#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 454 of 1
-# dnd should get rid of all forms of darkvision /end_of_hot_take
Anyways
in my campaign we kinda did it
i have to carry a lantern all the tiem
that is in my equipment and the dm let me use for free
but using it would alert enemies and finally is limited in sight
Love to hear it
Making a FNaF based campaign looking for tips on how I should put it together
I think that's my queue to leave I'll see y'all later
Do you want it to feel like fnaf or is it just set in that universe?
If the former, I'd honestly suggest a different system entirely.
Like Call of Cthulu
Yeah the horror of FNaF falls apart really fast when you can just Heat Metal Freddy and scorch him to a pile of molten slop
Hello
Hey, I got a player who wants to do colony building? are there any good books for dnd 5e for that sort of thing?
Not from 5e; that’s not really been a key part of D&D since maybe 2nd edition
damn. any suggestions?
Colony in what sense? Is it a colony for the party or an actual settlement?
I mean there's the bastions rules but yeah, nothing official beyond that for 5e
Bastion rules can be found here in the D&D 5.5 DMG: https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/dmg-2024/bastions#Chapter8Bastions
You can look at how domain play worked in 2e and check out third party updates of that material, or you can use the Bastion rules
You might be able to cobble together something using the settlements section from the '14 dmg, but that's more of a dm world building resource than a player facing mechanical thing.
MCDM's third-party books, Strongholds and Followers and Kingdoms and Warfare
thanks I'll look into these
I entierly forgot that was a thing.
Also if it's just a single player's desire, make sure the rest of the group doesn't mind if it gets a fair amount of focus, as such things generally require.
Except he can still get you like that
Good old FNAF Security Breach showing that
Me when I planeshift him to Barovia.
Let Strahd deal with it.
Would be pretty funny
Also I think Plane shift can't work on unwilling targets anymore in 5.5e
William Afton is the Dread Lord
Nah
The "Vengeful Spirit" probably is
Refusing to let him go to hell, making the other souls stick around to torture him
aka Golden Freddy I should note
The Mists rise around the Pizzeria every day at dusk, you have to find a way to survive for 5 nights
A big thing with FNAF is Afton is the cause, but hasn't been the continuing force of suffering for a while.
to the basement!
Yeah that entire paragraph is gone in the '24 version
just use the old version then ¯_(ツ)_/¯
I use 2014 CS for my games
I just got my first set of dice!!
Surprised it took this long I’ve been playing for a few months now
But still!
Yea even I who has never played 5e use some 5e stuff cause I like it more than 5.5e version
I don't need to be holding a component pouch to cast with it do I? I just need a hand free right? But I don't need to be holding it?
drawing the component from the pouch with the free hand is part of the spellcasting somatic component
Hello
But I don't need to be holding it in my hand right?
Like if I'm a caster holding a Greatsword I can just take my hand off the Greatsword to cast with the somatic and material component using the pouch right
Since you only need to be holding the Greatsword with both hands when you attack with it
correct, you wear it
Maybe my Greatsword Artificer should use a component pouch instead of artisans tools then
i thought artificers had to use tools rather than the normal components
Artificer's Require tools, yes, instead of more flexible focuses.
What an arbitrary limitation
I mean, they are trying to keep the flavor to...well, artificing.
The wording of this suggests to me that any artificer spell requires them even if the spell normally doesn't have Material components
And that means needing your tools to be highlited somehow
since otherwise they were...basically useless for the most part in 2014?
Because crafting rules sucked big time
So every other class can go without mechanically enforced flavor but artificer is where they draw the line
You don't need to have a deity for cleric but you're required to hold tools for artificer
You don't need to be religious to be a paladin but you need to have tools in hand for artificer
Because Paladins are not inherently religious yes, why do people keep forgetting this...
Brother I quite literally just said they don't
Are you telling me I'm forgetting something I explicitly just said
Literal seconds ago are you kidding me
What rustles your jimmies brother.
You acting like I'm forgetting something that I literally just said
Are you kidding me?
Me: "Paladins aren't required to be religious"
You; "Paladins are not inherently religious why do people keep forgetting this"
Am I forgetting the thing that I literally JUST said?
Anyways
This wording implies to me that artificers need their tools to cast any artificer spells, whether they require material components or not
Tools Required. You produce your Artificer spells through tools. You can use Thieves' Tools, Tinker's Tools, or another kind of Artisan's Tools with which you have proficiency as a Spellcasting Focus, and you must have one of those focuses in hand when you cast an Artificer spell (meaning the spell has an M component when you cast it).
I really hate this
This seems completely unnecessary from a mechanics and balance standpoint
It's meant to be thematic, aye.
I like it, it emphasizes the Artificer theme and actually gets around some component difficulty with Somatic stuff, so now you always just need a tool on hand and can use that hand for casting.
And it can be replaced by a bunch of different stuff anyways
And why is Artificer the only class that needs to have mechanical enforcement to its flavor?
Via infusions/rmi
Because its not
Warlock doesn't specify that you are required to have a specific being/creature stat block that serves as your patron
Cleric doesn't require you list a god as the deity of the domain your cleric worships
Those are false equivalents to artificer tool/magic item focus usage
What is something that's equivalent then
Clerics needing a holy symbol or amulet to cast spells
Clerics can use a component pouch
Wildshapes entire existence for one. Among other things
The thing about the tools is you can just. Flavor them as literally anything else anyways.
Or just use a magic item as your focus
I don't give a shit about the flavor I give a shit about of the mechanics of always being required to hold something to cast Artificer spells and forcing every spell my artificer casts to have M components
Honestly, that's when you homebrew a change. The design was made that way intentionally for the flavor.
Book mandated flavor
That's not to say you can't dislike it, mind you.
Flavor is free my foot
Yes just like wildshape
I don't think wildshape is equivalent that's a defining class feature not an arbitrary restriction on the spellcasting of druid
Flavor is free. You are just conflating flavor and mechanics
You have a complaint about the mechanics
Well I can't really flavor my Artificer as casting without tools if I'm required to hold tools can I?
24 rogue by a long shot
24 rogue gets more
You can. Because they (as already mentioned twice) mechanically don't need to use tools
14 rogue only gets one thing better by technicality but it's not worth it much because you have to do specific things to take advantage of it
2024 by a lot
Oh my god they literally are this text literally makes it so all Artificer spells have Material components and require tools to be used to cast with them
Another equivalent would be complaining about the wizard spellbook mechanic
Read infusions/RMI, as mentioned
You can just. Ignore tools. And use one of those for casting
very unanimous
Unsurprising
I don't think Rogue even loses anything from 2014 to 2024 that could make 2014 rogue better
What kind of improvements have been made?
The new quasi-maneuvers using Sneak Attack die
Weapon Masteries, Reliable Talent is much easier, Cunning strikes, the improved Cunning strikes as well
Well that would be fine and dandy if I was using one of those weapons
A very big buff to the assassin, arcane trickster, and Thief subclasses
But I started with a magic item weapon that I want for my setup
Epic boons actually being a thing for them too
Doesn't need to be a weapon...
Do you not understand a wand that I need to hold and an artificer tool that I need to hold are functionally no different for my purposes
armor
The issue is needing to have a hand committed to holding the focus
other wondrous items
Spellcasting Focus. You can use any Wand or Weapon created by this feature as a Spellcasting Focus in lieu of using a set of Artisan's Tools.
Wands or weapons
You don't need to hold it. You can have it on your person with a free hand the same way you can have a spellcasting focus on your person with a free hand as literally any other caster
Artificer is not unique with this tiny bit of mechanically enforced flavor
Hi chat what are we arguing over now
So you're saying I don't need to be holding a wand to cast with it
I see why you'd dislike it if you view it as arbitrary, but it's not actually intended to be arbitrary from a design perspective.
A wand is just a spellcasting focus
Do I need to be holding a wand to cast with it yes or no
Its just a spellcasting focus, so it follows all those rules.
So if you aren't aware, no
I just assumed that you were since you have been referencing them
First of all, I’m pretty sure we aren’t supposed to have AI stuff going on in this server. Secondly, would I as a player enjoy sitting through a mandatory song every single session? No, absolutely not
Ok yeah so love for musicals reaching too far, gotcha
You’d have to talk to your players about if they were interested, not us. Also, I think listening to a mandatory, AI-generated song once per session would be the easiest way to get people to stop coming to sessions if they aren’t as interested as you are
Me personally I'd leave on the spot
Oh this is just one of those creative whims
Yeah no AI generated work on our server - it’s in the rules you agreed to to participate here.
I was just kicking an idea about the musical aspect I wasn’t gonna push it and it was just from the songs I was listening to, wasnt promoting
Got started on my upcoming games setting guide.
Like I’ll have ideas for campaigns pop in my head from time to time and I just wasnt sure if anyone ever tried a Musical campaign outside of atmospheric music.
But D&D players in my area few and far between and I mainly do one shots but I want to do a long campaign to really use my Dragonborn character that is a monk but is scared to use his fists again after accidentally crippling his friend while sparring. So he took up a sword and shield to prevent hurting anyone by accident again
Why are AARAKOCRA so weak
Are they?
They get fly speed equal to their walk speed
Just innately and non magically
I think I turned my Cleric, a priest, into Carrie White yesterday. I literally shoved my opponents to the cliff
They're only 1/4 CR
Oh you mean the stat block
Could be worse they could have 50 fly speed 
and?
You can give a 50 foot fly speed to any humanoid statblock
call it an Aaracokra
Why not?
It’s stronger than a commoner
Even stronger than a bandit
I feel like lightly armored is a disproportionately powerful feat
A CR 12 Archmage could get a fly speed and be an aaracokra. Swap out some spells and make them more elemental if you want to
Not really when you think about it
It’s only light armour. Most classes in the game already have that proficiency
Iirc it’s only sorcerers, wizards, and monks who don’t get it
What else even approaches it
All three of those have better sources of AC
Warlocks don't get it do they?
Warlocks get light armour proficiency
I mean
Not that good, it’s a whole feat and you already have things like shield and mage armour
It’s useful yeah but hardly the most important feat for a sorcerer
Damn I thought I was cooking
It’s a good feat on paper but yeah every class gets the main benefit, or doesn’t need it
Now shield training is nice 100% but that’s the main benefit
It's also the only way to get a shield proficiency outside of already having it
There’s more consistent ways to get value out of a feat
But it feels really bad to take if you already have light armor
I was about to say some very horrible things about the Illithid empire this session, Knome, I was gonna start an interplanetary war ong
No Tokii remember what the menaces stand for
We fought Ettin Ceremorphs.
Their attacks normally have Int saves
Ti decided to make them auto stuns >_>
Guess who has proficency in int saves
Points at Artanza
I picked the wrong campaign to play a character with a flat int why are there so many mind flayers
I only got stunned once
But I was seething because I knew my ass was about to be stunlocked, luckily, it was killed before it could keep me grappled in the stunlock
The melee grapple stun thing is chill with me, thats my fault
But the ranged option should've been kept an INT save, I don't care how many it gets per day
Ranged stuns should always be saves imho.
Every day I feel good about the fact that my combat strategy is to go to a different postcode at the end of my turn
And I'mma shove that opinion down ti's throat
Wait let's just consider the shield then. That's 2 to 3 AC and a half ASI. Does anything else give as much?
It's still kind of good
I honestly haven't seethed this much at D&D in a while, but I don't hate Ti for it lol
"Tools Required. You produce your Artificer spells through tools. You can use Thieves' Tools, Tinker's Tools, or another kind of Artisan's Tools with which you have proficiency as a Spellcasting Focus, and you must have one of those focuses in hand when you cast an Artificer spell (meaning the spell has an M component when you cast it)."
I was right you do need to be holding the artificer tool when casting artificer spells
I do need to be holding it in my hand
Even niche feats that give AC when conditions are met are limited to like one
And then that opens you up for warcaster if you really want that advantage
I mean not really. Most of the classes which get enough value out of AC to consider a feat, already have light armour and shields (and better). For the classes who don’t have it, yes it’s useful but usually an ASI or another feat is better. AC isn’t really that good in the long run.
I know why Autostun effects exist, but that doesn't exlude it from being a shitty thing!!!
I like to feel safe 😂
Sure but it’s coming at an opportunity cost which is generally that you can do less things
By not taking it, you can take feats like warcaster, the toucheds, speedy, durable, and so many others
AC isn't important for Sorcerers and Wizards imho.
Just take spells that make attacking you a bit more of a task
Mirror Image and Blink for some examples
thats kinda why those spells exist
There’s value in it but imo it’s not enough value to justify a feat
A Warlock doesn't have a lot of spell slots...
They need to remake hex blade already
They probably won't release it with the armor proficiencies though
But I feel like it would be okay to make those features available through evocations
June.
Evocations kind of function like half feats anyway
Or at the latest September with Arcana Unleashed.
AC stops mattering at some point anyway
Invocations.
It's in Arcana Unleashed, yeah
I'm using voice to chat because I'm a terrible speller
And if they made it available through invocations you wouldn't HAVE to play a hex blade to be a melee spells user
All right I'm done yapping about it. Sorry about busting in on your conversation like the Kool-Aid Man lmao
Pact of the Blade exists. You can melee without Hexblade.
Is this a good channel to ask a quesiton im making a homebrew spell :(
sorry if not the right place
hey why the hell is only ONE subclass free for wizards and soccerers?
It’s the same for all classes
They’re part of the free basic rules, but most subclasses need to be purchased
oh okay ig i cant do anything then 😭
You could use the one subclass, or buy the books
Hey guys is anyone a fan of legends of avartis?
Or find a friend who has the books and borrow
damm
If you’re in a group that has someone with the books they can share it too
Most DMs offer content sharing so you can make a character once you join their campaign links
Some communities have content sharing campaign links strictly for that
ohh where can i find that
Just had the most stressful fight in dnd I think I’ve ever had
Did ya live?
My character had his face chopped off.
The fight isn’t over, I’ve got almost no HP left
Need a DM first who's offering otherwise maybe a Google search?? I honestly wouldn't know specific locations other than my groups westmarch
Probably the scariest words I’ve ever heard in response to attacking a dude
“He chops your face off, your brain is exposed and your body is falling apart, you’re still alive but if it’s not treated you won’t be for long”
nono i mean the sharing comunities
Google search would be your best bet. I don't know any specific ones myself
okay thanks
FYI it's not a permanent solution. If the campaign link owner deltes the link you lose access. I recommend trying to join an actual community if possible. DMs like myself always willing to share with their community members. #looking-for-community could be a start
First time?
That's gonna' affect your Charisma-based rolls, possibly
I think you lose the right to be party face when you don't have your face on anymore
-5 to all social checks and a -2 to all intelligence checks
However I can heal my face back with a potion, but it’ll take time
Wow. Tough cookie
‘Tis but a flesh wound
I've never played a game that made use of injury and wound mechanics, oddly enough
Just "HP go down. Unga bunga."
This ttrpg system my friend has been making has been has been really fun
I just happened to receive one of the worst critical wounds
Sounds like it.
I don't imagine it gets much worse than "Your brain is at risk of falling out and people can see your vascular system."
Though my dm has a rule that any physically altering effect on our characters is always temporary unless we say we’re fine with it
So my character had been critically wounded at the end of a long grueling duel that meant a lot to my character, so I said that he got a scar on his eye to represent what he lost in that duel, even if he had been victorious
That's actually really good. I found out recently that some people actually have very real issues with things like injuries and such
A friend of mine lost her eye, and ever since, she just cannot stand anything involving eye injuries in our games.
I like to be able to control how my characters look I guess
Hey y'all
Just started a campaign with friends and am trying to organize how I want my Warlock to progress, but I'm soooo not use to this class
Warlocks are cool
Yea, chose it cuz I'm making her based around a game character, but some of the things are hard to decide on
I'm going to tell you something important, friend: Charisma isn't just how good looking a character is. It's their independence and willingness to lead versus follow. It's their "presence" when they enter a room. It's the sheer force of will they assert.
Charisma casting is asserting dominance over reality.
Also: Warlocks are cool
Well that's good. Figured Wisdom was more along the lines of willpower
What's the power fantasy you're chasing?
For me that's usually a good place to start when it comes to having to make decisions
?
You're the magical equivalent of a martial class. You have your cantrips which are like your weapons, and then you have your spell slots which are limited and powerful and recover more quickly. You're more of a magical sprinter than a marathoner.
Oh, basically Galbrina from Wuthering Waves
I know neither of those things, could you describe them in terms of abilities and powers?
Funny cuz I literally took mobile feat from variant human
Ah so it seems like you're using the 2014 rule set.
Wisdom is experience, common sense, intuition, etc. Someone with a lot of Wisdom could be described as having a "sixth sense." It could be said that Wisdom ties into Willpower, but Charisma fits a little more closely.
This spell Dirge from Heroes of Faerun is so genuinely weird to me
Ehh ... the ability scores aren't very realistic. They're used for certain Skills, but outside of that they don't really map to the capabilities of real people.
The closest thing to "common sense" in 5E is your passive Investigation score, which would make it Intelligence based.
Alot to get into, basically she's Dante from DMC but she has a demon attached to her soul (kinda) instead of being one
You described one character by using another character. Is there a short description you could give me without using a reference? Or at least try?
Wisdom does cover Insight, though, so reading the room would be Wisdom.
I disagree very much. Wisdom is street smarts, common sense, intuition, etc. Intelligence is education, IQ, knowledge studied, etc.
Yeah you're adding stuff that isn't in the mechanics.
True, fast, stylish, gun user that incorporates a lot of dodging and melee kicks into shooting
And you want to use guns?
Nevermind, I see where this is going
It's easier to use guns in the 2024 rule set than the 2014 rule set.
Do you know which rules your DM and group are using?
The DM and I talked, less actually guns and more a pistol shaped arcane focus from my patron
Do you also want to use unarmed strikes?
I love wands with pistol grips and being a wandslinger, by the way.
Can somebody help me understand this Heroes of Faerun spell because it's breaking my brain
That's part of where my issue comes in
I was gonna add a few levels of monk eventually but idk cuz I'd have to keep dropping or putting away my guns
Unless they would let me flavor monk combat as kicks
Like this spell is genuinely better if they pass the first save against it
Monk attacks are unarmed strikes which include kicks
Why?
But I don't really see a monk/warlock having any sort of cohesion as a build ngl
Unarmed strikes can be with any part of your body, they do not have to be punches.
If you want someone who goes seamlessly between using ranged weapons and unarmed strikes you'll want Kensei Monk, no need to multiclass.
The spell Dirge from Heroes of Faerun, it's a 60ft emanation and when they fail a save they fall prone but on a pass their speed is halved, and the spell description doesn't specify how long this halved speed lasts for, so it's presumably until either the end of the duration or when they exit the emanation.
But if either of those are the case, then you want them to pass the first save so that their speed is halved; and then fail on subsequent saves so that they fall prone and need to get up with their already halved speed.
It just seems so odd to me.
Maybe the wording is just weird
Ugh .. the lack of the duration on the speed halving is terrible design writing.
Unless it's in the book and the compendium version is just not displaying it?
When you cast this spell, you can designate creatures to be unaffected by it. Any other creature can't regain Hit Points while in the Emanation. Whenever the Emanation enters a creature's space and whenever a creature enters the Emanation or ends its turn there, the creature makes a Constitution saving throw. On a failed save, the creature takes 3d10 Necrotic damage and has the Prone condition. On a successful save, the creature takes half as much damage and its Speed is halved. A creature makes this save only once per turn.```
I would assume the halved speed is only within the Emanation's AOE
But I feel like it would say that
Or it would say that the area is difficult terrain
So if they move out of it they just get all their Speed back immediately, making that portion useless?
Difficult terrain would have made so much more sense.
Also a 60ft emanation with this effect as a lawnmower is wild
I didn't make it, just interpreting based on design cues.
It is a 6th level spell.
Also it specifies that the halved speed is on a successful save
The fact that the question isn't answered and requires guessing is bad design writing.
That's just so odd to me
You want them to pass the first save and fail subsequent ones
So they're prone with halved speed
I mean I love stuff that still has effects on a successful save.
Agreed, but going off what I can see I really have to assume that exiting the Emanation would save you from the spell's ongoing effects.
It saves you from repeating the save
I couldn't decide on which martial class
Galbrina is a fast attacker, I figured fighter might be good, but the multi class isn't for power basically, more for character authenticity
Like I don't even care about the damage at this point
This spell is valuable if they fail or not
Ahh, failing also gets you Exhaustion, which is much much more punishing.
That's if circle cast though
But honestly may as well
Getting this spell off is likely worth it either way since it's valuable whether they pass or not
It can be quite hard to create a DnD character that has equal capabilities to a character in other media. Sometimes you have to sacrifice one or two things.
But either way the spell being better if they pass the first save is just such a strange design to me
Don't mutliclass for flavor or authenticity, multiclass only for mechanics, give flavor and authenticity by reflavoring.
Exhibit free will and multiclass for whatever reasons you want to
Mhm, you can achieve alot with just flavouring
As long as you know what you're doing
Right, I mean you can do whatever you want, but my suggestion is not to multiclass for flavor because in my experiencei t works better if you only mc for mechanics and use reflavoring for lore, narrative, and authenticity.
Speaking of multiclassing for bad reasons
I gotta get started on my Cleric Barbarian
I think Cleric Barbarian has some potential
Multiclassing for flavor is more often than not a trap, you end up with a character that just doesn't work how you want them to work based on your story.
I multiclass for the thought experiment/challenge of making two conflicting classes work as well as I can
So I'm not sure if I missed it, but is your group using 2014 rules?
Y'all ever absolutely bully a group of enemies so badly that they actually lay down their weapons and surrender?
Always be flavoring! The Fireball spell says you blast a streaking light that becomes a fiery explosion. It does not mention whether the streaking light is red, green, pink, or blue. It also fails to mention whether the cloud of smoke created by the blast is shaped like a skull, a heart, or fist raising a middle finger.
We ambushed this group of humans inside a dark hallway and had them boxed in. They didn't even know who it was that was killing them.
Flavouring is just a very neat way to customise without editing mechanics uwu
Yes
A group of "guards" that were actually a gang of bandits extorting the town started trouble with our party. After my character downed their leader during my first turn, which was the first turn (thank you, Action Surge), they surrendered pretty quickly.
Not quite, but one time we were hired to protect a treasure chest from thieves. We did a double blind Minor Illusion where we put the illusion of a plain barrel on top of the chest and put an illusion of the real chest on top of a plain barrel across the room. The thieves fought our whole party just to get to .. a fake chest. And then we finished them off.
I often have enemies surrender or flee when the heroes are clearly winning, makes for quicker combats and interesting narratives.
Yea
Mostly I figured I can flavor most her melee by using pact of chain and having her fiend do them, like she mostly does
I mostly was doing a martial multi class cuz of extra attack
It just makes sense. A sentient, mortal enemy isn't going to look at their ally's scattered bodies and think "Yeah, I can take these adventurers. I bet they're really worn down, now!"
Why not make a Kensei Monk with a Patron?
Lol, ours was on the opposite end of the spectrum, we were trying to steal their gold and drive them out (colonizers that they were) from the kobolds home that they stole. (One of our party members also murdered an innocent kobold at the start of the dungeon with Eldridge blast but that's besides the point)
After the bandits surrendered, one of them actually turned his life around and became a regular NPC we'd see working in the town Inn.
I wonder if Circle Casting would be able to allow my Barbarian Cleric to hand his concentration off onto someone else who helps me circle cast the spell.
We circle cast, split the concentration of Bless or something like that, then I rage and lose concentration but the spell stays active because someone else is still concentrating on it
very few things are worth fighting to the death for
The important thing I'd say about it is that you should agree in a session 0 that there should be no pc-introduced torture for any subsequent interrogations that are sure to follow.
Didn't think about it tbh
We already had a couple sessions
I should probably post the full version of what happened in tales from the table, because it was hilarious
Although I probably can't, because it contains a lot of swearing
Back in 3.5 I was playing a Chaotic Good Bard, and the rest of the party chose Chaotic Good too. They then proceeded to torture a Drow for info while I refused to participate. They just couldn't believe torture wasn't in the Chaotic Good wheelhouse. Then I showed them the bit where the handbook stated Chaotic Good characters despise torture.
My favorite thing to do is write down things that happen to our party while they are still unfolding
That's horrible, I'm sorry that this happened at your table
good characters hate evil actions? news to me
Too many people think "Chaotic Good" means "I can do anything and then say I'm good after"
I guess I'm one of the record keepers of my party
not even CN means that
They associate Deadpool and punisher as chaotic good types, and that's the issue
haha no
You can even leave alignment aside completely and agree not to introduce content (i.e. torture) into your game.
gods no they are NOT good
EXACTLY THIS
most dont understand the nuance between lawful and good
People don't recognize that those characters are Chaotic Neutral at best. Punisher has an obsession that just happens to target villains, but his alignment is not based in higher morality.
I do think it is wrong to assume all Chaotic Good characters despise torture. Not all alignments behave the same yaddah yaddah yaddah...
Man, looking for an art tutorial is painful
You either have to pay or well-connected
i think if they are good they despise torture.
Not to mention both characters originally were villains themselves
Torture is an evil action. Plain and simple.
Not sure if I agree. But there's no point in arguing it.
Aye, what's good everyone?
Well now I'm not sure
I see....
Why would using poison be innately evil? Unless you're poisoning an innocent single mother or an orphan child I don't see how that would be evil.
Characterization matters more than whatever you use for your avatar
i forget the exact reason
Ah, we mean simply using poison as a tool. Gotcha
yes, poisoning.
It depends, I would think
I mean....I've been using AI avatars, but they feel really dead no matter how good my characterizations are
i mean like as a tool not a creature who uses it
stinky ai mentioned
wild subject change
On a side note, I'm glad I remastered (remaee) my old edge lord character into a character that's actually hopeful and NOT an edgelord. He actually acts like Matthew Murdock now. Which is awesome! Oh, and he has a split personality with someone who acts like a Disney Princess.
If your character is poisoning their weapons to deal with monsters, that's sensible. If they're poisoning their arrows to hunt regular animals, that's more evil.
All of you imply that characterization matters more since you talk about how your character should act instead of how it should looks
HE CAN! 🤣
Poison is as evil as a sword. Unless you're using it to harm innocent people I don't see how that is evil.
offers high five
Accepts high five from giga-chad person.
i think the difference may be poison is always bad and maybe dishonorable
Surpise you dont need an image of ya character to play dnd, and using ai to get an image of ya character is stinky cause dnd is inherently a creative game. And ai isnt ( ´∀`)
again i'd have to see their reasons for it.
It's considered unsporting to use it when hunting, but that's hunting knowledge. Can't expect everyone to know that
Wait, do you play with a blank avatar on Owlbear and West Marches?
No, I actually draw my characters
noice
And the funny thing now that I've realized I'm genderfluid, I'm gonna have him be a Prince and a Princess depending on how he's feeling.
Man, looking for references are hard
It really isn't
slay
I just use Heroforge and kitbash my way to victory
I'm not very fond of Western Arts and prefer to use anime arts more. Should I 100% rely on my instinct to find it?
Yes sir! I'm gonna have him be the best Disney Prince/Princess ever to exist!
I even found a way to make it work!
yey
There's also Picrew, home of a bazillion character creators
Idk how to grow instinct to draw my own charas
Same here.
Legit, theres picrews online and hero forge
I find it strange that you guys see the usage of poison as dishonorable and therefore evil. Pretty sure that is a very unpopular opinion.
My final resource is the super talented artist I keep in my back pocket
Using ai is stinky and always will be and is heavily negativity veiwed in creativity
i kinda want a sharply dressed lawyer lol
idk what caster he'd be tho a few would work
Using poison to hunt animals is only an issue because you would be ruining the meat.
So, should I start with a raw copy without any sketches no matter how bad it is?
I can see our point isn't going through.
That's a brilliant idea. Wait- weren't we just talking about Matthew Murdock? LMFAO! 🤣
Id rather you legit have a stick figure drawing as ya design than an ai image
This person is speaking facts.
I'm confused about what to follow. I wanna talk about how to start learning to draw, but...all I see here are....characterizations
True
Using poison to harm a monster? Not evil. Firing a poison arrow into a bear and following it as it suffers a slow death? An argument could be made that the individual did not make a very moral choice
You dont need art for dnd but people love to create their character and not use a promt for ai to "maybe make it right"
i don't think ai should exist tbh
I'll need it one day, man. AI...kinda sucks my soul
That's a very specific way to kill a random bear.
Learning to draw can start any time, you just have to put in the effort to learn and adapt it
^
ai steals from real people so
I'm literally referencing something people in the real world do
Im a concept and comic art graduate, using ai is legit an insult to artists like myself
Here's a question of morality: My guy is a dark elf. He's very heroic in his actions, but he fell in love with someone evil. However, he made him somewhat good in the end. If he looses one more member in the party, he becomes like his old lover, but in a way where he does heroic things. Just in a more evil way. What does that make him?
What kind of imitation should I start with?
man i dunno
Honestly, whenever you have idle hands. Just doodle and it’s one of those things that you just passively get better at that
An awesome villain. The best villains are so close to being heroes. So close.
alignment isn't one act and that is you. It's a thousand tiny cuts
Oh, and where are my manners? Nice to meet ya Silas. I'm Aidan.😎 🤝
intent matters too
Careful withl the emote spam, you can get warned by the discord bot
lol what is funny is Aidan is the name of a flame spirit in a story i write.
So, if he were to loose someone in the party and go violent with his heroics... he would be technically a villain. Right?
Oh, and sorry.
Idk, man....my past interviewer kinda detested how I drew. So many bold lines, so many sharp lines, so many bold colors
It was disaster
Ish kk just wanted to warn ya so you dont get smited
Gucci lit.
I guess if you're hunting and you don't want to risk having the bear turn on you...
ANYTHING is better then AI
Try tracing
Depends. Is he having moments where he's convincing himself he's still a hero? That's usually a pretty good sign.
eh i said a word and got smote.
Also what’s with the Dino reactions 🙏
You learn to make art by making mistakes and experimenting in what you like
Language!
I still feel like a single action shouldn't brand someone as evil.
It's A: Illegal, and B: Immoral.
I have folders filled with art thats terrible, but I tried and learnt from it
it would have to be a very big choice with a huge impact to hurt your own alignment
Then your on the right track
nothing you'd do in a normal situation
And 99 percent of artists say their stuff is bad no matter how good it is
My art is trash. I love it
Did you draw that pfp?
Noooononono
Well.... that's and intersting perspective because GOD FORBID he looses another member in the party, he will pick up his old lovers watch and be as evil as he was. Just in a heroic way where he is helping people. But through more violent needs than it needs to be. He would be like from Nightwing/Daredevil to more like Punisher/Red Hood/Even evil Matthew Murdock from the Spider-Gwen comics.
That's my back pocket artist
I was about to say it’s freaking AMAZING
alignment is also how OTHERS see you
Personally I feel like something being illegal should not have any weight in morality. Plenty of laws can be immoral.
Ah, good point.
What is with these Dino reactions
and that is why Chaotic exists Alley
Sorry, it's a bad habit and means I agree.
Gotcha
idk i'm not the one using dinos
If your on a VTT, is it preferable to get token art of someone bust up or portrait/headshot or half body or fullbody? I'm trying to decide what I should get when im commissioning art
Okay, different example. Cecil the Lion
Will tracing the AI arts I have will do the work?
been watching a dnd campaign on yt and they just use busts
I'd also argue that someone who is Lawful would not automatically agree with all laws. But I don't feel like opening that can of worms.
I’ve- never heard of that before
lawful would follow
At that point just use real art
Idk who that is.
agreeing would be secondary
So, with that being said: If he goes down a more corrupt path... would that make him evil or neutral?
chaotics can agree with and obey laws
Heck no, also the reason why some ppl recommended tracing is to learn forms. You trace over stuff to break it down in to forms to learn from.
Tracing ai filled with mistakes will only fuel more mistakes
it is more the attitude around them
A lion that was doped up and released into an area it couldn't escape, so a man who paid money could "hunt" it "successfully"
This person has 20 wisdom
How tracing works, btw?
Anyway, returning to the alignment chart part
im a concept artist so id hope so 💀
You think a Lawful Good character would obey a tyrant's laws?
it depends
can I peep the art rq
i think they would overthrow a tyrant tho
There is a significant argument that poison is often a tool used by villainous types. Is it automatic? No. It is very dependent on the target being poisoned, though.
I post very poorly online vut theres probs like a piece in the art chat here
Monster? Villain? BBEG? Sure. Poison away
I guess I should look for it myself
tyrants are bad and abuse the law
You break down the form Into basic shapes, anatomy is basically made of shapes cobbled together
Just saw it, I ADORE your style
but they would use lawful means to depose him
Lawful Good is that person in the movie who says "We have to work within the system!"
Let's say you make a habit of using poison and patient waiting to hunt animals yet also donate a healthy portion of your money to the local orphanage. Would you say you're still evil?
more like trying not to collapse the gov overnigjt
chaotic good migbt be all "assassination go brrr"
Idk, man...looking for YouTube tutorials is seriously a bad idea....I got flooded with shorts 
That’s where I started and it helped aLOT
and I learnt by watching cartoons and comics ppl start different ways
Sacrificing my attention spans by learning from shorts?
Full length videos, goober
I got full length video only after 4-6 shorts recommendations
Screw you, Shorts
I think I'm done arguing the morality of poisoning woodland creatures.
Just look it up
“Anatomy practice”
Should I pray for less shorts?
Just don’t use shorts
I didn't think I'd ever have to argue that poisoning Bambi's mom isn't "moral," but hey! Something new every day.
Wish me luck 
I learnt much from life drawing classes and my art is heavily stylized, but stuff I learnt there drawing realistically can apply
You're missing my point but very well, we can stop this discussion.
They often tell you that you should master anatomy and realism, and that doing so makes it easier to have a unique style.
I kinda' agree.
Its easier to play with proportions and silhouettes. If you know the frame underneath
Electrolytes?
Lead
Im trash at realsim, but I still learnt alot from life drawing classes
Idk how odd it's to start learning from....theories
People who disagree with me about things are evil
They're what plants crave!
Lead
Pour poison in water, kill all the plants, use terrain to build a big general goods store (supermarket).
Well that's just true.
I don't agree with you.
You're both evil
Mind you, I'm secretly the main character of Earth
convinces them he can talk to plants so they use water
as for being evil due to disagreement hm
Feebleminded indeed.
what was that line again from that song?
When the aliens show up looking for a champion: I'm on vacation
Do you guys think they'll put Vecna in Fortnite?
I goddamn hope not.
DbD is genuinely so bad nowadays
What you mean to tell me that putting Kaneki Ken in was a little weird?
Anime isn't even real
okay Steve.
Nothing is real. Didn't you hear? This is all just a simulation.
words aren't real bruh
I said DbD not D&D
My wife plays Fork-Knife. Never tried Forklift myself, but many people have told me to give Flapjacks a go
yeah fair you did say DbD
V, it's pronounced Flakelife.
i'd like it but players are more toxic than a LoL ranked match
I hate how unbalanced it is.
and the licensed killers are a buzzkill
Right, right
FartBlight
i wanted original killers
I'll get it eventually
It is this weird thing where it's both too competitive and too unbalanced.
We're going far off topic though
Dungeons & Dragons!
Did you guys know satyr paladins ae OP?
probably lol
Gonna be playing a unicorn satyr soon uwu
owo
You'd think they'd be really good Monks and Pugilists. Solid kicks.
probably get a few points of extra damage at least
Magic Resistance + Aura of Protection + Ancients Paladin Magic Resistance.
Literally never fail a saving throw against a spell again.
natural weapons baby
Good headbutts, too
yep
In Pathfinder...
It you go Gnome Paladin in 2024 you get advantage on all mental saves spell or otherwise
i'm scared of halfling wizards with crossbows now tho
That's how it works in 2014.
int dump wiz is the meta
See, I'm about to start up a game wherein the party contains a Kobold Druid (circle of wicker), a Lizardman Barbarian (path of the belly brewer), a Risen (Orc/Elf) Monster Hunter (homebrew subclass), a Chthonic Tiefling Warlock (undead patron), and two humans. One is a Peace Cleric of Lathander, the other is my Hero Fighter hedge knight.
Is there a channel where I can show a homebrew I had commissioned?
Well... Not commissioned exactly...
donno
More like I made a homebrew so I could get one made for me.
This party literally contains a large lizard and a small lizard
lizard powers activate
I plan to ask the big lizard to throw the small lizard at something
by our powers combined
Then the small lizard can transform into a bear mid-flight
reminds me of that post with the 'don't feed kobolds' sign
Same for one of my games, dragonborn and kobold.
I think the Kobold player is making their Kobold look like a little Axalotl person
Lore accurate? No. Cute as all heck? His name is Dave
lol
My character is "Sir Daveth the Kind, Hero of Oakcrest." I'm sure him and Dave the Kobold will get along swimmingly.
The dragonborn that I mentioned could probably throw the kobold easily. Unfortunately for them I am the DM and I can't really see the whole throwing tactic working. In most scenarios at least.
eh a boost up a wall maybe
crawl through a window to unlock a door etc
throwing them straight at a wall, though? depends on the save for damage i guess lol
That could def work. The kobold is a rogue too so...
situational as all things imho
i can just think of a few creative uses of it
be careful not to MISS tho
And the dragonborn is a beefy fighter.
It was.
i still do like that dynamic though. I thought it was cool
This game almost had three high elves funnily enough. By sheer coincidence.
lol
I think I have been in a game where the party had three humans before.
that's less uncommon tbh
Yeah...
though now i want a full party of all humans in a diverse setting somehow being really unbelievable for an adventuring party
because those are usually full of random races and backgrounds
that might be funny
I oughtta play a kobold again some time
It is an opportunity to make devils cry
Reminds me of that time a Devil tried to posses my lucid dreaming Kobold Artificer who thwarted their attempts by just teaching them about rocks and geology
infodumping, the real mental save
He went full private tutor on them and even have them write tests and essays
lol
hey who says the devil isn't interested though. That's just enrichment
might be able to make a deal with a geologist later, too
They were very frustrated about the whole dear and did not score well XD To bad the game died out after a while^^'
Y'all I got a question
What would you make a character roll for those gut instincts (ie you feel like your being watched or that somethings off) I go to wisdom or perception,but I want second opinion
no you're right, sounds like those two things
anything else i imagine would be niche/situational so i couldn't tell you otherwise.
Fair,was just double guessing myself as I'm writing smthing up lol
You could also use their passive score!
Well are you asking for if someone would have that gut feeling?
Having a chart with passive perception scores of your players ready is a nice trick to have for situations like that
Characters getting stalked by scope,off feeling would have them notice a glint in the distance due to being on alert from gut feeling
i'd roll perception yeah
maybe passive for the gut and active perception check to see if they notice the glint
that's just my gut feeling lol

If a player themselves has a gut feeling then yeah ask for perception otherwise just take passive perception
:3
I’d use their passive score, if someone has the Alert feature I might have them roll cuz it’s fitting, but at the end of the day if they’re not proactively choosing to do so I’d not call for a roll
it depends on how important it would be for them to notice, i suppose
but yeah players can just choose to ask if they notice anything anyway lol
Perfect situation for passive perception
yeah that's why i said passive first, active if they choose to look for the reason
other than that i couldn't say anything else. there's lots of good suggestions here
Slightly related note. I've heard sometimes it's acceptable to allow a player to play off a failed perception as a gut feeling of something off. How do we feel about that?
(Not discussing the nature of a player sometimes describing their own failure.)
I often do "degrees of failure", where rolling slightly under the DC still gives the pc some information, just less than they would normally have.
Is it possible to have a holy symbol that’s also a staff?
Not in a mechanical sense no, it seems staves aren't qualified enough 😔
RAW no, why? What are you trying to do?
I would say if your dm allows it then yes, go for it. If you're the dm, what exactly does it harm by allowing it?
Raw only has as much sanctity as we as individuals give it, and even then it's only words stuck together to provide some meaning to something that we can choose to perceive in another way.
In other words: get mad.
I just want a staff for my cleric
By chance will you also want to wield a shield?
Actually do you want the staff to work like a quarterstaff in combat? Like are you intending to hit enemies with it?
Because if you're not intending on using it like a weapon I see no problem why your holy symbol couldn't be staff shaped.
Just say it's a holy symbol, not intended to be a weapon. It's unwieldy or fragile or something. Then you have your staff holy symbol.
I mean that would be cool but I don’t NEED to use it in melee since this is a spellcasting focused cleric and not a martial one
Right, so yeah go ahead. Just say you have a staff shaped holy symbol.
If its just a cosmetic change yeah go for it
I would still say you could easily solve your question by just asking your dm.
As is, just do it.
I think it's quite funny that the arcane/druidic focuses have a weapon option as a focus in the staff and the holy focus has a holy symbol on a shield as a focus
So it's kind of like most focuses are just flavour but then there's one option in eich of them that's kinda mechanically superior
There is also the concealability factor that hinders these ig but still
How does tremorsense work? For example, when you touch a building made of stone which is 60 ft tall and 30 ft wide. Can you sense a creature in 60 ft up inside the building?
I get it now thanks
I've been running the tomb of annihilation for a while now. I don't think my players like it. Is there a way to "kick them out" of the dungeon that makes sense and doesn't seem like a copout?
Talk to them out of campaign and say "Hey, if you guys don't like TOA maybe I can run something else?" Or something along those lines
Well it's part of a bigger campaign, but I don't want it to be like "you are teleported to the exit" or "the exit magically opens". I want to have some kind of way to make sense. For reference, the main villain is an illithilich and I use a lot of lovecraftian elements in my games.
How grim does a DnD setting need to be so I can play as a maggot that crawls inside dead bodies to control them
First thing to do is find out if it's actually a problem.
Ask
Feel like that's some book of vile darkness stuff right there. Also probably some Shadowfell type area
I have discussed it with them, I'm just trying to figure it out
Could be an interesting reborn
Ahh so you know they don't like it, ok.
What about it do they not like?
Also, if you're going to be talking about stuff in the module please keep it in #1029833015423143957
They don't really like dungeons. Just having to explore room by room, they prefer open world stuff
Ok cool, so how about you make the room-by-room stuff into a Skill roll and then montage it so it goes by quicker?
Just describe it ambiance and vibes, then give them the loot or clues or whatever and skip past the tedious pixel hunting?
Tomb of annihilation is more puzzly than normal, should I ignore that too?
Make it a montage of Skill rolls where you describe how cleverly/stupidly they passed the puzzles.
Just assume they passed everything, but make the Skill roll determine how good/bad they looked doing it.
If they looked bad, take a resource tax. Dock their HP, their spell slots, their gear, etc.
Ahh good idea.
This will keep it flowing and not stalling them in what is probably a boring and frustrating pixel hunt for them.
And yeah for more detailed discussion of an official adventure, use #1029833015423143957
I think we're okay for now here as it's high-level discussion
The important part, in my opinion, is to not make the players solve the puzzles. Make their characters do it.
I have a lot of questions just because I've only recently started getting into the actual DND community
I really oughtta get some art commissioned of my favorite characters
I've only ever played with close family or friends
All i have is an image of my enchantment Wizard levitating a piece of pizza like that meme image
Well #dm-discussion is a great channel for more in depth advice about DMing.
Wondering what would be a good weapon of choice for a barbarian who is resistance to almost all damage types
Greataxe
I like great swords because they have a higher damage average
I like Mauls cuz bonk, but here I like leaning into tanky and grabbing a shield and a, say, Morning Star
Unarmed! Rage hugs!
1d4 Wild Heart Barbarian from Tavern Brawler
I don't use the morning star or flail enough
I always go Longsword when I do shield and one handed weapon
But I suppose Flail has sap too
I was torn between Aasimar Wild Heart Barbarian for resistance to all damage types except for Psychic and Force
And Gnome Wild Heart Barbarian for advantage on all saves but Constitution and damage resistance to most damage types
I vote for this! Partially also for the temporary flight
More seriously I had a great time with a Nick Barbarian using Light Hammers. Still 1d4 but you don't need the Feat. And you get a bonus attack which you can add Rage damage to.
Oh I did that recently for a Zealot Barbarian in a 2014 game!
Works less well in 2014 without Nick Mastery.
Bjarrig Boulderbasher the Mountain Dwarf Zealot Barbarian, member of the Masons and Stonecutters guild and follower of Moradin
He was a real powerhouse for the low levels of Storm Kings Thunder before I had to leave due to scheduling things
But from what I hear they continued the game and did him justice with his send off
Morning
He had 20 Strength at level 1 thanks to the DM's custom array which had a 17, the feat we got to choose at level 1 (ASI included, I took Crusher) and the +2 from being a 2014 Mountain Dwarf
How does firearms works like automatic rifle especially with burst fire? How many bullets per reload?
According to the 2024 DMG, an Automatic Rifle can hold 30 shots before reloading, and sprays 10 pieces of ammunition per burst fire
What about the dmg? Does it do per bullet or whole 30 shots for dmg?
You spend 10 ammunition to burst fire which makes enemies in a 10ft cube make a dex save or take 2d8 + Dex mod damage
The DC being 15 for the dex save
Also you should ask your DM if you can have an automatic rifle before giving yourself one
Yeah most settings don't really have that advanced technology
What about the normal hit? Does it do dmg per bullet?
On a normal hit it's also 2d8 + Dex mod
I've never actually looked at the modern firarms and seen how they worked until now
You're right about that but we're playing in modern world mixed with dnd world. Ah I remember guns is allowed. Idk much about cost of guns tbh
Per bullet? That's nice. This is op
DNDBeyond is a freaking mess ngl. I can't fully turn off 5.5 despite wanting to play 5E.
That's why it's not in most settings.
Might also be that you don't add your dex mod to the burst fire, since it only mentions the weapons damage (which is 2d8) and the "add dex mod" is explicitely an attack roll thing.
That's why those weapons are in the DMG and not recommended as normal weapons
That's true
And I can't find a regular spear in the starting equipment. I also can't turn off the 5.5 keyword system.
also 2d8+Dex isn't an insane damage output
Yeah I'm also very much not a fan of beyond lol partially for the same reason
Why even have the option to turn it off if it doesn't work.
you can get the same average damage by using a Maul with GWF but with strength instead of Dex
Spent all this money on books the website won't let me use.
For a ranged weapon with a range of 100/300 yeah its pretty good
A Rogue with an Automatic Rifle is eating well
Lmao well yeah it's a Rogue
Manage Inventory, Weapon, scroll down, there's the spear.
Bugbear Rogue with Automatic Rifle is a hell yeah
No... but Ranger as a topic could go on to become "ranger bad"
I've played as a Bugbear Barbarian Rogue with an automatic rifle he never used
Because he already had a Cyberpunk Preorder Katana and a Banhammer
Rangers SUCK /silly
Why? That's a waste
Sorry wings, can't bait the bingo
He had too many magic items
I literally search for spear and nothing shows up. 
That DM dumped like well over a dozen magic items on me
are you in the character sheet or the character builder?
DM favored you llike a favorite child of the fam
Yeah it was a bad habit of his I had to talk him out of
Inventory tab (next to the spell/action tab), then scroll down
Now I'm the DM
My players have to earn their magic items
I took over the throne and became myself The Dungeon Master
every encounter I go "Do you want to make this encounter harder... for a magic item?"
He was banished from the land for his crimes
I've done the same going through Manage Inventory and it shows up.
Spear
Spear +1
Flame Tongue Spear
Etc
It seems your DM was grooming you to be his replacement but instead you stage a coup lol
I pity those players working to earn your magic items
that's... a weird way to word things.
It's become weird when you make it weird
I was using the character builder but I found it.
I definitely based a lot of my DMing around not doing certain things that he did
I still can't get all these stupid keywords to turn off.
Good to hear
"Keywords"?
But he's improved a lot and is a player in my friday games still
Like "Sap" and instead of "Reach" it's called "Range."
Ah, Masteries and technical terms
is it allowed to have a selfaware character
Talk to your DM
Which god(s) might employ both druids and paladins, and also send a group of the latter to free a bunch of locked up warforged slaves from their creator
Define self aware.
Chauntea?
Practically all gods can have paladins.
I can't see many druids going out of their way to free warforged slaves however.
So, a few things: Gods are not employers. Paladins are fueled by oath. A paladin may be an atheist or indeed be part of an order affiliated with a given cult. Druids are also not fueled by gods.
All that said, check any of the nature gods. They can all fit your need
Hm, I probably should've asked this in character discussion, it involves an idea I had
Off the top of my head the only deities that make any sense are Chauntea and Mielikki. However I have a feeling that followers of those goddesses would be much more concerned with other things.
I admit it, after last session I think Paladins have gone up to A tier for me
honestly all Charisma casters are amazing
I'll have to do more research later, it's quite late for me
I can see them freeing a bunch of warforged slaves if they happened to come upon them. Going out of their way to free some constructs however? I don't think so.
At least not your average druid.
If the blessed earthmother ordered to do it then probably, but I don't think Chauntea would go out of their way to do that
Yeah, that's my point.
yup
This feels like something Tyr or Ilmater would bother with.
Adding that to my deity journal, I only know the deities if someone mentions them to me
I have Kelemvor, Chauntea, Tyr, Ilmater, Bahamut, and Tiamat
I have memorized a lot of them.
D&D Question of the Day (D&D Beyond: Playing the Game):
A Critical Hit on a weapon attack means you roll [ ] for the attack’s damage dice.
I have not
Hey, I also said Mielikki!
twice the damage die, but you only add the modifier once?
Yeah but that one's harder to spell
I want to play as a silly plasmoid cleric of Mielikki one day.
additionally, things like CME, Sneak Attack, and Smite all get twice their damage die also.
Correct on twice. Unsure about the mods. Anybody?
By modifier I mean the ability mod for that weapon
Myrkul has gained a place in my heart. I want to play a cleric of Myrkul too.
not the outside things like Sneak Attack
the person that looks like a triangle?
More a triangle faced skeleton. But yeah.
I have also played a cleric of Tymora DMPC once and I liked him so much that I elevated him to PC status.
i’m going to crash out
Don't drink and drive.
one of my players is trying to incorporate his own homebrew. it’s forgivable cause this his first campaign but yeeeeesh.
“i’m not sure how i’d be able to incorporate those things. it would be a bit of a plot hole.”
“no, like, he has them”
give me a break, here, man
put your foot down
You're the DM
One of my backup characters is an ancient air genasi cleric of Akadi.
Niche gods interest me.
i am currently footing down as we speak
Yes I'm writing this down...
it is niche, there's only one art of Akadi
ok i don’t think this is gonna turn into a big ish
“so that’s called a homebrewed item, which is used in some campaigns, but typically the DM is the one that makes them. for simplicity’s sake, try to stick with what’s already in the game, ok?”
and he was like “ohhhh ok yeah got it”
what? but he has it /j
Tharmekhûl is also a super niche god but he's one of the few gods that has the Forge Domain and since I want to try out all subclasses I want to give him some love.
Also there's one semi official subclass called Community Domain and since I wanted to play as a lovable rascal halfling cleric I've decided to add a halfling cleric of Cyrrollalee to my list of backup PCs. Seemed a more fitting subclass for this wholesome goddess.
And those are all my cleric PCs.
My first cleric character concept was a cleric of Chauntea. But you already had her on your list so...
based Chauntea is awesome
my guidance always give maximum rolls
Yeah. She's my fave.
My current hedge knight is a Dawnbringer, but my go-to is good ol' RQ
Certain deities are amusing gods to serve. Enemies will likely look down upon clerics of Chauntea or Cyrrollalee which makes their demise all the more amusing.
Made a Tiefling Hexblade who had a pact with the RQ and had a blast with that.
Will have to play as one of these guys one day. Clerics seem very fun but I never found myself ever playing as a player.
Not counting that very very brief time that I played as a shirtless lizardfolk cleric of Eldath. Didn't even get to battle.
why specifically shirtless
Probably because the scales along a Lizardfolk spine do terrible damage to linen and wool shirts
He was a lizardfolk. He doesn't even need clothes in order to have a decent AC.
Just one good flex and BOOM no more shirt
Just an apron that used to be a shirt
Maybe "smock" is more accurate
Same reason why my thri-kreen rogue doesn't need armor. He can just wear a fancy purple suit instead.
The Lizardman in my upcoming party is a Path of the Belly Brewer Barbarian. I'm excited to see a Lizardman with the powers of a specific anime pirate
Rubber body, stretchy arms, eating ridiculous things
That subclass really does that?
Yep
Huh. Really laying it heavy on the references.
Would have rather see it act like an unpredictable barbarian. Like Drunken Master.
When the PoTBB Barb activates Rage, they choose one of three abilities gained by their consistent consumption of alchemy ingredients. Their body can become rubber, decreasing damage done to them and giving them reach on all attacks, they can chew and swallow anything they can fit in their mouth in order to regain HP, and one more I forget.
Oh, Belly Brewer refers to the fact they supposedly have a hunger that can only be satiated by eating alchemy ingredients, which mutate their body over time
Though that can be reflavored, of course.
It's a fun Barb subclass though. They can use both Prestidigitation and Thaumaturgy, and cartoon powers are hilarious
I would probably only play that subclass if there was some serious reflavoring.
I do believe the Lizardman will also have a Mawling Maul, basically a chained mimic on a stick.
Personally I have never been too fond of comedic DnD. Would rather see some comedic moments during appropriate times instead.
Really going in on the "hangry" theme
Eh, players get silly sometimes. I just try to find appropriate outlets.
I'm fine with silly. Nonstop/nonsensical silly is where you lose me.
Players are very silly billies
So I have heard.
I wouldn't say a specific subclass is itself "silly." While I described the PotBB Barb from a silly angle, it really is up to the player
Though there are some silly subclasses
And spells
I get it. But it's unashamedly referencing to One Piece which makes it lose a lot of its appeal to me.
I don't really think that was the goal behind the subclass
That's just a line I drew
We can only guess. All I can say is that I would rather choose a different subclass.
I would think a Monk subclass with rubber powers would be a more sensible Monkey D. Luffy.
Like a chomp chain? Vicious. One question would be how is it stowed for carrying.
The Mawling Maul is a Mimic on a pole, and a heavy iron chain keeps it sealed shut. The wielder can use a Bonus Action to loosen the chain, allowing the Mimic to do 1d4(Uncommon)/1d6(Rare) piercing damage with a bite each time you attack.
Failing to hit is risky however, as the Mimic will drool from its open maw onto you, dealing 1d4/1d6 Acid damage.
Genuinely only useful to a Barbarian, in my opinion.
Taking damage from your weapon continues your rage, etc.
That's... something.
Indeed it is. A ridiculous weapon for a ridiculous Lizardman
How do you interpret the 5.5e Fiendish Vigor? Since it was changed and doesn't specify to be at level 1 anymore.
The rule for casting things without a spell slot are that they default to the lowest level they can.
At will spells are always cast at the lowest level unless they say otherwise
As I recall you get the maximum value of the base version of the spell.
So it's still not really useful.
I'd say it is useful.
Its solid, nothing wild
Dunno I can see better invocations
Effectively, you can start every fight and confrontation with some extra health buffer, that's pretty good.
It being at will is what makes it useful
I remembered getting 14 Temp HP using Fiendish Vigor. Not a lot, but early on that's a whole hit
Doesn't mean it's not useful.
Early on thats basically 2 hits
From a lot of things
Doubling (or nearly tripling, depending on your Con mod) your HP pool every fight is very nice
Which is why Tough is a hard Origin feat to quit
Tough is just ♥️
Stop making eyes at me, Tough feat! I told you, we need to see other people!
Lessons of the First Ones makes life better
Sure, maybe as a Human I could have picked you, but I was in a unique position to get both Zhentarim Ruffian and Purple Knight Rook
Forgive me, Tough!
I think my favorite invocation, flavor-wise, will always be Mask of Many Faces
Good one
Yeah, I can see why that would be. It's great
I played a Tiefling Hexblade in a world where Tieflings were KOS. He had to use Disguise Self 24/7
gives me the feeling of being a changeling without the cool perks 😔
He wrapped his tail around him like a belt and made sure no one invaded his personal space and felt his horns by accident.