#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 333 of 1
I just talked about how this is super messy, trying to make everything "optional."
Tasha's was a bandaid, and it led to the ruleset being fractured, optional, and every table shaving the the line in different places.
My question is, what’s wrong with 2024 trying to seperate itself? It’s an update, after all, not an alternate ruleset.
Also, stronger monk
Stronger monkkkk
And stronger ranger
The optional rules were good, but they were never more than a bandaid for a ten year old system.
I hope 6e has more better written and defined rules, leaving everything up to the DM is a tradition that should be left in the past
debatable
I mean disagreed.
2014 ranger had a bunch of abilities that were very niche
And horribly designed (Primeval Awareness)
That's very debatable
Mornin
G’night
Probably also some more room for customization and expression. One thing I did hate was how 5 and 5.5 felt a bit limiting
Actually, they should also get to work on fixing certain broken rulings
If making a ranger that way they should focus more time into making travel and ig expliration more fun and have well defined rules
I personally find the hiding in 2024 kinda iffy, or maybe I just don’t understand it
And the fact that there are subclasses that are heavily reliant on DM fiat like Mastermind and 2014 Assassin rogue
We only just got a big update on the rules. If you're going to just be hoping for a next edition, that means you're not enjoying the game that's in front of you.
I usually use all of Tashas variant rules
Bro I love new monk, old monk was so trash lol
Don't hide, face the enemy head on like a true warrior
They should also get to work creating something passionate instead of trying to rival Eric Cartman's million dollar schemes
They should also make martials stronger, give them easier access to oversized weapons or something
Honestly, player side i dont see any big enough changes to hate it
Oh absolutely, that's one of my gripes with the new rules. It needs so much clarification.
It was still fun imo, overhated tbh
Maybe paladin, if you REALLY liked nova
True, they peaked at 3.5e
Weren't paladins way imbalanced in 5e and too op?
Yesnt
So to go back to this point, they did this. It was fine, but it was messy. An overhaul to the base rules was needed for clarity.
I never played it lol, I just saw it after playing new monk and was like "D4?" before never looking again.
Or rather divine smite
Regular paladin was pretty strong, but blew all their reaources 5 seconds in
If you were a sorcedan you solve that issue, but are a little squishier
New monk is sooooo much fun
Yeah they were really strong for a really short amount of time
5E is probably the second most balanced edition out of all the editions of D&D. Yes, there are certainly gaps and differences, but none of them made any class unplayably powerful or weak.
I've made the suggestion before of making weapons have better and more unique effects instead of a weapon mastery. It failed at making expressions easier and just made everyone scramble to pick up Sap, Vex, Nick, and Topple
Alrighty
Like, that one boss if your paladin has never used a smite?
Because I really am not, the DM has way too much power in this system because of how certain rulings are open ended enough to let DMs to make some kind of bs interpretation of it
Wasn't monk pretty weak in 5e?
In fact, I may be thinking of leaving my DM's campaign before session 1 starts in favour of a better system
Paladin is now equivalent to a barbarian
Which is not a problem if you actually like communicate with your DM and come to an agreement?
Ranger was also fun, but quite reliant on Tasha's. And the DM to know what they're doing
Not as weak as people like to portray them. All monk needed was some tweaks and now they're fine.
I see
Its not exactly a one and done fix, if the DM insists, there is nothing you can do but cast Find Greater Table
I mean, the dm should have power and control? A good dm is just…. Not bad with that power
Weapon masteries was also a really really great change
Having a bad dm isnt a system thing
Monks were not weak per se, just like ranger, a few iffy features, and the scaling was a little off imo
Getting more damage/debuffing enemies/getting aoe/usable dualwielding are all great
This just sounds like an issue between you and your DM
I do think weapon masteries were a good step in the right direction, though I’d like to see more properties in future books
Like, if that dm ran a different system you wouldnt solve your problem
If you just wanna play a different system obviously go do that
I disagree. It didn't fix the overwhelming weapon gravitations, it only changed which weapons would be gravitated towards
Making eich weapon feel more unique outside flavour or damage type would be great
No class was that far from the middle ground of balance in 2014, even despite some pain points. Everything was fine and playable, you only really noticed differences if your party was going super hardcore and requiring optimization to survive, which is not how most tables play. And probably not how it was intended to play considering how many weird exploits and stereotypically genre defying builds that were considered "meta."
This is more or less my stance. Flails being a decent example of wasted potential
Play for fun, not for optimization and you wont have that problem 😎
I’ve seen some players get great value out of push too
It helps martials get some level of utility during battle outside of pure dpr so it's great. Also usable dual wielding
Can 1 player play with 1 dm, is it good?
Sure
You can, I just wouldn’t recommend it
it is different and for some people wouldnt be fun
Uhh yeah, communication isn't a one and done thing, it's something you have to do constantly. That's .. how it works.
It was a good change, it just didn't fix literally everything, but it fixed some stuff
With a few DMPCs
Aka no one will ever play a whip unless you give them a magic whip that does like double or triple the normal damage
i played it without any DMPCs
What's DMPCs?
Weapon Masteries gave martial characters more tactical options, which is what they sorely needed.
Dungeon master player characters
player characters made and controlled by the DM but i recommend not doing that actually
I suppose that is a fair point, I'll give it that
bro why do dnd cats have a 7 in charisma? it should like 20 bareminim they literally manipulate you passively, New buff: upon seeing a cat you must make a wisdom saving throw or be completed to pet and give haft of your rations if you have more then 20 rations available
Actually whips aren't bad.
id recommend having one character as the DM, a companion, while the player has the most choice and their own character
you naturally will take a backseat role as you know the plot of the adventure
I like using them on monks but that’s about it
As a cat owner, this is objectively false
Characters played by the DM that are part of your party
My cat annoys me into stuff, this is a test of will
Oooo
Our paladin rolls pretty terribly but now his greatsword does damage even on a miss which has helped us a bunch and the paladin player doesn't get as upset when missing
You're very oddly passionate about fixing the cat statblock.
I wouldn’t recommend DMPC’s personally.
the RP is a lot more awkward in a 1on1 for me so when we played it was tongueincheek goofing around while following the serious story
I honestly don't like having companion npcs at all
Wisdom save?
this is specifically about being a solo player
I love cats
this is not about DMPCs in a normal game
lol
Would it still not have the same problem of stealing spotlight, if not more so?
no
It isn't the greatest thing in the world, tbh. You go from an average damage of about 10 on hit to 3 on a miss. But it being somewhat free does help some
Unless this is closer to a sidekick archetype
i think the benefit of it in a solo game is FAR greater
They just shouldn't be treated as full party members by the dm imo
in a normal game, DMPCs have barely any benefit to offer while presenting the full risk
in a 1on1, you are playing coop with your player
you are there as a kinda player, not just a DM
Idk about average damage or numbers but our paladin is much more happy now and the enemies are more dead
its a completely different dynamic because of that
So play both Player and DM, correct?
Kinda
Hard to describe the itch I have to play a PbP that worked similar to the type of RPGs you see in anime. So far, I only really saw it with AI
DMPCs in a solo game dont feel like "we are 4 guys but the DM wants his guy to get attention despite us all being here"
it just feels like youre having fun with your friend
I beg to disagree. They tend to have so much plot armor you can use them for cover. If you find yourself in a game with a DMPC, take the term human shield quite literally
Coop of a game you control? I feel like it might be easy to have the player feel like they lose a lot of power. Idk tho, I’ve never done it, so this is just from my perspective. If it works it works.
PbP?
a joke i assume?
you have to be very conscious of this yes
Play by Post. In laymans terms, texting
Ah, never been a fan
but otherwise its literally just a guy running through levels
dnd without any party seems kinda boring to me
It depends what youre there for
and tbh i wouldnt 1on1 with someone if i wasnt close enough to WANT that cooperation play
It would be fun to have at least one campaign to be in
Some people like roleplaying with NPCs or combat enough
It could be fun as a oneshot, to test out a character for a full campaign
It got the DM to realize what he was doing when I used his elf to Dodge arrows
Like test the build and how it feels to play them
1on1 games in my experience usually happen between people who are very close and wanna spend time together in a fantasy
But there are way better systems than dnd for a 1on1 game
at which point, there is both the trust not to ruin the game by maincharactering the DMPC, and also the desire to be directly involved
And unfortunately, that is past a dying art and are probably out of range of a Raise Dead by now
i had great fun running my DMPC monk along a fighter in mines of phandelver 1on1
i took a backseat on the decisions and played it as fair as i could imagine
I wonder what it would take to find a good DM for that
never felt like a problem to me
I wish druids could get weapon masteries
actually its kinda like playing warhammer killteam coop
Like 80% of problems in dnd
I believe the whole intention of them is to bolster martial classes though, spellcasters don’t need them
That's true, it's actually good, i just want my shillelagh to be more op
Beating people with sticks is funny
Cleave is especially great imo
In terms of utility and it just feels badass to slice through two enemies at once
I mean I am all for buffing martials but this is just homebrew, it doesn't lessen the divide, it just means you aren't really playing 5e anymore
Something like the battlemaster mechanics would be good
Based on this convo I just had, I made a decision. I talked to the DM and he's letting me switch between characters. When we have our sorcerer, I will be my druid. When we don't, I'll be my sorcerer.
Ranger can fill in the gaps if he wants to while I'm a sorcerer.
We'll do with that.
It's 5.5e, yes
Yeah…. Its 5.5e
That's the next step of evolution probably
Jinx. You owe me a dice
Sounds interesting
It’s only jinx if it’s the exact same text.
But I don't know where to send it😭
Into the void. Ill find it
Oki👍
My hunger for dice will lead the way….
Semantics, still doesn't change the fact that you aren't really playing the same game anymore
Yep
Bg3 spoliers ||is it the same issue as gale?||
Thats how updates work
the orb…..
The cube perhaps
The dodecahedron….
“You’re playing Dwantrail? Then you’re not playing Final Fantasy XIV anymore.”
The funny thing with edges…
Maybe the orb is just one of those big d100s
Its a d♾️
Most definitely
I'd rather focus on one because I know one of my characters will be behind the rest in money and magic items but 🤷 Maybe we can make it work. Maybe I'll go full time one of my characters and let the party sink or swim 🤣
We'll see how it goes!
That or it's the friends we've made along the way
I have a brass d100 I never bring to games because I think it might genuinely hurt someone.
Orbs are for pondering
Casters who use an orb as a focus must hate hills
Someone should make a d4 out of a caltrop
This will not have any adverse consequences whatsoever
I still roll them in my online games sometimes
I roll them physically as an online DM as my version of the DM screen, lmao.
I've had people step on regular d4s so i know I'm banning that in my games
The legos of dice
Legos should be a martial weapon in dnd
Metal d4s scare me slightly for this reason
lego dnd who done it
Might send you to a hospital
Can i join?
all my friends that are interested in DnD live 10 hours away
And my players all go fight my boss who kills them
ill note that down cracker
Thanks!
Go, a lightning bolt that reduces max hp
im still at that stage where im trying to find a person im quite familiar with
Go, 3 more of that
what if they win
The sorcerer of the party has 18 max hp going into it :D
I managed to get half of my friends to play dnd with me
I hope they do
You made me wanna get into someone's campaign.
as I just recently ended my campaign as I am a dm.
How often the games happen isn't a very good ratio though
I said goodbye to my players.
Oh! Well great! I hope you find a good group!
It's time for another 4 years of studying DND
The lightning bolts that reduce max hp are environmental effects just meant to force players to choose- take max hp damage or get opportunity attacked
Bait and switch battle master will love this
Gust of wind getting some action?
Dust devil, gust of wind, dimension door, wand of switcheroo
Last ones a hb item from a podcast
My druid player is gonna pop off
It sounds fun
He loves dust devil
Gotta respect the druid player
Theyve used it to stop 2 TPKs so far
I'll need to pick up dust devil at some point. I'm planning a sea druid so it'll probably be sand devil
Remind me what dust devil does
Creates a little dust devil
Creates a guy to obscure an area and trying to push people
Speaking of druid, y'all see the new Forge druid from Exploring Eberron?
Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of the dust devil must make a Strength saving throw. On a failed save, the creature takes 1d8 bludgeoning damage and is pushed 10 feet away. On a successful save, the creature takes half as much damage and isn’t pushed.
I've been trying it and it's extremely fun.
If theres sand, loose dirt, etc they can heavily obscure the area
Wait what?
Sounds sick
It's like a Warforged druid. Moon Druid but more focused on tanking and weird elemental debuffs.
Forced movement can be peak in niche situations
Is dust devil concentration?
Yeah
Dang
Unfortunately
Mixing it with spike growth would be fun
Pull them with thorn whip if the devil pushes them out of it, in case
Thorn whip is such a funny cantrip
Forced movement helps players not get absolutely walloped also
It being melee and 30ft is great
I used it a lot with Tolin (shepherd druid who had winged boots) to pull them 10 ft up then fall prone
That's why telekinetic is an S tier feat if your bs is free
The bonus action being free is the tough part
Just play wizard
True
I think about half of classes have it free
Usually
Telekinetic is for casters cuz of it's asi increases
Telekinetic or BA?
BA
Oh, yea, mainly rogue, monk, ranger, Paladin, and sometimes Fighter
Lists all but barbarian
Beserker barbarian moment
I think some barbarians have it weaponised too
Ewwwww
😔
2024 fixed berserker kinda
It was the first class i ever played…
Some, but in the same way some casters have it martialized
A barbarian warlock
I love this
It was pretty bad lmao
First character I ever played: Blue Dragonborn Paladin
I despised playing in that game so much I have yet to play Paladin again since in a campaign
Doesnt help i joined a campaign midway through, played an amnesiac bc i wasnt confident making a character midway theough
And i didnt know how to play, but the dm REALLY wanted to kill us
XD, a person just joined our Icewind Dale Campaign as an amnesiac
Are you secretly at our table?
Do all drow who were raised in menzoberenzon have evil tendencies?
Oooh, if you would like, I sometimes (rarely) run some oneshots that you could come into
No, but the society has a big influence. So probably most.
Idk what Menzoberenzon is, but I am inclined to say no
With respect to what Ophi said
Menzoberranzen is the biggest drow city in the Underdark, run by Lolthite Drow. Very nasty place with extremely cutthroat politics.
Ah, ok, so really bad
(it's "Menzoberranzan" by the way)
The great Houses of Menzoberranzen, ruled by the Matron Mothers, all vying for the favor of Lolth the Spider God.
After hearing (bg3 sploiler) ||minthara|| say "in menzoberenzon…" so many times, it makes it sound almost like a second hell
Menzoberranzan with an A at the end instead of an E?
Actually, I would say no to this, just because the absolute of "all drow", no matter where you are, there is the ability for evil and good, whether you're in a pris-perfect city or in Menzoberenzon
Menzo also has a lot of Demons and such roaming about, iirc.. because Lolth is also a Demon Lord :]
Do most drow from there have evil tendencies? Probably
Drow have evil tendencies bc lolth has huge influence
But they are prone to evil, just a generally evil culture
Being evil in drow City does help you survive longer
Yes, Menzo is like AREA 0 for evil Drow
Made by an evil god
Being arachnophobic must be tough in menzoberenzan
I think they just kill you if you are
And there is specifically a God, Eilistraee, whose biggest goal is trying to tempt drow to the light side. Her voice whispers to them about friendship and love and stuff. She's kind of the devil for a society that worships cruelty.
Large number of her followers are on the surface though
Btw can underdark spiders swim?
Hey Peach, I am not well versed on dnd lore, does Lolth have like an actual hold on the drow's minds? Or is it just cultural adaptation that came from lolth being a controller to now the whole Drow culture being controlling of its subjects?
More like her priestesses control society
Huh? So she is good? Sorry, the last sentence is confusing to me with the wording
Lolth doesn't have an automatic hold on drow minds, but being raised as a Lolth worshipper gives Her an easy in.
O, that's good news
In Menzo there are houses of Drow noble families, but they kill eachother off on occasion and are replaced.
The longest lasting one and most influential one is house Baenre, who's Matron Mother, I believe, is a CHOSEN of Lolth.
Eilistraee is a good aligned God, yes but because the society is rather evil aligned Her role is kind of like that of the devil, being a tempter to break societal rules.
Ah, ok, so yea, then I would be more inclined to say that they are evil, but again, all of Drow have the capability to do good, as long as they aren't all being mind controlled or forced by Lolth
House Baenre's Matron Mother is a CR 20, by the way, I think she has a specific statblock
You know the place is fed up when talking about kindness and compassion is like propaganda there
Kindness is not regarded as a virtue in Lolthite society, it is a weakness and a moral failing.
Drizzt is from menzoberenzan right?
Ah ok, I thought you were saying Eilistraee was the devil for a society that worshipped Cruelty, as in the society worships cruelty and Eilistraee is a devil (usually bad intentions)
Nope, nevermind, self-correctiom
ALL Drow Matron Mothers are CR 20.
So how the Sith view the Jedi
Ig so
No She takes on the role of The Devil, The Enemy, the Shaitan (and a word derived from that). You know what I mean, the Luciferan archenemy of their main God.
Sorry, I like to use comparisons to things I am better versed in to help me understand stuff
Also is there an actual seldarine/lolthsworn distinction in actual dnd lore like in bg3?
Ah, so not the Devil as in the actual embodiment of evil per se, but the devil as the main role that is in opposition to main god
Fun Fact: Lolth actually loves that her two Children (Eilistraee and Vhaeraun) are actively against her, she enjoys how Chaotic it is
pfffft
What do you run?
Uhh, not as in the species, but as in the pantheons. The Seldarine are the goodly elven gods while the Dark Seldarine are the ones that betrayed Corellon and were banished to the Underdark. Eilistraee was an unwitting pawn in Her mother's plan and willingly also went into banishment with the rest of the Dark Seldarine.
I love homebrewing worlds way too much
I see, thanks for explaining!
Ive made about 5 settings so far, id say
agreed, hey, would you be willing to take a look at my homebrew setting and give feedback? I've shared it a few times to people but almost never get critical feedback
That's just objectively not true
I've made 2, one I scrapped after running it
What part of that isn't true?
Sure, but i may be a bit harsh
Not as in trying to be mean but i try to be objective
It's pretty consistently peak
Nah, it has some weak points
Thank you 🙏 I actually prefer objectivism
I was about to say
Dissonant Whispers is RIGHT there
Just it's more usually peak then not
I realized I was about to be misunderstood when I reread my comment lol
Technically dissonant whispers doesn’t count as forced movement
Which is why its good
I believe Dissonant Whispers is the only forced movement that actually Provokes opportunity attacks
Opportunity attack moment
Command as well but yeah
Suggestion?
True!
Lolth is weird
I suggest you should take a marathon past all of these guys with swords
Dissonant whispers acts like the antipathy spell right?
Suggestion is, honestly, better used outside of combat imo
Unless it's mass suggestion
It's too good outside of combat tbh
But yeah if you are in a place with environmental hazard its peak, in a place where there is no hazards you can make them, and if you can't do that it lets you kite far better
I mean
Lolth IS also a Former? Maybe still seating? Demon Lord
With 2024 removing the action needing to be "logical"
Surround an enemy on all sides, cast Dissonant Whispers and just watch as the war casters and martials pile up the damage
Does suggestions still have the clause where you can't force it to do something dangerous
I believe so. The DM did tell me that the suggestion tell your mom she's wrong wasn't going to work
Oh! You guys wanna hear something messed up about House Baenre? (I find it more messed up than any drow lore ever)
The Matron Mother, Quenthel Baenre, has an Illithid Assistant
Before she was about to die, she had them take her conscious and thoughts and put them in a newly born Drow baby. Effectively erasing that Drows potential life and existence so she could continue living
that seems... pretty tame?
Don't they kill a lot of people
Driders eat humanoids too no?
She ERASED a baby's life from existence, dude 😭
She TOOK a body that wasn't hers and it was just a wee babe!
Yes don't get too attached to any NPCs when you're running around a drow City
Well yeah, but compared to some other DnD lore that seems pretty tame, don't get me wrong it's still messed up
That's not tame at all!
It's not the most heinous crime, but saying it's tame seems pretty disturbing imo.
Drow aren't all born Evil.
The ones that live in Menzo are conditioned to be evil.
What if they could've grown up and escaped the cycle? It's improbable, but it could've been the next Driz'zt or Jarlaxle
I wouldn't necessarily loop in Jarlaxle with the "good guys" haha, but point remains IMO.
Does she keep her memories and become a ultra smart baby or is she still bound by the mental limitations of a toddler?
I guess it disturbs me in particular, even if it wasn't violence, it still harms a child
Yeah, understandable to feel that way, but wasn't there like mass murder in Drow lore? If I recall correctly
She kept her memories but was probably limited by her new body for a while
Could be worse, she could have taken unaligned races like the Fey, forcibly changed them into elves to serve as cannon fodder in a war against the primordials like Correlon did
I'm sure her Illithid assistant helped her with running Baenre for a while
I get that it's not the worst thing that Drow have done though, it just messes me up in particular lmao
Not like, in an emotional way, but the thought makes me sick
working on an eldrich horror campaign based off of halloween, and been stuck for a long time cause it wasnt scary enough. Today i realised that it doesnt matter if its super scary or not, cause if the players are vibing and having a good time, thats enough. Right? I was so stuck on the horror elements that i didnt realize that they are just that, elements to the story! xD
And I know of the atrocities Drow committed, but, I look at those and some of them are like the crimes humans have done against themselves, so it doesn't disturb me as much, I guess lol
I've heard of it before, I mean
Drow are occasionally disturbingly realistic
The Horror Elemental
Horror is very difficult to get right. There's a lot of nuance, you have to keep them feeling powerless, and you have to take away their resources.
yeah! and at the same time you need to make sure the players are still having a good time, and also not overstep any boundaries (thats why you always ask your players if they have any tw)
It does require the right mindset to play. It is all about pushing boundaries, getting into people's heads, if somebody is uncomfortable with the horror genre they would probably be having more fun with another game
The biggest part of Eldritch horror is the unknowable
Generally it's best run as a mystery as you're trying to figure out what can stop or how to escape from whatever the big bad is
The more you know, the potential it has to be LESS terrifying
Bloodborne is a good example of Eldritch Horror done right, if you ask me... things are going on right underneath your nose, but you typically don't even know it starting off. At first, it seems like an outbreak of a plague or virus, etc.. and then, the more insightful you grow.. the more you start to see
It also helps if you can isolate your party so they can't go get help. That's a classic staple of horror movies
Horrors from Earthdawn are always fun for ideas.
Or, put them in a place they don't belong
Where the people are outwardly hostile to then.
Not trying to kill them necessarily, but telling them that they don't belong, making vague and cryptic threats and speaking of things that no mortal man would want to hear, maybe Whispers of beings in the sky... a creature with far too many eyes, far too HUMAN eyes, lurking in the caves/forest, etc
These are just average people, they don't know what the hell they've seen, but they know it's not natural, even in a world where monsters are awry
That's one of the reasons why the original Ravenloft was so good. They made it human centric, so if you showed up as an elf or a dwarf everybody was already slightly paranoid and you are not helping
I like the idea of being in a town where even the Priests, Gaurd and maybe local wizard or two are TOO afraid to help
It could be scarier when individuals of Arcane prowess are even saying "Yeah, no, I don't know what's going on and I don't WANT to know!"
Hey what are your guys thoughts on undying warlock?
Isn't it on the weaker end
Yeah
I haven't looked too much at it. My understanding is people generally regard it as underpowered. The recommendation I usually see is that folks play the more recent Undying warlock
No, just no /j
Undead is just better. Undying tried to make Warlock a little tanker and have healing esque stuff, but its just that, a little
I'm joking
I like undead
I don’t like undying
Undying has its strengths, but all of them are also present on the vastly superior Undead warlock
The tankyness isn’t useful
Taking a look at undying warlock, it seems like it's a lot of dead features, abilities that only work once a day, and sidegrades. The first and tenth level abilities especially just seem like they do pretty much nothing (save the cases where you're fighting undeads, which will vary from campaign to campaign). The 6th and 14th level features offer some healing, but... not a lot. You're probably looking at maybe 3d8+25 HP per day, which isn't nothing, but isn't a lot. None of the spells are anything to write home about either.
Undead keeps most of the flavour and seems much more fun to play
It is
It’s also top2 lock subs
Wait I fully forgot I've literally played undead before lmao
It was ages ago and not for long but it seems pretty cool at higher levels
Warlock getting a super mode is hella cool
They'd probably get supermodels too if they tried with their 17 cha
Dao and undead are very good
Limited wish is silly
Marid does kind of make me feel like its Fathomless mk 2
Granted the mechanics aren't the exact same but the theme is basically touching on it
Fathomless is 3rd best
Undead/Genie > Genie/Undead > Fathomless > Fiend > Archfey > GOO > Celestial > Hexblade for mainclass warlocks yeah
I think I forgot one
How would it look if you ranked them with genie split into 4 subs
Undying but undead is basically a rewrite
Genie is split into Dao > Marid > Efreeti > Djinni iirc
What about within the whole list
All in the genie spot
My list is a bit different hold on
Ahhh
Fairs
No matter which genie, genie is just good
Genie is based
Genie = Undead > Fathomless > Fiend > Celestial > Archfey > Hexblade > GOO > Undying for monoclass
I rate GOO over Hexblade because it gets a few good spells after level 1 while Hexblade's spell list highlights begin and end with Shield
So, apparently
Someone tried pulling the "Just use Fighter with a bow" argument on me
Should I be eager or disappointed?
We're talking DPR here, right?
GOO is such a funny abbreviation, makes it sound like that warlocks patron is a giant slime
Came across an old and defunct add for a 5e game set in an Arcanepunk/Weird West setting and it's got me keenly craving a wild west 2014 game so I can either play a Lawful Good Warlock, or Paladin. A Marshal/Sherriff/"Texas Ranger" bringing Order, and Justice to the lawless west. Reskin Eldritch Blast to be a six shooter, a rifle for Eldritch Spear, Repelling Blast and Grasp of Hadar is him doing trick shots..
Ranger is very good why would they do that
No, overall power
No its a community tier list I composed based on asking around over the course of 3 weeks, assuming 2014 and monoclass
-# It does... sigh
What is a GOO warlock?
Great Old One
Nah
thanks
Goo just sounds funny
I'm not fully upto all the abbreviations.
no one is dw
Well, they kind of are
YouTube bandwagon. "Ranger bad", "I broke the DM" sort of junk
Cthulu is goo-like
Main ones to know is ebarb (eldrich blast with agonising blad and repellling blast) and DSS (divine soul sorcerer)
Goo adjacent, if you will
Heavily leaning towards Warlock for the Wild West character I'll never get to play. Would be neat to play a Paladin too. Doesn't worship any god, he's just empowered by his strong civic duty. Whhen he gets his mount it's a steampunk/magepunk motorcycle, an Iron Stallion..
is not a giant monstrous squid?
Ranger is the best weapon user in 2014 idk about 2024
Have you looked into Gunslinger?
Hes also goo enough that a boat squishes through him
Waiting for the upgrade to a Steel Horse, huh?
How do you figure
Gunslinger exists in 2014 5e?
Its UA iirc
Pretty sure that was just a star spawn
Oh. I wish....
Highest damage and good spells
Fingerguns.
But isn't 2014 Gunslinger basically a discount Battle Master
Its also cthulu, accodding to lovecraft
So you can give Battle Master a try instead
Uptown girll
I'd want it to be a 2014 game. I've not been impressed by much of the changes in 2024? 2025?
If you want to talk more about Ranger we can move to #optimization
It's on DnD Beyond so many mistake it for official content, but it is Critical Role homebrew.
I dislike 2024
Got ya.
But yeah, I'd just reskin a warlock's eldritch blast. I'm a White Hat Cowboy, I never run out of ammo.
24, idk. 14, even without the usual shenanigans of Gloomstalker and CBE, Ranger is easily better than just Fighter with bow
Yeah, Matt Mercer made it as a conversion for Talisiens character since their original system (Pathfinder 2e) had a gunslinger but DND 5e didn't
That would probably be better for asking for advice on an optimal Ranger
This is more what makes Ranger good and why the "Fighter with bow/Fighter and Druid multiclass is stupid"
Pwt solos
This is perfectly valid. But I will say that if you can get a magical gun (even something like a Common magical pistol), you can turn it into a pact weapon. In 5e (2014), that'd let you benefit from Sharpshooter and Eldritch Smite from range.
That's probably also why the Druid multiclass argument is also stupid: you're already casting most of the important Druid spells anyways
Yeah
Except 5 ranger 15 Druid is just a Druid with extra attack
And minus shape change
What class should I try next, since I want to at least play every class once
So far my ranking is Bard, Sorcerer, Warlock, Monk, Wizard, Rogue, Ranger, Artificer from best to worst
Spores Druid rejoice
Quick tip: if you are at level 20 and you're not constantly scheming of ways to break the campaign with Wish, you're probably doing it wrong
Paladin perhaps, I noticed you played all the mage and expert classes and Monk
But no priest classes yet
*True Polymorph and yeah
I have wanted to play a Paladin, even have a character sheet for it, but the oneshot is on hiatus right now, because exams
Drow Paladin 🙏
Shame, something to look into in that case
I can totally see that. I think i'd actually want to go Pact of the Chain and just work something out with the DM that my 'Familiar' is a mount similar to what a paladin gets. maybe perminantly lose a spell slot and feat to counter balance it.
How is monk above wizard? Is is most fun for you or strongest?
That's why I usually stick to arguments at level 14, maybe 15 or so at max
Fun for me, and how it works within the group
Ahhh
Play with what you enjoy
Am I missing something? I’ve rarely played with ranger but comparing it to fighter seems like fighter comes out on top most of the time.
I dislike Artificer because of that, I didn't enjoy it, nor did I feel like I fit in with the group
Why break a game you're having fun with?
I will say that if you're level 20 and not using your formidable power to accomplish your goals, you're maybe missing something.
Conjure animals and pass without a trace
Slowly but surely making a tower defense minigame for my campaign….
Perhaps I also judged Ranger too harshly, perhaps it was just because of my DM at the time
Prebuff ranger was pretty dm dependent
The basic TLDR of why Fighter with a bow argument sucks (especially with Druid Subclass) is that Ranger is doing most of the things each of them want and then some
Level 1 ranger spells: Goodberry, Entangle, Fog Cloud, Absorb Elements
Level 2 ranger spells: Pass without Trace, Spike Growth
Level 3 ranger spells: Plant Growth, Conjure Animals
Level 4 ranger spells: Conjure Woodland Beings
Level 5 ranger spells: Upcast Conjure Animals
Might have to replay Ranger, Rogue, and Artificer once I'm done with the rest of the base classes
2014 Gloom Stalker was an art cuz its level 3 feature is basically action surge with a once per combat cooldown, and stacks independently with action surge itself
We haven't got to the spells yet 
I know for a fact I'll play Aasimar Cleric in my next oneshot
DM's that have a particular trauma from earlier players that played a particular class powerfully can make things go bad when they make judgements to lock down the things that make the class work.
Also gloom 5 is basically fighter 11 Druid 3
PHB beast master ranger was better than battle master fighter because spells carried that hard
quick, someone say a 5e race that isnt warforged
Aasimar Cleric slaps, I have a rough outline of an Aasimar Cleric concept
Dhampir
Giff
Warforged
Centaur!
Gun wielding hippos are funny
Auto gnome
ohh! I could play a Centaur Warlock Texas Ranger. He /is/ his own mount..
Aarakocra
To give a good idea for that: think about what you accomplish with a Bow Fighter and how that could be better than what a Ranger already does. For every legitimate answer you make, there's 2 that favor the opposite stance
I disliked it because
A. My DM had a month of preparation, came up to session 1 with no maps or vtt, no outlined goal for the party, no hooks for the adventure, even though he advertised it as a "Solar punk world with exploration and combat"
B. My party members were newer players, who instantly attacked each other in the tavern we met up at
C. Hunter's Mark is a concentration
I once played a Tortle that at 1st level managed to drop kick a Troll over the edge of The Yawning Portal in Waterdeep.
Teenage mutant ninja turtles?
ooph..rough game.
Hunters mark is bad so you ignore it
There's an easy fix to Hunter's Mark being concentration
Not casting it
Actually I think he was a Warlock. I played a lot of Warlocks back when I played 5e..
Better concentration: Entangle or Ensnaring Strike
He just had no cares to give, this thing was right at the edge having climbed out to attack people for the start of the adventure and my guy was right there and went. "welp...this is how I die. Witness me."
Entangle but I’d rather goodberry
then I nat 20'd
Yeah, for level one though i didn't have a lot of options, since the spells I picked weren't useful for the encounters he improvised
You always take goodberry
At level 3 that’s 30 hp out of combat
I did. I didn't take a single HP of damage, we were level 1
Ohhh 2024
Did none of your allies take damage?
If so really efficient
My party members attacked something that deflected back double damage, causing me to have to use my action several times to use my healer's kit on them
Well done
No, they weren't efficient, at all, they just instantly got to 0 hp before getting to use goodberry.
It was funny to think about
I hate games where the entire party are 'stabbing is my roleplay'
I hate tables that melee
Oh my, my ally just got hit back with double the damage he dealt... what should I do?
Oh I got it! Attack the thing!
As soon as I got them back up, they would spend a turn, and then die in the next
That's painful to read.
it was frustrating, I felt like my only purpose was just to be there and use my healer's kit
I typically like ranger classes in other games, not in DnD
Maybe giving Gloomstalker a chance will help me cleanse this bad experience
Gloom is so funny
How so?
Never heard of that term 😭
heteroclassed
That's crazy
Monoclassed
When trying out the base classes for oneshots yes, I only multiclass in campaigns or higher leveled oneshots
Personally, at that point if they kept doing that, I'd slowly be backing my character out of the fight. Let their in character actions have in character concequences. Then when half or more of the party have to make new characters maybe they'll learn that sometimes diplomacy is the best first option.
They call it multiclassed for a reason 
Okay!
I like calling it heteroclasses
It’s funny
I'm pretty sure I would've died if they didn't keep on sponging the damage
I'll be 100 with you: that is the characters having Wis dump stats irl, not Ranger being bad. You could play Life Cleric and still run into that same problem
Oi, that's my line >:c
I'm aware that the experience sullied my view of Ranger
it isn't the worst class, by far, it is unique in its own right
It has a niche over clerics
Actually, the artificer might've also been a bit sullied by my experience in that particular campaign as well... 🤔
Just have a great DM and a party not overcrowded and you'll be eating good
Artillerist is a good sub
Out of curiosity, what's the by far one in your book?
Barbarian
Followed closely by rogue
(And I feel you on the sullied experiences: people ruined Druid for me by stalling and being useless with casting and Wild Shape)
I had a shared backstory with this barbarian, she was nice, and was trying her best, but whenever she roleplayed she would scream into her microphone at the loudest volume and say stuff like "I eat book", I get that Barbarians are stereotypically not very smart, but still
Mmm, id argue rogue has its use
Though rogue has AT so it’s not awful
Id say barb followed by monk
Artificer
Monk is weird in that it's the best and worst martial at the same time depending on build
Just melee?
Other than that, I just felt like I didn't belong in the group, and that I wasn't having fun with Artificer's features
Barb is not so lucky. I always saw the class as being very antithetical
Shadow monk is a budget ranger
We talking 2014 or 2024 barbarian? Cause 2024 barbarian rules
Barb was almost good with wildsoul
Shadow monk with a musket is the best martial and nearly close to being almost as good as ranger
Melee monk is the worst martial
Look at my name…
Melee monk is fun enough at least, and is probably the best level 1 martial
Getting 2 attacks level 1 is pretty huge
Barb was buffed in 2024 but still meh
I like unarmed fighting I think its cool
Every martial got that at level 1
those my thoughts on this situation
Also, Monk has great healing and damage options as Mercy Monk. Being able to heal as much as Mercy does is already pretty good, but it's even better when you realize he also restores said healing options on short rests too
Dual weapon fighting for most classes isnt great
2014 artificer is pretty bad.
We Gunking
My overall class ranking (2014) is
S: Wizard, Warlock, Druid
A: Sorc, Cleric, Bard
B: Ranger, UA mystic
C: Paladin, Arti
D: Ranged monk
E: Fighter
F: Rogue, barbarian, melee monk
Gunk is an artstyle and I will Myrkul on this hill
I think my very first dnd character was a monk
Fighter being that low is wild to me
I have been thinking of Human Gloomstalker, I know that Bugbear is the best option but I just dislike Bugbears
Rogue Barbarian was pretty fun for that oneshot I played him in.
There should be gaps between all the caster levels
So it could be lower
😔
Im shocked I don't see more rogue/barbarian multicalasses
It's a good combo!!!
Lots of stuff can work with Gloom Stalker, I think Wood Elf slaps with Gloom Stalker for one
True but to represent that accurately I would need the entire alphabet and that would be less readable
Crossbow expert and Pam
Meh, i find melee/martials to be fun enough
I... have been imagining gloomstalkers' appearance wrong
I've been dying to play a 2024 rogue barbarian, using STR for stealth and getting advantage on it while raging? And using reckless attack to get advantage (sneak attack) on my weapons? and weapon masteries? It's such a fun hunter/stalker fantasy
I generally prefer a difficulty level where the cutoff point is "everything below ranger just won't survive"
I just imagine a Gloom Stalker looking like a standard assassin-esque character from Menzoberranzan
I thought they were covered in moss and grass to hide in terrain, that's why it's a "Gloom" "Stalker", turns out they just wear dark clothes
Oh yeah the Gloom Stalker thing originated from the Underdark where everything is gloomy
Or I guess in 2024 terms, its now Shadowfell based (arguably cooler)
Def pretty gloomy down there. Don't like folk brightening it up either.
I mean, I did think Aasimar looked like Skeksis from the Dark Crystal as well, I might be imagining other player species wrong
if players have enough money to afford any item of X rarity, do you just let em?
Ah, yes, The Shadowfell
The place where most are Dead Inside And Outside!
Amazing how different people's preferred experience of DnD is. I could not imagine having fun in a game where only like 10 percent of builds can survive
I quite enjoyed paladin the one time I played it
unfortunately I was trying to be lawful good in a chaotic "definitely not evil" neutral party so I swapped to a bard
If they can find a place that sells them, yeah
what if there’s only one shop in the entire module
It's still enough to have like... a couple thousand unique builds when accounting for all the different components
Yeah but what if you just want to play a guy who punches things
And that’s okay
But it cuts off a majority of builds, particularly ones that aren't centered around combat or DPS. social builds, intruige builds, I like games that keep those avenues open
I like games that put pressure on the players to be strong but only at big points in the story. It allows lucky weak character to squeak through if they’re chosen by the gods, while still feeling dangerous.
Monk is there
Unarmed Fighting style for
Ranger, Fighter and Paladin are there
I don’t like it when you’re fighting for your life every single day
Its kind of like Honor Mode in bg3, you shouldn't really mess around there
Ideally the pitch and subsequent Session Zero will help guide players to builds that will be practical in the adventures to come.
And that's fine +1
The thing is, every build that excels at this optimization level is a caster so you have all the tools for out of combat stuff in addition to having all the tools for combat
Doesn't really make Honor Mode good or bad per se, but some people do like pushing the system to its limits in harder modes
I can’t imagine a game without martials, so this is pretty crazy
Honor Mode in bg3 is easy ngl
Well yes the hardest part is like level 1-5 anyways lol
I was talking in regards to Haen's list and difficulty level
Honor mode with a self-imposed restriction of no more than one non-forced long rest per act, that's a bit more interesting
I don’t enjoy martials they aren’t entertaining to play other than Marc (moon knight)
But that’s cause Marc does like 300 dpr
It’s not good in high op though
Melee
To be perfectly honest, unless you're playing in a game as Haen described (IE, difficulty maxed up the wazoo), you don't really gotta worry about power levels or tier lists at all. DnD (especially 2024 DND) is good at making sure you build a competent character as long as you follow the guidelines
Bleh, not really a fan of heavy optimization in dnd
Mild optimization is my middle ground
That’s okay but I like it
Ive said this before but my favorite character was a battle master (+some ranger) dhampir with a heavy martial focus
Most DMs will try to tailor difficulty to the party, rather than just designing arbitrary power levels the party must hit anyway
All good! Im just curious tho, have you tried a crunchy ttrpg?
isnt it also online at like Lvl 20
My group tends to optimise but not to excessive extents, and honestly martials seem to do just fine. Certainly have fun tearing through enemies. And walls. And my plots.
Moon Knight is good in high op
Actually I wonder, how would someone run an optimization heavy campaign
Nothing infuriates me more than caster mains who hyperfixate on damage cough cough Sorcerer/Warlock main friend cough cough
I’m wanting to get into swse
In what sense? I can offer some advice, having played in and DMed many
I like sorlock not for damage though
I recommend Lancer for anyone looking to satisfy a high OP itch
May I introduce you to 2Wiz2Lock (2 Wizards, 2 Warlocks)
Optimize Schmoptimize
I'm gonna throw our Wizard like a Magic Missile!
Im trying out pathfinder 2e for the first time (dm) and man, you wanna optimize?
Actually wait I'll let the author himself describe it
Play 1e, way more broken and rules jeavy
Do wizards count as magical weapons? 
The real sin of martials is that they are boring and tend to only do one specific thing well.
if a module only has 1 shop but the players have enough gold to afford any rare or uncommon magic item, what do you do then?
But 2e is cool too
I'm talking about my adventurer's league table, most of my grievances are there
I mean obviously most stuff normally but I mean combat wise
Power wise they are mostly fine unless you’re hard hard optimizing.
I would say so, especially if they have Magic Robes
I’m in a challenge right now to see how many times we can complete a 30 encounter dungeon that gets harder every run through
Except monk.
Imaging a Goliath Barbarian palming a Gnome Wizard in his entirety
That shit sounds hilarious
This is how I know 2e is a better system, look at anyone that praises 1e and their first argument is 'its easier to break'
Homebrew stuff don't count
Who said I was homebrewing?
Most of my D&D experience is in the crunch but I'm trying to get out of it cuz I've gotten tired of it
Its more so its a “research based power system”
Big big fish
Honestly I think picking a warlock gives the DM a LOT of tools and value
You do heavy enough research, you break it. You dont do any, youre broke(bad)
what are y'all thoughts on the Pugilist class? Do you guys think it's broken?
like phantom hourglass?
I used to be really into it. Then I kinda realized I was missing the forest for the trees
It’s bad if anything
It's fun!
I can forward it to the optimisation channel if you’d like?
It's got Moxie
It’s middle of the road power wise for martials.
Not strong enough
It's got Piss & Vinegar
The dnd crunch is pretty small
oh nah it’s good, was mostly just wondering if the dungeon changes every time
Dog & Hound!
i feel like it's bloated with too much
OK so first you need to apply multipliers to the encounter XP budget because regular encounters won't suffice.
Second, you need large numbers of encounters. Difficulty through attrition and "this thing was meant to kill you four times over and it's the easiest encounter in this 20-encounter dungeon"
action economy's the hardest thing to manage with this
It’s the same one but we add an extra enemy to each fight
flavour wise, it's amazing
lmao nice
The reason I got there in the first place is because I play at a game store where players rotate around, and as a consequence most sessions were one shots where its just 1 guaranteed combat per session
And then at higher levels combat takes so long that literally nothing else happens during it
p2fe design philosophy is based around how much they can restrict player choices
how so
I enjoy playing Monk
So...
I enjoy playing Pugilist
I don't care how good or bad it is, I just love punching things.
what spell is better for a support caster, levitate or enlarge/reduce
On the one hand, no Warlock in pf2e is sad, but on the other hand, Witch seems interesting
i thought it averaged the most damage out of the martials
If you would throw four vampire spawn at a less optimized party at a given level, for a more optimized party you'd do, idk, six vampire spawn, a nosferatu and 20 skeletons
Ive had the opposite experience reading it, how so?
I'm currently in a group where sometimes we get so caught up in the character-to-character roleplaying that we forget to roll dice. And I love it. Never had more fun playing DnD than with finding a roleplay-heavy party
i wanted a class like Pugilist so I find it very intriguing
Is pugilist UA or 3rd party? I keep hearing about but I don't know where its from
Can get pretty sneaky with enlarge reduce
3rd party
3rd party
Also folk remember PF2e is for #non-dnd-topics
depends on who you're supporting
but levitate feels all-around more flexible
its got too much going on regarding the class and subclasses imo
“I enjoy punching things and this class lets me punch things”
punching things is good -w-
I don't know if I need another class all about it, I would be happy with an unarmed rogue subclass tbh
haymaker should be limited to PB times per Long Rest ngl
My favorite unarmed melee is a summoned barlgura
Which by the way rogue should totally be able to get sneak attack with unarmed strikes and I'm mad it can't
Think of all the poor dhampir rogues
Persoanlly im just happy i can punch with smite now
Yeah, STR based rogue isn't an archetype DND does well. Though I've always wanted to make a homebrew subclass for it, akin to Ruffian from Pf2e
Its so cool….
Street Saint is amazing
If I can still play my favorite fantasy
Thrashing people with my bare hands
Regardless pf GOOD or BAD
I'm gonna have fun, I get to absolutely knock people the hell out!
Sneak attack dhampir bite would give it a meaningful niche because of the check bonus
This is indeed a good change
That + ranged smites now, paladin has a lot more versatility in builds in 2024
but Piss & Vinegar might take the cake
wait ranged smites how?
You can do this pretty well in 2014 with battle master fighter and hunter ranger
I dont really care for Ranged smite, but i dislike ranged combat
I've had fun with Dog & Hound
I'm a Warforged Fella with a Doggo rn
I got a 40 on an athletics test with it once :3
Thrown weapons still count as melee weapons
oh my God the Thor build is real
Ok im being sold on ranged smite
Walk with me: a boomerang paladin
You see, my main enjoyment of Pugilist is that it's a non-mystical feeling Monk.
As much as I like the Fantasy of Monk, I like how down to Earth and Gritty pugilist feels
One of these days I'm going to make an unarmed/improvised weapons paladin
Oath of Redemption, they swore never to use weapons forged for war.... but the oath never said anything about a brick
that too, it's the flavour I like the most
Street Saint Pugilist is basically that
Monk is very eastern myth coded, which is… meh
I want to be big buff guy punching things
ngl i feel like 2024 should've added a detective-like subclass
Less so now, and less so if you give even a bit of effort.
Btw is there a point to running Tridents cuz it seems like its a slightly heavier spear (doesn't really mean much) but 5x the price?
Bring back urban ranger? >.>
That's just flavor, and flavor is free.
or just a genuinely drunk guy throwing hands for the love of the game
The problem i have is it isnt strength based
This is fair
And at some point, youre flavoring a LOT
2024 trident has an upgraded damage die and a different weapon mastery
what, Paladin or Pugilist?
monk
Fighter with unarmed fighting style isnt a bad choice
ohhh yea they're supposed to be harder to hit and faster
They improved them in 2024. They have a better damage dice and also Topple, meaning they are the only weapon with a ranged way to knock things prone.
hence the Dex base
Damn, well hope the table doesn't mind me sinking in 4 extra gp I guess
I'm aware
But I also like using Strength over Dexterity whenever It's feasible
This would be very funny when a campaign starts getting really high level
Its just a bonus for our flavor to be supported mechanically
My Glory Paladin was a Thrown Weapon Paladin and the ranged Topple was nice.
Also, I feel the flavor of the class should be highly considered when you're playing a character.
That's just my opinion
No I mean in 2014, not touching 2024 with a 6 foot pole for the time being
my character lore for Pugilist is literally "gimme a drink so I can bash it over someone's noggin!"
Like, sure i flavor my monk to be “buff tony, crusher of men.”
The ability scores are abstract and basically meta anyway, but if you like it you like it.
Then the dm says roll athletics
even worse considering Pugilist would almost one-shot everybody in the fight
Then trident basically sucks and there's no reason to use it.
probably for flavour tbh
You can flavor any other weapon as a trident.
By the time they get Haymaker people usually have more than 15 HP lol
I wanted to recreate the feel of a bg3 build one of those days, which does literally use a (magical) trident
Ah yes, Nyrula
My monks go to throwing weapon
haymaker stacks with crits, fisticuffs scale as you level up, extra attacks, you can spam the Moxie point every time, you have One-Two Punch
Yeah going medium armor Barb with a funny trident oddly hits the spot for my Barb fantasy
not to mention the force damage conversion
ngl the one thing I want out of D&D is a Dex-based Paladin type class
kinda like Avenger from 4e
Yes.
But you're not criting on every hit.
And its still a maximum of 25 damage at level 5 as a Haymaker crit
Genie Paladin rewards going Dex.
fair point, i miscalculated 52 HP at level 5
And dual wielding is in a very good place in 2024, so dual wielding finesse weapons as a Paladin can be pretty good.
yea but that's 3 stats I got to favour, which becomes too much work for this reward
Str and Cha to even play a Paladin, and Dex for Genie
Seems well worth it for the Genie Paladin fans.
A Dex build would go finesse, no?
Str and Cha can stay at 13. You don't even need the Cha for their powerful Dao Crush since it doesn't get a save.
yeah, a long-haired Tiefling, light armour wearing demon smiting people with a rapier is my fever dream atp
I like it!
For that matter Bladepact warlocks are also in a good place right now, and you can even Smite with them if you cound Eldritch Smite.
I like the idea of being both strong and agile but in D&D you usually only need one
Barbarian is kinda an exception but barbarian doesn't seem like a super interesting class to play to me
oh yeahhh i did forget about Hexblades
In 2024 you don't even need to go Hexblade. You can be any type of Warlock and do Bladepact well.
i just go Wildheart, so i can roleplay as a cat when not fighting and just mong out in combat
And they get three attacks!
Bladepact?
Yep!
Shadow-Touched for the Wrathful Smite access
well you need two other invocations for that but that's a pretty fair price to pay
Curious about something, mildly off topic if anything
If you're a Blade Pact warlock you're basically going to take those.
nah i meant what is Bladepact?
fair and true
Pact of the blade, its an invocation now
So there's people with no ping mentions on their server nickname, what's the equivalent of a no 2024 rules (or more like, a way to express disinterest in it) nickname without sounding overly hostile
ohh understandable
It's an invocation you can take as a Warlock that lets you summon a weapon out of magic and attack with your Charisma.
yeah I didn't know Pact of the Blade was called Bladepact
(2014 only) would seem to do.
Yeah let's try that, I think I jumped between three different nicks to no avail so far
2014 Enjoyer
Is it dumb if I use a character for a campaign or one shot and then keep the level 1 version of the character aside unless I want to use it in a different campaign with different people or should I always make brand new people
5.Only.
Your name is quite long to see the last part on mobile though, keep that in mind
Or you change the whole thingz that works 
Yeah I drastically shortened it now to a more... literal name
You can re-use characters, but they might need to be tweaked to fit a new campaign. Ask the DM.
i mean, just having the idea is fine, a different campaign may have different starting conditions so having to much preped may go to waste
Nothing wrong with reusing a concept, so long as you're good adjusting it to fit the specific campaign.
I was going through my Aasimar modding phrase back then too
Pings are not neccessary and you can turn them off.
2024 and 2014 can both be discussed freely in any of the appropriate channels (side non-D&D and Elder Editions) so it will be hard to control what other people discuss around you. Much like in any channel and convo, it's handy to specify which one you want to discuss. The nickname should help, but others are still going to discuss other rules around you.
I was very against 2024 rules for a while until I read what they updated about my favorite classes and then I was like
"Hell yeah! This is sick!"
Oh no its fine, its not like I'm personally irked by people talking about 2024 around me
I guess a metaphor would be like, you know you're allergic to shellfish but your neighbour really loves telling you how their shellfish recipe is the best thing ever and you should really try it out
He became 2014 incarnate
(2014 only, please don't talk 2024 to me) maybe?
Yeah I think that falls under being hostile lol
Hi 2014 Only!
But yes unfortunately it seems common to not read full names. Or read names at all.
2014 Enjoyer~
Salutations, the year 2014!
I don't think it's hostile? I wouldn't propose anything hostile.
It sounded like I have a vendetta against 2024 -- I don't
I admit to not always reading screen names.
(2014 Only) should be fine, but remembering the time I had pronouns in my name and still got misgendered... yeaaaaaah
Oh that's just the net, sorry to hear though
Okay I was just curious cause I played a monk for a singular one shot thing at a convention ages ago it was my first ever experience with dnd and I still have the character sheet but I have never played that character again or a monk again so I wanna explore him a little more
oh, ew, that sucks
That's perfectly fine, imo, but again ask your DM.
I'm curious, what were people's first classes?
I try not to Gender anyone
Everyone is just friend to me unless I know their pronouns for certain, then I refer to them as such
I do make it a point to click on bios to find pronouns, or else default to they/them if I'm not sure.
Wizard & I regret it
I made a Dragonborn Paladin after accidentally wandering into a homebrew wiki site for dnd, and I was convinced Paladins have a Fanatic subclass or whatever its called
My first class was Monk
And I loved it
Bard and I do not regret it. 🙂
Will do when it comes around to it. It is going to be a long time before we start a new campaign so will just have to see if I remember when it comes around to it lol
I was awfully disappointed when I found out that I can't be a literal religious nut
For D&D overall, Druid. For 5e, Fey Warlock.
i mean you can be a religious nut as any class
Came around to love Martials
Class and subclass to not define your personality
Yeah but the Fanatic had features that actively felt like I was brainwashing people into an army of sorts
It was my literal first game there's no way I would have known
My First REAL TTRPG character for someone's own made System was a Gladiator-Witch Multiclass lmao
Found out about my Analysis Paralysis
yeah, your going to have problems like that when your not working directly from the books thats for sure
It would be a bit strange to be an atheist cleric
Weapons and Potions, babeh
not at all, clerics can even exist in the absense of gods
Sometimes strangeness makes for interesting stories!
Think it was an online one shot, I thought I was being smart by looking up things online
Fighter, in ye olde days. 5e, warlock.
yeah folks whos learning is online only have a harder time with things than folks that got ahold of a players handbook in my experience
Not at all, you can be a Cleric and have faith in something other than a god.
Cleric is very much the "I'm built different" class lol
In a good way
I like the idea of an athiest assimar cleric who dislikes the gods but they just keep blessing them and they're very annoyed about it
First was Druid/Shifter, but was slightly annoyed that the 3.5 equivalent Master of Many Forms essentially needed druid for wild shape. I loved my Bard/Ranger/Master of Many forms who was one of my longest played PCs.
But then again it would also be strange to be an atheist in the DnD universe where gods are very much proven real and and mess with stuff all the time just for their entertainment
Atheist Clerics are a hard sell
Clerics can draw power from their Faith in cosmic principles like Love or Justice.
Well, I guess Clerics don't need to worship gods, just a concept would do
I can finally have faith in myself 😂😂
they have that to in places, the Athar posit that there are no gods and the entitys that claim godhood are just very powerfull mortal spellcasters
Made a Cleric without a deity but a spiritual aspect
Atheist covers a few different things, "I don't believe gods exist" is only one of them. You can also be an atheist by simply not worshipping any of them even if you believe they exist.
All my Clerics have had deities, alas 😭
There are some alternative interpertations of the word due to that.
You could belive that the gods are just really powerful but not otherwise special, or that no god is deserving of worship, or just be a consipracy theorist who geniunely doesn't belive in the gods
My concept was a Light Cleric of Chauntea
Mm, athiesm doesn't mean without faith, just without a deity. Or worship in one. Some useful terms for D&D is also Alatrism (recognition of the existence of deities, but no worship of them) and Henothiesm (Recognition of other deities, but devotion to one)
Something something light to help plants grow
Aasimar whose adventuring life is their exam to ascend to divinity.
What you described though is agnostic not atheist
Which they found out after being bailed out of prison...
Let's see here are all the Clerics I've had so Far (subclass wise) and the Deity they've had
Grave (Kelemvor)
Trickery (Vhaeraun)
War (Hoar The Doombringer)
Knowledge (Ohgma)
should we kick out a player (if we do there will be 3 players not including me, the dm left) for only about 3 months so that we can rearrange our schedules to fit DND, because they do something every single day at an annoying hour.
I kind of want to make a Cleric who worships the Truth. Like the Qowat Milat and their Way of Absolute Candor.
That works
Agnosticism is often called soft atheism.
I've made one cleric and she was a follower of Loki
I'm a little sad about it cause I turned down an opportuntiy to cause ragnarock because I didn't want to betray the party OOC
I know it's not really his domain
But I'd love to make a Peace Cleric of Ilmater
Those wacky Romulans! So counter-culture.
If players can’t consistently attend scheduled sessions then it may be worth having a conversation with your group about it
What is the disturbance
What Domain, though? Order?
Eh. Idea. Drow?
I'm surprised that Helm isn't an Order domain Deity
Interesting 🤔
Maybe?
he has some additional say judo lessons etc. for everyone else in the group both Tuesday and Friday work out but only for him not.
I'm not well versed on domains, as it turns out.
Ooh Light
Like it.
Asha, the Flame of Truth. Zoroastrianism baby!
Yeah just kick the guy
Im also considering not ending the session when he goes, so that he can still play for about 3 hours every session, but the rest still play (his levels ofc stay the same as the other players)
But tbf Knowledge probably also works.
Their character could go on a solo expedition and reunite later when judo has finished with new stories and the same levels as the party.
ye I also thought about that
I second the kick
But only because, I hate it when people stop the entire session for 1 person.
The show must go on~
A two strike system to make it more formal, but up to you
Fair
So it'd seem fair to some extent rather than something personal
Not a kick as such, they're just taking a break from it for scheduling reasons. No need to be adversarial.
That's also fair. They can come back when their schedule works for them
yeah
That's why you back up so when the enemy starts coming after you, you can just 180 and double dash AWAY!
Yeah, also just realized I haven't been applying my racial ASIs to my bard, gonna really strengthen him now, glad I caught that before it's been many sessions
Themberchaude no!
Themberchhaude YESSS!
Sorry... Team4Star has ruined "Name No!" statements for me..
ruined? I'd say it's perfect
so which deity would y'all say is the most good?
What do you mean by most good? Like which one we like the most?
i undertand why but i still dont like that temptest cleircs dont get lightning bolt
For real? Outrageous.
no the one that is the most morally good
yeah they only get storm cloud and thunderwave
1st Fog Cloud, Thunderwave
3rd Gust of Wind, Shatter
5th Call Lightning, Sleet Storm
7th Control Water, Ice Storm
9th Destructive Wave, Insect Plague
Replacing call lightning with lightning bolt would be an improvement ig
99% of the value of tempest is Sleet Storm anyway
i think what really matters is how long the player is gone during "doing something annoying at a certain hour" and why they do it
if its something they cant change, and they really want to play, having them drop out for a moment every session sounds like the best way to me
i still wanna know who thought making twilight cleric was a good idea
for around 1.5h at max
if they just decide to go on a 30 minute smoke break thats kinda on them and id be insulted that they value their smoke break
300ft of darkvision for what