#vehicles-discussion
1 messages Ā· Page 471 of 1
Tankenstein moment
what crew? š
Heh.
So yes, I suppose the Grille is just a carriage and the open back is not so much of a hinderance as a perk
By the way, modern arty system are usually designed with shoot and scoot tactics in mind, so they have an autoloader that can be refilled from outside which makes it a lot easier to pack up because all the shells that you prepared to fire are nicely packed in the magazine while the rest are on/ at your supply truck
A bit of an interesting off topic thing, but I believe I found the Vickers Light. It was part of the development of the Vickers MBT, but I wasnāt sure if WG just made up a light version or not (clearly the Vickers Light 105 ingame appeared to be inspired by the Vickers MBT project)
Well, now I know that it was actually somewhat of a real thing, thank you Armored Archives for providing lots of info on obscure vehicles!
Part? How so? Concept design prior to the Vickers MBT?
Pretty much essentially
Just a lighter version of a Vickers Mk1 essentially afaik, it uses the same gun and a similar turret just on a smaller chassis
I seriously don't understand why these things are classified, given how obsolete they've become. But maybe it's just the governments of the respective nations not caring or having the time to declassify them
France still refuses to declassify ww2 equipment
Probably the latter
They just donāt want to cause theyāre maybe just lazy or donāt want to cause they have no timeā¦?
To speak for the US, the government tends not to do such unimportant things š¤·āāļø
That whole Challenger 2 in War Thunder thing was funny, though
They literally send a random Pershing to a museum once and it turned out to be the last surviving E4 model
Also funny, the FV301 IRL was a totally different vehicle, what most people and what blitz calls the āFV301ā was actually the Vickers Medium Cruiser Mk1, the FV301 is similar in design but looks very different.
Not sure where WG got the idea for the turret on the Vickers CR thoughā¦
They min-maxed space with ugliness
Itās obvious that one is made up as it lacks inefficient space and lacks a lot of basic necessary components for a tank
That was hilarious, people taking a game way too seriously.
They're too scared the rest of the world will laugh at them smh
As undeniably attractive as FT AC was, I'd like to see more concepts
"What's this? Yet another boxy, 2-man tank? Are you cavemen? Hahahahaha!"
I should make a concept sheet for one
I wanna just get the IS-7 line over with. I already tried with the IS, I might as well get at least the IS-8.
Well, unlike E5, you're actually grinding it for the good tier 10, so why stop?
Is this a place where I can post pics of tanks I saw irl or no
Well, if it shots, it's useful.
Uh, the pain of 5 degree gun depression and 175mm pen?
It's a French blueprint for sale! Drawn up once, never again!
Er, less #general-blitz-discussion because if there's a discussion going on it would be rude to post a photo there.
You're afraid of a literal stock grind?
That's what fXP is for, but not for getting new tanks
M60 Patton, M26 Pershing and that AA woth double cannons that I remember frpm War Thunder
Well, screw me, I guess.
I got more
Welcome to the traditional WoTB experience
Don't worry, I can gain more credits through a nice 2 month long session with the Super Persh
Voluntarily using Spersh? Alright then
You just reposted...
Mybad lmao but here
Spersh? What an odd name. I love it.
Mk
Where did you take those pictures? There's even a battleship/heavy cruiser behind there @median delta
Itās not letting me send certain ones but I saw all these about 10 mins ago
Thereās a submarine and a battle ship and I went through tours of both and a sr-71 blackbird and some more stuff
Or, I could go the easy way and sell the AX because I hate that thing with a passion.
@hollow moth They're at the USS Alabama.
Fellow Alabamian? =O
Man found them real fast lmao but ye uss Alabama has a lot of stuff
Perhaps a T-60 or T-62
Pershing
Man, I've got no idea about what is this one
M4 sherman with A3 hull
I would send their info that was with each tank but ion wanna get banned for leaking info like the whole war thunder British centurion incidents
Iāll send in dms if I have one for that m4
Those are all obsolete and well knows tanks, there's not actual problem
It looks like a Type 59 to me, somehow.
i have some pics of current tanks like the abrams and stuff
Abrams isn't that new, but there's still secretes about what are all the components of it's armor iirc
Ig
BH finally let 8.10 changes out
Why does this have to be noted? xD
Surely nobody went and physically changed these values, and it's purely based on algorithmic application
Wasnāt that due to the weird bug where it made it look like every tank had a slight camo buff
While still, many premium/collector tanks got an alleged buff of:
Heavies: 2
Mediums: 3
Lights: 3
TDs: 4
Also now Jageroo is penetrable frontally by HE
ššš
whats the best td line?
So, first game in the IS-3. No new modules researched or anything. Turns out D-25T prammo ain't that bad.
Define "best"
Sorry, they can't. They just ask "what best tank for tier bajillion" and hope they get a good answer smh
and most of them are born in 2013
that is why i don't grind a new line unless i am sitting on 150k fxp
i cba to stock grind anymore š
and it is easy to accumulate fxp with prem time, boosters and premium tanks
faster tds like the tier V Stug G but still pack a punch
Well, luckily for you, we recommend the 268. Fast, and punchy! You won't regret it.
you will definitely regret it š¤
Steampunk skins when
Shhh, they canāt know anything
how to play sheridan
To quote Fatness: āA shotgun light.ā Basically, get close to slow targets, pump a shell into them, and drive away into the sunset, until 14.5 seconds later when youāre ready to pump yet another shell into some unfortunate HT. You really canāt do much in MT/LT brawls; if you feel like youāre in a position to mess around with them without taking a lot of damage, then abuse it. However, you might find yourself abusing HT lanes, due to a general lack of high DPM LT hunters.
What you need to take from this is to avoid most LTs and MTs, try to take as little damage as possible, and try to get close enough to actually hit and pen the target. I personally recommend Calibrated Shells; it makes every shot you connect have a greater chance of penetrating, which is key in a tank that canāt throw a lot of metal around like the Sheridan.
In order,
T-55
M26
M60A1
M4A4
It said T-55 rip me
do you think WG would consider an Italian tech tree? their heavy line works well enough, it has a light tank from tier 2 to move into tier 1 (L6/40), it's got everything.
Rinoceronte line?
can you think of another Italian heavy line?
I just figured Italy could be it's own nation unlike Poland, Czech, or Sweden.
We already have an Italian line. I doubt we need more heavies up-ending the meta any more than they already have.
I mean a pure Italian tech tree, with it's own low tiers. As for the Italian heavies, the Rinoceronte is considered one of the worst heavy lines in PC. If stats carried over, it'd hardly make much of a difference.
We donāt need another HT.
then what about a potential italian td line, comprised of semoventes?
From what I can tell, nothing special. Basically, MTs turned into casemates, but without any insane mobility.
at least they aren't HTs turned into casemates
regardless, a standalone italian tech tree should still be something to consider.
Amazing, letās give everyone a bunch of TDs who generally have smaller guns than their competitors because thatās smart. Letās take the 105/25. You place at tier VI, itās just a ARL V 39 without the the cupola. Place it at VII, and it competes with stuff like the JPain-ther and the T25AT. Youāre not really giving the Italians many options here except be a mediocre line that probably canāt compete.
Their biggest gunned SPG? A 149mm gun. But it has pretty much no gun depression, a gun that doesnāt seem anything special, and no further advancements. This line isnāt going anywhere.
it seems you and I have different ideas on what a line should be based off of
Then how about you show them so I can have a better idea. All Iām getting is basically a middling line that probably canāt even get past Tier VIII unless WeeGee pulls some really thin threads with the āmaking fake tanksā Department.
Nothing wrong with adding fake tanks, or heavies for that matter
You're just being nitpicky
If you're so deathly afraid of heavy tanks, It wouldn't be the first time a tech tree had only one line. Besides, like I said, Rinoceronte is a tad bit garbo (and by tad bit, I mean runner up for the worst heavy in tier 10)
I donāt see a problem with that. Itās that, thereās nothing really that makes the Italians stand out. Trust me, an Italian tree does sound like fun. But aside from those heavy tanks, thereās nothing else. The TDs are really weird. Thereās 47mm guns, then 75mm, then 105mm guns. Then thereās that one with the 149mm, but nothing else after that. Thatās the very farthest the Italians went with SPGs and TDs.
just add Centauro
As long as they look unique, they're unique enough to be worth adding
Wargaming doesn't care about this though.
^^^
@acoustic galleon oh good, i'm not the only one with the same conclusion
Fine then.
But if the Italians are getting added my E5 gets a buff.
and my ho ri and chi ri gets a nerf
Eh, the Ho-Riās fine. It doesnāt really need a nerf.
there is no reason for it to go 50 km/h
How in the world does ho ri need a nerf lmao
i just implied nerf the top speed
Nah
The Ho-Riās fine as it is.
you get nearly 20 tons added to the tank and you somehow have a higher top speed than the original Chi-Ri?
by like, 2. lol
it's still higher
I guess it's not very logical, but then they'd have to buff something else to keep it balanced. So not a nerf overall
The M3-Lee appeared on the premium pass
Itās not like youāre ever going that 50 in any case.
if this being an arcade game with completely fictitious tank stats doesn't answer why that's the case, you can just attribute it to having a different transmission
I finally can get it
i'm not sure why you'd want it anyways other than historical prowess (which the lee never really had either)
It's the tank I always wanted so I'm getting it
M3 Lee looks cool and has a cool name
i guess the name is decent. I will admit though, Lee does look otherworldly.
@humble nacelle congrats on getting it (if you do)
M3 lee ? I have M3 lee before in the previous event so if i restore my M3 lee back. And bought premium past. Does that mean i can get a refund of 100 gold?
What? Explain that a bit more.
I can show you the thing.
Sure go ahead.
This is the tank i have (i bought it like 4 times and sold it because Tier IV tooks long to enter the battle)
Probably the tank was on uh idontknow Update 8.6? I think it was 8.4 i dont really remember where the tank or event was started you know what i mean
The M3 Lee now and before has always been the same. You'll just get some gold back.
the jagdtiger is so slow
Deal with it; you get 3.5k DPM, decent armor, 3.5k DPM, good accuracy, did I say 3.5k DPM? and 3.5k DPM.
quite slow to use all that 3500 dpm.....
Then don't play the tank lmao
mY cReDiTs.....
you donāt need to be frontline to do it
2nd line usually works
Plus itās 460 alpha
unlike the Tortoiseās or 122-54ās 400
hmm
"The tank's too slow boohoo"
Too bad, the gun's a laser, pens nearly everything it needs to, has the alpha to scare off enemies, and you got the armor to compensate.
Any more ridiculous complaints?
Tort vs Jagtiger?
Jagtiger always wins
better armour and alpha leads to that
hmm ok seems fair
Jagtiger imo is the 2nd best tier 9 TD by far
Yeah, it seems fair so stop with this complaint. I think I've already seen this one from you twice before and it's just as annoying.
I think IS 7 needs a armor nerf in sides
The reason of nerf: JGPZ E 100 didnt pen IS 7 in side š
Is that bug or what?
aim issue
Aim issue.
nonono i clearly saw it didnt pen in side
half of the IS-7 side is a black hole
you just gotta know where to shoot
Just because it's a TD does not guarantee a pen to the side of any IS-7 at any given moment. You aimed at the wrong spot, and that's on you.
Theres even print that it didnt pen
print what?
of the AP shell
the text that tells you it didnāt pen
thatās just an aiming issue
The IS-7's side is just weird. accept the non-pen and carry on as you EU players do.
Please don't because I don't want to see your aim issues in any form other than text, which is bad enough.
alright so i need help getting good at the leopard 1, any advice? (i already know the basics but i still suck)
It's not that we don't believe you lol, it's just that you aimed at the wrong spot, hence you didn't pen
You're hitting spaced armor, behind which is a very effectively angled plate. Only in an easily direct hit on the side should guarantee a TD that it'll pen (unless you used HEAT, then it gets risky even with a slight angle)
Remember how Russian pike noses often are, this is showing only the main armor (and external modules but doesn't matter)
He said he didnt pen it in the side armor
Unlike ur NA friends, I understand him. Its literal black hole sides, and can be bounced if u dont aim it
You forgot the 3994 dpm
@solid gate i liked the Kƶnstrukta
except we understood him very well
he's using the image from the front to show how steeply angled the sides are
Well the gripe is how the response was "Aim issue", which was only a point in the right direction instead of a guide
nah, I think his gripe was that he didn't understand why you showed an image of the tank's front
I mean
He said he didnt pen sides
But u show the gun mantlet
Like I said
He's using the image from the front so you can see just how angled the sides are
If you have a side-on view of the tank, you really can't tell
Oh I mustāve misunderstood it
I thought it meant the actual sides itself, not the frontal angle of the sides
Black arrow = shell trajectory
Red line = angled armor plate
Thin line = nominal plate angle
he does mean the "sides itself" though
A its the frontal angle of the sides end dis now
It's the angle of the sides that you can only see from the front
Basic perspective concepts here.
you are beyond confused yet you're clowning "NA friends" for not understanding?
Is this more helpful? š¤·āāļø
I understood it all
Just dont know what words
A frontal side angle actually implies a sort of pike or shoulder, though we're not talking about the pike, but the subsequent side angle caused by it
@plucky summit They say this.
I wanna comment though
First time I drawn IS-7s pike, when I thought of it as two triangles, and it became T-22 medium
Also didnt realise how the main armor extends to the tracks
they have the same design concept
It helps to recognize the lower plate as a pentagon, rather than a 4 or 3 sided figure
except the t-22's sides meet up in the center as a triangle, instead of flattening out like the IS-7 ^^
It ultimately contributes to the "OP sides", which is just an abuse of the auto-ricochet mechanic
Thank goodness TDs don't have to worry since 3CR counters it now if you hit the track or spaced armor
Ex. A ^-^
Well, here's the Sheri-hunter
Sheris problem is that some of the spaced armor extends away from the main armor
Dont think 3CRB can uh.. counter that since it doesnt hit main armor (if its the extended spaced armor), though its pennable everywhere else
Sheridan isn't countered by 3CRB because it will get penetrated anyways if hit in the main armor
3CR ā 3CRB, just so you know
CRB?
Three calibers rule bypassing
The act of a shell instantly passing the three calibers rule against the main armor due to previously hitting spaced armor or an external module, regardless of thickness
What ChickenMan is saying is most likely this
See the difference
Precisely =>
So basically CRB is essentially the rule formula for shell penetration after going through an external module/armor plate.?
@past fractal No, this helps little.
WoT PC experience, you cant pen even lightly armored tracks at more than ricochet angle unless its an overmatch
If the caliber of an AP or APCR shell was ā„ 3 times the nominal thickness of an armor plate, then the shell will not ricochet
This is NOT a guaranteed penetration, as 3CRB likes to bring up.
This is why I used T1 Heavy and Strv as reference, its what exactly happened to me at one battle
I could Not pen his tracks at all at ricochet angle
Yeah, it ain't helping.
I'll just depend on chicken to explain.
Still a weird experience for me though
He was at 400 HP and I didnt clear a single one when shooting his tracks
Wot PC
Also back to elaborate on the "frontal angle of the sides", it can be thought of as the secondary angle you'll find on pikes, where it's not only angled against you in a single plane, but two planes (or well, a more complex plane)
You don't only deal with the bottom image's angling, but the top image's angling too
Well, I suppose I knew all of that. I just saw it seperately.
Of course.
Naturally, a shell actually needed to pass the 3CR, by actually having a caliber ā„ 3x the plate's nominal thickness
But now with 3CRB, the shell instantly passes as long as it hit spaced armor of an external module first
It's worthy to note 3CR is in both PC and Blitz, but 3CRB is only present in Blitz, which may explain Doom's images above
So as long as it passes the 3CR for the external plate, is also passes for the actual armor plate behind it?
No, it can fail all it wants, all it had to do is hit the screen first
It treads deeply into the concept of nominal armor and external modules
The external module is the same armor-wise no matter the angle, but it can cause 3CRB
Btw does 3CRB also depend on shell caliber or any will do?
No matter the caliber, the shell will pass 3CR through 3CRB. It then turns into a game of normalization and penetration.
Please remember, Cent I doesn't pass 3CR for either of the two armors it hits, all it has to do is hit something else before the main armor
I understand that the 3CR explains that [yadda yadda yadda] and that passing it means the shell won't ricochet, but it can fail to pen. Are you saying 3CRB acts the same way, but if it passes through the external module through 3CR, then it doesn't have to pass 3CR for the nominal armor due to how 3CRB works?
Let me
3CRB basically ignores auto ricochet and then the nominal armor will apply
Three calibers rule bypassing
It doesn't even test for the three calibers rule, and passes automatically, no matter caliber or nominal armor
@past fractal the resulting effectiveness of the armor is NOT the nominal effectiveness
But it needs to hit something else to take effect?
It's not a rule, it's a bypass to the rule
It must hit an external module (tracks, gun) or spaced armor (sideskirts, mantlets) first
The only counter is the shooter having bad pen, or your tank having obnoxiously thick main armor
So when it hits an external module, what happens then? Surely the bypass doesn't just take effect.
Then, the shell's penetration loses pen depending on the thickness of that module.
It proceeds to hit a main armor plate, but regardless of the rule, it passes instantly.
So the bypass occurs by hitting an external module? So it doesn't ricochet, but can fail to pen.
Yes (it also can happen with spaced armor, basically whatever isn't the main armor)
Huh.
Non main armor modules/spaced armor in the game will negate the auto ricochet mechanic, hence the bypassing
But still possible to not pen depending on armor thickness (general)
It's a "Get In Free" card for the three caliber's rule
Basically after hitting tracks or spaced armour, the shell will always attempt to penetrate, regardless of whether it hits the main armour at an auto ricochet angle or not
Just to not confuse anyone, Three Caliberās Rule does still exist in game when it hits main armor
@plucky summit are you sure it actually works in game?
I've had my homie bully my T-22 with his IS-7 ;-;
but if you wish to see for yourself, I'm fine with hosting a room
It's the most obvious the higher pen you have (and preferably AP for 2CR's sake)
Dunno how anyone can explain tanks penning E5/T57 tracks (not wheel) at high angles apart from that bypassing one
That's overmatch for a t22 (the is7 back)
??
He means this
It's a 30mm plate
I said he bullied my T-22 with his IS-7
His IS-7 3CRB'd my T-22
Ohhhhh
Y e a h, that's 76 degrees x-x
So if you got a Ho-Ri you can bully tanks of mine, to see it easily in action
I have yet to explain why the track will often stays strong when 3CRB occurs.
My best guess is that the track track and the track wheels are each two independent plates, so they stacked against the shell's trajectory
Can u show the full photo of that? The armor of it?
IS-7 vs FV215b
Wait, so is this asking why the track doesn't break?
I meant including the effective armor of it
Since I saw some o those red spots before and it says a pen
The T-22 challenges my theory though, because the yellowed part should also be double-layered, but is penetrable anyways
I see now, perhaps the highlighting takes that stack into consideration when the calculation doesn't?
I shall check T-22, glad this makes 3CRB consistent, though
Do the tracks really decrease the pen that much? It seems a bit ridiculous.
It's the same situation with T-22, I must test it in-game sometime
By calculation, the shell should pen, but it's highlighted red for some reason.
I can only infer that the highlighting stacks the track and wheel segments without accounting for them being a single module
Tracks would only decrease pen by like 15-40mm, based on the tank being shot
I assume its because of shell normalisation
AP does pretty insane in that part at times
Form what I've tried, 2CR gets a green light under 3CRB, so tracks won't be much of a help
That's probably it, then. It wouldn't be able to pen if the highlighting was stacked.
I could edit the image and correct it myself š¤·āāļø
But y'know, casual 5AM game mechanic dissection
Good morning night
Forgot you guys had a 2 hour lead. Might as well head off myself.
My eyes when I play for a lot of time
Not that it ever goes 50kph with its horrid p/w
I think you mean 3.9k dpm
Up t57 heavy
What do you mean?
batchat should get an alpha buff, or if not that, somehow to get better. maybe an armoured batchat ? sounds weird, but just something that makes it stand out apart from clipping?
i would love to see sheridan doing 1000 dmg with he
is the progetto 65 good?
Yes.
depends on the user
Itās situational
it's decent, definitely not meta but pretty enjoyable if you like that playstyle
(i personally hate it so eh)
Nah. Just give 183 a 60 kph top speed
I've had my homie bully my T-22 with his IS-7 ;-;
but if you wish to see for yourself, I'm fine with hosting a room
@plucky summit
You should take the replay and submit it so we can analyse the shots from the games.
Then we can see that exact same shot and understand why it did pen or didnāt pen.
The Proggeto 65 should get an armor buff.
Why
Just 'cause.
eh not really, the only thing it needs is a slight gun handling buff (0.01-0.02 while moving and rotating should be enough)
Okay then, using that logic lets give Smasher a 6.8 second reload just ācause
Velocity should be one dunno why they gave it the slowest of all meds
to balance it
Itās already one of the more inaccurate 105s itās not like every other med gun or Autoloader has high velocity
Its hull and turret look nice and sloped but the armor is paper :(
The upper plate is incredibly troll, especially with EA
the gun mantlet is retarded, it will eat even 183mm rounds
the frontal hull becomes incredibly strong if you use enhanced armor
Only things that can overmatch would be Jageroo and 183
The hull is 50mm thick, you get like 5mm extra with enhanced armor.
2mm, but itās an auto bounce meaning if the gun doesnāt overmatch it will bounce
IMO they should buff the sides with 10mm and make the turret 220 to 240 raw thickness. Make the UFP 70mm.
But reduce its mobility as a result.
No, itās already slow for a med.
Okay so don't. But giving it decent armor will help set it apart from other tanks with magazines.
Itās one of the only tanks left in the game that takes skill to use, thereās no reason to noob proof it
Its not T22 or E50m levels of armor, you will need skill to make it work.
It already takes skill, thereās no reason to lower the skill floor on it
I don't think it will reduce the skill floor, just give you more consistent results for playing it properly.
It will reduce the skill floor, itās a buff to the tank. There is also no need for it, you just have to actually have skill to make it work which is how more tanks should be
Pretty much every tank in the game requires skills, even the 252u. I don't see your point honestly.
Tanks like the 252 are incredibly easy to use
252 doesnāt need skill, it a literally just drive forward and shoot. Prog requires much more thinking to use properly
Its not like in the prog 65 you just drive to a spot and shoot some people while blocking everything
252u has the huge lower plate, you can't just drive and shoot.
You would be surprised
if you hide the lower plate its op
Oh, my bad, drive forward, wiggle a bit, shoot
If players refuse to shoot an obvious weak spot its on them, not the tank.
It still doesnāt take much to use the 252 well
We just shouldnāt be lower the skill floors on tanks, because that removes one of the only aspects that makes this a skill based game. Giving everything enough armor to bounce, and enough mobility to get about, and a gun that can penetrate anything it comes across just makes the game a bunch of the same tank running about
The Prog is slower compared to other meds though, and doesn't have the best gun handling.
Armor buff directly reduces the skill floor of a tank
The Progetto is meant to be about the armor anyways, it's all in the auto reloading gun that allows you to be flexible
You have got an auto ricohetable front plate against <150mm guns for most angles as it is
It does have an auto reloader. The only buff it would need is an accuracy buff
Personally feel like the Prog is in a good spot rn
It's not a very good tank certainly but not every tank needs to be
Prog feels balanced
Personally, the whole ābuff anything thatās underperformingā mentality is why we get tanks like the T32
^
If anything, more nerfs need to be given, not buffs
People forget tanks can be nerfed
T32 doesn't feel outrageously OP or anything, there aren't many in the matchmaker either.
Oh yes a insane hulldown tank with sandbags and super speed isnāt OP
Mmm yes, completely invulnerable hull down, strong hull just in case you canāt get hull down, ability to become a medium for 20 seconds, and a newly buffed gun so you no longer struggle with penetration
Never felt it was particularly strong when facing them, I don't own the tank so can't say for sure.
T29 but smaller hull
2mm, but this means the base armor becomes 52mm, which cannot be overmatched even by 155mm guns (only 183mm will be able to)
What about 17cm
Pls bring back kv5 in store
Maybe tomorrow as single tank deal even for 7.5k gold is worth it
Last time was sold before the buff, more than 6 months ago
even after stating all of that?
caernarvon, 53tp, emil 1, t32. wanna get all the tanks. suggestions on which order i should grind them in? i'd grind all of them together but eh.. credits are a problem lol
tie between 53tp and t32
then emil then caern
53tp, Emil, caern, t32
t32 is literally the best one out of them š
T32 by far the best; 53Tp and Emil 1 are close
It's also the least fun I'd say, it's just drive forward and win. The others all have a bit of uniqueness or challenge to play around
All are pretty fun.
T32 easiest to play
53TP probably the strongest
Emil I most interesting
Caernarvon probably the worst grind, but also very fun with the top gun, although its the hardest to play.
hmm is caer even worth using in tours? can it replace action x for same role?
More alpha, more dpm and super consumables makes it a very good choice
Itās flat out better than AX now after the alpha/DPM buff. Itās not a bad pick to add some DPM to a lineup
Caernarvon is cracked
alright thanks for help
Did people really play the CAX just for the dpm?
Well that and the armor
Yeah, regular Caernarvon has some armor but itās not super reliable, AX actually has armor.
Ngl the 218mm pen rounds still feel a bit middling in terms of pen power. Iām still throwing out a lot more prammo than I usually feel comfortable doing so. Guess thatās just me, however.
It was at 198 before iirc
It was, but it still feels lacking even with 218, which is probably for the best.
It's not that far from the 225 which the IS-3 has, so it's not bad
Iād say it has a pretty close to standard pen
Well, I did say it felt lacking. Never said it was lacking. Itās just a reflection of how I feel with the tank.
What tactic VK-72 is good for?
Being a brick.
Peek around a corner, don't sidescrape
Every German tank
Yes. The armor's there, to say the least. But I doubt it was ever a selling point. Just the supposed DPM which never works in practice since everyone knows you have the DPM to wear them down, but not the alpha to clear them out (why else would that 252 sitting off to the side wait so patiently for you to get them to a one-shot?).
Of course. Thereās no other reason to bother playing it otherwise. Itās slow, the alpha sucks, and the armor isnāt great
It sorta has some turret armor, aside from the cupola.
I just realised you guys are talking about the caernarvon lmao
I thought it was centurion
Anyways, angry eyes for attachments?
Ironically, the CAX is actually slightly faster than the tech tree counterpart lol.
doesn't matter, the tech tree is better and has super consumables if you want them
armor isnt great but it can still sidescrape
it functions sort of as a hulldown, including the 10 degrees of gun depresso
AX can sidescrape about as well as any med, which isn't good
super speed boost:
The fact that people played the CAX only for it's dpm is somewhat sad imo, but I can understand why. Thanks for the answers.
Superconsumables blow the AX out of the water if mobility is what you are after
no one cares about tier 5 sooo
@solid gate The M4 Sherman, at best, is a general fighter medium, with no gimmicks unless you believe the turret is strong enough to result in a hulldown gimmick. It's uninteresting, so people probably don't recognize much from it (not to mention it's a low tier as Asagi says)
Foch is also not spoken of because it's a general DPM TD, but nothing too special that isn't already taken. It can be thought of as the SU-122-54 that trades mobility for armor and some DPM. Tier 9/10 releases are dwindling its utility, as the armor begins falling apart, it may need something to account for it.
Playing M4 Sherman, its alright, but tier 5 is a pretty boring tier in general
tier 5 feels more sane than tier 10 on asia
Sherman? That crappy tank America built? Which version? There are like over 100 variants lol
(Sarcasm)
Guys how to play standard b
only shoot your first shot most of the time unless the situation dictates otherwise
when the opportunity comes dump your clip, especially if you can clip an enemy out
avoid direct confrontation and let your team mates take the hits because no armor and not adequate enough dpm
use HE whenever you can. @halcyon horizon
We play it becuz the Blitztubers over-hyped (I mean, a few did -_-) it and we fell for it.
most if not all of them did ngl
@halcyon horizon keep doing this,
Spot Then go run back , help your team from behind and follow and use the heavies armor as cover And if the heavies were destroyed Go run fast and
Use ur speed to flank keep doing that if it's not worked for you I'm sos sorry my friend is my strategy btw
Pantouf did, I think. "Insane tank!" and all that. 10 games later, and I'm finding the thing does not respond well to my touch. Heck, the T34 felt easier to use than the CAX and my experience with it is like trying to push a lazy sibling across the floor (very hard to do).
Ok @true ravine @vocal pond
Ok
CAX is not too difficult to make use of and def can work in pups
against experienced players it is just not as good. especially if they can just yank your cupola
honestly when the autumn season event happened i had a difficult time choosing between progetto 46 or cent 5/1
didn't even give a crap about the CAX
T34 is probably more comfortable to use since you can utilize hulldown better with the meaty alpha and trading potential
I did find it a bit difficult, since it shares the same problem with most tanks with high DPM: They basically trade alpha for more DPM, which increases your time out in the open. At least the T34 would actually pen.
i am not against cupolas being part of the game actually
i think they are pretty healthy but when other options are out there without cupolas it hurts the tanks that have them a lot
in order to make the CAX you have to be aggressive and push so the enemy can't just trade with you.
well with the sheriff out there which is basically a crossover between the CAX and the caern the CAX is hurt a lot. š¤·āāļø
Ye, I know what already. I just don't like the CAX. At all.
tfw my team has 4 meds/lights on canal and none of them go med side š
Mediums and lights evolving, backwards
Deal with it, really. It's not like you'd be able to do anything.
why so hostile
For real though
Mediums and lights going thru heavy side/not going through med side (and most likely losing a lot of HP) is the most braincell damaging thing someone will ever see
I wasn't being hostile? Where exactly are you getting this from? I told you to deal with it. It's not like you're capable of telepathic control, are you? What else can you do? Rage at the screen?
Two contradicting points it seems
It may just be me, but almost everything you say feels like it has some implied hostility
posting many questions with relatively obvious answers in quick succession is one way to do that
Anyway, lemme talk bout 60TP
Definitely one of the more accurate heavy tanks with a 152 mm gun
You got the wrong idea here.
@past fractal It's a noob-proof heavy. As long as you go forward in the right direction you'll do fine in it.
It didn't sound like he was asking for help with it to me
Nice point but what I was saying
60TPs gun is fairly* accurate for a 152 mm
I was just telling them what it is.
@past fractal The 152mm gun's accuracy and aimtime is actually worse than the E100 and the VK 72. But as I said, it's a noob-proof heavy. It's just that good.
The thing about that is that if the MTs are fast enough to force a breakthrough within a gap, they can mess up the TDs and stuff like that. It's hard, but the potential might be there.
taking on heavies head on in MTs is never a good idea and if it works it is due to the enemy being terrible
especially when there is a huge open flank for the enemy MTs and the enemy HTs can just hold
I never said that. If they could force a gap in say, something like D cap Faust, they might be able to flank any hevs on the lower lanes. idk
eh?
i guess
that is just avoiding enemy MTs and still flanking
i guess it will depend on who pushes first then
or the enemy TDs can provide cover fire
What is interesting is that I have seen like stuff before, but it mainly happens on stuff like Mayan Ruins, where the A cap is just a bunch of stupid corridors.
That reminds me, my first match in the E5 ever consisted of me pushing A cap in a 50% crewed tank(maybe 75%, idr)
I only play 50% for one or two battles in slow heavies to see how slow it's possible to go in the game
Thank God it was pre nerf E5 -_-
Lol
My first battle in E5, I made sure it was 100% so I paid the 1k gold needed
I've bought 100% crew for most of my tier 10s
60TP is the first tier 10 tank
Where it was 50% crew, then destroyed my gold and credits to make it 75%
Well, guess that's my cue to play around with me E5.
raises gun
Can someone give me a list of the most ammo racky tanks?
The SU 100 should be some where on top of that list I suppose.
There was an ammo rack HP chart for most T10 vehicles Chicken made. Give me a sec.
Another thing to not is their positioning. For example, the E5 gets ammo racks pretty close to the front, the turret bustle, so it's pretty easy to damage the rack there.
I still waiting buff E5 turret rotation and make it more like British heavy
More like british heavy? So worse?
It ain't going to happen, due to the super consumables. As long as those exist, the E5 will not get its buffs. Plus, if you make it more like the 215B you make it worse anyways -_-
Not for conqueror the turret armor is suck
Idk about conqueror
Conqueror has been buffed on turret Armor but like nothing happened
Still easy to penet
Ok
I think fv301 and Vickers cr and Vickers light could penetrate
If not then it would be a problem in 1v1
And? Does it really need everything?
Definitely not.
That's just stupid. We don't need another senseless HT buff. The Conq is fine as it is. If you're not doing well in it, then maybe you should reflect on yourself.
Thanks and yes the location is very important I would say more important than the HP.
this looks extremely cursed
Reminds me of M46 Patton smol gun
The tier V 105 mm derp gun
It exists in wot pc still it seems
Since in wotb it was removed already
I mean, I guess? The gun probably got pulled out and sent to a scrapyard, the poor thing.
We have 100mm gargoyle..
t82 + t54/t55 š
Yeah and horrible gun depression..
60TP is known for having terrible accuracyā¦
The chances of getting Skorp are really low
Chill, isn't worth spending your gold on those crates
Guys i need help, some ppl are saying that missles are back and sheridan missle is able to collect, is this true?
opens game
looks left, looks right
No
i wish it was
how can i learn track mechanics?
i somehow always end up not penetrating from tracks
@obsidian mirage no , even my beast can even pen him with 150mm gun
I mean the yee 100
There are times where the track will just eat your shell and thereās nothing you can do. The best advice I can give it to aim at the wheel in the front of the tank
shoot at the track wheels or slightly behind them
and make sure the enemy is not too angled to bounce your shell
or you are shooting too low and missing the structure
Does anybody know when the M41D / WZ-112-2 event is coming
Is FV215b 183 any good?
No
The 13th I think.
Funny tank that deals alot of damage per shot but dies really easily š
Heat and HE shells don't like tracks. Heat shells can still pen them, but penetration is significantly reduced as soon as it hits any type of spaced armor.
Another thing to watch out for is make sure that you are actually hitting the hull of the tank itself. Many times I see people frustrated by not penning a side on shot when it actually didn't even hit the hull.
You gotta hit the top half (ish) of the overall track
Hereās a visualization for what larks is talking about, you have to hit the yellow
And like sta1isbad said earlier, the idler and drive wheels (front and back) wheels are your best bet if you want to take off a track while damaging an opponent.
m41d is considered a better m41 but when i compare it there's pretty much no difference.. slightly better alpha and pen for slightly worse accuracy, top speed, depression and hp. m41 actually gets more advantages so idk
top speed might be slightly worse but the mobility is better
normal bulldog has 10° gun dep tho so yeah it's better imo
Ok, thx for the info š
Dpm is useful sure, but the bulldog is far to fragile to actually use it. More alpha makes hitting and resetting camo (what you kinda have to do with the tank) more effective.
But...
Type 62 superiority
I believe in Kunze panzer supremacy
Ew. LTTB is better
Kunze panzer for me
type 62 has the dumb 300 damage HE rounds tho
43mm of pen though
@violet timber @hollow notch thank you.
one last question.
hitting the part i colored the red (the track itself) does it bounce?
i mean its thick metal in real life so it can bounce or not get penetrated?
No, itās only counted as 20mm of spaced armor
It's around 20mm thick according to the game...
okay i got it, thanks for the answers.
have a great day
No, sometimes the tracks will just eat shells for no reason whatsoever, but thatās just rng and not really your fault
mobility is pretty much same
on hard terrain m41 will be slightly faster. on medium terrain they'll be same. on soft terrain m41d will be slightly faster. hp/t is higher on m41d but it has better terrain resistance which increases effective hp/t. and that's what matters in acceleration
ye type 62 may be better lol but im mainly asking cus that event. not sure if i should choose m41d or wz112.. wz seems a better choice but i just dont like that inaccurate tanks
It doesn't really matter, though. Both have way too similar mobility for their to be a distinctive change.
true. they're almost identical
one more advantage m41d gets though.. looks
it looks epic and no one can deny that
it also has 260 HE alpha for some reason
yea but 38mm cant pen a lot of things lol
I mean, if you're using a Bulldog, at that point you have to ask yourself, "Why am running HE with a Bulldog?"
Unless it's Nashorn
The DPM's good enough for you to simply APCR it to death. I'd rather take more HEAT instead.
I'm referring to M41D shoot HE at Nashorn
Why would you? Just use the standard rounds instead. It's not like you reload every 3.5 seconds. Oh wait, you do.
Delicious food for M41D
you can HE things like nashorn, sp1c, rear of any american t10. and m41d shooting HE gets more dpm than highest dpm tank in game
The 112 2 is an absolute monster. One of the top IS-X tanks in tier 8
The only reason to not get it is if you don't have the time to grind it (its almost guaranteed to be harder to get)
I already have the m41d so I'll try to get the wz
probably gonna fail and would have to use gold to finish the last stages if possible
sherman is best it is fast and reaload quickly
But crappy armor
is there some sort of event that started that i am oblivious to? or is it about to start
it hasn't started yet, we don't know when it will start but yeah it's there
Fresh account, and a fresh start. On the road for the T-62A, any tips??
maybe. just after trying IS-5 i absolutely hated how inaccurate it is. takes ages to aim in and even aimed is inaccurate.. wz meanwhile has even worse accuracy
T34 is pew pew, kinda hard to play.
T34-85 has higher than usual alpha but otherwise meh
T43 is DPM while otherwise meh
T44 has higher than usual alpha but is meh.
T54 is DPM armored yolomachine
yes. you can either get wz112-2 or m41d. i think you farm masteries (or was that different event?)
btw has m41d been sold in shop for gold?
dont think so, i got it for real money
oof
i can buy wz112-2 for gold when it comes to shop but not sure if m41d will even come in shop lol
Don't rush for t10
Learn the game first, honestly wouldn't even recommend to get it within first 2k battles
Oh, i already have an account with a tier IX, i just wanted to start freshly
Engine boost bad, use another repair kit
Use prammo
Got it, but im broke on prem
Ah well, what about that Tier 4 Grizzly you get after finishing the tutorial
Eh, sure it kills them faster, but Iād just use the AP
You sold your one credit earner.
Well damn me.
ohhh that's how they get it. i was always wondering how all new accounts owned grizzly
T44-100 being worse than standart t44 as premium š
what is wrong with that?
you can actually get it back from the player's support but with a 10% extra tax
Interesting
Arenāt the tanks basically identical?
the 100 has the same gun stats .
worse depression
slower acceleration.
same armour. (apart from the skirts ofc)
but that camo is š„
But how much actually?
needs more engine power imo
So apart from the dispersion pretty much nothing
Complaining player spotted spotted.
Preparing Copium Solution #3420.
I suggest you do the same.
You forgot the 100 being a premium, and therefore needs to be OP
š
2 degrees less gun depression
if you run the 122 on the t44 it loses gun depp tooš
Itās not like it really matters anyways. The tank is fine.
besides, the t34-2 is the better tank if you run the 122mm anyways.,š
Oh yeah
T44 with the 122 has a hell of a reload
Yeah
I only play the 122 on it in platoons for fun
You can do some silly things with it
But usually never run it
Is the Foch good the AMX ac 48 is horrible
Pretty good tank. It smacks things, and isn't as vulnerable to getting smacked back (pretty thick armor for a IX TD, after all) Good DPM, just a good gun overall. Yeah, it's a pretty good tank to have,
Good, AMX ac 48 is nightmarishly bad.
get the t54 ltwt instead of t44. its a much better tank
Are the 268/4 crates supposed to come out this update?
t62a was my first tier 10 too, lovely vehicle still
I know, thats why im going for it
general tip, save free xp for upgrading modules instead of researching new tanks
How to get credits faster
I need 2 million rn
Use Premium Account, complete missions, use credit boosters, play better, get more medals
obvious things are boosters, prem time certificates and pre tanks. but for playstyle that is more 'credit sustainable', be careful with your hitpoints
so, maybe try some more defensive tanks for that
I've got m6 rn should I go for t29 or the other one
hm
id say the m7 yoh, the tech tree is better. but the t29 is a better tank than the yoh
M7Yoh to get to the M6 Yoh
oh
7 -> 3 -> 5 -> 6
math
is is5 worth the 1.5k gold?
Only if you donāt have any other premium Soviet style heavy tanks
I kinda just remembered, T-54 stock turret is pretty strong lol
I wonder, would WG put e100's alternative turrets? Like for example the model with the maus turret or the adler modelš¤
Probably not
I have a T 34 and T 34-85 but still need to research the Type 34 and 58, neither fun nor does it make sense.
AMX 40
Technically, Maus turret was too heavy to be mounted on E 100's hull
what about Adler model?
Meh, E 100 with an cupola to be focused
ĀÆ_(ć)_/ĀÆ
definitely yes if you need a good credit earner
the is 5 is for sale ??
As Long as Youāre in a clan with tier 10 supply, and you have tier 10 personal supply, then yes
ohh i see
ty
I think I now have a logical explanation or should I say speculation as to why Kranvagn line (tier 8-10) tanks are so slow
Its because of the 80 mm sides they all have
That wouldnāt really make them slow lol
nah it wouldnt
Guys witch one is better for humans vs zombies mode?Leopard 1 or Leopard PT A?
itās probably because of balancing reasons, since the krans top speed on pc is something around 55-60kph
or another reason i cant think of right now
IS-5 is a very good tank
how would its playstyle be ??
A bit like an IS-3... But with better stats
an IS-3 without the excellent turret and a horrible gun
well i havent gotten the is 3
i have the german heavies tho
Ok...?`
like idk bout the is3's playstyle
Doesn't look at all like German heavies..
but doesnt is 3 have a bad gun already stat wise ??
not really
yup ill agree with that
IS-5's gun is fine, only dispersion
ahh well ig thats all the russian heavies
yup it is
the only tier 8 in my budget is the is 5
That's a good tank
IS-5 is honestly kinda garbage, but if you have no other tier 8 prems to grind credits with, itās worth picking up
well i have the amx cda
I don't agree... I rlly like IS-5... And that's a good tank.
other than that all lower tier garbage premiums
The CDA 105 is a much better tank than the IS-5, and a lot more fun to play too. If you have that already, I wouldnāt recommend picking up the IS-5
CdA is great š
But they aren't at all similar..
ahh well ty
i was looking for a tank to grind credits
Tanks donāt necessarily need to be similar for comparisons
CDA 105 is a pretty good credit grinder because of the high standard pen, and it wonāt get boring after long grind sessions. Itās one of the few tier 8ās I play nowadays
True. But that's not the same playstyle, so I say : keep CDA, and buy IS-5 š
The more, the merrier
And after playing the IS-5 you will appreciate the CdA on a whole new level
š„ŗ . š®āšØ
ohh thats cool
well the cda is a fun tank
If you're looking for a credit grinder, your cda will perform much better than an IS-5 simply because it fires less prammo, and hits more often.
The IS-5 is blessed with dogshit dispersion, and prammo spam is needed often when downtiered, which makes you spend a little more credits on resupply
This is actually a good point lol. You donāt appreciate an actually fun premium until youāve played a boring one
lmao
well tysm
and would u run rammer or cali on your cda ??
well u saved me 1.5k gold
Lowe grinding go brrrrrr
Rammer. By far. The DPM is a little lackluster for a tier 8 TD, and the pen is already fantastic
ohh cool
well ty
don't agree š
well ig it depends on your playstyle too right ??
Right
Cda is turretless so I will automatically choose an is5 over it
should I get the jackson or hellcat
Iād rather take a 252U or Celestial
Hellcat is a better tank imo, though both lines are rather lackluster atm
ok
hellcat is better
Because you have to ask, jackson.
The hellcat is objectively a better tank, but it is not noob friendly at all. The Jackson will cover up some mistakes you make.
^^^ but in any case, I would advise you to stay away from these lines right now
I recommend you to take both
Honestly, stay away from all tds
I can also recommend the German tank destroyers
If you want firepower, get a gun based medium.
If you want an assualt td, get a heavy.
Hereās how I have my CDA set up
The greatest benefit of driving a tank destroyer is that you can camp and all those annoying toxic people wonāt judge you for it
Any camping is bad
Why is your avatar and pass transparent?
Slow cellular data not loading everything lol
Ah, looks funky
Add invisible avatar weegee
Not really, and camping in one spot isnāt super beneficial most of the time, whenever you cant hit anyone for a while you should move positions
Thatās called sniping, or just effective camping
What if you cant snipe anyone
Then you relocate, thatās part of sniping
If you don't have shots, you are camping
If you do have shots, you are sniping
Well thats what I said in my first message
Camping is just sitting in one spot and not moving. Sniping is moving if you donāt have shots
Wow. Incentivising people to move when they donāt have shots. What a nice ambiguous way to promote deserting overwatch positions
I mean, yea
Their gun sitting out of the game is useless
ahh well ty mate
Not like the enemy team will go out and sit right in front of them taking hits
Do we play the same game?
Yeah... right
These overwatch positions only become useful after the match is already lost and the zombie hoard is just yoloing you
When will obj 268/4 be sold? Will they be in crates
Only if their team overextended which is actually just yoloing
Camping positions are effective during brawls, deep defence (enemy pushing), crossfires and push denial
M8
The only thing you will actually have shots on are bots that don't know peeking is bad
Meanwhile their actually good players won't be putting themselves in your line of fire while they just tear your team apart.
Thankfully Wargaming always makes sure to include some unnecessarily strong camping positions
Killing bots doesn't win games
Killing dangerous players does
Actually good players will not peek for enough to take hits, thus making the enemy team go into line of fire of their campers to shoot them
Two dangerous players are nothing against a horde of five tanks yoloing them
If a player is actually dangerous you wonāt take him out if he has any resemblance of support, simple as that
Camping is bad in all tanks. Hell, even grille shouldn't camp in one spot for whole match lol. Actually depends on map and position but generally it's true
Especially because of the camper support he has that will punish you for overextending against him
Camping is bad, sniping isnāt (for the most part)
^
It's very easy to isolate yourself the confront the player directly.
If you can do that then he isnāt dangerous XD
Sniping while relocating and actually being useful is good but camping in one spot while not caring where enemy is is bad
Also, you likely wonāt get any snipers because those who are good enough for that will often play aggressively to hunt some stats. Campers are the best you get in terms of deep defence and long range fire support, but are still a crucial part in winning games
All you have to do is place yourself in a position with cover from the standard campfires.
The other guy will do the same
Then the better player wins/ farms the bots next to it faster
Yes, itās just bot farming. Like I said
Honestly front line grille is more useful than sniper grille. At least you get an extra meat shield that way kekw
Campers are a powerful tool that can often turn around games if used correctly
Campers? No. Proper snipers? Yes
The difference is you are actively confronting dangerous players. If you are sitting in the back, you will not get any shots in on it, and it will freely destroy anything on your team that isn't camping.
You have to actually hold them back.
I know people love to complain about campers but in the end yoloing/ overextending is worse as it actually makes your team lose
Being aggressive and suiciding* are different things
You hold them back by area denial
sarcastic look Oh, really?
But area denial when sitting in the back is useless
You only damage suiciders
Aggressive smart players are completely unfazed by the isu sitting in the corner, waiting 5 minutes to put 1 shot out
I mean, if I follow your strict definition of camper then only like 10% of people sitting in the back are campers
Like I said, the positions are designed to provide ample fire opportunities
Nah. The useless clowns that sit and wait for things to actually peek them are camping
If you are hunting the shots (from a distance) you are sniping
You cannot hunt shots from a distance
But you can
leopard 1 noises
You know how far you have to travel to even get a slightly different angle? By then the situation is over and twenty after it as well
Castilla
I don't consider tds useless for no reason.
You seriously snipe in a Leopard 1?ā¦
Oh what you think it's a frontline tank?
Medium range tank
Lmao
What, should I be yoloing?
I only do that with stealth ramming in madgames
You all snipe in a Leopard 1???
Sniping doesn't necessarily mean sniping from BACK of map
The leopard1 is the sniper KING
Nah
I play frontline because im too aggressive š
I play it close to medium range, driving fast flanks and bold peeks
Dpm, accuracy, mobility, and flexibility
What else do you need in a sniper
I don't really snipe in any tank. Literally play grille frontline. So no we all don't snipe in leo but it's still a good option to snipe in it
The alpha is relatively low so sniping is a bit of a gamble
You harass them, find a different angle, harass, find a different angle, harass, repeat until everything is dead
If you catch someone in open they're dead cus of your dpm
Question, which tank is better for scouting and sniping T37 or Chaffee?
Only of they donāt shoot back⦠the Leopard 1 dpm is not that good anymore
You can hunt down crossfires
Mobility is top tier so what if it takes more shots. You have a tank with the ability to actually line up shots
With all the new tanks and with all the new buffs yes. That dpm isn't as good compared to other meds
I suppose that you consider as sniping what I consider as medium range, which is a bit extreme
Here comes in the long distance part
You don't get spotted
Why are you sniping with either of them?
Absolutely disgusting.
Basically sniping from medium range
Itās just good dpm. Not great, not terrible. Certainly not enough to out-dpm anyone
What
I usually scout, camp and snipe with light tanks
You can outdpm a lot of tanks lol
You donāt get spotted because of bushes or because of distance?
Why. Are. You. Sniping. In. A. Light. Tank.
Distance
An absolute laser allows this
No. Basically all mediums have 3k - 3.5k dpm, and the Leo has 3.6k. That is insignificant looking at the hp
Can't change my playstyle from WoT
Ru-251:
It has mobility
That is what differentiates it from those
It has mobility of a light lol
And less armour than a light
Then go play TDs smh
Don't burden others with dumb LT gameplay.
@balmy compass Eh, debatable.
And mobility doesnāt matter as much as armour and alpha in dpm fights
Leo 1 literally has best effective hp/t in t10. So it's literally faster than any light.. top speed is higher on t100 but leo 1 still has superior acceleration
No sh*t
Allow me to introduce you to yet again distance
Also, it out alphas the very common Soviet peashooters
In a brawl soviet "peashooters" will probably win lol
Doesnāt help in dpm fights
In fact, the whole mobility doesnāt help all that much because the maps are so small that you can run away initially but they will eventually catch up
I feel like most DPM lights/meds are primarily effective in just 2 scenarios
If youāre losing on the local level, pull back, and fire from a distance. If youāre winning at the local level, full YOLO push.
Mobility is helpful for closing the distance quickly
a good leo player wont be "running away" they will be using that mobility to get back into the fight faster in a better position
To come back on the initial topic, I believe you seriously underestimate the influence of campers on the game if you believe the only effective form to be highly mobile long range relocations to constantly change the angle to create fire opportunities
Oftentimes itās just better to lock down corridors of the map than to farm enemies
yea i probably underestimate the amount of times a camping e100 has lost me a game lol
Also, why are we on dpm fights
The leopard 1 is the best sniper.
Dpm fights are not sniping.
Yes the leopards usage is limited.
But so is sniping. It's rarely actually helpful to have a long range fight, but the leopard is the most suited tank for that job. All other tanks that might want to use that style of play have other crippling problems that don't allow them to fully use the gun.
You lose the game for yourself if you ignore the fact that your E100 is camping
I turn the e100 into a meatshield
It's not impossible to win a game with a camping HT...
They shoot e100, I then push and shoot them back
Which happens to be exactly what I said
Deserting the flank where he is camping is generally a good idea as the pushing enemies force him to play like a superheavy
It's getting spotted automatically, so its gonna get shot at even if it's not at the front
it usually makes it more challanging tho thats a full hp damage sponge sitting at the back yea he may do some damage from that position but when our other heavies get overun and die it can and usually does have a negative impact on the game rather than a positive
but the thing is.. why are e100s camping so often. why specifically e100 lol
Iām not saying that a camping E100 is an advantage, but it doesnāt have to be the deciding factor
it's not an advantage ik. and it can have big impact on game
Aside from that, camping tank destroyers are oftentimes actually an advantage
Cause everyone always goes for the Tiger 1 cause its popular, and then they keep going up the tree.
idk but like it is a e100 thing to do like when i think camping heavy tank at t10 i think of the e100
same lol. the amount of camper e100s is huge
Because they don't know how to play HTs and therefore adopt a pseudo-TD playstyle.
but why specifically e100. there are a lot of other heavies in t10
Because of alpha and popularity
i agree however it does require skill on the tds part to know when to stop camping and join the frontline battle
Because the line's hella popular.
The gun hits surprisingly often as well
@brave juniper Nah, the cheeks are very penable
That's not a "cheek" going by the words meaning
That's a literal turret side that's exposed to frontal shots š¤
Still a cheek
Okay, this better?
Yuh, now that's a cheek, seems hard to hit
No one aims there š
Yeah because everyone just slams shells through the turret roof lol
Watch me do it anyways
High pen tanks just slam through either the lower plate or mantlet weakspot
They stealth buffed the mantlet, so you canāt cheese it anymore, unless you hit the exact base of the gun (which is way harder than the top of the turret anyway)
Idk about u but unless it's a high pen tank i just
Question: Is the IS 5 worth it? Is the armor strong, like the object 252u?
1: Its alright, but not an OP tier 8 like the others
2: nope on the hull
It's worth the price of 1500 gold I'd say, but if you have other options don't buy it
Well the pike nose can be red when you're slightly above someone but that lower plate is the game killer plus the 5° dep compared to 252 U's 6°
I have the object 252u already, that means that the is 5 is worthless for me right?
Depends, wanna collect tanks, go on
Most likely, it's a kind of freebie for the f2p/beginner players, like it's not unusable there's just better picks
Yes, definitely
OK than I can save the 1500 gold thank u all
š
is the SU-130PM offer for 8500 gold worth it?
@zealous marlin the tank itself is decent, its main feature is the credit earning which is quite high considering it only costs 1500 gold
btw 252u is definitely better in every aspect
@strange solar no it's hella overpriced, and it doesn't even come with equipments nor camo
oh ok thanks
I've heard the FV215b (haven't played it) is the worst T10 heavy. What's the best overall?
8500 is never "overpriced" for t8s @strange solar , 12-15k for a t8 which some tanks did sell for IS overpriced, 5-8k is the best/good range, with 10k being the normal after release or some months after release
Don't be fooled, su 130PM is possibly the best t8 Td when it comes to paper turreted tds, currently at least
hmm
And it's troll against HE to some extent and smaller than the skorp g so I'd suggest getting it if you love the Playstyle of peek-a-boom
Autocorrect murders people btw
alr thanks
sure the 130pm is probably the best t8 td, but 8.5k would be a good offer if it also had camo+equipments+ 20 x5, otherwise it's not worth it imo @brave juniper
8.5k with a 2k gold camo and equipment worth idk 1k? We'll probably see that around Christmas, or even Halloween/black Friday , and it's not even a sure shot we will see it since we don't know what tanks get sold overtime by schedule or posted ahead of time, if you want a tank without getting it from crates or waiting 2 years it's definitely better to buy it stock when cheap than waiting for that one offer that has it all after it's been left behind like Lowe, t26e4 or any premium 3-4 years old, tanks that either don't fit the meta or are underpowered š¤
The FV isnāt terrible now, but itās still an extreme niche tank that really only excels at bullying mediums, which it canāt do as well as it could after itās DPM nerf. I personally think the E5 is worse.
Tier X is fairly well balanced, but the IS7, Yoh, and 60TP are the big three meta tanks. All three are quite strong and fairly easy to play as well.
"fairly well balanced" cough cough bunch of old meta nerfed tanks, cough cough over cooked current meta, repeat cough cough
i mean aside from a few exceptions most tier x tanks are still competitive and there arenāt really any awful ones.
While individually some may experience equal footing with certain tanks fighting vs their own type the same can't be said about the average player, E5 used to have more players before and a higher wr, not only did it go down but the players using it did too, same for fv215b, is4 which went unused in comp vs is7 when it used to be the opposite before, while it may be balanced from the perspective of someone with a high level of skills that isn't meant to say that tanks that are still "workable" after nerfs are competing against meta when met with similarly skilled players and easily beat by tank stats and not skill š¤
there is something wrong with Charles. probably an error from WG. Depression is only 5. As Charles is a wolverine, depression should be 10. WG fix it please. With a depression of 5 this tank is nearly useless
It had -5 irl I believe. Itās not an error. Not every tank needs -10 gun depression, and furthermore the Achilles/Charles had a 17-pounder which probably affected its gun depression level.
Double checked, indeed the Achilles did have -10 gun depression, but the -5 is from a gun stop that when used, limited gun depression to -5. Technically, the gun depression level is accurate.
Makes sense, after all the loader needs to be able to put the shell into the gun without having to expose himself
The E5, arguable was always worse than the 215B, if it werenāt for the extra amount of durability and smidge of armor the E5 has to sustain itself in HT-HT fights. But the DPM nerfs really hurt.
215b at least have a somewhat good gun, E5 is just no
Today I ricocheted a T100LT's turrent with my fv183. I've never raged so much before. Let me be honest, that little abomination needs an immediate nerf on dpm and it's troll armour.
It should be nerfed into unplayable condition
Exactly like other light tanks
The tank is just insanely broken
It just doesn't leave a chance for other meds/lights
I wonder why wargaming made that tank so strong. Its crazy
It's just too bad that the nature of Blitz puts light tanks (especially in tier 10) at a tough spot because it's either busted or just a worse medium
what about Vickers
Funny how almost all of them appear at the game being broken, and then they get nerfed into crap
Vickers is effectively a medium, not to say it's much different for T-100 LT
Yes, because each of them needed gimmicks to survive being in tier 10
An autoloader
A MISSILE
Effective Armor
Being FV4202
Last one's a joke of course, but the influence is evident
next up: double gun
After That: āWeāve decided to add in the M1 Abrams. Due to its mobility, it will be classified as a light tank. Deal with it.ā
So we got a medium MBT - stb/leo
Heavy stb - kpf70
Now for the light and TD one
You mean MBTs?
Oh and while we are at it we are also adding the Leopard 2a7 for a crate drop at 0.002% chance for 7 parts, with 200 required to craft the tank
dont forget the gold charm š°
Nah, no charms in this box
š³ š
Good. It'll make beating up 60TPs much easier.
Oh no, i bounced a grille 15 and a leopard 1 in my 183 who have lower armor values than a t100lt i want them nerfed now!!11!1
what's the ugliest tier 10 collector/prem
T95e6, biased opinion
concept 1b
Maybe the VK 72? It's a weird bunch of angles and curves. It looks unclean and unfinished, the way it just looks.
vk72 is tech tree...
It's a lowe turret on a weird VK hull concept
Screw me I'm being stupid
In that case... it's gotta be either the 1B or the E6.
ngl, 260 looks kinda ugly and cool at the same time
def 1b
how dare you put the e6 in the same boat?
Guys, should I buy SU-130PM or LT-432? For 130PM I already have Skorpion, but still, what ya all think?
no need to get the 130pm if you have scorpion
the difference is not too great to warrant a purchase
dunno about the lt432 though
Hmmh ok
cugly?
I love the tank, but it's gotta be the M60. Just doesn't look right without the cupola
oh yeah m60 looks awful
I mean, I guess it always has
for me t22 or the concept 1b
T22 defo, buncha triangles with a fat blob on top.
Id rate concept just below Chief, chief being numero uno. Both got that MBTish style
concept looks pretty cool because it has PBR
concept imo, never been much of a fan of the look. especially the back
chief and t22 look better than the concept
concept is atrocious
260 is an is7 prototype after all
M60's camo is atrocious
And you can't even replace it
I think it looks neat
I would rather use any normal or legendary camo bar a few really bad ones, like the premium account one
The only problem I have is that it's not an M60. You can't just take away the cupola, it doesn't work like that
Yeah it doesn't look very accurate to the real tank
I would've preferred an A3 turret, but keep the cupola. That way it's different from the M48, and you don't have turret cheeks anymore but you have a larger cupola instead
Well, it must be a really early M60ā¦
Donāt later variants have that slimmer profile?
It's the first generation turret, but without the cupola
M60 starship when
I'd love an A2
It's also got a redesigned turret
A slower Sheridan with much better armor
When was the last time a med had a long reload at tier 10?
Just because it's never been done before doesn't mean it won't work. The Chrimera is a med with high alpha, and it's dominating tier 8
There's even the KpfPz 70 which might as well be a med, it's working just fine
Maus had an engine issue, Tiger P had an engine issue, E100 had an engine issue. IRL issues don't matter
And you don't get my point.
Panther 2 isn't a sniper med but okay. Just because it's never been done before doesn't mean it won't work. It's got a decent a armor profile, okay speed, and a high alpha gun. I don't see why it wouldn't work tbh
What does that have to do with anything?
0
Except it has what's basically a Concept 1B turret lol
It's got a redesigned turret to handle the 152mm gun
IRL statistics don't matter lmao, this is a video game
Oh so thats where that tank is from (I see it in a different game)
WG need to give pbr to the tanks which have unchangeable camos. m60, tiger131, Dracula, hmm, they would look good ngl
It's in War Thunder and Armored Warfare
@autumn breach I know many people who would love to see a Starship added
I dont play either, I saw it in a game called Ravenfield
Again, it's not the same as an M60. new turret, new gun, pretty different tank
Sounds like saying the E3 and E4 are different
Well they are fundamentally different
I honestly donāt see why they couldnāt use a later variant. Would it really be that hard?
Or it could be a premium like it's more conventional brother š¤
Imo if WG will add it as tech tree it needs a longer line
I would.
They could've just used this
@autumn breach Speak for yourself, I'd love one
You would be incredibly surprised
Beautiful
I'd take what's basically a concept 1B turret, which is nearly impenetrable hull down, and combine it with a 560 alpha gun
IRl statistics don't matter. How many times do I need to say this for you to understand?
Nah, itās
-
an M60
-
an M60 with a 152mm gun
-
an M60
-
Did I say itās an M60?
Iām buying it.
Sheridan had a 30 second reload irl
I'm not sure why you're latching onto this IRL figure argument, it's one of the worst i've ever seen on this server tbh
Theyāll give it 12 second reload and we now have an American meta. Just as it should be.
This isnāt War Thunder š
Because game balance??? It's what they've done with literally every other tank in game
Dude what is up with your pessimism and obsession with real world figures lmao
Why would WG add missiles to such a tank anyway
Again, doesn't have to be tech tree, it can be a premium
This is one of the only non-prototype tanks what WG can add right now, I don't see why it shouldn't be added
Itās a 152mm gun on an MT hull. Itās like the Chim. A high alpha MT that smacks things while being a⦠ah, well⦠an MT.
Ngl I would love to see it in game, I would probably buy it at somepoint too
So the first time I say it can be a premium, no one will buy it, but the second time I bring this up it's fine???
Now we just need the HSTVL
I thought it's TL-1 LPC for a moment. Welp
Probably not
Kinda hot, ngl. Reminds me of the Israli T-55 with a 105mm gun
Itās basically a similar concept to the Chim, but at Tier X. Sounds neat.
TL-1 LPC? Sounds interesting .
Dont you know that there are so many people who would just dump money on games for anything for no reason?
5-10 people lmao, I guarantee at least 1000 people bought the least popular premium
Here's the TL-1 LPC
I know it's basically a 121B, but it's still hot
Eh? Itās not what I expected but okay.
@violet timber I mean, had the 121B have that for a camo Iād probably get it.
This is a fairly large game, people pay money all the time from the battlepass to tier X collecters
i hate that tank, its just not my playstyle..
looks good though ngl
ngl, I'd be kinda surprised if anyone can tell me what this tank is based on
Almost looks like a Magach⦠idk
laughs in Wot consoleš¤£
challenger?
I doubt we will get more MBTs into this game
Magach 6 (aka M60), Gal Batash variant
Does this mean Iām correct? Or is it a technical cuz I wasnāt sure?
It's barely an M60 anymore lol
@blissful osprey Yeah you're right
Yeah and tier X would become even more wack with MBTs
m48 patton is one of the relevant mediums though? your point is?
The moment you realize we already have MBTs
lmao i just came back to chat and saw that š
salty much?
are you conceding that you lost the argument then
Israelis can make some pretty cool stuff. Though, didnāt the Merkava use itās armor in a different way that makes repair maintenance harder? Think it was how the armor was layered⦠not sure where Ai can find evidence
We have 3 MBTs in tier 8 alone
Most of the MBTs are first generation
those being?
Yes, but MBTs were made before the Cold War started
@misty wing STA-1, T-44, and the Centurion
what about the centurion RAAC and M48 raumpanzer
Isnāt the raumpanzer fake
I put the RAAC in with the Cent, much like the T-44-100, but I did forget about the Raum
it's literally just an m48 with a plow attached, can't really be that fake tbh
I doubt its originally German š
The Centurion 1 is the first MBT lol, that is pretty much universally accepted. Then there's the wackos who argue that Panther was the first MBT
Itās in German service, really.
west germany did
Oh, guess I need to learn cold war history
Oh the T95E2 is in tier 8 as well, so that's 5 MBTs
might as well count chieftain/t95 then
Forgot to look at heavies
Iām sorta confused⦠if the Cent can be considered the first āMBT,ā what stops the M48 from being the same as well?
The Cent was made first
No, I mean as an MBT. Sorry for the confusion.
122TM is actually pretty historical, idk if you wanna count that as mbt
M60-2000
@blissful osprey Oh yes, the M48 is an MBT
Im being extra stupid today, it seems.
Relatable
An MBT is generally considered something with enough mobility to perform all combat tasks, enough armor yo bounce opposing tanks, and enough firepower to knock out anything it comes across
To bad there isnāt much tank vs tank combat anymore
The Cent 1 had a kind of lack luster gun, but it did the job, rather nice armor for the time, and good enough mobility to do the job
The Cent never really had composite armor? It came out in 1945 and was seen as the first MBT today due to its ability to have a balanced characteristics
Unless it actually does use composite armor, then good job Brits. Idk, the Cent never interested me.
Centurions were good for about the first month after they came out, then they were outpaced by everyone else for a few months
Poor Centurion.
Then the Challenger came out! But, it still used HESH, and against composite armor, it was rather lack luster.
is m46 patton a med or mbt
Good question. I personally consider it an MBT due to time period, however this is really up to personal opinion
Do you know why they still used rifle guns? I honestly donāt see why anymore.
they need it for HESH
Because rifling spins the HESH rounds, which spreads the explosive more. However, with HESH being awful now, they are making the Chally 3 which has a new turret and the 120mm smoothbore cannon that the Abrams and the Leo 2 use
Rotation makes it more effective
Explody shell do gooder when spin? š³
I got it from the Chieftain, but okay
tbh I would consider it a med because it was introduced and then phased out during the same year that the M103 was introduced. The fact that they made a new heavy tank after the M46's service life means that it was never intended to be able to take on that role, and hence it's not an MBT
I remember somebody making the argument that the reason why the M1 still uses the L/44 is because less space is taken up in urban environments.
Or the Scottish Koala, can't quite remember
yeah it's partially that, and they believe the depleted uranium ammo should make up the penetration that it would otherwise lack compared to the leo's tungsten
I mean, the M103 was designed around engaging targets from long range, wasnāt it? I suppose MBTs and HTs can still exist at the same time in a battlefield; it just depends on what you want with the tank. If you consider the M46 an MBT, then you might see the reasoning there. I personally just regard it as an MT since itās really just an improved M26, in many ways.
Funky
The M103 was designed to support your M48s and M60s from a secondary line
don't get the reference
Could you make me a Panther I with a Leopard 1 turret and Lowe gun?
The A-10 warthog is basically a plane built around the Gau-8
oh that warthog
I was thinking of the animal lmao
So engaging targets from medium to long range.
@autumn breach I hope thatās a joke, thatās not how it worksā¦. The US has almost always designated their tanks like āXmm gun-tank, M###
Pretty much, yes
Later š¤·āāļø
and ngl I would rather use the FV4005 as the example for the "tank of warthogs"
Thats fine with me š
Just ping me whenever you finish it on your own time
Yet the gun still didnāt fit in that turret
it worked fine afaik
That doesnāt mean they donāt want the tank to engage targets from longer range. Just because they designed it around the gun (almost any tank is designed around the gun) doesnāt mean they intended for it to drive straight up to a T-54 and shoot point blank.
Bruh my spelling is wack today
Itās designed to be a mobile 120mm gun engaging targets from long range.
So itās designed around engaging targets from long range. You keep saying as if the long range part isnāt part of the design and itās just something they found out and decided āhuh, who knew it worked like that?ā
The FV4005 stage II was supposed to house that 183mm autoloader but wouldnāt fit, so only the prototype was built and now exists as a display
Sounds like M103 should be a sniping tank in game š
It was built to be the ultimate anti-tank weapon
you mean so they got rid of the autoloader
It received the 183mm gun as the Brits feared tanks like the IS-3 and the IS-8. It was never designed around demolition purposes.
afaik they didnāt even use the stage II version
That doesnāt mean it was designed as a demolition tank tho
hehe 183mm go brrrr
technically they didn't "use" either version, but the stage II was tested and it worked decently. They only abandoned the project because it turned out the soviet heavy tanks it was designed to counter weren't as threatening as they thought they would be
I see
Yeah nah, finally found the video. The British used rifled guns for HESH rounds
^^
NATO HT superiority.
How would M103ās gun perform in todayās warfare? Like against modern Abrams or something
It would get absolutely obliterated, probably before even seeing the other tank
nitpicking here but if we're talking IRL it would be the T-10, not IS-8
Marshmallow tank vs square Abrams
No like say the enemy tanks arent moving or firing, like a test on armor penetration or smth
No worries, I said I like the T-10 designation better and I still use the IS-8 -_-
They had a stockpile because rifled guns are harder to maintain and wear out faster, so they needed a stockpile so they had enough to replace the old ones
It wouldnāt work. The gun is just too old a design.
The British are finally going to the Smoothbore gun because it has much better anti-tank capabilities
who are you even talking to
afaik no one brought up apfsds vs other ammo
Good job Brits
Ngl, the chally 3 do be looking kinda hot
How about M103ās other ammo types, like its HEAT?
That would fair worse due to NERA armor
what's the worst modern era mbt
I wouldāve said the M60, but they arenāt really used anymore since the Marine Corp got rid of them
You do know how AP and kinetic energy works right
That doesnāt sound like a good example to me.
I remember this one thing in this museum. A bed of spikes (Californian museums can be weird at times) that the staff had you lay down. You never got stabbed by the spikes since you simply covered too much surface area and your wait was never really enough to get the spikes to go through you, or something along the lines of that.
If they're sending T-90s or older, those aren't modern era MBTs
T-14 armata is unproven but is considered to be one of the world's best on paper
I love the weird physics behind rifled guns and sabot rounds!