#dnd-lore
1 messages · Page 9 of 1
did someone say stake? *hungry * (yes, i know the spelling)
Who often miss the actual nuance and even when they don’t, it gets filed down by multiple wiki operators competing for the bare minimum of verifiable, etc
That's why you can look up the books themselves for more details.
Sure, but look at ninja’s response; they’re reading the wiki articles not the cited sources! That gets real unfun real fast.
I went on a spiel about this a few months ago.
I miss steak...been over a 6 weeks since Ive been able to eat a steak. Will be another 4 weeks at least until I can have one. :(
And why you should tell someone “look up the books cited in the wikis” instead of saying “read the wikis”, aye
Of course, the original source is better but not everyone has access to the original books (I will never sell my 3E and 4E books! :P)
You should see if a good prom tonkatsu will satisfy in the interim!
prom steak
not unless I put it through a blender
had dental surgery awhile back...cannot chew much right now
my dentist resculpted the sides of my lower teeth. its like they are turning to dust/disintegrating. but unknown reason. so using the stuff for fillings, resculpted to mak ethem wider and is getting a bite guard. we dont beleive i grind my teeth but they are showing this wear/tear far beyond what they should (espec considering i dont drink coke every day, i dont drink coffee/tea, and no alcohol)
I just want to write something about traveling down the River Styx but am struggling to think of a plot hook or a good premise.
vacation to the lower planes?
Like why would anyone even be doing that and how could they have any chance of surviving.
(and yes, i beleiv that was metnioned in one of the old PS modules) 😛
well it was a common mode of travel
pay the boatman and go for the ride
Of course. lol.
That makes sense I should read more about the Boatman. That seems like the most viable means of travel.
jsut dont fall in. (before it removed your memories). oh and the styx dragons .. beware. i think their breathe weapons were water from teh styx 😛
There’s like so many other hazards too. I think you would just have to skip the Abyss entirely.
It’s just too dangerous.
And also the path of the Styx in there gets really confusing
the Abyss is sad 😦 its a fun place
The River Styx itself is dangerous. Mortals could lose their memory if they fell into it.
Various aquatic yugoloths and demons inhabit Styx too
Oh yeah it’s all dangerous. But like the Abyss is just too extra. I wonder if even the Boatman goes there.
The frog dudes.
uhhh
Merrenloths?
yeah the styx did flow thru before.
The slaadi?
the boatman back in 2e, was a unique? well not unqiue but maybe a more powerful altraloth
hezrou?
There was Charon and charondaemons
or sorry I was thinking of Hydroloths
Thanks I will look into it
Seems like the Merrenoloths are actually Boatmen too so maybe one of them could be a guide if paid well enough.
I guess if anyone is going to work with you in the lower planes it has to be a Yugoloth.
correction yes. merrenoloths. appaerntly one of them got upgraded to an altraloth or something
1E AD&D MM2 introduced Charon and charondaemons (aka merronoloths)
I mean I guess in theory the protagonist could be a Yugoloth themselves but I dunno if that would work from a writing perspective
raelly? tehy have an actual charondaemon for charon? that is , not sure y, but so cool to me 🙂
oh they were originally called Charondaemons? That makes a lot of sense.
well I guess that’s a good answer for how to travel the River Styx, but I guess the harder question is why.
Like I had some ideas but they were all too grandiose. I feel like something more grounded would work better.
Then again maybe the whole concept is inherently grandiose.
im still going for the vacation card 😛
Comedy may actually be the better way to go.
I mean the Lower Planes are so freaking dark that having a comedy plot to balance the mood would be useful.
no no. i dont mean comedy. i mean legit. there are some places in the lower planes that are cool. and more powerful beings would go there just to see it
A D&D take on Dante's Inferno?
That’s not a bad idea.
But like I guess I am also concerned with the idea of writing from the perspective of a powerful entity or otherwise I could just write from the perspective of a fiend.
The original idea I had was escaping from Carceri along the river styx through the other lower planes, but that’s just inherently doomed to failure isn’t it?
i thought. maybe oldman knows, other beings leave the boatman alone.. so if u paid him, u can travel relatively safely
so a trip isnt that bad. once u get to the destination though u beter be able to survive
Are there any cheese themed fiends?
That’s what I’m asking.
I mean the abyss has infinite layers so there COULD be a cheese layer
Make it official, WotC!
I mean wasn’t the whole idea with the infinite layers of the Abyss that people can homebrew their own layers?
I’ll add it to me list, then, see you in 4-7 months.
Demon Cheese!
Exactly.
Maybe the layer is made of Cheese and the Demons are just cheesemongers
Or maybe there are malignant cheese elementals
I can imagine some plot line in which some agent of Zuggtmoy is causing demon-tainted cheese to happen
Only thing I can say with certainty is that a cheese layer MUST have rat/mouse demons
We’re get off topic, I think. But exactly.
I mean the infinite layers of the abyss being unknowable is a real lore thing right?
This does raise a real question though, how much do fiends actually like delicate human foods such as cheese?
I mean if the Abyss really is infinite, then there absolutely has to be a cheese layer, because if there weren't, it couldn't by definition be infinite.
that’s actually true
Though is it truly infinite or is it infinitely spawning, in which case there doesn't have to be a cheese layer, but there would have to be at some point.
That depends on the version right? Because someone was saying that Shard of Ultimate Evil origin story isn’t in all versions.
If you go by the 1e core books, then the Abyss has 666 layers.
It's well established that the game's lore is inconsistent from edition to edition.
And the inconsistencies can't always be reconciled. The sum total of the game's lore isn't frankly meant to be consistent.
I believe 2E Planescape introduced the Shard of Ultimate Evil and it's continuously drilling into the Abyss and creating new layers. Asmodeus has part of the shard in his Ruby Rod and wants the rest of it, hence the Blood War (this is from memory)
Yeah this is what I am learning.
This is the version of the lore I am most familiar with I guess.
There are fans out there who really want it to be, but the fact of the matter is, it just isn't
2E's lore changed from book to book. In one book the demon lords were just that but in Monster Mythology some of them gained godhood only to be back as demon lords in another book...
tbh, that pleases me.
"Are demon lords gods?"
"Depends on who you ask"
Unreliable narration ftw
Fallible and inconsistent scholarship suits a setting which is in some degree medieval
3E was no different. The monster statblocks of demon lords and archdevils changed from book to book. I think the archdevils were just their aspects (their true forms were quasi divine)
Standardization is the realm of post-industrial revolution
seems valid, seeing as gods exist and are real beings in d&d, the main difference between gods and non-gods is power level and whether you have a cult of crazies trying to bring you into the material plane (or alternatively just worshipping you, but that's boring)
If the Shard of Ultimate Evil is up for debate does that mean that Obyriths don’t exist in every version?
I mean besides the first edition which obviously didn’t have them I assume?
obyriths don't exist in 5e
Welp.
I mean I guess Obyrith lore isn’t really THAT important but it’s kind of cool
I guess they just rendered all three types into general “demons”?
Wastriliths were obyriths
Looks like they got rid of all Loumara types entirely except for the Dybbuks
maybe they will be in the Planescape 5e
Suits the "simplified" aesthetic of 5e
I guess there aren’t that many Obyriths that actually have an active role in the lore but I like the idea of Obox-Ob just being down there somewhere waiting to conquer the Abyss again
The only really important ones are Pazuzu and the Sibriexes and they don’t need a special origin story really
Although it’s kind of important for the Sibriexes
Because it explains why they work for Demogorgon
well and Dagon too
But at the same time it also doesn’t really matter
No, they do. Sibriexes!
where was this? i dont recall this at all in planescape...
they had aspects but also true forms. the book or another book then said you can give them divine ranks/epic rules if you want them to be more powerful. the, hordes of the abyss IIRC says, in a sidebar, that they are weaker than the versions published previously (in the book of vile darkness) so that they are easier to use in msot campaigns but feel free to either use the vile versions or add the extra high level rules. something to that effect
Whoops. That was from 4E Demonomicon. Edition confusion!
3.5E's Fiendish Codex II: Tyrants of the Nine Hells has statblocks for the archdevil but they're just for the aspects.
Fiendish Codex I: Hordes of the Abyss has statblocks for the demon lords but they're not the aspects (although there are weaker aspects of the demon lords listed in other 3.5E books such as Expedition to the Demonweb Pits).
But yeah, the Book of Vile Darkness also has statblocks for the archdevils but not as aspects.
Again, inconsistencies between books within the same edition.
well vile was 3e. the codexes were 3.5 and they explained the reason was on purpose to make them usable in more games. the CR 30 stuff in vile. if u convert that as is into a 30+ for 3.5e, how many would use it i guess? shrug
they are similar at least. not like a total redo at least
Are there any other temptation fiends in d&d other succubi (and Erinyes)?
I can take ideas that aren't D&D, such as folk lore.
Yes.
Are you going to give ideas?
In Japan there are demons called Snow Women who lure men into snowstorms to freeze to death.
Maybe that would work. Not sure if there is an analogue in DND you could use or maybe you could homebrew something based on a similar stat block
Sorry I didn't get a chance to look at my 3E books. The Fiendish Codex: Tyrants of the Nine Hell has the Harvester Devil (Falxugons)
They're the stereotypical devil with a contract
Ooooo, thanks you two.
Lots of fae creatures use charms. Hag, pixie and satyr to mention a few.
Night hags for exemple can change appearance to trick people. Pixies are mischevious. Satyrs can enthrall with their music.
Or a dryad could charm someone if they deemed them a threat to the forest.
So something popped into my head.
Despite Eberron Drows not being “that evil”, they don’t seem to have playable character option (aside from isolationism) or any notable NPC.
? They are playable
There are multiple prominent drow cultures in eberron as well
I see, just don’t see them mentioned in adventure save for “reclusive jungle tribe, secret war against abyss, and totally not Sun Warriors”.
That and lack of drow adventurers art as well.
What adventure?
And the reason they are on the periphery in most eberron content is because largely they are from an entirely different continent than where most eberron stuff focuses
Which is to say, not Khorvaire. There are drow on khorvaire, but they are rare-er and not really seen as different than other elves for the most part by most people
But I think the majority of drow are on Xendrik
Drows are almost uniformly secretive as a race right?
Also ye
Yeah, 5e Eberron very much focuses on Khorvaire, not Xen'drik, so you won't see a lot of drow in more recent books
Good point.
I meant like book art or official art of them in adventuring party context.
That kind of art doesn't exist for.... so many things. That doesn't mean those things aren't playable
What’s up with zariel’s design change?
Cross roads demon?
Are the fey primordial?
they could be described as primordial in some definition yes. But they would not generally be considered Primordials in most settings. (Those are typically Elemental in nature)
The Feywild is probably my least understood plane
It's essentially the Seelie and Unseelie Courts (think of A Midsummer Night's Dream).
They wanted her to look more like a fallen angel then another devil I would guess
So did Morwen make the Feywild kind of like how the Raven Queen made the Shadowfell?
idk
and all fey be from either court, right?
no, there are plenty of fey that aren't a part of any court
there are also other courts
ofc, this also varies dramatically per setting
Oh sorry I was thinking of Morwel but seems I got the wrong backstory for the Shadowfell and made the wrong assumption about the Feywild
More secretive by circumstance. Not many people know of em because there's simply not many people that know of them.
Not hard to feel that way. Feywild's wacky.
Also, until Witchlight and Domains of Delight were released, it was probably the plane with the least amount of lore.
I wouldn't say that (at least in 5e's terms that's true) but it's just that feywild lore is convoluted
Feywild was introduced in the 4E Manual of the Planes with 15 pages.
I have the book in front of me.
Yeah, but even it's precursor, Faerie, didn't get more than a paragraph or so before 4e
Huh, the Isle of Dread is part of the Feywild now...
You wanted Feywild-type stuff before then, you went to Arborea
2E Monster Mythology had Titania, Oberon, and the Queen of Air and Darkness
Yeah, but that stated that the Seelie Court was it's own bower plane that travelled between other planes. It had no lore of it's own, it was all about the fey and gods who lived there.
The myths associated with the history of the fey stated that they'd lost their actual home plane - Ladinion.
I mean that seems fitting tbh.
I would be kinda disappointed if the lore of the chaotic feywild was easy to untangle and not at all confusing.
does anyone happen to know how much the skull of a white dragon wyrmling would weight?
Here know the way there's lots of god's in different domains in DnD other than real life pantheons what are some dnd gods/goddesses of war
Which campaign setting?
Regular I guess
There isn't really a default setting...
Here's a list of gods based on the war domain in Faerun:
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/War_domain
Don't quite get what ya mean
There isn't a default / regular setting.
Sorry that sent late
Meant to send that after my initial message
Like wdym by setting
Campaign setting like the Forgotten Realms or Greyhawk.
Anyone know why DnD Vampires are effected by running water?
Not asking for the reason because of the lore irl, but the in game lore reasoning.
Because that's part of the European vampire lore.
So your so saying their is no DnD justification
im looking for a dm for a solo campaign
In European folklore water was seen as a barrier that prevented the crossing of unholy beings, however running water was generally the strongest in this sense. Since running water is much cleaner and less likely to harbour diseases, it was considered holy.
So excluding irl
Is their a DnD reason
That's what am attempting to ascertain.
If not then their is none?
In the original D&D 45+ years ago Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson loosely based the D&D monsters on real world monsters of mythology and lore.
Ah, ok.
Again it's loosely based on the European vampire folklore, similarly to their weaknesses to garlic, holy symbols, and mirrors.
If you want to know exactly why then ask European folklore historians.
Didn't know mirrors where a weakness be it folklore or real life, thought they're just invisible in reflections
in folklore they are (just have no reflection). I guess reflecting sunlight would be a weakness;) but as oldman said: loosely based
Gotta remember, most of the time monsters are metaphors for people who hurt us or people we don't understand. There's not a lot of logic to it
Or at least, not a lot of evolutionary-biology to back it up
Fair
Since Fey always ask for the character’s names. What would could you do or what would happen if you got the fey’s name?
Also let’s say one of your party members is a fairy or some other fey creature. Would having their name be different from a normal human or ork name?
I think there's two angles to it.
- There's the concept of creatures having true names, and those names having power
- Making a deal with a Fey is binding, and they rarely state what they want directly
If a Fey asks you "Hey, can I have your name?" and you say "Yeah, it's Jeremy", you've just given them your mundane name
figuring out which name is being given/taken is probably the first step
Are there any good/benevolent ice/snow/winter Dieties?
What setting?
5e
That’s not a setting, that’s a system.
My bad i guess in general im pretty new
Settings are different worlds, like Forgotten Realms, Eberron, Exandria, etc.
the Norse gods are imported wholesale
The (until recently) base setting was Forgotten Realms, which had a bunch of gods. Pretty much any good nature god could sell as a benevolent winter/ice god, what with winter being just a specific facet of nature.
The giants have their own winter god. Not sure if he’s evil.
Hi. Am looking for help from those more lore-savy with creating a backstory.
Where in Faerun are some common places for Orc/Half-Orc villages?
And where are some famous and obscure temple and monastery locations?
Spine of the World has the orc Kingdom of Many-Arrows (they have peace treaties with the surrounding human and dwarf settlements).
There are gray orcs in High Imasker.
How ... advanced? ... is the kingdom?
Is it as far along as a human kingdom would be?
Awesome.
What about Temples and Monasteries?
Or would I also find a list on that site?
Temples and monasteries of whom?
Anyone and everyone.
Vague question, dude.
I'm not Google...
The Forgotten Realms wiki is a great resource.
Yeah sorry.
My Half-Orc believes their Shadow Sorcerer powers are a curse and went on many pilgrimages to try learn anything he could.
So no specific deity or order mattered.
Shar, the goddess of darkness and night, has sway over the Shadow Weave. She has believers, called the Shadow Adept, who try to tap into the Shadow Weave but they pay a very high cost for accessing such powerful magic.
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Shadow_Weave
how widespread is knowledge of bhaal and myrkul? if someone showed up at candlekeep with a picture of a skull in a triangle would they immediately associate it with myrkul? or would this require quite a lot of digging through books to find that that is the symbol?
They were dead gods but are, as of 5E Descent into Avernus, resurrected with just a spark of divine power.
so what you're saying is that it'd merit some digging
They have cultists now trying to revive their powers (gods get their divine powers from worshippers and the more worshippers, the more power).
I love that Ao changed the deific powers to reflect this. Gods were such knob heads before he enforced that change.
5E divine powers were changed. 3.5E had divine ranks from 0 (demi-gods) to 20 (lesser, intermediate, and greater gods).
Now in 5E, it's exarchs, quasi-powers, lesser, and greater gods.
I grew up on 3.5. But I forget. Was Azuth a lesser or a demi?
Are any of these mechanically different in 5e?
Kostchtchie?
Lesser.
5E hasn't gone into much detail on divine powers other than those titles.
That's what I thought
I guess that’s why I love 3.5 so much. There is literally a book about everything.
Wanna know about this? There’s an entire supplement about it.
My forgotten realms campaign guide is worth like 400$
I reference my 3E FR campaign book all the time.
I have the Deities and Demigods and Faiths & Pantheons as well.
Love those books
I have most of them as PDF’s currently.
But I have “Shining South”, “The Underdark”, the Campaign Guide and Players Handbook as hard backs.
the 3e campaign guide is so good. A great book for DMs to immerse themselves in the Realms is A Grand History of the Realms which in son DMsGuild in PDF and PoD
I won’t lie I was a huge snob towards 5E for a while.
“3.5 is so much more complex and in depth” for years was my mindset.
I didn’t switch until probably a year ago.
I have moved from 5e to PF2e and the lack of real FR lore is disappointing but then I found a lot of lore written in the AL modules for 5e so we have that which is nice.
5E's SCAG is criminally thin.
yeah, that's one of the core plot points of the module. Just trying to deep dive into the background for a prelude. I guess it's reasonable that the symbolism is almost completely forgotten, but there are also cultists who use it. I read an old (3.5?) module that said myrkul's power waxed every time a weird constellation called the eye of myrkul appeared in the sky. so it's fair that this hasn't happened in ages and people don't really remember the specifics about him. but now the cult is starting to rise again
crazy how adventure modules have changed. that was a 60 page module and the first 6 pages were a whole bunch of lore about how the world ended up where the adventure starts. a modern module would give you a paragraph. now, TBF, I don't have a clue why I need to know all about the kings who built uthtower and their war with the illithids thousands of years before to understand a dracolich moved in after they were all dead, but it does flesh out the area
So how does everyone feel about PC Gnolls?
Does the lore permit it to work in any possible way?
Newer lore - not so much, older lore - they were just another type of humanoid
Same with Hobgoblins?
Gnolls are kinda like cannibalistic psycho demon hyenas
Hobgoblins are more organized and not intrinsically bound to a demon.
In 5e lore, gnolls are specifically created by the god of gnolls to be evil demon spawn hyena creatures
Gnolls being worshippers of a demon gnoll god and routinely allying with Trolls and other evil goblinoids. Not so much.
Gnolls not only worship the demon god, but were created by him to be evil. The 5e lore of them preserves them as an enemy-only creature lacking the sort of free will that many other humanoid creatures would have.
Though obviously, in your game, do what you want. Remove Yeenogu and his lore entirely from your game if you want and have gnolls who run candy shops in the town and are pillars of their community. Not the official-content lore of the current edition of the game though
Accounting for how gnolls are as a whole, its mentioned that even orcs cant stand to be around them due to how vile they typically are. Both themselves and their actions.
So you couldn’t have a Gnoll who rejected Yeenoghu and had good hygiene?
I mean I guess you are saying that they are more like Half Fiends than evil aligned demihumans now
Maybe.
But on the other hand, Lizardfolk in 2E was more nuanced in that their god wanted to let them learn emotions by literally splitting into two but other wanted to be one again before 5E moved towards "cold and emotionless reptiles".
Not sure if they try nuanced Gnoll origin for player hook aside from Red Wizards book.
Like maybe PC is too far but it would be cool to have an NPC gnoll with perfect hygiene
Like they hate other gnolls and yeenoghu because they can’t stand the filth
but I guess being a filthy demon is their nature
This is basically how 5e lore treats gnolls, yes.
That or DND along with fantasy dislike canine (at least "dog-looking") anthromorphics except setting that is one (ala Pugmire) or Furry Fantasy.
There is Kobold, but it became more reptillian.
Where does the divide between high, wood, and drow elves usually come from?
Gnolls are now considered essentially fiends in 5E.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/monsters/16904-gnoll
Demonic Origin. The origin of the gnolls traces back to a time when the demon lord Yeenoghu found his way to the Material Plane and ran amok. Packs of ordinary hyenas followed in his wake, scavenging the demon lord’s kills. Those hyenas were transformed into the first gnolls, parading after Yeenoghu until he was banished back to the Abyss. The gnolls then scattered across the face of the world, a dire reminder of demonic power.
Gnolls be more hyena-like than dog/wolf
Though, while on this discussion, I generally am reluctant to support having a humanoid race that be strictly evil unless they were intentionally designed that way (i.e. Melkor/Morgoth and Sauron's creations)
5e has gnolls as being specifically created to be evil by their demon lord creator, yeah.
When they left the Feywild for the Material Plane and scattered around within different ecological niches (think of them like fey finches)
They (gnolls) lack the same free will in regards to alignment that other humanoids have, in 5e
Fey finch?
So like even a neutral goblin would be more feasible than a neutral gnoll?
Or like just a non evil one
In 5e, yes
Creature statblock language has been changed in newer publications to say that a given creature will "tend" toward an alignment or something to that effect. Newer books which update old material will have that. I'm not sure what the future plans are for gnolls, but it's fairly clear that the vast majority of humanoids will have individual variance in alignment, but this isn't true of gnolls in the current version of the game.
It's absolutely clear that a goblin PC could be any alignment the player so chooses for their character, while there is no PC option for gnolls.
Its less 'hygiene' thats a problem (but it is also a part of it, gnolls dont really clean wounds even) but moreso an...action standpoint. Theyre very unsavory.
To describe without describing...theyre 7 feet tall, immensely strong, and not keen on mercy.
But like, do you see all three main kinds of elves being immortal?
Is Shar's Dark Weave still a thing in 5e/One DnD?
Elves are not immortal in current D&D lore, they can mostly live for several centuries, though
I'm fairly certain that eladrin aren't immortal either
750-ish years, which is normal for elves
I see
I'm also fairly certain that elves have never been described as "immortal" in any edition of D&D
No they haven't
I guessfey being in generally by extension be absurdly long-lived too
True fey typically are immortal
Wouldn't eladrin be true fey?
More fey adjacent. Think of it like...a glass of soda.
The soda represents the fey in an elf, and as we add water (mortal nature) over time the soda dilutes.
Eladrin are when, after adding in a decent bit of water, you add back in more soda of a different flavor. It's not the same as an elf or a fey, but it's somewhere along the line between the two.
That would be Corellon Larethien
Most likely yeah
Elven lore states that the race of elves sprang from drops of blood shed by Corellon in battle
I see
You could conceivably argue that the way elven souls work is a form of immortality when compared with the other humanoid races
Hmm, elaborate
When an elf dies, their soul returns to Arvandor (home plane of the elves) until Corellon sends their soul back to the mortal world to be reincarnated. Elves remember this whole process, which is how Trance works. Technical death, but would you call a phoenix dying to be the end?
What about it?
about how Trance works
But this I get. Live vastly longer than any normal human, but end up functionally living for tens of thousands
Trance is roughly an elf...reflecting. On both their current life and past lives.
Think of that one scene in avatar where Aang contacts all of the past avatars to get advice. That's similar to how trance works.
Aah kk
^ you can't recall your past lives fully, but through trancing you can call upon a sliver of them.
something like that, I think.
also don't elves have perfect recall of arvandor until they reach roughly 100? @white ravine
Yeup. Then they forget what total harmony and true peace feels like! :D
Hell yeah! Existential nightmares!
This is not true, several types fey are stated to age and die. It's generally only the very powerful Fey rulers that are ageless.
Should be noted that Trancing to recall memories of your past life is considered to be more a young elf thing. Around the time they became a century old they stop being able to recall their past lives, and can only recall the memories of their current life.
On Gnolls they are listed as monstrosities now instead of humanoids.
Makes more sense, at least by how monstrosities are defined
Darwin studied the finches of the Galapagos Islands and realized that they evolved into sub-species to adapt on each island
Corellon cut off the drow souls from returning to Arvandor but Eilistraee appealed to her father that not all dark elves were corrupted by her mother, Lolth.
Kobold since 1E were depicted as reptillian
Both. Have the reptilian ones be the well known ones, with a hidden society of the dog-like kobolds that venerate the most hidden and ancient dracoliches.
In the FR perhaps. Gnolls are signficantly less demonic in Eberron and fully playable there. Playable gnolls had even been intended to be included in the official Eberron book.
I don't see kobolds as wolf-like at all; dog-like, yes
That came later. Initially, they were dog-like.
do chimera exist?
Si
nice thanks
can your character be a chimera by the definition of "an individual whose body is composed of cells that are genetically distinct, as if they are from different individuals" ?
Given that none of the lore of DNA uses that notion of genetic chimerism (or genetics in general), no
There are humanoid and human-like lineages that are a combination of different species; half-dragons are the product of various forms of draconic magic of influence, cambions are the children of a fiend and a mortal, and then you have dragonflesh grafters that attach parts of dragons to themselves
Remember that this is the lore channel, it's for talking about what the official lore says. If you have a character concept, don't ask us, ask your DM
There's no reason the character can't work, but there's no official setting where Watson and Crick stole the credit for discovering DNA is all
oke thank you🫡
Well, I'm not too familiar with Planescape but I've heard it described as a deliberately all-encompassing envelope reality that contains all others. So maybe not entirely true
In D&D, a "chimera" is like the creature by that name in Greek mythology (which is also the source of the name used to describe what you're describing)
I was look at the 1E AD&D illustration. They were dog-like perhaps they were yappy.
Planescape wasn't a setting onto itself per se but rather adventures in the Outer Planes.
That's how the Baldur's Gate VGs characterized them. Very yappy
This has the illustration from all five editions
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Kobold
Kobolds on western ttrpgs are generally the more draconic or reptilian version (although they do have a dog/rat-like ancestry that is more prevalent in older editions of dnd. 5e did bring back some of the doglike elements in the facial designs, particularly the nose)
Kobolds in eastern ttrpgs are often more or less just small dogs
Then you got whatever the heck WoW did
It pulled on the ratlike version, which iirc came from the original German stuff
Ancient Roman’s thought giraffes were chimera.
German Kobolds look more like Gnomes then anything and were known as helpfull house spirits who like to play harmless pranks for fun
Dobby is a free elf.
In fact, Goblin and Kobold mean the same thing in german
This is also true
German Fairytales. Best C+ I ever got in college. Lord, those fairytales were metal.
Drow can that worship the Selardrine can return to Arvandor, but all Elves that don't just go to the Outer Planes as normal for the setting.
They were both Doggish and Reptilian. They were stated to be hairless and scaled
https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5bd88db093a6320f071b1a50/1552612045660-GW2TI41ZLK5XEICH89V3/Kobold1e.jpg
any recommended deities for a zealot tempest cleric?
I want to purge chaos, evil from the realms. Heresy and corruption needs to be purged and the roots scarred so that they never can blossom again
Evil needs to be eradicated. Corruption needs to be purged.
Forgotten Realms I assume?
custom realm but with all the dnd deities' available
All D&D deities is a lot...
so yeah with every deity being available it's kind fo the forgotten realms
The DM is also asking for a good/neutral allignment. Soo can't bee too evil
yeah it's a lot
This is an "Ask your DM" question rather than a lore question then.
getting lost in all of the mlol
Yeah, there's like... 200...
I asked him and he pointed me to this https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/appendix-b-gods-of-the-multiverse
and said everything is available lol
You should work with your DM.
Doesn't mean npc's follow them tho
Any nature and/or storm deity in that list should be fair game though, but yeah. Like OldMan said, it sounds more like you should be working on your character with your DM at this point.
Hello, just wondering: can i post up my lore here, my document has a different writing style and just want some feedback
This channel is for official D&D lore.
If it's DM-related check out #dm-discussion
it's not DM related, just some character lore that i did
Post it on #1045165827068002374
ok thanks, sorry for my disturbance
after some looking and talking to my dm I have decided on Selune. Will make my lightning abilities moon based which sounds really fun RP wise heh
is there a good aligned god for a death domain cleric? best I can see is the lawful neutral ones
Which setting?
yeah, he was kinda who I ended up with. And classical mythological ones like Hades or Anubis. I also saw the Raven Queen, who's apparently also LN. I guess they'll have to do. I mean... a good PC really shouldn't be worshipping Bhaal, Shar or Vecna or so 🤣
Doesn't have the death domain though.
I personally think an argument could be made for Ilmater as well, the Grave cleric domain just didn’t exist yet when he was first mentioned in the 5E PHB.
A death god doesn’t necessarily have to have the Death domain.
Oh, asker explicitly asked about death domain lol
It’s been a long day
He's playing a death domain cleric. I guess it's fine to be a death god
so Naralis Analor in particular is a great option (especially if he wants to be an elf). Ilmater is decent too
thanks!
How old is Toril?
Aah, so a bit of 30,000 years
Lore got bumped down 😢
rabble
Is Nerull dead in every version of DND or was he alive in past versions?
Well "alive" in quotes because I guess he is undead right?
Related question, why does DND have so many death gods?
many different settings and little overlap in gods.
the realms has a lot because its like 4 different people fighting to be the Lord of the Dead.
You can have a god dead in one setting but alive in another.
Why does the church of Selune accept chaotic Neutral characters? https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Church_of_Selûne
Nerull is the god of death in the Greyhawk setting
I find it kinda weird, since Selune is more on the good allignment and she would probably accept neutral ones. Since she is quite forgiving of her membership
I mean you have the lunatics. But they are more on the chaotic good I would say. Chaotic neutral borderlines murder hobo. Tho that's probably more chaotic evil
Look at the source referencesfor the three alignment charts.
Normally there's only one alignment chart but there are three because there are three source references.
yeah. Sadly I don't have Faiths & Avatars or Netheril: Empire of Magic lol
For now I see it as a weird quirk tbh. I don't see Chaotic netural in Selune's wiki or the church
Depending on the edition the rules for clerics' alignment vary. One edition has to be at most one step away from their god's alignment.
I could see her members being more chaotic neutral against shar. But need to check sources
I have Faiths & Pantheons.
Clerics' alignment: CG, CN, NG
It's the one-step rule.
hmmm Interesting
Slaadi are outsiders, born of chaos.
So they can be any chaotic alignment?
Slaadi are CN, they are beings born of Limbo.
Demons are CE, they are beings born of the Abyss.
Devils are LE, they are beings of the Nine Hells.
There are exceptions to the rule of course. Like angels can fall from grace, fiends can rise to grace (but they'll probably be killed by their evil brethren).
Ah I didn’t realize Slaadi were actually native to Limbo.
I believe a handful of fae creatures are CN as well
Races don't generally fall into one alignment category exclusively, rather tending towards a particular alignment because of culture or external supernatural influence but still having free will and individuality.
Fey for example do tend towards chaotic alignments because the Feywild influence is inherently chaotic. The whole Paarthurnax dilemma applies.
Outsiders (3E term for creatures native to the Outer Planes) are heavily influenced by their native planes, a lot of times they're literally born from the planes and thus take up the alignment of the plane.
But again, there are exceptions to the rule. Celestials can fall from grace. Modrons can go mad and be chaotic.
If you imprisoned a demon on Mount Celestia would they eventually become good?
They would probably be very angry
calling all lorekeepers
i need help for a character's backstory
are there any gods in the forgotten realms that are both:
a) Heavily opposed to fiends of any kind,
b) Would have paladins/clerics devoted to them, and
c) Would generally be considered good-aligned
and if so, what town/city/village would work best for them
i got a tiefling who was run out of town by a... less-than-welcoming sect of [insert god here]'s followers as part of his backstory but i still haven't picked out an actual god or town yet and i wanna think of something before it becomes relevant
Which portolio/domain?
I mean Lathander or Tyr could fit the bill depending, though Tyr being the god of justice might fit better
Which pantheon?
it was either tyr or torm that was justice
Tyr, Torm, and Ilmater are part of the Traid.
weren't Myrkul and Lathander part of another triad?
Myrkul was with Bhaal and Bane
I knew that one, but I've heard those two gods were in another trinity, alongside the trinities they're already a part of
What would be a good fantasy version of a "ship's computer" aboard a spelljammer vessel? Aside from just having the ship be possessed by a ghost or it being an intelligent magic item, any other weird bits of D&D canon you guys know about?
Not all spelljamming ships are constructed ships. Some are living creatures that don't require a helm to spelljam.
This ship's main distinctive feature is the fully grown treant on the aft deck. The treant has a speed of 0 because its roots are woven into the deck; it and the ship are inseparable. If the ship is reduced to 0 hit points, the treant dies of shock. The ship can function if its treant dies, but the treant can never be replaced with another.
When the treant finishes a long rest, it repairs the ship's hull, enabling the ship to regain 4d12 hit points, and refreshes the ship's air envelope (turning deadly air into foul air, or foul air into fresh air).
A living ship can float on water and sail across it, but it can't land safely on the ground (its keel would cause it to roll on its side). Its standard weaponry is an aft-mounted ballista.```
Yeah, Lathander, Amaunator, and Myrkul formed another triumvirate. Lathander was morning, Amaunator was highsun, and Myrkul was dusk. It was called the Three-Faced Sun heresy
They weren't a formal triad but rather worshippers believe they were a triad. Lathander opposed the undead
Oh hm weird idea tangentially related to the above; does there exist stats for a "living painting" or "haunted painting" like the paintings from harry potter in D&D, as either a creature or magic item?
Not really a lore question.
There's probably one in 2E Ravenloft. I don't know if there's a statblock in the 2E Monstrous Manual (I would have to look but I'm working)
Again, not a lore question.
Well, it's a lore question insofar as I'm asking "does this fantasy concept from other IPs exist in D&D in a tangible form"
Closest thing I can think of is the Plane of Mirrors
Spelljammer has a living mirror, the fractine
I actually just found out that a living painting is a magic sentient item in the new keys from the golden vault book, so I'll pattern it off that
(for the record I'm going to have the spelljammer ship in my campaign have a wizard painted on the side like an airbrushed van)
Are most D&D settings creationist in nature? The main ones with print material, anyway
Most settings were created by someone, sure
But "creationist" is kind of a term describing an individual's relationship with their idea of how the world came into being
and that exists independently of what actually created the universe, so
it's a case-by-case thing
D&D is "creationist" in that the gods created their respective species.
You keep asking this question...
Mm, fair
Humans are one of the few exceptions as they don't have one pantheon, unlike the elves, dwarves, halflings, etc who have their own specific creator deity
And that is where there's room for speculation. Besides, perhaps some other humanoid races could've shared a common ancestor with us
Your table, your lore.
In official D&D settings like Greyhawk and Forgotten Realms they have specific lore on the creation of the multiverse/world.
You can speculate and change it however you want at your table.
Does anyone know how a undead warhorse is created?
Animated Dead?
But you have to recast animated dead at the end of the day just to keep that correct?
That's outside the purview of this channel.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells/animate-dead
The creature is under your control for 24 hours, after which it stops obeying any command you've given it. To maintain control of the creature for another 24 hours, you must cast this spell on the creature again before the current 24-hour period ends.
That’s what I’m trying to avoid, I don’t want to keep saving my spell slots just to keep a undead horse, but I want to keep the look of my oathbreaker paladin
Best bet is to try to find a undead knight or something along the lines of that and just steal there horse from the look of things 🤣 I cant find anything on it
Undead horses arent particularly very useful
Theyre sluggish and fairly incompetent beyond basic riding
As for making undead horses though, there are more methods to making undead than slapping an animate dead spell onto a carcass
Though if you want to actually employ that in a game thats on your DM to decide
hey I'm working on my first campaign and I'm trying to come up with names for the months
please help
I don't really have a theme
Well yeah you should definitely have some kind of theme to make the naming less hard
ok lemme do that
Yee
Am where did that name come from
I pulled it out of my buttocks
Lol
it's not related to anything I just went "hmm yes letters"
Maybe use different alphabets from other cultures
Greek or latin would be a starting place
who named the months?
oh yeah i can use Latin for the names
it's worth keeping in mind that months are made up
Bruh
well I mean the moon cycle restarts every month so it kind of makes sense to have months
sentient creatures invented them, which means that their names are informed by the people using them. are these people who live underground, or in a place with three moons?
etc etc
Oh
"January" isn't some universal truth like the number of protons in a hydrogen atom
I have to think about a lot of stuff actually
it's just some noises some monkeys made one day
that stuck around
specifically noises that referred to an ancient emperor
like how many planets are in between my planet and the sun
how many moons there are
That could be a factor! If the celestial cycles bring different objects into view over time
Different sides of the planets see different constellations at different times and with different orientations
I'll get back to yall tomorrow this is a lot
Does anyone know of any archdevils that have very explicit goat themes besides from the typical hooves and horns of most devils?
This channel is for official D&D lore, not homebrew lore btw.
Titivilus
I have a question to ask. In the first episode of the Dungeons And Dragons Cartoon, there were dragons ravaging the village. However, these dragons weren’t explored further and it left me with little that is known about them. What are those dragons anyway?
What color were they?
Brown. Also, they were wyvern-like in appearance.
But they weren’t even referred to as wyverns.
They also had scorpion-like stingers at the end of their tails.
stingers on tails = wyverns
They had a fire breath though.
Creative license
Wish I could post it, but it’s not allowing me too. All those screenshot taking for nothing.
There are and were so many variants of a creature that it really could be anything from: creative license from the cartoon makers to a wyvern variant they saw.
I gave up my early D&D books decades ago, so I cannot check them.
But my bet is probably on the cartoon writers
They first appear when Dungeon Master explains Helix’s history and how it was at the mercy of flying dragons. Presto later ||accidentally summons them at the episode’s climax||.
And remember, something doesn't exist...until someone does it. Then poof, it exists.
All it takes for a creature to exist is someone to imagine it.
Those dragons aren't any dragon that appears in the game
You saw the scene already?
OK.
Ok, so Infernal tiefling Ancestry can often be traced back to one of the main Arch Devils, right?
When it comes to demonic bloodlines, is it much the same? Or as the chaotic nature of the Abyss indicates, are these subrace/variants of tiefling based on the specific caste of demon, rather than a specifically named one?
In other words, if we were naming a subrace of tiefling, like a Rakasha for instance, would it simply be a rakasha tiefling, or their main progenator/god Ravanna?
Sorry if it's getting complicated, I'll try to break it more down if you need.
I'd imagine the demonic tieflings are the same deal as the ancestry to archdevils, however not extrapolated on since the tiefling subrace list is already a mile long.
ohhhhhh
my bad
Depends on the setting. You have a particular one in mind?
Nobody's really certain. Some people think they were created by Io (Big dragon god) to serve the original dragons, or that they were born from Io's blood when he was injured. Overall though, it's a mystery.
just looking for a reason for their lifespan being shorter than humans
Oh...that. Nobody's really sure and there's nothing that gives a solid answer for that
I think it's implied from 4e lore that they were bred to be a slave race- growing up quickly to be soldiers, but then dying off 'young', making it easier to manage them. it's pretty grim icky lore, and 5e didn't want to commit to it.
Frankly dragonborn have like...6 possible origin stories now?
Also I think they have the same lifespan as humans?
I think part of their origin is left purposefully ambiguous and there's multiple equally likely theories that exist in-universe.
My theory is akin to like, Carcinization, the underpinning magic of world just keeps converging on making Dragonborn in different ways.
Just that they're more likely to die young in battle because of the whole martial race coding.
They're all true and Dragonborn just keep happening for different reasons each time.
Magically transformed humanoids via Spellplague
Experiments by Tiamat
Made by Io as draconic servants
Spawned from the blood of Io
Bred as slaves for dragons
Frankly, I'd buy any of these.
However, god knows which one is real.
Yeah but even the dragonborn hate that theory
Well it's not even a theory, it's provable because it happened.
Dragonborn are oviparous (egg-laying), and youngsters are generally referred to as hatchlings for the first few months of life. However, young dragonborn grow much faster than human children do. They walk hours after hatching and master the rudiments of speech within three months. By the time a dragonborn child is 3 years old, he or she has reached the size and mental and emotional development of a 10- year-old human child. By 12 years of age dragonborn attain their adult stature, and by 15 they reach maturity and are accounted adults by other dragonborn. They live about as long as humans do, although dragonborn much prefer an honorable death in battle to a long senescence and will seek out such an end when the infirmities of age begin to appear. Few live to see their 70th year.
-Wizards presents races and classes (4e)
Age. Young dragonborn grow quickly. They walk hours after hatching, attain the size and development of a 10-year-old human child by the age of 3, and reach adulthood by 15. They live to be around 80.
-5e PHB
Compare to human PHB:
Age. Humans reach adulthood in their late teens and live less than a century
(I swear 80 used to be the norm but ey)
Post Tasha though most races are 'They live less than a century'
As for origins:
3.5 (Dragonborn of Bahamut- any race can become a dragonborn)
The dragonborn children of Bahamut are a unique race in that they are not born; they are reborn. Each one enters the world as a halfling, an elf, a human, or a member of some other humanoid race with all that race’s propensities and traits. Bahamut beckons to his would-be followers, and those few who might choose to serve him.
(...)
When dawn comes, the prospective dragonborn crawls inside an egg-shaped structure that she has built (see Cost) in order to sleep for the last time in her original form. This symbolic act represents her acceptance of the transformation. When the next dawn arrives, she is transformed into a dragonborn. After awakening inside the sealed egg, she breaks out of it as a glorious, draconic child of Bahamut.
-Races of the Dragon
4e (Distant dragon relatives said to be made fro 'lesser spirits' or the blood of Io or were a created slave race >.>.)
Of all mortal creatures in the world, dragons are the most awesome and powerful. In the beginning of days, the ancient deity Io created dragons by fusing brilliant astral spirits into the unchecked fury of the raw elements. The greater spirits became the dragons, creatures so powerful, proud, and strong-willed that they were lords of the newborn world, masters of all they surveyed. The lesser spirits became the dragonborn. Although smaller in stature than their mighty lords, they are no less draconic in nature. Dragons arose as the kings and princes over the dragonborn, who gladly followed their nobler and more powerful kin and in turn served as leaders and champions to lesser mortal races. In this dark and diminished age, dragons no longer rule over dragonborn realms, and dragonborn must struggle to make their way in the world as all mortals do—but in every dragonborn a hidden furnace of draconic blood burns with the same fury and pride all dragons know.
Dragonborn are a humanoid race of draconic origin. One dragonborn legend claims that when the gods warred with the primordials, one of the mighty primordials cleaved Io, the progenitor dragon god, in two. The two halves of the dead god’s corpse rose up to become Bahamut and Tiamat, but where the god’s blood fell, the dragonborn were made.
The legend more commonly told among other races is that Io created the dragonborn to serve and defend the dragons. In any event, the dragonborn are a martial race that forged a great empire of united city-states when the world was young. Their empire of Arkhosia fell after several terrible wars against Bael Turath, the infernal empire of the tieflings.
-Wizards present races and classes
Well that also varies per setting
Also note though that 4e says that while they did look to 3.5 Dragonborn for inspiration, then don't consider 3.5 chosen of bahamut to be dragonborn as they intented- it's just that they wanted to use the name again. Similarily 4e didn't consider Kolli (a very old dragmag race) or Draconians to be 'dragonborn', but 5e has tried to merge some of these concepts again
Half Dragons and Dragonborns are both seperate creatures for the record, similar though
Half dragons got tails (but tbf Exandrian Dragonborn can have some too)
Yeah Exandria is a setting, probs should have been clearer lol
New 5e Dragonborn in general seem to have tails according to the art
What new art?
The art from the MTG set has them with Tails and I think those in Fizbans also have Tails
Mordenkainen Presetn p.59 uses this image, which has a tail, although it is hidden behind the text and crop: https://i0.wp.com/nerdarchy.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/dragonborn-bard.jpg?ssl=1
Fizban shows no tails though, but the art for the MTG cards has them designed to have tails specifically https://twitter.com/ChrisRahnArt/status/1415014527033253888
So admittedly, it's more 'They appear to be able to have tails now if you want' but most art depicts them without even in the newer books.
COuld have sworn one of the new UAs or errata also gave them tails..
I think the One D&D Playtest for them just don't mention tails in general so its open to the players
Technically FR Dragonborn can have tails it's just super rare.
To be fair, Fizban is more setting agnostic
With how little Dragonborn are used in the books themselves I think thats not so important that it's settings agnostic tbh
And setting agnostic would technically mean it can be true for FR too
Indeed
After spending the past 3 hours reading up on goblin lore to help me roleplay my fighter, I have come to a conclusion.
I miss the great wheel cosmology :<
Isn't the great wheel what it is in 5e? Or have I been playing the last 10 years incorrectly?
yea the dmg says the Great Wheel is the default for 5e
oh cool, I guess it's just hasn't come up in my games as of late,
What would happen to a blind beholder?
Thats a lizardfolk no harm
Can you show me this? The fizban one sounds intresting tbf
Where does it say that btw?
It's def not a lizard folk
Im pretty sure its labelled as such?
It's labled dragonborn bard in the image.
Oh wait that might be my bad
Its is mentioned in Acquisitions Incorporated that some Dragonsborns have tails and it is seen as a deformity.
Ah my b
🫡 thank you Lord Kas
Is there a bigger pic of the green dragonborn where you can see the tail?
Also where is that mentioned?
According to the forgotten realms wiki, Page 200
Ty! Ill check that out
Also I cant see the tail in the art, but the wizkid miniture of the pic doesnt have a tail
In the full art i also see no tail
https://imgur.com/OLQbjAe It's there.
Im not seeing anything there no harm, unless im blind lol
That looks more like shading and the leather of the other persons clothes
https://i0.wp.com/nerdarchy.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/dragonborn-bard.jpg?ssl=1
And again, It is clipped off in the book, but not the MTG artwork. But we can see from the directions given to Chris Rahn it's intentional that the new art direction gives them tails, but the majority of artwork in official D&D books depicts them without tails.
Looked through Fizban again and i think I had some mandela effect going on but the MTG ones do have tails
Yeah it is the leather of the guys shoe, cause it goes upwards to the top
It's... really not, but okay.
Oh my bad actually, the red line kinda hides it actually
By pointing it oht it actually makes it less clear 😂
It's also why I gave the original link again to compare
Its the wrong page citation. Its in the description of Donnar Blit'zen of the C Team
Yeah, you right! Well TIL lol
But in general it's a bit of an odd one for sure. 5e started off firm 'no tails', AI gave their dragonborn a tail because it looks cool, then the MTG dragonborn art specifically have tails, and some of the art is used in the books but with the tail covered over, and now in oneD&D there is nothing saying they don't have a tail.
Well, they also used to have breasts on female dragonborn in 4e so it's not very consistent throughout the ages haha
But I think the tail being so inconsistent just boils down to "The players do it anyway so just let them do what they want."
I kinda hope they do something to make half-dragons more diffrent ngl
Also the AI tail checks out too
I.. really disliked a lot of the 4e art design for female characters because they literally said for dragonborn "Oh when it came to design, we made the guys first, and that was easy, but the woman were harder we needed to make them more feminine and curvy" so stuck boobs on.
Same book explained 'Oh yeah we took away the bearded female dwarf thing, because we wanted them to be sexy'
They really think bearded dwarves arent sexy? damn
Hate to be a stickler but could the Mordenkainen tail being cropped out by text be an intentional choice to make it not the case?
Could def be yeah
Cause the miniture doesnt have the tail weirdly
Could be a lost in communication thing too ofc
It's interesting that for the MTG crossover they were like ;give 'em tails', but then actually looking through no art in the book actually shows a tail (even when the full artwork actually has them).
Designing the male of the race was easier than the female. Like the earlier versions of the dwarves, we did not want the females to look so similar to the males. We wanted them to be more feminine and recognizable as female dragonborn. We gave them the curvy figure of a female and while they are more slender then the males, they are still stronger and bulkier than a human.
-Wizards present races and classes
Oh is it the wandering troubadour art?
A lot of it ended up in the D&D books too but here is it: https://magic.wizards.com/en/news/card-image-gallery/d-and-d-adventures-in-the-forgotten-realms-card-image-gallery
Yeah the mordekainen one is deffinetly differently cropped
gonna use my mod powers here in a moment
My dude!
I mean WOTC has not ever been consistent. The PHB says tieflings have human skin color, or shades of red.
And then the artist have a canonical pale white skinned tiefling purple skin
And gnomes should be tan to brown skin, but pre tasha/mordy's most I've seen are pale skinned.
I think they mighta meant a diffrent word other than shade tbh
Like Purple being a mix of red and blue, Im no artist so i dunno the exact word
or how Firbolgs in Volos are completely inconsistent with anything surrounding firbolgs.
I kinda like the fuzzy blue Firbolg, they've grown on me. Def more interesting than just 'big dudes with red hair' from earlier editions. They give me more huldra or troll vibes, which works for a 'nature spirit' type folk.
imo I will take fuzzy forest friend over Great Value Minotaur critical role has made them to be
blue-grey 😛
I can dig the furbolgs too, but there def seems to be a sliding scale for CR art of 'Firbolg' to 'Minotaur'. Including hooves and such as well.
Firbolg are supposed to be giant-kin, like trolls, ogres, verbeeg, etc
I think they were originally also called forest giants, and we’re about the size of Goliath or half giants
yep and Firbolgs are very clearly based on the Fir Bolgs of ireland. who were just big dudes dudettes and dudexes
But they’re not apart of the ordning
They're not true giants but giant-kin
In FR they were originally just big dudes, and then they got some fey influence in them and became the weird fuzzy druidic cow people they are today.
I think it got started when some art in volo's displayed them as fey cowlike peeps and then there were the firbolgs in critical role and now firbolgs are hippie cow giants
Which honestly, I think is p cool. They're like less intense minotaurs
To be fair, I think the bovine firbolgs are still mostly attributed to Critical Role. But 5E has only used like a single piece of official art for firbolgs, so who knows?
Firbolgs have been just "bigger humans" giant-kin up to 5E.
There was definitely room for interpretation of "somewhat bovine" in the 5e art from volos
There's also firbolg art in.. Tasha's? Mordys?
Neither Mechanus nor the Outlands feels like a punishment but Limbo does. Why are 2/3 of the neutral afterlives decent but the other seems closer to a lower plane?
Tortle lore?
I mean maybe my assessment is less objective than I think and Limbo just sounds miserable to me personally?
Yeah the sidekicks in Tasha: (link to a twitter post of the image by the artist) https://twitter.com/April_Prime/status/1329484591003029510/photo/1
But like it sounds to me like almost anyone would hate it.
Yeah, I wouldn’t say that looks particularly bovine
Are we talking the middle one?
Ye
I thought that was a Firbolg
Also in Mordenkainen's: https://www.belloflostsouls.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/mordenkainen-scry-header-image.jpeg
It is, that’s what we’re talking about. Critical Role has made their interpretation of firbolgs more cow-like (I think the TCSR actually explicitly states they have bovine features), but I don’t think that has expanding into any other setting.
The way I see it, Firbolgs are to Goliaths what Elves are to Humans
I think there were fan arts and meme focusing on bovine version though.
Like “Chill Cow” from Jo Cat music video and Kimmy’s bard character.
So def going blue-grey skin, fuzzy animal like ears, and broad flat noses and wide bridges.
But I wouldn't really say bovine . I think it went that way because Mercer tried to describe the nose/ears as 'bovine' and artists went with that? but it's mostly ..fluffy ears and broad noses.
I'm personally okay with the different look of the firbolg. It makes the stand out from the rest of the giant-kin.
Also fun fact, Firbolgs are the only 5e player race to reach over 8 feet tall according to the size charts making them the largest known medium creatures
Yes, I know that. I think that’s more from CR’s influence than anything else tho.
Also maybe Ogier from Wheel of Time.
Taking cues from them.
Yeah, I dig them
Never read that series.
Like this is official CR art of a firbolg: https://criticalrole.fandom.com/wiki/Caduceus_Clay?file=Caduceus_Clay2.jpg
Goliaths max out at 7’10” while Firbolgs max out at 8’2”
They made the ears and face far more bovine
How tall are the PC minotaurs?
And fanart often gives a tail or even hooves to the firbolg characters
But fans interpretation of races is often affected by other media see: Green goblins, green orcs, gnomes with brightly coloured hair...
This is also CR firbolg art that appeared in their setting book: https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/criticalrole/images/f/fe/Exandrian_Firbolg_-_Nikki_Dawes.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20211029080631
(I don’t like the way that link formatted)
The WoW-influence.
Orcs I’m fine with either dull green or grey but Goblins are green, darnit
AD&D goblins were red, orange, and yellow I believe.
I don’t care what the Monster Manual says, they’re green.
I don’t like the goblin art that D&D uses either
(I’m being mostly facetious and in my setting green is one of several possible skin tones for goblins)
But on the other hand, I don’t like that Pathfinder’s hobgoblins are just tall goblins
But the hobgoblin art is good. The issue is that the goblins are just short hobgoblins
....with better posture...
Who's hobgoblins are just tall goblins?
Also probably part of my affinity to green goblins is that I read Order of the Stick for years before I played a single game of D&D
Sorry, should’ve specified, huh? Pathfinder
Their hobgoblin art is literally just tall goblin
Ah, so they are
Oh really? Best of both worlds, dnd hobbo art and Pathfinder gobbo art (I love the PF2e gobbo art)
Which I don’t think is bad art, I just like that D&D makes hobgoblins more different from goblins, even though they’re goblinoid.
Yeah I can see that. I wonder if 1DD will every give us any of the obscure gobbo races 5e skipped
We got the core three which is good but we never saw say Blues for example
(Though if Blues ever return I doubt many people would complain if they got a more creative name)
I guess we got Nilbogs at least
Nilbogs are both fun and horrible lol
I loved the original 1E nilbogs because they were immune to all damages and could only be hurt by healing magic.
I had one as a BBEG.
Were they undead?
Nope.
Wacky
They were blessed/cursed by Maglubiyet, the goblin god
I don’t know a lot about 1e-2e lore. So I guess Maggie is an OG then.
Maglubiyet isn't the creator god of the goblins but took over the mantle from their arch-fey creator.
I thought that was new 5e lore, is that old edition lore?
I'm at the office so I don't have access to my 2E Monster Mythology book
Well looking him up just found something funny. In one of the 3e sourcebooks due to a misprint the Chaotic Evil bugbear god Hruggek was given the domains of Knowledge, Magic, and Law
A 3.5e book gave him Chaos, Evil, Trickery, and War which makes a lot more sense but that is one funny misprint
Goblinoids have always had a close connection with the fey, even in past editions
Particularly as members of the unseelie court
Types like Fey and Goblinoid were introduced mostly in 3rd edition, and so before that it was wishy washy and really things could be multiple things.
Unicorns have celestial, fey and magical beast vibes.
Nereids are water elemental but also fey?
Goblins are mischievous spirits (fey) but also just li'l guys.
Types both helped with mechanics, but also meant you had to pick a box on where something went.
Oh yea I wasn't even talking about creature type, just the creatures themselves
Do we have any further elaboration on the physicality of warforged?
Like what they look like inside and what makes them animated type stuff
They are made of living wood and stone, and there is a fluid that pumps through them similar to but distinct from blood
How does one exactly go beyond normal priests and become a cleric?
I’d think that depends on what god we’re talking about
I think it’s left purposely vague but it’s probably ritualistic I.E. Christian Baptism
Or maybe it’s a position earned nuns probably are clerics idfk
Most full clerics are given some sign from their deity that only they recognize (crow landing on branch, looking in direction, flying away) to send them on a spiritual quest
Thats usually the inciting incident.
its also a matter of having the capabilities to wield your power
otherwise gods would be able to just make all their priests level 20 clerics
Takes time to build up to being able to handle all that power
as clerics become wiser and gain experience, they can become stronger clerics, and there is a certain level of experience and wisdom needed to first become one
Not entirely. Gods only have so much power to dole out, so they have to be wise with who gets it.
Are there Warforged in Faerûn?
No. Can be in your game, though
Thanks, it's for my background story, so want it to be in line with accepted lore.
Definitely somethign you should be discussing with your DM
If they're not here, they're not there. I'm not looking to force anything.
Spelljammer means they can be anywhere
get on ship in Eberron, get off ship in Faerun
Given how eberron is though, thats not as feasible
The big draco-sky ring wouldnt be too happy about it
Just wanna note that while that’s the case in RftLW, in Kanon it is possible. Baker’s newest book, Chronicles of Eberron, addresses Spelljamming out of Eberron.
I think the point was that just because lore-wise they aren't there, there is no reason to assume your DM agrees with canon. I set my games in FR, but if a player wants to be a warforged, I'd allow it and then work with them on a backstory. Maybe they spelljammed from eberron. maybe he's a lab experiment from some mad gnomish tinkers.
or maybe there's a bunch of warforged somewhere in my game's version of faerun
I got that.
There are things similar to warforged in FR, such as Nimblewrights, but warforged are more an Eberron thing.
And Nimblewrights are less playable and more fancy construct assassins
https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Nimblewright
So possible to work with the idea that in FR Warforged are not called 'warforged' (As in Eberron as they were forged for war), but 'Nimblewrights', but lore wise Warforged have always been a mix between construct and humanoid, leaning more humanoid just 'constructed' where as Nimblewrights are very much Constructs mechanically.
Reminder, this channel is for discussing official lore rather than what any given DM may allow, and thus its best to assume all questions are framed as such, and try and answer all questions in such context
Tbf Dream of the Blue veil can be used to explain how warforged reached any setting right? I know one of the adventures has a lot of items from diffrent settings, is ebberon one of them?
There is no in-lore use of the spell, and it also requires something from the destination world (person or object) to be on the departure world already
Yeah but since there are objects from it in that adventure they could use those ones, or even the fact that item exists sets a precedent that more should exist
||that adventure being witchligh||
That adventure doesn't connect to Eberron
Im not sure if there is an item for Eberron there, but i know there are defo ones
Per the current lore
Damn is eberron the only main setting that isnt connected to it?
I dunno, just that Eberron doesn't connect to the Feywild per lore
It has it's own version of the feywild
That fact they have seperate versions of the feywild necesarrily exclude it though tbf I think, after all the adventure has connections to MTG and Exandria and they also have seperate versions of the feywild iirc
It doesn't exclude it, eberron is explicitly stated not to connect to the other material planes such as the feywild or shadowfel
It has parallels to those planes, but doesn't connect to them
Exandria connects to the feywild in the same cosmological sense as other settings
I think we might be using diffrent meaning by “connection”
Connection as in travel is possible
Im talking about like storytelling refrences
In the lore, you cannot travel to the Feywild from Eberron
Like the idea of an item from Eberron being able to find its way there
This is the lore channel, it's for discussion about what the official lore says
Not what is narratively possible for a DM
ok - very obscure question - does types of blood (a, ab, b ,0) taste diffrent for vimpires?
Yeah im saying that isnt there an item in witchlight from Eberron is my point though, there definitely isnt?
Can you point to an item stated as being from Eberron?
Reading now to double check
There is zero mention of blood types in D&D, let alone if it would affect the taste
so im free to make it as i want too
You're always free to make it as you want. Lore isn't law
easy on the spoilers
(at least bar them)
||/spoiler Toril, Mystara and Torol are also mentioned for sure||
||Ok so its actually Npcs from diffrent settings but I assume they didnt travel naked so whatever clothes from them would be worthwhile items. Elegy from Sigil, Klee from Taldorei, theres a planewalker too and apparently someone from Eberron, still trying to find their name tho||
You right my bad, sos guys!
But I've found who you're referencing, so yeah, that would allow someone to travel from Toril to Eberron assuming that person came from the Feywild to Toril
||theres a few mentions online of some of the npcs being from Eberron||
And then a warforged could travel back
Is Toril in Eberron?
Toril is Forgotten Realms
If you have a person from Eberron, you could use them to convey a person from Toril to Eberron
Who was trying to refrence then lol?
Then that person from Toril could convey a warforged back to Toril from Eberron
Noiceee
The original question was about canon ways for there to be a warforged on Toril
It's possible only if you're playing Wilds Beyond
Im not sure what wilds beyond is
Oh! Now i feel dumb 😂
lol
||So there is definitely an npc from Eberron in witchlight then? Who is it?||
Although this does overlook that Dream of the Blue Veil isn't referenced in the lore at any point afaik
There's three, I've closed the book but I just went through the chapters and did Ctrl+F Eberron
Oh, tell a lie, I still have the tab open
Noice! Ill do that and find out lol
||Majera d’Valzey, Zurrash, and Granam||
Also yeah thats a fair point, It is a newer spell tbf but that still doesn’t mean theres a necessarily precedent for it existing in lore
I was gonna say it would make sense if it didnt since there isnt much in lore of that sort of travel happening and largely affecting the world, but then again it is a high level spell
Something has to be in the lore to be in the lore
True true
It being in the game means that it could be the in lore, but that's not really saying much
Was Fraz Urbluu originally a devil?
What makes you ask?
I was watching a lore video that talked about that backstory but I am not finding any references to that independently
No, but I believe that there’s an unconfirmed theory that Graz’zt was
Was this a Mr Rhexx video by any chance
the grazzt thing was first mentioned in 4e i beleive. before that he was a straight up demon
(being a former devil)
AJ Pickett
Ah, well I'm not aware of any such lore
Yeah I had heard the theory that Grazzt was the son of Asmodeus
I never heard that before.
4E lore said that Graz'zt was once a devil who was sent to the Abyss but he eventually got corrupted and became a demon lord (why serve in Hell when you could be a lord of three Abyssal layers?)
Yeah, I never heard of him being the son of Asmodeus, just a devil or archdevil.
Glasya is the daughter of Asmodeus
Seems like there is a lot of bad youtuber lore out there and I should avoid Rhexx specifically
I mean I already wasn't a fan tbh
The story I heard, can't remember from whom, was that Grazzt was the son of Asmodeus and Pale Night
I've never heard that before and it doesn't make sense.
Pale Night is an obyrith demon lord (obyrith are the older demonic race, older than the tanar'ri). Asmodeus wants nothing to do with demons because they hinder him from getting the Shard of Ultimate Evil, which is at the bottom of the Abyss.
What's a good grave cleric deity that won't be mad at their follower not dying?
Half-Orc if that matters.
They'll always be on the brink of death but never actually die.
What setting?
Ask your DM which deities are available in their campaign setting
Sorry. Faerun. We're about to start Decent into Avernus.
They're trying to help but we can't think of one that fits.
Thought I'd ask a bigger audience.
And what do you mean by "won't be mad at their follower not dying"? Are you trying to become undead?
That's not really not dying... just not going unconscious...
Kelemvor is the main Faerunian god of death (LN)
Yeah I looked at them but they sounded like they wouldn't like my guy.
Unless I misunderstood.
As pointed, going to 0 hit points isn't dying, it's being knocked out
The other gods with the death domain tend to be evil...
There are no FR deities who are opposed to that
Kelemvor doesn't like undead.
Which is a whole other kettle of fish
That's why I asked "won't be mad at their follower not dying"
Oh cool.
That opens up way more options.
I just figured they'd treat not dropping to 0 as avoiding death and not like that.
Kelemvor doesn't like a lot of things particularly his current job
He didn't have much of choice on taking the gig.
thanks Cyric
Without Cyric, Kelemvor could have been happy with his lady love Midnight, and Adon could continue third wheeling his way through life.
Which planetoid in the Prime is the most pleasant to live on?
That's a vague question. There are countless worlds in the Material Plane. Whichever campaign world you play in.
Ahh I was thinking maybe some planets are nicer than others
The two main official campaign settings, Greyhawk (Oerth) and the Forgotten Realms (Toril), are loosely inspired by Earth, so read into that how you will.
There's Dragonlance (Krynn) but it suffered a major Cataclysm centuries ago.
I like earth. We have internet
Isn’t Eberron also a major planet or is that an entirely different universe?
I don't know much about Eberron's lore.
Oh got it. So Eberron is like a minor spinoff planet.
Eberron is an official campaign setting onto itself.
That and the fact eberron lore is wishy washy
Most, if not all of the D&D settings are in the same "universe" in that they can all be accessed via spelljamming ships.
The following planes have received moderate to significant attention in official products
- Eberron: Magitech world, world war happened a few years ago (the last war), quality of life is generally quite good. Think something around industrial revolution earth
- Toril: Generic fantasy world, closer to Renaissance era than medieval. Most people live agrarian lifestyles, but a lot of people live in cities like Waterdeep. Regular world threatening events occur
- Krynn: Medieval adjacent fantasy setting, massive war happened in recent history (war of the lance) and tore across the landscape. Before that a big cataclysm involving gods and dragons
- Exandria: Between Toril and Eberron in terms of developmental analogues. Has multiple regions of varying levels of stability, each one recovering from various catastrophic events in recent ish history
- Athas: Mad max hellscape. Literally the worst, 0/10
- Oearth: Typical medieval fantasy. Knights and kings and lords.
Eberron isn't in the material plane like other planes, instead its within what's called the Deep Ethereal
The Ethereal Plane is a border plane between planes and is often likened to an ocean. It laps at the shores of the material plane, but you can go deeper and deeper and risk never finding your way back. Eberron resides in the deepest depths of this plane
Ahhh got it. Thanks for the explanation yall.
And the Magic the Gathering settings too right?
Damn i gotta check out Athas and Oearth, not sure ive even heard of em before
Oerth, aka Greyhawk, was Gary Gygax's campaign setting. Most of the named archmages (which a lot of the spells are named after) were PCs from his campaign.
They're not part of the D&D cosmology and instead work on their own system (the blind eternities)
But they still connected to dnd somehow since theres that Ravnica connection in Acquisitions Incorporated right?
Eberron is the cool kid who doesn't like playing with the other kids
I finally introduced a spelljamming helm (or at least alluded to it) to my players last night. They were tasked to retrieve one on a small Tear of Selune. "Um, do we need a spacesuit because there's no air there, right?"
Acquisitions Incorporated is also a bit of a parody. The book was written under the impression that it can work in any setting, even if it started off as a Forgotten Realms campaign.
But I believe Davyd is correct, as far as lore goes, the MtG worlds are sort of their own separate beast.
It still takes place canonically in FR in the book too though iirc
Granted the connection is in a trinket which probs makes it a bit more murky in terms on canonicity
The adventure does, but the book itself is mostly just a guide on how to turn any adventure in any setting into a workplace comedy.
I could also be wrong, I’m just stating based off what I remember of it. I haven’t cracked that book open in a while.
You probs right tbh, at least in terms of the connection not being proof of a connection
Since its like one number on an optional trinket table
But damn if only that Ravnica postcard appeared in the adventure 😂
Oh wait!
It's lore, but it's not canonical
There is a connection in one of the adventures, not necesarrily sure if Ravnica specifically but there is a planeswalker
||Thank you witchlight my love||
I am super excited for book 39 of drizzt this year its teasing some major major drow lore updates. That is more than three paragraph from WOTC
Wait who?
||The gnome or halfling woman that helps you in the carnival…something…strings? I think her name was, she uses an instrument||
||Ellywick Tumblestrum||
||She's a Planeswalker in a D&D Crossover MTG set, that's not an MTG Planeswalker Lorewise. Tasha is another "Planeswalker" in another D&D Crossover MTG set, but she is not an MTG Planeswalker.||
I think this is the right channel for this question, what does a mimic look like when not disguised as something?
There any lore for that?
In the adventure she is specifically called a planeswalker, is that still not a MTG planeswalker lorewise?
The FR doesn’t get super detailed, but states that in their natural state, they’re grey colored like granite. Though I’ve always just imagined them as big purple blobs to match the official 5E art.
Sad.
Planeswalker is a D&D term too but it can literally just mean someone who can cast Planeshift or otherwise travel between planes. Fun fact, that's a straight up epic boon which exists and is called Planeswalker.
MTG planeswalkers are a whole different beast because the MTG multiverse is entirely separate from the d&d multiverse. They operate on different mechanics.
Is it? Searching the term on dndbeyond only shows up twice, once for Her and the other for Ravnica
Sorry it's the boon of planar travel, but point stands.
MTG multiverse is separate from the D&D one, crossover sets are not canon to either.
No harm but I don’t think it does. The term is only used twice according to dndbeyond, once for a MTG book and another for the person in question.
And I dunno where crossover set is coming from, am i missing something?
Okay do you know anything about MTG?
Have you played it or read the books or the story articles?
A Lil bit i guess?
Magic: the gathering: Adventures in the forgotten realms
Some, read some plane shift mainly
And commander legends battle for Baldur’s gate
Yeah that's not really informative.
Yeah im not talking about these for clarity
I've been playing MTG for 12 years, and DND for 9.
Even so it doesnt dismiss the point
To answer this question
It specifically calls out planeswalker as a term that hasnt been used in a non MTG book in 5e before, in a book with nocs from a large variety of diffrent settings that werent connected before and calls her out as being from a diffrent world too
The MTG and D&D IPs are owned by the same company so they make crossover material, there's MTG sets that are set in D&D universes, and there's D&D books set in MTG planes, neither of them are canonical to their respective IPs, they exist in their own nebulous bubbles. You can headcanon them to be canon in your own games of either, but that is just your games.
Im not talking about those things though
Im talking about an adventure set in the Feywild with npcs of many diffrent world, where one is described as a planeswalker from a diffrent world
An official book
||wild beyond the Witchlight to be clear||
You're being deliberately vague here. You do realize planes exist in DND and they mean something different than in MTG.
Planes in DND mean like overlapped realities that all exist within the same universe, like the material, Feywild, shadowfell etc. But they're all from the same "universe".
Planes in MTG are different universes entirely, to put it simply.
So Planeswalker is an in-universe term in DND because people can literally walk between planes.
But the term Planeswalker hasnt been defined in this book as being diffrent from that of Ravnica, adding the fact that the same book has links to many diffrent worlds which didnt exist before said book
And people can additionally be from different worlds in DND, it's not that hard. I mean it is, but point stands.
Eberron wasnt connected to FR til that same book
But this is the first time the term has been used if thats the case, and also the term hasnt been defined
Okay you're misunderstanding me. The MTG crossover books are not canon to either IPs overall canon.
The witch light book is using the DND version of Planeswalker which means one who can walk the planes.
It's self explanatory.
Im not misunderstanding you I just disagree
Planes exist, the witch light book takes place in the feywild, someone who can walk through the planes would be a Planeswalker.
That is not the same as an MTG planeswalker.
I don't even really understand your confusion here. This is not an opinion, this is a set of facts I am telling you.
||Witchlight os the crossover book in dnd, woth 5 pther settings being linked to FR through this book alone not including MTG settings||
Witchlight is not a crossover
They arent facts
It's a mainline DND adventure, it takes place in the feywild adjacent to the material plane of the forgotten realms.
Neither of those are outside the DND ip.
||Eberron was totally disconnected til witchlight, so was Mystara||
They are.
Anyone in dnd can be a planeswalker
In mtg only specific people “planeswalkers” are called planeswalkers
It absolutely wasn't buddy.
Eberron has been connected to the overall DND multiverse it's just very hard to get to compared to other worlds.
Debatable
Show me the term planeswalker in a 5e book other than a MTG or Witchlight book then no harm
This is incorrect