#Lazychanger - A 300mm V2 toolchanger
1 messages Β· Page 3 of 1
I am trying here lol. I need to wait for luke to send me chube compact info to make the chube compact version
I am also doing a redesign of the fromt toolhead so it looks nicer and fits the docks better
and you really think the stealtchanger approach is the best way? i feel like even with more magnets we wont escape the shitty pin and bearing tolerances and play π€
Yeah I might end up restarting
If you have any ideas please ping me
it should be pretty solid with bushings that aren't a slip fit
#1434612830614585476 message π
these will require a bit of force to push the pin in
max well coupling seams a lot more rigid then stealtchanger
i did swap to new bushings today that are a snug fit, but ofc now the toolhead doesnt tap anymore (likely because the backplate isnt perfect)
That looks like a maxwell coupling
yea
im gonna order all the stuff that i need for madmax toolchanger and try to install that one for the time beeing
should be doable on a v2 with a front cross beam as well for even faster toolchanges
and i know maxwell couplings aint great but they cant be any worse then pins and bushings π
I will have to think. There are options out there but they are either not compact or way too complicated
yep, have a look at madmax from the side. the footprint really isnt that bad and could be reduced even further with the use of slm or cnc alu parts
with madmax the toolhead mounting is really weird
not really and differnt then stealthchanger no?
the toolhead mounts on the side which makes it harder to fit a lot of toolheads but I bet it can be fixed
I am pretty sure madmax could be made slimmer than stealthchanger
for the actual maxwell coupling
yea but i feel like thats required because its mainly designed for tridents. if you where to use a v2 you could use the up and down motion to dock the tool with mount beeing on the front
That V2 also uses a maxwell toolchanging design and tools are mounted on the front because V2 gantry can move up and down
ohh I like that solution
thats the coupling design -> #1434612830614585476 message
the designer didnt publish the files online sadly (even though they said they would years ago lol)
I would like to see it in action
You can always dm zruncho
that one isn not from zruncho-> #1434612830614585476 message
Just some 'random' user on the Voron Toolchanger Discord :D
Issue with a maxwell coupling is that it isn't really designed for this application and the rigidity fully centers on your center locking mechanism
or the force of your magnets
yep but for toolchangers i really havent seen anything else. Its either maxwell coupling or the stealtchanger approach (or ig tapchanger lol)
The issue with toolchangers is that there always has to be one non fully constrained axis
with madmax it is y
with stealthchanger it is z
ideally you want it to be z but stealthchanger doesn't use a kinematic coupling so you are relying on bushing and pin tolerance
there is no easy way to mount a maxwell coupling on z which sucks
with maxwell couplings y is kinda the only option to be none fully constrained
z non fully constrained with maxwell coupling would be ideal but no idea if that would even be possible
It could be but the toolhead would be massive
well yea π
I think this time calls for a combing through stratasys patents
haha π
they have like 400 toolchanger patents and millions in funding so they always have good stuff
there are more exciting things then reading patents but yea the answer is likely somewhere in there π
The snapmaker u1 uses an interesting system. No magnets and no electronics only a strong spring. https://ditfjx9w4x3vl.cloudfront.net/assets/snapmaker-u1/Rock-Solid & Precise Locks.webm
might be worth a shot to adopt it for your toolhead?
Snapmaker's system is bulky, reliant on springs and has wearing plates that aren't held very well. We have seen the same setup in the prusa xl and lineux setups
similar to the old e3d toolchangers which were bulky but pretty solid
ahh ok π
the spring would be pretty buly indeed yea
it's.. not
it wears out fast and is even more tolerance dependent than bushings and pins
yeah unless you have a screw driven system like the old e3d setups it will always have those same issues
if we can sacrifice TAP, just attaching GIANT magnets to the shuttle and the backplates are a good option to increase rigidity in our case, or a servo to keep the tool in place with a mechanism
a maxwell coupling is made to constrain a heavy expanding object in z
works great for beds
The stealthchanger method is honestly not bad.
the giant magnets have been done many times before
It suffers from pin tolerance, but making our own bushings means we only have to care about each pin.
then you just buy a shit ton in bulk and figure out which is best.
but seriously- toolchanging will ALWAYS sacrifice rigidity
unless we're doing some form of pneumatic toolholding like CNC machines do, we will never get the same rigidity a non toolchanging printer will have
The other option is of course... hotend swappers
there's a difference between switching whole tools and just switching hotends only, and the latter is infinitely more rigid
have you actually printed yet with your stealtchanger v2?
1 tool, yes. I told you i did a while ago then killed all my tools and wiring! And fried a kraken!
i printed a whole pikachu and it looked basically perfect, with manual material changing
like that was why I quit on the printer for 9 months lol
that is true but if the pin tolerance is to tight then tool swapping becomes super hard and no longer smooth - like it is the case right now on my v2
The hotend swapper is covered by a jungle of patents. Basically impossible to release anything even with no license
if the dock is rigid (with crossbar for example) then strength doesn't matter as long as the gantry is stronger than the tool holding force
Are you sure it is the pin tolerance or is it the pins being misaligned?
If it is the pin tolerance a lot of those issues can be removed by adding larger magnets
this is what i mean
I don't think this will last very long. Give it a year and it will be forcefully removed
the real fix for stealthchanger is extreme magnet CNC shuttles + backplates, removing stealthTAP entirely and replacing with eddy sensors, and relying on reamed bushings + as good pins as you can get
i sincerely doubt it. MedusaHC is a thing too
that is what I am trying to do but there will always be bushing tolerance even if it is less than a maxwell setup
the other method is a pneumatic toolchanger which would be incredibly hard to justify on a 3d printer
there will be bushing tolerance, not enough to matter
if the magnets are strong enough to hold the toolhead to the gantry under full accel
like rn the magnets are strongest in Z
we need vertical magnets so that they pull in Y.
That would eliminate basically all tolerance issues
This is adding a redundant constraint
First thing you learn in mechanical engineering is tolerance compensation
just add double magnets on the bottom
nowhere near as strong
the point isn't to hold in Z. We don't need Z to be that strong
the pin tolerances actively allow you to wiggle the tool forwards and back
that's whats causing the print quality issues
it isn't forwards and back
it is left to right
if you have even subpar tolerances on the bottom spacers/magnets there shouldn't be issues in y
it's technically both, but left and right is far more constrained due to the angle and larger dimensions.
mhm what if we do a maxwell couling but with z beeing none rigid .. i think ive got an idea π€
#1434612830614585476 message
in that video it's clearly forwards and back that's the issue, also the whole shuttle is wiggling lol
@naive coral would you try the new bushings & a SLS backplate just for funsies?
that is all toolhead and shuttle flex
yep
Are you saying there's no flex in the Y direction in that video?
that's because it's too tight π
i can't draw a diagram rn but think about how much contact area / angle there is for left/right rotation vs forwards & back rotation.
If you have larger magnets in z it allows for a tighter bushing tolerance because with 8kg of magnets it will allow for the bushings to fully engage without it having to be a slip fit
left/right has a triangle shape pushing against all 3 bushings. Front/back has much less than that
stronger magnets in Z means more friction means more holding force, but that's less efficient than a magnet in Y
they quite literally have screws on the bottom to adjust backlash that do the exact same thing as your idea of a magnet in y but they are fully mechanically constrained by having pressure against the bottom pin instead of using a big magnet
that doesn't apply pressure on the top bushing.
left to right really isn't an issue compared to forwards and back imo but ig unless we have stress sims to prove it I can't say much
for the toolhead to move left/right it'd have to rotate.
do you think a magnet would put adiquite pressure on the top bushings? It would make it very hard to toolchange with a massive magnet in the y axis
i think the point would be to cinch it down as hard as possible, no matter in what direction honestly
to detach, all you need is a solid surface & push down hard against it, stronger than the magnet.
Large Z magnets and tight bushings
A magnet in Y makes perfect sense because it's strongest in the Y direction, but you push away from it in the Z direction
that is all you can do
large Y magnet + tight bushings just seems like a better way to me tho
If you want to try. It would be worth a shot
nah i'm too lazy and not good enough of a mech-e
And you are absolutely right about magnets in Y being space limited as heck
the stealthchanger method of just 2 magnets in Z though is also lacking so
it's just, strong magnets in Z is harder to toolchange than strong magnets in Y
and assuming the magnets are strong enough, both exert huge amounts of force through friction in every axis
magnets in Y -> easier to detach in Z direction
magnets in Z-> easier to detach in Y direction
like is it not viable to design a shuttle that makes full contact with a backplate, with 4 magnets on the shuttle and 4 magnets on the backplate?
heck honestly if there is a CNC shuttle base cad i might try the mod
@solid belfry i think i'm actually giving it a go. SLM shuttle too, or just an adapter that fits onto the shuttle and does not interfere with existing carto mounts
You making your own shuttle and backplate?
Btw I messed around for a bit with the wwg2 and i could not find a way to fix the center of mass
i might.
it seems honestly worth it. Either as an insert form or a full shuttle
if i can add 4 magnets to the Y axis alongside 2 on the Z axis then it's like perfect for my use
I have a base printed shuttle that you can modify somewhere
I know jakob has the cnc fysetc shuttle cad
even 2 more magnets would probably be awesome
I feel like you guys are over thinking it.. like yes it's not totally rigid but it doesnt show up in actual prints
But see that's the fun part
lol I guess :3
Well yes but where is the fun in that π€£
problem doing a full kinematic coupling when you want z decoupled is size.
are those chamfered magnets?
Misumi frame arrives tomorrow, I suppose I should start my own build thread...
Yeah
Yes
i thought those are weaker
they are, bit he's using larger magnets and two of them.
ah ok
@solid belfry i'm about to get really good tolerance pins (making them myself) and the better stainless steel bushings are coming today as well
i'll let you know how those turn out tolerance wise, we may not end up needing crazy magnet additions if they work
the crazy magnet additions arent for xy but z.
It is pretty hard to make good tolerance bushings yourself
You need a precision id grinder and hardened 440c
depends on what you want from good tolerance
I'm talking about the pins though. Decent tolerance pins are easy to make
bushings, you can ream for a "decent" fit
H7 is +- 0.015mm for reaming.
I guarantee you that any decent quality bushing that you buy off the shelf is going to be better than what you make with minimal tooling
that's really good tolerance compared to no name
We also have to worry about thermal expansion with brass
With 440c it is pretty similar to the 420 stainless pins
Out of brass. Not out of hardened bearing steel
You could use stainless
we don't need bearing steel.
I'm using stainless lol
Make sure you get good spiral flute carbide reamers then
measured the pin diameter on the backplate, should be 39mm but is 38.89. That surly doenst help the whole tolerance funnines π
i'd say 0.01mm is honestly not THAT big of a deal
OH
i read it wrong. 0.11mm is wild
wait
3.9mm tbut 3.889mm?
oh, but the bushing itself is 4mm so ig that's 0.111mm still
idk il just leave it be
and wait for hanks monster :)
not like i really need the machine anyways
ya fair enough
i'm leaning towards the normal stealthchanger shuttle but w a few mods from me
designing the adapter will be hard without cad π
but youve got the cad for the shuttle lol
what cad?
the cnc shuttle cad π€
you mean i can 3d scan it? yeah π
do I?

4040 monolith based Toolchanger. Contribute to azido-azide-azide/Monolith-Toolchanger development by creating an account on GitHub.
now you have it for sure
wow thanks
Seeing all the indx machines on smrrf streams and pictures really makes me want to just wait for indx π
lol
interesting
@naive coral i'm manually calibrating the tools with the sexball (no z probe working rn) and it's actually consistent with the standard mount but not your mount
remember mine is modded with the shim and 3mm magnet
it works really well tho
Huh wut
like i don't have Z
so i just wanted to test XY by using set_kinematic_position and basically just getting the X and Y offsets of each tool
with your sexball relocation mount, the XY doesn't work for some reason. Consistently inconsistent π
but with the standard sideways mount it works
i'm wondering if my part accuracy is bad / the screws are the wrong size or smth
Yea well you cant compare apples and oranges my dude :)
i thought the issue was with XY calibration for you too?
No the issue i am solving with that alternative mount is inconsistent z offset readings
OHH ok
π
so I found a different problem now π
i'll see if Z stays consistent with my mods π
Jakob, how are your XY offsets?
i'm getting around 0.1mm to 0.05mm per tool which is crazy accurate.
i think the only sources of error really in my parts are the threaded inserts that i inserted badly π
Sorry for the delayed answer lol .. this is for T1gcode_x_offset = 0.381 gcode_y_offset = -0.531 gcode_z_offset = 0.037
Thanks. I don't trust my offsets ngl so i'm gonna try again with your sexball mount
off to another state rn but we'll see when i get back
yea but mine is only going to solve gcode z offset / probe z offset
if your xy offsets arent great then maybe your carriage/backplate have tolerance issues
So i swapped the pins to better fitting ones, that didnt improve layer stacking at all. I then switched to a cnc sherpa mini that i have laying around and damn what a difference! There are still some vfas and pa weirdness but layer stacking is basically perfect!
Now im not sure if i wanna stay with a printed bmg extruder and order bondtech ridga gears or order cnc sherpa mini v3s or maybe order G2 extruder kits π€
told you it was the extruder π
all metal integrated bmg is really nice. i only tried the mellow one, bondtech also has their own now.
i don't see the point of cnc sherpa tbh. it's just expensive and transfers more heat into the gears causing issues.
yeaaa you are right enough often enough that i should really start believing you lmao
I'm trying to figure out what will give me the best quality for the lowest price seeing as i need to buy the extruder 5 times
The lgx light pro would be cool but its simply to expensive. Cheapest option would be bondtech ridga gears in a wwmbg with smooth idler
mellow all metal integrated bmg is really good, and like 20$.
idk if the smooth idler really makes that much diff.
dont know how much i trust mellow quality π
so it's papileo?
Dude. WWG2 has been THE BEST extruder of all time for me
single gear drive >>> double gear imo
G2SA is probably good, and you probably want to experiment with Aureus G2 as well right
so def order some G2 kits π
yepp
yea well maybe possibly kinda maybe
yea and it would be super cheap as well. ~25β¬ for the gear and the rest is already here (motor, bearings,...)
i wonder if it just needs more tuning or smth.
And that does explain our differences ngl
indeed
Go for the G2E π
maybe but idk what i can tune, papileo is like it is
i have three of them, they were all good.
bondtech qc prob better, maybe. idk. i'll get some of those soon too just because bondtech is nice π
interesting. I'm really curious
others have good results with pap, and in theory it should be even better than G2 so
maybe binding / belt tension issues/ etc?
but either way, G2 all the way π
yea maybe idk but im done with playing around with papileo :)
no worries, just sad that the one extruder supposed to eliminate extruder vfas are destroying layer stacking
yea kek
but going with ye old faithfull is likely going to be the best option .. just need to decide if its going to be wwbmg or wwg2
especially cause Aureus repack would be like a rather cheap slm part
wwg2
100%
guess its been decided π€£
gonna need to find a usecase for all the pancake stepper motors i now have laying around lol
robot arm!
Like this one? 
Cool
build 3 more mini ones
But I'm happy you're joining the WWG2 gang. I like the dualFS one
I am a big fan of wwg2. It is a tough one between lgx lite pro and wwg2
I love my full size lgx pro but it is too heavy to be useful on a small printer like the ones we use here
Wwg2 is still a good bit better than even the best of the bmg extruders in terms of layer stacking and retraction speed
Yea and your slm repack makes it an even better investment
I am working with dr oof on the slm order because his quality tends to be nicer than in3d tech and it is cheaper if you have a larger order. ( I have a 30+ part order so it saves a bit of money)
Is the wwg2 for tridentbert or the chubechanger?
I have 6 chubes on order right now and it is taking a while for luke to get to the orders
It would have been really nice to have them a week or two ago when I had a last minute contract
I am working on turning my whole farm into a bunch of flying gantry tridentberts lol
I need the temps for nylon
The g2s are for chubechanger!
Gonna use a printed housing for now but your toolhead + g2 repack would bd like really the goal
That sounds like a lot of expensive fun π€£
Damn .. yea il order all the slm stuff at once as well cause shipping from china via air is sadly super expensive
Looks like G2s it is π
I took the g2 off my printer and temporarily swapped it to a sherpa
I got an iphone but I really struggle to get it to focus
that was after 2 minutes of just struggling and it not working
excited to see aureus
Printed G2 is quick the jonker yea lol
@sour crest and @solid belfry i order steel bearing bushings a while ago (https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005007971520999.html?) and basically all of them are a very tight fit on the metal pins!
The pins will definatly need to be greased to operate smoothly but i think they are the winner!
I'm working on machining my own bushings, have the 3x6x6 ones ready and just designing a simple 3d printed press fit fixture to drill
H7 should be good enough
Will check these out though, thanks
yea im sure they aint perfect but a LOT better then the garbage fystec included
and im thinking that we should really use 4x6x10 bushings and m3x16 pins seeing as it would provide a bit more stability especially cause there is space for it on the carriage
pretty fire idea.. i was considering it too but i think that'd just amplify tolerance issues with docking.
like if you have just a slight angle in one of the pins, or it's off by 0.01mm, then it'd be basically impossible to dock.
definitely yea
for (again) SLS or SLM I doubt that will be an issue
But FDM will ALWAYS lead to some amount of tiny warping in the part, even when annealed
and dimensional accuracy with annealing is really hard to get right t oo
yep
if you printed the backplate with 100% infill then annealed it, it might work for tolerances honestly
me neither .. but i dont wanna order 100β¬ worth of sls backplates when im swapping to hanks design in the future anyway ^^
but either way, you still have overhangs where the pins go, etc so perfect tolerances that way is really really hard.. your pins will always have like 0.1 degree error or something which leads to binding
so for now its gonna stay fdm
yeah just saying it probably isn't necessary
to go with thicker bushings & pins, 14mm should be thick enough
Why does nothing ever fit together in this community π
As far as i can see there is no toolheadboard mount that supports the stealtchanger backplate and the spring steel coil
This one https://github.com/DraftShift/StealthChanger/tree/main/UserMods/MugenMicko/Anthead WWG2 EBB36 PCB Mount looks like it would maybe work but it requires a different backplate and im not sure i want to reprint backplates
for which toolhead?
***toolboard, fysetc h36>
?
in #1305231072992301208 there's one for ebb36, i''m sure it can be modded to fit.
so this might work .. but looks like it would also require modification to actually work
yea .. but its basically the same as the ebb36
yeah that is probably a good idea. Although I think that the tighter bushing clearance will already be enough
or maybe il just use the standard G2 with a generic toolhead board
would be a lot easier then adopting another toolhead for my needs .. and i would already have a bunch of parts printed for a anthead with sherpa mini mount
especially since this toolhead isnt my endgoal either way so maybe this cheap and fast approach is fine for now
thinking it over ... im gonna use a standalone g2 extruder with sherpa mini hole spacing and then wait for Hanks slm toolhead
So im printing all the parts for a stock Anthead with Tooks ebb mount
With a bit of luck the G2 parts will arrive tomorrow as well!
uhhhh
don't
Use my mod
of took's mod
there's some stuff I went over with tooks, incl these holes here for the shcs screws having narrow diameter
so it won't fit standard SHCS
the ebb36 heatset inserts here being on the opposite side of the board, so you can't screw stuff in with standoffs
mostly those only
like that you're going with dualFS!
it still works with anteahd? π
well i guess it should not matter
not much has changed with it lol
here's my mod
the step i linked is the correct one
if you use 5mm standoffs, it's also compatible with this fan cover i made
- def modded from someone else, but it's been so long I forgot.
oh awesome!
Pc pbt gf really is a pain to print .. no idea what happend here 
Z offset seams to have been off on some parts and maybe a partial clog for a couple of layers .. maybe the mellow lll plus messed up again π€
it's PC. PC is a nightmare
Also I think the LLL kinda messes with the whole point of WWG2
single drive = better at not fucking up the filament shape
= reduced VFAs at least I've heard
idk how bad the tension is on the LLL but if it's loading filament i'd imagine it takes a lot of force thus requiring tension
the lll only acts as a buffer and doesnt impact print quality assuming it can actually feed filament properly
but im reprinting it part by part right now
why have a remote filament loading thing at all?
you have a toolchanger, just have 6 filament spools and then run your print with whichever has the right filament in it.
helps the main extruder pull filament of the spool - especially when the bowden is rather long
I don't think WWG2 will need it π
planetary reduction goes crazy
but i should ideally move the spool in the chamber on tridentbert
the tolerances are super important for dualFS and PC tends to not be dimensionally accurate (warps)
ik it's PC-PBT but still
And GF should help with warping too but still
actually maybe that helps a lot
who knows π
na its fine pc pbt-gf doesnt warp for me ^^
which wwg2 dualfs are you using?
thor's mod or printables even further relaxed one
on tridentbert? im using a wwbmg on there right now
for SLS PA12 Thor's tight tolerance one works, but for FDM the printables one is better
no no the one ur tyring to print rn
ah right now its wwg2 that i downloaded from the Anthead repo
https://www.printables.com/model/1340329-wwg2-duel-filament-sensor-by-thor
this is the too-tight one
i wont be using the Filament Sensor either way ^^
All FDM prints warp slightly and the OG one in anthead repo is really bad for tight tolerances
lol fair
i got mine tuned in very well on all of them and it's been extremely reliable and nice
no need for stpuid SFS 2.0s or anything π
this is just a stop gap measure until i get my compacts and Hank has a version of his toolhead that i can test
still excited for aureus, sad that no dualfs or single fs version
think i;m most excited for that actually.
yea likely going to run aureus and his toolchanger toolhead on here
i think i might just end up with rapidburner aureuses
i really really like the rapidburner just cos of looks, and i'm attached to it bec i did a lot of mods to it myself
incl magdock, etc
(also new sls components for docks would be stupid expensive)
yea i feel ya but im kinda done with fdm printed toolheads, they are all flobby as hell π
true π
Which is why i went with SLS π π
titanium extruder mount on rapidburner is kinda wild though.
I could try that
for Aureus specifically
since it supports LGX, I just have to print that and the adapter
anyways
technically all I need to make mine not flobby is just a metal extruder mount (that also mounts the hotend)
urgh in3dtec is being really slow with my titanium adapter
Looks like the G2 parts wont arrive today 
Hopefully tomorrow .. but parts are printed and they are looking π₯
send picssss
π
yea gf filament is like cheating π
always scared of handling those w/o gloves tho
i just wash my hands if ive been handling them for more then a minute
idk ever since i've started messing with fiberglass insulation for the shields & some cf parts, i've been having eczema breakouts
on my hands
and it's def bec of the fibers getting stuck even if i'm washing really well afterwards
well fiberglass insulation is a differnt matter, that shit hurts if you dont wear propper protective gloves
they're the same pretty much, the GF / CF parts are in theory as bad lol
but you cant really compare fiberglass fibers and cf fibers π
yea just many many times bigger
GF is technically worse than CF yeah
G2s both showed up today!
The first of two Antheads is already build and its cool looking!
let me know how this one is compared to pap lite !
Interestingly the surface quality in x is a LOT better then in y where there are some serious vfas visible
but other then the still horrible vfas layer stacking is now 
i do wonder why thouse vfas(?) are so much worse in y and basically not existing in x .. maybe the umbilical? or the bad com? or something else entirly?
hmmmm that is interesting
is the first picture x?
first picture looks more like motor vfa which, depending on severity could cover up the gentler vfa on the second pic.. im not an expert tho
yea the motor vfas are a bit expected (and something i know how to deal with)
could also be ghosting for all i know
I assume the nozzle moving when i pull on the umbilical doesnt improve the situation
but the umbilical shouldn't get pulled really while printing so I dont think that is an issue
my non toolchangers would wiggle too if you did that
yea it might be fine, ngl i havent had a full scale voron with a fdm printed toolhead in a while π
looks awesome!!
So i ran IS and this has to be the cleanest graphs i have seen in a very long while!
Printer another cube and the artifact on y is a lot better, maybe this is just extreme ghosting π€
yep!
but i have no idea if the graphs are really any good .. im no graphs expert π
the peak being wide is a little weird but no that's a unicorn
Reprinting all my gridfinity bins i think to have printed labels
And have a differnt color for each type for screw
dude the alignment there looks really good
but also why recess it?
just make it a separate layer on top.
tactile = better
unless that is a layer on top and i'm blind
its one single separate lyer on top
just not visible on the picture
Oooh makes sense
why is the 8 weird lol
just too small of a print?
Also your anthead G2s look awesome!
yea i assume so
arachne doing arachne things lol
Was took's toolhead board (with mods) good?
yep!
i reallyyyyyyy want to build another two toolheads lol
but i feel like buying 2 more tzv6s is a waste when my chubes will arrive sometimes between now and in the future 
yea it fit just fine
Dude. Just join me and the goliath gang, Hank will do goliaths soon too.
Honestly chube compacts are a "scam" as in they won't be that much of a miracle better hotend for the size
I'm excited for these
A new version of the Goliath is born. Lighter, cheaper to make. Stay tune for more info soo on the release.
Printers:
-full Vz235 printer kit: https://s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_Dld...
-Full Vz330 printer kit: https://s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_DkF...
Printer Parts:
-X Vz-Beam: https://s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_DFS...
Waterpump kit I use here: h...
ah vez did a little copy and paste 
god chubes look nice tho
im not a fan of the goliath
so chube compacts it is, not like im in a giant hurry lol
why not? I can put down 60mm3/s all day every day
mostly weight?
its just way to big for what it is
and id rather support luke then mellow
I do have a spare goliath rn
but anyways
when I move over to Hank toolhead
i might ship you my fully assembled rapidburner toolhead just for you to see how good it ended up being π
Honestly tho, should just diy our hotends with PCBWay
and price wise it doenst matter .. goliath is ~120β¬ vs chube compact with was ~145β¬
ey im gonna swap to hanks toolhead as well
cant wait to get rid of fdm printed toolheads
I just want aureus so bad
When Hank is done i'll get Aureus but do either SLS for weight, or SLM but with filament sensor insert
Well its designed for slm so print it with slm ^^
Filament sensors are lame
After talking to the guys over at armored turtle, I am convinced they are completely useless problem causers
Aureus is on the way. The order is being made
My toolhead will be interesting. I am interested in seeing what issues pop up. V2 will hopefully be better
I might just run it in a normal printer while I am working on getting the electronics set up on the toolchanger
This is just a chc xl clone
And the chc is an incredibly simple hotend that could be so much better if they could have spared some pennies in a couple spots
I do think the goliath lite will be slightly better in terms of rigidity though
Emphasis on slightly
Still a jelly donut
I do really prefer chubes for everything but donβt we all. They are expensive
Sfsv2 would like a word
I HATE the SFS V2
the encoder sensor NEVER works
you jiggle the wire just a little bit and the thing fries, no LEDs, only the microswitch works
and even if it works, it trips constantly and doesn't change whether you're extruding or not even with endless tuning
most importantly glossy filament vs not glossy filament = diff settings
at least in my experience with 5 different SFS V2.0s I've given a shot to
Printed a bigger statue for a family member over night and other then one big bulgy line its looking pretty good!
Damn, I haven't had a problem yet with mine π
yet 
but the one im using works fine as well
i think they just come with really shitty QC
I really like this model do you have a link for it?
Open it up, the encoder wheel is most probably not secured to the shaft and wiggles around. I added a paper spacer on the flat part of the shaft and removed the issue
interesting, no grub screw or smth?
however wiring 6 SFSes would require 12 endstop ports which boards don't have, I have 6 available at most
i think just toolhead sensors is honestly fine. Maybe 6 SFS just for the encoder but
they're also heavily affected by filament type & filament length from toolhead so
idk just don't see the appeal
the only thing they help with is if the filament manufacturer puts a really shitty 90 degree bend on the toolhead, which isn't a big deal if you have a strong extruder
mine always claims tripped tho during extrusion, not a single bit of vibration, and the LEDs are off even when powered
granted i have 2 other sthat still work "semi"
anyway sorry toh ijack ur thread @naive coral lol, and thanks @acoustic lake ill give that a go on some of my more working ones
all good im used to it 
π
I'm still waiting on 1 more package (JST VH clone male female extension connectors) before I can start working on froron again
also did a full room re-furnishing to help my gf move in to our 2 bedroom (other 1 is taken up by my sis lol)
So printer is looking a bit delayed for now
Many feels were felt that day
its funny
there's a small circle of taken over threads and it's just Wheels, Me, You, and a few others
and i feel like im always the victim when a takeover happens π
But its fine lol its not like im good at making content for my threads π
reminds me of the 2804 VFAs i had π€
This has to be the most complex part that i printed just yet, gonna see if the toolchanging mechanism works reliably!
yea 2504s are a tiny bit vfa prone when printing slow π
ldo 2504? becauwe i have those but no VFA printing both fast abd slow
The print finished successfully and i think it was well worth it lol
Yea maybe i have a wrong config somewhere
yeah, or possibly a bad motor/driver match or something weird like that.
what settings do you run?
Going to bed now but il postem tomorrow π
that's great π
seems very reliable toolchanger
Very much so! Its not super fast, that model took about 12h to print but still!
Vez didnt do those lol. that was Mellow entirely didnt even talk to him
if you wanna check, maybe im doing something wrong :D
maybe something that performance autotune is setting? tried disabling autotune?
Monolith cnc kit has been ordered!
kb3d, fabreeko and a bunch of others in the future
cool, assuming west3d too
Anyway i haven't been able to get much work done on froron lately
life & room stuff & general laziness lol
PRE-ORDERS OPEN 12AM PST 4/3 Please note - We will receive the V2.4 about 10 days before the Trident. We expect to receive the V2.4 in April.Β Receive 10% OFF any BELT or MOTORs (excluding Bambu) when coupled with the purchase of this product! Must be made on same purchase. Information primarily furnished for the Monol
I wonder how easy it would be to add a liftbar for toolheads to this machine
~20 second toolchanges are still rather slow compared to other machines π
probably not si bad.
why is it so slow tho?
I have to limit z speed for noise reasons
oh π being cautious or already had complaints?
yea the loud z on my first attempt was hearable by a neighbourπ
so im beeing a bit more cautious then i normally am
i do have tmc2240s here but i havent installed them just yet .. they should be even more quiet then the 2209s (witch are already miles quieter then 5160s)
hehe. i have 5160s 48v, ran z as fast as i could. used to live in loud apt building.
but somehow got zero complaints π
i think it was mostly the fast deceleration (and the resulting bang) that was hearable
but better save then sorry .. i do like my neighbours and dont wanna upset them lol
did you check out daksh bolt? it's a yz gantry for docks, even better than a simple z liftbar.
yea but at that point i might as well wait for indx
monolith cnc has an option to front mount an alu extrusion that i could use to mount indx toolheads
so really no idea what im gonna do .. either just acept that toolchanges will be slow and try (and possibly fail to build a liftbar or just cancel my chube orders and wait for indx
could do that with sc tools too. once the trident docks come out.
waiting would not be that bad seeing as i already have 2 toolheads (and thats like almost more then enough already lol) ..
and give up on the chubechanger? 
would be a sad day indeed
but for the liftbar .. it should not be that hard
liftbar should be doable π
somethign like this .. an alu frame (where the toolheads are placed, a linear rail left and right side and two leadscrew motors with holes directily into the alu extrusion for the lead screw to drive it up and down
doesnt seam like it should be insanly complicated
just use viesturz design? are you in voron toolchangers discord?
yea i am
just a couple liftbars on dsd server.. did you see the staggered docks liftbar build?
fits like 9 normal toolheads on a 350
yo mean with two rows of tools?
yup
spaghetti management nightmare π
yea .. has to be a nightmare to cable manage π
You should try out 36v z. Those new excit3d motors would be sweet for a z axis. I am doing a 12mm nema 23 z drive with a 3-1 ratio
I just need to mill the gearbox
I have a few simple things to mill out of the 1 inch scrap from my side panels
Sooo i talked it through with my partner .. and im going to go with indx as soon as its available. Already submitted a ticket to cancel my preorder for 4 chube compacts π
I really dont want this machine to be another never ending money sink (like #1317580899184807976 is)
Well rip
Smart though
i really wanted to stay full diy but having something that just works and isnt a never ending money sink .. just seams nice π
Yeah and a time sink
The more I work on the toolchanger stuff
Just keep it to confuse people lol
i mean the time sink is something that i like about diy printers .. but it has to end at some point and turn into a reliable printer
I have been realizing how useless a high flow 80c toolchanger is
doesnt mean that this machine is reliable (cause it reall yis) but still
Idex with bellows is the smart way to go
yea high temp will do fine with a v6 π
The toolchanger is fun to design but it is mostly useless
The more stuff you do the more you learn
yea most of the stuff i print on it is either trinkest for my partner or gridfinity bins with multi color labes π
Yeah honestly most I will probably use it for is tpu buttons and breakaway supports
that would indeed be funny lol .. but i wanna give someone else the chance to take the best name for a toolchanger in the future
I will steal it lol. (I am kidding)
yea .. i havent tried that yet but pla prints with petg supports seams like an interesting territory
@wispy hill says he wants to make a chube toolchanger lol
well well well .. il give him the name lol
No i dont
If i wanted to i would
Damn well nobody wants to lol
Get a full size chube instead of the weak mini chube
Tooligan - A 300mm V2 toolchanger
Tooligan sounds like a fun name for the machine π
That makes me sad
Instead of chubechanger make it noobchanger
Lol
ezchanger π
Lay-z changer
Speaking of lay-z look at my gates sign I got today
oh damn, where did you get that one from?
Antique store lol
It looks pretty old
Probably older than me
looks pretty vintage yea
It is pretty cool
but i do still have one chube compact on order that im gonna use in my v0 .. and gonna use your g2 repack in my v0 as well
my v0 really deserves a lot more love then its currently getting π
Mine too lol
Both of mine are basically completely stock
i do have some mods (like tulip and dragonburner) but the machine looks like shits and prints like it too
sounds like fun!
But seeing as im gonna plan on indx i can buy longer z rails and longer z belts and have a higher z printer lol
500mm z machine does sounds kinda nice (if a bit pointless) ngl π
and omg i have so much hardware that i now dont need
Well the order has been canceld .. i need to check maybe i can sell all the stuff that i now have and dont need 
Lazychanger - A 300mm V2 toolchanger
from one scope creep to the next eh?
just build a bunch of printers with it π
its more a scope change then scope creep π
i want new z rails anyways, might as well buy slightly longer once
Stuffs happening huh
Scope changed and understandable everyones a bit sad lol
I will miss beeing part of the stealtchanger community .. but indx should simply work better, faster and be cheaper
Does kinda suck that i now have a giant frame that i dont really need .. among a bunch of other stuff that i now dont need either.
Maybe i can add an integrated spool holder on the top to hold the spools up there
most are ~23cm in diameter. Should be straight forwards having them uptop the printer and feeding directly into the nozzles
Or il have another idea what im gonna do with the giant frame 
We'll at least get to learn from you building with indx, any possible shortcomings and so on
yea i mean idk how long it will take until indx is actually available
the preorders have been solder a couple weeks ago and no idea how long until normal orders open up
Seeing as front bar is only possible in a awd setup i orderd 2 more stepper motors.
I do kinda hope that indx will have a adxl on board for motor sync
Im also gonna need a new mainboard cause my manta has a dead board slot and ofc 2 more drivers
well .. order that replacement board as well .. so much about saving money π
Im currently looking for panels to enclose the machine with. 4mm pc or 4mm (powder coated!!) aluminum are basically the same price ... π€
@naive coral stealthchanger you will be missed
damn bro
When am I gonna get Froron up and running??
like seriously- been considering it too after I won a free Bambu A1 mini and like it recovers from power loss like ???
At this point it feels like i'm paying more for less, just going DIY
Even the CMYK printing and stuff is locked and not in mainstream klipper or kalico.
yea a friend has a snapmaker u1 and that thing is pure magic. .. ofc diyourself and learning stuff is part of the fun of why im doing all of this.
If i where a sensible human beeing i would just buy a h2d and call it a day but at last i am defiantly not
there's diy as in sticking to the manual of a standard build..
and then there's diy as in "choose your own adventure" π
the snapmaker orca fork? what does it have to do with the printer firmware?
but you can use that stuff for your diy machien as well
its still orca slicer
just a fork of a fork
pretty sure i saw somebody on draftshift discord using it a couple weeks ago.
What's the hot stuff about 2240s? Wondering if I should get these for my Zs instead of using the leftover 5160ts I have on hand from going external drivers π
2240s are really quiet compared to 5160s and q more quiet compared to 2209s
Do you think its a good play for nontoolchanger 24v? Not really sure if I should touch my Z stuff since theres no issues right now
if your happy with the sound then just leave it be .. if you want quieter motors then 2240s are an option
I def didn't get 5160s for all axis's for the HexDex hopefully there temporary though.
There ain't much movement in Z when you don't have a toolchanger
@restive notch this chutney tastes good
π
It looks like doodoo but tastes amazing
Is that kinda just the vibe?
Cos the curry paste smells heavenly too
π€
I dont know how to computer
How did i get here

But here
Samosas
For your troubles
I legitimately have no idea how thatβs gotten here
Gn
holy shit that's epic
Mine is expected April 27th
Very exciting π
Yea the parts are REALLY nice
I swapped the noname ldo bearings for raindew once - dont wanna dissasmble everything again in a couple of months when the including bearings inevitable break lol
9mm belts hmmmm
Well yea, do it right or dont do it ar all 
damn
where are mine?
I ordered them ages ago
yea us gets em last
but i havent ordered a trident kit yet sadly
should have kept my meltbro order then i would have the trident kit already 
won't a 2.4 kit still fit on a trident?
if you alter it with a dremel yea
but as it is no it wont fit
oh ok
I hope I'll catch the next batch if there'll be one
there will be another one
atleast batch 2 is confirmed
Hope it won't be too soon
Ughhhh mine comes in tomorrow! I should call out sick from work π€£
doesnt take that long to install π
not even 2 evenings if you dont get sidetracked :D
that is actually fire
indeed π
im starting a print now, lets see if it prints well
did you repack your bearings btw before doing anything?
i think esp for high temp chambers repacked bearings are a must, no matter what bearings you're using
no this isnt a highish temp machine so no need to repack
i did repack them for #1317580899184807976
ah fair enough
but this machine wont see a chamber over 60c and for that the standard grease is good enough
Tried my hand with some pla prints with petg supports and holly hell does this work so well
heard that works well, is really cool seeing "in person"
what if you tried pla supports for pla but one toolhead prints 200C and other prints 230C?
yea its insane how well that works π
can make it more extreme like 180C vs 230C
i havent but i also dont really see a need to
heard that works well too and people tested it on the induction hotends
multicolor pla only print but modulate toolhead temperature to get good support?
but yeah that looks great
onlything i need to fix is this elephants foot
i think a toolchnager is also really good at that temperature modulation, for lower temperature on supports and higher for regular printing
at 0 space between support and the pritned layer its really obvious with 0.1 mm its gone
idk whats up there π€
i hae to print a giant car model for a family member this weekend and it uses a whole bunch of supports everywhere cause the model wasnt designed with fdm in mind and i want to use petg as supports if possible
wait looking closer
is that mostly pla support, then petg interface, then pla print?
that's cool!
yep!
everything is pla except the interface layer witch is petg
nice way to minimize toolchanges ic
oh yea! just speeds up printing so much
only issue i have left to solve is the prime tower
prime tower beeing a mix of petg and pla is like really bad for it not falling over π
and it doesnt seam like orca slicer really has a good option to deal with this specific usecase
_ _
And i also need to figure out why T1 prints so much worse then T0 π€
It forgot to have its Cereal
if you know what filament you'll always be putting in, you can just tune away the idle ooze and keep it perfectly primed
but it's a tedious process i've heard
i wonder if there's any userscripts over in draftshift
Also yeah get your cereal!
the orca primetower doesn't do different materials that well.
cura has a lot more optipns for primetower. a good one has ot built the tower with one material and simply purge in the center with the other.
yea i figured as much
yeaaaaa no lol
If the prusa xl can do it you can too
yea maybe .. i likely need to install nozzle blockers first lol
Lmao my rtv ones r pretty nice
yea i just need to make some
never got to making them π
Theyβre useful ig
I still havenβt done my nozzle wipers lol
I still haven't done my toolchanger... π
dont worry it took me a year heh
Since getting your first Voron?
yea, including building my first voron 2.4!
the parts pile shamed me into doing a big push
That's an interesting question too tho, do I want a "can do it all" printer or do I go specialized
Like I'm definitely getting a 350 but do I go monolith and toolchanger with EMU as well π€
if you do emu... I suggest you make it 1 lane per tool so you dont have to feel the pain of loading each tool (so annoying compared to ams-like systems)
Or I could go main 5 lane and then 2 lanes per tool π€
KTC doesn't let you load into idle tools because the extruder command changes who E is instead of having separate E.. so I have to toolchange into the tool, then heat up and push it through 2 meters of tube etc
Either way have to wait till HH figures out multiple MMUs with toolchanger
