#dnd-discussion
1 messages · Page 12 of 1
Also, a tarrasque who didnt burrow when dragons were flying was kind of a dumb one >_>
yeah tarrasque needs to burrow away which is sad
They can take down mountains. Theyre fine lol.
They can't die anymore either, apparently.
I miss the 3.5 tarrasque feature of. JUMP. tarrasque moves like 600 feet and then does a multiattack with grapple. Nom.
4e Tarrasque was the scariest, stat wise.
Something like 1200 HP and 51 AC iirc. Just dumb 4e things.
Its what happens when you add level into multiplier calculations >_>
they used to be quite immortal beforehand, too. Well sorta, you needed a wish spell with a really lucky roll after to keep it dead (for a time)
Yeah, it's just default tarrasque behavior now. Go back to respawn.
4e had a HP Inflation problem. "How do we scale higher level monsters right" "Just give them more HP lol" "But wont that mean they need to wail on them for 15 turns" "Yeah so they know its a hard fight"
i feel like tarrasques were always the kind of thing you do in a oneshot but never actually have in a campaign
Tarrasques are a great threat for a campaign, but their behaviour is, well, godzilla like
mm3 fixes this
Its a Tier 4 thing when youre kind of running out of track
sleeping for years at a time and then waking up to eat your house within 3 days, then going back to hiding underground
Its a good way to be like "Hey, Icewind Dale is about to disappear if you dont do something"
Just a set piece battle, really. Half the fun of fighting a tarrasque is that its knocking over hills and towers and junk
Usually while demolishing 5-10 commoners that are 'helping' the adventurers each round
Remember, if your tarrasque is staying up beyond 5 days in one rampagne, something has agitated it. Try to find the source of the agitation, as staying up after 3 days is bad for their health and will lead to their carapace losing their sheen, as well as other health concerns. A rested tarrasque is a happy tarrasque.
Don’t feed the tarrasque after midnight
Have you heard of ziz? Lol
did anyone hear about the D&D video game that just released? Dungeons and Dragons: Battlemarked just released, but I heard nothing about it leading up til now
its one of the main reasons why you can have entire siege battles based around fending off a tarrasque without actually killing/seriously wounding it in any way. If you are too much of a nuisance or it can get its food otherwise, and it retreats, its unlikely to come back for another ten years or so
its... a deckbuilder boardgame coop game?
imma check it out
no idea, didnt hear anything about it, but it looks like they stole gloomhavens concept?
its on steam?
yup its on steam
aw im too poor for that
Also I like the Welsh name
while indeed it is White in Welsh, I got this name from the Dark Souls series lmao
well 29 bucks for a new released game isnt too bad I guess
anyone got a master tier membership (share purchased content with ppl in your campaign) that has purchased Eberron: Rising from the Last War
im poooooooooooooor
My name is also Welsh too, it means drunk (I love dark souls and I am also Welsh)
but only 41 ratings rn, 40% of which are bad, did they do no marketing at all=
is the new one already out?
no Forge of the Artificer comes out Dec 9
Well you are a kobold, just steal some of your masters hoard. Either they dont notice and you are good, or they do notice and then you are also no longer poor
master dont got eberron
I will not pretend that Artorias the Abysswalker has not greatly influenced by taste in sword and board fighters ever since I did my first dark souls playthrough based on him
Manus has influenced my mage, wizard and magic tastes permanently
elden ring influenced my taste in clerics because i played a zweihander faith build and it made the game too easy
I found my favorite souls spell ever in a non from soft game
faith builds are just so good in souls games in general
it was a great first dark souls experience. I got the shield first, my brother gave me his sifs soul so I got the holy sword to hit ghosts and the best greatshield in the game
then I of course tried to get all of the three possible artorias greatswords in the game by any means possible
its just extra good in elden ring, because the zweihander has extreme reach and stagger which helps often, and then for annoying enemies you have lightning and fire, sacred blade crushes unholy enemies, and health regen is good against literally every boss
great time
and his armor set. I also dabbled in some int builds because the swords scaled better with int than str. Go figure. Was a fun time blasting at all distances
In elden ring my favorite build was just pure strength and endurance
Using the giant crusher
what sold me on faith was getting to lightning spear every single enemy i found annoying
we haven't gotten a new main class since the bard
oh my god faith builds are so sick
uh. The warlock and artificer only exist since 3.5? Bard was a thing since 1e if Im not wrong?
I used to like faith in elden ring but then I tried faith in lords of the fallen. I summon a blood tornado
look
i still remember grinding for darkmoon blade in ds3
i have a idea oh im stupid
i had enough of the sword birds in that one castle
Controversial, I didn't enjoy ds3
Even more controversial, I really enjoyed ds2
I enjoyed ds2
bard was the first prestige class iirc
Bloodborne was my favorite souls game
^
Arcane and bloodtinge were awesome
I had a lot of fun with a dark magic build in ds2. I know people complained about shields not blocking 100% of everything anymore, but that meant magic builds were more viable in general pvp without using things like dark bead
cries in no PS3
I dont have either of those, I switched from console to PC...
No same don't worry
It's just bloodborne is literally elden ring levels of peak
how long do you guys take to deliberate on a character for dnd
True chads do Strength Builds in the Soulsborne games
at this point i have seen so many spoilers of bloodborne that I basically know all about it without having ever played it or watching a lets play
true chads pick gear based on if it looks cool
i'm a dex/skill abuser i can't lie
Depends on the game tbh, in ds3 the real chads do luck builds lmao
deliberate? Like, consider all my options?
yes like how much time to finalize it
Hi guys does Anyone have a newbie group I can join really want to try dnd
Bloodtinge and arcane are peak
no we dont you go to #looking-for-players
Ohhh
is ok
Thanks
It depends, I was pretty set on my Tortle Knowledge Cleric for Dragon Heist/Dungeon of the Mad Mage
But now that my Noble Genies Paladin is dead in another Campaign, I'm struggling to figure out what the hell to replace him with lol
I was like
Right away with the Tortle Cleric, and I've been pondering for two days now with the other guys replacement
sometimes a long time, sometimes not long at all depending on how soon i know about a campaign before i start playing in it
yeah i get it because i usually have like 2-3 main ideas i wanna do, then take like 3 days to figure that out, then take like another 3 days deciding between options for backstory
About two weeks. If I need to rush a character, I can do that in 30 minutes. But if I invest in it, then yeah, I consider my options wayyyyy to long and go over possible ways to go.
im glad its not just me 🤣
How would I home brew a bear Druid, it’s a bear that is a Druid that can wild shape into different races
Yk after playing all of the souls games I don't judge people for their builds. I only reserve that for pvp
slow down please id like to say something please
cause i learned about a campaign i was going to be in, and i've swapped through like 7 different character ideas before finally settling on one just a few days ago
nobody is stopping you from saying something
what if there was a new main class called the worker a class built around doing more tasks then combat and helping others in doing a task like giving another player a bonus action or speeding up building something or constructing something like that could shake up the playing field in a way the other classes haven't done before
Good idea bad idea?
Sir Bearington, I see. Just build a goliath, say its a bear and communicate in roars and paw gestures
I want a class that specifically sucks at everything
yeah tbh would be cool to have a purely support based class, but most people don't like doing pure support unofrtunately
im not your dm you should ask your dm if you can play a bear
You sir know ball
I did and they said it was ok
2014 ranger then? Joking aside, multiclass as many classes as you can, so that none can actually do stuff
ok ask em to help you stat it out since theyre your dm and a bear is an animal
I want a Strength Unarmed class!
Slowly looks over at the Third Party Pugilist vlass
My beloved...
the dunce class
Just play a Ranger /joking
Also tbh most DND classes don't appeal to me other than the barbarian
yeah im getting peer pressured because this group finished their ideas in like a day and im like bro 😭
theyre not mean about it i just think i should hurry up
i mean just keep thinking about it, and when you sit down with your character sheet you'll come to your decision
ive already sat down with it wdym
this would be good in any other ttrpg that isn't focused on combat like D&D is
until i became super solid on an idea i was just gonna roll 1d6 for my ideas and pick whichever it landed on lol
I haven't even looked at what tavern brawler does for 2024 but I assume there's no way of sticking that on a barb and not just massively be shooting yourself in the foot?
you do know that classes are only on paper, its what you make of the character that defines them, right? If you dont care about "optimal" builds you can care even less. Build a fighter that just punches with his plate gauntlets for 1d4. Barbarian with cestus or brass knuckles. Monk with attitude problem
D&D but it's literally just Fallout: New Vegas
I'd like to do a Fallout-esk campaign set in Eberron but post-apocalyptic 🧐
if you talk with your dm with a specific goal in mind, if you have an underpowered strategy you want to make work for your character fantasy, they might homebrew a magic item to make it more palatable
I just like bonk
the light and dark path of playing a serious character or a gremlin
oh wise follower of bonk
All of my characters have a minute bit of gremlin in them
Go monk. Get the stats right, and you dont need to worry about a) weapons, every part (yes, every part) of your body is your weapon dealing set damage, b) you dont need to worry about armor, your bonk stat can be helpful for armor, c) you get in bonk distance faster, d) you can spend your one ressource to bonk more often
My Noble Genies Paladin was a treasure fiend, but he wouldn't go as far to steal from mosoleums or anything like that for example
A mausoleum,even
I have never seen someone write mausoleum like that
if i was an adventurer i would absolutely screw around and be a gremlin
I dunno how to spell the damn word!
Leave me alone >:[
its ok
Alas, most of my parties are people that screw around so I've gotta be the structured one 💀
most of my parties say they wanna be serious so i gotta be serious too 😔
I’m in that boat. I’m the relatively straight shooter nice guy in a party of absolute heathens
Me, lord of silly, having to be the serious one!
You. Titled LORD OF SILLY. Need to be the structured one. Also, take it from me, you dont want to be the straight man constantly, its a role that needs to be passed around or you will feel bad
I like playing serious characters tbh
I like being silly outside of games
like let me drink random potions and ragebait enemies and make deals i really shouldnt
it would be nice if going for an unarmed knight build didn't handicap your mechanical ability in combat
because at some point you will feel like you need to say no to everything because they expect you to and then its less funny because you cannot also come up with insane plans
i also think it's very much a spectrum, you don't have to be 100% serious and you don't have to be 100% gremlin, you can be both
i agree completely its tiring
because then what happens is the gremlins will specifically target you to get a rise out of you
I don't mind it, really
I don't mind being the serious one
It makes people more liable to take my characters ideas into mind occasionally :p
Yeah. From "Hm we could try a distraction" it goes to "WHAT IF WE SET THE ORPHANAGE ON FIRE, I ALREADY PLACED THE BOMBS" because they know you will shoot it down because its your job to prevent mass casulties
ive had to start playing more gremlin because tbh im tired of players acting like im their dad, or like im preventing them from doing stuff, or pushing the envelope exactly like you said. i have to outfreak them so they knock it off
That sounds like a session zero failure
i would call it a rogue/wizard/warlock/bard existing failure
i got a question do you got a spot open in any campaigns cause id like to join one ive been trying all day and i cant post in looking for a dm for 6 days so im kinda limited on options
My Warforged, Vanguard was very much No nonsense, but the moments he did crack jokes or be sassy was more impactful because of the fact, methinks
Think about it this way.
Tokii, lord of silly, being the one to play the serious structured,serious one, is in fact, a silly thing in and of itself, because of the irony of it all
Therefore he’s just making an advanced effort to live up to his own lordliness by surpassing the normal expectations of silliness
i like playing characters with serious occupations who are silly :p
I mean, in one party I'm in, my Dragonborn Fighter is in a Relationship with another PC's Kobold Monk and my fella has to be the wise and/or smart one because his boyfriend isn't that bright and has almost gotten killed a few times
yeah thats tiring 😔 id let him die
See, you cannot have drama with shenanigans. You need silly shenanigans to also have impactful drama. So you need character that take things seriously occasionally going "flip it, we ball" and ride a carriage full of alchemist fire into the castles banquet hall, and you need the bards philandering their way into the queens chambers to take a somber moment when he hears her sad backstory about being married off as a political hostage. Otherwise neither character and player can get the full experience
He even gave his name to a FEY for Christsake.
i did that too because it was funny
Orizontas wouldn't let Vakbo die, they're lovers lmao
all the fey did was change one letter
Best dynamic
gay dragons
He even surrendered a Valuable Magic item once because he didn't want his party to die in a fight against Bandits
Orizontas is byfar one of my more selfless characters, good Copper Dragonborn boyo
i like playing holy men or soldiers or monster hunters or (other serious things) because when you have a serious profession, it gives you so much room to screw around, and you screwing around ends up sort of pushing the miscreants in the party to start behaving, because they fear what you're capable of doing if left alone
this is also known as being a troll dad
My players were once shocked when they were accidentally teleported into a cave with not one, but two ancient dragons at level 6. Shortly after the dragons started bickering among themselves, one of the players went "wait... are they just an old lesbian couple? They act like they have been married for decades" and yes, that was the entire plot of that particular cave, gay grandma dragons being happy to have visitors
The giant octopus is pretty beastly against low level parties.
i appreciate selfless chars
selfish characters can end up being really obnoxious in a co-op game :p
Selfish is in tries to be overly self-reliant? Good. Can learn and grow out of that. Selfish as in throws others under the rolling purply wurm? Bad, dont endanger others unnecessarily, dont start big fights you cannot win and expect the party to become criminals for you
At least TWO of my characters have given their lives for the sake of others
K'ura, My Aarakocra Warlock
And
Jabal, My Earth Gebasi Paladin
last time my party got arrested for being criminals i told the jailers to keep them there another couple days just to spook em xD
Brick, my earth genasi monk, was eaten by a second T-Rex, while the party escaped, after he knocked the first T-rex the heck out
My Birdy and Stony Chads...
he died as he lived, trying to pet the animals
also protecting his party or whatever
i feel pretty proud of my death ratio
i think ive only ever had a pc die like twice
I've had three character deaths.
Jabal, K'ura and, Maloche, my Changeling Spirits Bard, but he was actually revived by the "antagonist" in that campaign to make a deal
i've had one character death, and that's mostly because i rolled a 1 a 1 and a 2 for my hp bonuses on a wizard so i had 10 max hp at level 4
When a fey know your name they own you. So my character was raised by sea Fey so they named me. is this a loop hole or a bigger screw over?
ask ur dm
All of my characters that have died were relatively high level
its not "knowing" your name, its "having" your name. A fey can read about you, can get your name from someone else, but unless you accidentally or willingly hand it over, they dont get any power over you
Jabal was level 11
K'ura was Level 20!
He's the reason for his own death, but he killed the BBEG too lol.
i run into the Serie situation where every time i take a risk it works out
a fae that named you quite literally GAVE you a name, it would be against hospitality rules to take it back
so i usually only die if like its overwhelming odds or holding the line or something dramatic
taking back a gift freely given would put them ins o much trouble
also remember if a fey is toxic and uses your politeness against you, you can just kill them @terse rapidsand they deserve it
Not died, but my fighter Alexis got retired after he searched a dead assassin and discovered a broken vial of contact poison. Level... 8 or so?
So im good? Like my characters parents traded baby me for passage out of the feywild. I wasn't named yet
Maloche literally spat in the Antagonists face, he still took the deal though
Maloche was an absolute chad
It's probably believable. Lots of variation in matters of the fae, asking them to have one set of rules that they unfailingly stick to in spirit and letter is asking the moon to tell you a joke. Ask your DM for verification.
tbh im usually never rude to npcs as a PC, it feels bad if they're not bad guys, and if they're bad guys then being mean is kind of petty and pointless
He spat in his face, the guy grew furious and he just said
"And what are you going to do about it? Kill me? Clearly you need me to carry out your plan, it'd be foolish to lay a hand on me."
They legaly own you if they bought you, and you are their pet, but they dont own your name if they gave it to you (though it might have been someone elses name beforehand), and they dont technically need to be in control of you. A cat wanders and comes home while having an owner
only the fey could buy a person and treat it like a joke
None of my characters are typically rude.
But you gotta consider with my Maloche fella, The BBEG's henchman was the reason he was killed and they had the Audacity to bring him back to life to plea a deal with him lol
while I agree with the sentiment, I have had the BBEG in a similiar situation pull a "Yes, quite right, I need you. But for my purposes, I suppose you could do with an eye and an ear less, wouldnt you say?" And get a dagger ready
New Artificer blogpost has me feeling excited for the class. This is a strange feeling.
nah im entirely serious, i dont even take intimidation as a skill anymore cuz i dont really use it 😭
(no I didnt do anything beyond that but it drove the message home not to disrespect evil people that currently have power over you)
The guy wasn't THAT evil, surprisingly, he was pretty reasonable
i like to be blatantly cordial because if an npc betrays you being sincere and generous with them, well at that point they're asking for it
The only reason Maloche was revived though is because him..
Like the big bad evil guy and the rest of his cronies were born from
The sins absorbed by the Fog.
Or whatever lmao
Changelings in that homebrew setting were weird
I.. want more character deaths tbh
I feel like they give interesting stories to tell lmao
I may be morbid, but it's interesting to hear how or what a Hero was doing before they met their end
Are you still looking for an artist?
Saw a song made for “Mighty Nein vs Tav’s party” (Critical Role vs Baldur’s Gate 3)
Very neat video.
Mighty Nein is so screwed
Hey
How are you doing ?
If you had to say what's the drippiest/fashionable item you can pair with cape of billowing
DM gave us the choice of one common to legendary magical item, and I went with the cape
Hat of Vermin
Or the Glamor armor that can look like any clothes
Glammerweave, uncommon variant, you get a cloak of billowing and clothes that can be wrapped in thunder and lightning. You are the storm that is arising
Im currently a pixie so would the hat of vermin summon mini-frogs?
Glamoured Studded Leather! That's the name.
And we have decided that I am 3 inches tall
Sounds like a pixie yeah
I may be a pixie
glammerweave, uncommon has so much potential for aura farming. Be angry, set yourself on fire! Be sad, have a raincloud accompany you. Be Happy, literally have the sun shining out of your butt. Anything your illusory heart can demand, it offers in a very close range around you
You have shown me a great item oh wise capybara.
Hat of disguise
is heart of terrasque a magic item?
Which one? One of the three main hearts or one of the 7 side hearts?
Just be a chad and just eat the heart
"The tarrasque swallows you" "Well I just drank my potion of invulnerability, and I do have a burrow speed..."
"The tarrasqu swallows you" "Counter argument, I have 2 bags of holding and a teleport spell set to go off when they collide"
the bag of holding trick doesnt do you any friends, as the tarrasque arrives unharmed and will likely be booted out of the astral plane quickly
I cannot imagine that it has never eaten multiple bags of holding when chowing down on magic item stores, so it likely is used to taking the readily available portals home anyways
Hmmmmm
I know a lot of content creators try to sell you the double bag of holding trick as an insta-win button but it doesnt hurt anyone and the astral plane is really not a bad place to be in general, you get to float around and there is plenty of exits
My character is immune to acid damage so he starts a new life inside of the tarrasque at the top of it's stomach with thrown together houses
see, now you are talking, thats the spirit
[Insert that one piece guy who lives inside of the giant whale]
And I begin a succesful business by setting up a gate to a town, and reselling anything I find [like two level 20 adventurers gear sets per day]
not seen the video but I would think the opposite
Wait a sec are you talking about crocus?
Yep
reminds me of the niche monster that is an ever hungry giant that sprouts more mouths if you wound it that has a portal to an unknown demiplane in its stomach. The guys job is it to eat the flesh mountain that is ever growing in the abyss, and hes the only reason that mountain isnt growing out of control
Dalmosh of the infinite maws, that was that guys name
Why not just send the mountain to the elemental plane of fire
Eternal fuel to the flame
supposedly its easier to just jump into his stomach portal when he swallows you whole than to try and get out, but eh
did you miss the part of it being from the abyss? its a fireproof flesh mountain
What you guys think of Aasimar wild heart barbarian?
A bulwark of steel to protect against the harbingers of sin
The angriest wing flutters.
Rage doesn’t always mean angry for a barbarian
Aasimar is very fun, barbarians work their role well, sounds good to me
It does for angry birdbarian
Why not just get another mountain that is constantly destroying flesh
so the giant can take a break
mountain of cockroaches
A flying barbarian is scary
Mountain of waffle house enjoyers
Waffle House should be a Monk path
Flying monks are scarier
goku
That would work but I dint think that one is canon yet. Old books did have the summoning conditions for hungry giant guy though, basically you need to produce 2 tons of food which he will consume in 12 seconds during which you best get out of dodge because the summon lasts 12 hours and HE IS HUNGRY
I mean… yeah.
I wonder what types of characters the mods (or others tbh) are playing in games this week
Or Yamcha, tho he cratering
"yeah so anyway i grapple the enemy and fly"
Turning this Waffle House into a Waffle Home
That trick stops real fast once you have fight anywhere with a ceiling
the mountain appearently eats vermin. Hence no insects being able to thrive there. But its a very little "fleshed" out flesh mountain, so I dunno
Im playing 1 fairy rogue, 1 pixie cleric, 1 human bard, and 1 DM
oh no, how terrible, i guess ill just have to cope with the enemies being in melee range due to being indoors
My character ate one apple fritter and he instantly beat every god and ascended to become the one above all
Ceilings? You mean skill issues for things that are slow and weak, just fly harder
Yeah flight is over rated tbh
its fun but ive never needed it yuh
Exactly
Yall ever just get a bad vibe when you join campaigns sometimes?
It fun, but not needed
yep
Like sometimes just how the DM and players talk just give a sense of "This is gonna last for 2 weeks"
its overrated at mid-high level, but its pretty busted at low level. We encountered a shambling mound at like level 3. Owlin of the party solo'd it with cantrips because yeah
That call a red flag
Yeah
Like a DM instantly cutting people off and "Remembering" stuff no one mentioned
hey so i know its session one but anyway let me introduce you to the demigods that are in the setting
Guess so, but then again why didn’t your dm include a range answer for that on the mound
cutting people off is rude at best, and controlling behaviour at worst. Best be avoided, as the cut off party will get frustrated with that very quickly
I think I'm going to give out a bag of tricks in the first session
Ive grown to try to speak 2 seconds after everyone goes quiet and people get so angered when I "cut them off" after we spoke at the same time
because random encounter shambling mounts in swampy areas usually dont go around attacking things outside their blindsight range?
Then they throw a hissy fit when I don't instantly respond when it gets to my turn in turn order
ngl its a massive pet peeve when people take 2 minutes to get to the point that couldve been reached in 10 seconds
Fair, but still gotta admit, why didn’t the dm thought about it?
Personal pet peeve is seeing an easy solution and someone just HAS to try their complicated idea that has a 50% chance of working
They knew the owlin had flight so why didn’t they prepare for it?
"hey what if we just confront the guy"
"no no no i need to - "
"Well actually my ability let's me intercept the attack giving me another tur- WE ARE 1 TURN AWAY FROM KILLING HIM ANYWAYS"
Think about what? Official adventure and it had random encounters? Think about how you need to now give every single enemy in the game 150 foot range attacks? Thats not how the game is supposed to work, thats counterplaying and antagonizing a player, not hte character, for having the option to fly
Only thing I can accept cutting into someone else's turn is if you can add a roll onto theirs or stop them from getting damaged
yeah i think the pet peeve in general is just wasted time. im perfectly fine if you're actually doing stuff, or if you need a moment to think, but if you're slow just due to not having a sense of timeliness its annoying
It keeping it balance by making a combat challenging for all player so no one can solo it
At most a turn should be 2 minutes
ive played a necromancer in pathfinder with like a dozen minions and my turn was still less than 2 minutes tbh
unless it's a boss and they actually need to use every thing they can use
Only reason I take a bit is because I actually search my spell lists for what would be the best
You cant just go "No you cannot use your flight in an open area with range spells" and expect someone else to fly into melee because you would prefer your players not to? There are plenty of winged races that can do that, is the dm supposed to take all non-flying enemies that dont have a roof on their head out of the official book?
yeah tho you can do that between turns
I like too until we have like a 67 turn order and I scroll on my phone
if your turn order is that bloated the dm needs to condense and abstract
Or just have something that would challenge the flying the character without antagonizing, or what you rather have a combat were they can solo?
most creatures have enough of a brain to use cover
I mean I am glad they reworked werewolves so they no longer need to be handled by only hte magic users of the party, and I agree that one player shouldnt always hog the spotlight in fights, but if you tell me that our encounter is a thing that cant see beyond 60 feet and you can fly above it with 90 feet range spells, thats ok? Thats smart play not powergaming, hence why its useful and powerful low level. Mid-level, most things can shoot, fly or breath fire and suddenly you dont want to be the only target in the air
yeah flight is truly OP only really with melee-only monsters. such as wild animals and maybe some other random things like oozes. but if the party cheeses those, thats not really a big deal
Oh to be a fairy warlock flying around spamming eldritch blast after casting greater invisibility
And yet you have a problem with me suggesting to include something in a low level encounter to make flying not so overpowered
you kind of missed the part of it being a random encounter in an official campaign though. Should the dm just write all of those out if they dont challenge a specific PC?
Also there's the matter of a PC that's high in the clouds potentially can't help their downed ally that's currently being devoured by a shambling mound
I have a problem with you suggesting the dm would need to rebalance EVERY fight to challenge that player
I got devoured by one of those recently
honestly id be really happy if my party member was flying and killed the shambling mound solo without me
exactly, I was glad we didnt need to fight that thing at level 3
I'd make my new PC have hold person then cast it on the flier /hj
You mean it was a module
Oh okay
that /j came just in time, I was very confused
That's the best part about flying PCs
Anything that can paralyze them or knock them prone
Not really, just a option to deal with it, not like I saying scarp the whole encounter
Barbarians be like,” I cast hold person!” And then go and bear hug their buddy
So they plummet for massive damage
the only time i actually criticize "powergaming" is if its from some weird interpretation of the rules or cheese that deliberately wasnt intended. which doesnt exist much in 5e thankfully, but in systems like pf1e for example its definitely possible
most of the OP combos i see in 5e are just from people not actually reading their abilities and thinking they're stronger than reality
I like super long campaigns but they feel rare to find
Just learned a new campaign that im joining is only going to be 8 sessions
Not too rare to find, extremely rare for them to last long enough
oh yeah. I think flying should be allowed to feel good and powerful against certain enemies. As others have pointed out, smart enemies go into cover/closed doors /have ranged options. Dumb enemies like oozes and shambling mounds however are there to be outsmarted and kited to death anyways, you dont want to fight those head on if you can avoid it
Ive been in one that's been going on for 7 months now I think
That's a pretty lucky thing
It's not the best but it has the passion
Yeah that sounds fair
There's a thing I like to call the 3 session rule
And it's that most campaigns fall apart within 0-3 sessions
i like the contrast of humanoid enemies being the hardest to cheese but the easiest to scare, whilst monster enemies are meant to be cheesed but often have to be fought straight up
And after the 3rd session the chances of it dying out get less and less
Course you can run into other issues with long campaigns that can harm them that appear as time goes on
i find the greatest issue with longterm campaigns tends to come from not having a good session zero so you have character misalignment which leads to player misalignment
Kinda
There's a good amount of people who just sign up for games
They don't really have any intention to actually play
for those i blame the dm
Really?
Yeah, not everyone who signs up for games actually wants to commit to play them.
They just kinda want to at the moment then by the time the game comes around they either don't show up or drop last minute.
Then there's the matter of conflicting game styles which is the biggest contributor
(dms be upfront with your game style)
If a player thinks that their PC dying is the DM being an evil monster then they're not gonna work well with a DM who has no qualms critting that level 1 Wizard for 16 damage instakilling them
In contrast if a player likes death being on the table and the DM saves the party with DMPCs or the monster acting out of character, that player isn't gonna wanna play with that dm
(And don’t be vague about it be precise on what your game style is, because everyone wanna be on the same page)
honestly its also way better than asking what the player wants out of it. i never got the point of that. just tell them what you're gonna do and then ask if they're cool with it
It's just better on your game health that way
Cause if you don't enjoy what you're running, you're gonna get burnt out probably
No reply needed but I've been thinking about this off-and-on for a few days now. Just wanted to share maybe one additional thought.
CC for visibility for @knotty pasture @marble lion @fossil hollow @atomic kayak @patent sleet @shut kayak @glass granite @lofty thunder (phew! sorry for noise!)
So I had conversations with others and watched some other videos and... I think I came at this wrong. I think what I was actually describing was propoganda. That is, I think D&D can be used as propoganda. It can be used to evoke emotions, break down emotional barriers, and make people more accepting of certain ideas the DM/designer wants to highlight. I would wager most of us have good memories of this, where we used D&D to tell stories about how "good will defeats racism" or "community defeats tyranny" or whatever. But in my original post, I obviously was concerned about people who use D&D as propoganda for ideas like "Some people are born greater than others" and "Genocide can be justified".
Again, no response needed but wanted to share my musings. <3
I would hate that dm
And if you gather people who like your style then you're gonna have a steady group if yall vibe.
yeah say something like "i want an adventure romp that has room for silliness but we're sincere and commit to the characters we're playing and their motivations, are you cool with that"
just be direct and it skips all the guesswork
Steve has earned heroic inspiration
Tbh I find a campaign that roleplay heavy is fine as long their combat that can end in your death
Tis was my point: dnd is a medium that helps us influence others. Some of these influences can be positive, some can be quite negative. The conversation was quite insightful tho!
What about the other side though? Propaganda goes both ways. Some people who are simply moderately conservative feel the same way about the opposite end of the spectrum.
I do think the framing of "We're just playing a game" can sometimes soften the gravity of "I want you to accept this just long enough for the pretend" when it comes to issues that are not at all middle of the road or close to it.
Using it as propaganda, I would agree, is not the point of the game. Not all "political flairs" of a table are propaganda though. Some are just how the people earnestly feel.
And that becomes obvious to those that would use any means necessary to plant the seeds of a message, good or ill.
I think that racists honestly feel that way, too, though.
pretty much all stories can push messages via themes, i think as long as the story is logical with the setting and the characters and isnt contrived, then its alright
ok first off I just wanna say thank you for the ping because otherwise I probably would've never found this.
second, I totally get what you're saying, and I agree.
and finally, third, I think your research definitely helped to clarify what you were saying
Well, it can still be bad. It's just still DnD.
A table of completely earnest racists is still playing DnD, without any propaganda involved. It can still be bad to me though.
D&D isn't just a book though. It's an interactive story. You've created a link between the person and the decision around a world you set the parameters for
im playing final fantasy tactics rn for example and it has a great story, but its very much "literally medieval england" so the entire plot is about nobles and war and obligations
and thats perfectly ok
Gameplay has a psychological effect beyond just exposure. We see it in video game gambling as much as anything.
War of the lions, I just gotten today
have fun
FFT is the best FF game full stop.
I had fft2 but never finished it
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here. Can you say more? I jumped to a conclusion but I want to double check before I share in case it sets us down a non-constructive path.
If people set up a DnD game with the intention to be propaganda, I'd agree they are playing it wrong.
I wanted to point out that this goes both ways though.
though ill also be fair, idk anyone who would go through that effort to make propaganda for only like 4 people
FFTA? The GBA one with the judges?
atp make a youtube video
No idea
probably people who are desperate to have their views validated without outwardly talking about them
I think that's most people and they still don't go to that trouble.
Most webcomic artists like >_>
i think thats more coincidentally related instead of the objective
like people who worldbuild a setting for 3 years and so it has their mindset baked into it, even though its not the point of playing the game
I think that fft2 not the first one
Making a DnD game is art and play, both always include expression of yourself. I suppose all DnD games you make express your beliefs. I wouldn't call that propaganda though.
Second one had a kid open a book and you know the rest
For example, me including a homosexual marriage in my DnD world probably does signal my acceptance of homosexual love, but it's not like I put it in there to make a point.
yeah i would definitely say games tend to have the beliefs coded into them of the dm, ive seen it frequently and its never been an issue unless they start making plot holes or stupid things happen to push the narrative
Propaganda is just a way to use art as a mask for pushing a point of view of the way the world should be.
but thats more of a skill issue id say :p
In other words, this is more about what your DM might set up in the world as the 'evil'. Not necessarily the nature of the things included.
There are two problems with that.
One is the DM hamfisting it and it's just not very immersive and feels forced.
The other is the DM having views that contradict your own enough to make you unhappy.
For example, if you had homosexual love in your game but every single one of those relationships was portrayed as failing.
That informs the narrative without anyone drawing hard lines.
Presumably thats not the case anywhere, but the world builder certainly shaped the world a certain kind of way
ive played games where the bad guys were corporations, commoners, evil tyrants, ancient liches, destructive demons, knightly orders, anarchist druids, cultists, manipulators, cowards, fools, bullies, etc
ill say they generally made sense anyway
We decide the weather, the time of day, the year, the plane, the monsters, the items, the potions and what color the bugs are. Its weird to say that one step further is ham-fisting it but other than that we're just letting the world write for us
I feel like the main way someone would use D&D as propaganda is if they're trying to forcefully convert someone to their own political view, I.E: the DM and their friend, who is a player, have different political views and the DM wants the friend to agree with them and believe the same things they do, so they try to use their world to portray things a certain way
There is definitely unelegant forceful and story-deminishing hamfisting.
tbh what i see more often is players picking fights with npcs that have worldviews they view as wrong, even if the npc hasnt actually done anything harmful to them or those around them
Sure, and that's also in the eye of the beholder. Calling Darth Vader Mean Father was a bit on the nose
that happens a lot more commonly than the dm inverse
But it seems to have worked out alright 🤷
I don't even wanna name examples to be honest because they feel so unsuitable for this place.
I think it's a false equivalence. Showing something in a positive accepting light is not the same as hate propaganda
No, but purposefully introducing a concept to bathe it in a negative light is
yea
There's nuance there.
If this helps, I find breaking propoganda up into two forms can be helpful. We're kind of already doing this but to be explicit (in the hopes that it helps us discuss more efficiently):
Type 1: Propoganda for people who already believe. This is the cringe, ham fisted stuff. This is easy to spot.
Type 2: Propoganda for people who do not believe. This usually just looks like "normal" media, but at the last minute, says something specific and frames the entire text as propoganda. Think of a thing where the protag is like an atheist... but in the very last act, converts to religion because of all of the things that happened in the movie.
But I think it'd be naive to say that no one at White Wolf and Chaosium and Wizards of the Coast and TSR ever would dream of using their platforms to push some weird shit.
It's definitely not the same.
One will make me slightly eye-rolley because I get it and I don't need a DM to tell me 10 times in one session that we should love our neighbour.
The other will make me leave the table and block the DM.
i think it can be
I think that fear of propaganda can hobble perfectly normal stories. And labeling normal things like gender or sexuality as "politics" or "propaganda" is taking a stance on it.
like the easiest example is the alignment discussion regarding supernatural creatures or certain spell uses
because that discussion is almost always the same as objective morality vs subjective morality, which while you might believe one way or the other, is still contradictory to the oppositions worldview
Having a queen couple in your story isn't "hey everyone had to accept this"
It's "in the setting this is okay because we are building a collective fantasy and we don't have to pepper it with dumb stuff like bigotry
To be fair half the recent Twitter debacle was because WOTC decide to say that gay people exist in Faerun
i was more offended they made orcs mexican >_>
i am not an orc, i dont take kindly to it
If someone decides that gender or identity is political, that is a personal failing of their personality
First time I hear that
Every Mexican and Chicano I know that plays D&D was -way- into it lol
They can happily find a different table for their stunted worldview lol
I’d like to prop a Ganda at the new eberron book coming out next month
you can look it up on google fairly easily if you wanna see it
wait did they really?!
was it more that they coded orcs as a whole as mexican, or did that art potray one example of a nomadic orc community, and the text remains culturally agnostic?
they are literally wearing sombreros
Yeah but does it say all Orcs do that now?
honestly I'm gonna wait until 6e exists to buy new books
They didn't make the orcs "mexican" as much a they added a lot of gaucho / pueblo aesthetics, which probably read New Mexico to North Americans and Argentina to South Americans
Mexican is the only point of reference muckrakers have for arid region nomadic peoples
wotc doesnt say all (X) does anything anymore, theyve gone away from that sort of language
But its worth mentioning that the vaquero was Spanish first, Spain spread from end to end along the west coast >_>
Lots of similarities with steppes attire from other regions of the world too
I think I moreso meant that maybe the specific portrayed group of orcs may just be mexico coded. Is that possibly?
Wasnt that just the "5e Orcs" art?
they are wearing wide-brimmed hats, i dare say that mexico doesn't have an exclusive hold over that concept 
i just think its odd that there was the whole "orcs arent black" thing and then they made them extremely latino coded
just eugh
And it is a great single piece of art that shows orcs doing things that aren't leaping to battle slobbering
I don't know what 'orcs arn't black thing' is.
An old controversy
In context of D&D?
What it shows is orcs in a community travelling
Unless all art of 5e orc communities is now hispanic, this may just refer to one specific group of them.
Well, no, it also shows a bunch of eagles and ranchero boots and its not any desert its hard coded to sonora
"orcs aren't black" came from a long history of representing eurocentric cultural oppression through orcs in both lore text and art. there is not nearly a similar phenomenon going on with current dnd orcs and latin american culture
🙄 this logic really doesnt work if you apply it to other cases
It is as far as I've seen the only orc art that has steppes attire that could be seen as "mexican" coded
I think this particular response to sinanis actually kinda demonstrates their point
It does seem like a strange choice to use those for the main art of the new main setting?
I haven't read the book yet.
Yes actually. Notable moments in the novels had some I know
I meant using it as the main art in the new main book for this edition for orcs.
Oh, when and where art is show informs what the "defaults" of a setting should be? Hmm. I wonder if that's ever been discussed before?
(/jk /lh)
Then the "I'm just asking questions" act is going to just lead people around in circles
Orcs as a whole werent coded as Mexican. They had a portrayal of a group that was inspired by various cultures in and around Mexico
Take a look and read the book before asking questions based on assumptions, is my suggestion
The mexican person in the chat says they are uncomfortable with this portrayal. I think I am within reason to ask this.
Notably, there is other orc art in the books as well with different aesthetics...
"One Latino complained so now we can all be angry" is an odd take.
i mean there isnt much else to say it just is what it is
That is not at all what I am saying there.
But maybe that's just my perspective. We have vaqueros with hats here in Bolivia too >_>
I am saying I think it's fair to say this.
And they wear sarapes. We dont have eagles though. We're more condor land.
But yea the specific art being discussed right now has some inspiration from more than one culture from the regions around mexico
Since we are discussing this, I proposed that if it is the big artwork for "orcs" in the new main book, that may explain why it was strange to someone reading it.
I do agree that grouping it all as mexican was weird though. There are more latin american countries.
How bout that glamour bard goth elf art
I might just not know the detailled clues so I could be wrong there.
Does it have a big moustache like Alaric
Theyre just things to think about. Like why are most angels coded to look like theyre Dutch lol
arent angels half the time made of metal
IMO I think if someone from a minority group expresses that art/text makes them uncomfortable, I think it's worthwhile to give space to explore that.
... I mean, here, it's kind of hard. That's this server. But like... I definitely think it's worth deconstructing those feelings. I think thats a good, net-positive exercise.
Negative Dave, it’s just pretty cool though
but also again
When the art was first revealed ofc (since it was some of the first art we saw from the new books) people overreacted and said. well. A lot of nasty things and did a lot of mole-hilling. But saying that "orcs are mexican now" now, after we have had the book for a year (oh wow its been a year) with it having other art seems, at least to me, a bit disingenuous
Its one single piece of (awesome) art
it was brought up in reference to another thing, i didnt pull it up out of the dust, thanks for calling me disingenuous
Since when were the orcs mexican? What did I miss???
Oh certainly. I'm not saying "you can't express if it makes you uncomfortable" - just that making a claim like was above "they made orcs mexican" is deliberately stripping context and all of the other representations from the situation to make a claim that simply isn't true
Im mildly confused
I mean you could literally read what the discussion is about
I mean, at some point the discussion can be "When will people realize FR is literally just earth"
truth nuke
Its pulling it out of the dust because they simply didn't "make orcs mexicans" - thats what I was getting at about how your reply to sinanis proved the point they were making. How it wasn't coding of all orcs but of a singular group of orcs.
Also yes it is I the Chaotic Neutral Wizard, I have returned from my small trip to the Feywild
That drawing is pretty Mexico coded though.
nevermind
If you scroll up a bit the discussion is all about what it's about
The clothing they are wearing is definitely pulling from (and thus coded to) cultures from the region yes, nobody ever said that wasn't the case
I mean the flora and fauna.
Eagles dont spread south of Mexico. There also arent cactus in the entirety of North America.
That color clay and sand, those cactus, those eagles, altogether.
That's not "Anywhere there are cowboys"
I agree with the point that it doesn't portray the majority of orcs. I think it's valid to wish for the "main style" of the shown thing to be shown in the big artwork though, if that is indeed what it is. I have not read the book and I don't think this hypothetical statement is therefore pointless.
Its definitely pan-"southern north america/northern central america"
What "main style" though
They definitely shifted Orcs from being tribal to being farmers.
it's mainly this sentence that i wanted to dissect if at all possible. From what i gather from it, you are Mexican or of Mexican heritage, and believe that Orcs across the board post 2024 are being coded as mexican, and this is upsetting to you. am i getting that right?
Are eberron orcs Main style? One of the variety of orc cultures in faerun?
The way I see it, orcs are orcs, Elves are elves, dwarves are dwarves, etc. etc.
But I dont see that inherently negatively either. I think its good for Orcs to just be another species. The fact that theyre clearly just outside of Tijuana notwithstanding
And people are people, and all of them can have a variety of cultures
If you dressed elves in Lederhosen in the next phb, on their big main page, I would certainly be confused.
exactly
No one complains if they see a bard in a poet shirt with a rapier and a cape with a fleur de lys, though, and thats what makes this awkward.
is there a way to add the d4 from guidance onto a skill yet?
I mean d&d elves are mostly tolkien inspired... and his elves are Germanic sooo
I think going for a more neutral style is smarter if you don't specifically want to show "hey they can be different" on the main page.
i would be confused by it but not offended
If they're only Tolkien inspired. It's been 51 years man
That kind of builds onto previous exposure of the reader though.
Lederhosen would be fine even looking at "authenticity" (whatever that means for made up cultures)
I'm not saying they have to be germanic. I'm saying it wouldn't be bad if one piece of art existed of it
I don't really think it's that awkward. Having a standard isn't anything bad.
It wouldnt be bad if that's how they wanted to code elves either, but WOTC is trying to take 0 stances in an environment that demands hard stances.
Wait so if the orcs are mexican and the elves are germanic, what are tieflings???
I think to Dave's point above, what is "neutral"?
That's not meant to be a "gotcha" and I'll try my best to show my cards: I think D&D actually has a problem at showing certain people and cultures as "normal" (or "neutral") and others as, well, "others".
lederhosen arent a thing in like 90% of germany either
Why would France be the 'standard'?
gay.
It's not just Bavaria if you thought that.
Also lemme just say that that scion of the three rogue art is also nice.
It's definitely not that promiment outside the south though.
The problem is that eventually you just get a conflation that means 'vaguely european'
Yeah, roll the d4 and add it
None of them are as you say. There is one piece of art with mexico/surrounding culture vibes, and someone missed the mark with a gotcha about lederhosen on elves
The phb is setting agnostic.
see: many dnd settings immediately treating any culture (in setting) that has a non-eurocentric aesthetic as "exotic"
And usually primal / tribal / naturalistic / animsitic
Rome conquered, Aztecs sacrificed.
The portrayal of tribal societies in a lot of dnd settings get my goat a lot too
this is both a humorous jab and an actual truth to the history of tiefling potrayal in dnd.
For a variety of reasons
(also steve clown pensive was a perfectly reasonable reaction there ngl)
(I removed it myself. I think a sea of "this" but slightly different was more poetic.)
(Pensive clown will make a return.)
tieflings have been strongly coded as representations of the queer community as as a whole, whether that comes from a stance of finding identity, or attempting to potray the community in a certain light.
It doesn't matter if you're a human, orc, elf, or even an undead or a construct, ALL ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO FIREBALL
I think I found a good fit of a dnd class for hero killer (from mha) stain and it is oath of vengeance paladin
Fire Genasi like :<
I mean, some tieflings have fire resistance
yeah but also they have horns. looks cool
Resistance, not immunity.
Yea Tiefling get queer coded a lot because a lot of their historic portrayal in dnd aligns with a lot of queer experiences (and experiences that on average queer people are more likely to experience than cishet people)
I’ve tanked two back to back fireballs with passing saves and took like 12 damage on a warlock
Oddly enough in World of Darkness, which lets you play actual Demons, I find most of my LGBTQ+ players gravitated more towards Changeling.
If that's the case then, lightning bolt.
tbh i disliked how a former dm treated my tiefling character with his npcs. i dont want this all the time in the fantasy game
And for some reason most Aasimar PCs they've made are asexual.
I'm not sure what the association is or isn't there, but it's consistent lol
Now we’re talkin
I wonder what makes Aasimars then if Tieflings are representative of queers
and there's yet ANOTHER rabbit hole to investigate about the potrayal of gender fluidity through the veil of illusionary tricksters
Yeh.
Angels being above carnality maybe
"The duality of man"
I see all species in dnd to be any kind of people, so honestly people can gravitate to any really
both for positive and negative reasons
Yeah, theyre generally really good about making the person before picking the race, so to speak, but for some reason Aasimars just be like that to them
it wasnt meant to be a serious issue, it was just in response to the twitter debacle statement, i dont really care what wotc writes, their modules are rarely good anyway and many dms do homebrew lore, the amount of annoyance is like a 2/10
I'll dip out here. Goodnight all you nice people.
See you tomorrow haise
Farewell Haise
anyways, how bout those monks these days
they are ripped
Sure do a lot of punching and kicking, but better..
someone is rolling up a monk in my new campaign and I'm excited to see it
so it was a light jab at it rather than any serious discomfort? got it, just wanted to clarify. I think that's what caused some of the dissonance in the chat over the topic
So far my characters I’ve played have been either full casters or gishes, it’s time to play a martial
yeah basically
completely unrelated but somehow I didn't register this before
The 2024 DMG has art of a dwarf shooting a troll with a shotgun with entirely inappropriate handling of the gun I didn't know existed
i will play a martial soon
Whatcha picking
if i remember correctly it says something about wrong handling?
Yea
people saw the artwork before the book came out and we had ai accusation agaaaaain
Yep, top teir art, the dwarf clearly has enough strength to mishandle the gun that badly
i'm still not familiar enough with all the art in the new books to recognize it at a glance lol - fun new surprises all the time
oh you should. its one of my little highlights in every release
I've looked through it all ofc I just don't remember it all the way I did with the older books
also i discover artists, google them and see other familiar art
(I was looking through because I knew I recalled other orc art in the books but couldn't remember what or where)
do you know there is a Dracolich on the DMG Cover. in the background?
yea
Did you know that if you take the DMG and let the party Cleric borrow it they'll leave a coffee stain on the monster chart?
sounds fake, bet it was the bard
Could be, though generally speaking the bard is pretty much allergic to reading.
She made an amazing PC and under Place of Birth it said "Somewhere in the Forboding Realms"
I didn't mind. Baby DMs need encouragement.
Cleric ran his first game like a month after that. 8 years later, I still remind him of that damn stain.
Foreboding realms?
If only it was spelled right.
hellooo
Would anyone like to have a conversation about rpgs on vc. I'm looking to record stuff to put up on YouTube. Lemme know
Hahaha
Hi could someone please shed some light on this question and yes I have tried to research it. in the current new rules is the spell Divine Smite a signature class feature of the Paladin? Or has it become a spell you use, from my understanding people would use Divine smite then follow up with shining smite causing a crap load of damage
Divine Smite is a spell and a class feature in 2024
it uses a bonus action and a spell slot, so you can only do it once per round now
As in, its a class feature that gives you the spell
Also the class features lets you use it without a slot once per day
Also magic items can now have Divine smite inside of them
how would that work please?
and would that be a one of use?
i mean it would be homebrew
Enspelled items, scrolls, spell storing items, that one rod that stores slots
oh that yeah
Spell tattoos as well
forgive the noob question but who would store that spell into the item?
Could anyone else use that item then?
If it’s a ring of spell storing you could probably just dump your remaining slots into it
Depends on the item but yes
Enspelled weapons are fun because they recharge on their own too
SO say if you have a barbarin you could effectively store the spell in their battle axe for when they crit and they could smite the enemy ?
Honestly turning it into a spell actually gives it a surprising amount of benefits
So long as they aren’t raging, yes.
K ty, has been some years since I played D&D back in 3E now things have certainly changed/progressed
Im just spit balling here witha question Say I use Shining smite which blinds the enemy for 1 minute which is 10 round? Would they be disadvantaged to hit ?
Shining Smite doesn't blind
Blinding Smite does
And yeah being blind gives you disadvantage on attack rolls
Enspelled Items are basically magic item versions of Artificer's Spell Storing Item
enspelled armor with the shield spell is a fun magic item to craft
only do it if you want the DM to hate you tho
Eh it eats a reaction to do, I'm fine with it.
Besides it is very easy to drain (at most) 6 charges.
Anyone knows any items that can turn people into things, like turn to stone?
Blade of the Medusa
i know forge of the artificer comes out digitally on decemeber 9th but will physical preordered copies take longer to arrive? (usa)
You think a wish spell could get me one?
earlygame tough feat is really addictive. a rogue at level 5 with 54 HP is something to drool over
also I do keep rolling really high on my hp rolls, but tough does play a big factor
i only really grabbed tough once before, and it was on a tier 3 barbarian, so the difference between like 160 and 180 HP wasn't as jaw dropping
Tier 3, only got 20 hp. Hmm.....
i just kinda made an eyeball estimation when i got it, It was during the level 12 ASI so it'd probably have been like a 24 HP bump
just relatively less impressive considering that the bard and druid only have like 25-35 HP and there's no d10/d12 hit die classes in the party
also my DM gave me two items (more aptly i took them from some yuan-ti I slayed) one being a pretty ludacrous 2d6 slashing plus 1d4 poison damage scimitar, and the other being a set of bracers that just gave me a +1 AC.
Neat
I'm just a little scared my DM who has been on the record as being wary of rogues isn't gonna like that the items he gave me makes me do a lot of damage
also I enjoy being really reckless/brave. I felt really cool when I escaped being bound via my belt, and then trying to run to fight a group of yuan-ti completely unarmed and in the dark. I was mostly doing it to buy time so the others could escape the bindings (and for the bards who were seperated from the party to find us), but they escaped theirs at the same time-ish
it has been a while since I've been this rambly about campaign stories, just getting to enjoy playing a martial this much again is a blast
can wizard change all their spells on a long rest?
I dont think so
They can change their prepared spells to what is in their spellbook!
I think they can prepare spells from their known spells and book spells
Changing Your Prepared Spells. Whenever you finish a Long Rest, you can change your list of prepared spells, replacing any of the spells there with spells from your spellbook.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/classes/2190886-wizard
Hello there..
Oh, I need to read up on what spells they have
Basically you start with 6 spells at level 1 and get two per level up
oh, it has nothing to do with intelligence?
You can use money and time to add more from spell scrolls and other spellbooks
so, I only know 12 spells at level 4, correct?
In 2024 nope.
In 2014 it did influence the amount you can prepare but not how much is in the book.
Yep! At least 12 from your class
oh, I need to go rethink this. Thanks for clarifying!
Actually in 2024 you’d have 14
you said 6 + 2(lvl up)?
Because the 2024 subclass gives you more spells as you level up
So an Abjuration Wizard would get a bonus level 1 and level 2 spell added to their spell book at level 4
They’d have to be Abjuration spells
Yes for the Base class
Hello there, fellow players.
I am new here, in this D&D server. (not new to D&D.. just the new in the server)
Well, at level 4, a wizard, following the 2024 version, can prepare 7 spells.
As for spells in their spellbook for free granted by "becoming a wizard and taking levels in wizard", they start with 6 in their book at level 1, and gain two more every other level (so another 6 for those 3 extra levels, total of 12 in the book, can prepare 7 of those) (this is assuming no found spells added to the book via copying spells into your book for 2 hours and 50gp per level of the spell)
Yeah but he asked about spells he knows not spells prepared
"Knows" is also a tricky term
Also he was told all that already
Hello new here, I’m Nugget. Glad to have ya here.
Might I borrow.. hehe.. a nugget of your time?
Uhhhhhhhhhhhh.... not touching that question.. lol
Contemplating my next Ranger. Might do the new Winter Walker
Anyway, you mana-ot.
I was wondering where I would go to ask for help, in regards to setting up a Side Quest for my campaign.
Probably #dm-discussion then
#dm-discussion most likely
How?
It’s an old term from 2014
oh ok, I see
Where some classes were “Known” casters and others were “Prepared casters”
spells known was used in 2014, yeah. But wizard also had a weird interaction with that and prepared, due to their unique method of having spells
in 2014, there was known, and prepared... and wizard. Like, Sorcerer had spells known, cleric had spells prepared. And wizard had spells prepared from their book.
in 2024, having your spells, whether it's the same way sorcerer had them or cleric had them, it's all referred to via the Prepared term, and so other game features can reference it easily and be more compatible.
So, in the end, saying "knowing spells" is always going to scrape against the 2014 term for certain classes having their list of spells they can cast, which ironically Wizard kind of... eludes.
wizard was simply known and prepared
I’m not gonna lie, I thought they’re gonna backtrack with the Magic Item Savant changes, considering Thief can still have their stuff going on, and I expressed that in the UA survey, half-expecting they’d at least put it to Level 18. Now that it’s happening and is going to be fully removed, I’m bummed again.
hi there. hows dnd
It’s dnd’ing
Huh?
Does Adventure with Muk count as homebrew? There's a Goblin subrace there that's different from the usual 5e Goblin we know
Artificer announcement. Magic Item Savant doesn’t give Artificers attunement to literally everything anymore.
WOTC HATES FUN RAGHH
can't have the artificer upstage the favorite child, wizards
In another world, Artificers of the Coast would never.
and honestly, removing infusions?? really?
Oh? So what did they do to Artificer if they removed infusions
Since, to be honest, being "half caster, half infuser" just felt like it was half of a total class. So I'm interested in seeing what they made the class actually be
where are you guys reading this?
new dndbeyond article
Their level two is now “make magic items” and their infusions have become magic items
infusions got replaced with replicate magic item and they lost tool expertise
They can now recharge their magic item’s charges they make with slots or convert their magic items into slots
Huh.
Also their level 1 can make equipment in form the PHB
are they at least a full caster?
Still half caster.
also why don't artificers have some form of expertise? they're actual experts, for crying out loud
Their level 2 magic items they make can now be recharged with slots (if they need charges) or they can break them down for a boost
but Wizards apparently get expertise, for some reason
And... still missing half of an anything else. 
Oh yeah and Flash of Genius recharges on a short rest
Also spell storing item can now store 3rd level spells
Their capstone is bad tbh
with the restriction on spells with material components, so no revivify storing
What’s a good weapon to flavor as a scythe?
half caster just means level of spells they can access
I was kinda thinking a halberd or maybe a great axe
IMO, Glaive.
Or Halberd, yeah, given the Clave property.
Glaive or Sickle mainly
I like the reach of the reach weapons tho
Sickles a bit too small, but I get both
Tbh artificer feels about just as mid as the 2014 one to me so I’m fine with it.
Since infusions got folded into Replicate Magical Item, I hope some of the more in demand infusions got made into regular magical items, like Returning Weapon.
Guandao
Halberd perhaps. One of the polearms.
Glaives
Nice, this is for a druid but 2024 druid can use halberds
as per my best explanation
A Guandao is a Chinese weapon created to be used as both a staff, a spear, and a sword at the same time.
Similar in appearance to a glaive, albeit with a more sharp point.
They meant what regular weapon can be used as the mechanics to represent a scythe, since scythes aren't one of the listed weapon types.
Oh
Halberd then.
though a guandao would be a sick weapon for a villain character and i don't know why.
Yeah
would be nice if infusions were buffed rather than removed, like letting them stack or evolve
I would still say its a glaive but halberd is a close second
woulda thought a scythe would be on there
Im sure there’s a homebrew out there
probably something with slash and reach but idk for sure. if we're talking the bigguns
"A glaive, sometimes spelled as glave, is a type of pole weapon, with a single-edged blade on the end, known for its distinctive design and versatile combat applications. There are many similar polearms such as the war scythe, the Japanese naginata, the Chinese guandao (yanyuedao), the Korean woldo, and the Russian sovnya."
Irl a guandao falls under the glaive family
also give artificers unique artificer-only magic items
Topple as well, since you go for the legs
Maybe 1d6 damage, it’s a simple weapon too since it’s a farming tool
maybe improvised weapon then? idk let's not get too complicated
Sounds like the reinvention of the sickle
Oh sick
Guandao looks and sounds cooler though
but glaives are cool aswell.
screw Bloons tower defense for making me think glaives were chakrams though
hoeh
On another topic, my waterdeep game ended up being called Waterdeep Menaces instead of Waterdeep Legends. I'll leave it all to you to think how that happened
something set on fire and/or someone killed
i'd say that but the plural versions, bare minimum.
grand arson and mass manslaughter
yeah that
actually, no fire, just lots of intimidation, drinking, and calling NPCs unsavory names lmao
Does it involve a certain Gale Dekairos
them's fightin words
Waterdeep is slowly turning into New York
It wasn’t already?
It even has the secretly living statues ready to fight you like New York
Old York 
Next session, the players ask me for the last 75 XP to level up to 2
Hi can someone help is there someone I can talk regarding copyright and using DND magic system in a book?
Probably have to ask WOTC about that
Where can I read about there copyright policies is there someone I can talk to about that? It's really important
i have no idea
But that’s more for game mechanics. You’d have to contact WOTC themselves
How do subclasses work
Ok thanks
You reach level 3 in your class and now you have a subclass
It gives you features as you get more levels in that class.
At level 3 in a class, you get a Subclass for that class.
You immediately get a few features for it, but otherwise you have picked that subclass. At certain other levels in that class, you gain the features of that subclass for that level.
Think of it like a subset of features sprinkled throughout the progression, and you choose which set you want to get throughout your progression.
Thanks
Yeah, like the "Draconic and Elemental pack" of features for Sorcerer, with Draconic Bloodline, or the "Psychic and Aberration pack" of features also for Sorcerer, with Aberrant Sorcery.
Has anyone done a campaign with only you and one other person? Is it difficult?
i've played sessions with just one other person it works ok, for all of them it was essentaly their first time playing and we played oneish sessions using a premade module. I used the companion or whatever its called from tashas to give them some help but overal its probably harder from a roleplay perspective as your bouncing off one person. It would inherntly feel diffrent to play a long game with just one other person.
sidekicks
thank you
its very much possible
i have done it too
this site might help: https://dndduet.com/
Yeah I was thinking since my roommate was interested in dnd I could do a small campaign with him cause we live together so scheduling wouldn't be as hard lol
And he likes worldbuilding
Ooo thanks!
oh wait so he would be the dm? then i reccomend not looking at the site
heh
No I would be DM but we would kinda work on it together
Then do look 
Hehe
anyone know how i might make a character based around blindsight and fogcloud that doesnt just become useless after someone moves 10 ft away
Have spells that stop people from moving 10 ft away easily
smart
Find a way to expand your blindsight, or grapple/restraib them.
Or play a shadow monk
Rangers get a bigger area of blindsight than that.
And also have access to Fog Cloud.
Either way, this strategy is still going to mess with your allies.
Darkness is more easily controlled, since you can cast it on a small object and cover it to turn it off.
I suggest casting it on a small, enclosable object like a stone inside a locket. A coin held between the teeth will do, in a pinch. Close your lips and the darkness goes away, smile … and the Darkness leaks out to cover you.
yup im playing a ranger rn but im not sure how to get bigger blindsight cause the fighting style one is 10 ft. (true about the ally thing atp im just making that character to satisfy myself) ur right about the darkness thing thats smart cause nearly my entire party also has some sort of darkvision
Darkvision can’t see through the magical darkness from the Darkness spell
Getting 30ft blindsight on a Ranger is simple, though not easy. Simply be a level 18 2024 Ranger.
hrm ill find a way to physically dark out everything
Then enemies with dark vision won’t be affected
yea ill probably pick something more practical to gimmick around with ;-;
There’s devil sight builds with darkness
Shadow monk as I mentioned earlier works
Fog cloud blindsight works, but you need a way to limit their movement
thanks! i appreciate the help!
Hi
Is it possible to break a magical staff to get its effects without carrying the whole staff?
I thought it would be a cool idea to kind of gather things from every magical enemy to get their effects as the campaign goes on
nah u need the staff for its magic
Is it possible to make a nuke(A lot of Damage) build for Cleric?
in some instances, breaking a magical staff releases ít magic violently, damaging everyone in a radius
yeah, pretty easily too. Tempest Cleric gets a Channel Divinity that makes ur Lightning spells insane
Thanks
Can I use it as a grande then?
Like throw it at someone and break with a spell or cantrip to make it explode
Sure why not
Yeah, but keep in mind that throwing a weapon and casting a spell both usually take actions to do
so like tossing your Staff of the Magi at an enemy is likely to end with them tossing it back or moving away before u can detonate it
This is why Sorcerers are cool
Throw the wand into a Quickened Spell boosted Fire Bolt
🙂
is there a website somewhere with aoe visualiers for spells?
Are you looking to use them on a VTT?
no, it's just hard for me to understand sometimes how different spells occupy spaces on a grid
would be nice if there was a website or something that just showed all of them
There's definitely a guide somewhere, I just don't have a moment to search for it right away.
If you search for "dnd spell grid templates" you'll probably find what you're looking for.
@lavish flame @knotty pasture in character me and some of my group just had their first toast in a tavern 🥹
dub
didn't find exactly what i wanted, but some visualisation for a few spell aoe types
they are all real 3d shapes, what do you mean "visualization"?
like how they look on a square grid
a cone is a triangle. a cylinder, sphere, and emanation are all circles. a cube is a square. a line is a line.
once you've got that down, just keep in mind that an AoE only affects a space if it hits at least 50% of the corners of that space. that keeps the shapes in line
i mean i got that
It may also be worth noting that the rules don't assume a grid by default. So you'll have to interpret these shapes onto a grid.
what
The general rule there is: if it covers at least half a square, it affects that square.
(ah Gwyn already said that, mb)
Win
W
Double You
Double
Dub
as a non native english speaker: what
like cloud of daggers i wasn't sure if it took up multiple spaces or just one square
it's a 5 foot cube, so one square
oh yeah
You can legally effect 2 adjacent squares with it
Just another way to say "nice job" i guess. Its a portmanteau of the word "win". In sports slang, people refer to victories as "W's". You can cut out half the syllables when pronouncing "W" by just saying "Dub" while still getting the idea across.
By having the cube centered in the line between two squares on a grid it covers 50% of both and legally effects both per the aoe rules
I get the idea behind it, the "what" was mostly tongue-in-cheek commentary of how you managed to smush together a whole concept
its kinda funny to think that playing on a hexgrid vs a square grid can make some spells more or less effective
yeah from what i was reading online it should affect two squares
"Should" isn't really the word I'd use. It certainly "can".
could also be WARIOS
isn't hexes used for traveling only
Lightning bolt also is 2 squares ‘wide’ due to the 50% square rule because it has to original from a corner not a side of your own space. Confirmed as intended by one of the developers
They're valid for combat too, but people rarely use it.
yeah i've never heard of anyone using hex grids for combat
me either
nah
moving one hex is like 1hr isn't it
hexgrids fix the "diagonals make you go faster" thing iirc
30 minutes or so?
i guess i'm just used to pathfinder where effects are centered on squares and not lines
when I played LANCER, all our combats were on a hexgrid, but thay might be a LANCER rule.
Depends on the scale.-
Diagonals don’t make you faster. It’s only a rule for movement and it’s generally a non-issue imo for movement
Some maps have hexes at 1 mile, 6 miles, 24 miles, or even more.
yeah same, its a mole hill that people have made mountains out of
actually yeah can you just move freely on diagonals in dnd?
By default, yeah.
oh hm, i'm so used to first diagonal free, then each diagonal costing 10 ft of movement
There are some optional rules that aim at making Pythagoras less mad though.
Like every second diagonal costing double-
mechs, right?
Well, its not free to move diagonally. Its just cheaper than moving orthogonally twice (its moving Up+Right vs moving right then up)
It effects all parties equally anyways and I can’t think of any cases where it negatively impacts the game
yeah mechs doing battles was my main takeaway
the mechs were sick
can you move diagonally past doorways?
You can't move diagonally across corners, no.
that makes sense i suppose
it's a rectangular door usually
if there's something blocking a diagonal movement, like a wall's corner, you can't pass through that
you have to detour the 1 space for it
you can if you're a ghOOOOST! OOOOHHH
yeah, if you can incorporeally move then you're fine. monsters usually do this
could you theoretically misty step around a corner or is it only to a place you can physically see
gotta be able to see it
You need to see the point
Stated in the spell itself. Now you can dimension door past it
i like theorycrafting
you can misty step through stuff you could not walk through, like jail bars or a window. you just gotta be able to see it
also bonus points if you share sight with a familiar or something
honestly your DM might give you inspo for that creativeness using misty step
oh yo i hadnt even considered using a familiar to move your eyesight to allow you to misty step around corners. thats fun.
Yes 2024 familiar vision no longer blinds yourself so you can use it to abuse ‘point you can see’ rules
However this doesn’t work with misty step
Both require a bonus action and you have to dedicate a bonus action every turn to see
Oh interesting, it looks like the Suggested ™ species from First Light actually were added to the character creator. In a weird way they're basically the 2024 modernization for a handful of races that haven't been re-released yet.
you'd still be limited by distance, but being able to send an animal under a door crack or through a vent to set up a Misty Step angle is really cool.
Still not legal as I just said
Use bonus action to see with familiar until the start of your next turn
quickened spell?
No? You already used your bonus action
yeah you'd need to teleport with your main action
Thunder Step works because that’s an action to cast and is still a point you can see
I kinda don't care about its legality tbh, its cool
Illegal. Banned forever
your DM might let you do it anyways just on rule of cool alone
Using your familiar to set up small scale teleports is cooler than NOT doing that
Time to use that trick to sneak into and out of gold vaults
Got it
Thank you
Also it's fine to ping me when you respond
Otherwise I probably won't see it
who doesn't like filling their pockets with gold
hallo
Exact same method. Familiars can be popped into a space you can’t see already
shame this also doesn't work with shadow monk since it's ba as well
assuming you got a familiar with magic initiate wizard or something
This time I'm gonna do a character with multiple personalities, I'm gonna do 4 multiclasses
with lots of personality disorders
You can also take the Strixhaven special familiar fear which has a built in position swap 1/day that you can also do by expending a lv2 spell slot
It’s a free way to get across most barriers or locked doors
echo knight's sight through echo is an action, so you can do effects from the echo as a bonus action
The echo must be spawned in a point you can see first
ah
And it can’t ignore solid walls it’s not incorporeal
4 multiclasses sounds like pure pain tbh, good luck
Off the back of my head, Rogue/Paladin/Bard/Warlock?
yeah the same method works either way. I'm always worried about the second half of heists tho. Using a familiar as a getaway vehicle is next level
The echo is still a free misty step without a use limit that can go as far as 60 feet away
i mean mizzium mage builds typically go at least 3 classes, you could do 4 pretty easily i think
yeah echo knight is a wild subclass
You're more likely to run into MAD with 4 classes
indeed
u can see through your Echo? neat
So your only options that won't cripple you are limited
Lv7 feature yea
i havent looked at the mechanics for it since release, thats pretty sweet
Maybe Fighter Rogue Wizard Artificer
It can travel up to 1000 ft away iirc. It’s not stated you can’t swap during that ‘mode’ but Matt said it’s intentional you can’t
mizzmage is...as someone who fully optimized it, is genuinely the most disgusting thing ive seen in a minute
Thats a nice Exploration feature for Fighters. Thats pretty cool.
oh ye, im new, thanks for the tag lol
Mizzmage is also an item that’s exclusive to ravnica no? Ie you can’t actually have access to it know this magic item exists at all in 99% of games
4 multiclasses only makes sense if you're minmaxing
I'd like to see how one justifies 4 multiclasses