#overclocking
1 messages · Page 69 of 1
Oddly, I was playing CSGO today, and I noticed that it performed best when I gave it access to all 32 threads. On a single CCX it was dipping below 200 FPS, avg about 240. 32 Threads was almost always above 350+, but never dipped below 300.
This is the exact opposite of the behavior I saw months ago, so they must've had updates.
Source 2 is weird
Wait, they updated CSGO to source 2 already?
I have literally no consistent data on how it behaves
I thought that didn't happen yet.
elements of it
not a full port
I see
how do I know if I'm thermal throttling, if my motherboard can't handle the OC, or if my CPU itself just isn't stable enough to handle the OC
thermal throttling means that frequency will be reduced in order to keep the processor from getting too hot
so you'll be able to see the frequency drop and the fact that temps will be very near tjmax
Keep in mind also regular boosting behavior relies on temps. Don't have to get near TJMax to see clocks decrease.
not boosting as high as it could isn't the same as thermal throttling tho. thermal throttling implies it will drop below the frequency you set because protections are kicking in
Right but you'll see a decrease in clock speed before you thermal throttle is the point
I need a bit of help overclocking my gpu
with a manual oc you won't. frequency decreasing IS thermal throttling
i need some help to oc my ram
Some reading should be done first, 🙂 #overclocking message
Or just tag fitz lol
good luck with that
Speak of the legend
@lavish tundra told me about you fitz and i haven’t a clue what to do, i require your assistances
Take a pic of the white sticker on the ram stick and send here
what white sticker
you want me to take it apart again?
Send a pic of that
Just 1 stick of ram
Not both
There should be a sticker with a lotta numbers
Send that
gskill and corsair go off the sticker, rest is 🤷♂️
where do i send the picture
pm to one of us since you might not be able to post it
Hope thaiaphoon is right
its reve
thank you for the explanation
I'm running a ryzen 5 3600 with a wraith prism cooler, and I was able to get to 4.375ghz at like 1.51 volts, but anything past that and I blue screened/crashed
Holy crap dude. Don't do that. You don't want any more than 1.3V unless you're prepared to burn/degrade your chip or go sub-ambient
More like 1.25 to be truly safe, but yeah
No, that's the idle voltage
"stock" during a very specific load
It uses less under load
Stock voltage can vary quite a bit, and ryzen can boost up to 1.5V but it does that automatically and under low load (current). A static voltage of 1.5V is far, far too much. If you load up prime95 or even cinebench you'll see voltage drop to 1.1-1.2V
If you want to overclock your ryzen processor, just enable PBO. Static overclocks aren't effective
Up to 1.3 is fine on amd
potato potahto
Eh im running my 3600x 4.4ghz all core at 1.286V
Stable for gaming and light benchmarking
At that point it depends on how long you plan to keep the chip, how intense your workloads are, and your LLC settings
llc on zen2/3 (arguement can be made for zen/+ too) should be left on auto
could I get a simple explenation of PBO and how to turn it on, what expectations to have when oc'ing memory, and how to match memory clock to cpu clock
is the arctic liquid freeze 2 good cpu cooling?
Hello all. I've sucked myself back into overclocking my 3950X, and I feel like I'm missing something.
I was trying to watch AHOC's videos on Load Line Calibration, but he is impossible to follow, and doesn't seem to really address a comment he made about how SVI2 TFN measures VRM only (which I knew already).
In my case, SVI2 TFN is set to 1.38V and it droops to 1.31V under load. As far as I can tell, this is basically safe, kind of, except that when it comes off load, I can only guess that it's boosting to about 1.36V or so. So right there I guess I need to lower my VRM vcore voltage to something like 1.35.
However, there is then Core VID (Effective) and Core VID in HWiNFO. Core VID (Effective) is (as someone blanketly stated for all VID on Ryzen) is just showing what the CPU is requesting. In my case, this is set to 1.325V.
However, higher up there is just "Core VID", which I can see go from 1.325V on idle, all the way down to 1.219V under load. But at the same time, my 3950X is hitting over 90C and then crashing with P95 (at 4.25 Ghz).
So what do I need to do here? Bump the Core VID to match the external so it can match up during droop?
I know that stock, most Zen 2 and Zen 3 CPUs hit around 1.4-1.5V, but then droop as low as 1.2V. So what could I do here?
Also, before you say it, no I do not want to do PBO. It is basically ineffective for Zen 2, especially my 3950X. GN basically proved that in their tests. I mainly just care about all-core speed for multi-threaded workloads.
Mmmm, I'd disagree. PBO can work wonders if you set it up right by unrestricting power and other limits. Play around with EDC, PPT and TDC limits and SOC voltages. PBO can do a lot if you know how to make it work. PBO will get my 3700x to 4.3 all core and I haven't been able to do much better manually.
Automatic clock/voltage tuning depending on how good your silicon is, Just turn it on, Memory look at the guides, idk
Yes
I feel like I'd rather learn from this all-core experience and apply it to PBO if I ever wish to, than to just turn on PBO, have my CPU run at 120C (like it normally does when I enable PBO), and ignore what SVI2 TFN and VID are saying because I apparently don't understand what they actually mean in the context of a Zen 2 processor.
Yeah, everytime I've used PBO that has happened.
What cooler?
240mm NZXT X52. It actually had been working fine with my all-core OC. 4.15 and 4.25 are very stable when not using Prime95. It even stays under 85C on R20 and R23. It just is Prime95 that causes it to crash and run at 90-95C.
But, even just R20 with PBO hits over 100C no problem. Granted, because I never really tweaked it, but still. The point is that I want to understand voltage on this processor properly before even touching PBO.
I honestly don't see a point in learning PBO if I can't understand how to overclock all-core, mainly what my SVI2 TFN and VID should be hitting under load and at idle.
if r20 is hitting such high temps with pbo on, then lower the limits
Right, but the point of PBO is to push single-core, as well as allow other cores to push higher frequencies when under 50-90% load, right?
the point of pbo is to push all core, while maintaining most of the stock single core
Right, so to allow a higher all-core frequency (when not all cores are being 100% utilized) while maintaining or also pushing stock single core
But what's the point in playing with that if I can't even get an all-core OC to be stable under p95? Shouldn't I understand what the voltage regulation on the processor is before I even touch PBO?
All-core OC is simple, usually, but Ryzen's power is weird
So why should I play with frequency limits on PBO when I may be missing out on more voltage, or completely over-cooking my CPU?
Does that make sense?
Maybe I will get to PBO at some point, but it's useless if my power isn't right, right?
given that you were running 1.3v+ under load, that will degrade it, especially if you do all core workloads
with stock and pbo, the SMU still have full voltage control, and will throttle to stay safe in all workloads
Okay. So the chip does automatic voltage contol, and all I need to do are contol the frequency limits that it stays within?
Also, under load, the SVI2 TFN (VRM) was at 1.300-1.313V, and the VID (vcore) was at 1.219V.
I just had them set to 1.38V and 1.325V in the BIOS. They droop significantly lower than what they're set to with LLC 2 (1 max).
My main issue with the guides I've seen is that they seem to throw a ton of information at you in not a very easily digestible way.
The information is there, but it requires a ton of reading and for me to piece together the information. The way PBO is shown is as this really easy thing to do, but all the documentation and information surrounding it seem overly complicated.
you have 3 options:
- leave it stock (best single core)
- pbo with power/current limits set for your situation (not as good single core as stock, but better multicore)
- manual, with 1.25v (best all core if pbo doesnt reach the same clocks)
1.38V is far too high for your 3950X. I would set at 1.3 at most, with low-medium LLC to let it drop 1.25 or less under load
also you must have disabled or adjusted your safety limits if PBO is hitting more than 95C
1.3 is max safe voltage for ryzen cpus
Atleast for daily
I think I've explained that numerous times already, that I know that. However, that number doesn't help me if I don't understand when that voltage is unsafe, because stock Ryzen CPUs often hit 1.4-1.5V on idle or light loads.
Is it only unsafe under full load? Or is is unsafe all the time? Because stock voltages kind of disagree with that latter point.
So in the case then which one is not safe over 1.3V? Is it SVI2 TFN (VRM External Voltage), Vcore VID, or both? Because clearly under load, I am hitting 1.3V on VRM, and 1.22V on vcore.
When i overclock do i want the llc to be more flat ?or the other way around?
Because i noitced my voltage is pretty high during stress test with auto on llc
it's unsafe whenever your CPU is drawing substantial amounts of current. How much is "substantial", is very difficult to find out unless you can beat the information out of somebody from AMD who programmed the SMU (they certainly won't willingly tell you), or if you very carefully and methodically induce a known amount of current into individual cores and attempt to document the SMU/boosting behavior. Good luck with that unless you write your own OS.
As for the voltage readings, SVI2 TFN (from my understanding) is the voltage that the core/SMU itself reports, and is the most accurate, as claimed by the author of HWInfo and tests that (attempt to) measure voltage on the chip.
Thats fine for idle. Not all core
On load
Vcore shouldnt be higher than 1.3V
VID is simply the voltage that the core requests, and Vcore is usually a motherboard-reported voltage which can be accurate if it's a mirror of SVI2 TFN, but is usually measured from VRM side which can be substantially offset due to socket impedance under high current
The reason why you should not set a manual voltage above 1.3V is that OSes (windows especially) will perform high power/current operations basically on their own whim, with no care for processor safety (OSes assume the processor/mobo regulate themselves for safety) and will thus cause dangerous levels of current draw due to scheduled processes, like AV scans or updates
not to mention the processor load of simply loading up the OS and its modules
Very true
Anything above 1.3V on a ryzen chip daily driver is basically slowly killing the cpu
Also ryzen will boost to ~1.5V usually when most/all cores are inactive and something is loading a single core. So it needs the voltage to drive enough current through a core so it can reach high clocks
Up to 1.5V for ln2 extreme is fine
Just to get the high scores
Then you come back to under 1.3
Bear in mind that the impedance of a processor changes dynamically, and transistor frequency scales with current, so if the impedance is high, you also need more voltage to reach the same current, which allows for enough clocks
The Ryzen boosting algorithm is written by people with much greater understanding of this behavior (as well as degradation) than most of us could ever hope to achieve, myself included.
I'm sure you're an intelligent person, but I doubt you will outsmart them on this field, at least at this moment.
The issue with high voltages is with semiconductors P = (I^2)V so as you increase the voltage you also increase the current quadradicly through the CPU which can burn out the power plane on the CPU
Exactly 0 things about what u said are correct
Current is quadratically proportional to Vgs
And you very much can burn out the power plane or the base layers that carry the power
current goes up ^2, power is quad afaik
In that case then I'll probably just pull the voltage back down to where it was and never do P95 I guess. Can't seem to get accurate answers on what does what, so I don't know who to trust.
SVI2 TFN is the most accurate voltage reading you're going to get from your processor. That's a fact
So is the reality that you actually can not measure the actual vcore at all?
Even though there's two VID values on HWiNFO and the top VID values seem to change pretty dynamically under load?
you can use a multimeter to probe parts of the CPU. People have done that and found that SVI2 TFN is very close, to the degree of measurement error of the multimeter contacts themselves
SVI2 readings are, for all practical purposes, perfect measurements of vcore. I would be more concerned about sampling frequency than the (in)accuracy of the reading
Svi2 tfn is treated as the vr vout for amd
So i've been thinking and it's a big question:
Does overclocking an overclocked cpu means it's in Overclocked 2.0, or it's Re-overclocking a Overclocked cpu ?
I was thinking about this while learning how to overclock a cpu
Just more overclock
its because its idle
if you want to reach those voltages idle, dynamic OC switching (or offset if i remember correctly)
but your motherboard likely doesn't have it :p
There's overclocking, then there's turbo boost, both are different
That there is bonkers
Not bad, #34 for config
can you overclock a ps5?
No
is the 1650 worth overclocking
you can gain some extra performance for free quite easy, imo yes but its up to you if its worth your time also depends on the silicon lottery some chips will OC well others wont
that just means its slighty overclocked above nvidias defaults spec out of the box, its quite easy you can just use msi afterburner (works for any brand of card)
you just up the core and memory in steps, hold on ill link a vid for you to help
alright
Play World of Warships for free: http://bit.ly/2ldpyOX New players will receive 1 Million Credits, the USS Langley Aircraft Carrier, 3 days premium time, and more by using my code PLAYLANGLEY2019. Big thanks to Wargaming for sponsoring this video.
○○○○○○ Items featured in this video available at Amazon ○○○○○○
► Amazon US - http://bit.ly/1meybO...
Depends what you want to do, do you wanna overclock or undervolt or what
Use bios instead. Ryzen master kinda meh and requires reboots anyway.
Overclock
But i dont know how stable my cpu is at 4.2 as ive never done any kinds of tests before. Ive just done thermal testing
Hehe my 3600x go brrrr at 4.4
Anyone managed 5ghz on 5600x yet?
@rough cairn of course
https://hwbot.org/submission/4632374_baby_j_cpu_frequency_ryzen_5_5600x_6132.34_mhz
there's multiple people who got it to 6ghz
well one core but whatever
haha nice but that's one core on liquid nitrogen. i was thinking about conventional oc that allows offsetting core clock higher than 200mhz in the bios. no option to offset higher than 200mhz on mine.
all core oc instead of pbo that is? why?
uh what
I thought you want 5ghz?
all core or set single ccx 5ghz then
pbo is good for everything else
ok i see, so i can either try all core multiplier 5.0 or single ccx to 5.0 but i cannot combine for example single ccx to 5.0 with a pbo. if i choose pbo than im stuck to whatever max offset mb manufacturer had imposed, correct?
I mean
the point to PBO is for the chip to choose how high it wants to boost
not to force PBO to boost to a certain frequency
if you want to force PBO, just set manual
well the benefit of offsetting the pbo to 200mhz on 5600x is that it allows the chip to boost to 4.85 (pbo + 200mhz offset) instead of 4.65 (pbo at default settings).
When you combine pbo + offset + curve optimizer = the chip boosts to 4.85ghz whenever possible while staying at around 1.27 volt on load and dropping to 0.965 volt on idle.
When you set all core oc to 4.85ghz instead = the chip remains at the voltage you choose (stable at 1.3125 in my case). With LLC level 3 the chip drops a bit to 1.293 volt on load but remains at 1.304 volt on idle.
To revamp, i guess my question is:
**Has anyone managed to OC 5600x to 5ghz: **
- either with all core OC (if so, what voltage and LLC)
- or with pbo+offset (if so, what mobo, bios version, curve optimizer settings)
Good stuff
@robust aurora For my PBO settings, I've got a +175 offset, for curve -30 on best 2 cores and -15 on the rest, -0.025v voltage offset, load line level 4, and the rest varies by motherboard.
A cheaper motherboard with smaller VRM heatsinks might throttle the boosting behaviors, and heat plays a huge factor in how high and how long it boosts.
He has a decent mb b550 arous elite so should be fine. Thanks
Tier A on the VRM for that board, should do nicely
Aorus elite very nais
i dont do over thing it may kill u pc
Incredibly unlikely, any modern PC has protections.
The only thing i could imagine is an unsafe daily driving votlage that would take a bit tho
Yikes
Or deciding you've seen enough sub ambient videos to do it yourself and don't insulate your mobo and kill it with condensation
1.65v on Samsung b-die is fine though, if you have a ram fan. I wouldn't do that daily though.
I think "kill your pc" as in kill CPU
But yea b die can take 1.65v without too many problems
tell that to all the redditors claiming their ryzen 5 3600 is stable for daily use at 4.7ghz 1.5V
(because they passed cinebench)
seriously, i've encountered people putting MORE than 1.5V into zen 2 and believing that was a daily oc
i saw someone just last night running their 5600X at 1.35V and when someone said "your volts too high bro" he was like NUH UH GAMERS NEXUS SAID IT'S OK
and linked a video from GN about overclocking zen... 1
never underestimate the ability of people to be willfully and dangerously ignorant
I've even seen people link intel oc guides to justify running 1.4v on zen 2
Incredibly unlikely for anyone with common sense*
which is not super common now that I think about it
smh i had too much hope for people
having common sense puts you in the top 1%
Given how hard it seems to even intentionally degrade a 3700x - I have no idea how redditors seem to do it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TYesViAsTE
My Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/buildzoid
Teespring: https://teespring.com/stores/actually-hardcore-overclocking
The Twitch:https://www.twitch.tv/buildzoid
The Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/actuallyhardcoreoverclocking
#overclocking #Ryzen #AMD
Buildzoid living in the future 
22/11/2041
simple
they just don't stop at 1.4v
highest reddit™️ manual voltage I've seen was 1.52
More power = more better right? 
yea bro my 5900x running 300W 5.5GHz all core is way better than the 5900x running 5.9GHz at 250W
does undervolting decrease the cost of a electric bill?
I doubt it will be noticeable but probably
oh ok
Not enough to notice
Hmmm... I have to reset cmos upon every. Single. Oc crash.
Anyone got an idea? My cmos batt is under my gpu
Use something conductive and use the CMOS jumper pins instead
Hold something on them for 10 seconds or so
Usually located down by FP connector, 2 pins all by themselves labeled CMOS
I mean if the OC fails and you need to reset BIOS, then yes, it's normal
But only one or the other, not both
Reason: Bad word usage
Which has be confused why it mucks subseq. Boots
OC's fail at the BIOS level always
SO if the OC keeps failing, ratchet it back a little bit
You free to call? I think I have it this time and I want someone to witness me xd
Ahhh, I don't do calls, nothing personal. But if you're having crashing and non-boot issues with BIOS and having to reset it, dial back the OC or add a tad more voltage
Bsod this time.
No cmos reset needed woo
well
I'm running into a weird issue now.
I'm windows stable @dusky orchidplet1 4.5 all core and @dusky orchidplet2 4.3 all core (3900x) though I get Thread12 (Chiplet0 Core 6 I assume) crash on prime95, so I lowered C03 and C06 to 4400mhz... and they downclock to 3600mhz.
result during stability test
Aye
So it's technically better already
yeah it's moving to 1.4 most things I checked said 1.4 and under is ailgith.
I'm not saying you're wrong haha
1.376 underload
prime95 stable.
can confirm that C3/6 are stuck at 3.6ghz through hwinfo
I didn't mean to piss you off btw, I'm very thankful for you even looking at what I'm sayin'
How long you been running 1.4
Was running the default 1.5v before that, idk, a bit more than a year?
I mean load voltage
Really should be 1.35 or less under load if I remember Fitz properly
highest it seems to get under load is 1.356v
still weird it doesn't accept single core clock speeds when it gives me the option. Is that a zen3 only feature?
4.45 all core is stable @1.4PeakVoltage
zen2 I'd stay below 1.25-1.3 set, and definitely below 1.25 under load
you work for mersenne?
hmm?
I assume prime95 smallfft
Prime95, the software, is meant to be used for finding mersenne primes, but just happens to have a good stress test on top.
Yeah, I ended up unstable way quicker on smallfft, I had to pull the clocks down, don't want instability 😄
though it seems my Asetek is betraying me
water temp 36c
coretemp 80c
sounds right
Which voltage readout should i be looking at
?
Vcore, vid,vrvout?
I have tried 5ghz with 1.3 fixed vcore on medium llc .
My vr vout is at 1.231 and vcore at 1.284 but the vid is at 1.4 and im not sure if its safe or not.
@zenith palm still stuck on 80%
Maybe power off then
Ok
@zenith palm sorry if im anoying but do you know if the vid on hwinfo is something i should care about or only vcore and vr vout. I have seen people in reddit said the vid values doesnt matter when you use fixed vcore but i dont know if i can trust them-_-.
I have no idea sorry
Ok thanks anyway👍
Vid doesn't matter
What you got there? 10700k/Gigabyte z490?
Yes
I had better luck with High LLC. Mine ended up stable at 1.345 set in bios. VR Vout is your real voltage. Came out to 1.26v max load and 1.3-1.33 while gaming. This was for 5ghz all core 4.7ghz uncore. Dunno what you're trying to reach though.
@dark ferry oh, i have rn stable 5ghz on 1.22v on vr vout on load. But when i raise the ring clock hwinfo showing windows error after 5-10 min stress test, but i dont crash or get bsod . Any ideas why ? Maybe i need to raise the voltage a bit im on 1.29 on bios rn
How do you know it's stable? What are you testing with?
Well i did cinebench r23 first and then prime 95 with avx off
Occt is nice
ok i will try it later👍
Neither of those sound very taxing to be considered stable.
What are you using?@dark ferry
OCCT
Oh ok will test it when i get home then
How are your temps?
High 80s on prime 95 and high 70s on cinebench
Cooler?
I'm going to assume not enough voltage and/or too much vdroop.
But all you can do is test.
Then test more.
And more.
@dull ginkgo what should i run
I'd say extreme if you want good stability
And leave other settings like they are now?@zenith palm
Yeah I'd say so
Ok thanks
Ye
Change instruction set to avx2
Just started
Auto is doing it on avx 2 anyway
Should i let it run the full hour?
i would
Temps are realy low rn the highest it was was 73 for a single core
Settings are ok right?
sounds fine, what cooler do you have and what temps do you usually get?
I have h115 its corsair 280mm and on cinebench im getting high 70s
Like 78 max
I thought it will be higher then r23
🤷♀️
Ok i guess it is stable then
Passed
Im still on stock ring ratio tho i will do the ring oc tommorow
I'm still using an manually overclocked penintium processor ;-;
And 4gb of DDR3 RAM
And integrated graphics
It runs csgo so it's whatever
My best stable oc
Drivers are out of date asf but its ok
If the voltage wasn't limited i could've prolly pushed +150 core and +900 mem
Now when you say 900 on memory, do you mean the total effective vram speed or the actual base clock?
900 above the base clock
So then what is your effective speed?
¯_(ツ)_/¯ 3355mhz but idk how you calc effective because imo its means less than just the mhz
divide by 4
Ohh lol
750......
he said nvm
But 100% fan :/
Oof
i was pushing 90+c on cpu
Stock cooler ?
Block of metal X)
Mb change again
Maybe add some intake fans so the air is filtered
Its too old
I barely use it anymore
I just wanted to push my 750 for the memes
Okay lol
Yeh
I could care less about getting a knew one
when next gen intel comes out
why not better cpu
Reason: Bad word usage
i-
I would b560 but it's a 10100 and theres b460s for like 60$ ish
I have a 8700, just want to possibly sell the old one
Id have to get a mounting bracket
Don't bother getting a new cooler for a cpu that old tbh
not sure if this goes in here, but my cpu seems to be doing a dance with its usage after I enabled XMP on my RAM.
I don't see any performance losses though
like when I play games and such
that and minecraft, yes
That's why CPU spikes then
but I get the usage spikes even when I'm not running minecraft
wallpaper engine
alright I'll close that and see what happens after a few mins
Yea. Wallpaper Engine has never affected my CPU like that.
I would re-install it, choose a different wallpaper in it, lock the wallpaper fps lower, set it to auto pause when not focused, or just plain pause it when you're gaming.
Depends on what wallpaper you're using
I know what it was
the nvidia container
for whatever reason
20% of my GPU and making the cpu have a heart attack
granted I noticed no perf drops, still
Wallpaper engine uses that for moving wallpapers
nvidia container is your gpu driver
I did figure that out by you telling me lmao
dont mean to sound rude on that sorry
but I just haven't seen it happen before, so it could potentially be a driver issue too?
either way its ifne
You can check task manager for what's using the cpu
I have also done that 😂
it switches between like lots of things, discord, firefox, AWCC(for my monitor, alienware thing), it was like all my normal applications but 50+% useage
which all went away when I killed the nvidia container
I actually bought that today
and got a pretty bangin result https://www.3dmark.com/spy/20072479
fun
I know, like a solid 6-700 points more than most others with my setup
Dumb that these leaderboards show duplicates, no way afaik to filter to highest score per user
you cant filter, the individual user has to go in and clear lesser subs
how much do you think i could overclock a 3700x with a stock cooler?
Can't even PBO with the stock cooler
What's the best way to put a floor on your vcore? I don't want it going below a certain level due to some instability Im seeing, but I want it to go higher as needed. R5 3600 / Asus Tuf B550
Load line calibration
But that doesnt let me choose a specific value right, just a "level"?
The higher the LLC level, the less it droops under load. If it's getting too close to the unstable level, LLC will flatten it out. If that still doesn't work, you can set a small positive dynamic voltage offset.
Maximum LLC level is the closest thing to no droop at all, but will increase heat system wide
I'm actually just trying to prevent idle vcore from going too low, as that's where this PC is BSODing. Under load it works fine, which is annoying to diagnose actually
It's crashing on idle? Odd. Normally the vcore is higher at idle.
How are you setting the voltage? In bios as a manual voltage, offset, or auto?
No at idle most CPUs drop vcore since it's not needed. This 3600 hovers around 1-1.1
at idle my 3700x is higher
This is totally stock
My 5800X and 2700 were both higher on idle too
It's not about voltage, it's about current
Low load it'll be higher voltage since it doesn't need to worry about being flooded with current
Only a couple gigabyte boards do that iirc, LLC shouldn't make idle less than loaded
Yeah my mb has it lol
Dont know how else to explain that Im BSODing at idle sitting on desktop, but I can run Cinebench looped and play warzone without issue
BSOD erros are different
will try that thanks
on a couple of BSODs, the full text doesnt even display, almost like it hard froze while drawing the BSOD
Make sure your bios is updated and maybe try cmos clear and redo your settings
all done
swapped RAM, fresh OS install
tried LLC already and no change
Could be a motherboard defect then. It's not supposed to do that.
yeah maybe, but the board is brand new and the cpu is used. probably shouldve mentioend that he told me it was doing the same thing for him. I figured it was his own setup, but now I dont think so
Possibly a hardware defect then in the cpu, yeah. Something in the voltage regulator.
Hmm there is no way 50mhz memory and 40 core increased preformance by 30%@storm kettle
idk it still went up, only story mode tho
Has to have been a peak or something that's not right
It's a very moderate overclock
I would push further
Try +25 core +50 mem and stress test with furmark or something every time
ok
so 1465 instead of 1440mhz?
clock or voltage?
dowloading latest edition of furmark rn
.\
@storm kettle how long where your stress tests?
under a minute
tweak 2 is inaccurate af for some cards
Do like 5 min runs
i have an asus card
Would recommend msi afterburner but up to you
gpu tweak works fine
ok
That was fun
restarted my computer to install it and i was stuck in a boot loop for 10 minutes
Just a casual 19GHz
Wow 19ghz :o

that's an underclock... 3080 (and 3090) have 19.5 Gbps stock
Mhz
^
and i thought 4.5 was good
Is there a specific number to overclock a 3600 ?
Like i just put 1.35v and boom leave it at that
On a 3600 pbo with decent tweaks will do better than manual oc anyway
I always wondered what a 14ghz cpu would feel like, How much performance it would give ?
(Not about the thermals, more of the performance)
Sad, I had to RMA a 3600 because it kept Bsod on everything
What do you think would be a safe oc for a 9600k
each chip is diff, but i get 4.9GHz @ 1.35v
Not true. PBO on zen 2 is NOWHERE near pbo on zen 3
My 3600x PBOs to only 4.2 all core while I can do 4.4 all core
at lower voltages as well
manual is better for all-core than PBO, but it's worse for (most) games which will hit higher single core boosts
For majority of the cpus
not all
Really? I thought it was about the same? I couldn't manual oc mine better than pbo ¯_(ツ)_/¯
They really improved the PBO algorithm in zen 3
Ahh i thought it was just a big boost from zen+ to zen 2
https://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/20132903/spy/20017592 stock 10600k and 3060ti vs oc
V nice
Yeah I left it and let it run and was actually really surprised when I came back and it hadn’t BSOD
Only thing was that temps were around 92 max so I’ll try to do 5.2ghz on Saturday with an AIO in an ice bucket
Good luck
What cooler you have on it atm?
Fuma 2
I set auto voltage because I was too lazy and was too busy to incrementally increase voltage
So if I fine tune it it probably won’t be so hot
@mint mountain how is the gpu temp 15c higher without oc compare to oc
Oc was on my test bench cause that’s where I have my good 10600k, non oc was in my case with side panel on
Oh okk nice oc!
Thanks
I thought you undervolted it or something
Lol
Is that for building your parents the pcs or for you testing for the fun of it lol?
Well I got my new 3090 to go over 110 MH/s but it very quickly thermal throttled due to memory junction temp hitting 110C. Turning the fan to max drops it to a still throttled 100C. This is all on stock memory clock and core is around 50C lol.
It's very obvious that I need better thermal pads. I've got a couple options in mind but which ones would you guys recommend? I need 3mm if it's the same pads as the air cooled model.
I watched a mining channel when i was deciding if i should put thermal pads on my 3070 and they said they just used the generic pads on Amazon and they were pretty good
Mando is mining person so @sterile flame might know smth about thermal pads for vram
Do you think we need it for 3070 im wondering too and not sure
You could just put a fan on the backplate
That may be fine for a 3070 but I feel like a 3090 would be too much for generic ~3W pads. I've got pads already, they're about that rating probably, and woefully inadequate.
ehh i dont think so my hotspot only gets to 60c max
well they were actually doing a 3080 but 🤷♀️
Mine is 62 max most of the time 60 but hotspot might be very different from vram temp
3070 doesn't have vram temp sensor
Yeah i know it doesnt have one
I'm at 50 core, 62 hotspot, 100 memory
Nope
but g6x gets a lot hotter than g6 anyway
Most definitely like 90c+
Isnt 6x alot hotter
Do you think a good 12W pad set would be enough? Or should I spring for 17W?
12w should be fine
Certainly won't hurt
i thought g6x was more efficient but runs a lot faster so cancels out the extra efficiency
6x is for sure not efficient lmao
its more energy efficient is what i meant?
Not at all
6x is just overclock 6
Its faster but efficient isnt the right term to use
ohh woops
aSUS > evga
The pads that needed arent the same for all 3070s right?
Correct
I need to search my model
Look up a teardown of your model, they usually measure
Generally the same for same brand
Gigaturd you need to look at height between pcb and backplate
yeah theres like 3 different sizes for gigabyte iirc
I will look today and share with you what i find since we have same model
Thanks
https://www.reddit.com/r/gigabytegaming/comments/n2ne4n/gigabyte_rtx_3070_gaming_oc_8g_thermal_pads/
2 votes and 10 comments so far on Reddit
so 2 mm for the back it looks like and 0.5 and 1 for the front i think
@sterile flame do you think the 3080 version would have the same thermal pads needed? because there is very little to none agreed on info about 3070 model
Buy Thermal Pads Here: https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2057872.m570.l1313&_nkw=thermal+pads+2mm&_sacat=0&mkcid=1&mkrid=711-53200-19255-0&siteid=0&campid=5337982317&customid=&toolid=10001&mkevt=1
Or Here: https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2047675.m570.l1313&_nkw=Thermalright+ODYSSEY+Silicone+Pad&_sacat=0&mkcid=...
yeah like this one is a good one but for a 3080
fal said probably the same but
Is overclocking a gpu a bad idea
Quite the contrary, it's free performance
How does one do so
MSI afterburner
msi afterburner
Thanks
Jinx
are Thermalright pads good?
i think just the thermal conductivity matters
thats good afaik
will cost me like 50$ for the pads and a paste with the shipping
smh
do i need to change thermal paste tho?
like its a new card
not sure if i need too
Do you need a specific kind of intel cpu to overclock?
Oh
Intel CPUs with a -k ending, and the motherboard need to be a Z series for consumer
and a z board
You can take off power limit and cool it well and let it boost higher
I’ve heard stock intel coolers are trash, should I get a better one?
you are right "after opening up the GPU I found the coolers base plate was made out of aluminium so I couldn't use liquid metal."
gammaxx 400 is also 23$ atm steal
This is the pc I’m going to build last, but for the time being I’m using it to do benchmarks and oc
ahh nice nice
probs not worth you time but you can try
it actually overclocks pretty well... but the base performance is pretty low in the first place
Stock
OC
14% uplift
gud
You've convinced me to buy 3d mark cuz it's like €3.50 atm now lol so oc gpu time
How good is the Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro for overclocking? I can potentially acquire 32gb of it at cl18 and 3600mhz for a decent price and it is version 4.31, which is supposed to be b-die
If it’s b die then pretty good, depends how much it costs though
150 USD
According to the ddr4 section of the overclocking wiki in the pins, Corsair ram version 4.31 is supposed to be b-die
I mean, Corsair is wacky as heck
4.31 is confirmed b die according to the list
RIght but the speed and timings seem odd for B-Die
The timings on the label on the sticks appears to be 18-19-19-39
Seems like Hynix timings to me. Double check the kit number itself also?
Just try to make sure you know what die it is
since yaknow, b die likes 1.5v, a lot of other dies don't
How does one correlate the kit number with die type on Corsair ram?
Yes, on that list version 4.31 is b-die, which is the version on the label under the barcode
As long as you're sure, I don't have access to any good sources.
I got that list from falcie ao should be accurate, and was for my ram
That's from the r/overclocking wiki page so there's no confusion
Ahh nice
Nothing says they can't change their numbering system halfway through a series, other manufacturers are guilty of that already.
Also it could just be low bin b-die like my kit was
But usually lower bin b die is like 3600 16-16-36 yaknow
Yeah so it's odd but who really knows. It could be they just needed more sets to fill out that series so they deliberately took ICs that can do much better and lowballed it.
my sheet is the good bdie that you want to buy, you dont want to get 3600c18 bdie
ah
the sheet is like top 5-10% bdie, there's oem and server bdie that cant do 3000mhz
then bdie that doesnt scale past 1.3v
wack
So what you are saying is that it could be pepeg b-die? 🤔
if its 4.31, its sadge bdie
Well, guess that settles that then
You can say you have one of the OG lamborghinis
antique™️
Also does anyone know a good gaming oc for a 3070? I've got about +150 core and +300 mem atm, +200 core didn't work and I'm going to try +175 core and upping the mem more tomorrow but just wanted to know if any others had experience with theirs?
just keep going
silicon lottery is fun
I'm guessing you can up the mem a good bit more
I was doing timespy and +200 black screened tho lol
But mem should go a bit higher i guess
I'm able to get +1300 stable while mining so
Mine is happy at 150 core and 1100 mem
Hm okay thanks
Was hoping to crank the core up more but most likely not by much more then
It'd be a real potato bin if it was
But I think there's some 3200c16 bdie out there
lol at fitz's analogy
it's a good analogy
Adjust core in 15 mhz increments
<+200 core, ~800 mem should be normal
Thanks forks 👍
Mine topped out at 2145 core, 2000 mem https://hwbot.org/submission/4701882_forks_3dmark___time_spy_geforce_rtx_3070_15175_marks
how so high! hmmmmmm, time to tinker
Yeah, just compare graphics score in that case
15430 👀👀
Maybe my mem too high
Forks are you liquid cooling thar bad boy?
I'll back that off and try more core
It's kinda annoying that 5950x's steamroll most of the 3d benches, but eh, that's just how tech evolves
lol
Me sitting here with 6k ish cpu score 😢
does hwbot have an option to just use graphics score?
This is common for comps
Same reason you saw me run ln2 gpu with a ryzen on a stock cooler kek
That seems so wrong
Couldn't fit a gpu pot on that card because the 8 pin plugs block it
ln2 itself is fairly cheap afaik, it's just not reusable
It's not too bad if you buy used hardware or make your own, cost of the ln2 itself is usually <= $2 a litre in most of the US
also pot costs like 300$ iirc
Bryce got a kp pot + socket heater for 250 shipped
fair
You can get gpu pots for <$200
Just don't get medical grade LN2, the other stuff is suitable to use and much cheaper
aight
Ohh nice so like 50c more than petrol per litre here cool lol
I mean, 30 litres can be hours of benching entertainment depending on the platform
"Entertainment" he calls it
Lol, I certainly don't get paid for it
lol
Mmm need good quality board mem and the pots sounds like ln2 isn't so cheap, even with it being 2$/l
Well, everyone who does ln2 oc is probably already into hwbot/competitive benching anyway
The LN2 itself is cheap, the setup is not so much. It's also very time consuming.
I know this guy who pushed 8Ghz on an FX chip with a really junk low tier board and a $30 chip and only a 10 litre dewar
Damm
FX was easy though
Still have my old fx 6300 in my dads system and an asrock no idea chipset board time to whip it out and get big ghz XD
Sounds like my old system. It was a FX-8350 in an Asrock 990fx
I put it in a new case and shoved it on top of a book case. Now it looks on with shame and self-loathing as I game on my Ryzen build
Those fx chips just scale really well with cold, can do -196C no bugs
Damm
Can you get the 9590 working with ln2 cooling? The world may never know
I'd guess almost all of those world records with the chip are ln2 or cascade phase change
If it's not been run on ln2, it's because it's not worth a lot of points
got a friend who received RMA kits from G Skill for 2x16 3200 CL16 that was reported as B Die in thaiphoon burner
taiphoon just guesses really, but yeah, possible
lol, do you know bones?
Funny thing about his chip (I think that's the one) one of the memory channels is dead
ahpcb?
nah, private one by Cheese
ah
dead memory channel = stonks OC? 🤔
Bones is a good dude
I think it was just a strong chip to begin with, I forget how the channel died
I'm very new to the scene so I don't know many people
Again, not certain that's the same chip
I see
insert weird overclocking noises
Requested a feature, dropped aida latency from 38 to 36 with it
lol
With a clean os, it should be 34ns range
This os has seen 4 cpus, like 6 mobos
(yes I had ryzen power plans on an intel platform)
x470, b550, x570 and z590 chipset drives 
lol
Mine has seen 5 CPUs but only 2 mobos (1700x C6H, 2x 5800X, 5950, 5900 C8H)
7 GPUs though
3 of those were less than a day though lol
Gpus are just registry files that get wiped when you ddu
btw vintage this was my gpu score with no oc so i think youre high mem clock is hurting your perf
Nah that was my non-OC score come to find out LMAO
I had the original timespy screengrab saved but not my OC one
That was my non oc too, mb just better factory oc or something
Not sure gen 3 vs gen 4 makes a difference but I'm on a riser cable
Tried +165 core it didn't work lol
I'm on a b450 anyway so don't think i have gen 4
I don't think B450 does no
Alright guess all i get is +150 core, time to start upping from 800 mem now
Mine topped out there too
Forks must have gotten his silicon hand picked from jenson then lol
Or he tinkered with voltage/clock curves more
More likely lol but 2.1ghz is what they had like jeez
Ahh okay i just did a run with +850 mem but performaned like 50 points worse than 800 for some reason so I'm redoing +800 to see if it was just a freak higher score than it should be
ntb, final results, might be able to push another 25 mhz or so on mem but meh
feels
through just a powerplan?
you'd still be limited by bios as far as power limits go, power plans dont alter much aside from cstates
Probably not a tangible benefit for bench scores I guess, but I was intrigued by how many parameters come up running powercfg /help
It was a rando newegg shuffle 3070 TUF, not a good card by any means
Nice, how did you get the score so high then?
Cold ambient air, stripped down benching windows
Ahh yes ofc
Also 5.3 10900k 4300 16 16 16 28 280 65535 memory etc
Could probably do 5.4 for 3d, haven't tried
Same chip can't even do 5.2 for x265 4k
Don't remember if I flashed the vbios, don't think I did
There were a few vbios with higher power limit than the tuf
I just meant of graphics score lol i only have a 3600 so nowhere near getting cpu score lol
Fast cpu will help graphics score - but tbh, in this specific case, probably <10 pts
It'll start to hurt if you're benching a 3080 ln2 on a 7700k stock etc
Yeah that's what i figured lol
I no longer have the card, so can't test further
IME gddr6 (non x) doesn't really need it if you crank the fans
Especially samsung memory, the micron chips like cold, the samsungs can be happy naked
I didn't crank the fans as i wanted a realistic gaming oc but i mine while not gaming anyway so might as well not a fan of high temps anyway lol
Just something about them don't seem right
for mining
Cheers
Does anyone know how to get this xmp profile 2 panel to light up and become selectable?
do your sticks have 2 xmp profiles?
that's still just profile 1, not profile 2
some sticks have a super high xmp, then a more realistic xmp
When I originally selected xmp, my pc wouldn’t boot up until I cleared the cmos
are your sticks in slots 2 and 4?
Yes
There's a general spot to where you can set the voltage
Idk the ones for ampere though
Probably gonna wanna find somebodies rig list like this with mixed cards
can someone answer me a question? does whea erros/ kernel power error just from ram oc? i have my ram OC'd to 3600cl18 but its samsung c die 3200cl16 (thanks corsair)
secondaries?
My c die does 3600 18 20 20 40
with procodt at 36.9
i used occt for like an hour on 95% load
Try tm5
with the extreme anta config
for 1.5 hrs
thats TM5
chrome might put up a warning
do advanced and proceed
Load that config
OCCT is fine tho, thats what the techies use so
They use both actually
ahh well occt should be fine
also any idea about the kernal error?
might just hop back on to xmp for the moment
Well if you run TM5 with extreme anta for 1.5hrs we can rule it out for sure
okay
Anyway can't test atm will try later but was reading up on kernel error 41 and their last resort was bios update basically
can you post the specific details of the WHEA error(s) you're getting?
you can get WHEA errors on AMD if your FCLK is unstable
ryzen 3000 series can sometimes fail at 1800 FCLK. I also know somebody with a 5900x that can't do 1800 FCLK either (extremely unlucky)
oof
ah that seems like an issue with a PCIE device
are you on AMD? Did you adjust your BCLK?
it's one of the clock multipliers you can adjust in BIOS. You should know if you adjust it
although you can get PCIE errors with unstable FCLK
not very unlucky actually
zen 3 has a LOT of flck issues
unstable IF can show up as pcie bus errors during 3d loads
I would update bios first and then test the current OC you have on extreme anta
TM5 doesn't show IF instability most of the time
it will still cause a crash if there is a problem
I can run a full TM5 test with stable memory but have hundreds of WHEAs
not necessarily
you can get corrected errors
which is what I got when I ran one of my 5800X samples at 1900 with DR B die
i couldnt post 3466 when i tried last time lol
if you could post 3600, there's no reason you can't post 3466
acc fal said its quite common
I know some boards have a clock hole at 3800, but I've never heard of one at 3466
try 3533 then
keep the same timings as 3600
ive never heard of that speed?
and make sure you adjust FCLK accordingly
idk some boards skip over the 133 increases
you could also just keep the same memory settings and just lower FCLK
and run tests to eliminate the FCLK issues
ehh dont want to desync the fclk heard it runs worse
you will get performance penalties running desynced, but you're just doing it to test stability without too much hassle
but ill try some of those
i cant atm but ill try update bios then see if that helps because my bios kinda old
think this bios update at least might help?
what board are you on? 1.0.0.6 is like zen2 launch agesa
look at the date
just update to f60 or f61a
yeah i will i was just looking up the agesa update improvements
How much should I overclock an Ryzen 5 5600x
silicon lottery
but precision boost overdrive will most likely outperform a manual oc on ryzen 5000
just set PPT to 120W if you have a decent cooler (more if you have a really good one), set TDC/EDC to 80.
if you're on stock cooler I wouldn't bother
if you go manual OC make sure to not cross 1.3V
bruh i might need help in overclocking my RAM
i bought it at 4266 Mhz but im able to clock it stably at 3666Mhz
idk much about RAM overclocking so any help would be appreciated
yea i did
also what mobo and cpu
thats how i clocked it at 3666Mhz
mobo - Asus ROG Strix X570E
CPU - Ryzen 9 3950x
ahh well 4266 is usually quite hard to post
but can i get anything further 3666Mhz?
What now?
shouldnt be hard to do 4266 is 2:1 mode, but it'll be worse performance than 3800 in 1:1
Ahh i see whats going on
hmm 3rd gen ryzen might not post 4266
i need sleep
i meant i am able to run my pc 3666Mhz but anything above that doesnt post
brain no workey
well thats fine. I wanted to know whats the max clocking i can get from it
even a 3800Mhz would be fine
i dont necessarily need 4266Mhz
yeah it should be able to do 3800
does it have a 2nd lower xmp profile ?
it should if its 1st profile is so hgih
leave xmp off for now, see how high you can set fclk, once you find that, set memory frequency to 2x that, and we can sort out timings from there
there was only one
yeah try what fitz said then
I imagine that 4266 memory should be b-die, nice overclocking potential if so
ayymd tho
fclk
Yeah, I know. Overclocking includes tightening timings. 3800c14 should be easy on a 5000 series CPU.
mine is C19
Yeah but it's probably rated 4266c19 (which is nice but fclk complicates things)
If you've got a 5000 series CPU then 3800 is likely the highest you'll get with fclk at 1900 (half of memory speed)
3600 maybe then, possibly more if you're lucky

