#dnd-discussion
1 messages Ā· Page 126 of 1
mage hand would literally revolutionize the pharma and defence industry
Cleric 1/Chronurgy 19
Spare the Dying, Cure Wounds, Revivify(With Cartomancer), Fire Ball is pretty good
Not to mention the real fun would come from getting 3rd or 5th level spells
Yeah but I do like...Everything with advantage. I'm just good at doing things I have no business being good at.
Depends on the disease, but seeing spare the dying completely stabilises sick poisoned and bled out people, i think youre being needlessly contrarian
Cleric is genuinely the best
Hilarious
Accurate weather prediction, immediately flowering or growing of a plant, a sensory effect which could help many a person in many ways depending on their age and illness, and being able to light or snuff out a torch or campfire?
I think it's prety useful.
I'd want mending or prestidigitation IRL personally.
fr
you could either start a cult or be the best doctor in the world
Mending would save a lot of money on phone repairs
Either no worries about cleaning ever again or paying to get anything fixed ever again.
In fact, you'd be the fixer person.
what about thaumaturgy guys?
I'd also want Create Food and Water
the 2024 wild magic table is very safe for the sorcerer and their party members. the chance of bad effects is very small and non of them are as deadly as the worst effects from the 2014 table
I don't think so? It stabliizes them until they take damage again.. If you've ever had a terminal illness, you degrade constantly. Don't accuse me of being a contrarion because I just don't agree with your take. Thanks.
Bingo
Thaumaturgy would be great for self defense. Someone following you in the dark? Thaumaturgy, make the ground shake, your eyes glow, and a booming voice just simply say "Try it."
Make michelin star level food with a wave of your hands is peak
Adv on intimidation in the real life equivalent would be cool
Genuinely if you're a cleric you'd have like UNLIMITED free time, a single phone repair or creating food isn't that bad if you get paid for it
I said depends
Thaumaturgy is pretty interesting in terms of being cool, but that's it
Revivify means anyone dead within a minute gets to have a second chance at life
Create food and water means that you will never have to worry about grocery budgeting (and modern science like preservation means that you can create bland, but infinite means of stockpiling canned goods)
adv on charisma would be better
the best leaders are always the most charismatic
But that would be an op cantrip
I mean it is useful but of the cantrips like it it is the weakest one other then bloom effect all it's other effects are done better by other cantrips or with the weather sensor not all that needed
You cant save all lives so better take druidcraft is hilarious
Wild magic sorcerer has advantage on it all.
What bloom effect is represented in other cantrips? I'm curious cause I must have missed t he "I can cast a spell and immediately start the growing process of any plant I target" in another cantrip.
The REAL question, is if you got one feat, any type except epic boons, what would you take?
At the risk of turning into a plant
Not to mention 5th level spells especially. Raise Dead meaning anyone dead within a week gets revived back to life assuming you have the money to do so
For 6 seconds
I said other then the bloom effect
True, also getting paid to cure the usually uncurable conditions/diseases with Greater or Lesser Restoration
Well then you're ignoring th emost useful effect that would be wonders for the farming industry.
Get paid by Farmers to cast Plant Growth to boost crop production
It'd be fun to be a UFC fighter as a battlemaster fighter. Tripping attack spam till it works
Prestidigitation is just the best option though. Makes all foods taste good, make your favorite noise and smell, light or snuff out a small fire, clean your clothes almost immediately by stacking it up in a cubic foot, draw little pictures and symbols, and make any old trinket immediately for use which could possibly just be any small tool you need for 6 seconds.
Has anyone here played Arch Fey Warlock before?
Lucky, perhaps. Game Tournaments would be something to behold. And lottery goes from "tax on the poor and those who suck at math" to a get rich quick scheme that actually works
Or even better, you can get so many rare items in CounterStrike or TF2, then sell them off for some great money
Boon of Fluid Forms (Gain any skill you want or needed for one hour) wait ignore this
Not to mention you can clean anything and everything with a snap of your fingers. Dirty dishes? Not anymore!
If I could cast prestidigitation irl I would be so happy.
Yeah Prestidigitation is the GOAT
I hate cleaning.
Same...
Prestidigitation is just the life convenience spell that would make everyone take far less time on the daily to do menial stuff
Ticks a box on the bingo card.
what'd you tick off
Lucky or Skilled
then you have the loons who want create bonfire lol
Presti would revolutionise medieval life.
Mmm, probably not the best spell to take as is
But great when paired with other QoL spells
I thought you were going with "common conversations in this channel"
oddly specific but glad you ticked that off early
The bingo card is all about the recurring topics.
Now what would be your once per long rest 1st level spell of choice in real life?
We were talking about only cantrips.
Ha I was right.
In terms of all spells, unseen servant being a magical force entity that hels with everythign you need seems like a good one.
Unseen Servant
QoL spells? No I'm taking haste. And I'm casting it on that annoying mf at work and instantly dropping it.
Cure Wounds wouldn't be a bad option
But yeah. If there was a tier list for Classes and sub equivalents, Life Domain Cleric is an easy S Tier. You literally become a medic, physician, and smaller other conveniences all in 1 with 3 levels, then become someone who can literally control who lives and dies at a basic degree at level 9
Once per lr? Gotta look up the long lasting duration ones
Just go artificer and make a homunculus.
And make magic items too
Oh yeah that works too
Mage Armor is eight hours
Ooh actually scratch that, Find Familiar
a cantrip people don't think about enough Resistance redusing damage by a d4 in real life would be wild level of protection
Mending, Spare the Dying, Toll the Dead, and Presdigitation if i could choose a fourth
I would definitely take prestidigitation for not having to clean. Instant cleanliness is such a win
Peak
I want an animal I can telepathically speak to.
Purify food and drink would be nice for charity
Eh. Not really super important to me. Just not talking smack generally prevents most fights
I'd take summon major elemental. Having a giant elemental to take care of stuff with sounds fun.
it would be nice for us in general
Comprehend Languages would be cool
I would want Nystul's Magic Aura and Planar Binding in real life
Fair enough. That was just the first long lasting 1st level spell I could think of.
Would pair well with prestigitation for flavor
And like I said, we could use modern preserving methods to make the shelf life many years
I'd take Banishment. Yknow....to send people to other planes of existence for a short while.
Minor illusion just to mess with people for fun
Tenser's Floating Disc could be handy too
Oooo Domain of Trickery cleric. More me per me.
Only problem, idk if it works on people online
Otherwise, that would be a great option
or make completely accurate maps of any place on Earth
Toll the dead is one that makes me think you wanna hurt people, mending is situationally useful rather than universally, and spare the dying would only help in situations where they weren't going to just keep dying after you stabliize them. Irl isn't in game, we're villagers not player characters, cancer, disease, etc will still kill us even when stabilized.
purify food and drink removes poison and rot food never goes bad again
Unseen servant I think wins this one as well, for reasons similar to prestidigitation. Aka, I'm lazy.
Charm Person for de-escalation
More for self defense, if anything. It was a choice between it and sacred flame, the people I would need it for would likely have Dex more than Wisdom
That doesn't deescalate anything
They could take toll of the dead and become a vigilante ig. I'd rather take sleep or something if I were to go that route tho. Batman it with the no killing thing.
That would make everything worse
How
Now calm emotions? That'd work.
you'd definitely need defensive spells, you'd be a high target if you had those overpowered abilities irl
When the spell ends they know you did it.
Oh forgot that exists
When the spell ends, the target knows it was Charmed by you.
I guess it'd be good for like... hostage situations? Or criminals in general?
I cast charmed again. Over and over and over. So they can know theyre charmed, they just cant do anything about it.
WE're talking 1/day use
Exactly. Or you could at the very least scare someone straight. You're telling me someone wouldn't want to have something that turns someone messing with you or someone you care about into someone rethinking their life decisions?
Only if they're showing it off willy nilly
how are you gonna earn a living, word spreads fast
THATS why I'd want banishment.
I wouldn't really be a high priority target that much, as I would mostly focus on using my spells for good. Helping the people that need help the most
But unfortunately, healing isn't as helpful if you can't stop the harming. Thus, self defense cantrip
Woah woah woah
Look at history. It's full of good people being targeted.
This is America. They dont care how you use it. Theyd just want you to use it for them.
I dont think you should be sending people to different planes of existence just for trying to mug you š
Its literally a scare tactic spell
But honestly, I would only want banishment if it worked over people you can at least hear
One good reason: scam calls
it's just a harmless demiplane
command would be helpful
Command IRL would be overpowered, just say "Die" or "Flee"
I'm pretty sure you'd be allowed to say die, given it's real life and there's no DM
Die wouldn't work.
they won't do anything that would harm themselves
It would be very hard to leverage someone using spells for good. Not impossible, just harder
Besides, if I am in a rough spot, I can make a friend who focuses more on utility and control spells like a Wizard
That's why grovel doesn't work on flying enemies
new command doesn't allow making up extra words it is a set list
So if I say... "Recede" while we're on top of a very tall building?
Funnily 'Die' did work in 1e but they'd dramatically act dead for one turn before realising 'Hey hang on, I'm not actually dead!'
If I were to make a vigilante build, I'd probably do...Summon Major elemental, sleep, shield, misty step, hypnotic pattern, arcane lock, and mage armor.
Really? man
Ooh, that's a good point
The only problem is that command won't always work. And if someone were to try and seriously hurt you, I would rather save my words for someone who can be talked out of things
if they understood the command they would likely understand the harm doing so would cause
Maybe swap Summon Major Elemental with Summon Fey
Depends what level of cleric you are, imo
command does not say anything about them not harming them selves or that they need to understand you
For my ideal irl Cleric, at least 3 levels. 5 would be pog
Just take sleep. If someone is seriously out to get you, a little nap never hurt nobody.
ah then yeah, save your words for later
2014 does, and 2024 does not allow arbitrary words, so we are talking about 14 version
also, I'd probably buy a self-defense gun, for when I run out of spell slots
out of spell, not out of shells 
yeah command got both a nerf and a buff with the new rules
Eh. It did in '14
always carry a shortsword is good too, its a general good weapon and versatile
Out of slots, but never outta options.
Sleep is a lot weaker irl than it should be, every turn is 6 secs irl so Sleep only puts someone on a nap for like 12 seconds, 1 min tops
"We're all men here are we not? let's settle this the old fashioned way"
because I mean now you can order anything and as long as it fails the save it will do the effect but it is limited to 5 set words
But if such a thing existed irl, I would happily designate myself as the medic, physician, whatever you want to call me
As with medics in game, the only request is that we would watch each other's backs
Wouldn't it be 60?
Still wouldn't want to lack defensive spells, people would likely still try to exploit your powers for their own benefits
Oh wait nvm you do stay unconscious for the whole duration on two failed saves, nvm
A full minute is pretty handy, hmm
Yeah, a lot can happen in a minute
That's why I'm picking Toll The Dead as a Cantrip, Guiding Bolt as a level 1 spell
and of course, a handgun for self defense
Oh yeah I'd be armed to the teeth. Shield, misty step, mage armor, lightning bolt, frostbolt, etc.
Ah, yes. The poor man's Eldritch Blast
Unfortunately, I'm currently too poor for such a purchase
i think sanctuary would be funny for a defensive spell irl, i wonder what it would be like from the other side? like why can't they attack me?
If you want a defensive spell no reason to not take cloud of daggers. 2024 lets ya move it around. If controlling a cloud of flying daggers doesnt put the fear of magic into your enemy, idk what will.
Come to think of it
If Palaldin, Ranger, and Wizard are the in game best trio of classes? (Or close to it)
What would the best irl trio be?
Cleric wizard rogue
give me artificer easy to hide your magic as just weird science inventions
And we are just going for day to day life. If we really wanted to push it, simultaneously preparing for bad scenarios: from getting jumped to maybe taking shelter for a while
the moment you invent an innovative machine, you get taken out swiftly by the government
clever
lol and there is the duality of people
Big oil companies don't like what you're doing
Unfortunately so. I sometimes think about what crazy inve-
Hold up, wait a minute
thought they got you mid sentence for a moment 
Itll be work for the CIA or KIA.
If ya get my drift.
Dang it, Speak with Dead needs a corpse
That still doesn't gurantee your safety my man
Ya know what does? Simulacrum.
just make all your inventions spew smoke from a gas engine you will be fine lol
I was about to say "what crazy inventions we would have had they (presumably) not been shut down
Randomly thought of Speak with Dead to talk to those people in the past, but you need a corpse to do so
Wonder if Locate Object could find a person's skeleton if you saw a picture of them when they were alive...
I mean, did you see their entire skeleton first?
if speak with dead became real I think freezing bodies would become way more common
Cleric, Wizard, Ranger
keep things as a corpse as long as possible for questioning
Heres the issue with disguising your magic as an invention. A buncha scientists will look at the invention and come to the realization that your invention breaks a fundamental rule of physica or science or relativity and youll get caught redhanded.
There are no DM limitations irl so you could probably keep making one over and over again
I wonder if I could cast silence in the living room whenever my older brother is playing online...
would Gate be useful irl?
true but would be okay for a bit
Guy never shuts up. Talks about all of the touchy and annoying topics, then wonders why he's single and I'm in a relationship (currently LDR a few US states away)
That's just Portal Gun from Rick and Morty, but also P2W
Geas
Transport via Plants is always my I want that spell in real life spell
?
How often do you plan to travel the multiverse in a day to day basis?
I meant the message before that
What's Geas?
the ability to walk into the tree in my front yard and go to any other tree I have ever seen or touched yes please
Geas is a spell
Once per year? Maybe as a vacation
Geas makes a deal with someone, if they break that deal in a monthās time they take a big bucket of psychic damage
Itās an Enchantment spell I believe.
...wouldn't that just be the s word for control with harsher consequences?
Less of a āI am controlling you mentallyā and more āI put a bomb on you. Do what I sayā
now if you want to cheat at only 1 spell per day just take wish you now can cast any 8th or lower spell you want
Let's just say similar to Slavic
Like that one DC super villain team
Also, I genuinely think that for a level 9 spell
True Resurrection would be a very useful spell
Itās kinda like a contract spell, takes 1 minute to cast as well
P2W
I mean, all you would really need is for someone else to provide the money needed to do so, and you can basically Resurrection anyone. If you reslly wanted to milk it for all it's worth, destroy the previous body, and the new one will be basically perfect
Wait, you could just ask for a loan from the bank
Just do a GoFundMe to make a donation to the family. Then give them the gift money can't buy (it can now)
In fact itās 500lbs worth of Gold
unless you are bringing back people from more then a century ago plain old Resurrection will cover you for most things you would want to bring back to life
Itās (at minimum) 16,500,000 per True ressurection
I don't want to mention irl things too much, but just think about how many recent games and movies have a budget so high, you ave to genuinely try to convince yourself it wasn't just money laundering
Notably itās with Diamonds too
Damn, i guess Wish still wins lol
The world does not have a lot of diamonds too.
Also Resurrection magic fails if it was natural causes
Or if the soul refuses and itās all the components down the drain
I'm just saying, reviving someone from up to 200 years back AND being in perfect condition? You could basically name your price and someone out there will make it happen
Heck, you could do the funny and try to tip culture bull crap your way into riches
Im pretty sure there are a lot of diamonds
still wish and use it to cast 7th level resurrection free is way esier
Yeah and thatās free
"Buy a True Resurrection now and we'll throw in a Death Warding and Mage Armor for free!"
I wonder though, can you use Creation and Fabricate to spawn more gold
a century is still a good amount of time and unless they were cremaited or died of old age you are fine
You don't even need that, there's tech that allows a Transmutation Wizard to generate infinite gold
There's one problem with wish
6 words: 33 percent chance of magical neutering
not when using it to casts 8th lvl spells and lower
Creation cannot be used for components.
Also the metals made by it last 1 hour. Gems last 10 minutes.
Not when recreating a spell (unless 9th level spell)
Ehhh, either way, Wish is rightfully banned from picking spells to use IRL
lol
It's for good reason
Nyet, only when you use it to not replicate spells of 8th level or lower
Either way, we are just banning Wish because then it would break the meta
Clerics at least likely need support from Wizards and other classes
if I had one singular wish, I'd know what I wish for
wish is just having whatever spell you need from 8th and lower on hand
Fun fact Clerics get to cast Wish without a spell slot in 2024
2 bagels
Come to think of it, funny thought I heard the other day
"Life went from a passionate survival MMORPG to a game flooded with microtransactions that constantly screws over most of the dedicated fanbase"
I wish for one extra electron on every atom in the universe
Likely fails
Lady of Pain FNAF jumpscares anyone who tries that big of a Wish
no, no... Three Bagels
The Perfect Sandwich
This is greed we are warned about by our priests /jk
Or funny monkey paw: gives you the ego thinking you are the universe, then adds an electron in every atom in your own body
It isn't gonna affect nor threaten Sigil so its fine
The perfect sandwich being a bagel between two bagels
She can do it even if does not effect her or Sigil
I wish for all bread in the planet to be teleported to a random location constantly for three days straight
Already thinking of mine. Ultimate Italian Sandwich from Jimmy John's
doesn't even need lady of pain if you wish would undo the multiverse itself it fails
seagulls are the winner here
adding an election would destroy the multiverse so instant fails
Yeah that activated the Lady of Pain jumpscare
But seriously. Resurrection would be so useful irl
Think of the people that everyone enjoyed when they were alive. They're back with the same personality and perfect bodies
Would it? I did specify just one universe
plus would threathen the city of sigil and affect the lady of pain so all 3 fail condtions met with that wish
She is the one who stops the wish from working
Domino effect, if hurts the material plane which ripples to all planes
Itās a giant plate and thatās a breaking a big part in itās middle
if we go dnd goes so it would
Easy picks for Resurrection before I sleep
Robert Williams, Billy Kametz, Satoru Iwata
Those 3 would be the top 3 that I would want to resurrect first
Eh
Oh the whole "world is flat" thing in lore
Iād rather do things that donāt collapse the economy
Okay, they're not the biggest people in the world, but they matter/ed to me a lot
Regular Resurrection
Still expensive
So just a single diamond worth 1000gp
Create Food and Water
Iād like Regenerate
Regenerate is free and does a lot of healing and fixes lost limbs
It would be great, but you gotta realize death is not something we can come back from
And?
If you're telling me that you wouldn't want to trade an expensive diamond for someone you care deeply about, then that would be... interesting to talk about
Thatās the same in DnD.
We can resurrect someone in DnD
Like a lot of deaths cannot be resurrected from
If you die from an Illness for example.
Since thatās a natural cause
what if you kill people before the disease kills them.
That wouldn't apply
Comes back to go back down in 5 minutes
Remember, the only requirements for resurrection are "needs to have died in the last century from a cause other than old age"
Well, yeah
After all āOld Ageā for the longest time was 40-50
I really doubt that
Besides, forget back then
Right now, you could resurrect someone from the past century. Cast a restoration or 2 before the big spell and then boom. Back in perfect health
And idk about you, but I don't need to be an adventurer outside of knowing other magic casters. And that means I can go back to enjoying the things I love in life
Like Nintendo going back to being a genuine company that was the textbook example of "made by gamers for gamers"
Yooooo I didnāt know there are DMs charging money, thatās interesting
Thatās a business model I certainly havenāt heard of before š
Paid DMing goes back a while- if someone is willing to do a service you and your friends aren't, and going through time and effort for it, then someone's probably happy enough to pay for that service. If they weren't, there wouldn't be.
Although I still feel as part of the same culture, it'd be nice if folk weren't so deterred from DMing. DMing has been put on a bit of a pedastal and made to feel 'more' than a player, putting players off even trying it.
But then again- some folk just really don't like DMing, even if they can.
I think I would probably work best as a co DM
Or at least, an intermediary between the 2. Like, I would help the DM prep for a few things and I would help the players manage a few things from a distance
hi
honestly I do wish more would become dms, but I suppose that's to help the DM vs Player ratio
Yeah. I think there are a lot of great DM guides out there now that help in taking away the feeling that you need to have been a player to DM (you don't) or that you need to be super good at doing voices (you dont) or you need to do huge amounts of prep (you don't).
I wouldn't mind being a DM, personally, but I do get why most people wouldn't want to be one
Having been a player once is not very high a hurdle i think but yeah not necessary
honestly, I learned dnd much faster as a dm than I did as a player
stat blocks weirdly enough made it easier to understand a character sheet
Having played once made dming easier
But dming made playing WAY easier
I think going into dming without any player experience isnt optimal though
for two reasons, not just to help you understand rolls
Yeah, and it kinda tragic
Fighting Fantasy. Choose your own adventure books. Get the idea of roleplaying for starters.
the more important reason, and one hard to copy without having been a player, is the insight into how a player experiences the world
weve all been there i think
the dm puts a door or riddle somewhere, or an enemy that is too strong to fight
but you dont actually know whats going on. you can only guess at what the dm intends
because dnd isnt reality. you cant use your reality knowledge to judge what is what. its up to the DMs internal logic
this leads to tons of messy situations and is why i think most things, especially puzzle clues, need to be way more obvious than the DM might think to himself
experiencing a world only through the words of 1 person is very very difficult and not something many people can imagine without having gone through it
No argument here!
its an interesting lesson that isnt as on the nose as the number stuff
Tho tbh their will always be more players than dm tbh, and some new players probably think it better to play a player first, and
i remember when i put a door with frozen ice blocking it and put pickaxes next to it
the players proceeded to try and break open a door in the other room that wasnt openable for half an hour
i was new and clumpsy and had no idea how to communicate my idea of pickaxing the ice away
Barbarian picks up axe.
"Time for Ragnar to pick a lock!"
tbh I feel there should be more to help drop that notion, but I know it's difficult
A story I've heard, Legend of the Five Rings, a demon magically seals a door and starts some chaos.
While the brave samurai outside battered futility at the door, one of them stepped aside and chopped an opening in the (paper) wall.
I had a GM once who presented us with a door who had the sign. to go through this door simply wish to do so.
4 out 5 players went through doing this until the paladin went "wait a minutyer, and tried to open the door, he was quite happy with the wish he got lol
It was a wishing door wasnāt it
one could call it that yes... that was how we learnt about wish forthe first time back in 3.5
Chat guess what? I just got the new 2024 monster Manuel today. Complete my set of the new books
Now get heroes of fae rune and forge of the artificer
Oof so many books. Ok ok I'll do it when I finish my spelljammer campaign
What monster are you excited about using next?
Was looking at the dracolich. Never done one of those before.
It changed a lot of stuff since I last looked at the 2014 version
Don't know if the Colossus is new or not but I thought that was dope too
It's new to 5e but has existed sinxe 1e adnd
Actually is artificer consider a half caster or a caster?
Itās a half caster. Because it has 1/2 progression casting
They got kicked out of magic school so they build a bomb
as normal well adjusted class does
I am ever so closer towards the idea of having a person succeed too much on a roll. I just don't know when to account for it. Cause obviously I could do it to where a person succeeds in a bad way on a normal fail, but how would I dictate that happening instead of them failing normally.
I.e. restraining a person, failing, but breaking their arm instead of losing grip or something.
Like should it be a "successful" fail in the sense that it's further away from the dc, thus more catastrophic as indicated by the lower number? A fail fail if it's closer to the dc? Or the reverse?
Hey
Don't do this
Probably not really a good idea. It's like hitting allies on a critical fai lwith attacks, where it's gonna be weird to get worse at something when you should be getting better
Rolling higher is better in dnd that's a core part of the system
This has nothing to do with attacks, myb. I should have clarified.
It was just a comparison for a common bad rule, since at higher levels whewre youre meant to be getting better and gain more attacks, you have bigger odds of attacking friends
I might try homebrewing a custom system then. It's one of those things that I feel like D&D indulges too much into.
You could have something like using it in specific situations which require extra care, but as a constant rule its gonna be a terrible idea
Or catastrophic 1, that's a thing isn't it? Critical fails.
I mean is it? It's a 1 in 20 just like every other roll.
Nat 1 auto fails on attack rolls and that's enough
Critical fails are not an official rule (or even an official optional rule).
They are purely homebrew.
And death saves
Natural 1s have enough of a consequence as it is as others have noted.
I suppose failing is just enough, it just feels like there could be more. Like it could be less forgiving, but maybe that's an aspect of DMing as opposed to the actual mechanics of the die.
If you want to run a less forgiving game you don't alter core mechanics you just run more encounters in a day, resting to freely is what tanks the challenge
I don't do encounters per se, but I get you.
What?
It's not a conversation worth having, trust me. I'm just supremely pedantic.
Welp guess I be busting out an battle smith artificer with a greatsword
You will still need 13 strength to use heavy weapons mind you
I plan on getting heavy armor anyway
I think I still will, because I'm an anarchist in regards to 5e RAW, but it'll take some time to adjust and see how things work out. Might start out lite, and add things overtime.
I'm a raw purist, 5e works best RAW in my experience
Do you like a1 sauce on your 5e?
The biggest problem I face is when rules are only treated as guidelines and then it creates less of a fair playing field
I don't change any core rules of the game when I run my games, I weave intricate plots and make some bespoke monsters and challenges
Tbf, from what I've read in the DMG, there's quite a few bits that are in fact just guidelines.
(Note, this is in reference to 2014, I have not read 2024 because I could not be bothered to yet.)
I do this as a full time job, I run games just about every day, 9 separate campaigns these days
Hey guys, im having an issue with my DM and we are trying to find some common ground: I've posted this a few times and still looking to get more feedback.
So im having an issue with my DM for D&D and want to get some advice, I am playing as an Apothicary and we are in the Drakkenheim setting. I am a prepared caster, but my DM wants to to discover the Drakkenheim setting spells specifically though they are automatically granted with my class. I fell like this is just a nerf to my class individualism, Im trying to find a compromise, any ideas?
The core rules are super solid if you actually use them, ans the 2024 dmg is a huge improvement over the 2014 one
Yes some are guidelines but it's important there is an agreement on how things are enforced. Or else some players get special treatment because the guidelines are bend to their will
Oh I get what you mean now, I think.
It's like when the RP players want to bend the rules to much because it's more fun for them, but then the mechanics get broken
Even considering that, 5e is just bad for SOLE RP, you're better off using GURPS or something else.
If you can't convince your dm we sure can't, vote with your feet and leave the table If you can't tolerate the game
What did you have in mind? If its a compromise, you must suggest something if you feel it's a "nerf."
Whats an Apotichary class?
Gently remind them they only have an action, among other things every 6 seconds.
Well more of ideas for a compromise, I understand where they are coming from and wanting the discovery of the new spells. Im just trying to come up with ideas.
It mostly comes up how they want to do skill checks or use spells
Mad Scientist (Almost like a Warlock and Artificer had a love child)
Is it a homebrew class?
Yes from the Drakkenheim setting specifically
Probably homebrew
Its a give and take, or simply walk away.
Ah ok. Do other players get different treatment how they get their abilitees?
They dont have acess to any of the setting specific spells and must find them as well. But my class is FROM THE SETTING BOOK ITSELF, and is a lot of the core identity of the class
By the book would you just get the spells?
Yes.
What ideas have you liked so far?
Sounds like he should have just said you can't play the class at all but did not feel confident in saying that.
So he's taking the weird way about it by nerfing your access to the spells
When I think you should have a talk about it with your DM that you feel it's not something you are enjoying. Worst case change class
That's like saying "oh your playing artificer, no worries but you can't use replicate Magic item"
My DM was once afraid of stunning strike and thought about introducing a different mechanic to it. I then said then I don't wanna play a Monk
1 - My guy is a doctor and has these theories (the spells) and has to work to make them happen
2- I can stil cast the spells but maybe have a narritive cost or some sort of risk
More like, you must discover each plan before you can use it
Is the reason for the DM the limit because it's more fun or to limit you?
For example I just unlocked a spell that cures exhaustion but one of the main other character has made this a real big story beat for another character, so out of respect for that person, I wouldn't take this spell because they have a bigger story to tell with it.
a spell that cures exhaustion?
Lets just call it that because its a whole thing to explain
Well what did your DM say last time you adressed you feeling limited?
Well he brought this up and I said would you be willing to find a compromise and he said yes, I havent heard anything back from him in a few days. I have also only played one session with this group so far
well when is your next session?
Tuesday
Just write them "hey, could we talk about that ability thing we wanted to find a compromise for"
they could be busy
I did, they just havent responded in a few days so im trying to come up with some ideas before that conversation
I think you just need to wait then
Well now I at least have 2 ideas off rip, i would like to come up with a 3rd one before sitting down
So, while I can see while this would feel kinda crappy (its in the book so should easily come to you).. but there are other cases with similar (optional) story blocks like Dunemancy and Chronurgy from Matt Mercers content wherein the character had to learn from a master to unlock some of the spells.
Maybe your compromise could be finding a mentor who can help "develope" these new magics.
Drak does say its become a very secretive practice since the Amethyst Academy doesn't like it being taught outside their school.
Maybe you stumble across a teacher from there whose methods were deemed "too unorthodox"
What are the two ideas?
See that I wouldn't mind having a story tied to it at all, that not the issue, for example when I level up, spells are automatically granted to me, thus those would have no story attached to them.
I also see where the dm is coming from with all of this being this interesting setting and having to learn into these types of spells. I just feel like if you take for example the Chronomacy Wizard, and say, you cant take Chronomancy spells on a level up, and have to find them in the world first.
1 - My guy is a doctor and has these theories (the spells) and has to work to make them happen
2- I can stil cast the spells but maybe have a narritive cost or some sort of risk
I'm not familiar with Apothecary but what's its Spellcasting Ability?
Intelligence
What if finding the setting specific Spells are always-prepared? And not count against your prepared Spells? That might be like your 2.
Thats already how it is from the subclass granted spells
It seems to be a narrative reasoning to "finding" the Spells.
Honestly, it sounds like the DM is using a variant rule where you should be finding a narrative reason to find the Spell before you level up.
What if he just flavours your spells gotten as found though
I mean honestly.... just say that
Now it has story without being nerfed
dpdlls?
I flavour my players features as earnt whenever i can because it just feels way cooler than suddenly waking up with more stuff
Thanks for reminding me on using an alternative way to level up: Story-Based. Like "finding" the next subclass Spells ahead of time, (or late)
are there any spells that make creatures no longer allies with each other?
Crown of Madness immediately comes to mind
There are a few spells that just make the creature hit what ever is closest to them, even if its an allu
nah but I literally want to make the creature hate the other one, like permanently
Hmmm... Just about any damaging Spells would do
I got it!
- Befuddlement
- Nystul's Magic Aura
- Awaken
Then treat it awful, or punch it.
Oh wait... it doesn't lower its INT. It's Feeblemind
no I want a third npc to cast a spell on one of them to make them hate each other
If you're the DM you can just arbitrarily say they do that
There's not any spell that explicitly forces personality changes permanently
damn
Oh... Friends!
is there a way to force someone to cast a specific spell?
cus like I want the players to REALLY hate the villain so I'm gonna make it so he made an npc kill another npc (whom they're married to) and caused them to therefore break their paladin oaths (which were their wedding vows)
So straight up mind control?
Yeah let me figure out the exact spell name.
Yeah. Dominate Person could do it.
How does that break a vow?
okay yeah dominate person
did you just ask how it would break weading vows to murder your wife?
If a paladins wife gets taken from him, hes a victim, not an oathbreaker
Oh he kills the wife i didnt get that part
But it did happen under mindcontrol so hes still just a victim 
he still technically killed her
Youre the dm i guess
look at law on duress, you're found to have commited the crime, but you aren't liable for it
I dont think thats how oaths work though in general
We dont have magical mind control in our laws world
says you, mind control is how I get most of my freelancing gigs
Damn i would be genuinely furious if a dm told me this was how law worked
Uh, yeah. Someone else is controlling my actions, I don't think I'm personally liable. Emotionally, that's different.
Are we talking about a PC paladin, and are you considering the Oathbreaker class?
Hey, if i already have dunegons masters guide and xanthars guide to everything, do i need any more books to be a DM?
sick
No need for it to be enchantment magic. It could be some Othello plot.
In Othello, Iago manipulates the main character Othello into killing his wife Desdemona, no magic involved. Just careful psychological manipulation
Sick yes for 3 months
hire a cleric to heal you or something
You free?
Oh, I could buy that, sure. The question is whether the table is skilled enough to pull it off.
nah
Rip
Ill pay you in a free char art commission, no colour, full body
If you cure disease me cleric
Lmao
Reminds me: Don't forget to periodically cast restoration, remove curse and dispel magic on your entire team! You never know if a subtle disease or curse or suggestion might be affecting your team members!
Once a week is a good idea.
yo
Hello Evren
ah, I only have Dispel Magic
You have other team members.
Does someone wanna know something very interesting about my character?
Shoot
You can say it here or in Character Discussion if it's lengthy
Iāve been playing as this character for about half a year now and Iām just now realizing I never set up his acolyte features
That's hilarious
Iām more disappointed in myself than anything
I played a Wildfire Druid for a year and a half and only used his Wildfire Spirit around 5 times (this was kinda purposefully a thing though)
Youāre gonna have to explain that one a little bit because Iāve never played a druid well except right now. I just leveled up so I multi class and drew it but
I typically roleplayed him accumulating and learning how to use new strengths he got as he leveled up
For example, it took him a bit to understand wildshaping and up until a certain point he only did it a few times.
Then, when he was able to fly with wildshapes, he could turn into flying creatures, but he was actively learning how to fly
you guys have a light cleric
The first time he turned into a bat, the Barbarian had to chuck him across a gap so he could glide over lmao
oh yeah we do
The reason being for all this silly stuff is because he was already getting used to having a "new body" due to being turned into a beast man, so he had trouble with a few things, but he eventually had risen to Archdruid status and is part of that dms Druidic pantheon now
i'm homebrewing a time sorcerer
hopefully i can bait a sorcerer enthusiast to playtest it in our campaign to replace the MIA bard 3#
:3
There should be a Chaos domain for Clerics, seeing as how there's plenty of deities that represent Chaotic forces
there used to be domains for literally everything at some point
We have an Order Domain afterall
what'll happen to him in the second session
no idea
btw guys is playing a DnD campaign without rlly knowing alot about it ok?
but i don't think she'll make it to a session ever due to irl reasons
learn as you go mate
i did a char sheet and stuff but i dont know what to do next
You should at the very minimum, know how to play
also does a bounty hunter criminal wizard makes sense? lmao
Anyone can be a bounty hunter
Why did I decide to make my character Chaotic Neutral
now I can't deal Necrotic Damage when using Spirit Guardians
Boring dm
You don't wanna deal necrotic damage If you're fighting demons anyway lol
that restriction doesn't apply to my table mate, have fun
Oh yes
well i know rolling dice to do smth and stufff
To be a relatively successful bounty hunter, the only skills required is the ability to track someone (divination magic will do it quite well) and the ability to either kill someone quickly or non-lethally bind them and transport them. Wizards have the tools for that.
Well I don't wanna have to deal with Radiant Retort just in case
You should also learn how your class works as well
What???
i totally gave radiant retort to a few enemies and didn't tell echo which
Evren is evil
why? funny.
What the hell is Radiant Retort?
It sounds sick
I actually have my own bounty hunter wizard
Sheās a Neutral aligned Illithid who eats the brains of her targets to survive
i finally reached lvl 5 wizardd yupieeee, now i have to choose 2 spells dear god somebody kill me aaaaaaaah
If I deal Radiant Damage to them, and they use Radiant Retort I get double damage and now it's Force
haver reflects all radiant damage taken back to the dealer as x2 force damage
I gave her an insanely long and stupidly powerful spell list filled with Illusion
Also being a bounty hunter requires a world where bounties are a thing, and a normal part of law enforcement. Which is a rather big worldbuilding detail
let's say I dealt 24 Radiant Damage, and they used radiant retort, I'd get 48 Force Damage, my character's hp is 52
nuclear bomb vs coughing baby
Haste is a good option for supporting and Fireball always exists
Hypnotic Pattern is pretty good as well
fear is poggers
Fireball for damage, Hypnotic Pattern for control
I wouldn't say that, lots of things are immune to fear š
and the worse part is I can't counterspell it, I don't think
i already have both shield and silvery barbs, + portent, should i even use counterspell?
Most definitely
Silvery barbssssssss
i think counterspell is better when you have a lot more spell slots to burn the 3rd level ones without a care
but sure, fireball/counterspell is always decent for lv5
yeah right now I have only three slots
Counterspell is Always good to have.
It's a wizard staple spell, afterall
I removed fireball, you pointed out we were in hell
If nobody else can get Counterspell, you most definitely should
simply transmuted spell the fireballs into iceballs smh
i can double fireball
or I polymorph the devil
actually you can triple fireball, even without haste in the campaign
but still, half of us decided to be bards
i dont have haste
Are they part of THAT campaign?
i copypaste bg3 rules for metamagic because i wanted sorcerers to stand out more
I CAN TRIPLE FIREBALL
in Evren's campaign*
except we ended up with 0
2024 Sorcerers stand out just fine, imo
hey man, I mean, you got three bards, take it or leave it
i'm running 2014 rules, a lot of the subclasses people play in the campaign outright don't exist in 24
You should always specify, you're in a houserules heavy campaign so not everything mentioned applies to regular D&D š
I think we also have a berserker barbarian and a light cleric?
Typically, no.
I'm sorry Lord of Goofy š
2024 is backwards compatible, you can use the 2014 subclasses.
yeah no i cant
i also just don't like 24.
but i still can double fireball by myself
Shoulda led with that.
Hi Sophie
i will not elaborate. explaining why i don't like x in a server about a bunch of things including x is the most exhausting waste of time ever.
It's backwards and forwards compatible in my experience
*Ophi
Unless you have an item that Casts fireball, you can't use more than one spellslot per turn.
fireball + cartomancer feat flourish fireball
Quickened Spell
Sure, which is why you shoulda led with it.
unfortunately doesn't let you
Again, you can't use more than one spellslot per turn.
i'm using my feat :)
Which is fire, smart idea, Cartomancer was awesome
pun intended?
No š
In 2024?
I remember in 2014 you could use more than one slot in a turn
Cartomancer doesn't let you cast without a spell slot.
i'm still at 17 int because of it :')
You couldn't even in 2014.
It's just more specified now
One spell slot for spells per turn is the 2024 rule. The 2014 rule was about Bonus Action spells..
Yes you could in 2014.
Oh yeah, if you casted a bonus action spell first you could only do a cantrip, right? š
Or something stupid like that
i thought you couldn't even do a cantrip
Yes you could
there was a whole chat here claiming that, guess they were all wrong
Could be, I don't know unless you link the convo.
In 2014, the bonus action spell rule was that if you cast a spell with a BA the only other spell you could cast that turn was a 1 Action Cantrip.
That rule was replaced in 2024 with a much simpler rule: you can only spend one spell slot per turn to cast spells.
ive looked at the feat descipriton a bunch of times, it never says that you consume a spellslot, it just says you cast it
Hello
It doesn't say that you don't use a spell slot, therefore it defaults to the regular rules for "casting" a spell, which means it uses a spell slot.
the main con is that you are a monk
I'm so glad they just changed it to one spellslot per turn instead of having nonsensical arbitrary rulings about it
yeah i get that, unarmed and all but
you punch people for comidic effect
cmonnnnnnn theres gotta be a good payoff?? are monks like combo oriented??
Oh you used a bonus action to cast a spell?! Woe be upon ye, you can now only use a cantrip!
i'm not creative enough to make monks interesting, unfortunately
Horrible take
Monks are amazing, frankly
oh welp, i still have mind sliver
Monk is a melee control class that requires a bit of finesse and tactical awareness to make shine.
I just cannot bring myself to care for a fantasy class that consists of punching
I can.
Punching dragons is fun
hey dont hate on the monks
Please don't perpetuate "Monk bad" it's not it.
hey, they dont gotta be, this character im making is a rly angry guy who did adventuring initially to blow off some steam but hes kinda chill now and is like "huh wait this is cool"
Monks are awesome
i think monks are cool asf
i'm sure it's good, i just can't care for it
My elements monk absolutely destroyed an Adult Black Dragon, I don't wanna hear it smh
It was especially egregious with the 2014 rules, where rogue and barbarian got a lot of love, but ranger and monk who were miles better than those two were the ones who were mindlessly criticized
(New elements monk, I mean lol)
i feel this, i'm just like: why use sword when i cant cast "delete that general direction" and do a bunch of crazy stuff with magic
I used to play a Goblin Ascendant Dragon Monk who used his Fury of The Small and Stunning Strike to punch people in the most sensitive areas because it was funny
i think giant swords are cool too i just don't care for punches
ora ora
More attacks per round than any class. Increasing levels of defense, to the point you become hard to kill. One of the fastest, if not the fastest character classes. Cons, using non-monk weapons, or any kinds of armor or shield nullifies some of your primary abilities.
Bladesinger Wizards are fun because you can do both
i'm sure there's appeal in using nothing but your bare muscles and body to take on gods, it just doesn't quite hit the spot for me
my bg3 main save file agrees
i see
You get a whole lot of attacks and other options to do. The class can be very cool and very effective, but it's also a bit to juggle for a new player, and requires that you think very tactically. Just going up to the enemy and punching them and nothing else is going to feel very boring.
double i see
don't monks get comical amounts of movement speed? idr
Please ignore people bashing the class without even knowing how it works.
uff.. word.. haters aint it..
do i make my oc before or after i find a campaign to join
mind you nothing bad was said about it mechanically
All of my Monks were absolute badasses
Two have killed dragons, one of which did so by himself
One was a Demigod in a oneshot and proved as much as taking down a Giant Deity of death
And they all just threw straight hands
After
Now for actual monk con: The early levels are a bit difficult
And monk requires more understanding of placement and action economy than other classes
Indeed
Having very little Focus means you need to be extra extra tactical about when you use it.
Now for all the pros:
Everything else
Lmao
Monk is a bit like rogue in the sense that the same build played by a player with good tactics and a player with bad tactics will be completely different.
Yes!
i am a student of the rising platinum dragon fist.. ive trained my whole 18 years, and i have been sent by my masters to defeat the demon lord.. HIYAH... 1DSOMETHING UNARMED STRIKE
Which makes it a bit of a skill class.
calling my next tabaxi monk car
Indeed, sometimes flurry of blows isn't always the best option.. like most people seem to think it is š
ora ora
For example, if youāre playing Curse of Strahd, which is a horror campaign, you shouldnāt play a joke character because that could ruin the atmosphere
If youāre playing in Lost Mines of Phandelver, ask your DM if you if you can play a joke character
I am so happy Patient Defense and Step of the Wind have free options now.
shiiiit youre right
Yeah like the main question you should be asking yourself is "Is this a situation where I should be dodging, disengaging, dashing or attacking with my bonus action?"
Get in a group, then make your character with information you get from Session 0.
I like that eventually step of the wind now allows you to take an ally with you
Just so you know youāre not supposed to curse here
i thought the flow of doing this dnd thing is like in roleplay servers where i make an oc sheet
Me too! such good Support
rly? mb
lmao that bypassed the anti-curse filter
The "I've got you, bro!" Move
Hi
And that's just the Monk's basic and doesn't include the subclasses
my dm made a critical lapse in judgement, he gave me not 1 but 2 hand puppets, i cant stop myself sometimes
I'm so slepy... gng guys
My Tabaxi monk, Sumatra, used Step of the Wind to take a civilian NPC out of a dangerous situation and it felt so good, honestly lol
I am new
hi new, i'm now very happy
I am a DM of a campaign and do you have any tips for running one
goodnight
Yes my name is new
A new DM should start with a premade adventure They will guide you on how to run an adventure properly
No
I want to be original
Well, sometimes it's best to get some experience before doing so š
Why
Indeed, I used to think being original was THE way to go..!
One of my more recent characters, however?
A farm boy who found out his great grandfather was a knight and wants to be a hero just like him.
Good night
It's a cliche, but it's a classic for a reason
You could also start with a premade - and then make your spins and twists on it!
That said, if you still arenāt liking that, yeah, you can for sure start from scratch. Itāll just be more work.
Best of luck!
That too!
descent into avernus is helping me a ton with my otherwise original campaign that also happens to be there
In my experience, people trying to be original just end up recreating something that's tropey anyway, but just in a more roundabout and tortured way. Meanwhile people who just go with the archetypes and tropes that feel good and just put a personal spin on them have a great time and get called original anyway.
my all time favorite campaign is just, curse of sthrad with a good dm
Seriously folks, try to do Archatypical campaigns and characters, you'll find it's pretty damn fun
Think of it this way, if you spend too much energy trying not to be like something else, you're letting that something else control you anyway rather just coming up with your own stuff.
I don't even like playing a Fighter, but my Farm Boy become Heroic Knight lad has given me a soft spot for the class lol
my last drop of DnD was from 2024 July I think, at the end of it I and another player character fought and I ultimately lost, turns out the three campaigns the DM was running at the same time was set in the same world and we were from different factions and had to kill each other
I lost so hard it wasn't even close
Hey my "PvP" bingo field has been really tortured today, not again.
hydrogen bomb vs choughing baby?
at the end he still had well over half of his HP
let me see if I still have his stats
let me guess, you were also a bard there
just wanted to say@woven flint@worn lagoon you 2 have some amazing pfps
oh thanks!
Thanks, it's my Tabaxi Grave Cleric from ages ago.
Nokiin Delvera
aurelion sol is goated
yes indeed
You can start originally if you want, I started by homebrewing a freaking continent
Itāll be really hard, but if a 15-year old could do it you can too
He was a good boy
He watched his fellow followers of Kelemvor get slaughtered however š
the worst part was I went up against their "leader" (not really leader, just the strongest member of their faction)
i've been really enjoying map-painting in my first original campaign
He got revenge on the being that killed them though š
And as an old man on top of that!
He's 45, Tabaxi live to be 60 lmao
I've noticed, I love playing old man grandpa Clerics
Really?
I thought itād be longer
At least 80
If I had a Nickle for everytime I've played an Old Man Cleric..
I'd have three
old fart
me but with annoying nepo baby sorcerers
He actually looked pretty young, but that was due to the fey magics he was exposed to as a child lol
Not as surprising as Kobolds living for 120 years (Longer than Dragonborn, for some reason)
Tortles only live 50 years, apparently
My Tortle is 70 though, we don't have to care about no fictional lifespans!
i've heard conflicting claims about half-dragons, some say twice as long as the non-dragon parent and others claimed the average of both parents
I play a lot of kids
(Monsters of the Multiverse fixed this glaring mistake
)
Notably, Dragonborns aren't half dragons.
Just creatures evolved to look like dragons
Maybe I just like beeing an immature person for a couple hours a week
Thank goodness lmao
i know
They missed their chance to give them an overly long lifespan, but now it's just a century like everyone else.
i specifically made a half-dragon because of a 2006 short story from an anthology, actually
Dragonborn draconic sorcerer's being double dragon but no dragon
I don't know if my Tortle will live til 100, though, he's in Waterdeep and although he's a good person, he cares for and associates with a party of miscreants
Did somebody say Waterdeep?
He's one of few of my characters that'd truly sadden me if he died
gale my fav boy Waterdeep?
Waterdeep, from my experience, is a hell hole.
it's so hellish my half-dragon cannot even enter it
Never said it was a nice place
I homebrewed it so they only die after mating, and can otherwise live up to 300
Being a good and kind person in Waterdeep is incredibly hard because lots of people there don't deserve a charitable and kind old man tortle
The 290 year old tortle :
I can't imply other stuff , png13
My character has even convinced the party to occasionally spare people so they can turn them in to the authorities instead of just killing them, he's been the main reason the party has been knocking out and questioning certain bad guys lmao
He IS a Knowledge Cleric, afterall
Funny, today I ended my session with me repeatedly bashing the head of evil person related to my backstory until it became head red pulp
#wizardgoals
I don't tend for my characters to be brutal in killing so much as they are just efficient
A stab straight through the heart or a mace to the head is much efficient enough for most of em lol
He IS very angry at that person
Well, was
My Grave Cleric, even as angry and upset as he was at the individual that massacred the people of his church, the people that raised him, he decided to spare their life, not because he was a better person, but because killing that man would've done nothing to bring those he loved back. Guy was banished to a demiplane as a punishment by his boss lmao, so, Nokiin still won there lol
That's quite similar actually, except mine is an very angry young winter eladrin
Said brutalized person killed his adopted mother, stole her belongings and set fire to his home and killing a lot of his friends in the subsequent fire
oh like bees?
"I'm too old to be angry, too old to care about revenge. Kelemvor will most definitely come to judge you when time passes, I hope, in your favor, he forgives you, as I've done my best to try and do so after all these years."
Summary of what he told him lol
Very wise indeed
Do tortles have mating pheromones?
Hatred doesn't fix anything was his entire mantra, the party was indeed full of angry people
i wanna know if tortle eggs deploy tortles or if they have little tortle larvae
Turtles don't have "Larvae" in real life lol
Oooh and the tortle queen goes around slowly to try and mate with the fastest tortle
yea but turtle isn't tortle, tortle has hands
That definitely is being better person
Absolutely, but his goal wasn't to be better, just to teach a fellow old man at that point that his anger and hate got him nowhere lol
Yeah, but if they're based off of Turtles and Torti then they're most definitely not gonna have Larvae š
The tortle larva come out of the tortle eggs
And they bury the tortle eggs in a hexagon shaped hole on the beach
but i want a worm tortle :(
Larvae aren't specifically worm-like either smhhh
Not for every species that has a larval stage
Octopus larvae are cute, go search em up
octopus have larvae??
Yes
OMG they have such big heads
They're very tiny octopi and look surprised to be alive
Wait radom questions
I think that's another reason mindflayers have a larval/tadpole stage is to kinda loosely connect them with the animal they're based on.. that's just a hunch though
Are there sea tortles and land tortles? (I have never looked at the tortles)
Not from my understanding, but all Tortles can hold their breath underwater up to an hour
I think we have an expert coming into the tortle scene
if i was to multiclass cleric/wizard (primarily cleric but wizard for access to absorbing scrolls) what level distribution would be good?
It's fun to speculate about the biology of fictional creatures
Uh. Hmmm.. I'm unsure...
You might find better help in
#character-discussion
to absorb scrolls i think you just need one level in Wizard, right?
I'm not big on multi classing but 3 levels in wizard sound sufficient to me
Correct
Frankly, a singular level unless you want a subclass is also fine imo
but also access to wizard spells of the level of the spell you want to use
i still wanted to level up some in wizard for some higher spells but it was more knowing like cleric level 2 to get domain and such then cleric level 3 doesnt really give too much so would going level 1 wizard then be worth it
Divination wizard is very busted >w> just saying
Spells like Shield, Absorb Elements, Find Familiar, Silvery Barbs, are all 1st level spells, however, they mostly just increase your survivability (which is good on a class that already has high survivability)
The mystic theurge. A prestige class made to combine divine and arcane magic. The dream for wizard/clerics. MAD as hell but damn could it be powerful if you managed to pull it off
conjuration also seems fun for my playstyle with ensnare/web/grease
I cast power word socialise
i counter attack with silence
I can't wait for 2024 transmutation wizard to come out, it got a serious glow-up
Counterspell!
I cast, punching the three of you in the gnoggin!
I counterspell your counterspell
No, gnoggin is another word for head lmao
that's noggin, tokii.
yes im british and its noggin
I cast blink to escape to the ethereal plane
Shuddup
Both of ye!
I, lord of goofy, say as I please
nocchi
Gnocchi?
That wont work on m-WHERE DID YOU GO
no according to tokii it would be nocchi
I was staring right at you
I'm always right, and that's my opinion, which is correct because I'm always right /joking
is in another plane of existance
i cast flee.......on myself
I cast iron
can you cast Enlarge/Reduce on someone's tooth?
From my understanding, it doesn't work on specific parts of a creature
it doesn't?
awww man.
imagine someone cast enlarge on one of your eyeballs
Imagine casting it on someones heart
Knowing my party, someone whould definitely choose a particular appendage
"For the duration, the spell enlarges or reduces a creature or an object you can see within range (see the chosen effect below). A targeted object must be neither worn nor carried. If the target is an unwilling creature, it can make a Constitution saving throw. On a successful save, the spell has no effect.
Everything that a targeted creature is wearing and carrying changes size with it. Any item it drops returns to normal size at once. A thrown weapon or piece of ammunition returns to normal size immediately after it hits or misses a target.
Enlarge. The targetās size increases by one categoryāfrom Medium to Large, for example. The target also has Advantage on Strength checks and Strength saving throws. The targetās attacks with its enlarged weapons or Unarmed Strikes deal an extra 1d4 damage on a hit."
Nope, can't target a specific part
yeah... THE ARM, imagine how hard those bad boys can punch
pair that with a monk
Note that body parts AREN'T objects unless severed before anyone tries to argue that point
Still targets the entire creature.
Order of scribes wizard is sooo cool
If you target an object on a creature, you're still targeting THE creature.
Bard drinks a Potion of Pugilism and Potion of Growth every night in hopes of Potion Miscibility's permanent effects
The creature feature, featuring the creature
oh i can't target their chestplate to trap them in a box?
I remember playing a warlock that was a preformer and my tophat was a bag of holding
But you most definitely can target a mushroom standing under them!
I could literally pull out a lot of stuff from my comically tall hat
Specifically within the spells text:
"A targeted object must be neither worn nor carried. If the target is an unwilling creature, it can make a Constitution saving throw. On a successful save, the spell has no effect."
How quick is the enlarge spell effect? Whould enlarging something under a creature causa the object to fling a person upwards? @woven flint
D&D is not a physics engine, it wouldn't do that.
It would just clip through their chin
So I can't catapult ppl with random objects, awwww
You can catapult their hearts
Human nature:
But what if it was faster?
A human heart is roughly 5 pounds
No you can't.
it'd turn 40 lbs
I thought catapult was something in range, not something you see
You can't do that for the same reason you can't shape the water inside someones blood, we aren't bloodbending with a cantrip ppl
what I'm concerned about is, if you target the heart, are you also targeting the veins and arteries?
Embrace the peasant railgun
First of all, it was to be an object you can SEE.
No, correction
This discussion. wow
One day I will make a particle accelerator with goblins
Inventing a portable MRI machine for evil
It's an object within range.
But, it can't be worn or carried by a creature.
A heart is carried.. by a creature as its inside them.
Also.. uh.. hearts aren't objects.
What if kinetic jaunt+true vision
Oh, thatās freaking amazing
well, what's your definition of an object
cuz the definition from google is "a material thing that can be seen and touched." a heart can be seen, and can be touched
It's possible but you get to Monty Python levels of preposterous
You also can't target creatures with the spell anyway.
"Choose one object weighing 1 to 5 pounds within range that isnāt being worn or carried. The object flies in a straight line up to 90 feet in a direction you choose before falling to the ground, stopping early if it impacts against a solid surface. If the object would strike a creature, that creature must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, the object strikes the target and stops moving. When the object strikes something, the object and what it strikes each take 3d8 bludgeoning damage."
parts of creatures are not objects
But objects can be creatures
Fun fact, my artificer one time used a ball of curled up rats
what's the limit here, what if it was a mimic?
Is it an African Swallow or a European Swallow
Semantics aside, if something is considered a creature, it's not considered an object.
mimics are creatures
He threw a ball of vampire drained rats at a vampire with catapult
Then you used it wrong, unless the rats were dead
page 19 of the new DMG is your freind when thinking about these things
They were very much dead
oh? then what's the ruling if the creature is dead? I'm curious
Anything that isn't part of a creature as creatures and objects are two different categories.
You can test a chest with catapult if it's made of paper
Until the creature is dead*
could you launch a dagger with catapult to deal both dagger and catapult damage?
runs in waving a zombie around "Behold, an object!"
I'm sorry if the way I type seems aggressive btw, just trying to be punctual and informative š
no, just catapult damage
okay Diogenes
No, it'd only deal catapult damage.
undead =/= Dead
But it's not living
nor alive
Undead are reanimated, therefore living corpses.
schrodinger's object
Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!
Are sentient weapons considered creatures or would they require motive force?
Sentient weapons are considered items.
Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time
Finally, an opportunity to pull a Monty Python reference out of my butt
Because it's still just a weapon
What about tiny servant?
Just because an object has sentience doesn't instantly make it a creature
I cant wait to play dnd again
Where's the cutoff between sentient weapon and creature
what about someone who was once a creature then cursed to be a living sword
That's just a magical force, not a creature
In the same way just because something is living it may not be a creature. Like an ordinary tree for example
because a mimic mimicking a sword is a creature... so what's the line
Because a self-firing catapult borders on construct
How much of a creature does an object have to be to be considered a creature?
Dagger is not going to do catapult damage. Presuming you mean from a Trebuchet. You have to use the appropriate ammunition for that kind of damage. The best you will get from a wasted effort with a dagger is improvised damage.
It is not a spectrum, it is a binary.
They're talking about the spell catapult
Warforged are creatures
"an object is a discrete, inanimate item like a window, door, sword, book, table, chair, or stone, not a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects."
That's it. That's the rule.
You know that meme where they show you a bunch of animals ranging from housepets to farm animals and askes you were you draw the line at ok with eating them?
What does that have to do with anything?
That's the question, where does the "creature" start
question though, what of the hilt and blade of a sword? are they still considered seperate or one object?
Quantum superposition is the problem here
And when I'm asked a question like that, I generally answer "In a famine, everything is okay to eat, including other people. Hunger trumps morality"
At which point an animated object become a creature
I think you people are looking too deep into a question with a simple answer
As long as it's attached to the sword, it's the same object
The answer was literally just given
Cannibalism is lazy
I mean corpses are in the in between space here theyāre considered objects as well as dead creatures
what about a piece of paper inside of a book, if you tear it off it becomes two seperate objects? though there are many pieces of paper in the book?
Yes
Idk, if you can shake it and it stays in one piece then it's a single object
I honestly don't see what is so hard to understand. The D&D definition of an object is as clear as can be
what about individual grains of sand
The force of the test shake is dependant on scale
Corpses are called creatures in the PHB. Some confuse the definition of an object as "non-living" to mean dead creature. Which is wrong. Non-living is simply an object, like a chair, table etc.
Are you trying to have an "Aha!" Moment or are you genuinely curious?
Yes, but it presupposes the platonic concept of the issues in questions
genuinely curious
How did we reach this point of discussion
also replied to the wrong person, was supposed to reply to Master of Dungeons saying "The Shake Test"
I kinda forgot
This was a discussion on hypothetically if we could cast enlarge/reduce on a single point of a creature
Which, within the spells text, already says you can't target a worn or carried object or if you target a creature, it's overall
Oh right, can I animate a steel defender?
Aren't all objects technically carried? (genuinely curious)
Also a part of a creature is not an object. Limbs are not objects if they're still attached to the creature. Hearts are not objects.
Steel Defenders are already creatures
steel defenders are creatures, not objects
yep, we got that, with the exception of prosthetics I think
So artificers just make life, zamn
Objects on a creature are considered carried by a creature, objects in an environment, are not
constructs are alive in dnd terms, yes
Me when I find out my artificer needs maternity leave
Warforged are also living creatures
Constructs are alive but don't typically have biological needs or a finite lifespan
Undead are reanimated deceased individuals and are therefore, technically living because.. well..
UNdead
When exactly is that distinction meaningful?
If it has a creature tag, then you'll know if it's creature
Which spell, which effect requires you to decide if constructs are alive or not?
I just wanted to know if I can have my own animated robot
A little bit of a joke