#paleontology
1 messages · Page 85 of 1
Dinosaurs really. And tbh, idk. Let me read a bit
the only thing ive found on utah lacrimal crests is that they were from gastonia and not utah
As I said… SO MANY TIMES
They are not crests. It’s just the shape of the skull mixed with frontal perspective
Actually just bc it was bone inside the eye
Any of yall know a spinosaurid tooth that was founded in Malaysia?
shouldent it be connected to the 'eyebrows' like this?
It was founded in 2012 and is the first dinosaur fossil to be founded in the country.
siamosaurus
Eh fine. Going that route
Booooooooooooo. It’s bottom teeth should be under the lipssssss
Ahh so it's habitat is in about the same area
Don't use these. Better to stick to hartman's skeletal. You're better off not having the bump, which if there even was one I would say you don't illustrate it well. You make it as if it is a lacrimal crest rather than a lil bump
Hence why everyone is mistaking it for a crest
might be icthyovenator, theres lots of stuff on invalid tooth specimen spinosaurs from asia iirc
Tooth in general honestly
But I guess spinosaurs have more distincted toth compared to other family
I made the Utah look forward, hence it looks like that
It wouldn't have this either. Soft tissue exists but with utahraptor in particular they suddenly think it has this wierd cleft jaw. Like no.
The fact that the first dino fossil founded in my country was younger then me is flabbergasting
was gonna point that out but i couldent tell if they were meaning that image as a bad example or a good one
Nevertheless, what raptor has bumps like that? Again, better off sticking to Hartman's skeletal, wherein there aren't bumps on it
I wonder what evidence or support that let them to think the Utahraptor have a goofy mouth
They are in feet. I did see where my math was flubbing up because I thought baby trex and baby allos might've been the same weight when they start out. Trex hatchlings were found to be within 50-100 lbs...But either way, its cool to see the growth spurts, even if the math is a bit overreaching.

Better?
Mucho!
Any thicker or?
I never knew what this thing is supposed to be
What "documentary" is this from again?
dinosaur revolution
Dinosaur Revolution
gottem
There we go
Corny ass name they have back in the day
Oh, and the sclerotic ring would not be visible is the last thing, assuming that's what that is
No. Eyelids
Aight, all is well then
Why exactly do reptiles need sclerotic rings?
Good, good
That’s were the muscles attach to for eye movement
so they no go jelly.
And maintains the size and shape of said eyes
But why is it only exclusive to reptilians/birds?
It's not, fish and amphibians have them
sclera.
Trex was able to get up to 15000lbs, while Allos only got up to 4tons. I'll probably go back and do some more research on them!
I think you have to add another 4 tons to that chart
But why they need extra supports for they're eyes?
so they dont turn into jelly
No allosaurua species got over 4 tons, but saurophaganax did, and it possibly reached up to 8. Rex was far above 6 tons, its maximum is 11.4 and its average is 8-9 tons
If you’re somewhat liberal with your definition of allosaurus you can pretty handily get it over 4t
Gotchya ok! Can I ask where you're getting that info? I'm trying to find it but everytime I look up information it comes up with the numbers I already have.
Mostly the papers Wikipedia cites off of. I know most people don't trust them, but its all information that experts publish thats just collected and put into it. And some times I use other websites like dan folkes, for his giga and rex estimates
The largest definite allosaurus is the 9 meter 2.7 ton AMNH 680. Everything bigger than that is either Saurophagonax or in some wierd middle ground between the two which we currently don't understand. It also doesn't help that said specimen itself is immature, but there's also specimens smaller than it that're more mature so 🤷♂️
Who tf knows
Saurophaganax are large allosarus specimens 🤓
Ah I see...I get mine off of Google scholar and there's not any information to go off. Either way, I think the information (what little I did get) was interesting and I'll keep digging to see what else I can find.
Not much of any**
i need to ask allosaurus' strongest soldier more about this sometime
Google scholar is fine, but usually its just related stuff, or things that mention the animal not actual studies about it.
imo the best paleo source is word of mouth of randos on discord
LOLOL
I'm gonna stick to google scholar for now, since I can trust the papers there to at least to be credible sources. I'm headed to the library in a few days so I'll just grab some books if I can find any on the subject.
@errant iron I literally replied to your message with it
Baby Gronk rizzed up lizzy dunne while mewing
Real
anyone know any asian pterosaurs?
Moganopterus is cool
Dsungaripterus Is nice
Asiansauripterus
shoutout to this thing
Pterodaustro isn't asain but cool
My son skrinkle with every single disease
Were there ever any amphibians with some degree of scaling? Scales seems to be present in almost every animal group from what I've seen
I know a lot about this!
Basically, some Temnospondyls still had fish like scales that grew under the skin. This includes Prionosuchus and that whole group.
Reptile scales evolved well after Amphibians had fully lost their scales. Some scales in Temnospondyls even adapted into solid osteoderm plates covering the belly, such as with the Archegosaurs
It was only a relic of their transitional state. Most opted to loss their scales to allow better subcutaneous breathing
Huh, neat
Mongol Giant 
What was the largest theropod from Australia?
Yes! (The only large one described is Australovenator)
prolly those big jurassic footprints
Footprints
I will turn you into a Missing 411 case
Ah so footprints are only good when it’s convenient I see (insert shrimply emoji that doesn’t exist here)


I'm likely gonna get SCREAMED at by some of you but I'm currently redoing a concept drawing and I'm trying to get at least a LITTLE accurate to the raptor's footing, any tips are very much appreciated, the only thing I know rn is that the wings are too big (i think) and the fact that their body structure is inaccurate but those are easy fixes, however, I always have trouble with the legs.
Just asking this because I’m confused; would 10 tons really be a “generalization of the species” for tyrannosaurus? If the skeletal reference used in this chart is Scottie (I think?) because PoT’s rex is based on Scottie I’d understand, but the blurb at the bottom says all the sizes are generalizations.
Or rex really is 10 tons on average??
average rex is like 7-8t prolly leaning on the upper end of that
Ok that’s what I thought
Reposting this as I don't think anyone saw it last time. I would like others opinions on it.
https://dinosaursandbarbarians.com/2020/04/06/ceratosaurus-osteoderms-a-revised-perspective/
They’re generalizations in the sense that I didn’t go for 12.3 meters and 9700 kg for trex for example
I intentionally simplify things. It’s not averages. It’s general max sizes because that’s the best thing to do when you’re you’re comparing animals with sample sizes ranging from 1 to over 100
Based PoT
It's funny watching people wanting to wreak havoc due to a video game
I uh...don't recall if I had pinged you in the channel initially, so if I didn't, so sorry
#386660586341138438 message but here
Does being a paleo researcher requires good art skills considering you have to make renditions and drawings of said interpretations of a creauture?
Not necessarily, some people just aren't too artistically gifted, I think they're fine long as they can describe or at least understand the most accurate interpretations of a (well understood) prehistoric creature
Hello everyone! Is it true any dinosaur has the ability to break bones?
There big
Scary
And strong
So...yes?
I mean,if you mean things like chicken bones,then a house cat can do that. Sooooo...
Is this true?
I mean I wouldn’t count on a sparrow breaking much of anything’s bones
Yeah… I only said Tyrannosaurs bc they were more built for it
Sure any huge theropod could do it, but tyrannosaurs evolved to break them by bite
I see. So that size of tyrannosaurus is based on a generalization of a few of the largest adult rex specimens instead of every adult rex ever, in an effort to avoid comparing the entire tyrannosaurus fossil record with some barsboldia back vertebrae from one single specimen (for example).
Correct?
Yeah another thing: only bites. No rams
There's alot of dinosaurs
90% of theropods can break bones mostly bcz that's kinda there whole thing? (Yes yes,I know creatures like the giganotosaurus have teeth that specialises more on slicing then crushing.)
The conversation revolved around bone- crunching bites
What kind of bones bcz as you know,diffrent creatures have diffrent durability to there bones
I argued only tyrannosaurids had that capability
I guess: the bones of any other huge Dino?
Any Dinos can break bone is such a vague and generalized statement its essentially meaningless
It counts only bites
I pretty sure tyranosaurids aren't the only group of predatory dinosaurs that can crush bones with bite force. It's a very regular method of taking down a prey even modern day animals is capable of it (on creatures relative to they're size I meant).
Most large theropods could definitely bite through bone but most dinosaurs aren’t large theropods
Wouldn’t really imagine a Giganotosaurus breaking the bones of another large creature like another Giga
To kill an animal, only damage the vital arteries in the neck. No?
There are several animals even I can break the bones of with the caveat said animals are multiple times smaller than me
Because cretaceous Argentina houses some of the most comically large creatures that evolving to a hunting method that focused more on tearing flesh for meals is much more effective
Yeah but even if a theropods intention isn’t to break bones it doesn’t mean that it just won’t
Well true. Size does matter, so won’t be counting large theropods against small dinosaurs. Bc it’s obvious
I mean large creatures against large creatures.
Yeah
These are still predators that weighs tons.
Not to be rude but asking whether or not they can break bones is just kinda...redundant?
What’s considered large
It’s confusing isn’t it
Not really
Idk. Several tons? Like at least 5 tons?
The mighty Ceratosaurus…bone-crushing hyena of the Morrison……
I mean yeah, totally agree. Any creature can break bones of others. But of ones around its weight class
Like a Rex against a Trike. A Giga against… another Giga lol
Probably?
i would like to wish all everyone a very ceratosaurus has a 10kN+ bite force
Idk I’m sure a giga could break another giga’s arm if it bit it
Definitely. But I mean… they r very small
I mean the Giga isn't as dense as a rex (as most theropods are)
Idk if this is outdated but here you go
What are you asking homie?
are these the most of the “main” birds that lived in hell creek
pretty sure almost all large theropods would have effectively the same density
unless you're a spinosaurid or something
I say really only the Tyrannosaurids have that ability to break really any bone in another large animal? (Ignoring each other’s arms)
Frail looking ass
i bet a giga could break another's giga's ribs
I mean… T.REX CAN BREAK THE HORNS OF A TRIKE
What about their ribs?? Tip of tail? Lower jaw?
No?
I pretty anything that's build to kill most of the time have the function to break bones
if only this question had some actual qualifications and constraints
Right
I APOLOGIZE. THE CONTEXT IS FEW
Rex just build like that
It has been estimated to have the strongest bite force EVER
me when 140kN rex bite force because "extrapolated dynamics"
you could prolly try asking the other guy for more clarification on what they're saying considering that seems to be the root of the ambiguity
if anything's missing good chance it's here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleobiota_of_the_Hell_Creek_Formation#Eumaniraptorans
This is an overview of the fossil flora and fauna of the Maastrichtian-Danian Hell Creek Formation.
I think bro really just asked "is tyranosaurid the only dino that can break bones of they're equivalent size?"
I dont think we need much debate on that
we should totally drag lance into pot that'd be a great idea
I've tried, he ripped my arm off and I had to wait a couple weeks for it to regrow
Also
I got a question
If panthera is a family in the taxonomy order,and thing like lions,tigers etc are considered genus,then why do most people still calls them "species"?
Panthera is a genus, lions and tigers are species within that genus
And the family is felidae
???
For some reason I feel like modern life is much more simpler to study then prehistoric one's
Not cuz they're still alive though that is one of the reasons,but because things are much more generalised and not so painfully specific
The family would be felidae
Thanks blub 👍
That too
Yw long my good pal and chum 👍
Like if dinosaur were to live in the modern time,would people really categorised them for the slightest diffrence?
It definitely is lmao
They already do
But they would 100% classify them via genetics
Until you get to inverts
Nah, that's more a result of simplification for the general culture
Ye. If dinosaurs lived in the modern time, we'd have more at our disposal to classify them.
Not because life is any less complex or anything, but because genetics are much easier to study on things that didn’t die millions of years ago
t. regina lives....
Allas...
We have not but rocks to work with
Woah...............
Extant classification has more metrics but it's still some sort of mess because it remains extremely subjective. Tho it honestly is the case of overall cladistic a d phylogenies.
There are various definitions for a specie and you cannot apply only one and think that it will automatically work as actual living world does not fit our mindsets.
wow i sure hope we have a handle on red wolves after all we have genetics and stuff at our disposal right guys plz
True that
The question with genetic is then that how much differences you will insert and actually use to consider 2 organisms/groups as separated species.
Wait, lemme...
You also have to use morphological differences, ecological, possibly metabolic differences and other physiological metrics if they are different between each geographical populations.
Very true… when is it right to call dogs c. familiarus rather than c. lupus?
There are sure some cases where it is easier than others, but between closely related animals it can be hard.
for these reasons and many more it is far simpler to treat every individual catalogued specimen as a separate independent taxonomic unit 
I said this once, supposedly it's like this in most of the cases now, i'm not sure
That's honestly what it is done when you go into phylogeny analysis with extant animals. Then you subjectively say that this group is a single species based on differences on various levels.
One of the things that make a species is being a reprodutively isolated population (well, the main one)
Meaning?
Meaning they only do each other successfully
Basically
So then is it right that red wolves and coyotes are classified as different species even though they can breed so well that coyotes are helping to breed red wolves out of existence?
That unfortunately does not always work. For example, blue whales are known to have very much genetic material in common with other balaenopterids due to hybridization with them. That's the case of the flue (blue + fin whale) which also is capable of viable reproduction. It can also breed again with blue whales.
That's more straightforward then I thought.
But it’s not
Nature doesn’t care about classifications of different species, it’s humans that do that, and that’s where problems arise
If the product of said breeding is infertile then it's a hybrid, meaning they are different species
Unfortunately it does not always work like that.
Because on top of reproducing with each other, that reproduction should be of fertile offspring
Its the main factor, there are others ofc, but this one is the biggest one, if this one cant be done, you cant be the same species.
As fin whales are actually some of the most distantly related rorqual to blue whales.
There are fertile hybrids ❔
One of the problems imo is that with modern animals we're also dealing with remnants of old classifications
That is definitely true.
Dolphins also are capable of hybridizing with several species and exchange genetic material via giving viable offspring (dolphin evolution is more so like a web than anything).
Someone needs to give me the lore of how this turns into a whale
Real and true.
As the one species which can destroy the planet the best, I believe we have the right to class the others
It just took a swim once and turned into a whale 🤷♂️
Saw fish and felt nostalgic
Bro over-leveled himself
And if it is fertile?
Gotta give a simple answer :
- fish were plentiful
- some predatory ungulates were taking refuge to aquatic environments and exploited the ressources
- was advantageous for their survival
- random mutations were selected as it gave more advantages
- speciation gets in
- through generations, the offspring differentiated from their parents and were more competent swimmers and aquatic foragers
Mine was much simpler tbh
Yeah but I didn't like it 🗣️🗣️
You ain't technically wrong
Then you get into genetics etc and the scientific community will decide.
Fair enough
its nice this channel has had two consecutive disucssions that both amounted almost entirely to pure semantics
Indeed
We're after all just Internet possessed bums that pretends like we understand science
The reason why the Middle East was kinda the cradle of Whale Evolution was because of the area becoming a desert hellscape early in the Eocene, which forced early whales to take advantage of aquatic food, and a lack of immediate predators in the area
There are tons of videos about cetacean evolution so finding explanations is quite easy.
Was it already desertic?
Though I should have added that there were lacks of aquatic predators and competitors in my resume.
Forgot about it but that's the main reason as for how come some animals adapt to new niches.
Walking with beasts shows ambulocetus filling a crocodile type niche, how likely is this with what we know now?
Just wondering since we’re on the topic of whale evolution
Idk if this happens or has ever happened, but they can also be classified as different, cos someone did call them different and it stuck, no idea, just talking out of my bum.
Yes and no. I doubt ambuleocetus was picky, but tmk it’s now considered a completely aquatic early whale. It couldn’t go on land.
Saw this being debated quite numerous times but afaihbt it's not unlikely. Would have mostly gone for fish and was maybe or not uncapable of land locomotion (also debated).
How am I supposed to sleep well after this?
Ok ok, so probably more likely to pursue fish than ambush prey at the shoreline, but it’s not completely out of the realm of possibility
Platypus, but with teeth
Probably ambush fish, caught turtles and small crocs on the occasion as well as water birds and was yet capable of snatching stuffs near the shoreline.
No wonder they evolved toothbrush in they're mouth it's to cover that atrocity of teeths
I do wonder how strong it's bite force was.
There are no studies about that.
Yet we have a complete skull and can reconstruct the musculature.
(going to sleep have to wake up in 5 hours but wish I could continue to discuss about these subjects. For once this channel is not flooded with dinosaurs or accuracy questions but more so evolution dynamics)
Then with that criteria they should be same species
And there are species that can produce fertile offspring(polar bears and brown bears) but idk how much of that is due to old classifications or if there's a genetic criteria i'm unaware of
Spino split jaw, tell me about it
Please?
Wasn’t real 
Tf does that even mean
It didn’t split. Just got really wide at the back to swallow big stuff
The end didn’t split apart
That’s what I was thinking. But someone says it could split
I have art I think I can find….
Went down the rabbit hole and found an animation
That's mostly a meme
how big was Shastasaurus in weight
are these all the dinosaurs from hell creek, and which ones are invalid or dont belong?
Acheroraptor
Alamosaurus?
Ankylosaurus
Anzu
Avisaurus
Dakotaraptor
Denversaurus
Edmontosaurus
Eoneophron
Leptoceratops
Nanotyrannus
Orcomimus
Ornithomimus
Pachycephalosaurus
Paronychodon
Pectinodon
Platytholus
Richardoestesia
Sphaerotholus
Struthiomimus
Tatankaceratops
Thescelosaurus
Torosaurus
Triceratops
Trierarchuncus
Tyrannosaurus
Dakotaraptor is my favorite Dromaeosaur, oviraptorosaur,turtle,lizard and therizinosaur
(aka it’s very very invalid and silly
)
asked in another server and said dakota was fine, although im not to knowledgeable when it comes to that, can you explain it?
It’s a mess of a chimera with a lot of different animals combined
Tatanka, Nano, and Dakota are all dubious
and alamo?
Pectinodon as well
alamo just isn't found in hell creek proper, there's remains from further south though
it is feasible for some to move further north into the southern parts of hell creek we just haven't found them yet
mamenchisaur empire
why is the indet. so big, what is a mamenchisaur doing that big who let him do that
he's just neck it ain't right I tell you
when a single one of your cervicals is longer than 25% of humanity is tall
33m long Mamenchisaur what
technically i am downsizing it from 35m
good god
waiting for the mythical 30m+ turiasaur to show up and round out the collection
that's a lot of neck
they won't get to 30m, not without breaking their no neck rule, but pretty sure a 26m one is coming
yeah, angeac
that's what I thought
I'm struggling to even visualize a 26m turiasaur that thing is gonna look bizarre
a 26m turiasaur is basically the same size as a 35m mamenchisaur lmao
it's all shed neck
hopefully it gets a good name when it's described
a 26m turiasaur deserves to have a cool sounding name
is there a 105t esimate for Cachalot Whale?
It’s been informally named “Francoposeidon”
Does anyone have any information on prehistoric fossils before paleontology? im talking how did ancient civilizations and tribes interpret fossils they may have found. i know a lot of them believed fossils to be the work of higher beings, but i would love some specific examples. thank you!
Dragons, basically
I know Ammonites were named after their connection to Amon-Ra and resembling their Ram Horns, hence the name "Horn of Amon Ra"
Teeth of prehistoric sharks like megalodon were thought to be the tips of dragon tongues
a few whales and at least one coelodonta skull were thought to be parts of dragons
Iirc there's a tale for the Dilophosaurus holotype(?) where the Native American guides who brought the paleontologists to the site demanded a priestess be there otherwise they wouldn't go. They believed the skeleton to be of a demon + they interpreted (Native Americans as a whole) fossilized dinosaur footprints as coming from giant birds
Is this still usable?

Gonna go out on a limb and say that indeterminate Metriacanthosaurid is Yangchuanosaurus
Tysm for all the answers yall. I’ll take this as a huge stepping stone for some research. Im doing a research paper and need to be super specific with sources and etc
anyone know good weight estimates for elasmosaurus or other similarly sized elasmosaurs?
I feel I've seen 12t estimates for Elasmo
The belly scales are like millimeters wide though.
i am growing increasingly convinced albertosaurus hates living (no using the largest specimen for everything else is not cheating)
That alberto looks, wrong, like its 20% more legs then it should
How long and heavy was Pycnonemosaurus?
about 9m and 3000kg
Fully grown?
no way to really know for certain
just somewhat larger by an indeterminate amount
could be 500kg larger could be 3000kg larger
Albertosaurus, an interesting Tyrannosaurid
Whats the weight and length of the megalania dinosaur
i dont think alberto lived with eotrike
nvm its probably also found in the carbon with eotrike
thats two massive 5 tonne ceratopsids its living with
Explain 
There's not much to elaborate on there, they are millimeters wide meaning at a distance, they're not visible
When up close, they are so incredibly small, it doesn't matter
Wait do we have allo belly scales? If so I wouldn’t have gone off the concavenator snake lookin ones 
I mean, yea, they're still snake-like
But as I said
https://tenor.com/view/rain-sad-man-man-in-rain-gif-23062134 idk why this GIF represents my emotional state because of this news….but it do 
Firstly, it’s not a dinosaur, secondly idk
How large is this particular Albertosaurus 
probably ROM 807, which is one of the larger ones but not the largest
5,5-7m and 500-600kg
And is a lizard, not a dinosaur
Isn't 600kg on the lowest end of upper estimates?
Just went down a rabbit hole on the Early Cretaceous Wessex Formation, probably the most interesting range of dinosaur species I've seen in a Formation. There's some species that are holdouts from the Jurassic (like Neovenator and various Heterodontosaurids), mixed with early members of clades that would go on to dominate in the Late Cretaceous (like a few decently large Dromaeosaurids, an early Tyrannosaur, and an indeterminate Oviraptorosaur) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wessex_Formation#Theropods
The Wessex Formation is a fossil-rich English geological formation that dates from the Berriasian to Barremian stages of the Early Cretaceous. It forms part of the Wealden Group and underlies the younger Vectis Formation and overlies the Durlston Formation. The dominant lithology of this unit is mudstone with some interbedded sandstones. It is p...
Alongside some staples of the Early Cretaceous like a couple Spinosaurids, some basal Ankylosaurs, and a couple Somphospondylan Sauropods
lots of brachiosaurids there as well
and megaraptoran
wait i just realized we have megaraptoran vs carcharodontosaur (which we already had in thailand but that's not the point)
which means tyrannosauroid vs carcharodontosaur
there aren't megaraptorans in wessex though
oh that one
idk if it's wessex though
for a tiny island, the isle of wight has like 8 different mesozoic formations in it
the svp abstract seems to imply wessex
which is nice because imo wessex is the funniest option
granted that's largely because i don't care about what's in the upper greenland formation
Did kaprosuchus actually stand like a dog rather than slouched like a caiman? I keep hearing about it and I was curious.
No, its legs were not found and its close relatives have a croc-like posture
There are mesozoic ''crocs'' with upright postures though, like Baurusuchus
Love the insane diversity of theropods in Early Cretaceous Europe.
Most likely was just a more terrestrial version of the Cuban Croc, with nastier teeth. Physically it probably looked almost identical to the Cuban Croc, minus the teeth.
They weren't closely related, just Crocodiles keep evolving into the same 5 animals over and over again.
based this postcrania
And all vertebrates are fish
How big was Penza Mosasaurus?
Whatever incinerox said it was
12.2 
I'm sorry it implies what?
As a wes, I assure you it's not
be hypacrosaurus
cmn 8501 has a 71cm skull and 1.074m femur
fit 1.074m femur into gsp skeletal
under 8m
apparently thing is supposed to be over 8m
find 83cm skull
oh
does a tylosaurus at 22t exist?
no
how big is db giga?
It is 13.6m in length
Like Salomon mentioned Kaprosuchus based on what we know of it was definitely similar to Cuban Croc, it was not as tall and lanky as popular media shows
Is there any evidence of other horned Gorgonopsids/near gorgonopsids? Outside of this family and Anteo
Biarmosuchians
Could've sworn there were a few more? But i am not entirely sure if you'd call bumps horns. What constitutes horns in your book?
Hm thats a fair point, I am using Horn a bit loosely here
Just overall large protrusions from the skull
I wish my university had a whale skeleton just displayed on campus
@vernal fable This is the holotype for Spinosaurus (Picture and then illustration)
Looks pretty damn complete 😏
Vs the neotype (in blue)
Which yes, isn't as much as many people think as "complete", but for Spinosaurus (and spinosaurs in general), it's pretty decent. It also covers every major section of the body so we can be more confident in reconstructions now.
Ooohhh. So indeed overtime we have been getting closer
👍 We 100% have! Legit the only thing you could argue changing significantly would be arms and back of the skull, but both are not as horribly drastic as the other changes (unless you believe the arms are the key in locomotion for Spinosaurus, fun fact: they aren't)
congratulations to 2/3 of the giant spinosaurus elements for not overlapping whatseover with holotype and neotype of questionable neotypiness
we should all strive to leave notes as detailed as stromer
he's so real for this
I refuse to participate in the abuse of coining new genus and species names on the basis of such isolated and totally incomplete remains, which then, due to the, for palaeontology completely inadequate, priority rules of nomenclature and their senseless pedantic application, will have to be used for further nomenclatorial acts.
Thank chu for letting me know some more information about it! I'll keep this in mind ❤️
Bro was ahead of his time
Stromer is an actual legendary leader and I repsect him greatly
we need more stromers in this field
^
Clone stromer
"now let's see how much of this is unanimously agreed to be spinosaurus sensu stricto"
This is a Stromer quote?
yes
Ahead of his time…. The hero we need but not the one we deserve….
i'm torn between if if i should average out the skull bone measurements rather than scale with skull length alone because 1.25m hypacrosaurus femur is really funny
Yeah...
hey @stiff osprey may I ask for mass can I still use your 2016 mosasaur size chart
wait nvm there's a 1.2m stebingeri femur apparently
Those silhouettes, I’d probably update em
I was just wondering is 12t mosa or 14t tylo was okay for a mass
My chart's mosasaurs are undersized, except Bruce which is oversized
Mosasaurus should weigh what, 9, 10 tons at Penza size
so Mosasaurus would be 9-10 using Penza size and Tylosaurus would be 5.2t?
15.9t?
Yes
so for Tylosaurus terms of mass how big do you think it would've resonably gotten if 21t Tylo is out of the picture?
Random should have all the answers, idk if the big paleo have made any Tylosaurus gdis
ah
just wondering as regardless of my usage of this information outside of thsi server I still wish to be informed as much as possible
If I had to guess, less than 15 tonnes for the big Tylosaurus species 
Pretty broad as well, preferably I guess hovering closer to 10 tonnes
The neotype is not neotyping
if you include the 4m skull i just made up it was probably at least 12 tons
Can't wait to find a complete egyptian specimen to show us that the current spinosaurus is the biggest most fraudulent composite known to mankind
Well, second one after pre-Sophie stegosaurus
Wow how insightful thanks 🙏 ☺️
corythosaurus is a really stupid animal
sweet hypacrosaurus altispinus grows 1000kg larger if i only scale with the (two) specimens i can find a femur and skull length for and choose to ignore any stebingeri specimens
Rapid color changes in marlins may prevent the predators from impaling one another during group attacks.
Learn more: https://scim.ag/60c
💖 2.13K 🔁 654
Just to be clear, Anomodonts (such as Tiarajudens, Suminia, Lisowicia and other Dicynodonts) are more closely related to Gorgonopsids than Biarmosuchians are.
I'm aware, that's why I corrected my language. More basing it on appearance
There is a fair range of diversity in Gorgonopsid interpretations, from shrink-wrapped reptilian things to chunky mammal analogues
Some of them did have some significant ridges on their skull though I guess
tyrannosaur mammal
That would be Anteosaurus.
Rubidgeans had less of pronounced ridges and more of just a really huge skull
Indeed, but it is the most you are probably gonna get
Is this real?
yes
Dodo is beautiful 
That first one looks freakin HUMAN 
bahariasaurus exists right?
Yes although we don't know much more than that
its a carcharodontosaur right?
im seeing lots of things with it relating to deltadromeus
It was considered to be potentially the largest known theropod. This specimen was destroyed in an air raid during World War II on the night of 23/24 April 1944.
The questionable remains of Bahariasaurus from the Farak Formation of Niger, which consist of a proximal caudal centrum (65 mm), two mid caudal centra and three mid caudal centra (from different individuals) were discovered some time later during the 20th century and described by de Lapparent in 1960.[1][7] It is possible that these remains may have belonged to another unrelated theropod.
Any more specific answer is basically impossible right now
right so ill choose smth else, thanks for the info
Are paleontology and paleozoology the same thing?
https://dinoanimals.com/dinosaurs/the-heaviest-ornithopods-top-10/
https://dinoanimals.com/dinosaurdatabase/barsboldia-sicinskii/
Bars at the very least was as large as the largest elephants and several websites put them up to 12 tons.
Reading through Wiki, they seem to be (or at the very least, paleozoology is a branch of paleontology)
I think it's just fossil analysis
thank you dino animals dot com
And abc news
after intense deliberation of giving up on trying to find actual measurements for two specimens i have concluded that calling tenontosaurus tilletti "rhino-sized" is actually pretty reasonable when you ignore white and indian rhinos
So, you ignore the rhinos people actually care about?
yes
Wait, I forgot that there are black rhinos, you are ignoring 2/3 of the important rhinos
And not count the smaller tenontos
tbf i'm not sure how large smaller black rhinos are
800-1400 kg, the biggest males almost 3 tons.
if you ignore the obnoxiously big ones they overlap pretty well give or take one or two hundred kilos
if you ignore adult elephants it is pretty reasonable to consider albertosaurus elephant sized
granted unless estes 1992 is lying to everyone i think that comprises adults
saying that i'm not actually sure what they consider adults
this is what i get for tiptoeing around mammal size estimates isn't it
how about i rephrase it as "skeletally mature tenontosaurus tilletti are broadly congruent in size with the usually cited mass for typical adult black rhinos"
Whats this
ngl wikipedia is ass at phrasing things
however unusually large male specimens have been reported at up to 2,896 kg (6,385 lb).
man
i like how wikipedia completely neglects to mention the 2800kg cows
Would spinosaurus have lips like other theropods or would it have a crocodile snout? Very curious 🧐
lips
Toothy
Well here we go. If you follow me on social media you’ve seen this teased, but I’m putting lips on all my non-beaked non-avian theropod skeletal reconstructions. So much for burying the lede, eh? Ah, but some of you may be wondering why I think they had lips? And what anatomical features I’m
Paleontologist can say whatever, the only way Ill accept lipped spino is if they clone it back to life to verify.
The Hartman post isn’t about Spinosaurs
spinosaurids can go either way unlike every other theropod where lips is the right answer
They had no oral tissue at all, just bare musculature and bone
Is this a auriculatus tooth
wouldent say so, seems to curved and not enough pronounced serations
Then what could it be
do you know where its from/collected from?
North Carolina
how does one specimen weigh the exact same in kg as another does in lbs... curious
hmm today i will mention black rhinos as a metric to compare tenontosaurus to
decades-spanning rhinoceros mass conspiracy
the depths i will sink to in order to remain correct
with this in mind i'm reinstating my black rhino comparison
Why is Tenontosaurus so fat
because for some reason people assume paul always uses large specimens for things even though he literally has a 4t magnapualia
y'know there's something really funny to be found in one guy accidentally doubling the mass of a population of rhinos because they swapped lb and kg and subsequently ruining black rhinoceros mass in literature
animal sizes always will amuse me because theres no standardized method to weighing any animal which has led to some bonkers stuff(see: large reptiles)
The mass…. It’s always been a lie…
The real question is; Would a black rhino do well against a pack of Deinonychus?
According to a bunch of outdated/inaccurate art I saw at a museum once so it must be correct, Tenontosaurus gets bodied by them.
deinonychus dies immediately because of the rhino's mammalian cunning
wait so did we just like kill 2t+ black rhinos as a concept
Yes
هلا
The true titans of Perissodactyla
do i get a cookie for this i think i deserve a cookie or something
You’ll have to purchase it yourself unfortunately
Mfw human-influenced breeding and a domesticated, nutrient-rich lifestyle has caused a species of large, but not massive Perissodactyls, become some of the largest land animals on the planet
you get a cookie(it has raisins in it)
worthless
should spread the word to mammalia
worst case i can always blame random for this considering he was the one who actually pointed out the discrepancy
Which Domestic breed is it cause I wanna see a lil photo
shires, brabants, and american belgium drafts(the largest known domestic horse is a shire, but brabants and american belgiums are larger on average than shires)
guys whats the update on livyatan
Shire Horses (>1.1 tons) and American Belgian Drafts (>1.36 tons)
Largest horse ever recorded was a Shire who weighed up to about 1.6 tons, so it was bigger than a black rhino
wrong chat dawg but theres nothin new
damn i just want my livyatan😭
exactly
This is the largest verified domestic horse
Can’t wait for the post-Holocene megafauna
its neck/torso looks like a pastry
Brother can look an asian elephant in the eye
That thing looks like it eats babies
in paleo fashion this horse is to be the go-to size ref for all horses 
just to prove that a horse could beat a tyrannosaurus rex in a fight
"hadrosaurs are like horses not elephants and rhinos" mfs when the horses are the size of elephants and rhinos
for legal reasons i have to clarify the elephant part was a joke
Same. I'm thinking variations of horses, cattle, and general livestock will be the inheriters of the world post-Holocene, if we don't destroy it ofc.
beware the tenontosaurus and rhinos -> horse glazing pipeline
hey someone throw me the most up to date big theropod size chart pls
This reminds me of something I’ve been pondering, were the relative saturations of megafauna between Cretaceous and Quaternary roughly equivalent or is there really a huge disparity
"B-but hadrosaurs didn't have horns and tusks!!! They were defenceless and had to run from predators!!!!"
**16 ton Shantungosaurus
**
Hadrosaurs had to lay down and die if they were hunted or they would get banned from the server
Can confirm, I was the Alioramus that watched the Shantungosaurus get banned after headbutting a Zhuchengtyrannus
Honestly I still like the comparison. The issue is that people think that horses are weak
I guess I can give up a career in paleontology knowing that
A.my country is known for paleo research whatsoever
B.I just ain't build for math
Paleo-kids when I show them the average hadrosaur (It's not Shantungosaurus)
It’s the slightly smaller Edmontosaurus 
edmontosaurus is a horse if horses lived with 375kg lions 
or you're regalis in which case you live with twink albertosaurus
The most hadrosaur species were still comparable in size, or larger, than most carnivores in their environments, I was just using the most extreme example.
Edmontosaurus rivaled Tyrannosaurus in size, Gryposaurus rivaled Daspletosaurus in size, Brachylophosaurus was larger than Lythronax, etc. Hadrosaurs in general seemed to trend towards the sizes of their environments largest predators, with only a handful of examples of inordinately small hadrosaurs in comparison to their predators.
Ok but...how many of those are average sized and how many are the largest known? 
Thankfully their mammalian cunning means the average horse can easily throttle checks notes uh maybe Dilo? Seems a bit big especially for the average horse lmao
i should scale the wahweap cf. brachylophosaurus maxilla sometime (thanks scalebars)
You will die
because its vaguely topical enjoy the fruits of my suffering last night
I think the average size of Hadrosaurids was around 30 feet in length, and that's about as big as Gryposaurus and Brachylophosaurus.
This is beautiful
They big I guess. If we put their disparity of size into perspective with equivalent extant predator\prey relationships it would appear a lot less impressive
Yeah, it isn't anything too surprising, but I was just giving examples of how most hadrosaurs weren't, y'know, helpless against most predators they shared their environments with.
What are the diffrent known species of tyrannosaurus?
mr. falcone sends his regards
Tyrannosaurus rex and Tyrannosaurus mcraeensis
What distinguishes both as a diffrent species? (BTW is t-rex considered a species now and his other genus mate isn't?)
i will say though with hadrosaurs that lambeosaurines in northern laramidia aren't all too great at getting much larger than tyrannosaurs at all you only really see it happen with parasaurolophus and maybe hypacrosaurus and even then both of those don't get much over 4000kg
Fodder….
T. mcraeensis had a lighter-built skull, and lived a couple million years before T. rex. Those are the main distinguishing features I remember, there's more though
however we stan giant brachylophosaurus femur
Aight thx
True, most stayed in 2-3 ton range from what I've read.
Brachylophosaurus my beloved <3
oh sweet elvis doesn't have the one element i actually want great
not that big actually
idk if it’s just too obvious but people who want an herbivore fully capable of decking predators sleep on the big sauropods
Certain big sauropods are not slept, but hibernated on
Mamenchisaurs, Turiasaurs, and other large basal sauropods are heavily slept on
I hear Early Cretaceous I sleep except for when ice is involved
Speaking of the Sauropods, everyone has always been in search of the great high latitude Sauropod, Wouldnt the James Ross Island stuff kind of be a really obvious answer
Is this creature possible mr peoples (I will probably change its size)
Really liking the Lambeo TLC here.
loving it
I just hope we get more accurate calls for it too.
Except for the hooves 🤮
What do you mean the hooves?
Wdym
Arent hadrosaur feet like that….wrong?
Hmmmmmm
Mb then 🤷♂️
It looks fine. Nobody really has a clear idea anyway
No, there is evidence that hadrosaurs had hooved front feet
I did just show a pic
I was typing as you sent the pic
O
Hopefully they do Bars the same way with the hooves
If they just try and copy PhP's Bars it'll be fine
it proves sauropods in those conditions are possible but we can’t name the james ross sauropod ‘boreatitan’ so the search continues
True, PhP Bars is a great design
Even tho we don’t have a head Edmonto is a great reference for bars (I think)
The way to make Gondwanan polar Dinosaurs cool; Austrotitan Antarcticus 
bars is a saurolophine of saurolophine affinities 
lump it
One might say…. a Saurolophus
the last actual study lines it up more with shant so
Wonder how they are going to do Struthio
Give it tender love and care of course
has bars had anything since tlatolophus phylogeny
Prehistoric Planet made it an Edmontosaurini does that count
i don't keep up with glupshitto hadrosaur placement
Of course, but what would they use as inspiration for the new design? I know they will use large birds like ostriches or emus as inspiration but what do you guys think they might use
Erm guys the new fragmentasaurus randomchinesensis just got moved in a new phylogeny
This Hadrosaur of ambiguous relationships is now tentatively placed within a wacky family for now 
What other species might we get TLCs for?
Besides the ones they have confirmed already to be getting one.
i'm still undecided if malefica or fylax is more forgettable
malefica has a kind of cool name but fylax sounds like a crappy startup web browser which is somewhat memorable
Malefica is a poopy name, Fylax wins
I’m not a regular here but I’m starting my training at a museum that I’m going to be doing a study project at for my school and I feel like this is a good step for me and idk where else to be excited about it :)
Bars and Struthi are really the only major ones left that aren't in need of outright redesigns.
styracosaurus is getting a facelift too right? it needs some tweaking
Hm, I thought there was more that was getting some TLC like Styraco
malefica also looses points because aquilarhinus is from the same formation but does the basal hadrosaurid thing better and with actual material worth acknowledging
Hadrosauromorphs are superior though
you could replace hadrosaur with sauropod here and it would be exactly the same, someone needs to sit down and sift through basically everything and then make a new matrix that’s actually dedicated to being a matrix
I guarantee everything will fall apart if that happens
Plus I would be surprised if they didn’t try to give Spino a TLC, even though it’s still pretty alright in terms of accuracy despite lacking the tall tail spines for the default species.
they should give pycno the tlc of making the hornless sub nevesi
That I can definitely agree with
Yeah I give pycno a lot of crap but it really doesn't need too much to be fixed. Make the stam sub standard and remodel one of the carno subs. Done.
And making the other species have head ornamenting of different abelisaurs
delcourt 2018 making pycnonemosaurus a hornless carnotaurus and its consequences...
ah yes inferred osteological skull morphology referenced from the nonexistent cranial material
Now I’m curious how they would do a Spino TLC all things considered
I feel like there must be some equivalently large, obscure and far more complete Abelisaur somewhere out there
No
ceratosaur mfs really see a composite consisting of a handful of verts most of a leg and cranial fragments and think its the most amazing incredibly complete thing in the world
That’s life for ya
So many diagnostic vertebrae. You can tell it’s a distinct taxon by the way that it is
is this implying 9m turkana abelisaur
I was thinking 8 metre Ekrixinatosaurus
thats literally like the most poorly described of the not complete ass abelisaurs
Whoopsies I thought it had a head 
I was really hyped for the pycno when the game was still in development, now I think it's probably one of the biggest let downs in the game. it's fine and all, but it has re-used animations and a really mediocre and unaccurate model, honestly I'd prefer if they just didn't have a Carnotaurus subspecies at all so it could be something actually unique and original in a dinosaur game, a non-Carnotaurus abelisaurid.
I does
Now I’m curious about what other species they might add after the entire roster has been added considering that I think I remember them stating they plan on adding more dinosaurs to the game.
Eh the carno sub isn't the issue. I even encouraged it. The issue is that they kinda saw that I guess and went "Let's just make its whole identity Carnotaurus 2"
we don't talk about ekrix's skull after the incident
I would have loved to have seen the default that had an accurate description of the head, the Carno based head, and a Rajasaurus based head.
The whole "Carnotaurus 2" thing is probably my biggest issue tbh, Carnotaurus was very different from most of Abelisauridae and it creates a sort of false idea of what most Abelisaurids were. Don't get me wrong, Carnotaurus is awesome, and its a very interesting creature, but a lot of Abelisaurids weren't leggy speed machines like Carnotaurus.
That's mostly an old world vs new world abelisaur thing tmk. Not quite carno being unique.
luckily for us anything between skorpiovenator and carnotaurus/aucasaurus including pycno is incomprehensibly awful material for a full life reconstruction so there isn't a whole lot to work with
Yeah new world abeilsaurs were very leggy bois
Very true
well viavenator's pretty decent but the thing barely has legs preserved
Wow he’s ugly. I change my mind I’ll take Carnotaurus without the horns
he is beautiful just the way he is you sicko
The inferior Abelisaur
Yep, what I meant was Carnotaurus was definately the leggiest of the leggy bois, only other species of Furileusaurian Abelisaurid with even half-decent material is Aucasaurus, who was definately very leggy, but didn't have the horns
“New World Abelisaurs” I love it
too bad because everything's way too unstable for you to seperate brachyrostrans and majungasaurines on the basis of geography
But I wanna
dahalokely and rahiolisaurus are in bed with brachyrostra way too often for that to happen anytime soon
Too excellent taxa 
arcovenator also likes be a dumbass and there's that weird bahariya maybe brachyrostran too
It's a fun concept, like Vultures, except they're actually cladistically related to each other.
and that one time furileusaurian genusaurus happened
and that potential ouled abdoun brachyrostran
idk if I should ask this but if Disney Carnotaurus was real like idk would it work like as it's own genus if it had more accurate proportion to carnotaurus?
and abelisaurus being a majungasaurine (in which case abelisaurinae would actually take priority) somtimes
We found them on a continent therefore they are related to each other….
bro thinks hes longrich
On my way to Morocco
Love how they named the clade after a species with only a partial skull
tbf a partial skull is incredible material by abelisaurid standards
My oh my look at all these glubshittos I can name
True
There’s quite a few like that such as Spinosaurs, though Spino is getting more material attached to it.
i mean thats not really a good thing but watcha gonna do
ceratosauria is certainly one of the clades of all time
Waiting for a Noasaurus paratype
It could work as a distinct Carnotaurus species if you removed the visible elbows and shrank it to "only" 11m
Also, off-topic but what's the current consensus on the placement of Megaraptora? Naish and Cau's 2022 study put it as sort of deep into Tyrannosauroidea, but in that same year Rolando et al. put it as another offshoot of Coelurosauria, idk which one is more accepted
Or is there just no current consensus, because it's Megaraptora
No consensus, even a position within coelurosaurs is dubious
that's cool af, btw Random if I ask any ETA or just in general will you post a new skeeltal any time soon ?
Late surviving Carnosauria real…
THE LAST STEGOSAUR
I have two skeletals waiting to be released when a JFD model is completed, but I don't know when that'll be
And no, not saying which ones
The Last 
damn well on a serious note I can;t wait for your hard work to be showcase yet again as I repsect you and your work as a person
its amazing the things you can get away with saying when the server isn't koi 
what is "KOI"?
kopper or inches
the big carp must never find out i support allosauroid megaraptorans
because i don't, i was just saying it to be unbiased
Kurupi Our Idol
Both seem pretty dubious now that I look at them, the Tyrannosauroidea study puts Siats as a member of Megaraptora, which is a neat thought, that there were once megaraptors in North America but were driven down south by competition from newer clades, but there's something about *Siats *of all things being a Tyrannosauroid that just feels odd
That being said, I prefer them over the Allosauroid or Neovenatorid theories, more signs point to the newer to studies
true men support dromaeosaurid megapratorans!!!
Holy crap it's the Ulughbegsaurus
luckily for you siats is also a dumbass unstable shitter
The feathered beast stalks the mountains of Argentina….
Any study that puts Siats or Chilantaisaurus in Megaraptora I am automatically skeptical of because what the hell is a 11m megaraptoran doing in the cenomanian or whatever
would this reconstruction be consdiered a "carcharodontosaurid"?
Without a doubt
chilantaisaurus the tyrannosauroid reaper of the last allosauroids
look at the size of that skull vs the cervical vertebrae 😭 bro was dragging its chin everywhere
We’re going back in time to make sure Siats and Chilantaisaurus never preserve
chilantaisaurus is merely a red herring as we discretely test how far back we can push iren dabasu before people realize there's a large derived tyrannosaurid there
...is there?
The last 
Gigantoraptor is cursed enough on its own we don't need to add anything to iren dabasu
its a lil baby man but carr compares it favorably to raptorex and tyrannosaurus and suggests it could be a tyrannosaurine
there's also supposedly large tyrannosaurid femora there but i haven't ever seen any actual measurements
I grew up with megaraptor being sort of a giant dromaeosaur and then like pretty much allosaurus but cretaceous so idk but a lot of older deciption of this animal holds a speical place in my heart
Secondarily acquired pennaceous feathers…. It’s real….
when is spinosaurid chilantaisaurus 
miles cooler than coelurosaur chilantaisaurus
while some may consider this questionable merit for the presence of a large tyrannosaurid i don't care
Montanaspinus fully realized
wait how come chilantai or siats haven't be considered a spinosaurid?
What big paleo is hiding from us
that tyrannosaurus ate gigantoraptor
Btw I was doing this piece of 2 Megalodons eating a Livyatan and I was wondering what I should change about it
( The piece on the bottom. )
oh they're hiding more than that
22t spinosaurus might make a return!1!1!1!!11
The Hell Creek Centrosaur….
the mythical hell creek lambeosaurine
Hola
nima's mythical 28m abydosaurus
The Unicorn of Palaeontology
rajasaurus being larger than magnapaulia
Alguien w able español
A theropod larger than T-rex
if i accept 1.5m brachylophosaurus femur does that make it morally permissible for me to consider random isolated bonebed elements different individuals to gut the average size
The lords work some might say
¡Hola! Para conversaciones en español, utilice el chat #español ¡Gracias!
I just want the chance to dismantle sauropoda with my bare hands and put it all together again
I will go irreparably insane in the process, but we will have a nice concrete sauropod phylogeny
The hardest choices require the strongest wills
Is it weird to call some prehistoric ankmals by their synonym name or outdated names
i know how to make a concrete sauropod phylogeny just remove 80% of the taxa
get rid of titanosaurs and somphospondyls you're already making progress
I feel like at least half of somphospondyli does not belong there, and there's probably a few non-titanosaurs lurking in titanosauria too but they're so fragmentary or haven't been examined in so long that who knows
fix Sauropod phylogeny
gets rid of all the Sauropods
“Concrete Sauropod Phylogeny” big paleo knows where you live, and your days are numbered
Depends tbh, I call Irritator “Angaturama” because it sounds serious, but calling Allosaurus “Labrosaurus” would probably condemn you to hell, so it’s a very context-sensitive thing
Manospondylus 
Call Allosaurus Antrodemus, it sounds like a wizard
Anyone have a accurate dacentrurus and stegosaurus skeletal?
Plot twist: Sauropoda doesn't exist and it's all convergent evolution from about every other taxa
Anyone know what the up to date information on what Ostsafrikasaurus fall under so far? A ceratosaurid or spinosaurid
usually considered ceratosaurid
Yeah I was confused since I've seen both depictions of both
Omg a tree
someone slide torvosaurus paleo art
size estimates
I can get ye a chart showing the size of about a dozen torvo specimens in an hout when I get home from college
Yes 🙏🏽
Self insert; hi
Please note, a very large majority of specimens are fragmentary, ichnotaxa or isolated teeth. Most of the specimens are also unlikely to belong to torvosaurus itself.
Torvosaurus tanneri
BYUVP 2002 - 10.87m, 4452kg
BYUVP 5005 - 7.6m, 1522kg (immature)
BYUVP 5241 - 8.5m, 2129kg
BYUVP 5280 - 8.7m, 2283kg
FMNH PR 360 - 8.5m, 2129kg
"Elvis" - 10m, 3467kg (likely wrong)
CEUM coll. - 10.7m, 4247kg
Torvosaurus "rex" (=T. tanneri)
TATE 1003 - 8.6m, 2205kg
CPS 1002, 1001, TATE coll. - 11.47m, 5231kg
Torvosaurus gurneyi
ML 1100 - 9.6m, 3067kg
ML 430 - 9.6m, 3067kg
ML 632 - 11.13m, 4779kg
MUJA-1913 - 10.7m, 4247kg
MG coll. - 11.47m, 5231kg
Argüero specimen - 9.5m, 2972kg
Oles specimen - 11.46m, 5217kg
Tazones specimen/MUJA-1889 - 7.33m, 1365kg
French caudal - 10.7m 4247kg
WMNM P 27685, 27686 - 9.7m, 3164kg
Megalosaurus phillipsi (=T. phillipsi)
OUM J29886 - 8.67m, 2259kg
OUM J13586 - 10m, 3467kg
cf. Torvosaurus - 10.6m, 4129kg
Torvosaurus "ingens"
54mm tooth - 11.4m, 5136kg
MB R 3627 - 11m, 4614kg
161GR1.1 - 11.46m, 5217kg
So Torvosaurus gurneyi could grow to 11.5 meters and weigh around 5.2 tons at max
yep yep
My Dino for a reason Jurassic hits better then Cretaceous
same as tanneri; theyre virtually the same size
Adding all the known specimens together, it seems gurneyi couldve also been bigger on average
I heard that gurneyi was the larger and more bulky variant of the 2
nothing to suggest bulkier
and the biggest specimens are around the same size for both
Sure could you mabey give me some tarbosaurus size estimat info aswell unless you don’t want that’s fine for me(Ty for helping me out)
tarbo is currently estimated at 10.9m and 5.4t
Dang it heavier then torvo 🗿
by less than 200kg
That's like 1 meal/dump lol
Tarbosaurus needs to take a sh*t
Dw, Ill scale tarbo of a pepsi bottle and it will be bigger then argent
So true
What are the largest size estimates for inostrancevia? (Height, length, weight)
Do you have any evidence supporting 200kg Tarbo craps?
oh no theyre onto me
I mean it is believed T.rex could eat 400-500 kg in a single meal
So while it wouldn't be normal a Tarbosaurus that had some gastrointestinal illness probably could take a 200kg shet
been there done that
#relatable
nah but personally tho torvo vs tarbo would have been an awesome fight
So yknow how Perucetus was downsized basically instantly? Here’s a proper paper that confirms it. https://peerj.com/articles/16978/
Extremes in organismal size have broad interest in ecology and evolution because organismal size dictates many traits of an organism’s biology. There is particular fascination with identifying upper size extremes in the largest vertebrates, given the challenges and difficulties of measuring extant and extinct candidates for the largest animal of...
Does anyone have a good skeletal/reconstruction of Plateosaurus
Had no idea it was downsized. Not surprised it was downsized, since it has such fragmentary material, you can't really say for certain that something was the biggest animal ever from some vertebra.
Perucetus is still the largest extinct whale, but it’s not even in the top 5 in terms of absolute size tmk.
holocene sweep
All I have is this, this valid?
Yeah this one still holds up tmk
Holocene stays winning 💪 😔 💀
Yo how’s the new lambeo tlc?
I imagine that’s been asked already but I haven’t seen the replies myself
The feet are iffy tmk but aside from that it’s basically perfect.
Awesome
Are the forelimb hooves like, 100% confirmed to have existed in Hadrosaurs, or is it still up in the air.
Hadrosaurs had hooves. It’s just more debated on how they would’ve looked.
It’s considered unlikely that all hadrosaurs had the same arrangement going on.
does anyone have a skeleton construction of torvosaurus gurneyi
ty blud
this is from 2014 is it still accurate?
Torvosaurus has changed a fair bit since then so I wouldn’t.
This is better. Even if it’s Tanneri the differences between the two is minimal either way so it works as a reference.
its such a sick dino man its like a combination of a trex and a allosaurus
I mean wouldn’t that just be Saurophaganax
sauro is just like a bigger allo
I am aware yes
But if you took the size of a Tyrannosaurus and then just mixed it with Allosaurus you’d probably get something similar too Sauro
torvo actually is diffrent looks like a hybrid between a rex and a allo
I don’t see the similarities with Rex
tiny arms, lack of lacrimal crest, long snout with that pinch in the middle
The size of animals is determined by mass not length and height
I am aware
so more like length and height of rex
I meant gave it Rex’s mass
bro sauro does NOT weight as much as rex
Prehistoric Planet in general has great designs. Not only they are beautiful, but they are also subjectively accurate, as they should be since it's a documentary. Their looks from the show are definitive versions for me.
PK spino looks awesome
it's the best spino in my opinion
Are fish a real group or just a confusing one?
In the taxonomic sense, no.
I mean basal vertebrates/fish look identical to the first chordates In the fossil record that it's hard to tell the difference
“Fish” is more of a description than an actual group, because by taxonomic logic, basically ALL vertebrates are fish, so it kinda loses its meaning when everything is a fish.
True but also what is the difference between the basal fish and the non fish chordates really there almost is little to no difference other than having eyes and a backbone
see these are the important questions
On the topic of marine life, what is an aquatic/semi-aquatic species that everyone feels should come to PoT? These are my choices, though I feel some of them could overlap with others in similar niches.
Globidens would be really interesting, we've yet to have a proper shellfish specialist in the game and it'd be neat to see how they play. (probably like an aquatic herbivore but its still neat)
Yeah, I’d love to see a shellfish specialist to be around, especially since we are getting ammonites in the game now.
Dinosaurs are cool
@elfin pulsar https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/path-of-titans/images/e/e9/Styraco_Skin_(9).jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/250?cb=20210824033105
It doesn’t look too bad to me accuracy wise other than what you mentioned about it being too fat
Above render by Max Bellomio
Big head, fat, poor textures, short hornl stubby legs
Its also the closest thing to a PoT mascot and an original dino with one of the oldest models, I think its very deserving
The head overall IMO needs major improvement now that I compare the two actually yeah
And again it doesn’t communicate its role at all
Sty is a fast offensive herbi, look at that accurate one it feels like it would be that. The one in game is so fat and stubby it doesn’t communicate that niche
I feel that most PoT Dino’s suffer from them looking like they came outta a McDonald’s, especially allo, I really want allo to become much thinner and lankier
both of these are inaccurate, Sergi made some more up to date skeletal of styraco
more than anything it needs better textures
Sty definitely deserves a tlc more then any new release, Kai being the exception.
Its still not that bad, just needs some tweaks.
Tho bars and struthi are way worse then it.
But that is kai.
I still adamantly think it’s still a pretty model. Styracosaurus that is
Its charming.
cough cough thalla cough cough
the face really needs a tlc, it's extremely smooth and not nearly as good as more recent models
Thats a more textures problem imo
the slug wrinkles on the body don't help it either
Pachyrhinosaurus when
Pls, not another ceratopsian 
it's an accuracy one too, since the proportions are also wrong
is alb off too? it seems to potato like
No idea how they went from this alb to kai
Daspleto I feel needs a bit of a texture update along with a few things.
I agree, Alberta is definitely the best looking ceratopsian out of all of them.
Alb also has the nice shuffle run
Nuh uh, eo also shuffle runs, which sucks
The animation is decent, but gallop was fun.
Nuh uh gallop looked goofy af
It did
Eo having all 4 of its limbs in the air at the same time will never look right
Thats kinda like stys run, but the legs are smaller
Also damn rhinos can gallop, I thought they couldnt.
they can hit like 25-30 mph too, they haul it when they need to
Which they typically don’t so you don’t see it often lol
Can hippos gallop too? Or they just waddle
hippos can’t gallop they just shuffle extremely fast
Or maybe we have yet to see a motivated hippo 👀
yes, its pretty good
I wonder how bad at stress resistance was the nasal horn.
Hippos gallop in water, sorta, its how they build up speed
Therefore ano should be able to gallop across the riverbeds 
Ok question is alamotyrannus a valid dinosaur Because just learned it and never heard of it
Most likely not afaik
the material previously referred to as "alamotyrannus" could be a valid taxon but it hasn't ever been formally described as such
We'll I just learned it all I know it lived in New Mexico in 70 million years ago and I thought that was mcraensis or did mcraensis live in hell creek
Sty is a bit, weird proportionally in game. It falls into the deinonychus problem of being too scrunched up
I think “alamotyrannus” came before mcraensis
mcraeensis is from hall lake in southern new mexico
all of the "alamotyrannus" stuff is farther north in kirtland/ojo alamo (but still in new mexico)
and imo a least the general perception of alamotyrannus is prolly two separate taxa from two distinct stratigraphic horizons
So then it's possible it valid
"alamotyrannus" can't really ever be valid until/if its described and that's assuming it gets described as "alamotyrannus" and not another name
but yeah some of the "alamotyrannus" material is prolly a distinct taxon
Ok so not a valid dinosaur
likely a distinct animal, but the name isn't formal/valid
So mcraensis is from New Mexico and Alamo is from. New Mexico also so technically mcraensis is a Alamo
no
"alamotyrannus" refers to assorted tyrannosaurid material from kirtland/ojo alamo
mcraeensis is a single specimen from hall lake
just ignore Alamotyrannus until it gets officially described
which it probably never will because if a paper spends that long in press it probably wasn't a good paper
this is "alamotyrannus"
alamotyrannus huh?
mcraeensis is the thing described here https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-47011-0
I thought it would be T. "brinkmani"?
the naashoibito material is god knows what
but the de-na-zin "alamotyrannus" material hasn't been said to be particularly similar to tyrannosaurus
So it could be real just not a tyrannosaurid
alamotyrannus is a tyrannosaurid no matter how you slice it
so it could still be considered alamotyrannus brinkmani not tyrannosaurus brinkmani
Ok all I want I'd it's valid or not valid
btw what does the material even consist of???
I heard it hasnt even been discribed yet lol
The 2013 paper that originally cites an "Alamotyrannus" mentioned it consisted of "many isolated but diagnostic tyrannosaurid skeletal fossil elements from the [Maastrichtian] Naashoibito Member of the Ojo Alamo Formation". ACM 7975 (a partial dentary) was also mentioned in that same paper as the "Ojo Alamo Tyrannosaur", so also Alamotyrannus.
ACM 7975 is kinda the informal face of Alamotyrannus at least in the online sphere on account of being the only specimen actually attributed to "Alamotyrannus" by name.
However, ACM 7975 has since been reassigned to the earlier Campanian De-Na-Zin member rather than the Naashoibito member, and a 2018 abstract mentions it as an in-prep distinct taxon similar in gorss morphology to Teratophoneus and Lythronax. It also mentions "two isolated dentaries and several axial and appendicular skeletal elements, including isolated teeth" from De-Na-Zin. Considering that its late Campanian and hasn't really been favorably compared to Tyrannosaurus, its probably something distinct from Tyrannosaurus.
This leaves the other "many isolated but diagnostic tyrannosaurid skeletal fossil elements" (that are not ACM 7975) of Naashoibito from the 2013 paper very ambiguous because nobody knows which specimens they refer to. Assuming these elements are still from Naashoibito (and haven't been moved to De-Na-Zin like ACM 7975), they probably represent a separate taxon altogether from ACM 7975.
Tyrannosaurid elements from Naashoibito have been compared favorably to Tyrannosaurus in the past and are also very large, so there's a good chance the Naashoibito material (which presumably at least some of the "fossil elements" under "Alamotyrannus" has affinities with Tyrannosaurus.
So much text
gimme a sec imma read all of this
Also worth noting there's a supposed novel ziphodont tyrannosaur from Naashoibito (known purely from teeth/teeth marks) with dentition unlike Tyrannosaurus that may or may not just be juvenile Tyrannosaurus teeth/tooth marks
so this was probably a medium sized Eutyrannosaurid?
ACM 7975?
yeah?
iirc i scaled it to like 10m based off lythronax but its a partial dentary so any estimate is pretty tentative
btw alamotyrannus isnt from the ojo alamo formation?
Naashoibito is either kirtland formation or ojo alamo formation
De-Na-Zin is definitively kirtland
so its alamo is inbetween them?
some of the "Alamotyrannus" material is from De-Na-Zin (kirtland), some of it might be from Naashoibito (either kirtland or ojo alamo) (but if this is the case "Alamotyrannus" probably refers to material spread across two different taxa)
so the alamotyrannus material might be two diffrent dinosaurs?
potentially
its hard to say because the only specimen we know with reasonable certainty falls under "Alamotyrannus" is acm 7975
this is also cool and worth heeding because the whole thing is a bit of a mess
and T. vannus is just a sub adult sp rex?
T. vannus is some Tyrannosaurus-like thing if not Tyrannosaurus sp. proper
iirc the mcraeensis description refers to it (well the Javelina material at least) as cf. Tyrannosaurus
Mcraeensis fans when I say adult nanotyrannus (they have been destroyed with facts and genus)
btw are their multiple "alamotyrannus" specimens?
yes, but the only one we know the catalogue of is acm 7975
and the other one is unnamed?
they're almost certainly catalogued, but the names weren't given
but there are elements from naashoibito people speculate belong to "Alamotyrannus" but the only specimen that can be associated with alamotyrannus for certain is acm 7975
how big would "alamotyrannus" get???
acm 7975 is kinda crap to scale cause partial dentary but last i tried i got ~10m
afaik the largest naashoibito material is a 1m scapulocoracoid
other than the fact that tyrannosaurus would be a effective sauropod hunter
would alamosaurus actually be a prey item for tyrannosaurus?
assuming it's not too much larger i don't see why not
is alamosaurus a sauropod or am i thikning of something else
it is
can you scale the willow creek formation fauna rq @sullen cairn
is there anything besides this i don't wanna check
why is montanoceratops late maas
north horn formation than?
imagine hell creek chart but its only torosaurus and tyrannosaurus and theres an alamosaurus there too
montano looks a little...
oh....
livingston.............????
you #paleontology commoners make me jealous
bone wars
whats even in livingston
livingston formation
livingston fossils
Man I wish I was S m a r t
REAL LIKE I WANNA JOIN THESE COONVOS
Fr, but I feel like a dumbass Everytime I say smth here with the anxiety building up thinking sm1s gonna go..”Uh no….are you dumb?”
i feel dumb when i say something and someone responds with 3 words ive never seen before
The Edmontonian-Lancian separation is a myth
well someone had to bring it up 
Teehee
yeah......
i secretely want eotriceratops to be thrown into triceratops so i can justify plopping rex in horseshoe
Albertosaurus lancensis….
Exactly 😭, and I google it up so I’m not dumb when I respond but that makes me feel even more dumb
but you didn't here that from me
The preservation biases…. They pervade it all….
LMAO
if it makes yall feel any better this alamotyrannus stuff out of context is lost on just about anyone but like four people in one single discord channel
mighty #coelurosauria....
The Edmontonian taxa simply moved to the Northwest Territories
pachyrhinosaurus summitcreekensis trust
albertosaurus brinkmani
@crude latch watching chat rn feeling like im watching my parents talk about taxesor something
Hypacrosaurus arcticus…. The last Lambeosaur…
rhinorex is such a cool name for such a obcure dinosaur lol
and it has skin impressions!
saltriosaurus is cooler..
wow a sauropod with armor..... so orginal
ever heard of scipionyx tho
saltriosaurus is a therapod, saltasaurus is a sauropod
dubious lmao
only now realising i just messed it up and now i feel like never talking again
still a cool name 😭😭😭
also saltrio looks cool so hes better
bro does NOT know about uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh uuuhmmmmmmm
vulcanodon
futalognkosaurus
bro hes so ugly
I know about that one because of roblox dinosaur simulator 😃
Oh ye Bcs the first image on google is the most accurate thing ever
chiliantrosaurus
my favorite sauropod because of its roar
my favorite dinosaur is murusraptor
CHILANTAISAURUS??????????
chiliantaisaurus*
why would you like murusraptor it steals everyone's walls
minor spelling mistake (im getting publicly executed)
@copper flame I bet you’ve never heard of sphaerotholus
cool name without context
and futalongnkosaurus is well preserved and means chief lizard which is why its also my favorite
that lameo pachycephalosaur???
yeah i heard of it
futalognkosaurus is a dumb idiot who clogged a river
wasnt that a boat in a canal
true tho
The feathered Ceratosaur
he is so awesome and italian
I love jokes about how dinosaurs fossilized
Bro invented pizza
i am italy
uuuuh ummm poop fart
i cut it off a little lol
credit: XtinctDesign
checkmate 
looks like saltasaurus without all the cool stuff (boring)
bad take ampelosaurus is better
fun fact: edward drinker cope was a MEGA racist
Literally one of the most primative Sauropods we know of iirc, literally a goated dino
oh fr? ong??????
please give me hadrosaur with long neck and tail
Could be wrong (probably am, just going off of wiki)
olorotitan
i want more monstrosities

