#history
1 messages · Page 219 of 1
With a text like that?
Lmao
Unless you posted it in the previous thread and not the current
what a nice and likeable person
Dissapointment he will get if image turns out fake


At least it's an improvement from 1939?


eh just give it a decade you're gonna slingshot past literally every navy but the USN anyway
No Soyuz tho 
Soyuz is in our hearts
yeah but the coolest looking DDGs by a wide margin

the water is made of the blood of her enemies
immensely based
*replaces the trips with quads*

Fren
Richelieu in the blood pool

Ok but consider
I think stealth fucked up the modern designs. Example from type 55
but they look so cool thooo
Bow tanking meta smh
Average Jean Bart viewer
Littorio
Marat

'Fujian' CSG
Type 055 DDGs
Type 052DL DDGs
Type 054B Frigates
New nuclear Subs
Carrier-based J-35 Fighters
Z-20 Helis
K-600 AWACS
Wait. Isn't that
Kinda low ammount of destroyers
what if we put moskits on jean bart though
British CSG looking ass
Oi
mfw doesn't recognize a double bottom
a 1.12 meter thick bottom
Those aren't thick plates
imagine
WIDE PLATE
No one's gonna call that ship top heavy
'It's ballast'

If soviet ships get thick plates at the back of their turrets, JB can have a thick butt
triple bottoms...
that's for people who wear bullet proof vests to the grocery store
coincidentally
America: that's normal ye
idk the exact function in the Iowa-class, but in Italian battleships it tended to get used as automatic balancing channels
wait
apparently JB had a basketball hoop on the rear turret plate
which turret? No.II 380mm?
Gotta keep gymming on those ships
the B turret ye
doin a dunk from the top of the ss
lol
What's the plate writing on barbette
Device
"youre mome gay"
Too far away to read
Usually those kinds of plates are there to commemorate actions the ship has taken part in
Do you have a date for this? And which ship specifically?
oooh oooh i know this one it's nevada
close but no cigar
Fuso with no guns
Hmm, distance makes it hard to tell which member of the class it is
Don't think so 
as seen from JB
Ahh, knowing it was a post-war photo would have helped a bit XD

this is fake btw

he does fan art of AL wows ships
Share the news on on AL lore. They will want to see this 
not in that chat
can you send like an actual link and not a screenshot
Then I will do it myself
北宅弎,小透明画手/板绘训练中/p站id16792743/群号207074519(申请请注明)
谢谢关注~;北宅弎的主页、动态、视频、专栏、频道、收藏、订阅等。哔哩哔哩Bilibili,你感兴趣的视频都在B站。

literally just scroll down once you kick the link
although i will say
he might just be added to the yostar team for art
because he does really good stuff
trolled
his stuff is good though
dishwasher started with fan art so
he could join along
The soviet battleship is garbage, holy fuck that face is cursed
and his coloring is sub par
the black and white art is fine
It's Vladivostok 
Lenin 
well he improved a lot when he did schieffen
i appreciate going for the special camo color scheme
Project 1047 
Day 2038 of flying turrets
dutch sorcery

Also Undef. Chriss says it was him who posted on alg
Listen I only ever drew real ships before that so drawing rigging was hard (especially when the file is so large you wait a second after each brush)
i like his vladivostok so

hope not
probably
superships would be broken

power level is arbitrary in AL

Super PR
Concept can work in a grind way
Like making all PR5 ships dev 30
Only then supership of pr5 unlocks
That said, why do those fan kansen never include Dutch waifus 
For all the times I told him
Mattzo still uses wrong armor values for Bismarck

shall I tell him?
Soyuz lily 
Russian naval forums be like:
- one guy that talks like a dude in the 1900s
- one authoritatian guy (usually boris/dimitri) telling everyone to re-take high school
- one guy misunderstanding something but starting a rant about the philosophy of wording and semantics
- a guy with direct access to the russian archives who posts everything, resolving the situation
- someone who rants about western imperialism
- царский
lmao
It's best when submarine vs carrier simps fight

Soviets big man 💪
Italians puny man
here's the semantics guy


blower fan - ventilatore aspiratore an
exhaust fan - ventilatore di estrazione
and there is even a blower fan - ventilatore di mandata
wait hang on thats just ALO #history
so true bestie
Wish I filled Soyuz like that
oy
I wouldn't make a meme about it if it weren't true
I've seen worse but don't remember where
I think it was in a forum post about Marat or smth
marat doesnt deserve this
tfw the russians have a T3 BB but the italians dont get the original dreadnought design

I actually didn’t really like his schlieffen
You’d think as a BC she’d have less rigging tbh
His Venezia was nice though
His what
i dont think he did a venezia
You know
The one with the pizza compartment
not him
Wasn’t that the same guy
no
well it's not on his fucking pixiv
Ohh that’s another guy
well tis the design of most IB ships now

Especially emden


Plen
and here we see the airplanis aeronauticus, being groomed by symbiotic lifeforms to remove parasites and dead skin
One day they will be replaced by laser cleaners
I think this thing had 1 problem
Except the cost
Issues with pilot oxygen
Even blamed a F-22 crash for oxygen deprived pilot
"Root cause of the problem was due to a mix of shortcomings in the hardware of the pilot's life support gear"
seems like a relatively easy fix
I think it was fixed by adding automatic backup oxygen supply systems in 2013
yeh
just add an extra pilot in the back in case the first one dies
Hah double seat fifth gen? I think only China has such prototype irrc
With the J-20
Would loved to see twin seat F-22
No, you add the extra pilot so top gun 3 can be made
From what I heard Topgun didn't used F-35 for that reason
It doesn't have twin seats and dogfights would look stupid with her
That, and the helmets are opaque
And navy wants the cockpit classified
Plus f35 job isn’t even to dogfight
It’s like telling a trained sniper to get into a boxing ring for rocky iii
Exactly. Movie would be boring
B-2 could have done their job in 5 minutes
Not even that
Like
They have tomahawk barrage destroy the enemy airfield
Why not just
Aim it at the uranium thingy
Yeah..
who cares i got to see an F-14 and an Su-57 angrily gesticulate at each other
immensely based
It's not Su-57
It's a Fifth generation fighter
Sukhoi doesn't exist
To be serious tho. Why call them fifth gen fighter
First movie at least called enemy Migs
Copyright i guess
presumably weird licensing jank and because of [CURRENT CONFLICT]
I guess that yeah
either way it's cool ad fuck
Funniest scene in the whole film is that Mach 10 part though
Yeah he would die irl with a crash like that
I’m pretty sure Tom cruise should have been sent to Guantanamo for crashing that 6826382 trillion dollar wunderwaffe
i think thats the point
its literally a tool to say right off the bat
"this movie is stupid"
"dont take it seriously"\

only background characters die to stuff like that
Project was literally about the get cancelled for drones
So plane was going to rust in a corner anyway
to be fair with the amount of like
I have to say though, unrealistic as it may be the canyon scene is a masterpiece
obscenely stupid stunts tom cruise has done over his life
you could probably fire him directly out of one of iowa's guns and he'd probably somehow survive
I have not seen this movie
Oh shit sry
[surprising everyone]
I assumed you would’ve already
Idc about spoilers
in anything
just thought it was funny everyone has seen this movie but me
You aren't true American wtf

the best way i can describe it is that like
it has a retired navy brick shoot down an su-57 and it doesn't piss me off

because it's the coolest shit ever
[SU-57 slander]
fuck off spon
First kill is understandable
Second kill is pilot decides to suicide suddenly
Third kill was...marvel hero timing
I’m disappointed that Tom cruise didn’t eject out the cockpit then take down the su57 by shooting in the jet exhaust with a desert eagle
Or the Hind
tom cruiser shouldve started doing air combos to daze the hind like its mgr
Same timing as the heli getting shot down
Or that guy who passed out waking up in the last few seconds
Shouldn’t the jet have an auto pull up system
Like
Iirc Stuka had that system
cod moment where he ejects from his vehicle, takes out a sniper rifle from the nth dimension, snipes the other pilot with a headshot while his parachute opens, then glides back into his own plane via autopilot
That’s a rendezook
That's BF
thats battlefield doe
my favourite part of top gun 2 was when maverick talked about how xenu brought all of humanity to earth on the DC-8
Cod doesn’t even have jets in multiplayer
Wat
sorry got my generic shooters mixed up
It’s ok
tom cruise scientologist joke
Hollywood actor tries not to join a batshit religion or do drugs [literally impossible]
I would have used tf2 but that's something that would canonly happen in tf2 so
my favorite part was when the guy piloting the hind channeled the power of the lifestream to let the gunner cast [Meteor] on tom cruise
Personally, I think Tom cruise crashing his landing gear-less tomcat into nimitz’s shipgirl tits and instantly fucking dying is my fav part
this wikipedia article is such a trip holy fuck
I do need to get around to watching it, not a big movie watcher but it sounds fun and is vehicle related
Ye
She movie star now 
Would love to see Topgun 3 giving J-20 attention as enemy this time
what about the scene where tom cruise had to flee to japan and got into a fist fight with kazuma kiryu
and then they became best friends and hijacked a foxhound in vladivostok to shoot down the north korean nukes
i hope to god there is never a top gun 3
Well uh
You have any idea the budget/profit topgun 2 made
Either China wouldn’t like it or US wouldn’t like it
why
top gun 2 was an exceptional reboot/sequel but a third would be just awful
they closed the narrative so well
I thought they hijacked the retrofitted KC Yamato with triple 510mm guns
Well J-20 would be destroyed. Could make China market angry. It's a big market
my man they made the og top gun in the middle of the 80s
And
if the us didnt care about migs then i dont exactly think they're gonna care about J-20s now
If you have a movie with j-20 China will have to be a bad guy
Brilliant maka
TG 2 wasnt against russia so
We’re promoting you

the f35s and j20s must fight the aliens
regardless this discussion is stupid
That was removed from 2
No it wasn’t
just go the usual cod/battlefield route and just say it's some rogue dipshits
Wait it wasn’t?
get the actual government on board for shitting on them too
I saw it
Was it just the trailer then?
Yep
good
Oh fuck yea
you can blow up chinese and russian shit and wank everyone at the same time
have the cake and eat it too
won’t the Mexicans find it offensive though

There’s a cowboys vs aliens joke to be made here somewhere
look I know those of the triple alliance are saved from a man who became the sun for the current age but aliens might be a strong term
true unde
Exactly
Imagine the potential of US if they spend %20 of their gdp to military instead
Zumwalt would suddenly look cheap
every single normal person: wow high tech military stuff is cool
some person on twitter: did you know, cringe?
WHy NaSa LowEr BuDgET
We must give space force 4619747152 morbillion robux for rods from god
Can you fund 7 Morbillion $ for FB-22 concept
Such wasted opportunity
all you have to do to get money for anything is release a nevada skin
it goes straight from my bank account to you

turbo dorito
maka crowdfunding a mod to retexture every ship as Nevada
Ye like F-16XL
'guys we've had low event profits, what should we do'
'release a washington skin'
'what will that do, this is an hms event?'
I hate my gummy bear addiction
I love gummies
I’m at a restaurant rn

That's the problem
mmm welches
So this place has 2 Wi-Fi’s
Restaurant staff and restaurant guest
I ask a guy for password to the latter and he says
“Yeah we don’t give out passwords for that wifi bc it slows it down”
Then why do you have that wifi in the first place
see the event was so profitable that the current pass doesn't even lock an eu skin behind it
they didn't need my help
I think it's the first time too
they turned my hype for wash skin directly into profit and are sated for now
Ah found it
Indiana Jones is archaeology propaganda
pretty bote
A theater had the airforce
She's missing a barrel 
"Who's gonna tell them?"



why the gallimimus class so pretty
Weakest ships ever
some of the best looking tiny cls

eries are pog
They do look cute
Old graph from 2018. But did Leo really did better than Thales?
incredibly capable DEs before DEs were a thing
Small botes with big personalities
just lil baby cuties, with big bite
He's had the updated version out for a while now
It's the one with the blue
pretty indepth
also really shows how well protected sodak and rich are when you add those numbers up
ahead of the pack and fight for like 1 inch here or there in protection
Yes but
I think in general Thales is responsible for much less in terms of diversity of products

Yeah...
Tennessee?
What if 
rewards with a baguette

she'll be fine
isn't submission better than extinction?
you just triggered my fight or flight response
unfortunately for you, I sacrificed flight long ago for additional fight capability
Madlad didn't even removed her name
Cry that you used inferior Bremerton
you should have a nice dinner with me
if only brimp's design was nearly as dope as a sick spooky angel
Hotdogs?
yes

shaped like a friend
I will take the dog, you take the best french bread
Indeed
we will combine them
And we will share among all the friends here
true
also honestly this is really cute even if kinda questionable
Colonize northern africa
declare war on the british
invade Moscow
Questionable is not a word in the late 1800s
you have my swords
and rifles

re-annex New Orleans
Not a bad idea but
New orleans is happy as it is rn
And I don’t want to disturb the tour guides in the french quarter

we should share new orleans
yeah im not sure about new orleans being happy atm
given protests about
certain things
that and apparently there were four different shootings last night
Superioria
omegalul
turns out when everyone is out doing stuff that stuff happens
should we tell him about the Brussels protests
sleep friend
..were there fatalities during the brussels protests?
No
when you try to punch down and end up hitting yourself in the knee
when you try to inject politics into a discussion about protesting, when the exact opposite side is also protesting
exactly

long
Lol
Followers of jesus
tfw you set sail and there's like eighty guys sprinting across the water to chase you down
'I booked a room don't you run away from me'
mmm, chimken
I ate a little before work but still hungry since it's been a while
the rough life
farewell friend
I will do my best
Nice ass
But have you really seen a nice ass?
Go on silver
oh my
when napoleon 3 seized power and proclaimed himself as the emperor, how did the public view him?
did the public want another bonaparte in power?
look at the size of that butt
look at that hole

You've got a hole in your l-
I just watched a video on the USS Barb, and uh... when are we getting the first UR submarine?
The only ~~sub ~~ ship to sink a f***ing train.
I need this story now.
They were making illegal alcohol while staying at the Royal Hawaiian Hotel during shore leave.
The still exploded, wrecking the toilet bowl and flooding the whole bathroom.
no

No persecution, but likely a hefty bill.
That's not really the same thing. They were also the only US servicemen to invade the Japanese mainland
Making hooch is standard for grunts
Was more a joke, but I think there are a lot of wild stories for subs in general. Was it barb's torpedo that broached and wrecked the train?
It wasn't a torpedo, they sent a crew out to the tracks and used a homemade pressure sensor on a scuttling charge. It sent the train 200 feet into the air before falling into the ocean.
They also started modern submarine warfare when they decided to ram other boats, and had a rocket launcher installed so they could do shore bombardments.
Ah, it was bowfin.
Once in a good position, the Captain ordered three torpedoes shot at the moored vessels in the landing. The first torpedo overshot and exploded on the beach. The second torpedo hit a vessel on the port side and completely tore it apart. The third torpedo was not observed due to a loss of depth control. Bowfin quickly moved into the second planned position to fire three more torpedoes. Each one ran true to its calculated course and hit their targets. Debris was thrown all over and high into the air from the explosions. The target was moored at the pier, and the pier itself, the crane and a bus were destroyed from the attack. CDR Corbus had planned on hitting the pier and everything on it, and to his excitement, that was exactly what happened! An examination of Bowfin’s battleflag shows a crane, a bus and a pier, and this the story behind it.
Blew up a bus with a torpedo.
Nice.
I still maintain that giving flight lessons to a train is better, but that's not bad.
and if we really want UR, personally would like none other than Venturer
But we know Manjuu thinks British subs don't exist
There is also another incident with Bergall, crippled after fucking with Myoko and had to travel 2000 miles home without diving
I was looking at pics of Joffre's design earlier
I like how it looks different from its contemporaries like the essexes and illustriouses
a lot more rounded in places
You mean the flight deck?
It's actually not that rare, Lexington's flight deck was pretty round before her big refits
same for Furious and Hermes
Oops, missed the word contemporary. Then yes.
fantastic content
Joffre's is also more offset from the drawings I've seen
Remember, Taihou's offset too
I recall a different graphic he post well after that which still had the wrong values, lemme dig
Oh Discord you stupid...
Replying to this
Zis one
Ah
Does someone have any historic key data on Musashi that could be used on a potential design of hers? So far I have that she thick and was at some point appointed as the flagship of the combined fleet and was trained as such and was also constantly being upgraded in equipment unlike her sister and of course her demise in the battle of Leyte gulf. Anything else?
I can offer some details on her machinery
Is it more than the simple data on her equipment?
Seems like nice info but I doubt it would have any relevancy in drawing a design of hers
would a detailed assessment of the damage she took during Leyte be more relevant?
give her an inferiority complex and imposter syndrome
Maybe.
Seems like a nice idea tbh
page 21 in Adobe, page 16 if you look at the paper

And that is strictly false, both vessels constantly received a stream of upgrades throughout their years; Yamato received even more anti aircraft guns than Musashi during her final operation at Ten-Go.
almost done now
added the salvo clock, crane supports and the correct mast arrangement
Richie, I has Dinosaur chemistry question
Where did all the extra oxygen back in the day come from?
plants
i.e. Large amounts of water and carbondioxide were converted into plants (carbonhydroxides) and oxygen?
yes
It's heavily debated because the absolute amount of oxygen must be higher back then
it's also a result of the geology of the time
Where the "excess" oxygen went is still not exactly clear
easiest explanation is calcium carbonate, but still
Drach is primary source for information
CaCO3 -> CaO + CO2
CO2 -> C + O2

so increased calcination and photosynthesis
Time to update wikis with Drach
this must've been a very gradual process though
otherwise you create a greenhouse effect
Drach is decent when dealing with operational history
but, damn, I almost always facepalm everytime he talk about engineering
While you were spending your time discussing your favourite waifu and cooming over their art,
I studied the Drydock; Breathed in it; Every single piece of opinion, integrated into my skills.
And now the youtube comments beckons me, and you dare to oppose?
It makes for an easy time arguing with them tho, because you'll always know where they got their nonsense from
Honestly, it's a bit of a headache now that everyone takes his words as gospel
And then I can have the appropriate primary source as counter
My secondary source beats your primary because 2 > 1
Problem: You're arguing on Wikipedia
Now get out of here with your original research and sources that need "interpreting"
Just write your own book. 
Also haven't shared it here yet, but his justification for saying that Bismarck had vulnerable cables (because no armor around the ones running to the spotting top, not even splinterproofing) is false
The cables running to the forward tower position shall be protected to the same degree as on the Battleships D and E within a dedicated splinter-proof tunnel which is to run to the uppermost level of the tower. The tunnel is to be made out of 12mm thick Wh n/A material.
you'd need to find a publisher though
War diaries? Or from Koop or someone else?
Be like those model guys and just put it on a weird form website
tea, that makes you as credible as the combat reformers
Right now my Publisher is secretprojects

Building instructions for Bismarcl
It's a start tho
Any RM inventory number?
Wiki doesn't care
Especially if you're actually citing your shit in the open
Wikipedia's no primary source policy was partly to counter dishonest first party, which is very common in biographies, politics, or even scientific papers
On the other hand, it does create a very frustrating situation when the information is obvious
I uploaded the full thing to Kingpin's library
Bauvorschriften für die Schiffskörper [...]
Something like that
I'll take a look. Thanks.
Sure, but then people will start coming around and questioning your book, whether it is peer reviewed, etc.
You don't want a reputation as bad as David Irving's 

Idk who that is either
🍐
David John Cawdell Irving (born 24 March 1938) is an English author and Holocaust denier who has written on the military and political history of World War II, with a focus on Nazi Germany. His works include The Destruction of Dresden (1963), Hitler's War (1977), Churchill's War (1987) and Goebbels: Mastermind of the Third Reich (1996). In his ...
Lots of revisionist work
Looks like a nazi
Irwin
Irwin is a G so it's a honest mistake
Among other things:
-
He's responsible for almost all of the myths about Dresden
-
He claimed Hitler was actually the biggest friend the Jews had in Europe and that he actively attempted to stop the Holocaust
Telling Lies about Hitler was Evans explaining how he came to the conclusions he did, refuting Irving's arguments and explaining how the historian should act and work.
A transcript of the trial is available online and its really good reading.
But I'll give you Evan's closing remarks:
"Irving has done all of these things from the very beginning of his career. Not one of his books, speeches or articles, not one paragraph, not one sentence in any of them, can be taken on trust as an accurate representation of its historical subject. All of them are completely worthless as history, because Irving cannot be trusted anywhere, in any of them, to give a reliable account of what he is talking or writing about.
It may seem an absurd semantic dispute to deny the appellation of 'historian' to someone who has written two dozen books or more about historical subjects. But if we mean by historian someone who is concerned to discover the truth about the past, and to give as accurate a representation of it as possible, then Irving is not a historian. Those in the know, indeed, are accustomed to avoid the term altogether when referring to him and use some kind of circumlocution such as 'historical writer' instead.
Irving is essentially an ideologue who uses history for his own political purposes; he is not primarily concerned with discovering and interpreting what happened in the past, he is concerned merely to give a selective and tendentious account of it in order to further his own ideological ends in the present.
The true historian's primary concern, however, is with the past. That is why, in the end, Irving is not a historian."
So yeah; Evans went for the throat by not only saying he wasn't a historian but also a Nazi
I mean, didn't someone create a whole networks of publishing company just to publish some shit
laughs in my Uni having multiple Irving books
his trial

Sirene
You should quote games like WarThunder and World of Warships as secondary sources
Tea...
Hunter is a big word for someone that hugs them
Hit
Please understand due to work I only use people's last names so I 100% ignored the David and only read Irwing, and the closest thing I know of to that soley off name is Steve Irwin and his son

Just remember to get your alarms blaring if the name "Irving" is used
Also cause I'm a weeb
Wait you actually remembered Irwin has a son?
Yes
Most people only care about his daughter
Not sure if you remember, tea
I worked like one of the biggest zoos in the world, kinda a funny role model I guess
There's a guy going on saying Irving's work is acceptable and that everyone else's work can be discarded because they're brainwashed
Also he has a daughter?
has a roon pfp, of course
Sliver if they enter this channel I'm hitting them with trolling

I do not play holocaust games
Mostly because she's hot and people gotta simp
Understandable
tea, the rules are written bright as day now, so there shouldn't be any concern
I mean, it sometimes fun to see how a particular issue is viewed through a completely different viewpoint
and if anything...I don't think the whole channel is going to greet them politely if such takes do happen
OH WAIT FUCK HIT I DO KNOW HER
But Bindi has also historically been way more involved in Australia zoo than Rob, although she's taken a step out of the limelight since she got married
She's had a few TV shows
She ran a game show back in the day as well
Kinda like Ninja Warrior but with kids
Ard, it goes deeper than that
I'll just leave this here...
https://imgur.com/a/iKSi3Fk and this absolute trainwreck.
Rob... literally never hear about Rob these days, or even back in the day
He makes an occasional appearance on morning TV and shit ig

I've seen a few tabloids on him recently
Something about turning another Zoo keeper down very nicely
Lmao guess he's been busy lately
Thanks facebook
I think since Bindi got married, Rob's kinda taken over pr for the zoo
Last time I saw him he did that standard thing of brining a snake into morning TV and giving Kochie a heart attack

35 knots??
And 29 knot Yammy
Also, why run away
just call Mitscher to do his thing
This comment made by the Essex gang 
IDK man, I've been desensitized by internet that every time I stumble upon such guy I'll simply assume them just trolling. The shallow and confrontational way of engagement feels way too obvious.
That's what most of us thought.
I think we'd be willing to listen if a well-constructed argument is thrown out, inaccurate or different notwithstanding.
Ah yes, the naval tactic of playing chicken until your enemy runs out of fuel and gets stranded at sea
the enemy must be a bunch of 4 year olds
it's fine, just tell these babies to come and help you, amirite
Average Roon fan
I love how armchairers always assume perfect scouting as if fog of war doesn't exist; or think ship combat is two ships sailing in a straight line one running and one chasing.
dude just fire at 40km out
Well... It used to be like that, age of sail, maybe

Shannon vs Chesapeake is still a classic
but yeah sailing distance is an interesting one
Except now everyone sails with an escort
like ah yes let me just sail my ship in battle for
uh
1,000 hours
until the other guy runs out of gas
wrecked pleb
the true one on one
Technically possible, if you need it, might as well have a tanker top you off
Actually, one point Ive been wondering
matters in a campaign, not a one on one
Imagine assuming 100% machinery reliability and/or that their machinery will break down before yours
If I recall, the Brits couldnt do parallel refuelling during WW2
I think it was only the US, actually?
They did from the bow/stern right
I seem to recall that too
Why such case?
yeah
Hey if that is a valid strategy then Bisko can enjoy wrecking Yamato as well
I really love Soviet BB concept as defensive BBs. Likely inspired heavily from Italians. They don't have great ranges since their fuel storage is small. Because they wouldn't sail too far or too long away from ports
Three month solo operation and 12,500nm cruising range go
Yamato no fuel would be awkward
Also Silver
Germans also used side by side refueling
I had a pic somewhere of them doing that, lemme dig
I dont recall which navies specifically had it
I only remember the Brits were stupefied the US could do that
Here we go, Nürnberg refuelling a Type 1923 torpedoboat
Tbf anyone who ever handle a ship would know that controlling lateral position is much easier than longitudinal
But the Germans also used in-line refuelling a fair bit, so maybe it's only certain combinations doing the side by side
Drach doesn't know about Isaac Sweers and ZH-1 
I wonder if Edinburgh could have refueled Gremyashchy. So Gremyashchy wouldn't be forced to leave her for lack of fuel
Would coal fired large warships have been a viable option for Italy in WW2?
Where Richie
The first refueling of destroyers was conducted on May 10 – in heavy seas – from the battleships and carriers. The fuel-line astern method proved slow going. The Royal Navy was at this point nowhere near as proficient at underway replenishment as their US counterparts.
It’s something the officers of USS Saratoga noted – and relayed back to Admiral King.
From armouredcarriers
1944
My guess is that the RN had enough locations enough around the world that underway replenishment was hardly necessary
Compared to the US dragging across the vast, empty Pacific
The performance of Richelieu during this sortie was particularly impressive in one respect. Despite refuelling two destroyers at the halfway point of the outward passage and a third during the return, she entered Trincomalee with half her fuel remaining, whereas the British Queen Elizabeth and Valiant were reduced to 20 per cent of their capacity. The British were also impressed with Richelieu’s ability to conduct alongside replenishment, American-style, which was significantly faster than the traditional over-the-stern method employed by the British ships.
considering rich chomps gas, yeh
British BBs and fuel capacity, name a more iconic duo
british bbs and trials at almost no capacity
A Soviet Sverdlov class cruiser refuels a Riga class ocean escort during the 1960s.

Question
Why Sherman had Stabilizer
While most other tanks of same time didnt
because US tank doctrine was, and is, based upon fire and maneuver to the extreme
because US tank doctrine was, and is, based
Fixed
the MG spam existed because an MG makes up for the lacking accuracy while on the move with the amount of shit being thrown
It can be simply why wouldn't you put a stabilizer if
- you have the technology
- you can afford it
- it does not impede functionality
- it does not go against doctrine/tactics
- it does not strain the logistic

Ah yes, 550mm belt
Makes sense
Lot of captured tigers
But not enough 88mm shells for them
So if you put your own gun. You will solve the ammo
That's one beefy minelayer
A sequence from a film shot in the early 1920s (the archival source says the film was completed in 1924) aboard the Italian battleship Giulio Cesare, showing her 305 mm turrets.
#RegiaMarina #navalguns #ContediCavourclass #battleships
Bote
Negli anni Venti del Novecento la Regia Marina aveva 4 unità di questo tipo: il Conte di Cavour, il Giulio Cesare, l' Andrea Doria e il Duilio; queste appartenevano rispettivamente alla classe
Luce archive is like deepweb for Italian warship
May found treasures there
stabilizer tech wasn't really matured at all yet
the sherman one is kind of a vague suggestion of stabilization
kind of?
Trials of the armament yielded interesting results. The hull machine gun had no sights, as per American tradition. The assistant driver fired at a 2 by 2 meter target from 100 meters, aiming with tracers and observing through his periscope. 86 bullets hit the target out of 100. The coaxial machine gun scored 85 hits out of 100 in the same conditions. Trials of the 75 mm M3 gun showed that the peak rate of fire is 20 RPM. The main gun was also fired on the move, with and without the stabilizer. Thanks to the stabilizer and good crew placement, the gunner hit his target 47% of the time with a rate of fire of 3.87 RPM. With the stabilizer turned on, the rate of fire increased to 5.17 RPM and the accuracy rose to 87%. The hydraulic turret traverse mechanism was also rated highly.
Relieving the gunner from the need to re-acquire the targets after every shoot is already big enough improvement
speed isn't indicated, but it can be assumed that when operating within the limits, then the stabilizer must be pretty damn stable
there's some weird wording there that makes me think they're talking about the stabilized gunsight and the stabilizer for the gun separately
but not really specifying
i was wondering how the fuck it was more accurate than the m60s stabilizer tests until i realized it was at
as stabilized sights were pretty normal
1/20th of the range
yeah okay that makes sense
afaik it works pretty well when you're rolling around at infantry speed it just kind of eats shit faster than that
which is still better than anyone else is gonna be doing at the time
87% at a 2x2m target at 100 meters still means you could be on the move in combat and successfully pulp some jugend with a panzerfaust and more bravery than brains
with HE
yeap
at pretty decent range
AGF in Europe had an obsession with 70 rounds
and just didnt get proper two plane stabilizers until like the 70s
which T25 w/ stabilizer didn't achieve
ohh
and things went from there
alright, there you go
just put a little hinge on the shells to let them fold in half
for better stowage
🧠
Stabilizing the train would also need pretty large (or fast) servomotor, which quite hard to come by at that time
without compromising the above mentioned ammo capacity that is
interestingly from the same article
In the spring of 1943 it also turned out that the T-34's gun couldn't penetrate the side of the Tiger tank, while the 75 mm M3 gun could penetrate it from 400-650 meters.
which I guess isn't too surprising when the projectile for the T-34 is a blunt (read: flat) nosed projectile with a windscreen smacking into a pretty thick plate
so if it can't force a plug it just
totally fails
i like that it doesnt specify which gun or the ammo used by either
How about APCR 
1943, the thick armor of the new German Tiger and Panther tanks had rendered the F-34 gun obsolete, and experiments were conducted to find a replacement. The better-penetrating 57 mm ZiS-2 high velocity antitank gun was installed on some T-34/57 tanks, but the smaller-bored gun couldn't fire an adequate high explosive round for general use
In the end, the F-34 was replaced by the D-5T and ZiS-S-53 85 mm calibre guns on the T-34-85 tank
I can't post images ffs
Turret and upper hull side:
45 mm model 1937 gun with a subcaliber shot from 200 meters.
45 mm model 1942 gun with a subcaliber shot from 400 meters.
57 mm gun with an armour piercing shell from 1000 meters.
76 mm gun with a subcaliber shot from 400 meters.
76 mm AA gun with an armour piercing shell from 300 meters.
85 mm AA gun with an armour piercing shell from 1500 meters.
122 mm gun with an armour piercing shell from over 1500 meters.

400 meters with APCR to M61 APCBC's/M72 AP's 450-600
I wonder about that 150m jump between 
not bad, not bad
Why is that
jank early soviet APCR
Bitch I am speaking of m61
Why it's between 450-600
Side, shell type M-72, distance 625 m. Result: penetration, minor spalling on entrance and exit.
Side: shell type M-72, distance 625 m. Result: same as above.
Turret: shell type M-61, distance 650 m. Result: dent 50 mm deep, 140 mm diameter. Penetration of the turret platform.
Turret: shell type M-61, distance 650. Result: dent 40mm deep, 120mm diameter.
Side: shell type M-61, distance 650. Result: Penetration. Shell knocked out a cork-like section of armour.
Side: shell type M-61, distance 650. Result: same as above.```
because that's the range of ranges recorded and apparently the author just listed that rather than the max range
even though both M72 AP and M61 APCBC did the same
which is kind of 

the 76mm APCR doing the same as the 45mm APCR is pretty bruh
though apparently HE-derping the Tiger was doctrinally noted
Front:
76 mm gun with a subcaliber shot from point-blank range.
85 mm AA gun with an armour piercing shell from 1000 meters.
122 mm gun with an armour piercing shell from 1500 meters.
76 and higher HE-fragmentation shells can break through the roof.
absolutely blessed

of course this also seems to be a case of a Tiger where the armor is actually performing properly
The Tiger had thicker all-around armour than any other tank when it first saw large scale usage in early 1943. Did the Allies have what it takes to defeat this tank?
Sources and further reading
http://www.tankarchives.ca/2014/08/tigers-in-tunisia.html
http://www.tankarchives.ca/2013/04/british-guns-vs-german-tanks.html
https://www.tankarc...
kind of annoyed that he only relayed it via video
but meh
tl;dw being
57mm (6-pdr) against the test tiger scored a pen against the ~80mm armor at a range where only ~63mm of British armor was penetrated
basically German armor quality was going down the shitter long before the years people think
just less consistently
simple
still shorter than the L/100


okay so pretty much the current tech in the game is up to the 1974's


























