#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 43 of 1
To be fair, goodberry's effect on nutrition is not that big a deal. It's not hard to find food. Just kill something and eat it
But being able to make characters that are unique and different is a good thing that players like, so the issue is something that needs to be hashed out between play groups at a Session 0, which is something that cannot be accounted for in design, or at least not easily. That work, of negotiating what is appropriate for this game is rightfully offloaded to the individual groups rather than something that the designers try to account for at the design level.
Nope, that is why the game is in parties too. You need a group and each one of them fill a flaw from the another
A fighter cant cast spells like a wizard
A sorcerer cant survive like Paladin
An artificer cant buff like a Bard.
Understanding that each role have a purpose is important.
And thats where i cant really understand, but it might be game experiences
Maybe a simple question: Why can't a Fighter cast Wish?
Because they don't own a wish ring
That's the entire problem simplified to the most basic question I can think of.
Sorry, can you specify what the thing you can't understand is?
Because they didn't dedicate themselves to casting spells from the getgo, only a few if they go one way
Yeah, but why don't they get to cast it anyways?
Not being excited at being allowed to be a PC
Because they're not wizards, bards, sorcerer's, cleric on occasion or a specific warlock
Apologies again, can you walk me through this like I'm five? Where was it said that someone was not excited to be a PC?
That just says that they aren't something else. Why can't they cast Wish directly, regardless of not being those other things?
Few dms get picky with that things honestly. Feeding, drinking water and who know what else stuff.
Others might add the eating like an extra layer and making some Meals//drinks//etc. have a real effect beside just nutrition.
I remember seeing a book with drinks and foods and i liked it
In my experience with 2014, a lot of pcs were basically npcs compared to other pcs due to relevancy and their ability to affect the game so the power level being moreso flattened has led to less npcing by design for me
Why doesn't everyone get every class feature and every spell, for example?
Cause they dont
But why not? There's a reason.
That reason is the fundamental consideration of this entire conversation.
Because they cant do everything, everyone have a limit.
Having a Do everything character is boring too.
Okay, small question while I'm watching this argument, is the debate rather or not should fighters use magical items?
Otherwise, I'm keeping up.
OK people it's simple
Hmm ... okay, so I think you're saying that the 2024 changes made more player choices more relevant to more situations in most games?
This is getting very warm, yes.
D&D is a team game. That is how the game functions.
Then everyone is a gary stu or mary sue or whatever the neutral equivalent is
No one has any unique factors
Team games require each teammate to have a specialty. And other teammates to be incapable of intruding on that specialty
Closer, but not yet there. This is assuming that you want to solely avoid stuff, but not that you want to enable something else.
Thats how i feel, I feel like im able to play any class i want without really becoming an npc
No, it's a high level conceptual discussion about how player choices are designed and the spectrum between Uniqueness vs Effectiveness.
The specific term for what I'm talking about in its entirety is called "niche protection".
then nothing matters?
Okay kay, I guess I got a little stuck on the wish question and the ring of wishes
That's D&D and reality
No, theres a lot that matter in both to a lot of people
It's that people are driven by wanting to be different and doing something that others can't do.
I just dont wanna be an npc
Being "original" its... too hard honestly and problematic, better embrace an concept and enjoy it
Doesn't that just get filled by roleplay and personalities, that's something unique every PC can have that no one can copy
What differs a pc from a npc anyways
You can't copy someone's backstory to have the same connections to [insert random clan]
Class levels.
You don't need to be, but jumping to this assumption so quickly gives the impression that learning some design fundamentals would be beneficial.
Niche protection is good, it makes players feel unique in their choices. Any level of niche protection leads to there being the possibility that there is a game for which the character will not be the most appropriate.
[You can but, very looked down upon]
Outside of the fact that pcs have a power progression, you can customize their backstories and roleplay, and more importantly you're controlling this very character
In my case "npc" is other players at the table matter more than I and I exist solely to pass checks they need me to, cause they're good at everything else
Roleplaying is my favourite part of dnd
Same
Isn't this just a table dynamic issue instead of a player issue
Again: Any level of uniqueness to character inherently leads to the possibility that any individual character may not be appropriate to a specific game.
It is an immutable law, aye.
maybe but its something ive experienced at several tables
Yeah, you can have any class you want but your character is what makes the niche
You can be a strong barbarian but does your character enjoy doing feats of strength?
The only classes where I feel like it actually stands out are martial classes like Fighter and Barb
Wizards, Clerics and Paladins would usually get more focus ime
Cuz in 2014 they have no utility beyond punching stuff
This should not be viewed as a problem, this is just how things work.
Where as anything else usually got memed on or just relied on for what checks theyre good at
But that's just the class themselves and most other classes have built in utility
Sometime when I am acting a morally grey or evil character it very hard to stay in character. Mostly because my mind keep trying to be myself, but I need to be the character
I think this is also where it's worthwhile separating individual experiences from the overarching principles of design.
Especially because that shift in focus can even occur from biases at the table level, entirely unrelated to the game itself.
More when i use the dice and have to interpenetrate some situations.
Failing a Deception? stutter while explaining the thing and look nervous.
Seduction won but still want to make it fun? Do something cute and gain the hearth of that person, creature...machine(?)
More if you add some layers like Luck, You got a bad roll, used lucky and got a perfect one? Explain it how you failed it and then suddenly some snowball of events make it be perfect for you
There's utility spells but no utility martial actions per se, wisdom checks are important, being a face is all too important
Perhaps but with 2024 im just not seeing these issues on the same level
Which goes back to this really
Being a face is really not that important outside of heist games
I think the core point is that character uniqueness doesn’t come only from mechanics — it comes from how a player roleplays, their backstory, their choices, and how they engage with the table. Design sets the framework, but characters make the niche.
Was this an issue of your character not getting screen time?
Could it also be a player's ability to roleplay, forge a story outside the bare stuff, and chemistry with the DM?
That can be because your table's biases have shifted, for sure. I'm also not saying that 5.24 is bad, I'm saying that the design is comparatively not as good at niche protection.
This is why bg3 is cool, you can choose whoever you want to focus on 
Pretty much if i tried anything someone would interject and take over and they had right of way since they're wizards
I had my Barb do all the talking (a bad idea)
Okay so this does not sound like something to be addressed at the design level, to me?
Yeah, not everyone is good doing some "performances". Giving some lil help to those shy players and some confident is good tho
No but making the design better softens the blow which it has
It's less mental anguish and more just sigh
Well I'm glad that you're having a better time with the updates to 5E.
The tricky part is that design rarely is inherently better or worse, as it being better for one person can make it worse for another.
Granted, it is poor table manners to talk over others.
Yep.
I can say that I truly like the changes to 5E in 2024 and view them as a net positive, but I can also acknowledge that some of the complaints about certain choices having lost flavor have merit.
For example, I find that 5.24 is great functionally, but very unexciting with its actual mechanical expressions, because so much stuff does very similar things.
Then ig the answer is pathfinder fixes this
True, if you heard someone is talking and you interrupt him. Have manners, shut and let him go in his talk.
Now if someone talk over you, dont be shy and remind him that you were talking and no one can understand if there is 2 or more voices at the same time
Pathfinder doesn't fix it, though, because it's not actually fixable.
I usually only talk over someone if we begin speaking at the same time
Can we stop with the "Pathfinder fixes this" meme?
*stares at the two convos going on *
what did i miss while making maps
It's not a problem that can be fixed, because the issue is like pizza toppings. It all depends on your taste for how much of any one thing you like.
But a lot of people subconsciously speak over others without even noticing it.
still would add in case if you are in voice chat in discord. In the soundboard a hit table sound just for teh jajas and some others.
Right and I think that cheese pizza that you can add toppings on your own is better than a specific pizza only for one when marketing towards a group of people
I do become unreasonably angry when someone repeatedly cuts me off then acts like im the problem.
Sure, but in this example, we don't have toppings either.
And other people might prefer a boutique pizzeria that tries to make every slice different.
Reminds me of the fact apple pie is the most popular, but rarely is it everyone's favorite.
While I do agree that Pathfinder and D&D are functionally the same, and the differences between the two are nuances, saying that a problem in D&D is "fixed" in Pathfinder cheapens Pathfinder. It is more than some cynical attempt to fix D&D
It's just what we can agree to buy.
Oh gosh, thanks for reminding me that I have an apple pastry in the fridge!
The "toppings" might just be homebrew, which means that I'm largely just making my own pizza and the only thing I'm using is the premade crust.
Great, now I'm hungry.
I want to make some tiramisu...maybe add it a layer of ganache of chocolate
(Every time we use a food analogy to describe D&D, an angel gets its wings.)
God why i choose Keen mind over chef...
alright so the consensus is
I like general design that allows for players to be relevant even when taking a backseat.
Yall want specific design where the relevance is completely campaign dependent, but you do agree that players should have competent tools for that campaign?
I think that a mixture is needed.
I wonder what kind of wings. Maybe buffalo wings. /jk
Can't sleep. Did I miss an alignment conversation?
Would you say it needs to strike a…
…balance? 
No, design conversation
Damn.
I also would clarify that something being entirely campaign dependent is not what I've been getting at.
I thought it was a class balance conversation
I never stated a want, tbf
If I understand so far, issue with some builds not being as great as others. And not enough attention being shared around a table.
Technically the balance of the Planescape is based on alignment
mmmm... making a campaign with lot of like, "limits" and using them would be nice
My type of response to this being what you understand of my statements is sort of similar to me saying that you don't want classes and you want everyone to have the same character sheet.
It would be a cool challenge of sorts if everyone was forced to use the same class.
Ooh, ooh! Me! I don't want classes!
If, folks agree to that, of course. I'm not one to restrict creativity.
So what then? Every class should have say half their subs be generally relevant with a few being niche and one being campaign specific, but the tools given must be competent so that getting to fulfill that niche is satisfying
Like, There is no more dragons in a world but then out of nowhere (one of your players) is a dragonborn or some of the party have dragon features and they need to find what happened to the dragons and why they are like that.
Oh that's easy! Lizard people exist.
Same with magic users if you want
What if, everyone just played what they like and respected other players urgency and characters?
Bold move
Pretty sure the point is that there is no one perfect answer to this question.
Certain options should work better in certain styles of campaigns, not because those options are inherently made for those campaigns but because they use a function of the game and them being better in certain campaigns is a side-effect. Hence, trying to avoid certain options being better in certain styles of campaigns results in extremely flat design and a much more boring game.
A kobold lizard that is a sorcerer and think is a dragon would be cute
That's assumed, but it dosen't make for a fun conversation.
"Yay, im the mighty dragon of the east!!" with a cute voice and stuff like that
See, just a little sprinkle of seasoning, and anything can make sense.
Like how Horizon walker may as well not exist in a campaign where planar portals dont happen but in a game during a planar crisis theyre basically god
Sounds like the perfect subclass for the game.
You could even have an Oath of Watcher Paladins since they also deal with planar forces.
but my point is, making a campaign with limits and using them for lore//development//etc. Is something that need work on it and would be nice to see
"May as well not exist" is maybe an exaggeration, but is also a legitimate choice, on a campaign per campaign basis.
I mean, it can very much exist in a campaign outside of that, as its flavor is driven not by working in that campaign but by its actual inspiration.
It just means that one feature wont be used
Almost same with some subclasses and stuff
Which can happen even to stuff you wouldn't expect.
And that's not the same thing as "may as well not exist."
And thats my issue
Ohhh... Okay, now I understand you better. Turns out a DM wanted a no magic campaign, but didn't tell me! Was upset at me for rolling with a cleric, and I'm like 'Dude, just say no magic.'
The problem is that your issue is only solvable by policing how people play.
I can't get excited for a levelup if that levelup comes with useless baggage
Communication is key.
"No magic campaign" is code for "Not a D&D game"
(Definitely don't play PF2e, then.)
Seriously, there are other games. Play those.
It’s one out of 3 features they get at level 3
What is dnd without magic ?
yeah but i dont like getting stuff i wont use
Stabbing mutated animals
Wait what sort of "useless baggage"? Sorry I'm trying to follow
Apprently we were bringing back magic, but that's neither here or there.
Kinda, it can be many things honestly, like even making some spells being forbidden and if you use them there is consequences.
A non magic world that got struck suddenly by magic and then there is a big chaos because no one know how to control the magic, the creatures mutating and more stuff.
The thing is, whether you use it or not is something you know, but the designers can't know.
I dont like it when something i should be excited about (a level up) has some baggage attached that cant be used
Homebrew a cat
It always depend of how deep and how the group//DM make the story go
Kinda like how id basically act like 2014 countercharm didnt exist
Yes that is what you said but what sort of useless baggage?
How dare the tool box come with an extra niche tool? /jk
You're saying things that sound very vague to me
Cause it was just not worth the hassle for such little reward
I used the 2014 countercharm a couple of times as a bard, so it sort of fits the theme.
Dropping out but thanks for this conversation!
I think it’s actually pretty rad when we dive deep into not just what we talk about but how we talk about it. I think it’s good for the community, even if it takes a lot of energy and space. ✌🏼
I mean, theme of folks using things and not using things. And perhaps you kinda just go 'oh, crap, I got the thing!'
Which is why we shoot the monks.
Ok so like .. if a DM specifically said they were running a no-combat campaign of Witchlight with 2014 rules you would be upset that Fighter only really gets combat stuff?
Because if you shoot monks, they can use their ability to deflect the bolt and feel really great.
Yeah, but only if the fact we were running Witchlight was dropped on us rather than what we signed up for
"im going to use countercharm in that couple that is in the corner of the tavern, they love acts are getting annoying", most possibly me if i play a kinda grumpy character.
So you agree that negotiating what is going to be relevant for a campaign is rightfully the prerogative of the individual play group, rather than the game designer?
I'm stealing that.
Yes, I also think the tools the designer makes should also be competent too
I think that one needs to assess what "competent" means to them.
I think some 2014 character options didnt work competently
And once more, the 'A session 0 would of prevented this problem' has come back to haunt us.
I could very easily say that a lot of 5.24 stuff (primarily subclasses) isn't competent to me, because it doesn't meet my standards.
Adapt it in some way, The fighter is in a negotiation with some character and in a persuasion got failed? use action surge for try again and maybe get it this time.
Make action surge being able to be used for some extra stuff, the second wind too. Etc. etc.
Someone very wise once said, "Communication is key." 😉
Everything is so... Vague. I'm having a lot of trouble following this conversation.
Almost same
The design of a tool vs the usage of a tool.
And i think a lot of '14 isn't competent cause it shouldnt be flavor over its actual use
Hi! New to the group but I love dungeons and dragons. I just wanted to share my thoughts on the new version of 5e. It looks alright but I miss the support for more sandbox style of play for dms like me.
yeah, sorry Sora, but im not really seeing much from your side but opinions and "I thinks"
Like im sorry, Undying Warlock getting immunity to hunger, hydration and sleep as a level 10 feature is not good
I think it's also worthwhile to not use the low-hanging fruits.
I wouldn't have a problem with that if I could understand what those opinions actually are
that too
Except it is the low-hanging fruits that led to a lot of the complaints that led to the revisions
Are you sure of this?
Making a chef Warlock that use a magic pot for cast some spells and his patron is like a god of gluttony that want him to give food to people so they feast. And some invocations ingredients change to food ingredients.
If you use a fire genasi, you can summon a flame chefs knife whenever
I mean im not gonna ignore that people had been calling Undying atrocious for years
Which is fair, but you are claiming that low-hanging fruits lead to the complaints that caused 5.24, so you should be able to find some sort of evidence, no?
Undying's one of the few exceptions where it just sucks so badly right?
im thinking in some sort of flavored class but cant find which one.
Yeah even in an undead heavy campaign its just passable to semi-decent
There's the Undead patron right there so we could just pretend Undying doesn't exist
I mean thats why they made Undead i think
Not, really. They're still really playable and fine.
they couldve reworked undying instead for van richten
To be clear, I'm actually not disagreeing that I prefer 5.24 over 5.14, but I think that the argument is being vaguely presented in such a way that there's no actually actionable or verifiable topics.
A whole party that are chefs that search special ingredients and giga rare stuff for cooking in their restaurant and then they end up facing some monster for their meats, ingredients, etc.
If this whole thing could be summed up with "I prefer 5.24 over 5.14", I think that's totally valid.
mmmmmm.............
5E honestly didn't have anything that was so broken that it was unplayable.
Yes I do prefer it cause I very rarely had fun with '14
I prefer 2014 over 2024 🫡
I always felt pressured into what was "strong enough"
Until 2024 gets as much content of its own as 2014 without porting at least
cause a lot wasn't good enough or even relevant to matter in the games i was in
Yeah I get that. Groups be sweaty sometimes.
This seems significantly more like a group issue and I'd separate this from it being a system thing.
yeah, not sure if i can follow this convo now, and this time its not becase of tamms 😭
Tamms do be using big words sometimes
A vent channel for terrible tables would do wonders in this server
Yeah, but group aside i think every class should be good on like a general level
when is the in-depth channel too mods 😔
Something I appreciate.
I would like that
I would agree with this.
So have you noticed how sometimes you perceive a PC very differently from how the player intends?
Like tales from the table but the dark side of D&D
would be full of "my dm dont let me do X" in less of 20 minutes.
Oof, I feel like a vent channel would just be a cesspool of negativity.
Like I feel like Innate Sorcery was a great addition cause 2014 sorc felt like just Wizard with only a handful of spells and some custom mod menu on those spells
Whatever that diverts away from using disguised complaints about a system as a vent I suppose
What I disagree with is the false dilemma that something can either be good or flavorful/unique, and that being one disqualifies the other. I disagree with this, because I like to make homebrew content.
Well, that's the whole point of a vent channel, all the negativity goes there and the good stuff comes here
and those metamagic some options were just starkly better than others
A channel where we can be upfront is a good thing
In a game I was in, the player intended his character as a fun, dumb barbarian. I perceived it as a dangerous, impulsive, sadistic man-child who had to be eliminated for the good of everyone else. It's a bit jarring when I think about this disconnect
But that's a personal opinion from me, probably won't ever happen anyways
Yea, I was gunning for a heroic, brave character once... but now I think everyone finds him a tryhard that consumes attention.
My party last session killed a giant octopus, i hope my Dm let me cook it and get something out of it.
X temporal hits for each portion of tentacle so when its my turn the enemy see me munch each time a piece of it until the point i offer him a bite
When that character died, I just thought "I think my character should argue that we should not resurrect him and burn his body"
My viewpoint is the ideal scenario is features with flavor, rather than flavor as feature
which is why i like ranger mechanically but i agree that its flavor was sucked dry
Welp, in theory you can deny a revivify or any revive. Dont making it use the ingredients of such spells.
Making it into a nice scene would add extra points
I mean the character of that other PC
yeah, but the person being targetted has to deny
I think that the best features come from flavorful origins, and that the primary cause of the lose-lose situation 5e is in comes from people wanting all options to work equally well in different campaigns.
Does stuff need to be hyperspecific? Nah.
Revives No thanks, im good dead. Go back to dead and the diamond just pop out of him with a small fart sound
It's also nice to work with your DM to make some changes that fits the campaign better. Which is something I often do.
I mentioned I was going to duel class sorcery for the wild table, and they just gave it to me because they agree that it fit the character.
Is Druid useful in a campaign where you may get good usage out of talking to animals a lot? Definitely.
Bear.
Because Druid is useful in that regard, should it lose being able to talk to animals? Nope, that's the part I disagree with.
What I mean was that when the idiot barbarian died, I hesitated. I thought my character should argue that we should not resurrect the barbarian and treat his death as a blessing.
finding a group is so hard 😭
Hey come join my campaign where I will cancel it in 2 sessions because my great grandfather died of old age!
Yeah, but its worth taking time and being patient.
Embrace bg3
Always remember to maintain your standards! You'll find your perfect match one day.
If anything, we could cut about 75% of the spells in the game if we were looking for only options that were generically useful.
Why does the advise to find a table sound exactly the same to finding love?
kk. Im just new lol
never played before 0-0
Because dnd is really not that different from finding jobs and swiping on tinder
The thing I hate most is finding a campaign I like then seeing a google application for it, I understand but no way im getting in
sameee
That’s why Wizard is so good, they can get a ton of niche spells
Aigh't, when the last time somebody used the, check notes, Warding Bond spell?
Then they take 2 days to respond and say you diden't make it
because it is the same way to find (a table you) love
the fighter and cleric in my sunday game used it a lot. ended up with those two taking the most damage because both of them were pretty reckless
I used warding bond when a magical shield had a built in warding bond spell once per long rest
I'm very role-pilled when it comes to design, though, so everyone having their niche is super important to me.
Well that spell is just bad
I think every class has a role, but ranger
Doubly weird when I gave it to my Warlock who casted it on my Sorcerer
I don't know why but I personally just find ranger to be the most, yknow class
Ranger are skill monkeys but in nature.
At least they're sharing their damage at the back
... can it be cast on an unwilling creature
I find Warding Bond is most useful when cast upon a buffing Cleric with high ac
Any spell caster does that too though?
I just dont wanna be an npc again
Used that spell on a Barbarian once as a Paladin, and that was a MISTAKE
Hey guys. Is there a place I can get info on D&D gaming group servers? Looking for a new forever-home for D&D games.
Was the intention for this character not discussed in Session 0?
Well yeah but buffing the Sorc is the best call here, my other team members were a Barb and Rogue
how much did you end up taking 
Nearly died died because the spell is still active if the caster goes down
And just play lore bard if you want to be a skill monkey
Would it be ok to post here, looking for a server?
lmao, that sucks
I don't want the Warlock to kick the bucket early from sharing his damage with the frontliners
Notably with Warding Bond it’s still the same amount of damage done overall, it’s mainly the AC and Saving Throw bonus
All that damage, I was so tempted to just run 60 feet away because I knew another hit and I'd be dead.
In hindsight perhaps the first red flag of that game was that we had no proper session 0
What is better, glamour or moon bard
I'll give it a try. Thank you.
I left that game don't worry. It was hell.
Because when I made a character that was intended to be unlikable in character, but funny for the other players I definitely discussed it with the group beforehand.
fiend
That's nice to hear Incubus
Oof, yeah.
I will say that when everyone is useful it makes toestepping a minefield
Characters with some deficiencies are generally more interesting anyway.
So just don’t bother
I love doing my unique thing! "Actually I can do that better, so you should let me do it!"
Good to double down as a back up if one fails
I tried to be a character that wouldnt step on toes at all and i was just miserable
Any combat scenario ever with a power player
thankfully, i dont think i ever had a power player
Have you considered taking turns doing similar things?
I have played with one.
I like feeling powerful
I like donuts
Like, I was in a sisuation where somebody had the exact same class and subclass as me, I just went 'Aigh't, wanna just focus on different things?'
I actually see that spell used more than most
But I dont try and minmax always
I hate donuts ** - Evil Donut Hater Guy**
jellyfilled?
That's why I like discrete roles, aye.
I sometimes do for one shots cause its fun
Any and all
call me basic, but sugar glazed is yummy
Hello basic, I’m Nugget
Call me basic, but I will genuinlly kill for a boston cream
You see that player didn't really have a sense of comedy to speak of. It relied on random actions, references, or just the occasional reminder that sex exists. Or puns. I think it's because he wants to believe he is someone who can be funny desperately, but is incapable of the actual things comedy requires. Tone, situation, punchline...
Oh your name’s basic too?
insert montage of throwing eggs at a giant mess of food
We are actually apart of a hive mind, would you like to join?
oh... i remember him now
Like next pc i wanna play is a control wizard whose good at knowledge skills so i do like being in specific roles
oof
You may remember a story or two
I just want that role to matter
...Imos?
Can’t, I made a pact that stops me from doing so
Oh I see, guess ill go start a cult in the kingdom again!
tho with a control wizard itd matter no matter the ruleset
Adamos "you may address me as Your Radiance"
How do I make a post describing what kind of community I'm looking for? I only see the bot letting me post as if I have a community I want to advertise, which is opposite of what Im looking for.
And it mostly matters because others can't be as good as you at that, generally, no?
Try r/LFG, you can specifically find stuff like that on there
Is that reddit?
Kinda. Bards are great control mages but Wizards get some of the best
Are you two mind flayers now, should I call the githyanki 
oh, you probably want to look through the community posts until something catches your eye or post in #looking-for-community
Yes
I have the sudden urge to go game hunting again soon, I kinda miss having a dedicated campaign. But I really should wait for Janurary when folks aren't having winter season celebrations
i loved adamos
Guys, we should all team up and kidnap a DM
It says I dont have permission to post there. I see the thread looks like it has a bot for people looking to post their own communities
Me too!
If I was rich, I would hire a full time DM that just does DM stuff and preps until I want to play in a campaign
And keep the DM in a little dungeon room I made
uh
That's ...
Kind of like how kings paid artists to live on their grounds and paint for them
That sounds like ghaik behavior
Patronage
uh
Let's attack the ghaik, istiks
Im not gonna force someone to DM for me, do I sound like a mind flayer?
That's called Patronage
Yep
I would become an IRL patron for DM's and players
It's a very popular website called Patron where you can fuel folk's hobbies
Anyways Tamms and Ophid, sorry for being hostile
And it's not as creepy as you made it sound at first.
His "jokes" involve:
- Making advances to a gargoyle in a way meant to be outrageous as an attempt at gross-out humour that just doesn't work. But it just ended up being jarring due to the fact that nobody would take off their pants in a dungeon.
- Using the severed hand of an ancestor of my character as a weapon because my character getting outraged is funny
- Lacking any ability to distinguish from in-game to out-of-game and treating the things I said as though my character said them for the joke...
Hellooooo
Oh conversation moved on. My bad
Could it be that this person has an intelligence of 8 and a wisdom of 8 too
Wait, isn't it normal for rich people to like hire full-time workers like butlers 
Sorry if I came off as psychopathic
I just wanna have more fun with dnd, I still feel like ive mostly had anxiety from it
Nah nah, it's fine. There's multiple conversations at once
"Keep them in a dungeon" sounded .. bad, friend.
"Little Dungeon Room", like a room themed like a dungeon
Why not just ask your DM to make a new character?
Like you know how some DM's have a man cave that's made to look like a tavern
I did and i did but I don't really wanna play it either
Definitely a problem player.
Like rn what i wanna play the most is a wizard
Well I know that now.
But my options are Druid, Ranger or Cleric
Looks like im going to have to send you to the "Understood text in a reasonable way that's different from the main way" room
Why can’t you play one
cause we have one
Why not play one?
All classes which actually can be very good at knowing stuff in their purview, actually. If you play 2024.
Is this a table rule?
And? Just make a different wizard.
Im playing a warlock and i was expecting a lot of damaging spells, but there actually isnt a lot of those on the 2014 spell list. What do warlocks excel in combat wise?
Wouldnt that be stomping on others feet
No?
No?
Depends on the Wizard, as they are pretty generic.
Like i do know wizards are like the build a bear of fullcasters, similar to fighters
cause of how large their spell list is and how functionally different subs are
Just build something different from the other wizard. Now it’s fine.
Over time, two wizards in a party will generally converge, mostly because they start doing the smart thing an swapping spells.
Yep
But that doesn't mean you will be stepping on each other's toes, just do the teamwork thing and talk it out.
Right, talking, the CR30 monster
Concentration means it's great to have two wizards able to cast different spells.
One of my DM's allowed homebrew combo attacks that party members could do [sacrificing both turns to do it], really encouraged teamwork
Damage and Control, generally.
Also good to double up on save and suck spells
Because what if the bad guy saves? A good old try again moment can help.
My Warlock did a bit of everything iirc, was a Fiend Warlock
and considering i either wanna play a Bladesinger or Diviner, both are pretty different from the other wizard
Where
Fireball and Wall of Fire, summoning Beholders, Haste, Eldritch Blasting people
Even with a party full of wizards, each one could still stand to their own merits.
Hunger of Hadar to combo with the Sorc's Wall of Fire
Web, Hypnotic Pattern then Synaptic Static
Web wasn't used but the latter yes
So why not do that? Is it a table rule that prevents you or are you restricting yourself?
Its a me thing, I'm afraid of toestepping
Wizard is like the most versatile class in the game
If someone is offended by a class pick you do NOT want to be in that game
That or Cleric, now there's a TON you can design a cleric with.
Its not really toestepping, there's plenty of utility spells so you can share those spell slots
Cause I know some people will get very angry if there's another person of the same class
Cleric snoozer
Well stop that, and play the Wizard and just make them different from the other character.
Now now, cleric isn't my favourite class, I'm just saying there's a ton of deities and domains to work with
Or just multiclass
Is there someone like that in your group?
I play a lot of clerics, i just dont wanna play one rn
Arcane Trickster Rogue + Bladesinger Wizard
Oh sorry, that wasn't meant for you
i dont believe so, so im asking the wizard whenever he gets back to me
My bard has 6 wall spells
You could just ask the whole group, too.
What's he doing? Building a house? slaps knee
Sounds like your Bard is the type to make a concert stage in the middle of a dungeon to sing karaoke
Trapping his enemies and suffocating them until they beg for mercy.
Sure that too
Mercy? In my good DnD game? Nonsense!
I dont think im capable of that
I knew everyone is a Bhaalist deep down
My favorite is using wall of gloom and stacking blade barrier on it, then running back and through it to rage bait
Don't have the permissions to message everyone?
Mercy? Is that a subclass
No mentally
Communication is key.
Funny enough, I think it's a Monk subclass. Way of Mercy... There's also the Oath of ... What's that word again?
Hard to play a communication game without communicating
Redemption?
Something something social anxiety perhaps, insecurity?
getting virtually stared down for not staying in what you chose
That's the vibes I'm getting
No no, there's no such things for enemies...
That OR mercy...
ive had games end cause people switched characters and i dont wanna cause that
But it didn't sound like you had chosen a class yet.
its an already started game so im making a new character
You know, you should be careful, because I had a DM nuke a game before because of such thoughts.
So scared to cause the end of the game, it caused the end of the game.
If its out of your control or if its the result of not enough information there's no one to blame
If you made the best decision you think you did at that given moment with what information you have that's good enough
No need to shoulder the blame of killing off a table
So an interesting question has popped into my mind: What in the world are hit points?
Just a game way to showcase your stamina/vitality
Your vitality
Like, is it health? stamina? what is it exactly
Once you hit 0hp you collapse
How healthy your char is. Like vitality
When your character gets hit by 5 arrows, do they have 5 arrows sticking out of them and how exactly are they still fighting at that point?
Had that happen.
at full power, no less
Bc it’s a game
HP is several things at once
This is the conclusion I've started to reach
It's your character's will to fight/avoid a fatal blow
To me trying to talk things out at a table feels like going before a court.
Also most lvls are high high lvl fighters
Lesson there was, maybe you should absolutely listen to your player, and perhaps their partner, when they say 'Hey, I'm not stress', and not treat them like a child who's lying to you.
I mean like if you're half HP then you're probably beaten and bruised
Like most of the world is way weaker then a lvl1 fighter
Maybe stuff like healing spells just increases your will to fight
“Hit points represent a combination of physical and mental durability, the will to live, and luck.” -The Player’s Handbook 2014
Ah glad they outlined it
I don't see how people can believe others when they have positive feedback.
I see it as a superpower
wonder if that description changed in 2024 though...
Luck…? Can I roll a d20 on it 
“Hit Points (HP) are a measure of how difficult it is to kill or destroy a creature or an object.”-2024 PHB
already sent that
Also makes me wonder though how killing blows are seemingly not always fatal
2014 goated once more
As a Paladin, I feel my hitpoints should be 1 million
Ahh I'm slow
I will say that's a part of '14 I think is better
if I have 1 hp and get hit by an axe, that's a fatal injury
Truth is, characters in D&D are like you and me. Whether they're level 1 or 20, if an arrow gets in their throat, they die
Something something “too slow” and “sonic pfp”
How could I still walk it off 3 hours later?
you would go down
Except arrows don't go in the PC's throats. It's a game not real life
Yeah the final fatal blow is hitting someone making death saves
I know I hate it when folks say it, but perhaps I shall use my 'It's just a simplification of real life' card here.
If I'm fighting a wizard and I'm at 1hp and they hit me with a lightning bolt how is the entire left half of my body not getting blown off?
You don't get an arrow in the throat unless it takes you below 0hp.
hp is not just meat points
Cause it's a heroic fantasy system
a fatal blow would be if it just. kills you
Doesn’t mean the lightning bolt is a direct hit, or even as strong as an actual lightning bolt
Wouldn't be heroic fantasy if you just got obliterated by anything
how does a fireball getting me below 1hp not just burn me to a crisp
Death saves
That’s what they are for
Hai
Is the severity of the injury only decided at the end of the death saves?
you decide the flavor, its a group story telling game man
Well bc to kill you also have to hit a threshold below the hp rq that’s a thing lol
I get it I just like asking questions though
Cause it needs to reduce you to less than negative your max health!
^
ive seen dms that will incorporate injuries
And the DMG backs you up: "Rules Aren’t Physics. The rules of the game are meant to provide a fun game experience, not to describe the laws of physics in the worlds of D&D, let alone the real world."
Ohhh okay so basically
You can take no damage from a fireball if ya got a shield. >:D
i think the death saves are mostly for player enjoyment ya
Hello
There is no injury severity in the rules.
less reality and more game design
I nearly pharsed it as 'It's not that deep', but thought of something more productive at the end
What I mean to say is, if you pass all your death saves does that mean it was just a good hit, but if you fail you got decapitated?
DnD is just a game after all
i always pictured death saves as a slow death
Sure, that's one way to do it.
It means lady luck was on your side + maybe your a very hardy hero!
Three failed death saves is bleeding to death in 18 seconds.
Eh maybe the more extreme stuff like dispemberment is just like for when it's an autokill from taking more than half your HP negative in damage
you held on!
i like to think of Hit Points similar to the "HP" in Uncharted
So having 10 hp, and taking 15 from a wizard would leave me like Toji after getting hit by the hollow purple
its the amount of luck you got til you actually get shot
Which is stated as part of the 2014 PHB
Yes. But what I mean is that in the fiction of D&D, the only hit that really connects is the one that brings to zero hp
ya you could probably incorporate that with something like cleave
or a dullahan
Dullahans are cool
their critical hits impose a con save or die
All the arrows that hit but didn't bring you to 0 HP? They didn't really hit. They got caught by your armour, they grazed and made a scar on your cheek.
What is lorewise explanation if why you cant put on more than one ring item?
One reason I like systems that use Stress instead of HP.
But then that one arrow that did bring you to 1hp hit a vital organ?
you can put on as many rings as you have fingers
I thought one was able to put on multiple ring items?
You can wear multiple rings
you can it just cant be the exact same kind of ring
I still have to wonder how even something like the healer's kit would work then, that's not even magic that's just medicine
one big finger
Oh
You can.
For a more irl example.
If you're shot centermass with a gun and it doesn't break through your bulletproof armor, you're still getting hit by that kinetic force which will knock you on your behind and break some ribs probably
The rules is you don’t get the benefits of the same magic ring more than once, and you can only attune to 3 magic items that require attunement
Healing someone with the healer feat using a healing kit, are you treating their injuries? but if HP is abstract what if the character isn't really injured yet until that fatal blow? how's that work?
basically a first aid kit
D&D is not a reality simulator.
depends on the story. its a group sory telling game
I dont think there's anything wrong with asking questions about these kinds of things though
Reminder, DnD is just a game
yes, but dnd isnt just a game. its a group story telling game
Right, but the answer is still, "D&D is not a reality simulator." It's literally the answer in the books.
the rules are there to help facilitate and standardize some things
Which is still a game
but its not just one
If they are unconscious and you can use the healing kit to stabilize them, you just abstract it to whatever makes the most sense
That doesn't answer the question.
a shit ton of the stats and stuff are abstractions
No I meant healing someone while they're not unconcious, using the healer feat to make them spend hit dice
The healer's kit works by containing first aid medicine. Stuff that stops your bleeding, closes your wounds.
The answer does break down to using one's imaginenation to fill in the blanks
Poultices that reduce the pain.
Its funny cuz you get spells like Disintegrate not disintegrating people literally because of death saving throws
hit dice can represent the body recovering, or you restoring morale or your will to live
The answer is to make your own answer.
I mean
Your especially good at being a field medic, your character prepared some special poultice that can really kick your allies into gear!
I suppose even if you did have several non-lethal wounds that aren't so bad, getting them patched up would in fact raise morale
this is the type of stuff thats best not thought about too hard. its just game rules
which you dont need rules for
Whenever something seems strange or whatnot, I always just try to figure out a way to flavor it so that it makes sense to me, thats basically it
Do we ask how the characters in a Final Fantasy game use the bathroom and how the plumbing works?
And that is an answer. "Not a reality simulator" is not an answer
That's great! That means you get to make up the details!
how the hell does Vivi use the bathroom though
ive always wondered what the hell is under their hat and robes.
I do believe the filling in the blanks is apart of character creation. Like does your character summon stars, imbue smoke, dance with flames...
I love everything about those examples.
How much time do you usually devote to pondering about fictional characters' intimate body parts?
I had a wizard, who was the child of a water and fire genasi, use mist and steam as a flavour to their magic. And they were a divination wizard.
look, vivi is literally a black blob with yellow eyes wearing a robe and hat
Which races in dnd are playable near homebrew?(like race is not on usual race list, but can be considered sentinent enough to play)
But really, how do gith do their business
Loved Vivi's character design.
Greatest joke there was the fact I had it as human and they didn't inherit any of their parent's elemental abilities
anything that isnt in official books is homebrew
I don't understand the question.
Dhampir I suppose
Understandable
Dhampir are playable.
Oh, makes sense
such simple key features, yet so iconic and recognizable
Dhampir isn't an official race but more like a lineage thing
I thought they meant races that are exotic
its an official race/species
If your character is a Dhampir, replace your race's features with the Dhampir
got reprinted in astarion's. its no longer a lineage
Dhampir is an official playable species as of the recent Astarion's book.
I really need to put in 2014 in my nickname somewhere
doesnt change the fact its a playable species now
Finally. A 5e book not named after a wizard created more than thirty years ago
I'm sorry, Astarion has a what?
he has a digital supplement on ddb
Astarion's Little Black Book ... I mean Astarion's Book of Hungers.
Oh, dear... How had I missed that?
(Tasha, Mordenkainen and Volo are all wizards. Xanathar isn't though so my joke doesn't work that well. Though he was created thirty years ago)
Midnight's Book of Spells?
van ritchen?
hes a cleric last checked
or at least has cleric spells
... I forgot about that one. But he was created more than thirty years ago
hmmmmm
Enough with the spell casters, when am I getting a Tempus' Armory of Weaponry?
Ophidimancer's Treatise on Why Alignment Sucks
Yondella's Kitchen of Delights... And for some reason it host most of the alchemical suppliments
i await Sardior's Compedium of Psionics
Minsc and Boo. And technically they were created thirty years ago. Almost
dammit
Made for Baldur's Gate.
Okay, that actually sounds really cool.
Yes people, there are two other Baldur's Gate games, they're pretty good.
book of many things doesnt use asteria's name 😭
Actually they're some of the most important classics in the CRPG genre.
Iuz's book of violence
Perhaps the most important classics. With Fallout 1, Planescape Torment and... I honestly can't think of any CRPG as influential
PT mentioned, gotta run
Yes. Run. Run to install and play it
I hab no monies or time! im about to run 6 campaigns in january!
i barely finished MH Sunbreak 😭 And thats the only video game i play now
... I will give you six months. In six months you need to have at least reached the Maze.
Otherwise I will haunt your nightmares.
how much is it again though?
Less than any D&D book.
sweet
i might hab monies then. time is something i got very little of now
back to making ouroboros dungeon
Can't be hard to make, it's just a circle.
gotta put in the cult fortress and the giant scion of thrymm. this takes place in the white dragon lair you partook in
Funny how bg3's companion cast drastically shrunk compared to bg2
We went from 21 + 1 easter egg > 10 characters
I hope you're putting some frost giants in too
The regional effect of a scion on giants are hilarious
What is it, +8 to all attacks and damage rolls? Something like that?
its their PB to attack and damage yeah
and thanks for reminding me.
just need to check what regional efects white dragons had... and brew up some for the avatar of ourooros
... Oh to mix the regional effects of scions and multiple regions. In one megadungeon. With fire giants and devils everywhere. And gargoyles...
I should get back to work on that dungeon. But I have had so little time.
wait, you havent ran it yet? I thought it would be ongoing by now
Time is in short supply recently
For those who don't know: I had this idea for a megadungeon for level 20 characters. The Hellfire Cathedral. The idea is that a bunch of fire giants worshipping Mephistopheles built a forge-cathedral.
Devils, giants, enslaved dragons, fire elementals. Gargoyles.
I should get back to it. Put all my ideas on paper at least.
hopefully when you run it i can join lmao
Sure!
If I recall my ideas...
Step 1 was the ash town. Where the slaves used to be housed until the cathedral was finished, and they were then left to starve and choke on the smoke.
i remember ashen zombies too
Filled with the undead corpses and ghosts of those people. A church too, with a deathknight who doesn't even realize she's dead, still praying for her god to come deliver the slaves.
hmmmmm genie paladin sounds great about now... maybe i can play P4R4D153 L05T again...
last time i played him, a lich point blank'd pwk him
hi all stupid question. is there a DnD mod forTTS?
TTS?
Table Top Simulator?
tabletop simulator
Ahh, shows how much I know.
yup
i remember one of my friends using it for dnd. never asked for deets though
maybe they got a dedicated server? #third-party might also know
thanks for the heads-up. posted there. will see how it goes
OK so back to prepping my cathedral, it's decided, I will run it in february at the latest
sweet
Hmmm... Anyone has a good name for a red abishai who fancies himself as a dragon king?
ashardalo-
No. Bad Ti.
Why not something simple? Crimson Fu-
...
been a while since i made a hellsing reference while in your presence
I have no doubt you made many in my absence
Rex Imperius
Goated, with the Sauce.
That's a bit redundant is it not?
And on the nose!
But maybe the abishai is unoriginal.
It's like that joke in One Punch Man where every ninja has a redundant name
The capitalization on Sauce being the important part of the name.
Like Empty Void, Flashy Flash, Shrieking Scream...
isnt that second one a One Punch man character
oh wait they are
im blind. Uhhhh.... Vulcan Imperator
The humble red dragon named Red Fire
Hey, we got one literally called Inferno in common
although perhaps you (or the dragon) can argue their name is where the word fire is from?
The major Dragons in my setting are color something
OK so back to the basics. The plan is to have the dungeon have eleven separate areas, which all are kind of their own dungeon.
Area 1: The ash town. Undead of the former slaves. Gargoyles and dragons patrolling the skies. Guardian golems.
Area 2: The Furnace. Has a portal to the plane of fire where the giants are sending their troops to war with the efrits for the resources of the plane. Elementals.
Area 3: The priory. The most religiously devoted giants take on a monastic lifestyle to honour and praise Mephistopheles and live in seclusion practicing clerical magic and studying the mysteries of hellfire
Area 4: The church where everyone must come to listen to the sermons of the pit fiend archbishop.
Area 5: The hidden tunnels, used by the renegades among giants who found solace in worshipping the elemental evils secretely
Area 6: The draconic terrace where the red abishai has enslaved multiple dragons, forced them to make their nests and delights in acting like a petty tyrant
Area 7: The star-forge at the highest reaches where the forgemaster toils at making her great work.
Area 8: The Canian Embassy where the devils live in total darkness and command
Area 9: The caverns of the cradle, in the depths of which a scion of fire slumbers inside his cradle, surrounded by all sorts of creatures forgotten since before most gods were born
Area 10: The Great Tree in the Feywilds where a group of hags plot to steal the forgemaster's masterpiece for their patron
Area 11: The prison of the forbidden god, in Carceri, where that patron waits for the hags to deliver.
Okay now what can I put in those?
Are you just making mini hell?
correction: the fire giants are
I remember one time I made a campaign where it was an infinite dungeon like infinity train, wasted it on a murder hobo and a dude who quit after like 2 sessions
Kinda!
where's my hellwasp nest and the celestial making music
adding something silly to the magic country in my homebrew
Everyone always bans magic in random countries, why don’t we ban martial classes?
The tortured celestial fused with the church organ is in the church. The hellwasps nest inside celestial corpses in the tunnels.
adding a regular grassy park in a desert city with a tree that attacks people in it
reason for it is an Archmage of Transmutation thought itd be funny
How exactly do you ban "Guy who happens to be pretty athletic"?
1000 pound cuffs
Men must eat plentiful and never work
And uh you need to pour magical focus into them for them to lighten
The magic servants will do all that
Wyd if you accidentally see your DM prepping a tarrasque token, accept your fate or warn the other players
tbh it does kinda make sense for an Archmage who just sits in their tower having magic handle everything to be packing on the pounds
He then sees the invite from the princess and he already wasted his good spell slots so he can’t use shape change
Smile
My favorite thing to do in campaigns is spam awaken on creatures
I love my intelligent monsters and sending them on the path to magic
Thing i like about running games in my own setting now is just going insane when it comes to worldbuilding
I only used it once I think
There was some sort of blight infecting the trees in the region, so I awakened the oldest oak I could find to see if it could find out what was happening
Who is the "Mark of Healing" even for? I wanted to add it onto the Mercy Monk to give them more versatility, but the spellcasting requirement stopped that.
What do you mean "even for"?
There is no spellcasting requirement.
You can have the Feat without spellcasting, you just miss out on the extra spells.
Add a level of cleric to it I guess
And yea its still nice even without casting cause of the other stuff
Halflings iirc
also like... Wizards, Sorcerers, and Warlocks might like adding heal spells to their repertoire
is there any way to snowboard in dnd
Thats probably just an Athletics check
cool thanks!
Acrobatics could be argued depending on what you're doing
Ultimately itd be a DM and situation thing
acrobatics for a flip
constitution when you snuff it
performance to make people swoon
deception to make it look like you intended to do that
the ski slopes in D&D have to be terrifying
Okay so I calculated things for that campaign idea... To build their cathedral, the giants would have required a workforce of about sixty thousand slaves. To feed them they would have enslaved just about everything in a twenty kilometer radius. So I think I have an idea I need opinions about:
The entire mountain range is nothing but ruined villages. As the PCs advance through it, they see fields left to rot, mass graves for slaughtered villagers, ruins everywhere, nature completely gutted, polluted waters. The giants left the builders to starve once they were no longer needed and slaughtered the farmers. And the PCs go through this borderline apocalyptic scenery.
On the way I could add mad feys and plant monsters. Any suggestions for monsters that can be a product of the general apocalypse visited on the place by the giants?
imagine skiing down the Barrier Peaks, rolling dex saves to avoid getting shot by laser guns
Seams like a great question for #dm-world-building
you mean rad as hell
Oh yeah
im worried about the monsters
getting sacked by an Abominable Yeti while on a family vacation doesnt sound ideal
the Abominable Yeti is also on a snow board
What weapon would a bonesaw be?
ooo im thinking of making a small ski trip in dnd (probably never will due to procrastination but idea still)
the reasonable option would be sword but the fun option is sickle
Baldur's Gate 3 has very stylized bonesaws that function identically to Longswords
Sickle sounds good
I mention that they're stylized cuz they're like 2 feet longer than a traditional bonesaw
I want it to be the backup weapon for my doctor lol
w pc
Non-magic doctor mind you
I'm playing a rogue with thief and some healing feats
But he's completely flavored as a doctor
sorry I can only perceive this as Medic from TF2
w should totally ask ur dm if u can give him proficiency in medicine
I made sure to take it
I have prof in medicine, herbalism kit, and alchemist's kit
Not only would I have him craft potions, but also things like alchemist's fire
Cuz why not
The healing isn't as rewarding as the hurting
there's two ways to cure a disease - treat the symptoms or destroy the source
it's funny part of his philosophy is "There is no better medicine than prevention. That is why we must take care of our adversaries."
Yo guys! What do you think of a magic item which as a side effect gives you a random cosmetical change or a mood change at the start of the day?
Healer origin feat?
More specifically, I'm actually using the "Traige Expert" feat
from Grim Hollow Player Pack
Is this 2014 stuff?
It achieves the same thing as the healer feat, but better. It also allows me to take another feat that upgrades it's healing and allows the curing of ailments. It's 2024
Ah i see
Sounds great!
It's quite cool
I'm the team's only healer so I feel important even if all the healing I can do is non-magical
Tbh sounds peak
best race for a monk? (besides variant human)
All species work with all classes. There is not "best" it's basically what is most fun for you.
some better with others tho, for example a class that gives bonus charisma works best with a sorcerer
Turn on customizable origins so you can freely assign any stat to any stat
Species don't give attribute bonuses in the most current rules, Backgrounds do.
Talked to the one Wizard and he was aight with me playing one so I'm playing a bladesinger
See? There ya go! Problem solved! What kind of Wizard are they playing?
Evoker, so pretty significantly different styles
2014 or 2024?
2024
Nice
Playing a Satyr
peak race
will 1 level in cleric/sorcerer unlock the ability to cast all the spells unlocked by the feat?
The way I see it, the "Mark of Healing" is basically only viable on Wizards as they dont get healing spells as standard, or on Rangers or Paladins.
I suppose Clerics, Sorcerers, Bards and Warlocks could potentially get it to round out their spell diversity...
Fighters, Monks, Rogues, and Barbarians are just out of luck.
is there a good form fillable pdf for character sheet? filling one in but the abilitiy modifiers are tiny
Have you tried MPMB?
never heard of it actually!
can i enter my own custom text or does it have to be built with options?
I think you can put whatever you want into it
thank you mate ill give it a go!
No problem
yeah
what is DND
Dungeons and Dragons
Is there online play or sum?
cheers
i js got into a debate
and i want you all's opinions
is shooting a ranged weapon within 5 feet, considered a melee? (In my opinion it's not)
It is not a melee attack
Surely not
While you can make ranged attacks with melee weapons, you cannot make melee attacks with ranged weapons
Even if you have sharpshooter or spell sniper and you hit someone within 5 feet, that is still a ranged attack
thanks, i'll be using this screenshot (don't you mean crossbow expert instead of sharpshooter or spell sniper?)
No I mean sharpshooter
can i ask for help creating characters here or no
#dnd-newcomers are better with guiding people
damn
i really got to switch to 2024 soon
While it is a subjective opinion of mine that some others don’t agree with, I find 2024 far more polished
I like the 2024 monk more, and it’s the one I learnt and taught people, so I like it.
some campaign does this actually
and hell
my idea was "You die, you be lvl 1" but toned it down to ONLY if the players suicides to get a new character
because i don't encourage dying and they want to die within 2 session
2024 Monk is peak
I am qurious what people are thinking about One-Shot Wonders: Holiday Adventure Pack (I am thinking about buying it and would like some reviews)
Couldn’t agree more
I love how everyone turned on the Monk in the final years of 2014 5e and then they just turned monks into absolute units
-# What psychopath said “make the monks resistant to everything but force damage”. I want to hug them
I was still a monk lover for the half year I knew the 2014 monk, but that’s just cuz I’m a die hard monk fan
ive just been saying i dark souls dodge roll and parry 😭
Peakkkk
blocked it by I-frames trust
Genius
tbh i'd do the lvl 1 gimmick that i said
except it'd be too harsh for my beginner players
Trying to kill a character (or really trying to kill the party) without a good reason. And that is VERY hard to justify.
Like, going out of their way to kill the party instead of developing the plot
Would having a goal of a TPK count?
Probably, yes
Intending to have a TPK is bad
Ah alrighty
I’ve been playing a 2024 monk for a couple sessions now. It’s been fun, I’d like to see more of it, although the differences are still emerging
i wont actually but it’s mildly irratating
So you’re gonna complain about them on a public server?
yes
I understand that you’re frustrated, but this feels like an odd place
Easily done. Talk to your players in session 0, make sure they’re ok with it, and you’re set.
copium is currently knocked out anx pepsi has a ruls that dead players return after a long rest and they only die if they take damage while unconscious so im considering killing copium at the start of next session if he doesn’t attent
It sounds like you should just talk to them like adults and figure it out
i dont wanna haul around an unconscious guy
we arent adults we are minors
I did say like adults, not that you have to be adults
true
Scheduling is hard but it’s a part of the game that is important to do
I ask my players to do 20 mins of scheduling work each month and it means our 15 hours a month of playtime run smoothly
Yeah calling out on a public server for private issues is not appropriate for both your game and this server
its not an issue its mildly irritating at most i just wanted advice to see how we sll sort it out
like a third unbiast opinion
i suck at spellinh holy patron of all warlocks
I would have an honest talk
Probably could’ve put it in a more mature and advice-forward manner, but i recommend just having a private conversation with them. Voice your feelings, and try to have an honest and calm chat
If a player is struggling to make sessions consistently it might be reason to have a tough conversation
This is even more reason to talk it out like adults. If you’re frustrated to the point of wanting to kill another PC then it’s time to take a step back and address your issues above the table
we are murder hobos we need the thrill of it
Well, at least you’re self aware
i wont actually kill him but lumping around an unconscious man because i csnt heal him because jm out of spell slots while being esnted criminals is hard
I guess it’s somewhat less of an issue if PvP has been discussed and consented to beforehand
we arent doing pvp unless they like do something to piss you off intentionally or its like you fail miserably and hit a team mate
Then yeah it’s a bad idea. You’re venting your out of game frustrations in game
Never fix out of character solutions in game
Out of game issues require out of game solutions
Usually involving conversation and compromise
on another actually game related note im still trying to bargin with my dm for a pet
If you don't want to use the pet in combat, that doesn't sound like a hard bargain.
i dont he kinda just sits on my shoulder as a bird
my character has voices in his head that constantly tell gim to murder rhongs but when hes woth the bird he doesnt hear the voices
he also sees everythingbin inverted colors
If your class allows for it, you could pick up the Find Familiar spell.
I'm making this druid character that has a familiar. The familiar is a Raven ghost with 4 arms(Fey corruption). I wanna use regular Raven stats for the familiar, but Ravens have 1 HP. I hate that.
tbf like 80% of Familiars have 1 health
Can always resummon it, and just make sure it keeps out of combat
Tiny Beasts tend to be squishy
Did not know that. Good to know...
They're not really intended to meaningfully participate in combat, unless you're a warlock with pact of the chain.
The other 20% have 2 /hj
It's a combat familiar because I can buff the dude with the Summon beast spell.
yea, this, better to use them more like a reconnaissance device than anything else
especially the birds like ravens and owls
Dream Druid.
I'm sorry? I don't know why that matters in this context.
The way I built the character, they play like a wildfire druid beastmaster ranger combined.
i wonder if you could reflavor an artificer with the Steel Defender into a druid with an angry little friend
I'm thinking of those pictures of birds where folk draw little arms on them.
"Sir, is this your familiar?"
https://www.reddit.com/r/HybridAnimals/comments/43npua/we_humans_are_animals_as_well_introducing_my/
the Steel Defender is combat oriented, right?
I think flavoring the tech aspect of artificer into more of a "nature's blessing" aspect could be really cool.
It sure is
I hate how accurate that is. Because the arms ARE humanoid...
Where are the arms, theres not a lot of space to the side of them because theres wing there
On the back. Kinda like a spooder.
Thats horrifying, checks out for the fey
Stick them straight up in the air while flying ig
Yeah, that or just naruto run those things.
omg wait they do the little superman thing
PFFFFF
that's adorable
"i can fly!!!!"
what's the best familiar to reflavor into a really big earthworm?
snake
orthworm from pokemon if you can find a homebrew of that
You want burrow speed? Badger.
Trueee...
yea probably a badger then
see it's probably been done before but i have arrived at a legendary concept: worm flavored druid
all worms
Interesting...
every wildshape is just a slightly larger worm, every spell is summoning worms
they have a familiar that's just a really big worm
Meanwhile the druid I'm making is literally nothing but fey. His race, his familiar, and both of his subclasses are fey related. Background too.
Thinking about it. He may have lived in the fey wilds for 370 years... but he has no useful knowledge of it.
You don't need to be that detailed about it.
Some people like having detailed backstories
In general I tend to just over-analyze my characters.
Sure but "Lived in a place for over three centuries .. don't remember much about it" seems like a wasted detail.
Fair
Many times it's better to have some mystery in writing your backstory.
AuDHD tends to not let me stop thinking.
Make a one-shot that may or may not ever play. That’s what I do
I've tried that. Running a campaign, playing in 3. Making a second campaign. And I still think of backstories. My brain is a Castlevania infinite corridor.
Yo guys! What do you think of a assassin rogue+ paladin with searing smite multiclass to get burn+poison? Would that ba usable?
I feel like you don't want to level rogue too much past level 3, considering how slow your spell level progression is for Paladin.
I'm dubious. Also both of those damage types are commonly resisted.
yeah? i just want the dip for usable poison dot and some other stuff
that is true indeed
Yeah, that's fair.
There is no "DOT" from Assassin's poison.
None of the Assassin poison abilities do damage over time.
ah i see. Is there any dot poison ability in the game?
I feel like there might be one or two, but it's not very common at all.
i see
I think there is a poisoner feat, but it doesn’t do damage over time
Generally stuff that does poison damage will do immediate damage of the poison type and maybe inflict the Poisoned Condition.
Some DMs, like myself, do a house rule that poison does X amount of dice at the start of a creatures turn if they have the poisoned conditioned. If thr poison itself deems strong enough.
poisoned will do ig
Ok
The Poisoned Condition is generally more defensive than offensive, since it gives Disadv on attacks.
i see. Well its still poison ability that stays ig. Are there any usable poison attacks?
by usable i mean not outright worse then most other options
You can carry poisons around and apply them to your weapons.
The Poisoner Feat helps with that.
alrighty. I need alchemist supplies to make them relatively cheaply right?
Could try getting the poison spray cantrip.
Uhh .. Poisoner's Kit, I believe.
oh i see
Hate how my dnd inspiration comes to me at the worst times