#history
1 messages · Page 227 of 1
With no indication regarding the caliber
Is H-class and Bismarck use the same 150mm? Or H-class use the prototype one?
It started around 4 hours ago...
Bismarck and the H-class (were to use) used the same 150mm guns in what should be the same mountings
aka a downgrade from the Scharnhorsts
The real question is if H-class still has that awful secbat trunk hole in the deck from Bismarck
How about 406 mm/52 SK C/34, is the 52 means the calibers?
Should have the same hole as Bismarck for the forward pair of 150s
Because of course she does
The number 52 indicates the barrel is 52 times the length of the barrel bore, i.e. Calibers
Caliber without s indicates how big the bore of the barrel is
tbf Scharny had it as well, but she also had a 150mm barbette as well as the 320mm main belt covering that hole
The higher the calibers, usually the higher muzzle velocity
(Also likely higher barrel wear)
Chamber pressure is better indicator for barrel wear
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com
Asked by Prmetime on Utreon: In WW2, Finland was given approximately 100,000 Carcano M38 rifles in 7.35 Carcano. I have heard it stated that the Finns d...


First F-16 Block 70 
Also seems Greek air force is coming to Paris
You guys getting very close lately
You guys building them warships now right
Laid the second one just few days ago

🇬🇷❤️🇫🇷
So current orders of Greece are
84 F-16 Block 70
20 F-35A
18 Rafale
Oh my bad
Greece made a new 6 more Rafale order
So it's 24 Rafale now
And 3 FDI frigates build by France
Here is the steel cutting for second one
They did it to em
Erdogan the watermelon seller strikes again
I saw the Finlandball and my brain instantly went "Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe!"
For a long time I thought ATSF was yellow/blue-yellow, due to their livery
Ah yes chkalov, a ussr carrier with american radars, truly a feat of italian engineering
I really expected them to be HMS instead. Since as I remember, Project 71 was inspired on Ark Royal
no, you're think of 72, which is Volga in AL
Nah 72 is Illustrious
Aka Volga

So 71 and 72 were inspired off British CVS?
yeah HMS would've made more sense but w/e
i assume it's just to have a smidge more variety in leveling fleets since there isnt a USN ship in pr5
look at the bright side, they didnt do the funny and make KMS for the first stage

still malding about harbin xp requirements because she's easily best girl, i mean she's a soviet ship but no soviet vanguards?
Soviet ships arent perma
well, other than Avrora
Need Rossiya event to be added to perma
Then we talking
@humble mulch It's almost her laid down day now 
Breast is also pecko pain cause only Iris L&D is perm do that's like 2m exp on some dds and sanrui
Closest example I will get for her Birthday 

One requires faith to unlock her after all
wait a second tea
you're talking about ingame PR ships in #history

mod aboose
soon™️ 
for whom?
I demand tea immediately be demoted to yellow flair for this off topic
red is redder than orange, and red is higher rank than orange. orange is redder than yellow, so tea should be demoted to yellow flair
Italian Navy could be called teacher of Soviet Navy. So them helping the xp grind of Chkalov is cute detail
That’s my thought process as well, makes more sense to me to have them tied to the navy who was more or less actively the one helping them and giving them designs
Yosh
neat and what factions for the chinese PR girl
chinese only
Chinese
tea we better not get nuked for this
As Russians are not perm


Due to Russians not being perm they cannot accurately tie them into the Chinese PR even tho the Soviets irl kinda helped them out and did gift them lots of ships and gave them info on ships going into the Cold War iirc
add eminent domain shipfu yostar
you're not hurting anyone by adding soviet ships as an option
Using hai tien in w12 is gonna be 
Soviets only have Avrora as prem build ship.
If Rossiya event ships were added then maybe
It’s also again Chinese
I don’t think they’d tie Americans or British to it when they did like absolutely nothing to help the Chinese build their navy outside beat Japan lol
If it was tier 9-10
Which are American ships
There would be american
Yeah if it’s American then sure
But this is a Soviet now Chinese PR so that imo doesn’t apply to Harbin
They do change requirements in different PRs but yeah
Wait till PR6 to see
Note changed funnel structure, lack of catapults, and the use of British Type 281 radar on the main mast.
harbin notes by silver
Using a British radar does not at all mean to use British ships for it
The Chinese also have what 9 ships in game now
With only 1 not being a vanguard
Aren’t Anshens all perm
And the purple fan girl who won CN was a freebie
So yeah you still have like 2 full fleets
If you are a newer player
only the two i said
Interesting, that’s still 5-6 ships, which is more then enough
Anyways
Time to repost this
Historical Basis of Priority Research Ships in Azur Lane This document briefly describes the historical basis of the Priority Research (PR) ships (thus far) in Azur Lane, all of which are sourced from a collaboration with the Wargaming.net (WG) game World of Warships (WoWS). Drawings and models, ...
New image China’s J-35 Carrier Fighter. The launch bar of the front wheel is roughly visible.
Launch bar? That’s the catapult hook up thing right?
Yup. Since Fujian got catapults
God what a sexy lady she is
It's not Ulyanovsk level but she carries the manners
lore and history being basically the same channel yet again
As Undef mentioned
"Designed as a successor to the Italian army’s current AW129D Mangusta fleet, Leonardo was awarded a development contract in 2017 covering production of a total of five aircraft.
Italy projects an eventual requirement for 48 helicopters, with the Mangusta to be retired from 2025."
48 
Hey Undef riddle me answer me this
Why Italy wasn't in Eurocopter Tiger program
because the Eurocopter was built by a company made by the fusion of a german and french company
while Italy has its own Helicopter company
First Agusta, then Agusta-Westland, now under Leonardo
Eurocopter is (was?) a full blown company for once, not a half assed joint venture, consortium or cooperation
stares at NHIndustries
yes but again
The Eurocopter Tiger is a four-blade, twin-engine attack helicopter which first entered service in 2003. It is manufactured by Airbus Helicopters (formerly Eurocopter), which arose from the merger of Aérospatiale's and DASA's respective helicopter divisions
it's a german and french company becoming one
not an actual "european" project
then again, no "euro"-whatever has been an actual european project for now
This is the closest we are getting to one
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Patrol_Corvette
European Patrol Corvette (EPC or PPX) is a Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) project that was adopted by the European Council on 12 November 2019. The objective is to design and develop a new class of warship. The project is coordinated by Italy, with France, Spain and Greece participating and Portugal as an observer. In December 2021, it...
Oh right, and the Eurodrone
wait the Tiger was a PESCO project? 
That's what I said, "Eurocopter" is a company proper name, not a project
Just like how "North American Aviation" is a company name and didn't represent the whole North America
And speaking of cooperation
So if this new is true
This mean Tempest and F-X will die to create a new project?
I can’t wait for tempest to never be delivered
it has WAY more chances than FCAS tbh
Dassault CEO said don't expect her before 2050
Mattarella already said "lmao no"
so we will see
British lead multi national program of that scope
how do you reject a resignation
he's his boss
ah
@shrewd pecan Also congrats
General Dynamics Land Systems announced today that it has been awarded a competitive award worth up to $280,112,700 to procure Trophy Ready Kits as an Active Protection System (APS) for Abrams main battle tanks.
Yeah actual functional APS mass field able unlike the Russians
Had to mention Russia didn't you 
fine I guess
I mean what else is that purchase being directed towards
He can do this because he still won the confidence vote they had today, but Draghi said he would resign if m5s didnt vote for it
m5s didnt, so he tried to resign
pacific wise that’s not really a tank fight
How bout middle east as usual
Mattarella had multiple options, this one was one of them
M1A2s TUSK kits have done fine in that regard tho future prospects of a major combat deployment to the Middle East are slim at this point
Just need to find oil
we’ve already hit peak oil investment
then there are rumours that this was all a strategy between Draghi and Mattarella to out the M5S, that would be pretty lmao
Didn't they choose Archer yet?
they haven’t to my knowledge
The evaluation saw national and international participants demonstrating their systems, including BAE Systems’ ARCHER, Elbit Systems of America’s ATMOS Iron Sabre, Nexter’s Caesar, AM General’s Brutus, and the NORA B-52 M21 system
So one of these
US armies gun artillery is needing the most attention in my opinion regarding modernization
there going the right way with the M109 replacement tho it’s looking like the M109s gonna stay around for a awhile regardless
Still using the m109 right
Replacement never came
supplementing the M777s outside of airborne units with something like a American archer or Caesar
The M1299 is like
2 years away from service
it’s gonna outrange everything tho it’s looking like It isn’t fully replacing the M109

US armies new division structure only shows like one M1299 unit with the rest being M109s
It is expected to be fitted with an autoloader in 2025, which could increase its rate of fire from 3 to 10 rounds per
Fuck yes autoloader
It looks like a longer range m109
it can reach out to around 100 KMs with its top end round
Says designed against latest developments from Russia and China
So if Russia development was koalitsiya-sv
What did China show
They have their own developments
idk army kinda skipped a entire generation of new SPGs with M109 modernizations
like they passed up the K9 and PZH-2000 generations
I think there was a replacement project that died
It was the multi platform unit thingy
They had a program that included a engine replacement for the abrams
vehicle was too heavy along with other issues
Finally 2000hp? 
No same HP

slightly better efficiency
Not by fuel I assume. Since it's heavier now
abrams still has relatively the same range

It can get you out to about 400 KMs on road 200 cross country regardless
probably not

abrams doesn’t need it
Then why Germany did it for their A6
tungsten has worse performance than DU
combined with lower pressure out of the German L/44
Why Germany didn't passed to DU? Too expensive?
Got it
idk even the L/55 isn’t necessary
You get similar performance out of the L/44 using DM53 and DM63
tho it’s still a notable drop
I totally forgot this was happening today
a few hours ago they had the groundbreaking ceremony for the Desert Storm memorial in DC
That's odd
Why 2022?
President Barack Obama authorized construction of the memorial in 2014, and President Donald Trump signed legislation in 2017 allowing for the memorial to be built near the National Mall.
Ohh
It's a very long progress
Italy wasn't in the Tiger program because they already had their attack helicopters. The Mangusta precedes the Tiger by a decade.
Don’t they already have a A129 replacement in the works
the whole conversation started because i posted about it yes 
essentially an apache sized mangusta
Is it getting a longbow style radar?
I don't recall any mention of anything like it for the AW249
no, mostly cuz it uses spikes
shame no F&F capability
every spike is F&F, but only one version is NLOS
I’m getting the TV guided adjust after launch mode confused aren’t I
yeah
but i think the Heli ones can still do that
The long and extended range versions of the Spike also have the capability of "Fire, Observe and Update" operating mode (also known as Lock-on after launch (LOAL))
I’ve only seen the spike fired in the post launch guidance mode
thanks

Somehow someone managed to connect it to how Italian Navy bad 
Well duh, ever heard of Italian shell issues?
Was so bad, even the captain of the ship wrote about it after failing his task

Undie is approaching your location
Iachino is a spy, he knew with 100% confidence that British optical equipment can see through heavy smoke, and guaranteed to be better than the Italian counterparts.
Should be executed, smh.
hello
Hello
i would like to learn more about history but idk where to start
Are you interested in books, videos, etc.? And what category, e.g. naval, military, food, etc.
well i mostly like ww1
and i know a bit of it but i like to know more
and just overall
Well, in terms of videos, there’s the Great War channel on YouTube for WWI
Are you interested more in the land or naval aspects?
If naval, I certainly have quite a reading list of articles and books
i never really was interested in naval so not sure
The Principles of War podcast has a podcast series on artillery in WWI, quite interesting
the youtube channel is just called the great war channel?
yes
its kinda weird if i look at myself, i dont like the naval but yet i play azur
thanks, i'll be sure to check that out
✂️
new Carcharodontosaurid get
11 meters long
it looks like Meraxes could possibly be the older cousin of both Mapusaurus and Giganotosaurus

why does in-game, Zuikaku wants to fight enty? Is there any real-life references to this?
The ships were on opposing sides at Eastern Solomons and Santa Cruz
And later, Philippine Sea and Leyte Gulf, albeit less directly

How theoretically effective was Alsace' design? If, by a miracle, they were to be built, and commissioned by the intended time and not end up like Vanguard, what use would she have?
(Im also curious as to which side she would've ended up on)
Tbh, by the time the first member of the class would be commissioned, Allied naval superiority over the Axis would be so extreme that the specific performance of the ship wouldn't be super relevant
You're looking at a delivery/commission date of at least Mid-1945 if Alsace is constructed. Undoubtedly on the Allied side, given the prerequisite of France not falling to Germany and still being capable of delivering resources to the Brest/St.Nazaire yards.
But overall it was certainly a solid battleship design and would have been more than able to hold its own against a Bismarck, Littorio, or any Japanese battleships short of Yamato
Granted, as a rough guesstimate the first H-39 should become operational at the end of 1945, and should be followed by three more by mid-1946 when the second Alsace should also become operational.
Gawd 1945-50 would be age of BBs if painter didn't go oof
Lions, Soyuzes, H-39s, maybe Montanas, All 5 Yamatos
And Alsaces of course
Would Italy still stick to Littorios or go for bigger when they see all other nations have big units now?
They are already going for 406mms with the succeeding design.
To be fair, the massive gap between the Nagatos and Yamatos makes it rather easy to come off better under those circumstances


lmao
Lol
They did this in vietnam with voice recordings at night to demoralise the vietnamese with their ancestor worship

the LRAD but even more insane
Depends on what gets priority in the 1939 program. The one from January 1939 that got axed called for both carriers and battleships. The RM put priority on the carriers, so they should have been built first, but that depends on the air force not donjg something dumb
Keeping in mind the Axis were expecting to kick off their war circa 1942-44, I would imagine the carriers would have priority as they were supposed to complete in 1943 and 1944
Whereas if battleships were built in their place you're probably looking at 1944 and 1945
Granted, the Italians were making their decision before the Alsace-class became a thing, and the French ordering of Alsace in mid-1940 may change their mind. The first 15,000-ton carrier was supposed to be laid down by Ansaldo (Genoa) in the second half of 1940 and the the second carrier by CRDA (Trieste) in 1941, so if they really felt the need they could have always delayed the second carrier to deferred it to a slower build on Ansaldo's second >200m slip, and had CRDA build a battleship that could be laid down around the same time as the first Alsace. Though only having a single ship in the class would be an extremely unusual move for the RM.
Ohhh, btw, @spring briar. I have a photograph of a shell for the 152/53. Unfortunately which specific shell it is is not identified;
(Ansaldo, supposedly circa 1927, showing a 152mm shell and propellant charge in an elevator cradle)
I don't know if a common type was ever issued for the 152/53
Perhaps it's the lighter 47.5 kg shell?
Unfortunately I've never actually seen what was done to the shell to make it lighter, just that it was lighter
It doesn't seem to match the shape of the few 152mm shells I have in diagrams, at the very least
It looks like one of those older ones from that drawing doesn’t it?
Lower on the body, yeah, though the cap looks far to pointy. Granted, this is versus shells from circa 1901
For Germany to still exist post 1945 without a war you kinda have to scratch a lot of their fleet programs

I'll allow Scharnhorst to exist because she's precious, but them building two Bismarcks and the entire H-class lineup and all the other stuff in the Z-plan is a highway to the bankrupt status


cheesecake
did they also count the conversions of the two Aquila sisters? because as far as I know they were way beyond that 15,000 ton class.
unless ofc the girls were relatively new, circa '41 or something?
The conversions were more a reaction to not having any carrier projects underway and the immediate outbreak of war. Such conversions had been planned in 1936 on efforts to act on them in 1939 and 1940 were largely reflecting the fact that they were the fastest way to get carriers given the imminent conflict
If dedicated carriers are under construction, and with no emergency to give impetus to such an effort, I doubt they would have happened
pretty much so yeah.
To give a rough outline of Italian carrier projects from the mid-30s to '43;
(teal = plan/design only, green = a program actually executed)
And a selection of aircraft considered or planned for various projects over the interwar period;
Navalized g.55 copium
Honestly, I'm not hugely knowledgeable on a technical level, so idk how navalizable G.55 would be.
Though tbh I think seeing the F.5 & Z.1012 (single-engine version was intended for the carriers) air group would be rather cool
Oh, also, @ivory ridge , did you see the news on the PPA?
No 

RID reported that the navy intends to upgrade all seven ships to the 'Full' fit
Granted, this is going to be dependent on getting the funding for it, but that's the direction they now want to move in
Nice
I heard it was likely, or at least that the light ones would be armed
Sensor wise too or just give weapons to the commissioned/launched lights and then build all the future ones to full standards?
I would assume so
BMD goes brr
Though with Paolo Thaon di Revel in service and Francesco Morosini to commission soon, I'd kind of assume they (the two 'Light' type) will probably not be modified immediately, while the Light+ all are still under various stages of construction
It's also possible that they're just planning on procuring another pair of PPA and selling off the Light's to the Greeks, which is apparently being floated as a deal sweetener for the Greek corvette program.
Much less work to modify the Light+ than the Light anyways, given they already have the C-band radar and the VLS cells installed
now we just need 3 DDX
That would be pretty great. And then replace the Orizzonte at the end of the 2030s with a trio rather than a pair.
Though tbh, I suspect the DDX will stay at 2, and they'll shoot for four when it comes to the Orizzonte replacement
Since that's going to be a joint program, most likely, either leading with the Spanish in tow, or a larger program with the French involved too
Well, at this point I have no idea what Greek participation in the program is going to look at given they're doing their own procurement thing right now for four corvettes, but, aside from that?
Not super clear, but it seems they want procurement to start fairly soon. If you remember that recent outline of future procurement for the MMI that was shown off at the conference in Genoa this past April, they outlined EPC deliveries as starting in 2027 and running until 2034
So it seems like production could start as early as 2024, or perhaps 2025
Looks cute
dome
Kind of a baby FREMM
At least for the Italian ships, they're almost certainly going to be built at Muggiano, which should have plenty of space now that the Qatari order is wrapping up and the last two corvettes are fitting out.
Would italy put a strales on it instead of SR 
Depends on if it needs the Strales mount to use the Strales system
If they use the NA-30S Mk.2 instead of the NA-25X, then the guidance function for DART can be handled entirely by the fire control director rather than needing the on-mount RF antenna
The SR mount looks better but the small radar of the strales looks cool 
Idk, maybe it would still help 
¯_(ツ)_/¯
That would be for a different function. Active decoy vs CIWS system.

yeah because its german

Kinda curious now what each navy thought of the other’s largest battleship
Germany: H-42 design pops up
Japan: Likely burned all archives about their German style designs if they even had one
Actually wait
H-42 was 1942 design right not 1943
It would make sense that the sudden weird jump between H-41 and 42 was because of Yamato visit of Germans
But if not. No clue
The New Ship Design Commission was working on their, uh, 'designs', starting in the latter part of 1942 and running through to 1944
But serious battleship design in Germany was basically done in August 1942 when they finished worked on H-41
H-42 and following were reactions to bigger bomb threats
Could say that Pearl Harbor maybe contributed to that, fearing that the Brits might throw AP shells out of their planes
But obv not serious work, more of a "assume this was thrown at a battleship, what kind of armor would it need?"
Bote
Love the chubby barrels
that is half the fun after all, it's fun to make toys but even more fun to share with the class
iirc Kaiser Wilhelm and Tsar Nicholas would send each other christmas cards, usually with pictures of their newest battleships
Le Triomphant shortly after her completion in 1936. (Philippe Caresse collection)
Quora people saying that long range dispersion patterns of 100 meters is typical and 500 is very large 
lol
i keep saying this but i find it absolutely adorable the soviets just got sent a prototype pershing for little more than to get their thoughts on it
look guys we made this cool thing whatchu think
For ranges 10 or 15 miles out, once ranged in, the circle of probability was probably around 100 yards.
wows moment
Wows players
Fuck you undie
cope
Part of this involved the guns in the turrets were located too close to one another, and when simultaneously fired, would tend to ‘push’ the shells AWAY from one another, and that might mean a dispersion of up to 500 Meters at long range.

500 is still normal for 'long' range
yuh
Most battleships in WW2 could count on a ‘hit ratio’ of about 10% at long range targets
I bet he got this from the Belfast guns thing
Italians actually
iirc the standards had 300 to 400 at range by ww2 time
But about the 12.6” ships for some reason

This issue of ‘dispersion,’ that is the difference between what you aimed at, and where the shells actually landed, could be very pronounced indeed, and the Italians and Japanese were never able to rectify this issue to any appreciable degree.
Ah yes
the japanese?
The Japanese never used those firing delays on Yamato that the USNTMJ commented on as being needlessly complex but effective
Those are just fake news
yuh
Quora is a hive of illiteracy

For Iowa crew, how long does it take for AA crew to reach their mounts. (Let's say an event where air attack is happening while they were sleeping)
Other BBs are fine if you know their times as well

This use of “sigma” hits my alarm bells
The North Caralinas could have had 15 inches of armor and 23 knots speed.
Found Maka
that do be a Maka Moment
I’d think for any battleship it’d be like a minute or less
You forgot the 500mm guns
I think that depends more on the crew than the ship
new people join a server
gun dispersion mentioned
2 of the new people mention Italian shell quality control

list of Bismarck’s armor
4.7-inch armor on the deck

No
bad

This meant close range combat so the German Battleships had to have
Thick armor belts

nah what they needed for close range combat was spikes
and big harpoons so they can actually start boarding
in some timeline, extra chonky nc exists, there were a few 15'' belt nc design studies though the most famous one is one with 14'' guns in 3x3 with 5.25'' deck at 598 feet 32.5k tons (so lots to play with), so they're not wrong
you'd probably like design V, which is 660 feet, 2x4 16'', 15.5'' belt and 6.3'' deck at 27 knots 35k tons
never forget what they took from you (standard studies), I would've happily accepted 20ish knots instead of 21ish for 1.5'' more belt
Remember, spamming that Bismarck flaws video isn’t historically accurate
But it’s accurate enough
And triggers IB flair, which is good
size aside, I just think 14 inchers on a thicc belt NC would be... peculiar for a post-standard designs to say the least.
well designs like that were made before 16'' was allowed
I figure WNT's 16 incher limit was after their finalised design? nvm that's Naval Ordnance stuff shenanigans not WNT.
and that was before even the Mark 5 was planned too?
if you mean the mark 6, it was designed but they weren't sure if it was going to be able to be put on a ship, the 14''/50 mark b was planned for that one
I mean the Colorados' Mark 5.
oh yeah those were around at this time
le funni thing because the Americans just dusted the chonky Mark 3s in Newport or somewhere
well actually the mark 6 was not designed before that one because it's an earlier nc design, the mark 5 was around though
btw, how much is the weight difference between the Mark 2/3s compared to the Mk 5/6s?
nc mark 6 guns are about 30 tons lighter than old mark 2 guns
still a bit chonky.
colorado mark 5 guns are about 10 tons lighter than the old mark 2
but the mark 2 is a very powerful gun
yeh.
I tend to forget that they had 5 caliber difference in length which kinda adds to the Mark 3's chonk
still feels 😩 when they skipped it.
How about we just say that Bismarck's side armor added up to ~660mm?
Just add up the LoS thickness of belt, slope and torpedo bulkhead

320 + 294 + 40 = 654, and then toss in some of the backing layers on the belt?

Could work
Should be 45mm torpedo bulkhead
And I forgot the backing material!
Time to blindly add those 40 or 50mm wood on top
And...16mm of Sbs III?

With 725mm of armor it's no surprise that he withstood all that shellfire
(the wood counts since it's 'spaced armor')
(or 'composite armor')
Wasn't there some wacko who said Bismarck had shape memory alloy as armor?
Maybe on Quora
I haven't seen one, I'd remember something that cringworthy
Okay now I do
Thanks, I hate it
Yeah, the one from Fuckin' Arpeggio
LOL
ah yes just magically repair all damages
just like british bbs in wows
average Quora moment
Meanwhile Bismarck: "No time to fix our stern, just blow it off entirely!"
There's no such thing as a flower class. Ship classes are named after their lead ship not the naming convention or else all 70 American battleships would be called "State Class" Every Cruiser would be called "City Class" and every destroyer "Famous Seaman Class"

i think this is referring to the flowers having a rather non-standard pattern of weaponry and other systems due to the extent of their construction
its still dumb
but ye
The most popular Light Cruiser was the Cleveland Class and the most popular Heavy Cruiser was the Baltimore Class but theyre the same ship except for the fact the light cruiser has more 6 guns while the heavy has fewer 8 guns. Why not just make them all one class or the other? Was it like the Naz...
The Brits didn't have any battleship that could compete with the Bismarck class. That's why they tried to get the Iowa Class to engage and sink it.
As evidenced by the Royal Navy hanging back in May 1941 until February 1943 to fight the Bismarck, after all
Guy is a complete tool.
Had a "nice" argument with him over in the WoWS discord over the Russian hybrid.
was about to say, tools are invaluable, that'll be insulting to them
I think this is the same guy that said the 5"/45 Mark 42 had the same range as a BB gun, etc. etc.
https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/255534-hypothetical-ise-battlecarrier-redesign/ There's also this absolutely genius design, though not relevant to the poster.
So, Ive made a number of previous posts regarding the entire battlecarrier concept, and thought over a number of redesigns to the entire Ise design, though to be fair the Kerasage suffers from a number of the same design issues that the Ises ran into historically; namely how to impliment the conc...
the IJN should have hired him.
fucking hell almost everyone involved in that discussion is dumb
oh my fucking god
do you even top weight bro
Spon, you're wrong. Warspite doesn't exist.
most intelligent kancolle fan
I'm no means an expert mathematics or engineering, but I'm quite confident, that if you did the math and engineering on the proposed design that it would prove me correct, and you wrong; and the design would, indeed be usable and cost effective.
man even the name is already annoying as shit, much less the smug filled answer
This still deserves to be framed and hung up at my wall
I'm no means an expert mathematics or engineering
should have stopped there really
Sirene should still remember the guy whining about Iowa's tiering in WoWS.
Also, had major issue with us discussing anything history related and not just "purely" on "WoWS history".
Why did you make me remember this?
Oi, don't lump me into the same group as that thing
Oh, right. You still play?

uh oh
dodges ban hammer
banned
Gonna dodge like Hermes dodged those four waves of dive bombers
ZG-3 is not real.

But why bother building cruisers at all when Jutland proved they were death traps in the face of Battleships?
🏃♂️
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_destroyer_Vasilefs_Georgios Should be her, not HMS Hermes.
Vasilefs Georgios (Greek: ΒΠ Βασιλεύς Γεώργιος) (King George) was the lead ship of her class of two destroyers built for the Royal Hellenic Navy before the Second World War. Flagship of the navy's Destroyer Flotilla, she participated in the Greco-Italian War in 1940–1941, escorting convoys and unsuccessfully attacking Italian shipping in the Adr...
Mhm
Sirene likes this boat too much.

She's cute
And hard working
And grossly underappreciated by pop history
Tho that may be a plus

phoenix you fool
he cannot be reasoned with
he is may allah forgive me for uttering this phrase
a kancolle fan
this person is like maine they read 1 piece of dubiously factual information and treat it entirely as gospel and use it to come up with more batshit ideas
man I check the chat after being unable to fall asleep
and I get to see the absolute big brains of the WOWs forums

The Germans sunk warspite in Jutland (duh)
100%
Cape Matapan didn't happen either
Yeap. The Italians just got drunk and had a party on their first rate cruisers. They all scuttled themselves.
Please don't kill me phoenix and undie
when the wine armor has you acting unwise
Ah yes, I wonder why the British decided to completely rebuild the ship afterwards.
What else is in here
Also mers el kébir being an equivalent to pearl harbor is
pffffft
Who is suggesting this notion?
Or is it just sarcasm

F-16 Block-70 will have APG-83
Should be significant boost
The APG-80 is the AESA radar on UAE's Block 60 F-16s while the APG-83 is a Scalable radar that is available to both older F-16s (Block 20 to 50) and the current Block 70 F-16. The APG-83's scalable design allows it to be integrated into all F-16s going back to Block 20
wait does that mean Block 60 is stronger than 70
Shh
The reason APG-83 has lower expected performance than the APG-80 here is because it's meant to be retro-fittable to older F-16 blocks that have air-cooling for their radars, which limits the performance you can get out of it. APG-80 only went on the Block 60/62s and those were designed with liquid cooling systems to accommodate it
Whether new production Block 70/72 have better cooling systems and can get more performance out of the same set I don't know 
Ah

This is where that diagram comes from and it explains the assumptions they made while calculating those ranges, by the way: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337985199_On_the_use_of_AESA_Active_Electronically_Scanned_Array_Radar_and_IRST_InfraRed_SearchTrack_System_to_Detect_and_Track_Low_Observable_Threats
Apparently APG-83 comes with some kind of self-contained liquid-cooling system built into the radar set itself, but I'm guessing it's not going to be as good as an airframe that was built with the cooling systems to support these sort of radars from the ground up

@royal kestrel Also sorry for tag but what's wrong with the engine of F-35?
Where it's already getting plans for improvement/upgrade
Pratt & Whitney says upgrades to the existing engine would entail fewer new factors and less risk compared to a new model engine, and a souped-up version would still have an improved core to provide added power, thrust, range and cooling
No idea, sorry

Tweedie said GE’s XA100 engine is able to offer 25% more fuel efficiency than the current F135, which would increase the range of an F-35 by 30%. He also said it could provide 10-20% more thrust, which would lead to 25-40% greater acceleration and twice the thermal management. 
There’s nothing wrong with the F-35’s current engine
They are just working on improved versions
I wonder if they'll end up with a dual-engine option setup like the F-16's AFE program
It’s something to keep in mind that the F135 as a design is over a decade old
Material technology can move fast
But it will mean they have to change all their F35 models with the new engine right. So more F35 they produce with the old engine, more time and money will spend on it for the engine change. Rather than building it with it
I assume 2030 will be the new engine
the F-35s intended to serve until the 2070s
at somepoint its gonna need a engine replacement
You don’t have to change them out it’s just beneficial to do so
The new engine isn’t ready yet so they can’t build with it
new engine from what I've seen
is gonna use new future engine technologies
along with other improvements that aren't gonna be ready for awhile anyways
The new engine is largely an efficiency thing more so then performance anyway
If you want the upgrade it will be available but it’s not required
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_XA101
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_XA100
The General Electric XA100 is an American adaptive cycle engine demonstrator being developed by General Electric (GE) for the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II and form the basis for the propulsion system for the United States Air Force's sixth generation fighter program, the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD).
The three-stream adaptive cycle ...
engines are also intended for the USAFs sixth gens so
regarding engine swapping costs considering the engines are being designed for the F-35
Would be a standard engine swap likely to switch them out for the older ones
@manic latch found the Sevastoplol dockyard photo
The naval shipyard in Sevastopol. What escaped German bombs, was destroyed by the Bolsheviks
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/515583624083406848/850521878329294868/Bessarabia-Ukraine-Crimea-321.png
Can you name what ships are shown?
A 10000-tons cruiser built on the Nikolayev shipyard
Ahhh
2 Chapayev sisters
They were destroyed in Nikolayev
Together with Sovetskaya Ukraina
She is either Ordzhinikidze or Sverdlov
Tho...
Molotov was also build there
Do you know the timing of the picture?
Ah nevermind
These are taken by Axis soldiers aren't they
So it gotta be Chapayev
I think that's Ukraina at the back
Left of the picture
these are from 41-42 after the invasion of Sevastopol
and yeah from german and romanian photographers
found the site: http://www.allworldwars.com/Romanian-and-German-Troops-in-Bessarabia-Ukraine-Crimea-1941-42-Part-I.html
I had originally gotten them from a Russian copy of it whihc has died
Yup
They reached to Sovetskaya Ukraina
Taken pictures of her most

the photos from that site are interesting cause there really wasnt much combat until they hit the larger towns and cities
Yep
At least this picture somewhat shows the scale of Soyuz class 
This should be Submarine S-36
Bombs falling on Sevastopol
good aerial photo, you can see what I am assuming is the dockyards to the left of the smoke
Just in case
Ukraina and 2 Chapayevs were under construction in Nikolayev
While not sure about Sevastopol construction
Likely civilian ships mostly?
Romanian navy secures the coast of the Black Sea (1 & 2)
yeah theres a photo of a few wrecked civilian ships but I have zero idea what actually was in the dockyards
Stop
Yeah Romanians also take fortification on snake island
On 1 December 1942, while the Soviet cruiser Voroshilov together with the destroyer Soobrazitelny were bombarding the island with forty-six 180 mm and fifty-seven 100 mm shells, the cruiser was damaged by Romanian mines, but it managed to return to Poti for repairs under her own power. During the brief bombardment, she struck the radio station, barracks and lighthouse on the island, but failed to inflict significant losses
lol
So our good ol Mechanic was there
Fun fact island belonged to Romania till 1948
Because of this invasion
Krem
Ye

What’s wrong tea?

mine
Soviets put a radar on it the moment Romanians left

Island has very interesting story actually
Despite being so small
The island was sacred to the hero Achilles and had a temple of the hero with a statue inside
Greeks named it "Fidonisi" meaning Snake Island
The D4Y Judy
A pretty good dive bomber design
Until they all got shot down on the Philippines


hi richy
But yes. Easiest way to find who is Lia and who is Shan is by their windows
hullo
Feniks 
Have been in Southern France so haven’t had much time for history
ah yes only used in air shows bcs the amount of speed you will lose is astonishing and is bad
Hmmm, that actually makes me curious. Any good naval museums in Toulon or Marseilles?
but my top gun maverick
ik
nope definitely not
Since she has Thrust vectoring
Toulon naval museum
Marseille I don’t know



No reason why it shouldn’t it has better nose authority than the F-18 and F-16
NASA F-18 High Alpha Research Vehicle (HARV) had Thrust vectoring 
It’s not really dependent on thrust vectoring
Is it more about the airframe?
hm
yeah
I mean just look at the Swede aircraft
That’s the not so benefits of doing that on combat
You go like helicopter speeds of slow
thats uh
does that count as thrust vectoring
kind of the point
well you go hella slow and one random dud that has any angle and a missile lock is gonna kill you immediately
Even after the jet before passed you after you do the manouver
you wouldn't do it if there's multiple guys on your ass, obviously
that’s why they only do it on air shows
It needs to do this

Thrust vectoring F-18 of Nasa
looks fucking horrible, just makes me thing the dude lost control and shit lmao
hm turret placements
thats what I do in project wingwan when I just give um trying to target shit
The AOA limit or
just spin
violently cartwheel
yep
lmao
PSM but easier
Mig-21 
double kulbit because having blood is for assholes
thats not "hurr durr my plane in now screaming at me and I dont feel well"
yep
anyway now that I'm done with my workout something I discovered last night that I want to post here from the CBO that's helpful in visualizing military spending
https://www.cbo.gov/force-structure-tool
This tool allows the user to see the effects on the Department of Defense’s total operation and support costs and on the size of the military of adding or subtracting tanks, ships, aircraft, and other units.
it's a little thing that shows you how much you would either save or cost by cutting or increasing certain elements of the US military
for example here's what cutting most of the A-10 squadron and the entire LCS fleet would look like
Not enough orange
Also how do you even do that
Didn't Pentagon just got 58 billion $ bonus for its budget? Why cut things 
cause A-10s fucking suck
May outlive F-22 
its just a visualization I found after a discussion with my friends

since the thing about military spending either way
you need to look at what you're either cutting or boosting
Arms Race 
My dude certain events show we may not need such a bloated army
yeah I wouldn't take that take away


hoo boy
does cobra manoeuvre in live combat
gets wiped out by an AMRAAM from 120km away
but that's the most I'd talk about here
We should give that money to nasa
Even monkeys use weapons time to time
Please
what is NASA gonna do with it?
Space Rock
overspend on another program for 20 years then cancel it
And stuff for the moon mission
Ye useless

I mean if your talking moon program
I don't really see why NASA needs that ballpark of money per year
Hey don't be sad tho. Military satellites are getting more and more popular
When did the military industrial complex really become such a major force
like giving NASA 2-6 billion dollars a year more makes a lot more sense than dumping them with a 100% budget increase they won't know what to do with
Cain killed Able.
If Able had a weapon Cain wouldn't dare
have the world banks data on US military spending to GDP over the last 60 years
Cold war 
As a superpower. You should get every opportunity you can
I'm gonna be honest
the actual involvement of Nazi scientists
outside of like Wernher von Braun
outside
is pretty minimal on the US
I do agree captured V-2s did get the US a good jump start regarding space
Also here's something spicy I learned
tho actual nazi scientists didn't really attribute much outside of Wernher von Braun in many aspects
The fall of USSR just delayed space travel by more than 2 decades
During the time we wanted to take Cuba there were plans to fake a terrorist attack
sad Ik
To get public support
yeah CIA being the CIA

300+ failed assassination attempts
Bay of Pigs invasion 
Don't even do a overview of Cia shit in the cold war
On Castro
god if there's anyone to chase after with budget cuts its the intelligence community
It really makes you hate America
well now it’s a more of a mess
I mean
your kinda just forgetting
what everyone else was doing at the time

The coolest duds for me in medieval ages
But we were taught that we did democracy in the cold war if taught at all
American exceptionalism died indeed 
here's the thing
Didn't they do literal genocide
the CIA's proposal for false flag terrorist attacks were rejected for multiple reasons
And what was a real early version of what the nazis wanted to do
well maybe if less Christians were crazy we would be more eham peaceful

Is this what created Bush did 9/11 thingy
No
basically if less fanatics on both sides
I mean the entire lead up to 9/11 was the FBI and CIA horribly fucking up
and failing to pursue multiple warning signs and intelligence lines

Afghanistan doesn't have economical oil deposits
Wait so why did we stay for decades

the US would of pulled out in the early 2010s if Iraq didn't immediately erupt into civil war after we pulled out there
well the only thing I know about Afghanistan is m o u n t a i n s
Anyway back to the middle ages since thatsnot a controversial subject
Soviets: Fail after 10 years
US: Sure we can do bette-
we repeated the same mistakes the Soviets made tbh
Do you think the vikings could have actually made a sustainable settlement in vinland
they did travel north instead for funy
Now I gotta sleep
If they didn't accidentally poison the natives because they were lactose intolerant
He who learns everything yet knows nothing
I don't know why the fuck we thought it was a smart idea to tell the ANA to abandon the country side and important roads to defend the cities



The Afghanistan Papers are a set of interviews relating to the US war in Afghanistan prepared by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) and published by The Washington Post in 2019 following a Freedom of Information Act request. The documents reveal that high-ranking officials generally held the opinion that the war...
"In one of the interviews, which were conducted through the agency's Lessons Learned Program, an official estimated that 40% of U.S. aid to Afghanistan since 2001 ended up in the pockets of corrupt officials, warlords, criminals and insurgents."

F
we failed to reach out to the rural parts of afghanistan and to afghanistan traditional power structures
along with the failure to make a adequate fighting force and security services for the country
What was the reason French didn't join 

Yeah
Restaurant 🥖
ANA's officer corps was heavily corrupt
we failed to provide benefits for ANA soldiers
and then had the entire combat effectiveness of the ANA weighing down on the Afghan army commandos
the only confident part of the ANA with actual good officers
that then fell apart when they weren't getting western airsupport
is the us war in afghanistan too recent for this channel
Doubt anyone will touch it again
i mean
I mean
these issues draw back
to the early 20s
I'm not really discussing the politics around the pull out
us pulled out in august 2021
Oct 7, 2001 – Aug 30, 2021. Did take a long time yes 



🤝 
hmm












all of

















