#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 436 of 1
That reminds me, I had a bottle of infinite rice wine, provided the eternally drunk Pixie was kept in the bottle. I eventually got around to making a booze aquarium for said Pixie.
Is it bad that I refused to play a campaign that my dad was running because it was written entirely with AI?
How did u know it was all ai?
He told me. I watched him using ChatGPT for even the most broad of details.
Chat what are we talking about
No, you need to be honest about these things
You should go no contact with your dad and never talk to him again
Thank you everyone.
I just log into chat gpt once a day or so to bulley it and make lists of why it's terrible, that's the ideal use right now
No, I’m just mad at him.
I'm not worried about ai use for creative things, the bubble is popping and it's gonna crash soon
Also, apparently I’m going to start being paid by the DM of the current group that I’m playing a divine soul sorcerer in. Apparently the fact that I can draw better than AI and that I have time to draw makes my art worth being paid for.
Nice! Artist are worth it
Hopefully, but I don’t want to play a campaign written with AI.
we call it slop ... just dont like to play slop
I miss human made slop
I commissioned my first art for a campaign recently
well, the next time you have spider related combat, leap up and hose down your players with silly string as you scream "Roll for initiative!"
Tbh, keep up w popular games and anime and u will have a decent source of inspiration. But ik u dont like rip offs so its gonna be a little hard to find a balance of inspiration vs ripoffs
I can break out my shoebox full of spider eggs and pour it onto the battle mat and shout "Minis!!!"
fear
Jjk and culling games have been pretty interesting. I also got inspired by destiny for a pvevp gambit game that also uses tarot cards to determine enemies, boss and final arena
Immersion!
reskin the entirety of the My Little Pony Movie as a campaign and see how long it takes the players to figure it out.
its weird how much that movie is literally a d&d campaign with singing ponies shoehorned in, you can actually tell when rolls happen and when there's a fail
I wonder if I can buy boxes of live spiders anywhere
Also, maybe don't be afraid to bend rules a bit! If you want to add a magic item that's very powerful, like a Bag of Beans, you could do something like a druid uses all of them to make a single beanstalk, or they are stolen or something.
Idk ran out of ideas
I can get a 6 pack of living Wolf Spiders for $50!
NO. BAD.
I personally used the legend of Zelda as inspiration for magic items
The different abilities are fun
do you have them hold up their new item while you say "do do-do DOOO!"?
LOL no, I use the runes/arm abilities in totk or botw
I made a "band of ascension" that they can use to move through materials like it were a liquid that they could swim through
Only upward tho
What are some good flaws for a fiery tiefling
weak to cheesecake
Perfect
real
Does Battlemaster multiclass well with other martials?
Usually
I took some fighter levels up to 3 for Zealot Barb and it just felt busted.
Fighter and Rogue are two classes that Multiclass really good
i've seen 2 levels of fighter work well, more than that less so
So I can believe it
Why those two?
action surge and cunning action
Fighter and Barbarian compliment each other like chocolate and peanut butter
Action surge, 2nd wind, every weapon and armor from fighter
Mmmmh Heavy Crossbow Rogue
Bonus skill, bonus expertise, Cunning action, some times sneak attack for Rogue
Add weapon masteries (and fighting style) they are just very good dips
Also in terms of stat minimus it’s really easy to get
I feel like Ranger is a really solid dip in 2024
If you're not already concentrating on anything
Yeah two hunters marks, martial weapons, medium armor and shields, fighting style, spell slots and spells, languages and expertise, and two free Hunter’s Marks
Also a bonus skill.
I just was never expecting Battlemaster specifically to fit that well.
Wish I could play as Hadozee without people judging me over it
I have a feeling the why is a long story.
What's a hadozee
A flying monkey race
A monkey with skin flaps
Action surge
I need feedback
So a bunch of adventures (the players rest at a tavern right after a long journey (thay do improve bar things until thay meet forexinstare who starts talking about dragon sittings and then everyone gos black mid sentinc (thay dont know this yet but the hole tavern gets swallowed buy a dragon thay wake up in a dragons stomach ware thay have to jump a pit of acid and then find the dragon hart wich is super fragile but will like nuke explode at the slightest damage (improve them finding a way to withstand/block the blast) then thay end up free falling ware thay land in thare own way then thay see a village that forexinstare says that's ware she grew up we go thare and we see its being attacked by ice elementals thay are thanked and taking to the mayor and that's it so far
Would probably be the only instance where I'm fine with them being reprinted with all the lore being scrapped
What’s up with the lore? If I may ask
Hadozee were gliding ape-people in the spelljammer setting. Their lore was basocally "We were apes, then a wizard gave us sentience and enslaved us. Then another wizard set us free."
So like the Hadozee were ape people that were enslaved and werent even agents in their own emancipation. They had to be given freedom by a member of some other species. It rubbed people the wrong way
Hmmmmmmm
Thanks for sharing!
Yeah Spelljammer was one of their worst recent products and this was one of the big reasons why
Also the lack of, well mostly everything you’d have in a setting
They were just lazy in everything to the point they were too lazy to think a species being made sentient then enslaved then freed by another wizard wouldn't be wrong.
Was when WotC was in peak "you shouldn't criticize us. Just consume and wait for new stuff to consume." Of 5e
Guys careful I think they’re listening
Nah we say this like several times a week
Lmao
It's on the weekly check list
It's an important communal event to make sure new people know and old don't forget that Spelljammer 5e was the worst official 5e product of the 2020s.
Huh. I expected it to be worse given how people regard it
It's competition being Vecna Eve of Ruin.
I mean that's bad for sure
But I expected it to be way worse
Like really really bad
Honestly the hadozee thing wasn't that bad but whatever.
Vecna didn't get the writing and dev resources it needed due to most of WotC focusing on hallowed be their name, the glorious 5.5e corebooks.
So it's the worst adventure book of the 2020s
Wish they'd suck it up and give us high difficulty adventures
Give me the official meat grinder adventure
Light of Xarxys would take it but I lump it with Spelljammer 5e since it's in the box set.
It was quite a bit worse than that, to be fair.
yeah, I've made a long and short of it. There's some notes to hit about colonialism and the idea of "enlightening" lesser beings that hits areas reminiscent of the "White Man's Burden" that I didn't get into.
Like Witchlights good, Icewind Dale is great. Candlekeep is decent, if a bit misleading title. Radiant Citadel is good. Golden Vault is good. Phandelver expanded is good. Netherdeep is good. Dragonlance I have qualms with, but is good and does a good job of showing how to run a war adventure.
Golden Vault is surprisingly good, given how quickly and silently I felt it came and went
Quests from the Infinite Staircase is nearly flawless since its all ODnD adventures.
Icewind Dale known as Icewind Peak
Quests only has 1 major flaw and it's that it ends.
I've stolen Party at Paliset Hall for a "The Prince is getting maried, be bodyguards" adventure and I cannot wait for it
I think why Quests was so good is cause they didn't change anything.
Other than update certain specific monsters to 5e
What’s the consensus on the handful of 5.5 adventures?
They're good.
Good to know
Stuff for dnd since the 2024 PHB dropped has been too good for DnDtube to thrive anymore hilariously
Quite a few dndtubers have quit or gone on hiatus cause wotc hasn't made any major screwups since Vecna so there isn't any new algorithm favoring content to be made.
Yeah I love them
That’s one of my favorite Golden Vault quests; some of the mid level ones started to feel samey in my opinion
Ye some adventures got some minor issues but overall it's a pretty solid anthology
Fights feel more challenging and I love the One page adventure format because it makes doing one shots super easy
Trying to set my party up to do either Axe from the Grave or Heart of Ashes; those are my two favorite adventures
And Quests updated one of the first FR Adventures ever released.
But I also dropped hints towards When A Star Falls, so we’ll see which bait they take
Ye I love the one page adventures in Adventures in Faerun
They're easy one shots while being easy side quests you can slot into FR games and even adventure template overall you can build off of
Dragon Delves is a great one shot book, its probably not great played as a campaign though. The adventures from Adventures in Faerun are all very slim, but workable. I like them a lot. Heroes of the Borderlands is peao because Keep on the Borderlands was peak.
5.5 has been very fruitful imo
Like I ran "The Flying Fortress" which involves the Cult of the Dragon.
So if you're doing a Cult of the Dragon quest or adventure you can just slot that in as part of it.
But I ran it as a one shot and it was pretty solid too
Yeah, there is no connective tissue at all between the Dragon Delves adventures
Other than the 1 hour spent on tech difficulties
Is it really D&D without that?
Yep the only real misstep in 5.5e imo was Lorwyn First Light. It felt so tacked on to FR's release.
My Cleric now has Proficiency in 4 saving throws 😎
Yup, they're all written for like 1-2 sessions of play. They say as much in the adventure intros
He's almost a mini-momk
If an enemy is blinded, it takes a few steps back out of confusion, Does that open up an attack of opportunity
I'm looking forward to whenever we get the first dedicated adventure for 5.5e
But I like that they're focusing a lot on settings and more unique character options atm.
yeah
That Forgotten Realms book later this year seems promising then
I remember them teasing a Lorwyn setting guide about a year ago. And then they revealed that FR would have 3 DLCs and one was a secret. When it was revealed to be Lorwyn I was like.
Hmmm. Someone canceled this project
same lol
also there was just, false advertising since they said itd connect to the moonshae isles and it didnt
someone couldnt get the team to sign off on this being a first party product
Netheril’s Fall too seems to be a canceled Eve of Ruin plot line
It connected to the Moonshaes in the announcement blog and that was it.
That’s technically true; you’re supposed to treat it like a Domain of Delight, I think?
yup
That makes sense; I was wondering why that was one of the FR DLCs besides “vague BG3 cross promo”
It is true. But it ment like Lorwyn's actual content makes no FR mention or connection
Compared to their predecessors they're off to a pretty good start anyhow
That is true
1 bad product vs several until CoS.
Also in an interview it was said the plan for Eve of Ruin to happen with time travel and Netheril
i dont hate netherils fall, but a lot of it is just copy and pasted from a 2e book
I remember when that first dropped, MTG people were very upset that it was just a Domain of Delight. Something about MTG cosmology.
But things didn’t go as planned
I think right now they're focused on establishing they're not their predecessors
I thought that had to do with the obelisk plot they ended up dropping into Phandelver & Below
Man, that book was a hodgepodge
The idea of digital DLC Supplements and web enhancements are a good idea. The first being the expansions to the Essentials Kit.
They just need to be relevant.
Since their predecessors said "Setting Guides are wrong and should never be done" until Keith Baker said "nah it will happen" and the one good setting guide came out.
That was meant to set up Eve of Ruin as well
Coulda fooled me
The obelisks tied to ancient Netheril and vecna in Rime of the Frost maiden
I kinda thought Phandelver amd Below was meant to be the finale of the Obelisk metaplot, and Vecna Eve of Ruin was just them freestyling
No Phandelvar specifically stated it was the obelisks were now in Vecna’s control.
Nah Vecna was just them fumbling the bag and basically making a half-baked greatest hits saga.
It was some Game of Thrones Season 8 level writing there 😉
If it were like they initially intended it may have not been the contender to beat Spelljammer of worst product of the 2020s.
Personally I think a new retcon could have it be that Vecna has the Obelisks as a back up plan to get his godhood back.
Speaking of Spelljammer, did anyone ever explain why there was so much Dark Sun content but the adventure never goes there?
Old Guard said there is no going to Dark Sun.
Cause one producer, Perkins and Crawford hated dark sun and never wanted to see it.
Yeah, correct me if I’m wrong but I don’t think he’s a deity on Toril
Interloper god
He is a type of god that meddles in multiple worlds
Like Bahamut and Tiamat
The one producer was one of the OGL crisis people so he did quite a bit of damage in his reign of terror.
Well I get why. They couldn't go six months with out controversy. When you can't avoid stepping on rakes. "Slavery the Setting" should not be done.
Huh, that’s interesting to hear
I could tell he was probably defeated after the OGL stuff failed.
He left before they released Vecna.
So tbh. I am Glad they didn't do Dark Sun.
But then how did monsters like the Brohg end up in Light of Xaryxis?
I believe it’s Perkcraw /j
For a minute there, we almost went to Athasspace in that adventure
Athasspace being Dark Suns solar system.
Doomspace was originally called Athasspace, we saw this in a community post that got taken down within the day. It was showing off the star-system map
I remember that part
The guy who said "no 5e Dark Sun" iirc was also heavily involved in why spelljammer was the way it was
I think it featured Realmspace, Krynnspace, and Athasspace
this is beginning to sound like a mythologized boogeyman in the WOTC studio
It’s a miracle Dark Sun got mentioned in both DMGs
Also in Princes of the Apocalypse
Or whatever the opposite of a miracle is
I acknowledge that Chris Perkins and Jeremy Crawford had a very hard job and they were given a Herculean task for 5e.
They made the game more accessible than ever. And that's a good thing. But uhh. Their opinions on lore in established settings and anything deeper than broad sandbox Storytelling should be taken with a grain of salt.
He was truly the boogeyman. A Spy sent by Paizo to bring WotC to the Eve of Ruin.
Can anyone explain why Bigby’s Glory of the Giants was so undercooked compared to Fizban’s? Or was it just less developed because it was the end of 5e’s life?
Nah but I double checked and his involvement was explaining how the Hadooze situation occurred.
Man, that book was a letdown
The content in the 2020s was very hit or miss
Design time at this point was being split between old 5e and 5.5e core revamp
You can say that again
Bigbys also had one of the WotC contracted artists put AI in it.
Why put a lot of effort into the mechanics if those mechanics are getting a total rework in less than 2 years
Yeah, I remember that; they had to update all the digital copies a month after release
Also it kinda had a bit of setting to it and we know what settings were to the old guard which was "boo settings. Boo"
You mean the Giant enclaves? Thats hardly a setting
"Ghosts of Saltmarsh is a setting agnostic adventure"
Agnostic Adventure.
Look inside
Saltmarsh region on Oerth.
"Setting agnostic" you have been banned from playing DnD
The book gives advice for putting the city of Saltmarsh in other settings
Look at cover, more like
Every adventure is setting agnostic with enough renaming
(Maybe not every adventure)
Literally the back of Princes of the Apocalypse
Yes the book gives examples of running it in other settings but most adventures do that
Me when I put a city of Oerthans in Forgotten Realms.
But all the setting stuff is initially predicated on the Greyhawk base. It’s like saying the Dragonlance book’s agnostic because you can file off the serial numbers.
I don't think it's like that
It even shows how to do it in Dark Sun.
Dragonlance book was mostly to sell a board game that was meant to be used to play with it.
The disputes in the town are predicated on local affiliations to Greyhawk factions. If the advice given in the book is just to change the names of parties involved to play these adventures on any world, all adventures are setting agnostic by that metric
I wonder the pain the old guard went through when they saw Dan Ayoub say "A new Dragonlance novel is coming"
I am just glad Weis and Hickman get to write Dragonlance again. I think WotC corp and Ed will probably never mend and that makes me said.
I'm honestly not certain what u mean. They're kinda identical book to me
I would have loved a conclusion to the Chosen Heirs series.
Ye new team can try, but the people ever since the late 2000s have treated him like he didn't matter.
It's clear the design team loves Ed. But according to Ed the movie makers were expressly told to not consult him.
Fizban just had a lot more meat on the bones. Better described monsters, more plot hooks for all the types of dragons, ideas on how to incorporate them into your setting. Bigby’s just kind of tries to crib off Fizban’s homework and gets a B- instead of an A
Bro what are you on about the only factions in the town are specific to the town, you can replace Keoland and King Scotti with any other nation and any other warmongering King. Replace the Faithful Quartermasters of Iuz with almost any other generic group of craftsfolk and they fit just fine.
It feels like most of his public communication with WotC is about specific NDAs getting lapsed so he can talk about more.
I'm just glad certain people at WotC are gone now
The quality uptrend is no doubt related.
Soon the stain of the Spellplague shall be cleansed
“What are you on about, the only factions in Waterdeep: Dragon Heist are specific to Waterdeep. You can replace Force Grey with any city guard and they fit just fine” that’s what your argument sounds like hastily applied to another adventure
Ye the sins that were committed in the Age of Cordell are finally being mended.
The Sins of the Mearls were considerably easier to fix.
I'm literally right though, the Loyalists and Traditionalists are not factions that exist outside of Saltmarsh. They are specifically just where the townsfolk fall politically
The Age of Perkins is over. The Age of Tondro has come
It's not this hard to change the name of something
I wouldn't wanna be the "no dark sun" guy if come August they confirm dark sun 5e
That’s not the point: when people say things are setting agnostic they mean they never had settings to begin with or are already made generic for your table. Dragon Delves is a mostly setting agnostic book. Candlekeep Mysteries isn’t. Saltmarsh was promoted as agnostic and wasn’t.
Tbh I am still full of trepidation with Dark Sun. It's a setting that has to change to be palatable in today's world and change is never pretty.
What were some highlights of Perkins time at WOTC? He's been doing this since 3.5 afaik
I think they just gotta use the 4e Dark Sun guide as a base.
2e Dark Sun was the "Slavery is bad but you can't do anything about it so may as well join them."
Yeah; I feel like a 5.5e Dark Sun would be kind of rendered generic; it’s very much a product of its time and has to be carefully remade.
I think they might surprise us.
Cause a setting if they market it as rising up against tyrants, killing Slavers and overthrowing tyranny would be something a lot of people would like.
Which was more or less what 4e Dark Sun was and it was considered the best 4e setting guide.
Most of the individual adventures within Ghosts of Saltmarsh have nothing to do with the fact it's set in Greyhawk, you can have the first adventure be in any spooky mansion on the coast. You can have the second one be in any swamp inhabited by Lizardfolk. The book itself treats Saltmarsh as a setting to run in your game in, but the adventures themselves within are setting agnostic.
Largely due to Cordell ruining the Forgotten Realms and Nentir Vale being legit nothing, but they did some good changes.
5e being as accessible has it has been. Curse of Strahd, the golden age of Dragon and Dungeon Magazines, ice wind Dale rime of the frost maiden, and the pioneering of actual play with Acq Inc, and Dice Camera Action
Icewind Dale would be my contender. That one feels like Perkins was just pouring everything he loved into an adventure
That's probably why Icewind Dale is so good
When someone pours their love into a creation, it does make it better even tho some people would disagree.
He also wrote make 3.5 Eberron adventures and he wrote the 2e book Warriors of Heaven
Here's how you handle Dark Sun in 5e: You plaster a giant ⚠️ !!Trigger Warning!! ⚠️ on the first page of the book and then just let it be Dark Sun and let adults decide what tone of content they spend their money on and choose to participate in
But you see. I need to market the book. And children might see the ads.
How they handle advertising it will be somethihg
Cause they have comfy funny ads for CoS and DiA
Size affecting damage dice was honestly one of the best homebrew things my dm could've allowed for me
The only books I've ever seen any advertising for in any capacity were the Book of Many Things and Eve of Ruin
Was dark sun even confirmed?
My barbarian gets blasted by all sides, but at least he can bring some pain back
All but in actuality.
I'm dying inside because my knowledge Cleric has 67 hit points now
I have noticed the more unique the advertising for a release the less they have for it.
Neil Newbon as Vecna narrating a CGI trailer that has nothing to do with Eve of Ruin.
A space shanty and full on awesome. A-tier albums spelljams for Spelljammer
After Crawford left WotC they released an explicitly Dark Sun 5e UA. Then two months after it was received well they renewed the Dark Sun IP which expired in early 2024
I get ads for all of them since Bigby’s; think Beyond has identified me as someone with ample money to waste lol
And they're being quiet about the last book of this year
Which I would be if it was Dark Sun
Do they only advertise on DDB because that's the only place I ever hear about having advertising for D&D books
I'd hope for good communal feedback from Ravenloft to whether the storm that would come of announcing Dark Sun 5e.
I found the Dungeon Masters actual play has a 45 song soundtrack. Plz advertise this more
I get pop ups on YouTube and other sites
I get Roll20 ads on YouTube for the occasional D&D book but that's about it
Cause DnDtubers who quit or are currently on hiatus will come back and make clickbait vids saying "WOTC Supports Slavery?!" And arrows pointing to Perkins even tho he doesn't work there anymore.
And there was the 50th anniversary Adventure through the Forgotten Realms album. Where are the articles DDB?
And people who don't actually pay attention to dnd ads will get them cause of how algorithm works and think WotC actually supports Slavery cause an unfortunate lot of people believe what they see first and don't actually look into it.
I don't think any person capable of reading that click bait title would think WotC supports slavery
Most 5e players can't read
That's objectively not true
Take a person you believe of median intelligence and understand that half of the people are dumber than that
ya a whopping quarter of americans cannot read at a 6th grade level
You unironically believe that the majority of 5e players can't read
Yes
Oh they have the same reading capacity as Yu-Gi-Oh players lol
For me it's not can't. It's won't.
Won't is probably more likely
And tbh won't is imo just as bad as can't. If not worse.
Lacking ability is one thing. Having the ability and refusing is a whole other thing.
I know you're not being serious because the assertion that the majority of D&D players literally cannot read is unironically the most ridiculous thing I've read in years
Like a staggering amount of players pretty much rely solely on the dm to remember all the rules for them.
Cause they either can't or refuse to learn them.
Those DMs should stop entertaining those players then
Those players are usually the consistent ones
I had a player read out the spell fireball at the table and then ask if the spell did fire damage.
It's actually a pretty common reason I find with other system dms who stopped dming 5e. They were tired of players not reading the rules.
Unfortunately I have met some players on my travels on server and most players can't read, myself included since I'm busy reading spells and other stuff lmao
I've never had this issue with any of my players. I've had players misremember the rules but just actually refuse to learn them, no.
Skyrim level up sound
Reading Comprehension: 0
Other systems have people who don't read the rules but it's easier to kick them out cause you can't run the game for them like you can run 5e for lazy players.
It's not hard to kick people out at all
so as a player, reading the rules and spell descriptions... I'm in the minority???
"Hey you're out don't come back"
Bam easy, barely an inconvenience
Yep
No you're not
They're being hyperbolic
Yeah I track the things the games tell me to track, ammo, rations, encumbrance. I have had players straight up attempts to refuse this.
To the detriment of the discussion
I also read the rules
I have like..
5 or 6 times lol
I'd argue at least 60% of players probably won't read anything.
Either way I hear Darksun and I'm excited since it's one of my favorite settings
though tbf I'm better at playing dnd for the mechanics and worse at the rp
With DDB yea I would buy that. The character creator while good for experienced players for a long time was not good for new players
DnD players are like the JJK fans of tabletop games. They're well known for illiteracy and they don't exactly help the case they're not.
If you're like me and have too much time on your hands so you end up in Reddits and FB groups.
I get we're exaggerating for the haha funnies but asserting that the majority of 5e players unironically are incapable of reading is a ridiculous claim to make.
Tbh, I've seen people who have read the rules and comprehend them also still say stupid things about them.
It didn't help our game to consistently refer to funny videos to learn how to play.
Yeah a lot of people "learned how to play" from DnDshorts shorts and One Shot Questers
Guys stop sending new people to jocat. Stop it. Plz
yes, but, maybe to reframe it another way, the average player is not amused by the proposal that they need to read a 350+ page book in order to properly play a game
He admits it. It's a crap guide to dnd
I read the classes and rules and spells until I got tired of looking at them to make sure I understood everything and could help people if they needed
Thing is they only need to read like a dozen pages tops
At least DnDshorts knows what they're talking about unlike OSQ lmao
Just asking them to read one page is often too much for thme.
or that other guy who constantly makes entire bits on false premises and says "yeah they're wrong but it's content"
it's just, ugugghghg
DND shorts regularly talks out of his posterior
I don't even watch D&D content...
I watch Pathfinder content 💀
Your unwillingness to get better players is not the same as most players being bad
If you wanna learn how to play dnd on YT. You find some dude with only like 200 views on a vid.
My most opinionated players were always the least educated…
Cause they didn't say enough nonsense to get the algorithm to hook on.
I don't understand how OSQ got big in the first place
Does anyone actually find "wizard dies to 1d4 damage", "ranger bad", paladin twerking, the same evil king skits, etc funny?
Algorithms
Damn, Pathfinder even fixed DND YouTube how will 5e recover from this
Also he made it big during Covid when DnD had an explosion due to people being stuck inside
the entirety of osq's content was derived from the pandemic iirc
The only good D&D short form content I ever see is from ZachTheBold and those are usually more just humorous skits than "try this funny thing that is actually mechanically possible"
there's one funny bit though
the death potion
I used to watch him just for background noise and somethings he was funny but now I don't even bother with him lmao
No.
What's funny is how pathetically he keeps throwing out the same jokes to hopefully get attention AND STILL gets attention.
Yeah ZachtheBold makes it clear his shorts aren't meant to be "educational."
I think for about 5 minutes before I got into dnd and first discovered it. Now it's just the same 5 jokes repeated a billion times over
I genuinely liked him. However I think the jokes just got boring eventually.
Hot broccoli and cheddar soup like boiling hot
Monkeydm is another one I watch for ideas
iirc his jokes aren't even that accurate (OSQ)
Then OSQ raged over an actual play
Like during the actual play?
Not as a constant skit.
that was... something to watch happen live, to say the least
OSQ feels like a LARPER honestly.
He wasn’t part of it
Nah he made a click bait expose on a new liveplay with a bunch of misinformation then sent them his resume.
This is the first time I am hearing this.
In fact he’s never even played D&D
He is a larper
no, he got mad that people played DnD and filmed it and that they were more successful than he is. Then he begged them to hire him twice
No he wasn't a part of it and did a 20+ minute tear down of it that legit felt like a call for help
He's never played dnd outside of something for the camera.
He is
dude literally sent them a google powerpoint about how they should paywall it
Weird
His wife told him to make DnD shorts when the pandemic hit
We blame his wife
And told him all the stereotypes
CURSE YOU, OSQ WIFE!
The woman who sold the DnD world
We support women's rights and women's wrongs
his wife actually plays DnD btw
OSQ doesn't
Yeah she does actually play
equal rights, equal fights?
I'm gonna make a whole ass
"CURSE YOU, BAYLE!"
speech about OSQ
and it honestly shows
it's a regurgitation of the most stereotype-derived jokes done to death over years and years.
But since it's done in an even less contextually informed manner, from someone who never actually played and just went to regurgitating jokes, it just makes it even more generic and inaccurate
I will say even tho DnDshorts constantly talks out his behind, he's done some good stuff with his channel.
The charities stuff he's been involved in and started up primarily.
I don't think any of these bad D&D YouTubers are bad people from what I've seen
Weren't they also part of making Ryoko's Guide? Elements of it have actually seen some use in the group I'm in
Yep
Mhm
After his DND timeline video I'm convinced grok writes his scripts. If he helps people good for him but I just can't consume his content.
yeah it's just... a lot of the time the job can be really badly done
OSQ according to his co-workers is actually a pretty horrible dude.
OSQ arguably because of the hateful crashout, gatekeeping, and drama farming
Like he was "quitting dndtube" for improv stageplay
oh yeah I forgot about how he treated his coworkers 💀
And he abandoned his stage partner mid-tour among other just harsh treatment towards others he's worked with
He has been awarded one yike from me.
Figures the guy who'd whine and complain about people playing the game for the first time not being good at the game when he doesn't even PLAY IT HIMSELF!
A Singular Yike
He probably thought he had a community that'd stand by that fake expose
Another DND tuber I used to watch was Tulok the barbarian which for builds though some are bad lmao
To the boiler room of the hells with him!!!
But all the comments were like "Bro. This is just dumb. What's wrong with you?"
honestly I need to find some dnd tubers that offer ideas on builds that double down on a really stupid concept
Is that the guy who also does Elden Ring content
except the only community that had been fostered wasn't actually invested in D&D properly, since they either quickly grow out of it for the inaccuracies and poor attempts at humour, or they aren't interested in D&D enough to care about the attempt at drama
Yup
Meanwhile Matt Colville's Running the Game Series spawned some of the better 5e third party content, an amazing Zine run. Three 3rd party classes and then made his own successful system and vtt all while losing a bunch of weight.
I used to watch him until he started unnecessarily plugging political takes into every video when it's not relevant to the video whatsoever
I don't care if you're saying things I agree with I don't want politics in everything
There's one creator I can't remember his name but he's bald with no facial hair and he's middle aged I think. And he makes clickbait shorts that "break the game" that he stands by as being RAW.
treant?
I saw two of those recently and was super annoyed by the tone of them
They just feel super pretentious
Ah understandable. I stopped after he stopped making characters
I once commented on one saying "yeah this doesn't work, ya know that right?" And dude was like "Maybe read again?" With a smile emoji.
I know exactly who you're talking about but I don't remember his name
MCDM and Dungeon Dudes, got in, made it and thrived.
Of DnDTubers those are the only huge successes of that scale
Wait no I saw someone different it wasn't treantmonk
yeah I've heard nothing bad about Dungeon Dudes thankfully
different guy but that's another bald dnd youtuber
tm doesn't make clickbaity shorts
Dungeon Dudes is fun to put on.
You mean that "hold on DM" guy?
Oh I also remember d4: D&D Deep Dive, I used his healer build and it's pretty good
yeah I was unsure, that's the only bald dude w/o facial hair I can think of
Maybe. I told YouTube to stop recommending me him so I haven't seen him in awhile.
Or uhhh which other of the like 12 bald with no facial hair dnd creators do you mean
Quick question for you folks, how does one enable content sharing on the new dnd beyond layout? I cant seem to find it in the campaign menu
They feel like they are just two people that like D&D and discuss it, without such a focus on "making it in the algorithm" or anything flashy, it's basically just two people reading out the topic's script and maybe a tierlist or an advice checklist
ngl I use that dude to sleep
DnDtube is full of
G&G ...
Grifters & Goons
I'd argue Xp2lvl3 is getting there but these days all I see are reddit reaction vids
XP still has some decent content concerning live play stuff at least
He has a neat format with his actual plays
also aren't Dungeon Dudes the personalities behind stuff like Drakkenheim? Because Drakkenheim stuff also sees decent use in my group 
Also I used to watch DnD Builds until he used nasty AI slop for thumbnails
He has like two sides of content creator.
Dude whose pretty good watch and getting the clickstuber.
Level 20 DM?
Naybe
Grifting?
You mean Dungeons and Discourse's 57 hour video about how WotC is OVER is for views and attention?? /s
Yeah Level20 DM that's it
My personal favorite DnD YouTuber is GinnyDi.
Stoked for more dark sun
Chuckled
Okay that is who I meant yeah
GinnyDi also seems like a person who just really enjoys playing the roleplay game, in a genuine manner
Ginny sometimes makes some clickbait but she's openly admitted she'll do it sometimes cause of Algorithms.
So she's got my respect too
Creators who openly admit they gotta appeal to the dumb algorithms sometimes get my respect cause algorithms favoring hyperbolic, misinformation and screaming at the camera in shorts is not exactly a secret thing.
My favorite videos to listen to are Jim Murphy, really old guy with a lot of insight in running games over 50 years. Dude was an inspiration for Matt Colville's Running. Style
I blame XP to Level 3 for making everybody think Tomb of Horrors is an unforgivably bad dungeon
Like how twitter algorithms favor Selfies where the phone is covering the takers face.
But to me one of the most annoying 'creators' is one among many of the "here's this gamebreaking scenario you can totally do! with three multiclasses and two specific magic items and completely ignoring half of these foundational rules"
and I forget the name, like... "mura" in there or something? It's been like over 2 years since I've seen any of that awful misinfo
He literally ran it wrong
never heard of them
Pack Tactics recently made a video that felt like it was time for rent
not to mention "topic heat" so if anyone takes time to make a video good or informed they're late to the party
glad I haven't if they use AI
I'm really dislike this one
I’m not a big fan of Pointy Hat
Same
Was your usual "martials suck in dnd" once per month vid
All Pack Tactic's videos are balancing hot takes based on white room math devoid of the context that is found in a D&D game
I despise DND content creators who use AI.
I use Foundry and had to unsubscribe from BaileyWiki because he uses so much AI
Ah yeah I saw that recently
Yeah they used to make their own until one day they said: "Hey gonna try out some thumbnails with ai. Which one do you guys like" lmao
I love that guy
It just feels like he’s everywhere now; he’s in so many collabs and I never found his advice that useful or interesting
Foundry recently updated their AI policy to not allow AI on the marketplace anymore which is a W
There was one video of a guy in a suit doing the geopolitics of Faerûn. He admits he is doing it just off the map and vibes in the video but he proceeds to get so many details just wrong.
I know plenty of Shadowdark creators weren't happy with that change in policy
Baron DeRopp?
Shadowdark unfortunately has a major AI problem
Cause the creator is a fence sitter who doesn't wanna cause any issues
But speaking of old guys if I remember right Nerdachy was a interesting fellow who help me out for which wizard to make
Dungeon Masterpiece his name was I think
the last video from pointy hat I watched was his fixing druid video where he said that level / 3 was too hard to calculate for moon druid 💀
I still follow nerdarchy
I beg your finest pardon?
Mystic DM is one of the only ones I watch nowadays
That’s the channel name, yeah
I'm not a big fan of some of his videos, but most of them are pretty good and inspired a lot of my current stuff.
Mystic DM the “this thing is missing from D&D” hides the DMG guy
WebDM will come back one day right?
-# right?
If I need someone to rave like a madman in my ear and interrupt it for like a minute of normal speech before back to raving I throw on ZachtheBold.
Or making Xp vs Milestone video and made his own new progression system.
Which was just DMG milestone again.
He makes good vids but his vlogs feel like someone who witnessed an eldritch horror and lost their minds which is hilarious.
Runesmith.... Haven't watch them in awhile
Runesmith started with XP to level 3 and then ventured out on his own
Runesmith feels like all his recent work has been to pay bills
Yeah I ignore any of his videos that involve official mechanics.
Runesmith’s videos do feel like he is exploring more of DnD
Sly Flourish is also a good guy and makes great videos
For me currently Jorphdan and AJ Pickett are the best lore videos. Though I suspect Pickett is using AI which is sad
I've only seen his videos on tanking and healing which weren't very good
Well the video quality itself was good, it's just that the arguments and points were kind of nonsense
maybe his other stuff is better
I just don't watch D&Dtubers
The Tokii does not concern himself with D&D content, for he plays the game very often
He did a cool one about hags recently
Is that why you watch Pathfinder content? Can't find a game
Regarding AI in dnd, Dungeon Alchemist is probably the only ethical use of it I've seen.
I like ZachTheBold's videos they're usually pretty humorous. I like his Guidance short.
Since their AI is literally just like a Sims room builder not an LLM.
True
Eh, kinda?
I just mess with Narrative Declaration as a group heavy.
Their Rottgrind Campaign is pretty damn good
Tokii needs to join me and Nealen for pathfinder
So he can help us find the path
I'm directionally challenged.
I've played Starfinder and Pathfinder at least once lmao
Dang I gotta continue watching rotgrind, I keep forgetting to continue watching it
Fun fact Pathfinder was a subclass for Rangers in D&D 4e
Dungeon Alchemist is the GOAT DnD map maker. Pair with Dungeon Draft, some chicken and a couple of hours.
And baby you got a stew going
Zee Bashew I like his animate spell book, favorite one has to be clone
i love zach the bold!
Yeah I love Dungeondraft and Dungeon Alchemist now.
What do you use for like World maps, etc
Jorphdan the PH is silent is doing a good series on dark sun lore currently
I remembered that one I really didn't like
hamasamakun
always with an entire video premised on an actual blatant falsehood, like to the degree of not mentioning something targets a creature or can only be used a limited amount of times or that something requires a save
Oo might need to throw that on.
I use inkarnate for my world/city/town maps personally
I draw my maps in Photoshop with realistic height map terrain data. And then I use Gaea and world machine to plot rivers and basins.
My first Pathfinder character was an Inventor.
He was a Ysoki (Ratfolk) and had a Robot named S.A.K.R (Super Ass-Kicking Robot)
And we changed his class to Mechanic when the playtest dropped because he was a Starfinder character and it fit more lol
I'm gonna be starting a PF game on Wednesdays soon
I just use inkarnate generally, my only issue is it's so much effort to make things look good that I'm basically never happy with my result
XP shifted really heavily to being mostly reaction/challenge content with a few skits in the past few years
It's part of why I canceled my Wednesday dnd game
Yes, I'm aware I could've named S.A.K.R "S.K.A.R" but it was too edgy for what I was going for with my character lol
Mostly I didn't have the passion anymore, but partially cause that passion went towards wanting to run Pathfinder or another system than 5e
He's the Tim Robinson of D&D content
Neat; starting up an OSE game myself once summer starts
I recommend new people watch WASD20's map making series. And use a program like Campaign Cartographer or wonder draft
I'm doing two pf2 games. One on Thursdays and one on Saturdays.
I've gandered at Wonderdraft
And then another Pathfinder Character I played was Rakeka, a Goloma Half-Orc Druid.
I have Dungeon Draft but I hate that it has so little assets at base and that I need to buy assets because there are so few online ones for free it feels like a scam
I have a guardian in each and that's a well made martial class.
Right now I run 4 games.
One paid Game set in Rashemen
One paid Game set in Zakhara
One free Game set in Kara-Tur
One West Marches set in Tethyr/Calimshan
Honestly though for Darksun I hope they keep the dragon transformation where you break your mind if failed
Rn my one game is a free one set in my setting on the continent of Draconia.
I think it's genuinely impossible to find any perpetuated idea from him that is actually true or accurate
Rn the party is in the tundra in a blizzard after they killed an adult white dragon
i dislike that dude, he just annoys me
This is why I like dungeon alchemist it has free steam workshop integration
But my next 5e game is called "Haunts from the Hallows" at least that's its running name and its gonna be in a Domain of Dread of my making that comes from my homebrew setting
and he also spouts like a whale from his behind like you mentioned
Tbh I never heard of him
Which is loosely gonna connect my world to the dnd multiverse
count yourself lucky 
good
Should I search them up?
Not enough that Alustriel can go tanning in my magic country but enough that I can use all of my content lol
After seeing the Augr's scifi nexus for foundry I am deciding if my next game will be Spelljammer or SW5e
I'm in.. well..
Let me just list my active characters.
Orizontas (Dragonborn Fighter)
Sovis (Drow Warlock)
Bogey (Bugbear Ranger)
Artanza (Tortle Cleric)
Pistachio (Firbolg Bard)
Sentry (Warforged Pugilist)
Rivilus (Triton Paladin)
Gustav (Air Genasi Artificer)
who, the hamasamakun dude
I may enjoy the hobby a bit too much.
Yeah I know that guy from tiktok.
Honestly I'll be down for Pathfinder though playing the awaken animal with Magnus I think it was (where you can do elements monk) is funny
search him at your own risk, just know that everything he says is most definitely a falsehood
oh I remember him💀
didn't he steal shorts from other creators word for word
probably
(his shorts also just suck)
it was so boring and each short was genuinely just bro talking to the camera, though i would say he was almost yelling in them
My idea for my next Pathfinder character if i ever play another Campaign of it is gonna be a Kholo/Gnoll Guardian as I love that class to death thematically
Whatever you have on wednesdays, it could be this instead /j
Nah but after monday concludes ill probably try and run a long term PF game in that time slot
Tbh sometimes I do use the homebrew monsters of creators simply cause I think they can be fun
Ah shit, lemme tell ya
It'd be hard for me to choose between my Bugbear Ranger and a Gnolm Gaurdian lmao
It's hard. Pf2 has so many spells that make dms go "it allows you to do what?"
Nah, just wait another 10 months until monday concludes
Oh, does anyone know the dude that converts monsters from older editions to 5th Edition?
I lovev that guy
I think he's dungeon dad?
Dungeon Dad
His content is pretty interesting and he does a lot of research from what I can see
He's even interviewed people who made the monsters on occasion
Yeah, I am planning to use his implementation of the Orium Dragon in my campaign
I think Monday game will probably conclude this year if there's no hiatus
I lied about not watching D&Dtubers, but he's the only one with a personality I can stand and do watch
Lmao
Dungeon Dad is like a diamond in the rough for D&Dtube imho
I'll fight anyone on this
There's definitely some other gems
Yeah, there is, but he's one of few
I also enjoy All Things DnD for the stories
I haven't watched him In like.. 2 years, I should pick him up again, I've just been busy lol
My favorite conversation of his was the Uvudaam
Jess Jackdaw is also so cool but they stopped making videos unfortunately
They're also an artist for Heliana's if I'm not wrong
Do note not all videos but mostly the grey necromancer who kept being neutral all throughout the campaign
Oh yeah, that's unfortunate I like they're videos
Hopefully they don't change too much of the setting for more softer tones we'll put it like that lmao
since we’re on the topic of content creators, what do you think of xp to level 3?
I think he's fine
Inoffensive. Most egregious thing he's done for me is convince people that Tomb of Horrors is irredeemably bad.
Don't have much of an opinion on him he's got some fine opinions but I haven't watched him much really
He does make fun of Vecna's statblock though which I think is funny
Used to but eh. Did like his Pathfinder video
Ye its pretty easy to make fun of
I have noticed that he's been moving to reaction stuff which isn't the greatest type of content imo.
He's been doing a lot of horror stories lately
yeah i stopped watching around that time
I used to watch CritCrab videos until I noticed a blatant and glaring pattern to almost all of the D&D horror stories he would read
Same
interesting.
Said pattern being:
Problem player does problem behavior
Everybody is unhappy, nobody says anything
Game blows up after session upon session of people continuing to not say anything
He's been like... running out of content ideas since the How To Play videos tbh. I like him fine enough, but it feels phoned-in to me these days.
How about Zigmenthotep?
Doesn't he just do the videos going through character creation for different systems
that a youtuber or an Elder One?
I find that content completely inoffensive
Ah yes, the kuo-toa goddess.
Xp to Level 3? Nah he mostly does skits these days
Yup
No, I meant Zig
yeah that seems totally fine to me. I might even say thats good to do
Its not even really like "How to make character for X system" and more just documenting himself doing it
I like to watch him due to the history of the old and new games like Gamma World. Bunnies and Burrows. Tunnel and trolls etc
I really wanna try older editions but i struggle to find an active community for them
Personally the one Edition I'd want to try is 3.5e
Same, 3.5 for me due to wanting to witness ranger in that time
I wanna try AD&D/2e
Though for lore, 4e since they got some nice hidden gems
Has anyone proven that the phoenix bird is the same bird after it burns and hatches? What if thats just how they lay thier eggs?
The only ones I wouldnt want to try are 1e and OD&D. 2e, 3.5, and 4e all appeal to me in different ways
You mean Dungeons and Dragons Rules for Fantastic Medieval Wargames Campaigns Playable with Paper and Pencil and Miniature Figures?
yeah thats the one. I just can't pitch my friends "D&DRfFMWCPwPaPaMF Night"
An original white box set for that goes for around $2000 it seems
More like $1200 actually
1200?
Yeah something like that
But it's also the very first edition of D&D ever so
Basically an antique
I have the whole original dnd box set in near mint condition it goes for 4-9k
Mines the wood grain one though
Gonna need to have the difficult conversation with my starter set players
The conversation about how I am not the type of DM to run the sort of campaign they want after the starter set is over
I had to go down a rabbit hole of remembering something awful - so the thing I hate most about "dndtubing" is when someone goes "hey here's a crazy wacky idea!" and it just blatantly doesn't work
So here's two of the more egregious examples
infecting a Centaur with Lycanthropy. Centaurs are not Humanoids, neither 2014 or 2024 support this
College of Creation bard, creating a Corpse because it's an object (debated), and using a resurrection spell. But there's no spirit. Also, you can't "make an army" of them because they vanish in an amount of hours. Not even a CR 30 NPC with that feature as written would have one lasting 10 hours.
Honestly a centaur with lycanthropy would be interesting. Sure, they're technically fey but they are a playable race so I think it'd be fair to look the other way. Also they look pretty humanoid too.
Turning an autognome or a plasmoid into a lycanthrope would be a different story as it would be too weird.
I don't think you can call someone with half horse for a body humanoid in any way
I always find the visual idea of a Centaur Druid turning into a Horse hilarious
Like their upper body just turns into a head
It's also just
in no portrayal has a Centaur had the Humanoid type
and in neither subedition of 5e has werewolf lycanthropy been able to go on non-Humanoid type creatures
Strict downgrade
And also blood hunter's specific person-specific lore and mechanics is not prescriptive for all variants of lycanthropy on all species in all settings of D&D
Ima pitch an area to my dm: the Underswamp. It's the underdark version of an ancient bog
I suppose you could say the same about minotaurs and tabaxi.
Speaking of lycanthropy, what are the prerequisites for something to get it's subtype of lycanthropy given we have werewolves wererats. Can you have werebats?
Those are both humanoid though aren't they
Full of massive, gnarled roots twisting from above
I really like the idea of a human werewolf looking distinctively different from a gnome werewolf.
Our barbarian in CoS caught lycanthropy and I don't like that the DM is ruling it where his strength is replaced by the werewolf's lower strength score when he transforms that just makes no sense to me
I would think a bigger stronger guy would make a bigger stronger werewolf
Tiefling werewolves would keep their horns, shifter werewolves look scarier and more bestial, elf werewolves would be slightly slender and have slightly pointier ears, etc...
And since heroes of Faerun there's also werewyverns so lycanthropy isn't even restricted to strictly beasts
Ok this infuriates me
Legacy:
The character gains a Strength of 15 if his or her score isn’t already higher,
'24:
The target is cursed. If the cursed target drops to 0 Hit Points, it instead becomes a Werewolf under the DM’s control
so clearly using legacy's lycanthropy rules which don't reduce it if it is already higher
Apparently he homebrewed something
to be actively worse, which is infuriating, it's a conscious decision to force something that negatively impacts the character more than the original rule
Lycanthropy in 5.5 is real weird
I ran a Werewolf fight, and afterword (cuz nobody caught the curse) I just explained how it worked. Everyone was pretty confused about the whole "get knocked out first" part of it, cuz that isn't traditionally part of the fiction afaik.
I think I need to try older editions at this point
WotC seems afraid of adding more mechanical depth to the game
I don't think it's fear I think it's design intent.
It's more cathartic to me to act like they're afraid
Who do you guys think is the least charismatic class? Stereotypically.
Tbh I don't think them reverting to DnD being crunchy again would change much.
The people it'd effect the most already ignore the existing rules.
How would y'all quantify the essence of "humanity" in D&D
In like, a mechanical sens3
Monk?
Barbarian
I'd say Fighter
Ranger
Wizard could also be on there
Barbarians usually have intimidation
They're weapon nerds.
They'd talk their dates ears off about swords.
Personally I think druids. Typical dude who lived in the woods all their life and has no idea how social cues work.
Wouldnt say thats exactly charismatic making someone so scared of you that they do what you want
Any MAD class that don't need charisma to function mechanically would most technically fit that
Druids usually live with other Druids and woodland peoples iirc.
No social cues for urban society tho definitely lol
What about rangers?
Rangers I'd say are probably not so.
I figure a Wizard would probably be a bad conversationalist. They're know-it-alls who spend their free time studying and writing and transcribing instead of socializing.
There's the Fey ranger but they're the single exception.
The most famous "Ranger" took his bros ex after saying "man you're stuck in the abyss? That's crazy. Thoughts and prayers."
It is objectively charisma intimidation is a charisma skill
How would y'all quantify the essence of "humanity" in D&D
In like, a mechanical sense
I can't think of anything.
I'm not sure I could quantify humanity in any context
I'm kinda getting the idea they're thinking of humanity from dark souls.
Where if you keep losing it eventually you lose everything about yourself and become a mindless human shaped animal.
Or other forms of irreversible madness
Oh, that gets even muddier then, cuz there's a thick gray area where stuff goes from "Monster" to "A Sapient Being" that isn't strongly defined
That is in fact exactly the thing I am attempting to carry iver
Which gets muddy cause the reason people go hollow in Dark Souls is often because they lose their will to fight.
But instead of that it becomes the essence of whether you are still yourself
Yeah, I might just say "Your will to live" which is nebulous as hell
:D
and like surely animals also have a will to live so
Like Solaire in Dark Souls 1 is one of the happiest people in a Souls game at the start but as you progress his story and he loses hope eventually he ends up in a horrid fate from losing all will to go on.
Pretty much the staple theme for those games
There's nothing that can be done, everything will just be a repeat of pain and suffering until you lose it completely
I need that type a sense but instead for will to live it should be losing your sense of being you
Through some whack ah soul stuff
And body morph things
I don't think you can mechanically codify "your will to go on"
Not really
Is there nothin that would kinda quantify as mental resilience? Kinda like whats closest to mental constitution?
IMO Charisma
I think I agree
Charisma in DnD is your force of will yeah
since sapping at your intelligence, ability to recollect or compute, or your Wisdom with by proxy your perception and survival skills, neither of those make sense
But Charisma is the most nebulous one, and kinda more 'spiritual' as it also resists possession and planar teleports
Madness tables exist but they're not really "lose your will to live entirely"
as well as Vargouilles or whatever
But more goofy and kinda stupid stuff.
Most things that affect your very being are charisma saves
Stuff like avoiding being banished or polymorphed and stuff like that
Like one indefinite flaw of madness in 5e is you really like killing people.
and typically when something loses its soul or whatever, its being of what it was, it has a low charisma score
I still think "avoid banishment with Charisma" is weird
Darn my CoS character has no soul and she has 20 Charisma
a zombie at 5 charisma, a skeleton at also 5 charisma
Str, Int, and Cha saves' mere presence make me want Fortitude, Willpower, and Reflex saves
4e fixes this
Isn't this Pathfinder😭
But yeah trying to make stuff like Dark Souls work in dnd will take a lot of work yourself and won't work out well.
there's like 3 different systems I know that use it
D&D 3.5, D&D 4e, PF1/2
Yep
Those would go hard
But Charisma makes sense, yeah
actually, lets bring back Saves Vs Rods and Save vs Breath Attack. thats the future
I think I'll use that then
mmm, peak design
Thank you
Using the vibes of Fromsoft games can work well but trying to use their mechanics will be painful.
Ah.
Well same kinda deal in it being a pain to use in dnd.
Cause adventurers getting more powerful doesn't involve mutilating their forms with cybernetics to the point where the question of them being a "machine or a person" can affect their mind.
Yeah
Now you can play some kind of character arc of someone growing detached from their humanity as a campaign goes on, but in general, dnd adventurers are generally not right in the head by our standards.
Oh if you go hard enough it can
o/
Sup
Im Trying to figure this out and im getting so confused
Like DnD adventurers will roll into a town, slaughter like 20 people just for hassling the local shopkeeper
Oh
And itll become less so a lack of willing to live and moreso losing control to the cybernetics you implanted
Well, no, that's murderhobo activity
a bit exaggerated but not without a bit of truth
Nah, that's slaughtering the "Bandits terrorizing the town"
Yep. Unless you lack feelings already.
Example being Adam Smasher. He was already a collection of the worst flaws a human can have before he went full borg so nothing changed other than his body cause he had no "humanity" to be influenced by all the changes.
He was a diagnosed sociopath with not a single shred of humanity in him
Empathy, feelings, whats that
Adam Smasher when his defenses get taken down and a netrunner uploads the Empathy patch to his firmware.
The Legend of Night City, Adam Helper.
Adam, Holctr?
Known on the streets as the King of Kindness
Thats so much better
Yeah but if ya go that far you will lose your character to the overlord (DM)
Thata the cost of losing all your humanity and goin full borg!
Or smtn
But then with soul weapons and mutations
Gosh I felt so jealous of someone I hate. He have Inkarnate subscription.
and you know what? Inkarnate is like the best dnd mapmaker.
What's with all the dungeon masters saying "new dnd players welcome" and then when they find out you are new, they immediately chang their mind? lol
some kind of performative "we allow everyone in" or smth? Just be honest and don't waste people's time and your own time bro
Human beings can be very weird sometimes unfortunately.
never heard about that at all, sorry that you had to experience that
admittedly, I do get why some don't like newer players, but I'd never turn away anyone just for being new
I dont have a problem with being turned away because I'm new
Yeah, sorry that happened to you.
It could be worth considering how people can have different interpretations of who they would consider new. I do make an internal difference between "I have never played the game" and "I have never read any rules", for example.
we talk about house rules, game rules, server rules, campaign lore, this rule and that rule but then as they find out I'm new, they are like "oh, you are new new". Wtf does that mean? I'm new. New to DnD means new to dnd
but you do know the game rules, etc.?
I may be new but i am addicted to the concept of lore and magic within dnd.
Also hello
The only lore I get is from the NERDS in this server talking about them /j they're very cool people
Kelemvor this and Lady of Pain that
Hi guys
There's a drastic difference between "haven't played -new" and "haven't read the rules -new", which is the only part about someone advertising a game for new players I could see acting like this
But yeah also there are just weird people with no logic to things, in which case bullet dodged honestly
Well so much yet to learn, but as the saying goes. You wouldn't know unless you understand it fully.
I've no active interest in the lore of D&D
at most I research deities for when I play clerics, paladins, etc.
Ah
Chauntea, Bahamut, etc.
It does seem strange that you were all the way there talking about the game just for them to suddenly turn around like that.
I just chose the paladin role because i can cheat death.
Usually that's Zealot Barb
Dunno that yet
Wait I've never heard of Paladins cheating death?
Ancients ig
And also, so much potential with what i can do with control
Do they get that feature?
I'm playing an Ancients Paladin rn
Biological immortality at a certain level iirc
Revivify and Dead raising such.
Almost sounds like a necromancer.
Well that's for other people 
Would be better to raise your own army than relying on your party
Noooo, my only advantage of controlling every population in the area.
Necromancers can't control hordes of undead.
Ig it's different from the novels I've read.
Not when you are a player.
Seems fair enough.
Initiative would be bloated asl
Besides no one would ever want to team up with a guy who just has his minions do everything and always wins by a large margin.
Solo leveling be like
Hey there are single player ttrpgs out there if that's your jam 😄
D&D is very team focused though
New Monk seems to be pretty decent
I'm aware, I'm just messin
'24 monk? it's great
Solo games aren't as common as you might think. They exist but they're not the norm.
From the UA
Oh, new playtest subclass? Haven't looked at the pdf yet.
Lamo
Ik², i chose the paladin role as a support anyways—can't do much with just myself.
Paladins are better at dealing damage than you think.
But yes, I have heard they're good at support.
They were so better they got their smite force limited
Some DMs have had the "Paladin 1 shot the boss" thing
I put mine on intelligence and charisma- especially spells with healing properties and buffs
Their fault for not having a bit of extra "emergency health"
My guy's background grew up in a church.
Paladins don't need Intelligence. But I won't argue against wanting to give your character a high stat in something that's not as useful. I get it.
Pretty normal. Lots of us have played as clerics that belonged to a church.
Buh i didn't know
Heck, I wanna play as a high priest of Lathander that's a sorcerer one day.
I thought it boosts health regeneration, damn I'ma change it
The only way a Paladin would be one-shotting bosses by themselves is if they somehow rolled a bunch of crits, and had buffs like Potions of Giant Size, and proabbyl did around max damage. Or the DM gave their 'boss' basically nothing for HP.
Paladins only need Strength and Charisma. Dexterity instead of Strength depending on the weapons you want to use.
Constitution is useful for everyone as it is what dictates how many hits you can take.
Health regen is not a thing. I recommend taking a look at the rules if you have not already.
Natural Regen in D&D sucks
Basically while unconscious, if you're stable and you have 0 hp it takes a few hours for you to regain one hp, if I remember correctly
Bruh, you're basically on a whim atp.
I mean, usually you'd have your other party members to heal you up.
But in a scenario with no healing, no potions, etc. Yeah
The only HP that you can regain is from resting, potions and your party healer (if you have one).
I'm the only healer in my party 😭
Hand out healing potions, boom, now everyone's a healer
That's usually enough.
Ancients Paladin with Cure Wounds from MI and Lay on Hands
The only hitpoint that matters is the last one.~
I said to my DM "Do your worst" and I got hit with nearly maximum damage
I should stop saying that, the other time I said that I got my mind broken by an Adult Gem Dragon, 40 points of psychic damage
The healer in one of my parties is just a ranger with the Healer feat. And on my build your town game the only healer is gonna leave and is being replaced by a paladin.
"I didn't hear no bell"
Indeed
I hate having low dexterity though, my initiative score 😭
I said I didn't want Alert... I should've taken Alert
Alert is so good
I still would've been at the bottom of initiative order with Alert
I haven’t had an initiative less than 15 in months
I'm not gonna ask my party members "hey, can we swap initiatives? I decided to play a paladin so you pay the price"
I pretty much only ever swap to bring someone important up to a good initiative
Like letting the wizard cast a high level fireball early on
Being a paladin means you need to sometimes accept you’re gonna hit hard but you’re gonna hit last
Unfortunate
I can't wait to get Great Weapon Master and just go ham
Anyone home?
I wish dnd had more lore to it
Class wise
Like I wish there was more lore to how each class was formed, who was the first in that class, how they began, etc
Like who was the first ever Paladin?
That type of stuff
Classes are a bundle of features for players. They're not an in-world thing.
Except for Wizards
Not an in world thing? People are literally labelled as sorcerers, warlocks and paladins
Well you can functionally be a wizard stat wise and not actually be a wizard in world
And everyone knows labels define people.
But I digress. Perhaps the FR wiki has some information?
They are usually things that people can be but they're not usually treated like inherent factions or anything like that
So a sorcerer isn’t a sorcerer? Are we deadass
It depends, right? Some classes are more "prone" to categorization, others less so.
Like a Barbarian is not likely to introduce themself as a Barbarian
A Fighter isn't usually going to say that they're a Fighter
But monks will
Monks are dumb. /hj
Not necessarily. Could call themselves a fighter too.
I guess warlocks are wizards now
I don't think I've ever played a Ranger that would call themselves a Ranger
I think you're missing the point we're trying to make.
My warlock's an arcanist.
My Wizard is an archivist first and is in the technical sense of the word a wizard
I just got to the new Artificer book proper (I'm poor so I can only read so much) and smh the armorer Artificer doesn't give the ability to use 2 shields for +4 and shoot them like Bayblades for long-range Slashing damage
What's the point?
He knows how to do magic because of its studies but its not why he pursues them
But there also are characters in the lore like Mordenkainen or Elminster who are wizards and would likely refer to themselves as such
I think wizards are also one of the classes that has a solid in-world presence as the name. But very few "bards" will suddely gain the ability to cast spells.
But yeah, hit the wiki, do some digging, check the references.
I feel like most classes will happily use their class name. Alternatively, most characters can use the Background's name instead. Lore-wise, I'd argue Sorcerer gets a free family tree and Druid gets a free Backstory but even Wizard PCs and Monsters often didn't go to a wizarding school for 20 years.
The fun part starts when your Druid calls itself a ranger of the forest and your Barbarian is a fighter but I think it's quite spot-on?
I've found that while players on a meta level rely heavily on class names and what that means, in-world it almost never comes up. Someone might be referred to as "oh, you have a mighty control of magic" or "you're very strong", but not much more.
No fighter is gonna introduce themselves as a fighter.
Nor will a barbarian or ranger be directly referred to as their class names
I feel like even pulp movies used that as a name often enough so I doubt it's impossible?
Yeah, I wouldn't go for "never"
Barbarian is a strong case tho. Ranger however would be weird if that wasn't a job title it wouldn't be proud of
something something Aragorn
There is, however, alot of reasons to introduce yourself as your subclass, depending on the subclass itself. More then a few are, well, actual groups in various settings.
Yall I caved and am finally giving elves a try
Oh I just realised that some fighting styles and subclasses are also easy job titles. Like if you wanna be edgy being a hunter and assassin, or if you want to give a full backstory like "I'm a Paladin who gave my oath to <insert something settings-specific here>"
Idk if this applies to warlocks tho
Still nothing against being an aspiring bard or edgy rogue though
Bc like
But in answer to your original query, #dnd-lore could give some more specific direction.
Farmer Totem Barbarian is least likely to use any of its meta titles I think personally
You ask Nyra what she is, she says she's a monster hunter. Character sheet says totem barbarian.
Can I please ask what your pfp is
G Man
G-Man from Half Life 2 specifically
And Zola says they're a delight for the eyes, ears and most any other part you care to name. But swashbuckler, eh, not really a stretch.
Dnd, Mr. Freeeeeeeman.
G man looks extra scary in their pfp 😭
yeah, 'class names' aren't exactly prescriptive.
Plenty of NPC statblocks will have unique traits not accessible for player characters, and certain player character accessible features never appear in NPC statblocks
It's at the start where the flashes make his head just white
Time, Mr. Freeman, is it really that...time, again? Roll iniative.
I haven't played half life in a while maybe i forgot 😭 thanks for reminding me sweetie
I did a little filter work on the original image.
Oh God
The right roll in the wrong place can make all the difference in the world...
STOP MAKING BANGER COMMENTS
Honestly, the G-Man is such stellar work in the writing, framing, voice acting, it's got that immaterial itch to it that makes me want to emulate even a fraction of how it felt
Quotes like "Prepare for unforeseen consequences." are absolutely iconic... And I'm a sucker for the strange esoteric godlike creature with machinations beyond comprehension
And the extremely limited droplets of information just raise more questions while answering none, it's so mysterious and enthralls one's curiosity
(Also Clear Skies used the G-Man model as Mr Smith, which is a neat coincidence)
What’s a good monster for underwater combat
Shark?
In a scenario where the players have magic that let them walk/breathe/fight normally underwater
What about a kelpie
Idk if DnD has Kelpies
Pretty sure it does.
What's the setup to the fight? Why would one or more kelpie want to fight the party?
Merfolk
Good day, everyone!
Could you please share your experiences of how—using interesting or creative methods—you managed to have a Warlock and a Paladin coexist in the same party with positive outcomes?
I’d really appreciate both comments and longer stories in private messages. TY
Why would they not?
Both players presumibly are neutral/good or evil so why would thet clash
Warlocks are not inherently evil and paladins aren't inherently good and for most D&D adventuring parties, there is a bigger issue at hand the group must deal with (e.g. put their differences aside and handle the bigger problem)
I think one way to think about it is that classes don't have inherent values - you (the player) assign those values.
You might say "wait but paladin does have values in their oaths" to which I would ask you if you have never seen a paladin just accidentally looking away while another party member did something against their oath?
So if the players are on the same wavelength, which you can establish as part of a session 0, you'll likely be fine.
My paladin would get along well any alignment of warlock
also, each oath will have different values, and perhaps the tenets of certain oaths aren't so blindly dogmatic in the given scenario
Character creation as a group in Session Zero is my short answer.
basically making sure that two people about to make certain polarized characters don't go too hard and make each other unable to be in the same party as those characters
How would you guys role play/character create a paladin that only picked up that class/occupation as a hobby or as a result of immediate circumstances
a result of immediate circumstances is actually suggested for oath of vengeance, iirc
I was thinking they’d be scrawny and lower on strength
dexadins somewhat exist
Make a deal with the hexblade 
Because they didn’t go through proper conditioning training
Half plate + dex weapon works
What about a paladin with wizard like characteristics?
define wizardlike characteristics
Hmm like they study magic and cast magic from tomes
Well, mechanically that doesn't line up with paladin so much, moreso wizard (or perhaps an Eldritch Knight fighter)
but they could still have elements of it
During their early years in the Academy, Dui looked forward to a life of magical research and study but all that changed when the Fire Nation attacked. Drafted into battle they saw their tutors and classmates fall one by one while their own magic did nothing, until the invaders were finally repelled. Taking up a blade, Dui swore vengeance.
Studying stories of potentially relevant religious lore, stories of cultural relevance, stories of mythos, and their oath and the circumstances surrounding it could influence things
What if the character was like
Snooty and looked down on muscle brained paladins as a result of being abused by a local group of them thatd past by or work as high ranking military( Sage background). So they became a paladin to mock the occupation in a sense, thinking it’d be easy. But grow to appreciate the deeper faith the role enlightens one to have
I had a group where the paladins were twin brothers. Meanwhile their patrons were bitter rivals. It kinda just played like a sitcom where the patrons act like divorced parents with their own favorite child
My favorite paladin I played was far too focused on being GLORIOUS himself to care what the Warlock was doing
Is there a way to find a group to join and play with? It's hard to find one.
I don't think someone intending to mock the moniker of paladins would end up gaining the powers bestowed by devotion to an oath
It would be a cool backstory to have the paladin be someone who swore vengeance on someone in the heat of the moment and have a god answer their prayers or something. You can go a lot of ways with that
It should be in #looking-for-players
Perhaps if the character bellowed to the heavens for a god to destroy their enemies
Thanks bro 👍
No problem. Good luck hunting!
Hmmm, what if a god saw fit to humble the previous Sage in their endeavor to tarnish the role of a paladin?