#off-topic-discussion
1 messages · Page 29 of 1
But basically cities where pedestrian activity is heavily discouraged by long times for green light to cross for peds like the 10 min crosswalk in LA, important places being far away, small walks for peds, little to not pedestrian only areas, etc.
cities designed with cars in mind instead of people
There’s 4 regions in Hades right?
that's weird, all cities I've ever been to are either large enough to have most stuff you ever need in large quantities sprinkled throughout the city so everything is close or are small enough for the distance to everything be small, although I guess an exclusion would be some areas in non central district sochi because some have just very little people but there's still very little time of walking to the nearest concentration of uhh stuff idk how to call it like various stores, clinics, etc
I guess maybe USA is rich enough for most people to have a car so such cities would make sense economically but here not very much people have cars so I haven't seen such cities
cancel cars, make more trains
it's not about the USA being rich
car and oil lobbies
cars within cities don't make much sense anywhere
cars are better for outside the city
yes
If usa wasn't rich then people wouldn't be able to buy those cars, they are however not rich in context of usa, just comparing to russia, so probably it would be better to say cars being cheap in context of usa, I'm guessing unlike most things cars don't cost as much more in usa than in russia
cars don't make sense at all
cars in the usa aren't cheap either but gas is cheaper there.
people in the US are bound to cars whether they want it or not for various reasons, e.g. because during the second half of last century the US planning decided to bulldoze most of its rail infrastructure in favour of car infrastructure
in many places in the US the mass transport is terrible and unreliable, or plain non-existent. so people have to have cars in order to just be able to go to work. because everything is designed around the usage of cars
and bicycles? what are those even, lol
here's a video with more info on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REni8Oi1QJQ
Go to: https://go.nebula.tv/notjustbikes for full access to Nebula for $30 per year (plus applicable taxes).
I have no interest in making “debunking” videos, but there’s one lame excuse that is so common, so prevalent, so ubiquitous, that I was literally forced to make this video. It's true: I had no other choice. My hands were drawn to the key...
good channel altogether in case you're interested in sustainable urban planning, that is to say, urban planning not focused on cars but on people
I googled and counted and average car cost in usa is about 1.75 times higher than in russia while average salary in usa is about 9.32 times higher than in russia so it's about 5.32 times cheaper in relation to income to buy a car in usa than in russia so I was right in that regard
gasoline price in usa is 1.76 times higher than in russia so basically the same relation as cars, I'm actually surprised it's that close
there are other factors than just price of product and salary that affect the purchase of a given product, but yes, it's unsurprising that by the simple metric you used it's easier to buy a car in the US than in Russia
it's not necessarily the reason for cities to be designed for cars though, could be it's the other way around, if everybody needs cars you're probably gonna lower the prices on them because the demand is so high
it's not how US economy works
well, I don't know how usa economy works, all above is guesses
high demand doesn't lead to lowering of prices, especially not in the USA
in practice, that is
the US requires cars because the auto industry spent a butt-load of money and time basically building cars into the US infrastructure
beside the auto industry other rich people bought all these lands. paid for the parking lots. theyre gonna resist reforms
so then the reason for cars costing less in usa is what
Also, eisenhower wanted a distributed road network that was capable of moving around the mobile ICBM launchers of the day rather rapidly
the reason for US cities to be designed around cars nowadays is a combination of car manufacturers and oil companies' lobbying, culturally ingrained perception of the car as a symbol of status, personal freedom and individualism, and lack of knowledge on other alternatives and how they function, to name just a few
ah, oceloctopus woke up so you get an actual american perspective
☕

or some other energizing drink
complicated 
like warm milk
like, you gotta understand that nearly every city in the US had trams and cable cars but they were bought out or deliberately sabotaged by the auto industry to make way for cars
yeah and sleep restores energy
you've got a point, i guess
even busses, as a mode of transit were discouraged because the folks with influence didn't want the lower classes to have access to their parts of the city
trams are so amazing
and by lower classes it was overwhelmingly meant black people
big thing in russian culture
so you have to understand that the US infrastructure was almost entirely built around racism
well, saint petersburg at least
which given the impact its had, particularly when you consider leaded gasoline, is almost poetic amounts of schadenfreude
the US is literally killing itself to screw over black people
average usa history moment :(
leaded gasoline was one of the most iconic "capitalism trying to kill humanity" moments ngl
love that story about the bridge that was deliberately built too low so that buses full of black undesriable folks couldn't get to the "nice" parts of town
classic use of architecture and planning to keep zee minorities at bay
You might have two points to my statements so far, "Wait, where did they build the interstates? How did they get that land to build giant roads into the city" and "Wait, can't black people just buy cars, how is this infrastructure racist" well I'm glad this hypothetical person asked because I've been dying to point out that they built the interstate through traditionally black neighborhoods, disrupting those environments even further
what's an interstate
uhm
Shhhh
yeah, no
If you want to know just how hilariously bad the US has been about spiting black folks that article is my favorite starting place
the kind of hilarious that makes me cry tears of happy rage
why what how
Chaussee is an historic term used in German-speaking countries for early, metalled, rural highways, designed by road engineers, as opposed to the hitherto, traditional, unpaved country roads. The term is no longer used in modern road construction in Western Europe, but survives in road names and is used by historians. In Eastern Europe and the p...
One of my favorite parts of all this is that a lot of foreigners who otherwise wouldn't be exposed to american black people are Super racist against them literally because they've only internalized the media made for white folks, which has, historically, not been that favorable
and by favorite parts I mean I hate the world
In Eastern Europe and the post Soviet states it remains a generic term for a common paved highway outside of built-up areas, but they may transition into prospekts within towns and cities.
That's how we call it here so I used it as a comparison, I didn't know it wasn't used in other parts of the world tho
that gangster rap that everyone likes to point at? Until recently almost overwhelmingly produced by white people(record labels) for white people(suburbanites who want to feel masculine)
I'm going off on a tangent here
someone stop me
well, i wouldn't call interstates chaussees, it doesn't match well by the definitions described
they're more like huge major highways
(good tangent though)
Well, that's exactly what chaussees are here, unless I'm underestimating the scale, because the interstates could be bigger than chaussees because while russia is way bigger railroad is very developed here
muffled speaking as if through a poorly applied gag
And the worst part is that racism as a concept is dumb, like, we all know white people who were dumber than bricks and we all know black people who are smart as hell there is no functional reason for this prejudice to exi--gets dragged off stage
used to be very developed in the USA too... i recommend watching that video i linked, they show a map there of what it used to be like
Yeah I saw those maps before
I wanna live on this planet anymore just not in the top 10 fascist tierlist country
CW: Bleak Doomerism: ||Nowhere is safe from fascism. As climate change heightens environmental stress, its going to stress our communities and societies as they suffer from things like crop failures, overfishing, oceanic acidification, and importantly, climate refugees from places hit harder by these things. This social stress is going to bolster folks prone to circling the wagons, and fascism thrives in a famine mindset because its easy to pit populations against each other rather than asking for sacrifice. Without a drastic change we're just speedrunning the decline to a few walled city eco-fascist city-states||
||my hope is currently pinned on the current batch of fascists being just so hilariously dumb and full of hubris that folks finally awaken to the concept being unstable as a whole and we throw it into the same bin we put the divine right of kings or the shaman/chieftan dynamic||
||also, this is why Nona the Ninth has been particularly.... good reading? for me? because(the following is nona the 9th spoilers)|| ||because a good part of the john subplot of that book is "is it OK to kill everything if it means the eco-fascists also die" and it turns out that's a really complicated discussion||
Nowhere is safe is true but I at least want a place where it's not illegal to be myself a place where people don't get arrested for simply being in an area a where a protest is held a place where I can transition quickly and easily a place doesn't doesn't regularly wage wars for no reason a place without an omnipotent propaganda machine and the fact that such a place is literally a hundred kilometers away yet unreachable is very unpleasant
I think you're missing my point but I don't want to think about my point so I'm not going to go into it
Well there's a not very popular very important philosophical concept "killing is always bad" which is a part of one kind of my personal views
... yeah, it got dark in here 
Well yeah cuz I'm not really engaging with it I guess
"killing is always bad" really depends on your definition of killing, as seen with the whole trolly problem thing
House grid short circuited apparently😔
That's why I got multiple kinds of personal philosophies for different cases
deja vu
Running in the nineties
i miss russia of late 00s
dollar around 30-35 rubles, average salary around 600-1000 dollars
people buying houses, cars, going to the other countries for vacations every couple seasons
science, nanotech, Steve Jobs going to Moscow for giving Medvedev new iPhone personaly
artists, movie stars, musicians.. come from time to time
cultured tv shows after 22 a.m.. it's allowed to make jokes about politicians, having opinion
be yourself
high school just ended, university life
everything is in the future
everything...
now everything is in the memories of a views of future days
[doomer.jpg]
My parents having a kid and marrying despite not loving eachother 
it counts as blasphemy
Light discord theme looks very nice and clean but it hurts
Beat Hades deciding between Isaac or Cult of the Lamb
isaac is worth a million runs but cult of lamb i feel done after one playthrough
Cult had a pretty big update few months back
considering endgame mostly, as there was barely any after you were done with the story
there is now more to do
but still at a certain point you'll be kinda done with everything, definetly less runs than Hades
haven't played isaac so can't say
ah ok thanks. Was looking also at Children of Morta and Moonlighter @muted smelt @grave sand
i am incredibly brave (talked to a single person in order to gate check my guitar)
also hey yall
So stronk!
applause for the champion
I need a little crochet bag
to hold crochet stuff for travel
but it can't be crocheted
aww why not
lining?
but then I'd have to learn more than crochet
well, lining for a simple rectangular bag is very easy
cut two rectangles of cloth
sew 3 of the 4 sides
invert
put in crochetted rectangular bag and sew to the opening
instructions unclear.
made a spaceship
plz make more crochet supplies bags
i've started doing bead embroidery, it's a lot of fun
Turkish Not supported
İngilizce ✔ ✔ ✔
Fransızca ✔ ✔
İtalyanca ✔ ✔
Almanca ✔ ✔
Kastilya İspanyolcası ✔ ✔
Lehçe ✔ ✔
Brezilya Portekizcesi ✔ ✔
Rusça ✔ ✔
Japonca ✔ ✔
Basitleştirilmiş Çince ✔ ✔
I love going to the zoo
Trying to get a consensus on something, how often do guys use your phones a day? Like on avg
there's a franchise that sell like Indomie with cheese for "cheap"
the markup's like 5 times I think from base cost
why do specialty coffee when you can do specialty instant noodles 
because I'd die while R&D?

I'm an anomaly in my friend group
if I eat one indomie a day, I'd get sick at the 5th day
once or twice a month
for calls, that is
if you're talking about using them as actual phones for calls, then similarly to Volus i use it 1-2 times (and it's usually to answer the food delivery)
i myself barely ever call
and it's just for stuff like appointments
but i get called once or thrice a month
I get called several times a month
By unknown numbers and I don't answer unknown numbers
Probably ads
I almost never text - and I only call family members unless I need to make an appointment somewhere or answer for a delivery
But otherwise I use my phone a lot for discord and such
I check it almost involuntarily haha
That's a mood 
I’m on discord mobile as we speak bc it’s comfortable to check from bed or otherwise away from PC
well, i think the question was about calls, otherwise yeah, doomscrolling and chatting on messaging apps is a daily routine
could also be landline phones 
could be referring to megaphones
If there are megaphones then what does a kilophone look like

i think it says blunt instrument
Hammer is a blunt instrument
thats a cool toy but its no match for kurkkumopo
Oh I think Im in wrong discussion sry
yeah people here dont know hades stuff 
youre welcome
...I was about to answer

Why don't you release Turkish language support?
its been 3 years its just not going to happen
Some turkish players are still buying this game
and will continue to buy it... without turkish localisation
not cool
translating a game in every language that exists on Earth is unrealistic and unnecessary, for the most part
The game has been translated into 11 languages, but not only for Turkey. Is it laziness?
no, it's cost-benefit analysis that has lead to the conclusion that it's not necessary for Turkey
either because the market is small, or the demand is low
In case you haven’t seen hades 2 is being translated into turkish
i saw it
well, then they decided it's worth it
and i don't see why you keep complaining about it
Because there is no Turkish translation in first game, that means I'll be out of the story.
for second game
but i see
Hades helped the studio become much bigger, which lead to access to more resources, so they are now expanding the language list for Hades 2, as you can see
i understand that
well, it's definitely not laziness that Hades 1 doesn't have turkish localization, in any case
as i mentioned earlier, it was probably not within their goals either because there was no demand (possibly not true since they're adding it to Hades 2), or because they didn't have the resources for it (more likely)
I don't think most AAA games have as much translation as Hades does. Language translation requires people on the team to either know the language or outsource it to others
I don't think it would cost much for Supergiant to have other people translate the language. I think they were in a position to handle it.
Maybe, we can't really know either way
well you don't think it would cost much but based on what information do you think that
Right but what I'm writing now won't change anything. So I think there is no need to talk about it.
indeed
i swear entire nations are invading video game communities begging for translations
i swear it's either chinese players or turkish players nothing else
Like I get it but the scarcity of such translations should make you have a pretty basic understanding of english, the lingua franca of today's times
For just the text, I'm getting figures ranging from $25000-100000
Apparently QA is the biggest cost and can range to the half a million area
look at the fansubbing scene doing it for free
wonder if the scene is still alive
How familiar should I be with the original game or Greek myth to enjoy this one?
You don't need to know anything about the original game or Greek myth to enjoy Hades II (though it is filled with connections to both).
From #hades2-faq
Also, I get your point, but seeing you talk in here, I'd say your English comprehension is good enough to understand most, if not all, of what is going on.
they might be using gtranslate for here
Seems too coherent for google translate
google translate can be very good if you give it good input and enough context
and if the language has enough users to train it properly
Never seen google translate to be good
then i don't think you've used it well enough
There isn't anything to use it for for me so I didn't really have to learn how to use it
So yeah
i use it almost daily for 9 languages, so in my experience it does pretty well under the conditions i listed earlier (and yes, native speakers check the results afterwards)
Thank you all for this lovely conversation. I hope I have been able to explain my problem to you. Yes, you are right, English is now a world language and we need to keep up with this situation. I have enough english to express myself properly. But I don't think it's enough. When I have difficulty, I don't hesitate to use translation, like now.
😋
boy do i love alienating people by overanalysing everything
my favourite activity
I keep getting russian tiktoks related to Drive (2011) Im scared
he didn't die in the end of drive!!
You're being recruited into "literally me" mafia, beware
I saw the cast of Barbie 2023 and I saw that Ken is played by me
I once saw this film Drive 2011 and it's played by a mirror!
I love these dub actor announcers so much
Aww, sad news for CR fans
https://gamerant.com/critical-role-youtube-videos-brian-wayne-foster-removed/
It’s sad that it’s inaccessible but I completely get it, and watching anything with him in it would leave a bitter taste in my mouth now either way
at the end of the day I already watched all of this content anyway and was likely not going to rewatch it so maybe that’s part of the reason I won’t cry over it
Oof would anyone be able to link anything to help me catch up to speed?
I'm so behind and new to CR
I liked campaign 1 better than either 2 or 3, but I get the need for them to do that
There are plenty of options of where to start. the beginning of Campaign 2 is the most common for newer people.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1tiwbzkOjQxD0jjAE7PsWoaCrs0EkBH2
But others are:
-start of C3 since it's more recent
-very beginning of C1 although they had technically already started it before they started streaming
-the start of "the briarwood arc" after watching the animated series
There are even two good (and one that I don't call good) Fan Made musicals that cover big chunks of C1 by covering Hamilton and Dr Horrible's sing along blog
Thank u ;;
Admittedly I was referring to what the above comments were referring to, but that's okay. I can go look stuff up myself lmao
I think it says a bit about it in the article but the TLDR is that brian wayne foster who dated (or even was engaged or married to) ashley jonson left CR a while ago despite hosting and being in a lot of their shows, and it turns out it’s because he was very abusive towards her to the point she got a restraining order against him
so they decided to scrub the channel of most if not all of the content he’s in (which is A Lot of things since there is a lot of cr)
Hades II.
this isn't google
ey b0ss
Helloo
Thanks Alma... That sucks. Thankfully there's content without him though
Hades II
out of curiosity
I wonder if SGG at least joke about naming it I-Iades
cause you know
I is roman one
there's two of them
and
uh...
I feel like it's more stupid than funny the more I explain 
keep going
yeah i dont understand it yet
thanks fluffy
i'm literally him
that lidl tho
Lidl my beloved
Hi everyone
Hades II
Hades 11
Hades LL
Hades二
hades=
Hadeez ||🔩🔩||
Hades !!
Hades ℂℂ
Hades П
Hades Ц
Hades ║
Does anyone know why the food gets wet in the microwave
because the water inside the food basically turns to steam
So the inside of it must be drying out then?
Added jalapenos to my soup, about to find out if it was a good idea or not
microwave works by vibrating water molecules in food, which heats up the food, so that's by design
so yeah if you had it on long enough it would dry it out
but the air inside the microwave is normal temperature, so that steam cools down and turns to water again, that's why it's wet
It's uhh very spicy
I wonder if there's some way to catch that water, like it rises some distance at least so maybe it's possible to have a slanted sticky for water surface there maybe so that steam would instead gather onto it and run down instead of just falling
Almost too spicy
you can get covers for the food that have like a vent in them that you can open or close to let the steam out so that when it condenses it falls on the cover
but it's obviously not foolproof as a lot of the steam will stay under the cover and condense back
Oh, I didn't realize since it explains the whole story in the link I had posted
<@&456908176877551658>, user hannah_zoey, ID 868421994989899856, is a bot in this server DMing people
typical "im a starving artist please commission me for xyz" scam
if you could DM me a screenshot of the interaction that would be great. thanks for bringing this up!
tis done 👍
Real artists looking for commissions are welcome to list their prices and samples in #self-promotion 
not the usual thing to post but
Mike Pence gets hit by a water balloon
Insanely satisfying warning
afaik it was found out that it's not mike pence
and it's just some parade where throwing water balloons at people is part of it
bruh
why am i so gullible D:
Im just gonna take the L
it would have been literal poetic justice if it actually happened due to his recent mask off moment
So
my mom baked cookies
and she... made a mistake
which is understandable, this is her first time
I'm gonna share the mistake, not to shame her, but to show what would happen if you overcook cookies
...and yes that's a bite mark
hey whens the last time you got cookies with great acoustics
eventually I got some hot milk and dunked it to that
I've been thinking how to repurpose it
maybe crush them and sprinkle it onto some ice creams
blend it in shake
yeah, i used crushed old cookies for an under layer in sweet pies, just under the filling
it keeps the dough from getting mushy
and they soak the filling
wear them as necklace
I don't want ants on my neck
keep it in case you need projectile weapon
"Excuse me, the coffee's too bitter..."
COOKIE STAR
sneak them into prison and you can carve cell keys out of em
@sharp grail so am I not allowed to share my art in the art channel? Looking for clarification
Just feels similar to when I was told "video games can't be art, they didn't draw any of that the computer did"
sure, just please state that it is AI generated and not something you drew yourself. and again, dont deliberately start or contribute to arguments - it is a very controversial topic as i am sure you know and some people are bound to disagree with sharing it in such a channel for hand-drawn pieces
crediting the artist is very important and in case of ai art the artist is ai so credit the ai or it will feel sad
Wow
#art message
"Stated as generations"
#art message criticism
#art message
Conflict
"generations" isn't clear enough for most people
i do think its silly to say that about video games when most if not all assets in video games are handmade 😉
as i said it is a very controversial topic and some people would get upset about it or have a strong stance opposite of yours about AI art - but doubling down is not the way to solve any conflict
I'm sorry I don't understand what your saying here. It sounds like "when someone is upset by your opinion, you shouldn't keep having that option"
this message is incomprehensible, try talking
having discussions is fine, but please keep the other person in mind when talking and dont be rude for no reason
several people have already stated distaste for you posting AI art @stable comet , the polite thing to do is to stop aggravating people
its essentially theft, its no different then just going to someones twitter, taking a screenshot and saying you made it
instead the ai is stealing from thousands of people twitter accounts
Sure 🙂 I was told to make sure I wasn't saying they're my hand drawings (link 1) and to not deliberately start conflict, so I linked where I wasn't starting conflict but others were
just so you can make your phone wallpaper
that is not what i meant, it just seemed to me that in response to people being upset about AI art, you posted more to get a reaction. its being inflammatory on purpose and what i meant by "doubling down"
🤨
So a person doesn't like my art then I shouldn't post more of it? That seems... Odd
5+ people have already said they don't like your "art"
so yeah, if you're just inflaming the community, might as well look for another place to post your "art"
theyre still going ? 😭
ur missing the point. its not about not liking your art. we dont think its your art... at all
Like I can't imagine caring so much about something so simply made
Simply made? I put a lot of effort and work into what I make
there is some fun effort that goes into prompt crafting
Fair
It is waaaaay more than that
Oh really
Enlighten me then,
What words to where, which of the generations has the right features, which source images,
for the record, darc, don't mistake me defending ai art as me defending you.
Plus everyone knows the "dreaded ai hands" it's hours of work to get those right without ruining other features
Darc, have you watched an artist (digital, traditional) make their craft before? For some digital artists, it takes them over 24, 48 hours to make their final product. I won't engage further- you've revealed all I needed to know.
Yep. Art is expression. 🙂
The art of mine that you replied to earlier, for example, took me well over a day.
art can be viewed from several lenses. some of the biggest ones are meaning and mechanical. AI art frequently has neither.
also kinda odd you went digging for art i posted 🤨
while my stance on definition of art is a mix of "art is mastery of something" and "art is expression of something for not necessarily practical reasons" and ai art doesn't fit my definition of art other people may have other definitions of art that ai art does fall in so it's not really relevant and I stated it for really no reason just because I could so getting to my point: ai art is made by ai, so if you don't credit the exact ai you gave a prompt to and refer to ai art in form anything close to "this is my art" you are stealing that ai art firstly from the ai secondly from the artist the ai was trained on and thirdly the programmers and doing plagiarism and iirc that's not allowed here
well, that's your definition of art
I checked the art of everyone who had a strong reaction 🙂
Still odd ngl
it's about the same effort as learning how to use search engines properly. it requires some skill but the search engine does the actual work of producing the result, not the person typing the search words
I found some metal scrap that had been thrown away once and thought it was pretty so I took it out of the trash and put it on my shelf. It took literally no effort.
Its still beautiful to me
keep ai out of creative expression lol. ai cant and will never make anything unique, its completely built off of the back of others and their work
the art of googling 
@forest basalt that's a slippery slope to No one makes anything unique, which is actually a half defensible philosophical position to take but I just want to make sure you know where you're going
ain't no art yet though
Ah ok that makes a bit of sense, My creations are made with Midjourney and the license I have through them says I own my generations
inspiration isnt theft imo
I will actually fight you
ai crosses the line of theft
I think ai will create unique and creative things, when ai will gain consciousness, which I hope it won't
proving this within any meaningful reason would break philosophy
why?
i guess
That .2 inches of a line was taken from this exact painting, your whole image is stolen art
Sure! But a few of the people throwing a fit don't even have their own art shared, so I didn't really care what they had to say anymore lol
you don't need to be an artist to dislike AI art
You don't even need to dislike ai art as a concept to dislike ai art 😄
No one was throwing a fit? If you think that people criticizing you for putting ai generated images into an art channel is throwing a fit maybe you need to get some sense knocked into you
@stable comet refrain from the clown moji reaction, as it's downright meant to offend
nothing constructive in it
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/516763813790482464/1130221908080734329/20230716_123728.jpg
you tellin' me you would be able to pick this out of a lineup at an abstract sculpture exhibit?
People make art by accident all the time
art in general has some intentionality in it, usually a message, often a show of some skill. the definition is very fluid, ye, but just finding a piece of metal doesn't count as art imo
All that it takes for art to be art is for someone to think its artistic
I disagree that art has to have intention and this is art to me also metal scrap is one of the coolest looking things ever most of the time
afaik it needs at least a tiny bit of intention
I mean, the intention of thinking of it as artistic seems fine?
no, i didn't mean it like that
or, to pull out a layer of abstraction: me fishing it out of the scrap bin and putting it on my shelf was the intention
it needs to have been created and/or at least imbued with message intentionally
nah, thats not it
art doesn't need message
well, by your definition of art
it's not mine only
Woohoo art gatekeeping
Message helps art but isn't defined by it
true, it doesn't always need a message
but then other characteristics must be present
didn't say it was your only, just that it yours
Haha I'm ok with that 🙂
You really shouldn't be 🙃
it's a definition discussed in the faculties of art
defining art was meant to be an unsolvable task when i was doing my studies
to say that art requires message to exist is to throw rothko out the window
also a video a literally watched an hour ago had a point in it that a message only requires a recipient thinking it's a message, not a sender
That's a cool one~ happen to know the video still?
well, that's some faculties' definition of art
rothko did show craft and skill though, not to mention he himself does put a message in at least some of his artworks
right, art is measured through many lenses
economy of movement is art
meaning nonwithstanding
gheh... "i heard a message from the stars"....
it very well could be. there are certainly plenty of performances in which it is
it's lovely btw, totally get why you kept it
any idea what it might have been?
oh yeah, its a discarded nest of a laser cut sheet of metal
it was what was left over after they cut out everything they wanted and to save space they twisted it all up
accidental sculpture, you say
Found it
https://youtu.be/dhHwPoSp7AU
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/GeneticallyModifiedSkeptic
PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/GMSkeptic
Frank Turek (Cross Examined on youtube) is a Christian apologist who recycles old, tired apologetics like William Paley's watchmaker analogy and the teleological argument when his views are challenged. Here, Turek goes up against Douglas Adams'...
real and true
god I wish I were an eccentric billionaire so I could found the found art museum
museum of lost art
it's called the junkyard
its nice that this genre is keeping things up.
what in the world did i miss
tl;dr: ai art bro thinks it's alright to piss off people by defending "his" "art"
Thanks a bunch
yeah, that happen sometime, maybe it's not a place to share something not everybody would understand
maybe some sites like DA would fit better
Yeah that's why I checked the "pinned" posts in the art channel first, looked good.
DA actually has a very useful filter for users: it removes all AI art from their feed 
please keep it clean, this server is definitely not the place to talk about it
if it wasn't breaking the rules of content, then i don't see the issue
I didn't either, but apparently my ignoring criticism and continuing to share my art was seen as "attempting to be informatory" 😢
Which isn't the type of reaction I would have expected from Supergiant games group
some people may see issues where others don't, in the things you like, in the way you talk, dress or even name yourself, it's usually normal to move from their field of view to stop further rage
even if you're technically innocent
there are people whose job is to judge others, and they will defend you when time comes
probably
Yeah that's a good way to look at it
As just a general good rule of thumb, early adopters of possibly radical technologies should act compassionately towards the concerns of people who haven't gotten on board yet.
But self driving cars are gonna be soooo nice when they're actually working right
😛
rofl
great time to shill for self-driving cars
I'll try to keep that in mind.
well you see, people who aren't on board are just mere pedestrians
i'm at least 75% certain that that response had a few layers of irony on it
intentional?
i'll never have a car, the fact that i underwent professional psychological treatment prevents me from having driving and weapon license
so if the fate somehow tosses me to the country where i'll absolutely have to drive a car, like US, i'll have to rely either on taxi drivers or AI cars
the latter don't exactly exist yet
Tesla can't get full autopilot in a goddam tunnel, it might not exist for a while
and recently there have been a lot of issues with self-driving cars
a tunnel they built
i also cant drive for medical reasons 🤝
sure it'll be issues when company is driven by dude who is out of his mind
not being able to navigate your own infrastructure is a next level failure
but i've heard about attempts at creating autonomic cars since early 90s, with huge vans full of computers and TV-level cameras on their roofs
we'll get there someday.. in several decades, i believe
at least there's hope
Honestly if we had just started building infrastructure for automatic cars back in the aughts we'd be halfway there by now.
That's really what is needed. Once they have their own lanes and ect then it will be working much better
i hope so, it's a good idea to have them, but certainly not with the current approach and infrastructure
if you're going to have dedicated lanes you might as well stick busses on them instead of cars
or put tracks there and put trolleys
significantly cheaper
moves much more people
our current infrastructure is still based on the principles made in the age of horse-powered wagons and chariots
i think, there should be some radical changes soon
but muh individualizm n indipendincy
trams are underrated
trams 🧡
If not, then we get to watch "Fall of Rome part 2" and everything breaks before it gets fixed
i think old cities can't be saved now
but new ones can make some experimenting
getting rid of some awful design desicions like intersections of pedestrian roads with autotransport roads
Well the news has done it again
Lmao people actually beliege a 2 year old in North Korea actually got sentenced to life in prison
crosswalks, sidewalks
they were safe when average speed was 30 mph and you could see at most 3 cars in a minute passing by
now countless number of people die in road accidents every day
maybe there should be road junctions everywhere on busy roads instead of crossroads with traffic lights
some other crazy stuff
as for now, not even storing all the cars is possible in many places
yards are cluttered with cars
a real problem of cities where most of people live in apartment buildings
yeah, and most places of the world have such bad public transit that all of those people in one space are convinced they all need to own a personal car (and in many cases it is necessary for survival)
they were sentenced to life in North Korea, that's already heavy enough
which leads to crazy parking structures and ect eating up otherwise useful area
even design of our cars, btw, is still based on ancient cart concept, with roughly same size, number of wheels and the way they turn
same square box with four wheels
@rotund rivet the mods asked us earlier not to debate too much in the art channel, we can talk here
fair enough
is combining things in a certain way not creating something?
that's a pretty vague question
if I squirt ketchup and mayo into a cup together and call it art online you know it would spark debate
but I ain't talking about that
so is the issue that the programs can remember and catogorize details better than most people?
I was referencing the fact that most publicly available AI tools are pulling references from public domain without permissions from the original artists
with these tools, many folk have been feeding them prompts then calling the generations their own art, despite not having fed the tool anything themselves
it's downright unethical
what issue?
I feel like you're trying to ask something not coming across in your questions
computer programs can remember things well, sure
never seen anyone take issue with that ability
I don't think that's a debate within the art community or comp sci community
so it makes more sense that you're asking something else
hm i suppose i'm trying to think of the right way to word it
because every type of art is usually pulling reference from something, and some people can recreate things they see with photorealistic accuracy. A tree is a tree. If i create an image of a tree with Midjourney, how do i credit the origonal artist of a tree? how is it different from painting a tree, would i also need to credit the origonal tree artist? or if i walked through an art galley of different artists paintings of trees and painted my own tree, would i have to say oh i liked the leaf shape i seen in this painting so i made my leaves kinda like that now i must credit these artists.
still trying to word it right, this is just my mess of thoughts so far
how is it different from painting a tree, would i also need to credit the origonal tree artist?
the historical precedent with art credit involves giving credit to the one who created the art piece
right, i'm saying who drew the first tree, and why dont we always credit them
if you say who inspired you, that's cool, too, tho it's not typically involved in the crediting process unless there is IP/copyright involved
i think in music there are some juridical definitions on where is certain pattern of notes is considered borrowed from someone else's work, and when it's not
i suppose there should be similar things somewhere in art laws
as for how it's actually different from painting a tree
well
Midjourney painted the tree
the brush doesnt move without the hand pushing it
ye that's still a debated topic, but somewhat easier given the mathematical nature of music
this also seems a cold take
not to be callous
it's just
yeah
no one debates that
is this a metaphor?
ah but when you say 'you didnt make the tree, midjourney did' it feels similar to saying 'you didnt paint that, the brush did'.
why would I say AI and paintbrushes are the same tools?
they are vastly different in scope, function, and ethics
conflating the two seems a nonlogical shortcut
sorry, "feels similar to" not implying you're saying the two mare the same
right
you proposed a circumstance in which you were looking at other paintings and inspired to paint yourself
then asked how AI is different
it seems you acknowledge they are not the same
I feel like the difference is that Ai is better at remembering and applying the details, which somepeople can do and some people can not do
to reiterate with clarity, they are different because in one case the brush is controlled directly by the artist, and in the other the AI is using the brush
that's not touching on the ethical issues
just the functional
the ethical issues are when credit/ownership becomes a question
inspiration is not the same as authorship, we both agree
creation credit is still important tho
we do not credit the brush because the artist has direct, refined control over their tool
it takes immense skill and practice to direct the brush in such a way
the purpose of credit is to acknowledge the invested time, effort, skill, and imagination of that artist
AI just doesn't involve those things to a degree that garners respect
I did mention before that artists do use AI
they feed their own work to an AI, as you mentioned you do
they also apply their own art on top of AI generations
it's a valid tool
credit is usually the sticking point
if AI is doing all the work then there is no art involved but the domain sourced, y'know?
that domain gets the credit
the reflex response to this would be to ask: "so someone who creates 5 minute speed paintings doesn't garner enough respect to be an artist?"
but i understand your intent there and what you're saying makes sense, but i dont agree with the last statement
completely onboard with you there
the ability to create a 5 min painting still took practice and skill to achieve
not actually making that argument
I see
idk why you said it then
...i dont agree with the last statement
is it your opinion that AI created art takes immense skill, practice, and time investment to a comparable degree as other creation tools?
my opinion is that there isnt some level that needs to be reached for it to be qualified as 'art'. its its own thing
it doesnt need to be on the same level as everything else to be a valid form of expression
hmm
to circle back, if I squirted ketchup and mayo into a cup and posted it up in a museum gallery, you'd vibe with it?
there's def a school of thought amongst artists that want to push the boundaries of the definition through doing stuff like that
see tape banana
what about if you collected 10s of thousands of dead flies and glued them in a circle? you'd be in an art museum
that's a pretty different process tho right?
tape bananana, halarious
genociding flies and putting in the work to arrange them like that could be considered enough effort to garner respect in some folks eyes for sure
but you didn't answer my question
ah! my feeling is that i dont need to vibe with it, if you made it, and you vibe with it, bam art
to go further with it
so what you're saying is if I was walkin down a city street and felt nature's call, I could just drop trou, lay cable, and call it art?
as long as I felt it was special?
somehow expressive?
oop
idk what dyno read it was too fast
sec
to expand, i feel like it would be Unkind of me to try to disqualify something you thought was art if i didnt like the way you had made it
see: performance art lol
well in my example the sidewalk is the canvas and my creation is the steamer
tho the process of extrusion could be a performance too
depends on the artist's intentions
there have been dumber things, for sure lol
anyway, I was asking these questions to get a feel for how you define art, because that's important when discussing relatively new boundaries, like AI creations
it seems you're in the camp of "art can be anything", yeah? correct me if wrong
if so, how do you think this avoids diluting the meaningful practice of artistic expression?
it's one of the primary concerns of AI creations tools, since AI has no understanding of human emotion
the use of these tools do objectively function as a significant spacer between the imagination of the human and the meaning of the creation itself
is that to say that if ai art exists, then people wont make other forms of art?
if i may
as it was stated before, AI doesn't run by itself, it doesn't create things out of the blue in the middle of the Wednesday, it has a human being to make a prompt and then it'll execute the prompt
and then it takes a human to choose if the human is okay with the result, or finds it necessary to run the process again
i feel like having access to the ability to ai art allows people who otherwise wouldnt make art the oppertunity to do so
one of its benefits
so, the expression point here can be applied with restriction on the operator, who chooses what result fits better with his original vision of possible result
right, a human still has to post it and whatnot
my recent question and following statements were addressing the nature of artistic expression and how that may change with the tools in question
the 'final image' of a lot of the things i make is vastly different from the options offered when i begin
the aforementioned brush is in direct control of the human and maintains a very thin barrier between the artist and ultimate creation
AI is a much thicker boundary
this is a big talking point on the subject
thats understandable and not inaccurate
definition of art is a complicated thing, and it takes lot of variables to be defined
ye I ain't looking to define art
it just helps to know how others do if I'm gonna talk about it
starting from "is art a gift from god" to "is art applies only to pictures" etc
the only issue comes from some people making the argument "ai made art cant be art"
I wouldn't say those are the only issues at all
feels very, defining what art can and cant be
we talked about credit, remember?
knowing that an ai made a piece makes it feel soulless
to you maybe, this makes me feel a lot of things https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1012804630448722021/1130180576314409000/darc_kross_Hyperdetailed_hyperrealism_surrealism_Other_dimensio_c2813999-7d3e-40d4-8b6a-d93bdb015b90.png
it's certainly pretty
its impressive, i think its a nice piece
but i think it would be a lot more impressive if someone who had been perfecting their craft for years made it
by the way, with the development of AI technologies, the humanity will definitely have to face the questions more complicated than "what is art".. like "what is soul", "what is life", "what is personality" etc
this was made by a computer in 3 seconds by pulling from other peoples art
very false
i worked a long time on this
and went through 100s of versions before coming to this
what was the source domain?
considering art, there is difference between legal copyright things and personal impression things, and i think, they should be percieved separately
it still feels very arbitrary
as well as when talking about definition of art, any art, there are different things that have to be taken in consideration like artist skill, time and effort spent, vision of artist, and others
if you'd ask me, i think time and effort don't make any difference in terms of cultural and artistic value of a piece
i immagined an alien planet with giant trees and people living on it and wanted to make images for it
but it does make a difference in terms of monetary value, as well as personal sentimental value
yeah i;m not trying to sell stuff or anything like that. i just like being able to make visable images of things i think of
bc if we go the way of "if you spend too little time, you don't deserve respect" way, we can as well refer back to old statements
that's not what "source domain" means
some of the most popular osngs of all time were written in 10 mins
that's Midjourney yeah?
where was it pulling its references from?
"photography is not art"
"movies are not art"
"printed pieces are not art"
"computer imagery are not art"
"digital drawings are not art"
--you are here--
"ai images are not art"
etc
this feels like a rewind
you didnt spend 3 weeks carving into the wall, you just put berry juice on that leather
the strawmen statements aren't really warranted
does anyone want to address this?
i thought i did?
er
i remember similar discussions back in the day, when people who used to spend months on a single drawing were refusing to respect people who used photoshop
this was a gross misunderstanding of my question
I didn't notice followup
people can still make art other ways if they want to? it enhances artistic expression by allowing people who otherwise wouldnt make art to do so. i think i might be missing how this does the thing you're asking if it avoids
you were there too! there is always progress
and tbh, i actually understand why in this case people are mad. nobody wants to accept the fact that the thing they did for years, put lots of blood, sweat and tears into, defining their very life for, is being replaced by a machine work, much easier and faster
to reiterate
if so, how do you think this avoids diluting the meaningful practice of artistic expression?
it's one of the primary concerns of AI creations tools, since AI has no understanding of human emotion
the use of these tools do objectively function as a significant spacer between the imagination of the human and the meaning of the creation itself
this is the full context
especially artists, who are by the nature more sensitive persons
you both just said opposite things 
folks can def make art in other ways if they like, I agree with that
therefore no one is being replaced, unless you refer to corporate interest
my opinion is most probably the history will reiterate itself
the AI art will be considered an art, but it will never replace in any way the art made by traditional and digital artists
people are being replaced tho
almost every writer in hollywood went on strike over ai
always and forever everywhere in everything
it will exist as a thing of its own with people who like to do it and like to spend time on it
did you read the bit where I mention corporate interest?
sadly true
it seems ignorant to ignore it
the demand for the work of artists might decrease in terms of illustration work, which involves minimum creativity, but it'll stay the same in terms of real art expression
ignoring corporate interest
skill is always needed
i can only imagine concept artists being much less required
i guess i just dont see the skill in writing "big ol tree on alien planet" and the computer spitting out an image
anyone can type words into an ai art generator, that dosent mean everytime someone does they will be able to hone it to a visually appealing image
those who have to draw same things over and over again, just to see 98% of their work being rejected by directors
which sucks
it's understandable.
just as much as people don't see the skill in "pressing the button and getting an image"
or "moving and clicking the mouse"
i'll even call it the kind of "ungrateful work"
i could do an example generation though dm's if anyone has never used MJ before 🙂 you tell me what to tell it and i can send back the results
this must be disingenuous
you really don't see anyone use tools like mice skillfully?
ever?
given what you've been saying so far I have trouble believing you feel that way
i do, but there are many people who don't
there are still people who don't accept digital artists as artists
you listed mouse movement next to clicking a button tho
they say that art is only made by paints on canvas
by pressing a button and getting an image i meant photo
oh
photos aren't produced by clicking buttons tho
you gotta put the camera in the right place at the right time
I understand you are referencing folks who disrespect certain types of art, though I gotta say your reductive descriptions are muddling the dicussion
every professional photographer will tell many reasons why those statements about the low effort of their work is incorrect
im not an artists, but i used to be a programmer
and i think, the process of creating art with a use of ai is as well more complicated than some people think
especially taking in consideration people who make training themselves
to be reductive myself, everything is more complicated than people think 
you def right
it's more nuanced than just pressing a button
once the issues of stolen datasets and corporate interests making people jobless are solved, AI art may become less negatively viewed. atm though...
ye it's primarily an ethical issue for me too
i feel like i've run out of steam, but i again thank you for discussing this with me.
#art message has this helped at all with your original question? 😛
as well as that, i can objectify about the "stolen art" thing, but this issue is not applied to all the models out there
you did say Midjourney was feeding from your own drawings in one case, but you didn't say about the others
so I'm still unsure
different AIs use different ways of putting an image together, and early ones were definitely just photobashing images from the search request together in a way that kinda reminds what they were told is more correct
ah, so your stance is that if i havent input my own images to a creation, then it can not be considered something i created? is that accurate?
like DALL-E 1
some modern models, however, use different approach, and instead they study the way lines, forms and transitions are used, and then try to make new ones, that look like original
I think the process of creating your own original work is separate from using public datasets, which was my original line of questioning
the two can not be the same? i am not able to go through the process of creating my own work while using public datasets?
if the creation process involves your text prompt directing an AI to fetch and analyze other people's art, I do not feel like you created anything
it's basically taking other folks art as your own, in a reassembled form
like Volus said tho this can work differently with different tools
are the images used to train them public domain though? there were several cases already (dA, artstation) where art sites would quietly include their entire userbase's artworks into their AI training. by the time users would react and insist on opting out, how much has the AI learned to emulate their styles?
idk which Midjourney is
Ain't no way it's still going 😭
ah ok. to me it is not different than analyzing from memory things you have seen. the computer is just doing the job of the memory
ain't your memories
I mean a long discussion is cool but it's pretty shocking
it depends. some models don't even use any kind of pre-made datasets, and must be trained every time again
no, and i dont feel like they have to be for me to express myself 🙂
how do you connect other's memories, which you cannot see, to your own expression?
the imput you provide to the tool and the details you choose to include or remove, what you choose to leave or change. everything from if a person is blonde or redhead to if they have their hand in the air of if its on their hip
the input you provide to the tool are not part of their memories
if anything they just fetch them in ways you cannot see, right?
sounds like a commission for an artwork :)
if you are actively looking at a fresh generation and want to change it, that isn't their memories either
so I'm not seeing the connection yet
that reminds me
can memes be considered art?
if you create a meme on a template, can you pretend you created it?
some of them - totally
look man we'll be here all day if you keep trying to define art
Yes of course
if you take someone else's meme and edit it, does it count as the process of creation?
i think, the answers are more simple here bc there is no really such thing as copyrights when it comes to memes
memes belong to everyone
I think adding your own ideas to something counts as an artistic contribution yes of course
art belongs to everyone
lol
if anyone engages in philosophy without liking prolonged discussions that don't lead to anything they shouldn't be engaging in philosophy
hmm?
how do you feel about copyright law
God if you are trying to imply something I would appreciate a more direct statement
art does belong to everyone, but it has an author
I don't want to try to parse your meaning
for which country?
It can, r/bonehurtingjuice is definitely creative and artistic
unless it's NFT, then it doesn't belong to everyone
then it belongs in the trash
just in general
I am not implying anything
the problem of copyright pops out every now and then in discussion of AI art
I see
I guess the reply was accidental then?
to the point i feel like it's the main problem of the whole topic
When you buy nft you don't own the art though you own a link to it iirc and some copyright with it in some cases
also
one can own a physical piece of art
but the actual image is still available for everyone in the world
mostly
No, not every reply at least reply that I reply is a direct point made directly in response to combat the point of the message I reply to
sure, I just didn't quite catch what you were trying to tell me
so it was meant for me, what did you mean?
It wasn't meant specifically for you although directed somewhere in that general direction however it was indeed intended as a response to your message simply not as an argument against it or for it but being related to it enough that I considered making it a reply to that message fitting

man okay nevermind
I didn't mean to press if you don't wanna explain it
thought I'd be able to respond better if I asked
anyway
A physical piece of art isn't the art itself, it's a recording of it in physical form so you don't own the art you just own one of it's presences
Sometimes the things are what they seem
On another topic, buckwheat flakes with milk are delightfully delicious aren't they?
https://drememoto.tumblr.com/post/673046033703583744/andthebeanstalk-drememoto-andthebeanstalk
ken franklin (jack cassidy) voiced by: https://twitter.com/BrendanBlaber
song used: Columbo - Murder by the Book
public voice file library: https://patreon.com/GetGianni website: https://GetGianni.com
some right use of AI could be if it wasn't actually voiced by real ppl
but still, there are numbers of songs remixes with voices of people who are not alive anymore
the only proper way to eat buckwheat if you'd ask me
everything else like making it garnish and stuff is just
feels wrong
Hi everyone! Im popping over from the hades speedrunning discord. We're running a tournament this Saturday called the Elysium Cup, and during the break we'd like to showcase some art/music made by people in the community. If you're interested in being added to the showcase/playlist, please feel free to DM me!
If anyone is interested in the tournament you can check out the details here: https://www.start.gg/tournament/elysium-cup-2023/details
Hey all
Hello!
Is there mods for hades?
there's a modding server pinned in #self-promotion
I ate a habanero sausage and my tum is terribly unhappy about it
this is literally the worst thing
Heyo

if you don't mind me asking, where is that character from? if anywher ein particular.
@solid pulsar
https://mysticbeasts.com/manticore-vs-chimera/
#art message @solid pulsar Did you also know that the scorpfeline there is also based on D&D's Displacer beasts, which are a pretty fun creature type
I also noticed the similarity there as well. I did always find the six legs to look strange on displacer beasts. While DMing I usually explained the extra middle ones as actually being illusory on account of the creatures' fae origin as opposed to being actual legs.
How does one find "wet bulb temperature" of your area like online I mean, I tried googling but didn't really accomplish anything
wet bulb temperature?
Wet bulb temperature is the lowest temperature to which air can be cooled by the evaporation of water into the air at a constant pressure. It is therefore measured by wrapping a wet wick around the bulb of a thermometer and the measured temperature corresponds to the wet bulb temperature.
https://www.weather.gov/news/211009-WBGT
Maybe try the local weather channel
I can't seem to find any weather sites that do show wet bulb temperature, maybe it's just not a thing that's measured in my country
Possibly
do tell
fridges are notoriously resistant to nuclear weapons, so I'm not surprised
its temp was going up, so we decided to check the condenser inside. Had a history where it didn't want to cool cause the inside condenser was clogged up. It was sort of clean but decided to give it a little brushy. My right hand met one of the brackets that were holding some of the parts.
Now I have a gash

I cleaned my hand afterwards
cause the bracket is somewhat dusty
unfair of the fridge to use metal weapons in a fist fight
I almost spit my water reading that
I tried cleaning one of these, and while wiping the thing in the middle that shows the water level my finger got caught on the metal surrounding it and, well, I learned that it’s pretty sharp 
rise of the machines
I just checked mine
It is not sharp
Prob cause of different brand
Yep I ran my y finger on it
Twice
third times the charm

i'll move the goalpost to four times then
Nonono
You'll just move the goalpost every time
And eventually I'll get to the point you want
We ain't playing that game 
aw
Small question, is anybody here an expert on Japanese mythology?
not an expert but sounds like a fun discussion
fr
I watched Ghost Stories so if you want 2000's american version of it then sure
so fire away!
Can anyone help me with downloading mods for hades? If yes dm me pls
but sawadex, you don't seem particularly interested in reading anything in the server, why would we DM you something we weren't sure you would read?
If you do a search in this server for "mods, pinned: true".
Do you know how to do that? It should be the 4th or so one
it is pinned in the self promotion channel :) #self-promotion message
uhh oops
there we go
Btw the women chess championship is currently ongoing
google en passant
holy hell
New response just dropped
woops
was chilling at the door when a roach ran over my feet. Right after, I noticed a customer walked through the door.
Basically went, "DARN- Good Morning! How can I help?"
"Please leave the establisment"
i dont wanna
Is it possible to buy DRM-free versions of Supergiant Games games?
might be on GOG
no hades though😔
well, GOG does stand for "good old games"... :)
I thought all games are DRMed in steam
nope
you can open it from the exe without opening steam
you do need steam to download and update it tho
Not all... CBP doesn't have DRM. My bro bought it, we have family share, I can launch it from .exe without opening to steam.
he can also play it at the same time as me
nice to know
hi
HELLO all 😄
elo 
I am mastering making pizza in the microwave
Yo, anyone down for some Gartic Phone
garte my beloved
he gave me a discout after i tired to run away but clumsily fell almost on a wheelchair old lady
I have an idea
0/0 = log 1 1
Wait nvm that's not true
Log 1 1 can only be integers
log 1 1 being base 1?
base 1 provides some interesting challenges to doing math that doesn't really apply itself to logarithms well
well, the good news is wolframalpha believes that 0/0 = log_1(1)
that is, undefined
Logarithm of 1 from base 1, at least I think it's the right way to say it
However not all undefineds are the same imo
Mmmm why didn't anyone teach me about non integer powers
All I know about them I figured out on my own and it ain't much
Yeah, so far while googling I only found that x to the power of z/y is y root of x to the power of z but I didn't find an explanation why is it like that yet
Well that makes sense but still doesn't show the transition from x^(y/y) to sqrt_y(x^y) directly like not through an equation of those to a different thing
Hmm
Perhaps think about it this way, Raising an exponent by another exponent is like multiplying the two exponents together, right? 2^2=4, (2^2)^2=4^2=16=2^4
is that intuitive to you?
Yes
so if (2^2)^2=2^(2*2), then we can play around with the numbers a bit and get (2^2)^(0.5)=2^(2*0.5)=2
That is understandable
Also, there's the additive part of shared base exponents where (x^y)(x^z)=x^(y+z), so (x^1/2)*(x^1/2)=x^(1/2+1/2)=x^1, so x^1/2 times itself(Squared) is x, which means that x^(1/2)=SQRT(x)
and (x^y)(x^z)=x^(y+z) is pretty easy to prove yourself intuitively because x^2=x*x and x^3 = x*x*x so x^2*x^3=x*x*x*x*x=x^(2+3)=x^5
get math'd on
what language is this!
so, x^1 is composed of (x^1/n)^n, and as x^n is multiplying x on itself n times, x is the n root of x^n, so therefore (x^1/n) is n root of (x^1/n)^n, so therefore (x^1/n) is n root of x^1, so therefore (x^1/n) is n root of x
literally me rn:
https://tenor.com/view/cat-cats-flowers-gif-5256893
so x^k/n is (x^1/n)^k, which is (n root of x)^k, which is n root of x^k
I can't believe it took me literally 30 minutes to literally just remember that (root of x)^n is root of x^n
Wait nvm that IS true, log_1(1) can be non integers
Why cannot I sleep
Because you need to hear about how e^i*pi = - 1
so e is what happens when you set a constant so that the derivative(or rate of change) of the function e^x is e^x. It is its own rate of change, approximately equal to 2.71828
i is what happens when you try to square root a negative number(i = sqrt(-1))
and pi is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter.
so it stands to reason that e^(i*pi)=-1
Can someone help me quickly.
When you unlock a hidden aspect does upgrading the other aspects abvove bring any benefit?
I have the rail hidden aspect and the other aspects don't seem to be activated.
I want to know if its worth upgrading other aspects after unlocking the hidden one!
you're best off asking in either #h1-discussion or #h1-builds-and-combat as this is the off topic section of the discord @clear raft 
cool people language
Real
How is it integer if there are so many irrational number in it
an excellent question!