#paleontology
1 messages Ā· Page 1 of 1 (latest)
oh man would you look at that. they do have a decently noticeable amount of hair, especially at the mouth. kinda expected
They are very fuzzy like an elephant, and have special whiskers that are used to grab and hold onto food
Closest to hairlessness is likely the cetaceans tho, they have whiskers and a few body hairs, but thats it
Non-mammal synapsids are the best bet for nakey mammal things
Hmm, so cetaceans had hair on their face and all over their body?
Like every mammal , our common ancestor looked like a rat after all
so we are the rats
hmm sea potato
What is Epanterias, a distinct species , a big Allo specimen or Saurophaganax?
Anyone has up to date triceratops horridus skeletals?
who was bigger and weighed more deinosuchus or purasaurus
Deinosuchus
What is yalls fav allo?
torvosaurus gurney

uhh i said....
fragilis and jimmadseni
thanks
crap didn't realize it's bad res
here's with the good resolution
torvosaurus compared to saurophaganax
quick question
how accurate?
Largest megaraptoran provided chilantaisaurus and bahariasaurus aren't megaraptors and aerosteon was downsized for 9m to 7,5m
eh iirc chilantai possibly a neovenatorid or a primitive coelurosaur
while baharia idk
You guys are some smart ahh people lmao
Not really, we are just interested in paleo stuff.
even i admit that i'm such a dino nerd š¤š¤
So am i but daym i cant even understand what yous are saying lol
I'm not a biologist/paleonthologist by a MILE, so sometimes I'm in the same situation when the topic gets too complicated.
I have a question that's been bugging me about the megatherium (giant ground sloth) I'm currently drawing one and when I got to the head, I couldn't decide if it had internal ears like current tree sloths or external ears like all depictions of it. I'm no expert but I'm really interested in finding out what the answer is
ehhh...that depends on how you would drawing the megatherium. you can draw ur megatherium either it has an internal ears nor external ears
my opinion is draw it with external ears like all megatherium depictions 
Okey ā¤ļøā¤ļø
This good for a Rex remodel idea
Accuracy wise
(Based off of multiple specimens)
Carcharodontosaurid
Huh...reminds me of the zhucheng from a roblox game
Well Rex and zhcheng are very related animals
I quite like it, only thing is removing the jugal keratin š¤ (And replacing it with large scales or smth akin to that)
Yeah but it's just the shape of the skull that is absolutley on point with that exact model
A. Europaeus
Same
Europaeus has some validity issues iirc
But i mean
insert Europe joke here
Anyone have the info for Deinosuchus being bigger than Purussaurus.
Europaeus might be just fragilis or smth
Possibly but it's living all the way across the atlantic ocean and has some key diffrences with the skull shape
Since A. Europaeus is from portugal then... RONALDOSAURUS
Afaik europe was an island very close to NA during the late jurassic and I dont see major differences between fragmentary skull remains of europaeus and fragilis
TY someone on youtube said I needed to "check my facts" and go "know common knowledge."
Future sadly I tried to post those links to youtube but the "spam filter" hide my comment.
But there are diffrences, not that many because if there are too many that could make it a diffrent genus.
Idk what they are specifically, maybe its really just location
Havent read its description paper
i have question again
what's the differences between anurognathus and jeholopterus?
there was something different between em...maybe
Wasnāt Europaeus also larger in general than fragilis
Hey Iām new and I got a question
@pearl briar @hallow shell any links to read these by any chance?
Think it was smaller
these can be explained by individual variation
Wait yea nvm
I remembered the size of both torvosaurus species in their respective formations
Is T. Imperator larger than T. Rex?
T. Imperator is not real
is T. rex larger than T. rex?
t imperator and regina is invalid so no
Wdym
The three species hypothesis is a load of nonsense. For perspective, the only differences between the supposed three species are, get this, slight variation in tooth size and slight variation in the thickness of the femur. Thatās it.
They didnāt exist, didnāt Jack Horner bring it up and then it was immediately disproved
Greg paul did that
Jack Horner...
imperator and regina is nonsense and bullcrap
Oh
so thatās why no one talks about it
The same mf that thinks centrosaurus, styracosaurus, pachyrhinosaurus, and others should all be one genus.
štheres no way he said that
or Deinonychus and Velociraptor
no way ššššššššš
Wasn't that article debunked years back??? T. Rex is the only species. Anyways to answer the earlier question asked by Lamborlobator if the allosaur diffrences were individual variation...well there was a huge size diffrence and those allos lived like 2000 miles apart since
- Atlantic ocean being about 200-100 Km wide at the time
- The journey from the east coast to colorado.
I thought that since 2019 but no one talked about it so I just kept remembering it
They can be same sized
Yeah well it was debunked by some paleontologists who found too little evidence
Oh ok Ty
The whole Regina and imperator thing is hilarious to me in particular cause I remember there being debate about its controversy in the days leading up to the paper getting published. We didnāt know what it was exactly so people like Holtz not being the happiest kind of increased the hype cause everybody likes a spicy theory. Then it comes out, we realize that it was just the same bs Greg has been trying to pull for the past 40 years, and just go https://youtube.com/shorts/QztCvnmGcYw?feature=share
Is that Simo HƤyhƤ???? WTF IS HE DOING HERE???
Bro thinks Pelecanimimus can fly
Justice likes the sniper god ig
Do you guys think itās possible to bring back dinosaurs (I donāt)
Some
Even if we could I donāt see the point. Letās fix our planet and bring back the stuff we murdered first.
Dna degradation moment
Also Simo was pretty small so ofc A. Europaeus would TOWER over him (Simo is a winter war sniper that killed 500 soviet soldiers in 1939-1940 and somehow he managed to be in a dinosaur size comparison)
I READ THAT AS SPINO

itās 100% possible but not ethical or necessary
That is something
Thatās it, Iām done, who is really the biggest pterosaur
Queztalcoatlus
Hatzegopteryx
hatz
hatz
its very likely all three allosaurus species are just members of a. fragilis
Cant disagree
For refrence, A. Europaeus is about 2 - 3 meters tall and A. Fragilis 3-4 or even 5 meters tall.
The person in the size chart is Simo HƤyhƤ known as "The white death" being 1.6 M tall, that would make the allo in the photo 2,5 M tall.
it was not 16 feet tall lol mf was not azhdarchid height
googlešæ
you still can see dinosaurs
just see birds
problem solved
Proof?
16 Ft is rex height and that's the largest estimate, but from what i have seen the most is 3-4 meters
The type specimen for a. jimmadseni is an immature specimen so by that fact alone it shouldn't have been erected as it's own species and the small differences between europaeus is likely individual variation, something that is very common in allosaurus
fragilis and europaeus arent that different in size
No 16 feet is a whole 4 feet taller than Scotty
Not really good at the imperial system...
Rex was barely hitting 3.7 or so meters tall
allosaurus size according to google
You talking about Big Al?
Gigachad allo
The differences between them become largely irrelevant once you look into the differences between a lot of the fragilis specimens we have...
Then there's NMMNH P-26083 who isn't assigned to any specific genus and remains "allosauridae indet." but is most likely allosaurus and that boi is sauro sized
This started from "Is A. Europaeus a valid species" into "How big was allosaurus?" And "Were all allosaurs just fragilis?"
Saurophaganax is the guy who is actualy differentš«¦
Diffrent genus
Saurophaganax likely being an allosaurus too
unlikely, very
It's like a 50/50
Think there just a supersized gigachad fragilis being way larger thhan the rest of it's spdcies is unlikley, or all fragilis remains we have found are sub adults and sauro is just an adult fragilis (impossible really)
Saurophaganax has tyrannosaurid like chevrons and very different vertebra
Nah we have tons of adult fragilis specimens again size between fragilis specimens is heavily variable
Then allosaurus can be the same sizs as rex
So in that case google was right
No
oh the kangaroo pose vs hip pose ordeal again
Not sure there is a skeletal that actually shows that tho is there?
No because there's no good description of Saurophaganax
Itās extremely fragmentary and the bad skeletals donāt really help
We have tons of undescribed stuff so
Yea but I don't think it's being described
It also doesn't help that people seem to think it's a carch
Imo the only thing that really distinguishes sauro from allo is the vertebrae. Everything else seems extremely similar to allo from what Iāve read, although the descriptions are very poor. Iām personally in the A. Maximus camp since it lived with other Allosaurus and I donāt feel that sufficient time, space, or niche availability would have been available to allow for a whole new genus of Allo to evolve
Imo A. Europaeus is it's own species
One day Im the one who laughs here
Issue is the whole chevron thing is just from word of mouth and given the amount of conflicting information and misinformation I can't trust it until i see it in a paper
Really? Just word of mouth? How unscientific⦠smh⦠idk then. I need to see a paper too.
Afaik it's word of mouth I've looked for something referencing it for awhile and I couldn't find anything so I can't take it for fact atm I don't doubt it but I'm not going to jump on it either
Where'd you find that?
Bing
What website tho
see this is why i'm always asked "what is the most up-to-date [animal name] size (especially length and weight)" to you guys bcuz do not ever trust google and wikipedia y'all 
I forgor (btw i used google)
The chevron thing is literally described
It is?
Does that make Sauro valid?
Idk how diagnostic chevrons are, we gotta wait for the further description
So not yet huh, eh it is what it is.
Afaik not super diagnostic
But like no other carnosaur has such chevrons
Which i find weird
You would think it would have popped up again in more derived genera
Two individuals are known from the quarry, which makes it likely a separate species at least (if not genus) rather than just a large specimen of A. fragilis
Basically no one supports it as a large specimen of a. fragilis
When and who described it cause I for the life of me can't remember this at all
Daniel Chure 1995
Saurophaganax is just Allo Prime
Interesting
Where 10.5m Dasp š
Undescribed
Do you guys think A. Europaeus is just Fragilis or that it's a separate species
Although afaik the chevron thing is from Chures long ass Allosaurus paper from 2000
Yeah the only skeletal that I know that has them is randomdinos' and I take every skeletal of sauro with a handful of salt since every sauro skeletal varies a lot
Heres also an informative video of chure talking about Saurophaganax https://youtu.be/m0aGEUlfiHY
Dr. Dan Chure, retired park paleontologist from Dinosaur National Monument speaks about the enigmatic predatory dinosaur Saurophaganx maximus found at the extreme western end of the Oklahoma Panhandle in 1931.
.
Likely yes
WICH? Yes what? As in it's fragilis or as in it's a valid species?
It's likely fragilis
I beg to differ
Same with jimmadseni
Europaeus is likely not fragilis since they lived in diffrent places on earth and when a genus of dinosaur is all across earth there aee most likely more species than one
Geographic location is not diagnostic
And let's talk about the time when they lived because as you may know that sometimes when one genus lives in ome generic area for a lot of time there are probably going to be diffrent species
ironically Chure supports the validity of jimmadseni & europaeus
The differences between the 3 species can be chalked up to individual variation since allosaurus vary wildly
Imma say jimmadseni has more of a right to be valid than euro does
I don't think either are
I'm agnostic, I can see both side's arguments until we get more material
Not my fault allosaurus is stupidly variable
very true, most dinosaurs seem to be pretty variable & we have a decent sample size for allosaurus to prove it was too
5 meters wtf
With the allo species they're all fragilis to me until we get more material especially europaeus, but with sauro I see both sides
The chevron thing really throws me off. Why would Allo evolve such chevrons in the first place? Even from my ID perspective, Allo is clearly ancestral or ancestral adjacent to Saurophaganax, yet the two would have occupied extremely similar niches and lived in the exact same habitats. What could possibly prompt such a change in the chevrons into a tyrannosaurid style, especially if youāre basically doing the same things as Allo in the same place as Allo (if you arenāt still just Allo with weird chevrons) just on a larger scale?
Idk that's why I find it weird that it had them in the first plave and that it hasn't appeared in any other carnosaurian genera
SaurophaganaxidaešØ
There's also like zero evolutionary reason for sauro to have them in the first place
there is 1 reason: because
That's not something you or anyone else knows
if it's convergent evolution it's likely they served some purpose, even if we have no idea what
prolly to look cooler
Idk man. Megafaunal Ecology is pretty well understood. We know what Allo was doing, we know sauro is derived from Allo or at least a sister taxa that either evolved parallel to Allo, which makes no sense because Allo was so dominant in the environment both shared, or a very derived Allo that was specificalizing in larger game and through specializing developed differently shaped chevron as a the only meaningful difference other than size? Call me over confident, but the whole thingās fishy. Based on our understanding of the ecology of the environment of Sauro and the way ecology affects evolution, there truly is no reason why it would adopt tyrannosaur chevrons, except if there is some advantage shared between sauro and most tyrannosaurs, even smaller ones in size to sauro, which doesnāt make sense, because these tyrannosaurs were occupying many different niches themselves, making it less likely to be a specialization!
You are very over-confident lmao
We have no idea of Saurophaganax's niche besides "big game hunter" because it's so poorly described. I'm confused how you're able to draw out "It had no reason to evolve these", are you able to tell me why tyrannosaur chevrons are shaped like this?
I recommend John Foster's book Jurassic West for a discussion of Morrison ecology, but basically it was a vast continent-sized region we're talking about and a stretch of several million years on top of that. We have OK resolution for a Mesozoic ecosystem as to what was going on but frankly, that isn't saying much. All we really know about "Snax" is that it seems to be on the younger (i.e. later) side for the Morrison & it's been found more towards the southwest of the US than the more famous quarries- that's more than enough imo to justify a different ecology, different predators, etc. than the traditional A. fragilis sites
But to be clear, what are you implying is "fishy" about the specimens?
I would assume based on the fact that alioramids have the forward protruding chevrons, that is has something to do with the ancestral condition of tyrannosaurs. They also show up in maniraptoriforms, so perhaps a trait basal to certain coelurosaurs? Idk, but not an adaptation for gigantism. Whatās fishy to me is any origin story for the distinct chevrons and/or any ability for snax to become derived enough to be differentiated at the genus level. In addition, Allo itself has some forward protruding chevrons further down its tail than snax but theyāre still there, so it doesnāt feel like too much of a stretch for me to think that in certain Allo populations, a homeobox gene for these chevrons could have a slight edit that didnāt come with any specific advantage, but coincided in the size increase and thus got selected for unintentionally
I think the issue though is that the chevrons only appear in saurophaganax and not any other carnosaur even carchs don't have them
True. Not even obvious sauropod hunters such as Charcharodontosaurs
I'm still confused because nowhere did we imply that these funky chevrons in Sauro were linked to gigantism? At least, I swear I didn't. AFAIK tail muscles are linked to movement, so (just throwing this out here), the chevrons are attached to some form of movement that Saurophaganax and tyrannosaurs shared
Idk why we're even speculating when a good majority of the skeletal remains for Saurophaganax aren't published or at least, well-published
^^^ Could be that the animal might of needed to be very mobile with the prey it was hunting
Also yeah a lot of what we see with sauro atm is taken from prep rooms and pictured with a scale bar not even fully described yet and ppl are already trying to make out what it is, and one of the big things here us that some of scale bars used can oversize some of these bones by up to 20%
wasn't the original thing about the chevrons indicating it being separate from allo, regardless of why they were the way they were
Yeah that's what's confusing me. They are there, and they are different, so the question = is it enough of a difference to warrant a genus or species level split. IMO it's enough to differentiate it on a genus level
considering how diagnostic vertebra can be, and the other differences we can see is sauro etc, I think it's reasonable to differ on the genus level
Yeah sauro is probably it's own genus I just want to know why the tyrannosaurid chevrons
- Idk maybe it was a misinterpretation on my part. 2. But then why the locomotive change from Allo? Do we have an understanding of the difference of locomotion between Tyrannosaurs and allosaurus?
That we definitely have a good understanding of
Iām on team A. Maximus until i see a fuller description
As KM said here, perhaps it was hunting prey that required a heightened level of agility compared to Allosaurus, or something/other
AFAIK Torvo kicked the bucket and then Sauro came in, so likely shared the same niche (They were not outcompeted, I suspect it's the climate again)
Torvo went extinct because of the aridification of the Morrison and maybe to a small extant some competition with allo since it was a more of a generalist compared to torvo
I thought it was already arid by the time torvo had come around to it
That would make sense but issue is why didn't carchs evolve them too, they would have needed to be decently mobile as well
To my knowledge no since megalosaurids seem to prefer more wet environments
I seriously wonder how they make accurate dinosaur sounds like theseš¤š¤š¤
I have honestly never seen a depiction of a megalosaurid in something other than an equivalent to the New Caledonian dry forests
Yeah and I've never seen maip depicted in its correct habitat either so what
here is the secret: they guess
just the current exposure of the Morrison is over a million square km in size, in reality it was a continent size region. It had both arid & wet regions and diverse habitats. What we have are tiny snapshots of an enormous area
Oh what I thought it was all just super dry šdo you have any papers on the wet environments
Yeah the Morrison formation is massive
I really like the sounds though I hope they really sounded like that
one probably did but we will never know, all we can do is guess and dream
look into John Foster's work, he's the current authority on the Morrison paleoenvironment. I recommended his book earlier in the chat, Jurassic West: The Dinosaurs of the Morrison Formation and Their World
the typical view is of a subtropical, semi-arid savannah like environment predominating & that is true but far from the full picture. There are fossilized conifers from Utah that resemble PNW old-growth forest both in size & the amount of precipitation they indicate. It was a patchwork of many habitats, think of all the variety that can fit in a continent and you can get the idea. The climate was less variable then now, of course, but that doesn't mean it was all just one type of environment
aka the morrison was: yes
From Foster's book:
"The apparent contradiction between the semiarid climates indicated
by the rocks (Demko and Parrish 1998; Parrish et al. 2004; Engelmann
et al. 2004) and the wetter setting suggested by the plant, wood, fish,
and semiaquatic animal fossils (Tidwell 1990; Ash and Tidwell 1998;
Foster and Heckert 2011; Foster and McMullen 2017; Gee et al. 2019)
may be at least partially explainable, however. The geochemistry of the
rocks of the Morrison Formation suggests a semiarid climate, whereas
the abundance of large herbivorous dinosaurs, aquatic and semiaquatic
vertebrates, and relatively large plants indicates a significant supply of
water. But not all water needs to come from the sky in the form of humidity and rain.
Rather, the air mass over the Morrison basin may have
been fairly dry, and evaporation was possibly high. Much of the water in
the basin could have been groundwater flowing from the mountains to
the west. Surface runoff from the mountains also supplied a number of
perennial streams, and rainfall into the basin itself provided an additional,
seasonal component to the dampness of the soil and the levels of the
rivers and ponds. In fact, a system of shallow ponds and lakes (some of
them perennial) that existed in what is now the eastern half of Colorado
was ostensibly groundwater fed and resulted from a reemergence of the
water table caused by downslope flow of groundwater coming out of the
western mountains (Turner and Peterson 2004). It is also possible that
the contradiction between paleosols and large logs and other indications
of abundant precipitation reflect long-term, regional wet-dry cyclicity in
the climate that we do not have the fine-scale stratigraphic resolution to
distinguish in a formation representing about seven million years."
Okay if it was that variable then I could see snax being separate from Allo, but I still need more evidence before I change my mind
your skepticism is well taken, that's good science
whats the largest alvarezsaurid
This is gonna be a guess here but when looking at meraxes and some of the crachs might have just either went into speed and possibly even more of a chase/long game hunts, In acros case and maybe even the some of the larger carchs they tried to use those arms and necks to simply over power prey which could explain the such high spines and arco rather scary arm mobility.
When looking at what we have for sauro we have a animal that seems to be possibly more wider chested/torso ( proportionally ) and using its arms a lot more than any carch, these features may have it being a lot more in the face of the prey and those chevrons are serving as anchors of a lot of muscle to easier help turn this animal or not lose its mobility while also having this more in ur face type of hunting style ( this hunting style of trying to over power prey and still being fast and mobile is something you see in tyrannosaurs as well which could bring to have some similarities to them )
But again this is just a guess and could be a wrong or as right as any other shot in the dark rn
they take modern day bird/reptile sounds and mix them together
thats the secret
Ah ok so sauro likely adopted a similar "watch this drive" hunting strategy that crackhead tyrannosaurs employed good to know
sauro was also large enough it was probably dealing with juvenile sauropods and you need some serious grappling power for that
Well tbf allosauroids can still hunt adults if need be
I could see it fairing decently against camara or diplo (not sure if either of them was still around sauros time tho)
I don't think either were
Apparently there is evidence tho that allosauroids were hunting adult sauropods decently frequently
Both were, they were found in the same quarry. Plus a large apatosaurus
so pretty much a allosaur with gigantism exploits long neck bois having a skill issue
Thought they were found in older rocks tho?
They are found pretty much continuously throughout Morrison rocks, the snax quarry isn't that much younger- just comparatively
the dinosaurs specifically found at the Snovall Quarry include: Apatosaurus, Camarasaurus, Stegosaurus, Camptosaurus, & Brachiosaurus in addition to Saurophaganax
so it's pretty typical, it does seem to be a pretty wet environment right there too
Nostalgia anyone?
Biggest Bird
I quite like the jugal keratin 
AFAIK the area's not rough enough to really justify it. You can achieve the same effect with large scale clusters
I will likely do that
I really hope the devs see stuff like this and act on it, Rex kai and thal are recent but their models arenāt that great.. (accuracy wise)
How accurate is the PT Giganotosaurus mod? I've been wondering about that for a while. (The base subspecies of course)
Eh⦠itās alright, I would take off the scutes then it would be pretty much perfect to our modern knowledge
Have any of you ever seen a new dinosaur reconstruction or skeletal based on the newest information and thought "Wow that is ugly." or "This older reconstruction of how we thought the animal looked was so much better looking?"
Probably the new dunkleosteous for me
do carchs and abelisaurs have similar niches?
pretty sure no: the sausage bois from last ive seen were either run down and murder them, or just murder them in broad daylight while carchs being more clawing bleeding and stealing the literal flesh off bigger bois, though could be outdated and have variables clearly
no no, i meant like prey
ITS A YES OR NO ANSWER
uhhhhh maybe, i know they both had hadrosaurids( or something to that effect) and sauropods atleast, also depends which ones
I doubt it
Derived abelis did
ok quick question, other than size what's the difference between Eotrike and trike (Eotriceratops and Triceratops)
that eotrike is a bobble head
isnt that something they all had?
The most notable differences are proportional head sizes (Eotrike has a larger head for its body size) and more pronounced cheekbones afaik.
kinda but like eotrike was the biggest example by far, its how we used to think it was bigger than trike itself before scaling it correctly
so Eotrike is a bigger trike with more pronounced head features (yes ik the paleo police are coming for me now XD)
eotrike is smaller
moreso its a bobblehead with pronounced head features, hence why we used to think it was titanic
All we have of eotrike is the head and some ribs and vertebrae. If scaled using just the skull, then you get a larger animal then trike. However, vertebrae is more reliable, and when scaled that way you get an animal about the size of an average triceratops rather than an exceptionally large one. Eotriceratops just had a larger head for its body size than trike.
i think "biggest example by far" might've caused the confusion there
and the paleo police are always coming, waiting for a chance to strike and show how little grass they touch
also something to note is that ingame eotrike is just trike for some reason
In terms of ceratopsid size, eotrike isn't even in the top 3 at the current moment.
and then proceeding to say its how we used to think it was bigger than trike itself so i don't exactly see it( and it being in response to the bobble head statement)
ingame itās bigger than any trike
that just makes it come off as contradictory/confusing from the standpoint of someone who doesn't already know how big eo is, imo
model wise its just trike, the other 2 species are based on prorsus and nedoceratops, which are both trikes
why are we talking about the phrasing of something when we have the exact same point, and again i don't see it unless you specifically cut out the context
so Eotrike easly could be a trike with a bone growth disease affecting its head
no
Not quite. It lived earlier than triceratops and has enough differences. Ceratopsids can vary a lot individually within a species but eotrike's differences aren't ones really seen.
if it were a case of stunting, eotrike's head would actually be smaller, and any congenetic issue that would cause a bobblehead would kill the animal before it hatched, or not long after it hatched
Eo just needed the bigger head to look smarter duh
he became the very thing he wanted to avoid
Has it turned smarter? š
did all pleisiosaurs have tail flukes?
or is it just speculation
So Iām thinking
Utahraptor weighs like 500 pounds right? Who would win between it and an equal weight grizzly bear
utah is more like 800 pounds but it is indeed big, ngl id put my money on the bear seeing how more robust and stable it it, though utah did again deal with tougher foes so hmm, this one might come down to a skill issue, or just they ignore each other
Depends on which Abelisaurs and which Carcharadontosaurs.
Yellow is eotrike while the greenish-blue is trike
Amazing rex
My brain only thinking about what rex could have been
That trike looks really cool aswell! Wish eo looked a bit more like that, though definitly not that size
I don't think all of them but the vast majority did.
1,000 lbs*
sup
hi
Current rex is just...
I dont even know what to say
Its just a bigger dasp the way it looks, it should have a slightly deeper chest and the head just needs a full remodel but Matt doesnt hear us sooooo.
XD
Kai
kai needs help.....
Current Rex is garbage. Like cmon. Rexās had a bite that literally could kill a Dino bcuz of the bacteria in its mouth.
The spino haunts me, not as badly as the puppy???? That ark has, but its rough.
Matt isnāt the guy to go to when it comes to model stuff, Jiggy does it afaik š
This is rex. not whatever we have in game
Is there a legal way to get messages to jiggy?
I doubt it, but if you were to express your opinion enough it may eventually be heard
I have expressed it alot
By alot i mean alot
rex really deserves to look nice especially when its probably the most popular dino its not a good look to have it look like a dog turd found on a New York city sidewalk
they could have read it by now but it can still be a while before it was changed. jiggy was around when people were originally complaining about rex iirc, so they have some idea of what to do with it if they ever change the model
Model for Rex is one thing, but to bring an apex like the Rex and make him food to herbs that he should be dominating in a 1v1 is pretty hilarious. Theyāre also heavily overestimating the capabilities of the ano/anky.
I doubt it, is jiggy ever really in the discord long enough to read critism?
Either remove him completely or stop nerfing him
not as active in regular channels but they were around in backer chat when rex released and people were criticizing the model
did they say anything, Im guessing not
hereās a random assortment of simple model accuracy issues that could be changed
- spinos posture is kinda iffy, not sure how it bodes
- Sophie stego specimen that the adult model is based on has been shown to be not fully matured, with the plates likely looking different at actual adulthood
- Rex.
- gimmie a moment to think
I would like to dm this list to jiggy but thats not aloud 
The spinos arms in particular are the oddity to me, it seems like he wouldnāt be that spectacular at either fishing, scavenging or hunting. Dont get me wrong i love my spino but looking at him move bothers me and i cant quite put my finger on why.
I think the plates can tweaked a tad, but Iām not an expert on the creatures anatomy so Iāll wait for someone a tad more educated to comment on that
Spino is just an oversized slow piece of meat that can get run down by every big herb. Lol. But regardless, he wasnāt much of a hunter as he was a scavenger. At least according to what the paleontologists have said.
I would suggest against trying to contact the devs directly about it at all. I can basically guarantee that they'd heard the critisism, but game dev has a lot of layers to it and they need to pick their focus. Rex has issues but it's at least passable, and so it can stay as is for now while they focus on other stuff. Maybe it'll get revisted in the future, though who knows.
Nah your right, they are a bit too spaced out
Sir, altho your spitting straight facts. I dont like it lol
I think the biggest thing is this, give the carnivores some love. Stop focusing so much on the herbivores.
Ah the future, AKA 2050
Most the carnivores have gotten remodels as of recent, but this is more for #ptb-non-bug-discussion and #path-of-titans than it is for here
Honestly the plates on stego are fine imo, they're conservative size wise but that's not inherently an issue. The biggest inaccuracy with stego now is that stego's body shape as an adult is pretty different from the specimen PoT's stego is based on
yeah, they just bother me a little but nothing major
a lot of the dinosaurs need retooling when it comes to posture
realistically stego is an orb with limbs basically. Musculature diagram uses outdated specimen too but does the job in showing how broad stego is
oh ok
I understand your opinion
But imo rex is not really passable, due to the fact that its such a recently made model and yet looks like one they made when the game first came out
The model is more than likely an older one, could definitely use some retooling but older releases need it more imo
We don't know when it was made tbf, just when it was released. Might be an older one that they sat on for a while for some reason or another. But I'll still stand by it being passable. Textures are a little iffy and needs a little facelift to meet some accuracy standards. But it still looks like rex so it does what it needs to for the time being
Its likely it wasn't recently made
Rex model couldnāt have been a recent one. Itās just a larger dasp with an uglier face
Its a face only a momma rex could love
I wouldn't give much credit to the whole "rex is just a tweaked dasp" theory I've seen thrown around a lot, it doesn't actually hold up when you really compare the two models.
I purposely made a speed Rex bcuz the balanced or attack one was so ugly
I just want the poor thing to get a face lift 
I mean the devs got so much hate for the model on its release you would think they would remodel it especially when to this day they are still getting alot of hate for it.
spinosaurus was a hunter, but not a terrestrial one
Any "just a big das" take isn't worth much and shows little understanding of the animals. Its a rex. Its not the prettiest, but its a rex.
Facts
its not an upscaled dasp model
the two models actually share no features other than textures cause its the same game
In game dev you're used to critisism. A very important part of game dev in fact is knowing which feedback is critical and should be addressed asap, which feedback is important but can be addressed later, and which feedback isn't worth paying any mind at all. A lot of people don't like the rex, but it's not the only model to get negative feedback, so why should it take priority?
I understand. So give us more fish! Hahaha. Let me feed in peace on my spino hahaha. But anyways, back to my gripe on the Rex. Iām not saying itās JUST a big dasp. However, you canāt deny the fact that the model used for this Rex is definitely lacking compared to other Dino games out there currently
Because ignoring your tiny community is a proven method of ensuring your game isnt remembered.
tbf, kai came out even more recently than rex, and... well... it aint good
i think rex could be a recent model if we take that into account
It definitly got the most backlash thats why
they had to shut off the discord due to all the hate
It got the most backlash because it's rex and people had high standards, not because its the worst. There are other models that imo needed attention WAY more, people just care about rex more
If the devs listened to everything the ātiny communityā said, the entire roster besides lambeo, kentro, struthi, deino, and maybe kai would be gone 
I agree. The Kai model was pretty bad as well. However, bcuz of how empty it is currently in the ocean, no one really realizes how ugly it really is
I jot that down to it being old. You know what though
It shows that a lot of people appreciate when it looks good or accurate. Even if they don't understand all the intricacies, the appreciation for it is still there
i do think rex could use a remodel, but yeah, there's models in the game that need an overhaul much more desperately than rex does. it's bland, but it looks okay
And i love that
Where so many people who arent always educated in the field love the accuracy
Its just nice to see that accuracy is becoming cool
I do still have my fingers crossed for rex getting a revisit at some point don't get me wrong, but I don't think it's worth kicking a fuss over for the time being. Just a shame its meh 
looks at barsboldia and sty
Bars. Big ole ugly tank that can smack me around with its tail
I agree with this
But i still really want rex remodel (hyperfixation go brrrr)
Suchomimus was the worst culprit of this previously but now, chef's kiss, arguably one of the best in the game
Jumping topics now, bcuz Iām too sensitive over my Rex, which models are you most impressed with
I do understand its not the most urgent remodel needed but it is to me XD
Cant let that blind me though, opinions are opinions, not truths
Anodonto easy. Crisp, beautiful textures and actually looks like anodonto, with subspecies that take inspiration from other related ankylosaurs
tie between Cerato and conca tbh, the remodel looks so nice and real I canāt explain it
I definitely agree. Ano and cerato are on my top atm
Conca, Sucho, Ano and Alberta
Honorable mention goes to Alio
Worst models in your opinions
(Mine are, in order Kai, Rex, Thal, Sty ect)
Remodel campto looks pretty great too
whats wrong with thalassos model other than the slightly shorter neck
Speaking of thal. That sound is obnoxious and hilarious at the same time
Thal's model is fine for me its just absurdly huge. But otherwise, Kai, Sty, Lambeo and Bars
And maybe one other I'm forgetting but namely those
Wings are inaccurate and the weird cape of pycnofibers rather than an actual coat is just... ew
Kai, stego, styraco, and bars are all rough around the edges.
Thal just needs some cooler crest options and a downsize otherwise it's fine. Though textures make it seemingly lacking the "feathers" it should have.
If you look closely at thal it does have the pycnofiber textures. all down its body, but the only 3d modeled ones are on the neck portion.
You can call em feathers. That or pycnofibers but ay whats the difference
kai, struthi, bars, lambeo, and sty for me
and what about thalassos wings is inaccurate? also the feather covering is perfectly reasonable, we dont know to which extent feathers covered larger pterosaurs and PoT thalassos coat is perfectly reasonable afaik
the way they fold
see how when folded almost all of the wing membrane is retracted to the bones. this was the condition in most if not all pterosaurs
rex, kai, old sucho, spino, and stego
oh that. i dont consider that a model thing, thats more of an animation thing but i see what you mean. Ig if you want to consider that then yeah
Yea I think that's just really difficult to translate onto a model.
Examples on other pterosaur species
My boy hatz by my fav paleoartists

No clue how they would animate that though
Will you be making a rex remodel (your own, not PoT+)?
Also hows this rex remodel concept accuracy wise?
is chasmosaurus still valid? WHY IS THERE A MINUTE AND 30 COOLDOWN?
thats pretty nice. I assume you used the saurian rex as a reference for the lips tho. Id advise against that personally at least, they gave it extremely meaty lips, mammalian to a degree. Using reptiles should give it a nicer looking mouth, imo
They want us to carefully jot our thoughts down without having the discord page spammed with single comments like mine.
this is discord not a school project
Our chat cooldowns are in place to help moderators and staff manage high traffic in those channels. Once the traffic is low or when multiple staff members are monitoring the channel, the cooldown will be altered accordingly. Otherwise, conversations related to the chat cooldown are considered off-topic and may make you liable for a mute if continued
No i didnt actually
Just used some different specimines as a reference and made a sort of composite using different features taken from different specimines
(Listening to Prehistoric Planet
)
I agree. The lips are a bit too big for my liking. However, much better rendition than I can come up with.
Also its alright to go a bit more meaty with your dinos
when you look at some modern birds with very very extravagant meaty bits its not to far off the rocker to think of a rex with thick lips
Took some off
Might be better as a more intermediate between mamallian and reptilian
PT seems to have done it with their Quetz, and the Isleās Pteranodon has better shirked up wings than PoT Thal
That said, Thalās model isnāt bad, just off putting textures
im confused at both your messages ngl lol. Fossils dont show lips, so using different features from different specimens cant give you meatier lips. As for the 2nd one, yeah ofc, but birds dont have lips, and oral tissue is nothing like display tissue. They have completely different functions. The closest example I can think of is crocodile monitors, that have massive lips, but thats for a reason. They have extremely big teeth, so its not a good comparison. Id advise looking at reptiles that have a similar "teeth size to head size ratio" to call it something
but yeah, overall its a nice drawing
I haven't seen pt quetz, but ptera on the isle looks sort of gross imo. It has a really strange curve on its wings when folded up. By folding up the wings better its also caused odd bends and stuff too.
Honestly i think i liked it with the thicker lips
Really anything is possible. and with the size of its teeth maybe it did have large lips like a Crocidile Monitor
I tried my best on a size comparison, did I do good?
Croc monitors have much bigger teeth proportionally tho, so its not a good reference
if you like bigger lips tho thats fine ofc
Oh their Ptera is disgusting, but the way they modeled the wings is stellar. PT Quetz
Yeah, tbh most of the lip tissue looking like the saurian rex is just because of the angle of the drawing
I tried to make it looking like it was slightly glancing at the viewer so you could se a little bit of the other side of the head but not much
That Chasmosaurus is pretty grossly oversized. Chasmo is incredibly dinky
Yea that looks stellar.
Isle pt for reference. It doesn't look nearly as good as that quetz. They got the wings to fold up a bit more but at the cost of this weird semi circle on the wing. Not trying to bash, but just using it as an example of how making wings seems to be a difficult thing to do.
Yea, I imagine itās quite difficult to animate properly while trying to prevent overt clipping or mesh issues, but a number of other pterosaur models do a better job portraying that is all Iām really saying
I imagine that Hatz and Rhamphorhynchus will look better, as Jiggy will be more familiar with pterosaur wings
Clipping, stretching, stuff like that. I get what you're saying, the other versions do get the point across better. I wonder if the devs decided that it wouldn't be worth the hassle of trying to figure it out.
At least in the short term.
I think it was just them rushing. Theyāve gone over and are going over models for tlc like this and greater, so I def see Thal getting a sort of facelift at least a year from now
Could be
i mean BoB figured out how to do it correctly with their new ptera so no one has an excuse anymore
Really? Whatās that look like
new sai as well
altho unfortunately BoB is cursed to have really great models made that become inaccurate down the line like krono, para and acro
i think apa too i could be wrong tho
Hey there!
I reccomend you to use this skeletal
yeah apa too
achelosaurus and pentaceratops
or
chasmosaurus and pachyrinosaurus
could they live together?
Achelousaurus & Pentaceratops were from roughly the same time but different places. Chasmosaurus & Pachyrhinosaurus it's the opposite.
What's wrong with um?
Krono is based on old skeletal iirc para is also based on an old skeletal and acro just needs some edits, and apa is also based on an old skeletal

Do you have the updated skeletals to show us the outdated aspects?
eh here's what i can find atm
That skeletal is sachicasaurus
There aren't any good krono skeletals because kronos description is bad
Well then how is bobs krono supposed to be good???
it just is
It was good before most of the krono stuff became sachisaurus
That still doesn't explain why krono is bad. How is krono supposed to have a model accurate to the skeletal when all the skeletals are bad? Why would they try at that point?
Again most of krono was reassigned to sachicasaurus, the material from kronosaurus queenslandicus is poorly described so any attempts at a skeletal or reconstruction are to be taken with a grain of salt
Sounds like what is inaccurate then is the name. They might as well pull a megalosaurus and rename it to sachicasaurus.
Well you see their megalosaurus model before they changed the name was a pretty awful megalo model
According to you their krono isn't great either so... š¤·āāļø
Yeah it's not
So change the name to Sachi if the skeletal they based it off is now belonging to Sachi.
And whats wrong with the apato? (best screenshot I could find and I don't have the game downloaded atm to get a better one) Seems pretty close to the skeletal posted.
Proportions and the posture of the neck iirc
Doesn't seem that far off. Maybe the necks a bit too long.
Could use some more curves too ig.
And what about their para?
has a really short tail and the female crest is based on a younger animal thats not fully grown
Oh interesting
I'm really confused as to how a single skeletal dictates exactly how an animal should look. I understand that these animals can change quite a bit over time but there's really not a major issue with any of BoB's newest models (outside of sexually dimorphic para).
Palaeophis is also a bit off admittedly (ontop of being huge, even for it).
Yea I feel like all of that is super nitpicky tbh (aside from para sexual dimorphism). If anything they're exactly why striving for paleo perfection is just... not a good idea.
Ah true palaeo is funky
and even the sexual dimorphism, even if inaccurate, isn't exactly "bad"
and it goes without saying that BoB's rex is one of the best rexes in these kinds of games atm, its animations are a bit wonky but the model itself is 
on palaeophis, i have no real comments since its def inaccuate...but im hella impress that they are pulling off an at least semi-convincing snake
I did my best with what I had available to me but para doesn't look that bad at all. Maybe posture but it's not like the tail is obscenely short. Maybe a bit too thin vertically.
yeah i think what doesnt help bob is even though a lot of their recent models are really good in terms of general quality, there's a stiffness to the way they're posed and animated that makes them look off imo
Yea bobs models look really nice but the new animations play almost like they're sped up.
iirc its to help avoid hit reg issues n whatnot, case of functionality over aesthetics, but it def doesn't look The Best
though the animations for like their lurdu are p dope
Apato doesn't look too far off as well. Aside from the tail obviously.
I would have gone into the game myself and gotten better side view default posture screenshots but I currently don't have the game downloaded 
i have a soft spot in my heart for BoB despite me rarely playing it 
Same. Clocked in 2k hours. I don't play much anymore, got the game in December 2018 the day after steam release. I sometimes go through old bob screenshots and get nostalgic even though the games probably (read: definitely) better now.
the new models that have been teased(save palaeophis) have been really nice on the accuracy scale too imo
like, first dino game to get a pterosaur right
I hope they'll get to remodeling elasmo... that one has definitely... aged. Sai too but we've seen the new one already.
Tbf it took them a while to get pt right...
ahem randoll death roll...
ahem 2k damage a peck
Yeah BoB has gaming's best pterosaurs. By far.
it did take em a while but the new iteration is
, miles better than current ptera
the new sai also looks p cool, i like his bulb nose, the megaraptor is one of the nicer models in the game in both the looks and animation wise, i like him, the rex is baller to look at
Does pc:e count because those are pretty fun too.
Have they changed pts playstyle at all or is it just a remodel? (A bit off topic but we'll loop back around)
no the tail is pretty short thats the hartman para
I'm missing where the difference is significant.
I'm just going off the skeletal others posted here 
You got a better skeletal on hand?
afaik it's getting an ability that greatly boosts its aerial agility
That apatos body looks⦠short?
PC:E's pterosaurs are ver inaccurate boyos, but also the most fun boyos so they get a pass, same with...well most of the PC dinos, game is just Fun so accuracy isn't the mainstay imo 
and yeah BoB ptera is basically getting a super agile dogfighter ability that lets it outturn the tropeo
Oooooh right I remember hearing about that. Pretty cool. Might reinstall if it runs better than it did previously.
People aren't used to seeing sauropods to scale. Apatosaurus and Tyrannosaurus have always been oddly around the same height despite the former's much greater general size.
most sauropods are just Long, and not particularly tall
Idk someone else posted it earlier so I just went off it.
Idk if this is better.
The thing I notice about bobs apato is it seems to hold its tail very high. Assuming for clipping reasons.
its also attached to the head movements in a way so it often is up high because of that, but yeah, its again a functionality thing to keep clipping and hit reg issues to a min
here's bob's para outlined with the skull's to about the same size compared to the newer recon
Yeah I'm sorry that's not really a significant difference.
Para seems a bit shorter in bob but that's probably because it's legs aren't stiff as a board like the skeletal are.
Slight proportion differences are not really something to be concerned with most of the time.
BoB's animations may not be pretty, but there aint none of this biting into the body of your attacker and not hitting nonsense 
also yeah thats not a huge difference, esp since the tail length seems to vary from skeletal to skeletal
also yep! i cannot stand skeletal posed dinos(PoT is a major offender of this), they would not be stiff as a board with their heads level with their topline all the time, they'd be...loose and lifelike
that is quite a lot, that tail is the difference can cause effect on bipedality not only that the shape of the tail is really short as well. To be honest if a theropod had that type of change it would be pretty big ex. the whole meraxes tail to the rest of the carchs
You're talking about things that really don't make a difference to people that don't care about these specifics though. An actual example of proportions being a problem was everything about PoT's sucho before the most recent update to it. It felt like a different animal.
I was so weirded out by pot sucho for the longest time and didn't know why until people showed me the comparison. Bob para is just... para. Looks good might be on the small side but other than that a short tail isn't much to complain about.
theres also stylization to take into consideration too, esp with BoB, which does have some features more exaggerated or modified to add a certain look to em, they def are not going for 100% accuracy, it just so happens that some of their designs are just very accurate even with the modifications 
I personally consider accuracy to be a spectrum. There's just a certain point where there was clearly enough work and research done to make the animal look accurate that it succeeds, even if there's still a few things wrong. Even the average dino nerd that knows their way around accurate dinosaurs won't notice a lot of the nickpicks some others give.
I mean this kinda does make para feel like one if you put the bob para hip to hip with with newer recons you can see a large partion of the tail is missing and doesn't fell like it holds the same weight nor size and even could rob it of some features that could be used in game
Paras short tail actually works out for it in game. It has a back kick which wouldn't be as effective if opponents could snipe the tail.
Also para feels plenty heavy in game without as beefy of a tail.
it also would have a harder time shaking its booty at attackers with that tail 
š Oh I forgot about the emotes in that game...
with almost a a 3rd of the tail gone and i just feel that could have pushed para to either be a better swimmer or a attack that would actually do something for para in game its kick doesn't really stop acro, meg or rex and the swim speed to escape is rather slow para just feels less compared to to things like acro and more of a match up with megalo, XD also to go with that joke with that tail para would have massive card fem that would look better in the dance
Like, pardon me if this sounds pedantic, but I feel like sometimes people are too critical over things even when it's in the top 10% of dinosaur reconstructions. Like trying to tell me Prehistoric Planet got the trike segment wrong because "there's no caves in Hell Creek" like we'd bloody know that. People need to understand we're not going to know everything and being critical in such a way is wrong.
I'm sure there would also be a bit of variety in terms of proportions. Just look at michael Phelps or... any basketball player
Just, again, most people that know about accurate dinosaurs aren't gunna notice things like this. At that point I feel like people need to relax. It's still accurate at that point.
There are no caves in ba sing se
also the thing with media people tend to forget is that accurate =/= good design
To be fair bobs model are for the most part great and the game play is fun at times but i just feel like with a animal that struggling to be a decent playable on the game case its getting clapped form things it can defend or escape you kinda wish it had other weapons or attacks to kind help with that and with that kinda tail it leans to help the game play then just be mad cause its not accurate, with out mixed herds para is pretty much a sitting duck in game
The irony here is I just saw someone complaining about op bob para yesterday...
I remember roaming around with a para herd clapping rexes on official... good days.
Also how does a slightly shorter tail prevent it from being viable?
i've been seeing the opposite cause para is getting face tanked by acros and its tail eating by megs on a few other servers, Also i had two para try my rex took them both down before they got my health to health,
Para has no way to really deal with the mid tiers or anything on its tail the back kick does nothing but push it back with no dmg but most things with stoic laugh at that and stay on it
I don't think paras slightly shorter tail is the cause of that...
Para could use a buff but it's not a sitting duck or completely unviable.
When there's a 3rd of the tail that is gone that is a bit more than slightly imo and from what i seen from leaderboards para isn't sitting to well
blanking on good examples of this but plenty of examples of the inverse
like Primal's rex, not accurate at all, not even close, stylization aside, but a fantastic design thats wonderful to look at
by comparison a lot of paleo-accurate designs kinda lose the charm(like all of those redos of the OG jurassic park with an accurate rex, yes its "more accurate" but in changing the accuracy, you lose some of the charm the OG design had)
Prehistoric Planet blew everyone out of the water because paleo-accurate designs with charm and character, they arn't some stiff skeletal-posed models doing boring stuff(which, surprisingly, is what a lot of folks wanted...)
Eh I'm alright with it myself. Rexes are a nightmare but aside from that it's ok. I know Para has a good matchup against acro in particular.
Especially if it can get behind. Just don't try stomping out a playable that nerfs your damage.
sadly at the moment speed combat acros are the meta and speed combat acros they kinda make para life rather rough you can't really tail ride that acro and it starts off nerfing ur dmg ( and EB on acro is kinda scary for para too )
I always played combat survival para and hoped for nimble inherits. It worked when I used it against acros but struggled a bit against megs.
I haven't seen combat survival paras now adays on titania i wish would and yeah megalos and megaraptors kinda abuse u at that point and raps evasive is pretty annoying to deal with in groups
True megaraptors exist. I wonder if you would be able to combine the kick to turn around fast enough to stomp but I doubt it.
Aaaaaaanyway. Paleo chat. Do we know if kai would have been primarily filter feeding or would it be sifting through the sand/muck?
likely both, things with teeth like that often can do multiple methods depending on the prey
sift the muck for clams and crabs, filter for krill out of the water, or rocket through squid/fish breeding aggregations(all stuff the filter feeding seals do, not perfect comparisons but close enough when talking broadly like this)
There are filter feeding seals? š
yeah
walrus are suction feeders who eat clams but they aint who im talking about, the crabeater, ross, and leopard seals are the real filter feeders
(oddly enough the weddell seal, their 4th cousin, is a plain ol fish eater, and despite their penguin eating tendencies leopard seals are more specialized into krill filtering than the crabbeater seal, which p much only eats krill)
Interesting, I never knew leopard seals were built for that sort of thing.
Gnarly teeth
their teeth make a net that catches krill
But they decide to murder penguins instead 
I mean, walrus are usually mollusk suction feeders, but they use those same lips to suck the brains of seals and small whales out through their nose
orcas when the bull walrus decides to whip out the ol Naval Prolapse trick:
I'm convinced the ocean is a horror movie
i forgor ampelosaurus exist š
guys so let me get this straight
Having bird as a pet = having dinosaurs as a pet?
Birds are dinos, dinos are archosaur, archosaur are reptile, so this means birds are reptiles?
we (human) are a fish?
Well, the fish part is at least definitely not true lol
Humans may have come from fish but we no longer share similarities between them. Birds do have some things in common with dinosaurs still. At least enough to consider them related.
A lot of species will be related if you go far back enough (life had to have started from somewhere) but we change enough to be classified as a different group.
The funny avian theropods
They nerfed my boys so hard.
Technically speaking it is, cladistically at least. Anatomically we are not fish but due to the weird relations of what we call "fish", either all living tetrapods (us included) are fish or certain fish groups like sharks are not. It's for much the same reason as the whole "birds are dinosaurs, thus birds are reptiles, to say otherwise means crocodiles are not reptiles" but with extra steps
hey uhh...
i'm sorry for bringing this but...
i remastered sm of my first dinos size info
one of them is spino size info
my question is...
how accurate? (if there any innacurasies i will fix it)
Stuff like posture and some details might be off, but spoon hasnt had any downsize iirc, so the length and weight should be ight.
What do we know about hyneria
crab eater seal? they have sick teeth
uhh iirc the original fossils came from two localities in Pennsylvania, United States, one found between the villages of North Bend and Hyner and another near Emporium. They consisted of a disarticulated partial skull and fragments of the shoulder girdle. The fossils were found in the Catskill Formation of the Red Hill Shale, dating to the upper Devonian. These were the only remains known until 1993 when a renewed collecting effort discovered abundant new material. Hyneria is considered the largest and most common lobe-finned fish found in the Red Hill Shale. In February 2023 a second species of Hyneria, H. udlezinye, was named from remains discovered in the Waterloo Farm lagerstƤtte. These remains include the skull and shoulder girdle.
abt the size i don't know to much but iirc again H. lindae is estimated around 2.5ā3 metres (8.2ā9.8 ft) in total length, while H. uldezinye, was once estimated at range between 2ā4 metres (6.6ā13.1 ft) before being described, However, the species description estimates that the largest specimen belongs to an animal about 2.7 metres (8.9 ft).
Based on an unpublished specimen (it is not mentioned which species it belongs to), Hyneria was possibly able to reach up to 3.5 metres (11 ft) long.
Its skull had heavy, ornamented dermal bones and its lower jaw was relatively long and shallow. The teeth were stout, with those of the premaxilla forming fangs upwards of 5 cm (2 in). Its body was covered by cycloid scales. It had large sensory canals to aid in detection of possible prey, as the freshwater environment it inhabited likely was murky and had low visibility. Adult individuals retained juvenile features (i.e. partially unossified skeletons), suggesting that they were likely neotenic (delaying or slowing of the physiological, or somatic, development of an organism, typically an animal.)
Taxonomically yes all tetrapods are fish as we belong to the group sarcopterygia which is a specific group of fish
How do ya do fellow fish
sharing similarities is not what determines whether or not two clades are related; these days taxonomy is based around evolutionary relationships, not morphology. birds are dinosaurs because they're directly descended from dinosaurs, not because of the anatomical similarities they have with some dinosaurs. we're lobe-finned fish because all tetrapods descend from lobe-finned fish, despite how different most tetrapods are from animals like coelacanths.
They WHAT

This Sachica skeletal doesn't really belong to Sachicasaurus : now it is Monquirasaurus.
Also it has articulation issues and it's too deep.
Iām so glad theyāre extinct they look like theyāre constantly in agony
Arenāt we all
huh, so wwd actually had some pretty good anatomy for this guy
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08912963.2023.2190760 new Sinosaurus specimen
Dayum, ty for the info!
What a gorgeous skull! That's absolutely fantastic
bro got sent to the shadow realm
is that even possible for the size or carno and puert? ToT
ima be real: i don't wanna find out, because that seems like it'd hurt
who got it worse, carno or maip
carno easily just look at how fast it gets flung as a bigger animal vs le maip, carno gets shadow realmed and maip got ragdolled
maybe maip is just fat
http://www.oldearth.org/curriculum/dinosaur/dinosaur_curriculum_home.htm yo is this a reliable source?
Free Online Dinosaur Curriculum
Looking through it, it's just wikipedia articles but outdated by who knows how many years so, def not
Why are carnos attacking a sauropod šš
they tried their best ok
the carno is gonna be ok, he just has maybe about 4 or 5 minor severe concussions
he broke every bone in his body, a minor inconvenience
Both dinosaurs can just walk it off. š
haven't you heard, laughter is the best medicine, so he'll just laugh off being sent to the gates of doom by that tail
....
is it just me or the carno run looked like slow
looks like dan didn't include a 1.8 meters tall human for comparison lately eh?
maybe he just making the skeletal
Prehistoric Planet bachelor Carnotaurus would never get yeeted that far or even hurt at all by that sauropod. He is an embodiment of chadness among abelisaurids who all aspire to be like. He can one shot Gods, Goddesses, Demons, Eldrich Abominations, Lovecratian Horrors, Kanjiu and more with a single swat of his ripped arms.
humans overrated lel
Also he is quite beefy for a Carnotaurus. He must work out at the gym for like six hours per day.
what a based "meat eating bull" š
@pearl briar
oh
Thank you @tough parcel i appreciate ur help 
oooo
who is that in brownish fur and green?
your mo-
Coelophysis is the theropod, green is Postosuchus
oh that's cool the trio of triassic
god posto is smaller than i thought
Everything seems to be getting a downsize these days.
postosuchus and coelophysis, i think
Time for my daily complaint about recent model accuracy
This is what we could have had for our rex
The actual animal and we got the stanky uncanny boi.
I mean, besides the lack of keratin and proper and defined horns is PoT's rex all that inaccurate? I mean sure its not the prettiest model on the block but inaccurate wasn't the first thing to come to mind
PoTs rex is less kai in the fact its both ugly and inaccurate, or metri in being inaccurate, or thal being....playstyle wise, id say its insert generic rex and we're done here, next playable, in that way
I had to read that twice lol.
make it 3 then, since 3rd times the charm
Well I got it the second time so, no need haha. That's a valid way to look at it I suppose.
like my thing with rex here is: jp rex is inaccurate now but was accurate then AND its own thing, Ark rex is mega inaccurate but again is its own thing, PoTs rex is semi accurate but....not its own thing, its A rex, not PoT rex is my point, only can identify it if you actively look for it, other playables have this but not the same extent
In my opinion the PoT Tyrannosaurus is easily recognizable as its own generally speaking, but it's not a good design. The head is so rounded like that of the old models, the body textures are so lackluster, the eyes are so spread apart, the eye texture looks ugly, etc. I don't think it's as bad as people say, people exaggerate a lot and talk like if they knew what they were saying in most cases, but generally speaking its not a nice looking Tyrannosaurus.
its head and neck are the only issues on it
The textures are a smaller issue in my opinion, but the head looks awful. The lack of bosses and the overall roundness make it look so ugly. And then the dumb "bataar" subspecies that doesn't look like Tarbosaurus, not even remotely.
A rex species called like tarbosaurus but looking like an albertosaurus (an ugly one)
Yeah
to be honest when the model in not only ugly but also inaccurate their was a clear mistake made and it needs fixing
A reminder to please view pinned messages for appropriate paleo-chat topics. We recommend all off-topic conversations for paleo-chat be directed to DM's, the appropriate channel or another server entirely. This channel is for educational purposes.
Please see #suggestions if you wish to post feedback somewhere constructive.
We were talking about the accuracy of a model
which would go in paleo chat correct?
would stegosaurus and amarga serve a similar niche?
scan, What dinos do you think should be remodeled?
i need a accurate baja/amarga reconstruction
This amarga is quite accurate,
Im a huge fan of Max Bellimos work he makes such amazing models
anyway,
lets continue, what models do you think need remodels?
i mean when you look at how accurate and amazing the models are made by one person on their free time for fun.. it just sucks that this looks better than a dev team made of multiple people.
(Max Bellimo is incredibly talented though)
Please refer to our #rules in this server.
-Read pinned messages in every channel you intend to post in, as most channels have guidelines or formats you must follow.
-Be respectful of staff members and their decisions. Rule enforcement is determined by the staff team, and is not for personal interpretation.
Regarding #paleontology do not discuss the game/media itself, this should be of little focus of discussions in this channel. All conversations in this channel must be associated with paleontological discoveries, scientific news, and depictions of prehistoric creatures in media in relation to paleontology.
wouldnāt discussing the depictions of prehistoric creatures in PoT count as media that relates to paleontology
^
some of the rules in this server really make no sence
discussion of the accuracy of PoT's models is a conversation about depictions of prehistoric creatures in paleontology-related media, same as discussing the accuracy of JWE's models
Deinosuchus with feathers
I do mean this with respect, I just dont understand why we cant discuss accuracy of ingame models?
discussing accuracy =/= stating a model is dumb, ugly, stanky
Please move onwards from this topic.
me when talking about paleo stuff goes against the rules talking about paleo stuff
We are just stating our opinions, Apoligies
not a fan of the entire discussion being stopped dead in its tracks because some messages weren't worded ideally, but alright
Again koala these our our opinions so it doesnt seem fair to punish someone for that
Everything you said is true aswell
Scans vid says it best "After amargasaurus, PoT designs have fallin the ----- off".
We know they can do better in terms of accuracy and they have, look what they did with campto, they should do the same for rex and kai. Just because they are new releases doesnt mean they shouldnt be fixed
Ok. why
What is the purpose of the large ears of African Elephants?
Thermo regulation and intimidation
theres also others
Thermoregulation, how? also, what are the "others"?
bro wtf
no the purpose is smth called H E A R I N G
The ears increase surface area, allowing more heat to flow out of the body
I was talking about other than that XD
Please view pinned messages for appropriate paleo-chat topics. This channel is for educational purposes. Anything else will be considered off topic.
If you have an issue with a staff member, you can direct concerns to Support via #help or by DMing @feral crane.
sinosaurus ay
Spino do be slapping
can this channel just be turned into a general science chat? so we can discuss prehestoric life and other types of science including animals that are living currently?
You're not the first to ask that, you won't be the last.
Unfortunately we would have to make a #suggestions for that which... let's be honest, isn't going to change anything.
It's weird that we get shunned when discussing paleo accuracy in #path-of-titans yet when we come here to discuss we are told that it's off topic somehow to extensively discuss the paleo accuracy of the game and various media.
If one person was being disrespectful then remind them of the rule about respect, don't make it seem like we were talking off topic.
Its just barking up a tree everyone's barked up already. Personally I'd welcome the topic extending to extant animals but won't change so.
But I'm as irritated with complaints as people are with complaining, so lets find a topic to discuss shall we. Cool new Sinosaurus stuff dropped today. I haven't got a chance to look at it yet besides images of its skull
This stuff
bruh why does sinosaurus get the cool skull material while dilo is stuck with this
Throwback to when that alone was cool Sino comes in and one ups it
Dilo cooler overall though š„±
I wanna see a comparison of Random's and synopsis's dilo skeletals but I don't want to make it because I'm lazy so someone put them together for me
the hell is a differences between dilo and sino????
there is one...maybe
iirc sinos skull is a bit more robust
Ah, yea, so it helps to avoid over heating. So I had a thought, hence why I asked this. Amargasaurus' neck spines are thought to have been covered in soft tissue as either a neck sail or a hump.
I was wondering if Amargasaurus having a neck sail is comparable to an Elephant's ear in the sense that they help increase surface area to disperse heat.
elephant question: Who is the biggest Palaeoloxodon specimen?
antiquus?
recki?
or namadicus?
Could be, but iirc those spines hold a thicker structure than those of elephant ears, which can also be flooded with blood and moved to more effectively disperse the heat, since blood vessels are close to the surface
Yea, I think there is a similar theory going on to explain Spinosaurus' sail? how it has blood vessels that help disperse heat as they are closer to the surface of the skin despite their being bone in between.
Namadicus by a lot
Absolute unit
like this?
Yep
That is one big fella.
Christ almighty it's a big fella, holy hell.
Now I want a mammoth in pot
I don't have the game yet, but I do hope we get some cenozoic animals later. We have megalania already, so.
I donāt even know if it would fit . But I would love to be a mammoth š¦£
I think it would like a bunch of other cenozoic stuff.
Terror bird all day
@frosty cedar MWHUWHEUWHUEHW
Would be awesome to have some paleoaccurate cenozoic animals ingame
Meg:
who do u guys think would win in a hypothetical fight?
Bruh moment.
Iām starting to think T. rex is gonna get stomped
I agree lmao
I think anky would have a hard time with breaking its legs ngl
Legs are the only thing an ankylosaur could hit on that guy
Rex would probably win if it attacked at night, since elephants have poor night vision (lions used to use this to hunt elephants before the mega-prides stopped forming)
Who would win, 1 million T. rex or the elepha-sun
Depends if the elepha-sun is more like an elephant or a sun
You would need at least 25 billion T.rex to defeat the sun
Sun ain't going down without a fight either
I suspect the elepha-sun is like a nuclear reactor in the shape of an elephant but instead of uranium rods, it's the unmatched power of the sun š¤
Rex facetanks.
me
Definitely not text
yeah, I would win
You got this.
Iāll cheer and record from the side lines, u got it bruh
Whyād the mega prides stop forming?
Probably people
human intervention being the main one, to avoid inbreeding excessively large prides are often broken up
but to my knowledge they still occur, its just that in recent years the massive coalitions have all fallen due to infighting or losses during disputes
still amuses me that lion prides are a recent thing, we have evidence that pre-civ lions didn't really do the whole pride thing, and likely lived more like tigers(solitary most of the time, pairing occasionally)
and there still are areas where lions dont form prides/large prides, usually just pairs or 1 male and 3-4 females
then you have places like kruger national park with a 30 lion pride
KOSing lion megapack at the watering hole!
when the continent-range species has variable behavior (paleotwitter astonished)
what is weird is that we're not entirely sure why prides started existing to begin with
we know that larger prides and coalitions are likely the result of human poaching creating a pressure for males to tolerate eachother more for protection + lots of male-less prides about, but that likely wasn't why prides originally formed, prey doesn't seem to be the reason either since, if anything, prey has become more abundant and also smaller since the time of primarily solitary lions(which would indicate that a solo lion would fair better than a lion working permanently feeding a family)
but also lions arn't the only cats getting more social, cheetahs now are seen more n more in loose groups, and just a few decades ago seeing more than 2-3 subadults together was unheard of, and tiger cubs stay with their moms longer and in some cases dad sticks around and babysits 
Very nice, tiger prides dropping next patch?
definately a really interesting behavior change to witness, esp since we have evidence of how big cats lived all the way into pre-civ times(cave paintings, trackways, etc.)
cheetah coalitions are really cool because documentaries tend to be a few years behind actual research, so our generation basically saw the behavior evolve in real time
when i was little cheetahs were exclusively said to be solitary animals aside from females with young and now there's plenty of group cheetah hunts on tv
When did cheetah coalitions even start? Ive seen them in documentaries all my life, must have been in the early 2000 or earlier.
"all my life"
"early 2000s or earlier"
Well, I couldnt have been seeing animal documentaries when I was like, 2 years old lol.
i was born in the 2000s :L
and it still took me a while after i was old enough to watch documentaries before i started to see cheetah groups on TV
Randomās old af, ancient
Be me, young spring chicken
Idk when I saw the first cheetah documentary, but I know that thing was old, there were some stripped cheetahs included and an african legend talking about how the cheetah got its eye marks.
Dont remember anything else, think I still have the DVD.
Aren't you about my age š§
and yes, striped cheetahs are awesome
I rarely see stripped cheetahs in documentaries anymore, they look very cool.
Buckle up, we got 2010s babies round these parts
im surprised that you rarely see peeps doing abberant or unusual patternings/genes in paleoart tbh
abberant patterning, hypo/hypermelanism, black-spot-esque melanism, piebaldism, etc. etc. are all relatively common in birds and reptiles
abberant patterning is like, intense patterns(pseudomelanism, its what makes those tabby striped tigers and king cheetahs basically), patternless, and just weirdly done patterns(like how there are misbarred clownfish with partial or missing white bands)
hypomelanism is partial lack of melanin, making the animal more red/yellow, often with black patches and green/pale eyes
hypermelanism is the opposite, making a darker/duller animal with more yellow/brown eyes, both look fairly normal unless set next to a more typical specimen
black spot melanism is often called dalmation, its most well known in crested geckos, just makes lil black dots all over the animal with no other pattern change
wild piebaldism is usually seen in birds, its normally just like, one or two white feathers or a white patch on their feet, not like cow splotches
a dromaeosaur with this level of piebaldism would def be possible and would have zero issues surviving 
yeah, it can be a big issue for birds since a lack of melanin isn't great for feather strength (it's part of why naturally pale/white birds often still have black wingtips), but for a flightless dromaeosaur, low levels of piebald patterning might not cause many problems beyond possibly making it harder to find a mate
- Tyrannosaurus es uno de los generos mejor estudiados de todos los dinosaurios, hay mas de 30 ejemplares que nos dan mucha información.
Y con esta animación busco reflejar un poco de la vida de este dinosaurio que para muchos ha sido su puerta de entrada a la paleontologĆa.
Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/paleogdy
Facebook
https://www.fa...
I wouldnāt say zero issues of surviving. Animals evolve the coloration they have because itās beneficial in some way. An individual with aberrant coloration may have issues camouflaging, which is very important for most predators.
piebald land carnivores generally have few issues, its just normally fairly rare to see it to begin with, so long as the animal isn't pure white it often has no issues camouflaging since its outline is still broken up
What caused the extinction of North American cheetahs
Pronghorns living there best life
megafaunal extinction
Such a good rex model
I donāt like Rex, but thatās a good Rex model
Rex in general or rex in PoT?
pfff that baby rex isnt that great
In general
Max bellomios rex is my personal favorite
Wish we had this in a game, max is insanly talented
yeah its a rex not based on the largest 2 specimens which is also nice
Itās just uninteresting to me now, and itās inclusion in media just ruined it for me more, I do not like Rex, and I never will again unless itās under certain circumstances such as Rex being an actual animal instead of a cold hearted killing machine
I loved prehistoric planet for that,
It never showed them actually hunting, only interacting peacfully and eating
Prehistoric planet Rex is the single only Rex I like
to be fair ingames it has to eat, though more often than it would in real life
plus so game designs for rex tend to be very inaccurate to the animal *COUGH COUGH POT REX
BoB Rex is the only game Rex design I love
Max's models are so great, really hope i can get that good someday
Suarian rex is amazing i just wish it was a multiplayer game. plus the fact that we havent really gotten anything out of them for 2 years
Iāve seen a lot of maxs models, very good
Isnāt saurians Rex like heavily feathered? Isnāt that outdated?
the new one
They changed that a while back
Ah
the old rex model is, but the new one (idr if it's in the game yet or not) is entirely featherless
they have to fix that head
The lips are slightly too meaty but other than that is perfect
no its not they based the head on stans so it has a prominent dip which was formed from an injury stan sustained
dip in the skull between the nasal holes and the lacrimal crests?
Are the lips too meaty?
I feel like such a thing cant really be determined and is in the realm of posibility especially when looking at the range of soft tissue types on modern dinosaurs
lips are fine afaik its the dip that is the issue
that dip is caused from Stan's skull being crushed by another tyrannosaurus
average tyrannosaurus does not have the dip
Definitely see that when looking at Sues skull, No dip on there
Drew this based off of her a couple days back
throwing some fleshy soft bits on that skull of hers
Though it did also use multiple other specimines as reference to try to find an average look
(remodel concept please devs..
)
Yours does have some real meaty lips
What, we don't know if it was from another Tyrannosaurus? It's possible as everything, but more likely is crushing during fossilization
it showed signs of healing...
Proof, no balls, cause I have never heard of this
pretty sure it does but i might have just mistaken it for the other multitude of skull related pathologies stan has
Iirc he has a punctured braincase which does have signs of healing, but the skull warping is not...a healed pathology
stan was a zombie....
not necasarillly a bad thing
yeah it was the braincase that i read thought it referred to the warped snout but it wasnt
speaking of pathologies allosauroids have tons of rib fractures
I canāt think of any extant reptiles with particularly large lips..Def not the worse thing but it is a little uncanny imo
It was me. I was hitting them with a hammer
they dont heal well either apparently
Smh just be a hadrosaur. Healing trait through the roof
i dont want to be a hadrosaur
i want to be a tyrannosaurid so i can be brutally maimed my entire life and shrug it off
Allosaurus took that to another level
Theropods just live their lives being deformed
They was just built different
The average carnivore life.
Lizards with large teeth have large almost mammalian lips to house them, thats what im basing it off
Yeah, lizards with proportionally large teeth, which rex isn't really comparable to, and even then their lips aren't similar to that of mammals at all, as mammal lips are really flexible and fleshy, while lizards have rigid and relatively small lips
Comparing mammals and reptiles is a very bad comparison they're physically attributes are very different
Lizard lip talk got me thinking
So here
This guy is an exception tho
people out there will argue if they even had lips still let alone if they were large or mammalian in nature
Teeth size has very little to do with lip presence and a mammalian nature is highly unlikely given that dinosaurs are reptiles, therefor likely had a reptilian like kind of lips (similar to Lepidosaurs even though dinosaurs are Archosaurs, but those repeatedly lost lips through their evolution).
As much as I enjoy tracking down soundtracks, this isn't the chat for it. You will be drawn and quartered for this (by the mods)
we also have to consider the possibility that some dinosaurs had lips that werenāt particularly similar to other reptiles, itās a good baseline but theyāre so derived itās likely thereās a lot of the picture we donāt have
ah yes that song
look up lego jurassic world ost on youtube and you'll find it eventually
well, I assure you paleo chat in a Path of Titans discord won't help ya with that lol. that or the actual Jurassic World ost.
Speaking of Jurassic world, idk if this is a rule break or not because it concerns fictional animals but I think it would be cool to see an artist's attempt at recreating Indoraptor and Indominus rex in a more realistic sense, as if they exhibited physical/anatomical characteristics of the animals they're composed of
Take Indominus for example, said to primarily be Giganotosaurus and Tyrannosaurus, looks like neither of them. Generally doesn't look like anything specific at all outside of maybe an Allosauroid
i looked through all jurassic park and world music and guess what, nothing
and i cant find a reliable lego jurassic world source
š¤·āāļø
I FOUND IT I FOUND IT YESS MUS HUBISLANUBLAR INTRO
š
Back to paleo topics
listen to that banger bro
A reminder to please view pinned messages for appropriate paleo-chat topics. We recommend all off-topic conversations for paleo-chat be directed to DM's, the appropriate channel or another server entirely. This channel is for educational purposes.
is there a dorsal view out there of Gorgosaurus
I've seen a dorsal of its skull in a recent paper but not of a full skeletal
my bad š„¶
I've encountered some older ones but idk how reliable they are. I've also seen Albertosaurus more recently but idk how comparable that is to gorgo in this case
AFAIK nothing for Gorgosaurus exactly, people have just used Daspleto
Modern archosaurs! Saw these at the museum today
yooo is that two extant dinosaurs and a crocodyliform????
it would appear that one dinosaur is a juvenile, possibly mislabeled as an adult of another genus
would that be Sue EDIT: lmao didn't read
just one dinosaur?
Nah itās just a baby on the nest
it sees through your sins
Idk wtf to think of this⦠what dinosaurs could have looked like the living testicleā¦
More from a different time I went
Shantungosaurus
I have someone who did Scorpius that way and probably will do indom and indo in the future, let me search it
Reptileano mayhaps
You got it
https://twitter.com/ElReptileano/status/1624682987596967936/photo/1 for anyone curious about it then
I saw an archosaur earlier when I went to take out the trash
i am insanely jealous that you got to lay your eyes on sue in person
at first, i thought it was utah and had to double check, deinoychus looked like a crow and loved it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yS71VeptuEc this is my favourite of theirs
I felt like doing something new for a change, and also to correct those that say accurate dinosaurs can't be scary.
accurasies night question: how accurate?
What dinosaur is it btw?
Utah probably
deinonychus
my opinion is between dakota (if valid), austro, achillo, and utah
Rate this diagram (not made by me)
short rex so 7.7/10
I feel like this one is more accurate, the bones on the legs look stronger, a rex with 8200kg and skinny legs just don't add up
an odd choice of composite I find that one. Would stick to Dan Folkes's skeletal of Scotty. Plenty of other rex skeletals too that are perfectly serviceable. With such a complete animal I find it odd to intentionally make something like it a composite. Unless they're just saying like, missing elements restored from Sue and 5027 which then by all technicalities it would be.
The irl trex might get the biggest buff of all time if they discover a āfully grown oneā if the trex fossils we have now where still growing
mmm, that'd be sick
It might be just a croc situation weāre they would keep getting slightly larger with age
Gotta remeber that still the biggest found was like 20 pounds of Rex and was 43 feet long
Then Canadians said : there might be 70% bigger relatives but itās just an hypothesis on theyr growth curve .
But if that was true , we talk about a Rex that could weight 33.000 pounds
the chances of that are near impossible for most specimens. You can tell via the bone if an animal is done growing afaik, itās not very easy to āmissā that
I donāt ever recall a 20 ton specimen being described?
Its 19.500 but ye
Its Scotty the Canadian one? The largest known T. rex ?
did you so happen to check the first Google result lmao
Was reading a reserach tbh about possible Dino growth
Scotty was around 8.8 tons afaik, nowhere near 19
Oh wait naa thatās on me I wrote tons instead of pounds
Was kinda easy to get since I wrote pounds after ward to describe the estimated weight of the bigger ones
but in that context it would have been 33 pounds, which is the size of a toddler 
...
how accurate is this?
Scotty is 10.6
T. rex fun fact , many ppls think that they arenāt able to clap due to theyr short hands , in reality they canāt clap cuz theyāre all dead
he is 10.3 tons atm but 10.6-11 tons likely possible
hadnāt seen a source for 10.3 tons, thank you for the info! I had heard they recently got an upsize of sorts
I think its pretty accurate as of late research done on Dunk
Also no clue where 10.3 comes from, but 10.5t is the exact one for the most recent model
Lets go 11 for a nice whole number.
does anyone actually know where the 10.3t estimate is from ? I have been looking but no luckš
It's probably from some stupid private model that can't be shown because people want to feel special and nice about their information despite how it should be public knowledge 
Are the rexes in PoT bigger than they should be?
I think so? Just looks smaller than normal cause spino and eotrike were heavily upsized to be literal Kaijus
also since someone mentioned the ācrocodiles grow their entire lives so thus tyrannosaurus probably could reach sizes double whateverā, crocodiles do grow after adulthood but itās heavily slowed. That would have to be a long living Rex to get double the size of it at adulthood
crocodiles and Tyrannosaurus rex are also very distant mind you, again not impossible, but unlikely
if one survived long enough for that
Honestly, it's a heavy misconception that large crocs are old
Giant crocs won the genetic lottery and nutrition lottery when they were young. It has (almost) nothing to do with old age. Of course, you're growing as you age, but it's wrong to think that crocs grow any significant amount once they hit their ""adult stage""
Agro is allegedly about 6m and only 27 years old
All large crocs are old but not all old crocs are large 
Theres also a possibility that hormones are involved like in fish but since crocodillians take ages to grow and with ethical husbandry its not an easy thing to study
(In some fish, fry will produce a hormone that stunts growth in an attempt to outcompete its kin in smaller bodies of water, eventually 1 or 2 will grow double the size of their clutchmates and eat them)
Ofc hormones like that very much did not affect terrestrial animals like theropods 
Lets give crocs steroids and see if we can make a deino sized alligator.
new movie idea
5m crocs are already titanic
Steroid Crocodile releasing in theaters in March 2024
You saw Cocaine Bear, get ready for Gustave the Roided Crocodile!
Gustave is overrated as hell tbh, there are a whole bunch of more formidable specimens
Like, 1? And they are salties.
Mahishasura, Lolong, Bujang Senang, Dominator, Don Kalia, Kalia, Old Charlie, Obo crocodile, Edgar
How many of them are nile crocs?
0 lol
Gustave still the best from his kind then.
Gustave is known by so much misinformation
there are still reports of massive nile crocodiles just none of them are maneaters...yet
tbh Gustave is memorable by the goofy name despite the misinfo around it
Or they just havnt been caught yet 
"Hippoes got em" Meanwhile Big Ben the croc
8m long and eats hippos every day!!
Based and gustavpilled
scrumptious fat lards for breakfast lunch and dinner
you telling me an 8 meter nile croc exists??
No that's just Gustave for the average person
Also tbh, average size niles are puny
salt water crocodiles better
The overhunting made it even worse probably.
Saltwater crocodiles are black air force energy
american crocs on average are longer and heavier than niles
be afraid of salties because some populations spend more time in the ocean than you think
I was gonna say they were better cause of that one octonauts episode but I feel kinda stupid now
it ok, tyrannosaurus rex solos salties in the ocean
Rex gonna Rex.
nah aquatic bear slams both
idk, water bears are p tiny
Somehow the biggest species, the most widespread, the most aggressive and highest standard metabolic rate. Salties got all the buffs
waterbears simply outlast them
american crocodiles got some weirdass jaws looks like they trying to reevolve lips
american crocs are whack creatures and exhibit A on why large predators and large predators shouldn't exist in the same habitat 
iirc american crocodiles spend more time in saltwater than salties
theres populations who solely live swimming from island to island
americans got weird ahh osteoderms (godz-)
yes the transient population
(they are also the largest members of the species, and are quite large)
I thought that was pinacosaurus for a second and almost got excited
FUN FACT: they caught several of those massive island hopping bulls and released them in florida to combat the nile crocodile issue, since they dwarf the florida nile crocs
yeah was going to mention it
same thing with the small amounts of transient salties
Carnivorous ankylosaur dropped.
American crocodiles until the half sized cuban crocodile bullies them
cuban crocodiles casually being the most terrestrial croc
and the most social for some reason
anywayyy dinosaurs 
How heavy was smilodon?
idk but ik smilodon was weird asf 
~400kg for da biggest
thing was built more like a hyena than a cat, and couldn't crouch down and stalk like a cat
Ye my boi had some ripped forelimbs.
no, pseudosuchians
lips or no lips for smilodon?
most people go with half lipped
normal cat lips + the teeth didn't stick out so far so like, just the tips poked out really
yeah modern cats especially jaguars have canines that stick out a bit
cat skuls are weird, the teeth go wayyyy into em and a lot of smilodon skulls have the teeth drooped way out of the skull, so they were long asf but not...that long
teratosaurus casually being the coolest rauisuchid
Rauisuchians are so cool
why does dasp have some of the most baller paleoart to ever exist
Cause dasp is cool duh
Yes, dasp is very cool.
Dasps model is super nice imo, looks very accurate and unique
apart from its legs
Dasp model is monkey approved 
Still got rex leg proportions
Kai textures are really nice though, quite accurate to the real animal, only problem is that they were put on an elesmosaur not an aristonectene
just bc he didnt skip leg day?
Nice thick legs, love em thighs
although i say "rex" leg proportions but dasp kinda just has a little too much tissue in the front cause his calves are fine
Wish Rex had Rex proportions on its head 
They should drop an anvil on the game Kais head and half of its problems are fixed.
Thereās a big difference when you look at it, also facts flex 
Think the soft tissue just makes it look shorter.
As you can see with sues head, itās not very rounded like the pot model, the head is shaped quite differently and the body is slightly thicker (though thatās cause sue was hella old)
are deinosuchus the largest shawn mendes?
Sue is such an interesting specimen, itās very fun to go see her once in a while in all her beasty glory
gustave the roided shawn mendes

Can we just talk about how cool Terror Birds are, they basically tried to take back the throne as the dinosaurian apex predator and I just think thatās the coolest thing ever
how based
for a huge portion of the cenozoic the dominant predators of south america were still archosaurs
Mammals are for nerds
Too bad they sold out their tail, so they couldnt reach half the level of chadness their cooler ancestors achieved.
What Dinoās do you think should/will get accuracy updates
Honestly a whole update dedicated to accuracy would be great
sebecids were the top predator in south america for 50 or so million years
None really, I want the combat and questing update first
I mean after those two updates, what Dinoās should get so accuracy touchups?
Sty, bars, lamb, kai need upgrades the most imo.
Factual, the poor hadrosaurs look like dog turds and canāt fight for their lives. For lamb thatās understandable, but bars being pretty unable to fight is not good
Stego, rex, styraco, bars, and Kai
How you gonna put rex and stego when kai exists 
I meant to put kai idk why I forgot lmao
Kai definitely needs help first but the rest are able to wait a bit, not to long for Rex tho the poor thing looks like itās contemplating soup of side.
Stego imo needs its calls to be bassboosted. And if Rex is contemplating suicide, Bars, Lamb, Sty and Kai are already dead.
They are all contemplatingā¦
Kai is such a sad story, the poor thing just wants a break
A ton of calls need reworks tbh, stego is one problem but many many of the other Dinoās have bad calls
From my experience growing all the dinos, the calls I dont like are Lambs and Stegos, the rest I either really like or are just alright.
Lambs calls are uggo
Some of the calls for PoT in general are very repetitive. Like the ambient noise Rex makes when doing literally anything
lalalalala
says the mammal
Not all mammals are nerds, but all nerds are mammals.
Lambeo sound design blows yes, Stego to, I know it shouldnāt be like extremely whacky but at the very least unique and distinguishable
An accuracy update to models and calls would be wonderful for the game, wish I could get that to the devs without using that suggestion website they donāt read often
Real
Anyways, I feel like if accurate remodels came in, there'd need to be some rebalancing too (Stego being a brick poophouse comes to mind)
Modded creatures tend to have way better sound design, Dilophosaurus being a prime example
Thereās no way I can get the idea to jiggy or Matt which makes me really sad. Such a good idea for the game may never come to light
I could dm them but that would land me with a ban
What should we do?
This Rex by @valid grove is perfect for PoTs style if they have it a remodel, absolutely beautiful work
Sadge, no big snout scales
But it's sexy either way
That looks like an Acro ngl.
Change the snout a bit and itās nice
Not really
Optimal PoT Rex
Thereās also an issue with calls feeling very shallow and bland, sounding too similar from Dino to Dino
It would be so cool if calls here travelled long distances like in Isle š©
(by the same person)
Even better rex! I want this in the game, Iād there a way we could pitch Rex remodel and other accuracy updates?
Ya here.
https://feedback.pathoftitans.com/
Add and vote up suggestions for Path of Titans.
Do they even read those though?
no but itās a nice thought
Someone does because they have to be reviewed
Minus that fuzz it looks perfect.
I heavily doubt that the devs ever see 90% of them
Another good rex.
fun fact: the fuzz is also accurate
Best part of it, just the right amount of fuzz
If you believe that sure but its been stated that the person who requested it says no fuzz/feathers.
#TeamScales
They also said "no tarbosaurus species" and we still got one
The perfect amount of fuzz, wish we had this in PoT
Eh Im happy it doesnt and Saurian does perfect for the accuracy.
Saurian Rex 
In name only 


