#graphics-cards
1 messages · Page 41 of 1
The zotac 1080 blower I got isn't to bad. It def needs a repaste though.
I fail to see how I've taken anything out of context but pop off, king 
all I was asking was why some people had disliked it in your experience, mate
you clearly were implying I was saying a lot more than some, mate
but keep the passive aggressive tone. No skin off my back 💀
whatever you say 
Rtx 3090 super ti suprim ftw3u ventus strix is for sale at the very cheap price of $……….. 3,090.23 total
🤷♂️
Any way I can just install amd drivers without adrenaline? I'm having this weird thing where both of my monitors are being counted as one monitor
You can. But try running DDU first and see if that solves it, since you'll need to anyway to remove adrenalin.
?ddu
DDU (Display Driver Uninstaller) Guide by Pato
https://github.com/NeweggTechie/Graphics-cards/wiki/How-to-use-DDU
Newegg when r u gon get me 100$ steam gift card for 40 series gpu
If you were promised that you can DM @cursive urchin and they'll get back to you when they can
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 40 Series Laptops: https://www.aorus.com/en-au/laptops/landing
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxed
Join us on Floatplane: https://www.floatplane.com/channel/HardwareUnboxed
Buy relevant products from Amazon, Newegg and others below:
Radeon RX 7900 XTX - https://geni.us/OKTo
Radeon RX 7900 XT - ht...
Well 3070 could have been 16gb if they just used 2gb chips like on the 3060
Not that unrealistic
Wonder how many gamers said forspoken looks bad because they ran the game on a 8gb card 
I'm wondering how many people thought Hogwarts was buggy because of all the texture pop in/out
Should I wait for the amd 7000 series gpus or buy a $500 gpu now?
The sales are pretty good right now
You can get a 6800/XT for ~500
You may need a new psu though
hey guys, what is the best 4070 out there rn
haha very funny
im going to microcenter tmr to get one cuz they have a deal that you can get a $100 steam card if you get a 40 series card
so im tryna see what the best model is
why cheapest
Cos it's a 190W card and based on pcb design all cards should be fine
In layman terms: all 4070 good
No bad 4070 yet
So not worth spending a cent over the lowest price if they're all ok
tru
isnt zotac known to break or die earlier than other companies tho cuz of garbo build
We don't know yet because the 4070 has been out for like a week

Me using zotac fine 🙂
Most likely this. Depends on the price and how much you value raytracing
Get free customizable resume templates: https://clickhubspot.com/mi7
There is a massive $200 price gap between the 4070 and the 4070 Ti. Can the Ti version justify a 33% higher price tag? Let's compare them in the latest games at 1440p and 4K resolution to help us decide: Is the extra $200 worth it?
Buy an RTX 4070: https://amzn.to/41Xp4LE
Buy ...
To bad I can't afford one
Yep, and you can't have all 4070's in first place either
It was still surprising to see that card rank so high
Who in their right mind is paying 360$ for a 3060
New PC builders who haven't done much research
It's like the default choice
Also the "computer graphics cards" may be skewing those results. Amazon has a ton of different categories for the same thing
True
hey guys 😉
I want to use MyUS Shipping Hub in the united states to shop on NewEgg.
from MyUS i want to ship it to south africa
i want to buy a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Titan Graphics Card from NewEgg. 😉
A what? 
mysus.com
I wouldnt
You can almost for sure get a better gpu for less
From Where!?
1050 ti's also haven't been manufactured in over 5 years so you'd probably be better off with a newer or at least used cars
don't buy cars looking for a good gaming experience worst mistake of my life
In no country is a 1050Ti worth 145
where in the usa can i buy a GTX 1050 Ti 4GB DDR5 PCI express 3.0 Double Fan.
and have it shipped to a forwarding company
find me a $50 NVIDIA 1050 Ti on eBay!
I'm not going to sorry
Even this would be a better buy https://pcpartpicker.com/product/Mc7G3C/sapphire-radeon-rx-6500-xt-4-gb-pulse-video-card-11314-01-20g as long as you have a pcie 4.0 system
If you can afford more https://pcpartpicker.com/product/D9ytt6/asrock-radeon-rx-6600-8-gb-challenger-d-video-card-rx6600-cld-8g
Could likely find a used 6600 for the same price as the 1050 ti from newegg
i dont think my HP z220 CMT Workstation Motherboard supports PCI Express 4.0 🙂
don't even worry about that lol
If you can afford that 6600 then I would try for that
If not, the 6500xt on pcie 3.0 I'm pretty sure still beats the 1050 ti
This >> https://www.ebay.com/itm/125896740016 for $99.99c is that ok?
It's better, still not good though
High 16 series goes for that price
I'd look for 980 ti, 1070, 1660 super, 1660, 1060 6gb, 2060, 1660 ti, 1080
Also 6600 and 5600xt
Could prolly find a dirt cheap 580 8gb
Arc gpus also an option
Make sure whatever it is works with his system
Specifications page for HP Z220 Convertible Minitower Workstation.
400W, not sure if it has power for the gpu other than the pcie slot
they come with a single 6 pin iirc
should i turn this on? or nah
6900xt^
also Is anyone else gettng stutters on the recent driver for 6900xt?
DDU never hurts if you have issues like that
Im not actually sure if im getting stutters how would i check? i think i am but not surei did the ufo test but i didnt get any through that if i did it right
That only checks for ghosting
oh
Stutters you need some sort of chart plotting software to see how many and how bad
hm like what kind?
There's GPUview which comes with the Windows diagnostic toolkit
Nvidia has Nsight now but Nvidia only ofc
You want the WPT (Windows Performance Toolkit) feature https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/test/wpt/
Alright, and i just download it and run it during games?
Here's a quick guide https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/display/using-gpuview
Ah kinda
idk
So i run the log.exe while gaming ig? and then gpu will tell me if im stutering
It tells you a lot more than just fps that's for sure
Yeah let it log while gaming and then use gpuview to see the data after
this is gpu view?
is that the only program that sees stuttering or na i have alot of programs installed but not sure if they monitor that
If you have afterburner installed you can kinda see stutters with the RTSS
yea i got afterburner installed im using rtss rn
Ok well you can watch the line that shows 1% and 0.1% low fps and if that dips hard for more than a few ms, that's a stutter
this right
i have a framelimit on rtss should i turn that off to see the stutters or na
nah stuttering is a drop in low frames not average
looks ok
ight ill see. i also dont get how limiting my frame rate to my refresh rate helped with smoothing like i havent had problems since. but say i wanted to not play with a framelimter it wont be smooth
so i have it on show on screen display but it isnt displaying lmao
There's a couple things at play for that actually.
If the GPU isn't pushing more frames to the monitor than it can handle then they sync better to the refresh rate.
Also if the GPU has a little more idle time to prepare the next frame then the next frame gets delivered faster, which makes it smoother with higher lows.
ohh okay, But i remember that my gpu was pushing more than 240 on certain games but it still wouldnt be smooth, i did a benchmark test with 3d spy and my fps was fine last time iv done it. Anyway to cehck to see if the gpu isnt pushing more frames to the monitor
You mean like a way to check that the fps limiter is working? You just look at average fps for that
Noo I mean if my gpu is pushing the right amount of frames
Bc I’m guessing it’s not since it’s smoother when I use a frame limiter
Right, you can just look at the average fps for that
And the 1% lows will show when there's big drops
Also should I turn this on, will more power make it perform better or no
It can perform better with more power, if the cooling is up to snuff
Yea my gpu cooling is pretty good on apex it gets to 80-81c on max settings and im on 1440p
Well as long as it's under 95 on the hotspot (junction on AMD cards) crank that power limit and temp limit
alright ill run hwinfo rn on my 2nd monitor and see but the rtss wont display on my game
hwinfo doesn't have charts and I don't know if it tracks fps
no i mean im using hwinfo64 for hotspot temps
oh ok
hotspot reached 86 but isnt getting near that anymore
rn tis at 72
okay during a game it was sttaying at 82-86
but never reached 95 rn
Go fur it
this right
but on a side note my rtss wont display and i have it enabled to show on screen
Honestly you're leaving my area of expertise now, I haven't overclocked an AMD GPU since the original Radeon 6000 series.
I don't use RTSS, I use the Nvidia overlay
oh okay no worries
so on my 2 monitors when i click on my 2nd monitor it tabs out?
Yeah run your games in borderless windowed mode instead of fullscreen
also question does overdrive feature on my monitor effect perforamnce anyway
like overdrive mode
That only affects the monitor itself
It's a tradeoff feature between response time and ghosting, every monitor behaves differently and has different options
Hey, for the power limit thing: 6000 series gpus for ocing like an undervolt on core and overvolt on memory
I would check with #overclocking to make sure, but I believe 6000 series likes MorePowerTool when increasing PL, I don't know what the difference between doing something on that and what you already did does
yea ivc messed with mpt i have it installed so underbolt on core and overvolt on memory bet yea ill look into it
That's how it was for my 6800xt anyways for the first part, I've never used MPT though
Nah that's fine
its roblox btw it shows up on but not apex lmfao
Oh apex, yeah they don't allow overlays thanks to anti cheat
oh
xD
yuea my games are smooth as butter
man i wanna get the 7900xtx
bc it runs so well on warzone lol
Is it true that Radeon cards suck at VR? Also what about Intel graphics cards?
i got the oculus quest 2 but i kinda wanna get the new vr headset that recently came out
Last December I ordered a quest 2, but for some reason they didn't include the controllers (this was used), so I returned it. But it made me realize that vr is kinda useless apart from a few games that don't take long to finish per game
uh, they should, unless some weirdupdate just happened lol
i use msi ab all the time on it
my rxt 2070 just died in a mess of sparks and smoke, with the crazy prices of today cards whats the best replacement for 1440p gaming?
USA looking at 7900xtx right now but not sure if it over kill or good for future
xtx is a good gpu
but i don't think you need a gpu of that caliber
depending on the rest of the system, xtx can be good or not optimal
6950xt can be had for $600 these days
have a r9 7950x cpu
look in newegg and you will find some
hm, well then 7900xtx is good buy
go for it
if you wanna save money, 6960xt
7900xt is around 750$ aswell
also play vr with vive pro
I would be very worried about your power supply if that happened to your 2070
Also if it is the psu, every single other part of the pc aside from case
it was on water and over clocked to mox from day one
That doesn't change what I said
seasonic prime 1000 is my power supply
I would do a paperclip test to verify if it works, or if you have a very cheap gpu you don't care about lying around throw that in and test it
Oh wait, your cpu has an igpu
Try booting the pc with the gpu taken out
yeah a have a 1050 in the system right now and its working
Ah alright
Just wanted to make sure, because if the psu was bad you don't want to buy a new gpu just to kill it lol
yeah i have already tested in on a bench system
7900xt isn't a good buy
since 6950xt exists for less
it's either 6950xt or the xtx
6950xt also noticeably weaker
7900xt isn't faster
I saw a 6950XT used on Facebook marketplace for $400 recently, make sure you check your local used markets too
lol
Not that much of a gap between 6950xt and 7900xt
Yeah it's not faster
6950xt faster, and xtx is faster than 7900xt
For 200ish more xt non c isn't worth
Also getting extra 4gb vram and way better rt perf
other option would be a used 6950xt
considering they have 2070
it doesn't matter
6950xt still an upgrade
If you want rt then you'd get the 4070ti tho
^
An 800$ 12gb card is yikes
Just remember it was gonna be $900
12gb is plenty lol
can we not worry about vram so much
Lol
it's not like your pc is gonna explode
If Nvidia launches a 75 watt RTX card I'll literally buy 5 at launch
The efficiency improvements with ada
Have me so excited
Maybe it'll be like the 950
It was a 100 watt card but some AIBs has 75 watt versions
They were down clocked a bit though, like a full 20%
I have a no external power 950 as my backup GPU
I just bought i7 8700 Dell optiplexes for $170 a pop
I'm just sick of throwing 1650's in machines
i hope 4050 fulfils this gap
They're getting old we kinda just need a new generation 75 watt card
1650 launched in 2019 and the RX 6400 is more of a failure than me
Like the i7 8700 is still a decent CPU
But it can't use the 6400 because the pcie 3.0 gimps it
4 lane 
I bought 6 of these, I'mma upgrade them to 16GB of ram and replace the 500GB HDD for 500GB sata ssds
$170 for an i7 8700 machine isn't bad at all tbh
I love it when businesses sell old stuff
Some of them are pretty dusty though so imma have to clean them out pretty good
Imagine a budget $150 AMD card
THAT HAS 8+ LANES
AND 75 WATT
We were so close
6500XT is 90 watts and is a failure of a GPU
6400 is 60 watts and is a failure of a GPU
Also the lack of media encoding on the 6400 is ???
Like isn't that one of the purposes of a GRAPHICS card
it's a repurposed laptop gpu
Yeah but it's extra stupid
In a laptop the IGPU will do the video encoding
For a desktop you're just screwed
I leak new info on Navi 33 RX 7600, discuss Intel Q1 2023 earnings, and take Zen 5 Q&A
New games suck fr
8gb was more than enough to run doom eternal high-ultra and fortnite UE5 high-epic both at 144
Mf i literally benched my 2070S the most it dipped was 90
yeah i played in sub 40s and below that after the ue5 patch came out
crashes in tlou where the 2080ti had none
but i am gonna play valorant to justify 8gb cards
👍
You problem
1440p 144+ on high-epic on my 2070S
Epic preset has lumen and nanite on by default
We must use every feature, pc gets obsolete every year
Nvidia and AMD stocks: 
It is not unreliable because twitter tech tubers says otherwise
All they do is telling you to waste money tbh
Exactly what the companies want you to do
Buy gpu every gen
Looking at osd daily during gaming is also only gonna fuel that mindset
lol been a while i heard of j2c
"buy a $1200 3090 ti, they'll only get more expensive"
buy a $2000 4090, they'll only get more expensive 
did you perhaps buy that evga 4090 prototype
i wish lol
which vid he said that?
same lol, it'd go up in value like crazy
he didn't, I was parodying his "buy a 3090 ti" video
i was simply joking around
tbf though, Safi does have a point even if they're taking it to the extreme. 8GB of vram was an issue in some games almost since the inception of the 3070. I ran into issues with it with certain settings in bf2042 for instance, and that game uses the same engine as bf5. that said, you could smack DLSS quality mode on and get more performance at less vram usage for equal image quality, so it was a nonissue. however that isn't always an option.
sure, you can drop settings, and that's totally valid for an existing card you already own. I'd stray away from making purchases of new cards with low vram buffers though. even 12GB doesn't seem long for this world on the 4070/ti imo. but hey, that's just my take
seriously tho, games have gone way too crazy with being lazily made
I prescribe safi with GTX 760 for 6 months to wean off the addiction, and 1280x720 to alleviate the withdrawal symptoms
taking such a hardline stance on either side is kinda dumb imo. it is a problem, but don't buy a 4090 because your 2070 only has 8GB
even a top of the line 4090 doesn't do well maxed out in 4k in a few
still does not justify only 12gb for a 800$ product but whatever ehh
true
it doesn't really matter in the end
if we keep boycotting like this but keep buying nvidia anyway, nothing is going to change fast
^
1650 for a time was the most popular steam gpu lmao
right. if you're happy to turn down settings then do that
3060 likely rose with chinese market
otherwise, maybe don't buy an 8GB card, and be weary of 12GB ones
cuz chinese lang skyrocketed by 50%
when medium textures look like garbage on 8gb cards
so suddenly everyone using a say
1650 is suddenly stupid?
cuz they decide to stick to it
High-epic custom
It depends on game
i would not push personal views to people making purchase decision
BF2042 was already a buggy mess and a bad game
if they want to play cp2077, yes. if they want to play esports games (the kinds of games the card was meant to play) then no, it's perfectly reasonable
it's been ironed out. it's one of my favorite games in my library currently
i mean it can run cp2077 at med-low mix
lol its not like cards with more vram arent out there for same or cheaper price
no texture issues
hell i ran 2077 with my 850m
2 gigs vram still did a-okay, albeit i did have to use render res scale
can it now? interesting. i would have expected 1080p low at like 30 fps at best
it can surely do above 30
Core>vram
you do realize that games take 3-5 years to make? there is no catering to a market that only sprung up 2 and a half years ago mate
not for another few years at least
DEPENDS ON THE GAME
Cough cough ea sports
Cyberpunk 2077 (CP2077) gameplay test/benchmark on PC. Low, Medium and High in game settings on GTX 1650 Laptop and i5 9300H. Resolution: 1080p. Resolution Scaling: Disabled.
PC (Acer Nitro 5 Laptop) Specs:
CPU - i5 9300H 2.4GHz Base, 3.75 GHz Turbo (4 Core 8 Threads)
GPU - Geforce GTX 1650 Mobile 4gb GDDR5 [Driver version: 457.30]
RAM - 16 GB...
this is a laptop too
neat!
Bro forgot that GPUs take years to make too 💀
but not near 60 ofc
what does that have to do with playing games at higher settings?
it's still a 1650, but it's doable
well i will take my peace saying my 8gb card definetly bit the dust and i am soo glad it is away from me
you can drop settings if you want. if you don't, don't buy a card without more vram
sure
if you're buying gpu rn, i would say don't tbh
and ik a few 3070 owners aswell who have the raw compute to turn things up but cant due to vram
and are selling the 3070
used market is decent at least
few is not all
and yeah, used is a nice way
or just grab a 6650xt and be happy for multiple years
shadows, ao, aa and screen space reflections are basically the stuff people wanna see
no need for ultra
that is just a few people
it doesn't mean it is everyone
this feels like ubm but in the form of a person
8350K faster than 9900K
except in this case it's 3060 12g compared to 3080 10g
More vram equals more better
The only game one needs to be happy is titanfall 2
No sorry
meanwhile you two sound equally insane. not because you're technically wrong, but because you're not admitting that there is actually a problem lol
safi is under the impression that </=8GB cards are dead, and the impression I get from you is that actually everything is completely fine, just ignore the half dozen games that just came out (I'm sure the other next current gen titles won't also need more vram)
there is a problem everywhere
thwre is a middle ground you know, right? 
Dawg these new games suck
And i said who tf wants to play any modern AAA release when most of them are bad games to begin with, expensive, and unfinished messes
and yeah i mean i wouldn't go out of my way and fell people to get a 1650 now
or 6500xt
sure, so then don't buy new hardware
my point was buy only when your experience isn't fun anymore
and that you could afford it
but if you're still okay with your current hardware, don't
right, and that's exactly my own point. with the caveat that if you're buying a new card for playing new games, maybe don't buy one that's going to run out of vram in a year
i'm not against innovation, it's nice to have faster and better things
i don't know honestly, 8 gigs was and is still good for most
if 3070 owners are having to turn down textures they are having a visually degraded experience compared to its counterpart 6700xt but if you already have a 3070 just have to turn down settings ig
it has lasted for years
and still will tbh
^
oh also, the console version of said game can run without issues
because there was actual work put into optimization
would you rather we go back to games looking like they did 6 years ago? we're in a new generation of games, it's reasonable to expect a sharp increase in performance expectations before a plateau. that's just how that works
they are not
ps5 has only like 1-2 gigs of ram allocated as vram normally
look at a770 with 16gb or the rx 6700
can't you see how there is bad pc ports?
because it has a unified memory system, that's a complete misrepresentation of reality. it can stream textures in and out because they're all right there
tlou looks worse than ps3 version
you can emulate the game and it will use up less vram
and look better
tlou is a bad port. but when there are half a dozen games coming out that all want more vram than previously, am I to expect that they're all bad ports or are the standards changing
it is not a misinterpretion, a ps5 works just like an igpu system lol
They’re all bad ports to be honest
prior to turing, vram was neary doubling tier to tier every generation. games take years to develope. the reasonable assumption to make is that game devs targeted what they thought would be a market with cards that have far more vram than they do
cope I guess 
just gonna ignore the 6800 selling for cheaper then a 3070
so what, a ps5 will allocate 8 gigs as vram, only leaving 8 to the rest of the system?

it is just pure laziness
now i don't expect same level of console optimization
but the diff in requirements is unreal
a ps5 isn't a PC. all of it's memory is unified, it's just there. there's not a meaningful distinction betwen vram and system ram. whereas on a PC you need data in system memory and video memory
cheaper then 3070
if AMD made a toaster would it be a PC?
it's laid out very differently than a PC
rdna 2 gpu
go read a block diagram or smth
Technically yes. A flip phone is a computer.
xbox also has unified memory
different SOC, also one that's quite a lot different from the PS5. it does still have a semi-unified memory though, so the same principle applies
anyway, I'm all done arguing with nerds on the internet. I'm going to go be a productive member of society and have some tasty breakfast
read a block diagram sometime 
my point exactly
i don't see a modern console being any diff to a pc, just different os
This got me thinking of raspberry pi and now I'm hungry
lmao
Send pie pls
My Nintendo switch is pc
personal computer, aka computer for personal uses
so just about anything with microcontroller
this thing does not exist
when did we say 6800 does not exist
but you have to pay more 🤷♂️
If it has a processor and memory it's a PC. Most microcontrollers do.
👍
I don't personally like computing, that's why I get the personal computing devices to do it for me 
Beeg braine
People that took the time to program their flesh PC invented the silicon ones so other people don't have to

And so the abacus was born
now with ai, the silicon can not only help us. it can design itself to be better version
Self programming AI is legit scary though
it really is
this was unthinkable just a decade ago
2013, we still had crappy ai
or just pre programmed
Jfc there's a lot to read since I turned this off.
Sure, we can acknowledge there can be a problem that is inevitably, ok.
So what about the 95% of pc gamers on 8gb vram or less?...
Hey at least i dont have to code arduino anymore
Chatgpt
This vram crap is just blown way out of perspective and devs can just do better to cater for the remaining majority. It's not like a game suddenly became impossible to run with less vram caching.
There's a reason this happened
Same with TLOU, HGW and all the other poorly running games before it. You could argue for a need for change or you could argue for dev incompetency to recognise the status quo of a market. I choose the later tbh
If anything this to me just highlights that devs are trying to do something the market isn't ready for
Core > vram
The issue from the dev perspective is it takes a lot of time to optimize the textures to fit an 8gb buffer. They're sick of it when that time can be better spent squashing bugs and getting something playable launched.
"3060 has more vram than 3070" theres a reason the 3070 outperforms it
Yeah and this is why these games have been met not only comtroversially but with poor launch impressions
They dig their own holes like this
This reminds me of the whole digital ownership scandal bs that blew up many years ago 
Damned if you do, damned if you don't for that optimizing. People will complain either way.
No devs can just do better. Stupid when a 4090 needs 19gb just to run a game in 1440p
It's still pretty rare to see a non modded game that can use more than 12gb, they're not that crazy
Sure but dial back the clock 8 months ago and this was hardly ever a complaint
I'm all for positive change but the whole *8gb is dead" crap is way out of proportion
3060 does have better lows 
Entry level is a 6600/xt
One thing that'll never change from this discussion is market reception to this vram bs. Most people live and get by on run of the mill pc's with 3050's, 2060s, 3070's. People will downvote, refund and not play these games
You can't change that most people don't want to spend up just to play these crappy ports so devs lose business
Just don't play and cope that the gpu which is powerful enough is held back by the vram
Silent majority agrees that people don't want to play a lot of new AAA games and would rather stick with good indies with charm
Or older titles
Every game is gonna unoptimized this year or next from a 8gb owner perspective
Meanwhile 2080ti and 6800 cruise through
Finally took you weeks to admit this is the right thing to do. Turn down the settings or refund a crap game
Honestly this^
CS2 😤
Games are fun without the graphics nonsense
I am not saying 3070 owners to upgrade but don't buy a 8gb card knowingly the gpu can't do good in titles at the time of buying
Agreed, most of the games I play are at least a few years old
Also a lot of newer titles have the most boring ass gameplay ive seen
Yeah but your same ethos is the moment your own card runs out of vram you panic buy a 2080ti
There's no middle ground with you safi
Also no good game soundtracks released these days
Besides nintendo
Say what you want but splatoon 3 soundtrack goes hard
Only modern AAA games i wanna try are FC6 DLC, ghostwire tokyo, P5R, and 2077
Cant get em cuz im broke
And MW2 just cuz funny
I forget what games I want to play
Waiting for FM8 rn
Oh yeah Lego Racers 3
Nothing else has truly set my interest off this year
I might be in the minority but I've never had a desire to play cp2077
I don't really care about FM8 since I got FM7 tbh
Also when the 6800 is like 50$ cheaper rn
Yeah but buying a new 30 series for a long time has been an L take anyway
What i wanna see is a AAA VR game
Ok but where your dlss crutch that you love so much
🤷♂️
CS2 and TotK are the only games im interested in this year
Ah yeah CS2 forgot about that one for a minute
@shraf2k @HardwareUnboxed you either have enough VRAM or you don't and then the game either silently drops texture quality or stutters like mad due to needing to access the CPU's RAM.
Just keep seething about it honestly lmao
Can't wait to see you panic buy a 20gb+ card in the next 2 months
Mans defending 2023 releases harder than i defend final point in tf2
Idk man
Did I say 3070 owners should upgrade
It's gone from caring to just grey now
But you don't willingly get a 8gb card in 2023
👍
Only reason i upgraded gpu is cuz i dont wanna have to upgrade until im in and out of college and so i could also have av1 support and play VR
Tell that to the people buying 6600xts to this day
And used 1070s
And how much cheaper is that to a 3070
🤷♂️

Got no answer for the 100$ question do we
core>vram
💀💀
3080ti and 4070ti both use g6x and 12gb
they perform about the same
3070 beats in most cases for averages
Until the 3070 runs out of vram 💀
My 970 is equivalent to a 1060 and better than a 1650 by a small margin
based
Better than a 1060 3GB at least, equiv to 6GB
Ya you always dwell
Never gonna have better graphics if we are hold back by 8gb like this
Safi, dwellmaster
"jedi survivor needs more vram"
Would be the case with tlou but cpu is a bigger issue in this game
its already a bad game to begin with from a buyer standpoint cuz of all the drms and "security"
probably a cpu issue but purely devs fault
EA was quick to blame the Intel e-cores for the performance issues
Yeah but 7800x3d was clearly not seething
"Modern multicore CPUs designed for Windows 11 running on Windows 10" specifically is what they blamed
When I saw the 7800x3d struggle to maintain 60fps i knew something is wrong
Literally the strongest chip out there rn
x3d and amd encoder have so much potential but shame professional software doesnt use
most demanding games i play are fortnite security breach and doom eternal
Tmw next-gen RDNA is becoming actually good at pure tensor work
Patch by patch they're closing the gaps
oh i just remembered i have a ton of free stuff on epic
Me too
peak game
I got mudrunner for free and I can play it on my A8-6410 all in one PC 
I want to get snowrunner
I have all the mudrunner dlc except for the American one
"a percentage" LMAO
i have BL3, bioshock all, daemon x machina, wolfenstein NO, death stranding, watchdogs 2, hitman games, xcom 2
I got GTAV from epic
The bioshock trilogy with the remasters was a great set from epic
Fun to be able to play the funny GTA game
how good is death stranding
Idk I don't have it
You can bruteforce the games with a 7800x3d and 13900k ngl
ok
Oh walking simulator
EA is an ecore
My flesh PC was always slow 😎
HOW DARE YOU
fun delta on XTX
For some reason going to windows 11 made the GPU temp lower, but junction higher lmao
I switched to windows 11 just to see how performance is(mostly the exact same), and for some reason my junction temps are way higher
Same settings and everything
While the edge is lower
went from 70-75 edge 80-90 junction to 65-70 edge 90-100 junction with the only difference being windows 11
Did you DDU the drivers between those tests
Yep
Hmmm
DDU and windows 11 drivers
I had a weird thingy with chipset drivers but it functions the same
Wouldn't let me uninstall or reinstall em
Yeah that's a known thing. It's recommended to do a clean install going from 10 to 11 to avoid, especially on AMD.
Yikes. Could revert back to 10 and then back to 11 again
Ive experienced this first hand LOL
But does it actually like, do anything? Numbers have been the exact same on every game idk lol
Win 10 seems to be better with amd for me
You can always take a system image of 10, save it to a backup drive, and clean install 11
That way you can restore 10 even past the 10 day test period too
Oh fairs
Wow, that VRAM discussion had bad points from everyone IMO. Overall everyone should be on the middle ground where it's both game devs and Novram's fault. Wall of text inbound... Some points I'd like to make:
Firstly, no one defined texture "quality". This needs to be defined with an actual resolution and if it has any modifications that will increase VRAM (mainly mipmapping comes to mind). One cant say texture storage optimization is bad if there is no defining stuff about it. Random words like "medium" mean nothing across games of the same time period, let alone games across a multi GPU generational time period.
Other features that can sip at VRAM is also not mentioned. If there are say ten new graphical features (say for example RTGI/RT reflections/RT RT/RT IDK anymore/RT what even is RT at this point) introduced over a time period that sip at VRAM, that'll add up.
I've noticed a few mentions of large VRAM based GPUs (3090(Ti)/4090) eating VRAM like it's nothing. This is more of a "kinda concerning" thing rather then a bad thing. Dont forget texture caching exists and you only ever get to see VRAM allocation usage rather then actual VRAM usage. New SW game did have a mem leak afaik, but taking 19GB on a 24GB card doesnt mean it'll need a 20GB+ card as it might only be utilizing 16GB and then have 7GB as cache which ends up being 9GB of VRAM usage (example, SW port didnt do this).
People seem to really disregard the fact that VRAM has been doubling for at least XX70 tier, and prolly every tier, every two generations (apart from 800 series) when looking at Fermi - Turing. As it was noted earlier games take ages to develop and expecting Ampere to have doubled the VRAM was probably a thing. That said VRAM size has gotten to the point where doubling makes a massive difference, so deving for a "doubled" Ampere+ can make the game very hard to run on previous generations due to lack of VRAM. That point can further be extended with worrying about what most people will be on and such, so a few gens old and mainly low/mid tier hardware on average. But that can be the distinction between lowest - highest setting presents.
Lastly to talk about ports specifically, the way console work can seriously change a lot of stuff here. The PS5's unified 16GB memory can mostly be used for VRAM. With Xbox X it's kinda sorta capped at 10GB usable VRAM due to mem config (10GB @ 320bit + 6GB @ 192bit), can technically use more for texture caching but that'd be highly questionable cuz even 6GB of RAM including OS is hard to work with, let alone less. I'd suspect that with just this stuff alone (I'll talk about smth else soon) VRAM usage would prolly cap out at ~9GB for most devs. Another main point for consoles is direct storage. The ability to quickly load textures off disk is quite literally a game changer, it's literally a game design job to design levels with loading times in mind. It also massively changes the programming with how one optimizes graphical data. This cannot be brushed off like many just did. Seems like SW port wasnt really CPU/GPU bound as well, so I'd guess the complete change of optimization direction played a large role here in being a bad port. Windows DirectStorage still seems mainly unused by everyone, dont know if it's different then console direct storage.
So in conclusion, your best bet is to hate everyone equally. Enjoy the wall of text.
Lucky for you, I already do hate everyone
what I'm getting from this is that I was right 
Any advice?
Nvm I’m getitng 160 fps
I don't know really, since directstorage equipped games has no perf gains on pc rn lmao
And isn't it exclusive to xbox and windows
PS5 has no such thing, but it does indeed cache textures with its speedy ssd, I do know that
So still similar to xbox
Pushing stuff that takes up so much vram like this is not right, and the gpu makers aren't right for being slow on vram increase
I don't know when did I ever convey that the gpu makers aren't at fault lmao
It's everything blended into one big mess
I suppose I didn't mention that, but it's okay. I'll just let it end here
I've got my answer out
gonna sell my 6900xt and get the 7900xtx tbh. im not getting the right fps with this 6900xt lol
welp
Not cope
Nah it's a cope
at this point
reinstalling windows could probably fix it
sometimes windows is messed up
Maybe, stranger things have happened and that can fix things
exactly
160 fps for low settings on a 6900xt isnt what im suppose to be getting i should be getting more
but im also not OC
low? that's probably causing massive cpu bottleneck rn
GPU usage is probably not in the ideal range (90%+)
CoD has always been a CPU heavy game too
on 1440p res?
Watch the GPU usage
and yeah, do that
msi afterburner
Some overlay, afterburner rtss works usually
No
you have to configure it
Task manager doesn't know jack about GPUs
Alt+r should bring up amd own overlay
If you enable it yeah
Same with Nvidia, alt+r for overlay, alt+x for settings
But you have to enable it
in actuall warzone all my quality is high shadow is low 130f ps
80 usage on gpu 50 on cpu
Yep you're not loading the GPU fully and the CPU is being blasted
Because 50% means half the cores are fully loaded
Yep that's a CPU bottleneck at work
You could upgrade to a dual 4090 (if sli wasn't dead) and not get more frames
Unless frame gen with 40 series 
That's a horrible idea in a shooter lol
Ye but that does cut right through cpu bound situations
Kinda yes but not in the way you're thinking
the increased latency though
You would get a few more frames out of it but not the usual 30% more
that eliminates the extra frames
And yes worse latency, and garbage frames messing with your tracking
how do i fix it
Overclock or upgrade the CPU
im measuring the usage with task manager
There's a chance that a fresh install of windows would help still, since iirc you were on AMD and I know there's some odd issues with performance and windows 11
bruh
well task manager is very unreliable for readings
you could spend a few minutes figuring out how to turn on amd's overlay
or rtss
I've seen task manager claim I'm using 100% of my GPU at idle. It was asleep at 0MHz.
lol ya
similar case is for salad
i have been running salad and task manager says it's only 2% loaded
i got amd rn
ill run a game warzone again rn
task manager is awful lmaooo
im not cpu bottlenecked ig now
amd says3%
^
I could use some advice here. My monitor just stopped recieving signal today morning from my pc, even tho it was working perfectly yesterday night. After further digging we reached the possibility of a faulty gpu. My gpu is old, from around the start of covid, and its a 1050 ti(first hand). Could anyone recommend me as to what i should do now? Don't have the money to really upgrade to a 20 series...
Did u check if monitor works with anything else besides ur pc like a console or something like that
yepp i did, monitor isn't the problem
which country?
Used rx 580s are cheap i think
So I am noobie at this for those who don’t know
And I’ve been searching for a used gpu
But I am to scared to go with anything that isn’t Rtx 3060 ti founders edition, merc 6800 and sapphire pulse 6800
Hence why I haven’t found anything nearby which I can pick up and try
I wanted to know more about the other editions? Since if you search Rtx 3060 ti ur meet with multiple different gpus
Whichever one is cheapest
Hopefully it's not the mech 2x but it's probably the mech 2x
?
It's a cheap design, runs a bit warmer than other models.
Which is technically fine with enough airflow.
Ohh
So it doesn’t really matter what edition? Or brand?
Not on a 3060 ti. They're all acceptable.
Ah does the same go for 6800xt?
I think so yes
Ah okey I will look at every graphic cards now instead of those selected few I’m familiar with
also 6800 and 3060ti kinda two different performance tiers
Very different and yet about the same price rn lol
@solid glacier weird suggestion
Idk if we ever talked about it
Have you ever enabled pcie 3.0 in the bios for your gpu
Yea its enabled im pretty sure. i can double check
Gen 3, is pcie 3.0 right?
Ye
Nah not in the other gpu slots no
Could be Just warzone to though lol I get 240 fps on apex in high settings
I stumbled across that the other day as a possible fix, thought maybe it'd help cases like yours
Oh warzone? I hear that's a complete dice roll for good and bad maps
Some maps run really well, some run like 60fps lows
💀
I’m thinking about OC my GPU but not sure how much that will help
Also does this look correct? To have p cores on bc I’m on win11
P cores are the performance cores
E cores are the efficiency cores
Having both on is good for win11
Disable E cores for win10
Disabling e cores why pepehands
Yes they're all on
What(
Why are you disabling the e cores? Pepehands
Just always leave them on
i wonder hm i wanna snag the 7900xtx lol
but i might have to get a bigger psu
i got a 850w
Rare instances where e cores off can help
also i have this off not sure if i should have it on or not
oh dang fr?
Iirc if you turn on you can just increase/decrease power limit
if i do turn it on i should just go oc right>?
yea
Yes you could oc it?
I got around an extra 10-15 fps on average by overclocking my 3070.
and another around 13 fps by overclocking my cpu.
So I fixed my storage problem
And finally added the new storage
Now my gpu won’t load
Fans turn on when startup but turns off after some seconds
So my monitor is not being displayed
Is it processing the new storage or something is wrong?
Do you get a bios splash screen, where it shows your motherboard brand logo?
Yes
Then the hardware is fine, what's wrong is probably the boot order
When that splash screen comes up press the delete key
I mean no
Mb
What motherboard? Do you have any SATA drives?
Motherboard, not gpu
Try moving the sata device to another sata port
Sometimes having a M.2 device conflicts with those
Ok so that's a little bit older. You might need to clear the cmos if moving the sata device doesn't help.
Remove what? The cmos battery? That's the idea, it resets the settings to default and forces it to recheck the system. Leave the battery out for 10 minutes.
No 3080 ti
I do have an AMD one but it's a HD 5770
Nvm I forgot to plug the part where you connect the gpu to the monitor
💀
What’s is the radeon xfx 6700 xt 12gb vram capable of?
Generally, 1440p high, or medium in harder to run games. 1080p max.
Lots of games it will hit 1440p max too
1080p definitely that cards sweetspot these days
You're right. My pleb 12GB can barely do 1080p low now.
I run everything 1440p max even cyberpunk since he loves that game so very much
Rt works too in select games
Damn unfortunate
My all in one PC runs mudrunner 😎
Nah cause mudrunner goes hard
👍
Can i play jedi survivor at 4k low to med settings with 32 gigs ram and 6800xt?
Maybe once it gets optimized/fixed
Really does depend what cpu you got
Game is relatively OK on the gpu department
Is the new SW game very CPU heavy?
Have 5600 non x
Oh xD.
I would wait for some patches then
Jedi Survivor is out with day 1 patches and drivers, and its performance still leaves a lot to be desired. The main culprit seems to be the Ray Tracing hit to the CPU, but the CPU limitation can be pretty bad even without RT if you don't have one of the fastest new CPUs. In this video I test how it performs on an extremely high end system with a...
Yk it's bad when a 7800x3d sometimes dips below 60
You think 5700G + 3070 + 32gb ram can handle the new game at 1080p?
But if you have a x3d cpu 60fps seems doable for the most part
Jedi survivors?
Again I would wait for some patches for things to get a bit better
Yeah.
I currently not overclocking my cpu via pbo on amd. Will perf increase if i pbo my cpu
With amd always turn pbo on
Unless your bin is just complete garbage and won't run it lol
pbo barely does anything it's the RAM OC that unlocks Ryzen's potential
sadly, I gotta wait until after work to test it out
if it's fixed fixed, I might just restart the game since I'm not to far in
sadly, I am not seeing a difference in the micro stuttering and random frame drops.
without RT
"7600X" and "CPU limited"
What is this reality

