#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 380 of 1
btw this lowkey reminds of the nemesis system in the middle earth games lol
Ah but I feel like that'd be a bit too much to do for just a dnd campaign lol
Just for some examples, there were times he might have to hunt down a certain demon that was causing problems (his main job serving the hells was tracking down demons on the material plane), going after an item stolen from his father's forge, claiming the soul of someone who owed a debt, helping a devil cult that was struggling, or delivering a message to another archdevil on another layer while avoiding any spies on the way
That's so cool ^^
I still think my favorite part of that character is his pet mouse (WotC should have never gotten rid of the urchin background, and I will never forgive them)
Well, urchin gives you a mouse, but she was rat
Well they didnt get rid of urchin they just renamed it pretty much
Warner bros. aint gonna do anything with it so may as well use it in dnd games
Damn shame ✋😔
That system is so good
Yep, they wanna keep rpgs from having living world like systems like it
They're part of the "Sauron did nothing wrong" crowd that believe that irredeemable evil (patenting the entire idea of npcs remembering pcs and getting stronger) is good
Tho now they're owned by netflix cause they didnt wanna use anything they owned but rather sit on it like a dragon hoard so who knows
shaking my head
Maaan I wanna find some people to brainstorm that roguelite gameplay stuff with, perhaps get a lil campaign of our own
Hmmmm, but I wonder about weapons, items n all that, randomized encounters lowkey feels like chaotic as hell 😂
It is crazy how the game industry just cant have an enemy army that functions like one in them now cause of it
Or maybe it doesn't always have to be like that where you must fight your way through, perhaps stealth would be a nice addition too- if it works, great! If not, fight or (maybe) run away? Idk man
If you mean the Wayfarer, then that's not the same background, because that doesn't have the pet mouse
Yeah, the Urchin background just doesn't exist in 2024 rules right now
Ye cause Wayfarer replaced it
And wayfarer sucks
Well, it still exists, you just use the rules for using 2014 backgrounds with the 2024 rules
Hello, Samamathan
It's not fine, because it doesn't have the mouse
Ask your dm if you can have a pet mouse? lol
Why dont you just get a mouse anyway
Guys, DMs and players, what do you think about this kind of player?
Me (DM): I introduce a new homebrew rule to the table to customize and upgrade weapons, just to spice things up a bit for martials and add some new variety to the game.
To summarize: there are 5 weapon qualities: Poor, Damaged/Rusted, Normal, Reliable, and Reinforced. Reliable and Reinforced weapons can be used to negate one critical hit and turn it into a normal hit, but when you do this, the weapon loses quality and is downgraded to a lower tier.
The rules also introduce some ways to customize damage dice (like advantage on damage rolls or alternative dice calculations such as 2d4 instead of 1d8, etc.).
So far, the table likes the rule and it works well. It makes weapons feel more special, and everyone is interested in upgrading their gear or looking for higher-quality weapons from enemies or in towns.
THAT ONE PLAYER:
“I’ll just buy 100 of the cheapest weapons and use them all the time to ignore critical hits…”
And every discussion with this player turns into them trying to break the rule to become overpowered. They only want to exploit it in the most broken way possible.
Having weapons with different damage dice and the ability to turn critical hits into normal hits isn’t enough for them—they just want to abuse the system. And honestly, it’s getting boring and exhausting for me, because all I wanted was to bring something fresh and fun to the table, not create a new system for someone to try and break the game.
My Bugbear Ranger has a pet rat, but because he found it and rolled a good animal handling check on it
The rats name is "Slank" :>
You made a new system that could potentially be exploited. You got two options, remove them (player) or let it happen, I insist on the first one
not at all true, you can also just say "please dont exploit things in my game"
a house rule being exploitable doesnt make it a bad house rule
any of the other players wants to use like that
I'm assuming theyve already said this and the player doesnt care
then the player can walk
Have you explicitly said "Stop trying to do this?" to the player?
I know dnd its not perfect and full of holes that can be exploited but is not funny
but i assume the player wouldnt do it if told not to
yeah, when I say I m exhausted is literally
if you tell a player you dont want exploits, then going against that is disrespectful to your time as a DM and possibly to the other players as well
Reminder that everybody starts can start a Trinket in 2024, two of the examples for which are: “A petrified mouse” and “A tiny mechanical crab or spider that moves about when it’s not being observed”
I’m sure most DMs would let you start with a mouse.
RAW DnD itself doesnt really have many serious exploitable holes that can be argued to be allowed unless the dm is a pushover or is being too liberal with "rule of cool"
My tiefling has 2 "pets", the Jane the Rat, and Gug the Otyugh, who he fed a spoiled sandwich and rolled a bit too high on animal handling for and decided to stay with the party and pulls the carriage
its just:
"pls dont do that, this rule is for think like this : examples"
he:
You can do this, and this, and this, and with this feat/ability them you can use that rule to do that, can I do that? or you ll be mad if I try?"
all the time
Ok so this is the point at which you've made the request for them to stop bad behavior and they have ignored it, which is a serious red flag and constitutes a kicking offense. I mean kicking them out of the group, by the way, not literally kicking them.
i recommend telling the player that you feel like he is disrespecting your games intention by constantly doing this
explain to him what you DM for, what you create the game for, and then why his attitude is making you frustrated
My Bugbear fellow is the only one with a pet at the moment because my fighter had a horse that died 😔
Now, imagine I'm not playing with "randoms" I'm playing with friends and kicking him ll be hard for all
then talk to him
Doesnt matter, if you keep letting him be a pain in the ass itll only get worse.
Its just... why ppl must play "roleplaying games" like this.
he doesnt understand how youre feeling
"Dude, straight up, please don't try to exploit my rules and just be a kind person"
because we dont all think the same way
"I have requested that you stop doing this because it's ruining the fun, if you want to keep ruining the fun for other people I'm afraid you're going to need to go."
Friendships will end at the table eventually if someone doesn't call their friend out on their annoying BS
now for another question
how can a player even afford a 100 reinforced quality daggers?
who is selling 100 reinforced quality daggers?
Hello, btw, Haise :>
Been a second since I've seen you, I believe
Probably is trying some skyrim infinite inventory stuff
hello tokii have a nice day
No, YOU have a nice day!
Intrapersonal relationships are games of boundaries. A boundary is a line that, when crossed, has a clear consequence. The line has been crossed, now comes the consequence or you permit others to ignore all of your wishes. The natural consequence, in this case, would probably be something like “I will no longer DM for a game with this person in it.”
does the player realise that the DM can exploit too?
players when the DM starts exploiting
No, no, that’s not the point
i know i know
If you let them do what they want, its unfair to everyone at the table
i already said my piece. i said they need to talk, explain to the player how they feel and what they want from the game etc
Cause you either gotta play favorite and alienate the others by making them play legally or let everyone do whatever they want with no restrictions and now you have an unplayable game.
I dont want to do it
Clarifying question: Have you explicitly told him that it's making the game not fun for you?
"Look at me master I m a muchking"
"DM uses the book and create rules just to obliterate the player"
Not fun for anyone really
yep
i am not telling you to at all. its bad
yea sorry
i was just making an offhand comment on how funny the idea of players "exploiting" and trying to be super broken is to me
Wow, so this person doesn't care that they're actively making a group experience worse for someone in the group. Kick them out.
Or if group dynamics dont permit you to force that, you need to leave. Or at least let someone else DM
I wonder if the others players are fed up with it too, wouldnt be too surprised
Being excited for game day and half the session is spent "nuh uh, you made this rule this way so I can work it this way"
My players have decided that killing goblins is more important than meeting with the BBEG. Lmao
What adventures do you guys recommend for a beginner one shot introduction to D&D?
Easy XP
In a single session? Uuuhhhh maybe the DMG 2024 Oneshots?
Adventures of Faerun has a good few too.
BBEG waiting for the party to arrive to his manor.... Still waiting....
This is fixable by just stating you have to be holding said weapon?
Gotta use carrying capacity and rations for a reason.
Maybe I need to see the rest of what they're doing/breaking but my PC carrying extra weapons because they have been shown to break down seems reasonable- maybe not 100
Oooo okay thank you! I’ll look into it
hi
Yeah the DMG 2024 has 4 adventures for varying levels and Adventures of Faerun has around 50 one page adventures.
Is the book dmg 2024 on D&D beyond?
do you guys do online sessions here?
The server itself doesn't host games, but there are channels to help you find a game. Try #find-a-game or #looking-for-players
So full…
cool cool
I ate too many dice
I saw these cool eyeball dice but I don’t play irl I’m so sad
Giving me war flashbacks.
I haven't played dnd for so long that I'm at the point where I can 100% bg3 💀
I need to breathe
If my players decide to ignore BBEG, he will not ignore them
Time to feed the dragon
But he looks so hungry
Literally why kill goblins when BBEG asked for a meeting to make an alliance. The goblins also work for the BBEG 😭
Ugly things
Even if they don't intend on an alliance, at least try trickery?
You expect to much from dnd players
But no "Let's go slaughter the forces of the guy who is not actively against us right now!"
Perhaps lol
I was taught to always use strength unless the enemy said otherwise
BBEG: "Let's work together! Meet me at my place!". Players: "Nah screw you, Imma kill your goblins."
The fact that they don't even try to trick him is funny to me
I try to be a honest player even if it’s too my detriment
I gotta get better at solving puzzles
If an NPC is open to an alliance then we can try that, but i feel like every time i see "lets ally the enemy" it's while we're in active initiative and we have to spend 6 rounds of half the PC's playing teaparty while the other half are getting wailed on but aren't allowed to respond in kind because we're "being friendly"
My experience is that an alliance ends the combat
Or if its an alliance against another foe, combat ends once that foe is killed
Either way, taking 6 rounds in combat sounds insane
Wrapped up another fun session today
I say the DM take the L for this one, should've checked to see if there were easily exploitable parts of the mechanics and patch it asap before the campaign starts
My level 6s (now sevens!) took down a cairnwight and a barrowghast, before long resting in a temple and crying. The paladin got a new sword, they travelled to a new city, tried out a teleport, and we ended off with players rolling their d100s
Can a cane be used as a spellcasting focus?
I mean it could technically count as a staff or wand so sure go ahead
Ask your DM
Having a player be rude and (from what you've described) only really try to use it in bad faith about a new homebrew thing? Yea thats on the player
Getting more work done on my setting guide
About a quarter done with the pantheon section
6... 7?
Does this apply to only normal weapons or to magic items? If normal items break it actually incentivizes taking up a magical armament pretty well.
Dont you dare
nope. Magical Weapons cant be upgraded
Perhaps you could send players on a quest into a dungeon and they encounter some kind of enchanted weapon.
That is true, but it is very hard to break a magic item.
I'm casting Dispel Evil and Good on you, you're clearly possessed
The main reason why is that the blade/weapon is enchanted
also, sometimes, Hazards, combat situations or whatever I think is logical can donwgrade the weapon quality (If I do this I also add that Every weapon, enemies included, can parry 1 critical attack before a downgrade)
reliable and reinforcement weapons can parry 2 and 3 respectively
If you want, maybe you could make my monsters that corrode someone’s weapons when they hit them.
yeah, acid, sometimes fire for wood weapons
How do rust monsters work with your stuff
but just think on " I ll has 1000000 sticks to parry critical strikes" its just unfun
wow like the slime?
thats a problem (for the players)
No in dnd there's a monster called a Rust Monster
You use weapons to parry?
It can break mundane weapons and armor
Not from me this is a homebrew by BOB THE WORLD BUILDER (I love his content):
Downgrading Quality
At the DM’s discretion, weapon quality may be downgraded in combat or under extreme conditions. In
combat, a weapon’s quality can be downgraded when a character is subjected to a critical hit of
primarily bludgeoning or slashing damage while wielding the weapon. In this case the character chooses
to either take the critical hit as usual, or to use their reaction to sacrifice their weapon, downgrading its
quality and reducing the critical hit to a normal hit. Weapons of reinforced or reliable quality can absorb
multiple critical hits before their quality is downgraded in combat (see Properties, pg 2). Weapon
quality may also be downgraded by extreme environmental conditions or magical effects including but
not limited to fire, lightning, lava, extreme heat and cold, long periods underwater, or very long periods
of time. Note: Magical weapons cannot be upgraded or downgraded.
check his video/patreon for more info
Rust Monsters are how you really have fun in regular dnd.
All the martials got nice shiny new plate armor? Here comes a bunch of ole rustys /j
Hit em where it hurts: introduce the healing potion mimic
Got it. One concern I may have is that casters will be unaffected since they……….well, cast. If you’ve ever heard of anti-magic fields, those are a fun time for DMs.
Ah yes the 'Fun' that leads to someone flipping the table and getting a brand new shiny tale on reddit
Hit wizards where it really hurts
Mimic that takes the form of a Scroll of Fireball
I'm evil, I know
Maybe they shouldn't have taken that shiny new plate to Lamordia
No need to praise me
If I ever had PCs end up in Lamordia that'd probably be the one case where I start breaking armor and weapons.
Spell casters against martial PCs are very funny
Plant Growth + Sleet Storm and then cast Slow for flex
Casts Fly, promptly ignores the Martial without throwing weapons, or bows Huzzah
The Martials who chose flying species
I can't wait to cast Heat Metal on someone in heavy armor sometime.
It's really rare that a DM allows those ime
I've never once had that be a case in ANY game I've played personally
the diviner statblock on a mule against melee martials
grr
I forget do Druids get heat metal?
doesn't work :c
huh, I think i've played in maybe 4-5 games where flying races were allowed, and of those half the time the DM absolutely despised any time I'd use it.
Yes.
Nevermind that MOST martials get movement speed increases or have a way to move really fast
phantom steed has 100ft movement btw, dash once and they have to waste turns dashing towards you
You said on a Mule, not Phantom steed, though.
A mule can ride a phantom steed. (Note, I'm being entirely unserious.)
mule is 40ft so diviner can move 80ft/turn with it dashing
yes
The Monk and Rogue laughing at your pathetic attempt to flee
80ft a turn is cute
the diviner statblock does get fly though
barb rage becomes a moot point when diviner's arcane burst deals radiant damage (they won't get the same level of DPR until Lvl 20)
I mean... not really?
These are all intentional parts of the stat block anyways. It’s meant to do this
The Barbarian typically WANTS you to keep your eyes on them and attack them anyway
Damage to them means less damage to their allies 🧐
Not really actually, if you lack survivability as the "tank" you just die and the enemy moves on
they choose to ignore the barbarian (not 4e so cant draw aggro)
Now your allies have to use resources to revive you instead of keeping themselves alive
Looks SPECIFICALLY at monk
I'm not gonna hold you guys, that's a stank opinon
Melee is still fine regardless, as a matter of fact, its gotten STRONGER due to weapon masteries
Then the barbarian keeps pursuing lol
And range doesn't have weapon masteries while not needing to worry about the lich auto paralyzing?
The humble lich slays basically every melee PC in melee
I’ve never really seen any DnD players who build their characters like this
mfw a lich is a better Fighter than the Fighter
I'm saying that Melee has gotten stronger with weapon masteries.
I'm not ignoring ranged weapon masteries, but most of the masteries they get is.. kinda ass.
Wow, slow! so good and yummy!
Vex is good though, for certain
Where is my cleave longbow 🙁
You think slow is bad?
10ft max speed reduction is bad, yes.
And push?
Compared to topple, cleave, even graze and sap.
Yes.
I indeed do.
Especially at higher levels when there are enemies can teleport or have movement speed that doesn't care about a 10 foot reduction
No it's not that's a third of most creatures' speed
nvm they can actually do it cuz they'll die in like 2 rounds
Basically the same thing, just slightly better cause you can run away after pushing them away so no opportunity attacks.
Its only 10ft. Idk which kind of slow you're using but..
Have none of you ever trapped a monster in a hazard spell
Not ALL creatures only have 30 feet of movement either.
Slow. If you hit a creature with this weapon and deal damage to it, you can reduce its Speed by 10 feet until the start of your next turn. If the creature is hit more than once by weapons that have this property, the Speed reduction doesn’t exceed 10 feet.
they did say most
Martials being a help for that is a good thing. Slow plus difficult terrain is freaking awesome
I'm not really a fan of push and slow masteries either but for different reasons
Sure, in low level encounters. Ever play past t1? Where monsters have ways to teleport, move as a reaction and ignore some hazards?....
Or have speeds other than walking...
Most teleports need line of sight and most hazards block line of sight
How's everyone this afternoon
81.13 dpr radiant against a barb with 17 AC, a Barb with 20 Con has 125 hp
I love grappling, I'm sorry 😔
I mean there’s like, 10 teleporting creatures in dmg24
Average barb damage taken moment
pushing and slowing is for the warlocks eldritch blast
Yes but if I am playing a martial I would rather them push and slow over a increase to melee damage
Most dms dont relegate all of their creatures to 2024 only lol
And how many have no line of sight teleports
There's your problem ™
Lol
It was an example. If you’re a GM and you have to build most encounters to have teleportation access, you’re extremely limited
It's truly a 5e moment
Feeling good! Just wrapped up a session!
huzzah
I feel like a lot actually. At least ones who can do it with abilities like dimension door
Unironically I played in a WM where every single boss creature had no LOS needed 120ft LA teleport.
DM got microwaved a few to many times lol
Dm's* but yeah, any control casting was basically impossible.
I mean, the ones with the action just called teleport are sight bound yes
wtf, what was their reason for doing that?
You would be surprised it's almost exclusively dim door
Arcanaloths funnily enough do have both a teleport action and access to dimension door
Yeah it's a yugoloth trait to have an action teleport but as caster they pick a better teleport
litterally just control spell hate, i'd ask but they just insisted i was being "Overly general" when i'd experience it in 10 of my last 10 games.
Arcanaloths are underrated
Arcanaloths are unironically, super chill
Not biased
The Arcanaloth shopkeeper in Sigil is a homie though
So what, we're talking about.. web + hunger of hadar specifically? Cause what is even being talked about when it comes to no vision + hazard to where slow is suddenly better than topple?
I think more creatures need immunity to blindness
I love Yugoloths, I just wish they got more love by WOTC
Sleet storm and summons is another option
Creatures Immune to immunity /silly
fog cloud also
They are my favorite fiend
Yugoloths are genuinely really freaking cool
their fault for not moving to a system without a control meta, it's another one of those poorly written excuses
can we have more far realm boss creatures
I love their theming and how their neutrality makes them so interesting to interact with
They could be friend and foe
bring back the Uvuudaums from 3.5e
Bring back the Uvuudaum
Stares
Same brain frequency
Yesterday when optimizing was being discussed I brought up how it is kind of self defeating to optimize in DnD games, since most DMs will just bump up difficulty to keep things interesting in combat. This is what I meant.
one of my least favorite boss designs for sure, right along with recharge mechanics and giant AOE save for half
love my sneak jackal wizards
Like yugoloths are a very philosophical evil and are merit based. Each rank of yugoloths is a lesson needed to be learned, this is why arcanaloths are stronger than ultruloths. The lesson is that political power is greater than personal power
I mean I just say raise the difficulty on the one player, let everyone else just enjoy normal difficulty
I just don’t play with power gamers
kinda but it just lead to a different optimization meta of "Nuke bosses really hard" so everyone played hyperagressive nova characters and the boss and PC's would just take turns trading damage numbers until the boss died
which is a great argument to stay within the intended design parameters and common sense rulings so you got more of the game to play with and more options
I disagree, I find it enjoyable to say I fought impossible odds compared to the average player
How would you do that?
My thought process of why I dislike this kind of thing is mostly just a GM thought that I’d like to use monsters based on fluff reasons and it’s gonna feel pretty contrived if every monster can just teleport, but I also don’t want to run games as combat tests for people who are super optimized so this is more applicable to stuff like arguing against force cage
Say, if we’re talking about optimising… #optimization
in horde encounters just throw the more powerful ones at them, and have the average monsters go after the others
So real, Amity
though tbh yeah, I do prefer throwing monsters based on flavour
Wont the party have to deal with the strong ones regardless?
Winning anyway against such odds give one of the greatest highs you could ever get in a TTRPG
If you are dming for a group like that, its best to try and create unique effects for each dungeon. Sometimes it's teleportation other it's ghosts and other it's mages who take advantage of your own spells
Each have their own solution
don't you dare give the dungeon portent
I posted about it earlier but when you don't have table rules you just go by mostly RAW; if you have a table you play at you can optimize for that table, but the "just play to what 'average' tables allow" to me doesn't work because i've had so many tables just outright ban really standard uses of begign stuff like using a phantom steed to travel somewhere or using fabricate to make armor.
well for impossible odds to be actual impossible, you cant rules lawyer your character into an unbeatable god
is using a phantom steed to get from one town to the next really me rules lawyering to become an unbeatable god?
no, your gripes with those rulings are valid i think
I was speaking more generally, sorry
Yeah the games swinginess makes things feel rather binary. Encounters can be cake walks or tpks. I guess emphasis on feeling, since players can often go panic mode when they’re winning just due to mixed signals
but i dont think the choice needs to be between hyper RAW readings and dumb house rules
sure but where that line exactly is isn't really established and being able to talk about strategy without being hit over the head with "a DM could ban it" is useful
well "a DM could ban it" is legit argument if "it" is way too powerful compared to other options that are supposed to be of equal value. especially if the language is not clear.
but yeah, the lines are not clearly defined
Like i really enjoy using tiny servants and giving them flintlock weapons: something i've wanted to do since my first campaign, some DM's are cool with the idea, others have gone out of their way to make it impossible.
I mean, yeah? There are a lot of problems with the execution of that idea. I would totally let you reflavor magic stone as little flintlocks though
What's the problem with the execution of it though?
I have also seen this banned btw
the size of flintlocks and tiny servants, their ability to load them, fire them.
nothing that wouldnt be true for bows either btw
Also having like.. 4 strength
Flintlocks are small enough to be used by small sized PC's easily and there's no rules preventing tiny creatures from using them anywhere
i think its just one of those things that sounds like a whiteroom chicanery busted thing even if that's rather slot and money intensive, and not even that crazy strong (5d10 damage per turn that ends when one AoE touches you)
also i can imagine just some general disbelief that the plan would be a "simple, general command"
okay so you get to fire a flintlock but no proficiency bonus and disadvantage because its an "oversized" weapon for the tiny servant
lets not bring in the dmg14 oversized weapon thing, thats a seperate can of worms
no prof is true, not dis because that's what the heavy property is about
Suffering.
also even with the dmg14 oversized stuff in play... it's for things 2 sizes too big, muskets are useable by halflings
I mean a gun made for small/medium creatures would be too large for a tiny creature.
by the rule that was brought up that's not true though
weapons are assumedly build sized for the holder
also then could i just buy and/or make smaller versions of said weapons
What rule?
that is true. Very game dependant if you could a craftsman who could make a 6 inch long gun
not even a really functional rule, but DMG14's monster weapon damage guidelines has this weird suggestion that creatures using weapons bigger than they are have disadvantage or cant use it if 2 or more sizes larger.
That is true
I am open to a flintlock for tiny creatures with adjusted damage
If a creature tiny or small would be wielding a weapon made for medium creature they would have disadvantage
Is a part with a warlock, cleric, monk, and sword bard a balanced party
A creature has disadvantage on attack rolls with a weapon that is sized for a larger attacker.
from the 5.0e DMG
I mean, sure, you lack an intelligence person, but its got the essentials otherwise
it would make sense, but most people here don't really consider it a legit rule for PC use because of its location in the DMG giving the implication that weapon damage die is size dependant, when the damage die to size thing is an internal game balance choice. I guess it's for some insane DM who wants to build an encounter of hobgoblins using ogre clubs
I mean does it not exist anymore ?
i just quoted it. it hasnt been reprinted or replaced
Who needs smart person
You'd honestly be surprised how helpful it can be or probably not
Intelligence skills are just great in general
Does fighter get more or less boring to play if you focus your build on (cross)bows
Ill take a look at it
oh huh it does specify just 1 size difference; Still workable but slightly more difficult.
Also the warlock has a high intelligence
For some reason
still if small sized weapons specifically don't exist then small PC's have disad with all weapons
Yeah rules as written it would be the case
Depends on what you enjoy and what you don't enjoy
If you don't enjoy ranged combat.. Yes, it gets more boring
If you do enjoy ranged combat, no, its not
Its completely opinionated
We can't really tell you because we're not you
They would need to buy gear that is fit for their size
well "sized for a larger attacker" is kinda vague
considering small and medium creatures take up the same space
Taking up the same space has nothing to do with it
but like, that was what the heavy property was all about in 5.0e
that heavy weapons were to unwieldy for small creatures
so the implication is that all other weapons in the PHB are sized to fit both medium and small
Heavy and oversized are two different things but basically do the same thing
PHB5.5's equipment chapter says in general most equipment will fit PCs, but common sense will be paplied
its the same concept. natural language
Today was truly a "AC stops mattering after a certain level" moment
Maruts: "Your AC mattered NEVER to me!"
i think the assumption is just that you can buy equipment sized to your species and in general, magic items can magically fit you with exceptions if the DM says so
Your Armor Class means NOTHING it serves ZERO purpose.
You should play more carefully, NOW!!!!!
I think the more proper takeaway is that is was a vestigial holdever that was poorly ported.
Today was also a "Barbarian after level 9" moment
I’m playing as a champion fighter with heavy armor, I’m going 2 levels barb for reckless attack, but is there any subclass that can work with a champion fighter? I can’t rage because I’m wearing heavy armor
If you go barb you should not use heavy armor.
Heavy armor or barb levels.
Make your choice.
Most barbarian subclasses rely on you raging to be effective
barb subclasses typically do their stuff while raging
I’m not. I’m only dipping barb for reckless attack
Because there were different sized weapons with different damage dice. And they half-kept it in 5E's format, desptie otherwise entirely ignoring size, because 2014 was fairly rushed out the door
Not a good reason for the dip
So there were...glaring teething problems
Imma be real, if you can't rage you shouldn't go barb at all
You lose 75% of what makes barb barb
Rage is like the whole point
Besides an army of tiny servants using long range stuff sounds like a hassle
You also just lose a good tool that you'd probably take dipping for regardless
Reckless Attack isn't even that good
But i mean one aoe spell and their gone
You can just get advantage by flanking
i play wizards everything I do is a hassle
Rage, that's what I mean.
Depends on your table, I don't use flank
Reckless attack is more important than rage tbh
Yep
Flanking rules aren't used at every table
I certainly don't use em
Yeah but they themselves they were going Barb purely for Reckless attack.
Because I'm stubborn, not because I don't like em or think they're too powerful
I have a magic item that basically gives me a mini rage, with the damage resistances, and a weapon that gets me increased damage if I have advantage. Plus it’s helpful for fishing for crits no?
yeah i think the logistics of that and your DM's definition of what simple repeated tasks it can do is what makes it fine
The strongest class frfr mr I do everything that you can do but better
Which is fine, free advantage.
Though, yes, enemies free advantage to attack them without the added bulk that rage can add is... questionable
Magic items are a band aid fix and not considered in general build choices.
I don't use flanking because it favors things that are already too strong, i.e. hordes of expendable minions
If you have a magic item that fixes what heavy armor takes away from barbarian then go for your life.
I just don't use flanking because I'm stubborn and I'd have to redo most of my blocks
tiny servants can attack and even when not ordered act to defend themselves; otherwise i think "Shoot that guy" isn't like... terribly complex as compared to sorting my books.
I don’t use flanking rules at the start of games but if players try to use flanking rules and ask me to get advantage i will start using them as well
What dip/multi class would be good for champion fighter then?
Unironically fighter gets the most out of being a mono
If you are dead set on multi'ing out, shit man many attacks go brrr with monk
i guess in my head i can see "grab a gun from the other guy, shoot the the closest guy, then give the gun to the other guy who will reload the gun" might be a bit much for a 2 int creature, but yeah DM discression
Yes that might be a bit much for something dumebr then the average squirrel
And is almost at the point of non-sentience
Monks lose Martial Arts stuff when wearing armor.
You're so right, even more reason to go mono
Tiny servant will be using that flintlock as a mace frfr
We do, but my dm also loves using anything with pack tactics, so he considered it fair for us
They're non-sentient but they're competent enough to do household tasks which are more complex than firing a gun
but the complexity is negated if you use your BA every turn, which at that point you'd be better off with another spell like spiritual weapon upcasted
Pack tactics is a great thing
You mean the feature that pack monsters have?
Prob nothing, fighter gets so many feats it’s easy enough to make up for missing other features
Don't forget marshal undead, thats also a very funny thing
Yes
but dont take me poking holes as total dismissal, I don't hate the concept after thinking about it
Yeh? My dm still lets us use flanking rules as a way to let us have fun
Spiritual weapon isn't my favorite and it's not on my wizard list, plus tiny servant guns are really cool for like; artificers and transmuters.
We’re just all out brawling in groups, it’s dope
Its completely fine to do so
I absolutely love transmutation magic, shame the subclass is so bad.
Fair enough, which is why I just wanted reckless attack. Adamantine armor to block any crits and an increased chance I crit before going back to fighter levels was my idea.
Its fun, sometimes cover rules get ignored
no i get it, magical firing squad is fun
too bad that forgotten realms conjure constructs spell is complete garbage
Fair, there is other ways to procure advantage (you also get a ton of attacks, so you don’t always need it tbh)
I like when I can still interact with the magical weapons and armor on my casters
Imagine you have it as a signature spell and during a span of 7 hours you just start spamming that spell then you attack whatever fool you intend to mess with
It’s only for times I can’t flank really, either smaller horde fight or if I’m the only one getting near a big enemy before my teammates can follow
Do you do 2h, dual wield or s&b
Great sword with GWM
Ah
oh hey signature spell is a free tiny servant every short rest
Any weapon with topple is a really great way to go for advantage
i was assuming tiny servant would be upcasted
Hmm how many tiny servants can you have at like lets say level 14
The fact that it dont have a limit on how many you can create is absurd to me
38 if you spend all your slots from the day before
2014 is a little unclear if it stops being a creature or not when the spell ends. You do however lose control of it for certain.
Ah yes dm sit and wait till i finish rolling these 38 attacks
I recently got an item that lets me go from medium to large, and if I move 15 feet before attacking I can make enemies do a dc 15 strength check or they’re toppled
And then its just unga bunga time
Ah yes dm btw i used circle magic to extend their duration to permanent btw
Circle magic is fun but i've yet to have a DM allow it
Cause its broken
true
And casters dont need more options
Circle magic?
Behold my army of 10 hp things with no AC and crap dex, oh good lord look they're all dead to a single AOE spell. Ooops
Let’s you have two+ people cast the same spell to amply its effects
Basically.
im surprised i havent had anyone use it yet
That why you keep em in a bag of holding and then unleash that army on your turn lol
Ahh i see
Im just exaggerating this as a joke
yeah you gotta do some work to avoid AOE mass death; bag of holding is an option but so is keeping them in barrels or on horseback, ect
Then they're added to the iniative later, the enemy acts, then they all die still. :V
But my games lean towards martial heavy
I can unironically do this faster than most players do 2 attacks as long as i'm not having to contend with Avrea
Btw which races have been in dnd the longest. Not lore wise, but like when the 1st version of dnd dropped
Human, Elf, Dwarf, Halfling
Ah yes dm lemme start rolling those 38 tiny servant initiative’s with different results
group init is a thing
Figures
Yeah some players are slow
He killed everyone
I had to wait for someone for like 30 mins just to make a single attack and then use one spell
Imagine dying to Xanathar
Group Iniative isn't for "Lump the players into the same iniative" It's for "For the love of god lets just have these twenty mooks that die in one hit go together to speed things up."
Ive been grouping a lot recently, its good
yeah so my PC's mooks can all go at once...
It definitely preserves the DM's sanity
what yall talkin about
Thats a funny encounter with a high level wizard, the party just pisses them off and in return the wizard just summons like 40 tiny servants all spread out and then dips
tiny servant army shenanigans
Minions from despicable me frfr
i mean with the 40 tiny servants thing you can get the same results with animate dead, assuming proper corpses
at least those guys would have actual attacks
Tiny servant has an attack
Tiny servant army would do wonders against a poison dragon
mindflayers too!
Until it starts flying😢
this started because I wanted to give them guns
i guess for small damage 1d6+3 and 1d4+3 aren't that different
2
muskets get to be 1d12+3
+2
yeah i was saying for the "spend all your slots for a billion guys" thing, not the gun thing
Okey those pea brains cant use guns not with that int score
a creature with a 6 int and understand speach
Today is the best/worst day of my life I rolled a hundred only for it to deal 6 damage😭
Tiny servant has 2 int
Womp
ever had a party member that was a vampire?
Tiny servants are non-sentient thus the low int, still doesn't take a whole lot of int to aim and shoot a gun.
Yeah me
That is legit the worst feeling ever
Int barely does anything in 5e anyway unless it's your casting stat
it does control if you can understand and speak but thats one notable example
we wont be able to prove that until a rat can properly aim, shoot, and load a gun
It is able to take the Attack action and have a gun as a wielded item
D&D rats are better than irl rats
Yeah cause I was jumping around since it's my first hundred since I started then my DM said it only had 6 damage
thats true
We're still on this? 😭
but the int thing mostly matters from DM assumption of what counts as a simple general command for the tiny servant spell
i did originally preface that as a DM adjudication thing
Also I think if you don’t word that Tony servant loop right a particular GM could consider their job done after just shooting once
you can word it more effectively or use your BA every time
Could they reload the weapon tho?
Yeah there's no int requirement to reload and they're competent enough to do house chores which are more complex than reloading a 5e musket
Yeah? Give a rat a musket
It is a shame that there are no ways to domesticate small gelatnous cubes.
5e rats can use guns and irl rats can't do my laundry
I feel like they'd be wonderful pets.
I mean, the examples provided are grabbing a key (seems simple) standing watch (probably the most nebulous concept) and stacking books (also easy since it’s just moving stuff)
Bro that tiny servant ain’t reloading anything
Moral support?
Give him a little drumset.
At best they can use the gun as a mace afterwards
The one time a ruling meant to make things realistic has limited a spellcaster instead of a martial 
Stacking books is about as complicated as reloading
A musket?
Bro 😭
it takes like a whole minute
Yeah I doubt that. I haven’t reloaded a gun, especially not an old timey gun but I’ve stacked books before
And it must be done, in order.
Got to have a long rest caster in my tuesday game, poor dude is already out of slots.
Yeah, they're not that complex, especially in 5e which presumably uses paper charges to keep the reload time to one turn and not 1 minute
(level 16 party)
I have. It's not easy.
The firearms of the time, being a musketeer was a profession for a reason.
It's not easy but it's not complicated
It's not that it's complicated, it's that it requires high dicipline
And high dexterity.
Especially under fire.
I mean they have 16
Late game wizard is scary when you're down to just cantrips
It's a Bard
That's..actually probably enough if they have thumbs.
I mean also reloading is just one part of the ordeal, which is why I imagined a seperate tiny servant being on reloading duty and the other being on point and shoot duty
Tbh I think you're just overly fixated on the int score: 1int PCs can use guns under feeblemind
This was common. Especially for these kinds of weapons.
The sharpshooter and the loader.
High volume of accurate fire from a 2-3 man crew.
Sure but rules don’t account for everything even the rules say that it aint a irl simulator
Its up to the dm
Correct. But the rules are informed by reality, at points.
I'm just giving you the base information.
Everything is "up to the dm" 💀
But damn if i say it don’t make sense that with 2 int they can use a gun
Becasue I have it. Becasue I've fired black powder.
Yes there are not rules that dictate what intelligence lets you do but I am trying to think from a dm standpoint why one might rationalize why a thing would not be considered a simple, general command
Someone correct me, but I was pretty sure that you need Int 3+ to even be a chraracter.
Like 2 int is a dog.
What's the general goal of this convo or are we kicking a point back and forth for thought practice?
Can rats be musketmen? 🤔
And I wanna restate I’m not trying to shut you down I’m just doing this because it’s fun to think about
It is fun. My take is 2 int is..not sentient.
And giving a firearm, let alone any weaponry, to a non-sentient being is a bad idea.
From a RAW persepctive ( #dnd-rules ) or a game balance/preference perspective?
Oh new UA dropped I can talk about something of substance
Both I think. I'm down to argue both.
My take they can atleast make one good shot and then use the musket as a club at best
This is a great idea if you're of chaotic alignment what do you mean 😂
Well I sit Neutral good, so yeah, that tracks. 🍈
Kinda neither. Just a hypothetical. RAW here is vsgue and up to interpretation and I don’t even think the tiny servant gun thing is any OP at all i just found this fun to think about
"Go my child, do a crime" energy
Do we have a homebrewing channel?
Personally I'm more curious to how the rats even got good with the musket in the first place.
You gotta practice soemthing like that.
I imagine it cost a lot of rats and fingers.
They were trained by wizards and did tasks that rewarded them sugar when they did good
Wizard
100% Tracks.
This is 100% why my said character has a ongoing beef with basically all magic users.
"Doin stuff just cause."
Wizards are pretty much the poster child of "yeah but what if"
A non magic using ranger is "Yeah but how about we don't."
I do enjoy that a few monsters in D&D lore just have their origins as 'Wizard did it'
Wizards are a poster child of “im literally better then you in every way”
This one will start an edition war.
That is an owl bear, if I recall correctly?
Becuse my only answer to that is "Material component rules."
And spiderhorse!
And probably a few other creatures that sound like they're from AtLA
Out of the dozen of games I got that reached level 20, I’ve only had 1 wizard who felt like he was the “can solve anything” character
Ngl least of their issues is the components
Physical incompetence is.
There is a feedback loop of wish -> suffer.
The wizard class basically has no...backups without multiclass.
I hated that, personally.
Why cast wish if you can cast shape change and break the game
And the large Crossbow they got (DO they still get that?) was a bonafied trap option.
I took that. Long ago. I'm still mad.
Shapechange into things like behir and watch your party scream when you eat bad guys.
All of the class skills(That I'm familiar with, old editon, could be wrong) basically 100% leaned on magic as their damage output. They have zero martial backup.
Generally if they weren't magically created to obey my commands I'd agree but since they are
Shapechange into a genie grant your party 3 wishes and repeat
Cantrips scaling helps a lot with this (sorta)
Absoloutely.
Now a wizard can be a mage hand genius.
The biggest issue in 3.5 is the fact that the backup..fell off. You could run out of all spells.
And at a low level, your job was "Cannon"
Turn into Traxigor and go crazy
At will cantrips are a very nice fix to that.
I only played 3.5e when I was in high school and that was a good long time ago now so my experience with 3.5 has been in Pathfinder settings
That why you cast wish beforehand to make uraelf immune to that spell
I've written a multi thousand page, multi setting RPG over the course of a decade.
I wish I could play a minotaur but their abilities are NOT good... reflavored firbolg it is...
The local dead Magic zone
You can wish to be immune to that as well
i've run..a lot..of games.
With shapechange anything is possible
With Wish sickness notably
Honestly counterspell is also wildly powered requiring only an arcana check for a 3rd level spell to swat down a 9th. 'no u' on the lich power word kill has to be somewhat humiliating to have happen by a 5th level nerd
How do you deal with disproportionate game interest across the table? Two out of my 5 players are significantly more interested in d&d than the others, and they end up creating tons of cool stuff and lore for their characters. But I fear the other ones may feel a bit diminished, what do I do?
Nope
Doesn't stop being stabbed!
Monsters dont suffer the effects of wish spell
He (the firbolg) us blue baba di baba di (with star freckles)
Depends how the dm rules it
Hmn. What can you do?
But any sane dm would ban shape change outright
I mean this literally. Think about what you actually can do.
The easy max hp removal to bypass the temp hp
The way I see it, this is a horse..water..drinking..situation.
The local Mythals
My DM banned animate objects the first time I casted that too.
Hello. I have a question. This is a bit hard to say, Im looking to find a new community that might be interested in DND. Ive had poor runs inthe past. A campaign was fun, the people made it abysmal. They were causing problems and cutting people off. So, Im coming out of my shell a bit, and wanted to ask here. I understand there is a tab that is dedicated to finding communities, I wanted to ask here and hope for the best. Am I allowed to put preferences here, or do I need to take this sort of query elsewhere?
I am no longer allowed to use any books containing "Smokepowder."
Just..outright. No more.
Why: I blew up a town by accident.
New UA! Villanous options!
#find-a-game has information on getting into a gme here!
I really hope that Druid in the new UA is an indication we could get a published optional rule that allows Druids to use their spell attack modifier in Wild Shape instead of a beasts
A few low rolls were involved too, yeah? Hahaha.
You can put preferences in the post you make there. LFG chatter can't occur elsewhere on the server
When the dwarf puts a "Killswitch spell" on himself, and wires it up to everye xplosive he has ever made, and Dies mid dungeon.
First off, that dungeon room was Clean.
No skeletons. No furniture. No loot. No dwarf.
As a Wizard that's practically a housekeeping miracle!
I forget what build it was, but he, being the dwarf, didn't cast it
I'm assuming something like contingency?
He had it made, by a wizard in town, basically to "Spark" the normal striker, if he dies.
Welp. he died. His warehouse, contaned about 10 barrels, of smokepowder.
You guys just ran around with an armed nuke haha
Those all went up immediately.
Becasue we're nerds, we did the math on the yield of 10 full barrels of gunpowder.
Yeah, that town was Gone
Oh that's practically required
Also you dont get wish sickness for making urself immune to a spell or a magical effect cause its listed as a option that wont strain you
Clever lad, Greg was. Lotta homebrew nonsense. Like crossbow that fired glass globes.
Is that immunity permanent?
Filled with things. Sap. Oil. Gunpowder lit. Whatever fits.
8 hours
I like that. Alchemist Fire but now at range
The downsides were it was basically a light crossbow in range but requried a full action to reload.
Ah okay, but you wouldn't be able to wish AND shape change unless you could trance.
okey dont seems bad
good for martials that cant access magic at all or some rogue
Yeah you can, shape change into a creature that can cast wish
Well his thing was his ammo.
We have an war forged artificer that built himself a Gatling gun. He rolls a lot of D4s it's very funny.
He had paint rounds.
for?
Slimes.
Oh, that makes sense actually
"oh it's see through"THUD "Not anymore!"
Dispell magic what? 💀
Also marking things. Or people.
Just a high velocity glass globe filled with paint.
corked with a cork.
I really liked back in 3.5e being able to play a dragon PC. Sadly up at 5e we homebrewed the whole thing but it worked out well.
Unironically best spell in the game hands down as it literally gets stronger the more creatures are released by wotc
Shape change is amazing, I agree. It also really just solves every problem the regular wizard can't.
lets see..paint..glue..gunpowder bombs..sting bombs(That's water with ground peppercorns), and one where he just shoved a bunch of broken sunrod pieces into a globe, with gunpowder, and fired it.
Grease!
Weaponized bees?
My favorite one was oil.
Funny thing that only druids and wizards have that spell
We got into a fight, I hit the dude with oil, he was like "Tf"?
Then he picked up a torch.
Guy was like "Oh. Okay. we give"
Being soaked in accelerant and staring at the guy twirling a torch is a usual good oh shit surrender option 😂
What problem do wizards cant solve?
Not just guy, Angry looking dwarf
He will set you on fire. That's not the question.
The question is "What do i say to this man to make him decide not to set me on fire?"
That's the neat part, you don't.
Does anyone want some short and stupid juice? I have some extra
Nah it didn't warrant all that. he gave up. I think Greg made him pay for the glass and oil.
That was a fun campaign. 🍈
"You're wearin' it you bought it"
"Naw man this cost me Five copper. I Want my coppers."
It cost 2 gold to fire this weapon for 6 seconds.
"but that thing...it scares me" points at kobold picture
I don't speak GOBLIN neither. I'm here for money. MONEY! 💸
And it's just a Cutebold shadow.
Is bardbarian the most blessed combination?
WizBarian.
”boblin the goblin holds out 15 silver coins and begins breakdancing”
The name isn't as marketable
Our party had a kobold that ambushed us and rolled so badly we gaslit ourselves into dragging him along. He became a beloved party pet and I was the fighter that towed him along in my backpack.
I have created an entire species in my own Tabletop RPG, with my co author. Called Pet Jellies.
They are exactly what you think they are.
They eat beans.
You should homebrew a class around cutting beards so you could be a barberian
This place is odd. Can someone summon the Homebrew section?
Your raging is just shaving your beard
I don't see it.
Would work great if you were a dwarf
What if there was a librarian where they just rage really quietly
They do that bone chilling sush instead of screaming
“Get out of my librarby!”
Librarian rages by ripping out voiceboxes. "SILENCE!"
Now thats dark
Whats really dark is when someone casts darkness on me
You dont say
You know what's really dark? Ibrandul, god of darkness and caverns 
Know what isnt dark? FIREBALL
Counterpoint, Shadow Fireball 
What's a shadow fireball
Scribe wizard can do that or a sorcerer with transmute
Which is always funny, as even if you change the damage type of fireball to anything, like even Cold, it still burns things within its radius due to being a separate thing from the damage type (:
who is griffon?
Like the creature?
as in the person who is being hyped rn
#server-announcements
I do say
I just saw a video saying that apparently 6th edition has been announced. Bait used to be more believable.
Its a creator I believe
And the announcement is for the release of his book that has a ton of magic items
And the video was made on April 1st. Lol I knew it wasn't true
Well its been out for a while
Bait used to be 'You won the lottery!', now it's 'Here's a job offer!' They literally JUST announced 5.5e, I really doubt 6e is being announced already.
But part 1 of his book is in dnd beyond
how dreadfully boring...
and i thought with all his endorsement he would be a celebrity or something.
then again what celebrity has a discord account.
Which already had part 2 ….. idk why they had to release it in that order
I mean its a good supplement for dma that want more unique magic items for their games
Idk why you expected a celebrity in a dnd server
New edition will reintroduce Thac0 and give Vecna an actual statblock trust
Wizards will have a d2 hit die
New edition restores maximum AC of -20, THAC0, and Shield duration of 1 minute per round, none of this 'One round' nonsense.
Watch as people say it still won’t make a difference for wizard’s viability /hj
tfw abjuration wizard exists
Paladins will get a warhorse feature back trust
The setting will be the remembered realms
New edition retcons 4e lore ever happened
Warlocks will be able to summon their patron once per month as a boss monster that stays an amount of rounds equal to DMP which will replace proficiency bonus
Will we get 100 outcomes on Wild Magic instead of 50?
Hello everyone im Danishman. I joined this server to see how much would be reasonable for alot of my dnd stuff. Its just been kinda sitting around for a year or more. How can i add images?
No they fired the guy who was gonna write up sorcerer
You can link to images with an explanation to what it is but not post them
Will Barbarians get a better functioning kit?
Never
Well its alot of eh painted miniatures some not painted some pre painted, two dungeon master books, a player handbook, a monster manual, starter set missing a single die, bedlam in neverwinter, and an “immersive battle atlas dungeons” boards like those foldable ones. Everything is in pretty good shape
We have our college of creation channels, if made by yourself. And #merch-and-dice to show off owned product. If ever in doubt or not sure what the best channel is, #channel-guide can really help.
Thank you so much
hi guyss i have a question can i ask here ??
You already did 
You don't need to ask to ask questions but go ahead 🤙
my game wont open what can i do
Don't know what game you're trying to open
Game won't open? You're gonna need to give a bit more context
What game is this?
dnd??
That's not enough
… dnd is a tabletop roleplaying game
DnD is a tabletop roleplaying game, it's not really something you open
dnd online from steam
D&D is a Table Top roleplaying game. Is this a VTT or are you talking about the online MMO?
Oh you're talking the old mmo
That's not us I'm afraid
I was so confused for a moment
Pretty sure it's community ran isn't it?
And I still am bc I don’t know that game 😭
It's still official i'm pretty sure
even neverwinter nights servers still run
I thought they meant dndbeyond or smth
I think it's cause they allowed the games servers to be hosted by players
Try this discord: https://discord.gg/yVmtjcnaeT
I was half expecting them to be talking about the starter set and the box was stuck or smth 😭
oohh tysmmm
Used to be a common practice in older online games when they got abandoned to let the community keep them running
Rather than just shut them down entirely
There is one that also claims to be official, but I don't actually know if it is.
It's headed by SSG staff, sooo -
Ah neverwinter nights is the community ran one of old online dnd games
Neverwinter Nights is pretty much owned by it's own community, yep.
Like Bioware and now Beamdog might be the publishers, but the community has a very strong grip on it with the CEP and the big servers like Amia, Arelith and Ravenloft essentially controlling the 'official' online spaces.
Ye there's some other old mmos that were shut down or abandoned by ran by the community
I was mixing them up with DDO I think as well.
The DDO Discord is technically community, but SSG has its own employees there as well
Not built by SSG, but overseen by them
It's how they connect with their community
Like D&D 
Ye DnD. What an old game.
Try playing something newer like DnD 1e but it has a different name. /j
Oh, crapbaskets. Speaking of OLD GAMES, frickin Meridia's Beacon just spawned in a random treasure chest. 
old I can feel my grey hairs.
Maybe I'll just let it rot in here for now
On a serious note I like the whole "OSR" type systems that are based off of old dnds style of play.
But back to dnd.
I need to finish my setting guide so my mind can focus on something else.
I'm not gonna be at your table obviously but lmk when you're setting guide is done. I'd love to read it
I could send you the WIP link if you want. It's gonna be a long time lol.
I'm down. I read a friend's setting guide recently and it was cool(extremely inspired by age of umbra)
i like the idea of old school roleplaying, mainly the whole fiction-first stuff with more emphasis on procedure and less on the minutiae of game mechanics
i don't really like how most OSRs always gotta have a mudcore dark low power wading-through-shit tone though
I say I need to finish it but I've only got like 34 pages.
man i think i just got kicked from a campaign bc i told the DM he shouldnt use AI art LMAOOO
Ouch.
A worthy sacrifice. We dont like ai art here
My biggest fear above ai art would be the adventure were running being ai written.
AGREED. like, just learn to draw a pay a mf.
Even a stick figure drawing has more soul
sad tho, i really wanted to play my new character, its a fighter based off of lawbringer in for honor. he has a curse to where he cant remove his armour. its quite cool imo
I wanna learn to draw but I'm too focused on writing the guide. Once I'm done I'll be able to focus on learning to draw so I can draw the art for my guide.
Holy shit for honor player no way
dont get too excited i main highlander, lawbringer and juren....
Ahhh i play shugo its fine
MY MAN
i love shugoki. so so much. hes so fun to fight, and being headbutted is so funny.
Real af
but yeah now i gotta go redo the looking-for-dm thing. ugh
Well as they say, no dnd is better then bad dnd
that is very true
Heyyy wait i might have smth for you actually
dude also said apparently my lawful good lawbringer would be hard to fit into a campaign... my entire thing is if i see crime i punish crime
Or wait no we are full nevermind
thats foul. you got my hopes up bro.
I had plans on running a 3rd game but mind's too preoccupied.
Sorry mate sorry but i wish you luck on finding
its all good<3. could never be mad at a shugoki player
DMs often prefer players making new characters for their campaigns
I'm not saying it's all the time but from what I've seen with other DMs it is often
Might give me an idea to make shugo in dnd. Yeahhh
it was in my lookinf for dm post that i had a character set already and that his entire thing was justice and law following
i homebrewed an entire for honor style campaign, follows the campaign of for honor. had monster sheets for all the knights, vikings and samurias. was cool asf
Thats awesome
it was fun, very difficult tho but was fun nonetheless
shugo in dnd is fun asf. i made it so he can charge his heavy (takes a full turn to charge it so he cant attack while charging) and then it will skip AC and you have to do a con save to tank it or a dec save to parry it.
That is so peak
Right, good luck
ty buddy
We have finally met our final boss- our main fight is starting next week and we're already fighting it rn
I love alter self. So good for BBEG disguises.
bbeg takes of disguise "suprise it was me this whole time" PC's who have never met the bbeg "Who are you?"
they met him once at the start of the campaign, they eventually realized the travelling cleric they were with was acting sus
So thankfully I managed to avoid this lol
so many...
the explination is they are the leaders of certain areas
7 areas so one leader for each area
have the characters encountered them all yet?
They have met 1, and currently in the area of another and has to jailbreak the aprentice of a third
They each affect the worlds in different ways and lore
interesting. Sounds like a bunch of fun.
It is. But the gimmic is also its like a shatterd plane with 7 areas floating close to each other each representing different faerun settings
currently they are in the desert darksun area
and when they are done here they can pick another of of their interest. There is ravenloft esque area, feywild area, ice wind dale area, salt marsh area, magic steam punk area, and just nine hells area.
They met the bbeg if the ice wind dale area
seems like a good concept, at least to me.
It allows for both a sandbox and also railroad experience
and vareity in gameplay
Teehee I just pulled strings to do i think like 16d10+7d8+21 I think it was total?
We just kept finding and thinking of more things to add
meanwhile I have players that are ignoring the BBEGs request to meet in order to kill some goblins (that are working for the BBEG)
I mean sure you can ignore the BBEG when he's being polite, but being rude might make him not so polite...
127 damage
So when did paladins get smites
It's not just my base smite I'm using a versatile sword, Holy weapon (campaign special things), radiant strikes, its a fiend/undead, so extra, plus then since I have a special item that time compresses my smite and other things, I then did true strike
Oh and extra 2d8 cause of the special item
Absoloute cinema my oath sister
Thats so peak
We love paladins here
I sent a picture to you of the first part of the roll for my turn
There can be Javelin +1?
and at which point upgrading one with returning weapon is even worth?
Ofc
MMm......good, because im seeing the weapon option for "throw weapons" and there is...
Daggers, lighthammer, spear, javelin... not so... "much" stuff
More if i deep in martial
A trident being a martial weapon do the same damage throwing than a javelin
oh, trident was upgraded in 24, nice
that 1d10 seems good, but two hands
okey that sound epic
Welp, time to go for the Steve build
the other two hands weapons have reach and that is pretty neat most of the time
others just "Almost" have a higher dice
True
being maul and greatsword some examples
And then there is the morningstar....why it dont have any "property"?
Idk, it's strange
Flail and mace almost the same, weird stuff
I would say it's so they have a 1d8 piercing damage weapon but warpick exists
I'm just gonna have the BBEG show up, give the players a bit of a jump. Since they're ignoring his request for a meeting to go kill goblins, he will come to them.
I JUST DID ANOTHER 221 DAMAGE IN ONE TURN TEEHEE
where are these goblins from?
From their first debut! 5e Paladins are actually pretty similar in mechanical concept to 1e AD&D paladins, aside from the more 1e based rules (Stat and species restrictions) and being capital Lawful Good or else
Edit: Fun fact, I was wrong!
Actually, hang on.. hmm, I might be misrembering their mechanics. I swore they got a little extra damage to baddies
These goblins explicitly serve the BBEG lmao
Paladin is fun lol
he's recruited them for his terrorist rebellion
Will they hold up against my kobolds?
the goblins will sneak and slip
You know I never really connected the dots. The blatant East Asia rip off of the Forgotten Realms. That was first introduced in first editions Oriental Adventures and then later expanded upon in the Kara-Tur boxed set. Evokes a lot of American views on East Asia.
The only other game system that did and still does that is cyberpunk.
And that's when I realized Mike Pondsmith is heavily responsible for both.
1e got Detect Evil, Lay on Hands, Cure Disease, Aura of Protection, Turn Undead, Warhorse, Extra Attack, Spellcasting.. Huh.
Guess Smite was a 3e thing
Sounds like mein can hide
So I decided to go Ranger 5, Trickery Cleric X what subclass of Ranger is best here?
If wanting optimization tips #optimization can help greatly. If not wanting to go too into the numbers, #character-discussion can also help pick complimentary classes for your concept.
Fair nuff
Might want to think about replacing Ranger because of its range implications and go for something like druid or wizard for the spell casting
I just did 484 total damage one turn
This sounds like a great suggestion in #optimization
Wait, does this UA mean what I think it means?!?!
Yea I’ll think about that in optimization
Is the book of vile darkness finally being printed in 5e
Thats kinda what I think tbh
there are rules that are ment for reading with new editions
Finally, after 7 years of asking lol
there are also rules in the original vile darkness 3.5e that are useable by variance
says 4th and 5th edition
I wonder if we'll see a particular set of chains come back
Though if this is the case with BoVD I'm genuinely happy
what did you find?
Nothing, but the villainous subclasses are a good tip off
aye. and in the new homebrew
Time to start back up work on a character piece. ..I still really should be working on a token for Sunday but, my brain does not want to focus on that right now
First Dark Sun, now this
chill Mr Alaster.. there is always time.
Until there's not. 
yeah?
Oh I just mean what else are they planning on unvaulting
Yeah. That's how time works. It runs out. For everyone. 
campaigns and expansions
Yeah but anything else that Wotc said they wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole
If the session is literally the next day but two people aren't able to join, is it still worth running if 4 people are left?
Maybe doing like a mini side quest?
That is by FAR the most damage I've ever done in one turn and I'm proud of it
i'm a monk
I always try to run if I have at least 3 of my players.
Cancelling the game over 1 or 2 people being absent creates a feedback loop where people are more fine with cancelling because they know they won't be missing any of the story.
yeah
It's easy to call off when you know you're not gonna miss anything of note.
Thats big damage, How did you do It?
Wdym