#Lazychanger - A 300mm V2 toolchanger
1 messages Β· Page 2 of 1
If your z is almost touching the ball it's easy to see the curvature difference on each side for me
Started working on a cable management backplate that will fit my hardware
still need a way to mount the flat spring steel from the umbilical and split the design into two parts for printing
consider making it rotatable
@nimble grail
Why would i?
oh thats neat! any chance there is cad for it available?
no clue where, which is why i pinged @nimble grail haha
but yeah the fact that they rotate means less cable memory
they also did rotatable umbilicals on the toolheads too
genuinely so cool. They absolutely have THE BEST cable management for sc
@naive coral what current are you running your motors at?
1.7A for XYZ
Well would ya look at that, its finally doing its thing without me intervening!
Seems good
Looks like bondtech was able to get the last 2 extruders I need in stock so I am waiting for those to arrive. Jokes on you I already have my 6 chubes even though you are way farther along lol
awesome, im excited to see your machine printing
Man, yours is awesome. The papillo extruder that is integrated into the anthead looks awesome
Umbilicals are going to be a pain
Thx! I hope that papileo and especially the integrated version dont create problems in the future
But im gonna test papileo as much as possible before i build more toolheads
It already is lol
Yeah i have not even designed the umbilicals on my toolhead yet
I am thinking of mounting it to the lgx lites
I am going to end up bringing the cable back to the bowden and sleeving them together
Well i installed tmc autotune and my z motors sound like they are dying 
its less bad with tmc autotune set to performance for z but still noticeably louder then x and y
thats actually really neat!
and like not even a bad idea π€
We will see how it works in practice. I got the toolhead boards soldered up over the weekend. I hope to sleeve one this weekend to see how it works. I have time. Hotends arent shipping yet π
guys
just use N3MI's old cable management clips
https://www.printables.com/model/1382188-ebb36-wwg2-mount-w-spring-steel-slot-for-stealthch
this is what i'm using alongside the terminator, clips, and the old backplate
No top hat, no extended vertical extrusions. Every mm matters for me.
So my current plan for making z a lot quiet is to
- Replace the z metal motor mounts with pc pbt gf parts and
- Replace the 5160s with 2209s and order tmc 2240s .
Ideally i also wanna order some more quieter motors
you need quiet Z?
and autotune quiet isn't good enough?
is it bec toolchanging Z is loud- g2zxl has been far louder for me lol
The moment you install insulated metal panels w cork or neoprene spacers, all of your sound issues are gonna get cut by 80%
so i'd say just ignore it for now and work on it later
autotune makes the motors sound like when you put sand into a gearbox lol
its better without autotune then with outtune for z in slient and performance mode lol
weird haha, I love my g2zxl motors in performance and quiet mode
but yeah put the panels on. Maybe you have the wrong motors selected or smth
i wonder if anyone has a quad NEMA23 AWD gantry on a 350 v2...
i think its either thouse motors in combination with 5150s and/or with 48v
i'm on 48v, so it can't be too loud. Also running 2160s not 5160s ig
and maybe them beeing mounted to metal mounts doenst improve the situation
well some motors handle 48v better than others
what motors are you using for Z?
cnc g2zxl here, no doubts
stock g2zxl motors, so obv diff than you
ah so differnt motors then
yeah fs, idk what motors ur running
differnt motors differnt sound level
u got audio of ur Z?
the stock formbot one for z
what if smth's just misaligned on 1 of them
oh bro
just get some OMC ones and you'll be cooking with quiet or performance mode
yea im thinking the same lol
btw i'm actually getting similar toolchange times as you on g2zxl with 48v motors and 2160 krakens
Product description: Dieser NEMA 17-Schrittmotor verfΓΌgt ΓΌber einen Schrittwinkel von 1,8 Grad, ein Haltemoment von 55Ncm(77,93oz.in) und verbraucht 2,5A pro Phase. Es ist mit einem 55-mm-Rundschaft und 1m langen Kabeln ausgestattet. Dieser | Product mode
pushing the motors to i think 1A or 1.2A?
guess im gonna give omc some money
ah yeah the standard monolith gantry motors π
yep
ah ... n.o.
my next printer if i ever start one might be a 8x nema23 printer with AWD NEMA23 v2
before you get side track go and see that your current machines actually works :P
Side questing side quests is a dangerous exercise. For the wallet and the sanity
Guess il be ditching the 5160s and 48V in favour of 2240s at 24v
Going to install the other moons motors that i have here and printing replacment parts in plastic right now as well
2240 gang!
yep! my trident has them and they are great
i kinda wish the v2 had the z motors inside the chamber lol
May I scope creep you on 36v? :)
For real. My toolchanges are too loud for overnight printing
Considering moving dock
yea it sucks a lot
i can hear it across my apartment and i very much assume that my neighbours can hear it too and just havent said anything yet
compared to my v2 my trident is dead silent lol
Subwoofer feet helped a ton for z reverberations especially but still the higher pitched noises are all there for me
Subwoofer feet? never heared of them
Wheeeeeee sound
Oh yea ! I got the svs soundpath feet on mine #1363336403882348624 message
Screwed it in with the stock feet screws and reprinted those feet stl to have no lip
ah yea that sounds like something i should maybe install
wonder how loud G2ZXL are on fast moves
the svs once arent available but i orderd thouse -> https://www.amazon.de/Dynavox-Silikon-Elastomer-Plattenspieler-ResonanzdΓ€mpfer-3M-KlebeflΓ€che-Schwarz/dp/B0CF25CDX1/
Mit den Dynavox Silicon-Elastomer DΓ€mpfern erzielen Sie mit einfachen Mitteln eine hocheffektive DΓ€mpfung von Resonanzen und Schwingungen fΓΌr Ihre Hifi-GerΓ€te, egal ob fΓΌr den Plattenspieler, den CD-Player oder fΓΌr VerstΓ€rkereinheiten und Boxen/Subwoofer. Im Set befinden sich 4 DΓ€mpfer fΓΌr eine L...
the shoud be doing the same thing
Yea it looks similar enough
i hope that the 32mm diameter is enough
I printed some plastic coasters? So I can still slide the printer around lol. It was too grippy
50mm would work as well if where to adjust the printed part
That a 300?
bigger should mean less vibrations getting into the floor .. in theory
yea with the difference that they are glued and not screwed π
Those feet look far less bulkier than my solution π
guess im cancelling and ordering the 50mm once and altering the printed parts
350!
The video perspective makes it look so tiny tho π
It's taller than my workbench table by a couple inches, probably a bit too big for me 
no tophat stealthchanger would be so nice but no one has figured it out yet (without big sacrifices)
@fair spindle just might (by necesity
)
It is the plan π
Ping me when you get started! :3
but you are cheating by only having two toolheads 
i still don't have my 6 tools built. Waiting on my berserker vindr fans to get here
god 3010 axial 24V fans need more love.
wait.. i'm scope creeping again but 40mm fan compat maybe on the rb goliath???
ah nvm absolutely zero chance LOL
tempted to shove a 3020 fan in it and just have it stick out. would look really funny
I did ditch the AWD, so I could technically add two more
wait are you building a 300mm?
i'm on monolith sheet metal AWD on 350 and can do 6 toolheads.
350, but I am using only a single MCU, passive toolhead boards
cool, but if using monolith you should ask @thorny spruce for where their crossbar stl is. I can fit 6 normal docks with 0 issues
you can go AWD and still fit all 6 tools, idk if you're using FT FT or not tho
I am using monolith, but a restriction of using only one MCU is that there are only 10 steppers total. 4 for Z, 2 for A/B, leaves 4 possible toolheads. Its not a size thing π
https://github.com/DraftShift/ModularDock/tree/main/UserMods/MikeYankeeOscarBeta/Monolith_Crossbar
https://github.com/DraftShift/DoorBuffer/tree/main/UserMods/MikeYankeeOscarBeta/Doorbuffer_Adapters
throw toolheadboards or another mainboard in a hexabackpack or something?
I AM going to use that crossbar though. That will work well.
nope. 1 MCU and only 1 MCU π
any specific reason for that?
partially just to do it. The other is that I really am tired of toolhead boards. Mainly just to do it. Honestly, I only need 2 toolheads for my use case anyway. Why make things more complicated than they need to be π
ah fair enough. ngl it feels a little wasteful to only use the thermistor ports and drivers and one heaterport for the bed of the main mcu π
also cheaper that way. only real pain would be more long wires to deal with for the umbilicals but that's not really a big problem.
if you change your mind and want more toolheads you can always add another board later
It is 4040 and inverted. Not long runs at all really. I don't think it is wasteful. I am using MORE ports on the board , so I am getting my money's worth
ah doooomed π i meant using toolheadboards is a bit wasteful*
Oh, I read it completely backwards. LOL. If you want to watch while I struggle -> https://discord.com/channels/460117602945990666/1458580085643677839
it works AMAZING!
And that makes a lot of sense, sry
esp with a btt kraken.
you're awesome for making this for me/you almost 11 months ago π
can't believe my printer still isn't done lol
at least i'm in the mood and have been for a while to get on with it and finish it π
hehe. im in the same boat. started my voron years ago.. and i keep finding ways to make it "not finished"
I hope you integrated the papilio legend design or you need to keep up 
nope but ive seen the new version
but im hoping that this version is good enough and will last long enough
Yeah I think so, just wanted to give you some fomo π
You still have time to beat me .. im waiting for parts and im sick again and i technically have not fully printed a part just yet.
Geez. hope you feel better
Also, i completely destroyed my gantry wiring and z bilical parts so
you still have time to get a fully functional printer before me lol
besides i have to rebuild 5 more tools π
Oh my haha
Onlything thats stopping me, other then beeing sick, is parts to quiet z down a bit
for the next few days i'll be building up 5 more tools
while i wait for all my e-bay mounting parts and 8 pin 22awg conductors
So i switched z motors and it feels like its a bit quieter
also printing parts for nudge right now cause sexbolt is giving me Probe samples exceed samples_toleranceproblems
Oh I got that too, check your bottom backplate screws again with paper test
Could be also the probe might be loose
wdym? π€
whatr bottom backplate screw and what paper test?
ah
mhm yea would be worth a check good idea
The bottom screws that thread into the plastic yea
Start at no drag, then tiny steps until it drags, and make sure both sides are evenly done
well you where right
did the paper test thingy and now its working well
Yay :)
First actually finished part looks pretty good
There is only one print issue where im not sure what happend
Pa and em need tuning ofc as well but the tool offset in xy and z seam perfect.
Yay great work 
Ive got a very long road ahead of me before the parts are actually useful but its a start!
And also ive switched from 5160s to 2209s and the difference is INSANE π
Lol how so? And voltage?
5160s are just loud as hell lol
and yea z will be slower but i cant go that fast either way without waking up the whole building 
ah and voltage 24v ofc
Subjectively I thought the 2240s were 20-30% quieter than even the 2209s at 24v. And slightly quieter than that at 36v
So you might like those :3
my trident is already running 2240s at 36v and they are 
i'm just confused
omc 2504s on quiet mode on 48v are just silent for me
as long as I don't drive Z at 200mm/s π
Yea well you want to do that if you want fast tool changes
well at 200mm/s with 9:1 ratio they're loud but not louder than the gantry motors so
with 2209s z motors are pretty quiet, with 5160s they are unbearably loud
if you have time i'd try this for 5160s
autotune isn't the best
im aware of it
also tried tmc autotune
but nothing will convince 5160s to not be horribly loud
instead of messing with software il just use drivers that are known to be quiet :))
maybe just increase microsteps
what Z microsteps are you running?
if you run like 64 microsteps it actually silences everything ime
idk.. they're not that loud. mine are much more quiet than my partcooling fan π
maybe i am doing something wrong but z was unbearably loud before and its almost wisper quiet now
joke is i have a 600w cpap fan for parts cooling now π
mine is loud too. not crazy loud tho. i run all default 16ms with stealthchop disabled
on your toolchanger? π€
yup. #1224045810442829824 message
still working on the toolhead for it tho π
pretty cool!
What have you got so far?
I have just been doing cfd and duct design because I had it working with COM but the ducts lost a mega amount of x travel
Installed some vibration isolation feet witch makes the printer real wobbly but they seam to work great!
it's a happy wobble :)
very much 
@naive coral I ordered a new frame from misumi that's gonna look a lot like your frames 
how much reduction of noise?
i dont have more then "noticable" π
ey nice! Joining the 4040 cult as well ey? hehe
4040 verticals, 2040 horizontals, regular gantry with carbonara x. Door will be clicky clack with 2040 verticals to be correct width for the 4040 verticals
Or monolith door for a bit, idk
First time drilling and tapping my own, will be fun
then use my extrusion drill jig -> https://www.printables.com/model/1586502-voron-aluminum-extrusion-blind-joint-drill-tool
I downloaded it already yeah, but I swear the f695 dont fit
No, too big
Maybe I grabbed a different one that is similar and not actually yours
well im gonna print them again on my trident and see whats up
could be that the shrinakge wasnt tuned on the machine i printed mine with
I also printed scarecrow's little drill jig and it came out great
I can show you a pic tomorrow of my prints
kk but thx for letting me know π
and for the door just use metal hinges and the clicky clack latch!
As I said, I might have grabbed similar ones
works a treat and is super sturdy
I'm thinking 4040 all the way and do 4040 L shaped so it fits doors
But don't know how I'd figure out z drive
good choice!
im gonna convert yall to 4040 loves in no time 
Also i need to figure this wobbly toolhead out
no matter what i do i cant remove the backlash
It will be a whole new build cuz otherwise I wouldn't have any working printer
tbh swapping your current machine to 4040 is pretty easy
build the 4040 frame and then migrate all the hardware over to the new frame
you can use all the original hardware including printed parts
I like my 4040 verticals. it let me fit the panels and door in the outer 20mm :3
That the monolith slm clamp?
that? yep! works a treat!
So it looks like the bottom bushing tolerance is really really bad. Ordered a couple packs of replacements to try and find a bushing thats really tight. Gonna be a couple of weeks until they arrive sadly.
Im also gonna check if Misumi has precision bushings for sale cause the once from AliExpress are all over the place when it comes to tolerances! A good source for high accuracy precision bushings and pings would be great.
Misumi does have bushings MDZB4-6 or SF-10406 but they are just sliced and not milled witch aint great for tolerances
@fair spindle you might wanna check your carriage as well!
At least it ain't the linear carriage that would wobble
yea lol the bushings and pins are fixable
im really thinking about ordering bushing and ground pins from misumi to test cause the cheap aliexpress stuff is hot garbage for any kind of tollerance :/
Yea
Thats the play before and after the bushing swap π
There is still some play, comming primarily from the top bushings
Damn
Technically
Could I use the changer mechanism for tap instead of using the classic tap with linear rail? Wouldn't it be more rigid?
Or is the linear rail one still better?
the cnc carriage flexes a lot
yup. better than linear rail tap for sure.
sure that's not the rail moving ever so slightly?
alix stuff can be hit&miss.
you could try some of those igus bushings. just avoid the ptfe coated ones, they wear quickly.
Yea seams like it! Good to know guess i might order some from igus as well
I feel like getting good bushings and pins is really required for this machine to worl well
it helps.
back in the day people struggled to get good enough prints so slightly misaligned skewed pins and bushings kinda helped "fill" the tolerance gap. preload helps but not end all be all, and limited because you couldn't run too strong mags because of tap.
but now people are printing way more accurate parts in more exotic materials, so better tolerances are needed.
and now that beacon/carto is more useable, tap is no longer a hard requirement, one could use much much stronger magnets and have lot tighter fit.
good to know π
and i guess i need to get beacon up and running and use strong magnets wherever possible
for some of the backplates you can mod them to double up on mags without breaking compatibility with the cnc shuttle.
Damn, that's good to know
i don't think i'll have too many tolerance issues with the CNC shuttle + good tolerance pins
esp with SLS.
have you done offset calibration yet? cause if you havent then it will show there!
My ldo shuttle flexes a lot at the top pins
I made my own shuttle to fix the issue but I still have to print it
I still need to make new ducts that attach to it so I can fix the awful center of mass
a lot compared to stock stealthburner flex?
Not quite as much as that but still more than most well thought out printed toolheads
Let alone slm
I will eventually do a test where I bend it but I donβt want to ruin it yet
hmm. it could use with some beefing up π€ actually a lot of things i'd want to change on it now. looking forward to seeing your take on it π
keeping it compatible with scv1.1?
It is compatible except for opto tap which i am relocating but i will do a normal version
It is made to work with monolith belt clamp and it is 3mm thinner while at the same time being 9x more stiff
According to simulations on the top pins
sounds promising π
have you done any testing with fatter magnets?
I have not. I tested magnets on the bottom with shims but it was so aggressive that I wouldnβt trust docking
Like 3kg
hehe. time to graduate to metal docks π
I donβt even have proper docks designed and I donβt know how much torque the z drives have
I would like to use pins for the docks
Since i am using Chube conducts I probably am going to mill them
kitchenweight test could yield some ballpark numbers.
must be more than 3kg
I have a picture of doing it on a scale somewhere
i had a design i worked on for for universal docks usikg holes in the backplate "feet" and long 3mm pins. worked ok, veery simple.
1.1kg without the tool for the 3 magnets
i'm gonna do conduction, fins in the toolhead and active cooling for it. just in case.
Vs 630g
Yeah i am doing fins as well but they might have to go when I am tuning center of mass
I have like 8x the surface area that i need right now
bespoke to specific extruder then right?
anything worth doing is worth overdoing π
I am going lgx lite. I might do a repack but I prefer to use lgx lite or wwg2 which are both super heavy
i redesigned a sherpa mini to make it narrower. only shifted extruder up a few mm. wanted to stick with bmg.
I am not a fan of sherpa mini but if you want to keep opto tap it is the best bet because you can use a small motor with it with gear reduction and it is overall really compact
that, and the availability of decent all metal ridga.
Yeah I still wasnβt super happy with it even after bondtech ridga
how come?
It still wasnβt as consistent as orbiter v2 which I would consider the bottom of the bar with my farm
idk. i've had some issues with o2.5, they are ok but grind a little and are annoying to feed π
I have not used the 2.5 yet. None of my 2.0s grind. You might want to return yours
That is weird
I agree with the annoying to feed part
i don't have a functional gantry! π
nah, probably just need to adjust and chamfer the nipple thing. just something i never needed to on the sherpas.
smaller gears so not the same radius problem.
can confirm I printed a similar one that was not actually yours 
Got a little something in the mail today!
Plan is to mount this in the ebay using this mount and connect all toolhead boards directly to it since the cables are more then long enough
Cool!
I modded the BTT CEB CAnbus backpack to fit
This link is broken now, did you take it down for adjustment or something?
yea gona correct it and put it up again
@naive coral i'm so tempted to start working on a full cad of my printer
like complete complete cad
you should do one too π
i already got one π€
building a custom printer without cad is .. not the greated idea lol
i can't ever get mates to work in solidworks
eh, having individual cad is enough imo
kinda .. tools not cause that would not help me and just make fusion more of a pain 
See, where you are smart is that you have one big cad
I have the frame in one assembly, the gantry in another, the toolhead in another ebay layout on my drafting table and z drives not even finished
the full cad wasnt that helpfull π
this is what i have π
Planning on finally belting the gantry on sunday, I will take a look then. I have only played with it on the bench currently. Thanks for the heads up!
you got the spacer right
that i shipped out a while back
Yep! Thanks!
having full cad saves a bunch of irl trial and error. easier to measure thrice cut once π
for sure!
im also gonna order the once from misumi and maybe they are a lot better in the tolerance department
i sadly dont have accurate tools to measure internal diameter of such small parts accuratly
gonna order a micrometer to measure the pins next month so i can start atleast somewhere
I just need to figure out why layer bonding is poor. already done a successful offset calibration but either the values are no good or the values arent used correctly.
can you try a side by side print of those two and see if it squished evenly?
will do!
id send you a picture but T1 first layer didnt even stick
so i assume T1 z offset is fully wrong
yea seems like its off by a lot then..
but im not sure how to get it better, got the value from the z endstop test
you could manually dial it in by changing the z gcode offset in t1.cfg or try to fix whatever issue is happening during your sexprobe routine
yea thing is z offset for T0 seams to be slightly to close to the bed
and T1 seams to be way to far from the bed
not sure what changes between the two toolheads using the same sexprobe that the values are that much differnt
for T0 z I always change the main z offset number in t0.cfg instead of the gcode z, cause all of the gcode offsets are supposed to be relative to T0
yea same... ive got it both set in the probe_multiplexer section
and it beeing 0.5mm differnt seams a lot since they are both printed from basically the same stls π
i even checked cad already and according to that the z offset should in theory be 0
ohh your z_offset should = 0 for every tool other than t0
everything is relative to t0 so you should have 0 for z offset in the other tools
oh i just put the value in that the offset calibration provided for T1 π
like this?
π
yep looks good! I put mine here
oops I originally typoed this msg to the opposite of what I meant.. fixed now
tried again and the T1 nozzle is trying to engrave the build plate π
uhh hmmm
maybe there is a difference with how tool_probe and probe_multiplexer works
think il ping Contomo again cause im just kinda out of ideas π
ah yea I'm not sure the differences for probe_multiplexer
I got confused by it so I wanted to wait for someone to document it first, or until contomo forces me to do it with obsolecence π

but like other then the tool offsets the printer is working really well
single nozzle prints with T0 are 
i rattle the wiring a bit and the whole hexa turns off
oh turns out the usb c cable was bad
use a good one for urs jakob π
but yeah i flashed katapult / klipper on it and it works great!
the additional features are nice. hot-swapping toolheads is now possible thanks to the switches on the back, it doesn't break anything I've tested it
good to know π
So the nudge that my trident printed seams a bit .. skewed wtf 
time to recalibrate π
reprinted it in asa and its dead on accurate π€
idk what the f happend with that print
weird.. was it pcpbtcf/gf? that's supposed to be more dimensionally accurate than asa π€―
treed pc pbt gf
maybe i deformed it when removing it from the bed π€
This is from Rosa3d pc-pbt-gf
Dunno how this filament blend handles fast temp change
I want to print with it too but not sure I'm capacity of handling it
oh that is warped to hell π
my trident handels pc pbt just fine (basically everything in this machine is printed from it, even the backplates)
ive never seen a part skewed that badly before
Also, there a big difference between CF/GF PC-PBT?
no idea π
also pc pbt filaments really arent comparable since each manufacturers formulars will be very differnt
i havent heared anything good about the 3do one
i personally can recommend the treed pc pbt gf and addnorth pc ht lcf (with is also a pcb cf filament)
there is also another that im testing right now thats also pretty good but not public just yet
And polymaker unfortunately makes only non fill PC-PBT
What your parts made of? Given you able to print pc-pbt-gf
either treed pc pbt gf or the not yet public pc pbt gf π
ah .. im printing on #1317580899184807976 message
If I'd be able to print it too when I got abs parts
this machine isnt able to print more then pla just yet
Damn that looks like Tartarus
yea haha
Them titans locked inside
its my hot and spicy machine (and also the most reliable one ive build so far)
So no pc-pbt-gf printing for me lol
the add north pc ht lcf prints in a 60c chamber if you print slow with zero fan
I'm glad if I hit 53C
add a couple of blankets over your machine and your golden
yea that works well as well
just be ready for some trial and error till you figure shrinkage out
Hmm, interesting that treed don't include a figure for chamber temperature
I designed a new basepalte for the mellow sexbolt to stop it from tilting when calibrating probe z offset
The bolt still needs to be cut but im going todo that tomorrow once #1317580899184807976 has printed out a proper (and hopefully good) screw cutting jig
So i ran calibrate_tool_offset a couple of times and other then T1 still erroring out with Probe sample exceed samples-tolerance the z offest for T0 seams to be very steady now. Between all 3 runs the T0 z offset has a delta of 0.01mm witch is very good and wildly differnt compared to before!
Oh wild is the stock mounting inconsistent?
Either that or it needs fo settle in for z offset calibration to work reliably
It the pressure from the toolhead pressing down on it presses the entire probe down od something like that
i thought it mounts normally to the side of the extrusion
confused
Yea and i always had issues with it mounting that way
could you send me the stl for this?>
yea let me test mine first and then il send you the step file (or just publish them on printables lol) later today
the base plate alone aint enough. also needs to be mounted using both sides screws - printing that part right now
and im also gonna print both parts from pc pbt gf later cause stiffer is better here
i might also replace the stock thread cutting screws with m2(.5) screws and heatset inserts
thanks!
ideally i would replace the entire top part with a single piece part but this should work just as well
cant be bothered and i didnt find the file for it
thankssss
oh it's the standard sexbolt by hartk
yea the standard sexbolt by hartk sold by mellow
they did not just injection mold the hartk files cause the included sleeve for example is (as far as im aware) not a thing that hartk included
ah fair enough
Works well so far!
ugh i should switch the trident to print the parts from pc pbt gf but i .. cant be bothered so asa it is π
ah well im reprinting them from pc pbt right now
even with that you still need to calibrate the z offset and gcode z offset
yes i'm saying this might be good for XY at least
Z should be much easier
i do really like ur sexball mount tho, getting the parts printed
na for xy sexbolt is more then good enough
Huh my z for all tools was pretty much perfect with sexball and the default mounting
It should be just as good as klicky
yea idk why im having issues
Just checked and mine is the mellow one from the github aff link
yea same
Watching it do its thing is kinda really cool
and it again failed :/
i didnt find the extra bag of bushings that i ordered some time ago so i need to wait for the bushings to show up
also gonna order a micrometer next month
cause i feel like tolerances are the cause of all my issues here - no matter how i change the preload on the backplate its always just as bad :/
SLS PA12!
SLS PA12!
you want the normal PA12, or maybe GF.
But not the tough
SLS PA12!
just try it on one backplate.
maybe two to get the discount
also @naive coral which m5 threaded rod did you use for sexball?
mine i sourced a while back from draftshift's own ali link has a damn groove on the bottom, which makes sexball alignment really annoyhing.
that wont fix shitty bushing / pin tolerances no? π€
but im keeping what i have now and swap to @solid belfry madness
I am working on it. I need to move the COM back 2mm
youve got time
it is centered in x and z
its not like i already have my chube compacts lmao
im just gonna play with the two antheads i have rigth now
and save up for the inevitable extremely expensive slm order lol
Well I found my issue. That is definately NOT 158g
Somehow it went from 55 to 158 by just adding hardware lol
I have something in there wrong
it will improve it lol, but yeah i'm also switching to hank madness eventually
anyways @naive coral i really need to know what dowel pin you used for the sexball, the draftshift design bom link is dead
π
yea the pin has a little flathead slid on the none threaded side
well yeah that's our issue
but im gonna cut the pin short in the future either way
when that pin bottom aligns with the d2f switch that's down there
the little micro pin
mhm
it makes the switch mushy and also drops down a little
but why does it error out on T1 on the every same side π
i was thinking of filling that groove with epoxy or adding a circle shim there
if it slid where the problem then it would fail randomly everywhere
cutting it short seams easier lol
Well I am an idiot
you need it to be flat.
I have a massive block of aluminium there to test chube
that about do it
If you have a lathe, sure.
dremel 
yeah that's only going to make the problem worse.
Well that makes more sense
i think what you want is a small m5 cylinder
or washer that doesn't have a hole in the middle
also the reason it might be doing it on t1 is because it literally just rotates into position
that position has the lowest PE, i just hand test it and it immediately goes into that position after like 4 clicks.
whats the plan for installing pins and pushings? hopefully not to machine it to dimension? π
For pins it should be fine
For bushings you will have to buy a 5.5mm reamer
π
so like 10$ on ali
epic
man if this wasn't made out of rubber
@solid belfry i love how u bounce between our two build threads lol for ur toolhead
so excited to test it out once it's done!
I have a thread lol
it just sucks and nobody is in it
fr? send link
well ur in the monolith discord, that's the issue!
those folks don't even like mentioning stealthchanger exists.
I don't think anyone except us and mikeymike have any interest though
I should make a stealthchanger thread
on the bottom of the sexball dowel pin
wait it actually works with any mm magnet
the issue being magnet tries to jump up to the bushing
8mmx1mm stainless steel should work i think
the magnet does hold the whole assembly in when upside down
and it does stay down later
too strong magnets don't work though sadly
6x1.5 works for me
https://www.amazon.com/uxcell-Stainless-Circle-Stamping-Jewelry/dp/B0DR2L94ZP
this probably works for both the magnet and non magnet version to prevent the magnet from jumping up.
if i use this with a 6x3 magnet i think it'd work really really well
hold the dowel pin in, but not jump up to the shuttle
@naive coral
i just wired up my sexball and should be done with the e-bay
unfortunately when i test the sexball as a filament switch sensor i can see it changing and detecting fine
but when i try it as a calibration probe, and test it out using TOOL_CALIBRATE_QUERY_PROBE
it always says triggered no matter what
any clues?
ah mhm .. did you set the sensor pin the tool_calibrate section?
[tools_calibrate] # for more documentation see `docs/tools_calibrate.md` pin: ^PF1
yes
are you running ktc-easy or ktc-hard?
i'm thinking of migrating to ktc-hard
ktc-hard and kalico
nicee
i can't even boot up now in ktc-hard with carto mode
No section: 'tool_probe_endstop'
yea your gonna need to change stuff likely
endstop_pin: probe:z_virtual_endstop
homing_retract_dist: 0``` is no longer working lol
i reinstalled ktc-easy in carto mode, unfortunately still no dice
cant help you with ktc-easy sadly π
maybe ask the folks on the Draftshift Discord?
nah i'm on ktc-hard.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/apprisco/klipper/klippy/klippy.py", line 130, in _connect
self._read_config()
File "/home/apprisco/klipper/klippy/klippy.py", line 123, in _read_config
self.load_object(config, section_config.get_name(), None)
File "/home/apprisco/klipper/klippy/klippy.py", line 112, in load_object
self.objects[section] = init_func(config.getsection(section))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/apprisco/klipper/klippy/extras/tool_probe.py", line 184, in load_config_prefix
return ToolProbe(config)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/apprisco/klipper/klippy/extras/tool_probe.py", line 36, in __init__
self.endstop = self.printer.load_object(config, "tool_probe_endstop")
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/apprisco/klipper/klippy/klippy.py", line 112, in load_object
self.objects[section] = init_func(config.getsection(section))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/apprisco/klipper/klippy/extras/tool_probe_endstop.py", line 368, in load_config
return ToolProbeEndstop(config)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/apprisco/klipper/klippy/extras/tool_probe_endstop.py", line 30, in __init__
config.fileconfig.set(self.name, "z_offset", "0.0")
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/configparser.py", line 880, in set
raise NoSectionError(section) from None
configparser.NoSectionError: No section: 'tool_probe_endstop'```
like is it that i need tool_probe_endstop included? Why does contomo's repo say use the scanner_cfg which means you won't get tool_probe_endstop? π
idk maybe something is broken in ktc-hard
you can ask Contomo on the Draftshit Discord for help .. he is the ktc-hard maintainer π
yeah i think i'm just going to wait till he wakes up π
sorry for bothering ya
i'm so sad. The full e-bay is finally complete and i can flip the printer upside down.. if the damn printer would no longer error.
all good im not a expert, im just happy that my machine kinda does sometimes work lol
@naive coral for your zbilical, are you using the hartk zbilical or how are you mounting the z cable?
trying to do 2 8 pin cables + carto cable + thermistor wire is just not working for me lol
esp through the pg9 gland.. maybe pg11 could fit.
Just a simple spring steel wire nothing fancy
M5 screw and two washers
i like the hartk cos it does have a second gland for the carto cable umbilical
oml, that's the Y endstop for monolith
ok that makes sense lol
Yea
But im gonna swap the spring steel wire to flat spring steel caus the wire isnt really that controlable
takes me back to my ender 6 days.
Corrugated pipe conduit
flexible, perfect for this
idk why complicated when easy works just as well π
@naive coral contomo fixed it π
and now i'm good on ktc-hard on normal Klipper as well
well maybe not. I did a couple more runs and every now and then the probe z offset for T1 would jump from -1.5 to -1.6mm
something is really wrong here cause 1th of a mm is more then enough to cause issues
i did notice that when the toolhead homes z that it tilts slighty .. maybe thats also an issue
@wind gorge when you home z does your tooolhead stay exactly verytical? could you maybe take a video of your toolhead homing z from the side? would be interested in how it looks on your machine
Not exactly vertical for me but consistent.. I can take a video when I get home
would be awesome! im gonna runn offset calibration a couple more times to see what the run to run variance is
Do you see the mechanism slide when it's booping the switch? I think it shouldn't
slide like left to right?
or up and down?
so i think precision pins from misumi are out of the question lol. A single pin in the size we need is like 20β¬ π
Either one
The magnet should hold enough to make the sexball click first
il check in a minute
I think you can just match tolerances from the cheap stuff no need for perfect ones
yea maybe high tolerance bushings and aliexpress special pins would be a decent combo
I can calibrate_tool_offset 10 times after playing around with the backplate screws and it seams kinda good now. Twice i got an out of range error but the values seams reasonable consistent.
even though the offset calibration values are very reliable now the actuall z offset during printing is way to close π€
adding 0.19mm to z offset produces nice and repeatable results .. now i just need to figure out how to apply that offset reliably
are you calibrating before each print?
I heard it's fine to just calibrate once. People actively remove the sexball apparently
no lol .. just once and then i set the values manually
but sucks that there is no real way to set an additional z offset via the print start macro
then just add that to your Z offset values
or does it not work like that?
yes but no. z offset when printing pla and abs will be slightly different seeing as the hotend expands the hotter it gets
i really think it's a backplate tolerance issue
still wiring the gantry but when i did some offset testing before there were basically no issues
ahh
That is described here: https://www.klipper3d.org/G-Codes.html?h=offse#set_gcode_offset.
The klipper3d.org site is part of the klipper GitHub repository, and is meticulously kept up to date```
i'm sure there's a klipper-toolchanger-hard method to do this
and when you change tools the z offset is set to 0 again π
ok so for your change_tool macro just add that in
can you not make macros take additional parameters/
kinda forget how this works π
idk ive read a couple of times now that baby stepping really isnt supported in klipper toolchanger
no idea what side affects setting gcode offset would have
i really wish we had a proper tooclhanger feature in kalico 
honestly klipper itself could use a rewrite
it's a huge jumble and kudos to everyone contributing to it / making plugins cos like wow
i have a friend working on making their own manufacturing startup with ultra-modular machines
and they took 1 look at klipper and said nada lol
granted they also wrote their own CAM software cos "why not"
idk about rewrite but a differnt mintset from kevin would help
start with not breaking extension space every with every second commit and start adding actual real features that are needed in the diy 3d printer community
the fact that idex mirroring is still not supported is crazy to me
to a degree that kalico is that kinda
and how like peopoly and the induction hotend stuff all need custom klipper forks just to work bec it's that not modular
but still missing features from plugins that a lot of us user ever day
things like awd stepper motor sync is dependent on one guy that doesnt really want to support kalico
we could all just switch to reprap π
ehhh reprap isn't that good either haha
it's not modular enough
what's that?
i've never had the need to do this
but the maintainer added a fix so tha it also works with kalico cause motion queue is not and will never be a thing in kalico
just loosen the front 2 pulleys
you have also never printed before π
ah
and remember, this printer printed like 2 prints before getting a catastrophic umbilical tie in that fried 4 ebbs and pulled out lots of wiring π
that only works with low tension .. with high tension no loosening of the grub screws is gonna sync the belts
on a single tool print too
i run extremely high tension, if you loosen grub screws it syncs them auto bec the pulley slips on the motor shaft.
also galvanic corrosion can bond the pully to the motor shaft making a sync that way impossible
sync_motors is just .. easy
if you experience galvanic corrosion that quickly you need to control humidity haha
idk mine was perfect every time
fast and easy lol, but i do see the use for this
video 
Mhm yea looks similar to my setup, thx!
are you saying stealthtap itself is bad?
if so, even on PA12 i do get some failed examples. I do probe_count 5 now
this is also why i'm switching to carto.
Adjusted the pretension screws? Any wobble in the bushings?
Never said that, it just relies heavily on tigh ish tolerances on the bushings and pins
i'd argue stealthtap itself is bad lol
yeah toolchanges are perfect and extremely smooth, there is no wobble.
there's two opinions i've heard in draftshift
years ago they said it was more accurate than regular tap and basically perfect
and then more recently I saw more and more people saying it's not consistent / accurate even after 100s of wearing in
I have seen a lot of issues mostly stemming from fysetc carriages
For some reason they donβt have good tolerances on their bushings
The ldo one seems to be a lot more consistent
yea the bushings fystecs uses are hot garbage π
Sounds about right for fysetc quality
thats the pin in the bushing beeing able to move side to side
That is so bad lol
yea .. gonna order bushings from misumi with my next order
misumi bushings are 80c a piece but hopefully well worth it
Misumi sells bushings? I wanted to source steel bushings for less thermal expansion but idk still
those are shitty mlb slit bearings though
I found some actual drill bushings but I still need to order them
yea they dont have anything else
if you found some let me know
hopefully whatever they are there is a source in eu for them
They are too thick wall wise for the fysetc/ldo shuttles
ive checked igus as well and they have some but are all plastic ofc
https://at.rs-online.com/web/p/gleitbuchsen/5217736 / https://at.rs-online.com/web/p/gleitbuchsen/5217742 rs has some from bronze that are longer then needed but i can cut them down
tolerance be tolerancing :)
@naive coral sexball + 1mm stainless steel shim + 3mm N52 magnet worked really really well
flipping upside down doesn't drop the pin, and it clicks VERY well
pretty good!
Soooooooooooooooooooooooooo
it turns out printing asa in an open air chamber is bad, who could have known
i seam to have accidently grabbed asa instead of pla when trying to tune z offset
π€¦ββοΈ sometimes my adhd just kinda gets to me
If you donβt keep PLA around, wonβt have these problems. 
yeaaa id need to buy panels and add insulation to this machine
im gonna get around to it eventually
i kinda wanna get it toolchanging first
guess il go and find that white pla that i have laying around somewhere
A lot of tuning is still ahead of me but damn is this cool!
jeez that is cool
yea! print quality is hot garbage but i haven't tuned em/pm/input shaper π
and no need till you get your chube compacts π
meh that might as well take months lol
and tunint a printer only takes a couple of hours at most
Very nice !!!!
Appropriate use.
very much! im gonna make sure that this machine will never print a benchy ever!
dino clips are just too usefull to not print them
haven't printed a benchy in literal years
I have only printed one. and it was sometime in 2016-17
Did some minor pa and em tuning today .. gonna print another dino clip for comparison
Looks a lot better even before but its still not perfect.
There are some weird layers with layer stacking issues where im yet unsure where that came from
Layer stacking for white filament also seams to be noticeable worse then the black parts.
if you ignore the horrible layer stacking then yea looks great π
is the only thing i would be sus about
among other things yea
also pressure advance seemds off on the corners
but yeah why are you getting so much z banding? weird
I'm trying to build up my 6th tool but for some reason the moment i put xhp-222 in the nylon gearbox it just eats shit and dies
yea idk layer stacking is also noticably differnt between T0 and T1 as well
my current theory is that the fitment between bushings and pins makes a huge difference to print quality
that is really interesting
maybe preload on t1 is bad?
na jus bad bushing / pin tolerances
why is it good on one tool and bad on the next tho
because pin tolerances arent set in stone?
and it's interesting. I think your printer is the first stealthchanger i've been closely observing tolerances for and i'm curious if anyone did as much print quality tuning as you did
then that pin must have really bad tolerance ranges haha
it doesnt take much to cause print quality issues ^^
is replacing the pin annoying? would you have to do the soldering trick again
ive seen this bad layer stacking on a couple other stealthchangers as well .. if you look at posts on their discord from other users
ah
i'm scared now π
that stacking looks like Ender 3 levels of z banding
@naive coral are you using the fysetc shuttle? Could you try the printed shuttle instead w your own bushings?
for a couple of exmaples .. possible that its extruder related
baby yoda one looks intended
you can also just swap the bushing :P
i have low confidence in their cnc part tolerances
π
we should just wait for Hank's toolhead π
yea or someone should design a better toolchanging mechanism that doesnt rely so heavily on pin and bushing tolerances π
i think just increasing magnet strength is a good solution
two mags to hold in a tool is kinda ass
still relies on pins and bushings even if the magnets are really strong
and they can not be to strong or else the tap function will ruin printplates
cartographer! π
cartographer + tap for tool detection is ideal
Cekim has tool crash detection working with cartographer too
ive got very strong opinions on cartographer and because of them i will never use a cartographer π
ok, use a beacon then π
thats better and i already have one here lol
but yeah i think standard TAP stealthchanger is slowly getting phased out.
wow everything is up to date, wtf
if only we had a design using maxwel couplings that doesnt use a metric tone of space on the docks π
kinematic couplings are cool but i've found they wear out surprisingly fast or rely too heavily on extreme tolerances
https://youtu.be/tlMmmSFyGIo
check this out instead
Printing in multiple materials is typically either expensive, wasteful, ugly, or all three. E3D released a toolchanger, but it fits firmly in the expensive category. Welcome to my take - each dual-geared, direct-drive extruder costs only $20. The toolchanger itself cost only $15 and can be made from common parts.
with my extreme Z space i should really look into methods that lower the tool docks into place
@naive coral btw so what's your current bushing tolerance rating? And are we not allowed to use graphite
i have sources for really high tolerance graphite bushings
tolerance rating? on aliexpress bushings? π€£
π ok
i believe my current ones are +-0.022mm
for all i care the tolerance is "trust me bro" lmao
my pin tolerances are ass probably but my bushings i trust
pin tolerance also fals under "trust me bro"
https://www.amazon.com/MECCANIXITY-Stainless-Chamfered-Elements-Furniture/dp/B0FJCQ5YGB
these are my pins rn π
but atleast pins we can measure with a micrometer (that i dont have lol)
we can round the ends pretty easily with an actual machining tool or just sandpaper + drill
so what matters most is actual 4mm tolerance
well de.misumi seams to have them but only for an id of 6mm or bigger 
same for mcmaster unfortunately
also truly disappointing mcmaster doesn't have 4x6x6, just 4x5.5x6 and 4x7x6
for bushings
i think the stealthchanger design just uses very weird/ uncommon dimensions
https://www.amazon.de/dp/B0G5PXY88K? ordered some normal brass 4x6x10 bushings that im gonna try
why longer ones?
they are still china specials but atleast full brass
cause thats all they had and i can cut them down using my dremel :P
π
sorry when you said tubes yesterday I was thinking like full on metal chassis tubes
what do you think i make in my hobby room loool
what i'm thinking is getting 4mm ID, 7mm OD super high tolerance bushings from mcmaster
then cutting them down on a lathe
to 6mm OD
if you have access to a lathe why not just make the bushings yourself? π€
like i can get 4x7x8 bushings
very old manual lathes. And I'm not a great machinist
it sucks that all the bearings I can get are all oil embedded haha
woahwoahwoah
this is viable
and steel is good if you think about it
@naive coral i have a good plan. If it ends up working out i'll let you know.
Shipping to EU might be hard but this is probably ideal
@naive coral i'm also curious
brass expands more than steel
does that mean the hole gets enlarged as it heats up compared to the dowel pins?
do we not heat it up enough to matter?
yea it will likely be an issue in a warm chamber
maybe i should really just machine my own. Getting the inner tolerance good would require reamers tho
all out of stainless steel would be kinda fire.
might just be our best option
to bad i dont know anyone with a metal workshop 
i'll see how it goes. Machining both out of stainless steel IS the ideal option
I'm a horrible machinist so maybe this is a good project to get me started.
i mean we do have cnc services that we could possibly use
*I'm good at using the manual mill, but not a lathe
- wait that is a pretty damn good option
or someone comes up with a tool changing solution that doesnt suck 
should I try it? I can get sendcutsend to machine me stainless steel parts
it should honestly be really easy
does scs do cnc?
Machining "The Part" started in late 2025 when a SendCutSend customer and X user (@emm0sh) began posting about incrementally increasing the complexity of a ridiculous single part design adding more and more wild features, undercuts, weird geometries, etc. and basically daring us to manufacture this part. On day one we thought nothing. Day two we...
wait this sounds so much easier π
thats amazing π
do you know how long the thread is supposed to be in the m3x12mm dowel pin? @naive coral
i'm designing the step files now
well almost all the way inside i think
@naive coral sendcutsend won't do it
too small part volume
pcbway / jlcpcb is insanely expensive
self machining might be the only way
ah damn
what i can do for the rod is just make it obscenely long so we can cut it
but then there'd be no hole in the center we can use..
they cell steel 4x6x6 bushings
for the bushings i can just turn down mcmaster-carr ones, should be pretty easy
oh nvm they are 4mm od 
no they're 4mm id
yes they labeled it wrong
go look at the description
they say order is id x od x length
oh lmao
def getting them, thanks for the spot!
lets see how bad the tolerances are π
you should also grab them. We can see if they're better
there is also this -> https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005007971520999.html
so.. im already running self-reamed bushings π
i have some of the stainless ones. we bought all over while testing different stuff.
our focus then was on not messing up tap too bad, so different goal.
but if all you want is thight bushings for IS, then get some undersize ones and ream'em.
4mm h7/h8 seems to be what we landed on.
or this -> https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005011768052687.html but for 40β¬ for 3 bushings i think il skip it π
guess i could buy 3x6x6 mm bushings and buy a 4mm reamer
yeah ig that's expected
one problem tho.
too tight and it will be hard to dock/undock.
that gets easier if you had stronger/more magnets. but..
you'll need to find a balance
wish 4.01mm reamers were a thing π
but yeah thanks @thorny spruce for the input! makes perfect sense
theres 4mm +/-some tolerance. that's what the h5/6/7/8... is about.
i just bought a bunch measure them and use the "best" ones π
you can more easily sand pins down than bushings.
micrometer!
typical calipers are "trust me brow" level of accurate π
i've got some really nice japanese ones π
calibers not accurate enough for that π
i just went by feel. calipers for the quick first round of elimination.
yea ive got mitutoyo in my cart and its just waiting for me to buy them π
also would you stick with 8mm pins or go with 12 or 14mm once?
is'nt stealthchanger bom 12mm?
ah yea
we kinda started out using 14-16mm pins.
cause i feel like when i home using tap that the toolhead leans a bit -> #1434612830614585476 message
idk if thats because the pins are too short
or if its the play in the bushing
it is. but because of flared bushings and other considerations 13-14 is probably better.
longer pins can help with that.
but usually it's the umbilical pushing or pulling on the toolhead. and toolhead com. causing it.
i mean the fysetc shuttle isn't great either π
guess im gonna try the 16mm pins that i have here somewhere
only reason to not use long pins is that you need to have backplates more aligned, so can't as easily run different toolheads as they don't all line up.
the docking path might need to be changed a bit with 16mm. depends. you'll find out π
i mean.. eye of the beholder..
fysetc cnc shuttle was a huge improvement over printed π
it's def a little on the flexy side compared to LDO
the ldo one that much better?
bunch of people claim so. I'm sticking with fysetc cos i already have carto mounts in pc-abs for it
there's quite a few differences, but they're all based on the same cnc shuttle base cad.
well ig with the ldo one there is a lot more meat where it counts
but its thinner .. i hate when rigidiy is scarified in the name of making something "lighter"
ldo is definitely beefier. Just don't know what's better once you install carto/beacon and fill up the gaps with 3d printed parts
yea, common theme in niche hobbies that..
weight doesn't really matter that much in this case.
sadly yea
they fystec one could be so much better if they didnt skeletonise each feature to the absolute minimum
then again thats the same company making that stupid light weight x beam π
just design a better one with carto built in & get it CNC'd π
yea no lol .. might as well wait for @solid belfry creation
not the worst idea.
but you don't really want the beacon there because it's prime real-estate for fan-ducts.
I have both. Both are pretty flexy
The ldo one has considerably better tolerances on the bushings though
Better screws as well as fit and finish
The bushings that i ordered from amazon arrived and they are a lot tigther then the once fystec provided
They are made from brass and not steel so likely cant use them in higher chambers but for now they should hopefully be good enough.
Ngl if i cant get the fit to be almost perfect with layer stacking that im happy with il likely just wait for indx cause rn layer stacking is worse then on an ender from over a decade ago π
@naive coral did you get time to finish touching up that drill guide yet?
ah damn not yet 
np, I think my frame ships later today so I got time still
you've calibrated it with axiscope already?
small differences in xyz offsets will make for some bad stacking.
if you've already calibrated.. there was some changes to how offsets work in klipper and ktc.. might want to doublecheck a few things in your config.
indx in above average chamber temps tho?
asiscope wont fix bad layerstacking ^^
the offset between toolheads is fine
but within the same toolhead layers dont stack very well .. even on single toolhead prints
if it's due to xy offsets being off it will. if it's z then no.
its even worse with multi toolhead prints
if xy offset where to be bad then the two colors wouldn't line up perfectly π
π€·ββοΈ lots of variables involved with it. the changer mechanism is just one of them.
its ofc possible that the extruder is to blame
never had layer stacking issues on mine, even with bad z offsets the stacking has been decent. π€ but have only run changers with sherpa-mini+ridga and o2.5
i have messed up slicer settings a couple times, that can cause weird stuff to happen.
but i'd check extruder first.
you're running papilio right?
yea papilio
im gonna replace with one that i know that it runs well. maybe it really is the extruder
but i do kinda doubt it
how much wiggle do you have in the mechanism?
preload screws adjusted and perfected?
yea, i also ran offset calibration many times a couple of days ago and there is some variation in the values that its reading.
i did 3 runs, then homed, then another 3 runs
z offset is very consistent, xy offset is kinda all over the place
and seeing as minor changes to extrusion can impact layer stacking quality, a 0.01mm shift in the toolhead might have a rather big impact on print quality
but il swap extruders and try again, maybe papileo isnt as great as i was making it up to be π
0.1mm, yes.
0.01mm, not great.
0.001mm, kinda, but hard to tell.
0.0001mm, nah.
yea and for x the max delta is 0.018 and y for its 0.005. maybe y is so much better then x because of the preload screws for y. nothing stops the toolhead shifting around on x every so slightly when changing / going fast
but thats only my theory
so the preload screws do push the bottom pin against the bushing and should hold it atill enough in x
but how fast are you printing?
maybe, printing at orca slicer stock speeds for the v2
i'm printing at 4 times that accel and higher speeds.. so it's not that.
and. 50k travels.
yea but only trial and error will show π
easiest fix might be the different bushings and then a differnt known good extruder
last step is getting a micrometer and checking all used pins for consistent diameter
it's a little easier to experiment with just one factor at a time π
ye ofc
gonna change one, then print a cube, then change the next
also maybe get stronger magnets for the carriage, no idea how good the fystec once really are
I swapped to the new bushings and the play is gone but ofc it doesnt slide in freely at all .. and then there is also this:
@solid belfry please save me from this 3d printed toolhead madness π€£
This toolhead, consisting of a couple different parts, defiantly does not help with toolhead rigidity
Maybe we really do need to drop the Stealthchanger approach and follow what everyone else has been doing for years
Both parts should also be really easy to either slm print or cnc machine and would allow for much sturdier and rigid mounting, lets see if they respond and are willing to share the cad file (and maybe bom if there is one)