#paleontology
1 messages · Page 44 of 1
its not the tallest, LOL
so?
theri is the tallest theropod
not tallest carnivourous theropod
If you’re not a goofy goober and willing to measure an animal by it’s tallest point…. 🫴
BY HEIGHT NOT MASS EVERYBODY
theropod height is measured by the hip, not the spine
yet by logic its the tallest of the 3
its uh, not
Spinosaurus has a hip height of 2.8 m. Tyrannosaurus has a hip height of 3.9 m. It's not even close
Is Spinosaurus within tickling range
TY RANDOMDINOS
if you saw the 3 together you say spinos tallest due too the sail overall
But, its not B)
B)
im arguing with a rex fanboy who am i kidding
bruh
I think this chadly beast might just be taller
Its a simple concept
You don't go by the sail
yall stay gasing up spino, giga, and theri but did yall forget him?
bro built like a baked bean
oh hell nah, bigger than a whole giraffe
Excluded from Theropoda. L Azhdarchids
blud got that hippo build bruh
no way
blabbit is here 😨
aram is just a neckbone and maybe other material but i dont know about the supposed height overall
Blud got that " uh actually Im de strongest thewopod 🤓 "
Makes sense why Lecho Formation has like no big dinosaurs, Saltasaurus ate everything there
Spinosaurs still isn't tall B)
thats wild
stop calling them fat, they are just big boned
It’s real and true. The wacky and very reliable world of the Mesozoic fossil record
dont care ignoring hip height spinos taller
I also like lying to myself
Based, I love willful ignorance B)
there fat
i aint wrong
Damn didn’t know Saltasaurus was extant
this guy is the biggest bird tbh
not a bird 🤓
Argent?
Proof?
Nah
Me when people call non avian dinosaurs "birds"
So real
The actual biggest bird
sauropods are on the same line as birds so for all intents and purposes..their birds
NO
THEY ARE NOT BIRDS, BIRDS ARE DINOSAURS, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND... RAH
nah
argy 🔛🔝
was Gargant Hateg?..
yall think sauropods woul mourn the death of herd members
hot topic: I hate feathers, and I don't care
I think it’s got attributed material all across Europe
I hate skin 👍
I hate bones
scales🔛🔝
i hate eyes
i dont love it..spino aint even top 10 for me
I liked spino in the first place for haveing 3 fingers
Feathered Spino, Feathered Giga, Feathered Rex, Feathered mammals, feathered food, feathers are everywhere 🙀
I hated rex for only haveing 2
spino is the least likely to have feathers
Tf did you see a “feathered mammal” 💀
Bros finding new animals
I've seen a lot of weird feathered things, don't ask
i mean emus look like feathered mammals cause they got hair like feathers
Fur isn’t feathers
Emus are birds
noo i dint know..
loon spino looks cool tho
THESE FEATHERS
everyone knows Oxaliaia is the better spino..and untill said otherwise its valid
Oxalia is very likely to be invalid just accept it
Oh hell naw they can’t get away with putting loon colours on a Spinosaurus. We already have a million loon-esq birds in the Cretaceous, we don’t need more 😭
no material to prove it so nope
actually, we got a few bits of spino
Hesperornithines
BRAZILIAN SPINOSAURUS IS REAL
Large misconceptition that we don't have a lot of spinosaurus material, we just don't have much
Please avoid less serious topics in this channel. Make sure you read the pinned messages in all channels you plan to use. This channel is for educational purposes.
There’s lot of material pointing towards oxlaia just being a spino specimen though, I like the idea of oxalia just as much as the next guy but it’s unlikely unfortunately
I can see it being similar in appearance to Spinosaurus. That’s about all I got on it
freshwater hespornithines
did sauropod mourn the death of loved ones like elephants
tf you mean "L"
I doubt sauropods were smart so probably not
Dude is just a troll lets be honest
L sauropod, couldn't be me laying eggs
I wonder how long ago where humans laying eggs
Never
They still lay eggs............

yes and no
No we don’t dawg 💀, having eggs that are necessary for internal fertilization isn’t “laying eggs” in the slightest
The eggs simply don't go out of the body, doesn't mean we don't lay them into the womb
we have eggs they just hatch inside us
but we dont just straight up lay them
What a lil cutie
sauropods were smart just not in the way humans measure it
you guys see d. longus yet?
No animal is smart in human standards.
D.shortus
A lot are actually even in “human standards”
Guys I'm also smart just not in the way that humans measure it (this is a joke dont attack me)
this dino was my childhood
compared to a human? they have a million years to go
Dolphins and elephants are incredibly smart animals even compared to humans yes
very long boi
did you see that Fred Weirhums Diplodocus may be fairly close to reality colorwise
Uh no, that's a huge overstatement, You simply underestimate yourself
dont we all
Got be bamboozled
No I don’t that’s a scientific fact, I’m not saying they are smarter or even as smart as us but they are very intelligent
ravens learning how stoplights work to crack nuts
Not close to a human, and probably won't be unless we teach them or something
That dolphins are smart is a fact. They just lack hands to make tools with, and live underwater so they have no fire
They can solve complex problems, have their own language, name eachother, understand the concept of death and mourning that’s very smart
Good luck building a calculator without hands or fire lmao
Wow, I wonder what human can't do that, oh wait, we did, and did that a millions of years ago
The coolest marine animals to have existed are here now?
blob fish
correct
I mean we had a giant cuddle fish so no
The real question is can you argue with a dolphin? No? Well, dolphins can
humans suck apart from stamina and mild intelligence..thats why humans suck without a weapon
damn that wild
and each dolphin pod has a unique dialect or something
som thing
This channel is for the discussion of past and present paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in the media in relation to palaeontology.
Please avoid argumentative or provoking behavior and make sure that this channel abides by our channel guidelines and server #rules. Please be aware that if a staff member has to constantly remind users of the rules, mutes or time-outs may be handed out.
I was gonna post more whales. Let me check if they’re prehistoric enough
any whale is prehistoric enough
blue whales fall under prehistoric technically...they evolved 2 million years ago
Okie these guys are definitely old enough
yea i think the first orca appeared roughly around the end of Megalodon
Pliocene or something
what happend to tyrannus
meanwhile sharks in general are prehistoric..since they predate trees and saturns rings
bro there older than TREES
they lived with mushroom talks
also hear me out
Some more prehistoric oceanic life
Evidently I suppose these guys make the cut for cool fellas
remember when penguins where humming birds
the good ol days
Please keep this channel on-topic. If you have any concerns, you may direct them to our @feral crane bot @wary panther. Thankyou!
Im scared 😦, of dinosaurs that is
DINOSAURS
Canon
Love me some big ol penguins
This is 100% accurate, no one can say otherwise( I see you mods, I cited the stuff)
NovahNaigahfah
I wonder if other Hadrosaurs accidentally adopted each others kids.
Aesthetic
Damn
Love that
My favorite dinosaur
The escalator
Spinosaurids are so cool damn
It looks correct on a first glance, but there are several problems with it. Pterosaur legs don't point downwards like bird legs do, they are splayed out. Also the palms of pterosaurs faced outwards during flight. Also it looks like the arms are too low, should be higher on the body
A stegamasurus rex
Do we think achillo will be as big as this says. And how accurate would you guys say this is
no
20 feet tall?? No not even close
Yeah no -- that entire segment there that you just shown us screams "Action Bro" or whatever that is called. I think I got the term right?
20 feet tall is even taller than Quetzalcoatlus and a Giraffe, for example.
". . . a hardcore carnivore predator that is always on a hunt to find its prey."
Yeah, whatever the site you found those things on is not accurate in the slightest. 
The correct term is "AwesomeBro", and refers to people exaggerating traits in dinosaurs/prehistoric animals to make them seem "cooler". Examples are carnivores being mindless killers with bare teeth, large claws and spikes and unrealistic features adoring their monstrous and deformed bodies
Achillobator, while being one of the largest dromaeosaurs, absolutely wasn't breaching 1000lbs Utahraptor didn't even breach that
500 kg is 1100 lbs
Okay Utahraptor may have breached 1000lbs, and as such Achillobator may have as well. Personally, I doubt it as I do believe Achillobator was the smaller animal but it's not out of the realm of possiblity.
Definitely wasn't 20ft tall though, maybe like 5ish feet at the shoulder
20feet long tho, maybe
Still, the quote is basically AwesomeBro vibes.

As an awesomebro myself, yeag
Within booping range it seeems
Accurate enough since we have very few hatz bones
It’s doing all those things, perspective may have fooled you as it pertains to the feet. They are facing each other
Yeah, I looked at it again. Perspective's really odd on this one
Hey it’s wilsoni
You're joking right mind you, I've seen plokutes vids before and wow bro has no brain cells here are some examples: https://youtube.com/shorts/8HrUsSmGAdI?si=Fb_fL0EF6N2riwPV https://youtube.com/shorts/Z97TI7EXW54?si=MYjSJgTR5N-mpnbk https://youtube.com/shorts/QKOyG9nBytc?si=Uo_V6h5fR60A2C7L https://youtube.com/shorts/GZYScucytmw?si=GJw6oLUCwnlbNZw9
I think they’re obsessed with Hank
Are you subtly trying to advertise plokute
Gorjirasaurus still a valid genus or no?
that question has popped up like 3 times this week already which is a weird coincidence, but no it’s not valid
Heck no I’m trying to drive y’all away from plokute
okay
Spooky lmfao
Killer whales are like 1.5 million years old.
And Balaenopterids (idk for Balaenoptera specifically) are like 20-17 million years old. Narwhals are quite recent too and so are also the other animals group you are showing.
Lmao

Oh yeah idk why I used Narwhals. Silly me
To be fair though, a genus doesn’t have to be that old to be prehistoric, if that’s what we want to categorise as paleo-related
dan is still dissapoint me
That has way too much soft tissue and the sue display is too robust due to it's gastralia being on backwards making it too robust and by extent the sue display (the one where it's eating something that you posted) is too robust
Satire response, don't take what I say seriously
Ah ok, although I do hope you know the rex in Prehistoric planet Also has too much soft tissue
You already said that, more than twice 🗿
anyways, this is the legit size
Yeah
expect those feathers... I need em gone
Digital Duck rex my beloved
Anyways, finding a comparison between rex and giga, cause, why not
2nd largest theropod vs largest theropod
also, the 3rd largest mega theropod, unless mapu is larger lol
Carch is larger
LOL, spino can't even push top 5 💀
Spino is around 7 tons, I think carch can push 8
Any estimates for carch tho? need proof for that
Grabbing dan's skeletals for spinosaurus v giganotosaurus vs Tyrannosaurus since someone said Spinosaurus was taller then both
Carch skeletal, can’t find any estimates
Looks good enough
I’d ask anybody smarter than me ngl, maybe Scanova or Fred
Also bro what are those gifs I saw what you deleted
Alr, you didn't see a thing
I’m pretty sure it was 8.2 tons to be exact
Idk man, Im going to need estimates
IDK MAN, but I'll take it
Mkay
Hope the mods don't come 😱
Technically that may not be spino, it has no overlapping material
Spino has teeth, good enough for me 😎
I think the list for top 5 biggest therapies goes something along the lines of
- Rex
- Giga
- Mapu
- Carch/Spino
Idk what to put in 5th
There is a private estimate that puts carch at ~8 tonnes
YAY
Deinocheirus is larger than mapu
I forgot about duck thx
There is a private estimation which puts spinosaurus at 0 tons, it called the extinction estimate, and a paleontolgist named carchardonotosaurus had something to do with it
Largest theropod is me
I think the list for top 5 biggest therapods goes something along the lines of
- Rex
- Giga
- Duck
- Carch/Spino
- Mapu
Huh? They are contemporaries what are waffling about
Carch and spino are larger than mapu as well and deinocheirus is the third largest
Wait rlly? How big is mapu then?
I can imagine all the carchardonotosaurus hunting spinosaurus went it was forced to go on land
Fixed
Fred is typing a whole essay 💀
Mapu is 6900-7900 KG deinocheirus is 8.4 and carch is ~8 and the largest specimen we know for a fact is spino is about 7000 KG iirc
Nah, just making sure I got the right numbers
Rex and Giga are about tied rn, right?
no
Giga is 10.1 tonnes rex is 10.4 tonnes
Ah, giga got downsized from Dan’s blog post
the downgrade is real
Yeah a little bit
I wouldn't call 300 pounds a little bit, I'd say a bit
600 pounds
Oh.....
That's 661 pounds
Also gojirasaurus solos even though it’s invalid now
never even capped 7 tons 💀 what is blud babbling about
Or so I heard
It don’t matter it’s fokin gojirasaurus
kingkongosaurus negs
Also I can’t wait for new Utahraptor material to be found
Also Rip Dakota raptor, will not be missed LOL
I can't wait for more sarcosuchus material to be found
Can't wait for more oxaila material to be found, oh, wait.........
I can’t wait for new Giga material
I can’t wait for new maip material
Let me guess, 11 tons from a tooth estimate?
We do a little something called trolling
a unreliable whole jaw fragment > Well backed up studies over the course of years studying and analyzing theropod body mass.
I've compiled the largest theropods before, let me grab it
- Tyrannosaurus (12m, 10 tons)
- Giganotosaurus (13m, 9 tons)
- Deinocheirus (12m, 8.5 tons)
- Mapusaurus (13m, 8 tons)
5+6. Spinosaurus (14m, 7.5 tons), Tyrannotitan (12m, 7.5 tons) - Carcharodontosaurus (12m, 7 tons)
8, 9, 10, + 11. Acrocanthosaurus (12m, 5.5 tons), Suchomimus (12m, 5.5 tons), Therizinosaurus (11m, 5.5 tons), Tarbosaurus (11m, 5.5 tons
Keep in mind Carchar is probably larger than I put it here given what I've heard, but nothing official has really been put out on it yet
I’ve heard of 8.2 ton estimates for Carch
Same, but again, nothing but heresay yet
who would have guessed t.rex is first?
That is currently private
Oof
Literally everyone
Damn, crazy what times we live in, remeber when spino was at top?
20 tons 💀
Spino was a very rare case in which a lost fossil was considered valid due to incredibly detailed sketches and lots of photos
even rex can't pull the estimates 💀(regardless how inaccruate)
But the fact is, a spinosaurus built similar to a rex would have been heavier
If spinosaurus was built similar to Rex it wouldn’t be Spino anymore
it would be Spinosaurus Maximums
How would a spino ever be built similar to rex
Trolling
hahaha saurophaganax
Ask 2001, they had good ideas B)
I see
There's nothing really like T.rex in that regard. It's how you get trex being nearly double the size of tarbo despite being only a meter longer. Like it's absurd. Tyrannosaurs are already heavily built for larger theropods and then you get trex being a tier above them in that regard AGAIN.
T. Rex is Moto Moto
If I had a nickel everytime rex got a buff, I would be rich
Tyrannosaurus Rex > a whole lineage filled with Allosauridae
Tyrannosaurus looks skinny compared to stego
The downside of that is even sauropods are faster than you
Also I got an interesting question, what dinosaurs from other time periods/places would be able to live in the hell creek formation and not F up the environment/food chain significantly
Still not built similar. Or in said regard as Scanova mentioned
Uh, no large theropods, and maybe a few herbs if you get lucky
We really wouldn't be able to determine that tbf
Only way I see any large theropod surviving, is simply being on the other side of N.A without many tyrannosaurus
Soroavisaurus. Competition for Avisaurus
I remember when a friend of mine pointed out tarbo and tyrannosaurus were animated with different gaits and I couldn't unsee it. Compared to how tarbo walks in PhP the t.rex is very lumbering.
I mean Rex is a big boy
Well yeah, its a big bear compared to its kin
It’s like comparing modern black bears to a cave bear or smth
The kodiak bear compared to the black bear. XD
And maybe some other enantiornitheans would do absolutely nothing to the balance of the Hell Creek
Rex didn't have time to evolve and become a copy and paste of tyrannosaurids, it needed to get that muscle up 🗣️
Rex was on a bulk it’s entire existence
Rex chose to get its money up not it’s funny up
Juvenile rexes are like super skinny
Its kin were to busy trying to become slimmer and not bigger, even tarbosaurus is only 5 tons
5 tons is quite average for a theropod of that size so I wouldn't call it getting skinnier
Also do y’all think any other megatheropods would be able to survive in place of T. Rex in hell creek?
5 > 8
As in they replace T. rex in the environment
Maybe some speculative marine biota, where you could include Polycotylids, Elasmosaurines, and Protostegids. Doesn’t pertain to to most of the Hell Creek though
There is a very large zhuchengtyrannus specimen that is currently undescribed iirc, it may be as large as she but is likely smaller than Sue but it's probably still larger than a Tarbo and the zhuch holotype
That's a big boy, but I don't know if its anatomy will allow it to come close to Rex though
Certainly no room for contemporary megatheropods in the Hell Creek though
No prey to hunt
Zhucheng is a mess rn. It's size varies a lot depending on what material you look at and if you consider it to be built more like tarbo or trex
Tbf we don't really know much about it's anatomy, all we know is that it's vertebrae are roughly the same size if not larger than sues
Estimates have ranged from 8 meters and 3 tons to larger than tarbo
Or maybe some isolated populations of Albertosaurus. They’d seem to be limited to Alberta though. Hypothetically if they did continue they’d be extremely limited at the end of the Maastrichtian
I’m trying to say if T.Rex were suddenly replaced by a population of a different megatherapod, which one would be most likely to thrive
None, they can't
Then there's also the various undescribed large tyrannosaurini from NA
Im not askin If they could, im just asking which one has the highest chance of thriving
Take any large mega theropod from any formation, and they struggle to kill edmontosaurus, let alone a whole trike
Ohhh. Idk
Eh tarbosaurus lived in a world where trying to hunt any of its large herbivores sucked, I think it'd be fine
A tyrannosaur replacing a tyrannosaur? Damn, where have I not seen that?
You got various sauropods and hadrosaurs significantly larger than you ontop of theri, deinocheirus, and the various ankylosaurs
Was it tarbo or zucheng that coexisted with shant? Either way they’d probably be better off than some other therapods
Zhucheng coexisted with shant
All I know about Tarbo is that the thin skull may be a reconstruction error
It is yeah
Whether it could hunt them or not is the problem, Hell Creek is difficulty
It was thinner than tyrannosaurus but it wasn't a significant difference
Oh what a beautiful still I found
I wonder if zhuch would be able to hunt an adult Shantungosaurus
(Probably not)
Tarbosaurus would also just simply evolve to be similar to Tyrannosaurus Rex anyways, hunting the bulky mega fauna takes bulky of your own
Tbf, that's what some of the Asian tyrannosaur ancestor of Tyrannosaurus and Tarbosaurus did when they crossed from Asia to North America and probably outcompeted the Albertosaurs and Daspletosaurus. Of course, other things contribute, like a changing environment and whatnot.
Oh hell no, it would get stomped hard
By itself, absolutely not, shant is nearly 3x its weight iirc
So… Tyrannosaurus would replace Tyrannosaurus in Laramidia 😐
Exactly B)
There's nothing really backing this up, especially with the SVP abstract released the other day that states a tyrannosaurus sized tyrannosaurini was coexisting in the Campanian alongside them
mcranesis was in southern laramidia
So basically what I’m getting is that carcharodontosaurids would be mostly screwed if they ended up in hell creek, even if Rex wasn’t there
Eh
Well, not really but yeah I guess
its morbincraensis time
i mean most theropods over like 4t would be able to eat least subsist on hadrosaurs fairly easily
Nope, Hadrosaurus neg your favorite theropod mid diff
I could imagine giga, mapu, and carch holding their own for a bit
The adaptations required for such massive sizes means that a lot of them get generally similar at such sizes. Carcharodontosaurs are still giant megatheropods with tiny arms, giant jaws, and massive bite forces
the 5t edmontosaurus on its way to kill a 7t allosauroid
As in maintaining the population
8 ton edmontosaurus stomping the hell out of a fraudsauroid
kid named averages
I doubt they'd have a problem with the hadrosaurs. Triceratops and the ankylosaurs might've had more difficulty tho
Lot of waffling in here it seems today
What do they do after they can't sustain themselves on hadrosaurus anymore?
literally ever big carch outsizes an average edmontosaurus
Eat more Hadrosaurs
I said more difficulty, I doubt triceratops and ankylosaurs would've been unsuitable prey
I mean if Trike has a ~70% WR against Rex or smth like that giga would be in a very bad position to fight trike
Every Big edmontosaurus outclasses carch
I highly doubt Triceratops was as successful at defending itself as what is typically perceived in media
They most definitely had variable diets, Tyrannosaurus didn’t just a single species of animal in Northern Laramidia
Yeah, I mean Rex did evolve millions of years along side it, its not going to die easy
Average edmont is 5 tons, an 8 ton edmont would be a very rare specimen.
With the armor Triceratops and Ankylosaurus have, I doubt the Carcharadontosaurids would've been able to take them down without major difficulty, though some cases are still possible where success is met.
hardly any edmontosaurus got that big its fairly irrelevant in any discussion about general ecology
😦
I mean, due to territorial disputes rarely ending in death and only occasionally in a serious fight I wouldn't doubt that something like giganotosaurus would be able to intimidate or fight off or possibly even kill rex
Alright, have fun trying to take down a 9 ton trike though, I'll watch
Predators have to kill prey regularly in order to stay alive. That's a suitable kill once a week or so. If going up against a triceratops meant even a 50% chance of death then that wouldn't be sustainable. And we KNOW tyrannosaurus hunted and ate triceratops regularly given pathological evidence and the fact that tyrannosaurus had a whole process to processing triceratops carcasses, which they wouldn't have formed if they weren't being eaten regularly.
Also Rex completely outclasses giga with its weapons
Rex would probably start the fight, it was the more aggressive species
Hehe look, Laramidia
Bro we literally cannot know which is more aggressive
Uhh, yes we can, t.rex was a very aggressive creature
That doesn't mean giga is a pushover, think of it like a polar bear VS a grizzly bear
Evidence? Predator doesn't always equal aggressive.
Chat is getting wild
I'm referring to the face biting and nothing more, you guys chillax
No..... we literally cannot determine this, like it's actually impossible to determine if something was super aggressive
Allosauroids in general show evidence for face biting as well. It's not unique to tyrannosaurs.
Tbf, Tyrannosaurus also had massive jaws and the bulk to pierce the armor of Ankylosaurus and Triceratops. Hence why we get Tyrannosaurus that preferred to eat Hadrosaurs and Triceratops . . . And that one individual that has a specific fondness for Ankylosaurus flesh.
Tyrannosaurus have a higher rate of face biting, even if we wanted to use peservation bias thats a lot of fighting in tyrannosaurs.
do you guys has evidence that says giga got downsized onto 10.1 tonnes???
Is that because they did it more or just because we have better remains? Keep in mind we only have 1 good giganotosaurus specimen
A lot of large therapods have evidence for interspecies combat, just because we have more evidence for fighting in one species doesn’t mean another is less aggressive
Check Dan's discord
Wait he has a discord I need it send it to me in DM’s
I think that was an isotope study for a Tarbosaurus tooth, not T. rex or maybe those reports were sus to begin with I can’t remember
Face biting could indicate fightning during breeding season when almost all animals show aggression
We also have a ton of tyrannosaurus specimens so obviously there is gonna be more evidence, the most complete large carcharadontosaurid only has like 5 specimens compared to the over 30 rex has
me too @wary panther
We don't have an isotopic study of tyrannosaurus (surprisingly). We do for tarbosaurus tho, which showed a preference for hadrosaurs and sauropods (along with that one individual that really liked ankylosaurs for some reason).
Doesn’t have any pertinence to the viability of Ankylosaurian being a function of the prey selection, with a lovely little Tarchia skull showing signs of Tarbosaurus inflicted damage.
Again, had we not had so many face biting specimens then maybe we could argue it wasn't an aggressive creature towards it own species. but we have 30 rexes, and they don't seem to get along with each other
Hell, was it stan that had a broken neck?
How is this unique to tyrannosaurs in particular though? We see it plenty in other theropod groups too (even velociraptor has evidence for it lol).
We have 2 carch specimens and one of them shows evidence of face biting
(Wait I think we have 3)
thats 1 out of 2 💀 rex has a higher ration even if we used the same amount of specimens
That's just preservation bias my guy
And iirc the paper on Borealopelta associated is apparent countershading with predation as well, so Ankylosaurian hunting isn’t even correlated with the presence of derived Tyrannosaurids
I, just said, that, but you didn't read it
No..... like....... over 50% of rexes do not have face biting evidence
Ples send me a link to Dan Folkes’ discord server I need it
I did, you can't just compare 2 vs 30 in terms of porportion and say a pair is a fair sample size
I, actually have no clue where that is
50% of tyrannosaurus’ fossils with cranial pathologies would be quite the revelation
The fact that even 1 of those 2 has face biting says a lot
1 fossil is all we need 😎
Now I’m sad
I already mentioned preservation bias, again if we lowered the rex specimens to the amount of carchardonotsaur specimens, we still get a higher ratio in Rex face biting.
bruh
Ever wonder just how far some animal biogeographical ranges extended in the maastrichtian? 🤔
miles
I don't think you understand how this works......
No? That's not how that works. The fact that we barely have any carchar specimens, and they STILL have pathologies for face biting, suggests it was something the species did a lot. I have no idea how you'd try and argue for the opposite with said evidence.
Like, with some of that affiliated Quetzalcoatlus material in Morocco, and the same scant but present evidence of Arambourgiania in the U.S. The ancient world is full of possibilities.
50% of the carch specimens show evidence of face biting compared to the significantly lower amount from rex
Not to mention trying to argue that one species was less aggressive than another based on such things is arbitrary as hell. Keep in mind that a lot of these tyrannosaurs were social animals as well, meaning that such conflicts probably didn't come down to just 1 thing, and as such idk how it'd be a measure of aggression.
Alright I concede, not trying to argue any more that is
Certainly with those not so fossiliferous areas of the world as well. British Columbia and such could’ve been really interesting during the Lancian stage
I think we’ve already had a new Leptoceratopsid not too long ago from there
measuring aggression in extinct theropods is entirely pointless
We sure can measure it in humans
Humans aren't extinct so we can actually effectively study their behavior without having to make random assumptions based on. Very limited number of specimens
It’s joever for you
Its gojoever for you
It's not my fault your arguments go against science and logic 💀
Pulled a "50% of the carch specimens show evidence of face biting compared to the significantly lower amount from rex" without a source but no more arguments
the industrialization and its consequences.
Which one? And for which country?
We have 2 carch specimens, 1 shows evidence of face biting, that's 50% less than 50% of rex specimens show evidence of face biting
Also bro you literally said the large palaeoloxodon femur isn't actually palaeoloxodon
ah, had a feeling i'd seen this guy before. that explains it 💀
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, regardless of my other "outdated ideas" on other animals, That still isn't a source 💀
Oh it’s the same fella?
yeah its the same fella 😦
I’m bamboozled. Baffled even
Still waiting for that source fred, we really could have gotten lucky with that Carchardontosaurus specimen
WDYM a "source" like bro it's really just common knowledge carch has evidence of face biting in 50% of the specimens
"The only specimens" If you want to argue about a preservation bias, we simply still have 1 face biting specimen, half of 2 doesn't beat majority of 30 💀
Fred those are rex skeletons, show me the carchar
The majority of rex specimens do not show evidence of face biting though
Bro those are literally carch, look at the teeth
uh those are tyrannosaurs
Yeah they are
Those teeth don't look very tyrannosaury
Do not let bro cook 💀
Chat is feeling outrageous today.
and the skull shape looks even less carcharodontosaury
My man can't tell the tyrannosaur tooth is clearly there
Nevermind the teeth what about the skull
Well here is a diagram of face biting marks on carch skulls
Blud did not show evidence 💀
thats sinraptor
Who let blub cook?
blub
I can cook 😟
Haha blub can’t cook
You're getting closer tho that is an allosauroid
Why can't I find anything 😭
Google isn't a very reliable source smh, I know there is a picture somewhere on here but I'm not scrolling through hundreds of images to find it, well actually I guess I will since Google appears not to be very reliable
There'a your mistake
Blub is getting clowned
Well here is carches skull and as you can see it has bite marks on it
That's meraxes, but even closer
Bro still did not provide evidence 💀
Ah, my apologies -- I remember there being an isotopic study of the diets, I guess I just assumed it was for Tyrannosaurus.
Though, I highly doubt that Tyrannosaurus would've been any different, other than replacing the sauropod part with ceratopsian.
Here is a specimen no idea if it pertains to your elusive Carcharodontosaurus skull
My man actually made me win the argument fr, and he lost to the guy who believed paleox wasn't real 💀
I don't trust anything in this chat rn
Me neither

Bro is beating himself up rn
Wtf......... well that doesn't really matter tbh because the point was that carches did face biting and since our only meraxes has evidence of it then 100% of meraxes have evidence of it
You know what this has taught me tho, we could all use a lil practice in identifying our animals
No evidence, 100 percent confidence 🗣️
Fred defeated himself lol. But yeah I think the maxilla I posted is indeed the one you’re looking for. Pray I don’t Fred myself.
Yeah . . .
Let it be known I beat fred in an argument with nothing but my wits, bro got smacked down just by talking to me, Skill issue fr
Bro the evidence is literally in front of you, a mapu skull with evidence of face biting is right in front of you and since that's the only mapu specimen 100% of our mapu specimens have evidence of it
I can see mistaking sinraptor for a carcharodontosaurid tho. I had a double take wondering if it was sin or some weird carch I wasn't familiar with but lamb clarified it
I won the argument for him. Couldn’t bear to watch it further
Mapu does not equal carchar, who let bro cook again
Also pronto provided evidence of it
ANYWAYS, is anyone wanting to talk about the new discovery of Diplodocus being ginger in color and the implications it has for other sauropods?
Potentially being ginger or yellow colored
And idk if we know the extent of said coloration
Fred, where is that carchar specimen you were talking about? remeber Mapu and Carchar are still 2 seprate animals, either that or you made up a source fr
It implies that sauropods have scales. Very surprised 😮
You never said carch specifically originally, what you originally said is tyrannosaurs are more aggressive than carcharadontosaurids because tyrannosaurs have evidence of face biting
I was mainly talking about the purpose of said color -- whether it is for camouflage and whatnot.
NUH UH, I SAID CARCHARDONOTSAURS AND GIGANOTOSAURUS, who let bro cook and burn the whole house down again
Bro is cooking with the stove off
This is carch...........
Blud is finished 💀 had to use other carcharadontosaurids to stand a chance against my might, your right, I should just take the w
Lets not hype yourself up too much
Yeah you're right, Fred embarrassed himself enough thinking that a rex was a Carchardontosaurus
Tbf you literally never specified carch, scanova is the one who brought up carch having evidence of face biting
@wary pantherPlease remain polite and respectful towards other members. Refer to our #rules
I say time out for the sillies
I was talking about carch, I didn't say it out right but in no way was I referring to anything else, but hey, what ever gets you to sleep
Yeah that was pretty bad when I mixed up dasp with carch
But we have evidence of face biting in carch and meraxes
a shocking revelation
Oreos are the perfect cookie I swear
You know that cool thing about the diplo coloration is the implication not only for it but other sauropods
DASP? nah way bruh, I concede, I don't want to aruge no more 💀
Bro you weren't even the one who brought up carch, my original statement was actually about giga
the implication that we have a shot at identifying some sauropod colors if we find more scales is a beautiful thing
Personally I think the chocolate chip cookie is more balanced.
What sort of implications might I ask
1, don't want to argue, and 2, find evidence fred, then we will talk
Ah yes, because all your takes are good, it's not like you said the palaeoloxodon femur wasn't from palaeoloxodon and that palaeoloxodon might not be an elephant
Fred my homie you know when you get involved with an argument and it gets perpetual and strays, we at that point boss let's shift gears
Guess we are even now, truce?
I posted evidence of meraxes (a close relative of giga( having evidence of face biting and chonk posted evidence of carch having face biting
Determining how sauropod colors may have been factored by, whether for complete camouflage, intimidation, etc., in my opinion at least.
the implication is basically that sauropods may hav had a much more vibrant range of colors than the largest mammals today (those colors could still be somewhat muted but still), it’s not a huge revelation it’s just cool to have some confirmation
Rad
Fred I just called a truce, 2 don't find me images of Carchardontosaurus realtives and call it evidence when I never mentioned them
Bro the thing chonk posted is carcharadontosaurus
Chonk?
Big ungulates can be kind of fun coloured too i think. All I can think of is Giraffidae tho
Oh, he's called pronto here, chonk is his name on a different server
giraffes are the big one for fun coloration yeah
Was that an actual Carchardontosaurus image?, alr guess he won it for you
Wait, where was the bite mark on the carchar? I cant see it
then just look it up
what's circled is the maxillary fenestra, all theropods have that
Im gunna scream
I've never heard of the saharicus maxilla having bitemarks, so I can't say that it's right, but i can't say that it's wrong either
I know Acrocanthosaurus got the [censored] bitten out of it by a croc (and survived), and Sinraptor got the [censored] bitten out of it by another theropod (and didn't survive), and a bunch of Allosaurus specimens have broken or injured jaws. that's about it for allosauroids
I think I can guess what the [CENSORED] thing is. 
And you dare doubt Randomdinos, crazy
I'm just, like, some guy. A random guy even
as for the [censored] I keep forgetting the censorship here and my comments get deleted
Noted. 
Oh, and don't forget about the thagomizer that went through an Allosaurus's [CENSORED].
Anyway uh what is balaur
A prehistoric herbivorous/omnivorous bird, last I heard.
Doesn’t it change every paper
Dunno -- I never bothered looking at Balaur and its history. 🤷
Anyway, prehistory
probably a basal bird (meaning an avialan), although some papers apparently still place it as a weird dromaeosaur so. ? unclear?
I’ve returned, the neotype has all the pathological stuff, not the paratype. At least a think it’s the paratype, holotype pics look like different material
Hmm, how many Camptosaurus specimens do we have?
Trust in birb ☺️
balaur gets placed all over, at one point someone even threw it in with the unenlagines, right now it’s kind of a split between basal avialan and really weird dromaeosaur
Naish and a few others had a paper recently that basically amounted too “we can’t rule out dromaeosaur but it’s less likely than avialan”
Speaking of birds, what should I make of these possible Maastrichtian NA Procellariiformes.
who even named balaur "balaur"
like... it's just a copy paste of the name of that romanian dragon
there's no creativity on it
y'know what...
nvm... don't even think abt it
this guy hasn't even heard of the location-saurus gang
Those are my favs
Albertosaurus is the king of that gang
Balaur is a better name then 98.999% of all dinosaur names change my mind
Balaur is a bird for the sole reason that I like saying it’s my favorite bird 
any dinosaur can be a bird if you stretch the definition enough 
Let’s goooooooooooooooooo Halszkaraptor is a loon after all!
cough cough
sauroniops
cough cough
you think dinosaurs would appear fat but secretly be all muscle?
Isn't the Prehistoric Planet Trex based on this concept?
is it?
maybe?
idk
i mean we have rex iirc
chonk in the outside, muscular in the inside
Large crocodiles look fat but they are all muscle
I mean he's chonky but it can't be all fat it has to be bulk of some kind
U can ws with a trophy still right
this is paleo chat
I wouldn’t see why not
some dinosaurs for sure
I wouldn't use a hippo to convey this but, I suppose it would be possible for some dinosaurs to look deceptively bulbous but are actually quite muscular
Insert that one Spino meme here
Lmao scrolling up this channel and seeing someone use the phrase "Rex winrate" unironically 💀
Wait someone actually said that 😭
Careful not to discuss too much actual paleontology here, wouldn't want to interrupt the awesomebros conjuring absurd hypotheticals to justify getting to say "t.rex wins" just one more time.
I love Rex but even I know it ain't invincible, a Trike would absolutely demolish a Rex if given the chance
Rex wins against twenty camptos 🙏
When did Trike even come to be used as a nickname for Triceratops anyhow?
Idk but it’s better than anything else it could be right?
Me when we have more evidences of regular T.rex predation over Triceratops than on other HC taxon.
I think people mostly try to depict it as a brutal fight where the 2 are clashing, with each one facing each others, or either Rex being incapable of going against a Trike on face to face (even though we have evidences they did it).
The better option always is an ambush on the pelvic area, but we know that some Rexes indeed have going to the front, likely aiming the neck. Some were successful and some were not.
Picture one : Tyrannosaurus bite marks, shown by the red arrows, on a Triceratops illium.
Picture two : Tyrannosaurus bite marks on two different Triceratops specimens, both on the frill.
Picture three : snapped Triceratops horn. Yellow arrows are pointing to tooth marks left by Tyrannosaurus.
Picture four and five : recent abstract about again Tyrannosaurus bite marks on a Triceratops frill.
Let's also not forget that the average Triceratops is very far from the 9 tons everyone is running with. We have hundreds, if not thousands, of specimen and the average size would be about 5 to 6 tons, which is quite smaller than average Tyrannosaurus with its 8 tons.
I do not mean to discredit Triceratops, nor place it as a "Rex fooder". I only mean that Tyrannosaurus would have regularly hunted Triceratops: it would not have been an occasional prey item and these predators were well equipped to face these preys.
I’ve been watching this debate for a while now but I think this is the best crafted argument I’ve seen on the subject
Satler refers to the sick triceratops as a trike in the first Jurassic Park, so at least since 91 it's been in use, and probably earlier.
How do we know that this wasn't Tyrannosaurus scavenging over a Triceratops carcass
I think bite marks on the head indicates hunting because the head isn’t very meaty, other parts could be of scavenging too
If Tyrannosaurus had a consistent way of feasting on a trike which is strongly supported by Triceratops pathologies, then more likely than not it indicates that rex would’ve hunted Triceratops regularly enough to understand how to more efficiently eat it
There's also the simple fact that with the amount of triceratops in Hell Creek something had to be eating them.
Triceratopsines in general were probably much more hardwired for physical defense than other ceratopsids, but they still were regularly predated.
The paper which mentions bite marks on the frills also mentions that the marks match the distortion caused by a Tyrannosaurus feeding on a carcass
Individual hunting behaviors may lead towards rex hunting either trike, edmont, or even ankylo’s more frequently than other taxa (like the Tarchia specimen with bite marks from Tarbosaurus) but as a whole Triceratops was predated on frequently enough that your average Tyrannosaurus was pretty likely to have developed a specific way of eating one
I'm not discounting that Tyrannosaurus hunted Triceratops, however from modern animal feeding behaviour I would assume(?) that it hunted it less than a hadrosaur like Edmontosaurus purely because Edmontosaurus is smaller and lacks horns
Somewhat similar to how modern lions seldom hunt buffalo
Edmontos and trikes were about the same size generally. The largest edmontos were the largest things in the formation.
I thought those were not confirmed to be pathologies and could have been something else?
I don’t doubt that a rex would’ve preferred hunting an obviously less armored herbivore, but I think it’d be more willing to take on a trike than a 10+ ton superadult Edmonto
The average specimens I think simply comes down to whichever was more abundant and more frequently encountered between the two
A lot of the pathologies found on trikes are pretty shut cases. Edmonto is a bit debatable in some circumstances. A lot of hadrosaurs get injured tails from high-stress movement and environmental damage rather than predators.
I was talking about the pathologies on Edmontosaurus
From what I remember Becky's Giant may have been a Saurolophine as some traits present which were attributed to pathology may not have been
Also from what I remember the largest cranial fragments (?) were quite fragmentary in themselves so I would assume the super-adult Edmontosauruses are on thin ice
Interrsting
Keep in mind that the paper proposing that new giant hadrosaur also state that said differences from typical edmonto might just come from aging. We don't have a lot of giant edmontosaurus so it's not exactly clear what they might look like compared to typical edmontos as they get older.
Probably has something to do with trikes being 3 wheeled bikes and triceratops being a 3 horned ceratopsian.
Then again we call spino, spoon... who knows where that came from.
Some healed.
Swimbo is a better nickname 
Me when an argument is supported by the literature :
What is the most up to date bite force estimation for Sarcosuchus?
None have been made
It would have to be higher than the largest modern crocodiles (>26 kN) but lower than Purussaurus (69 kN)
I think it came from Ark
True
Trike has been a nickname for triceratops for a while actually, I think thanks to JP influence
the oldest I can find is this toy from 1997/98 that referred to it as Trike
oh, that's interesting
Its been long enough since I watched the movies that I can't remember if they call them trike at all in any of them, though at the very least i dont think they do in the original. Maybe in TLW since this is what that toy is promo for
Glad the “awesome-bros” in the paleo-chat can unite to explain how an ecosystem works.
I'm confused, what exactly does that guy's breakdown of trike pathologies have to do with what I said about chuds trying to gameify animals like they're in a fight club?
wheres the evidence of meraxes face biting
Pretty sure it's called trike at least once in the original. Name came from the franchise eitherway and just stuck around
Ellie calls it trike in the first movie
This same sorta thinking is what spawned the theory of Barsboldia being an exceptional Saurolophus specimen, with the more exaggerated sacral spines being a symptom of age. However, none of the saurolophus we have have spines as long as they are younger adults iirc, and Barsboldia is often placed off as a basal member of edmontosaurini (At the very least, Shant has a similar ridge above the hip, so it’s not TOO weird of a trait to see)
So Barsboldia is an Edmontosaurini, that was my I intuition but I thought I’d read something different
There are none.
Well there it is lol. In my defense over thinking otherwise its been like a year and thats enough for me to forget everything ever 
There are quite a few suggestions the two will be lumped. While multiple large hadrosaurs in an area isn’t out of the question, the uncanny similarity in Bars and Saurolo’s spinal columns make it hard to ignore their association
Meraxes description does describe the skull as non pathological and does not show any sort of bite marks, even though it is an old animal (40 to 60 years old).
go grandpa
is it possible some thalattosuchians could death roll?
like probably not the thin snouted ones right but I could see it with geosaurines like dakosaurus
As it stands, they are distinct, but I personally wanna see them lumped so PoT can remodel Bars into it
Does anyone have any art of Mesozoic pterosaurs or birds in a feeding frenzy type scenario?
Yeah I doubt most of them did, they had more of a piscivore thing going on so there really isn't much need. But larger, stouter ones like Dakosaurus I'd say so. While not quite the same we do see things like large sharks employing a similar "rip off chunks" strategy on stuff like whale carcasses
teleosauroids are more gharial like so I can't really see them doing it
Pov: T.rex, changes a little throughout the years, Pov: Spinosaurus, whole different being
is the idea that camptosaurus could walk on 4 legs outdated now?
curious you specified mesozoic pterosaurs as if they existed outside then
Iirc their wrists don’t allow for a heavy amount of it
thats what I thought yeah
Probably followed along the lines of a lot of bipedal ornithopods where they could rest weight on their forelimbs but probably wouldn't do so well trying to locomote like that
Danian pterosaurs
the wrists wouldn't be the problem though, right? ceratopsians, thyreophorans and a few other quadrupedal dinosaurs don't pronate their wrists
it doesnt come from a need to pronate but just simply not having the structural support. Regardless of whether we can pronate our wrists, I promise if you tried walking on all fours for a while your wrists would get pretty sore
yeah just wondering if camptosaurus's arms could bare its weight
I find strange how hard it is to kind proper Maastrichtian bird art. Feel like it’s infinitely easier to depict them and show scenarios which pertain to their lifestyles and such.
They are a little few and far between, small and fragmentary so don't fossilise often. But I think for the most part they're just overshadowed by the non-avian dinosaurs, it's a similar story with basically every other mesozoic animal, such as mammals or non-mosasaur squamates
Yea, it’s not about pronation much at all, just whether or not the wrists and digits could be sufficiently load bearing. In Campto’s case, we don’t have any extensive research on the topic to my knowledge, but it’s somewhat robust hand anatomy shows that it was probably experimenting with quad movement
Experimenting LMAO
That's a good question, but I don't think the slender snouted ones would have needed to given their convergent snout shape to gharials which cannot death roll.
As for Geosaurines, I think they could do just fine as they were capable of tearing, pulling and suction feeding.
death rolling becomes somewhat redundant when your whole shtick is just grabbing a fishing and swallowing it
cool
they could suction feed??? I thought that was a fish only thing
Yea, probably pushing itself off the ground or grazing on all 4s
tbf yeah I don't see why it wouldn't at least hold its weight on them when bending down to eat, drink, or manage something else
A lot of marine animals are capable of suction feeding.
Whales are a good example. Either baleen whales, sperm whales, beaked whales or oceanic dolphins.
That weird frog headed turtle:
coulda sworn whales just ate their food without inhaling it, neat
Schlorp
Suction feeding is basically just opening your mouth fast enough that the pressure difference forces water (and whatever is in the water) into your mouth, like a momentary vacuum. Plenty of animals do it because its one of the easiest and best ways to catch food in a medium like water
ahh I see
The problem with water is when you push against it, you also push the surrounding water. So if you push your hand forward to grab something in the water, you will often push it further away before you manage to grab it. If you create a vacuum you can force it towards you instead (or do what lots of piscivores do and get Thin so you push as little water as possible)
Also Ocepechelon
Two of the wackiest giant Cryptodirans found from the same formation
The other being Alienochelys
forgot about ocepechelon yeah, I love that thing lol
alienochelys just has a flat face what's so wacky about it?
Just particularly durophagous feeding habits
ah
what were the arms of bipedal pseudosuchians like postosuchus and poposaurus doing?
their best
in light of the new Dryptosaurus mod..its bad enough i see no one ever talk about Drypto but its even less i see talk about its huge hand claws
Oh, I can actually talk about drypto more freely now
Yeah its such a cool animal. Just the entire premise of it, what if we took a tyrannosaur and let it keep its longer arms
and give it meat hooks
Such an enigmatic ecology as well.
welcome to Appalachian fossils
At least Hornerstown is full of birds. Not that pertains to the megafauna 
depends how big a bird is
There might be a large bird from there. Idk if Larramendi has scaled all these fellas lol
but Drypto is just..amazing cause ts like a Albertosaurine-ish headed alioramine bodied and legged tyrannosaur with the arms of like Yutyrannus but with 2 fingers and massive butcher meat hook claws
since yesterday was Rexes birthday, i went on just a Nostalgia trip of depictions and i came under the realization that Albertosaurus rex was..weirdly common for depictions
and i think it started with Phil tibbets rex that i swear i was sure was just Albertosaurus and seems to have ended with Prehistoric Park
Albertosaurus rex?
Albertosaurine rex i guess
What is that though. I’ve never heard of this term
credit: Phil Tibbet Studio
its just T.rex but more Albertosaurine build to the point its just Albertosaurus
Huh
doesnt help that in Prehistoric Park the rex was literally just a slightly modified Albertosaurus model
Well, I guess that’s a thing then
for Disneys Dinosaur, one of the T.rex concepts was just Albertosaurine build rex
Tbf, back then rex was depicted way less bulky, so it ended up looking like an albertosaurine by proxy
i hate Albertosaurine by term..its just Alberto and Gorgo and its argued ones the other
Sometimes clades be like that
Wikipedia says Laornis is kind of big maybe. Probably a big seabird at that point though
Si
Does anybody have refs for Ptychodus ?
Tbf, when you have such thick leg bones like those, I don't think Camptosaurus needed to go quadrupedal. 
Radical Rocks
Jiggy
Mod Id: UGC_M_YZK74KD09W_SK
What ?
you're in the wrong channel, then
Take on Squalicorax.
It was a Lamniform and not an Hybodontiform, even less an Orectolobiform.
^^
Mf gave dasp a tumor
Big brain time
He works out at the library
the neck would not buldge like that.
Dan's skeletal has the head retracted to on the neck, which increase the neck height.
Anybody got any refs for Carcinosoma?
is titanosaurus valid?
if not what do the fossil remains belong to?
titanosaurus is troodon if it was a sauropod only if instead of a tooth it was some caudals that were lost for over a century
so no fossils
btw are there more than 2 triceratops species?
I was looking for references for some art and I found this
art by Thejuras on deivant art
those last two don't exist
titanosaurus has fossils still assigned they just aren't diagnostic
Oh lookie here, maybe you can answer my question about Dermochelyids
what about dermochelyids
how much this guy weigh because I dont trust googles answer
Is it possible the other members of the clade would’ve had the monochrome colouration that Dermochelys has
I suppose it'd be possible and I'd imagine the majority would've had some form of countershading
just looked up dermochelys
why are you talking about a leatherback sea turtle?
Cause I’m obsessed with Mesodermochelys rn
based turtles
hmmmm yes what should we call the dermochelys thing from the mesozoic
I wonder how similar they would’ve appeared in life, which I why I proposed the question
larramendi has it at 4.3t which seems fairly reasonable
About right for a sauropod of that size yeah
The idea of something like this living in the maastrichtian pacific is too cool to pass up on.
larramendi?
Certainly an individual of all time. Speaking of has he done anything for Laornis?
whats the most armored sauropod because apperently its not this guy
could any abelisauroid actually take down iguanadon? becasue carno certianly aint
I have nightmares about him rebbachisaurus tooth scaling
titanovenator wouldn't have trouble with iguanodon if it didn't live in a different hemisphere fifty million years away
for a skeleton bro looks BUILT
these lads would probably be fine but most of everything else wasn't getting bigger than 3t
whats the largest neotheropod?
rex
neotheropod
still rex
largest coelphysoid
probably gojirasaurus or maybe some of those eubrontes tracks if they belong to a coelophysoid
last time I checked gojirasaurus is dubious
cause its indet
Maraapunisaurus Fragillimus
it still consists of a probable coelophysoid material its just not diagnostic on the generic level
what about it
They should add it
it too fat
Wrong chat I think anyways
how did lythronax get its name?
campanian eutyrannosaurian described post late-2000s edgy name syndrome
Beautiful response
and argestes because its from the southwest
how did spinosaurus walk with those toothpick legs
WHAT IF
What if it didn’t do whatever that implies
tripod stance
Even if gojirasaurus exists (which it doesn't), it wouldn't be the largest of the early theropods, given dilophosaurus is fairly close in relation.
whats bigger than dilo?
A lot of more derived Neotheropods
Herrerasaurus also exists, but we don't know what's going on with herrerasaurs taxonomically.
chinese prosauropod dorsal
whats the biggest prosauropod
that big elliot thing
Plateosaurus itself I think? What's big elliot?
undescribed big lower elliot bipedal thing
Nvmd
I think I’m onto something with Dermochelyid condition to monochrome schemes
the lower elliot thing is a monster so that’s the largest prosauropod, after that it is a plateosaurus specimen I think
Triassic is wild for that one
damn straight
remember what they took from you
There is evidence yes.
I bet where scratching the surface of how HUGE sauropods could get
Mmmmm sure
It seems tyrannosaurus preferred to remove the head when feeding to get it out of the way. Also we have no idea what maraapuni would look like and thus how big it actually would be.
It definitely was in the realm of largest dinosaurs outright, but it's placement as a very early rebbachisaur makes details very tricky
As an added note larramendi's two largest basal neotheropod things (dandakosaurus and shawanensis) were both assigned to theropoda because of similiarities in the vertebrae to those of sinosaurus. Said "sinosaurus vertebrae" is actually from a prosauropod.
we really can’t say anything about maraapunisaurus because the original measurements are very likely not reliable
do yall think certain ankylosaurs pulled an echidna and burrowed a bit with only there armor exsposed to protect them during wild fires
W h a t
Somebody Please Show Me This Fossil
I'm So Curious Now..
Reminds me of pike
OH. MY. GOD.
I NEED ONE IN PATH NOW.
Path hehe
Welp
To The Modding Channel I Go To Ask The Great Question.
whats the max weight for theropods like giga, rex, and spino
also whats dinosaur has the coolest meaning in there name
Giga is
also whats the diffrence between them
One is giga the other isn’t and is smaller
whats there weight
all carchs look the same 
Basically
fr
Giga is within 7-8.6 tons and tyrano is within 6-7
As far as I recall
giga is the biggest of there species right
Yep giga is the trex of carchs basically
well rex only has like 2 of its species close to its size
giga has like 4
also whats gigas largest esitmate currently?
Believe that would be Dan's reconstruction of the dentary specimen at ≈10.4t, rivalling the largest rexes
Someone correct me if I'm wrong
I'll stick with Sue and Scotty
there like 8t
It’s a stomp because one went extinct 27 million years before the other
no its a stomp beacuse rex would destory giga in a fight
Rex has new weight estimates that put it the largest individuals at around 12t no?
Nuh uh
No lol. They're certainly not 8 tons.
Hmm I could have sworn I saw a study recently
rex has better vison, inteligence, and raction speed
the theoretical max for the species is still around 12 tons, no specimens actually approach that right now
i have a question, woujld deinosuchus act like a saltwater crocodile seeing how majoirty of the usa was under the water in the west interior seaway?
Oh ok that’s what it was
It really doesn’t matter… cause one died before the other
whats the max for theropods in general
It was a coastal animal so I would imagine it would
I would guess that theoretical max of 12 tons
At least 10
Grams*
id bet 13 to 15 tons
15 tons is insane
you think deinosuchus was out there eating sub adult mosaurids? tylosaurids?
Wrong the maximum weight for theropods is 12.7884848387373774kg and 84 cents
I mean I could see that being within the realm of possibility but there’s currently no evidence to suggest that
Seeing as the largest theropod is tyrannosaurus and its theoretical max is 12t, that number
15 ton deinocherius.
nah its probably 13t
I'm also just taking that theoretical max number at face value I have no actual idea
Largest reliable rex is 10+tons tho
Seems to like Bothremydid turtles. Don’t know about any Mosasauridae though
z
that’s not even how all reptiles work
To my knowledge, rex growth is understood well enough also
15 ton rex might be peak idk
Rexes stink I can name 5 better tyrannosaurs and a bunch more theropods
Proof
but hey its just a theroy
80 ton rex peak
Didn’t check this number, but can confirm it’s true
Did the gdi myself
13 tons is prob the MAX
Real question is why does Lacerda’s Plotosaurus look so different than any other Plotosaurus depiction I’ve seen
fastest swimming plesiosaur
my favorite plesiosaur
long necker
I was being facetious, it’s a mosasaur
tegu mosa is crazy
Say what you will, lil dorsal fins on mosasaurs ain't a bad look
do the last 2 exist
honestly it looks cute
They’re fictional
Is it real and true though?
womp
Idk but I like the look
also what did triceratops skin look like
Righty oh, I’ll trust Lacerda then
chat is this guy real
I haven't heard of Chilantai being clapped
But I also haven't heard anyone say with certainty what Chilantai was
chilantai is underated
why was dinosaur simulator roaster so bloated (the main reason why I know about these dinos in the first place)
Prolly isn’t too intensive to make ‘em and presumably they make money somehow
More is always better. No need to argue with me, my logic is flawless
nah
also most of the roaster there still has jp rex sound effects
did ankylosaurs burrow during fires to protect them selves? like echidnas
what a coincidence someone was talking about this earlier. I was just going to say yeah, dryptosaurus is SUPER underrated
I feel like the most that larger ones could "burrow" is to dig small hole in the ground to lay in and close off their legs or to dig for food
not like how Conway had it here afaik, but it's still possible IMO that other ceratopsians maaay have had some back thorns for whatever purpose?
idk if you guys have seen the "dinosauria" cinematic shorts on youtube, but there's a euoplocephalus that does exactly what I'm talking about in one of them
stylized animated short films by dead sound on youtube. they go hard. but here's what I'm talking about
I could definitely see smaller ankylosaurs digging more advanced "burrows" though like in prehistoric planet
What a lil cutie
I imagine more like a creater
echidnas do that too so it cant be to far fetched to think they ankylosaurs did it to
the isles mid btw
the roaster bloat is insane
There’s nothing particularly comparative between Monotremes and Ankylosaurs
they have defenses
what a comparison 💀
And I don’t know specifically what Enchida does to burrow, but I doubt even Stegouros did what you’re showing in that image
ah yes a small insectivorous spiny mammal and a giant armored cow gator, comparable indeed
its burrows a bit to protect its self from the fire
An Enchida burrow.
Here’s the smallest Ankylosaur I know of.
yeah ankylosaur burrowing is a fun concept but-
ceratopsians that actually have proof of doing it-
protoceratops moment
also a leptoceratops moment
axe anky is so cool
Unite both genera and you get a Leptoceratopsidae moment
and jakapil
I don't think proto is a leptoceratopsid, just say "small ceratopsian moment"
was its macronarians specsificly that could'nt go on there hind legs
pretty sure they still could for very brief moments probably
but not like this tho right
that's rearing. While it would be brief for the macronarians yes they'd still be capable
just not as long as things like titanosaurs
Whoops
and honest to god diplodocids might be better at rearing than elephants and..
prosauropods where better
I must’ve been conflating prenoceratops
all the big boys with a center of gravity in their chest like brachi or titanosaurs would be very brief, probably to the point of being pointless aside from being probably very very scary
VULCANODON ON TOP
I beg to differ, proper sauropods are far cooler except like lessemsaurids they're cool
or fighting
big chin ceratopsians are chads
Surely Ferrisaurus will make an appearance in a PhP season 3. Especially cause it’s a newer genus
non ceratopsid ceratopsians are underrated really. I mean protoceratops and psittacosaurus get a lot of attention but the others get nothing
thoughts on loon spino
So little attention I just assumed basal morphotypes all belonged to one family lol
it like that lol
why alta built like.....
ugly as sin, especially for the sheer improbability of spinosaurus having the exact same color and patterning as a loon
chicken rex moment
duck feathers have a benefit in aquatic environments though, Idr what, but I guess it's an unlikely possibility
why does nobody talk about this thing btw, it's built like the spiderman kingpin that's hilarious (not as much as cotylorhynchus but whatever)
what if....
speaking of goofy looking sauropods, brachytrachelopan is a joy
It’s less wonky than that depiction. Still funky
dont do that to my man
wait WHAT
?
explanations I require. Did it really have those osteoderms and enourmous tail spines??
no its a sub species of a mod dino
This is a real thing?
Yes
YES
mmhmm
Are we sure we arent just missing some neck vertebrates
This thing is marvelous
nope
you gotta look deep for the wacko sauropods
Such sillies
coolest sauropod name tho (means volcano tooth)
Sauroposeidon might take the cake here sorry. As an objective fact really
you seen the exact opposite? this is xinjiangtitan, the mother of all longnecks if you ask me
and no, that's not exaggerated
YEAH RIGHT
xinjiangtitan's was at least proportionally longer
I think Mamenchisaurids are just beautiful
earthquake lizard god
tyrant titan
volcano tooth
gore king
all of them are just such cool names
Lythronax has such a good name man
Edgy, but good
IKR
fr
volcano tooth is a mid name, doesn't even sound like it means anything, just a combo of 2 "cool" words
gore king when the bistahi destroyer, monstrous murderer, powerful terror, and reaper of death enter the room
maip's name is edgy but it does kinda go hard
I beg to dipper
What does maips name mean again
whenever i hear maip my first thought is always this mf
heavy claw (baryonyx)
something like "he who kills with one swipe" or "he who kills with cold wind"
Name the dinosaurs
shadow of death who kills with cold wind or something like that
Austroposeidon deserves the official second best sauropod name for just being “Sauroposeidon” but southern
we talkin' bout a BEEEEAST
bistahieversor, teratophoneus, dynamoterror, thanatotheristes
therizinosaurus's name is kinda bussin' aside from the cheloniformis part but whatever
Thats awesome
Like how jaguar is he who kills with one leap
yall forgetting about him?