#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 391 of 1
I specifically mean Tabletop Simulator, the game on Steam
Well what i mean is you only own a temporary license to access the stuff on ddb.
You don't own that statement you just made 
i've never heard of that until right now if that tells you anything
Yes
Well "temporary" basically until revoked either by them ending service of ddb or other means.
I mean, worst case scenario, I use my PC setup to play offline
Maybe hook up my fourth monitor for an extra screen to slap books on.
It's a VTT that can be used for a lot of various things
It's caveat tho is everyone needs to own it.
is it a purchase?
Yep
oh, maybe like 0.3% of people then
Ye it's 20 bucks and everyone has to have it.
But it's also usable for board games, warhammer, card games of stuff I'm aware of.
So people do use it it's just not as popular as Foundry or free options for DnD.
I think Fantasy Grounds is also pretty popular tho I'd never understand why.
I call it the VTT for people with 8 monitors, 6 computers, and have the 90s hackerman music playing as they output thousands of code a millisecond.
Apparently it's amazing once the DM gets the Fantasy Grounds Academy Master's Degree but my experience was with someone who didn't go to the academy.
I've seen people use Google meetings for DnD, where there's a will there's a way
That shared drawing feature is clutch
Oh for sure. I just have had a year of excruciating pain using FG so I don't see any good with it personally.
I figured out how to make a nuke with a infinite money
With infinite money it's easy to do anything in D&D
Foundry has some issues, like a hard learning curve and having to host it externally via port forwarding or a hosting service but it's simply too good
No you did not. Money is usually made of silver, copper, electrum or gold. None of those are usable materials for a nuke
Yeah, the learning curve is nothing compared to FG tho
Unless you mean infinite money like bribing the DM in real life?
FG?
Level 3 glyph of warding and 100 page book
OK so: You did not figure that out, a lot of people mentioned that before you. And who wants to explain why this doesn't work?
Actually pythons much easier than FG
Ohhh
that aint even old tech, that's ancient tech
We should all know why this doesn't work by now, come on people.
FG is basically ancient
glyph of warding abuse has been around even before 5e where the spell was called something else
it operates like an early 2000s software
Then at level 7 u can create a minion as a wizzard who thwn at level 9 can cast wish for low amount of gold then use the gold on glyph of warding
Basically you have to take several courses in their discord to learn how to DM using FG
So you dont end up making a miserable game where players are more focused on manual labor than the game
Well, if you put enough time and effort into it, it can be good but it can't beat the comfort of using something prepare with all the bells and whistles
No, that is strictly impossible. I don't know which rules you're using, but those aren't 5e rules
Oof, the main reason I love foundry is because it's super player friendly
Yeah FG isnt
if the DM doesnt know how to work it
If the dm is lazy, its the worst experience you'll ever have with a VTT
it's like the Linux of VTTs lol
I bet an experienced dm can make something 10 times better than foundry but it just seems like alot of work
It can be better in the automation department
Hey guys! Things with my Good and Evil party members are coming to a head on this next session, I'm excited for it. Any of you guys have good stories on mixed-alignment parties in your campaigns over the years?
But it requires hardcore electronic music, several monitors, and montages that make you look like a super genius
That can be detrimental though, sometimes some manual stuff is fun like arranging inventory
Ooh ooh I know I know, I raise my hand
Another way to put it could be its the Shadowrun of VTTs
It doesn't work because the Glyphs disappear if the book moves too far from the casting location
Exactly pink!
Do you have any video representation of what a good FG session looks like?
Nope
Simulacrum (7th level, Wizard)
I bet there is some crazy guy out there with the most intricate set up hosting the best dnd game the world has ever seen
Simulacrum can cast the wish spell for me and I just simply repeat the process
Multiple monitors is mandatory
Won't be me though, I'll just use my lazy man's vtt and a prepare campaign
as you cant adjust window sizes in FG
one of my favorite campaigns i played in had one player playing a morally dubious character who was the way they are because of their track record of people using, abusing and manipulating them, causing them to have a pretty blah perspective on the nature of sapient beings. being in a party of comparatively loving, affectionate people put them on several identity crises throughout the campaign, it was great to watch
That's just unreasonable
Everything im seeing is from years ago before Lord Foundry saved paid vtts
By giving something anyone can figure out how to use on a base level in a couple sessions but a lot of time bores a lot of fruit
I still just use Roll20
God bless foundry and it's one time purchase
I thought pf something dubious
A Champion fighter whose secondary fighting style is Unarmed Fighting
Maybe they usually fight with a sword or something and they're like
"Man, I don't need a weapon to rock your shit!"
And drop their sword to put up their dukes
FG had to go f2p
God help you
It works just fine for me and my group
FG does have great support from official avenues but yeah its a VTT for someone who enjoys coding in Malboge or C++
That's what the style is for
I like c++ but I'm not spending hours learning the Linux of vtts, I don't even like Linux
I mean sure back then maybe, if I had no other option
Id say on a diffculty list of my personal experience.
DDB 1/10
Owlbear: 2/10
Foundry 4/10
Roll20 7/10
Fantasy Grounds 20/10
Well the main issue is that you have to pay for everything and it's a subscription
What’s the current DnD discord discourse
@hot marlin Simulacrum (7th level, Wizard) which then can use the wish spell
Alignment system, obviously.
I'm learning about an obscure vtt
I still maintain Vecna's CG. CN at worst.
Funny enough it was the "Foundry" before Foundry
The most diabolical vtt is tabletop simulator
Only thing I pay for is the PHB and the adventure I'm running which you can get away with not paying for, I just do it so my players can use the character builder
Tabletop simulator is pretty bad tbh ime
One day there will be another giant after foundry, but it'll take atleast 7 more years
OK so:
- You said "at level 7", no. At level 15.
- That still doesn't work because that's not how glyph of warding works
Basically its Fantasy Grounds is the stubborn old man that wants to do everything the hard way out of pride. Foundry is his son wanting him to take it a bit easy sometimes
Glyph of Warding works however the DM agrees it works 
Still, after I bit the bullet to switch to foundry I couldn't go back
Ye ill never use a different vtt
Foundry is good but it requires esoteric knowledge
Spells typically work as worded
Eh not really
It's just generally good in every area
Foundry is pretty simple compared to the one im blabbing about
No, it's just intimidating at first
Roll20 is the McDonalds of VTTs
Then you realise half the stuff on screen is just files for stuff
Let's imagine a DM whose reading comprehension is above a toddler's.
Foundry gives you a direct route to most of the tools and tells you what they do.
And the other half are rulers and map tools ect
Fantasy Grounds gives you a coding page
I feel like foundry is the best if you’re running whole games using it, OBR is best for games that are being run half using avrae/ddb and half vtt
More like arbys
only reason i like roll20 is that the character sheets are modular, and there's character sheets for games that aren't DnD. in roll20 character sheets, you can write in whatever you want in the boxes, which lets you do many things.
- you don't have to buy online character packs, you can copy and paste from your own books.
- you can make small alterations to abilities based on houserules.
- you can add homebrew content
That's why I love foundry, I have nothing else open on my screen
I remember the first time i used roll20 was for a Pathfinder one shot and i was in tears by the end of it
You can do all of that in foundry
Oof, you'd do Zachthebold like that? 
cause it wasnt letting me copy and paste
Matter if fact it's easier in foundry
He reads more than others but he doesnt read all of it
No one even mentioned the lag yet
I am not sure I know what you're referring to
you can, but that part doesn't do it quite as elegantly
I like Roll20 because I've had so many good experiences with their support and such, I've had Roll20 support employees hop into a discord call with me to help me get my session up and running thirty minutes before the session started. Feels like they actually give a damn
It just feels. So. Clunky.
Hey Zach is one of the better D&D YouTubers leave him alone
Roll20 is the best if you're playing hyperniche systems imo
How so? For me with less than 2 modules it's like 2 clicks
Oh, I guessed you missed his short regarding Glyph of Warding: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/AcQ8OBq-oXE
Not a single person here is trying to tell you Roll20 is better, people are just sharing their subjective reasons for preferring it
we're DnD players, you can't make fun of us for our game having bad rules cause we don't read the rules of our game 🔥
Is it just me, or do I find a deceptively good chemistry between Ranger and Belt of Giant Strength?
I think even then, you can just tweak foundry to remake said system
Oh. Oh this is making me angry.
I love me a STRanger
Oh that I hate
No, not like a full investment in that. Just getting the belt
I downloaded fantasy grounds again out of curiosity and i didnt even get into the actual map without closing it due to information overload
And I'm just saying, it is technically easier, alot of people like me where intimidated by how complicated and headache inducing foundry looked
Okay but we're not intimidated by it we just prefer Roll20 for our purposes
Why can't people read before they make youtube content?!
More power to you then my friend
Is it so hard to read?!
Gee, it's almost like some folks make content for fun, not for 'muh accuracy'
Roll20s grown on me better lately
I'll never use it as a dm but i dont mind games in it nowadays
Accuracy is fun!
Like, the main drawback of a Bow Ranger is that while sword and board is also a possibility, you have very few options for actual weapons (and if some form of weapon masteries or unique abilities are present, this becomes more impactful)
There is this one bald guy on tiktok who just reads broken combos on reddit and acts like it's his own and half of them are just wrong
Look, if accuracy is not fun, if people find it acceptable to put such garbage on the internet, then that means I'm the abnormal one. Which is not possible, everyone else is wrong, I am perfect
I know who you're talking about. He fully believes they work too
Okay, it can be. Counterpoint, this party just became the new BBEGs of the next campaign because they blew up a city 
He'll fight with you in his comments if you call out the obvious flaws in his logic.
The other half of the time they are so utterly situational they are just useless
But having the Belt of Giant Strength means that you can make use of your Martial Weapon proficiencies without sacrificing neither feat nor Fighting Style
Or he finds a broken class ability but fails to mention how it can only be used like twice per long rest
They did not blow up a city! Even if that worked. That was maybe a hundred fireballs, yes. But each of them was centered on the same point. They utterly destroyed a radius of 20 feet and maybe caused a fire, but that's not a nuke
Stop spoiling the experience. We'll say it works like circle magic and expands the radius 
It can be a deceptive first look into what dnd is since recently there has been alot more people entering this hobby
It does not. You could throw a billion fireballs, if they're centered on the same point, someone 30 feet away will still be fine
People do look at those shorts and think that they actually work
Like, even getting the rare variant means that swapping from, say, a longbow to a pike is very much possible without taking damage and accuracy decreases
Now all you get are just copy cats of people obviously trying those op combos then getting disappointed when it gets shut down by a competent enemy
yeah you get so many people thinking youtube shorts mage hand stuff is actually something you can do and its completely unhelpful for everyone
I can't hear you very well over how I want this to work
I feel like it's so harmful to the community
love a melee ranger, the dual weilding one with the belt of storm giant strenght in my last exandria campaign Slayed so hard
Gotta remember most dnd players dont know how to play dnd so when yt man say something work it works
If people need to spread misinformation to be funny, that means they have no business even attempting to be funny and should go back to whatever infernal hole they crawled out of, and admit that they will never be funny.
yep, its up to the dm to make sure their games are ran properly, no one else is going to do it for them
Or just YT algorithm as a whole and think that a Ranger is the 2 worse halves of Fighter and Druid the same way that a human is the 2 worse halves of dwarves and elves
It also just makes the already dying martial class scene worse, martial classes are good it's just that people keep getting too many long rests!! Now everyone avoids them like the plague
the martial caster divide depends on a LOT of factors
"I don't misinform. I just LIE." -HeavenlyFather, 20XX 
Based reference
optimization level, character level, length of days, encounter types
ZachTheBold is usually pretty good about stuff like that, that video is definitely an outlier.
I find his Guidance video very humorous
It also just promotes the idea that D&D is a game to be "beaten" and that you HAVE to optimise how you play, I don't mind minmaxers as they are valid but it just makes people feel dumb for just doing cool impractical stuff
- DND shorts -pointyhat -everyoneelse
Ok fine. One little mistake, no big deal. No big deal. No big deal.
I now understand the power of absorb elements ngl
there's also just the fact that none of their build advice is actually good optimization lol (except pack tactics is decent)
its for algorithms
algorithms favor anger, buzzwords like ranger bad or "i beat my dm"
and misinfo
Uh. I was told that pointyhat was generally above the norm of D&D content creators
I always keep it in the middle of compent. Not lowkey throwing, not ultra top tier combos
And I think the new rule is "we don't talk about oneshotquesters", yes?
All you have to do for this op broken synergy is multiclass and suffer until level 18!! While the campaign ends at level 6
I watched the D&D shorts timeline of the Forgotten Realms. It was so wrong. I immediately just assumed he used ChatGPT
hi
I like ZachTheBold's videos discussing topics like dungeons, PC death and how it can change the tone of a game, and making up boss HP and how it can devalue the boss encounter and such
oh man it was so bad wasent it?
Fun is the most important factor, that abd not being annoying to your teammates
exactly, at most they end up slightly better than just what an average dnd player would cook up for a normal character
Recently almost any video about dnd reads exactly like chatgpt, and chatgpt gets all the lore and info INCREDIBLY wrong it's funny
yeah optimization is awesome imo but im not gonna do it if nobody else at the table is cus then they dont get to do anything (unless its an optimized support character i do have one of those currently)
And that's the best case scenario
I think the part that makes me the most upset is that his video was hyper condensed, which is fine, but there's literally a hyper-condensed version of the lore that's correct in the sword coast Adventurers guide. He couldn't even be bothered to use that.
OK I'm putting it on! Let's see... I'm not as big an expert on the Forgotten Realms as you are but we'll see if I find the inaccuracies...
I think dnd shorts is among the just doing it for algorithms
It also just screws with the difficulty curve, now either your party will suffer with unfair fights or you'll get targeted unfairly OR the fights are too easy, complete loss situation
Perhaps. But if you spend your turns in a corner crying to the point that you get the Frightened status, you may need to reevaluate what fun is
Or be like me and see leaving the campaign at request of the DM a lowkey flex because they couldn't handle average Monk gameplay
the bald dude mentioned earlier is more like Oneshotquesters and fully believes what he says
OK first off: No, this is not the D&D timeline, this the Abeir-Toril timeline. Misinformation one.
You’re not wrong
Depends on the table, everyone has a way of playing they like, a DMs job is also gathering people who will mesh together well
Random question real quick, if I am grappled by a creature and someone casts sacred flame on the same creature, do i need to roll a dex save as well?
No
He's just so cocky too
Alrighty, thank you
No it's not an AoE
Only AoE spells like burning hands or thunder wave
No
I think that's why it feels chat gpt to me. It's just so confidently wrong
Wow, no, this is nonsense. Even the 4e lore is poorly understood
Do y'all mean D&DShorts?
Even D&DShorts’s “broken character build” videos are just there for the views. Im convinced he either doesnt know the rules as well as he says he does or he ignores them so he can make his “broken” characters.
Which, for the record, I make a lot of attempts to get along well
But some people can be intent on having their fun only be from your lack thereof (and from my experience, more often than some)
4e lore was a WoW expac no one asked for, if it's misunderstood, it could only improve.
I wish cleric subclasses were more specialised rather then "here is an op base class with free extra spells and an even more broken class feature!"
It is pretty sloppish tbh
he gives bad advice much more often than he gets rules wrong tbf
Thats impressive, considering how often he gets rules wrong
You know, as somebody who is a big forgotten Realms nut, there's actually quite a few things that I actually really loved about 4th edition and is lore. I think the execution was very poor. But they were some nuggets in there that could have been saved.
His whole MO seems to be proving how “WOTC doesn’t know what they’re doing”, but he also struggles with proving he’s any better
YouTubers like those are why I'm so strict about Rool of Cool in my games
I'm just glad they moved on from the D&D must be like improv and you must yes and until you die. That was an exhausting few years.
nah this bald dude is like baby face shaved and american or canadian irc
rule of cool is "if the rules allow it then its cool" /silly
Honestly, I'm pretty sure that I can make a debatably video with no prior experience on how Ranger is a lot better than people give them credit for
Rule of cool is dead nowadays, if you do it too much you'll eventually get a player who will just use it to reverse engineer an op combo
... He did a part about the war between the dragons and the giants without mentioning the dracorage mythal?!
Mind you im not saying WOTC gets it right 100% of the time, but if you’re gonna call them out at least try and make sure you know what you’re talking about
yeah ranger is the 7th best class in 5e and 9th in 5.5, nothing fabulous but theyre not like bottom tier garbage
Literally the most important part of that lore and he didn't mention it
Depends, alot of rules can be open ended so it can lead to some shenanigans
Ughhh oneshotquesters. After everything hes done i cant look at him the same way anymore
... I'm sorry, Lolth the most powerful being in the abyss?! No, no, no, sir.
yeah even the "RAW" players like me ban some stuff, mostly infinities lol
From what they tell you. But I lowkey believe they're higher with a competent DM and setting
Oh, he finally mentioned the dracorage mythal. And he didn't mention what it was actually about and messed up the timeline
imo nobody plays the game 100% RAW and that’s by design
There are also spells that I just hate
Yeah, no, I'm done, this is bad. This is incredibly bad. I am utterly convinced he did not even read the timeline on the wiki, nevermind opened an actual book
Leamonds tiny hut is just such a stupid spell
nah they tell you ranger is last im basing this off like actual optimization and not whatever goes on in youtube videos
obviously its different for every table cus not everyone does play with optimized stuff
nystuls is also nearly always banned lol
Then you get a youtube shorts video calling silvery barbs a hate crime against humanity when there are spells 100 times worse
... King Karsus. He called Karsus a king.
I am starting to think youtubers can't read
the reality is most dndtubers cant read and a lot of the ones who can will ignore it for whatever works
It's super dumb. Even dumber when they call Barb and especially Fighter direct upgrades
to be fair if you account for level id call silvery barbs maybe like 5th best spell
They can read. Selectively.
Whuh whats happenin
6th ig cus nystuls
most dnd fans in general can't read lol
true
i certainly cant
Dndtubers aren't for actual dnd fans or ttrpg fans, they are for people too hesitant to actually play but just interested enough to learn about it
My problem with it is that most of the time it isn't even cool, it's just then describing something happening in a different way then it does, or them describing themselves doing something with no regard for action economy
I don’t even know what any of this chat says
I don't think this is broadly the case
Yes but to be fair the lucky feat exists and nobody speaks bad about it
The disingenuous shorts guys maybe
The biggest channels generally yeah
It's a funny meme that D&D players can't read, but it is a very alarming thing at the table. Just how much D&D players blatantly do not to learn the game they're playing
Well: One Dndtuber made a short that propagated a misconception about glyph of warding. Then we collectively took a dump on DnDShorts and I have been watching his nightmare of a video on "the entire D&D timeline".
As they grow off disingenuous shorts
Yeah just trying to bend reality to win
oneshotquesters lol
the best meme/shitpost dnd youtubers are the ones who are transparent that their content is all for laughs and aren't actual genuine advice of how to play the game
And hes wrong on several things i assume
Maybe but most channels are just wrong
A lot of D&D YouTubers have vods of their games up on second channels and such
A lot of D&D influencers genuinely seem like they’re fans of the game. But there are others who, to me, feel like they’re more focused on being influencers than they are being D&D fans
He only plays dnd for youtube thats it.
Ginny Di earned a lot of respect with me when she said sometimes she makes disingenuous slop and clickbait just for the algorithms in one vid.
I think when it comes to players learning the rules if anything else could be put on the dungeon master. In my opinion it would be, stop solving the rules for them, teach them, and show them where to go in the book to find the ruling so they can learn for themselves.
That said, this is a personal opinion and not a fact
Almost everything? Even the things he gets right, he misrepresents. First off, it's not the D&D timeline, it's the Forgotten Realms timeline. And no, it's not the timeline. The dracorage mythal does not happen after the king-killer star. Lolth does not cause the Crown Wars.
And Lolth is not the most powerful being in the abyss, what the hell?
most DND influencers have less than 25 followers :V
Oneshotquesters was more of a grifter than anything.
Oh good lord how can someone be so wrong
From what I've heard he's never played much dnd at all, mainly his wife did
That's not fair in practise, if you are a new player absolutely ill guide you with patience and welcoming love, but if you aren't new to intermediate I shouldn't have to do extra work to stop you from breaking the game
I believe hes done oneshots but only on youtube
... Oh no. Oh no no no. He confused the time of troubles and the spellplague.
Not as a hobby
He thought Mystra dying at Helm's hand during the time of troubles is what caused the spellplague and the collision of Abeir and Toril.
How? How does someone make a video so blatantly wrong?
Aight we rolling initiative
How dare the Time of Peak get compared with the Slopplague.
so you could say he was a oneshot quester
Dungeon Masters should never allow anyone to break their game. That's not what I'm saying, I'm saying that instead of the DM taking all of the responsibility of knowing the rules players don't have to learn them. And that's a problem.
You know what's a true honest tap of info that isn't just reading the books? The old classic of having someone who knows about it tell you
What youtuber should i watch to learn of dnds deitys
Like a folk story being told around a campfire
Badum tss
Jorphdan for Forgotten Realms
"Midnight steps forward to become the god of magic during the spellplague and stops the worlds colliding together".
DnDshorts, being absolutely, unbelievably wrong, 2025
players of most games don't learn the game before playing them, that's not unique to dnd
Who is the most powerful being in the abyss?
A lot of DnD players just never learn after playing either
Thanks
that's why tutorial is so important
It indeed is, though thankfully I run my games fully digital so most of the complicated stuff is automated
a level 20 wizard next question /silly
lolth being a god, I thought she would be
I think shar is one of em
She's not in the abyss I don't believe
The queen of Chaos? Maybe Pale Night? Maybe Demogorgon? Any of the hundreds of gods that live in the abyss?
Tharizdun Is where I put my money
Altough shars a bum tbh. Selune better
Yeah, probably. Though I thought he was in another plane
He's moved around a bit
I just didn't know they reached divinity like lolth but I don't doubt it. I want Pale Night to be the strongest in my hc
He's less consistent than the cosmologies
Mother of Demons not being strongest being there is a lil weird to me
Vlaakiths definetly not up there, miss fake god
@hot marlin in your opinion what is the coolest D&D monster, and if it isn't the bulette why are you wrong? /silly
The reason I picked the chained God is because the abyss exists because of him
Vlaakith is mostly a fraud
She’s not the mother of demons
She's dangerous but only against mortals.
Isnt she a lich actually
Yep just a regular lich
Damn what a fraud
She makes herself appear as a God but she's just a lich with a Vorpal Sword
I'm pretty sure I'm stronger than my mother in just about every way. Admittedly, we haven't boxed in a while.
Vlaakith is mostly a lich. She's spent centuries feeding on the remaining energies of a dead god's corpse, trying to ascend.
Nothings happening really tho
Vlaakith also feeds on the souls of other Githyanki, taking their powers and skills for herself.
Vlaakith is also one of the most accomplished wizard, fighter and psionic in the multiverse
Also to eliminate any potential threat
Tbf, if she tried to do it quickly, she'd just die.
The Queen of Chaos is also a good contender
Shes almost as bad as lolth when it comes to treating their subjects
Guys i need a little help on something, my dm is allowing me to play a fairy in our campaign and im trying to figure out the mechanics on how it would work out
If she didn't regularly eat strong Gith all it'd take for her to be overthrown is for the illusion of divinity to be broken.
Lolth propaganda /j
I like the gith lore tbh, a false god is not smth you see everyday
She's a barbarian, and uses a shortsword like a greatsword
Then just give her a Greatsword
Be a huge fairy 🧠 /silly
And say it's a Shortsword she's using as a Greatsword
You know, people keep saying "Zeus sucks", but that's based only on Hesiod's Theogony and Aeschylus' Prometheus Bound. In every other text, Zeus is great
Lolth couldn't handle not being loved anymore and caused all that bad stuff in corellons name
I just figured demon princes weren't true divinity, thats why I thought Lolth was the strongest being there. Devils got Asmodeus, surprised to find no greater deity for the abyss
Lolth is far from the strongest
I believe bg3 handled the giths very well
Oh yeah, and Ovid's Metamorphosis, but that's technically Jupiter, not Zeus.
Love the idea of rebel giths and has inspired me to make my own rebel gith
Ya but she's an actual lesser deity in the registered pantheon, that was just how I inferred it
(Whos actually a githzerai but shhh)
Key word being Lesser
I still gotta play the Githzerai order cleric I was making
Yes, but still a deity nonetheless
Asmodeus isn't the strongest, either. He managed to oust Gargauth, but that was only because a majority of the Nine Hells basically unanimously voted Gargauth out for being too evil.
Im actually making a githzerai cleric lol
Asmodeus is a case of the right devil for the right job
Gargauth didn't actually take an L from getting kicked out of the Nine Hells, though. He became the Tenth Lord of Nine and a deity.
Tenth lord of the nine is a cool title
Yeah, Asmodeus will always be second place 
He's also kinda chopped
Gargauth is now the god of contracts, power, and betrayal. No wonder Asmodeus wanted him gone.
Too bad he's a bum
All Devils are bums!!!
RAGGH
A real and true statement
True
Maybe her little 3'6 frame could handle it?
The Demons put belt to ass
I can respect them for that
Gargauth is basically a Dark Lord of the Sith
"I have altered the deal. Pray I do not alter it further."
BTA as some would say
Too bad he's stuck in a shield
Might be spoilers 😭
||I know DIA is probably one of the most played Moduels but...||
If it had been said last week, it would have been for us
That Shield's been in D&D since third edition
Not all players have been playing since Third Edition 🤔
Using a regular Shortsword without doing TWF on a Barbarian would just be significantly worse than using a Longsword or Greatsword so I would just say that it's a Shortsword she's using as a Greatsword and functionally just have her use the Greatsword weapon stat wise
Fair enough
Just because something has been around for a while doesn't mean it's common knowledge
Hell, I didn't know about Lord Garguth until ||I looked at his shield a while back by accident while looking for legendary items||
Thinking back to that one time a moderator here muted me because I mentioned that Strahd was in Eve of Ruin.
Despite the fact that the marketing of the adventure spoiled that.
This is a much better place now
Thats still a spoiler
It was also on the front page of D&D Beyond
In my experience the vast majority of D&D players don't consume D&D marketing material
I can agree that something is not a spoiler if it's part of the marketing
Or even if it is, the spoiler was already done by the marketing, so who cares
I think technically it is but it'd be like saying Hulk wasn't gonna be in a Hulk movie if you said strahd won't be in a module ddb said he would
Yep, I love that so few players metagame and read the modules
yeah thats kinda just a product of big servers most of the time tbh
Thankfully, like I said this place is a lot better
theyre still pretty strict
If I brought Eve of Ruin to the table at session 0 and said "Aw man are you guys excited to fight Strahd von Zarovich?" my players would be pissed
Because that would be a huge spoiler to anybody who doesn't actively use D&D Beyond
Far far far less than they were not even 2 years ago
Perfect
Well in this case it wouldn't be reading the module it would've been scrolling social media and you see "fight strahd in dnds newest adventure!" From ddbs social media advertising
my main issue with the way most servers do moderation is that its based on infractions with no lenience for more active members so youre essentially punished for chatting more often but thats not an issue specific to this server
There have been some changes to the server that do make it more livable since... About the end of 2024.
There absolutely shouldn't be more lenience for more active users
Regulars shouldn't get special treatment
Yeah, you should definitely maintain the same standard regardless of who it is
All my moderated actions I've understood since that time ended.
I've been like "yeah I had that coming"
Me too with the exception of during the dark times.
I have such a seething hatred for DDB, both because its such a god awful platform, and because for some reason people assume that everybody uses it when it's such a god awful platform
But yeah I can see the argument for a spoiler but also for it not being when DDB had it on reoccurring paid advertising on social media.
It's so wild to me to assume that everybody uses DDB it's the most predatory means of accessing D&D content
It is by far not the most predatory
Yeah they could have been worse
They tried to be worse but thankfully it didn't work out
its not special treatment its accounting for the fact that youre gonna have more slip ups if youre more active
Vtt specific versions of modules can't be used elsewhere. D&D Beyond absolutely can be if they wanted to prevent its content from being used elsewhere. Things like Beyond 20 Chrome extension and the ddb importer for Foundry would not exist
Naturally why would you receive moderator punishment if you never talk in the server
That's part of the problem, they want to make it less consumer friendly
Not breaking the rules shouldn't really be numbers game
You can just not ever do that
I've been an early adopter of ddb. I got a legendary bundle when it was less than $300. I've always been a defender of the platform. As a supplementary way to get access to content.
I always buy my own books on top of ddb because I have that ability. I've been far less friendly of the site since it was purchased by Wizards of the Coast. I was a lot more forgiving when it was a third party venture, then when it became a first party venture. Especially now that it's been years.
And the rules are pretty fair.
thats not really realistic though, everyone gets a bit off topic sometimes or forgets which swear words arent allowed or sends an emoji or smth (mostly the first one lol this chat is only talking about dnd like 60 or 70% of the time)
You don't get warnings for mentioning pathfinder like you would if you mentioned Pathfinder in some smaller dnd servers.
i did once get muted for being off topic while talking about dnd so like
The moderation has improved a lot over how it used to be
I got a message deleted cause I said a cat breed…
That could have been auto moderator. It's pretty strict here for good reason
yeah sure im just saying thats a gripe i have with discord moderation in general is that it punishes you for being active
I just don't get why it shouldn't
Yeah but there reaches a point of being active for long enough that you should know the rules
It's not like they fully ban you for one mistake.
There's also a point where if your activity is getting you warned often enough, you may be better off touching some grass
that is true 
Yeah I often get too heated in here so I try to do something else
Some people are terminally online
Unfortunately can't touch grass
They gave me dozens of warnings before banning me and even then they accepted my appeal several months later and let me back in
But on D&D Beyond, I'm happy the changes that are being made are finally being made. But I will also acknowledge the fact that Wizards of the coast is not a small company. They have big company profits. DDB probably should have had these quirks and updates ready to go for 5.5's launch. Not 2 years later
Cause the weather keeps going from 80 to 30s
What if I'm allergic to grass? 
So the human adaptability isn't able to kick in comfortably
Maybe I should need to use the chant
"With this human body I summon"
No kidding, so many service failures
Hello
Then touch some water, get near a river.
Like I said, far more forgiving of it whenever it was a third party venture. And about the first 6 months to a year after it was acquired.
I think the reason the fixes are finally happening is connected to the noticeable increase in book quality and positive connections with creators
I will never use DDB unless I'm joining a game where it's required and I'm not needing to pay because the DM owns the content already
But especially with the 5.5 rules revamp, it wasn't like that came out of nowhere. They had like 2 years.
Yeah but there were different people in charge then who still had considerable control until the corebooks started releasing
And I get that. The website had a lot of spaghetti code and a lot of tech debt. Believe me I'm aware. But the Wizards of the Coast is a large company you could probably given more resources to the ddb team.
The main "issue" with the. mess. that is the website is that to actually proper restructure (and more importantly) futureproof it, it would require taking the whole thing offline and doing a clean wipe of everything. Including everyone's characters.
Which well. Sure would go over with people
DDB was already failing in this regard even before wotc bought it
Maybe my web dev skills are a bit out of date but database cloning and staging sites exist
They still exist right?
Even when I have used it as a player the character builder felt obtuse in the order it did things in, even I as a person who isn't inexperienced was getting confused by it. Can't imagine for a new player, though maybe I'm just dumb.
Oh it's definitely not been very good since the new rules have come out. It's very confusing
Im confused by the new layout but the changes to some things have been better
The site was designed pretty much exclusively around the very narrow band of "this is part of the base rules in the 2014 phb". It didn't even support a lot of the optional stuff from the 2014 dmg
Like the dice roll history starting with the most recent roll now
Its why the site stopped supporting the mildly more experimental UA so quickly (which was before wotc bought it)
before itd start with the first roll of the campaign so you have to scroll through pages of rolls
No, I get that. And I'm aware that I'm not privy to a lot of the behind the scenes stuff, but it's felt that ddb has always been a very tiny team, especially considered the emphasis that the company puts on it. I think a lot of the delays in the services could have been softened if the amount of manpower share that ddb has was more equal to the amount of importance that it had for the company
If that makes any sense at all
As for the UA stuff, I completely understand why Adam and the original team stopped supporting it. He would mention on the live streams often that he would learn about the UA when the public did
Ye i think they might finally be getting the resources they need, now that some major changes have happened
tbh, based on just how spaghetti the homebrew tools are (which as far as I am aware, was literally almost identical to the rules the devs themselves used for the actual content), I doubt more resources would inherently help without the aforementioned "total reset" method
I do hope they can eventually get back to putting UA on the website.
Maybe it wouldn't have. Like I said, most of my comments are armchair and I'm willing to admit that. I've just managed similar projects for other companies in obviously different industries and I just get curious about what their thought process is
I think their (wotc's) thought process was something along the lines of "this thing is making money so its ours now and we don't have to change anything about it or (more importantly) invest anything into it"
maybe thats not fair and it was actually a hasbro thought. who knows. but still
I've had a bit of a feeling since the book quality jump, the content being more exciting and more respect for figures in the community since the new team took charge that a lot of issues may have been from people that aren't exactly there now.
Definitely! I think the new team that's been spearheading the releases has been a great change. Chris Perkins and Jeremy Crawford did a lot for this game, but it was getting pretty easy to tell that their hearts weren't in it those last couple of years.
And there was the guy who said wotc would never do dark sun or setting guides cause "it's not worth it"
Who left in early '24
Which to be fair given the controversy that guy was going through at the time I would have said the same thing
If you can't handle the backstory of a flying monkey species with care and candor. Do not attempt slavery the setting.
From what they've (the lead for DDB's back-end, iirc) said, they're working on stuff (that stuff being revamping the website as a whole) in a sandbox.
I think they even said they're working on getting the character content to transfer over, which is the hard part.
Then new team comes in "Slavery exists in FR, it's not good and there's people against it."
In early 5th edition Dark themes like that existed pretty prevalently. And then like the internet mob found them like bad tweets from 2009 and they kind of over corrected really hard on the bad things happening. I think we're in the equilibrium phase
Ye the new team is just like "man dnd has all this prime for content just sitting around. We just have to respect it."
always worth remembering that Dark Sun was mentioned in the 2014 core books
And 2024 dmg
What I'd give for darker themes to exist in 5e again...
And like we're still not all the way back there, I don't know if we should go all the way back there. There's some things that should be updated. For example, slavery exists in the Forgotten Realms, but you can bet they were not going to let it be featured in one of the five Adventure settings in the book so Calimshan was updated to outlaw it.
I think Dark Sun 5e the more I look into it has been in the new teams plans since they started taking over.
I now understand the peak of absorb elements
Since the IP for it was renewed after WotC let it expire in '24 last year in October after the last of the Old guard was gone and the Dark Sun UA was stewing for a couple months
I'm going to be real curious if they actually end up doing it what the marketing is going to be around that book. Dark Sun If it's done as always has been done or at least to that r-rated level. Cannot have run-of-the-mill wacky fun happy-go-lucky marketing attached to it. People should be informed of what they're getting into.
Market is as "you hate slavers? You hate genocidal maniacs? You wanna killem? Come to Athas"
Since 5e PCs can do something about the state of Athas as opposed to the past.
Dear wizards employee, that is reading this chat hopefully. Please do not make the Mad Max comparison. Somebody already did that for descent into Avernus
Wizards employee. I come to you as a humble consumer. Do not make Borys, the Sorcerer-King a misunderstood bad guy. Keep him a sadistic monstrous genocidal maniac. Let us have irredeemably evil monsters to destroy.
We already have those, they're called Dwarves, Hobbits, and Goblins 
I think the difficult part of darker themed contexts like Dark Sun is that you truly need to have a clear communication on how you expect people to engage, including engagement that makes sense in the context of the setting but needs clear boundaries so that people don't view that engagement as indicative of anything real world.
Yall i have a question
I think it should have a "session 0" section in the first few pages
if i were to make a magic item that allows me to cast Mordenkainen’s Magnificent Mansion what ratity would it be
Clearly outlining the content, and whatnot
Honestly, they'd be better off hiring Rich Burlew. He recently wrote a parody of Dark Sun that, while comedic, clearly completely understands how the setting should be treated.
the biggest problem I would assume is thise who will scream loud on the internet about how wotc are evil and all that, even tho they aren't the target audience of such a setting
Out of curiosity, did you consider Galder's Tower instead?
Do that, minus the comedy, and you're golden
I wanna throw parties!
Rare realistically, assuming its a 1/day
Of course
Like for my setting guide, I recently started on the blood magic for my world.
It's dark and disgusting, so I put under the chapter title in big bold letters "content warning, gore, cannibalism, dark themes"
I find MMM to be too much for a personal lair, but the other dwelling spells too pathetic for various reasons. Galder's Tower was the only real option I liked, however, it's locked specifically to Wizard spell lists, so I had to make a homebrew version for Warlocks and Sorcs.
I think if they do something like that but as a section in the beginning with guidance on how to handle the dark themes for Dark Sun that'd be good
I think the problem is moreso navigating the moral issues in a "realistic" way, without putting a shiny gloss on them.
I do not disagree, but there will always be people who react negatively just because it makes them feel good about themself
If the new team ignores people who won't play dnd, and releases a good dark sun book my soul is theirs
Maybe
Oh, and the Instant Fortress is just too squishy. Primarily because it can only be repaired via Wish.
Cause an important thing a lot of companies could stand to adopt is that a lot of internet screamers aren't actually consumers of your product.
They're just screaming out of boredom or for cash off of clicks
Honestly, I'm not seeing it.
I like to live lavishly is all
Of course, but that's not people who will actually be engaging with and affected by the product.
Ime it's mostly "old dnd players" who haven't played anything past 2e but seem to have the "right opinions" on 5.5e
Like, I'd settle for 'Mordenkainens Moderate Manor' or something. 
very true, but it never stops them from making noise
Mordenkainens houseboat
Shadowrun has involved themes of racial discrimination, political corruption, since the nineties. VTM has involved a certain kind of violence since the nineties. Dark Sun is not special
True
Dyno did not like you there
honestly that sounds nice too
Shadowrun even involves prejudice in its character creation to a degree.
I think we're kind of past peak "complain about bad things being presented in fiction even if they are presented as bad", that feels like a very early-mid 2010s thing to me
They're negative qualities basically telling you you're a bad person for it
Time for me to be the change in this world. Newbie player who has only played 5.5e and thinks old dnd is bad 😈 /j
Way Shadowrun does it is by having sections where it's like "this is the kind of stuff you'll possibly go through or experience"
The advantage with having a smaller audience is that you can also allow yourself to explore a lot of darker themes
if you have clear warnings and guidance for handling dark themes, you are not at fault for the consumers mistakes.
But thats something thatll always exist
some Mom will get her son "Murder death kill" simulator and scream at the devs for there being Murder in it
The fear of people reacting negatively to fiction portraying bad stuff as bad is overblown. People don't do that. The Boys is still a very popular show. Breaking Bad is still considered very much above the cut.
True, the Boys has won several big awards and couple of its actors big awards for their performance in it
Homelanders actor and Karl Urban iirc
its truly down to how you handle dark themes
While there are some people who are, for lack of a better term, reactionary children whining whenever a work of fiction refuses to be a comfortable escapist fantasy, those people are still the minority.
like S4 had a very bad handling of a certain dark theme and the director got rightfully criticized for it and his bad response to the criticism
then the opposite end of the pendulum become clear, people who view the affect of dark themes as positive because the show doesn't have explicit good and bad guys
IE, big corp supporters watching The Boys not realizing that they're exactly the demographic that the show makes fun of
I've been slowly working towards my setting being as dark as originally intended but the right way (imo)
settings with lots of bad stuff usually aren't my cup of tea but they should have the right to be a thing
Oh yeah btw the other most popular tabletop game is Warhammer, and every Warhammer world completely sucks
Warhammer is so grimdark it loops around to being morbidly hilarious
But it also has those same dark themes that are serious issues
really the most important question to ask when using dark themes is "what kind of story am i trying to tell?"
there's a lot of thoughtful storytelling that can come from dark themes, but if they're just used as shock value or present the narrative in an inauthentic way, then that's when it comes of as in bad taste
I've seen a lot of people that get upset when a villain is evil and does evil things, they can only do evil things on the normal evil list. It's weird, they can't do more intimate evil because it's too much i guess compared to like murder
The Australian femboy tiefling artificer kind
Like you can "For the Emperor!" all you want but there's a reason Roboute Guilliman is trying to make massive reforms to the Imperium cause it absolutely sucks
yet another reason you gotta ask yourself what story are you trying to tell. sometimes people try to hard to portray a villain as evil as possible, not even wondering what kind of evil we're trying to go for
And then the question is what kind of dark themes? Berserk has a very different kind of darkness than Warhammer, which has a different kind of darkness than Mississipi Burning
cough cough, average warhammer fan
Theres two kinds of warhammer fans /hj
"I know this is absurd and it sucks, but i like how it sucks"
"this isnt absurd and is ****"
I love warhammer's setting, it seems like fun, but also man it feels demoralizing to me a little because my god it's a bit unrelenting (though I guess that's the point).
yeah its a setting where if you try to play it 100% straight you're likely gonna get tired at some point
Settings like FR where there's capacity for both sides are much more my style
Absolutely the point. It should be demoralizing, it wants to be demoralizing, because war is demoralizing.
But some people love dark worlds and the stories that can be told in them
Yeah, I know. I'm just not the preferred audience, can still appreciate how dope the setting is though
when i couldn't be in 1 warhammer forum without someone being an actual xenophobe, i took that as a sign that the game probably isn't for me
but that's starting to get off track
Yeah that
It depends on where you engage with the community
forums suck, social media is memes and cosplayers
there's the weird titles I can't remember it but like noble bright or whatever, isn't that what the FR is?
Discord its either the bad ones or good ones
It's discord. What do you expect
A good comparison ive seen is Warhammer and Helldivers 2 have the same kind of fanbases
I mean I won't lie, grim dark settings attracts a certain type of people that are like the worst
I KNOW
Thats why i always avoid games that say "game of thrones" like 😭
Half to majority of the fanbases engage in the absurdity of the IP without taking it unnecessarily seriously
But the loudest online presence are the ones who take it 100% seriously to unhealthy degrees
Actually the people who take it seriously are not the problematic ones.
The ones who take it actually seriously are the ones who are concerned about the themes, about what the story is saying.
The ones who uncritically accept it and revel in it? Those ones are weird
Explode
my point is unnecessarily seriously
Like the 2% of HD2 fans that supported ruining a dudes life for no reason
Or in warhammer the like 10% that make the community look bad by being racist and other stuff online
Anybody else think that PCs being unconscious during death saves is kinda odd? Not balance wise, but like, narrative/in world?
That was an insane situation, every fandom/community has got those people though
Your just eepy
I don't like it personally
Dying/very sleepy
kinda part of my point
the insane minority aren't the sane majority in both cases
yeah for sure, it just feels like those settings/games they're louder than usual
its cause they're more openly nastier which gets a lot of algorithm pull
Yeah, I can believe that for sure.
I was in a game years ago with a "gold standard community" and everyone was very two faced toxic positive
I was in a group that had people from a south american country cant remember which one, that'd talk crap about the other guild members in their native language cause they assumed we wouldn't know it and they were part of the "positive gold standard members" as they liked to call themselves
i haven't heard that term before, gold-standard community. where did that come from?
I dont remember what they actually called it so i just called it what i think would fit
basically it won an award for having the "best community"
ahh, gotcha
yeah, some people get really good at being toxic while using words that seem really positive if you blur your vision
But a lot of them started dropping their facades when the WoW players made a migration cause they wanted a game that better treated its players
My brain is failing to think of any other cool flavor combos for gestalt for star druid besides diviner
Why'd i read that as shar druid
Think ive read too much on the deitys
Definitely depends on what "dying" is meant to represent, so I can see it. I think the "dying on your feet" works better for stories where death isn't necessarily a "bad thing" and you wanna have the ability to control your own demise.
Idk, I just don't think people that are in fight just immediately knock out
I take it as you're teetering in and out of consciousness narratively
1: the swamp arena
a thick hazy fog rises from no where it seems and trees sprout quickly and abruptly once everything calms down they hear a loud croak in the near distance and a death slaad jumps them
death slaad
swamp with a hazy fog
2 desert
sand starts to pile in quickly and they all start to feel incredibly hot like boiling hot and a few cactus sprout out of no where as the sand settles they see six gnoll's come after them
a gnoll fang of yeenoghu 2 gnoll pack lords and 3 gnolls
I don't like just becoming suddenly inert
I think mechanically its cause being downed is something thatll commonly happen in dnd
HOW DOES THIS SOUND CHAT (it needs more details sorry also if im inturupting)
And part of streamlining is making it very clear and cut
Its not necessarily like older dnd or OSR where hitting 0 means "you watch your cleric get their head cut off by the minotaur" immediately
I watched this happen once
It was crazy
High lethality lends itself to very funny deaths ime
that's a fun part of systems where death is common, the deaths themselves usually become more comedic and slapsticky. Call of Cthulu is like that at a lot of tables
rolling two failures back to back then having to get three successes in a row is the worst
I ran a 3 session game of Shadowdark and one of the deaths was a Wizard flying off a handrailcart and slamming into a wall dying instantly
Cause they hit a tight turn too fast and the cart tipped
When playing games like that, you're just out for the rest of the session? What happens?
they made another pc
sounds like it needs to go in #dm-discussion
on the spot?
shadowdark you can make pcs in like a minute
fire mb
Gotcha
its just
Race
class
item
go
and they have a character generator site to make it faster
that same player died 3 times that session
Makes sense, deaths do sound like slapstick
he was a graverobber who then got knocked into a grave by a zombie and broke his head
then a dwarf going to his grandmas grave who got pushed into a grave plot by a zombie and broke his neck
it became so hilarious all these people coming to a mining town graveyard
Theres a lot of sheer hilarity you can have in high lethality
In normal games it can be really awkward when a PC dies instantly in a funny way
cause a lot of people will wanna laugh but its that persons 20 sessions in pc
Like theres been a few deaths in CR where you could see the players trying not to laugh including the one who died
I had this happen in my wednesday game last week. it was 2 fails then 2 successes then 1 last fail
Death saves are fun
especially when they're stuck in a situation where autodamage will cause a failed death save
Like being in a swallowing creatures stomach
Gotta love when you roll 2 nat 1 for death saving throws
i think ive only seen one pc die to rolled death saves
and it was the one last wednesday
It happened to me on a charscter I was playing for the first time
Every PC I've killed with monsters has been instakills or finished off
It was looking like a character death yesterday when a Remorhaz critted the wizard for 65 damage and ate him
here's a question: have you guys ever gotten a nat 20, when it was the worst time to get one? for example: a character i had was a lycanthrope who had to resist bloodlusts or go feral for a turn, targetting whoever was closest. near the end of the campaign, he fought his sister who he was trying to save from the evil path she had taken, but when his bloodlust got triggered, he had to target her. and i rolled a nat 20 on the attack. with all the damage riders i had since we were level 12, it was an instant kill.
Does anyone know if they banned content sharing with players on dnd beyond?
Never had one like that I can remember.
I did roll two 20s and instakilled another PC
You know you can.. declare nonlethal on melee attacks, yeah?
even if you do massive damage
But I intentionally attacked them.
One of my characters almost died by having their souls tucked out of them
Two nat 20s on both attacks with 2 level 2 smites against the party warlock
yeah, it was out of my hands at that point
Luckily he had durable which gives advantage on death saving throws
That was one of the cases that led me to believe pvp can be fine.
Usually its a true death if the amount of damage goes into the negative to the amount of hit points they have and no death saves
Cause in character my Paladin and his Warlock had an agreement "no killing innocent people"
That we agreed would have consequences out of game if broken.
He broke it then I reduced him to atoms.
Or they fail their 3 death saves. Its always fun when you have 2 pass and 2 failed
I liked that paladin I kinda wanna play her again sometime since that game was cut abruptly in the worst way
She was scared of the dark which was fun when the Warlock casted Hunger of Hadar on her.
I want to do something emotional and vulnerable at the next session but I don't think anybody at the table will come with me (in a RP sense, not actually going anywhere)
Hey, I don't mean to interrupt your conversation but I had a question, I'm dm'ing for the first time soon and I've built the world and what the goal is but I don't have any puzzles to find certain items and don't know how to create any, I'm starting on doing kids on bikes and it's a once upon a time themed campaign. Any suggestions?
One time, my party sorcerer cast a fireball on my Armorer Artificer while attacking some other enemies near me, so after the fight, my character was frustrated, the sorcerer said "Then don't get in the way, idiot!"
I downed him with a Crit Thunder Guantlet punch and then healed him back to full after lmao
We both were fine with these incidents out of character because I told him it'd be okay to fireball me as I had absorb elements anyway, but we, in character, had been at eachothers throats for a while
We both laughed when it critted
I believe that’s a subscription thing
It crits when you dont want it to, and doesnt roll well when important unless its one of those lucky times
My only instance of PVP that involved characters actually attacking eachother
They had somewhat of a heart-to-heart when talking during a long rest, so it actually gave us some character development
(For clarity, I asked if it was okay before I hit him out of character)
This would be a good conversation-starter in #dm-discussion!
So what I’m hearing is I need more monsters with Crown of Maddness and Dominate Person.
Or beings willing to make tempting deals
I've got like....
Two characters who absoultely slap the shit out of a fellow party member if it got them something in return though
And that's my Bugbear Ranger (Who only really likes 1 of his 4 other party members)
And my Air Genasi Artificer who'd do it out of curiousity
My first campaign had a pvp moment that ended in my character falling apart cause he didn't remember anything about who he was. Only the bodies that kept stacking up trying to get a powerful staff to destroy a bhaal cult sect from within.
It was a session that I've yet to experience anything close to.
Otherwise, most of my characters are too caring to hurt their party members or are actively trying to be better people
My character straight up blew up a neighborhood in waterdeep before they stopped him.
We had to pay Xanathar to cover it up.
The biggest issue im running into right now is I got 2 players who dont do anything to help. They just sit there and pick daisies pretty much
Made one of his "casters" he was done with take the fall for it.
My Warforged Pugilist almost caught his first in-character kill (He nonlethals usually) over one of our party members being shot at
And would've absolutely caught a body after our Gnoll Rogue died if i was there that session
my first dnd game, the rogue wanted to steal my spellcasting focus without me knowing. the DM was also new and didn't know how to handle it, so they just let it happen. i then went like 2 more sessions without my spellcasting focus because "it would be metagaming to assume my character took your focus"
That sounds... painful
since then i've had a generally bad taste for PvP, but i recognize it can go really great if done right
we were all like 14, i look back at it with humor lol
The Waterdeep party I'm in plans on killing Xanathar and Manshoon eventually
My party and my mass murder basically made part of waterdeep a better place.
Cause all the killing was like Cyricists, and other evil God cultists and criminals and such. Xanathar probably lost quite a number
We're all locals of Waterdeep and we're tired of the crime on the streets, though we've spared plenty of Zhentarim and Xanathars Guild and a few other criminal folk to try and give them a second shot at life (which has actually been doing well, some live in our manor with us and help us run our Tavern during our offtime)
We could've killed Xanathar if we'd wanted I think.
We were level 11 with a DMs very busted homebrew shenanigans.
Laeral probably didn't appreciate all the holes I kept putting in her city
level 20 waterdeep shenanigans sounds like peak dnd lel
we've done good deeds for the city, so we have a few allies
We went from Dragon Heist to Dungeon of the Mad Mage with the same characters lol
you can just mog xanathar into behaving cause your party has defeated the equivalent of 10 xanathars
Screw that.
Kill Xanathar and their title
Send him to the Rock of Bral to be trained in the art of Pizza by Large Luigi to reform him.
Nah, the only good Xanathar Guild member is a dead Xanathar Guild member. Only exception is the fish
Xanathar's men has put too many holes in our Home/Tavern for us to be anywhere near thinking of redeeming him lol
Yeah and part of initiation for the Xanathar Guild is pretty screwed up crimes
Like murdering your family and stuff
Are there any disadvantages to playing a PC species that IS NOT a Humanoid?
So every Guild member killed is a positive for Waterdeep
Uh... Not an inherent disadvantage, but discrimination?
Oh, and banishment in 2024
I ask because my friend wants to run Crooked Moon and I wanna use the player races from that book and most of them are not Humanoid
Me when I cast Banishment on a Fey PC in my world and they're basically dead if they don't break the conc.
So Banishment probably won't be an issue since most of them are undead and plants and constructs
Guys. Do you think making DnD cartoon is a good idea ? To show duferent monsters and places. Or people just will not care ?
Blight would be trouble for plants
There already is a DnD cartoon notably
I think theres a couple spells that constructs have disadvantage on
But basically the downsides are niche.
The race I'm considering playing is one of the only two humanoid races amongst these player races
There's a weapon that does more damage to Constructs, but I'm fairly sure a dm wouldn't use it against you
: )
Don't some healing spells not work on constructs and undead?
Well yes but they old and new one is cringe anime stuff. Am talking old school dnd. With half naked man fighting monster to save half naked woman or smthing
My Monday party only has one Humanoid now
A lot of the races are constructs and undead
Me when I use Orc Splitter on the Orc players
Cause the tiefling was resurrected as a construct. (Reborn mechanically)
Not In 2024 rules
What new one?
I’m talking the 1980s Hanna Barbera cartoon
I don't think there's any animated dnd stuff where it's half naked man saves half naked woman.
Other fantasy stuff sure
Yeah haven’t seen that before for D&D
Vox
I mean technically we had War Duke for the men part
Pretty sure that show actively pushes back its DnD ties last I checked to be its own thing.
Vox has lewd scenes and raunchy humor but it's not like 80s fantasy type
Well let's say a barbarian fighting a drider in some ruined Lolth shrine
Will it be interesting to see ?
I mean if it looks good
A concept that is a bit just ok.
"Primal" style
Tbh I do have a fondness for the ridiculous 80s era but the ones that did it for both sides
Well i dont wanna do like heavy scenario stf. Just short episodes from DnD stf tht can happen
Where men and women were in basically nothing and ripped to the gills
Let men have bikini armor
He-man and She-Ra style
Well u ripped or u have magik or u undead
Notably their show was also Hanna Barbera like the D&D cartoon
Hanna Barbara made so much peak
Scooby Gang vs Venger when /jk
Well it's a bizarre fantasy world what do u want from it ?
Ye something unfortunately lost in fantasy along the way was a lot of the weirdness.
People thought they had to throw weirdness out with the bad stuff
Take over xanthers role and title
There's a lot of good stuff you can take from the past and do right with what is known now.
Like a lot of people will whine about skimpy armor but if you put anyone in it and not just women, you're gonna get a lot of "hell yeah" from a lot more people than whiners.
I would much prefer to see men in skimpy armor anyways
You know what the strongest warrior in a Fromsoft game looks like? A person in their underwear.
I think so
A male in bikini armor would be fun to run
As a man, I prefer no armor
That's just a barbarian
I run into the fray...
Booty ass naked!
Dude would get along with Bjornulf the Unclothed
And Monks!
And Sorcerers..
and Wizards!
The last barbarian I played wore only the pelt of a tiger as a loin cloth and nothing else, not even shoes
Ok am doing this
Also a subclass for Paladin too
And Dance Bards
Oh right that reminds me.
All the priestesses of one of my gods church don't wear shoes.
Kojima would be proud.
Ive got a yuan ti bard dancer who won't be wearing shoes
Do all the worshippers not wear shoes or only the priestesses
Lowkey, I think I'm onto something with combining your normal Ranger with Belt of Giant Strength
Say my name say my name
Worshippers take their shoes off when their actively praying or on "Hallowed ground"
Basically the class that can actually benefit from all those weapon proficiencies without sacrificing things like Archery or ASIs
So in the city they sort of call home, everyone's barefoot until they leave the city pretty much.
Ughhhh completely irrelevant to everything else going on but one of my players canceled AGAIN
I had a lizardfolk Rogue who didn't wear anything sometimes...
I neev@teeth_are_yummy @teeth_are_yummy
The real BBEG of DnD
Conflicting schedules
It's okay though, nobody ever saw him /silly
The Priestess I'm writing my setting guide through the eyes of has a quote actively complaining that she wishes she could still feel her feet
Hi
More like she lives with strict grandparents bro this is buns
A goblin would be interesting as a pc with their short lifespan
I have starter set hero's of the borderland
He was a Phantoms Rogue..
But also an Albino Lizardfolk.. so people thought he was a ghost sometimes!
Either way, RIP
A lot of the lore for my world varies between dark, unhinged or just goofy
If you're looking for players you gotta check out #find-a-game
Like Kobolds being made by the Dragon God to make the Dragons learn responsibility
By annoying them repeatedly until they guided them with anything.
The ranger in my toa game had a fire giant belt before he got petrified, good times
I like how I do Dragons in my world.
I loosely base them off a manwha where Dragons act a lot like people but completely disregard the damage they cause the world and its inhabitants.
I mean, it realistically would make sense. The main upside about sword and board is that you do get that extra AC to fall back on. But unfortunately, your options for weapons are limited
Having that belt would fix that issue (and if the dnd/bg3 game has magic weapons or abilities locked behind weapons), you now have plenty of opportunities to expand your arsenal
In my world Dragons wouldn't exist because I'm sick bastard!
Every other fantastical beast would though
Except in my case they kinda have a divine mandate to regard the inhabitants of the world.
Not that they have to follow it but most choose to
Thinking about the time I knew very little lore about dnd and just invented my own with the named characters
Wild times
Bahamut and Tiamat died when creating the world.
Tiamat being elemental magic became the world and Bahamut being mostly positive energy made life on the world
I remember my first campaign was basically about a crown of wishes that caused some bull crap and broke into several crowns worn by the original holders children.
Then some nonsense happened which caused their palaces to be melded to FR and trapped in places
Like one was under mountains on the sword coast
Another was buried at the foot of the big volcano outside neverwinter.
I ran that one as a one shot
I thought i did alright
Made the boss have a lair effect that caused exhaustion from extreme heat
I feel like I've reconnected with that creativity but with an understanding of the game now lol
Does ANYONE have a stat sheet for a fairy? Does that even exist?
What kind of fairy
So your campaign was essentially about entering several different areas, seeking different bits and pieces of a McGuffin, areas that could be tackled in any order?
Uh... Why am I getting the urge to play Dark Souls 1 again?
Never got that far.
Tbh I drew it up based on two messy low player one shots, got it started on a whim then went four days with only like a a total of maybe 8-10 hours of sleep overall before the 1st session rewriting all the prep based off some reddit advice.
Cause I had like 5 days I thought to make a whole first megadungeon.
Expecting the players to just speed right through.
I'm not running any additional more 5e campaigns for awhile.
Rn my brain is completely full with my 3 5e games and shadowrun game along with the setting guide I'm making.
Btw you should do this
Play peak souls 1
Just be careful you don't go Hollow
The Fairy playable race in Modenkainen Presents Monsters of the Multiverse
You are amazing and I love you
I have no strong feelings towards you one way or the other
what other smol races we have besides Halflings, Goblin, Gnome and dwarf?
That one race from dragonlance, the halfling with the serial number filed off
kender
Yeah that
There's also faeries
"halfling with the serial number filed off" absolutely killed me
Hi everyone
I wanna borrow all of my friends kids and do a baby’s first D&D campaign party…soon as those kids turn 8 it’s over
Judgement
an adventure of them being knights trying to slay a bad evil creature
Something simple, something nice
and you give them characters
I’m making one of them a wizard…the most chaotic child will be the wizard
What level wizard
To make it fun I’m gonna teach them fireball immediately to see what happens
Yooo im tryna make a magic item for a campaign im gonna run could someone tell me if its op or not? 👀 first time dming and making magic items so i hardly know what im doing
#homebrew can help ya
Thanks!
"you can be a cool wizard that throw fireballs and spells, or a knight with a shiny and strong armor, a Big strong barbarian with 2 axes that scream a lot!! or finally you can be X" (X = place any option you want"
Rogue
I’ll make sure it’ll be simple enough to understand and simple enough for me to DM because I’ve never DMd by myself before
yeah, you will need to explain their options, what they can do, etc. etc.
My friend and I made a scooby doo campaign together and trolled tf out of everyone the whole time
Changeling Con-man tricking all of them
A familiar is still useful to a Barbarian surely right?
I mean it can attune to magic items and take the magic action, maybe I can give it an Enspelled item so that my familiar can cast spells while I'm raging
Also. It can be your friend. 🥹
True
Unrelated topic just chiming in but im building a western campaign and im telling you all this might be the greatest thing ive ever written
Ima need to make a table of contents for my setting guide cause at 50+ pages finding where im going is getting to be a huge pain
Obsidian is great, have you checked it out?? All your notes complied to an easy mind map!
I couldnt make sense of it
Out of combat, sure
I'm using homebrewery tho
Valid valid^^
its good navigation utility and like steve said, it is a friend
it looking like a dnd book gives me the fun i need
Hello, I am new to the server. Not totally new to DND, but am an amateur. I played Pathfinder Kingmaker a lot so I am familiar with some basics of the rules and the system. Can I find a DM here and a group to play together online with?
rarely a familiar wont be useful
Thanks!
At my current stage and theres no easy way to write this so ill just type it.. im coming up with fantasy slurs, which i have cleared with my players but i still feel.... "ew" is the best way to put it
If my DM is doing flanking rules then it may help me get around needing to reckless attack
Trying to find that line currently where less IS in fact more
I'm playing a third party race and can cast Find Familiar once per day without material components, and I wanna play a Barbarian of this race but I don't know if I'd get value out of it
But the race also gives me built in spider climb and lets me use a reaction to add my PB to my AC once per day
Help action (although thats a bit redundant with Reckless).
Otherwise, it will be out of combat utility
A familiar can help you to scout areas, depend of which and its features too.
íf not it serve you like a character design//mascot
Surely these are good for a barbarian
Cute pet is the best utility 😏
Spider Climb and Parry are neat
The familiar is required to be a Spider
The parry only being once per day feels kinda weak though
It cant like throw webs or apply venom?
Oh crap, welp, it can go through places at least or serve you like some sort of "mage hand"
If not, use it for intimidate people 
I'm thinking this third party race with Barbarian with a Longsword so I don't need to reckless attack and can apply Sap giving them straight up disadvantage against me, which can be made more effective with my racial parry
Oh wait the racial parry comes back on a short rest that's way better
in my head my character should only know two languages but i forgot that character creation hands out languages like candy LOL
Hoping tomorrow my power won't be out for over half the day and I can get more work done on my setting.
My party is finally gonna be playing dnd!!
Finding out that two handed versatile weapons don't work with Great Weapon Master
I could have swore they used to but apparently no they never did
GWF does, that's probably why I thought GWM would
One part of GWM does
True
Not really worth it though
Yeah the PB extra damage was the main thing I wanted
Surely falling onto an enemy counts as moving 10ft in a straight line towards them
Assuming I fell from higher than 10ft
Uh... Yeah, it actually might.
yeap!
Which may lead to my "misty step 30 feet above enemy's head" tactic on my monk to combo very well with certain feats
axe kick em
Interesting
Makes my built in spider climb feel a lot less useless on my barbarian
I could fall onto a target, split my fall damage between me and them, and then attack them with extra Charger damage
yeap. although youd (both) be Prone, but you'd presumably have enough movement to get up
Could be an Athlete moment
Nah that's getting too whacky
If I was a beast barbarian though able to add (Athletics Check result) to my jump height
Now that's a gimmicky strategy with some chest hair
Idk why but I thought of a literal chest with hair when you said that
Any advice on running a 24 character in a 14 game?
The DM says it's allowed but I am confused
ask questions like is casting two spells legal? what year of nagic items can i use and drinking a potion an action ?
Wait 24 characters can cast two spells at once?
You can only expend one spell slot per turn to cast a spell.
Yes
You just need a way to cast a levels spell without expending a spell slot
Like a wand?
yup or a species trait
Or magic initiate
You know?
I really like the Fey Touched feat
I didn't know but now I know
Indeed you do :>
I plan on taking it on my Firbolg Bard when he reaches level 3
1 because... Misty Step, duh.. But also to give him Bless (As It gives you 1 free level 1 Enchantment or Divination)
I don't like doing fey anything in DND because I don't fully understand the fey and it's hard fore to visualize it on my head
For me
I like the idea of getting bless on a bard because it makes the anxious resource hording side of me not worry too much about the Bardic Inspirations I'm spending lol
Isn't bless use a +1 to an attack roll
And saving throws.
No
its a 1d4 to an Attack Roll or Saving Throw
In older editions I believe it was a +1 that scaled with level it was cast at
Easily one of the best spells.
When you say older editions do you mean 14 or 4
... Older editions in general lol
So it's only 1d4 in the 24 rules?
I consider 2024 and 2014 to still be the same edition (Because they are.)
Oh okay
For me it's hard not to think of it as 3.5e
But I know it's not as drastic change as 3.5.was
They technically aren't
you can consider it that way, but 5.5e is its own thing as stated by WoTC
as much as it shares in common with 5e of course
Much like the hexblade warlock of 5e is the same as the hexblade warlock of 5.5e
to reinstate the above.
anyway
yeah, I think taking Fey Touched.. on the Fey adjacent bard is genuis.
Thank you, Tokii 🧐 /silly
WoTC threaded the needle on making just enough changes for 5.5e to not be unique but just enough to where you need the newer books.
I always try to like... take feats that make sense
A lot of my Fey adjacent characters have Feytouched
or characters that have close affinity to fey
hey, so im looking for a party to join, and get to know with...
I don't really think you do. The only thing I think is probably a necessary addition are the new monsters which are way better and more combative
It's a lot of minute changes that add up to a larger whole. Feat changes don't matter on their own, some spell changes don't matter on their own, some subclass changes, etc. but it adds up.
The thing is I don't think subclass changes really matter
Cough cough Metamagic Adept for the Sorcerer cough
My party members don't ever use the bardic inspiration I give them
It's funny that your reply has made things more ambiguous and less clear!
unless its stuff like the old hexblade with its charisma for attacks
In some ways, I did mean that
But what, in this case, constitutes a "literal chest?" That's the funny part.
There are at least two meanings that I can think of, both of which are literal.
What do you think?
My Beast Barbarian's epic pectorals!
Are those the stomach ones
Why have a six pack when you could have a keg I always say