#Problems finding the printer's IP address.
2642 messages · Page 3 of 3 (latest)
Basically, your current print start is doing stupid stuff. The better print start macro fixes that. But needs a chamber thermistor to work properly.
So, the fact that the hotend isn't heating up and I'm getting that error, is because I don't have the macro installed that I need for the chamber thermistor?
post your current PRINT_START macro
is that it? no wonder your hotend isn't heating
So what do I need to put in to heat up the hotend?
a bare minimum of M109 Sxxx where xxx is the desired temperature of the hotend
but you're also missing setting the heated bed temperature, qgl, bed mesh, etc, unless you have a custom G32 macro?
a better print start macro is definitely the way to go
That's the guide I followed before, but the thing is, when I get to this part (the capture part), I don't know what data replaces the XXX
i see above that you don't have a chamber thermistor, so none of that is relevant
because of this, you'll need to comment out or delete these two lines from the PRINT_START macro on that page:
SET_DISPLAY_TEXT MSG="Heatsoak: {target_chamber_wait}c" # Display info on display
TEMPERATURE_WAIT SENSOR="temperature_sensor chamber" MINIMUM={target_chamber_wait} # Waits for chamber temp```
Could this be the cable for the chamber thermistor?
no, that looks like some kind of grounding wire
And I suppose this isn't either, right?
nope, rpi wifi aerial
you're looking for something like either one of these, assuming the kit vendor supplied one
Where can I buy it?
amazon? aliexpress?
head over to #rules and grab your country's flag so we can maybe suggest vendors in your region
i don't know of vendors in spain, but i do know that onetwo3d ship to eu
or ask for advice in https://discord.com/channels/460117602945990666/1046795200271499264
I assume each thermistor is designed for a specific printer, right?
no
they are mostly generic and interchangeable. as long as you know the defined type they can be integrated into klipper.
your manta has several spare thermistor ports to plug into
For example, this thermistor is compatible with the printers mentioned in the title, but it's also compatible with others, right?
yes, that will do the job fine
Ok
sure
Okay. But before we buy it, are we sure this is the reason the hotend temperature isn't rising and not a problem with the startup G-code?
I ask because I thought the problem might be the print startup G-code
yes, i'm sure it's the PRINT_START, there's nothing in there to tell either the heated bed or hotend to heat up
but like i said yesterday, we can get it running without the need for a chamber thermistor for now and add it later
Ok
But when I get the camera's thermistor, I'll have to add those lines to my printer.cfg file, right?
correct, as well as this #1436004447682826330 message
And where it says XXX I have to replace it with some data, right?
yes, it'll be the pin name of wherever you plug in the thermistor from the pinout diagram for your mcu
Once I have the thermistor, where on the printer do I install it?
a good place for starters is poking out the Z cable chain
about half way up its travel
What? I'm not at home right now and I don't have the Voron in front of me, so I can't get a clear idea of what you're saying
I think I know more or less, but I'm not sure
What do I do in that area of the chain?
feed the chamber thermistor up, so it pokes out around there
Do you mean putting the cable on that chain, but making it stick out where you circled it in the photo?
the sensor at the end of it would be sticking out, yes
When I have the sensor and I'm about to install it, if I have any questions I'll let you know
I already have the chamber thermistor. Where does it connect on the Manta board?
any of the spare thermistor ports, circled in pink
then you will need a config block like this:
sensor_type: Generic 3950
sensor_pin: PB0
min_temp: 0
max_temp: 100
gcode_id: chamber_th
that is if you use PB0, the second port from the bottom
Thanks
I've changed a few things in the printer.cfg file, and now the print bed heats up, but the hotend takes a long time to warm up. Here's my printer.cfg file
I've also encountered several errors where it couldn't detect commands starting with STATUS, and we've discussed them all
what have you changed? can we get a klippy.log?
i'll ask again, what have you changed?
I commented out all the commands that began with STATUS_ because the printer did not recognize them
it looks like you need to download and include stealthburner_leds.cfg for the STATUS_... commands to work
have you ran pid tune for the hotend?
Yes
your temperature graphs look fairly normal
I think that the problem of the long waiting was that there was a line of g-code that told it to wait 5 min to stabilize the bed temperature
We followed the first step on this page: https://github.com/VoronDesign/Voron-Stealthburner/blob/main/Firmware/stealthburner_leds.cfg
But we don't know what value to put in [neopixel sb_leds] for the second step
you said "the hotend takes a long time to warm up", that was confusing
you need to update the line pin: 'enter_your_led_data_pin_name' in the [neopixel sb_leds] section to the port that the sb neopixels are plugged into
So we should say that the data pin is this one in the [neopixel sb_leds] section, right? And if this is the case, how should it be written?
the pin names are in ()s
So apparently, the pin is aleredy used here (in printer.cfg) for more or less the same thing:
[neopixel toolhead_light]
pin: EBBCan:gpio16
chain_count: 3
color_order: GRBW
But we don't think it's a really good idea to uncomment these lines
@craggy stratus When posting configs or logs, please surround with code fences (```) so that Discord formats them correctly. Example:
```ini
[mcu]
serial: /dev/serial/by-id/usb-klipper-12345-if00
```
[mcu]
serial: /dev/serial/by-id/usb-klipper-12345-if00
Oh, I'm sorry
that section is defining a neopixel string with a different name, toolhead_light, stealthburner_leds.cfg assumes the name will be sb_leds by default
yw
Hello everyone. I installed an ADXL345 accelerometer and recompiled Klipper with the configuration shown in the screenshot, following this manual, which is for the accelerometer: https://3d.nice-cdn.com/upload/file/BIGTREETECH_ADXL345_V2.0_User_Manual.pdf
I connected the accelerometer to the Manta M8P via USB while holding down the BOOT1 button, and now the Voron screen is black, and I've lost the printer connection in MobaXterm. Does anyone know what might have happened?
I also don't want to turn off the printer as it is because I don't want to corrupt the SD card
if you can't get in over SSH, your choices are either to reboot the printer using klipperscreen (i can't remember if you have this) or a power cycle
Yes, I have Klipperscreen, but it's not working right now
But if I turn the printer off and then back on, won't that corrupt the SD card on the Manta board?
there is always a risk, but you don't have any other choice right now
Ok
We haven't had any problems turning the printer off and on this way.
What I don't understand is that following the instructions in the accelerometer manual (the manual in the message I'm replying to) didn't work, which I find very strange, because we followed all the steps correctly and didn't do anything else. At most, to recompile the firmware, we typed make clean
does the single board computer see the accelerometer board at all, if you run lsusb
No
are you sure? there is an rp2040 device there, what else could that be
But do you know if the accelerometer I installed has that processor?
Because I understand that rp2040 is a processor, right?
I'm a little confused about that part, because I'm not sure if that processor is for the accelerometer or the SB board
at the most basic: look at the accelerometer. does it have a raspberry logo on one of the chips
Yes
and nothing else you have told us about has an rp2040 chip, so therefore the accelerometer is the rp2040 device
so next, run ls /dev/serial/by-id/*
This is the output
so the accelerometer already has klipper on it
So how do we proceed?
What I need now is to calibrate the input shaping
follow the rest of the accelerometer instructions for putting that ID into your printer.cfg
I tried updating the accelerometer firmware with the command make flash FLASH_DEVICE=my ID, but this is the result. There were some errors
And now I've run this command because the instructions say that for USB communication, I have to run it to flash the firmware, instead of running the other one
the thought occurs to me that your toolhead PCB already has an accelerometer built into it
The SB electronic board?
yes
Yes, it does
So, what are the next steps considering that the SB board has the accelerometer?
so you'd need to have in your config something like this:
cs_pin: EBBCan:gpio1
spi_software_sclk_pin: EBBCan:gpio2
spi_software_mosi_pin: EBBCan:gpio0
spi_software_miso_pin: EBBCan:gpio3
axes_map: z,-y,x
[resonance_tester]
probe_points: 125, 125, 20
accel_chip: adxl345 ```
those probe points are correct for a 300 build
The print volume of my Voron is 250 x 250 x 250 mm, not 300
I see that I don't have that in the printer.cfg file
i have updated it for 250
Ok
Can I put those lines wherever I want in my printer.cfg file?
yes
Ok
I have a question: is this manual (https://3d.nice-cdn.com/upload/file/BIGTREETECH_ADXL345_V2.0_User_Manual.pdf) compatible with the accelerometer integrated into the SB board?
there is nothing in that manual relevant to the integrated adxl
So now I'm going to turn off the printer and remove the accelerometer I installed earlier
Once that's done, considering that the SB board comes with an integrated accelerometer, how do I calibrate the input shaping?
you are going to want to install shake+tune which is a much easier way of working with input shaper
Okay, thanks
then there is a workflow to follow: https://github.com/Frix-x/klippain-shaketune/blob/main/docs/README.md#resonance-testing-workflow
Where the following code appears, some lines need to be uncommented, right?
only if you want to change things. it would tell you if things needed changing.
What things?
it would tell you if you needed to change things...
Are you referring to the input shaping parameters that are in the printer.cfg file?
I pasted the lines and when I restarted Klipper, it didn't tell me if I needed to change anything
The settings that are shown there are the "default values"
Aka, "this is how this line will effectively be set if you dont Uncomment anything"
So you have the defaults, you have the descriptions
Which line do you wish to alter from default, and why?
Modify it by changing the values? Is that what you mean?
Yes
My wife disturbed me...
Start with an ethernet cable, so much easier than the wifi route. once in and yo uhave the ip address with the cable. you can SSH into the printer and setup the wifi that way. so much easier for me.
wut
❔
I think that is a possible answer to the original question with zero of the context. 🙃
Well, the context is very big
it is. but it should be reasonably clear it is not the current issue at hand.
That's true
i'm guessing it was meant for https://discord.com/channels/460117602945990666/1448544520219136173
Don't jump in and spoil this rollercoaster, this is one of my favourite reads.
Hello everyone again. I haven't made any progress with the Voron printer for a week because I haven't had the time, and now when I try to connect to it from MainSail, the screen goes black (that's from OrcaSlicer), and then, when I try to access it from Chrome, it says: "This website could not be accessed."
But everything else works correctly
how are you connecting, ip address or name?
ip address
does it have a static ip address?
I don't know
it's possible the ip address has changed if it's not static
is it visible on your network or from your router?
I'm going to look
Dynamic thing acts dynamic! Surprise!
Well, when this problem happens again, I'll know it's because the IP address has changed. Anyway, you told me there was another way to connect, right?
Yes. Generally you should be able to use the hostname instead.
And how can I do that?
I mean...you just do... there's not really a process
Just. Type the other thing
Do you know the hostname of your pi?
I don't remember, but where can I look for it?
If you can get back in via ssh, it's the part after the @ in the prompt
Okay, thanks
Once you have the name, say its "raspberrypi"
Then either raspberrypi or rasperrypi.local should work
Depending how your network is setup
What are you referring to?
I don't know what you're asking, sorry
Don't worry. What I'm saying is that I don't know what you meant by what you said in this message and the next two
- Figure out your new ip address (sorry, gonna have to do that this time to find out what we need to know)
- Ssh in
- Grab a screenshot
Yes
So head to your web browser, and try either http://btt-cb1 or http://btt-cb1.local
It works
Thank you
Both links work
By the way, one thing. I've been thinking it would be a good idea to continue adjusting my printer using this guide: https://ellis3dp.com/Print-Tuning-Guide/articles/setting_expectations.html
Because the printer is already printing, but the quality needs adjusting. Would you agree (that I should continue with this guide)?
And I forgot to mention that I'm saying this because I've noticed that when the printer prints circular or semicircular shapes, it doesn't make perfect circles. I don't know if I'm explaining myself well
I'm not sure I've been following all the events. But generally I'd say yes, working through the ellis guide is a good place to work on quality
Would you say I should continue considering the problem I'm having right now is when the printer makes circular or semicircular shapes?
What exactly is the problem
The problem is this
How not-circular
Like, say you print a 100mm circle
Is it squished on one axis? Or on one diagonal? What is the measurement along that line?
This is a printout the printer made today (it's the Voron cube). If you look at the circle, you can see that it's not a perfectly round circle; it has several imperfections that prevent it from being so
Forget the circle
Figure out why your straight lines are so not straight, imo
I suspect the circle will take care of itself
That's true
And by following the previous guide, do you think I'll be able to solve this problem?
Maybe. I'm a little concerned, just looking at that cube, that something more fundamental may be happening (I'm worried that belts may be walking up on their bearings someplace)
Things like this
Happen a little bit from just not having tuned fully yet
But that looks a little extreme
So I'm not sure
Well, I don't know. What is true is that the other day I had to tighten the straps again because the data the quad gantry level was collecting was strange
If you are using Orca, try a few of the calibrations in there like the flow (yolo) it looks over extruded, even if it is something else, this will give you a start, assuming you have checked your extrusion multiplier first..
You are with the printer, and have eyes
So you can observe if the belts are misbehaving simply by watching
I didn't see anything strange there
Hi. I've been thinking it might be a better idea to install input shaping first before following the guide on improving your print quality (https://ellis3dp.com/Print-Tuning-Guide/), since I printed a Benchy yesterday and it came out with a lot of imperfections that I think are because I haven't installed input shaping. Anyway, I'm attaching a photo of the Benchy here so you can see the imperfections and correct me if I'm wrong.
Do you also think installing input shaping right now before following the other guide is a good idea?
Those issues look like they're way beyond what input shaping does. Looks more like some (very) wet filament.
My other printer prints this filament perfectly
I think the reason it works well on one machine and poorly on the other is because the other machine (the Voron) is missing some things to fine-tune the print quality as much as possible
looks like you're over-extruding, re-check your extrusion muliplier
Well, yesterday I calibrated the flow with the test that broski1838 told me about, the only thing is that the pieces came out quite bad
can you show us the results of the em calibration prints?
I'm not home right now, but when I get there I'll look for the calibration test and show it to you
I haven't found all the pieces, but I have found these here
Are you sure you did your basic extruder (sometimes incorrectly called e-steps) calibration?
I don't remember what kind of calibration that was
Maybe I did it, but I don't remember
Ok
Are you referring to the test to extrude x mm of filament?
Wait...is it in the startup guide? I don't see it now...
Regardless, you need to do it
Yes
Oh, it is there. Just under the deceptive heading "finish line"
I remember now. I remember doing that calibration, but I don't know if I did it correctly, because I extruded the filament without the hotend attached
Thanks
Doing it without the nozzle is something some people recommend. Not sure why you'd do it without the entire hotend
I still think you should do it again, just based on that last photo you posted
Okay, but this time with the hotend installed
Indeed
And for some reason, now that I have the Voron turned on, it makes a strange noise that I don't know why it happens. I'm going to send you an audio recording (if possible, and if not, a video)
one thing that guide we linked doesn't specify is that when extruding the 50mm twice, it's important to do it at a very slow rate, so you don't skip steps/overwhelm the extruder, and therefore give you inaccurate results
can't hear anything
I just realized
I sent the axes back to their origin and it doesn't do it anymore
Okay, at what speed?
for calibration 1 mm/s
Only?
yes
Okay, I'll do it
I don't think the distance from the mark or tape to the hole where the filament enters the extruder matters, right?
I'm not going to put 10 mm, but maybe 100 for example, I think that would be fine
That's true
I measured 20 mm.
I'm honestly surprised
And the calculator also gives me the same value for rotation_distance
Which is 40
Well, maybe it was 1 mm more than 20 mm, or less
Your extruder rotation_distance is 40?
Yes
Really?
Show me
Everything except the extruder generally has a rotation_distance of 40
Something like this?
Okay, but once again, we're talking about the extruder
So the [extruder] config section
You just showed me the [stepper_x] config section
Oh, okay, I hadn't realized I wasn't in the extruder section
And it's a good thing you said so, because it turns out I was wrong and my rotation_distance value wasn't 40
I mean, that's why i was so skeptical. Because 40 doesn't make any sense for an extruder.
But I just updated it
So okay, let's back up here
When you did the test
How much did you try to extrude?
That's what the calculator gave me
You only requested 20?
50 mm twice, as stated in the instructions
...
Okay, so I don't understand any of the values you put into the calculator then
You still have the value from a completely different part of the config in the "old rotation_distance" box
And your "requested" value is completely different from what you just told me
The instructions tell me to make a mark 120 mm from the hole where the filament enters the extruder. So, once I made the mark, I extruded 50 mm twice (a total of 100 mm), and then I read that I had to measure the distance from the hole to the mark, and that's when I got 20 mm
You skipped part of the instructions
Let's go through it from the top
First box. "Old rotation distance value"
What needs to be there?
Hint. It's not 40
Ah, okay, I've noticed the mistake now
It was approximately 20, but without realizing it I updated the printer.cfg file having set it to 40
Approximately, nothing
You need to put the exact value in that box
Now
Moving on to the next box
It's asking how much you actually extruded not how much was left over
So you need to math that out:
You made a mark at 120. After extruding, you had 20mm left
I don't have it; I accidentally updated the printer.cfg file to 40
So how much was extruded?
It's in the screenshot from a moment ago...
So moving on. Second box? What's your answer?
20 mm, but I just realized that's wrong
So what's the correct answer?
100 mm
I set it to 20 mm, and I think that's fine, but correct me if I'm wrong
Thats not fine
What does that box say to put there?
"Requested mm" aka...how much did you ask klipper to extrude?
Yes....and a moment ago you said you requested 50mm twice
So that would be a total request of what?
Or is 50mm twice not what you did?
In total I have extruded 100 mm
So....what goes in the box?
100 mm
I mean, the interesting thing is, I already know the result: it's going to come back that I was wrong, and your rotation distance is fine
But it's a bit concerning when you try to use such a simple calculator, and put completely wild values into each of the 3 boxes
Anyway. Long story short, I'm wrong, your rotation_distance appears to be fine
40?
Is 40 okay?
40 has never been okay
The one in the screenshot. 20.whatever
You need to put it back to that
Sorry, 22.9...
That one
That's the value it had when I did the flow test
I'm aware
But like I've already said several times, it appears that I was wrong, and your original rotation_distance (the 22.9 one) was actually fine
Do you know why this happens?
I discovered the mistake. It turns out I put a comma instead of a period in the number
Ya, klipper doesn't really know what to do with that European style notation
(Using the comma)
This also happens with other programs
Ya
When you did the flow calibration test, what range did you use? I'm having a hard time reading some of the samples
What do you mean when you said what range I used?
When you run the flow calibration, it asks you questions
I need to know what choices you made
Orca slicer didn't ask me anything when I clicked calibration test YOLO
I was replying to this message
This is the first time I'm aware of, that you've mentioned that you were using the Yolo version
I used it because Broski recommended it to me
Ah, so he did
He recommended it to me, yes
But hey, there must be a reason for it
Sorry for putting "hey"
The trouble with the Yolo test, is that all your samples still look overextruded
So I think you should run the not-yolo version of the test
Which covers a wider range of values
These two here?
I don't know if you'll recognize them because they're in Spanish, but maybe you'll recognize them by the order
The first one circled is flow test step 1, and the second one is step 2
Do you understand it that way?
I think in English it's just "pass 1" and "pass 2"
So you do pass 1 first
And it does a really wide range of values
That's possible. It's just that English isn't my native language
So that gets you somewhat in the general range
And then you do pass 2, and that further refines it
So in short, yes. I agree. Let's start with Paso 1
Yes, this is the test I've done every time I want to calibrate the flow
Now I'm lost. I thought you did the "yolo" one
But now you're saying you did the "paso" one
I do this test with my other printer
But with the Voron, the most recent test I've done was the Yolo test
Ah, okay okay
That makes sense
Let's try the 2 pass version with the voron, and see where that gets us
Just out of curiosity, what is the flow multiplier set to right now?
(Aka, before we start the test)
Wouldn't it be better to start with pass 1?
1,28
Okay, now that I think about it, I did tell you the flow ratio
But then, where can I look up what you told me?
Let's reset that to 1.0 before we start the test
Ok
The flow ratio?
Yes
ok
Under normal circumstances, it should almost always be a slightly negative number
So having it be as high as you did (1.28) probably explains a lot
By the way, I have a question I've been thinking about for several days. The filament I use for my Voron is from Bambu Lab, and Bambu Lab's profiles in Orca Slicer are very good, so would it be necessary to do some testing before using it on another printer?
Bambu's profiles a very specific both to their filament, and their printer
I'd expect you to have to do some calibrating as soon as you try to take that to any other printer, yes.
Ah, okay, that explains why those profiles work so well with my A1 mini
I'm going to print the test. Should I start with pass1 or pass 2?
Ok
By the way, how can I avoid having to constantly change my printer's IP address in Orca Slicer so I can send print jobs directly to it?
Same way we dealt with it for web browser
Use the host name in the orca settings, not the ip
Ok
It works now, thanks
I seem to recall that in this test, the part with the number 0 represents my current flow rate, and as that number increases or decreases, my flow rate increases or decreases. For example, the part with the number 5 would indicate that my flow rate is equal to 1 + 5, or 1 + 0,5. Is that correct?
with the non-yolo version of the flow calibration, you have to do some maths
Extra zero.
5 is 5% or 0.05
So 1 * 1.05= 1.05
(If the starting value wasn't 1, that calculation would actually, you know, do something)
I imagine it's 0.05 + 1, right?
No, no, no, that's what I said in the previous message
In this
I'm noticing that the fillings are coming out a little unevenly.
I mean irregular
Could indicate various things. Incorrect temperature, partial clog, tension issue on the extruder...
But let's see what the finished prints come out like
I'm printing at 220 degrees with Bambu Lab matte PLA, I think that's fine
I haven't done the temperature test yet, but I think overall this is a good temperature
What is true, and perhaps it has an influence now that I think about it, is that the printer is printing the infill at 200 mm/s, and since the infill density of the parts is quite high, they are also printed at this speed
In the end, the pieces ended up like this
There are a couple i can't clearly make out, but all of them that I can still look overextruded, no?
How can I tell if they are over-extruded?
By the way, this is the result of the second test
the wiggly edges are a sign of the nozzle being too close to the bed
it may just be shadows, but i agree, the quality isn't good
what is your current em?
What is em?
extrusion multiplier, also known as flow ratio
Ah, okay, I already knew what it was, just said in a different way
My flow ratio is 0.95
ok, that doesn't sound crazy
what values do you have for rotation_distance, gear_ratio, microsteps and full_steps_per_rotation in the [extruder] section?
I can't access the printer.cfg file right now
oh?
When I click on it, instead of accessing it, I get a message that says "downloading", but it doesn't even download
I'm on Mainsail from Orca Slicer
this is a limitation of the device tab in orca slicer, use an internet browser instead
Before I could always get in, even when I was inside Orca Slicer
But I can access it from my browser
In rotation_distance I have 22.905740611, in gear ratio 50:10, in ```microsteps16, and I don't think I havefull_steps_per_rotation``
Yes, I only have it in the stepper_x and stepper_y sections
which extruder do you have?
I don't know
did you not assemble it?
I assembled it, otherwise I wouldn't have been able to do the flow test
I assembled it a few weeks ago
but you don't know what you assembled?
I know I've assembled an extruder, but I don't know the exact model of the extruder
ok, which toolhead? that should narrow it down to a specific extruder or a couple of optional extruders
Stealthburner
ok, so probably a clockwork2 or galileo 2, do either of those names sound familiar?
The first one yes, the second one less so
post a photo of your toolhead, i'll see if i can identify it
looks like a clockwork 2, add full_steps_per_rotation: 200 to the [extruder] section and re-run the orca flow rate calibration again, see if it makes any difference
btw, you have no ptfe tube from the toolhead? and what's the wire hanging out the side of the toolhead
I don't have the tube, no. And the head's cable is a cable I don't know where it goes
I haven't finished assembling the printer completely yet
lack of ptfe tube may cause print issues as the filament isn't fully constrained
we should work out what that wire is, it may be causing issues, but without knowing what it is, i can't say for sure
Are you sure that having the cable disconnected could cause printing problems?
no, i'm not sure, that's why we should work out what it is
For now, would it be okay to install the Teflon tube, set the value you mentioned for the full_steps_per_rotation parameter in the printer.cfg file, and then reprint the flow test?
sure, i'm in no position to tell you what you can or cannot do
Okay, so I'm going to start by putting on the ptfe tube
I'll print the flow rate calibration tomorrow, I have to go to bed
Hi, on your flow tests, are you reducing the height as they look quite low "short", if you are trying to save filament by printing less layers it wont help you tune to the right "flow", just a thought
Hi, I'm not really sure what you mean
If I remember the Orca flow tests are 10 X 0.2 height, so 2mm, are you changing any of this..
No
By the way, I'm running into a problem now, for some reason I don't know, and that is that right now, neither by putting the IP address in my browser, nor by using the hostname, can I access mainsail
there should be numbers on each of these tabs, which appears to be missing, and it looks like it's filled in with archimedean chords
did you change any settings in orca?
No, I just clicked on flow test and sent it to print
But do you know why this might happen?
what does it look like in the preview?
I get this message:
This website cannot be accessed.
192.168.1.26 took too long to respond.
i meant the slicer preview
Oops… this page cannot be accessed. The IP address of the btt-cb1%20rv server could not be found.
this looks like either the ip address has changed or the wifi isn't working
I received another message that said this
slicer preview, as in this
The Wi-Fi works perfectly; in fact, if it didn't, we wouldn't be able to be talking
Oh, ok
looks like you have a space character in the hostname, that's been encoded to %20
spaces in hostnames are a bad idea
i meant the wifi on your cb1, not your wifi in general
I changed the hostname back to BTT-CB1, there is no space
ok, in that case, you also need to change it in orca
I've changed it, as you can see in the image, but it still won't let me in
click the "test" button
Now I'm getting this message
i don't know why it's complaining
try deleting everything in the hostname box and type it in again
also, why do you have "api key/password" set?
Is it possible I need to update OctoPrint?
you're using octoprint?
I think so
I was replying to this message
Why did you ask that? Is installing OctoPrint not recommended?
it's not as common as it used to be, besides, you're using mainsail so having both is kinda pointless
Both mainsail and octoprint?
yes, why have both?
I don't remember why I installed them
But I do need Mainsail, otherwise I can't send print jobs to the printer
mainsail is just a web front end to moonraker
you send the print job to moonraker and in turn it passes it to klipper
And how do I access Moonraker?
via mainsail, that's it's job
So, since I can't access Mainsail, I can't access Moonraker, right?
correct
Then I can't send print jobs
that's not strictly true
your slicer sends the print job to moonraker, regardless of whether you can access mainsail or not (assuming moonraker is running)
but since you can't get your slicer to talk to moonraker, then correct, you can't send a print job
so, we need to figure out why
can you ping your cb1? from a command prompt, run ping BTT-CB1 and see if you get a response
I got a response
Pinging BTT-CB1.local [192.168.1.26] with 32 bytes of data:
Response from my IP: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64
Response from my IP: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=64
Response from my IP: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64
Response from my IP: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for my IP:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0
(0% loss)
Approximate round trip times in milliseconds:
Minimum = 2 ms, Maximum = 11 ms, Average = 4 ms
Where it says "my ip", my ip appears in the command prompt response
Do you understand?
ok, that's good
are you able to ssh into it?
Yes
ok, run systemctl status moonraker and see if moonraker is actually running
This is the output
so, moonraker is running
try http://BTT-CB1.local in your browser
It works
Thank you
So, what would be the next step to solve the quality problems?
ok, so change the hostname in orca to BTT-CB1.local
Ok
i haven't seen a reply to this yet #1436004447682826330 message
It's not working in Orca yet
I solved that problem with the help of some of you
wdym?
What does wdym mean?
“What do you mean”
I've basically solved that problem already, but with your help
huh? i thought that was the issue we were addressing before the wifi/hostname issue?
I had that problem before the host problem, yes
so....now i'm confused, what is the issue then?
Now that we've resolved the issue where I couldn't access MainSail, the problem now is that although the printer prints, the print quality is not good, and this is related to the flow test I did the other day
right, and i was asking what the slicer preview looked like #1436004447682826330 message
Ah, okay, I thought you were asking earlier about the problem I had at first when I managed to turn on the printer, which is that I couldn't find the printer's IP address
Sorry, I forgot to send you a screenshot of the laminate preview. I'm sending it to you in this message
that doesn't look like it's using archimedean chords?
I don't know what archemedean chords are
the top surface pattern, they should be circles
Ah, okay. Yes, it's circular, look
hmmmm, ok, maybe it was just your first screenshot making them look...weird
Okay, so what was it you wanted to see in the preview?
i wanted to make sure that the preview looked correct, and it does, so try printing them again
Are you sure? It's going to be the same quality as last time
i just want to make sure that when we're looking at the results that we're look at them as of now rather than a few days ago
Okay, and one question: I've noticed the filament is tangled. Do you know how to untangle it?
tangled on the spool? that may account for the rough looking prints
Yes
unwind it until you see no tangles, then wind it back on fairly tightly.
If I try to unwind it, I move the knot
usually this occurs because you have let go of the filament end when loading or unloading the filament. use some common sense to unknot it and untangle it.
as there's not much filament left on the roll, it may be easier to just respool it onto another empty spool
But wouldn't that be done with a machine?
that machine being you 😉
Anyway, I think I've managed to untie the knot
Okay. I print both pass 1 and pass 2, right?
it's recommended to do the yolo version
I was told that the YOLO version had a problem, but I don't remember what it was
i wasn't aware of any problems, but, if you want to use pass 1/pass 2, see here
Okay, I'll print it out
By the way, I've discovered that the right-hand belt has loosened. I've tried tightening the screw more, but the belt isn't tightening
it looks like the idler is at full travel already
Can it be seen like this?
yeah, looks like both idlers are already at full travel
the only way to fix that would be to fully slacken off both idlers, undo the toolhead carriage slightly allowing you to pull the belts tight, screw down the carriage and then use the idlers to re-tension the belts correctly
Full travel and loose by the looks of it.
Hi everyone! I've been offline for a couple of months and haven't been able to continue working on my Voron. I'm so grateful for all the help you gave me, truly.
Now that I'm back, I've run into another small problem and I was hoping you could lend me a hand.
It turns out I can't tighten the belt on the right axle because one of the screws I use to tighten the belt rests on two plastic pieces that separate when I tighten the screw. I've attached a photo.
The screw pulls the red piece back
Its a 2 piece part.
Check the CAD
The screw itself doesn't actually move (other than rotating)
You're already at max travel looks like
So how do you tighten the belt?
The red piece travels on the screw
The problem is, yours is all the way in the "tight" position. So if that's where it was when you ran your belts, you started out with it already set to "max" tension
Leaving you no where to go
So your fix is going to have to be something like:
- Spin the screw counter clockwise a lot, allowing you to slide the red piece towards the back of the printer
- Shorten the belt at the toolhead. (Remember to do both, since they must stay the same lengh)
- Turn the screw clockwise, which will pull the red piece towards the front of the printer, thus applying tension to the belt
The red piece has already been slid back.
Yes. That's the problem
the tensioning mechanism has a certain amount of travel
You have used up that travel
So if your belt isn't tight yet, that means you left too much slack in the belt initially, more than the mechanism is capable of fixing for you
Initially, when?
When you installed the belt?
It's been a few months now
I'm not sure what you're trying to tell me
It sounds to me like you made a mistake a few months ago (possibly installing the belts with the tensioner in the wrong position for installing belts), and have now discovered that mistake
Ultimately, the historical part is all speculative, and doesn't really matter
What we know now is the current situation: your belt is too loose, even when the tensioner is run out all the way
And the solution to that is the 3 step process I described above
These steps, right?
Yes
By loosening the screw, I discovered that the screw hole is not aligned with the screw, but is slightly to its right
Thats...odd, but i don't really think it changes much
Though it does make me wonder if the whole piece is somehow distorted?
Do you mean that piece is defective?
I am wondering...
Yes, I understood you, but I was wondering if you meant that you were wondering if the piece was defective
Do you think it's worth completely removing the belts and comparing they are both the same length, as a starting point
By over tightening the screw you may have twisted the heat set slightly, it shouldn't make an issue
The problem I'm having is that the screw is between two pieces of plastic, and when I tighten it, those pieces bend
You can see it in this photo
Oh, I hadn't noticed
I hope it doesn't affect the functionality of the piece
It would, if it means the z idler in there sits in any way crooked (which can misalign the belts) or something is rubbing. I think that is probably fine (and just causes the red part to sit at a bit of an angle), but once it's cracked it's likely to get worse over time. You should probably print out replacement parts as soon as possible so you at least have them on hand if it deteriorates.
I have a 3D printer capable of printing ABS or ASA, which I understand are the best materials for printing these parts. Since I live in an apartment and don't have an exhaust fan, I've been advised to put the printer on the terrace (when the weather is nice, of course) and print the parts there. However, because I have to leave the terrace door slightly ajar for the printer cable, I've also been advised to use a fan pointing outwards to avoid drafts. But I suppose there's a small risk of air getting in above the fan. I'd like to know your opinions on whether there are other ways to print technical materials in an apartment without an exhaust fan. If there aren't, I'll use this method; it's not like I'm going to be printing in ABS or ASA for five hours straight
ABS or ASA is what you should be printing your voron parts from, yes.
While both of them can give off some gasses, and those are hazardous, it's not like they're going to instantly hurt you or anything. There are different opinions on what's "safe", but there's a big difference between constantly running a printer in your bedroom and printing a few things now and then.
Also they can give off a bit of a smell, which is also a reason to ventilate things a bit.
I don't have any exhaust fan on my ABS-capable printer, I keep it in my downstairs office (usually printing when I'm not working there, but mostly due to the noise). I'm not bothered by any smells, and I choose to ignore whatever else there's to it...
Yes, I know they won't harm me immediately, but if I print a lot this way, I don't know if the toxic fumes could cause damage, either in the medium or long term
I have an air quality monitor that I use every time I take the printer out to the terrace to print technical materials, to constantly check that the fumes aren't getting into the house, because, as I mentioned, the terrace door isn't completely closed due to the cable running through it
What I don't know is if this air quality monitor measures the particles and gases released by these types of materials, but I use it because I once had the brilliant idea of printing ASA in my living room, and since I had to open the printer door mid-print due to a malfunction, the monitor started beeping. We opened the window completely, and it stopped
Whatever harm they could cause in the amounts you get from a 3d printer is a long term thing. How high is the risk? No idea, doesn't seem to me to be very high (but this discord is probably not the place to look for what is essentially medical advice).
Get a nevermore or similar in there with activated carbon, job done, get it back indoors
Don't you think an exhaust fan would be the safest option? I'm not saying what you told me is useless, I'm just saying that, from what I've read, filters (whether inside or outside the printer) sometimes create a false sense of security; that is, you think harmful fumes are being filtered out, but in reality, they aren't. But I'm not saying they don't work, just that if I use them, this risk exists
By the way, before reprinting the part, I’m going to dry the ASA, since I haven’t been able to store it properly after using it on another printer
And I think I read somewhere that if I’m going to dry ASA, it’s recommended to do it in a well‑ventilated area (preferably indoors), and that it doesn’t carry the same risk as printing with it, since it melts during printing. However, when drying it, I’m only heating it slightly. Do you know if that last part is correct (when comparing the risk of printing ASA with the risk of drying it)?
Both ABS and ASA can release VOC's when drying, but in much smaller amounts than when printing. At least for ABS (which tends to smell more when printing) I've never even got a hint of that smell when drying them.
Safest option I think would be to check that air quality meter, determine for yourself what values on that you are willing to live with, and apply remediations until you're happy. While the nevermore-style filters definitely work (I mostly run one to sometimes reduce the smell and to get chamber warmer, but people with VOC meters have tested their effectiveness), getting the fumes outside should be rather effective. One downside with that would be that if the airflow is too high it could make the chamber much cooler (since it will draw in room-temperature air), but it wouldn't take a whole lot to make sure the print chamber is at a slight negative pressure and practically anything leaving the printer does so via the exhaust. If you want the best achievable filtration, why not both?
any kind of air filtration can lead to a false sense of security if you don't maintain them well, by replacing filters/carbon pellets at the specified intervals
That's true, I hadn't thought of that
But I have a question. When you said I should determine the levels I'm willing to live with, did you mean the levels I usually have at home when I'm not printing technical materials?
That's basically entirely up to you. Different VOC meters behave a bit differently, but the ones I've seen have very varying sensitivity to different compounds (which may or may not correlate with "harmfulness"). And what levels of VOCs you tolerate in your home is pretty much a personal choice (how much printing you do with what materials when you're in the room, and how much "nasty stuff" you're willing to accept while still feeling safe about it).
Expecting to read "background levels" while printing I think sounds a bit overkill (as long as you don't run the printer overnight in the kids bedroom), but that's just me.
I have the LifeBasis HAQ66 air quality monitor. Do you know if it's a good product for measuring the levels of gases emitted by technical materials (if you're familiar with the device, of course)?
I have absolutely no idea about that device, but I'd bet it uses one of the handful of similar sensors you'd find in any home device. I'd personally not really believe that measurement very much on any of them, but at least it's a number that can tell you "are there VOCs in the air" or "is it more or less now than it was before" or "is it shitloads more or just a little bit".
These are the capabilities of the sensor it has, according to what it says on its box
Sure. But it will still have very varying sensitivity to different compounds. Some molecules will actually read at the actual concentration (there is some "reference compound" that should be 1:1), but some will read less (with the sensor being less sensitive to them) and some a lot more (being more sensitive).
At least for ABS and ASA the "main emissions" I think are reasonably close to that "reference molecule" in sensitivity (someone mentioned a factor of about 2, but I don't remember if it was more or less sensitive or even what kind of sensor they were talking about) so such a device is fairly useful at detecting if "3d printer stuff is leaking", but I still wouldn't trust the measurement value to be very accurate.
So what you mean is that this device is good for detecting if the air is contaminated (that's what I assumed when you said that the device is good for detecting leaks), but not for obtaining exact values of how much of a specific compound is in the air, right?
Pretty much, yes. It will tell you if your filtration/venting system is working or not and what changes to it make it more or less effective, but it will not actually tell you "there is 0.123mg/m^3 of VOC in the air".
I suppose if it can't tell me the exact (or as exact as possible) amount of a compound in the air, it'll at least detect it approximately, right?
Depending on the amount of a specific compound (like CO₂) that the meter detects, the area where CO₂ appears on the screen will be green, orange, or red. I mention this because I might be able to use it as a reference to know if there's a high amount of CO₂ in my environment, or of other compounds
It will tell you pretty well if there is more or less (and to what degree) of a certain blend of VOC compounds in the air, so there the values can at least be compared between different occasions. But that would only be accurate for a specific filament (at least "kind of plastic", maybe even just for a specific brand/spool). Different plastic flavours will have different proportions of compounds, with differing sensitivity and harmfulness.
A CO2 sensor should be more believable in terms of "actual values" since it's just a single compound (and a separate sensor for it). But unless the manufacturer specifies some kind of accuracy, I still wouldn't really believe the number very much.
I mentioned CO₂ as an example, just as I could have mentioned VOCs