#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 16 of 1
it would increase their power, by how much is honestly weapon dependant? Like, critting with a dagger is a lot different than critting with a greatsword (2,5 vs 7 average extra damage, magic weapon shenanigans not calculated in). Its nothing to grandeur in total, but keep that in mind for multiclassing and such? You probably wouldnt give a wizard his level 15 feature at level 3
Worth noting that some rules take alignment into account, so might be worth writing one down even if it is a stupid way of defining personality
would it be broken to homebrew and expect every DM to be ok with it? yes
can I homebrew this is a question you should ask people you play with
The Monk experience is to punch people while wearing speedos
monk weapons is a simple weapon that MUST be only one-handed and NOT heavy?
Yea
Wait but isn't a staff used best with two hands
Which basically comes down to javelins, quarterstaves, handaxes, spears, shortswords
Versatile weapons are safe too
Not really
You don’t need the d8
Staves do more damage with two hands but with one hand you can hold a shield with it
staff is best used dual wielded actually
Staff and shield
Really depends on the class and all
Best dual weild ( and shill exist)
Spellcasters sure (but why use a staff on a spellcaster if it isn't magical?)
Tis is true
Monks want to dual wield staves
quarterstaff spellcasters confuse me
just use a wand, are you overcompenstating for something?
Why?
you can't use a shield anyhow
Quarterstaff has more aura
Holding a shield disables martial arts
now if you play a small character and then make yourself tiny, the dual wielded staffs becomes chopsticks
If quarterstaves are not magical its a terrible weapon, if it is magical (and more often than not staves do come with spellcaster effects) you'd run those on spellcasters for the record
Because quarterstaff scale with martial arts dice, and yeah monk don’t want to use shield, but you got options beyound dual wielding staffs to increase ac
There is no such thing as a "One Handed" tag. It only means the weapon cannot have the Two Handed tag. You can still use versatile weapons that can be used one or two handed.
Get a ring of spell storing with shield spells popped into it
bruh
Anyways when did they say the Artificer book would release?
oooh
At that point I think you'd be missing the point of the Monk lol
what's the point of having 5 more ac when I can just deflect the attack? waste of a reaction
Monks need hp not more AC lol they have those in spades
Quarterstaff and Spear are the two Monk weapons that are also eligible for Polearm Master.
That why you get tough feat, and increase con
check the events tab
Ok thanks
Yea, that or other items that buff con
that's why you just disengage and run away smh
Not items that buff AC I think those are relatively low priority
That too
I mean .. until you get rather high level, increasing your AC based only on Dex and Wis is rather hard so the Bracers of Defense aren't a bad pick and other martials won't want them.
But you can get speedy/mobile so you can do flurry of blows and walk away with oas being at disadvantage
Frankly 2024 monk can be played however you like
Okay I read the monk class detail but 2014 now.
What subclass should I try?
I wanna be a monk that moves like water, shapeless, formless.
For 2014? Ummmmmmm idk
You put water in a cup, it become a cup.
You put water in a bowl, it become a bowl.
Be water my friends.
- Bruce Lee
So plasmoid way of the four elements monk
Adaptability is truly one of humanity's greatest strengths.
Kensei Monk has a lot of ways they can dial back and forth between offense and defense. Very adaptable, very flexible, but you need to have that tactical awareness to know when to do what.
why were you asking 2024 differences when you're playing 2014 anyhow
Just in case.
insert a just in a case over here ba tum tss
Yeah, and that the one subclass that want extra ac in case of tactical blunder
Long Death helps you stay alive, Mercy has built in healing
Big sticks are cool, and I can easily beat a person over the head with one if I wanted to.
well I don't know how to answer any of your questions coming forward then if everything is a just in case
The reason is because of deft parry
for 2014 I like astral self, because it's the closest one to 2024
Kensei Monk full offense turn is using their weapon for both attacks as well as using their Flurry of Blows (or possibly a Ki Fueled Attack with their weapon). A full defense turn would be to make one unarmed attack instead of weapon to use Agile Parry, as well as BA Patient Defense. Or you can mix and match offense/defense Action/Bonus Action.
Yup
Kensei can also go full ranged build, unlike most monks.
actually if you want fluid monk, you can go with drunken master monk
they weave through the battlefield
That why bracers of defense and wraps of unarmed prowess are great for a kensei monk tbh
dance in a battle I assume lol
For any monk subclass, imo.
if you want to
but it's more like the water currents bending from the objects in the water
Yeah, and weapons in general too, never underestimate a monk with a staff of striking
Or a flame tongue
Because all good monks know that you shouldn’t punch everything
nah punch everything
You hands start melting
that's what the force damage replacement is for
I thought it because it less resisted
if your DM doesn't give you +3 wraps, cry about it until they do, no flametongue needed
if there's a problem the monk can't punch through, what's the point of the class
I wish Bigboy's Chew Toy is an actual thing in 5e
Monks wielding weapons along with their unarmed attacks is also cool.
Yup
Plus you can use light martial weapons as your monk weapon
The truth is monks using magic weapon isn’t bad tbh
It gives them options beyond the fist depending on what it is
Here the big thing about monks irl, they use staffs, using weapons are in fact martial arts irl
Yeah, the idea that "martial arts" means bare hand only is not true.
Yup
This is advice to dm that think monks only use their fist, they infant don’t just use fist
I know I am ranting but it something that kinda bugs me tbh
I didn't know people thought that. They definitely don't, they just look coolest when doing that.
I dunno I think monks look cool using weapons.
Me 2
Because the truth is martials are the coolest using all the tools in their tool box
Like saying ranger is the bow class
As someone who trained in staff forms and think the look awesome .. more staff monks, pls.
I want more monk of all weapon varieties
Club Monk
Pick up Nick Mastery and totally go Escrima.
Wait club isn't nick, is it?
Light Hammers for Escrima
You can even use light crossbow I just realize it a simple ranged weapon
Or a short bow
Oh simple melee weapons
Man I need to reread stuff before I speak
Wait greatclub is a simple melee weapon
Now I be making way of the ascendant dragon greatclub monk
Or Goliath elements monk
Take a wild guess at why
Hill Giant topple and Grapple? Get big and Grapple Dragons?
Or become a giant dragon with a big fat kanabo
Or something like it
(Reference to one piece of media)
Uhh ....
Want me to tell you?
Sure
Kaido from one piece
Why I said one piece of media
I mean I suppose, but also punching people and knocking them out is awesome.
Why not both
I'll be honest, I prefer weaponry, I've always disdained 5e's unarmed stuff.
At least for non-monks. It's just messy imo and should've been reworked in 2024.
I agree unarmed strikes should damage should be better for all classes tbh
For I find grapple and shove being saving throws to be a good thing
There's a lot of things that could be better, honestly. I doubt it will be, but at least we're kind of not really heading in a right direction with 5e overall?
Like there's improvements, but then there's just as much new issues being made for the sake of... something.
maybe its because of dnd's nature of "houseruling is correct" but i never felt like 5e has issues
now that they changed things in new 5e, i feel like there are some issues because they took what i already had away
I have not seen much of that series, sorry.
I find 2024 to be improved overall.
Besides one or two things, I don't have an issue with the changes.
I can find a lot of issues in things, but I realize I usually overblow it in my personal perspective.
So you're probably right overall.
I feel like the direction is good.
Except for the weird background stat thing, that is utterly stupid.
I'll always criticize backgrounds though.
Yes, they had it right in the UA. Luckily fully custom backgrounds is available in the free rules. I consider it the default.
Custom backgrounds reign supreme.
Ability scores coming from Backgrounds just makes sense. Limiting it to three per Background is weird and unnecessary.
You can bet your sweet bippy my acolyte of Torm is about to get that +2 to strength and not wisdom.
More acolytes should be weirdly buff imo. Funny image to have players go to a chapel only to get confronted by the muscle squad of all the priests and clerics there.
Just vestments and ripped sleaves.
what proficiencies do you have
The difference between, "Forgive me Father, for I have sinned" and "Sorry, Daddy, I've been bad?"
D&D, that's about it. I'm pretty bad at most other things.
I kind of absorb them slowly like a milkshake tbh. As a connoisseur, you should savor it.
Technically they also enslave people
That's actually their main shtick. They turn people into cattle
Which... Fair. We do it to cattle after all.
I like journaling in different dnd alphabets because 🤷 but either way I’ve journaled in draconic, dethek, I tried espruar but it’s annoying getting all of the symbols looking not like garbage scribbles, but anyway I thought “hey, I play tiefling, I should try to write in infernal” and this alphabet looks impossible for me to draw, this would all be avoided if I just wrote in English
Also calendars, I like calendars in fiction
This isn't 1378 anymore, they're people with brains made for consumption. Not cattle.
Besides, just eat criminals. Less heads turned and you even get looked on positively by some people.
they flay your mind from your body
its symbolical
shaving away until you dont exist anymore
Right? We should call them Ghaik instead 
Im coming for you first.
technically brain does not equal mind. mind flayer refers more to the fact that they can absolutely ruin you psychically, I'd assume
Chk, istik
Who gets to decide what's a criminal?
Criminal is a relational quality. You are or are not a criminal according to a certain law. Who gets to write the laws? Who gets to enforce them? Who gets to decide the punishment?
If someone powerful has an incentive to have more criminals, then it is only a matter of time before the definition of crime is extended to include many actions that have no reason to be on the list, except have more people to feed the illithids.
Imagine a system where slavery is illegal except for criminals, for example. Then there is a profit motive to have as many criminals as possible to have more slaves.
You could eat criminals as a mind flayer but still be glared upon in general and seen as a threat in Faerun
So you end up with a system that encourages crime, extends the definition of crime to include acts that would be necessary for survival, or maybe even actions that are completely non-harmful to others. And then incarcerates all those people to feed the illithid. Or to have as many slaves as possible
The justice system are base on what people think is fair
Either the king, the elected, or the people
And gods in fantasy settings
Yet that doesn’t people won’t have different opinions on such
But their also people a system were a magic eight ball decide the rules
Yes. Which means the strong get to decide who gets to be a criminal and who gets to be free
The basis of their strength varies, of course
Yeah
So yeah when people say "the illithid/the lich/the vampire should just feed on criminals" my mind goes "I give it two months before it turns into a dystopian hellscape"
That kinda mess up part in itself strength in number or strength in one the strong decide, but strength is use for good or evil
Me.
Should I say to a person own desire
And you're starting to sound like one too if I'm gonna be honest. Questioning the law is very criminal of you.
portal opens jump in, I take you to safety
Tbh this make me wanna go over how a villain can turn the question “why you hurt people” back on a paladin
Because of their oath
Its especially a no brainer with subclasses like Conquest, Glory, Vengeance, Oathbreaker
Any Paladin subclass can hurt people
Villain: You say you protect the weak, but yet you create the weak by destroying the strong, you let no one become more capable to defend themselves, and I know why, you would lose all purpose, and lose your seat of strength that you use to lord over the weak like a god for you decide who is defended and who is weak, and you ask why I hurt others, why because I am weak person trying to defend myself against your kind
Does this sound like a good villain monologue?
Eldritch blasted by the 7th word
You get hit by your own eldritch blast by them vortexing warping you Infront of your own spell
Villain: what are you a savage animal?
Yes
I mean, mechanically, vortex warp isn’t a reaction
Usually, but I am the dm
Plus it a special reaction for this particular villain
Well anyway enough with the funny
Guess I should have a shorter villain monologue I guess
NPCs don't play by the rules that PCs play by.
Also interrupting a villain monologue have consequences you know
Because villains know not everyone gonna let them monologue
In fact imagine the hero attacking villain but they continue to monologue while fighting them
This is the only type of monologue I like
Noice, the Forgotten Realms Wiki crossed 60K articles today.
if making a dexy paladin how bad would using the criminal backrgound be since im losing out on some charisma?
Get 14 in Charisma if you strongly value what it does for you, you'll be okay.
What should i try to get my charisma to eventurally?
I feel tempted to build halbard hunter ranger
I’d say minimum 18 down the line
Alrighty, thanks!
Stranger with a halberd is quite good i think. Ophidimancer suggested a build like that to me actually when i tried to build one
Cleave + Horde Breaker? Yer a walking AOE.
that does sound fun
And add in Pam
I am a dangerous whirlwind of destruction
Mix in fighter for multi class and you get something very interesting
And have the alert feature
btw 2024 hunter lost their whirlwind ability, just saying incase
You mean the spell whirlwind?
the ability to hit every enemy within 5 feet of you
that you used to get at level 11
You meant 2014 hunter
Wasn’t thinking of that
But hey I found 2024 version of that
you mean the hoard breaker?
yeah. The 2014 hunter had an ability called whirlwind and since you mentioned it i thought thats what you were talking about
Nope
alright, then good
I was imagining spinning the halberd so fast is like a whirlwind
Now, I gotta think of which species to go with
I`d suggest you to go with a small aasimar
it would be funny imo
Funny is really not the measure by which you should consider character-defining traits
depends on if youre just looking at a little angel carrying a halebard or being destroyed by one
Which measure would you suggest?
Literally every other measure is if not good at least better
i see
I base it on if I think I would have fun with it
Funny is the worst one. A good joke is told once, and then you move on. When you make the character itself the joke, you are stuck on the same joke until the end of the campaign
You can give depth to a joke character tho
Funny the first time, might make you smile the second, maybe funny again the third. Everyone will be thinking of strangling you at the sixth time
like Scanlan from vox machina?
what happened to 4th and 5th?
There is a difference between a character who makes jokes and is a source of occasional comedy and a character defined by the joke
As it stands, it may be personal, but I would walk out of a table with Scanlan in it.
Or with Grog.
dam
Sound like you hate vox machina
Or maybe just not to your taste?
I haven’t watched critical roll so idk
I think not being a fan of certain tropes and tones of characters that contrast the rest of the group or campaign is a valid criticism
That is fair, and I respect that
Well to be fair, Travis Willingham and Sam Riegel know when to shut up when something serious happens.
were grog and scanlan contrasting the rest of the world? (asking because i only saw the cartoon where it didnt seem that way much)
My knowledge of CR is surface level but I'm aware a lot of it is very performative
I dont watch Critical Role I just know it's had a large impact both positive and negative on the community
I can't stand the idea of watching someone else play D&D when I'd much rather use that time playing D&D myself
A lot of what happens at the critical role table wouldn't fly in my games and I'm a huge fan
Back to the topic
Why are heavy dice "good"?
Satisfying clunk
Joke characters can get annoying if define fully by the joke
For the same reason heavy food is good, you feel it more
my friend has a Frenzy Barbarian who is a 'wizard' and he uses 0 magic but every spell is him doing stuff manually. shouting for message, throwing white javelins for magic missile, knock is athletics vs door, etc. I've only played one shots with him and it's fun but idk about a full campaign. that tone would limit what character id play with them
Haha yes, I had the barbarian cast sleep in my last session (non lethal meele attack for a knockout)
That another thing group dynamics
Sometimes I think you need that one person in a group that kick open the door when everyone else examines doors a lot
Group dynamics are definitely very important, aye.
And having contrasting personalities help too
If you work to define group dynamics very early on in a campaign, along with building rapport between players, you often get to play more "authentically" because players ideally understand that other players have the best interests of the table at heart.
Had a gr8 session 0 with a few people from this server recently, and the session 1 was definitely made better because of that session 0 and the rapport built during it.
If you have good schedules for it
not exactly
Well you just host session 0 when you would session 1 so the schedule would be the same
This is good news. I can finally be a bee.
you can walk into your swarm and teleport with it at level 15 as a reaction. If you want to be bee talk to your dm i think
This is good news.
are you sure?
Something I've learned over time is that when I join a new group, I try to undersell myself a bit and clearly display some of my potential flaws and my awareness of them.
I've found that it's significantly easier for positive group dynamics to form if people are self-aware and display that self-awareness in a way that allows others to say "I don't like that" without feeling like it's awkward because of the social contract.
is this so people can easier decide if they do or dont want to play with you?
In the grand scheme, yes, but also so that people aren't taken off-guard by certain behaviors that now feel significantly more difficult to approach because they came up during play itself. I don't see it as self-deprecating for someone to be aware of their flaws and display them as much as it is honest.
One of my flaws/boons I'm self-aware of is that how I approach the game ends up with me often getting really into character, meaning that I find it really important to know what people (don't) like and tolerate. My go-to story of this from a few years ago is when a DM set me up with a curse that would basically go against my PC's entire sense of self and I played it up because I was on board with it. Turns out, the other players never got the hints I was putting down and the DM's weakness (in hindsight) was that he approached the game with PCs as unconnected monoliths and was really bad at managing intra-party conflicts/dynamics, meaning we didn't really get a chance to build a meaningful rapport with each other. Ended up being removed from the game but it fell apart 2 sessions later as I heard from another party member, so it apparently wasn't an isolated thing.
Was a valuable lesson to me that building the relationships early was one of the best methods for success, and one of the people I was in that game with ended up introducing me to a group I've been playing with for over a year now and will likely continue playing with for a very long time to come.
Literally all of my worst D&D experiences were with that DM, but those experiences taught me very valuable lessons that help me to this day, so I think it was worth it.
Okay so I asked dm who is a mutual now.
that his campaign gonna use 2024 basic rules
@humble cairn
I see, interesting. Thanks for sharing! I`ll try to keep that in mind too
It's funny (but not surprising) that being straightforward with potentially negatively-seen traits ends up making it easier for everyone at a table to play in a way that is overall more fun.
Yo! Im getting new dice soon
Biggest difficulty here is probably identifying and coming forward with these flaws
Congratulations!
That's why it's such a green flag to me when someone can do it 
Someone who has that self-awareness is also likely someone who is mature enough to work through stuff with others.
could you give some tips on how to bring it up?
Hey, I'm having your trouble figuring out how to calculate encounters properly, is there a good vedio or explaination that a five year old could understand out there that someone can point me to?
Yeah, and sometimes it better to talk with said person if it does come up
Instead of kicking them out without talking
aaaaaand now shazil's spamming channels.
Better to place this in #looking-for-players
Wait
its literally spam now. posting the same thing in multiple channels, auto-friend requesting on mention, an account that was made nov 7, and at that the account just says "power of money"
So a scam bot
me resisting the urge to see a group of a fighter a cleric and a rogue and play a wizard
Session 0 is definitely the best time, for sure, but it's never bad to continuously mention that people should feel free to let you know if there are any issues they have with your play. Another way to think of it is that people often provide more leniency for someone who has been transparent about those things, because from an outside perspective you have the impression that said person would actually listen to you if you brought up the issues.
It seems a bit odd to think that people are more lenient towards behavior that involves self-awareness, but I'd speculate it's because someone who isn't aware is much more likely to break the social contract continuously, where someone who is self-aware has the knowledge to act within the social contract if necessary and the knowledge of that possibility makes their behavior seem as if it is acting within the social contract.
Tbh, I prefer for people to tell me if they have a problem with me
Aye, and people are most likely to do that if you give them an outlet or permission to do so.
Session 0 is a waste of time in my opinion. It's waste of 2 or 3 hours.
ok
Moth
Yeah, and I would let them have permission
the moth
Ti-Moth the Mothy mothingson
Can you elaborate why?
depends on the players, how well you know the people you are going to play with... etc..
It can be un-necessary, but it can be very important as well
i like it for setting expectations and making sure all of us are on the same page about how the campaign is gonna go
session zero is great to establish what the tone and theme of the campaign is, for people to get info that will help them pick what kind of character they want, and to get everyone on the same page. however, not every group needs one. if there's communication back and forth between everyone leading up to stuff, most things that would be in a session zero are already covered.
Session 0 is like doing a pre-operation check on machinery. It's useless...if the machinery was never going to fail in the first place. Unfortunately, you don't actually know if the machinery was going to fail until after the fact, and if you catch something before you use it, you may avoid the failure entirely.
I cast silvery barbs
Too bad, but it already on the ban list/hj
I cast Wish to cast Silvery Barbs, get absoluetly destroyed 😎
It was casted on you now reroll
ok, you incur wish stress, since silvery barbs isnt a spell in this campaign :P
Wish SICKNESS, Plebian /hj
Tell me what you wish for and i’ll try my best to monkeys paw it
Hamburger
You get sliced ham between two moldy pieces of bread
I just take the ham and put it on some fresh bread :p
I wish for a toilet
You get a toilet
Nothing for it to lead to anything tho
You just get an unusable toilet
Me when I use the display toliets at lowe's anyway
Yeah I launch campaigns on about a half hour of startup time then we're playing, unless we are rolling charicters in that first session then it's 45 to an hour
I am not bot
I place the toilet on top of a liches lair
Im gonna roll wisdom to see how much brain damage that sentence gives me
Nat 1
My first experience with dnd was with a dm who had a super long session zero and that was because he had so many house rules that were bad and weird, my house rules can fit on an index card so that's not a problem for me
You die instantly
Im a half orc barbarian. Nuh uh
Now that's about right
You may not died but you start morphing
I stop morphing
Roll int for the saving throw
Thats a -1
So…do i start rolling death saves or…?
Roll for flush
I wanna play dnd again but i am SO antisocial
The topics of youe typical session zero are important, I just have things laid out In advance and prep things before the session
Session 0's usefulness admittedly largely depends on the actual trajectory of the campaign and how variable the play patterns you expect to see are.
Folks can read everything they need to know for the most part before they join
Oof, well you can participate in dnd beyond playing it
Tbh we haven't had a session 0
I would absolutely not join any campaign of the style I'm primarily interested in without a session 0, and I'd consider a DM or player's minimization of its importance as being a direct reflection of their lack of experience or skill with that style of campaign, with no exceptions.
Hopefully the dm would tell people that they are new to dming
what style would that be?
How exactly? Im sorry if its a stupid question im just a couple braincells away from 3 intelligence
It's my first campaign and the dm has been a dm for 3 years. I don't really want to leave it as finding a new campaign would probably be pretty hard though I do think a campaign with a session 0 would be better probably
Watch dnd campaign vods, make fan fiction from dnd lore, make dnd figures, ectra ectra ectra the limits is only up to you
Well im watching jrwi rn and I’ve wanted to write about my characters for a long time
Their you go
Thanks for the help
Very story driven with nuanced characters that may (and often will) come into conflict with each other via their goals, motivations, and desires. It's a breeding ground for intra-party conflict (and this is often part of the goal through the lenses of the characters) but it also mimics a very authentic social dynamic of an adventuring party. It often goes along with darker themes because that authenticism means you also get those reactions out of the PCs.
Highly volatile, though, and reliant on a mature group that views the campaign as being more important than any one person's character, though.
Actually we have had barely any between party rp so far
I plan to bring it up before the next game
Ngl i turned my off it was getting in the way so much
I just let my players rp in character while I have to go afk
Every DnD player should take at least 1 improv class in their life
I took theater in middle and high school
helps characters build stronger bonds and lets me use the bathroom without trying to speedrun it so I can get back ASAP
Everyone should do it at least once, its a massive help
You do improve in theater class you know
I do in fact know
I don't think my party is too kin on rp, but I'll ask
I took part in some theateresque stuff but i can't say I'm great at it
Doesn't need to be great, simple familiarity with the rules is still a massive help
Rules?
tbh as a dm you just gotta read books
You mean dnd rules?
it helps build a story and describe things
Yes
I'll need to get to that
Well meant more on how improv works, but that too i guess
Ah. No I don't really know about that
Keep on keeping on
What does that mean?
Hey, trying to think if there are any existing features in official content that cause your own character to need to make a Saving Throw when you use them. (ie, when you do this, succeed on a save or else X happens). Mostly looking so I can use that to build something similar in DNDBeyond homebrew.
because there's a big difference between "The walls have a fancy fountain with jugs pouring into a pool" and "The walls are lined with decanters of water with streams leading into a reservoir to create a decadent fountain."
omg is that 4 decanters of endless water, lets dismantle this fountain
I’ve been playing for two years now and STILL need to prep descriptions, they’re not the easiest to do in improv
I'll need to start reading books
tbh you just have to know a lot of fancy synonyms to make your descriptions more flowery
I’ll keep that in mind
for example
instead of: "The streets are dark, with fog over the town"
try: "The town has a strange feeling of gloom around it that you can't quite shake, the streets foggy and the area dark save for gas lamps hung high on poles"
you just need a lot of filler and flowery language
Right now I'm kind of multiclassing irl in terms of languages so i know both of them on a pretty decent level but not well enough to actually use these fancy words, synonyms and idioms
In all frankness, one must simply command a large aresneal of similar words so as to paint a more colorful picture of the scene
this is where my favorite dinosaur comes in: a thesaurus (badum tss)
and this is a perfect example of what you gotta do
Any TFTSD fans?
What's that?
What's that?
Tales From The Stinky Dragon
Ah i see
basically a dictionary for synonyms and antonyms, the joke was that a lot of dinosaur names end in -saur/saurus
might wanna go to #non-dnd-topics , despite it being a D&D podcast it's not really discussing D&D
Okay
It would fal under #dnd-media
Thanks for explaining! I'll look up if there's one for my first language and finally start reading the book i borrowed from my friend some time ago
"The Fog floods the cobblestone street, flowing and shifting like water. You feel its cold moisture upon your skin as it moves past you"
I don't know any fancy words but i think that would be still plenty descriptive
yeah, like that. if not big language, then flowery language
I think for that I'd still need to get reading
yeah books can definitely help with learning descriptions
Fantasy literature is plenty great, i can give you some recommendations if you want
I simply struggle with forming cool sounding sentences i think as that is a kind of language i rarely use
That would be delightful
Having said all that about thy flowery speechifying, often just plain simple English (or whatever your language at your table) will do the trick, try not to bamboozle your players in a flurry of words about a simple bucket and mop
Alrighty, will keep that in mind!
What if I want to mess with them
Use a paragraph of words to describe the table your ranger rolled a 20 to look over
Look over as in look all over it and not as in looking beyond it
Very well
Btw hi @glass granite ! How are you?
Ah, well hope it goes well
Great to hear!
Dragon Princess by S. Andrew Swann is great
its a hilarious book about Thief being hired by a wizard to free the princess from the dragon... just for everything to derail immediately
Scholomance trilogy by Naomi Novik
its a book about a magical school, a deadly one. Children are send there and left to fend for themselves as monsters try to devour them for their magic.
Mistborn series by Brandon Sanderson
Can't go wrong with brandon, he is one of the best fantasy writers today. Mistborn series follows a girl called Vin on her way to topple the last emperor.
All 3 Trilogies are fairly light reads so you should be fine
The first one sounds like a dnd campaign.
Thanks for the suggestions!
It very much could be.
In fact i will go and reread this book because its a great comedy
how evil is lolth as a goddess?
Very
Pure chaotic evil
damn what does she do to be that evil
Like, the most
is she the most evil god/goddess?]
She not only enjoyed, but thrived upon torture, destruction, and death, whether personally performing it or causing it. Every interaction was ultimately done with malice,[15][26] ill will seething from her every move, and even those who knew her well could be surprised by just how deep her viciousness went.[41] Her malevolence could be compared to the rage of the brutal orc deity Gruumsh, but where his fury was as mindlessly violent as a force of nature, her malice was complicated and deliberate. Furthermore, Gruumsh could at least be said to be steady and constant in his hate, whilst Lolth's was utterly capricious.
Lots and lots of murder, and cult running, and murder, and cults, and murder
One of, probably
is there a game/tutorial that easily explains how D&D works
I wonder if vecna's more evil
Hmmmm, good question
👍
I think vecna doesn't do more outright evil actions
Well, he did try to destroy the entire multiverse and start a new one to his liking
rather he's more generally evil, kind of like how bane doesn't do much as a god and prefers his subjects to do the work
I mean... Vecna is also the god of secrets...
yeah that's pretty evil to be honest but it's not like he's trying to do that 24/7
I can see that, actually
bhaal's up there with the most evil gods 100%
not everything Vecna does will be documented or told
He’s absolutely got skeletons in his closet. And everywhere else because he’s a necromancer
is bhaal's goal to murder everyone btw? like what does bhaal wanna achive
his goal is to spread wanton death
so his goal is to murder everyone
also wanton? like the soup?
Bhaal only lived to hunt and kill, the presence of the living instilling in him an overpowering desire for death and destruction. He was at all times a cruel, violent and hateful being, though his behavior could vary from cold and calculating ruthlessness to a savage thirst for blood.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Bhaal#Personality
Hes essentially a serial killer
Everything you can think of, and more
thats Wonton. Wanton means cruel action thats deliberate and unprovoked
imagine if all the evil gods started working together
the planes would be screwed 💔 😭
usually if they do, it ends up with backstabbing
and the good aligned gods are still powerful
Aren’t wontons the dumpling
then theres also Ao
post session anxiety sux
Ao does nothing about evil gods though
dunno, the Chinese restos my family visits have stuff called Wonton soup
Shoulda seen umberlee and Auril trying to work together
yeah, but not everythign goes
isn't umberlee the goddess of the sea
Ended so badly
Yup, and she worked with the goddess of winter for a while
wouldn't that just freeze over all her water
That’s exactly what happened
also is there a god of elements? like is there a god/goddess of fire
there are so many
The giants have gods for fire and ice, Surtur and Thrymm, who are also the gods of the Fire and Frost giants respectively
I love Surtur
There's also the primal element deities, though I don't remember their names
Oh Tharizdun was the elder evil of elementals
is there anything close to something like the titans of greek myth?
The titans exist. The greek pantheon is just not active in Faerun
o h
Theyre supposedly in Carceri, which is Tartarus
I mean like stuff BEFORE all the gods, excluding ao
If you want elemental titans, the Elemental Cataclysm is the thing for you
not all settings follow the lore of Greek mythos
Titan can also refer to the forgotten type of giants, who ranked above Storm, or the creations of gods used as weapons, like Empyreans, Tarrasques, Colossus, and others
Isn’t Theros based off of Greek mythology?
Inspired. Rather loosely
inspired, they mostly just replicated the vibe. Its also MtG, so its not too connected to DnD canon.
Well, there was a group of leonin who got isekai'd to Icewind Dale...
anyone know how to make a G sheet?
Ah, I understand now
I hope they’re coping with the cold well :(
What is a G sheet?
Google sheet?
Finally got my back-up character for Nealens campaign done 😎
spill the beans Tokii
Hmmmm...
Do I?
Do I say anything about my new lad?
I'll tell you his name:
Sovis Cova
SPILL IT
Sweet name
Lots of dms will replace a skill with another skill like that
Well there’s the important thing of almost all melee weapons in the game needing strength
Where did my post go? 😭
Themberchaud must have got it
Themberchaud?
I've done a few Strength Intimidation checks with my Cavalier Fighter lol
im building a character.
Themberchaud only eats GIFs
Anything with Finesse is Dex-based tho
Red dragon in dnd lore. It’s just a joke here that Themberchaud eats gifs
Finesse can be used with either Stat
Understood lmao well I have the post copied becayse I sent it to a friend
Well there’s only life 4 finesse weapons, and none of them have a damage dice that goes above a d8
It was:
Is it me or does Strength need some kind of buff compared to Dex?
Like Dex is a fantastic stat...it has:
- 3 good skills
- the most commonly rolled saving throw
- initiative
- AC
Meanwhile Strength:
- carrying capacity (which many groups ignore)
- one skill (Athletics, which many groups just allow people to use Acrobatics for)
- one of the least commonly rolled saving throws
Now I know some groups use the optional rule to use alternate stats for certain skills depending on the situation and what the PC does to accomplish a task (like Str for Intimidate), but I still feel like Strength needs some sorta buff. Am I crazy?
This is Themberchaud’s world, we’re all just living in it
Don’t get me wrong I agree with you that dex is better, but strength is still pretty important
STR is still used for AC. Heavy armor has a STR requirement
and a crap ton of weapons
@woven flint Right but if you're using a finesse weapon, you're using Dex anyway
Once ran for a party who all used strength as their dump stat and… it was painful
But yeah, DEX is a fantastic stat
Barbarians should use Strength and Constitution for AC imo
I don't get the point in it being a MAD Class.
Yeah I have ran campaigns with Google sheets
You have a point there
Especially since combat is literally all they do
have you worldbuild a world
All you should need for a good Barbarian is Strength, Constitution and a LITTLE Wisdom
Give the barb something they can do outside of combat. And stuff outside of rage...most Barbarian subclass features outright dont function unless you're raging
Barbs should be the options of Str or dex and con so they’re not just forced into strength
Dex is still one of the best stats, but I’ve learned to not take strength for granted
I also feel like the 2024 version of GWM should just be stock for heavy weapons
Also, give us Strength monks
I like the fact that Barbarians are forced into Strength because otherwise almost NOBODY would use Strength
As even Dex builds are better for Melee now.
As a DM it feels so good to run for a party with at least one strength character, because you can build some things around their strength
Maybe its just my tables, but I've only seen a handful of Str builds in my entire time playing 5e
It's kinda sad, even Paladins I've seen have been Dex-based
Yeah, tables and DMs can make the usage of stats vary wildly
No I just use published settings
Dex dual wielding vengeance paladins are scary now
my dm said if i want homebrew i need a g sheet but i have no idea how to make one cu half of slots hame ?name
My players can tell you that strength and intelligence is a very important stat in my game. And whenever I’m a player I rarely see them used
have you written original adventures?
My Fighters, Paladins and Barbarians will always be Strength boys, the moment I play a Dex build with any of them is the moment I lose my credibility /hj
My current group doesn't play with 2024 rules so I dont know much about it, but i know Paladin is in a much different space now
I have ran many custom campaigns yes
A party always needs at LEAST one person who can do heavy lifting without magic imo
btw uritz when are ur campaign and sessions? what day of the week
he’s busy that day
?
he runs a session every day
cool
that would be exhausting
Every day exept Tuesdays, but that may change soon
Dear god. I fear and respect such power
do you have any tips for writing original adventures?
8pm my local time, or 530 pm
you tell him. He's scary no matter what game im in
im a new player im already in a campaign but would love to join more campaigns
chat help me half my school knows dnd through stranger things
Running games is my play and it energizes me from the actual labour of my life
I hate being a DM
bro in my school everyone knows stranger things but no one cares abt the dnd part most of em dont even know what dnd is
grab the Stranger Things starter set and roll with it
Even Urizt honors the sacred tradition of Taco Tuesdays.
that is EXACTLY what I've done
i love being a dm and player
Yep, start with an idea you can express in a single sentence
nah wait
Same, being a DM is my passion. DM>PC
being a DM is my UN-passion
here
then don't do it.
seriously I would rather work a 9-5 than keep DMing
Then Stop.
If you dont enjoy DMing, nobody is forcing you to DM
and no I'm not stopping because the other DnD groups at my school are hellholes
Do you like being a DM?
suzie poo do you copy
School is not the only place to play DnD
I have nowhere to go
If you hate running the game. The secret is eventually your players will notice.
Online 😎
my LGS is out of spaces and the other ones are unrealistic
i wish atleast someone from my school knew whats dnd 😔
I've read way too many horror stories about online DnD thank you
that wasnt even where i first started playing DnD. My first game was with people from my Youth Group. Then i checked out my LGSs, then i started doing online
I hadn’t played an irl game for months before I started playing online
Internet is a godking for getting games about DnD.
I have met thousands of people from around the world because of Online DnD.
Most of those horror stories are usually engagement farm if theyre on sites like reddit
im playing online its not thatt scary
Hey, not all games are like that. I’ve been playing for half a year by now and joined many many groups, and I haven’t had a single horror story experience
i mean one player quit on us so its only 5 of us now
I don't know man it seems like a cool idea but I really just prefer irl dnd
also, its usually IRL that gets the horror stories. So many of them are just players cheating or being creeps
Going from strangers on a forum to people flying out to my wedding. Or crossing an ocean to meet up at GenCon.
also I can obtain plutonium easier than figure out how the hell to find games on this server
easy
This server's finding a game section is terrible imo. Other servers are much better.
wait will u be a dm or player?
also the fact that I'm a minor and a lot of games want 18+ people

It's easier for D&D Irl to also quickly become an unsafe situation lol
player because I hate DMing for people
can u dm me rq
I get that. My games are 21+ Sadly.
whar.
private msg
But that is because our content is not suitable for people underage.
No I get that. I’m like the only person I know who runs under 18 games
Oh! Hey, Kas, I dunno why my head isn't registering people I've seen before, I like saying hi to the nice folk :>
wazzzzzup
WAZZZZZUPPPP
the sad thing is I wanna keep DMing for people because the people in it went to my club to get away from the bad ones
I love it
but I hate dming for people
Nothing will make you hate the game more than doing things you don't like.
don't feel obligated
No DnD is better than Bad DnD.
exactly like dming takes so much work and doing it when you dont really want to is exhausting
but the people playing it I cannot let them down
you got parties up to level 20 characters before right?
It’s not on you to keep doing this, don’t ruin your enjoyment
The horror is real in person too, you gotta be awesome and rise above it no matter how you play
yeah they can find another dm if you dont wanna do it
5 times so far with 5e
also like all my players are new and that drives me to insanity too
I wanna be a ranger in one of your games but im not sure when to join
I have told them about 50 times that when I ask for an ANYTHING check it's always a d20
Imagine having only 21+ players in order for them to legally be allowed in a tavern bar. Would be funny.
Hey there buddy, I am a veteran of this hobby for 25 years.
this mindset will cause you a level of pain that will take you years to recover from.
i'm feeling a little bad for our dm right now bc he introduced an NPC that i think he really wanted us to sympathize with but the bit has become that we all rag on her
Occupational hazard of being a DM 🤷♂️
hellooo?
true
i asked u smth 😭
then what am I supposed to do? I don't want to let down the people playing the group because they specifically came to my group to escape the hell of the other two
players gonna play
just dont
The Waterdeep Group I'm in would like to have a word with your group
We're supposed to be "Good Guys" but we act like the average Waterdeep residents...
Waterdeep is just D&D Detroit
hahaha regular dudes
soo
"Hey everyone, I know that you are having fun with this game. Unfortunately, I am not in the right space right now to continue with it. I know you are excited for the game, but this is what I need to do right now. If you would still like to continue to hang out and play other games like [LIST OTHER EXAMPLES] that sounds great. I just cannot run D&D at this time."
No, not regular dudes...
We uh..
We're menaces
We robbed a Gnome from the Xanathar Guikd after intimidating him so badly he passed out
And then the group wanted to extort a noble We just rescued lmao
Your own Mental Health and stability will always come before your players.
Always.
our dm introduced this woman who lost her family to kobolds and she's like "please, help my town" and then our warlock made the joke "i think she's scamming us" which has become a bit
dm also said he wished we asked her more questions but i honestly don't know what we would ask her bc the only thing we know about her is "woman with no family"
OMG
Average Kobold Scam
also the fact that I've already poured about 50 hours of my life planning everything and getting the word out
Sunk Cost Fallacy
only 2 people are in the campaign anyway what's the point lamo
do you have like a major quest
To be completely honest, I think my character is the only educated person in the party
(Tortle Knowledge Cleric who works at a Library)
But he's traveling with them for the money and because they make good drinking buddies lmao
In the wise words of Kylo Ren. "Let the past die. Kill it if you have to."
I offer an ancient proverb
the sequels are the most overhated pieces of media ever
Nice, dm me If you want to see what I got right now
My dnd campaign going great called black stone and I’m playing a bard/paladin
i was a scholar/farmer kid who went for the sense of adventure
bard paladin is a cool combo
DM’s considering calling it when it starts to go to badly south, “I know what I must do but I don’t know if I have the strength to do it.”
Now I may be getting a little off topic with this reply but I agree. They weren’t amazing but I didn’t hate them
I really wanna play a bard that just smashes his intstruments on people's heads
okay
rock n roll
i wanna play a glamour bard so bad
huge rockstar energy
@fossil hollow
Man, we should've streamed that first Waterdeep session 💀
I know you don't stream, but that shit was hilarious
So there’s this item in 2024 called the lute of thunderous thumping, you’re gonna love it.
they weren't amazing but people act like the sequels are the worst movies oat which they far from are
ahhhhh
Trying to see what will match but sadly bard not had time to perform but kill piglins instead only had the one performance but do have a musical sword
guys i wanna play a tanuki but idk what class
but yeah chat I don't even know why I'm running the game anyway where only 2 people are actually coming
Right now, I am running a Living Campaign with 35 players, and two paid games, one has 3 and the other 5. Your games and best players will be there in the good times and the bad times. But if you can't do it. Never force yourself.
The narrative of the forever suffering dm is a stereotype this hobby needs to kill with a blunt hammer.
Well I wish you a good and calm ending of the campaign and eventually a lovely time playing
how to make a forum for lfp
So how bout don't. Take a break. One door closes in the universe, another opens.
Either don't run it or end it with a bang.
And if there are no doors, smash in the nearest wall
Or that
That bang should be a PC's chest exploding as a hundred slaadi tadpoles burst out
Perfect
Do /looking-for-players
could a half tiefling reasonably exist?
It's kind of a logical paradox
Tiefling already means "half", or "quarter" or whatever
yeah considering tieflings are already only a quarter devil
devils are full, cambions are half, tieflings are quarter
So that person would say "I'm one eighth yugoloth", but that's... Well that's just a tiefling
Tieflings arent really a percentage
Slightly sunburnt
theyre just folks with varying amount of fiendish connection
"Finnish"
It's kind of a binary. Either you have enough fiendish essence to be a tiefling or you don't in which case you're just a human
Finnish connection!
Someday I'll find it, the fiendish connection, the tieflings, the kobolds, and me!
I always knew something was off about Finland
now I wanna make a fiendish nation called Fiendland
haha
when trying to configure Adventurer, what things I need to look for to define it?
Do you mean like the Adventurer background?
Adventurer in general: class, school (or whatever it's called), background, race. Do these contribute to skills he'll have aside from class and its sub-type?
the race will, some backgrounds do
Howdy friends! I've been playing/running dnd for over a decade and I'm looking to really step up my game in both aspects. Is this the right place to go?
Check out the players handbook
Hi welcome!!!
100%. But this is kinda the general lobby chat, check out the channel list for further topics
#dnd-newcomers are much better with explaining things to newcomers
but
I'm not necessarily new, just looking to hone my craft.
cause, for now, I tried to configure Bard class with its base abilities, then add on subtype abilities (College of Whispers), and no, not like all abilities, but just like 1 site I found describes: 3rd level: unlocks 1 of 3 abilities shown here
can't spell this site apparently
Species: gives you some features for example humans get inspiration, wood elfs get better mobility and darkvision
Class: gives you armor prof, skills, hit dice
Subclass: more stuff
Background: gives where to put your extra ability points
I prefer the paper Player's Handbook but if you dont have that go here https://www.dndbeyond.com/character
so what are these 2 and do they affect anything: Nar and Faceless
Are those part of the official rules?
from what I've read: Nar is ethnicity, Faceless is background
I dunno what those are. Dont think they are part of the official stuff?
Never heard of them in my five years of playing
Faceless is an actual background. Youre basically batman. Nar is probably a human ethnicity from Forgotten Realms
Nar as a human ethnicity in the forgotten realms and faceless as a backround from baulders gate
WHEN YOU CAN'T EVEN SAY...
MY NAME...
They are office, if niche
Well, are nar and faceless both in the new books
Nar might have been mentioned, faceless has not been reprinted
No, those are older options
Who’s had a chance to see the new subclasses for 2024 edition
Are they in older books?
theyve been out for almost over a year now
Yes
yeah, wasn't sure about it, cause when I tried to find from which expansion it is, Faceless was from Baldur and Nar is from Forgotten
Nar are indeed a human ethnicity. Basically mongols.
yknow, it kinda weirds me out that humans have more ethnicities than other races
There are plenty of ethnicities of dwarves and elfs in campaign settings
Is it possible to have negative charisma for a character?
Ok I see Nar is mentined in the forgottenrealms websites
I have the PHB 2024 paper book and neither Nar nor Faceless are mentioned there
You can have a negative modifier
i can?
That is because the phb 2024 is ment to be setting Nutral and dose not have specific details from specific campaign settings , just broad strokes
thats because the PHB does not cover any particular setting. Nar is setting specific.
Yes, if it's below 10 than your modifier would be a negative
Everything below a 10 score will be a negative modifier
Yes but humans have no subspecies, just ethnicities. In Forgotten Realms lore all elves and dwarves and whatever can trace their ancestry to one event. Humans have migrated in a hundred different waves to Toril
So like 8-9 would be a -1 modifier
i have a 9 in con on my character
yeah, but elves and dwearves are still pretty widespread across FR, like the elves in Maztica are different from the typical Sun elf
9 CON is a terrible number
So that... Technically explains why humans are more culturally diverse. There is cultural diversity in other species, that said. Drows have three different ethnic groups. And as you said, the elves of the west are very culturally different from the elves of Faerûn
i think humans having so many ethnicities is for 2 reasons
theyre what we all are irl
other species are already different, just for not being human, so the team decides its worth more to make more humans than to make a different kind of other species sometimes
it is a game made my humans after all
Try living through an adventure where the rogue decided to put 8 in con and take no proficiency in stealth. And the barbarian decided that dex was more important than strength in order to fight with a whip.
so, do these mentioned do affect skills or not?
Anyways there is another thing about human ethnicities.
i do not recommend putting con below 12, not even mentioning below 10
Rip
It'a a matter of fantasy worldbuilding. Are the other species just other kinds of people or are they magical?
I never put con below 14
You can add as many ethnicities of dwarves, gnomes, dragonborn ect as you want to your own writing too
so, do these mentioned (Nar and Faceless) do affect skills or not?
Are elves people, or are elves immortal semi-spirits of the woods with wisdom and history you can't even conceive?
Nar does not. Faceless, as a background, gives you skills and tool proficiencies
Tolkien chose the second one. Admittedly, the second option only really works if you have few non-human species.
Some elfs go one way, some another way and others are secret third forth and 5th options
ok, so what was Faceless classified as again?
Not to mention that humans are also one of the original species on Toril. They predate elves and dwarves by a wide margin.
Background
I thought elfs came first to toril
wait por que? I thought they were the sudden late arrivals from Ao-knows-where
Elves are older but entered Toril later
ok, so Background, Class, Subclass, and Species do add on to skills adventurer has
Humans are one of the five creator races of Toril.
Ive always thought it was:
- Giants/Dragons
- Elves/Dwarves/Orcs/Gnomes
- Humans
Occupation, Flaw, etc. does not, correct?
Same
Humans have been on Toril since the Days of Thunder -35,000 DR
If Nar counts as generic human then you get:
humanoid form
medium or small size
speed 30 ft
skill: select one skill
gain one origin feat
get heroic inspiration 1/RL
Basically, according to relatively recent lore that could be seen as contradicting older lore, in the beginnings Toril basically only had Sarrukhs, bird people whose name I forgot, amphibious people whose name I forgot, and humans. Who evolved there naturally in theory.
Nar would be generic human for stats. Ethnicity is mostly flavor and character stuff
Oh wait I'm forgetting one.
During the Days of Thunder (−35,000 DR to −30,000 DR) on the supercontinent of Merrouroboros, humans were a primitive race, similar to apes. Tribes of humans largely inhabited the land later known as the continent of Katashaka. They used simple tools, banged rocks together to make fire, and dwelled in caves. According to Bazim-Gorag, a batrachi (another of the creator races) they hid in caves in fear—he called them "Meat".
@wispy wing , correct? Those affect, the rest does not?
... TTRPGs really like their elder frog peoples
Well. Warhammer isnt exactly a TTRPG
I don't know if those early humans would have been homo sapiens though. Maybe homo neanderthalis.
Humans, Batrachi, Aearee, Sarrukh, LeShay
leshay are the fey?
Progenitor to fey
That depends on what you mean with skill. Skill is strictly defined in DnD. If you use skill as a generic word then yes, all those give you skills.
@tulip anchor
hags are fey right?
Wait that doesn't make sense. Leshay were fey. They would have been in the feywilds not Toril
yes
10 in con
typically. Night hags are fiends
Yep
so elves are related somewhat to hags. weird.
same way the Unseelie and Seelie fey are
The LeShay are not natives. But they are counted amongst the creator races
yeah I'd imagine they're connected loosely like how we're loosely connected to primates
Somewhat. In the same way that I am related to a canary. We do have a common ancestor.
so elves and hags don't have a common ancestor?
In the case of the canary, that common ancestor was before the triassic era if I'm not mistaken.
They do, the same way most people will claim we are all from the sea
yeah, like Incubus says it
skills like Bardic Inspiration, Spells, Jack of All Trades, etc. Cantrips also count, that's what I mean mainly
those arent skills, those are class features
is there a god of fey?
More than one
Skills refer to Acrobatics, Perception, etc
The first known dwarven settlements on Abeir-Toril originated from the mountains of Yehimal. These dwarves settled underneath the junction between the three continents of Faerûn, Kara-Tur, and Zakhara, and migrated in all directions from there, spreading across the face of all the planet, except for those who migrated northwards and came to rest in the mountains of Novularond, becoming the ancestors of the arctic dwarves.
A lot of gods are fey-like or make their home in the feywilds.
ok, but this is what I meant. Traits, class specifics, race specifics, etc.
is lolth considered a fey goddess considering she's goddess of the drow?
Then yes. You get "skills" from all of those.
But skills in DnD vocabulary is defined here
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/phb-2024/playing-the-game#SkillProficiencies
Auril for example. The archfey, like archdevils and demon lords, count as demigods somewhat. The elven gods are like halfway between celestial and fey. Or fiendish and fey
skill in dnd refers to the little list on a character sheet going through atheltics to stealth to survival
And from the example of Auril it can be extrapolated that the "weather" gods are fey but that is unconfirmed
skill is not "everything that lets you do something"
Lolth is a member of the Dark Seldarine she isn't a fey goddess.
skill is specifically a d20 referring thing in the skills category
Elves are Fey-like but they are not distinctly Fey.
are drow even fey?
At least in the realms.
No, humanoids
Skill
Acrobatics
Animal Handling
Arcana
Athletics
Deception
History
Insight
Intimidation
Investigation
Medicine
Nature
Perception
Performance
Persuasion
Religion
Sleight of Hand
Stealth
Survival
theyre descended from Fey. Hence Fey Ancestry
If you wrote a statblock for Lolth, it would be fiend though. For Corellon, celestial. But the other gods? Especially the outliers of the pantheon like Shevarash? I'd go with fey
I would think Corellon's statblock is Fey
is there a god of the nine hells?
Thats Asmodeus
Spells I only understood as Spells for class specifically. Not every class has them
More than one.
Tiamat lives there. Asmodeus rules. Probably a few more. And archdevils are usually counted as semi-divine.
Correct. Monks do not have spells for example
I recommend this resource
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/br-2024
I is the most important stuff from the player's handbook in a free format
Tbh I would prefer WotC never stat a god again but if they did. Make Deity its own creature type.
Honestly, deity could just be a creature tag like titan
I like the fact that some gods are fiends, some are celestials, some are fey etc.
It showcases a certain diversity.
And you can use this to get started with character creation if you dont want to read.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/characters
It has the bard class for free but not the whisper subclass. You will have to test some other subclass that is there for free.
would a god like myrkul have the undead tag?
In theory.
would bhaal have a tag? isn't he technically dead
Especially after his death. Technically in Mask of the Betrayer he could be targetted by an ability that only affected undead
Yesn't
he lost his true form iirc
Bhaal before his death, if I statted him, I'd go with humanoid or fiend. After, yeah, probably undead
so basically he's still there but he has no physical body, that's why he made the bhaalspawn
Bane seems Fiend
I think bane was just a human? don't quote me on it though
all of them (the Dead Three) were humans
oh rlly? I thought bhaal was an elf for some reason
The Dead Three are in a strange place.
Bhaal was killed only because he was made mortal and forced to inhabit a mortal form.
Bane resurrected himself by subsuming his son Iyatchu Xivm.
Myrkul al-Kursi just really liked bones.
All three. It takes a human to decide to walk up to the palace of the fourth most powerful god of that time and decide to beat him up for the throne
The dead three? is that faerun lore?
also, his more human looking appearance doesnt mean he cant be fiendish. Lots of fiends take a humanoid shape...
Illmater is human looking, but id slot him in as Celestial for a statblock
Yeah I think we’ll probably get more albeit in a weakened form like exists in certain adventures
Also bring back Jergal's bug like appearance you cowards.
As long as they stick with just statting out avatars (which is all they've done in 5e, yes even that one) its fine
the dead three are the three faerunian gods of death being
myrkul the lord of bones
bane the lord of tyrants
bhaal the lord of murder
they got their power by making a deal with the original god of death, jergal
Now some guy with the best muttonchops around is the Lord of the Dead.
Jergal was originally the god of death and other associated concept. Three extremely powerful human adventurers decided to claim his divinity. When they arrived, he saw them as his chance to retire and offered to divide his portfolio between them. He kept his part as god of scribes and record-keepers, Myrkul took death, Bane tyranny, Bhaal murder. They proceeded to be general menaces for a few centuries until they were killed during an edition transition event
so you know in baldur's gate 3 when you fight myrkul he's called an apostle of myrkul
its an avatar of him yes
what's an apostle?
A follower
The easy way to know if you are fighting an avatar? If you kill it does it actually kill the god in totality? If so, its not an avatar.
It's a term from real life. From greek "apostolos" meaning "sent by".
so would an apostle be an avatar sent by the god in question
not always
It means someone who is a high-ranking servant of a divinity on a mission from them
I believe that that instance is even referred to ingame (at a later point) as an avatar of myrkul
which, tracks with the previous
Apostle usually implies that its not the actual guy themself doing the mission
Anyone can be an apostle. Even a god can call themselves an apostle of something.
I'll be honest I think 90% of the reason its called an apostle is simply because it makes a cool name
It's just a title.
Gods can and do serve other gods.
yeah
Dog my party wizard is talking about sum “you can just recharge wish rings” is this factual or are they tweaking?
Not to be confused with an apostate which has almost the opposite meaning
The dragon gods and Asgorath, the elven gods and Corelleon. The Faerûnian gods and Lord Ao. Lord Ao and the Luminous Being.
is asmodeus even an actual god in FR?
yes
Tweaking. Borderline cheating
hmm i always thought demon princes and arch devils werent actual gods
Yes. He became a god by stealing Azuth's power in the wake of the Spellplauge.
Incubus using tweaking? 
so who is the guy that made EVERYTHING
oh right he did that i forgot that
Theyre not, Asmodeus is just a god who is also an Archdevil
In Toril, Lord Ao
I still think the luminous being is just Ao's non-divine completely mundane boyfriend.
Interesting…
And they were roommates.
no but EVERYTHING. ALL THE PLANES.
all of Realmspace
The guys who wrote the setting. It's a long list of writers
Unknown. Perhaps they have always been.
so there's no in-lore supreme god
Nope.
I swear to god FR is just some tired coder's program running
besides ao of course
Ao is only "supreme" in the realms. He has no powers outside of them
It is possible that he doesn't even have the ability to leave the realms
AO is only one Overgod. And just of realmspace. He is not even the only suspect Overgod of realmspace.
time of troubles was just the boss calling all the code engineers to actually work a full week in the office for once
some died
Actually it was the boss firing everyone on a tantrum and then hiring them back
no no the joke is that code engineers are just chilling at home 24/7
Because his house was broken into
yeah the time of troubles were when all the gods became mortals right
Also Ao did not create the realms.
being "mortal" is being in the office here
he moderates it
Ao wants to be bothered as little as possible
By all accounts the first deities to actually work on creating stuff are Shar and Selune
AO, is a discord moderator confirmed.
ao seems like a bum ngl
thats literally how i view the FR gods. Mods and code
Ao is Balance. Balance precisely meaning you don't get what you want all of the time.
- People overreact to his behavior
- Wants to do as little as he needs to do
- Has a lot of power but generally doesn't use it
- ???
Sounds right
you joke, but thats literally how i view em
so is ao the game dev who balances all the characters in his fighting game
Other suspected Overgods are The Celestial Emperor, Fate, and Maztica.
Gods are generally very boring people. Do not bother with them
Celestial Emperor like the guy from Eastern folklore?
the dark powers could also be overgods, we really don't know
Instead may I introduce you to the wonders of demon worship?
But not of the Forgotten Realms
FIEND
Kara-Tur really do be like that sometimes.
ALLEGEDLY
Anything is possible, you can take or leave what you like from offical settings
incubus is asmodeus confirmed
The evidence at this point is pointing
goddammit, they literally copy pasted?!
Pointing at you slandering me, yes
Its not slander if you keep giving reasonable excuse and evidence
Does the Celestial Emperor have a nephew who is a god of water engineering who, weirdly enough, is the best fighter in heaven?
is io an overgod?
When your setting is made in 4 weeks....
god i hope if they go back to kara tur its great
Let me tell you about the Mad Monkey... Hu Sen.
... The mad monkey. Really?
I will make Kara Tur great again!
(I was referring to Erlang, nephew of the jade emperor in Chinese mythology, who is the only one who succeeded in beating Sun Wukong)
(He's the god of water engineering. Yes, seriously)
goddammit TSR(?)
Yes TSR.
People crap on WOTC but honestly they harmed the setting less than TSR
looks like they can escape the Satanic Panic, but not the Stereotype Gripe
TSR gave us the... Let's call them the "ethnic fantasy" continents.
In order to not call them racist
Yeah. TSR had a lot of issues with hyper stereotypes. They had one half decent take.
The worst you can say on WOTC's handling of the setting is... 4th edition lore. Which, alright, is crap
Zakhara, is the best of the bunch. And even still requires a deft hand.
but i feel its less racist than TSR's
flipped through a copy of Oriental Adventures my LGS has in their DnD room... it was interesting
Well it's not really racist, it sucks because it's nonsense that introduces idiotic retcons that serve no purpose.
Which one 1e or 3e