#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 343 of 1
Stay in general?...
Talk about AI being bad or be spoiled in a campaign I'm in... 
Ah yes. Their “friendship”
Just no sharing of AI generated content or advertising/suggesting ai
Oh I understand completely, I HATE using AI as a REPLACEMENT, but I think its a tool that can be used for good thing.
To quote myself: "A Great Beast which devours the soul of humankind and vomits forth the stitched corpses of their dreams, revenants animated by dark magic which pollutes the earth, the skies, and the waters."
what campaign? Vecna?
Dragonlance
Uh this isn’t campaign talk?
Like it’s a setting with a thousand novels
Absolutely. If you use it for ideas and inspiration instead of using it to carry your game, then I think it's okay
Ahh sorry, did not know about that, just heard dragonlance and thought about it
This is what I would consider acceptable. Just never get ideas from ai, or use it for art.
I’d much rather get ideas from real people in this server than offload it to a machine that scrapes data without consent.
Dragonlance: Shadow of the Dragon Queen exists as a playable adventure though 
Plus it’s use at all is very, very bad for the environment too
all the water
Random idea generator that gives you prompts and you think about how to make it work
None of my players use AI, they all drew/commissioned their characters, and since they were being such good players I surprised them with a commissioned art piece for every single one of their characters 
I would actually advise reading and consuming media to get inspiration, it's far more nuanced and helpful and lucrative. There is so much you can do with classical titles and things of that nature to help push forward ideas for you. It also just makes your work look more thought out and professional in the end.
If I want more ideas I got like a bunch of source books and novels to use
I wish I had the money to do that lmao
meanwhile me getting villain ideas from niche books
Artists from other countries💯
I do that but with ao3.
I just Google a picture or follow artists for character art.
It’s very very tempting to use the idea to just outright canonize the relationship (in my setting)
For example, i use it a lot to flesh out my character backstories, I tend to have a lot a of ideas and it straights it, I can feed it the highlights that I want, and sometimes it has some interesting ideas to fill in why things happened
Not a good example, imo
Eh that just grabs the most generic stuff from other people’s writings
My best ideas all came from ao3 fics lol
My CoS arrives today!!!!
There's probably a reason why my characters tend to have a fallen from grace motif, alas
All D&D games are just D&D fanfic
With improv
True....
If you’re running a homebrew setting… where does that leave you
See I do a lot of scholor type of character, and doctors
mega fanfic
AU
Even my most scholar-like character is also... you guessed it, fallen from grace!!
Good luck, ive tried tried that campaign 8 times and it always fell apart
Coffee Shop AU for next DnD campaign /jk
I will enjoy Curse of Strahd, I think
thanks, I think I have a pretty good group gathered here.
Have fun with it! That was the first campaign I fully played and beat as a player
Writing 100k words about ||Sergey and Tatyana slow burn where Sergey waits centuries for various incarnations of Tatyana||
Actually in podcast discord I’m in based on Spelljammer I remember bringing up in a “modern day” AU their Spelljammer would be an RV
just straight up make one of the hyper tropy "healer/support cahracter kicked out of their party goes on a revenge tour" characters that are spamming fantasy media nowadays XD
It's very good
"I WAS KICKED FROM THE HEROES PARTY"
Definitely enjoying it as the first campaign I'm DMing
I already have so many ideas for the character of strahd
He's a creep, he's a weirdo, what the hell is he doing here /ref
I once started as a PC and my character ended up though his decision, becoming a NPC and one of the main villans for the campaign and I switched to another PC
"so I joined a party of ruffians and underdogs to outdo them!" 17 light novels and a manhua adaptation
the author gets imprisoned for tax evasion for the betetr part of a decade before finishing it
Those are my guilty pleasure watches but even then I kind of rate them at B tier stuff, I might do it as a placeholder for campaigns where I don't want to sortie my prized PC concepts
CoS reddit has inspired me quite a bit
Getting kicked from a hero's party implies I have this pressure to go mvp on my tables
It's hard to roleplay a character who's more charismatic than me
yeah.... this will be an issue for sure
Here is a question for the DMs here
How many adventures do you think you’ve ran that were just plots you got from other media?
I remembered I did a Sigil one shot with Demons that I realized after the fact was just some stuff I got from Batman: Arkham Asylum
Not plots I got from media, but plots that coincedentally was very similar to a movie
Anyone got a good feat recommendation for a Divination Wizard?
Should have realized it when the Gnoll Demon was just the joker
there is nothing new under the sun 
it's best to not worry about it
War Caster if you haven't already?
That’s it. You’ve solved DnD. All campaigns are fanfic or AU. I don’t know what to do anymore
Hmmm.... I'm new so I'm currently running my homebrew campaign, with basically a vampire spawn killmonger.
👀
telekinetic c:
moving enemies around is nice <3
I guess that could work. What feats do Wizards try to take aside from an ASI?
While not the exact wording, that is literally said in the DMG.
Pictures? In our general chat? Heresy! /jk
That is pretty neat tho.
warcaster, fae touched, resiliant (con), spell sniper, telekinetic/telepathic, elemental adept (depending on build), etc.
Lucky,Resilient, Fey touched?
Soooooo many of them. My current campaign is taking concepts and ideas from the musicians Rush and King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard. They just had good ideas and names so i'm taking them.
“Abusing” my power to bring you news from GaryCon 😛
Oh boy news!
hey guys, i know dnd is high fantasy for the most part.
but hear me out. bards with other genres of music. is that a thing?
LaTia!
Hi!
Yeah, they kinda do, you can use in theory any music you want for your stuff and even make it part of his identity
Get one of the most aggressive subclass and use Rock for them
What would be amusing Party themes to have in Curse of Strahd?
Of course it is. Your Bard does not need to be a Classical or Baroque musician. Your Bard can play Jazz and the Blues or Folk music or Rock & Roll, they can make Rap if you want. The only thing the game cares about is "One of the Bard's hands is occupied with an instrument" so you couldnt use a sword, shield, and instrument all at once.
Electric attack? Play that guitar making the lighting go through it
Lin Manuel Miranda as a bard
just make the scooby do mystery gang 
My brain is thinking of a Goblin War Band party in CoS
I had a bard in the game I ran yesterday play a set of quad drums like in a marching band
For a thousand years I laid dormant! I awaken now to seek my food: Alignment arguments and optimisation debates
True Neutral doesn't exist
Hello everyone. Haven't logged in a while, what did I miss?
Four sherlock holmes / benoit blank / hercule poirot level genius detectives show up in barovia, with the sole objective of disproving the existence of vampires.
Harmonica beatboxing bard
everything O_o /j
Yeeeees. Feed meeeee
that one song in wotr that plays at the start
“We found proof a vampire does exist!”
everyone sharpening their stakes
“Not for long.”
You understand precisely what I find appealing about this idea
Scooby (Druid)
Shaggy (Either monk or Ranger)
Dave ( Fighter or Paladin)
Daphne (bard or rogue)
Finally Velma (Wizard)
Not music theme. As in character theme.
You can't balance good and evil precisely, down to the point where it is "true" Neutral
a bunch of dhamphir that think they are related to strahd, but just had modify memory cast on them. Strahd is just confused whenever they show up.
Strahd having to raise Dhampir children
Strahd’s cousin clearly did it (that is an actual character)
The flaw here is in believing that true neutral represents an exact point of balance. Another flaw is in believing that there "amounts" of good and evil that can be measured and balanced
What was her name? Lisa Zarovich? I gotta check again
He's back
Zanaris I deeply want to run a westmarches barovia game with my party (Detectives set out to disprove vampires) and your party in the same world. I want to see how poorly that goes.
How can one display a true neutral approach then?
I know Strahd’s cousin invented Vampiric Mind Flayers
Ah is Lyssa von Zarovich. Thats her name.
that would be chaos lol
I live
Are you sure
You live not
True, you killed the grim champion good
... I liven't...
Counterspell
whaddya'll think of the theory that DND secretly runs pop culture?
I liver
You could go all-in with Gothic Lineages and spooky subclasses
literally just being a pragmitist or chill XD
no/limited internal/external guiding code or urge to randomly cause mischief
no/limited inherent need to always do what would be perceived as the good or evil choice
not just like killing random people becaue they inconvenience you or helping them just because they ask
would be funny if the party was cottage core and stuff though
Oops all goths
"I'm willing to wait for it"
Now I want to give someone permission to have a dhamphir character that is "related to strahd" only for some troll wizard also in barovia to have cast modify memory.
... I am the one thing in life I can control.
I think this would unironically make for a good arc
EXACTLY
How many darkness theme builds could a party have? Shadow Sorcerer, Way of Shadow Monk, probably Death, Grave, or Trickery Cleric of Shar or the Raven Queen
...i now see the light
Vengeance Paladin and Oathbreaker maybe?
Thank you Aaron Burr, sir
Hexblade if you push it, Gloom Stalker
It is very simple, let's refer to what I consider to be the only definitions of alignment that I consider not just useful but usable.
A good character is a character likely to sacrifice their health and comfort to defend the dignity and lives of others
An evil character is a character likely to attack the dignity and lives of others
A lawful character is a character likely to compromise their principles, interests and beliefs, doing something they do not want to do, in order to defend social order, traditions, the rule of law
A chaotic character is likely to attack social order, traditions and the rule of law if they go against their beliefs, principles or interests
A true neutral character is a character unlikely to do those
Warlock is the “dark mage” class so makes sense
Here's a great one:
A party who has had a great session 0, they're all showing up with connections, and backstories that tie into the adventure, and character BBEGs, and they've got player connections, and super deep lore.
It's all fiend lore. They're in the wrong adventure.
Gloom Stalker ranger; skulker/blindfighting fighter
I was thinking of how Hexblade has ties to the Shadowfell/Raven Queen
All of them being Necrotic Shroud aasimar
Oh yeah species too.
Drow, Duergar, Deep Gnome, Shadar Kai, Fallen Aasamir, Dhampir, Hexblood, Reborn, the upcoming Lupine
Deep Gnome, Necrotic Shroud Aasimar, Duergar, Drow, Kensei?
Oh god, forgot we're getting Lupine.
PLEASE BE ACTUAL DOG
Please be a cat
unless you're going by final fantasy terms; in which case sorcerer is more of a darkmage than warlock is 
Kensei? Odd species
Crow people
We already got Tabaxi, WoTC hates dogs :spb
oh, you mean kenku
Fun fact that was from Dragonlance
Okay as a follow up, it's an oops all one class run of curse of strahd, which class is doing the absolute worst
A lot of early Final Fantasy was just Dragonlance
Rogue
Barbarians that aren’t Berserker
Four rogues stumbling their way through barovia sounds amazing
I would have thought Zealot
Wizard party isn’t getting through the Death House
I've heard curse of strahd is brutal... worried for my fellow noob players lol.
Vampire with Charm is why
They are dead at the start
That's the problem when you take the time to write down something thoughtful. The conversation has already moved on.
Kalashtar as well if you stretch it a bit
I apologize Incubus, I do not mean to remove your sustenance
We are too brainrotted to stick to actual substance
melee martials
Artificers could struggle
My brain is mush right now
Four human fighters vs the world
I hate Artificers, never liked 'em
Im fairly sure a team of all paladins is fine
A fighter party would ruin Strahd
I mind controlled warlock, he oneshot artificer.
4 bards vs Barovia
A team of all monks would do well too
Oh a team of all paladins has that campaign locked down
A group of Frat boys going up against strahd
So... many... stunniung strikes...
What matters the most is that the team has some ranged option and a good wisdom save
Ranger, Paladin, Cleric, and Fighter are classes that could MonoClass Curse of Strahd
A team of all paladins is effectively Seal Team Six
Bards...? :)
twenty potential stunning strikes at level 5
Bards die
Reminds me of Paladin in Hell (2e adventure IIRC)
Bards get turned into Spawn
Well enough. Spellcasting carries the team through the tough patches
I don't think fighters can solely because I don't know if the healing from Second Wind is enough
Their spell list gets ruined by the undead running around
The Bard Slander will not be tolerated
They would have 4 of them by level 10
They get cleric spells :(
Each, and all get their stuff from short rests
if they live that long. More likely to be turned to Spawn
If they live long enough they'd be fine, it's the low levels I'm worried about
They get two at level 1 each
Does he know?
A balanced group of fighters are probably fine I guess
The best team to all-one-class CoS is either wizards or warlocks
This is basically the same questions as "what's the best class"
Add something like a Battlemaster or Banneret they got enough HP
Oh perfect
I think Cleric might be the best... no?
It gets filtered at some point
The wizard party isn’t getting out of Death House
They absolutely are lmao
Yeah Clerics would do wicked good in CoS
Wizards can't do it, I'd be cautious signing off on warlocks but maybe you could
Not really
One broom vs 4 wizards
broom solos
Broom gets stomped
Turn undead, sear undead, their entire spell list negating the curses and debuffs of Strahd, great wisdom saves, healing and utility
ok, clearly the vibes are not meticulous today
Varied subclass options. Clerics handle CoS hard
Spirit Guardians dodge too
Do clerics maybe have the best run of it?
Yeah plenty of options to stop Strahd’s running away tactics
The most important thing for clearing CoS overall is the quality of your class spell list
That's what I think
we were 1 missed attack away from TPKing to broom q_q
Main weakness of clerics is they are slow
I feel their only competition might be the paladins
Overall I'd say the best possible comp to clear CoS in 4 people is 2 wizards 2 warlocks
ok
Ranger is decently close to
Best possible monoclass team would be either 4 warlocks or 4 wizards right?
Things are heating up in the Strahd community
Ranger might not be a terrible shout here
Mainly because Ranger counters Strahd’s primary tactics
if we are just talking about death house at level 1 then twilight cleric
We aren’t
I'm also gonna be honest part of my consideration here is: Does this class have access to any real healing
One bad initiative and wizards die to death house
They meant the entirety of CoS
one problem with all wizards is you do not have a lot of healing options
i see
I have a feeling this is an elaborate ragebait
Oh hi Lime
The surprise round dudes in Death House killing wizards round 1
Hallo Sublime
5e or 5.5e?
this is monoclass right?
Yeah monoclass
5.5e we'll say
more like not everyone is high optimization minded
5.5e
my cue to leave
5.5e Death House likely one shots every Wizard since the damage buff to monsters and their action economy too
I'm assuming four reasonable well built, but not completely optimized PCs. The kind of PC you might play in an actual DnD Campaign
Right? saw the 2024 stat blocks and went back to 2014's to make it easier, now I'm running 2024 stat blocks the gloves are off
The only encounter that you actually have to fight in DH is the armor, everything else is skippable one way or another
Have there been any more details about what's included in the upcoming season? (Additional adventures, store support kits, etc?)
Healing isn’t too much of an issue for CoS personally
It’s removing all the evil status effects.
It's not a huge issue but having some is always helpful
Just whats been announced (Ravenloft, Arcana, potential Dark Sun)
In 5.5e you get healing through Magic Initiate (healing word or goodberry)
You don't need healing every fight, but you will eventually reach a fight where you do need healing
Healing Word is probably the shout here as far as efficiently getting people back up goes
Heyo
You really don't need more than HW and Goodberry
True
Death house difficulty is very frontloaded too
It’s the bouncer slapping the wizard party out
4 wizards are bringing up to 8 magic missiles assuming they spend one slot each on Mage Armor
Realistically fewer
They are so cooked
that or 5.5e making healing potions a bonus action
Armor - kite
Specter - probably magic missile it which is an L, burst it down in general
Broom - burst it down but cantrips may very well suffice
And then everything else is just a default kill
well, it was fun 
The big L in this prompt is that it's single-classed so no armor dipping, might unironically give bladesinger a niche
Or we just go Tortle or cope with 16 dex mage armor
16 AC is low but it's still just a module
21 AC if you really need it with shield too
Yes
Single-classed warlock is really sad in 5.5e now that Moderately Armored is gutted
Poor moderately armored
ok wait i came to ask a DND question but why am i suddenly getting a verizon ad overlayed on my discord sidebar wtf
I miss medium armor master not removing the dex disadv
discord's orb thingy?
But yeah, for an all-PCs-are-the-same-class run of CoS or any other module I'd do 4 wizards or 4 warlocks
yeah i just learned it's togglable but idk why it suddenly turned on. was a jumpscare
It would be correct to say melee martials would do the worst right?
Amusingly the 2024 melee Martials all got bonus mobility options now
Welp, the chat has turned into optimization, back to looking at pinterest for art references
Yep folk please keep optimization chat to #optimization
I always have a hard time picking a race for characters because so many of em are cool af
is this the right channel?, i just wanted to ask for advice on what to do
i just joined a campaign but the dm is hella spamming me on character creation information that i already get it and was already doing the character creation but his just repetitively doing it and it's making my head hurts i can't continue on creating my character
Communicate - tell them you already have the info and are working on creating a character
Like elves alone and their subracrs are cool, the changelings are cool. Every race is so awesome and i have a hard time picking one
roll a die
Perhaps i should play a giant race. What were those guys called. Not goliaths, another race
Connection to the feywild
Bugbear?
Firbolg
Ah yes
Firbolg thats the one
Those are some silly fellas
Yes a firbolg ancient paladin, i got it!
I'm gonna be playing a Firbolg wild magic sorcerer soon
Firbolgs are great
Yeah, and they have some pretty solid species features tbh
The first dnd campaign I wrote and ran was based on firbolgs and the meme "the forest won't be harmed when the lorax is armed"
That's based
Classic D&D interaction right here.
"What race should I pick?"
Gives the most obscure and oddball species ever
Play one of the like 10 types of elf elves are cool
When in doubt with weird races, pick Giff
Firbolgs feel incredibly underutilized
Gun wielding hippos in campaigns with no guns will seem out of place
I dunno, I think Thri-Kreen and Plasmoids are the weirdest species, as much as Giff are my beloved
Also half of the species in D&D are literally just normal animals that walk on two legs instead of four
think about it
Beastfolk aren't that abnormal in the realms, no
Speaking of Giff. Im hoping when I run my small spelljammer adventure soon I get someone who picks one.
If you run it and I'm avaliable, I'll play Reginald
The legend himself
Sora every villain has to dab him up and recognize him.
That’s just the law of Reginald they all just know him
On the contrary, I said that beastfplk are way more ordinary than they seem because they're just like... normal animals that exist in real life. Like just normal animals. The only difference is that they can stand up and talk.
What class/subclasses would you guys recommend for a pirate campaign I have coming up. The only one on my mind is swashbuckler lol
That is literally the one that makes the most sense
nah, just look at tortles life span. they did that race dirty
But you could also go gunslinger
Plenty of options. Barbarian - boarding party. Bard - herald and negotiator. Cleric - sea priest. The list goes on.
I haven't decided on a time and day yet so we'll work it out.
You could also do a warlock with a fathomless patron if you want to be the weird fortune teller character who has visions and communicates with the sea
If you ask me, they should live longer than even elves
Turtles do live long irl so yeah
Yk I was thinking of that one, I’m gonna play as a skeleton with a bunch of coral and stuff growing on him
Youd expect these wandering lil wise guys would travel for hundreds of years
can someone help me name my character
race class?
Guys is skeleton a race
Plumbert.
What species?
er... species...? that's what they say now
Reborn could be flavored as a skeleton
Relicborn from Crooked Moon
discription is in character discussion
Crooked Moon isn't official content
Can I encourage the character discussion over to #character-discussion please?
Well yeah but third party is close enough
too much work can't be bothered
John Dungeon
What are folks doing D&D-wise this week? Any interesting games coming up?
Its completely dm dependant on if it's allowed
Just another regular sesh this sunday
It is when you’re dm is so flipping cool and let you make stuff
We are doing a pretty small campaign after realizing 8 people was a mistake
Let me tell you about running a game for 13 teenagers... 
i've got a session next wednesday
Ain't no way my DM would just let me make races
Sounds like hell lol
I will next week, we don't know when exactly. Our ranger is very busy.
It was crazy creative but yes a nightmare to keep them all on track lol
When the campaigns done we will simply split up into 2 groups again lol
yeah i'm playing a level 4 paladin right now
it's pretty fun not gonna lie
I want to start dming but none of my friends are here and roll 20 is so hard to use it almost made we want to quit
Have you tried Owlbear.rodeo yet? Can be a pretty simple "map + tokens" VTT
is it free?
well, all I'd need is joining a game and moving my token as a player
Reading the curse of strahd module, looks like I have to buy a deck of cards
But I still have to make Stat sheets... character sheets... what ever it is for the NPCs ughhh I don't knowww
I mean.... You don't have to make homebrew enemies
Yes, unless you're the clown running the whole thing (that's me)
(It's fun though)
You can have two browser windows open - one with the VTT and one pointing at a notes/rules/adventure references
But I want to...
yeah roll 20 is my preferred. but a group mentioned using the rodeo thing. I would have much preferred roll20 but at least it's free and I can still use my own stuff for character sheet
Hmm I wonder if I should start a curse of strahd campaign alongside my homebrew one
But like all my friends use roll 20 and I don't know if they want to switch
Or since it's my first time, just focus on my homebrew
This is a problem solved by asking your friends
if you're the odd one out maybe you should switch lol
not really how it works
Ultimately as a DM you decide some major factors in how your group plays. If you decide you're going to meet in person and use physical maps, it's on the players to decide if they like that will participate in that. Or if you decide you're going to run the game using Owlbear.rodeo and Discord, it's on your players to decide if they can do that or not. There is obviously some communciation and accomadation though of trying to find the best tool(s) that works for most of the playing group.
imo, if they (the dm) wants to use some weird site the group doesn't know/want they should just share their screen and let the players use their preferred character sheet site
I'll focus on my homebrew for now, I will run curse of strahd in a few months when we finish
I mean Owlbear isnt a weird site, its just Roll20 without a lot of ads and easier to use
Roll20 has ads? I've never seen any cause ad blocker
You use external sheets for it anyhow
Its just the easiest vtt for a dm to use online that I'm aware of
This whole conversation started with me saying that Roll 20 is very hard to learn to use and I don't even know where to start
Owlbear then
ah, well I had like a 20 minute run down from my last DM then started DMing using it no problem
at that point its more work for the DM
I don't think so? sharing your screen in discord is like two clicks
It does indeed have ads. Quite a lot actually.
you, my friend, need adblock then
I might need to download another one
Sure, but the last thing I need on my platter is also asking where exactly the player wants to move their char or mess with their tokens
they should volunteer where they want to move not you asking. anyway, it's happened before due to technical issues with my group in the past and hasn't been a big deal.
I'm a believer that DMing follows much of "drivers rules" in cars
use a chess board style grid? I just don't tend to want to join any non roll20. kills my wanting to deal with it
Driver picks the VTT, riders use it if they don't wanna drive
I still use grids yes.
The point is that I dont want to worry about moving their tokens, period
by that I mean: chess board grids are labeled with letters and numbers. like: knight to E12
oh perfect, now I gotta put more on my maps- the point is that I already got enough on my plate without having to do more
that's good for you, I'm just saying from a player perspective I don't want to pay for another service, join another site, or learn a new site
The only VTT that makes players pay is Tabletop Simulator afaik
And if a player ain't gonna put in the effort to hit a button to roll on ddb then say it aloud the dm shouldnt need to put in the effort to learn a VTT they're having trouble with
ddb = dnd beyond?
doesn't Fantasy Grounds cost money?
yeah, thats a shortening on DndBeyond
isn't that paid for most things? like using content from books other than phb?
Its the same as Roll20
There's a free download version for players
Anything outside of the SRD and free rules is paid (regarding D&D materials)
hard core no thanks then
R20 works the same way as DDB does, it just offers a bit more than just DnD
I want to be able to add my own features by typing them by hand if I want
I mean even Roll20, anything outside of the SRD and free rules is paid too
features from books of course.
Tho Fantasy Grounds is a pain in the butt I wouldn't suggest it to anyone
I mean, the homebrew system also does the same. Even if its a pain to figure out
Unless they're good at Microsoft Excel
naw, I just add a new feature and copy paste
Hey folks, not sure where to post this: What character sheet layout do you like the most? I'm trying to see what's out there for a new character I'll be playing
maybe you mean the auto level up wizard? if so just don't use that lol
You can technically do that on D&DBeyond as well using the homebrew tools. If you own the physical book you can recreate your content on D&DBeyond - just don't publish it (e.g. make it publicly available to everyone) and you're good.
?books
There are four ways to access content on D&D Beyond that you may have in your physical books:
- Purchase the full digital book from the marketplace
- Purchase a digital/physical bundle from the marketplace
- Join a D&D Beyond campaign with someone who already owns the book where content sharing has been enabled
- Use the homebrew tools to copy the content from your physical book into D&D Beyond (Note: Do not publish any content copied in this way; it is for personal use only)
so you have to create content to pull features from? I'd rather make the features directly into the character sheet. seems like extra work
Or you by the book
DDB's homebrew system is def a bit janky
Oh 100%
that's why I'll just stick with roll20
Hopefully after the D&DBeyond rebuild it will be a lot better but yeah, there's some things that still aren't possible to do mechanically on D&DBeyond
and others will stick with pen and paper and physical books...
I'm a firm believer in pick and use the tools that work best for you and your group
for character sheets, to me DM should be satisfied with me sharing screen as proof of rolls if it's a trust issue. and screenshots of character sheet. are people that picky with forcing ddb?
what about screenshots lol?
depends on scenario
I guess I can use chrome's print to PDF but that's extra hoops
I mean ideally your group you're playing with can be trusted to roll physical or digital dice and everyone accepts whatever they communicate as being what was rolled.
Basically they can be trusted to play according to the rules and not cheat
yeah, that's true. I have physical dice I just roll with roll 20 cause it gives me proof I don't have to worry about being accused
and I don't have to math
one day ill have a camera facing downwards so i can use physical die for my online games.
Eat your dice on camera
I still need to find someone who sells edible die
I think there are dice ice cube molds you could probably make candy or ice dice and eat them
It can also be fun to see the dice rolls so the experience is shared by the entire group... but yeah. Communication and trust is pretty critical regardless of what tools or processes you use to play D&D.
unfortunately my candy making skills are not as great as my frying skills
Your frymaking skills 🔥
yes, a shrimp did fry this rice
Because you're short! HA!!!
Gnomes.
Still baffles me to find out that they count as an uncommon race, even Rock Gnomes (the most common kind)
Like, theyre not as common or what?
PHB classified them as an uncommon race
I thought they were common all this time
Forest/Deep Gnomes are rarer sure but that's mostly it
I mean, theyre typically holed away somewhere. Its probably less theyre rare and more you just never see them cuz theyre always being autistic at home
Considering that in the most detailed setting of the Forgotten Realms Gnomes are uncommon to the point where most of them come from a small island that just recently recovered from an apocalypse.
Uncommon makes sense.
Guys hear me out
no
Necromancer who works in a Stable
In order for the players to stop him they need to beat a Dead Horse
Ok I have not started my first DnD session
Necroprancer
If it doesn't smell I'll do it
Nealen, silence
(this is what they told me)
I walk 25ft out of it
Entangle
Immune
What in the YouTube Shorts was that pun
: )
calls owlbear to take you back to us
I cast death by cringe
Unsavable Rime's Binding Ice
It missed
What do ya all think of Fantasy Age?
But mom /j
I was playing around too much with an upcoming TTRPG about manifesting things with the power of puns and world play.
so my upcoming sessions might be insufferable if I get my computer working in time.
Lord Soth is gonna have a weapon that tears up the battle field because he keeps Dragging the Lance
I think my Cleric is gonna have to chastise his party a little bit the next session we play
We're finally in The Dungeon of The Mad Mage now and they just.. pursued two bugbears without checking for traps or letting me Arcane eye ahead first
"I know ya think that ya can just be risky cuz ya've got a Cleric, but it don't matter if I end up dyin' because o' yer mistakes! "
Mind you, it was a Monk and a Rogue doin' risky plays, not even the Barbarian (he wasn't there for most sessions but was there for the combat at the very end)
In one of my paid sessions recently, the party paid me money to lay them out as their employer for 2 hours after they got caught lying about murdering an innocent person
I've never been paid to yell at people before. I felt weird lol
I'd pay you to yell at me... /silly
I love my party to bits, but man sometimes it sucks being their cleric 😭
And my Cleric is such a kind old man that he doesn't even view them aa a nuisance
He wasn't very kind to Volo last night 💀
Worst part is they spent the entire previous session coming up with a cohesive story that they could all tell as a lie. And after they did so and the employer bought it, one of them sighed and said
"thanks so much for being cool about us lying when you go to tell your bosses" think she was in on it when she very much wasn't.
Btw Tokii did I tell you I got my idea set up for my next Mini Campaign?
I’m titling it “Volo’s Guide to Barovia”
My Tortle Cleric would like to punch Volo in the teeth
He wouldn't
But he'd like to
Oh, question, who is Volo
Volo
The guy who wrote Volos Guide to Monsters
A level 1 Wizard called a Bard who gets into way too much trouble
I know Drizzt, Jarlaxle (thanks to Ti), the wizards
He's a Wizard that parades as a Bard
He is kinda an idiot gag character
Guy who would be in bigger trouble if elminster didnt edit out a lot of his bigotry
The one from Baldurs gate?
Yall i need some villainous acts for a really cocky human fighter rival to do
Yes
That is one of his appearances yes
Elminster leaves in just enough so people will know what hes about
Something thatd make my players hate him even more
Acererak and Volo being in the same zip code is fun to me
Wait, The Baldur's Gate Volo is the volo?!
How villainous?
Yes
Yes.
Not actively going out of his way to harm people, just whatever it takes to boost his ego
He's what Wizards decided to pin all the "inherent evil" stuff on as well
Do want him to be a bad guy tho
I knew it, joked about it, and that it was coincidence
Volo once killed thousands of people
Because he wrote a very bad book called “Volo’s Guide to Magic”
Maybe have him push a kid or something for accidentally spilling something on his armor because he's that Egotistical and it damaged his fragile ego
Too many people trusted it
Oo i really like that
Wait wut 0-0
Volo is amusing
Not too heinously evil, but just evil enough
So is Volo always a level 1?
Yep
Yes
Very!
His CR is 1/4
Hear me out, I give Volo a walking speed of 35ft
Interesting, crazy that he has his own books
Volo writes about monsters he has no true experience with
So that he is faster than the player’s walking speed but slower than their running speed
He was created by the gods to keep faerun in a Renaissance era
Is that true?
No.
Damn you, Sora!!!
You're one of my trusted dms!!! /silly
I love how he is such an unreliable narrator
Because that makes it an easy excuse to retcon all the “Volo’s guide” books
Basically he's the one that painted all the species in VGM as monsters and evil.
So Wizards stepped in and stopped his bigotry
They can just say “it’s a book written by Volo”
I liked Volo in Baldur's Gate,|| he stabbed my eye out||
Sounds like him
Larian made him the best version of himself
If it were 5e Volo he would've killed you
Volo's already made a play on our parties adventures in Waterdeep
We've talked about shutting down the Books he's writing because
- We don't trust his narrative declarations
And - Our Waterdeep party is already too widely known for their comfort
Cause he'd be very drunk during the eyepoking
He has 5e stats
Which is so fun
It’s literally level 1 wizard with no damage spells
Ye his statblocks in Dragon Heist and Tomb of Annihilation iirc
Trying to sell his book “Volo’s guide to monsters”
CR 1/4, 1st level wizard with 31 HP
When the level 1 wizard rivals a level 3 fighter HP
Yup
Dragon Heist is where we first delt with him
And since we're using the same characters and lore for DOTMM he came begging us for money after we completed the Dragon Heist.... ||And the city already taxxed us.||
Ok, what is the worst module you've ever played in? (If any)
Because certain ones get bad reps and so lots of people piggyback on that without playing it, so I want experiences
Honestly?
I've liked the ones I've played in so far
Dragon Heist
EOR
Phandelver
Most games I've been in have been homebrew settings
Tokii, you are a greater man than I, far luckier than myself
Homebrew settings just hit different
sees EOR
I wonder who runs that game
The modules ive touched are
Phandelver
EoR
CoS
OotA
SKT
QftIS
ID:RotF
SKT was by far the worst
Oooh, I got to be a Guest Star in Candlekeep last night, so that was fun
Dragon Heist is probably my favorite because I just love our Waterdeep Menaces
Ti had to change our group title from Heros of Waterdeep to menaces after first session lmao
EoR?
I think honestly, if I was to ever run a game that was not set and forgotten Realms it would probably be set in the Elder Scrolls Universe
Eve of Ruin
Oh, I keep thinking Eve of Ruin is the one shot
I've been a DM for decades and the idea of creating my entire world on my own from scratch is not appealing for some reason
The Waterdeep Menaces AREN'T Evil.
We're just a rowdy bunch who want to get on with our lives
The module where Mordenkainen says "what are we, on the eve of ruin?" Before the module title drops
Tokii has played it before iirc
It sounds like a oneshot tbh
Nealen is the only full game I've played it under so far lol
I’ve run Wild Beyond the Witchlight, Descent into Avernus, Eve of Ruin, Lost Mines of Phandelvar, Princes of the Apocolypse, Hoard of the Dragon Queen, and Rise of Tiamat
The one shot is nest of the Eldritch eye
Also QftIS
Yeah Chapter 1
Quests from the Infinite Staircase
That is one I have not heard of, mind filling me in?
I played one session but was ultimately disgusted and didnt wanna keep running it
Not related to the module at all
It’s like Tales from the Yawning Portal. It’s a handful of reprint adventures from older editions
quests from the infinite staircase is a module that updates five classic modules from first and second edition
Well actually, kinda. The Maps are too small for VTT use which is an unforgivable crime for me
It has in it one of the first modules and ever written for the Forgotten Realms in a region that they never touched again
Oh yeah Sunless Citadel and Forge of Fury I ran as well
Don't have to do it from scratch, nor do I believe it is possible, I famously (among friends) cherrypick and take things I like from other settings and kinda mix it all up
Basically they had one room with Two Large creatures in it and the map itself could only fit one large creature and it couldnt leave the room
And I saw enough, I was done
@fossil hollow
Is my recollection right?
Did you change our name from Hero's of Waterdeep to Waterdeep Menaces after session 1? Lol
Legends of Waterdeep
Ah, Legends to Menaces lmao
Quests is good, but not if you're a VTT guy like me unless you find some community made maps or makeem yourself
One that's interesting about tales and the yawning portal is that it has a reprint of an adventure from early 5th edition in it. Dead in Thay was a DnD Next Adventure
Honestly, we should get Leather Jackets that say "Waterdeep Menaces" 🔥 /silly
And it wasn’t a “1 square is 10ft” thing too?
quests from the inifinite staircase had some of the best maps in a published book in a long time imo
exept for the last chapter
Yep! And I think against the giants too?
Is it? I’ve never actually played pathfinder.
I think it was this case but that doesn't transfer well to a VTT
You pretty much ripped almost straight from pathfinder
Against the Giants was published in 1981
You don’t just double the map size? Or does your VTT not let you do that?
Most of my longest campaign experiences have been bad, which were PotA, ToD, OotA (not yours Ti), and 2 homebrew settings
Man that’s embarrassing. Suggesting an idea I think is original only for someone else to have done it first.
Wdym double it
Like if the map layout is “25x25” just change it to “50x50”
So the squares match the VTT
i've been running DoIP myself
That’s Quadruple.
That doesnt change the hallways only being 5ft wide tho i dont think
Like a biker gang?
Hell yeah lmao
Does the maps change the square size mid map?
I dont think so? idk
But then you would have to double the footage of every spell and creature to one size larger to hold up with the canonical measurements
Better to just say that 1 grid should be 5ft
No?
I usually do that with TaleSpire. Although it does technically increase the distance my players have to move, it makes up for it by actually looking good.
Why would you make the monsters bigger?
Like I ran Princes of the Apocolypse and that’s what I did since half the maps there were “1 square is 10ft”
10' grid? Could just use the four corners, suddenly it's a 5' grid.
ye thats why I dont like modules
1 square is 5ft should be a rule of life
One of the main reasons why you have 10-ft square maps is because they try to get the maps to fit on a singular page while also making them massive
cause now we got a hill giant thats 40ft wide
Why would you change the monster size?
Monsters on 10ft grid maps be the wide meme
Why would the monster change?
Because if the map is 25x25 and you are scaling it times 2, objects on the map will be bigger and more squares, so if you want it to stay proportional for play, you make players "large" and large creatures "huge"
"I take wide steps."
It’s the map changing not the monsters
The monster doesn't change in size just because your grid size is different
Why would any creature change in size?
Changing grids don’t change creature sizes
cause how are you taking up 50ft of room as a 10ft tall, 3ft wide monster
If you take every square on a 10-in square map and subdivide it into four squares, you have four 5 ft squares.
That's what I said.
So rather than 1 square of 10ft, you’re doing four squares of five ft which equals it?
If I would cast a spell on the first 25x25 foot map, and it had a range of 30 ft, I would usually be able to cast from one end to the other, right? But now the footage, according to VTT is 50ft, so I cannot stand on one end of the map and hit the other side
I'm agreeing with you. It doesn't change the size of the monsters
A large creature isn’t 2 squares by 2 squares. It is 10ft by 10ft
Yet another 5ft grid square W, dont have this nonsense going on
10 foot squares are fine on a vtt
you can just overlay a grid thats 5 foot on top of it
The actual size doesnt change, just according to the VTT, they are still for all purposes a large creature
Yeah the VTTs split up the squares you know that right?
You can program the footage to say whatever you want on a vtt if you're editing the scale of the map, the footage should automatically correct itself
Okay but you could also double the monster size. It’d be funny.
Then you have large monsters in 3 different rooms
Like even DnDBeyond maps does that.
If the footage does not automatically correct itself. You're playing with a bad vtt
No?
it uses the 10ft grid as 1 square
Roll20 and DnD Beyond both do that for me
yeah, and then 4 medium monsters can fit in the square
That just sounds like a pain to keep track of
all 4 tokens on the same spot
They aren’t
they arent in the same spot
They are?
The squares are split up into smaller squares by the VTT
Whenever I run a module like that, the tokens are automatically adjusted to fit into one quarter of the square as there is a secondary grid that overlays the map that splits every square into four
because a 10 foot by 10 foot is 4 5 foot by 5 foot squares
I assumed you were using community made fixed maps
No it’s official maps
You might have to turn off "snap to grid" but that's hardly a deal breaker. Right?
I must be experiencing ceromorphosis…
That came packaged with the modules I bought
I'll entertain this idea
And besides gridded play is optional
entertain the idea? were telling you how it works
I think you aren’t understanding the idea
You are not making the VTT’s grid bigger
Grab yourself a string. Do not be bound by the grid
You are making the Map Bigger.
I dont play irl
Most vtts allow for gridless moving
Artistic freedom.
So you walk through walls?
#dnd-maps message here is an example of 10 foot grid use
I could show you what I mean perhaps? If you got time for me to show you.
Disappear and fly?
So you make the tokens smaller sized?
No walls can still block movement, but you can move without having to snap to a specific grid and most measurement tools in those vtts allow you to move however you desire within your movement speed and the available space
No
The tokens and grids of the VTT are unaffected
The map is made bigger
Perspective-wise, technically yes. A bigger map, smaller tokens, potato po-tah-to.
Proportionally the tokens would take up less space from the total map.
Both making the map bigger and making the tokens smaller by using the grid as a subdivision will both achieve the same effect. One just might have to have manual toggling of the measurement tools of your vtt. Again, if your vtt doesn't have this, it sucks
Sora uses foundry
Basically you are not making the Grids on the map match the Grid on the VTT
Which has editable measurement on grid
It does but the maps are too small?
You make the VTT’s grid half of the map.
Once again Sora I can show you since we share a Roll20
I read this as “edible measurement”. I need breakfast.
No, i did too
I am eating breakfast myself ahaha
Foundry can do that easily
think like math blocks, if you have 4 cubes, and you say they are each 5 foot, putting 4 of them togeather maes a 10 foot by 10 foot surface
This seems like magic to me
Measurement-O’s are very nutritious
Yeah you can set the map pixel size directly. You can edit the grid size you can at the grid pixel width you can free. Scroll it to get it to exactly where you want.
All of this can be done within the map configuration menu of the particular scene
🟦 🟦
🟦 🟦
like that each 10 foot square is made up of 4 5 foot squares
I suggest editing the grid size more than editing the maps image file as if your map has dynamic lighting set up on it. Grid size will be easier to deal with
Now idk what's going on
Now its actually doing what you guys said it should do
Who got into my foundry
Wait
Blessed be Atropus and the Devs of Foundry
stares
Quadruple.
If I double the size of one 5 ft square. It turns into one 10-ft square
If I quadruple the size of one 5 ft square, it turns into a 20-ft square
We aren’t cubing it
Doubling it is the correct term we're not dealing in length or width we're dealing in square feet
It’s just making the dimensions twice as big
We aren’t measures blocks
This is weird
We are measuring dimensions
I cast a spell upon chat today
It's a new spell. I've been working on it for a bit
ive lose the sauce with this convo
Before it treated every square like 5ft but now its doing what yall said
It's called. Learn Geometry
Realistically, Foundry fixed a bug that made these maps function wrong
My fatal weakness, my anathema
Just saying that doubling it would technically make 50x25, not 50x50.
But I believe yall used magic to change it instead
We aren’t doubling a single dimension
If you double both dimensions of a 25x25-ft map, you have a 50x50 foot mat because you've doubled both dimensions
We are doubling their dimensions plural
If you only doubled one side, you haven't doubled anything. You've just changed the shape
Well that certainly changes my approach to running modules if the 10ft square is working properly
Doubling both dimensions, both x and y, is quadrupling the total area.
Theyre talking dimensions
We aren’t measuring total area
I won't need to make my own or buy community maps
Blessed are developers of Foundry
they can have my 50 bucks when i die
Geometry is fun.
I'd much rather give them 50 bucks once then pay a subscription until I die
Which, if my latest plans work, will be sooner than expected
You Fiend
evil laugh, but in a non-fiendish way
Too late
Lich laugh?
The fiend does fiend things
The ability to be able to just buy things and not have to endlessly rent them is a good thing
Lord Kas is wise
Personally I don’t find Foundry all that fun to use
Tech bros reinventing DnD by making subclasses available via subscription:
I'll probably get the community made strahd maps anyways over the official ones but this is good to know
Foundry's not to everybody's tastes. I get that but I found it to be much more stable than the competition. I found it to be The Sweet spot between free services like owlbear rodeo And roll 20 and hyper complex systems like talespire and fantasy grounds
With the ability to mod it like Skyrim
I prefer roll20 out of habit but Foundry is a close second
Owlbear is free and does everything I need
I'm over 10,000 hours into roll 20. Was a supporter from day one. I bought Foundry on the winter sale a few years back. 20% off. I haven't opened roll 20 since except to export all of my assets
I use TaleSpire. It’s been fun so far.
Fantasy Grounds is the VTT for people who can use Microsoft Excel
You can't use excel?
Excel isn’t too hard.
I've been a player in one fantasy grounds game and it is very very powerful. I think it is probably one of the most powerful systems out there. Problem is is that it requires such a steep learning curve
I had a college course on Excel and it was basically a free pass because I got it all done in a week.
Ditto
A bit of an exaggeration, moreso, people who can make Excel do the tango and ask for permission to marry your daughter in a victorian era story novel is what Fantasy Grounds is for
Using it for its base uses makes you look like hackerman
Ah yes. A common activity.
Took me a while but I made excel take care of basically every rule added by Matthew Colville's Strongholds & Followers
I played in a game with someone who didnt know how to use it and it was a neverending stream of issues and the campaign got deleted so it needed restarted
Every dm i have played under that used roll20 or foundry did not actually know how to run dnd they just had a few buttons ready. And it was painful when the buttons stopped working
I think the biggest slowdown that's happened in one of my campaigns on Foundry is I was trying to load a map and somebody was trying to access it via a Chromebook tablet while stating they had a computer and so it wouldn't load for them. So I had a hot swap of map real quick took 5 minutes. We took a break
For me, its just wondering why DDB is rolling twice for around 5 mins
For me my common issue is maps made in dungeondraft either not showing up or being a different map
So I just use my czepeku ones
Dnd beyond has been super langgy since the everyone sees the dice update
Yeah, I don't use dungeon draft. I have had a very good track record with dungeon alchemist though the fact that I can just export it as a json map and add it in with dynamic walls and audio is awesome
That program turned my setup time from 30 minutes per map to 2 minutes
Ye DD has a good track record for me but every now and then it gives me trouble
I looked at dungeon alchemist before, seems nice.
I wish you could toggle that. The times my initiative roll has been knocked over thanks to one of my friends…
That stuffs hilarious
I'm about to start a spelljammer campaign in Foundry and I found this cool module that can help randomly generate star systems with orbiting maps that animate on screen with no AI generative code or images
My setup time per map on owlbear is like 10 seconds
How much is it?
I'm looking to run Jammerspell myself
Drag and drop and fog fill
Going to have a side NPC that said he was going to the capital not be there when players inevitably want to go there. Players will wonder where he is, it is like he vanished off the face of the earth. Cue the second campaign, Curse of Strahd, where it is revealed that he was taken by the mists.
Subscribe to the Augur patreon for the 10$ a month tier and then install the mod and unsubscribe until you need to update.
Time and starting date?
TBD but a few months out.
I'll keep that in mind.
My patreon needs are stacking up.
But for an entire campaign they will wonder what happened to him
Well, if you need a player, I’d happily join.
Remember you only need to say subscribed if your module accesses the internet or you need to update
And I'll happily pay somebody money to do coding. I don't have to
Presumably the party know where they're meant to be finding this chap? A capital city is a big place.
He's a descendant of the king, he left to go do noble things.
If my small spelljammer games makes me enjoy the setting an extra 10 to the sum probably won't be too bad.
So the king will be like "Huh? Neel never arrived"
Right now I use DDB importer, the Ripper93, and The Augur
I'm just trying to wary of getting to the point where I'm spending too much for my game running.
I pay only when I need an update which is like once every 6ish months.
The urge to start an IRL campaign is super strong within me
I wish I could run an irl game
The only reason I pay for DDB importer is to get all of the monsters off of DDB for foundry.
So I did it into a template world and packaged all of the monsters I owned up into a module and made it locally installable. Some work but now I can keep my statted DDB mobs forever.
In person is the way for sure
An extra 10 bucks really isn't that much when I look at the few hundred that's in my next cart
Marut smash last night
Would you rather be 20th level with a class, feats, and subclass of your choosing (from official materials) or gain the ability to cast wish without the drawbacks?
Cast wish
Not having to worry about getting crippled for wishing for cash would be nice.
wiah
I don't fr need any other ability in my regular life
did someone mention spells
I'd wish my body to good health, wish away some other issues.
Wish a pizza to my house
You’d still only get one wish per day.
I got like 50 more years I can handle a day limit
I used my wish spell to wipe out a city before
More if you use it to replicate clone or similar magic.
Once a day wish would be enough for me
Wish myself the motivation and energy to do stuff instead of sitting on discord
Just wish for a meteor swarm over the general area and everything miraculously stops existing
I’d probably take the 20th level and build a wizard.
20th level would end up drawing too much attention to yourself imo
If I want to use Wish for something beyond replicating a spell, Simulacrum solves that.
Just find a wizard tower to spend your days in then.
“Oh no,” I say in my demiplane.
20'th level drunken master Monk aura
So Jackie Chan?
Eh. I'd rather just a cureall on a daily basis, but I can see the appeal
Tho I'd use it in ways I wouldn't draw unnecessary attention to myself
“I wish that all of my wishes appear normal to others.”
I wish away my texture issues with food then wish that it's normal for one day for them to disappear so nobody questions why I can now eat salad
That would help a lot of people too unintentionally
"I wish that wish only works for me"
Actually yknow what? No. HERES how you make a good base.
1 - find an abandoned area
2 - cast Mordenkainen’s mystical manor (or whatever the spell is called)
Free mansion, barely anyone will find it (except for some urban exploring commoners)
Learn tenth level magic and create a floating island.
Too lazy to learn it, plus it’s not safe if a dragon happens to fly by.
Make the island big enough that if it falls, the impact would be catastrophic.
No one would mess with you after that.
I think you’d need a 14th level spell for that though
Uh. Yeah they don't care.
There was a netherese city that was dropped on a city in faerun cause people don't care about the damage
“Floating continent” is a pretty hard spell to get
Not big enough then.
I think the Netherese Cities were with a 10th level spell
Ye Proctivs Move Mountain
Just go with my plan, and maybe bring a necromancer friend for extra defense.
Then if an enemy DOES find the base, they have to deal with the several reanimated piles of bones with swords and bows.
If something has stats, it can die.
Something I always think is odd is how often dnd players will scoff at characters who don't go in with the intent to kill 24/7. I understand it below board, but there are occasions where it is above board and I guess I find it inexplicably odd.
It also surprised me in the starter's kit recently one of the adventures pulls you through a scenario that doesn't even offer the idea of not going through it with the intent to end it peacefully or otherwise.
These are two different things, I know, but I believe both can be scoffed at and it somewhat confuses me. Like, we're truly not that far gone so as to think non lethal combat or peaceful settlings to situations is tacky or bizarre, right?
Is diplomacy really that much of a foreign idea these days?
I don't think there's magic powerful enough by mortals to lift a whole continent though.
I should note there is always the option to knock out and not kill enemies
Not with that attitude!
So I think the intention is to beat them up hard enough to listen
you just need enough mage hands 
Most powerful spell by mortals was Karsus's Avatar (12th level)
Pull an Ultron! Lift that mountain so high that if it falls it’ll destroy all life!
Can I knock them out with a 4th level fireball?
The point of my statement is that I feel like there are players who scoff at that. And DMs who refuse it even if it would be reasonable.
Attack rolls only
Iirc, lemme double check
Specifically melee attack rolls
Then it’s useless to just knock them out!
Can't non-lethal by burning someone's face off or shooting an arrow into their heart.
What do you think I am, a monk?
Yeah, but pommel stamping a homie down shouldn't always elicit death if you're measuring your blow so as for it to not be lethal.
True
It's why non-lethal is a melee thing for the most part.
Nice thing is, it's Melee Attacks
So Shocking Grasp aka DnD's equivalent to a Taser can be non-lethal
Certain control spells allow for non-lethal resolutions
I get you. The difficulty an adventuring party often faces is expediency. They're often in the wilds, far from civilisation. They may not have the time or supplies to return with multiple prisoners for lawful judgement. Left alive, today's beneficiaries of mercy are tomorrows stalking predators, waiting for a moment of weakness.
Like if someone falls asleep from the sleep spell you can just tie them up as an action
Or the new Street Justice feat in the FR book that let's you arrest people you grapple with manacles.
i have this assimar rogue with the sinner subclass and i need help figuring out how i should play the charecter
Well it sounds like a homebrew or third party sub so idk.
Ah
Trying to lean into ideas of modern play for this campaign I'm running has been fun. The party as the protagonists of a large, campaign-spanning conflict, personal connections from PCs to a larger narrative, heroic stakes that lead to heroic victories, etc. It has been a different experience than how I usually run, but a fun one. I am so used to my old-school style with a focus on verisimilitude and player-led play, and I still love that, but this has been really neat
It's nice to switch things up now and again
My current games are sandbox hexcrawls and the story is told by the players engagement with the world. But recently I ran a 3-4 session Shadowdark game about reclaiming a mine from a dark force and it was a lot of fun.
I kept trying to do these big expansive things for a couple ideas I had but chat here helped me reshape my focus which now has me working on a couple more 1-4 session adventures
I think you're conflating two things. Non lethal combat and diplomacy are two very different situations.
I often do non-lethal combat with one character. Because that character is very arrogant and believes most enemies to simply not be worth killing. "Let them come for more, it will be good practice"
But diplomacy? Now that really only can happen in specific situations. While you can always just decide to spare someone's life
I guess I mean more than diplomacy? Non violent solving of situations which shows those possibilities.
Diplomacy was a bit of a hasty word to go with.
I've got a warlock who will always try to negotiate. Even with an angry giant, even with a demon. Once you start throwing hands it's a lot harder to get back to talking.
I understand what you mean. So, for non-lethal solutions, or even non-violent solutions, there are other matters to take into accounts
Mostly, the question of the game's expectations.
I don't like interjecting, but this is a very good point. There are games with that expectations.
I like to come back to a certain scene in critical role season 1. Party has captured and interogated a duergar enemy after incapacitating him in combat. He answers the question honestly, with the deal being that if he does so, they let him go unmolested.
Grog, ever the buffoon of the group, wants to keep the duergar's weapon. The rest of the party agrees, the duergar disagrees that having his weapon stolen counts as being "unmolested".
The argument turns sour, the duergar goes to flee. He is killed fleeing.
So, what the party just did, in real life, would likely see them tried, and maybe even hanged.
In a military setting I mean.
They broke the negociations, they changed the terms agreed upon, they killed an enemy who had surrendered.
For me, that scene was... Not shocking. But the fact that none of the players seemed to consider that what their characters did was bad was meaningful to me
(Whuf!)
Now maybe there is something to be said about the fact that the media has consistently portrayed heroes that break those laws and customs and treat those basic cruelty as heroic since 2002 and that may have something to do with it.
But that would be getting into contemporary politics, a road that I am not inclined to take
Apologies, an expression in this case indicating approximately "the cads, how could they?"
No need to apologize
I sometimes use language in a way anybody not occupying my personal six inches of thinking space might find unclear. It's a bad habit.
Anyways I feel like there is a desensitization to those actions, that I personally find horrendous of course, that has gotten ingrained in people.
But thing is... That kind of mentality is at the root of Dungeons & Dragons.
Heroes by definition being heroic, kinda thing.
Or "It's only bad when they do it to us"
For a non-contemporary politics example: When Daenerys in Game of Thrones had hundreds of aristocrats crucified to death, the direction treated it as her triumph. When she burned a city, that was bad. Of course burning the city was bad, but why was the horrific torture of those people treated as good by the direction? As empowerment even?... Well, because the masters of that city were "evil". (And it was coded as being middle-eastern, while King's Landing is functionally coded as white)
Thank you for the analysis. It gives me something to think about.
And that's the thing. People have been talking about bio-essentialism and how it's bad. But I always felt like that consists of missing the forest for the trees.
Friend Vincent says (in AW) "Name everyone, make everyone human." And I think in that game of small communities that helps to establish a world. Everyone knows everyone. What you do to one person, likely everyone knows about by the next day. It'll affect how they think of you - even if you feel your actions were perfectly justified, Keeler's going around with a black eye that you gave them, and everyone knows it.
I'm trying to think how to bring that thinking to D&D.
Of course treating entire people, like orcs, as being functionally evil, is a bad thing. But let's take the focus out of the racial aspect and into the moral aspect. What does evil mean?
Essentially, evil, to that kind of direction and to that kind of mentality, means "anything they do is bad, but there is nothing we can do to them that will be portrayed as bad"
Your enemy being "evil" gives you a moral license for cruelty.
You do not need to respect the laws, to respect their dignity, to keep your word, to even be polite.
Long ago, I remember an argument I had where I had been somewhat... Misunderstood.
I argued that saying "orcs are not fiends, they're humanoids, therefore they should have choices" is a meaningless sentence. What I meant was "treating orcs as evil by default is bad, and the same goes for treating demons as evil by default". It was understood as me saying something more akin to... "it's fine that orcs are evil because you accept that demons are naturally evil"
I heavily dislike and despise the concept of the Thermian Argument and people who use it, I think calling something "a thermian argument" is in itself a show of bad media literacy. Regardless, justifying it through that difference is, in itself, kind of a thermian situation
I don't know the exact detail of this conversation, but I do want to say that I kind of always look at morality treated in regards to species as the equivalent to looking at humans from two different places. Calling one evil and one good has never been true, and the issue of the matter almost always falls apart if both species you look at aren't being born from evil goo, which they usually aren't.
Though that isn't as concrete an argument as I wish it could be.
Ah, that's what I'm reminded of. The later days of Cherubael, daemonhost of Eisenhorn. But that's a different franchise.
That will be going on my reading list
Anyways I suppose my point is that saying "humanoids cannot be evil by nature" completely sidesteps the problem. The real problem is the equivocation of "evil" with "unworthy of dignity". The concept of evil itself is a problem.
Alright. What if we roll back the landing zone? Evil not as unworthy of dignity, but as a range of behaviour that puts one outside of the tolerances of society.
"You do you, but over there."
That would be a good start, but do you see all the new questions that raises?
Mostly "which society"?
Fantasy, since Tolkien, has always been concerned about the intersection of multiple societies. It's a core feature of the genre
Like Einstein said, it's all relative.
"We are Klingons, Worf, we don't embrace other cultures, we conquer them."
I'm thinking of societies and their various standards of expected behaviours like some kind of multidimensional Venn diagram. Boundaries and crossovers.
Also just keep in mind that most parties in DnD are neutral at best. Most parties do some really evil, f-ed up stuff and claim it's heroic and justice.
We want to see our characters as good people but at the root, most aren't. The spells we cast on enemies, the morally grey things we have to- or choose to- decide at times.
I ran a Lawful Evil character and honestly nothing he did was horrific to the party, including good aligned characters.
Which, I'll admit. It's not a bad thing. But not realizing how messed up your characters' actions are and even defending them... Is possibly just a look into your own morals. XD
When I was Slane, I spent a lot of time in third-person mode because she was not a good person.
Totally valid
Anyways yeah. What I mean is that over the last twenty years, we have been bombarded with the message of "the hero must torture the prisoner to get information and save the day", "rules only get in the way of the good guys winning". I can't blame people for having absorbed those ideas, no matter how repugnant I find them
That evil character I mentioned was really fun sometimes but other times, I am feeling kinda terrible because I know it's something he'd do but I also know it's horrifying.
hellur
Hi feesh
And that is what evil means. It means "we do to them anything required". And that's at the fundation of D&D.
It is a bother. And I hope you don't think I'm taking it lightly with my one-liners, this is a fascinating chat.
That's why I have such a conundrum when people ask for my character alignment. I have no frickin idea.
And who is evil in D&D? The foreigners. The ones outside this society. There's a move to trade the foreign invader, the orc pillager, the goblin attacker, with the "cult". This time an enemy from within. This also reflects cultural anxieties.
The eternal Other.
And the unknown.
The cult member functionally makes themselves a foreigner. They worship a foreign god, a forbidden god, who is not part of that society. Whether it's Bhaal or Myrkul or whatever
... You can't imagine how difficult it is to make my points while avoiding contemporary politics.
I can do it, but damn.
I feel like human sacrifice to summon Tiamat is pretty objectively evil
might be best to switch topics if that's true