#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 51 of 1
Some of the specific ones, sure. But dwarven magic items are definitely made by artificers.
dwarven wizards probably made like 50% of the magic items in the world tbh
dwarves actually despise arcane magic in FR
duly noted and discarded from my headcanon
In the Forgotten Realms, magic items tend to either be old or made by a currently living powerful spellcaster. If they are old, they're made by ancient dwarves, elves, giants, gods, fiends, celestials, netherese, imaskari and the likes.
oh how can i forget the netherese
my barbarian despises magic because he's usually the target for it. His feud was slightly tamed by the fact our bard used enlarge on him once
I'd asume it tastes more like pure agony
If your magic item was made by Sarrukhs or Batrachi, I would recommend locking it up
please only do this with your partys and dms approval
Done it gotta say: not nearly as fun as it seems.
because if you're drunk and obnoxious and not paying attention it makes you unlikeable
Because being drunk in a game that involves decision making can be a sign of disrespect to others and their time
oh dear
you know what would be hilarious, playing AS a drunk
I have played slightly drunk in the past, I would not recommend it. Not my proudest moment
drunken master gameplay
against ToS and server rules
ty for the info
Well, no, not slightly. I was borderline wasted at least once
It waa until we had our firsr encounter and we were all too wasted to do anything smart. Suddenly the game went from "haha this is fun" to "now everyones angry drunk and making new characters"
that doesn't work out as well, because you need your perception and acting skills to carry the act out
As someone who’s DM’ing for a drunkard character, it can get old fast
(Forgot to specify)
Any actual method actor will tell you getting drunk to play a drunk character is the stupidest idea possible.
playing DnD drunk requires the same level of trust as doing anything else drunk
the full plate tank going home angry and sober
not sure if mentioning weed or acid is within the rules either
Haha that actually would be fun. Sounds like a St. Pattys day DND game.
Take it from me. I have played D&D borderline wasted. I had to spend a week apologising to everyone involved.
If everyones drinking its not as bad. Our DM tho got hella wasted and angry drunk. It def has its downsides.
This is something that has to be discussed with the table
That is not how acting works and that sort of reasoning is why so many actors end up having alcohol problems.
damn you
I'm the same way. That and I like drinking outside becauss then I just stare at the sky for hours.
Don’t slander the dragon, it’s just hungry
Heath Ledger, the man who died overdosing on antidepressants and vodka in his hotel room?
Then find a party that can do that and supports the playstyle
Go to somewhere like Yellowstone national park. Its a whole ahh experience.
the dragon ate my Dexter gif
It’s hangry
themberchaud is a hungry boy
I can tell it’s very moody td
hi
all red dragons are moody
I was unaware of this fact
No it is not. Method acting does not lead to that.
their moods just go from anger, mad, rage, and bloodthirst.
how to tell the DM to allow me to cast my cantrips without needing the materials?
Show them a Component pouch
What leads to that are deep mental issues that gnaw at people.
i wanted to cast light but i dont have many firefly and phosphorescent moss
Component Pouch
never interacted with one
... Anthony Hopkins gave his best performance as Hannibal Lecter, and he had not drank a drop in years.
Your component pouch or arcane focus does that
i said i have a comp pouch but the dm still said yeah but you need the materials first
If a spell doesn’t consume its materials and doesn’t specify a cost for them, a spellcaster can use a Component Pouch (see chapter 6) instead of providing the materials specified in the spell, or the spellcaster can substitute a Spellcasting Focus if the caster has a feature that allows that substitution. To use a Component Pouch, you must have a hand free to reach into it, and to use a Spellcasting Focus, you must hold it unless its description says otherwise (see chapter 6 for descriptions).
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/phb-2024/spells#Components
Isn’t it also because they’re incredibly skilled?
I can say the opposite without lying. Heath Ledger's performance is the product of his skill as a physical performer. He calculated the body language of the Joker and the speech manierism through experimenting. Then he was completely sober during filming. Save for the medication he probably took
im fairly certain that method acting drug dependencies falls under rule 2 so it probably just shouldnt be discussed here >_>
I dont think Johnny Depp is a method actor
A good performance is the result of knowing and understanding the character. Of mastery of the text. Of experimenting with the character's body language and verbal mannerisms.
Id a character has a phobia of something would it be Wis save or frightened on sight or just simply frightened on sight?
Don't play D&D drunk.
Depends, you mean Frightened as the condition or frightened as scared?
you can choose to be scared of whatever you want to be scared of
Condition
Neither. Let the player decide.
boy i love drunk dnd
The condition isn’t usually done from just seeing a fear
i told him this but he said the way he currently use balances spell and "why does some spell have materials but not others? its for balance "
As a recovered addict, I find that this romanticisation of drunkeness, especially in a space where younger people are involved, is extremely problematic.
at that point theres nothing i can really tel them. If they wanna run it like that, thats just how it is... even if i vehemently disagree with that logic
It’s also for flavour
The balance is mostly for spells that consume the materials
Yeah but I do wanna give my character’s phobia a mechanical impact
Are you the player or DM?
Don’t
yeah, like darkvision needing a carrot (vitamin a was said to be good for eyesight, and carrots have it)
Player, but im working with my DM they seem to be okay with the idea
This never works as well as it sounds it will
where do people romanticizes drunkness?
Then coordinate with them, our input doesn’t matter
true the romanticising of substance abuse is not suitable for here
literally scroll up 5 minutes
Might go with a Wis save in that case then
also yes its specifically mentioned in rule 2
liking dnd with drinks though is not romanticising that
I’m with Poker in the sense that I wouldn’t do anything like it, and anywho Frightened is far too harsh an effect for THIS, but again our input doesn’t matter
Glad we can agree
i mean yeah, having a beer or two with dnd is not being drunk lmao
People saying that they drink a few beer during their D&D game is not the same as... One specific person arguing literally in favour of substance abuse while using, for "positive" examples of the consequences of substance abuse one man whose abuse led to his death, and one whose abuse led to domestic violence.
yeah definitely
I mean, it’s just a phobia of a specific thing, it only comes up when that thing comes up, and in this case it’s ghosts
yeah that's kind of a take detached from reality
ghosts already have a built in fear feature
Yeah, I used to run games at a Cafe that had a full bar, was a good time
its not appropriate for this server to talk about J
no matter if theyre wrong or youre wrong. that topic is not allowed
It’s wierd that there isn’t such a think for monks to be able to “silence” spell casters, kind of like chi blocking in Avatar: the last air bender
stunning strike
Yeah, and it me staring smiling at them saying in a demonic voice “hi new friend”
Way of Silence monk subclass would go hard.
i think its ok to say getting drunk, but only within safe limits
yeah thats off topic af, i rather u guys talk about other rpgs
I personally know one actor who can pull off a perfect Jack Sparrow. And that person hasn't had a drink in four years. Stop linking skill with drunkeness. This is irresponsible and dangerous.
Way of the anti…way of the weave?
not going "down the rabbit hole" as you put it
Sound like a mime
Grappler feat can nullify somatic components
So like, Mage slayer feat?
ngl you sound like a person that just started drinking lmao
A monk who can cast silence, grapple well and with mage slayer is likely among the best anti-mage build
You clearly know nothing about method acting. I would advise reading Stanislavski.
It doesn’t say it can in the rule book
No. I imagine the subclass would involve stealth abilities, casting silence using ki, or enemies hit with fury of blows have their vocal cords cut off by hitting a certain pressure point.
As long as you do it respectfully, you shouldn’t get banned. But it’s a red flag for some people.
i dont want to play with a dm thats shitfaced
Does savage attacker or even mage slayer work when using fists as a monk? Both feats mention using “weapons”…
Then no
Neither do I
Neither do I
Cuz I’m the DM
and also a player that shitfaced
I was thinking of 2014 Grappler, mb.
i haven't seen pirates of the carribean since I was a kid, but i dont really remember him being a drunk
helloo
he is majorly drunk
Does anyone know if bloody sacrifice is balanced?
"where is the rum gone" is a quote for a reason
So a throat punch lol. Stunning strike it is then
Not even 2014 says it either
He literally almost has a bottle of rum in his hand
You can’t perform somatic components while restrained
And this is a PSA: You do not need to be drunk to play a drunk. The point of method acting is that the method should teach you how to play drunkeness without even touching a bottle.
Some people don’t want a drunk player at the table
It’s implied, come on now
no offense but how you cant see the problem is a red flag upon itself
So no drunken fist monk lol
I checked restrained and it doesn’t say you can’t use somatic components
Technically they don’t even have to be drunk
buzzed then?
Even then
If you’re restrained/binded, there should be no way for you to use your arms to the extend of you to cast a spell. Be real
I feel like this is a common problem IRL too. Alcohol is so normal in our culture, a lot of people don't understand when people might not wanna drink/be around people who drink
That’s more than a lil
Different people have different boundaries, so it’s important to check
being under the influence means that you lose some part of your competency and social limits. some people are uncomfortable with that
Then argue it with wizard of the coast
Method acting as an alcoholic doesn’t involve consuming alcohol at the level of an alcoholic, it involves acting as if you were drunk outside of when you’re actually playing the character. Indeed, method acting in general can’t be done in D&D as a DM, because you play a lot more than one character.
Source: me actor
its nothing personal and is subjective
It’s in the rules on spellcasting
We're playing a game here with rules. If you're so drunk you can't play properly get out of my table imo
It seems like you want us to say it's fine for you to drink at the table which isn't where the conversation is going. At the end of the day, talk to your DM, it's between you and them, not this group to tell you it's fine.
some people just might not wanna hang around a guy who's drunk
When has WOTC made any good decisions?
doesnt make a difference
same shit
i mean it makes a difference but it doesnt "disable" the effect
That’s like arguing with penguins that the Arctic should be warmer
I'd argue they can make a strength check to get an arm out to cast. I think Ill set that as a homebrew rule. If they fail they use their turn but not a spell slot
im perfectly fine with drunk players, and to a lesser degree DMs because they just need more detailed focus running the game, but it can certainly get too much
for some groups thats fun. play with those groups
on the other end, if we're just chatting than I dont mind even if u gonna black out
Agreed
Sometimes I forget how busted stunning strike can be
I can’t wait to play 2024 monk in my friend’s campaign
lets change the topic have any of u ever stepped on a d4?
It would probably count as an improvised weapon if so
this is why I never buy those metallic die
If youre fine using an improvised weapon or your dm lets you have a custom thing, sure
does anyone know how normal / abnormal a human-elf marriage is ? (esp with the inhuman age gap)
Say it with me class: “Ask your DM!”
It's pretty normal, there are a lot of half elves out there
What setting? What region?
I’d say it’s about as normal as a Goliath and non-Goliath…or a bard and a dragon…or a donkey and a dragon
really? where?
a lot of people treat it like real life interracial. I imagine it's more common in big cities
Okay thank you !🩷
i once played in a circle on the floor in da dorm. One of my friend tried to walk past us and walked thru the circle. guess what happenedl. was bloody.
Marrying an elf as a human is probably the best case scenario for the human tbh
Are you sure?
I am checking the book and I am not finding it
Yes you need a free hand to perform somatic components
More like lion smashing tiger
i was just imagining that 'til death do us apart' takes a whole new meaning 😭
bro ngl youre kinda annoying tbh
the restrained condition means your speed is zero, not that your hands are useless, you can still attack with weapons too when restrained
Are you familiar with crooked moon?
Interracial and beastiality are two different things
nope, never looked at it
😐
-# Is this still age appropriate
Can I get ur opinion on a spell for balance?
Hobbits are humanoid
guys what are we talking about
arent dragons intellgent?
let's tone it down before we compare fantasy races to animals
sex
They're not, they're humanoids
So are dolphins, but you know where to draw the line, don’t you
-# should we ping a mod
😔
sure?
-# considering it Maybe just go to #moderator-support
not comparable
Well half elves exist
😶
I’d consider a dragon a beast long before I consider a hobbit an animal
Elves and humans almost always if not always make half elves
its a fantasy game, DNA is not a thing
bro, they doesnt looks that different
Sorry, I know u experienced. Basically the spell is a ba that inflicts 1f6 neurotic damage to you (not preventable) and your spells do an additional 2d6 damage
I’ll keep it simple, humanoids and mate with humanoids. End of discussion
It doesn’t say it restrict your hands in restrain or grapple, so you talking like, I grapple their hands which would be a call shot, so this is dm fiat
doesn't have to make sense, if the player wants to play a multiracial or a multicultural character, they should be allowed to. 5e plays into just whatever you want
Idk its weird magic or the fact they are all humanoids or something
They can? Isn't thst what a liger is?
they can you know
They literally can…their offspring can’t reproduce though, fun fact
is it accepted in elf /human culture ?
Magic
fantasy genre being uh.... fantasy who woulve thoughts
Setting dependent
Same with mules!
It's a fantasy world with magic, anything is possible. If you don't like it, play a different game.
I call bait, imma block and move on
self harm spells suck imo
Agreed with urizt
shitty bait at that
Yea, agreed
Actually that too is an exaggeration! Not all hybrids are sterile but hybrids have much higher sterility rates.
I hate when I take neurotic damage
But that's a crazy buff
can you just drop it?
why are we talking about interracial cracking
i mean, we have hex, hunters mark, conjure minor elemnetals, lots of things give you more damage
Ligers though would be incapable of surviving due to the fact that their bones and muscles simply can't handle their size and weight
Depends on the setting but in my experience elves usually shun half elves for their impurity and humans are usually chill with them, but half elves are still kinda outcasts wherever trhey go
So maybe ligers can exist with enough trial and error
the novles explore this quite a bit in the kingdom of many arrows post the war of the orc king in the legend of drizzt, check them out
are you this oblivious?
This is a common trope, but it isn't the defined trope within faerun for the most part.
But 2d6 buff is ridiculous
Ehh, not necessarily
No. They would never be able to survive in the wild. Too large, too... Mentally incoherent. Lions are extremely social, tigers are semi-solitary...
In faerun they're sort of seen as favorably by both species instead
Is this like per attack?
Yeah, hence depends on the setting
Even if you released a population of thousands of ligers in the wild, I give it ten years before the vast majority are dead
usually
Each time a spell does damage, it triggers
I’d argue their social constructs are based on how they were raised. Cats can act as dogs, you know
So worse conjure minor elementals
Sure but there are also instincts. Tigers raised next to lions still are more solitary than the lions.
Would you rather it stay a 1d6 forever?
Idk
And weird hunters mark, in a way. 3.5 mor average
some people thinks insticts doesnt exist
Neurotic damage? I do hate when a spell gives me anxiety
I'm sorry, when did WOTC publish a genetic study of their fictional species?
Absolutely not.
Nah they don't
bro youre just making headcannons to fit your thinking
Btw @cinder timber I assume this is concentration?
Yes, last a minute
yeah the logic of magic
Also no, it's fantasy
Those people are wrong. Even newborns know not to put their hands in the fire. All cats have the instinct to pounce when something turns their back on them
What level spell?
Ya'll need to stop interacting with bait like this
That would be going way back on any sort of progress they've made on removing the blatant racism from their game.
Never, but they have said that their worlds are MAGIC and have MAGIC rules
Also no the solution to you being curious about how half-elves work is not to provide a blueprint to including eugenics in a game.
I think its 1?
Shit, I’d major in that if it was a college degree rotfl
not saying i agree with them.
Ok I’m sorry what.
I think they used a lvl 2 spell slot to buff it
My mostly grown kids still touch the hot things.....
No, they do not. It's a fantasy world. When I run fantasy worlds, science isn't true. Especially when it's used to be creepy and bioessentialist.
Thank u 🩷 I'm kind of new to lore lol
I said i think, idk
what the hell
Is J creating a menagerie?
…suddenly had a thought of a goblin and a Goliath bumping uglies
No, it dosent have to make sense, it's magic
Hi being so serious bro I’m Nugget
“But they need eugenics” okay buddy every word you say from here on is worthless in value. You are incapable of having an opinion of value in my eyes.
yeah... eugenics.... yeah,,,, serious
what u waffling about
I suggest you treat lore as a story you can choose to utilize instead of something you must prescribe to, when it comes to dnd
How did we get to eugenics man
“Ask the DM”
Idk, I think it depends on crossover maybe
Because he's trolling and everyone continues to engage in good faith for some reason
Can you stop?
That's quite literally what's being discussed.

The reason I asked about the spell is because everyone is doing a little damage and suddenly this warlock does 48 damage at lvl 4.
reported
Aasimar are humans
some dudes trolling talking about interracial cracking and yall keep engaging wit him😭
I thought it’d be level 3 or smt! Yes, it’s a lil unbalanced
Well considering 2024s PHB, since stats aren’t tied to races anymore, you’d just have to work out the racial abilities in your own
We all need to stop engaging with J for now. Between the very dangerous words around drunkeness and this new eugenistic thing, disengaging appears like the responsible option.
first wanting to get drunk when playing dnd then eugenics lol
I could be tripping, but I think it is level 1? Spell slots are designated for spell level right? Ljke a lvl 1 spell slot is for a level 1 spell?
Block him and move on
Yes, I regret engaging
i never block people
We don't use vancian casting anymore
I’ll just my step of the wind bonus action and spend a ki point
So… horses, right guys?
What?
like from red dead
I don't belive in them
You… you know horses are real right?
Yes.
Well if you think it’s broken ban it, or nerf it
spectral horses
Hogwash
A 1st level spell can be cast with any spell slot of 1st level or higher.
I like horses
Oh, wait it's a warlock. Don't they have x spell slots that can be any level?
I've never seen a horse irl so I'm not sure if they are real...
I use my bonus action to disengage and my action to take influence action and say “how bout them horses, pretty cool right?”
i like unicorns
they are and theyre based
They always cast at highest level
Great for mounted combat, though tend to be frail for higher level combat.
i hate unircorns
I'll make it proportional. 1d6 self damage for 1d6 increased damage.
Anybody have tips for keeping a horse alive?
And when upcasted?
noo💔 theyre so cute
restart your game
Hay is pretty effective
Make it win races
Also no. They have 1 or 2 pact slots that are a certain spell slot level
Feed it.
Make sure it never breaks it’s legs
Oh okay, I can always just have them receive a lot of damage which may break their concentration anyways
Fairly sure not letting it get stabbed helps
Hol up, bout to cast 9th level alarm
I thought they are always cast at highest level?
Hay… and anti-stab… got it
go right ahead ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Mounted Combatant Feat, Saddle of the Cavalier, even the Gift of the Metallic Dragon Feat.
thats warlocks right?"
jus turn on cheats
That EB of theirs is no joke. People meme on it but it’s still a powerful cantrip
I am talking about a warlock. I'm asking if that is correct
They're cast at the level that spell slot is.
But it's hard to keep a mount alive even with all those Feats.
"Highest" isn't necessarily correct.
Just forget it. I'll ask clone or someone.
sorry my brain is tired but yeah
So warlocks get x spell slots that are all of one level, right?
Warlock spells are always cast at the highest spell level they have access to up to 5th level, then anything after that is mystic arcanum stuff
Especially because they can cast 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th level spells, but never have spell slots that are that level.
Warlocks have their spell slots increase in level the same time sorcerers and wizards would gain their higher level slots…except for warlocks all their spell slots are at that highest level, regardless of the spell you cast
Yeah… I might just have to pop a Warding Bond and pray it works
Oh okay, thanks for clarifying
Sorry if you don't like my answer, but there's a nuance that it seems you're just ignoring
My paladin pre 2024 kept his mount alive by buying big armor and judicious use of the aid spell and self casting armor of agathys
Ur answer is just not clear to me
(Due to the shared spell shenanegans)
Difference is, warlocks have very limited amount of slots to use…but they gain their slots back on short and long rests
except they don't, though. Their pact slots only grow to be 5th Level.
I see. I'll have to read more on this stuff. Thanks for clarifying!
what nuance?
Yeah but by then they also have hella invocations and busted ass things they can do that the other spellcasters can’t do
Basically, you’ll have 1 spell slot at level 1, 2 slots at levels 2-10, 3 slots at 11-16, and 4 slots at 17-20
And the 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th level spells can't be cast with those spell slots and do not expend a slot to cast.
The best option, but now you got summon steed
Correct
You have 2 spell slots at level 2, they increase a level at level 3
Wait, I read that wrong
Which means you can cast one of those higher level spells as an action and then a pact slot spell as a bonus action or vice versa in one turn as a warlock
I was gonna say
Too bad for non paladins
Because the '24 rules are about spells that expend a spell slot
Free cast spells got buffed
Oh man, I gotta see what GOO Warlock is about in 2024
That's the kind of nuance I mean.
Warlocks in 2024 definitely got some nice quality of life stuff
Same for monk honestly
Absolutely
And rogues
And barbarians
Wait, is this the horse I'mgiving you?
wow horses
GOOlock essentially gets a form of subtle spell for 2 magic schools so long as they're using a spell focus at level 6
horses are cool
That would probably be an artificer
horses
unicorns are cooler🦄
That’s their whole gimmick
Yo , is there anyone starting a new session?
not dnd
#find-a-game check here for information on finding a game
Alchemist artificer
Thank you!
Can they still use their telepathy gimmick like in 2014?
iirc, it's better
If I was gonna make a GOOlock, it would have telepathy and telekinesis to make up for the lack of spell slots
warlocks are dependent on their cantrips?
On their invocations more like
Depends on the warlock some are melee
Uh, mods?
People please do not engage.
This is nothing more than a new provocation. Do not take the bait
Sometimes it helps to have compassion people
i was afraid u gonna put chaotic neutral or neutral there
me?
Everyone
im just talking about warlocks
No someone else
Anyways, GOOlocks
are they in 2024 phb
Remember, you can report posts with the report tool
Yup
actually interesting concept
Considering J is the one baiting, that message has two explanations:
- J is engaging in DARVO
- J wanted to post that comment from a sockpuppet account and forgot to switch
Dude he’s not baiting, he’s just uneducated
You’re giving me a horse? I got myself a horse too 😬
Darvo?
Ok so I know the adage "don't attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance" but this is a lot.
snapchat 🥀
This…actually make so much sense
Deny
Attack
Reverse
Victim and
Offender
DARVO is a method manipulators use to shift blame to make their victims look like the perpetrators
I got a Stable in my Bastion, remember?
They don't exactly have a lot of spell slots to work with
Have a Druid shapeshift into a horse, have them escape, and re-sell them. Infinate money glitch
They’re dependent on their invocations, and abilities given by the pact they chose
Ah. I remember seeing this in an ig reel and i forgot about it. Anyways, is Goolock good
The spell options are a bonus
Well you might as well use your Stable since we're like half a week's travel away from mine.
Yes, player handbook 2024
Oldest trick in the book, if your dm doesnt know how to deny that are they even a dm
Is that not basically the same as selling a horse trained to escape and go back to you?
I mean clerics can pray to their gods to have them intervene in a bar fight. About as omipotent as it gets.
I already know the workaround, that doesn’t mean a DM does
Dnd has the weave, source of (i believe) all magic, #dnd-lore would be more usefull probably
No. And ngl I'm glad it doesnt exist 😅
That was an actual trick used by con artists. Generally it ended with the con artist hanged.
Druids could probably change the look of the animal they shape into though, so the buyer wouldn’t be able to tell it’s the same “horse”
No.
You’re talking about the weave, and someone already tried doing what you’re thinking of. Look up “Karsus” and why the floating islands exist
And the Weave is not a place you can "go to". That is not how this works.
And if there was such a place where fate can be changed, the world would already be destroyed
Dnd characters get strong at level 20 but even then theyre no match for the gods. No player character will ever be able to do such things
It's not a plane.
More like tried the hardest anyone could possibly try, and monumentally fail
I had this idea but as an artificer changeling. Sell a magic item thats an infusion. Change my identity. Cancel the infusion. Rinse and repeat.
The moral of the lore is what you’re about to do is impossible
Are you planning to run a campaign like this? If so go ahead theres no rules for your campaigns. But if youre planning to do this in a game theres a 99.99% youre out of luck
Where do I find a dnd group in germany guys
Karsus found the limit and nearly tore the fabric of reality in the attempt, and cursed the land indefinitely, and pissed off just about every god
This is a very specific type of campaign youd have which im turn needs a very specific dm and group of playere
You misunderstand, Karsus wasn’t evil
Karsus was a Netherese archmage, a prodigy from a young age. Back then Netheril was in constant war with... Things that ate magic, to put it simply. And Karsus believed it would eventually end in the destruction of his magic-based civilisation. He was a bit of a patriot so he sought a magical solution. Through studying he invented a spell that would allow him to ascend to godhood by killing a god and absorbing their essence. By that point he had gotten a little crazy so he decided to target the goddess of magic. That set the Weave on fire, killed the goddess and... For a few seconds, there was no magic at all. And Karsus was at that point standing on a city kept floating by magic. Looney Tunes logic ensued. He died, the goddess of magic died and was more or less reincarnated in a Netherese peasant girl who happened to be nearby.
Karsus was, by all accounts, a great man. A genius of epic proportion, well beloved. Somewhat ruthless, as the politics of Netheril required.
And then he blew tf up
Dude is trying to make magic Oppenheimer
Insert tempting fate line ”What could possibly go wrong?“
Yeah, let's move on from this topic
Ooowh wait ive jeard this before, fun stuff
It has not been approached properly.
Thank you mods
How is everyone doing?
Movin' on
casts expeditious retreat on the modrons
It’s the weekend, and nothing I’ve wanted to do has been able to happen
In regards to dnd or in general?
In general
Just finished our Mad Mage campaign. Took years >.>
two D&D sessions I was giong to play in fell through this weekend 🙁
Nice!
it's december
December is when campaigns die, yeah
Now that I think about it... I can't think of any Forgotten Realms video game whose story does not involve Karsus' folly as being one of the causes of the plot.
Nice, I'm on track to have my waterdeep campaign cleared in about 35 sessions, dragon heist into mad mage
Aasimar or Warforged for artificer. cool/lore reasons only.
Did the NwN ones involve Karsus? Been a while since I played the original modules.
I mever finished Baldur's Gate Dark Alliance, do those games deal with Karsus?
I sure hope not, we just got out of the death house
Aasimar. He or she taps into the powers of heaven to infuse into their creations. It's definitely a unique one
Oh yeah NWN 1 I don't think so. I'd have to check the story of every module though
Don't know, never played that one.
I don't think NwN1 or BG:DA do. Just drow. ALways drow.
NWN2 does, Baldur's Gate 3 obviously, there are some important mentions in BG1 and 2...
Nice, im trying to finish my first campaign
When I think about it, the Forgotten Realms really only have two setting defining events. Karsus' folly and the time of troubles
Every time you're going to tell a big story that involve realm-specific lore, you're always going to go back to one of those
Time of troubles has some hilarious lore to it
Like the 2nd Mystra getting fatally backhanded by Helm for trying to "I wanna see the manager!" Her way back into Celestia
My dungeon master said every spell is allowed for the Christmas one shot.
So im putting silvery barbs in my spell list and wait with using it till some is on death saves so I can give advantage on it, or when someone is about to go down and needs a save.
Why would every spell not be allowed before?
silvery barbs is apparently an annoying spell for dms
Some people (me included) only allow spells from the books we are actually using. No Strixhaven spells for a campaign not set in Strixhaven.
Why? It seems underpowered if anything
heh
Thats weird for me personally but they can do them.
yeah idk
My dungeon master is chill.
If the spell exists in dnd beyond and usually isnt 3rd party I allow it without question. 3rd party content I pick n choose since yknow things can be pretty unbalanced sometimes.
Well, we always have: divination wizard portent, the lucky feat, croqnegy wizards that practically do the same.
You mean chronurgy wizard?
Yeah those fellers can be a real hassle.
It's not an English word :v
Nah youre good. I was just trying to sound out what you meant.
He typed it how it sounded, just didnt spell it. Its all good
chronurgy aint a common word either
Like, there are stronger things then silvery barbs, the lucky feat ain’t even a spell and is a set thing that happens.
Just add spells/effects that add disadvantage too. Force them down to a straight roll every once in a while.
I got that put on me, hold person, and when I read the spell it doesn’t say I get disadvantage to get out (correct me if I’m wrong), gonna talk about it with my dm in private next week.
Eh? I've never heard this take.
I agree it's not as overpowered as people like to claim it is, but I don't think it's "underpowered" in any way.
Paralyzed doesn't impact wisdom saves, correct.
Yeah never seen underpowered either lol
I feel there is better uses for a 1st level spell slot
Like shield
Just because another option is better does not mean that option is underpowered. That is not how those things work
Yeah SB isn't an insanely OP spell.
It's strong, but it can be more annoying than anything
"Better uses" != silvery barbs being "underpowered"
Yeah, fair
Fireball is better than healing word. But there are still situations where you should cast healing word rather than fireball
Nah, fireball the downed players
As a DM? Yes.
It's what they get for being downed
Most of the time, my monsters and NPCs do try to finish downed characters, yes.
For me it depends
In a world with healing magic, it is good policy to make sure your enemy is dead rather than unconscious. If you are a non-sapient predator seeking to eat, you go for the kill, and then you either take your prey and run, or you go for the kill, run without the corpse, and wait until they leave the corpse behind.
If you are a bandit, you take the downed PC hostage.
Yes and no. Undead will for sure, but if theres an enemy down but whole bunch of other enemies on your butt you cant focus the injured ones. You can take them hostage though.
Wind mill wind mill for the land
Of course, there are no hard rules.
Turn forever hand in hand
It all depends on the situation. But generally in combat I think you should consider finishing or taking hostage the downed PCs to be the default behaviour, and ask yourself "Why would that character not do it?" rather than why they would.
Does the monster I am controlling have a legitimate reason not to finish the downed PC, and does that reason trump the usual reasons to?
Sometimes the answer is yes. But most often I think it's no.
Mine purely depend on the NPCs intentions and current situation
Of course an NPC who is absolutely certain the group has no healing magic left has no reason to bother finishing off the downed PCs.
Non-sapient creatures do indeed follow a different logic
Most of my player charicter combat deaths are executions rather than failing the death saves
Or instant death effects, disintegrate or power word kill ect.
The monsters want the players dead dead the majority of the time the way I do it
People really should have a death ward up at all times at those levels.
My first death was opening a door to an animated rug of smothering. By the time the rest of the party got to me, I was dead
I don't think I've seen a death just from naturally failed death saves.
I homebrewed an ability for an Arch sea hag, power word Krill, turns you into a pile of krill If you were under 100hp when she hits you
A pile of krill that keeps your volume or your weight?
My first character death was being one shotted due to dms crit homebrew
Asking the important questions here
100x your weight actually
Big pile
I feel like for some people, being turned into that pile of krill may actually be a buff
Nah its pc death
12 d 12 force damage If above 100 hp just like power word kill too
Chance of a Maps update tomorrow?
Most ridiculous PC kill I have was against a level 6 ranger
A Necromancer (MotM) hit him with all 3 of his multiattack
With one being a crit
Did a total of around 120 damage to that poor ranger
Those motm wizards are spicy
Yeah they can easily annihilate any party up to their CR
Given they don't get CC'd somehow
We come back to the golden rule: Never engage the enemy on their terms. Ambush, deny, hide, poison them, cut their throats in their sleep
Never get into a straight fight.
You forgot scout
Very random thought, but came after reviewing some of our characters:
I enjoy how many heroic and good PCs end up looking really evil, because they loot magic items (including armour) from the evil guys. Like my artificer rocking a Black Robe of the Archmagi despite being CG.
Gonna have to use that in future when party encounters anyone and goes 'Oh c'mon, they look evil. Look at what they're wearing.' Have the villian be like 'No, really, I got this off an evil guy I killed, I'm totally good, just using some UMD skills here >.>'
Gaslighting also works great. In VTM, I get vampire hunters to go insane by tormenting them with dreams of loved ones I murdered.
Oh this is for a villain
Villains also have loved ones sometimes.
Reduce (the number of bad guys)
Reuse (their cool gear)
Recycle (their minions into your undead army)
Just turn their family into a zombie and do deplorable acts that tarnish the image of their loved one until they beg you to stop
If villains be monster then they create a monster
Having a reputation for cruelty helps! In a certain campaign I played, at least one bad guy killed themselves in fear of what I was going to do to them
The reputation does not need to be true. Pay bards to sing songs of fake cruelties you did to fake enemies
Some villains might even ask your hand in marriage
Get them drunk during the wedding and stab them then
You could also poison their drink
I have had several parties take detours to master crafts folk to strike emblems off of armor, change the hilt of blades, dye robes ect
Remember.
Have your villain shoot the parties favorite horse
Nah I rip their tongue out while we are kissing
that's actually a fun little thought - do you / anyone else here kinda handwave cosmetics?
generally we just kinda have a table conceipt that unless it's auspicious for plot reasons, a new magic piece of loot generally will fit your vibe
He's a happy little guy and I'm never taking that away from him.
Thats something i think i should acknowledge
as a part of the magic (similar to how magic rings size themselves)
Tho ig cosmetics matter in the magic country of my homebrew
like, my barbarian started using the halberd of this horrendous plague warrior guy (based I'm sure on nurgle stuff) but since it wasn't a cursed weapon it sorta shifted to match what his extant halberd looked like
Cause most people wear robes, but depending on your strength/status as a mage, the more intricate the robes. Usually symbols of school or family insignia
My gnome artificer ended up wielding a Hag staff, black robe of the archmagi and has a hat of spider climb made out a of a dark mantle.
She went in being an adorably fashion confused gnome wearing something that wouldn't look out of place in the shire or Snow White.
still went with green metal, because it's cool but got rid of the fleshy boils etc
Remember: Shoot the villain's favourite horse
She's done her best to bedazzle them as she's not had time to really change them fully, but I'm not sure that really helped.
My Twilight Cleric wears thick leather gloves, to hide his hairy Shifter hands :p
Then decapitate it, and put it in the villain's bed.
That being said mages robes are usually middle eastern style robes in my setting.
I greet the Lord of Goofy!
Glompus
I do also like the idea of some magic items changing to reflect the user's values though.
I have a magic spear that does that
That leads to a question: Is there a cultural norm to that? For examples, for nocturnal species, wouldn't dressing in white have more nefarious connotations while dressing in black be looked upon as normal?
Elves have darkvision. It would make sense if, for them, the night and the dark is associated with safety while the day is associated with exposure.
Our familiars do this when our characters die
Do the clothes of evil people always look inherently evil in your games?
Two people wearing the same clothing can look very different in my experience.
I mean. Robe of the Archmagi is colour coded for your convenience, and the cleric of evil wearing the spikey, blackened armour with red accents and screaming faces might be.. y'know. A little bit of a red flag.
I'm not just stealing their shirt here, even if it's made of nice silk.
but you could
I have stolen a BBEG pillows and bed sheets before.
Were they comfy?
That's why I stole 'em
I mean you could just be doing it to be a pest
DM: Their room is luxurious and decadent.
My PC, having had to use a bedroll for too long: ...What's the thread count on that bed.
Nothings more evil than separating a man and his favourite yellow pillow
we had an entire three session arc in BitD about stealing a really cool chair
sometimes the juice is just gonna be worth the squeeze
hello
evening!
What does it mean to be bloodied?
Half hit points or less
Half HP
Villain who spends the whole campaign plotting the parties downfall cause they took his stuffed animal.
Any websites other then hero forge that work for making a character?
I’m trying to pick a race or species for a d&d character does anyone have any recommendations
Warforged
Are you asking in regard to mechanics or a specific narrative?
Halfling.
-# Did you have anything in mind?
i do things based on vibes n characters. if your trying to be some big badass orc or goliath would be cool but also since its dnd nothing is stopping a orc or goliath to being a wizard either
Elf is good. Warforged is great. Changeling is an absolute BLAST.
Nothing beats being able to change how you look at a moments' notice.
Im an elf enjoyer
What is the best mixture
What are situations monk would want to use weapons? (Beyound kensei monk)
Multiclass
Meh
magic weapons in general (that they have proficiency with)
I think for magical affects of the weapon
And their enemies you don’t exactly wanna punch, or get close to
Or out of reach
And what I mean by punch I meant the monster that gonna hurt if you physically touch it
Hi
Ranged options
What race is best to mix them?
Half-Orc.
Dwarven engineering is the finest in the world™️
Is there a race that has every race creature in a single character
no
You can flavor custom lineages into a Frankenstein character but you aren't getting everyone's passives
You cant combine races in dnd
Not what someone told
You can flavour your character as multiple options, but mechanically gain only one race's effects
There are some existing hybrid races in dnd, like halfelf and halforc, but they are specified races with specified effects, and dont exist in 5th edition from 2024
they still exist, just not separate mechanically
The DM can of course homebrew something with you, as in ignore the published options and mix effects
I know there’s advantages on making a hybrid race what the dm told me I can create anything I want but I have to be sure to understand to give it proper weakness
Thats not real
The guy is homebrewing and overwriting the games rules, which is fine
By this standard I'm making a primal elf by taking every elf subspecies and throwing them in a blender. Absolutely broken!
real tho my party of 6 has 4 elves
Oh ok:3
Now youre talking
Oh god, can you imagine this in 2014 rules
ALL the ability score increases
Waterbreathing, misty step, charm immunity, dark vision, hiding in the wilderness, 35ft speed, extra spells
More!
And with 2014 rules that's... What, +2 dex, +2 charisma, +1 wisdom, +1 intelligence, +1 constitution?
Make it an aasimar of corellon with elemental genaasi influence of all 4 planes
As extended eladrin flavour
Now make it a reborn too
This is my next character
... You know what... I could imagine some sort of secret magical path hidden in multiple elvish temples that lead to a pilgrimage that could turn an elf into a primal elf.
I know I did a high elf mix with dark elf
The terling I forgot how to spell that and half ogre and human and that race that can transform or Shapeshift
Hello there
I was told that FR lore was that elves did not have a fixed eye colour but their eyes switched colour depending on emotions.
Hmmmm i never heard that before, unless you mean eladrin
Do you know if my character can work here?
Sorry for interrupting Im kind of new here also new to DnD Can someone guide to what to do
It doesnt
It breaks the rules of character creation as published in 5th edition 2014 and 2024
The DM can just allow it though. Up to DM
Ok
Might indeed just be an eladrin thing.
I don’t know
Oh wait! Alright, so apparently it was a thing back when previous editions had "infravision" that this made elven eyes glow red
'14 Base Human gets +1 to all ability scores. It's kind of like a blender of sorts.
So let's say a Tiefling has fire resistance, darkvision and three spells, you can't combine this with a Dwarf's poison resistance and a Halfling's Lucky trait
You can have items that give you poison resistance at most
Almost all races don't have weaknesses baseline either, they're just extra good at certain things rather than being bad in certain situations
True
-# Puts away Locathah & Grung... 🐟 & 🐸
Both of which aren’t core playable species anyways
Im new to d&d although i understand the basics and rp. how should i get into my first campaign?
There are a few ways. You can try to get your friends to get into the game and then start a campaign with them, you can go to your local game store or library and see if they have any games open, or you can go to #looking-for-players and sign up through the posts. You can also go to #looking-for-dm if you want dm's reaching out to you instead.
Hi I know this sounds like I am crazy I am a friend of Alastair (Patchwork Tiefling). He was hacked the Hacker has been running roughshod over the servers we share. Do not click any links from him. I know how weird this sounds, I am trying to help my friend before the hacker ruins more of his servers. If you have any DMs with Alastair please comb threw and delete personal information that might be in side
Action Surge sounds like a good idea, all things considered
It's not bad but may not be as impactful as you'd think, especially considering ranger is a halfcaster
Ehhh, not particularly useful spells. At least, not when your party has a Wizard, Cleric, Paladin, and Bard
Depends on the campaign. The campaign I'm currently in has a bunch of stealth, survival, exploration and travel so for us a lot of their spells would be great. They also get some decent control, support and offense options
I understand the benefits under normal circumstances when you be a versatile long range attacker AND get access to some useful spells like Cure Wounds, Hunter's Mark, and Entangle/Ensnaring Strike
But a rule of thumb is that the more classes you have in the party, the more an individual benefits from doing things that most/all of the others cannot
I.e. having healing/ranged spells when there are tons of bulky characters
And rangers have a bunch of spells no-one else has access to and without a druid on the party their entire spelllist is pretty unique and can fill a niche no-one else can
So what spells are that noteworthy to warrant thinking twice before a Fighter multiclass?
Pass without trace. Niche, but its extremely useful.
Multiple summon spells, stoneskin, dominate beast, steelwind strike, conjure volley, greater restoration, commune with nature for level 4-5 spells. Also what will you do with a action surge
cure wounds?
As a frontline fighter having cure wounds is pretty good.
Couldn't I still cast that while being multiclassed?
yeah nothing is really stopping u from casting cure wound
multiclassing doesn't prohibit anything on its own. your Class Features might though (like Barbarian Rage not allowing spellcasting)
So my question is, why would I not want to multiclass my ranger into a Fighter?
Not that good. It takes an action to cast, an action that may better be used using your second wind.
Idk about cure wounds, wouldn't healing word be more valuable
Ngl if ya wanna multiclass, multiclass is better. Ranger doesnt have much thats like "WOW! I should take this instead of multiclassing into Druid or Cleric!"
Do you really wanna stop for a whole turn bealing
Actually second wind is a bonus action so... It's just better
Healing word is better in combat. Outside combat, cure wounds is better
You're multiclassing into Fighter for the heavy armor proficiency anyways
You're not going to level 20, you're likely going to level 10. If you multiclass fighter you'll slow your spell progression and the unlocking of some ranger features
Idk if ranger learns that
But again, we have both a Cleric and Paladin on our team. Not to mention a bard
Ranger learns neither for the record, I thought we were talking about spells from multiclassing
Level 11, apparently. Didn't update that bit yet, my bad
Ah, then great! That's the level where you get your 3rd subclass feature which is pretty great depending on the subclass
All their 24 subclasses unlock something pretty strong there except the hunter
Ranger Rogue multiclass is also v cool
Somewhat
I was already going to multiclass into Fighter eventually, but I was debating between Gloomstalker or Hunter for the subclass
I assumed it was Multiclassing Fighter vs Just choosing Ranger.
Okay, I will make a bigger post to clarify what I am telling/asking
I like Gloom Stalker more
If you're making a melee strength ranger take hunter, if not, I'd personally take any other subclass. Hunter doesn't get any really fun abilities and what they get is mediocre
I've been trying out Gloom Stalker with excellent results
Keep in mind they got nerfed quite heavily in 24
Oh wait are we talking about 2024
Gloomstalker is good...But wouldnt it be better to choose way of the Shadow Monk?
Tbh idk
elemental monk 😄
Ranger Monk multiclass is okay but you have to discard your armor which is eh
Grapple from 15 ft away monk
They have different abilities. Also shadow monk in 24 because of their darkness ability can be difficult to team manage
Fair I didnt consider that and the fact they cant wear armor.
It's excellent but it has one glaring weakness. If your teammates rely on their darkvision and you end up downed, you are out of luck
Real min maxers would do gloom stalker ranger and echo knight fighter to compensate.
The darkness thing is kind of a perk at most, I'd pick Gloom Stalker only for the damage output at turn 1
At some point why not multiclass Assassin Rogue? Echo Knight Fighter + Assassin Rogue = free real estate.
Ah, then in 24 it's definitely horrible
Level 3 is right around the corner, and I was debating on my subclass: Gloomstalker vs Hunter. Hunter is a little interesting from Volley and Escape the Horde, and the level 3 option could really help chip away at boss-esque enemies
Gloomstalker's perks seem a little underwhelming at a glance, especially because I don't understand the unique spells that well. However, the dark vision and level 11 ability are both pretty useful, and Dread Ambush would currently give me a +8 to initiative rolls thanks to high Dex and Wisdom
Echo Knight's burst is rechargable once per long rest, Gloom Stalker triggers every fight at turn 1
Also, this is 2014 edition
2014 content only as mentioned, I don't really care much about 2024
Also quit the pinging for a moment
EK hasnt been updated for 2024 anyways.
Ah. Gloomstalker is by far in a way the strongest 2014 subclass for ranger as far as i know so if you want a strong subclass go with them
Anyways, which of the 2 would work better with Ranger? Especially if I am going to consider a fighting multiclass
Why? What makes it that strong aside from what I already know?
And keep in mind
2014, 11 is max level
In a game where combat ends within 3-4 turns, having a free attack that does extra damage at turn 1 is crazy good
They get great initiative boost, great damage and invisibility in darkness can be very op
Invis is lvl 13
Have you considered maybe Monster Slayer?
You get pseudo invis as early as level 3
Is this different from Hunter?
Different subclass yes.
Ah, i see. I thought it was the same in 14. Well i haven't played the 2014 version, only heard everyone say how it's the best subclass so probably can't help
It is a strong subclass, I just am not getting all the benefits
Unless you monoclass unfortunately
To me they seem to get great spells, a decent damage boost and great initiative boost, proficiency in one of the most common saves, invisibility in darkness from creatures that rely on dark vision which will likely be most of them who fight you there, and at level 11 you can attack again if you miss which is also a great damage boost
I'm a Ranger MCing into Fighter, not vice versa
But level 10 isn't a bad place to stop at, 10 Ranger 1 Fighter
Alternatively, 8 Ranger 4 Fighter?
Tbh a ranger fighter is the ranger that would benefit from hunter as you'll likely go melee
Wouldn't that miss out on 3rd level spells?
At level 10 Ranger gets Hide in Plain Sight
I might as well also explain my weapons
Mostly focusing on a sniper-esque build
Exactly so depending on the campaign Hide at Plain Sight at level 10 isn't bad for a sniper build
Longbow for now, but eventually a musket or musket adjacent firearm
The drawback was that I was too poor for a Scimitar
Good news, got a silver shortsword
What do you want to get from ranger?
In terms of combat?
Why did you pick that class?
I forgot if you get level 3 spell slots at level 9 ranger
Overall. What abilities compelled you
Cuz otherwise your cut off point is either 10 Ranger 1 Fighter or 8 Ranger 4 Fighter
My Owlin Glamour Bard when he kills a boss enemy with a 7th level spell fire flare but the boss only had 13 hp left, but he still does his dramatic bow because its his first major kill of the campaign:
Quite frankly, all the other ones I was interested in were taken: Fighter, Barb (at the time), Cleric, Rogue, etc
I still could have picked them, but I don't like doubling up much
I see. That doesn't sound great tbh
Yup, they do
The team comp? We also have a Bard, Wizard, and Paladin, but those classes don't interest me as much
The fact you're picking ranger because the classes you like more have already been picked
A fighter melee with heavy armour and greatsword and champion and a long range fighter battlemaster will be played very differently
What am i supposed to do to answer to your message?
Just type it out I'll see it, promise
Okay, sorry
Like I said, I don't like doubling up
And I would have picked Rogue, but the thing that stopped me (aside from also already having one) is thag Rogues aren't proficient in the ranged weapons I would have preferred
You don't remotely sound sorry sometimes istg
I wish there were considerably more Beast statblocks tbh
I've been pinging people on every message for the past 2 years of talking on discord, it's a hard to get rid of habbit
It'll happen sometimes. idm pings because it means people are interested and responding, but that's just me
You can reply to a message while turning off the ping. It's hard to break a habit, but you gotta start somewhere
Alright, I'll turn off ping then
Anyways, I chose Ranger because several long range hits of piercing damage is a very good start
Do you like their spells?
I don't mind packing a few spells that could help the team out, but I see it as a means of small support
so bit of a random thought
It's why Fighter MCing presumably lowering your spell slots won't bother me too much because I wouldn't be picking too much anyways
if dragons have gods, do mind flayers have a god?
I'd say get level 5 for 2nd attack and just go full fighter afterwards. Might aswell grab hunter subclass and go like 14 wisdom
I mean, Sharpshooter, Piercer, Stalker's Flurry, and a Musket with Gunner are already good starts
or do elder brains fulfil that roll?
Why not Action Surge to turn up the damage higher and get Second Wind for self healing?
Illithids have 2 ‘gods’ one of which is an elder brain god
I mean, yeah, it's great. You don't really get anything from staying in ranger at all though, especially past level 5 so I'd just go full fighter after
Are my original 5e books outdated now? I saw that there was a 2024 version today that I had never seen before.
I already have 18 in Wisdom. Hence my slight gravitation for Gloomstalker buffing my current initiative modifier to +8
A lot of people stick to 2014
Elder Brains are more like Mind Flayer Leaders than gods. Think Politician, not religion. They've got Thoon and... something else I forget for deities
What did they add in the new books?
Oof. What's your Dex?
Both are +4
New books are updated and improved some stuff while not improving some other stuff
Better versions of a lot of subclasses.
Some worse then before
I see. Tbh I'd suggest just grabbing gloomstalker then, multiclassing to fighter since level 6. Ranger hunter is only really good for melee
In Sept 2024, they released an updated Player's Handbook, Monster Manual, and Dungeon Master's Guide. These are mostly the same books with a great deal of formatting improvements. The classes all got an overhaul, they are like 75% the same. For the most part, Quality of Life stuff is much better.
what subclasses got worse??
Gloomstalker i think
oh wait, gloom stalker
Their future products will be written under the assumption that you are using 2024's Core Rules. Their products from 2014-2023 can all be used with the 2024 stuff. I'm currently running a Curse of Strahd (2015) game using 2024 characters.
Maanzecorian and Ilsensine are the mind flayer gods but they are regarded more as elder beings and concepts by mind flayers because they do not really worship the way other mortals do
Though tbh new gloomstalker seems not much worse depending on how many encounters you get. 1d8 at the start of every fight vs 2d6 wis mod times per day which increase at level 11 and do additional effects
If you take BG3 as canon, even if they worshiped, it would not do much due to their souls being non-apostolic
I question saying "Gloomstalker got worse" tbh. It just stopped being so oppressively good
I'd even say i might prefer it
@trail mirage
tbf, it still got worse, but i do agree with the statement
At level 6 or since? And how many levels of Fighter would I take? (Max lvl is 11)
BG3 forcibly made them have no souls iirc when old lore disagreed with that
I hope it is because it does things I really like but it also breaks a few things in established lore from what I understand
I'd say just go all the way. Rangers only get rangery stuff, not much fighting stuff
e.g. the githyanki potentially having a less evil future
Actually, the term used by Withers is that they have "non-apostolic" souls, which can be taken to mean that their souls do not interact with gods, their prayers don't feed them.
Having not played BG3 I can comfortably disregard any lore changes they used
Why is 2024 gloomstalker considered worse? What ability because worse?
Go all the way what? I'm confused
So no even BG3 does not claim they are souless.
Just that they have a specific type of soul.
After level 5 of ranger go into fighter and stay there I'd suggest
its no longer as borked as it used to be; spcifically its extra attack thing. surprise also got nerfed
Wouldn't I need 2 levels for Action Surge and Second Wind?
oh also I still think the partial illithid stuff is extremely fascinating and helps mind flayers not solely be monsters
They've never been solely monsters.
Except surprise though, extra 1d8 attack at the start of eich battle got replaced with extra 2d6 damage wisdom modifier times a day which seems to be about the same number of times as the other ability would activate. Though i might just have much less encounters then most players ig
Why stop after that though?
They’re living parasites but they also have a complex warped culture dynamic not unlike how drow act
Volo's Guide to Monsters, for all the lack of love it gets, gave a nuanced and interesting look at Illithids.
And non-evil illithids have been part of the game since... Well, since Illithids were established as evil.
I don't know. Does Ranger get anything special after level 5?
There have always been adventures and novels that included a rogue illithid that had no interest in the usual stuff
There’s a cultural stigma against magic for several reasons for example and they engage in constant one upmanship to obtain higher social ranks
if anything is canon from bg3 though I hope it's omeluum
‘Deviant Illithids’ are not uncommon either
Spells and exploration stuff mostly. Rangery things
dude is cool as hell
Omeluum is canon and exists in an official hard cover before the game
The society of brilliance is an official organization
Gloom Stalker gets Iron Mind at level 7, which gives advantage in wisdom saving throws
If you already have advantage in wisdom saving throws, you can pick between int or cha saving throws instead
proficiency
Omeluum was invented for BG3, but you are right that the society of brilliance predates BG3 and has included rogue illithids before BG3
not advantage
Omeluum exists as an NPC in Out of the Abyss and that book predates the game as well
A certain Mind Flayer who's a renegade that was tormenting Duke Stelmane is also canon btw
Only officially named in bg3
Nope! In Out of the Abyss, the Illithid member of the society of Brilliance that appears is not Omeluum, it's Grazilaxx
Then my DM must have renamed him as a side effect of playing the game when I ran it the first time
Most likely yes.
Omeluum appears in other content last I checked?
Perhaps but none predating BG3. I am positive he was invented for BG3.
They. They were invented. Illithids don't have gender, no reason to use masculine pronouns.
Ah BG3 it seems looking it up, must have gone what other people here said
Would I be able to get feats like Gunner while taking levels in Fighter?
This Mind Flayer showed up before Omeluum 
Also, another question. When there are multiple things I can do upon leveling up, am I only allowed to choose 1?
Depends on the level/feature
Like wizard gets to choose two spells on level up for example
Wasn't Omeluum (or maybe the org he works for) in Princes of the Apocalypse?
The organization we already know predates the game
no! wait! the underdark one!
If you want to use guns, most likely
Out of the Abyss! Princes was the Elemental adventure!
I already quoted OotA and that’s a different mind flayer
alas, they're all calamari in the end
very bad calamari, if volo is correct
My mind flayer wizard takes offense to that
Don't eat illithid though
Defintely not that module
In society underdark calamari eat you
Shame mind flayers aren't a playable race
for good reason
First off because illithids are people and that's... Well, not cannibalism but... I mean, if it's wrong for an elf to eat a human, it's also wrong to eat a mind flayer.
They are when you’re like me and use DM permission and Custom Lineage
CL + Telepathy + Telekinetic is close nough ig
2 more questions
Lizardfolk says hello
or an Amethyst Dragonborn
Custom Lineage seems to be the closest we'll get
- What does taking more and more levels in Fighter accomplish?
God, I wish Custom Lineage was a larger process
more fighter levels
I'd like to see the chaos in a party between a Githyanki, a Githzerai and a Mind Flayer
Moar attacks + class features
The party's over before it'll ever start
As in, what do I gain from them?
Progression towards all the class features fighter gets at higher levels. That’s what you get in all classes
just read the higher level fighter levels and the question is answered
Got it. Brb
never escaping the dnd players cant read or do math allegations
Conflict between a githyanki and a githzerai party member is a bit boring anyways
was messing up so bad with calculating damage like, 30 minutes ago
Because the githzerai are just... Well they're right
Them making up after 30 mins isn't too surprising, I'm more interested in the group dynamic when a Mind Flayer is in their team
i think youre underestimating the grudge
Put a Duergar in there as the 4th for good measure
A mind flayer character will get more than enough flak from NPCs already and in general I’d recommend against partying with a gith.
There is no way around the fact that the Githyanki are simply wrong and the Githzerai are simply right. That's kind of a boring conflict, unless we make it more personal. A sort of cult-deprogrammation thing on the Githyanki side, but there's nothing much to do on the Githzerai side
I literally just learned how Help Action actually worked for Attack Rolls. For the uninformed, you distract an enemy, you don't help your ally. You choose a creature and make them easier to hit instead of choosing a buddy to make their attacks easier to land.
But how else could I justify Baezel 😔
hello
Story-wise it's uninteresting.
And having a mind flayer in the party? I mean sure. Until you get in range of an elder brain.
And by that point it just doesn't matter how the mind flayer feels about the party, their only loyalty is to the brain.
No
Not in one class, no. You could not grab Champion and Battlemaster as a Fighter.
if you have two classes only.
You can have 2 subclasses as long as they're part of 2 different classes. You could be a Hunter Ranger + Champion Fighter.
And hell, how do you adventure with a mind flayer? Everybody's going to be like "oh gods help us, an illithid come to enslave us and eat our brains and put tadpoles in us".
"Those adventurers have been enslaved by the illithid, put them out of their misery!"
Not when you’re already a deviant mind flayer. Arcane magic proficiency interferes with the psionic control per lore. Some can also be excommunicated or simply have left for personal reasons. Also ring of mind shielding works too
I'd trust Omeluum to watch my back
Omeluum specifically also has such a ring iirc as does Grazilax
I mostly question how a Mind Flayer PC eats rations. Afaik they can't consume most foodstuffs.
the only calamari i trust to watch my back is nihiloor
They don't. They need people's brains.
That’s not true actually Illithids can eat regular food but they need a brain at least once a month
Oh, really?
Tbh its kinda like Astarion in that sense
They just go out and hunt things after dark
Astarion is a notably different thing though
It’s required to maintain their brain health and not decay but they also still need regular food. However they also have a 100% efficient digestion system. They don’t have to defecate
or at least stave off the hunger
maybe being a Mind Flayer isn't so bad
Most Illithids eat a brain either every 2 weeks or if they’re feeling gluttonous they eat a brain weekly
nothing is stopping strahd from having a full course meal. just doesnt do as much as your party's blood
Tell that to Duke Stelmane's partner
In itself, it's not bad. It's nice to be an illithid. It's not nice to be a non-illithid near an illithid though
I'm sure they'd agree with you
It has to be the brain of something intelligent so you can’t go and eat animals
BG3 is its own continuinity if theyre from there
But if I were to multiclass into Fighter while already having Gloomstalker as Ranger, I could get a second subclass as Champion
