's for example.
does he know
I think not
Crocodiles are bad pursuit predators (underwater)? They seem to be capable of swimming very fast. Unless you mean they generally prefer to hunt though ambush rather than pursuit.
Based so fex
I don't think team Sereno ever said that Spino couldn't swim. Or that it even was a bad swimmer. Just that it probably wasn't a good enough swimmer to hunt while swimming. At least that was my understanding. 😄
Eotrike skeletal anybody?
pantydraco the absolute goat for stegosaur descriptions
Sometimes i wish Hadrosaurs would get the respect they deserve in media
You are going to love the PoT lambo update
You bet i am, Lambeo's finally going to be a multi-ton animal that can beat stuff
I have, sad news for you
What do you mean by this
Bull 50m edmontosaurus in musth
w-w-what do you m-mean the destructive power of m-mammalian cunning isn't a real thing...
Mammalian cunning from the smartest species to ever live:
such long-lasting energy, if they went up against a tyrannosaur they might well win
Mammals aren't dumb
But there's very few that are that much smarter than dinosaurs in all likelihood, and that doesn't mean a huge difference when you're typically severely outclassed
the superior mammal cunning
tbh, if we're going by outliers, the smartest mammals also drastically outclass your average mammal, and so would the smartest birds
hohoho the superior mammal intelligence overcomes the war of evolution
I mean, the opportunity was there, you gotta prove if the guy is lying about the pain
Most people just don't have a concrete understanding of the variance of intelligence
what
Everyone I need confirmation
Is the Stegoceratops accurate, and does the script sound good?
It looks like if prehistoric kingdom did hybrids and I love it lol
Is the frill keratin covered or scales?
Brow horns should (likely) not follow the bone, but instead curve upwards a bit. Extent is up to you
You can add the lil frill spikes that younger trikes had cause while the bone may be reabsorbed, can't really do that with a keratin sheath
Imo add a little jugal spike (spike on the cheekbone)
T. rex has been discovered in a group for the first time! One adult, one subadult, and two juveniles were buried together in South Dakota. Was T.rex pack hunting possible? This video explores the evidence for group behavior--including the possibility of pack hunting--in Tyrannosaurus rex by examining modern analogs like crocodiles and birds, clo...
I know I usually am critical of Vividen for bringing attention to remains not worthy of it, but I think emphasizing the fact we do in-fact have had multiple tyrannosaurus found together is kind of relevant.
In a nutshell, Sue wasn't alone when she died. There was also a subadult and two juveniles with her. I'm not convinced it's evidence of gregeriousness akin to the other mass-tyrannosaur sites, since the rest of the tyrannosaurs aside from Sue are very fragmentary, and they have evidence of cannibalism, which might suggest that this was a largely cannibalistic event, but it's interesting regardless.
I love how the evidence is totally up to interpretation and not entirely compelling for gregarious behavior or for non gregarious behavior and yet the video is titled like we found 16 individuals all together sitting around a petrified family sized dinner table saying a family prayer before digging in to their thanksgiving Anzu 
I wouldn't go that far. It's a general summary of what evidence we have of tyrannosaurus group behavior (TLDR not a lot).
Weren’t many things recovered from the Sue locality that were distinctly not Tyrannosaurs
Nanotyrannosaur and Pigmyceratops...
It could be stated that Stegoceratops had a mix of keratin and scales
- this is based on T. prorsus, not horridus
But how is the script
This changes nothing, both have the same brow horns
Ok fine. Push that aside. How about the rest
Well Trike had a scaly frill last I checked, not a mix
This is Stegoceratops, a hybrid between Stegosaurus and Triceratops
...
What accuracy are you looking for then?
Is this a good blend? No creative liberties
If that’s too hard, then look at the script
Sir this is paleochat. This isn't in this chat's field of expertise. I think it's understandable as to why we aren't really on the same pg rn.
"Good blend" is up to you
Accuracy is what I've listed, (mostly) factual information of the dinosaurs used and how the drawing does not adhere to said information
Seeing as Stegosaurus does not have a frill, it is probably more optimal to go with the scaley frill that trike has
And by probably more optimal I mean do that
^^^ If I didn't say that, I said it in my head so it counts
Alr bye!
This is random but why are there no basal thyreophorans found that look more like stegosaurids than to nodosaurids
This is like the 2nd or 3rd time they've asked for accuracy checks and then left in a huff when given accuracy checks 
Oh wah. Stegoceratops isn't real you can do whatever you want with it. But if you're asking for questions on accuracies, then hear people out. You don't have the answers, it's why you're asking
Eh, c'est la vie
I assume they've muted and blocked everyone here so matters not
Ah well, onto the next topic!
which is the conspiracy that big paleo is trying to hide from you all ..
big phylogenetics is hiding the fact that this is not in fact your grandpa
speakin of these two
Ichthy is fine but Concave is way too small
FINALLY! The 2nd annual Dromies are here! Join me and a diverse array of fans, users of the Paleostream Discord and YouTube Content Creators as we celebrate the best and worst that paleo media had to offer in 2023!
Intro
AWARDS
Best Dinosaur presented by TBA
Best Non-dinosaurian Reptile presented by TBA
Best Mammal presented by TBA
Best Paleo M...
what are the images from?
from the same roblox game: Prior Extinction
omg I knew I recognized those
pretty good game if i do say so myself
How do we know kaprosuchus had long legs?
we don't
iirc it's believed that kapro had longer legs because of the way its eyes face forwards or something
speaking of the guy
Definitely not a Piscivore
I think kapro was land based
why not?
Those teeth are very bad for piscivory
they are normal croc teeth though. Just has extra tusks
mk i'll fix that
its also from the cenomanian echkar which is in niger
Those legs, ick
It didn’t
it has zero evidence for it and it’s relatives legs are pretty normal
For Monquirasaurus, what should I change or add about this?
a widdle bow tie
Better
fat whale
It's eyes weren't forward facing
Gabriel's Kaprosuchus is underrated
thoughts on my Suchomimus
Not bad except for one big bad thing
Pronated hands
and the overall body
Based on Franoys's skeletal if I had to guess from the looks of it
yes
I assumed the appearance of pronation was more so the angle of the humerus
is the refrence i used a big problem
I wouldn't call it a big problem, just a problem of being an older recon. I don't know the particular details on if one is more accurate than the other, but I'm under the impression that Dan's is currently the most optimal to use
Dan's was made after more suchomimus remains were found
It looks like the tweaks wouldn't be too hard, save for maybe the longer torso
when i make my models i dont usualy think about the age of the recon so thank you for pointing it out because i will start doing that
Yep! If you have any questions on if its good for reference, usually someone here can tell you or provide a good reference for you, so don't be afraid to ask
And in time you'll kinda learn your way around the skeletal artists
is my carchar ok?
Googly eye
Your sucho, def better than your carch from the looks of it lol
cristatusaurus may or may not be suchomimus and all proposed autapomorphies are with the premaxilla
suchomimus' holotype effectively doesn't contain cranial material and any skull material is referred
Hip dip reminds me of dan's but not the rest of it. What was the reference for this one
ah its hard to judge the eye size like i think my tyanosaur has a good size eye
Is your rex meant to be accurate?
has there even been any new sucho material in the past like decade
There has been recently yes.
Me wishing spinosaurus was reclassified into a new suchomimus species
oh sweet
Ye
yes at least decently, and yes i know the head is small
Well may I ask what skeletal or reference did you use?
this
better reference
thanks
mfw 0.5% difference in length (symbol of decadence)
ft elrhaz being a wretched formation
kem kem as told by planet dinosaur
whos that little cyan guy back there?
oh yeah kryptops, forgot it for a moment
or is it?
Bingo
okay his name is bingo
btw, WHICH CENOZOIC ANIMALS WOULD YOU WANNA SEE IN MY WIP WORDS PAGE??
The mighty borophagus
this guy? hes pretty interesting
is there a reason the one in PoT is such gargantuan sizes, or is tiny kryptops some kind of meme
The one in PoT is big because they didn't care about accurate size. It's that simple.
Incorrect sizes? In my dinosaur video game? It’s more likely than I think?
i guess a better question is, why do a lot sources have it at like 6 meters ish
a) as a rule of thumb abelisaur estimates in the literature are unfathomably terrible b) kryptops might be the single worst abelisaur taxon in terms of material c) previous kryptops postcrania has been reassigned to an allosauorid or something
Abelisaur size estimates are all over the place, and traditionally have gotten smaller over time.
blud nigersaurus still sorter than sucho
You can understand why sucho's a firmly terrestrial animal. Boi is so damn big there's nothing stopping him on land from doing what he wants.
the suchosaur takes what it wants
i like how several elrhaz animals have been incorrectly upsized in the past and then there's sucho casually growing an extra like 2t in the span of a year
RIGHT. T. rex has taken a break from the protein shakes and sucho is now exponentionally growing. S T O P
just like T rex…
was it apex predator of its region ? or else just fully fish eater
Like all other spinosaur it's primarily a fish eater. Doesn't mean it wouldn't have taken other prey though, and when you're the largest animal in the entire region that can be a lot of things.
I think very vaguely it's the grizzly of it's ecosystem, with eocarcharia being the wolf, not a perfect analogy but the best I can think of
elrhaz desperately needs an herbivore thats actually like bigger than the large carnivores
like a sauropod?
they have one its just that sauropod is nigersaurus
giant ghost lineage therizinosaur obviously
Isn’t there another one
not really
What does that mean
no
K
elrhaz formation ghost lineage giant stegosaur when
unironically a possiblity at this rate
there is paleobiodbd's magic elrhaz brachiosaur but i'm pretty the source they cite explicitly says there wasn't any brachiosaur material so i think its just on something
Africa doesn't have the strongest fossil history. It feels like you can jump at any point in time on the continent and you'll have no idea what the composition of dinosaur fauna is like.
india when
also congrats to taquet for predicting nigersaurus
this year there will be a discovery in Antarctica that reshapes out understanding on thyreophoren evolution trust me
thyreophorans have really earned the title of cryptid clade these last few years
Idk if the great mystery of Africa’s Cretaceous megafauna is totally true. I’ve only invested time into understanding its fossil record during the Maastrichtian, but you can get a more or less good idea of the charismatic fauna
jakapil was a sneak peak
i too love morocco and maybe parts of egypt
Cenozoic nodosaurs fought off those giant terror birds in the eocene
actually i think lurdusaurus might be slightly larger than eocarcharia so nevermind elrhaz is saved
the last dinosaur…
The Elrhaz was simply too productive and well vegetated for the gigantic Colossosaurians to have frequented it often
What the freezing of Antarctica took from us...
what if in 2 years we find a live phorusracid on Antarctica eating a penguin
I think that would go pretty hard
guys could you make a survival dinosaur game roster for me im lazy
House sparrow, american crow, peregrine falcon
thats not what i expected but i cant say im not satisfied...
kelenken, sylviornis, elephant bird, pachystruthio, annakacygna, titanis, haast eagle
i mean for the mesozoic
someone make a list of Mesozoic birds
Ischigualasto formation
guys i dont want birds in general i want NON-AVIAN DINOSAURS
late Cretaceous Mongolia would be cool
Triassic representation when...
triassic isn't real mesozoic smh
no tyrannosaurs? BORING!!!
How can I enjoy this Mesozoic ecosystem when there aren't any megatheropods???
when i mean roster what do you guys think i mean
like a male chicken right
a list of dinosaurs for a game?
Anything other than the bajillionth assorted Mesozoic grab bag roster
exactly, with different and unique playstyle
and late Cretaceous Mongolia would be that right?
tbh yeah... if u think about it
only like 2 carnivores tho afaik
New fighting game: burly bird beatdown
elephant bird glass cannon bleeder
i sea path of titans has mor acret dinos
What type of tongue did hesperornis likely have?
idk
Someone who does please?
Like penguin or puffin tongues ?
when then ? 

Does anyone have a visualizer for the size of Vectidraco?
I feel so bad for every aquatic reptile except for plesiosaurs. it must suck being not the best
boom or doom animal?
Galeaspids are better
does anyone know of any realism servers that only have Cenozoic creatures?
Not the appropiate chat to ask this
Skorpiovenator is just the GOAT
Would be cool to see it in Path of titans because there’s only one official Abelisaurid (Pycnonemosaurus) and it would make for a nice playable
its a crying shame 80% of skorpiovenator recons are ruined by paleojoe's pathetic excuse for a tail
The Pug Dinosaur…
Lipless and better fin shape
yeah I fixed the fin shape but I think am gonan keep it lipped
did microraptor had a small beak?
No
hoooo boy 
Why? Pliosaur teeth aren't horribly splayed, but they still are
idk Joschue depicted his Sachiasaurus with lips ig
Yea? Doesn't make it right
oh okay
It's like saying "Hodari portrayed Gasosaurus as using toxic gas to defend itself, that must mean it's right"
I mean iicr he mentioned something about lips in pliosaurs but forgot what it was but yeah I'll just add the teeth in
It's an error.
on the contrary, I think it looks less natural because of how pliosaur teeth are

hi
howdy..
Hola
here's a thread by Tosha about lips that you might be interested in
https://twitter.com/fishboy86164577/status/1764681785970250062
@ARGAtheropodfan A lot of plesiosaurs have teeth that tightly interlock and splay out laterally. On top of that, they came from ancestors with similarly wild dentition. This arose in tandem with a new feeding strategy, a rapid lateral strike. Similar behavior is seen in crocs and lipless whales
Yeah that
aren't pliosaurus and plesiosaurus don't have any lip evidence ?
Basically that tweet thread above describes the thought behind their liplessness
not knowing how short skorpiovenator tails are
dunkleosteus sized antiarch when
I saw an article where someone suggested therizinosaurus could be related to modern sloths because of its claws and I'm may not be a paleonerd but that's some bullcrap lmao
you see... the mammalian cunning let Xenarthrans like Megatherium evolve during the Cretaceous!
Yooooo the pachyrhino!!!!
PK does have great designs yeah
I hope all of these EXCEPT TORVO become a mod for pot. Oh wait wrong channel my bad
Arg and Acro are already in PoT and so is Nasuto and Ed, and para, etc
And Torvo lol
apatosaurus not yet, feels sad
pachyrhinosaurus perotorum my beloved
Interesting, juvi tyrannosaurus has lips in PK
I mean, if youre going to depict the adult as lipped, makes sense for the baby to be as well.
Adults aren't fully lipped
Adults aren’t fully lipped
Well, then you can just say they grow out larger at adult
Also, the adolescent rex in the back looks beautiful
hey Sergi are you online
hi
nvm but in a separate me and another person we're arguing what meraxes skeletal to use and I argued yours was more reliably than that of liam's and I was wondering is that true?
cant comment much on liams cause i havent looked at it, but i believe they both need some updates
okay well I can't wait
They found material for it?
carchar is so beautiful 😭
new study material i suppose
yeah, for april fools
still april 1st guys
Spoiled all the fun 😢
:>
thats fire 🔥
Damn i wish the flightless pterosaur was real 
All pterosaurs can be flightless, just slash their wings
Quetzalcoatlus the ground stalker….
Theoretically could a large azdarchid survive without its wings?
A theoretical sort of idk
That spino is beautiful 🥹
i dont think PK has EVER missed with one of their dino designs
oxalaia lore drop
hesperornis is the true swimming dinosaur no cap
Woolly Pachyrhino and half-lipped rex want to talk to you
I'll be happy to talk with them about how baller they look thank you
(They're horrid) 
and the torvo
Wooly Pachyrhino is wrong but it has always looked cool, anyone who says otherwise is a hater
Half lipped rex, however, manages to be both wrong and not cool, an impressive feat
^ Either make it lipped or not lipped. Halfway looks lame.
I agree, I hate the way they did the feathers on Pachyrhino. They literally just made it saggy fur.
I am woolly Pachyrhino's biggest hater (I destroyed the feather impressions from the Pachyrhinosaurus bonebed)
wooly peachy sucks man its a rhino but fluffy
🤮
oh fric no that ain't got a place in my heart
Kinda random but why does the struthi TLC look so shrinkwrapped to me
Bro looks starved 
THIS ONE THO 
because the struthi is annoying
Not really. I never had a problem with em.
Love this Pachyrhino, not this one
that peachy is garbage,who the fric made it like it was living alongside the mamoth
PK is....ok
I do love the fairly accurate designs (least for out current understanding), but the gameplay is a biiit boring to me and I also wish it had more dinosaurs then mammals
Does the spino turn faster than trike?
It's not, people are just...really really really unaware of what shrinkwrapping is nowadays which isn't your fault, it's just that the word has lost its meaning now
Que the person on twitter that turned triceratops into a hippo
Erm Shrinkwrapped much? Why doesn’t it look like an overweight Seal Lion
I don't know if you mean in game or in real life, but either way, no
Can spino turn faster than trike
What
pachyrhinosaurus with musk ox trait is mid. simple yet easy taking
What does this mean 
this ?
Aaaaah
Twas confusing since it wasn’t a reply and there’s stuff in between
i always seeing this kind of pachyrhinosaurus with this fur dentation. btw. P. perotorum is the only northen subspecies rest of the other so that's why i like imagining what P. perotorum may look resemble to musk oxes
Tbh they probably didn’t need feathers to any large extent. They are already pretty big animals. If you give pachyrino fluff prepare to give edmontosaurus fluff (ik Edmont is bigger but I feel it still works)
edmonto with fluff cover give me weird vibes. since artic E. regalis more like reindeer vibes. why not we starting off this kind of trend. and spread this kind of thing to the paleo community
Pk's fluffy pachy and partially lipped rex look nice you cannot convince me otherwise!
Both are false
Whats a partially lipped rex? Thatd look goofy
it has the tips of the upper teeth sticking out, but not the entire tooth
I am a PK adorer and I still think that should be changed, it’s not consistent with their other theropods and looks pretty strange when the mouth is closed sometimes
Even stranger now that juvies are lipped
yeah, that makes it even weirder. I hope this is a hint that they’re changing it because that would be cool
I believe its not unfortunately. Don't have a quote on hand rn
Thats kinda, weird, imo either make it lipped or full upper teeth showing, this pleases no one.
I know the devs have been asked about it many a time, but I haven’t checked for the most recent statement on it
ah yeah, they said that the baby has the same amount of lip as the adults, just that their teeth are smaller
kind of disappointing but whatever i suppose, when the game is fully released and modding is (hopefully) supported someone will probably mod it in
Disappointing indeed. Trying to find any excuse they can it sounds like
ngl I love PK Rex but it's downfall is the lips
Wait a min, that thing is peak, minus the arms
I think Tarbo has the same issue in PK as well unfortunately
Tyrannosaurus & Tarbosaurus ( rex skin ) all don't have lips
They do, they only are partially lipped
Paritally lipped theropods are not okay
Tbh, partially lipped is worse than no lips, it looks stranger to me somehow - not to say no lips is any good
I prefer partially lipped than no lips like Indominus Rex or 65's Rexes
Besides, it's an artistic choice, just like crocodile osteoderms on Spinosaurus or Iguanodon
I mean on theropods like tyrannosaurus Rex you meant as well either go with lips or no lips
Yeah, one or the other. As much as I prefer lipped theropods, JP did pull lipless off in my opinion yet no other lipless rex in media has really replicated that well, which is where I blame partially lipped as an even stranger looking choice meant to be a compromise between accuracy and whatever aesthetic appeal no lips has
Honestly it makes Rex stick out like a sore thumb next to the super accurate animals that are also in the game
I mean JP Rex is partially lipped now (idk about 1993 JP). No lipped theropods in the Jurassic Franchise would be Indominus Rex, Indoraptor, Scorpius Rex and Giganotosaurus
Honestly in PK recently I reckon my prior opinions on it being a good lipless rex to it's just a miss opportunity to just have a full on lipped rex
At least with the hybrids they had the excuse of crocodile DNA. Giga had no excuse
Or the excuse they're hybrids ( please nerf the slowmode in this channel )
Meh, we have osteodermed Spinosaurus and Iguanodon, so PK is not always SUPER accurate.
I remember 1993 having no lips or that they were so reduced that it hardly mattered
I forgot about Spinosaurus and Baryonyx having no lips too
Well, at least there is a debate there about if they had them or not
Iggy has the excuse because it looks cool
I mean there is still a debate about lips in theropods overall, there is still some back and forth
To me Rex not having lips feels more like a cop out rather than speculation like in the case of Iggy and Spinos' osteoderms
Well for Iggy we KNOW they don't have any so no speculation there, just an artistic choice to represent them with osteoderms
Even though we legit had a study on tyrannosaurus having lips
Yeah, especially in the context of PK. I'd feel the same about PoT rex but then again, most theropods have a lipless sub in-game
Also idc if it's accurate or not this is badass
Exactly, every other non-Spinosaur theropod in PK has lips. Rex and Tarbo lacking them very much feels like they're trying to achieve some sort of ulterior goal or something
Counter point: based on 1 tooth. I'm all for lipped theropods but proving something with 1 tooth on an IDR how many toothed animal from 1 skull, meh. The best argument for lips is that even basal reptiles do have lips, so lips are the norm not the exception.
And even then, it proves lips on 1 genus of theropods if the tooth was the only argument. There are so many genus and species, so many derived ones that we simply can't generalize that. That's why lips on Spinosauridae is still debated so much
im lacking the knowloge of dinosaurs after many years
Just treat them as large and irregular feature scales and it is a fairly accurate and creative depiction of the animal.
What? Where did you get the idea that the study was based around a singular tooth?
JP rex has consistently been half-lipped
I feel like debating on if dinosaurs had lips or not is like debating if Smilodon had fur
Holaaa

Hey guys, if anyone have any info on how we are able to identify or classify a lot of prehistoric sharks from just their teeth, I would love to be informed
Have we finally decided if dinos were mesotherms or endotherms yet?
everything I can find is from like 2014 and none of them agree on which is correct
Personaly I value creativity over accuracy long as you keep the skeleton fairly accurate (ahem.. WORLD)
so yeah prehistoric park meets my criteria for good dino depictions
The word 'mesotherm' doesn't have an agreed on definition, it's a mix of endotherms with low metabolic rates and regional endotherms (which only produce heat in a certain part of the body / at specific times)
Non avian dinosaurs were endotherms with relatively low metabolic rates
I feel like I have caused chaos with me sharing the new PK images
"Caused chaos"
A simple discussion on dinosaur designs
We live in a society where chaos has lost all meaning
Agreed
I have to agree
Same
Should I add anymore line detail?
Add every muscle fiber
Real!
If you are lining the whole thing and not just the front maybe some curved vertical lines around the hip to give it the wrinkly look reptiles typically have around there
Or a line in between the leg (s) and stomach similar to how this has it
Peak quality!!! Also wouldn't it make more sense to reference a side image
Am only lining the front but thx
Most side images don’t have that lining because of the legs being parallel to each other and I wanted to give a good example of the lining itself
Uhm okay
What about me...
Also btw regarding Fadneo's Deinosuchus how accurate is it ?
Maybe add little notches around the lip area to give it texture
How should it look like
Similar to how the round bumpy shape around the edges like how it’s portrayed with these
God if only the quality helped a little
Btw ig
Sadly can’t do anything about the quality sorry
Well since this is Daspletosaurus this would be a better reference
The worst Stegosaurus I’ve seen today (1st one I’ve seen)
I am literally going to explode
Don’t do that silly goose
You made it stand, L.
Also @outer tusk I'm hesitant to make tyrannosaurs with these large snout scales because the usually cited evidence (the pits) are not found in every tyrannosaur specimen
Heck afaik, not even in every Tyrannosaurus rex specimen
I meant the shape of them around the edge not the large scales on the whole of the lip
Oh the line? I usually make a distinct line where the actual jaw bone ends
Wasn't gonna put it on das anyways but okay
Ye cause it has round “indents” along the edge of the lip
So where again
The end of the lips
Ok
This would’ve been cool asf to see
I really hate monkey puzzle trees
They’ve permanently stained all art of the hell creek region
Hm
But they be pretty 
Nuh uh
I just saw one 2 days ago
shun the monkey puzzle hater
I love putting the generic Mesozoic tree in places we don’t have evidence of it in 
Make references for the trees that existed then
Perhaps I will…
99.9% of mesozoic plants have no references besides "looked kinda like X modern plant" it's painful
And a good 60% don't even have that
Is this crest to long for a female pteranodon?
Yeah the females just had a bump

(Wrong chat LeRoi
)
Aw crap
Wait what about trees?
Trees treeing
The only Paleo tree I care about is Lepidodendron (even though it isn't technically a tree)
I didn’t expect struth to look so skinny particularly with his legs and tail (I was a big fan of the fluffy tail) but I love new details on the legs and beak.
I hope they made the tail a little bit more fluffy and maybe bigger/taller legs to really show he’s a runner (maybe a beak attack too like modern ostrich/emu)
The TLC has accurate proportions though. Making the long legs even longer would take away from that.
The TLC anatomically is pretty well put together. I’m hesitant to include any sort of beak attack because A) I’ve only seen ratites do it against humans and B) its head is so small, a Deinonychus could crush it like a grape
and not only that, but their bites dont really hurt
Wtf Sergi…don’t you know herbivores will kill anything with their powerful attacks…
‘Big paleo’ sounds like something David Peters would unironically say
That's why it's funny 
"Big paleo is ruining our dinosaurs!!!!!!"
reminds me a of a video from a few years ago about a chick complaining about "science ruined dinosaurs" 
Sounds about right
hey paleo chat, more obscure size question and idk if there's actually any answer this time. how big was Pavo bravardi compared to the extant species, muticus and cristatus?
Trees aren’t real
Well they’re not a distinct phylum or class of plant
Trees are like the megafauna of plants if you will, different types belong to different lineages
Quick question, is stegosaurus in PoT undersized or just based off of a smaller specimen? Or is it the right size and stego in other games is just grossly oversized lol?
Like for example: the family of plants that includes palm trees are more closely related to wheat and rye than either are to an apple tree
So yes Lepidodendron is a tree because it’s a big plant
tricky question. stego's too big based on the skeletal it uses as reference, but it's too "small" based on the newer sizes
Yeh, I grew up with the WWD series which is probably hella outdated but stego in that was massive haha. Just seems small in PoT
it's weird. stego in game is too long, but it's also too light + short and should be in the same bracket as things like Deinocheirus and Spinosaurus weight wise
NAH LITERALLY
Yeh, I guess it’s one of the older models so hopefully it will get a tlc
I just realized your PFP was Namielle and the Great Sword PTSD I have shot through me like a bullet
Like where are my beloved Ginkgos and cycads 😭😭😭
Btw Stego size as of rn
LIKE WHERE ARE THE BALD CYPRESS AHHHHHH
That’s obviously a picture of godzilla you can’t fool me 
Wait I didn’t know cannabaeceae existed during the Mesozoic 😳
What seems to be the most recent weight estimates?
“It is best to avoid thickets of these herbs during forest fires” 😭😭😭😭
Here’s the indet. Cannabaeceae fossil
hold up. is that juvenile ? USNM 4934 right
Idk lmao
Your pfp Stu 
I don't remember the age estimates all too well, but I do recall it's not entirely fully grown
prehistoric flora is underrated
And severely underrepresented
true, yet rarely seen one in any big paleomedia, broadleaf trees dryophylum, ditaxoclaudia, srry if i wrong pronouncing
Trees cant roar while epic music plays in the background, so theyre not getting attention any time soon
Yeah but- but they feed roaring things
These?
They also get massive, some plants smell good, others don’t, some emit smoke that will bake a poor dinosaur during a wildfire
looks like it
Trees are very cool, wish I could talk to them.
Magnolias existed during the Mesozoic too, idk if they were present in hell creek tho
Oh this is nice
ingame dinosaur survival game like prior extinction using these type of plant. marmathia, zingiberopsis, sabelite, osuma, gleicheiceaea, equisteum,ginkgo to introduce in prior
Pots trying to introduce some plants like that, hope they blend in well with the existing scenery
i hope they will
I’m hoping that they make a balance of having nice unique environments while also having the paleoflora noticeably stand out in some areas
The tree ferns especially would look nice in places like rockfall hills, maybe a few around big quill lake to replace the swarm of bushes that cover everything
A thicket of paleo weed in pot💀 (forgive me)
😭😭
If you walk through/eat it you get a debuff that slows movement speed but can hear footsteps from further away
Walk through it and you get the absolutely well-designed ARK: Aberration effect when you walk through mushrooms
we should be able to eat amanitas and get high asf
Cannabaceae made it in but not Graminidites 😢
very nice
Hi i'm New here. Any body want me to tell a few facts about dinosaures ?
What specifically? That’s a broad question.
Idk the T-Rex or whatever i have in my book
What's the book's name?
Dinosaures of the cretaceous
I mean with T. rex it’s like, what record does it not have?
The largest and arguably most powerful carnivorous dinosaur recorded. It’s got the best sight of any currently tested animal (several times greater than an eagle’s). It has one of the best senses of smell recorded, tmk only beaten by certain vulture species. It also has the greatest bite force of any known land animal (4-6 tons per square inch).
Apex theropods when they're in any form of competition on any stat with Rex:
erm, top predator 
Albertosaurus beats it in a sprint…. Looks like there’s a new top dog….
Tyrannosaurus is also one of two theropods known to possess osteoderms (although it’s not quite in the way you’d imagine in a traditional sense, which the other theropod cerato does)
Tyrannosaurus was likely a pretty smart animal in life too. Estimates range from crocodilians to baboons
Do you have even the slightest idea how little that narrows it down
I do 👹
But also crocodilians are not stupid 😭😭😭 they are thoughtful animals and have been observed using tools
I know Crocs aren't dumb but I've never once heard that.
Crocodilians yes, baboons no.... that study was deeply flawed. Their relative brain size and the structure of their brains is very crocodile- like
Yes because they’re archosaurs
What were the main flaws of the paper?
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.10.575006v1 Naish et. al recovered significantly lower neuron counts in large theropods, and go on to dispute the usefulness of factors like neuron count in general as a proxy for intelligence. Basically everything the original paper states is disputed.
Recent years have seen increasing scientific interest in whether neuron counts can act as correlates of diverse biological phenomena. Lately, [Herculano-Houzel (2022)][1] argued that fossil endocasts and comparative neurological data from extant sauropsids allow to reconstruct telencephalic neuron counts in Mesozoic dinosaurs and pterosaurs, whi...
Thank you for linking me 🙏
You're welcome! It's a tough but very interesting subject
Yes I do like reading Naish papers though
So how do we actually know that Tyrannosaurus neural tissue did not take up the whole brain case?
Similarity to crocodilians basically puts them into likely similar ratios
Wouldnt it be birds? Sorry im stupid and dont go into paleontology as much
Is this context, crocodilians are better as they alongside dinosaurs are both archosaurs and yes birds too
The changes from more crocodilian to more birdlike brains starts to show up in maniraptoriforms exclusively
Time to cause some chaos with this hot take: while yes it is partially lipped, I have to say this is one of my favorite designs for Tyrannosaurus
Ok still wish they gave a lipped version ofc
Yeah true, a lipped version would be a bit of a nice touch to it. Still it’s a pretty good design
The overall design is good, the teeth are just too distracting
^
Really trying to wrap my brain around this answer specifically
Because birds themselves are dinosaurs
WHAT 
Broke the news
Man I would’ve never known Birds were dinosaurs….such a news flash
Next you're gonna tell me spiders aren't insects
Would it be wrong to say that, although the brain shape would be more similar between Rex and crocs, is it not possible the brain of Rex could also take up more space in the brain-case like a bird?
Intelligence discussion
anyone know what a smok is?

I think people need to remember that intelligence is just a BS measurement like horsepower. It means nothing except to boost people's fragile egos. I'll pose this to you:
The survivorman knows how to build a fire and skin a deer. A businessman knows how to read silly stock charts and drive. Neither can do the other. So tell me, who is more intelligent?
Bro- why are you so mean 🥺
I just had a question about T-Rex’s neural anatomy 😭 I don’t really care about proving how smart it is
I want a deeper understanding of the paper’s argument
do you know what a smok is?
No what’s a smok
I didn't mean it rudely, that's just the quickest and blunt way to say it. Usually I'm extravagent and over the top, but people don't understand that apparently
that's not very spinofaarus of you
idk if this fits here idk where else it would fit but i spent an hour writing about genetics [punnett squares] in the most simplest forms and if anyone is familiar with punnet squares and genetics id appreciate some feedback! The subject is Styracosaurus and pot skins.. its been a few years since i wrote research papers or studied genetics

im writing an ~8 page paper on the history of paleontology, from early on with te usage of fossils by tribes, to the first scientific discoveries of fossils in the 1800's, to the 1900's with everything that happened then. once im done, would anyone like to read it and maybe give some notes on some stuff i may have gotten wrong?

heheheheheheheh
No, the structure itself dictates the endocranial fill due to the presence of other tissues. In birds and maniraptoriforms, these tissues don't fill up nearly as much of the volume and that space can be occupied by the brain.
OHHHH I got it now thank you
You know, Ornithopods seem to have a very interesting brain structure
They did, they were evolving some pretty sophisticated brains independently of theropods. Possibly something to do with their social behaviors
Wow ornithopods are so cool they’re always overlooked fr
Abelisaurids are such a weird family of dinosaurs. They have such a different body plan to other theropods including their own ancestors the ceratosaurs. I haven't herd a good reason for their unique physiology yet. Any suggestions?
I understand the short arms they stared to go away because they weren't being used ok. So they had to be using their mouths to hunt and stuff. They have short snouts which could mean they had very strong bots, but unless I'm mistaken they have serrated teeth so why they evolution to strong bite force if they where cutting meat like an allosaurid? What where they hunting to require that?
having powerful skulls with ziphodont teeth isn't necessarily any less efficient than incrassate teeth
Oh table tell us about Abelisaur ecology
because the only abelisaurs important enough for anyone to make any comment on their ecologies are majungasaurus and carnotaurus i will instead subvert this into a friendly reminder that we have an ecosystem where abelisaurids are several times larger than local carcharodontosaurs and rival if not exceed multiple sauropod taxa in size
ergo abelisaur ecology is being the neocomian grim reaper
We also have the Allen formation. A pleasantly moderate assemblage of Abelisaur sizes 
didn't you try to kill niebla
regardless allenian is objectively worse than coloradoan
Try? It is an inevitability
wow thats a nice giant north african dorsal centrum be a shame if there were a precedent for assigning material to taxa with zero overlap
Ah the pains of being a dinosaur lover ;-;
yall are dino nerds i used to be but i gotta be one again
did megalania really weigh a freaking ton?
I was doing some googling
looking for size references for a project
Around a ton if we round to the nearest ton yeah, they’re the largest varanid to ever exist that we know of
I mean I new they were the largest but being a ton really surprised me
that's like
The weight of a salty
Yeah even the extant monitor lizards that are way smaller can get huge
1 ton megalania probably did exist, but that's the equivalent of like a 13-15 ton T.rex. None of the skeletons we have found of megalania are that big
I mean 10-12 feet for water monitors right?
(Komodos are heavier I think)
wait when did we start talking about rex?
or uhh
meh rex is a pretty good size comparison animal I guess
i just figured people were familiar with the 15 ton rex study
you could also say it's the equivalent of a 10 ton african elephant: they did exist, but are incredibly rare one of a kind specimens
didn't meg have a pretty good sized range.
Like couldn't they be found on some islands as well as southern australia?
Put Rex on tren
Megalania is around 400-700 kg depending on who you ask really.
Accurate?
looks pretty good but the legs look a little thin imo
CARNOTAURUS ECOLOGY? IM INVESTED
was it possible for microraptor to have feathers on it's head
What kind of habitat did carnotaurus likely inhabit? Savannah? Forest?
A cold desolate tundra
The abyssal zone of the deep ocean
What does this mean in English
estuary, tidal flat or coastal plain environment,
Epic
Guys was the lambeosaurus simi aquatic
So real
should be fine
@river plinth hadrosaurs are a part of the clade iguanodontia 
So it’s more of a switcheroo.
If you wanna talk more dinos let me know!
Oh cool so iguanodots did it first 
They walked so Hadros could run
💨
Noice wonder why they ditched the thumb spike tho
No, but part of their habitat was wetlands, so they were around water a lot
I think they made a deal with David Attenborough that they can get the cool head crests but they have to lose the thumb
Think of it like stags or moose at swampy areas
Rip but completely understandable a shant or Edmontosaurus with a thumb spike would be scary
aren't hadrosauridae split from iguanodontid ? or i was wrong abt that
because ouranosaurus. first thought it was iguanodon alike but no its basal hadrosauridae
Its neither.
iirc the whole hadrosaur iguanodont thing kind of depends on who you ask? Though either way hadrosaurs evolved from very iguanodont-like animals
Do we have info on what Ramph's in-game wingspan is?
There's two ways to look at "iguanodont". You're either referring to the family Iguanodontidae, which is an iffy family that only definitively has iguanodon. Or, the more common usage, the clade iguanodontia, which includes almost all ornithopods tbh (The exceptions are elasmonarians and a few other outliers).
Best advice I can give is use the wing stretch emote next to the human for scale item and do good old pixel measurements
So in truth iguanodont doesn't really have a set definition, at least in how we use it. Mostly just ornithopods that aren't hadrosaurs (despite the fact hadrosaurs ARE iguanodonts).
soo, hadrosaurus is iguanodont ? by evolution ? im so confuse
A square is a rectangle, but not all rectangles are squares. As is with hadrosaurs and iguanodonts. Hadrosaurs are iguanodonts, but not all iguanodonts are hadrosaurs
Iguanodont in this case referring to iguanodontia
Iguanodontia is what I’m referring to
Think iguanodont as less a family like hadrosaurs and more an overarching classification. It's like how cows are a type of bovid, and bovids are in the larger overarching group of hooved mammals (ungulates).
I’m a cow fun fact
Faxxx
How would I go about spawning it? Never figured that out
First you need the CMIPlus mod installed. Next activate creator mode via the admin panel in singleplayer. You'll figure it out from there
~~I never figured out how to activate Creator Mode on SP
I've tried ~~
Scroll to the very bottom, there's a check box there
No Edmontosaurus, looks like they aren’t iguanodontians
Size obtained, Thala for reference as well lol
Does anyone know what the name Dipnorhynchus means cause I'm struggling to find the etymology on Google
Nvm I found it
I Iguanadon’t want to get into this
sooooo what is species is siats???
meekorum
no like what species does it belong to?
meekorum
is it a carcharodontosaurid :V
Depending on who you ask it’s either related to the carcharodontosaurs or megaraptorans. Nobody really knows which right now. I put them just outside of carchaeodontosauridae personally to save myself the headache.
Rex Need more demage
Wrong channel, bud
no he‘s saying that‘s why they died
huh, why hypsi don't counting as ? lemme check the phylogenetic on ornithopods
Peak paleoart
i think its highly accurate personally
the elephant might be a bit off
Undersized human
S A U R O P O D S I Z E D P A C H Y
As it should be.
Matt's gonna snap one day and he's gonna make pachy the size of bars and make it oneshot everything
The pachy is huge
outdated reconstruction never ended last. this is pure nostalgia
Here’s a screenshot of my original comment because even though there’s absolutely nothing even remotely needing to be got by the bot it decided to say it had content blocked by the server
Alderon are Jurassic simps fr 
The finger part gets autobotted, if you dont get why youre pure, the censor tho does suck a lot
Nah in my Alderon head canon Matt deleted it to silence anti Jurassic world sentiment
only valid explanation
Wuh
"Siats" is the genus name, it is a rank above species in taxonomy. The species name of the animal you are referring to is Meekerorum.
Genus: Siats
Species: meekerorum
This can also be written as S. meekerorum.
Many dinosaur genera only have one species assigned to the genus, because the lack of material makes it quasi impossible to differentiate species. The more we know about a dinosaur genus, it's more likely there are multiple species listed under the genus.
Yoooo sauria episode two is out :0
It is indeed, can't wait to watch it (:<
holy cow is freaking amazing (no spoilers ofc)
Glad u like it!
i fixed it (here is dromaeosaurus for example)
also, i forgot what siats are. megaraptora or carcharodontosauridae
^
wait no. siats are different neither to carcharodontosauridae and megaraptora
the pachy way off
How would you rate the paleoaccuracy of my Ilokelesia? Please give reasonings, too.
Idk specific to the animal but all the scales shouldn’t be the same, also the ankle bone doesn’t really give off a convincing joint on the left leg, it’s really fluid
The feet also seem a bit small and the tail might be too thick
I think the tail is fine but agreed with the rest
I suggest referencing Scott's Hartman aucasaurus or Alexander's Viavenator
I based my ilokelesia off of majungasaurus slightly
Oh well most of the points would still apply then, I guess not the tail tho
I tried to give it a thicker tail, to make it feel like it actually is alive
Imo the legs need the most work
Also applying different scales would really improve it imo, especially for accuracy
Would you class the Jurassic Park velociraptor as a Utahraptor or as the new raptor in the game the one whose name I can’t remember how to spell
I'd just call them Deinonychus which is what they were in the book
^ Utahraptor and Achillobator weren't even public when Jurassic Park released, let alone during its production
Yeah in the novel canon “deinonychus” is a species name under genus velociraptor
Even worse when jurassic world upscaled it to Utah raptor size
Isn't achillobator Utah made in China?
mongolia
Out of curiosity how (comically👀) fast would y’all say shunosaurus was?
Not fast
My mouth is broken now thanks alot

how accurately sized is the ingame dunk?
I swear someone said (Iirc one of the PT heads?) that the in-game human is not a reliable thingy
I mean it's not in general. That human model is not in scale with the environment.
The mannequin’s 1.83m. PT definitely wouldn’t have said that it’s not reliable.
I stg, someone said I shouldn't have scaled the Thala with the human????? Am I insane??? 
I apologize Naut, I swear I remember it being said in the PT discord, but
ugh
not accurate like most thing in POT
I mean eh? The Dunk could be bigger but it's not badly sized at all.
It's a bebe
chineses dinosaur are soo freaking cool and badass at same time they are look
what do you mean?
btw, after checking the holotype carch drawing, i think the tooth shape is not drawing correctly, since there is no single tooth at kem kem bed look like that
and what do you think of this?
I dunno why anyone would say that when we have the exact size of the person
That is a mod
what clade
maybe an allosauroid maybe a coelurosaur
what is a good tetanurae skeletal for a non avian theropod
I feel like you don't know what you just asked, because that's super broad
would this be a good skeletal for a non avian tetanurae
Isn’t tetanurae basically just like every other theropod ever
This is a good skeletal for a non-avian tetanurae. Pretty much most theropod skeletals you've seen are tetanurae I would reckon
Tetanurae is a clade that includes a lot
ight thanks
Anyone else think that PoT Stego looks really weird? Mainly the dorsal plate’s look really strange, like they made body pretty good but then kinda goofed up on the dorsal plates, the shapes are fine (except for the def subspecies) but just the placements, shouldn’t there be some sort of skin membrane to make it look like it’s actually apart of the Dinosaur?
Yeah. Which is odd because kentro's plates look fine in this regard
Stegosaurus's general shape/model is wrong, although it's not totally their fault. At the time of its creation it was alright enough.
Stegosaurus is now known to be significantly more square and robust.
It looks really weird seeing steg’s body, is it suppose to look so compressed like someone squished it from tail to head and it’s just that
It's just that lol. Stegosaurus had longer bodies when young and got much more robust and squat with age. The stegosaurus individual known as "Sophie" is very well preserved and thus has been the main basis for stego for a while, but Sophie was also a young animal.
I hope my spiky boy gets a tlc,
YDAW did a good video on it
Nuh uh
fym nuh uh 😭!!!!
I don't expect a full blown tlc since it kinda already had one (and personally, I don't think it should bc more compact = less range to work with)
but they didn't touch the plates last time. I'd like it if the plates got updated and actually attached to the body. Because it's accurate! and it looks better
how much did archelon weigh?
lots
bout 2-3 tons
I present a Bayesian phylogenetic predictive modelling (PPM) framework that allows the prediction of muscle parameters (physiological cross-sectional area, APhys) in extinct archosaurs from skull width (WSk) and phylogeny. This approach is robust to phylogenetic uncertainty and highly versatile given its ability to base predictions on simple, re...
also found the 2nd half of the image I posted in #modding
I converted the main values to kg and put some modern animals on there for reference
awesome
w/ some slight rounding and variation cause bite forces are messy like that anyway
we live in an ecosystem
It's just to make it simple. The study's still there for direct values.
iirc the cera skull used in sakamoto also isn't particularly large
its something like 10kN+ scaling to the largest skull
welcome to mamenchisauridae, we have
-omeisaurus tianfuensis
-omeisaurus tianfuensis but tiny
-omeisaurus tianfuensis but with even less tail
-omeisaurus tianfuensis but with normal neck proportions
-omeisaurus tianfuensis with short arms
-omeisaurus tianfuensis with even shorter arms
You could even say oh my
The casual racism against Omeisaurus here is astounding 
Failed to consider the possibility of them having uncharacteristically long back legs and short front legs 💀 sauropod stegosaurus if you will 💀
Is there anything new on Tyrannosaurus Mcraensis? if thats how you spell it
The most incredible clade I’ve ever laid eyes on
Shuddup eeg head
erm eeg head is a very offenvise term, there young man!!!!
Wart der frick...that's not based...
I just want a new Utah Skeletal...
too bad, you'll never get one.
^ Trug
Utahraptor is mid anyways, Achillobator is better anyways!!!
Ngl I thought I'd heard much higher estimates for Gorillaa
What would be the best way to generalize like marine reptiles, pterosaurs, and dinosaurs?
What do you mean exactly?
Like what? Archosaurs in general?( I think I’m using my brain right)
"mesozoic reptiles" sums it up
Basically ^
If you're looking for more technical, pterosaurs and dinosaurs are easy: Ornithodirans (Pterosaurs + Dinosaurs). But marine reptiles are already a generalized group. Most of them aren't that related to each other and are put together due to the fact they live in salty liquid.
What non dinosaur and pterosaur lineages are in Avemetatarsalia out of curiosity?
The main other thing seems to be Aphanosaurs, which I've never heard of until just now.
One species here: Teleocrator.
Ah they look like silesaurs somewhat more generic cousins 
Or like a very small prosauropod
lizard
Hmmm, he's a danger noodle but not a danger noodle at the same time
Who wins: (territorial) ajnabia vs Tyrannosaurus rex “copium”
Cope rex to godzilla lvl, easy wash
Does anyone have a skeletal or just photos of anything regarding Microsuchus? I just learned about it and there's like, barely anything from what I'm seeing
What’s the current size estimate for Megalosaurus as of now?
doesn't exist
Around 8 meters or so?
11m
Ah a few meters short on what I thought
what Megalosaurus gets that huge ??
Yes
that was not what i asked lol
The holotype is 9 meters and 2.5 tons or so, but there’s a femur from another individual that is that large
i see i see
So Megalosaurus and Torvosaurus are the largest theropods from Europe, right?
T. gurneyi is the largest theropod dinosaur on europe. if i was wrong abt that
Hey, in the context of dinosaur names, is the suffix ‘Venator’ pronounced as ‘Ve-NAY-ter’ or ‘Ve-NA-tor’ because I hear it both ways a lot
Yes. Torvo is slightly bigger but not by too much.
Well the actual word venator is pronounced "ve-NA-tor"
If it changes once it becomes part of a name I'm not entirely sure. Like you, I've heard both, and it might just depend on what sounds better to the person making the name.
What about Wiehenvenator?
Wiehenvenator is about megalo's size I think? Maybe a tad smaller.
The subadult is 8,5-9m iirc
There’s also that giant premaxilla from iirc France
it's about 3t
how big neovenator is and i heard there's like species of spinosauridae like randomly been discovered
Neovenator is about 8 meters long and 1.5 tons (ish). "Neovenatoridae" as a concept is very poor, and it's more fit to describe Neovenator, Siats, and Chilantaisaurus, three species which might not be that related to each other but they all share the trait of being fundamentally finnicy in what they're related to.
Neovenator is firmly related to carcharodontosaurs, although whether it's one directly or just related is a matter of debate, while Siats and Chilantai constantly juggle between being in that same boat or being megaraptorans.
I personally put the three of them as just outside of Carcharodontosauridae to save me the headache. You WILL lose if you try to find the objectively best answer.
Megalosaurus of 11 meters is not correct at all.
I agree with “Ve-NAY-tor”
Can't seem to find anything that claims Megalosaurus was 11 meters, plenty of stuff saying it was 9 meters or less. The thought of an 11 meter megalosaur is awesome though.
The holotype is the more heavily promoted size, but there is a femur also attributed to megalosaurus that is significantly larger, and is where this largest specimen comes from.
It's called the Parker Collection Femur.
Ah, so its not 100% confirmed but it is possible that they could get to that size.
Basically. Although I don't see why it would get discreddited when there's whole taxa that are determined from far worse remains.
There are torvos with 1100mm femora that are barely over 10m, megalos are basically based on torvos because there are more complete, thus the proportions should be those of torvos, 1070mm for a 11.3 m looks too elongated and short legged
Also that femora doesn't belong to the same species of M. bucklandii.
That is true, given the whole debate that happened with Cope Rex it can be debated exactly how big it is. I also never said it was bucklandii specifically.
Furthermore the femur isnt even complete, it is estimated at 1070mm.
I mean, a particularly large individual is not out of the question. Yk, genetics can be very wacky sometimes
Yeah, could be like what Saurophaganax was thought to be before a bunch of remains were found.
So I know that Sue has a really wide chest but I heard that Scotty isn’t as wide and is more slim?
Scotty is the porportionally more stocky one tmk. Although they're basically the same size regardless.
Btw guys, I wanna ask for some advice. You see, i've always loved dinosaurs and prehistoric animals, since I was a kid. But I don't have a very in-depth knowledge about paleontology. Any recommendations on books to read about? Some introductory ones, and then heavier books
"Wierd Dinosaurs" by John Pickrell is a highlight for me. It goes over alot of the popular recent discoveries/topics and the people/stories that founded it. Deinocheirus, Regaliceratops, Prince Creek, the Hatzeg dinosaurs, Chapter 1 is Spinosaurus etc.
May I say, actually there are a bunch of giant allosaurid individuals, between allosaurus and saurophaganas there are like 15 individuals over 10m.
They gave Regaliceratops a keratin face and it makes it look lame somehow 💀
it looks pretty cool to me 👁️
i will never not believe that regaliceratops evolved for the sole purpose of mocking the recently defunct centrosaurines
Kinda agree
you still persistent on that 60 ton edmont existing?
considering hadrosaurs evolved to replace the niche left vacant by sauropods i'd say its more of an inevitability
60 tons is ridiculous and completely out of the question
well that's awfully reductive
how do you think an edmont could be 6x bigger than a rex
i require a scientific explanation on how that makes any sense whatsoever
after a certain size they'd probably be able to eat some smaller rexes for calcium supplementation
which would then fuel them to grow even larger
positive feedback loop kinda thing
in turn you are saying hadrosaurs could live hundreds of years? because after a certain point in growth, growth slows down Severely
It’s partially covering the frill horn plate lookin dudes

hadrosaurs could've had indeterminate growth
Tf did you do to that image, jesus 😭
I got the first image I saw and it ended up being that 💀 thought it was the good version at first
here
so what you are saying is hadrosaurs grow like lobsters
some hadrosaurs ate crabs so its implausible that they digested they're growth systems as well
like how flamingos turn pink from krill
the only problem would be it would die of old age before it even got to a third of that size
but hadrosaurs grow fast
Would they be able to consume enough food to grow that rapidly at an older age though?
no they wouldnt
plants were bigger in the jurassic period because of higher co2 levels so there was no shortage of plants
are you able to confirm this with an article
Lol
hadrosaur carcinization real?
no they are delusional and think edmonts could reach over 60 tons
its not delusional its a difference of opinion
you're getting trolled lol
Tbh I gotta agree with them, they've raised valid points
theres a fine line between delusional and theory this is delusional
y'know they put galileo in prison
They laughed at every genius in history...
This is probably random but I know a word that can trigger most paleonerds
Phytodinosauria is a valid clade
no it aint
Gonna be honest, never heard of that so
I think 60 tons is a far stretch however I think with time and ofc no k/t extinction hadrosaurs had the room to become larger, just look at shantungosaurus, and edmontosaurus most certainly would’ve had the reason to get larger, such as predators like tyrannosaurus
^ this. so much this.
maybe maximum of 20-23 tons
largest rex is nearly like 3x larger than zhucheng so you'd expect edmonto to grow to like 3x larger than shant
ergo like 60t
that makes 0 sense
argument from incredulity
I mean the real question there though is did shantungosaurus evolve it’s size to combat predation from zhuchengtyrannus
- they had the ability to chew which means they can break down food better in the mouth so their stomach does less work + their intestines can absorb more nutrients
Also consider sauropods did not have chewing and they grew to gigantic sizes so think about hadrosaurs...
Are megaraptorans in tyrannosauroidea or neovenatoridae and were dromaeosaurs pack hunters

