#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 389 of 1
Excuse you? This is DISCORD, arguing is mandatory 
It could even be an adoption situation. Von richton's Guide to ravenloft gives us the story of Jander Sunstar's dhampir daughter who was adopted
This is the D&D DISCORD, arguing is an obligation, I will have you know
It's true. See all the times I've gotten in trouble for it in the #dnd-rules channel
I would partially agree, but I think it's more "if your characters are not challenged it wouldnt make a good story"
and I would put "a difficult obstacle to overcome" is sorely different from "traumatic event for your character"
Your so-called 'clarification' is useless because it's all Discord, server doesn't matter. 
It also stems from the fact that a lot of D&D players got a lot of stuff they got to work through. And a lot of them use their characters as an avenue to explore that.
I do not recommend doing this. As your dungeon master is not a licensed therapist most of the time. But it's a thing that happens
Such a feeling has gotten all the more popular when you see live plays like critical role, which in the first few campaigns constantly did this to draw up more emotion and more storytelling beats. Now if you're a character that doesn't want to be dramatized, all you have to do is talk to any good DM and they should abide. If they don't get a new DM
I think "traumatize the character" is a bad way of describing it. Like, I get what it means, but I think if someone was new to the hobby/space, it might give the wrong impression.
It's better, but still not perfect, but I like "knife theory". That is, you, as the player, give the DM several "knives" they can use against your character. The DM then helps guide the story so that they can "stab you with a knife" at moments when it'll feel fulfilling, narratively compelling, and/or cathartic for the players.
imo traumatizing characters for no other reason than wanting to traumatize them or for drama is very low hanging fruit as if the only way to deepen a character is to subject them to trauma and wound them
themes and such
I mean, if you really wanted to hide it, you could go the whole campaign without revealing it, but that's not fun, is it? The correct question isn't how long you can hide it, the correct question is how you should work with the other players to create the tension and the reveal. Players who try and keep secrets from other players usually turns out one of two ways, in my experience: 1) The other players figure out the secret immediately and ruin the surprise or 2) the other players never figure out the secret and when it is eventually revealed they don't actually care .. ruining the surprise.
yeah I have heard of knife theory before
it's like
it's like gege akutami
woah....
I'm an advocate of sharing secrets with players while getting their help to keep those secrets from their characters.
Outside of a dedicated secret mechanic like you would find in rime of the frost maiden. I do not advocate for any player to keep secrets from their party
At a base level it bears the potential for players to see that the DM is awarding favoritism to a specific player character. Which is something that I personally avoid like the plague.
i personally would struggle to figure out how my character would react to a secret if it was revealed out of the blue because i had no time nor opportunity to investigate how my character would react
i would also, as a player, find no reason to be invested in another person's character OOC if they tell me nothing about their character and their relevance to the plot
imo keeping secrets is, in most cases, very very bad because the players are not their characters, they are writers, and it is hard to write anything meaningful without full context
Secrets can work but only if everyone in the party has one and obviously any Secrets kept from the DM do not exist
Aside from being randomly selected from the player pool to be the secret doppleganger/killer for a Halloween one shot, the biggest character secret I've had with a DM is that my human rogue was actually a very well made warforged who had been dropped in faerun during a bout of wild magic during a battle.
I think it's ultimately up to players and the kind of game you want to run. I run for a group who are super invested in having those discoveries over time and organically. I only allow them because everyone is excited for them and willing to invest in other characters.
Yeah, I think that mysteries can be awesome as you explore each other's characters. My thing is that one player at the table shouldn't be the only one with the secret. Especially of the caliber that we've been discussing.
Speaking of secrets, I did the cliche of telling my players there is a traitor amongst them without there being one and it worked almost too well, I honestly expected them to call me out sessions ago
Oh absolutely. It needs to be all or nothing, everyone matching each other's investment in the game
I honestly don't know where to go from here, they are at each other's throats (in a friendly way ofcourse, no pvp yet)
Or at the very least, I think players need the opportunity to have secrets and surprises like that.
I have no idea what would be a satisfying reveal for them bc there honestly is no traitor
On the traitor thing, if it gets too much, you can always have the villain reveal that they pitted them against each other. Makes the villain all the more hatable
I maybe see it more like, everyone needs some amount of plot investment. A certain amount of campaign time should be dedicated to each player, and that should be balanced.
That's kinda hard to do unless you made your party around that idea, not everyone likes to be that tuned in to other ppls characters
I would love to have something like that where everyone has some part of their character that they might be a bit more reluctant to share. The problem is that 1 of the other players is brand new and the other has only played one character and it was Jimbo from Balatro
The idea of this party has caused me physical pain
I do agree, which is why it only works for some types of groups.
It's strahd that did it, and they all are already hiding a bunch of stuff from each other
Almost everyone in the party hides their true race in a plethora of ways so everytime the traitor thing dies down a little a reveal happens and it's back on
It's hilarious, and good fun
I do not get the incessant need in curse of Strahd in particular to have a character who is a bad comic relief.
What? I've never heard of that
I once had a player who brought a character to the table named ulfric dank meme storm cloak. I had to sit the player down and have an honest discussion about expectations
The Mourning Slingshotting them into another setting sounds fun
I think it stems from people wanting to feel unique/distinct in a setting, and not knowing how to properly make that work
That's be an immediate no from me, this is not only a serious campaign setting, it's also a very long one, even if I didn't have an issue with it the other players will in 10 sessions down the line
Thing is, you can be both a serious character and be unique, even the setting kinda pushes you to be a good person as killing most of the bad guys in cos tends to make barovia a better place to live in
oh definitely. That's why I say it's from people who don't know how to make that work
Part of my characters purpose is admittedly to try and help the DM keep things in check because otherwise there's a pretty good chance the other members either becoming murder hobos (even if we use milestone), accidentally killing each other, or getting killed in 2 sessions because they decided attacking townsfolk was a good idea. I'm not trying to railroad or anything, just help them understand that this is a more serious setting and keep them alive long enough to get used to how the game works so they can really enjoy it.
Usually it tends to be new players, they are a bit to shy or self conscious to take their character seriously in fear of being seen as cringe, so they try to paint themselves as joke or ironic characters
This will very likely crash and burn, I don't wanna be rude but I'd hate to play with a surveillance camera as a team member, also dying alot and killing each other IS part of cos, the whole adventure punishes you for going in guns blazing, you have to gather info, talk to people ect to advance in the story
If your party members simply wanna kill everything that moves even after being punished for it then it's simply not their table/adventure, don't waste your energy and time trying to turn a wrench into a screwdriver
Once again, sorry if I sounded blunt or rude but this is a long adventure, be patient, find the perfect party then have your fun
Shame how people have made it look cringe but they will warm up to it. I thought it was a bit cringe at first too but now i love it
I used to be one of these people, now I'm a huge geek and I love it
Same here. Who would have guessed that me, the guy who thought roleplaying was a cringe and loser thing to do would end up loving it
There is no book, youtube video or sentence that'll convince someone to love ttrpgs as much as playing the actual thing does, now I'm addicted to DMing and I'm willing to burn my wallet to ash for this hobby lol
I know, and no offense taken. All honesty, I doubt I could really stop them if they tried, I just mean to give them a nudge in the right direction. I still want to enjoy the campaign myself, I'm not just here to babysit them, I'm here to have an edgy character with a mildly traumatic backstory dressed mostly in black who has a toxic family relationship with a bad guy, as Gary Gygax intended.
What does this have to do with secretly being Strahd's son?
morning all
Nothing really, I just thought it was a neat idea and gave him some motivation
And I honestly hope you do have your fun, but once people have an idea of what their character is and how they wanna play it's impossible to change their mind
Yeah same, i even want to get into pathfinder too
Good morning
So real
Right okay, so is that secret somethign you would be willing to share with the other players and enlist them to help keep it a secret from their characters?
Also, bulettes are underrated and deserve more variants
what we dions im new here
Chatting about random stuff, mainly Curse of Strahd
nice
I do honestly believe bulettes are as close to perfection as a monster gets, it's not too humanoid and doesn't look like too much of any one animal, and it is just a really cool monster all around
no perple worm
Probably, I've run a similar character (In the sense of the kid of someone kinda evil) and I told that party about it beforehand. I might just say he's the son of a powerful vampire or something, though, just to keep a bit of the mystery
It's cool but at the end of the day it is just a big poisonous purple worm
Not exactly the most creative monster no offense
i almost killed one at lvl 3 for fun match
I just lost my passion for D&D
Flashbacks to the time the party fought a giant sandworm and the DM put a tube sock stuffed with other socks on the table
Hmm i got a nice idea for a gith im makin. Once being a cleric and soldier of vlaakith but soon after finding out about her lies, changes to a selunite
How so?
What happened?
Do I need to stop any form of online campaign and start looking for real life campaigns even if they are using 2014?
I'm an.....excommunicado in my current D&D server
Well, can you tell us what you dislike first? Irl can be hard to set up and comes with ots own problems, so you might not find your solution there
Every topic I start is immediately ignored
Ahh that's rough, mabye take a break and try and find a new community later.
That just sounds like a bad community
Wait, you're not literally banned or something?
No, but I feel treated like an outcast
It's just a generational gap
Okay because I thought you were saying you were excommunicated, which is being banned.
I see, why not find a more welcoming party then?
Idk where to find. If I don't need sleep, I will find anywhere around the world
Most people don't mind an age gap, I'm sure if you look around you'll quickly find people willing to take you in
My real life party is really good, but one party can only play 1-2 times a month
There are many servers that post ads for adventures, even here #looking-for-players
As I said, if I don't need sleep
You people play in my sleeping time thanks to time zones
How long are you waiting before considering it "immediately ignored?"
what timezone are you
UTC +7
I'm sure you can find a group playing in your timezone, also try other dnd discord servers as they also post games
that's my timezone!
I don't know all of the details of course, and I don't want to play arm chair psychologist or anything, but you had mentioned that you were experiencing a lot of emotional bleed from your online game. And as such, the DM asked you to take a break, right? (I'm assuming this is the same group you've been talking about.)
IMO, based on what you've shared, I do think a break might be best. Let things untangle a bit, drink lots of water, get more sleep, maybe even go for a few walks. Just really let things clear up a bit and then come back to the situation with fresh eyes.
Idk what real life activities I wanna do
Start with a walk. ✌️
I'm from one aswell and ik how you feel, try picking up an obscure hobby, I personally love blacksmithing
Bro forges in his spare time
I wish the D&D community in my place would use 2024 instead of 2014
heyhey people! I'm working on a homebrew document of statblocks and i'm trying to remember the word for a book of multiple items that are similar but disconnected- I keep thinking of the word Anthology? but i'm not 100% that's correct
You can also try dming yourself after your break, I used to think I'd hate dming but it's amazing
Respect.
Sometimes topics of conversation don't land, for various reasons. That's not always a reason to think you're being ignored and even if you are, that's not a reason to lose passion for something you like.
Anthology is a series of 2
I mean I understand feeling dejection if you don't feel like part of a community, of course.
Not currently sadly, the forge I used to borrow closed down but I hope to continue this summer
understood- what might be the correct word then?
Anthology, compendium, appendix, ...
Hmm.
"Statblock [Blank]"
Never mind I was wrong
Compendium might work!
I've only seen anthology in use of series of 2, oops
Compendium?
Compendium is the first thought
im just wonderign , im totally new. Are there text based dnd campaigns?
Yes there's a lot, also #dnd-newcomers
Yup! Sometimes they're called PbP or play-by-post games. Sometimes they're in a group chat, sometimes a Discord server, etc.
So you know what's one kinda dumb weapon think I want to do but haven't been able to. Stabbing someone through someone else with a long spear or something. I think that'd be fun as a magic item
thanks
There's a magic weapon that does that, it's in a third party books, Griffon's Saddlebag 1.
just say that ray of enfeeblement was changed
I can't be the only one who feels like this should be what the "Piercer" feat does, right? Like, if you crit or deal a certain amount of damage, the weapon/arrow goes through them and can hit someone behind them at disadvantage or with reduced damage or something.
Idk how many of you follow WWE
But somehow...maybe some groups write their own homebrew setting like how TKO writes WWE now
Elaborate?
I guess you don't follow WWE
I need someone who follows WWE to explain things better
Heaven pirece her
Not much, I've watched a bit with my stepdad and seen clips and whatnot, but I don't keep up with it.
Rigged performance art to steal gambler cash 
Its prob so arcane archer can feel useful or something
Also....so many potential characters are underutilized
Dont tell me your gonna make a WWE character a dnd character
For the sake of their most prominent chatacters
No, I just compare how my DM groups write and run their homebrew setting to the modern WWE writing and story building
This...is.... D&D Discussion! 
Just watching season 3 and it's an interesting situation
So yes or no
The answer is whatever is more inconvenient for you
/s
No its not
Oke
i thought that they were playing dnd in that show, at least for the first few seasons right?
season one and 2 of critical role plays dnd
i think season 3 (current campaign) is playing daggerheart?
i think that's right too
tho i don't follow critical role much (not like i wouldn't, i just haven't even finished Dimension 20 yet)
it's good fun. i get to run a bossfight tonight
lol i love that dm in the animated series
also love defeating tiamat at level 1 with some wooden trapdoor, what a way to start a series
"we are level 1"
"fight tiamat"
Non conclusive please rephrase
Tiamat
Nope still D&D
Curse you
good to know, thank you
current season is also s4 i think
Bless you
Yea all 4 seasons of CR use dnd
I thought season 4 was using their own system?
Nope
cr’s season 1 campaign was ported from pathfinder 1e to d&d 5e when they started broadcasting it i think though
I really don't know where that rumor came from tbh.
Outside of some speculation after it was announced, when they actually started talking about it they made it clear before it even aired that it was gonna be dnd.
I should stop telling my players if there weapon/attack do damage to the monster or not
it was speculated but once it was announced it was real clear it would be DnD 5.5e
why?
really? i feel as though at least melee attacks should feel different when they land right then not
yeah, why?
I'm curious, why?
You could do what my DM does when something's resistant or immune to something, he might say something like "The [insert monster] doesn't look particularly bothered by your attack" or "You get the feeling that didn't do as much as you thought it would"
I feel like there should be a diffrent way of just "the creautre is not effect by that attack" or "its immune to that damage"
Wai
“your blade finds purchase in their flesh, rending muscle from bone” vs “there’s a scraping sound as your sword slides off their skin, scratching but not digging in”
After making an insight check, forgot about that for a moment
Wouldn't that be the study action?
I'm starting to think all younger sisters look similar in DnD lmfao
Study Action to find out more about the enemy?
younger sisters?
Is this a typo?
Hilarious typo
U look similar to Cassandra
(I meant it for humans)
Not a typo
I feel like mechanical things like that should just be made obvious.
younger sister…?
It could be, but considering the stuff we fight, we can't often afford to spend an action seeing if an attack worked or not, so he just has us do it after we make the attack
also you don’t know what i look like my pfp is a pixel cartoon
Have U watched vox machina
Ok it's fine then u won't know
ominous
Do you .. think the profile picture is what the actual person looks like?
No but what their character looks like
Is what I meant
You mean their profile picture?
Not everyone uses their characters as their pic. I don't.
wwwwwwwwell lmao.
Then you say "your pfp looks like" not "you look like"
Hallo
i mean i do have black curly hair, i chose the photo bc of that similarity.
Ok well you are exceptional!
Hey, what anime is that person from your profile from? he seems cool!
but it is a cartoon. that’s p different than my actual appearance.
I have yet to play a snake person.
welcome
Hallo hallo :D
I see pfps from afar, so sometimes I have a hard time distinguishing what they are, I thought Ophidimancer's pfp was just green
How we feelin today?
My royal guard npcs with their suspiciously bandit-shaped statblocks
Good brothers and sisters?
I would also accept that.
Bored, waiting for the weekends to finally play D&D, hoping that my campaigns don't cancel
We get weekly play here?
Ya think
Nope, I mean the campaigns I'm in, but you can find campaigns in #find-a-game
Ok thank you brother
Fairly happy, went to a fancon yesterday by last minute invite and free ticket! So that was exciting.
Ah free ticket, must be nice
I love free
everything is better when it's free
Friend who has a sweet connection with someone who works for the company.
Cool brother
Real, finally having a session after 2 weeks of nothing. Hopefully we might have our druid back after her several months of absence. Just in time for her character to find out her friend died fighting a dragon and they still need to finish killing it.
I'm in 5 campaigns, but only regularly get two sessions a week
Ngl I thought vox machina was a custom campaign until I saw the book for cal doret
Also yes ik I misspelt that horribly
Ahh .. actually I prefer not to be called by any variaton of "bro" or "brother" except by my actual sibling, if you don't mind.
Ah no worry
But yk what I mean
I've only got one, 2 depending on when the CoS one starts, if we even end up doing it
It was a custom campaign and then the CritRole people got to make an official D&D product.
Thank you for telling me
What's S3 and S4 of vox machina based off?
Niceu niceu
Explains the romance part I can't lie I don't think you'd normally see that @humble cairn
At least not between party members
Wait is there romance built into the Tal'Dorei book?
Oh you mean in Critical Role.
Its to match the mask
Honestly I wish more people would explore romance and emotional plots in D&D. I think there's somethign deeply unsettling about the fact that most people are so comfortable with violence and killing, but not with romance and emotions.
sam e
Make sense, but how choose color?
Perhaps it's because it's harder to be vulnerable for most
I think it's cause a lot of people have grown up on violent media but lack romance experience.
that too
Yes
Lowkey, I don't remember
I also find it sad that a lot of people assume romance isn't 'PG'.
When every Disney movie has romance in it.
Yeah
That too!
Useful
roleplaying out romance is harder because you are essentially having to flirt with your DM in character and that is weird
I'm green now :D
or vice versa you have to flirt with your player as DM
I think of it the same as RPing in character.
Yeah, romance and "not PG" has become sort of synonymous for a lot of people's thinking.
or with other players
What if its a text campaign?
hey no offense to my players, but i'm not interested in flirting with any of them.
much, much easier
Puppy love, crushes, admiration that shades over into a bit of infatuation. All of those could be explored without it being racy at all.
Makes things 10X easier
Your character can say and do things you might not as a player.
Still a little cringe, but managable
Says the bard
Rarely RARELY i'll do some flirty stuff, but it'll be maybe a sentence or two
yes, but many of these things are awkward. actors have to be trained to be comfortable with stage kisses; it’s the same thing
So think of it like if this character was in a story you and someone else was writing, would these two characters make for an interesting romance?
Right, but I think it's weird that it's weirder than roleplaying killing and violence, not even to mention the gruesome stuff some players describe.
It's much easier to rip a monsters head off than it is to flirt.
The embarassment I get because of my own words deal 4d6 psychic damage to me every time
killing and violence are pretty impersonal and abstracted mechanically
Not saying that it's just that easy- I have been in some very awkward RP scenes involving romance. But it can help to shift the mentality surrounding it.
Make the dolls kiss.
My party's Aasimar cleric (son of kelemvor) is dating the Slimekin cleric (crown princess [I still don't know how that happened]), and there have been some sweet moments there, or really traumatizing ones, like when my last character died after the Slime sent him to fly after the dragon the Aasimar was currently on top of, and then his son showed up the next day
Well yes, and it is that way because of the culture from which the builders of the mechanics are steeped in.
This is an old cosplay of Blackwatch Genji from Overwatch. I think it's from like... 2018? Katsucon.
I mean, when romance is similarly abstracted it’s not awkward
the bard saying “I’d like to seduce the barmaid.” “okay roll a Charisma check. 21? yeah she’s into you” is not awkward
Yes, when there are concrete mechanics for it, that means there are buttons that players can press instead of having to improvise it.
Oh cool! Oh my, 2018 was 8 years ago what
i agree
checks result
"She's not interested."
I think it's also worth pointing out that flirting isn't always a requirement for romance.
You can absolutely have a romantic scene where two characters sit in silence or act in very small but measured ways.
"ooh sorry, you needed a 30"
I actually really dislike the 'roll to seduce' concept because it generates more awkwardness and bad vibes.
i have a group who is better at handling sexual and romantic themes than average because our other main game is vampire of all things
Exactly!
the DM calls for rolls, not players
The roll to seduce concept is part of why I'm adverse to romance at the table tbh
I particularly, as I've said before, hate the bard stereotype of them "romancing" or "seducing" every creature on the face of the earth!
I mean technically RAW, the NPC not being interested at all would just forego a roll at wll.
rolling to seduce or otherwise affect npc. . . ?
There are other ways of persuasion 
if that's the case, then don't ask for a roll, yes.
sure there are.
yeah, “into you” here is more like, “egged on” etc
Yeah I was a longtime WOD player as well and that system was built to handle relationship mechanics a bit better.
i’m not trying to go into rules nitty gritty.
fair
it's built around that kind of social positioning and manipulation, yes.
If I ran romance with an npc at the table I'd probably use the renown system in a way.
I ... may have a different understanding of the phrase "egged on" than you?
it wasn’t, really. nothing mechanical handles relationships differently there. it’s just that the game assumes you’ll be doing more of it in the fluff
What is that, if I may ask?
i mean “encouraged”, like, if someone’s mildly attracted to you you can encourage them to pursue that by reciprocating and expressing your own attraction tastefully
A system you can use to basically track how well known players become for good or bad which makes people like them/dislike them, give discounts, more likely to help with stuff.
I mean there were definitely mechanics to handle both internal psychological stuff and interpersonal stuff, moreso than in 5E.
ohh, reputation meter basically
Basically yeah
exactly
So if you're like well known for being a hero and the npc finds the character themselves favorable then they might be interested in that kinda thing.
Or just helping the npc directly enough.
My main issue with reducing such things too much to a dice roll is that it ignores consent, which is the biggest issue of the mechanics of D&D trying to interact with romance/ affection. If it's a dice roll, consent does not feel part of it and it introduces the idea of winning/losing or set DCs in a situation where that should not apply. 'Roll to seduce' is more often than not aimed at female characters to abstract 'romance' or seduction into a predictable method where the target 'shouldn't be able to say no', because the roller succeeded at the roll. The rules say they win, they get the girl.
AC 13 is super super low for a level 5 rogue right?
but still, it’s not about morality of it or squickiness, it’s that most people don’t like flirting with their platonic friends and that’s essentially what you have to do to do romance in d&d most of the time. text campaigns alleviate this since they put some distance between what you’re doing and what the characters are doing
Very
But other systems like Monsterheart have mechanics that hinge directly on the interpersonal relationships between the characters. I don't know if that is something 5E needs, but ti does go to show that the mechanics do set a tone and comfort level for dealing with certain things.
yes
Well said
Indeed, seeing as how Dexterity is rogues main stat
Ok yeah I gotta figure out what's up with that
A lot of tables have no romance/sex rules for this reason.
but persuasion isn't mind control, and that's an important thing players oughta know
I think if you want romance at the table, there's probably good third party supplements to help with it.
One player is a level 5 mastermind rogue with 14 dex and leather armor at the start but I think I gotta help them out a bit here
Oh wait their main stats are wis and cha huh
Another issue with rolls is that being the most charismatic doesn't always win the heart of someone
... first time playing DnD?
We did a tutorial, otherwise yeah
then functionally use that check as "consent"
Either a) they are not interested at all, so no check is needed.
b) they might be interested, but need some "good" seduction or flirting to be properly interested, so a check is needed.
i don’t see this as different to any other charisma (persuasion) check in the game; it’s an abstraction of how willing they are and how well you convince them, and, also, it definitely cannot be done if they just outright are definitely not willing.
I'm gonna suggest they fix that up otherwise I might help them allocate some funds towards a better light armor
Exactly. Some people are into kindness, or money, or, dare I say it...big butts.
Yeah, I'd communicate to them and say that they should get that patched up 😭
Wisdom and Charisma as the Rogue's main stats?
I can get a little more behind abstracted mechanics like relationship points, but really at that point it's kinda just vibe based. You don't have to go into detail on some things just 'My PC takes (NPC) out on a date. They visit that nice bakery by the river.' or giving of gifts, or so on.
I'm not interested in running long term romances for my players, if they want that, they have to tell me it's happening.
fair
I acknowledge that this is true, but assert that it is not something that is inherent or universal and is instead an artifact of culture and can change based on regional culture as well as the zeitgeist.
i think the only real consent issues with dice rolls comes in when (a) you roll to basically override another player’s free will (never ever should happen!) or (b) you’re deciding when and what your rolls are and not the DM
strongly feel players should not be rolling to override another player's free will.
Rolling is fine as long as it is for an NPC and not another player
I don't think that playacting a romance or flirting or crushes with platonic friends is somehow "naturally" uncomfortable.
talk it out and have a discussion, maybe as a group decide... but we're not rolling to say "joe makes john do this."
i have a useful way to navigate that issue
There's a reason some people consider Enchantment to be the most evil school of magic.
With platonic friends it depends for me.
Little kids will playact being married to each other and it's just a thing they do that's fun.
It makes a lot of sense for their characters backstory, but dex does too so like I'm gonna still be figuring that out. I'm currently bringing their character sheet over to the google sheet we're using. I'm not going to force any changes but since they started with level 1 gold and stuff I'm prob just gonna bring up that they do have the money for at least studded leather lol
If it's someone I can't see romantically, it's very easy
Me when I tell da homies I'm feeling romantical
They could just change to a class, and flavor their character as a stealthy criminal?
Oh god wait the melee ranger also has 13 AC I'd forgotten
That seems ill advised.
as a player and as a dm i am not interested in being involved in romance at the table.
Chad
What's the lowest AC you can still dodge tank for the party
I think you still have to have like 15 AC at least
This isn't going to be a super combat focused campaign but still I feel that this is rough if I'm balancing combats traditionally
if a player wants to "get a romantic partner" and wants to roll to see if they find one, sure fine i can facilitate that.
Yeah and that's fine. I'm not saying anyone is wrong for feeling that way, I'm just saying I think it's kinda wrong that society has made us feel that way.
Blind Dating arc 😭
At level 5 yes. Like every notable balanced enemy is gonna have at least +3 to hit probably which means 50% hit min
I'm not only aromantic but nonamorous (I don't do relationships) so I'm definitely not interested in that stuff either.
Yeah the game balance system expects the PCs to be functioning correctly
The romances in my games tend to be rather abstract as we just assume things are happening off screen and don't have to act out each scene. One PC ended up marrying an NPC, but it was just sort of assumed that during downtime back at the base he was spending time with her. Occasionally the player would note in his RP downtime plans things like 'Vand takes Gabrielle to the city with him when shopping. They spend their week there browsing the cafes and points of interest between them- they both really enjoy a lesser known theatre group that appeals to their shared sense of humour.'
i dunno, how good are you at dodging oncoming tanks?
i wouldn't say society made me feel that way, more just... i'm not into excessive gore or violence, i'm not into excessive romance, i like it all rather mild in that regard
I think the artificer has the most AC out of anyone 😭
Notably, the most experienced of my players lmao
They don't have to be optimized but they do need to be made right.
How should I react when a DM said that my fear toward loud noise may hinder me from joining the DM's campaign?
I wanna feel upset, but I cannot show it clearly
don't join their campaign
I can safely say I've never been hit by a tank in my entire life
i am fine doing romance at the table as both DM and player but it’s definitely awkward and you’ve got to watch people’s boundaries
Take it as a polite and considerate warning that there is loud noise?
If one of my players said to me "hey, can you avoid loud noises?" I'd probably say "Sure."
Or i'd say "loud noises are a part of this campaign, you might not have fun."
Valid! Nothing wrong with keeping it low-key. What do you like to roleplay, if you don't mind me asking?
If you had a fear of dogs and the DM ran games in a house full of dogs, I think it would be very fair to warn you of that.
I will say, after a few sessions I'll be allowing all my players to respec their characters slightly for a second introduciton, so I imagine they might just get the chance to learn from mistakes by then
The good news, the same DM also suggests that I should join heavy-combat campaign
why not let them respec now?
How good of a sport are they?
that makes one of us j/k
For me it depends on what feels realistic.
My only enjoyment in D&D somehow is in combat
Oh they can if they want, but I don't know if they'll choose to
Because... you can do it the hard way
Good, we're all friends irl
I really dislike gorey horror movies that try to capture realistic gore
wacky zany antics. As a player I tend towards chaos gremlin.
My "beloved" character is a celebrity who adores her fans who adore her. Behaves like a cartoon character in and out of combat.
I have an extra attack now as a level 5 fighter, so I can double my enjoyment in heavy combat
as a dm? I like to give my players morally grey issues that they need to resolve as best they can.
why not quadruple it?
But stuff like Gears of War where it's roided up sensitive men chainsawing people to bits with a chainsaw attached to an assault rifle it's too ridiculous to bother me.
Also they won't die in session 1 unless they actively try to so that'll be a good start
(Not to say I'm going insanely easy on them, but enemies will be going for nonlethal knockouts because the main bad guys of session 1 need all the players to be not dead for legal reasons before the end of the day)
that's absolutely valid and a good thing to know about yourself, you said the DM invited you to a combat heavy game?
That's for level....I forgot which level provides second Extra Attack
Scimitar, Shortsword, Vex, Nick, Bonus Action Two-Weapon Fighting
I like you.
She suggested it to me to do so. I should just wait for combat-heavy campaign
my god, i hate convoluted dual wielding builds
Does it still work in 2024?
ooh, can we get an example?
no reason in particular other than “this feels like too much work”
I like you, you have a good name
... Masteries are 2024, yes
2024 is what makes it work
Nice
Bromamce is my favorite
I played a Dark Elf Druid who was best friends with the parties Goliath Barbarian, they were so close that they almost seemed like a couple lmao
But my Druid had a Husband and the Barbarian had a wife
My Druid was the first to figure out that his wife was pregnant one day and his character in that moment asked mine to
"be like a father to those kids if I die, Vask.."
I told him
"The day you die is when the hells freeze over!"
I've done bromance before
i just want to swing my big longsword in two hands
But actual romance if I had to RP would be very ridiculous
There's actually a few weird things about the rogue's sheet hmmmmm
You have to have masteries in both Scimitar and Shortsword, so you can attack four times, you'd also need Duel Wielder feat and Two Weapon Fighting (The Fighting Style)
Got it from the first Pokemon Mystery Dungeon.
In one campaign the party is grappling with a megacorp who's dominating industry and travel, yet providing tangible safety.
On the other hand there's another group who's trying to break up the megacorp and allow free travel, yet can't provide the same level of safety.
Alright. Since I just recently leveled up, I can arrange that
They were always side by side in Melee during combats lol
They even kept a competitive count of how many undead they slain
A lot of my PCs just end up in queerplatonic relationships with other PCs.
what level of danger are we talking about?
planar destruction, and keeping the roads safe
the opposing group can probably do something to mitigate planar destruction, but don't have the manpower to keep the roads safe
well, if you can chase deer off the roads that takes care of that
My current two campaigns are
1 is doing Gods' Trials and being apart of a country that's broiling in a cold war so it's wilderness is very chaotic.
2 is in another country that's suffering from resource deprivation, as well as mad blood mages and dangerous criminals that wander the desert, and capture Druid/Rangers/Clerics for their resource spells. Along with the fun kind of odd people you meet in that desert too.
Like at some point we stop and realise 'So these guys are planning their future with each other in mind, living together and consider each other one of the most important relationships in each others lives? ... Good for them.'
Level 5 melee rogue with 13 ac and 28 hp
if only wild deer were the greatest threat
I may have to go easy on the combats
the infinite and the divine?
At least roleplay will be fun lmao
Least he's got some good hp
I expected that answer!
That is literally the bare minimum hp without having negative constitution lmao
Oh wait.
Ah, I'm afraid I do not get the reference.
In a stream, a friend and I both decided we wanted to play husbands. So rather than try to sit there and figure out how they met, what their favourite dinner is, etc., we pulled up a mini-RPG that was full of questions.
These ones were aimed to help players understand some of the deeper parts of a relationship, like what some of the fears and wishes and tensions and joys a relationship might have.
We were guests on that stream and we played it in the "green room" for like 10 minutes. The team were actually wildly impressed by how quick we went through it and how efficient it was about getting details on the relationship. Like by the end of the 10 minutes, even the rest of the crew felt like they knew the kind of marriage we were going to play.
Yeah you might need to either help them build their PCs with the experience player, go really easy on the combat, or go normal and let them learn the hard way.
it's a warhammer reference. There's these 2 millions of years old guys who pretty much do that. The community joke is they're obviously in a relationship.
After the campaign they'll open up a bakery with their adopted daughter
in a previous game the players realized they were actually working for the baddie, who was posed as their benefactor.
They work with the more experienced player so I'm gonna just ask the more experienced player (who is our mutual friend who invited them) to take a look at the sheet if possible and maybe share some insight. I don't want to be too overbearing, and I don't want to force them to do anything too much, but I fear that it might just cause problems for balancing combats wherein some are just WAYYY better prepared for combats than others leading to unbalanced participation and potential to engage.
And also I imagine there's some unforseen problem with having the frontlines be less tanky than the artificer as well
rogue shouldn't be frontline?
I guess I don't actually know if they will be frontline, but the melee ranger will be and I think they are less tanky but I'm still waiting to hear back from the artificer on what their AC and HP is
My mind is battling with me, I could buy Foundry
aren't rogues' Extra Attack literally replaced by a duck and weave thing specifically to aid their diving ability?
i concur, rogues aren't supposed to frontline
they're supposed to get in, hit, and get out
yea, it's replaced by the bonus action disengage, dodge, and hide, because they're meant for diving
"Diving"
What is this.. overwatch?
oh i see, my question mark was confusing.
One thing i will never understand is when people do what i call "reinveting the wheel"
Skirmishing would be the term for what Rogues do lol
Aka they make homebrew thats already a rule in dnd
or they just reinvent pathfinder
That too
Its just like why are you using homebrew when it already exist
Rogues don't HAVE to use melee at all if they don't wanna, so getting in and attacking then getting out isn't always their thing
pretty much, right? there's poke (casters), dive (rogues and some specific builds), and brawl (paladins, barbs, and fighters)
No.. no, no..
i sometimes suspect a vast majority of 5e players don’t actually really know the rules
I mean if you use it for longer periods it's definitely worth it
Wdym suspect that's just true
also yea, i feel it's often neglected that Rogue's Sneak Attack mandates a finesse or ranged weapon
what rules? /j
there’s a lot of times ive seen complaints that dnd doesn’t have rules for X when it has entire pages of rules for X. often in the DMG, which the same people will insist you don’t need to read because it contains no actual rules
What?
I don't think it's neglected at all? Lol
i mean, of the other rogues i've encountered, too many of them don't play for sniping
idk, snipe, BA hide, snipe, BA hide, lather rinse repeat is p common
... what?
I've seen plenty of Rogues doing ranged stuff
Of the parties I play in
3 have Rogues and they all prefer ranged combat
gonna depend on the groups you play with
also, it would suck playing melee rogue against sentinel/polearm master enemies
how many enemies do actually have a feature like that though
Luckily, enemies don't typically get feats or have things like that
many my groups fall consumed to the concept of greed and just try to eat them without regard for personal safety
They don't sure, but keeping distance with BA hide is easier than relying on BA disengage and having an ally in melee
I have a question
hulk smash, eh?
I always say
"If you wanna go melee Rogue, just play a Monk!" Lol
that's what my monk says
Melee Rogues are valid, don't get me wrong
lets say i have a group of monsters how does one roll for initative
you can hard counter that by just hitting BA Disengage before attacking, which is extremely silly on paper, but is entirely rules-valid
But atp play a Monk
the two types of tabletop players are Fate players and GURPS players. All players fall into these two categories
officially every monster has its own initiative right
I see
One roll for all of them with the same modifier, that'd work. Or one per group. Individuals should roll their own.
What about saving throws?
if they are multiples of the same enemy, say a group of goblins, its fine to roll 1 initiative for them too
roll their saving throws
or 1 initiative for melee goblins, 1 for ranged
how big a group were talking? i dont think its too difficult in most cases to roll for each
lets say 5 skeletons
i once hit a completely absurd gameplay loop where i was using my BA and Movement for Steady Aim every round with a Vex Shortbow to fire on someone who was on the other side of a small pond
Going over character sheet for kenku
Skin - Feathers.
Hair - Black Feathers.
birds do have skin though. . .
Not that you can see so it doesn't matter and I just thought it was really funny lol
Skin: Bird Skin
Hair: Feathers
this sucks. this sucks because in this dichotomy i am a gurps player, but i hate gurps
when they ruffle their feathers you can see that pale skin underneath
Hear me out; play a ranged monk
Yes but the section is made for defining features and describing how you look. Why would you put the shade of skin beneath your feathers that is only barely visible every once in a long while
🤷 accuracy?
I'd rather die.
Tbh if we see the Kenku’s skin the poor bird is going bald
one roll per group of monsters. i use the scores though
Listen, when I play Monk.
I play to punch things
I don't play around with guns or ranged weapons or ANY weapons in fact
I, The Monk, AM the weapon!
still there though
This is a Hokrun callout post
Darts they are proficient with, and Darts are only 5CP a piece, so you can pay 1 gold for 20 Darts, which is very cost effective, i once spent 7 gold for 140 darts
I didn't even know people seriously use that section at all, it's not that serious lol
I remember reading I cant exactly remember if it was in the 2014 dmg or player hand book but if a group of monsters were to roll a save you just roll it as a group
Listen I saw the gun and I knew what I had to do
too bad darts also suck
Hokrun is fine because he's not a typical flavor monk
Skin might be appropriate for other kinds of bird, like turkey or ostrich
Shurikens?
Monks being proficient with them is what saves the build, as Monks can inflict their Martial Die upon the darts
He’s definitely closer to a rogue in vibes
ill be honest not fully knowledgeable on how monks work so ill take your word
still feel like there would be better options though
Play the improvised weapon ranged monk, literally random bullshit go lol
My Monks are all
"Walk 'em down" in vibes lol
He’s funny because he started as an adaptation of one character idea I had and he’s now an adaptation of a totally different character idea I have
And he got there entirely organically through gameplay choices after character creation
Playing Baldur's gate as a dark elf is so fun
Sumatra, my Tabaxi Elements Monk
Is probably one of the scariest Monks I've ever played
NOTHING could stop him lol
you can forcibly overwrite the damage of a weapon Monks are proficient in with a different die, called their Martial Die
aah
He only used his elemental reach when he COULDN'T close the gap to you lol
they're proficient with all Simple weapons, which encompasses Darts, so you can deal Shortbow damage without a bow and 5 cent arrows
He had reach, but he ain't using it!!!
"reach? yea i can reach you from 5 feet away." lmao
New Elements Monk has a thing where they can extend their reach (through elements) by 10 feet
How do they do short bow damage?
He only ever used it running up cavern walls to punch an Ancient Black Dragon that wouldn't fight him on the ground lol
Martial Arts die apply to all weapons you use as a Monk that are considered Monk weapons
Darts are 1d4 Piercing, and by inflicting your Martial Die, they become 1d6 Piercing, identical to the shortbow
Only for melee weapons
Darts are ranged weapons
Martial Arts Die. You can roll 1d6 in place of the normal damage of your Unarmed Strike or Monk weapons. This die changes as you gain Monk levels, as shown in the Martial Arts column of the Monk Features table.
“Your practice of martial arts gives you mastery of combat styles that use your Unarmed Strike and Monk Weapons, which are the following:
Simple Melee weapons
Martial Melee weapons that have the Light property”
Darts are simple ranged weapons, meaning monks would be proficient but they wouldn’t be able to have them as a monk weapon
Only with Kensei monk you can use ranged weapons as monk weapons
Ahh, the situation allowed you to kite them perfectly.
darts are thrown. not ranged
They are both
ranged and thrown
The only thrown ranged weapon
and finesse
That too
Which means they are the only ranged weapon that can be used with Str.
the records i can see are all Simple Weapons and Martial Weapons with the Light property
That's not the definition of Monk weapons, that's the definition of weapons that monks are proficient with. The definition of "Monk Weapon" comes from their martial arts feature.
good to know, that could be really useful
Is that for what classifies as a monk weapon, or what monks are proficient in?
oh i see, that's really weird but mb
no dart monk after all
Dw it’s a common misconception
I only know because I’ve been corrected on the same matter
Was tryna make a rope dart monk
i've used Darts on a Fighter before
How’d that go
i spent 7 gold of the alternative equipment option to get 140 Darts to run with my high Strength, and it was incredibly funny to track ammo
I stil want to make my Thrown Weapons Battle Master.
it was viable, i was using them to provoke my BM Maneuvers from a range like Goading Attack to force them off my teammates or Trip Attack to prone them
Darts are by far the most cost effective for this btw, you can easily buy like 100 darts for the same price as 20 arrows
art I commissioned of my players dying finally arrived 
I can't find a game and it's really disheartening
I have a really fun character I wanna play as well
Darts honestly have to be my favorite weapon purely for their price, their absurd cheapness and the capacity to buy so many for so cheap gives them an air of whimsy to me that little else in this game truly has
would you call yourself a "dart frog"?
it is frog.
She's a fae/spirit critter that's obsessed with human story's of valiant heros and grand adventures and upon finding a ancient blade with the soul of a old fae empress sealed in it set off to make her own stories and live out those storybook fantasies
actually, a Grung Rogue with like a billion darts sounds viable
I don't have a favorite weapon in the game tbh
I kinda like Flails i guess?
That's what my Dragonborn Fighter uses
Anthropomorphic hedgehog that fires out a bajillion darts when they sneeze
Mace to the face!!!!
Im a simple woman, longsword is always gonna be good
Halberd and rapier are close seconds
i have two favorites based off of comedy alone, my favorite weapon and my favorite monster
There should be a barbarian subclass that can one hand two-handed melee weapons
Just combine polearm master with something else and you'll be set
Absolutely not lol
i think that's Giant, right?
No
Giant Is the subclass about throwing ANY weapon
And being big
And doing elemental damage
Barbarian is already overly boring give them something fun
open question, what's your favorite weapon attack combo?
Barbarian isn't boring
I think you're just not embracing it enough tbh
No barbarian is boring
I love barbarians. Im soon to potentially be trying the zealot one if things go right and it will change from frenzy to zealot
Not a single subclass is interesting to me
i homebrew my own mwehehe
I would rather just use a better more interesting class and also be angry
That's an opinion
I'm fine with good Ole Berserker personally sometimes
Absolutely valid
Scimitar and Shortsword, the Nick + Vex combo goes crazy
I love a good ol' shield bash from the feat Shield Master into an attack on a prone opponent (requires you have an extra attack).
Ah yes, the exhaustion subclass
Rage isn't specifically tied to anger you know
It's a primal energy
2024 doesn't have that problem. :p
What im saying is I don't need to play barbarian to play a barbarian
2024 Berserker kicks ass
And rage can have different conditions you and the dm set
Thank God, but most dms don't use 2024
laughs in 2024
I've seen a good number that do lol
i was running a "Dual Wielder" Thri Kreen BM Fighter for a oneshot, i was running a Shield, Warhammer, Scimitar and Shortsword, which enabled me to make like 4 attacks in one turn
Theres someone at my table who once in a rage doesn't come out of it and will attack allies if your to close
YES
Fighter 2, Valor Bard 6
Wow I would hate playing with them, that's terrible
Agreed.
That's genuinely such a garbage mechanic
Outside of charm effects from a enemy you shouldn't ever be hitting your allies
Barbarians don't have to be angry, but yes you can play a type of Barbarian aesthetic as another class.
Or specific rp moments and such
Barbarian subclasses just have nothing going for them imo
All of them are either way too boring or a worse version of something else
Well okay you don't have to like them, but plenty of people find them fun.
I will say
In my humble opinion
Although I've started appreciating Fighter recently
I still find Barbarian (and Monk) to be way more fun to play lol
God forbid I discuss the flaws of the game 🙄
And any slashing bludegion or piercing gets halved when in a rage. Theres also at lvl10-12 you get relentless rage so if you were to hit 0 hit points while in a rage you can roll to see if you remain standing. DC goes up by 5 each time
I think Druid and Barbarian are the classes that I'll never play
See .. you not liking something doesn't automatically make it flawed?
Monk also has the "it's cool, but this class does it better" issue
Theres all classes we dont like
No see, I don't like bard but I think it's fine
Barbarian just exists to be a braindead meat wall
That's a take, even for 2014 Monk
2024 Monk is like.. defacto the strongest martial up until later tiers.
Actually there's plenty that mechanically is way easier with Monk and can't really be done that well with other classes.
I dislike Barbarian, but this is just slander
Personally im not a fan of fighter
perhaps it's the players that you were with?
I haven't looked at new monk so....fair I guess
They are just worse fighter and paladin
Objectively
The monks can negate so much damage especially witht the defensive stat
I've had this player who was roleplaying this barbarian as "I eat book.", and that really got me disinterested in barbarian
2024 made all the martials feel way better to play imo
I've played each of them with the new rules
Based off what metric?
Barbarians can be smart. Not all are dumb
(And the old ones too lol)
I still think weapon arts would make the martials feel way more fun in terms of variety
Not objectively
Once people start saying their opinion about how good/bad a class is "objective" it's griefing.
The designers for the 2024 rules said that you can cast buff spells on your allies with the war caster feat
Eh, depending on the metric.
Wise*, depending. 
Damage output and variety in gameplay
Weapon Masteries exist in 2024
Its not EXACTLY weapon arts, but it helps greatly
Monks are objectively worse than fighters. At weapon fighting with great swords.
I FORGOT ABOUT THOSE
The only category barbarian wins in, is sheer HP and resistance to dying
Damage output is exceeds fighters at lower levels, but yes they have quite a one dimensional playstyle
And with barbarians depending on how you set them up theres reckless attack which gives you and enemies agaisnt you advantage, and you can negate that advantage to a normal roll with great weapon master to deal an extra 10 damage on top of everything
I dunno, I've played plenty of Barbarians and they've consistently beat the breaks off of most things they've fought lol
damn 2024 barbarians actually look fun to play. well done wotc
Heck a berserker barbarian (2024) is absolutely destroying my encounters in my game
I can’t speak for 2014 then, never played it
check out the free rules for barbarian. honestly its a big improvement
I hsvnt used the 2024 one. Only the 2014
Even then
2014 Barbarian is a menace at lower levels.
I do agree that they lack I higher levels though
I like 2024 more from what I've seen but it also seems WAY easier
And 5e is already a joke
2024 made monsters more powerful
The monsters in 2024 got buffed iirc
Did they? Thank god
Yeah
That's a common misconception, monsters are scarier.
I'm sick of every build I make breaking the game
It's boring
I like being challenged
Then play 2024 lol
I still want baba yaga as a statblock
I do recommend 2024 tbf, especially the new monk
(Also, for the record, unless it's reprinted, 2014 subclasses are compatible with 2024 classes)
Plus blade pact being better and stuff
Pact Boons are now eldritch invocations so you can choose more than one now
And the spell changes, like true strike actually having a reason to exist
Hey Guys, i am Ruby and 24 looking for dnd friends to discuss about it. If anyone is interested dm me
....
huh?'
I mean there are hundreds of thousands of people to chat here
Succubus behavior, do NOT go with her
Maybe not all online at once, but still
No i am new to it so i have to learn that 😓😓
Please don't share your age, that's against server rules for everyone's safety. FYI you can edit your posts.
Baba Lysaga?
But yeah I wanna find a game
The mother of all witches
granted my character idea is gonna make that hard
you can check out #find-a-game for information on how to find a group online. To make a post, type the appropriate command in any chat channel. There’s also DnD beyond forums, reddit or roll 20.
My mother
Okay thanks!
Don't you want to have a Session 0 before coming up with a fully fleshed out character idea?
I want a 5.5e Updated version of the 2e Domain of Dread lord
Draga Salt-Biter
He's a Wereshark Cleric of Umberlee 😔
I just have a character idea I really liked the idea of
Lore is flexible
Sorcerer king warlock sounded cool
Draga is my GOAT, I love him
The main thing is the character design/race
I really like the yuan ti class
... Class?
I still think its funny that the max size for a medium creature is like 8ft tall
Race
Of course, my favorite subclass of Yuan Ti is the King Cobra
I feel bad for him though
He was kidnapped by pirates as a kid and they'd relentless torment him by shark-baiting (they'd throw him in shark infested waters with a rope around his legs and only pull him away when the sharks were inches away 😭)
Sorry l
Wrong term came to mind
I mean his fear would go away eventually and just accept he may die. Horrible though
whats the smallest medium creature
same here
I want more Domain of Dread lords updated to 5e to give a shit about
Where's Arijani? Hazlik? Draga Salt-Biter? Azalin Rex?
I need them NOW!!!
One thing that really makes me wanna "run for the hills" is when people say faires are tiny when they ARENT
those are PIXES not fairy
should be though
Its like confusing Demons and Devils
Fairies are a wee folk, but not nearly as much so as their pixie and sprite friends
Mordenkainen Presents: Monsters of the Multiverse
It is very strange that fairies are basically halflings with wings
Infused with the magic of the Feywild, most fairies look like Small elves with insectile wings
Why must it be so hard to find a good group
Well, Small is just the amount of Area a creature controls
Small creatures control the same amount of area (a singular square) as medium creatures
You could totally flavor your fairy as tiny, but they control space as Small instead of tiny
They are diffrent from the player race fairy
I got invited for one and all the world info was clearly written by chat gpt
I immediately left
just like how the player race minotaur is a fey rather then a monster
.. that's wrong?
One of them is a fey
You mean Centaur, not Minotaur
was it centaur..?
Yes. :]
It's one thing to use AI for refs because not everyone has the skill to draw or the money for commissions, it's another to have it write for you, like why are you playing DND and especially trying to be a DM at that point
Could have sworn one monster race was changed to fey for the PCS
The question is why they didn’t use a preexisting setting
I personally don't like preexisting settings for dnd
What?
Cause the lore is less flexible
Nope
Minotaurs were monstrosities but were changed to humanoids for PCs
Im i tripping
same here
makes the game more about studying than creating sometimes
IT WAS CHANGED
i knew i wasnt going crazy
Minotaur were once fey in MM but it was changed to humanoid
Wrong place
wrong place bub
Egg
I love writing lore and world building. Its so much fun
The research and learning portions is really nice
Currently scripting, i hope to play this soon
I do the same thing when charactrt building especially when I dont know much about the race or classes
The mods are sleeping i guess
Egg.
Ah
Clean ehat from the channel?
Centaur*
No it was the minotaur
it's gone now, no worries, was just spam and in the wrong channel
As of Monsters of the Multiverse, Minotaurs have a trait giving them the Humanoid creature type.
Minotaurs were reworked in Mordenkainen Presents: Monsters of the Multiverse. The playable race now has the racial trait:
As a minotaur, you have the following racial traits.
Creature Type. You are a Humanoid.
When it comes to spell users I really like the bard if you know your reaching higher levels. You get access to spells from multiple classes without having to have a spellbook
I'm gonna keep gaslighting
It was fey at one point i knew it
Only reason I dont want to run a centuar as a player is its body type would make a lot of places difficult
I think centaurs are the main reason dnd 5e almost never goes outside of the human body type
Gaslight gatekeep girlboss
I guess plasmoid too
Hi
since blob
That's the slime right?
No.
This is just incorrect
Minotaur were NEVER fey.
It's Centaurs that we're monstrosities turned fey.
Minotaur were FEY 
Whats going on now
You, just earlier, were getting Minotaurs and Centaurs confused
No the two confused
Minotaurs weren't fey.
Centaurs were
centuars still ARE
not much, i get to run some dnd for my table later, i'm excited
Centaurs still are, yes
But Minotaurs never WERE
Ok cool
I can't find a group ;-;
If you are facing an issue in finding a good map, why don't you commission an artist?
did you try the looking for game channels?
points at the economy
Money
D&D can be such an costly hobby sometimes
Yeah but nothing yet
Has anyone here used a wendigo in their campaign (I'm considering it)
Ahhh, that's the issue
No cause they would be too easy to sniff out/find
Unless the public just isnt aware of there existance
You could literally say the SAME thing about ANY monster
ONE word divination
That point Is rather moot.
Throw me to the wendigos and I'll come back- actually I shouldn't say that here
Yeah but depending on creature type a "wendagoon" would just be a either a buffed up or maybe waterdown werewolf
No,no, I get it
I mean I don't get it, but I get it
Wendagoon and wendigos are different
Monster girls 😊
Look around on Facebook, here, or even some game stores have groups. Though those ones usually involve pay per session
That was more of a joke on how weak a wendigo would be compared to dnd but go on
They're fine.
The wendigo when he sees the fighter attack him 6 times:
People are allowed to make a career out of DMing proffesionally
Don't like 'em? No one's forcing you to play in them
It's like, not Morally Wrong to pay for your hobby.
Idk it just doesn't feel like DND to me at that point
That's like saying making money from writing a book is wrong?
"Why pay to look at letters when I can write my own book?"
I wouldn't feel comfortable at a table like that
That’s reasonable
Paid games are just another way to play. But totally understand the “but this is a game I like playing with my friends not for pay”
Yeah, but like, again, you're not at the table, it's not objectively wrong
People can have their opinions on paid games as long as no one looks down on those who do. Urizt is a fantastic DM and his players I'm sure are extremely happy with their purchase.
I don't think this would seriously shift allocation of resources. So much stuff basically just eats people, I figure this is barely different than like a Ghoul.
Can still have friendship. For some who dm professionally it can be their source of income or something on the side to help them out
You can still be friends with a dm and players in a paid game..?
hello
Thats why i mean it either be a big issue or a none issue
@winnieadams00 what s the difference between a paid game and a normal one?
Dnd already has all sorts of crypits and such
Just because you pay to play in someone's game doesn't make it completely disingenuous
I can understand the feeling.
But a lot of hobbies can also be like this. Like if you love to cook, you might charge people when you make food for them. You may or may not be friends in those situations.
You might love to make music, and you might charge people who come to listen. Again, you may or may not be friends in those situations either.
And a lot could be impacting those scenarios.
I'm not saying that to try to convince you that you're wrong or anything, but hoping those examples might be at least a little interesting? And maybe give a fresh POV. ✌️
Dude no I wouldn't be able to connect in that environment
"Which kind of monsters can I eat in this dungeon?"
-Some Paladin
It to me feels completely different
I still think its weird that False Hyrdas arent a real thing
I mean it's self evident is it not? One you pay for, one you don't.
Most people in my experience can't run them very well
I pay to play games and im still able to find friends through that game
Yeah you genius I m asking about the difference between them
D&D is just another one of those games
There's not really any inherent difference beyond one requiring payment.
I would be in my mind the entire time thinking it's not real and is just about money
... that's it, that's the difference
False Hydras are overrated
would never pay to play dnd
I also just don't have the money to put down for any hobbies
there's no guranteed quality or anything, a free game could still be amazingly good, and a paid game could be... less than ideal, that's why you've gotta check out their games first before paying
I would but not anytime soon
True
But than like the dm is getting paid for the game while the other one isn’t yet there is no difference in the experience or complexity?
Ive put down a ton of money for dnd in general
I'm not gonna go into my life situation but I don't have the means to do so
And like, 90% of the time not what anyone in the Table is looking for.
With how weak my currency is, yeah nah I'm not setting down 900 pesos for one session, and that's fine, no one's forcing me to play
Plus the books and the time it takes to write a campaign is no small feat. Building it around players. Dm had to balance players and the story while managing many npc snd storylines. Prep for main quest side quest whatever the players may try. Plans and contingency plans or just going off the rails and going with it
Fair enough thnks for the info
Laid down all my dough, now I ain't got no bread 😔
Your good Luna
even if you had money you have the right to have your opinion on paid games
Sudden Psychological Horror Heel Turn is not something most groups would enjoy.
Understandable!
I think not being able at the moment to budget to pay for D&D and saying things like "it doesn't feel like D&D at that point" are two different things, and probably shouldn't be confused for one another. ✌️
Some dont have the money for paid tables and that's alright
Yeah, still imo, doesn't give the right to say objectively that "Paid games are wrong"
Oh I love that kinda thing, it's just handled so badly 9/10 times
I know a few who would enjoy psychological horror type
There's a free version of your favorite hobbies
And then there's the paid version
It sucks but it's true 😭
The paid version is more often then not better
Either can be better whoever is running it
Same issue I had with the last person who said "fools errand" I don't like the wording people use. Just trying to keep the peace

It makes me wanna cry
I don't like Paid games either, but that's a purely personal thing. I feel like it invites easy bad vibes. In a free game "Oh last week kind of sucked, but whatever, this week is past the rough spot." Whereas paid can easily develop into "I paid 50 bucks for that crap?"
I like peace
paying 50$ for a game sounds crazy
Urtzi is not a fool! He's the goat!
and most paid dnd games are a game by game baises
The goat is often the one who is last standing when they really shouldn't be
I've never seen Urizt DM before, though I do know the channel, I've never sat down and watched
For 50 a game i would expect some good quality stuff
Idk anything either about his dming but he's answer many of my questions and I appreciate it
I would watch If they server didnt hate me for whatever reason
They better bring out a real dragon /j
Everytime i try to join i get "oh its you"
Wild 💀
BABY LEAFEON AWWWWWWWW
what did you do to make them haye you
I get that, but also, sometimes I pay for movies that I really don't like. Sometimes I pay for food I really don't like. Sometimes I pay for music or video games or whatever that I really don't like. Sometimes that's life. You live and learn.
You get used to it
It's so cute!!!!!!
Weird and random question:
If one of your current characters were to die, what would you replace them with?
What were their class and what would your replacement fir them be? 🤔
paid games in theory make sense, but in practice they tend to be nervous and set strange, strict expectations...
Fighter 2 Valor Bard 6 Human, Replacement for Lore Bard 8
I think if my Dragonborn Fighter died
I'd either replace him with a Paladin or a Barbarian
I cant imagine the kinda stuff someones gotta do to get a reaction like that
I'm not in a campaign so I can't answer that -w-
I'd completely randomizer a character to join
I can't get the Nuzlocke DnD Idea out of my head
I guess it was when someone picked a class I didnt know other person picked said class and i asked if i could be that class so they just didnt like me from then point onwards
My characters sister and a cleric
........w h a t
So now im forever hated in that server
roll or class, background, species, etc
I've got replacement ideas for most of my characters lol
Why would you do that
Not that I talk/chat in that server
Its always made me laugh when theres a character that somehow never dies even though they should with what's happened
My favourite PC was a random generated PC, down to alignment, background and gender
in my personal games ofc
I always deeply plan my characters so that just
That... is very brave!
It does sound like something that could work. Just go with the flow
Where do you get that kind of randomizer?
Genuinely made me recoil
there are tables for that
there are spin the wheel randomizers for 5e
Honestly this is one best to do slow and with a DM
I have only 1 pc(first pc and only pc ever) If he dies I uhh not sure what I'll replace him with
Adept yourself to the character rather than adapying a character to yourself
the new quick builder also allows you to as well
Let's see, I have
Dragonborn Battlemaster Fighter
Drow Celestial Warlock
Bugbear Gloomstalker Ranger
Tortle Knowledge Cleric
Firbolg Moon Bard
Warforged Dog & Hound Pugilist
And
Air Genasi Forge Adept Artificer
Its how i got the idea for my warforged sorcerer
"Are you the strongest because you're Satoru Gojo, or are you Satoru Gojo because you're the strongest?"
I am new to DND so i do not know
how that little thing made them hate you
i mean i kinda get it but still
crazy
I did make a randomizer in excel that randomised everything but... it took the discovery out of it. One thing I loved about randomisation was it removed choice paralysis and you could but the idea together as you rolled.
I'd probably roll with one of the eternal ideas that have been rattling around in my noddle, An Artificer Battlesmith/Arcane Archer knockoff of Chaika (Magic Rifle firing Spells is neato), or an Eladrin Undead Warlock. But my current Wizard dying and not getting revived would probably kill the entire campaign.
Some people hold grudes I think its better to let them hate and move on
You can also just get a random number generator. 13 classes random number 1-13, do the same for species, sub class, ext
... I feel like I'm missing something 🤔
That is fair
You cant please everyone in life as they say
Ngl I just use custom lineage most of the time