#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 44 of 1
Thanks!
doesnt sound too bad with a bit of homebrew
I got an idea that might be kinda dumb but I think it could be fun.
Tell us
What do you need to homebrew?
So to playtest my rendition of a Gunslinger I wanted to run a nautical game initially
making the poison be applicable to your weapon using a bonus action and stuff
And it was gonna be about undersea ruin delving for treasure and dealing with threats on the seas
That's the Poisoner Feat, no need for homebrew.
But I got a further thought, to have the game about pursuing a sea legend in-world and surviving threats on the seas and delving into undersea ruins would be apart of it.
And said legend if it were uncovered might have some permanent effects on my world.
Sounds cool
But unfortunately it's December.
Nah what I mean is tabletop games enter a lull in December generally
Alrighty
So what’s the fun/dumb idea?
i have a question abt my homebrew rules (i wonder if my players would like it and want feedback)
While downed
- You can fail 2 death saves to do an action and stabilize yourself. But until you get healed, if you get hit once you die
- If you exhaust yourself to do a crit in this state, you can fulfil your action dealing max double damage but you sacrifice yourself to save the party
- Temp hp stabilizes and you back by one
- Death saves are made in secret
- After combat is over, initiative keeps going till you are either dead or stabilized
Coming back from being downed does two things
- DC 10 CON save. On a success you get the “Adrenaline” effect. Doubles movement and ADV on all rolls until end of combat
- Player takes one level of exhaustion until the end of combat
OHH
Well the fun but dumb idea is ||The "treasure" is a people that survived a Cataclysm due to an artifact that shielded their palace (whole area not just the building). And they managed to survive and thrive off pure will, determination. So it would be less a material treasure and more of a "the real treasure is the power we have inside ourselves to survive and thrive even in the worst of times", and that species would become playable.||
But if anything just a fun thing to add to my world
Just had a funny thought, is it allowed to multiclass into commoner?
It's a fun thought, but since commoner isn't a class, no. 
1d4 hit dice 😭
2 Warlock/18 Commoner 🔥🔥
Yes, actually. It’s called being a ranger
....
How does one equate a ranger to a commoner?
I believe it’s a “Ranger sux” joke
"Why not just take the flavour of Call of Cthulhu and Cyberpunk Red and mash them together into DnD through reflavouring and homebrew, instead of inventing a new system for something that is much easier to homebrew? It sounds like a waste of time."
Damn, people really hate the idea of playing another system lol
does ranger really sucks tho?
No
may I ask why you want to make your DM tweak
because they still have the dm vs player mindset
Well I know that much, I wanna unpack it
So your solution is a PC vs DM mindset?
its interchangeable
I wanna figure out why they have that mindset and help find a way to move past it
You're seeking a peace treaty, whereas it seems the OP wants to escalate the war by opening a new front
Pathfinder for martial fantasy
Where did you get dm vs player from
It looks like a random contextless complaint about dnd-only rigidity
Gigi said 2 things and neither imply a conflict with their dm
nah the guy was saying that 5e was easy to homebrew so why have other system
What guy
not from this server and @limber trail is not talking about me
Do you know who knome is talking about?
As a general question, no right or wrong answer, just curious:
In your opinion, what's the most iconic D&D spell that isn't fireball, lightning bolt, or wish?
mate you can literally scroll up
Silvery Barbs for the memes maybe?
Web, Sleet Storm and Nystul's Magic Aura
I did
One of or any of the spells named after a PC, Bigby's, Mordenkanen's, Tensor's
Ah deleted i see
Magic Missile - It has even penetrated other media in reference to D&D
yea my bad.
guy basically said " give me top 3 spells beside silvery barbs to make my dm tweak "
See "Magic Missile the darkness" memes and even the tv show The Magicians.
counterspell has always been iconic to me
Yeah, I think that's what I think of when it comes to "iconic". Like do people recognize it as "yeah, that's a D&D thing".
Magic Missile is definitely a top contender. Whereas I personally feel like something like "web" feels generic enough that it doesn't just scream D&D? I think the named spells are also a good choice since they're definitely deeply rooted in D&D.
I think maybe more people know of "magic missile" than say "Tasha's hideous laughter" or "bigby's hand".
Y'know what, I misread that sentence as "what's your favourite spells that isnt lightning bolt, fireball and wish"
my bad
I'm trying to decide if I want my soulknife rogue to be a halfling or a small human, what do y'all think would be more optimal?
Depends on which you’d prefer the benefits of
Mage hand
Halfing
probably small human
Would you like an extra feat, skill proficiency, and free inspiration every long rest? Or advantage against being frightened and able to reroll Nat 1s?
Both have their benefits
Sorry, thought this was 2014
My b, 2024
If it was 2014 I’d pick halfling in a heartbeat
But I can’t help but love 2024 human. Their underdog nature stole my heart
And the extra feat and skill proficiency
The main benefit of halfling I’m considering is actually their ability to hide behind larger creatures.
Trust me, it doesn’t come up that often
Playing a goblin Beastmaster ranger that just hit 4th level. He rides beast and use pike (try to knock enemies prone with beast and/or hit and push away with pike). In terms of wanting to add to these abilities that restrict enemy movement, should I take sentinel or polearm master first and take the other at 8th? Also I sure there is likely another build/class/spell combo whatever that does what I want better, but I am looking for advice for beastmaster ranger.
Oh does it not? It sounds pretty good to me but if it’s largely irrelevant then I guess I’ll go with human.
I’d say polearm master, it’s so strong that I can’t see taking much of anything else first.
That is what I was thinking. If beast and ranger hit enemy, then he is prone and pushed back. When it start turn it has to waste move to get up, and then can potentialy be hit again by pike reaction and pushed back again (might not be able to attack at all or at the very least no move far).
The main advantage of being small is that a lot of animal based summons from Druids are now rideable mounts
If you were a Druid and had high strength would it be possible to throw your summon at something-
Yes but then you're a Druid with v high strength
yea you could but they aren't STR casters, they're WIS, so like, don't dump that
I mean if you came across a potion of hill giant strength go drink it for funsies
But its better off if you give it to a martial character instead
you could dump INT for better STR
And tbh I don't think you need high strength at all to throw stuff like rats
or dump CHA, which would make sense because throwing animals at people is a bad look from any perspective
i guess it depends on if the summon disappears when wild shaping but you probably could throw the summon with the right wildshape
RAW throwing summons isn’t possible unless they’re dead
Even then they only do 1d4 damage
iirc a Druid's summoning spells aren't concentration so you don't lose them after wild shaping
i don't know how DND does throwing but i know this isn't lore accurate, humans are a very unique sort of animal because we are one of few species with the structure to throw things accurately
Summoning animals above people’s heads, though…
that would technically be a heavy object falling…
our bipedal semi-climbing design structure is specifically a really good platform to throw things from, because our shoulders have better motion range than other quadrupeds, and our bipedal nature lets us plant our feet in a way that provides a good platform for using that upper body chain from
I’m pretty sure Tasha’s has rules for falling on people
Speaking of which, a level 9 conjure animals (2014) can do 672 damage if you drop the animals on people’s heads
Assuming all saves fail
Save the world by dropping a rothe onto a greater god's head
my DM outlawed goomba stomping people bc i had a climbing speed :(
I mean aoe damage like that is wild when you have enough targets
goomba stomping is the sorta thing where, I'd personally allow it to work once because it's cool, with the stipulation that future attempts won't work the same
just because it's not as fun if it's repeated
yea i mentioned it and they just said what i reason to be "i'm not allowing it specifically because i know your plan and the other players wouldn't be able to do a similar thing so it wouldn't be fair to them"
i would allow it but it needs an acrobatics check to avoid a problematic fall
because landing on creatures tends to be messy if you look at wrestling
yea, that makes sense
I allow anything RAW
That doesn’t mean the monsters won’t try to stop you, though
About to jump on a goblin? Ok, he readies his action to move out of the way
well see that DM doesn't have Tasha's so we didn't have any preexisting rules for trying to fall on someone
there wasn't a rule to as written, so we didn't
Not really. Greater gods don't have a real body. They sometimes manifest phsyically for one reason or another. So you can kill that form, but never the Greater god itself.
Aw damn it would have been funny
If your god can die by a mortal's hand how powerful were they to begin with?
eh pretty powerful prob, just cause it can occur doesnt mean its easy
depeneds whats helping the mortals is it other greater gods lol
Very broad question here
Very broad answer incoming
very narrow answer also incoming
And I'm posting it here because I want potential answers from everyone willing not just from a specific channel
very tailored answer that only fits what I like incoming
How does one, write a campaign
With a pencil or Microsoft word
Y'all are funny
I know
You know, that.. was a broad answer
think of a plot, write it down, dm it
Start with an idea
its like writing a book?
thats like #1 advice not to do
A story is not a campaign
But more serious answer. I more often do sandbox campaigns because that’s easier than doing a straightforward story
ever heard of the dm that should have just written a book?
im not saying it is, im saying the idea is similar in you have an idea and write the idea, then dm it
I genuinely dont know what the question is? like wdym write a campaign
like a specfic one? or how we make ours?
Ehhh okay, this is mostly used for DM's who railroad,
Mercer and the folks that built up Exandria absolutely could have just written a book.. I mean have you seen some of the lore for the forgotten realms? It's extensive
you write the setting, continents, cities, towns any big conflicts in the world. think of what your plot is in the biggest of strokes, e.g. big bad guy x is trying to do y you need to stop him
It depends on how linear you want it to be
You shouldn't write a book, and expect your campaign to go like that- I remember someone who put it as "write the campaign how it would go if the players weren't there"
fair
I just mean like, the broad strokes,
not a dm but how is this for advice, write the world first then write the next session after the previous one ended
To be distinct my main issue is major writers block
I'm stuck on concepts for villains and conflicts and absolutely nothing in between
obviously theres some stuff that needs to be planned out long term but this way you dont get this
Speaking of, I need to start writing the second game I wanna start
I could, and most likely I will, but I want to have a framework atleast
Since it's kinda linear
Branching paths in particular seem so complicated to me
power of improv
Trying to weave everything together, and then the concept of cohesive arcs
I know how to do improv that's so not what I'm talking about though
I can improvise if things don't go as planned, but I'd like there to be a plan
i can understand your struggle
Tbh with you, a lot of players won't notice plot holes
But I'll notice them
For context, this campaign I'm writing is a rewrite of an old one I did where I did essentially improv the entire thing with nothing but a vague idea in mind, a campaign that my players said they really enjoyed, but one that I wasn't happy with
so i basically create an abstract theme of the game, i maybe create an endgoal, and then i just populate the world and local area with people, events, terrain, structures, etc. i think its better if stories flow naturally, and the way to make them natural is to not have personal investment in an expected arc or prewrite many interactions, but rather to just set up a fantasy world that does stuff that the players can make and follow objectives within
This rewrite is mainly to prove to myself that I can write a good campaign and not just focus entirely on giving my players everything they want
Like obviously I'll still focus on giving my players everything they want but I don't want my campaign style as a DM to boil down to "she's fun cause she let me play a dragon"
Then perhaps ditch that campaign remnant, and start over from scratch with a new concept
It is meant to be a rewrite though
One that you're clearly struggling with
I suppose my main focus is the world building right now, it's what I find the most interesting at the moment and what I've gotten the most work done on
mix good luck with bad luck and have limits
So I could just, run a campaign in the world, and write something new
That you're struggling to develop an idea could be a sign it's doesn't have much potential
Otherwise, like I said above, start with an idea:
- a world overrun by zombies
- a world where magic is illegal
etc etc
and go from there
Also a reminder that a story isn't a campaign
Worldbuilding is not a campaign
It absolutely has potential
I just dont- in the original campaign the players were fighting gods
But fighting gods is iffy, because either the god feels under leveled, or the party feels punished
I'm trying to figure out how I could ground the threat, while still making it feel fantastical
hello! so I have a question
if someone will make a deal with God does this make them cleric or warlock?
I mean, he made a deal so he must be warlock, but he getting powers from God so he is a cleric, but he is not worshipping it, just work on it, so he is a warlock.... And its also kinda dont feels like multiclass
Greek gods type, "yea it's called a god but impactfully it's just a magic dude with a cool sword that does things"
But at the same time, I'm not even sure who I want the main villain to be
Do I want heralds of these titans?
Do I want a single arch druid?
Do I want an Empyrean of the mother of all?
Is the threat that the titans are going to destroy the world by reverting it to it's primordial state, or is the threat that the sheer act of escaping their former jail would crash the world down into the hells?
paladin, the deal is an oath
a warlock would also work tbf
But making a deal for power makes you a warlock
you can if they want to deal with you, tbf
Paladins are devoted to an oath, and clerics are devoted to a domain
thanks
You can, but that raises that other thing I said about making gods feel too...small
I'm not sure if I even want the campaign to be centered around the titans, rather than centered around the acolytes of the twin gods
I could make it even smaller and just make it like a boss rush monster hunter style thing
This isn't writing a campaign, this is worldbuilding - when you address how a party of Level 1 nobodies fit into all that, then you'll be writing a campaign
Hhhh there's so much to think about
Thank you, Dunnik, for summing up the issue
Though, actually, thinking about who the villain might be and what the conflict is is still absolutely part of writing a campaign
idk how to define what i have planned, i have a world that needs a bit more building but i have the exact spot where the people fit
There's no point figuring out how the players fit into the conflict without a conflict
maybe start small instead of world ending
At first their conflict will be with 10 rats in the inkeeper's basement, the world-spanning conflict comes later
i have the conflict already, i have the beginning and middle and end and now i need connections
if you want a conflict but dont know what you could start with something basic like a supernatural incursion or maybe a civil war
God's at level 1, rats in basement at level 20
oh no i have that, there's a faction of what i've been calling terrorists but are pretty much just the common association of what a viking does who are attempting to ascend their leader to godhood via widespread fear and belief, and i have where the people are, which are the counterterrorist group trying to make sure that the leader is killed, captured, or otherwise stopped before that plan comes to fruition
was referring to the person who doesnt have a conflict and was asking for one
Dungeon Master of 25 years here.
Here is what I do. Which is not a universal answer.
Answer the following questions, who, what, when, where. About your antagonist.
Who are they?
What do they want?
When are they going to achieve it?
Where is that happening?
When you have those answers go to the next stage. And ask.
How do they achieve it?
And why do they want this outcome?
This works for antagonists of all tiers. And imo the best campaigns are the ones with compelling antagonists. Especially ones that are present within the Narrative. i.e. Strahd.
Sometimes I forget that people have been playing this game longer than I have been alive
Does anyone, off the top of their mind, have a weird, alien/eldritch/cosmic/whatever name for a woman that can be shortened into a normal female name?
Most of your campaign and adventures will be informed upon the How question.
DND has outlived multiple people and that's scary, isn't it?
Nah I find it funny
Æmanshaznarbamon
Aema
nah, but you can work backwards and call them Ana and then turn that into anything else
[*] to P., who has played a warforged warlock named Toad
is it possible to play a DND character with no name at all?
Someone’s gonna give you a name
we had a player who was a dragonborn encased in a full plate armour and we just called him whatever made sense in the context
We will call you
Noname
idk i figured it'd be difficult to refer to them
I once went through the desert on a horse that had no name
I keep making NPCs who have no name and the party make nicknames for all of them
pretty universal experience tbh
yea cause i had a concept for a warforged warlock and it'd be fitting to their aura farm to have no name at all
The words used to refer to him were, for example, "armour", "big guy", "horns", "he", "the one who got knocked out by a handshake", "friend"
It just felt good to get out of the rain honestly
There was like a multiple year period where i just accidentally had a bunch of characters with M names. Marin, Marayna, Mirion, Mysterio (i guess that one wasn't my fault I was playing the marvel RPG)
can you say? my name? is the memory gone are you feeling numb
idk how to add to this reference but i want you to know i get it
A Horse With No Name, by America (1971)
Is this the server to look for tables to play in or is this mostly just discussion?
Oh gods no
it is mostly to discuss but there is an LFG here
they used to host games here but nobody did that so now they don't do that
Got a new player in my paid game that has been going on for 6 months and got a very long and sweet message about the effectiveness of my onboarding and how excited they are to continue 
That's nice
Onboarding is obviously crucial, clearly you're doing it right
what is the appropriate length of elf ear
@shy stirrup btw i saw you on a YouTube comment section
Kinda crazy style, it was about commoners in dnd
Man, I wish I could have psychic spells on another warlock subclass, that seems absurdly fun to play with, but great old one isn't really a kind of warlock that I see as someone who'd play around with illusions
rabbit /j
Heh, yea BECMI Berserker's channel
ask ur dm
As much or as little as you want.
He'd deny it, and I'm not even a spellcaster
I just look at the text and imagine what could've been
Elf with comically large ears:
dodging the question
i think it has to be at least knife sized
so the joke makes sense
Just make it the size of an open palm
But what kind of knife
Butter
So it fits a slap properly
The joke is there because the ears are pointy and most people don't use spears anymore.
Spear ear
the ears arent on long sticks...
Wouldn't a larger knife be a butter option, so they'd hear better?
Butter option 
Not with that attitude they aren't
please do not cut elf ears off
How else do i get the bounty?
btw guys, talking about other rpgs are prohibited here right?
That'd be for #non-dnd-topics
Bring the whole elf
I see so much tiefling with a clipped ear and I always am like.
"Girl are you OK?"
that's 100% more bounty per bounty
ngl looking for character art is always wild because of the random stuff you see
Is a clipped ear for a tiefling the same as a split tongue for a human?
okie dokie
Now I just make my own art now. Or take art from DnD Books. Searching for character art without getting AI slop is so much harder these days.
IRL you clip ears to show that animals are neutered or spayed
I didn't know that. The more you learn
Hence "Guuuurl you good?"
Understandable
I use the portraits from dnd beyond
Yeah. Those are all from the books I believe
i make heroforge tokens for a bunch of charicters
In the game Ive been playing there’s been like a player character death each session for like the last 5-6 sessions
Awesome
Sounds like you're in a Meatgrinder campaign.
Most of them have been like 80% their fault
Self-meatgrinder then
Like this one guy saw this blood trail leading into a cave from where some other guys left their horses
Went into it and then light up the space briefly and was really quickly dispatched by the thing living in there
The same guy attacked this npc with his previous character in town Im front of a guard
If the dm describes a blood trail youll be hard pressed to find players not catch on to that plot hook
And he got executed for attempted murder
They had no proper light source
how does an adventuring party have no proper light source
I have Executed PCs for crimes before. It gets a realistic world across very quickly.
They have firearms in the system so they fired a few rounds to get a look at things
Like half the classes start with a dozen torches 
We’re very poor
Is this a gritty realism game, but the DM didn't tell the players it was going to be?
torches are literally a copper 😭 wdym
Also none of them had dark vision?
no
I have Darkvision
Everything under the sun accept humans and for some reason cats have darkvision
Dm, i have darkvision
baffling
Show off /j
Did I mention I have Darkvision?
In case not, I have Darkvision
Dark vision should be less common
This feels like the DM wanted to run a gritty realism game, but either didn't tell the players or didn't explain to the players what that meant.
dm actually...i have superior darkvision 😎
“The room is da-“
“Dm I have darkvision!”
“The lights go out and-“
“Dm I have darkvision!”
Playing with a twilight cleric, who needs inate darkvision
Benefits of faith
remember to pray to ilmater to keep the demons out of your sleep
"So what benefits do you get from your god(dess)"
"Bravo six, going dark"
“Suddenly you’re encased in darkness-“
“Dm I have darkvis-“
”Magical darkness mofo”*
Glows like a glowstick
Need me some way to get tremorsense or truesight
"A darkness is spreading across the lands of-"
"I have Darkvision."
It’s been established for a while
Congrats, you can see the darkness coming at you at mach 2
ive had the opposite a few times where the dm describes something dark and im like "im a human id obviously have a light source out instead of stumbling around blindly"
So you all know it's somewhat of a hardcore game and ... ?
Darkvision is so powerful, it can see through metaphorical darkness as well
Best part is if youre the only one without it
too bad for them
Just hold your dwarfs hand and trust they wont walk you against a wall
It got worse because the one guy could speak to the creature and he pled for his life by offering up their other horse to eat
the dwarf isnt sneaking around in his clanking plate armor im using my light cantrip
So now we’ve lost all our horses
Where can I join campaign? (I just joined this group)
Sneaking is overrated, noone can hear you if everyone is dead
im a fan of the diplomatic route and you cant do the diplomatic route if you're being a rat, so im more want to walk up to the gate and say hello
Where to # it? (Can't do it on the #looking-for-players )
meanwhile, the warlock about to pipe up:
idk what you just said
Playing a paladin rn so im more tending towards the diplomatic route too
Where to ask to join?
Helps that i couldnt sneak in if i wanted to
you look for an advertisement that interests you and you message the person who posted it
I mean you can always try and sneak in
go to #find-a-game and do the / command that fits what you're doing
Thank u
:D
+0 stealth and disadvantage, i dont like those odds
YOU CAN AWALYS TRY ONCE FOR THE BIT FOR THE COMEDY OF IT
Dc 15 is a 1/16 to pass
Well those aren’t super fun lmao
i think its better to try to have a diplomatic resolution or an honorable combat with an enemy rather than intentionally fail a check to get caught
Actually its 9/100 not 1/16
From 6% to 9%, upgrades people
This is True and depends on the situation idk the what context the sneaking is in I just like a good bit
And upgrades an upgrade
Havent had a good chance yet, i most definitally will try
Okay but have you considered, its funny as hell
Exactly sometimes we gotta do a silly bit
we need a Rogue who can mitigate stealth disadvantage with armor
Even if it might kill our characters
or like 12th level Ranger, high level Rangers get like, nothing lol
Just fyi we also have a cleric with disadvantage on stealth checks. And we do have a rogue, who i imagine if she wasnt very new to the game would hate us
i would rather my party do literally anything else than be intentionally counterproductive
Different seriousness of campaigns, we dont mind throwing ocasionally if its really funny
Im in a dnd group with friends
Exactly sometimes a but is fun not when it’s a serious plot element
Ofcourse
actually, there's a spell to silence movement, "Pass Without A Trace", would that help you?
Yes, its a flat +10 to stealth thats always very usefull
We dont have anyone to cast it though 😂
This is also a good solution
We'll cross that bridge when we get to it
Exactly
Hello
Hello
Hey hey
hi!!! :D
Btw is your pfp a fairy frog or frog in a flower
Fairy frog
Cute
Thank ya
Lot of frogs here
How are yall?
I’m not a frog
Good wbu
Not yet
I’m decent
i am!!
I don’t like frogs personally so I think imma stay a puppy
Heck yeah! Good for you!
Froogggs
I strive for a future where any man can make their profile picture whatever species they want - without being questioned for their choice of animal, choice of drawing or photograph!
exactly
This is real
personally i use a photograph of a frog because it seemed way too overdramatized to be such a silly looking animal
Frogs are cute. Also kinda of terrifying in their all consuming hunger.
all that shadow just to be ○ _ ○
They would absolutely eat you if they could. They try to eat humans, despite not being anywhere large enough to handle it, they just. don't. care.
have you seen that clip of a guy pulling a frog out of the mouth of another frog and then points them at each other like that didn't just happen? lmfao
Nope, but I believe it. Hmm ... maybe Kirby is just a pink frog.
How do you play a character that has something already? Like a business, or a job they have to do?
make sure it actually fits the campaign
Relegate it to downtime.
Have it be a Flaw, so when things from your day job come and interfere with the adventure, you get Inspiration.
Obviously that needs some discussion with the DM.
in the shadowrun system being employed actually gives you extra stat points because its a drawback
I’m wanting to play a doctor, and while I would love for him to like have a clinic already I feel like I need to push that into a goal. Rather than something he already has, maybe he is working at one but wants to start his own?
You can do like a travelling doctor sort of deal
That’s the other option
So like the character has a business but it roams around
as a suggestion, maybe you're just a class with access to healing spells, or you have proficiency with herbalism/alchemy/medicine, or perhaps the healer feat, or maybe all of them at once, and you could be like a hedge mage or a temple priest or hospitaller
that way it can be past experience but you can also use it in the future to help people when you have the time or when its in demand like a big hero
I actually already have the plan of healing without magic, I’m gonna be playing a homebrew class for him (already okayed by DM)
Normalize downtime usage
i dont know why you'd avoid using magic for healing but alright i guess
I just wish a single potion of healing didn’t take an entire day of work.
How about using the Bastion system?
In 99% of settings a potion of healing is a miracle drug
That’s a good question to ask actually
You could have your Bastion be a clinic that levels up and gets bigger as you advance, also it can make you potions while you're out adventuring.
Wait can it? Or are those hirelings that will work for me?
It might make more sense that “healing potions” only heal HP, which are NOT meat points.
HP, being an abstraction, can be “healed” lots of ways. A hot cup of coffee can be a healing potion.
Yo guys, just getting back into DND after not playing it for years
Joining my friends’ game as a loxodon monk
Yeah they will work for you.
it is also perfectly reasonable to still invest in learning medicine in the "normal" sense, considering that magic is a limited resource that is expended quickly
so you can combine the two without infringing on the doctor concept
Hell yeah I’m just starting this journey of dnd
Yea for more context I’m playing LaserLamas Savant class
At level 5 you can choose to have a Garden, which can produce both healer's kits and potions of healing.
I feel like creating a compelling villain isn't my issue, its just deciding on who I want that villain to be, and their wants would be ingrained into the conflict- so I also need to figure out what I need that to be
I really do appreciate the advice, don't get me wrong, it just doesn't really help with the issue i'm currently having
Nice, you made a character yet or just working on concepts?
maybe i'll just take some magic cards, get some randomization out, build off of some rolling tables
I’m playing a warlock half elf we’re just starting lol
I also have like 15 character concepts running through my brain at all times lol
Actually as a doctor you'd probably want two gardens at level 5 so yuo can produce healing potions, healers kits, antitoxin, and poison.
Nice you can’t go wrong with a warlock
also YEAH SAME i had an idea for a pirate campaign that i wanted to do and now my brain just keeps spamming random characters at me
Going back to the topic of magical healing, why would someone in the field not learn magic, especially if they are smart enough for it
The Savant is an intelligence based class without magic and is focused on gathering information
I was just thinking of like what if my character hates magic
Are you asking me a question? Or are you answering it?
that would be like hating wind or thermodynamics
Also in many settings magic is not something everyone can do regardless of how smart they are.
Both
That could also be the case
i suppose it is true that he could lack the faith to become a cleric for the sake of healing
I assume Savant has it's own skills, why do you need to justify it? Just say this is the path you've chosen.
There's no reason to assume that magical healing is commonplace.
Take the Realms for instance. There is the concept of the Gift.
If you don't have the Gift at birth or are given it by an entity such as a outsider or patron. You can never cast magic.
Oh funny idea, “it was the simpler path, I like simple” as if getting a PHD is easy
I don't think that everyone who chooses to go into the healing arts just somehow gets to learn magic.
Also true
So you don't have to come up with some sort of explanation, because it's not assumed that you will just get magic.
Wait, is this about explanations on how one gets magic?
Remember that nobody else in the world gets Player Classes. That's only for Player Characters.
Sort of? We are talking about my healer character who doesn’t use magic
Ah
NPCs don't run on the same rules as PCs.
Hello everyone I've been playing dnd for a while and can any just explain to me the concept of the dice when different dies are meant to be used?
Most times it’s a d20 for rolls, but the ability, item, spell, etc usually tells you what dice is used
Ohhh thank you so much!
I mean isn't it possible for npcs to gain character levels/abilities from classes but not to the extent of PC's
Anything is possible but its not the default
Fair. I know it was experimented with for death domain and oathbreaker in 2014
Mechanically NPCs should not be built like PCs. Narratively do whatever you want. The character sheet is an imperfect translation of this fictional person into the Rules of the Game.
because the concept of wizards and sorcerers flat out just exist, i just say that classes are real
Ive heard a couple of mentions of using class abilities like rage on enemies
You can still call them sorcerer and give them spells without the mechanical players sorcerer
Tbh I just believe adventurers are commonplace, what sets them apart are achievements and the power they wield
what would be the point of that
Some NPC profiles are given thoae features but they're not given class levels. Most likely for the sake of simplification
In the Realms the classes themselves do not exist.
the realms dont have wizards? the more you know
Druid in the MM?
Not all clerics are Clerics. Not all Berserkers are berserkers. Not all wizards are Wizards.
that is a separate statement from them not existing
squares dont exist, not all rectangles are squares
I suppose its why wizards for the most part are classified as mages as npc's
The idea of "oh that person is a Cleric™"
Does not happen in the realms.
It might be called a Druid, but it is not a PC Druid.
As for wizards. In the realms the term exists but the usual term for spellcaster of any kind was Sorcerer
A cleric could be a priest in world
ah yes, the sorcerer's tower, the sorcerer's spellbook, the sorcerer's hat
Warlocks I could see being the few by name
also druids absolutely exist, they literally have a language called druidic
A priest is someone who leads prayers. Anyone can be a priest.
Druids do exist. But 99% of druids are like the same as IRL druids. Not wildshapers
Rogues wouldn't be rogues but based on their archetype like scouts, swashbucklers
why not
NPC Druids aren't PC Druids, though they're similar. PCs and NPCs are built differently and exist for different reasons.
ok, why
Because they are not run by players.
The same as IRL druids? Extinct? /j
i dont drive my moms car but its still a car, i dont see how the distinction matters
The whole game exists as a way for Player Characters to experience the story with Non Player Characters as backdrops and antagonists.
As a druid. Rip me I guess
NPCs are there to tell the story PCs are there to be the main characters.
NPC wizards existing doesnt impede the PCs being the main characters of the story...
Is this just another excuse to fight for no reason?
Do we need to just cut it at "you can run it at your table however you want"? That sucks, but maybe it's the best use of everyone's time and energy.
NPCs wizards do exist. But they don't follow the same guidelines and in a setting like the realms they aren't the same as PC wizards.
No, and that isn't what I'm saying? I'm saying they don't exist for the same reason and thus don't run on the same rules.
"Suppressed by the roman empire" may have been a better version of that joke. I hesitated between the two.
your reason is they dont exist because players arent using them, how does that make any sense
I .. what?
did you mean something else? because thats what you're telling me rn
If I am from Waterdeep and I call someone a mage a Wizard. That is not at all the same thing by definition as a PC Wizard.
"They don't exist for the same reason" = "they exist for different reasons."
tbh just sounds like a lot of effort to make things more complex than they have to be , instead of saying classes exist
The same way the Paladin when it comes to Fantasy TTRPGs is very different than the Historical basis for Paladins
Honestly the big difference between them is power scaling
Classes exist, I'm not saying classes don't exist. They're just for players.
There be a reason why players can't be NPC builds
right, so sorcerers and druids and wizards arent for npcs
npcs arent sorcerers and druids and wizards
Not in the same mechanical way they are for PCs, no.
They are NPC statblocks, not character sheets.
is there a reason why....? beyond "because they're not"
Bingo. What the PHB defines as a Wizard or a sorcerer is not how someone in Neverwinter would.
or is this entirely circular
Something seems very obvious to me so I'm not entirely getting what the question is.
If you see a man fighting in the Roman arenas, you don't call him a Fighter.
You call him a Gladiator
One piece of evidence that supports Ophid and Lord Kas' view of this is how things like "druids" have a monster statblock: https://www.dndbeyond.com/monsters/5194976-druid
And you can see here it "echoes" what a PC druid is, but it doesn't have everything.
A simpler way to put it is that the language we use extra-diegitically is very different from the diegetic language.
if you see a man fighting in the UFC you call him a fighter
whats your point
Wizards you'd probably address them by mage or by their school of study
PCs have character sheets and character classes. NPCs have statblocks and titles that sometimes make them similar to classes, but are not because they are NPCs.
You call them Mixed Martial Artists.
I mean I could see fighter being used as a term
alright, this just reads as the logic being circular, that npcs cant be druids because npc druids arent druids because druids are pc classes and npcs arent pcs so npcs cant be druids
Right, and an NPC "Druid" does not work on the rules of a PC Druid, exactly!
Like lack of prepared spellcasting, and wild shape
Even ArchDruids only got long rest Wild shapes
Mechanically they do not run on the same rules. I'm treating Character classes as specific bundles of rules that work in a specific way. NPC statblocks do not run on those rules, therefore are not those classes.
Anyone starting a game I could join?
alright, you can have npc druids not exist at your table if you want, just seems odd
This isn’t the channel to ask. #find-a-game is where you go for that.
Diegetically, they're the same of course.
Oh my bad
There is no difference from an in-universe point of view between the archdruid NPC and the druid PC.
But yeah it’s kinda like how Bard the Job exists and Bard the Class exists and Bard the NPC stat block exists
Things were better when you built npcs like you did pcs in 3.5 dnd imo
They just share a title
No, this Druid NP does exist and I would use it, but it mechanically is not a PC Druid: https://www.dndbeyond.com/monsters/5194976-druid
And having different terms of the mechanical classes versus what they are called in-world can serve to build a lot of Verisimilitude
aside from the entirely different abilities that they would recognize if they actually interacted with eachother...?
"wow, you can turn into birds! i cant do that, how do you do that?"
"cuz im a druid"
"but im a druid"
Mainly by level of power granted/accessed to them and ArchDruid is also just a title too
What I mean is that to an outsider they are both druids, perhaps even of the same order. Might be master and apprentice.
The nuances of their powers are minute details.
So again I'm defining a "Class" as a specific bundle of mechanics and rules.
skip this outsider nonsense. why can a player druid wildshape and an npc druid cant? why can their peers not do what they do?
The "Druid" name is shared by an NPC statblock and a PC Class, but the NPC is not a member of the "Class." Class is a metagame concept.
Take one of the most famous DnD characters of all time. Minsc. The man is from the Land of Berserkers. His home has a fighting force so powerful they repel the red wizards regularly through rage and deadly close combat.
Yet people don't call all members of the Rashemaar Berserkers barbarians. Minsc himself is not even a barbarian.
the red wizards. interesting
Because the PC druid learned wild shaping and this specific NPC statblock represents a druid that didn't learn wild shape.
who did the PC druid learn it from if their peers cant learn it
Because everyone in the world is different and has different capabilities, it is only for the purposes of the game that players have to pick a "Class" which is a metagame thing, and which restricts them to specific rules.
iirc not all the Red Wizards are wizards either
No one said that the words don't exist. But a Red Wizard can be a sorcerer, an Eldritch Knight, a Paladin, a Warlock.
Volo is a well known Bard but very much is not a Bard in the class sense (he even has wizard spell casting)
Who said they can't?
For what it's worth, this feels like one of the least constructive ways to discuss this. It really sounds like arguing to prove who's right rather than try to seek understanding.
Maybe like... hitting the pause button would be worthwhile if we wanna keep doing this? Like we've all got time. Why not just write things out fully in as clearly as possible? And then ask for more clarity if needed?
I think the new FR books say that you don’t have to be a Wizard class character to be a Red Wizard
Never had to be.
Just someone trained in the Art.
I don't see a "can't" anywhere. Did you link to the wrong message?
oh so we're being pedantic now
alright im out have fun
What we are saying is like not all diviners in worlds get Portent they are not Mechanically Diviners.
I am not going to call a tactical commander a Battle Master.
i get from the game sense why PCs and stat blocks are significantly different from each other. but in world lore is where things get off-track interacting with the disparity. especially when it comes to NPCs that used to be adventurers.
The Druid Player Class and Druids in world might share a name, but they are not the same thing. They are both Druids, but the NPC is not of the Druid "Class" because "Class" is a metagame thing for Players.
i mean you can 1:1 import the mechanics of giving levels to an NPC, it's just a little not how the game is supposed to be balanced
Dude said he was out why are people still going at him?
Could a full party of every max level class beat like the strongest characters in fiction? (No wish spell)
Depends. Who is the writer of their fight?
Someone completely unbiased and goes off of facts alone
And what kind of story is the writer trying to tell?
I for one love adding a lot of the details to make the world feel as alive as possible. I am the anti Hand wave DM.
(Both sides have prep time)
A fight of great proportions where the mightiest wins, no underhanded methods
Well. Considering that many of the fictional characters in published DND Settings have the backing of literal gods. I doubt the PCs will survive that.
this isn't to say you should or would because the game is not designed this way, but you could, or also just... write in for the Druid NPC that it can cast Wildshape and give it the charges to do so
Oh. Then that person doesn't write that fight and goes to make something better with their time and the fight doesn't get written.
Fan: "Who would win in a fight between the Hulk and the Thing?" Stan Lee: "Depends on who's writing the comic."
You lowkey right 😭
Strongest in Fiction is broad
Dumb question, writers favorite will always win
Take 100 level 20 characters.
Lady of Pain: Looks
All dead.
Not necessarily. Sometimes writers put their favorites in losing situations
I was thinking death match YouTube videos where they actually analyze strengths and weaknesses then compares
yea strongest in fiction can quite literally refer to mary sue tier abrahamic gods in universes where nothing goes wrong bc it's a kids show
And moreover you are forgetting the rule of fictional fights: The underdog is more likely to win.
Let’s make this less broad, Demi-god level of characters
So the stronger of the two parties in a fictional battle is actually the loser
To win a battle in a fictional fight you need to be weaker than your opponent
for that you would need to port over the fictional characters into the exact same system using the rules of the system. then run the numbers and see.
It's a good question . It's a question design to create a specific discussion. People responding with 'the writers favorite' or whatever aren't smart for saying it, and seem to be unable to grasp context and the point of things.
I think most characters would get stumped by force cage
Not alot of them have the specific power of teleportation
Also very broad as Demigod is varied as well in stories
What kind of demi-god?
Let’s say Kratos for a base
Like Hercules and Vecna are both demigods after all
Exalted demigods? Greek demigods? D&D demigods?
I don’t understand the character sheets 😭
The seven sisters are demigods. They're just wizards.
what do you need help with? on DnDBeyond or pencil and paper?
They more or less just show your work for abilities and weapons
Pencil and paper
okay. which rules do you have access to?
I just have the players handbook
Which Kratos?
Is it Kratos at the start of a game with the fight he mandatorily loses to establish the stakes?
if you go step by step in the creation process it really helps you figure out where things go and what the numbers come from. it took me like four times of manually going through until i had the "aha!" moment and i finally grasped where things came from.
And prepare for the inevitable endgame rematch
GOW: Ragnarok, end game
Crazy how this server doesn’t allow server tags
Oh he loses. The first time. In that case the D&D party is an optional boss fight in a hidden area, and optional bosses are harder. Nobody beats them first try
I think in 1v1’s he would stomp the melee classes, but I feel like the spell casters could have something new every time
If im a cleric, where would i write light armor, medium armor, shields?
This is assuming that the spell casters just don’t use some cheese spell for an instant win
Nah. Nobody beats optional bosses on their first try. Kratos loses.
True
there should be an area on the page that allows you to write language proficiencies, tool proficiencies, and weapon/armour proficiencies. i think bottom left-ish.
but i might be thinking of the 2014 character sheet instead.
how do i get a free online dnd game to play with my friends
You don't need to buy anything to play D&D. You just need friends, a way to roll dice (digital is fine), a way to track character info, and an adventure (which can also be had for free).
I dont think that's the answer to their question
Sounds like they already have a group
D&D Beyond.com occasionally has free written adventures on the site. So one of you should be able to run it. The basic rules also provides a few guides on making your own adventures as well!
I think it comes with the starter adventure dragon of stormwreck isle (the beginning part)
y'know
I just realized something, I'm thinking of mind flayers as xenomorphs
where they take adapt a little bit from the person they were born from
but idt they work like that
if you are playin in person, DMsGuild and DriveThruRPG have a bunch of free adventures of varying quality. but you don't even have to go that far. DnDBeyond used to have a bunch of Encounters of the Week. these were free adventures or encounters you could run, but they have not been incorporated into the character builder or vitual tabletop. they exist only on their posts
wish they did but they don't
its been a while since i've seen encounters of the week. i'm trying to figure out how to search through those posts
The above is definitely what I'd suggest first - but if you are looking to do a bit more tinkering and/or you just need some general ideas, the way back machine / archive should have the old 3.5E adventures. There were like... 30ish of them? At one point, they were all hosted by WOTC and I don't think I ever read one I didn't like (though I definitely had favs).
slaad are more closer being literal chestbursters
I wasn't thinking the actual chestbursting part
I was thinking this
Yoo
Yooo
Do any of y'all do Warhammer
This is a D&D server, not a Warhammer server.
Nope
Jees just asking
#non-dnd-topics would have better results
Im thinking about getting a new dnd book, what should i get if i already have the 3 2014 core books and the 2024 phb
As a player
Player at the moment
2014 I'd reccomend tasha's, xanathars or mordenkainens
2024 the only one I could think of are the new FR books
the other ones practically extinct no?
I've seen them in LGS
it's out of print and I haven't seen stores selling them around me unless its more than $100 can
though I would reccomend tome of foes for DMs
i swear i see copies on like facebook marketplace like all the time
Tome of Foes is such a good book for DMs. Tbh. So is Volo's.
yeah, i doubt we'll get books like those again at least for a while
i'm kinda sad the orc stat blocks were straight up wiped
Weren’t they renamed?
yeah, I think the only chance for humanoid blocks like those again are in setting books (see forge of the artificer with gnoll statblocks) but i doubt a setting book really wants to spend that much page space on such a specific topic
not that I'm aware of
the only DM sourcebooks i think we'll get are setting books and books laser focused on a big specific thing like an iconic creature type. There's little room for the smaller monsters anymore
the orcs were straight up removed, drow were made so that they could be any alignment along with duergar
Truly the last Splat books
i think setting books can get away with some of them, as long as they're tied to a faction such as Adventures in faerun specifying drow of Lolth as the villainous drow faction
and even then we dont get the same amount of writing on them that books like volo's would. A couple paragraphs is the most you get
Hold up a min. Is this the first year without a Big Campaign adventure in a while?
i have a feeling Orcs will never get that treatment again
yep, eve of ruin was the last big one
I am surprised there wasn't one to go with the FR Books.
like, there's the very slight possibility of it since people were very excited to hear about the new many arrows kingdom. But even then that was only in the book because the artist for the map added it
And Many Arrows didn't invent the "Peaceful Orc" when Salvatore created it. The sad part is that a lot of this pulling and twisting over Drow and Orcs are based on assumptions players and DMs make.
I'm just thinking we're gonna see Venger and the Red Wizards team up
They'll just make him a red wizard
true, it's just the only example of orcs doing something in the forgotten realms as of right now
We are talking about the team that put amethyst dragons with the Dragon Slaying knights because purple purpled.
Perhaps venger's just temporarily aligning with them for power in FR
2026 is 4 weeks away and we still have no idea what wotc is planning to do that year for d&d
That mentioned in the 5e Books the Ondonti Orcs have been leaving peacefully in the Ride for centuries. The mostly half Orc town of Palischuck in Vaasa is one of the better places in the whole nation.
i think wotc cares more about the lore for the cartoon than any of their other settings. Venger will be fine 
Humanoids of all kinds got statblocks in the new MM. Specifically Drow statblock were reintroduced with the Faerun books, wasn't it?
A cartoon that aired 20 years before the primary demographic was born lol
Orcs are humanoids. Thus the humanoid statblocks are also orcs.
Drow are also humanoid tho
Will we get a 2024 version of tashas caudron?
Yes, and they are also included in the humanoid blocks. Though the specifically Faerun culture Drow got reintroduced for the Faerun setting.
yeah i'm sure i have a biased point of view as someone with no attachment to the cartoon, but it really is some pandering to a target audience im not apart of
I believe that’s just the 2024 basic rules now
If they reprint a 2019 book for the updated rules. It'll be the worst cash grab ever.
I meant with the ones like the hand of yutrus and the other named orc pantheon ones
yeah adventures in faerun has some statblock for drow of lolth, trying to specify that those drow are the ones that are bad guys, not drow in general
I don't believe the 2024 Monster Manual has any specifically Drow statblocks.
I like how WotC did this big announcement on a Drow lore update and then proceeded to do absolutely nothing with it.
i mean there was a drizzt novel about it
at most all we got last were the new drow settlements to show off non evil drow
It's basically lore from the novels, right?
but i feel like in the setting books themselves, they probably shouldve spent more time explaining the aeven and lorendrow to people who havent read 30 something drizzt books
About one of the two cultures. The Aevendrow. The Lorendrow has a city. Somewhere.
Ahh, that's true, those were very interesting.
A lot of the options in TCOE still hold up in comparison to the 2024 rules imo, so I’m not really chomping at the bit for them to get updated/reprinted with minimal changes
They announced the creation of the Aevendrow and the Lorendrow prior to the Way of the Drow Trilogy as this big thing on the old DnD website. And renamed Lolthite Drow as the Udadrow. And then just didn't touch it again.
ngl my headcanon on those two kinds of drow was that they were Lolthite but fled and found each other to start building
this is also just the first time theyve touched drow in the books, so it's not a great first impression. I remember seeing someone very confused about the just random loredrop about it
And here is the thing. Non Lolthite Drow communities have been around in the realms since the 80s
if we had like, another drow/underdark adventure that wouldve been cool, but thats not gonna happen
One of Mystra's Daughters is a Drow
also doesnt help out of the abyss is half underdark adventure and half demon adventure
ngl that gives me an idea for a campaign where it starts out that the group are uadrow but realize Loth's evil and begin changing to the point they side against her
The thing about the Aevendrow and Lorendrow that made them interesting is they are Drow who were never under Lolth's thumb. They were dark elves of old Ilithyir that rejected her call and went into hiding.
How do yall run Feats in 5.5e?
Like the non-2024 PHB feats, do you treat them as origin feats or just not use them at all?
As general feats
Origin feats are their own thing
Bears are fish
IIRC this was also in the weird time where WotC hired Benedict Cumberbatch to narrate a Drow Lullaby and then less than year later unlisted the video
i remember that
yeah I know, but with the feats that are no longer in the 2024 stuff, like XGE, are they still obtainable?
i think i do like the cult of lolth as an evil group. They're a pretty uncommon case I think in these settings of bad guys that have basically won. I think that's very fun
5e realms did that a lot which I enjoyed. It leaves a lot of room for adventure.
yeah i think as a whole they've done a pretty good job at not just making them intrinsically evil bad guys while also keeping them as interesting bad guys
Yeah? It's not a new edition.
Only downside is older feats don't have the big qol change that started with Tashas
That being feats being half feats so you get ASI points as well as the feat
In the Old Empires, Unther crushed the Dragonborn.
In Damara, the Tyrant King still is in power after somehow surviving his death.
In Tethyr, Queen Ysabel Linden is Bad News in the worst possible way
I wont spoil where but I find it suprising when they try having non drow worshipping lol
yeah i do get a little scared of neccessary removals of lore things might not get anything new in return
Isn’t there a lore channel
isn't lolths whole thing shes a hardcore racist to non drow?
Also sexist
that too, a huge mysandrist
yea. I am not a realms grognard who gets mad when things update.
I get angy when. Things are just removed and nothing replaces it.
like, new Calimshan is really cool, I just feel like there's less room for conflict there than previous the way the books are written. Songal is such a benevolent and good ruler as written idk if i really love her
Yeah, she’s basically a bigot in every sense of the word
yup but this would go in rules not lore
She's top of the bigotry ranked ladders
Why?
if she's not a bigot somewhere I'd be amazed
Songal is very good. But they got very very close to Mary Suing. I love her as a character. But she needs a good old fashion conflict she can't fix alone.
Because it’s a question regarding rules and mechanics, not lore
yeah i think she exists for a good meta reason. It was a good choice to change up Calimshan to give it a new twist and remove the very prevalent slavery stuff
I’m not talking about you
But yeah old feats aren't just gone.
They're just not reprinted yet
Because it's a question regarding rules and mechanics, not lore
Well you’re in a general public server
I was talking about skittle as kas
i think also the fact that she's still a relativelty new ruler who practically invaded and conquered Calimshan, there should be a good bit more instability written out
Whenever we get a Lolths Web of Everything we'll probably see a lot of feats reprinted
Yeah. I get the update. But. "She is the best all of the time everywhere and also rich, and everyone loves her." Is not engaging narratively.
Would have loved a book trilogy on her rise to power.
The question may not have been directed at me, but if I have the answer to try and help you, I’m gonna provide it
I wasn’t even talking about your discussion
Baby girl Songal deserves a treat of character development and more art than one spell art lol
You didn’t have the answer
or a calimshan Adventure where Songal is a primary NPC. Seems like the story given to her would totally fit a higher level AP
A 5-15 adventure of the events described in FRAiF would have been much better than most 5e hard backs where nothing really changes in the end.
oh there is art of her? where?
At her spell
ngl after going through some old movies, the fabrication machine in 9 would make an interesting villain for dnd
I require more lore on Songal WotC or The Eberron setting gets it
Thank you very much Kas, my calimport campaign tonight needed that
Woah Urizt, full time pro DM?! For real ! Damn
yes, im currently running 5 professional campaigns and many extra premium one shots
I awoken from my SLUMBER
Today is EXTRA GOOFY day!!!!
How do I get onboarded?
What about your other days?!
Those were just practice...!
Congrats on the promotion
the first message i see when i join the server 😭
Hello.
Tis I...
The goofy man.
ok spongebob
I'm no mere SPONGE, Mortal.
drawing up this 2nd game i wanna run, i feel bad for whoever plays in it
there gon be lots of traps and puzzles
Ooo add the magic missile room as a punishment room
two of my favorite words
A room of nothing but magic missile glyphs and only one other a counter spell glyph for shield spell
Don't give this man ideas!
He killed my Fighters childhood horse in LAVA!!!
I don't need more torture
rip 😢
Also if i play in a minecraft campaign and i choose artificer can i make a redstone machine?
He's a Cavalier without a Steed now 😔
When it comes to playing dnd online, assuming you want maps and stuff, is Roll20 the best way or are there other better ones?
buy a new horse trust
I prefer Owlbear Rodeo.
I didnt know that existed
It's not as easy as that for him
He could buy another horse, but the horse that perished has been his friend ever since he was a young farm lad 😔
fair point
theres a few good VTT's it depends on what you want
ddb maps is integrated with ddb and i think is easy to use so if you own a lot of ddb content could be best
Roll20 is good if you play a lot of different systems
Owlbear is as complicated as you want it to be, can just slap a map and tokens down at its base
Finally got my hands on the 2024 books! Now I just wish I had a group
Visit #find-a-game for everything you need to start your search, including:
- Instructions for finding a game here on the server (including how to post in our #looking-for channels).
- Suggestions for finding a game outside of this server.
- Basic advice to help you in your hunt.
🙋♂️
If I just want let's say character sheets, and a relatively simple program that's free or has a free version that offers at least all the basics?
Owlbear, and use ddb or docs for sheets
and also, I want it to be one that does not limit the amount of characters and campaigns you can have
Not sure what the limits for Roll20 are, but given those stipulations, maybe that will serve you best. Unless you want to look into the score of paid options out there.
Roll20 will be very ad heavy and its sheets are kinda eh
does owlbear follow this as well?
but i dont think it has game amount limits
Owlbear doesn't do character sheet management.
Nice. Also, couldn't you just use the official digital fillable character sheets?
what about foundry? I've seen that one being mentioned a bit
its a 50 dollar buy-in
Folks love Foundry, but it costs money and is resource-intensive.
and if your players dont have decent pcs they wont be able to load maps sometimes
a modern pc is pretty much a must
yo unrelated question
ive been tryna make a physical character sheet but im too used to dndbeyond
how do i calculate the hp?
What level and class?
level 3 bard
How is your game handling hp
Are you Guys more,th more powerful the better or more of a the better Lore the better?
im not joining one,im js making it for the future
you dont wanna make sheets prematurely, usually
lore is better imo
Oh yeah kinda self Promo i guess But i Draw stuff for free
For level 1, it's max HP for your class's hit die (HD) + CON modifier.
For every level after that, you can either roll your HD and add your CON modifier, or you take the average of your HD (then add your CON mod).
but if the game was running average hp on level up and you got say a +2 to con your HP at level 3 would be 24 (the actual math ^)
k thx
I tend to have my enemies be "lore accurate" with their power
I do so to a point. Because I have some people who I have to buff slightly or need slightly to balance an encounter
man i wanna run something
You know I have no limits when making stat blocks...
Clearly you do, else you would’ve kept the self heal
hate december when it comes to dnd
My schedule frees up in early December, so I’m happy
Hey! That wasn't a limit that was a choice!
December be like a void where games go to die
What are limits to a god? You are the ultimate deity in your campaign, the limits are your choice.
I think that becomes the limit. Are you a god or the world?
“Yes”
Damn
I have 22 AC now in my campaign lol
Got a one shot ima be doing, but it just makes me want more.
Playing a tank is always fun
I still think fondly of my paladin super tank build
Lol
We're on our last floor of this dungeon which is all we've been doing this campaign lol
Plate armour, +1 shield, +2 AC from haste from the wizard, +2 AC from cleric's shield of faith, and then some other thing I can't remember
25 AC... it was bliss
Jeezus
Im excited...my group has its first official session today and we got a new member. New person plays a artificer fighter insectnoid.
What’s y’all’s funniest dnd memory?
Got a paladin at 19ac no spells with +0 shield and chainmail who has access to shield of faith and the shield spell, this is gonna get fun
The party sledding down a slope using the petrified wizard as a sled.
Punting a dragon the size of a football across a village. We have a barbarian dragon born in the group
Our party druid getting backhanded by Strahd so much that he should have theoretically died
The BBEG having absolutely no recollection of killing a PC's family.
"You killed my father"
"Do you understand how little that narrows it down?"
Im literally doing that to my barbarian next session 😭
A fellow player decided to draw 10 cards from the deck of many things
He made a new character next session lol
Mine was when our dwarf ended up on a stick
You evil son of a-
Thank you
Basically
My funniest memory would be my player that’s playing the vessel from Hollow Knight having his character name mispronounced from “Aspid” to “Aspirin”. He then proceeded to be flipped upside down, thrown and then be temporarily stuck with his horns stuck in the snow.
Is there a joke term in the D&D community to refer to people who are instinctively DM's even though they don't want to DM? Because I may be that person
My Ranger crossdressing to get info from a gang boss on where their hideout was.
me knowing the rules better then my dm 
Forever dm is one
Ye some people will just choose someone to be the dm and if they won't dm they won't play
The way it happens to me is that I tend to worldbuild instinctively. Like my friends and I just propose it and I'm already drawing the continents and nations
Legend of Drizzt moment
I really need to get back to reading it
In a dragon heist game I was in the dm let us have a magic button that summoned muffins then we learn it actual just stole them from a random person somewhere in the world and was left their by a bored mage
I like doing goofy stuff with magic like that
Like I have a boss who has a magic music deck that forces everyone who hears him playing it to be under the effects of Otto's Irresistible Dance.
Who wants to chant bard?
You could survive the planet exploding with that /jk
Another time the dm tried to set a cool fight against a werebear criminal in the field ward but the warlock he gave a buff that helped with intimidation rolls scared the boss so badly it combined with a calm emotions and a persuasion check from the paladin let to the werebear giving up crime and later on helping us out
So a pro wrestler build? I’m thinking a bard/monk multiclass
Why bard?
That seems like a full monk thing
Pro Wrestlers are actors is why
Yeah, but they don’t typically have magical powers
Nobody does what
Or actor feat
I mean. You can’t see John Cena notably /jk
Wizards are fictional, and typically do have magic powers. Pro wrestlers happen to be real, and don’t have magic powers
It makes sense for a fictional wizard, not a fictional wrestler
I have seen subclass themed around the wrestler style combat for barb
Monks also have magic powers. Go with barbarian or fighter
But you could say that they are storytellers and actors. Bards arent only music based.
If you wanted to be an athletic bard that's totally acceptable
The fiction of pro wrestlers absolutely includes magic. The Undertaker is a lich
Take proficiency in performance.
I mean i was basing it off of Ric Flair
Yeah the fiction. In real life the Undertaker is just a dude. Sp you play a fighter pro-wrestler, get proficiency in performance, and mention that part of your character's act is being a lich or whatever
Yeah, like the Eloquence bard was designed to be an orator
Watch that guy in his pomp and tell me his CHA isn’t super high
Of course, but it’s kind of jarring to have your wrestler shooting fire bolts, or whatever bard cantrips they get
Bards are artistic, but not inherently musical
Might want to look into the UA “feats for skills”
Note that anyone can be artistic
And play as a monk
They have what I think you’re looking for
Many pro wrestler enter to pyrotechnics and lighting effects.
In a game of fantasy confining a real life profession to its real life parameters seems a little overly literal.
I mean bard makes sense to me, i mean it’s also The Forgotten Realms. A pro wrestler that is actually wrestling people would definitely cast vicious mockery
Well if you're wrestling for entertainment you're not gonna be casting spells that can kill people, least not usually.
Personally I feel barb fits better as a base as since strong feats and physical power and control is required for wrestling a bard can do the performance side sure but it’s less suit fir the core
There are probably a dozen builds across different classes that could easily fit the bill of "pro wrestler"
There is not a set "one"
When did I say I was confining them? I’m suggesting that if they want to play as a non-magical wrestler, then don’t use magic
Be my guest, make a magic wrestler guy. seems like a cool concept
I mistakenly read “anyone can be artistic” as “anyone can be autistic”
Ok, that’s not really what I was envisioning, but go ahead
Sounds fun
The question when we say "pro-wrestler character" is what are we talking about? A character that does the exact same thing as pro wrestlers for a living? A character that does what pro wrestlers are pretending to do?
In the first case that's just an ordinary fighter with performance. In the second case... There could even be an actual lich in the pro wrestling scene in Waterdeep
Why fighter over monk?
Because monks do magic stuff. Not in the spell sense but they walk on water, run on walls...
Because fighter is top tier
You can reflavor it as being non-magical. Maybe this wrestler guy is just really fast, it’s fantasy
There is no way to just be fast enough to run on water with a human build. That is just magic.
Again, fantasy
Yes. Therefore it's magic
When we see the pro wrestler go up a 135ft wall that is a 90 degree angle in 6 seconds
Whats good yall?
Just say he’s climbing/swimming quickly
But he is not. A monk running on water is not swimming. Their clothes are still dry on the other side. If it's not water but acid, for example, the monk took no damage and therefore was not swimming. If the monk attacks something while running over water, the monk does not have disadvantage
✨flavor✨
You cannot "just say" he's swimming. Because everything else about the fiction indicates that no, the monk is not swimming. Because the monk is immune to every other thing that would happen if they actually were swimming
Also, fighters can swing a sledgehammer 8 times in six seconds. D&D characters do not abide by real-life human limits.
Make it 9 for Bonus Action (Light Hammer)
Actually swinging a hammer 8 times in 6 seconds is very possible
Sorry, a crossbow in 6 seconds
In the same way that you cannot flavour a character's spells as being mundane gadgets they have. Because those gadgets suddenly require vocal components and don't work in an area of silence, can be counterspelled, dispelled, and don't work in an antimagic field. Flavour cannot do away with that
Actually you can swing a hammer eight times in six seconds. More in fact.
Also possible!
Interesting goal post shifting right there
Slowly looks over at Artificer
Ok, fair
As if you aren’t doing the same thing
No Nealen is not.
guys do you think its better to have personal bonds at chargen or do you think its better to just come together professionally
The vocal component could also be activating the gadget, you know :p
That is a good point. Everything else remains.
Right, sorry, I forgot the fun police would show up to my door if I even as much deviate a tiny bit from the stereotypical wise old sorceror
Hey does anyone here have a campaign vacancy? Ive been trying to find a group to join and play a character in because my old group is mostly gone. Preferably without having to pay to have character art done.
Oh. Now we're... what's the word? Strawmanning?
Guess I’ll rot in fun jail
not currently but you can look in #looking-for-players
Am I?
I can't wait for Psion to drop
I was just thinking that with Firearms and casting Artificer Spells through'm like... 👉 👉
Is that not the word for that rhetorical process where you invent another version of the argument made against your position or another argument entirely and answer this invented argument instead of the thing the other person actually said?
Yes, it is and I see your point
But like… fantasy!
Therefore figuratively making a straw man, hitting it and pretending you actually hit the person.
I don’t play D&D to play as “normal dude” or “stock character #198274728”
I don't see why you would. Nor do I see anyone saying you should.
You kind of are though
Putting arbitrary restrictions on how classes can be described?
Pigeonholing them into their stereotypes
It's not arbitrary, it's literally saying how Monks run over liquids
what are we on abt gng
Sure, but why can’t MY character just be good at running over water?
a debate that's as old as dnd itself, probably older
Just cast water walking, ig 🚶
Yo I’m new
You do not see that there is something of a gap between "putting arbitrary restrictions over how classes can be described", "pigeonholong them into their stereotypes" and "forcing you to play normal dude or stock character"?
Not that I or anyone is actually doing any of those things. But even if someone was doing one of those things, those are three very different things.
they can certainly practice. lol
Your character is good at running over water. Because they're a monk and use magic to do it.
