#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 400 of 1
sure
And she also voice acts maka
defense is more safe
I know, my plans are usualy air tight and solid but apparently my party does not see that
i know just the demon who might change their mind
im listening
tbh magic missile is like similar damage to scorching ray in damage, no? bit more stable
12 on avg with level 2 magic missle, like 13 or something avg with scorching ray with more variety
the one youre summoning
scorching ray scales better to my recollection
well they are kind of weak since im a warlock, but im binding my time till i get my hands on Gate
but yeah having one or two core damage spells is enough
get to pact making
May I dm btw?
tbh I could just forgo picking 3 level 1 spells, no? since we are starting at level 4 and it doesn't say I have to know 3 out of 5 level 1 spells
i dont really play spellcasters but i think you can do that? you can usually change known spells on level up anyway
man I forgot mage armor
Depends on the type of spellcaster. Some can change spells after a long rest
Hello!
Whats up
How are you?
Not much. Just looking through stuff for dungeon planning and a one shot
Yeah. I’m reviewing my old character sheet while eating a burger.
should I go 12 wisdom and ASI or 10 wisdom and fey touched?
Im just looking for stuff that I can use before a black pudding
(sorcerer)
I need to get a Friday game scheduled.
My players are investigating a murder in the Welcome to the Hellfire Club starter set
Still really need to decide on a campaign module to run after this
I wanna do some of the higher level one shots in the FR book.
Nothing long term cause I don't think I can do 3 long term campaigns.
The DM book for the FR books
Adventures in Faerun
Has 51 one shots in it iirc
its got a bunch of 1 page adventures in it
or, thats probably Adventures, not Heroes
There's some generic ones then there's ones for Regions. And yeah it's in Adventures.
Like a Cult murder adventure in Icewind Dale.
Or a pirate one I think in Moonshae or something
May have been one of the general ones.
What is everyone’s favorite class!
Paladin probably.
Cool. Mine is either warlock or sorcerer.
Weezard
But yeah I wanna do some one shots and the FR one page adventures are a good choice.
Yeah, that’s my friend’s favorite. Oh Adran Amakiir, how I hate running campaigns with you in them.
Who is Adrian amakiir
Did you get a friend request?
We recommend not accepting unsolicited friend requests and reporting suspected spammers/scammers to Discord.
Artificer
Wizard. I like magic and being smart.
I always loved people getting stronger in relation to anger, it's a very cool trope.
Artificer
I like machines magic and being smarter
What subclass is your go to ?
14 or 24? 14 is definitelty bear totem, not even for the resistance to everything but being extra strong like physically. 24 is Berserker, way cooler in 24
I like fighter
Lock
What’s everyone go to race ?
Many dragonborn warlocks for me
Human or Tiefling
Indi 500
I like high elves
I'll play anything that isn't Human or Halfling.
5e Variant human 5.5 Aasimar
Bro hates hobbits
Human? I like drow the most though.
I like humans if they're tall mute men named Caim
lol my current character is half drow half high elf
goliath is up there for me though, i love being extra big guy
races with powerful build >
I try to choose a different race whenever I make a new character but I find that it's easier for me to make human characters.
Minotaurs exist.
Next time around I want to do a paladin tiefling
I am gonna play an astral elf this sunday
D&D has too many damn elves
I like Kobolds, Goblins, Shifters and hex bloods lol
my first ever character was a goblin, its my favorite
Yea chaos gremlins !
What do you mean, we've got High Elves, Dark Elves, Drow, Space Elves, Space Not Actually Elves, Snow Elves, Discount Tire Service Elves- Hold on just gonna unfurl the rest of this list...
I love hexbloods!
One shots are at least nice when you have to prepare big things for a campaign
Elves is one thing I havnt really used much
Elves are pretty much the Bubba Gump shrimp of dnd characters
Keep in mind 5e consolidated elves too
How many more was there before that?
Well Forgotten Realms for example has 7 subraces of elves and thats consolidated a little less than 5es player options
I didn't realize 5e and forgotten realms were different
Forgotten Realms is a setting older than dnd.
But in general theres probably been more significant elf types than years dnd has been around across all settings
sure
cause theres open relations with a few of the companions already
But in general if a game allows modding and has romance itll have a mod for stuff like that
can you cast slivery barbs on an Initiative roll
I know, it's just I do not endorse it, so it's a bit disturbing to see
Many paladin players really give other paladins a bad rep. Heard a story of one paladin that killed their cleric teammate just because the cleric was a tiefling
Then you don't use it.
Aladin the Paladin iirc?
What did you think I was doing? Using it? I know.
Idk i havent looked in too much into it but i think its ridicolous for sure
Yeah Paladins nature tends to draw people who larp too hard in the wrong way.
Dont get me wrong i love to be mr goody two shoes but like chill out. Not all tieflings are evil just because they have fiendish blood
I sorta get the charm of paladin now
I keep thinking these must be jokes. But sitting down makes me realize there are people like that.
After playing it for a bit, it's neat
but I still prefer warlock archer
don't ask
Yeah Tieflings haven't been "evil" for awhile.
I also like the FX tv Show Archer he would make a fun Warlock
They were never really "inherently evil" to begin with I believe.
Yeah no theres legit people who take em way too seriously. Sure paladins are great at killing fiends and their known for hunting down beasts like undead and fiends etc but like chill out its just a tiefling
The lack of social awareness is astounding
There's a lot of people whose thought process is "if it's not a human, elf or Dwarf it's not a person"
I believe that the cleric tiefling wasnt even trying to be evil
Not all paladins are extreme. It just depends on their oath and setting. Some gotta realize oaths change, beliefs change, and temporary alliances are a thing
I like playing warlock because being morally grey suits my style
It's so I can do what I believe in instead of following an oath like paladins
i will play one that is a good guy that dont know what kind of powers he is using at all
My main dnd character just does what he believes is right, dragonborn warlock
I think oathbreaker is a sign of freedom in a way. You follow your own path
Someone in my DND group is making their own sourcebook
Oathbreaker isn't that in 5e
Just sucks how oathbreakers are more edgy now
You can have freedom if you word your oath properly
Oathbreakers have always been evil in dnd.
Cause breaking your oath doesn't make you an oathbreaker.
Now it's warlock that's just the chill guys
Especially because of Wyll in Baldur's gate
Wait what
An oathbreaker in dnd is someone who willingly breaks their oath in pursuit of dark power and selfish gain.
oh, my main for now is a fighter, half orc.
He is searching glory and fame, kinda arrogant with some weird companions
(His real objective is someday find someone to finally get a peaceful life after leaving the adventures)
true, all of my warlocks have been morally chill
Another main dnd character I made is morally gray but is trying to learn how society works
He doesn't know killing is bad 🥀
It's someone who wants to protect the weak suddenly deciding he wants to crush the weak underfoot and make them suffer so he breaks his oath and accepts power from a dark entity to fulfill his dreams of tyranny led by blood.
Well...shit there goes my character idea
It's very much always been an Evil class.
I like to imagine warlocks as drug addicts that encourage you not to do them.
stoping wanting to protect the weak doesn’t necessarily mean you want to crush them. maybe your just tired
Man the everyone dies book is so much fun for the dm to do
That doesn't make you an Oathbreaker that means you're retiring.
"Hey I made 500 deals with devils, don't do that."
"500 devil deals"
An Oathbreaker is specifically A Paladin who breaks their Oath specifically for evil, accepting power from a dark being for purely selfish gain.
You know Death Knights? They were Oathbreaker Paladins.
It says in the book that the paladin has to be level 3 and any evil aliment
my most recent warlock got his powers from a celestial that was in love with him but got kidnapped, so the celestial lended him their powers to save them
But what happens to paladin that breaks their oath on accident then
Or for the better good
They just have to rest and repent.
Then they just lose their powers.
Everyone and their magic character always makes them copulate with some divine being lmaoo
Specifically their Oath abilities temporarily.
They just broke there oath but they can get that oath back or swear to another oath
What just pray and fast
Whatever the DM deems aprorpriate
A cleric can also help you iirc
there's not actually any rules or guidance on this thing in 5E AFAIK
Oathbreaker would be cool if it's not so edgy
Mainly cause Oathbreaker was never intended for player use.
It was designed when they wanted to use PC sheets for monster design.
Cause they rushed the dmg in 2014 and didn't think about it.
Homebrew deathknight class is good enough 🍵
Honestly this feels like they should have a oathless or something similar to breaking the oath by accident but can still use some features until fix
oathless? wouldn’t that just be fighter?
In my honest opinion right. I want oathbreaker to be smth you become after breaking an oath like in bg3 and you either have to live with it or repent in taking a new after a while.
In general they just expect the Paladin and the dm to solve it over a long rest with RP.
That's just fighter
I mean you can use your base Paladin abilities and lose access to your subclass for a bit.
But thats what i think atleast
That's proabbly the best way to go about it
In a sense, Laserllama did a idea in their paladin class
Most DM's ignore Alot of things.
your now a temporary fighter
A better potrayal for oathbreaker is "Order is cruelty", it only makes sense.
Nooo, I was talking speciffically about just having your Base Paladin features.
Just do the skyrim method and pledge or make deals with multiple evil beings. Then they'll have to fight over who owns you
That's Conquest Paladin
I made a fighter subclass called “Oathbroken Knight”. I may be a bit biased but I love it
but your oath is how you get those powers tho
God dammit
It would be quite silly to suddenly have Extra attack X4 because you accidentally bludgeoned the wrong guy to death.
Conquest paladin? Didnt know it was a thing
It is and it's fun
It's about crushing the weak, breaking their spirits and ruling over innocents with an iron bloody fist
Oh i was more suggesting to not have the divine powers lmao but sure
But I do like oathbreaker. Just because the edgelord vibes hit just right with me
It's the actual intended for player use evil coded paladin subclass.
Mechanically speaking, that's more your Subclass, then your Paladin features. But since the whole thing is Wibbly Woblly, it just Works better then "Suddenly you're a level X fighter for no particular raisin"
I love conquest channel divinity in both options
I love the oathbreaker abilities compared to the normal paladin
And I love the lore implications of being able to corrupt an oath alongside yourself
Another issue about Oathbreaker is their abilities buff enemies
So if you're in an Undead campaign you're helping the enemies kill you and your friends.
That's it, I'm making an oathbreaker paladin that just goes with the wind. Crushes whoever they want, but won't explicitly target the weak. Absolute cinema.
but lore wise, where are your powers from without an oath?
Dark power takes your power away cause you're not killing at least 1 innocent a day
One of our party members was a oathbreaker, got reconnected with their deity then broke their oath the second time. Couldn't go back to divinity so they became evil aligned oathbreaker. To make it worse they were a aasmir paladin
Then they kill a minimum of one innocent a day
The oath is still there, it’s just corrupted, tainted, in a way
That’s why oathbreakers often have new evil masters
Long as evil is committed for the sheer thrill the entity is happy
So you basically simply lose the features the subclass gets but you keep like divine smite and stuff
Oh yeah do a multiclass with oathbreaker paladin with warlock for some real flavor especially undead
Dammit I wanted to not follow oaths to not follow gods, why am I doing something to please an evil GOD?!
Take ||Ketheric Thorm|| from BG3, his new master was ||Myrkul|| after breaking his oath to ||Selune||
Yeah most Oathbreakers dedicate themselves to Lichs, Death Gods, and Fiends
Necromancer paladin
I would multiclass a paladin and cleric but id need some good wisdom and charisma to do it
The occasional oathbreaker just kills for the thrill
Fine guess I'll just do fighter.
But most want true competitive evil and suffering so they work with entities that wanna destroy the world
If you want I can send you my Oathbroken Knight fighter subclass when it’s finished
Nah it's fine, I'm creative
Conquest seems cool but nothing id really play unless the whole party is evil
Yeah a Conquest Paladin is hard to fit with a good aligned party
Conquest paladin does sound interesting in its own meaning
It's basically about being a Tyrant
I’ve done it 😎
Mind weaver was always my goto homebrew class just because I love mindflayer powers
So if your party ever wants to let someone you deem weak live you gotta kill them.
Cause they're weak. You strong.
Not as the paladin but as the DM, I have a lawful evil oath of conquest paladin in a good aligned party
Cant really have a tyrant paladin in a party that want to be heroes. Atleast not without ruining stuff for the party and no one wants that
Whose covenant may or may not be worshipping Asmodeus
It's possible but it's hard to do without being disruptive or just ignoring your oath altogether.
It’s definitely possible, but yeah there is a fine line to walk
Batman
I am very proud of my player for playing a lawful evil oath of conquest paladin and so far not causing any problems for the party
It can be very disruptive if played as intended.
Yeah my first paladin was one and boy was it restricting
if a paladin is no violence, why it have a sword
DnD is very much a game where most players are actually leaning towards evil but they don't really understand it.
At that point ill just play cleric
Like people will casually talk about skinning humanoids in dnd to make armor and stuff.
And think their PCs are heroes.
Ime a lot of people's "heroic" characters make the Punisher look like Superman morality wise.
You cant stop violence without using violence
Is there a way to get the compelled duel spell without being a paladin
In my campaigns, the actions of the party determine society's outlook on them. Bad people get treated like bad people
this literally came up in my campaign
wall of force stops violence pretty fast
We killed a minotaur (evil and spoke just moments before) and I just took his weapon, one of the other pcs feels straight out of a slasher film and tooks the dudes everything
Enspelled Staff if you're using 5.5e if not then I don't believe so.
my character just cringed
Damnit ok
Skin, meat, horns. I'm like damn dawg the guy was just speaking to us, that's... not ok
A sharp sword or a pretty intimidate presence around the violence you are capable to do, too.
My character isn't the paragon of justice but thats just a bit much lol
Btw can a cleric serve more then 1 deity
Such is the nature of living in a magical world, Sometimes your bits are just good reagents.
Enspelled weapon in 5.5e
A consumable called the Spellwright Tattoo in Tasha’s I think
2014’s Bard could with magical secrets I believe
And Wish
Dragons are also Inteligent, people still love to make things out of them when possible.
Bro my PC is gonna die and just gonna get scalped or something 😭
2014 Bards (And as far as I'm aware, 2024 Bards) can get any spell they want with Magical Secrets
yeah but you can only get your power from 1 deity
Not in 2024
Wizard, Druid, Cleric spells only in 2024 last I checked
Makes sense. But good so that means i can make like a cleric of tyr, torm and ilmater for example
What species is your character?
I go by monster hunter rules. If thing is cool or has some biological component that can be used, I make it something the party can try to harvest. Ex Behir has thick hide and a lightning gland in it's throat, purple worm has acidic bile and can have gemstones in its gullet
Just human lol but this slasher does not care
So, basically everything that's not unique to Sorcerors and Warlocks.
Or Paladin
Yeah he'd probably get some clothing out of you
Or warlock or Ranger
Meh, Ranger specific spells are pretty trash so nothing of value was lost
Artificers don’t have uniques to my knowledge so I’m not adding them
Artificers just borrow from Wizard spell list
Ye they just a mix of the cleric and Wizard spell lists
Honestly got a question now, if you were to make a pact with Bhaal what warlock subclass could work?
Fiend
the person didn't care for components, they were just hungry and wanted to sell the parts. Those things are gonna sell for like 5 gold bro, just leave it 😭
Or just play Scion of the Three Rogue
Ye if a PC in the party dies I'd definitely watch out for what they do.
Well Bhaal is a god, so my first instinct would be celestial... but he is murder oriented, so maybe something like undying would fit better mechanically
Undying would definitely not fit mechanically, or thematically.
He's the god of murder, Undying and Undead very much do not fit.
Evil gods are usually Fiends so just do fiend
He likes things being dead, and Staying dead.
Because as a god, he'd keep you alive until you've killed as many people as he deems fit. As a god, resurrection is fully within his power, and he would keep you alive whether you like it or not until you do what he has bid you to do
No he wouldn't
That’s Myrkul
He doesn't give a crap about any of his worshippers
Wizard sorcerer builds are so silly.
The other god of the dead three
Lol no, Bhaal is happy to let All of his mooks die
500 spell slots used
He actively pushes his worshippers to kill each other as long as it's bloody and beautiful
Even his Favored mooks kicking the bucket is fulfilling his purpose
Well then I guess celestial since undying was such an awful answer lmao
Why celestial?
It's an objectively good thing to die
Because he is a god
Celestial is the healer sub tho
You know that God doesn’t equal celestial right?
EXACTLY
uh can't you just go like hexblade because u poke people to death
Like Gods are a lot of different creature types
Thats murder 👍
Fey and Fiends even Aberrations
I'm pretty sure Bhaal resides in the Lower Planes doesn't he?
Thank you for suggesting a different thing instead of just dunking on me
Fiend would be an easy fit.
Notably Hexblade is the Raven Queen subclass
Hexblade curse could be flavored as being Bhaal's victim
Turned Generic Sentietn Weapon subclass in 2024 IIRC
Also undying is objectively the absolute trash subclass of warlock ngl
Not in 2024 still
Ye Undying was WotCs darkest moment in 5es history in the 2010s
Must have been thinking of the wording on it's UA
The dumbest moment was the release of SCAG.
Where do you think the Raven Queen is from and who do you think is making the Hexblades?
Hi again!
A book full of the aboslute Worst designed things to ever disgrace 5E
Green Ronin realizing they were about to release the worst book in 5es history
"Hehe ye boy"
Until Spelljammer came along
Cause at least SCAG has some good subs and species variants ect.
Spelljammer was just lazy not poorly designed.
ya, I got it i was just asking the location not the god
Agreed SCAG with terrible ideas like Swashbuckler and Bladesinger
It was a Monster Splat they pretended was a setting book
Regardless, that doesn't matter still
True. Spelljammer was just "Alright release this so they stop asking for it."
I'm still disgruntled about the whole thing.
Then surprised when people didn't like that the combat rules were "just don't do combat" and travel rules were "go to forgotten realms"
I fear that'd happen to dark sun if they released another book
Yeah I'll probably go fiend and I haven't touch that one though if my group allowed my favorite class I'll definitely went with it but nope which is Illrigger
If it was under the old guard yeah
I think it was apparent Crawford and Perkins did not wanna be working on dnd anymore.
Yall what is a half humanoid half devil
Considering how much the new team is knocking it out of the park with setting stuff I’d love to see how they handle Dark Sun
Cambion iIRC
Tieflings don't even need to be all that devil adjacent.
I trust y'alls word
They had so much damage to try and repair from 4e and then damage of their own.
Tiefligns are just dudes that huffed too much Fiendish or Demonic essence.
Dark Sun is a cool setting, I hope they do release something of it in the future (good hopefully)
Honestly yeah.
If they use Dark Sun 4e as reference it'll probably be good
Since in 4e was when they made the one Sorcerer-King have a change of heart and wanna save Athas.
I need more power
Ye if they build off 4es lore then it'll be yet another common 4e W
They're basically just like the Fiend version of Aasimar. Just insert Species, generally human effected by too much Fiendish energy. Like Aasimars are just guys hopped up on Celestial energy
Eat a plot rock
The only part of 4e lore that is good. That being Dark Sun
Although I do have a soft spot for Abier and the Dragonborn
lol I always hear bad things about 4e, must been the trenches back then
can’t someone also become a tiefling or aasimar due to bloodline shenanigans
The guys in charge of 4e shouldn't have been in charge of it.
Their damage is still being felt in dnd today
It was mostly people getting made at the game being changed so much compared to every other versions of DnD
I have played both, and it is exactly that. My Aasimar is and elven Aasimar and literally is the healer and damage maxer. (Divine soul sorcerer.)
Yup.
Then they had their own OGL disaster and treated their writers badly
A lot of the actual colossal mistakes were at the guy in charge level.
In terms of actual game design 4e is wickedly good to the point a ton of new TTRPGs point to it as a source of inspiration
Draw Steel, Daggerheart, and D&D 5.5e being notable examples
According to some research I did he wouldn't listen to anyone telling him something was a bad idea when 4e was in its first breaths.
If one had a Tiefling/Aasimar in their bloodline, yes. It works alot like Sorcerors, "Make up what bout of magical nonsense created your magical self."
I personally hate 5.5e, but a lot of people like it, like my dad.
He was the one who did the whole Spellplague nuke FR so there's no lore so players can make their own lore.
Oh yeah and Pathfinder 2e was also inspired by 4e too
I've heard good things about the classes (I think)
Why do you hate 5.5e?
And told FR writers and Ed Greenwood "lol just deal with it."
Also it was when they changed their output of books for D&D.
Nooo, not the rant about 5.24, not againnn
WOTC has been proffesionally ignoring Ed Greenwood for like, years.
3.5e was basically every week while 4e does what happens now which is every few months
Until the new team stopped ignoring him thankfully
With the new UA, you are all obligated to make an encounter of an Erinyes/Narzugon w/ a clipboard grading 4-5 Hell Knights either fighting or menacing the party. Or, for the diplomatic outcome, they hand out pamphlets.
Ed Greenwood's vids are real nice
The new team seems to be trying to fix all the damage the 4e corporate did and 5e corporate barely tried to fix.
Love that he's making extra lore videos for his setting after all
@junior jasper How thick is the Levistus Iceberg today
Extra THIIC
With acknowledging Ed professionally again, bringing Tracy Hickman and Luke Gygax in for more dnd IP work.
Another 5mm of frost was added for this joke
To quote Aku
It’s fun reading 5e’s UA (called D&D Next) which kept trying to make a new system with lots of issues before eventually just doing a streamlined 3.5e
Cardbuilder 5e
A lot of reasons. Mostly just because I learned to play with 5e, and am super rigid and have a tough time learning. You don’t know real stubborn defeat until you lose your PHB and have to get a new one, only to discover that you can’t get it from stores anymore and have to spend 40USD to get a 2014 copy off eBay.
It's really not that different. It's just every class is good and all monsters are stronger.
thats less than the MSRP of the book in 2014
With better guidance for a lot of things, and better treatment of official settings so far.
I do like 5.5e a lot, but there's a lot I liked from 5e. An amalgamation of both is good
Ohmygoodness. You asked me about lore of my character. But anyways, it’s only 2 meters thick, but it’s magically imperceptible.
I do love the idea of Aspiring Warlocks hoping to serve Asmodeus being handed protien powder and Extra Attacks instead
I know.
I miss using athletics for grapple checks
So nothing to do with 5.5e
I wasn't a fan of the all level 3 subclass at first, but then I liked it when I imagine Clerics and Warlocks being barely paid interns
Like games go out of print
And also it makes things pretty cleaner.
Everyone hits 3 and gets excited for subs.
Especially with DnD being roughly 10 years per edition
Please do not lick the Levistiberg, it does count as damning your soul
They also got rid of half elves and half orcs and now you don’t get your ability score increased by species.
Yup.
Yeah it’s now your background. Also half elves and Orcs are still a thing
Because the life you lived being what affects your capabilities makes more sense than your race.
You just don’t have a unique mechanic for them, you just use the features of either
I think having choice with Racial API is a decent thing, because it led to way too many "Recommended Classes" for Races just being what you had to pick to not get boo-womp'd early on by forefiting feats
And in the setting where Half-Elves and Half-Orcs are their own long established people at least the Khoravar have their own species.
Yeah you still get the same starting stats overall since it’s in your background (which would have more bearing on your ability scores realistically)
Playing Neverwinter Nights, I do marvel at how limited the LE writing was back then
Everything was either Chaotic Evil or Lawful Good
(The Video Game)
man I wish buying books was easier because hard covers are so nice
I know, but I feel like a half orc with big fingers would not be able to get super good (to an extent) at picking locks precisely.
Why would they have big fingers?
Bigger handled lockpicks exist
People overcome their physical traits all the time.
They are still medium creatures after all
Also who needs a lockpick
You're using a Waterdeep Expertise Lock, it can be opened with a Waterdeep Expertise Lock
I know that I’m super rigid. I spent months learning 5e and now everyone is switching to something I’m going to have to spend another full year and a half learning.
Not really
It's literally not that different.
It's evolving
Its basically the same as 5e with better organization to read
It's just 5e in its true form.
I mean it's not that different
And the neat part is you can choose what rules to use
Ah yes, I totally have months of free time to learn.
It's literally not that different.
Why would it take months? Its the same system.
5.5e is just 5e with a shower and well shaved.
They even made it easier to read
Weapon masteries and backgrounds takes months? The only other thing is monsters but no one like no one will care if you memorize all the new stuff in monsters
Plus there is only like around 10 Weapon masteries
can I hide then use like misty step to teliport behind someone to get advantage?
there really aren't that many major differences between the two editions. picking up 5.5e from my brief experience with baldur's gate and 5e took me a couple weeks at most
Yall if your dnd character had pokemon typings what would they be
Bonus action to teleport and action to hide.
So you'd have to wait another turn to not get discovered
Missingno type as I had 12 potential campaigns but zero characters realized
in 2024 no, casting a spell breaks invisibility - which the hide action gives you. not to mention the verbal components misty spell
Also yeah hiding in 2014 also breaks if you cast a spell to
I am aware, but the fact that I had to spend that amount of time to learn 5e, which the parts that I actually use are becoming obsolete.
When you spend time to learn 5.5, you might get dissappointed it isn't more different. It is fr just the same game, with some very minor tweaks. I was honestly hoping 5e->5.5 would be a little more like going from 3.5 to 4e. 5e->5.5 is closer to going from Basic to AD&D.
ah forgot about the verbal part
Except you won't?
5e and 5.5e intersect quite nicely. i still use the 2014 expanded rules in my games that use the 2024 core rules
crap okay thanks (I need advantage since I need these crits for my vorpal blade)
Because you already have the knowledge of how the system works from learning 2014
So you already now 95% of 5.5e already
you can mostly pick and choose what you do and don't like, as 2024 is mostly just a revision of the general rules
Like Monk for example
The difference between 2014 Monk and 2024 Monk is 2024 Monk does more damage, and has more focus points essentially and is less reliant on stunning strike.
That's it.
Fighter gets weapon masteries and better indomitable now for 2014 vs 2024
Bra I seen that lol you almost confused the poor guy 2014 lol
Or 2024 Fighter. All they changed was adding more second wind charges, you can use second wind on ability checks, and now indomitable adds your fighter level to the reroll so it actually helps now.
The game rules are better organized too, so learning them is considerably easier in 2024
if 'it'll take too long' is your only excuse not to use the new rules, at least have a go at reading through them. a brief skim over the free rules will take an afternoon at most and then you'll have a more informed decision on whether or not you want to fully learn 2024's rules
I was planning on playing a ranger for the first time, but now it all depends on a single first level spell. Also, half of the races I find fun to play are suddenly nowhere to be found.
Action surge no casting spells with it
It doesn't tho?
Ah yeah, which is good.
Like they just get a few extra uses of a spell.
You can use old races you know they convert well
I mean you could just use the 14 versions for other races
This is a statement that you will find is untrue if you read through the books
Yeah literally you just use the old species
Also 2014 races still work in 2024.
The rule is "If the feature hasn't been updated you can still use it"
Also Ranger already relied on Hunters Mark ever since Tashas it just wasn't called Hunters mark and it was worse than in 2024
Like page 1 of the 2024 PHB even says it
If you cast flight on a fighter or any martial, they're kinda superhero like, especially if they're mainly unarmed
Where is Mark's Hunter
Page 1 of the Basic rules too
Like in the time you've been here you likely could've already read the changes for players.
Do Mount Rules work if you're running a Master Blaster build and if not why does WOTC hate fun
Sounds like a lot of judging something that hasn't been engaged with at all.
Pathfinder is dnd? (I'm not sure about the difference)
where would the rules for mounts intersect with character builds?
Caviler and Mount Feats
pathfinder and d&d are two different systems of ttrpg
I wuv cleric
Pathfinder was born from DnD 3.5e and uses DnD 4e as a main inspiration for Pathfinder 2e and its a different company
different game by different company
ima give it a try
warlock is coller
My last warlock was my fav character I’ve played
iirc cavalier only really gives you the ability to stay on your mount a little better. you can still ride a mount without feats/cavalier subclass, and you follow the mounted combat rules all the same (if that's your question)
If you're expecting dnd 5e you'll get quite an awakening.
Ok, I get it, I understand that everyone is suddenly using one that everyone says it better, but I spent too much time trying to learn one, and now it’s just switching to something else that I don’t have the energy for. It’s not like I haven’t seen the rules of 2024. My dad decided to buy the player’s handbook for me. I hate that the spells are slightly different, and half of the monsters that I thought were cool and wanted to fight at some point are gone.
I swear there's one that gives you advantage on attacks on unmounted combatants
It's a pretty crunchy game.
Monsters are gone?
The only monsters that didn't get reprint are Orcs and Duergar (and they weren't that unique) the rest are still in the game, in fact we got way more monsters out of it.
it's been a while since i read through cavalier so yeah i may be wrong, but you can still use mounts perfectly fine without being a cavalier
Aren't they just 2024'd? You can still use Legacy Content
Other than specifically Humanoid statblocks that have been turned into generic ones of the same idea no
Also once again you can still use them
Because if it hasn't been updated you can still use them
Yeah legit it's only Orcs, and Duegar.
the 2024 mm also does have a section at the back for all the 2014 name conversions
Just want all the tasty bonuses while riding atop my trusty Wasteland Warrior
We even got updated Drow
Which the new Drow are so much better to use
somethings are just straight up more fun, so idk why you wouldn't want to use them
Drow Weapons are funny
And the spells are different cause they reworded a lot of them due to bad faith rulings
Ah damnit, I got sunlight on my +5 and now it's useless
Also they buffed bad spells.
Making the Drow racial spells bonus actions is soooo nice
The 2014 rules especially the dmg were very rushed which led to a lot of assuming, bad formatting and unclear stuff.
yeah 2024's spells are imo better than 2014's. the new counterspell is kinda questionable though
New CS has been better ime
I had players bully an archmage on my tuesday game so hard because of the new Counterspell rules
Literally the spell that best works with a Patron
Those were the ones I wanted to fight! I wanted the experience of fighting a full orc warband as a high level character! I wanted to see how it is to fight a sizeshifting Duegar.
Yeah the new counterspell is bad
i kinda prefer the 2014 cs. it's a lot more balanced
They are still in the game
in 2024 you pretty much have the same chance at countering a 9th level spell than you do a 1st
But yeah I had an archmage unable to cast spells because she only had a +1 con save
This just seems like nitpicking. They're still in the game they just were made generic so you can use them anywhere for any species.
Old Counterspell was just annoying
i kinda liked the fact that you need to expend a spell slot of equal power to counter a spell's casting, but i do see the appeal of the new one. it's a lot simpler
The old Orc stats in the MM had only 1 unique ability and it was the war cry. Besides that it was running and hitting things.
Which you can do with any humanoid NPC by giving them the PHB orc traits
Which you can just add the war cry to the generic statblock anyway
I still love how much Orogs were hyped up in the 2014 MM only for them to have an intelligence score of about 8-12 and no special abilities
I've found caster battles in 2024 to just be healthier and more fun with new CS
Orogs got better armor and multiattack. That was it.
I take a middle ground with counterspell
Cause it's not just "oh well I got counterspelled. There goes my slot cause I can't have it yet as a bard"
When a player uses it on an enemy, I go for 2014 version, when an enemy uses it on a player, I go 5.5e
I don't use anything from 2014 if I can help it.
So many spellcasting NPCs got bad con saves its funny
i like the DM stuff in xanathar's but yeah all my player facing stuff is 5.5
Personally, I found mixing both versions has made peak TTRPG for me.
-# For me
Them not being able to counter 9th level spells from monsters with legendary resistances is a big problem
Plus 2024 counterspell lets you keep the slot, something the monsters don't have.
I was thinking this too, and then I ran an Arch-Hag and I realized the genius behind it
Idrc tbh
Or have people cast it more than once. Or have burned it ahead of time.
I'll open with that so it's rare that it's burned
I had group of players do a triple counterspell to stop a PWK from Acererak a few weeks back
And it was his opening spell
wait this is awesome
I didn't even consider this interaction but its peak
Yeah a monster so magically powerful he can force his way through a counterspell is sick
To me I feel like my game is worse if caster battles are just purely which side has more casters.
Dazed and silly characters are my favorite
100 wizard apprentices vs 1 lich
Nothing goes through their minds, but they have a spirit
Pretty much. 2014 CS you just went and spent like a few thousand gold for a few 5th level casters then just have them counterspell with you. Becomes a Cold War where each side just stacks up more and more counterspells
lich casts wish and they all die
unless the wizards prepared counterspell
can you even wish to kill a hundred people?
You can wish Tsunami
You'd get Wish sickness or recreate a spell that does it
In general I just never liked old counterspell
Not sure, I don't know the limitations of wish
Always felt like a sheer necessity like if you have a caster in the party you need to get Counterspell somehow. If there was more casters everyone needed counterspell.
And if you didn't take it and your party got wiped it'd be your fault cause you didn't take it.
And it wouldn't hurt to try and recruit as many PCs as possible for more counterspells against the dms wishes for a 5 player only game.
It depends a lot on the DM.
Basically they changed it cause original counterspell was just too powerful and not very fun
thankfully the 2024 rewordings are slightly clearer on what can and can't happen as a result of wish
Notably new CS is player-sided.
Cause Monsters don't have spell slots so if they're counterspelled they don't get their use of that spell back.
And most caster enemies only have a few uses of Counterspell that they share with their castings of Shield.
Which I don't agree with personally and won't use it as such in my games.
I think it's that way specifically cause of it being a save and Legendary Resistances being a thing.
So a Lich can't just keep trying to spam PWK on the Wizard.
They don't have spell slots because it letes them manipulate action economy
And also why casters have high damage high attack amount multiattacks
You cannot use more than 1 spell slot in a turn and Monsters don't use spell slots. So they can use more than 1 spell in a turn.
Its a trade off for the monsters to not have spell slots
GUYSS can I join a dnd party as a young person I don’t have no one to play with lll
Don't advertise your age.
Counterspell removes their spell if they fail but they get to cast more spells in a turn.
#looking-for-dm #looking-for-players , but make sure you read the age requirements for campaigns. also yeah, what sora said
Ye I've never had more fun caster fights since 5.5e dropped and saved them from needing nuclear deterents (old CS)
no worries, it's mostly for user safety than anything else lol
Ohh i see for weirdos okay yea ill be safer
I like the spell system in 5.5e but Idk. I've been playing some OSE in another group with Grayhawk rules and there is a benefit for making spells limited.
The spells are still limited
Ofc Melee in OSE doesn't get nearly anything as good as 5e or 5.5e either. No multi attacks, nothing.
Yeah cause it's an OSR system ain't it?
Yeah its a different game system after all
Guys so I’m dm’ing for my little cousin and I’m making a village any ideas for the village
Like Shadowdark has unlimited spell uses but you have to roll to cast and crit fails have significant consequences.
Like Priest(Cleric) loses the spell completely until they prove to their God they can have their toy back.
where's the village - costal, landlocked? is it a farming town, mining town, or something in-between? what kind of vibe do you want?
Through days of repentance as well as some cold hard cash
You think your gods gonna let you have magic back for free? Maybe don't fail so bad. Pay up.
Just like a stop by town with a shop and blacksmith
Yeah I've been expanding a bit into other editions and even other systems and I do like the ones where nat 1s = fail.
Shadowdarks pretty funny
Ever been a Witch that casts a spell and fails so badly a baby is born into the world with an undying hatred for you and is destined to kill you?
Zoinks
ratton (rat-town) was once an inn by a crossroads - but as its reputation improved, so did the need for local employees. those employees had families, needed tools, and ended up forming a village with a reputable blacksmith there. the village gained its name after the inn's (and subsequent village's) infamous rat infestation.
if you want more than just a quick description, there are mutant rats in the inn's cellar
although to be completely honest, most villages i make literally are just a name and a sentence about what can be bought there. i improv the rest
YOO BROTHER THAT FITS THE THINGS SO MUCH BECAUSE AFTER THE VILLAGE, THEY HAVE TO GO TO A FREAKING SEWER AND FIGHT RATS
glad i could help
Tyy
does anyone know any cr ~6 monsters that would serve the same purpose as a mummy lord?
aren't Mummies CR 4? just pump them up a lil bit, maybe remove the Fire Vulnerability
mummies are cr3 and i fear wouldn't be an interesting enough bossfight, but if nothing else crops up i could probably make it work
hoping to pit it against 6 level 4s
i'm altering an 11th-level tomb dungeon to suit a 4th level oneshot but don't think it's quite fair to throw a mummy lord at them
based on the australian tv show "bluey"
starting level 3, no homebrew 😠
NO CHILDREN!!!
this seems kinda counter produtive
bluey and d&d is something i never thought i'd see combined
Same here
reflavored lost sorrowsworn? c:
to be honest yeah that may actually work great
i might swap its hug out for spellcasting but it's otherwise perfect thank you
Where did this come from lmao
#looking-for-players , 3rd one up
As an Aussie myself I don't expect bluey I dnd
what will we do when bluey casts cloudkill
shrug I also don't watch the show
Bluey casts Dream of the Blue Veil
Can someone host a one-shot right now? lol I'm in the mood to play 🤣
You'll wanna check out #find-a-game , soliciting for games outsdie of those channels is against the rules
But also D&D isn't a pick up and play -kind of game. It takes effort to host a game, and not many are just gonna do that because some random wants to play. It's gonna take some time to find a game 😛
thanks for bursting my bubble.
The messenger was the friends we made along the way 
or if you want something immediately; you could alwasy run through a selfguided CYOA c:
Info: https://1shotadventures.com/solo-adventures-beyond-the-vale-of-madness/
Booklet: https://1shotadventures.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Beyond-the-Vale-of_Madness-5E.pdf
Info: https://1shotadventures.com/3-lessons-from-solo-adventures/
Booklet: https://1shotadventures.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/DragonsDemise-5E.pdf
DMs (or players):
What ways have your party ruined an encounter and/or puzzle? For example, my party managed to solve an entire puzzle based on 2 clues 5 minutes in and my DM felt so sad.
guys. i understand how much time goes into a campaign. It was a light-hearted joke expressing my longing to play. Thanks for the recommendations though.
My party keeps skipping most of my dungeons by sheer luck 😭
i suggest having a chasm eat them up and put them into the dungeons
no fall damage
my 3rd session DMing ever (having never played d&d before), player with far more experience than me lied to me about a spell description and proceeded to bore his way into and out of a prison. several hours of prep wasted, and the session sucked.
2nd story hardly 'ruined' anything, but my party once solved a puzzle before i'd even finished setting it up
My partner turned up to a session that was entirely underwater with little air pocket mechanics and a single super expensive water breathing potion, she then told the shopkeeper they can do one and announced she had the spell.
We once had a player shove a nuke into his chest (he was a robot) thinking he could absorb it. (He couldn't and it ended very bad).
We had a boss fight immeidately stopped because the Sidekick Psuedodragon critted their stinger attack on the boss.
It turns out being immediately filled with a stunning (Well, unconscious, but...) poison = no more boss encounter.
In a previous campaign, during our downtime I acquired a ring of spell storing way earlier on and I put Hallow in it. Our BBEG had a huge army of undead used as a healing source/armor pool that was meant to make the encounter difficult. However, I then told the DM what spell was inside of it and let's just say, we finished the BBEG in like, 5 turns. 😂
that's a pretty creative solution, hardly ruins an encounter haha
if anything i'd applaud my player if that happened
Our sessions are normally 3 hours long. This one was 1 hour 12 minutes.
Ring of Spell Storing* is actually clutch.
10/10 item
Power-scaling question for the DMs here, does having higher Challenge Rating(CR) make an enemy more powerful and beats enemies easily that have lesser CR than it?
The game is not balanced on cr alone
In general the more powerful the monster the higher the cr though
I've seen 4-man lvl 6 parties defeat a singular CR 10 creature before.
They just knew how to synergize off one another
Unironically, sometimes it does come down to how skilled and experienced the players are.
4 level 6s against a single cr10 doesn't sound too gruelling tbh
So whats the difference between torm and tyr. Difference as in what they stand for
According to the 2024 Monster Manual, an assassin has a CR of 8 and it somehow beats a white young dragon that has a CR of 6 in challenge rating.
Also, I’m running a 6 player DoIP campaign and I’m using both of those with Cyrovain being the white young dragon and it doesn’t make sense him being the big villain but gives out less experience than one assassin that may hunt down the players. Should I buff Cyrovain into an adult white dragon or is it too much?
a CR9 beating a CR6 sounds obvious
the higher the cr, the more powerful it generally is
Honestly I am DMing for the first time next Wednesday and I've been thinking of how to balance encounters, but I guess that's something I will learn as the sessions goes on.
The exp budget on page 114 of the new dmg is how
you might want to ask #dnd-lore for a more detailed answer, however despite sharing similar domains they do have quite different roles. tyr is also dead, which is what i think led torm to overtake his domains (i may be completely wrong though)
Wait tyrs dead? Aw man
Uh... Yes and no. Imagine a monster with a thousand HP, six melee attacks a turn that all do 4d12+20 damage. Sounds strong right? It would be high CR. And then, that same monster, if given a speed of 15 feet, would likely be killed without the party losing even a single HP.
It's all about how the elements come together. Which party against which monster in which environment.
as of ~1400dr, but that doesn't mean you can't use him as a deity. just check with your DM
Too many variables to give any sort of hard rules, you know
Well thats good atleast
"At some point between 1385 DR and 1479 DR, Tyr died fighting off a demonic invasion of the upper realms in an act of heroic sacrifice. Tyr's absence reinforced the role of Torm as the new master of Celestia." or so the wiki states. haven't checked the source
Tyr was resurrected.
And if not ill just take torm ig
Do all gods die and ressurrect man😭
my apologies, i somehow missed the section right below his death lol
Real complicated answer or funny wrong answer?
Funny wrong answer
FR lore is really complex and often written over by multiple different people over multiple different periods, but from my ~2 minutes of reading the wiki (therefore making me an expert on the matter), tyr granted torm his deific power during the spellplague. he then died and resurrected during the second sundering, reassumed his divine powers, and torm returned to being tyr's right-hand ad the god of courage and self-sacrifice (correct me if i'm wrong @hot marlin )
so the intersection of their domains is largely based on what year your campaign is set
Alright, the real complicated answer is 4th edition.
4th edition did a timeskip, which was intended to "simplify" the Forgotten Realms lore. Specifically, it sought to cut down the number of deities by having many deities die, others fuse, others become "exarchs" of others (whatever that means), others revealed to be actually another one in disguise. 4th edition tried to do many other things to Forgotten Realms lore, almost all of them very poorly received.
When 5th edition came out, the general consensus was to undo all the changes of 4th edition and pretend like it didn't happen.
Wow thatsssss something alr
Makes sense
Tyr died because of the mandate to simplify the setting. Tyr was resurrected because of the general policy of pretending 4th edition changes were all undone so well that it's like they never really happened
tyr is dead, long live tyr!
though i do kinda think that simplifying the amount of gods may be beneficial, as there's like 100 something gods all from different editions and it gets a bit muddy
Beneficial in what way? Which harm is prevented, which benefits are created?
Wow dnds not great at keeping track of its lore
beneficial for understanding of the setting, and to cull gods that are generally irrelevant. i'm not familiar with the entire library of FR lore, but there are a lot of gods
Speaking of gods. What are yalls favorite god
call me simple, but i like mystra
The gods are not necessary to understand the setting. They are, in fact, the least relevant factor in understanding it
Im kinda torn between ilmater or selune
The core of the setting is the nations, the people, their histories, and their churches. The only gods actually relevant to that are...Well, the ones relevant to the campaign. So cutting down the number changes nothing
to me it feels as though a lot of actions that affect the nations, people, etc. are related to the gods or are directly caused by them
but yeah, i see where you're coming from
you definitely know more than me when it comes to lore, so my opinion probably isn't as informed as yours
Have you guys killed shadowheart's parents?
No
#baldurs-gate-3-spoilers , and ||no||
Oopsy
Can a werewolf become a vampire and vice versa or can ur dude only handle one curse at a time
Selunes a very cool god in my opinion. Youd think she would be evil for her theme but no and i like that
If you were running a campaign about escalating tensions between Neverwinter and Luskan, with Thayan agents seeking to make things worse until it turns into a war, in order to have both countries compete for a trade agreement with Thay to deliver them weapons, which god would be relevant?
depending on your edition, it's a maybe?
If you were running a campaign about a white dragon with an affinity for druidic magic seeking a Nether Scroll and creating, say, ice golems to invade the village where its divinations told it that the scroll was, which god would be relevant?
Gods are plot devices, and they are an unecessary one most of the time. They're relevant to some PCs, not even all PCs. But to the plot? In the infinity of possible campaigns in the Forgotten Realms, the ones where the gods are not important to the plot outnumber the ones where they are. As much as infinities can be compared, which is a whole mathematical thing that I don't really get because I made the mistake of studying literature
For a cleric or paladin yeah a deity will be a lil important but more for the character. Being like a cleric of shar of course says alot about who you are
i hate to be pedantic, but you could trace nether scrolls back to netheril and by extention karsus / mystril. i see your point though
i'm grasping at straws though, point taken
Netheril is fallen. Most of the Nether Scrolls are lost and fragmented here and there. Whenever one is found, people tend to fight over it.
Deitys are definetly flavortown for me ngl
Like how a warlock patrons flavor for warlocks
Indeed. "Relevant to some PCs" as I said.
i do personally think they're quite important to the setting and shouldn't be ignored, but yeah incubus has proven they're not essential or widely necessary for a base understanding or the majority of campaigns
Yep
While they do form the backdrop of some conflict and lore, cutting down their number does nothing. It's just a waste of energy
The number of gods is not, actually, a deterrant. People see that only some of the gods are actually important
guys, is there like a gigantic compendium compiling all of the faerun lore??
i want one. would be cool. asking for myself
Do you think any gods are important?
the forgotten realms wiki is pretty good, and the sources they cite are often even more so
Important in relation to what is the actual question.
Importance is a relational quality.
but i want a big ol dusty book 🥺
You are important to someone or something
Important to campaigns in general
if there is, i wish i had it. FR lore has been written over by many, many people in the past. though i think you can find quite detailed books/entries based on whatever you're interested in reading about in FR
Which campaign? To Waterdeep: Dungeon of the Mad Mage? Not really. To Tyranny of Dragons? Yes, two gods are important to the plot. To my hypothetical campaign about war escalating tensions between Neverwinter and Luskan? Not at all.
like, to my knowledge, there's not one single book of everything that's ever happened in the history of earth. same goes for FR - the wiki is the closest you'll get to a complete compendium without owning a library and a spare hundred years to read it all
I barely know any of those campaigns really but alright
Hey, dnd-discussion
Was Princes of the Appocalypse any good?
But to the setting in general?... They're not that important. The fall of Myth Drannor had no gods behind it. It was the story of a moron summoning powerful fiends and those fiends getting an army to ravage the center of civilization in the west. The fall of Netheril had one god have some importance, not as an agent, but as a McGuffin.
I never seen anyone mention it.
That should tell you a lot.
For precision's sake: Princes of the Apocalypse barely has a plot. It is a dungeon crawl, and little more. A relatively good dungeon crawl, but completely forgettable.
Oof
I give it a 5/10. Not bad, just so utterly mediocre that it's not worth your time
Contrary to other flawed campaigns, there's really not much the DM can do to make it better.
That's pretty damming for a plot that's supposed to be the Elemental Evils prepping for doomsday.
Storm King's Thunder is, by itself, a 3/10, but with a DM making a lot of work, it can become pretty good. This is not true of Princes of the Apocalypse
Campaigns are fun. Hardest part is creating or improvising and then adjusting as they do stuff not expected
Its really fun to. I love the surprises
Yeah PotA is just bad through and through imo. The only thing a DM could do to make it good is take the back-cover premise and write their own campaign based off of it.
Its just set pieces
gift of Alacrity is such a good spell
While all published adventures are just set pieces there is a difference between changing things here and there, keeping only the skeleton and fleshing it out differently, which turns SKT into a good game, and just dissassembling the entire skeleton, acting like Victor Frankenstein on a cocktail of a dozen different drugs, adding some genetic modifications, and torturing the campaign until it bends your way, which is what is required to make Princes of the Apocalypse good.
TLDR: You can have a good SKT that is still SKT. This is not true of PotA.
Would you, if you were my DM, hypothetically allow me to play a character that boils down to a combo of
MadManFenrir's American Wizard
&
Helsing Ultimate Abridged Alucard
?
no
It'd be funny though?
No. Theyre good because theyre not in DND
oops no punchline
It'd be funny though
Theyre funny because theyre not in a DnD setting
Comedy comes from context
I'm not familiar with the first one, but the second one I'd have a talk with a player as to what extent they'd wanna play a character like that, and decide based on that.
Many characters don't work for D&D like they work for series they're from. They might be funny, but that comedy works because its written that way, alongside other characters. Its not gonna be nearly as funny with actual players having to deal with someone playing that kind of character
While I am not familiar with the first character, I know that Hellsing Ultimate Abridged Alucard is only good because he is written by excellent comedy writers. Not by someone improvising sexual harassment. Because, yeah, a lot of the jokes around the character are sexual harassment.
They're good jokes, don't get me wrong.
But again: Written by a team of excellent writers. Read by a professional actor. Tweaked a lot between the writing and the moment the episode is uploaded.
I simply do not trust someone to improvise that kind of humour and be funny, especially not someone who is not a professional.
Moreover people need to stop trying to be funny and play the goddamn game.
Humor and jokes are gonna be better coming naturally. Trying to be funny / making a joke character is not gonna be nearly as funny as whatever on the spot shenanigans is gonna come up in the game 😛
Seriously, this desperate need to artificially insert jokes in D&D games? It's not good. It's not trying to make the game funny or good. It's people trying to flatter their own egos convincing themselves that they are a person that can be funny. Comedy comes from situation.
And so we end up with people with a sense of humour about as refined as a toddler's, inserting humour that does not belong, that distracts away from the situation, that ruins immersion in the world, and who are so utterly incapable of making their own jokes that they're reduced to just aping something else they saw.
The result? Reference humour. The joke was not funny, but you can still expect positive reaction because it reminds people of something that was funny.
The lowest level of comedy, lower than the lowest pit of the Nine Hells
Like, I wouldnt find Alucard as funny if he was in something liiiike uhhh. I dunno, Strawberry Shortcake
Incubus is hitting an insane combo, I felt that in my soul
(thats a lie, i would, i just would be wondering who made that episode and who let that slide)
I very much agree, though, jokes that come organically usually tend to be even funnier rather than artificial jokes from a joke character
Also so many times I see players with ideas / characters that are basically: "I saw this online in a meme / video, tohught it was funny, and I wanna repeat the joke!"
Joke characters are a bit of a pet peeve of mine. And I play a comedic character in Ti's campaign
Damn, you too? 🐐
Rolled a Nat 1 on my Medicine Check (with my Wis modifier it was a 0), so I begged my DM "please let me use the 0 it would be so funny", the dice sometimes tell the story (I had advantage, I decided not to use it)
I couldn't resist the idea of a wizard who just faints in joy at the idea of going to Candlekeep.
you guys play d&d together?
i had no idea people in this server were so connected lol
Ever since I rolled a natural 1 on a d100 I've seen the dice in a different light
Session 0 of the fairytale campaign that I'm gonna be playing my Firbolg Bard for 😎
oh Fairy Tale the anime? or as in folk tales?
Folk Tales
Oooh, sounds fantastical
Yeah
Gonna be a Firbolg Moon Bard
Don't have an actual name for him yet, but the functional placeholder is "Pistachio"
He IS Fey Adjacent, so, probably
That reminds me, I should build a moon bard soon
There’s a bit of a honeycombed network of ppl in this server who play together
I play a game weekly with Ti, Tamms, and Tokii
damnn - wish i could work my way into it lol, guessing they're private games though
Damn right 😎
I mean I joined through a lfg post
They’re very hit or miss
Ti, Tamms, Me and Horizon smh
You named Tamms' character lol
if you'd have me, i'd love if you kept me in mind should you ever need an additional player in any of your games. would be great to play with some people i'm somewhat familiar with
I'm laughing so hard right now, and I can't explain why
Pistachio the Mustachiod
It's probably because I just woke up, but here, when you throw a rock at someone they're obligated to throw a piece of bread at you and I just keep on imagining that
i tend to kidnap- i mean recruit people i vibe with
I absolutely love peace cleric +bless
never heard of the duo
-# kidnap me next!!!
I threaten to throw rocks at a lot of people
He doesn't have a mustache, no lmao
How many pieces of bread do you get a day
Dio...
I can't believe I made a jojo reference without realizing it.
…I don’t actually eat a lot of bread daily
🗣️ im too busy counting it 🔥
it pretty much allows you to give 2 allies a 2d4 to any ability check saving throw or attack roll
Its an amazing support build
Hey that 2 can be all you need to pass a nasty saving throw you wouldnt have been able too
Kono Dio Da!
rolled a 1 on a d100, Adult Gem Dragon showed me the secrets of the universe
ah
Broke my character's mind a little, but he's alive, just needs a little therapy, + I got a free feat (Gift of the Gem Dragon)
Gift of the Gem Dragon is a sick feat
I played a fighter/wizard with it and it was awesome
And all I had to do was be shown Cosmic Horrors
I'm planning to play Fighter/Valor Bard with it
If my players got feats out of their cosmic horrors they'd be the strongest folks in the setting in a week tops
I been messing around with peace cleric
Two of them canonically get dreams every couple nights which show them eldritch horrors
Ooo tell me more
The best I could do for now is premonitions of the future
Cleric, Bard, Wizard, Rogue and a 5th person
That's what's been confirmed for this campaign so far 🧐 (the fairytale one I mentioned)
The problem with the Dragon feats is that you have to actually get it from a Dragon, unless the GM says otherwise.
5th person... perhaps a Warlock Hexblade?
No, I know that for certain lol
there's 3 casters and 1 martial at least
No Fey Wanderer Ranger?
oo that's also nice
One of them is a dragonborn. She's essentially getting at all times flooded with the instincts of her ancestors, to travel to a particular place in the world and prepare for a fight against a monster. At night she sees visions of her friends, her allies, and her ancestors, as they die. Most recently she saw as a great beast erupted from the sand below her feet. A being so enormous, that it so completely blotted out the sun, she believed it was in fact night.
That's the more tame of the two.
We're loosely based off of Fairy Tale characters
The only ones I know for Certain are Witch from Hansel and Gretle
And my own.. essentially a Male Snow White lol
(Bard incredibly good with talking to animals)
||(The monster in question they've started to accurately suspect, is in fact a tarrasque)||
Lets larp
I should be more creative with my premonitions
We dnd players love larping
||Perhaps this?, a pc of mine is a reborn, and their memories are slowly coming back, they are in a very bad emotional state right now (the character), as they just witnessed the death of a friend (this friend, had a similar appearance to their first friend when they were first alive)||
is this in the new slang meaning for it or actual larping
OneShotQuesters cough
||The other one is essentially being at all times flooded with the memories of a dead god, which was killed and then over thousands of years was reworked, reshaped to become a weapon to kill its siblings.. Visions of a world that was ruined and torn to pieces, feelings of being in pain, as if he is being torn limb from limb. Dreams of a sunless sky in a neverending hazy twilight.||
a dnd player who doesn't larp needs to immerse themselves better.
oh you mean LARPing
a new character of my player right now is a Hexblade Warlock with The Haunted One background, so I'm leaning into that for more premonitions 
I had a little fun crossover dream with them! In recent prominent dreams from both of them, they each saw rock, resting on the ground, covered and stained in splatters of blood. Can't wait for them to figure out what that means
I love haunting my players
What can you do to lightly mess with a Hexblade Warlock? (Their Patron is the Goddess of Order)
it's a warlock, there's always options
yup, just looking for some pointers
this will be the first Warlock player I'll ever have
Oh right this is you as the DM
I already killed his Wizard and Sorcerer
I would lean into the warrior aspects of things. He has a patron which is essentially manifest in a weapon. So maybe that weapon has strong opinions with how it should be wielded
dreams of the foes it's cut down and those that it wants to cut down
The sword communicating to him "Kill that guy. Now."
(Because, well spoilers for the campaign CoS)
I always love playing the haunted one
The idea of someone having a mental illness that either embraces it or overcomes it is so appealing to me
Oh wait, I don't have to mess with this warlock, he's already being messed with
The Goddess of Order follows the technical law
Haunted one is very funny to me
I once played a level 6 fighter who had four feats (2014)
in Arizona
"No, no, you can't give that Donkey a bath."
which now in 2024 is pretty easy to do
how many feats do fighters get again?
Yup, now I gotta make a magic weapon
They get 2 extra, so 7 total
what's good for Hexblade Warlock that is haunted...
Sword of Vengeance is a pretty solid uncommon cursed magic item, it's a +1 though so make sure you're happy with that
That actually seems pretty fitting with the backstory
Note to any good campaign ending: play that link in park song from transformers it makes it so much more conclusive
What I've Done?
Yeah
I'll also enter into submission a smash cut to credits with "I want you back", or a more refined choice for those with a tighter palette, an in-universe dance party
Chat, does anyone know how to play Three-Dragon Ante?
Hit em with "The Last Goodbye", personally.
Im larping!
it's a complex card game, but you can check wikipedia or google for rules on how to play it
DnD in space might be the new meta yall
heya Im lookign for friends
what game do u play aside from dnd im interested in trying some but I alos wnanna pla stuff like minecraft
uhh well personally i play a whole lot of stuff, but this is a dnd server
i play a lot of dark souls, dbd, been playing esoteric ebb recently its a disco elysium successor
and you know i did actually start a minecraft map just a couple days ago
-# singleplayer, but ill mention
I gotta say as much as I love love love magic what i will always love more is doing things that are twice as cool then just casting a spell
Its why I will always support new subclasses that do cool stuff without magic
like making a melee weapon attack with a longsword three times in one action! hell yeah!
Echo knight has to be my favorite magical non magic thing in dnd
Dunamancy is the ancient and esoteric study of the magic called dunamis which is based on potentiality and probability.
the Echo Knight has mastered the art of using dunamis
My favorite magical thing is Sunblades
Echo knight is very magical
It feels weird that most magical effects cant target the echo
granted it does have one hit point
Is the echo knoght a creature or
If youre talking about the Echo, its a magical effect that technically isnt an object but is definitely not a creature
it still has AC and hit points
its also not generally worth attacking
true it cant do all that much
it also pops to aoes
shatter effects objects yeah
Hello, dnd-discussion
Guys how do I write a poem
dont post the same message in multiple channels
Try Rhyme.
I didn't know what one to put it in so I did both didn't know that was a rule my bad
Topic - Followers of Bhaal, if my character kills one for going on a murder spree, does that count as murder (for the purpose of a bhaal followers desired end to their life)? and if so, how would you vanquish them for it to not be murder?
Killing people in general is aproved by Bhaal
He cares not why, where, when, or often how it is done. Only that someone has ended up dead as doornails via violence.
Give them the batman/flash treatment
Bhaal cultists are asshats, kill them anyway, they don't deserve to live
Their whole lives are just about murdering people
They're likely not going to change and they'd probably be executed if you turn them into law enforcement anyway
to split hairs, Isnt Myrkul death and Bhaal Murder? and going off the only definition of murder i could find in DnD, from 3.5 book of vile darkness, 'Killing is one of the most horrible acts that a creature can commit. Murder is the killing of an intelligent creature for a nefarious purpose: theft, personal gain, perverse pleasure, or the like. The heroes who go into the green dragon’s woodland lair to slay it are not murderers' would killing a murderer not be classes as murder
Bhaal is murder, yes.
If you've never written one before, just look things up in a rhyming dictionary
Thanks
Its for school
Learning to write a style starts by imitating.
... If it's not D&D related, it doesn't really belong here
Well i put it in off topic and thay deleted it so
And you thought after something got deleted from off-topic of all places, you would put it in the dnd chat?
There are college professors who still need to hear this, preach
So you've polymorphed a Young Dragon into a rat... what do you do with the rat?
Because if you kill it, it transforms back doesn't it
What if it suffocates?
Assuming you want to harm the dragon?
Let's just say, remove the Dratgon from combat.
It doesn't have to die but can't come back to kill us later
What kind of dragon?