#history
1 messages · Page 184 of 1
Have you seen German political polls?
.....
I will niether confirm nor deny that info
Well let's just say they're gonna be putting the H man's DNA to good use
I mean the ss used arab soldiers but I bet that is not the angle you shooting for
Im talking about this
I know what you talking about
Anyways Germany is gonna channel their inner... Prussia... eventually
Wait....funny mustache man hated the prussia
Prussia literally doesn’t exist anymore
Prussian culture and militarism are gone, dead and buried
The Allies made sure of that
Ok France
No I actually haven't studied Prussia stuff me and @timber linden were talking about German political trends
Infact @timber linden was the one who brought up Bismarck
Wait this Prussia stuff just made me think, @spring briar did you learn about the Franco-Prussian war in school?
He's not talking about you
He isnt?
He's talking about the guy you were talking with
Do we know that for sure
Wait @desert agate do you hate Prussia or something?
Franco Prussian war poisoned the minds of german high command for world War i. Germans almost got away with the "we can out mobilize the enemy ".
Also me personally, I think I was more of a France and Britain kid when I was first getting into history
I thought poisoned them in the sense of "We can use rail networks to beat France quickly"
Found at the recent Aquino Tank Weekend.
Find Matsimus here: https://www.youtube.com/@UCFWjEwhX6cSAKBQ28pufG3w
Merchandise (The carousel below seems dodgy)
https://the-chieftains-retail-hatch.creator-spring.com/
Public facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/TheChieftainArmor
Financial donations:
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/The_Chieftai...
Basically the same thing, germans only had two real things in thier favor in Franco. Better rail and better arty.
I just realized that I should have put this upside-down
¿ƃuᴉɥʇǝɯos ɹo ɐᴉssnɹԀ ǝʇɐɥ noʎ op @desert agate
You're not funny
Prussian militarism started 2 of the deadliest wars in global history, including the number 1 deadliest
Prussia was dismantled as a political and cultural entity by the Allies in the aftermath of WW2, who recognised that Prussian militarism was only going to create revanchism in Germany, which could not be allowed
German high command in WW1 was already poisoned
The Prussian heritage of that force created a high command which was delusional enough to believe that land meant victory
The final German spring offensive in 1918 proves just how much the Prussian ideas of how to fight and win wars, were so completely inflexible and created nearly 2 million casualties for nothing
The Germans deluded themselves and the environment that created those delusions in 1914 and in 1918 were fostered in the Prussian War College
Spring offensive was a good final gambit, stormtrooper tatics plus all the troops they freed up in the east. Just plans fell apart with a failure of follow up. Would Germany had won the war, no because the commonwealth had more meat than the germans had ammo.
I am sure there have been some chinese civil wars that outranked those wars
During the siege of chinese city 60,000 where ate.....sixth time that happened
Stormtrooper tactics very quickly found themselves ineffective against Allied defences. In fact the only Allied force that used trench raiding tactics effectively was the AIF, along with the CIF to a lesser extent
Tactics however do not change the disastrous planning that went into the Spring Offensive
Hindenburg, Ludendorff and the other German commanders genuinely believed that all they had to do was take enough land and the Allies would collapse, regardless of the long term strategic necessity of defending that land or its short term importance to the troops defending it
This is why despite creating 2 million casualties, the number of strategic locations the Germans actually took in their great push was minimal to the point where the Allies simply withdrew and then used the now overextended German lines to springboard their own Hundred Days offensive later in the year
The Hundred Days Offensive was in fact a far better operation, it was strategic, it was precise, each battle was fought not for the sake of merely taking land but to take land that the Germans cared about
Unlike the Germans, the Allies learned their lessons from the disastrous offensives at the Somme and Ypres and understood their consequences while German operational planning between 1915 and 1918 was basically unchanged
It was... really not
As hit said
The Stormtroopers made breakthrough yeah but they quickly lost cohesion and headway due to exhaustment and outrunning their support elements
Plus the four operations did not have clear strategic goals other than 'either get Paris or try to kill as many as possible'
The result is, when the Allies inevitably recovered, they quickly get pushed back
I mean someone noted the relative lack of corruption in West Germany might have been a remnant of it, so hard to say
Something like ~2 million German people died while evacuating Eastern Europe during WW2 but they can't all have been Prussian...
Militarism to such a level is pretty stupid anyway
Though looking at how countries that "unified" in the late 1800s went (Germany, Italy, heck maybe Japan) maybe it was a trend of the times.
Its the CEF not the CIF
Also fresh troops from the AEF arrived. Despite their inexperience they were belligerent and numerous
Cyprus, 1950s–60s. An island divided between Greek Cypriots, Turkish Cypriots, and the British Empire becomes the battleground for one of the Cold War’s most explosive regional crises.
What begins as a struggle for independence soon spirals into a three-way conflict of nationalism, colonial strategy, and clashing identities — with Archbish...
Hypothetically…how granular could one get if one were to Balkanize Mainland West Taiwan?
Based on modern politics, or historical factors?
Political, geographical, historical and ethnic factors.
There should be more “Of China”s than Chinese Brown Water Naval assets.
In this hypothetical scenario.
Look at the old governorships from the historical period. Example. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Kingdoms#/media/File:Three_Kingdoms_timelapse.gif
The Three Kingdoms of Cao Wei, Shu Han, and Eastern Wu dominated China from AD 220 to 280 following the end of the Han dynasty. This period was preceded by the Eastern Han dynasty and followed by the Western Jin dynasty. Academically, the periodisation begins with the establishment of Cao Wei in 220 and ends with the conquest of Wu by Jin in 280...
Neato
Gives you some idea of the natural breakdowns.
The rest would be internal politics if there were somehow a breakdown of the central authority, so ... look at the PLA/PAP/Militia/CMC structures.
Tbh China isn't like Europe so the division isn't going to stick, albeit it does fall apart spectacularly and takes literal decades to get back together. Last one we saw was 1911~1949 I guess.
Also look at the language maps..
Linguistic diversity is fairly related to ethnogroup diversity (even if say, all the speakers are still Han)
Given a splintering, you're more likely to either follow your same-language-group folks or remnant command structures (or really, both)
Even some Mandarin dialects aren't mutually intelligible
It's kind of inevitable given the size of China.
I mean it's like french and italian...
I guess you can like... do what the French did, what the Germans did, and REALLY PUSH for standardization?
Well yeah. That's what the CCP did with going with simplified and mandarin.
Actually the ROC, too.
It's kind of what you do to put a country together
Like Japan also did in the Meiji era and the Kagoshima dialect just... died
Even though it was a straight up different language
....actually kind of unfortunate
But anyway, any sort of balkanization is going to be due to a loss of central authority, with the breakdowns lines being geography, language, and remnant command authorities.
I don't think massive border changes or breakups of countries are ever going to happen in the next few hundred years, everything's too standardized now
At least not without world ending catastrophes. That said.. USSR breakup, Yugo breakup, etc, did happen within the last century.
And you can see something like Iraq or Syria doing a breakup based on ethno lines.
Tbh the USSR did break up, but the territories they lost were mostly relatively recent stuff
Russia didn't split down Siberia.
For the same reasons I just cannot for the life of me imagine like, the US being split down the middle again or Bavaria breaking away from Germany, etc.
Anywhere with relatively strong ethnic subgroups and weak central governence can have some chance.
To be fair ethnic nationalism can pop up out of frigging nowhere
Well a lot of those bonds are preexisting.
On the other hand successful independence movements have
- the backing of another country
- extreme chaos on part of the ruling country
E.g. post-WW2 independence movements only succeeded because the countries they were seeking independence from were exhausted by WW2.
Look at, say, Uganda. Buganda, in fact, is a traditional african kingdom that is already somewhat self governing. While it's currently fully integrated, it might not always be the case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buganda
Buganda is a Bantu kingdom within Uganda. The kingdom of the Baganda people, Buganda is the largest of the traditional kingdoms in present-day East Africa, consisting of Uganda's Central Region, including the Ugandan capital Kampala. The 14 million Baganda (singular Muganda; often referred to simply by the root word and adjective, Ganda) make up...
It's also entirely possible for people that speak the same language/same ethnicity to not want to live in the same country out of political reasons (North/South Korea)
First example that came to mind but there are other situations like that. Ex, Kurdistan.
E.g. if it's a long established dictatorship then someone trying to achieve democracy might realize seeking to straight up separate a part of it will be easier to do, etc
To be fair, Taiwan and the mainland didn't speak the same language until recently 🙂
Early RoC Taiwan had a whole bunch of riots that usually started with an RoC soldier listening to someone speaking taiwanese hokkien/Japanese and beating him up for being a "traitor".
Yup
Damn
Pedantry
Wait now that I think about it, why did you guys call your expeditionary force an "imperial force"
Because Australia did not have a standing proper standing (only about 3'000 professional soldiers) army prior to WW1 due to a variety of cultural and political reasons. The defence of Australia was to be left to the militias and no army was to be sent overseas
The 1st and 2nd AIFs were established as separate military organisations to the militias, and the AIF and AMF continued to exist in both wars until 1944
It wasn't a case of the existing army sending an expedition overseas, it was an entirely new army being formed
America was looking at the disaster unfold, and considered intervention (Taiwan at this stage was on paper Japanese territory occupied by the NRA, ultimate fate to be decided at the peace conference), but then the Chinese nationalists started losing the civil war and they NEEDED Taiwan.
It's a VERY unique place.
Hainan was also held, but... well... Mao's sailboat spam proved too much
If the NRA won the 2nd Civil War, things wouldnt have come to this
Eeeh... hard to say. There's not a lot of documents on this but the few that does exist seems to suggest the KMT would have gone down a non-aligned policy
Had they won on the mainland
So, essentially a third front to the cold war.
(If they're strong enough to be influential)
They'd probably try to further the US's "anti colonial" policy, try to kick the Brits out of Hong Kong etc while trying to "retake" their "lost territories"
The issue being a lot of these "lost territories" are straight up sovereign nations or someone else's holdings...
I'm almost certain they'd have a hand in the Vietnam War if it even happens in this scenario.
I mean China literally translates to center nation.
Yea
It's an issue of how annoying they get
😛 Very.
7000 years of history bruh and all that stuff.
There was definitely some concern that, the US and allies were defeating Japan only for China to take its place as an annoying regional hegemon...
Perhaps a bit too much worry, but China does have the most people in the world.
And everyone else in the region minus the guys that are losing a world war were colonies with the sole exception of Thailand
Whom the US didn't even consider fully sovereign
Amusing how India isn't talked about in the same breath.
I mean Churchill wanted to keep India, so...
I mean as far as population is concerned. That said, In/Pk is .. fun.
The Brits and Chinese having a spat at the Burma campaign is quite funny
Literally sabotaging a war effort because WE WANT INDIA vs WESTERN IMPERIALISTS BAD
...don't you guys have the Japanese on your doorstep?
Althistory where the Brits somehow managed an allied, unified india..
...WW2 has to not happen iirc
Brits were broke after the war so they just, abandoned India in a way
Oh it'd would have had to start way earlier than that.. with, say, the East India Company not being a bunch of wankers.
and India following a trajectory closer to Canada
I do wonder if decolonization would have been a much lengthier affair if everyone didn't exhaust themselves or lose their colonies as a direct result of losing WW2 (Italy, Japan, Germany didn't have colonies in the traditional sense after WW1).
So you guys were like America pre-War of 1812
Small standing army but a lot of regional militias who are kinda unprofessional
Interesting
Officially yes but unofficially it may be considered somewhat suspicious how quickly many of the AMFs officers transferred to the AIF, and just how much equipment happened to be lying around in AMF warehouses, far more than the AMF would ever reasonably use but seemingly plenty enough to rapidly raise 5 divisions for an overseas expeditionary force
One might suspect that somebody had intentionally set up the AMF to maintain all of the equipment and at least some of the institutional knowledge that a far larger standing army would need in the event of an actual conflict
Canada had something similar but different. There was a militia for centuries (the first ones were formed all the way back in the 1500s in New France) with compulsory militia becoming a thing in 1669. The British also did similar militia stuff too. Speaking of, after the British conquered New France the militia system remained kinda the same, compulsory service was still a thing and in case of war, conscript people en masse or just call out for volunteers. Even when compulsory service was abolished in 1904 (though officers stuck around until late 1921), there were still enough volunteers for WW1, the Russian Civil War, WW2, the Korean War, and so on, with conscription only being needed twice and the majority of soldiers being volunteers (73%-80% of the 1.1 Million Canadians in military service were volunteers). Frankly in a lot cases Canadians seek action elsewhere. 25,000 to 40,000 Canadians volunteered to fight in Vietnam, of which 160ish died, 1,500 to 2,000 Canadians volunteered to fight in the Spanish Civil War of which 750 died. And Canadians are one of the largest foreign contingents in the "current events" of which 25 have died so far. (All of the above would make for great movies and mini series)
But WW1 was the start where it was seen that the Canadian military would need to become more professional in the long term
Wait this also makes me wonder, what about wars prior like the Boer Wars?
Each of the individual colonies operated their own semi-professional militaries
5 of them even operated their own Navies, Victoria’s being the most powerful
All of the colonies sent troops to fight in the 2nd Boer War where they fought under British command, however while the troops were away fighting, in 1901 Australia federated, creating the Commonwealth that we know today
The colonial troops sent to fight in South Africa therefore went to fight as soldiers of their colonies, New South Welshmen, Queenslanders, Western Australians, etc and returned as Australians
The Australian Light Horse was developed from the colonies seeking to create actual professional armed forces, as opposed to the traditional militias the colonies had operated for decades
The Light Horse was developed on broadly similar grounds with collaboration between the colonies on equipment and traditions but obviously paid for by each colony
The Light Horse would later prove themselves as some of Australia’s greatest soldiers in WW1, being actual professional soldiers rather than the citizen soldiers of the AIF, participating in the charge of the Light Horse at Beersheba, one of the last decisive cavalry charges in history
A little bit of sporting history to change things up
This Friday is day 1 of The Ashes, one of, if not the oldest professional sporting rivalies in world history
The cricket rivalry between Australia and England goes back to the earliest days of an Australian identity in the early 19th century, but it came into its own when the Australian team toured England in the summer of 1882
It was one of the first times in cricketing history that England had been beaten on home turf and it was a very close run match, as England needed only 10 runs to win
But after achieving just 2 runs, Englands final batsman was bowled and so the legend of the Ashes was born, as a satirical obituary declared that the ashes of English cricket would be brought to Australia
The rivalry would continue as in the next year Englands captain declared that he would recover those ashes, and England would win that series
The Ashes has been played biannualy for over 120 years, excepting gaps for the wars and it continues in 3 days time in Perth
🎉🐭 Happy Mickey Mouse Day! Today is Mickey's 97th birthday. 🐭🎉
Did you know Disney artists created 1,200+ military insignias during WWII? Here’s one for Marine Scout Bombing Squadron 245 featuring Mickey in action! 💥👊
#MickeyMouse #NavalHistory
OTD 84 years ago HMAS Sydney II was lost with all hands
Australia’s most decorated warship went down off the Western Australian coast after a close range duel with a German raider causing the greatest loss of life in the RANs history
They have no grave but the cruel sea,
No flowers lay at their head,
A rusting hulk is their tombstone,
Afast on the ocean bed.
They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning,
We will remember them'.
Lest we forget
Man the Bu Ren Jia and Tiefutu type armors are ridiculously cool
It's funny how the Son deployed the former precisely to stop Khitan and Xia cavalry charges, only for the Jurchens to deploy the Tiefutu instead and rolled the Song all the way to the south
And that doesn't get to how utterly horrible the Song's military capabilities was
In 979 Emperor T’ai-tsung, acting against the advice of several highranking military commanders, made plans to ride the tide of national prestige that had followed the Sung’s conquest of the Northern Han. He planned to recover with a single stroke the Yen (modernHo-pei) and Y¨un (modern Shansi) regions ceded to the Liao by the Later Chin (936–47) earlier in the century. The Sung forces, exhausted after their battles with the Northern Han, mounted a long siege of the walled city of Yen-ching (Yu-chou, modern Peking), but failed to take the city. The Liao brought in reserve forces at the last stage of the siege and decisively defeated the Sung armies, and T’ai-tsung himself was struck by two arrows during the ensuing light. After this T’ai-tsung did not dare to undertake any military expeditions under his personal command; instead he remained deep within his palace and continuously issued impractical commands and compelled his frontline commanders to implement them.
In 986 the Sung mounted a new three-pronged northern offensive against the Liao, but every segment of it was crushed by the Liao defence and the valiant general Yang Yeh was killed in battle. After this the Sung did not launch any more attacks against the Liao and instead implemented only passive defensive measures; troops were deployed to defend cities along the border areas, and in the plains moats were dug and rice paddies constructed in an effort to hinder any possible cavalry attack by the Liao. This passive defense strategy was continued from the reign of T’ai-tsung until the end of the dynasty.
During the military crisis at the end of the Northern Sung, Teng Su (1091–1132) observed that the Jurchen army enjoyed a number of advantages over the Sung. The Jurchen were better able to control their troops because “their written communications are brief and fast; ours are prolix and slow.” Chu Hsi also frequently criticized the delays and bottlenecks that plagued Sung administration and bemoaned the contemporary excess of “empty paperwork.” He once saw a Military Affairs Commission dossier from the T’ai-tsu era and praised the “speed and simplicity” of its documentary process. His own age, he lamented, required three levels of administration and a chief councilor’s approval to appoint a minor functionary to hold a lamp during the emperor’s visits to the ancestral temple
Like, it's something of a miracle just how BAD they were
The Song basically only ever succeeded in military expansions during the pacification of the Southern Tang states, when they go up against the mobile Xia and Liao troops they keep getting trounced regularly
And afterwards they mostly stick to static, ponderous defenses relying on defensive complex and walled cities
And let me be clear, the Song had significant numbers and technological advantages
They're stupidly rich even by Chinese dynastic standards
Their armies totalled over a million men at their peak with top of the line weapons like fire lances, zhanmadaos and repeating crossbows plus crude cannons
They're just horrifically bad at grasping the actual strategizing part
I mean, it is by design
I know it's by design, they're absolutely afraid of military coup since Taizu did the same
First Song Emperor came to power through military coup so he know very well how much of threat uncheck military leader can do
And they also wanted to avoid the Jiedushis from happening again
To their credit, it worked, the Song almost never got any military disruption internally
Just so happens it also makes them hilariously impotent at tackling external threats
Yeah, that system allowed Tang to rapidly expand but without an overwhelmingly strong Central Imperial Army like the Tang did, Song cannot do it.
Honestly it's simply more because of the quality of the generals themselves, the central Song army at its peak was a mighty 600k formation, the other 400k is provincial armies
But when you have career bureaucrats holding the reigns down to the lowest level of command, yeaaah
You have to look at this from another way, Song came very close to winning in this campaign. They underestimate the loyalty of Northern Han Chinese to the Liao and therefore faced stiffer resistance and Song Force lack the cavalry for recce and pitch field battle but even Liao found it hard to break Song Infantry square once they are in formation to support each other.
And that's precisely what I'm saying, effective weapons hampered by questionable leadership
That's not even going into the internal corruptions that often caused the weapons to disappear when needed
I am about to say corruption isn't that bad but then I remember how bad it really were 
Top 10 in the whole of Chinese history probably, and that's saying something, all thanks to the insane bureaucratic system they put in place
Yeah but Late Song military defeats are actually hilarious had it not involve so many death civilians
To be fair, after the horrendous beatings they got from the Jurchens, the Song shaped up
Holding off the Mongols for 40 years was no mean feat
I mean to be fair a lot of Chinese armies didn't do well when sent on expeditions. It's not just the Song, but the Ming and Qing seems to have had similar issues.
Mind you, the reason for this success bc Southern Tang State quite literally are what Southern Song later became. Southern Tang had a very good chance to not only defend themselves but move north as well but their Emperor too chicken shit to even think of doing so.
Nah, early Ming and Qing Army are very competent
Early Ming is even good enough to beat the Mongol at strategic mobility
Neither were to the level of the Song yeah
Yeah pretty much, and that's with Taizu in command, since Taizu actually was pretty good
Song also lack a lot of traditional Horse breeding area. The collapsed of Old Jiedushi system see the rise of Western Xia which blocked Song access to not only the Silk Road but the only horse breeding ground that isn't Northern China.
Hence their focus on incredibly heavily armored infantry like the Burenjia
Plus a plethora of ranged weapons
Only place left that realistically can product quality Horse is Daili and their production will never enough to maintain a cavalry corp for Song.
The Song was one of those dynasties that's actually not much of a hegemon of the region
Their overall diplomatic reach was minimal, they couldn't project beyond the Hexi Corridor or the 16 Prefectures
And throughout their existence they had to contend with actual rivals they couldn't get rid of
Oh yeah and the Viet also managed to successfully beat the Song several times
Conversely their trading fleets went EVERYWHERE
The Song loved trade and kept encouraging it for revenue
Which can tell you how much profitable it was. A small part of it was spend on the military was already enough to maintain such a large force well equiped, meanwhile the rest turn Song into one of the most prosper period in Chine history
Although ultimately the military budget then went so high Song economy started straining and they had to come up with shit like paper money to keep up
But still the Song was so prosperous they basically blundered into a form of Proto-Capitalism
It is funny bc Song also have a very good Arsenal system that churned out weapon and black powder weapon reliably but they can never translate it into battlefield success via attritional warfare.
Not only that, their Powerful River fleet wasn't able to break the blockade around Xiangyang
It's like a minmax build that goes hard on eco and production but neglects military skills deliberately because they don't like the war aspect
I suppose Song is peak Potential Military™️
But the Song also mix it with some really aggressive diplomacy that tends to end with military disasters
This is stupidly accurate
They had the potential to have absolutely tough industrial army, but with an atrophied military officer class it's not happening
I feel being called out 
We've all been there LMAO
Tbf, it turn out sometimes really good when I have reserve to immediately replace a catastrophic defeat
On an unrelated note, I was wondering why the US Navy in the 50s didn't all switch to J47s after the disasters that were the Westinghouse jets, but realised those were already in use in the FJ-2 Furies
Also TIL the F/A-18 Hornet (not the later Super Hornets) was a lighter aircraft than the F-4 Phantom
That is like saying a honda civic is lighter than an 18 wheeler
Yes it was a light fighter shockingly enough
The light part of light fighter would generally imply that the plane is light
Tbh a lot of premodern states accomplish it
Song, the Romans, Bengal
Usually what happens is that it gets invaded by another country and everything goes to shit
Well yeah, the YF-17 was a competitor to the YF-16 in the lightweight fighter competition and was basically in the same lineage as the F-5.
Definitely not Romans or Bengal in terms of the degree of how the Song encouraged the Middle class and maritime trade with other regions, or how it thoroughly industrialized its output
Song steel production at several points basically outproduced the entire world and wouldn't be matched until the 19th century
And uniquely, this Song-style economy was actually continued under the Yuan, it was ironically the very Han Ming dynasty that put an end to the interests of international commerce
The Romans and Bengalis didn't achieve Song levels of success yes, but I'm just mentioning there are several pre modern states that did reach a phase of "proto industrialization" before going to shit
The thing with Britain and why it eventually achieved industrialization, well it's a frigging island and it's quite tough to send an invasion force over water
Still definitely not the Romans, given their disinterest in anything not relating to practical items
Tbh there's a reason I don't take Song supremacy that seriously
It was emphasized in Chinese scholarship as "proof" that China could have achieved industrialization on their own without foreign influence, without exactly a lot of evidence
But muh expeditions to north america...
I mean the Vikings also reached North America
Kidding. Retcon scholarship for sure.
That's the thing, the Song, despite their many advances, wasn't supreme, it was a deeply flawed society sacrificing many aspects to get what they had. They had serious military rivals that never managed to kill, they basically created the world's first paper based inflation, they inflated the Jinshi system so much there's chronic lack of job openings, and their bureaucracy is so mind shittingly slow the Emperors themselves complained about it
Like it was one of the few Chinese dynasties that actually got multiple peer enemies on equal terms for one
Just test better and you'll get a job m'kay.
Not even guaranteed, there's a waiting time of seven years even when you get first rank on the exams
And the Song only pay you after the fourth year
Sarcasm is hard to convey in text...
Did I mention senior officials also had means to reserve job openings for their cousins and shit on important days like the Emperor's birthday?
And that the quota increases by each rank?
So yeah, welcome to the Song
I mean the confucian legalist ideals and all that, meeting reality.
I'm actually kind of convinced the imperial examinations were more trouble than worth for most Chinese dynasties
Joseon Korea had the same system. Modern scholarship is kind of torn, because some people acknowledge its value to the dynasty but others think it made society devote too much resources to ONE means of striking it big
We just call it the college entrance exam these days lol.
They did their purpose
It's mainly to separate the ruling civilian class from the military
And for that it worked wonderfully
Every important position in Song society was ruled not by military officers, but scholar-officials
And hypothetically meritocratic promotion.
very hypothetical
Remember what I said about Song weapons having a nasty habit of not actually being in the place they're supposed to be in times of crisis?
Something something the local prefect sold them off for extra income
Yup.
Tbf can't say I blame them, the core income for bureaucrats was legit not that good
Even Ministers dabbled on real estate and trade businesses on the side
Court intrigue discussions are incomplete without talking about eunuchs ... Heh
Remarkably they only started being a problem in the Song towards the end of the Northern Dynasty
Before that the Imperial Chancellor and the Censorate had enough clout to just bore eunuchs to death with inane paper procedures
History question (if I can ask)
How come Shia Islam never spread outside of the Middle East and South Asia Indonesia has some 1M Shias but not a lot compared to Pakistan
Actually a side effects of the Song being that much of an obsessed maniac for procedures and legal signatures is that the Song court was remarkably stable aa far as Chinese courts go
They did
Several Muslim dynasties outside of those regions were Shia
Bahmanids, Zayids, hell even Hulagu turned Shia
For Indonesia it's more because the first Muslim preachers in Java were Sunnis, hence the negligible Shia presence, simple as that
Fair but what makes Shias unappealing in recent history to SEA or most of SS Africa? The only recent conversion I can think that was successful was in Nigeria outside its basically negligible
Sectarian violence probably had something to do with it, most Sunni communities in premodern times were violently hateful of Shia Muslims and vice versa after all
If you're talking recently though, I don't think most religions are in general getting a lot of new converts these days anyway so kind of a moot point
Anyway back to Shia, you kind have to remember that the Shia became majority in Iran mostly because the Savafids violently suppressed Sunni elements there for about 3 centuries, and the Ottomans were doing the same thing but the opposite for places like Egypt
Shia being a smaller branch already, and you probably can already see why it has limited reach without the ability to do forced converts and suppression over long periods of time
Er, well considering Ali as the only legitimate of the Khulafaurasyidin for the Shia, yeah pretty much
Also different Sunni branches was already persecuting each other over different Ulama rulings so
When the fundamental difference is already that big theologically you bet your ass there's gonna be blood
The whole Mahdi business is a factor too for Twelvers
Sunni generally doesn't buy in Mahdi stuff while afaik Twelvers Shia very much made him a central pillar
But don't take my Sunni word for it, lots of Sunni basically have incorporated the concept of Mahdi on their worldview these days
Iirc the Shia idea of Mahdi is that he is alive and in hiding
As far as I'm aware yeah, and that he'll come down during the Apocalypse to slay Dajjal
Or at least that's my understanding, could be different for Shia
Of course that didn't stop a bunch of Mahdis from popping up around the world throughout history
I wouldn't say stable. Infighting was one of the biggest reason leading to the fall of Xiangyang and later defection of the Lu Family to the Mongol.
Ironically, Song attempts to suppress the military somehow lead to few noble family have major influence in the Army. They may still under heavy restriction of the bureaucrats but the fact that major Chinese stronghold and forts are under command of people sharing the same family name meant that if the Emperor did something stupid like trying to prosecute them then you will see mass defection bc how Chinese Law works in punish family members for simply sharing the same blood
Yeah but Song still have military families that served generations in the Army. The bureaucrats have absolute control in the interior but it tend to be private family Armies that fought in the frontier.
Better than the kind of shenanigans experienced in the Han or hell, even Qing courts still
But they were still very much pushed to the fringes and had fairly limited opportunities
Military position in general was not high and not given a lot of the benefits gained from climbing the civil ladder
Yeah, Song Emperor are notorious for being incompetent buffoon at best of time and even downright treasonous coward at worst but rarely did palace coup happen
This is Shenzong slander and I do no stand for it smh
My boy tried his best, just so happens while he's a great reformer he's a dogshit military man
Doesn't help the fact that unlike previous dynasty, civil servant copy paste battle strategy from history book instead of you know, use a map
Nah, I am not criticize Shenzong, more like Gaozong
Ok him I completely agree, Gaozong was a shitass
I am not like other who think Yue Fei should be allowed free reign to move north bc frankly he still lack the cavalry corp to succeed in such endeavor but Gaozong killing him is a major blunder
"That wasn't on the test!"
Yue Fei mentioned !
Check Out Delete Me: https://joindeleteme.com/Electrician
20% Off Code: Electrician
Merch Store & ALL Other Links:
https://thefatelectrician.com/
Seriously EVERYTHING is on my website
Other channels:
The...
The 101st Airborne assaults Carentan and repels the counterattack at Hill 30
Watch the Latvian Legion documentary on patreon: https://www.patreon.com/wwiiepicbattles
Odysee: https://odysee.com/$/invite/@ww2_epicbattles:d
History Videos Revived: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOzBTdG3EY9apdSCN2DPdWA
Visit our Teespring Shop: https://teespring....
The assault along the German perimeter and the fall of Cherbourg.
If you'd like to support our work you can donate on patreon and unlock additional content: https://www.patreon.com/wwiiepicbattles
You can also make one-time donations on: https://contribee.com/ww2epicbattles
Visit our Teespring Shop: https://teespring.com/stores/world-war-ii-epic...
Jump inside the A-10A Thunderbolt II - the OG 'Hawg from before it was cool
Filmed at the New England Air Museum: https://neam.org/
Check out my books
- Ju 87 Stuka - http://stukabook.com
- STG-44 Assault Platoon - http://sturmzug.com
- German Panzer Company 1941 - http://www.hdv470-7.com/
- Achtung Panzer? Zur Panzerwaffe der Wehrmacht - http...
Play Hearts of Iron IV for free on Steam from 20th - 24th Nov: https://play.heartsofiron.com/F2P
Buy a Poster! https://www.historigraph.media/store
Get Early Access to Videos: https://www.patreon.com/historigraph
It’s hard to imagine two more different classes of naval vessels than aircraft carriers and submarines. But during the second wor...
How often were AA guns good at picking off unshielded structures and men in naval battles?
I recently watched Greyhound and saw this scene of the Fletcher being harassed by a U-boat's AA gun, penning the bridge
almost never because those ranges rarely happen
notable exceptions include the bar room brawls called the Naval Battles of Guadalcanal
and multiple actual escort vs submarine engagements
some of which involved ramming and repelling boarders
Ah, ty!
Reminds me of Laffey and Hiei
Laffey I believe used their AA guns on Hiei to clear her deck of sailors since she was pretty much too close for normal guns and torpedoes if memory serves correctly
I've seen this one before
Honestly an utter miracle Hiei's secondaries just didn't evaporate Laffey, considering they were LITERALLY at chair throwing range
that would require the director for those essentially blind casemate guns to be able to aim at Laffey
I mean when you're at a range where even blind shots can probably hit each other
Mussolini grindset, simply build a mosque in Rome
Iirc Laffey is also the ship that survived a concentrated Kamikaze barrage off Okinawa. In a battle between the angriest Japanese men and the angriest DD... the destroyer won
Something like 80 kamikazes thrown at it
Bit of a dumb question, but the P-class (Adalbert and Heinrich), are, in essence, just bigger Deutschlands, right?
it makes sense now
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sword_of_Islam_(Mussolini)
Yea the Axis obsession with Islam is actually hilarious
You even had a dude in Japan called Okawa Shumei who was obsessed with the Quran
Not the same ship - Laffey 459 immediately ate a 14" shell after her knife fight and subsequently finished off by Teruzuki and Yukikaze.
it was political despite that
Oof, wrong ship
like Nazi Germany and Japan had Muslim allies and soliders so there had to appeal somehow (Bosniaks, Indonesians, some Indians and Arabs)
Hiei was being targetted heavily in the chaotic engagement of Guadalcanal - her massive searchlight towers were a primary target
Shumei Okawa might have been genuinely interested in the stuff
He's the guy with the... dubious honor of being one of the very few Japanese civilians tried for war crimes. He didn't do anything really so wasn't executed but he translated the Quran into Japanese during his time in jail, and said translation is still used to this day
In an environment that is unpredictable and under stress, there really isn't much the casemates could do.
he was an exception tbf
i doubt the axis would be amazing to muslims if they won (Japan was proving they werent when they occupied SEA and china)
I mean they can't win anyway so that's kind of out of the question
just saying a hypothetical 😭
Yea
It kind of depends on which Axis country but all of them wanted a totalitarian state in the end with Germany being the most extreme, so it's hard to imagine any minority population would have uhh... been particularly well off
WW2 in the end really benefited nobody
I guess it did create a massive anti war sentiment
And people started taking human rights more seriously
Though to be honest a global war wasn't needed for any of this
The two world wars were such a bonkers event I honestly think the gods were just bored one day and decided what would happen if the world had a free for all. Twice.
I mean I'm divided. Without WW2, Korean independence would either not happen or be delayed by decades.
Like if you look at the rate of "Japanification" that was happening in Korea over just 10~20 years (Japan before like 1920 had no real plan for what to do with Korea) it's actually scary. Korea and Japan shares a script (at the time at least) and the language is actually quite compatible (at least a lot more than say, French and Berber), so policies to erode Korea's national identity, once implemented was absolutely breakneck pace
If that had continued say, into the 1960s there simply wouldn't be a Korea left.
Nazi German allies
Bosniaks
Pick one buddy
You do know there were Bosniaks in the Nazi army and involved in thr Ustase?
It's a Google search away
Axis involvement with Muslim nations was basically just an effort to inspire a 2nd Arab revolt in Egypt
Which is what I said
Except all the times the Ustace fought and massacred Muslims
I’ve actually met a few Ustace and their descendants and their views on Muslims do not bear repeating in this channel
Still doesn't change what I said and I said there were Bosniaks involved not that most were supportive
There were also Indians in the german (SS) forces for much the same (geopolitical) reasons.
Also ...
Cossacks, Latvians, Estonians, Ukranians, Finns, Norweigans ... Gee, I wonder if there was a reason. Maybe 'enemy of my (USSR) enemy' is sorta my friend (for now)...
They ramped up on the foreign recruitment the moment they saw the Allied meat grinder coming on their way
Some was it was long before (well, 1941) like the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Legion from indian independence movement folks.
The Indian Legion (German: Indische Legion), officially the Free India Legion (German: Legion Freies Indien) or 950th (Indian) Infantry Regiment (German: Infanterie-Regiment 950 (indisches)), was a military unit raised during the Second World War initially as part of the German Army and later the Waffen-SS from August 1944. Intended to serve as ...
I know, just sayin, they walked back a lot on the whole racial purity thing when the writings on the wall started appearing like they're a guest at Belshazzar's feast
It still funny to me the length of mental gymnastics Himmler went through just to justify Serbs and Ukrainian as Aryan adjacent 
it was cope so when the nazis win they would just do a 180
A Test cricket first today.
Across ~2,800 Tests and 148 years, this is the first time the score has been 1-0 in each of the first three innings of a match.
@SEN_Cricket @1116sen
Sporting history was made today
Get Nebula with 40% off annual subscription with my link: https://go.nebula.tv/realtimehistory
Watch Mad Kings about Uday Hussein: https://nebula.tv/videos/madkings-uday-hussein?ref=realtimehistory
The US invasion of Iraq was the culmination of several developments that started at the end of the Gulf War in 1991. In 2002, the Bush administrat...
Removing Saddam was not a bad idea but goddamn the followup sucked balls.
It's a Gold AA gun, either in research or opsi
DUDE
DUDE
TURN ON THE NEWS. ANY SCROLL. THEY FOUND THE SHIJING
QRT: MuseumsChina
🥳A thrilling breakthrough in Chinese archaeology and literature! Bamboo slips from the Marquis of Haihun tomb in Jiangxi province have revealed the first known complete version of The Book of Songs (Shi Jing), dating to the Qin (221-206 BC) and Han (206 BC-AD 220) dynasties.📜📌NOTICE: The gallery dedicated to books and bamboo slips at the museum built in the National Archaeological Site Park for Nanchang Han Dynasty Haihun Fief Site is now closed for renovation. It will reopen next year with newly conserved pieces on display. Stay tuned!
Learn more🔎:
the Marquis of Haihun is finally good for at least one thing
Also Arabs
Free Arabian Legion
A reminder that Hitler once suggested he send an army for britain to fight the Japanese with

Yea uhh, I guess you understand why the Axis couldn't win here
y u got an emote like that
Do health risks remain for British Army's Ajax armoured fighting vehicle?
Three members of the Household Cavalry Regiment are facing medical discharge due to injuries sustained since the introduction of Ajax at the unit, BFBS Forces News understands.
The news comes just two weeks after Defence Readiness & Industry Minister Luke Pollard insiste...

What?
1930's german was more close to china than japan
I more reacting to that statement
followed up by the wehraboo emote
I mean it's the emote for Germany dying

Discord Nitro and being in about 100 servers
I have a question regarding this. I got this for my birthday today and after reading this I wonder was Bismarck actually sunk like britsh claim or was she was scutlled, I know it was heated debate and I saw documentaries that didn't conclude on that matter so does anybody know here. My personall opinion doesn't matter since I am not knowledgable enough on this matter but I doubt that it was black and white scenario, the british may not have been entirely responsible for sinking the Bismarck.
even if she was not sunk by the British, she was already mission killed to submission by the task force sent to hunt her
@spiral cedar has been studying the specifics of the battle far better than anyone here, but the basic gist of it is that when the British caught up to her, they proceeded to completely pound her and disabled her ability to fight without too much difficulties. Whether after that the crew scuttled her or sunk her is irrelevant to the result, that is she's stuck in the waters, couldn't escape, and had been so thoroughly wrecked her value to the Kriegsmarine is dead
Per my memory of earlier discussions on this channel, Bismarck is already suffering from progressive flooding by the time the orders to scuttle were delivered
In other words, the ship was already taking on water from the damage done by the RN, and rendered combat ineffective by the destruction of her fire control equipment and thereafter, the weaponry themselves
The important part here is that they aren't mutually exclusive. Many ships were scuttled, such as Akagi, USS Hornet, and even USS Johnston. No one quibbles about credit for the loss of those ships. The reality is that ships don't simply explode and roll over once they are unsalvageable, as if they're video game units that have zero HP. Unless something catastrophic happens (think HMS Hood, or HMS Barham) that causes them to sink in a few minutes, big ships (cruiser and up) usually take hours to sink from progressive flooding. As the USN put it in their damage report analysis:
It is an excellent example of what may be termed a general rule for damage primarily involving flooding which has been derived from many cases of war experience, namely,
IF THE SHIP DOES NOT SINK WITHIN A VERY FEW MINUTES AFTER DAMAGE. SHE PROBABLY WILL SURVIVE FOR SEVERAL HOURS.
Loss of NORTHAMPTON by progressive flooding also parallels other war experience which has shown that,
CASES OF LOSS BY BODILY SINKAGE, PLUNGING OR CAPSIZING SEVERAL HOURS AFTER DAMAGE HAVE BEEN ENTIRELY ATTRIBUTABLE TO PROGRESSIVE FLOODING.
Kirishima, for example, was fatally wounded by USS Washington in less than 10 minutes of shooting, but she only rolled over and sank nearly 3 hours later.
Bismarck took a bit under 2 hours to sink, from the first shell fired by Rodney at 0847 to finally finishing capsizing at 1040. By 0931, we should note, Bismarck had no main battery left, her damcon teams had ceased recording flooding, she was listing to port, and some of her crew had already begun trying to abandon ship. Survivor testimony and the relatively limited implosion damage suggests at least some of her crew deliberately opened scuttles and set timed scuttling charges as they evacuated, but they were abandoning ship because British shells had destroyed her main battery and she could no longer move. She was slowly sinking, but the Germans likely sped up the process while abandoning ship (scuttling being the default action to take while abandoning ship in proximity to the enemy). In any case, her stern was awash and she was clearly sinking at 1000, and the British started torpedoing her at 1010, so whether or not she was scuttled just influences how fast she sank, not whether or not she would sink.
Thanks for a detailed explanation and that's what's been on my mind actually. The ship was allready done for and speeding up the process was the best option to deprive the enemy of information or technology that may be captured from remaining of the ship.
Honestly the near point blank shellfire probably slowed her demise because the shells weren't really hitting the waterline at that range
Does anybody wanna talk about Commonwealth troops in the Second Boer War?
This episode tracks how the doctrine “Algeria is France” — departments, settler power, and forced assimilation — breeds dispossession, mass violence, and a new Algerian nationalism: from conquest and the Sétif massacres to the FLN’s launch in 1954 and Philippeville in 1955. As Paris doubles its forces and passes Special Powers, Suez i...
Probably should have just pulled out
Algeria was consider a part of Metropolitan France and they had a lot of Francophone and French descent citizens. Pulling out early was never an option
With all the flack the British get, France needs more of it they were fighting until even this decade to keep their influence in Africa
French neocolonialism is beyond disgusting
Inarguably one of the greatest shames of the modern Western democracies
Biggest shame is support for Israel
I'd argue that unlimited intervention anytime something remotely Communism popped up but then I would also blame Communist for spreading their "revolutionary" idea anytime they feel like it.
Xiphactinus lowkey is a lot scarier than even some bigger predators bruh
the head part is fucking demonic
also apparently its also ludicrously voracious because we've found several Xiphactinus that died trying to eat something about half its size whole
The Battle of Fort Sumter (also the Attack on Fort Sumter or the Fall of Fort Sumter) (April 12–13, 1861) was the bombardment of Fort Sumter near Charleston, South Carolina, by the South Carolina militia. It ended with the surrender of the fort by the United States Army, beginning the American Civil War.
Following the declaration of secession ...
Heh
TIL noone actually died at fort Sumter
Except for an uma
07
No doubt due to fort Commander realized how precarious his position was, being attack from land position instead from the Sea, therefore he didn't order the manning of the Fort heavier guns, which are exposed to arcing fire, instead use guns that are better position and have better covers.
Eh, sunk cost fallacy
It can cause absolutely bizarre things, like throwing away your entire 50+ year colonial gains for an unwinnable war
(Cough Japan cough)
Hoshi "Aiki" Tetsuo was a Japanese soldier arrested and executed for war crimes in Burma
Dude was... bizarre, apparently was so enamored with a religious figure named Ueshiba Morihei that he changed his name to reflect it "Aiki", and later spent his time guarding a PoW camp where he routinely brutalized PoWs as martial arts practice.
Did the Japanese ever know about/attempt to implement steam catapults on aircraft carriers during the war?
They do, but mostly on Army Carriers
Just discovered I've been spending half a week in a videogame with the fucking Emperor Taizu moonlighting as a vagrant for shit and gigglee
Army carriers?
敵前逃亡(てきぜんとうぼう)とは、兵士などが軍事遂行命令を受けず、戦闘継続可能な状態にもかかわらず、戦わずに逃亡すること。この行為は重大な軍規違反であり、重刑になる可能性がある。
多くの国の軍隊では、戦闘を放棄し、逃げ出した部下を上...
Seems like WW2 Japan also simply executed soldiers that "fled the battlefield".
All reports on court martials were destroyed in 1945. But it seems like there were over 5000 executions in 1944 alone. We don't know if how many of those were actually a result of someone running away from the battlefield.
Stories about the Soviet Union but REAL
You are aware that France is still in Africa right?
The Japanese army had aircraft carriers
Yes
But it's not like, trying to hold onto Algeria
Which ones?
It wasn't the worst idea but also really stupid
Akitsu Maru (あきつ丸) was a "M Type C" landing craft carrier with a full-length flight deck built for the Imperial Japanese Army (IJA) during World War II. In some sources Akitsu Maru and Nigitsu Maru are also considered to be the first amphibious assault ships, although, this title can be disputed with Shinshū Maru that served a similar r...
they essentially functioned like LHDs
Landing craft carriers or landing craft depot ships were an innovative type of amphibious warfare ship developed by the Imperial Japanese Army during World War II, capable of deploying multiple landing craft for ground invasions. Their official designation was "Army Special Purpose Ship" (陸軍特殊船, Rikugun tokushu-sen). The prototype was ...
The rikusentai deserves a lot more mention than it does tbh
Probably did like 50% of the work at Shanghai
When the Army wants to muscle their way into Navy territory I see
The IJA and the IJN never had a good relationship with each other
That would explain things for the most part
Lol, let me guess, you let the Emperor visit the brothels?
nah nothing of the sort
just kinda caught off-guard even though said video game was directly set during the opening days of the Song]
there's a lot of mentions about Khitan invasions, the Southern Tang, Tiefutus and so forth
So where are the catapults on these, as one claimed?
The Navy is walking away from the Constellation-class frigate program to focus on new classes of warships the service can build faster, Secretary of the Navy John Phelan announced Tuesday on social media. Under the terms negotiated with shipbuilder Fincantieri Marinette Marine, the Wisconsin shipyard will continue to build Constellation (FFG-62)...
Noooooooooooo....
Would you consider this a good thing
No
May I ask why?
The price of those two ships that will still be built will balloon very high because costs will be spread over only two as opposed to over however many they originally wanted to procure.
Ok, what the actual fuck
This happened with zumwalt
I'm aware of what happened with Zumwalt
I think zumwalt is friend shaped
Are you upset about the news
Thinking about how there's a plausible scenario where the Japanese just loses 100,000+ men at Rabaul by the volcano annihilating the entire base
#OTD in 1961, USS Enterprise was commissioned, becoming the world's first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. CVN-65 was the eighth U.S. naval vessel to bear the name Enterprise. The Gerald R. Ford-class carrier CVN-80 currently under construction will continue the tradition.
Does anybody wanna talk about Commonwealth troops in the Second Boer War?
There isn't a lot of good videos on YouTube about them
How long until even the rest of the Gerald R Ford is cancelled /j
Yes, I love FREMM and USN complete blundered it
Probably not but no more Electric Catapult, back to Steam now 
Problem with Zumwalt is that by the time it was launched, they really don't know what to do with them but Constellation are what USN desperately needed right now but they keep adding and changing the design so instead of you fast building a new class of Frigate, you only have 2 overbudget and way too expensive hulls with nothing else to replace them.
And they will no doubt go back to decide which designs from those American shipyard will replace the Constellation, which mean yrs before anything else got build other than Burke.
Yeah, Taizu was famous for being on the battlefield most of the time and a workaholic. But the thought of him fucking around as a beggar quite funny tho.
American century of humiliation beginning frfr
Honestly, I am not against going back to Steam but abandon Electric Cat and favor stupid shit is big no no
Tbh I want hulls but idk, USN-ized FREMM wasn't ideal.
IKR ... at that cost we could just have more zumwalts.
Yeah pretty much.
That said, sunk cost blahblahblah. Also what do we really need for warfighting.
more burkes. ... kek
Goes back to a capabilities and needs question.
Meanwhile type 054 printer goes brrr.
another procurement disaster
ugh probably would of been better off just redoing the construction contracts to more yards
You saying that and Congress will turn it into funding for the current yard, which will go nowhere, again
like
they did this with the JTLV
if the yard ain't gonna meet its end of the contracts
go to another yard that will
now we're gonna be stuck with 2 super expensive frigates
that don't have commonality with any other hull in the fleet
It is LCS all over again and this time it is worse
I just don't get it, the rest of NATO done it correctly with a lot of their Frigate and Corvette design but USN just so anathema with adopting foreign design and too much overconfident in US yard ability to deliver that they are literally screw in the next decade or so.
I have a solution to the USNs need for an off the shelf frigate
shoulda just made more zumwalts 😛
It's not the yards, it's the requirement creep the USN keeps adding.
This week we’re looking at an Albanian Kalashnikov (that Ian recently looked at...) with a very personal mark carved into it: “UCK” (UÇK), standing for the Kosovo Liberation Army.
We're also joined by our friends at IWM for this episode and we'd like to thank them for providing footage and collaborating with us.
You can find their chann...
How possible is it that crews could see enemy torps launching from their destroyers?
Very possible, at least at night. There were plenty of instances of crews spotting the flashes of enemy torpedo launches at night and taking action as a result. The IJN put some emphasis on hiding the flash to reduce the likelihood of their torpedo launches revealing their position
During the day, usually you just assume that if the enemy DD noticeably changes course within torpedo range, she's probably just launched torpedoes and you should take evasive maneuvers
The Swedish government's offer of Saab’s A26 submarines to Poland has been selected by the Polish government to replace the current Kilo-class.
︀︀Read more here: www.saab.com/newsroom/press-releases/2025/sweden-and-saab-selected-for-polands-new-submarines
︀︀#A26 #Submarines #SuperiorAtSea
In the last competition, the T26 didn't qualify because it wasn't in-service with anyone yet
It's also not built to USN standards and is frankly poorly equipped for the modern AAW threat environment
Really? I seem to recall there being some interest in procuring it from some in the USN
Does anybody wanna talk about Commonwealth troops in the Second Boer War?
You can just post a writeup; no need to wait for an interlocutor especially given how long you've been waiting
in the sense that it would come with the obligatory redesign to fit the needed AAW suite and desired robustness, yes
So I can just talk?
Well I start it tomorrow because it's late
And yes, I will have pictures too
Isn't Spanish F100 also in competition as well? The class seem have more American component than other proposal so why didn't they choose it?
Yeah but F100 have Aegis system and already a heavy AAW ship
see above
So what does they want more than Aegis and nearly 100 SAMs?
the F100 doesn't carry nearly 100 SAMs
the wiki stat card is weird
and again
see above
and read the whole sentence
So not enough robustness then?
I was under the impression the T26 was more robust compared to most other European ships
haha
no
it still doesn't meet USN standards
those standards are written in blood and it's kind of baffling that other navies are willing to cut the corner on it
Well, those standards were clearly throw out during the early day of LCSs program.
not worth it
So let me get this straight, USN is willing to cut corner and lower their standard to churn out LCS but when they need to build fast a fleet of frigate, they decided to modified an already exist hull even more bc "not robust enough" and then complained about delay and cost overrun?
This video explores the Malayan Emergency, a brutal counter-insurgency conflict in colonial Malaya spanning from 1948 until 1960.
00:00:00:00 The Malayan Emergency
00:01:27:15 Importance of Malaya to the British Empire
00:02:39:10 Japanese Occupation
00:04:22:06 The Malayan Union
00:05:58:04 Social Climate
00:08:12:03 Declaration of Emergency...
Japan really made sure to fuck up the rest of Asia on its way back home lol
INFINITE RIFLES
FOR EVERYONE
Try War Thunder for Free PC/Console:
https://wtplay.link/militaryaviationhistorywt
Mobile: https://wtm.game/militaryaviationhistory
Check out my books
- Ju 87 Stuka - http://stukabook.com
- STG-44 Assault Platoon - http://sturmzug.com
- German Panzer Company 1941 - http://www.hdv470-7.com/
- Achtung Panzer? Zur Panzerwaffe der Wehrmacht - ht...
I didn't know that there was a Canadian killed during the French Revolution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/André_Grasset
Nord ACAM 5301
French early SAM
Pointy
Map of China, 1935
Yellow (Japanese controlled)
Green (warlords the Japanese bribed)
Gray (KMT)
Pink (CCP)
Basically.
Northrop's F-5 Freedom Fighter was a sales success that gave many nations their first taste of supersonic fighters. But as the 1960s came to an end, the avionic and performance compromises that had been taken to get to the right price point no longer looked so clever. So Northrop remixed the formula and came up with the F-5E, one of the best bal...
"Soldier spirit insertion rod"
No it's not gay, it was used to beat soldiers in the IJA
Is that what it actually says?
Yes
The Royal Australian Air Force will be the first foreign operator of the advanced AIM-260A JATM air-to-air missile, according to U.S. sources 🇦🇺
By @cjohnston.bsky.social
www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2...
-# USA Approves First AIM-260A JATM Export to Australia - Naval News
The Royal Australian Air Force will be the first foreign operator of the advanced AIM-260A JATM air-to-air missile according to U.S. sources speaking to Naval News on condition of anonymity. The sale ...
Well no doubt we helped test it
F-20 time
What do you guys think of Cody/Alternate History Hub?
He’s an internet funnyman and not much more
he's better as a movie reviewer, and significantly more hilarious
We look at the history of the AC-130 gunship, from its humble beginnings as a C-130 Hercules transport in 1954 to becoming the ultimate aerial powerhouse in modern warfare. We look at how this aircraft evolved through WWII-inspired designs, Vietnam War innovations like the AC-47 Spooky, and groundbreaking upgrades in Project Gunship II, leading ...
For some reason, this website (https://alchetron.com/Japanese-aircraft-carrier-Akitsu-Maru) depicts the Japanese Landing Craft Carrier Akitsu Maru with a steam catapult on the aft-port of the short flight deck. Which is weird, because Japanese never used steam catapults and all other depictions of Akitsu Maru do not have this.
Akitsu Maru () was a Japanese landing craft depot ship and escort aircraft carrier operated by the Imperial Japanese Army (IJA). In some sources Akitsu Maru and her sister ship Nigitsu Maru () are also considered to be the first amphibious assault ships. Contrary to many secondary sources, t
points at gunpowder catapults which were used on other Japanese ships
Poverty catapults man
Probably the only warship named after a frigging pilot of all people
Werner Mölders (18 March 1913 – 22 November 1941) was a World War II German Luftwaffe pilot, wing commander, and the leading German fighter ace in the Spanish Civil War. He became the first pilot in aviation history to shoot down 100 enemy aircraft and was highly decorated for his achievements. Mölders developed fighter tactics that led to ...
Also... died in a plane crash
Bruh
Guys ill get to the Commonwealth Boer war stuff im just busy rn
Exam season is coming up
Objection, George H. W. Bush, USS Wright
Really interesting thing to post under what I posted
?
Bit of a bizarre question but does anyone have a diagram of how early aircraft toilets worked?
Seems like even very early airliners in the 1920s sometimes had those, but I doubt it was the vacuum flush toilets on modern ones.
Im joking because it looks like the missiles you posted are pointing up at what I posted
Apparently anybody that doesn't miss the USSR doesn't have a heart, but those that actually want it back doesn't have a brain
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft_lavatory ... so anything from a hole in the hull to buckets to standard flushers.
The Vietnam War didn’t begin with American boots on the ground. It began with a promise — and a break. After the French defeat at Dien Bien Phu in 1954, the Geneva Accords split Vietnam at the 17th parallel. Ho Chi Minh led the North. In the South, Ngo Dinh Diem struggled to hold a fragile new state together while armed sects, crime syndicat...
"Churchill of Asia" 
I must admit, I just now found out how much US swoon over Diem
<@&460646206851252224> sieze them
why is the text irradiated?
Based
Since when you a War Criminal? 
my dad is a war criminal - some Serbian
On the topic of war crimes
I got a new book explaining war crimes
Should be a decent bedtime read
honestly dude, i've had that as my server nickname basically since I got here
I never really notice 
it's all good, i only talk here, like, once every three months
#OTD in 1950, ENS Denzel Crist managed to escape his burning AD-4 Skyraider after the plane smacked the deck and broke apart while landing in rough weather on USS Philippine Sea. A week later, Crist had another close call when he was shot down but rescued near Chosin Reservoir.
IDK who was it, but there was this Luftwaffe pilot that suffered 3rd degree burns all over his body, survived, and later joined the postwar German air force
Johannes "Macky" Steinhoff (15 September 1913 – 21 February 1994) was a Luftwaffe fighter ace during World War II, German general, and NATO official. He was one of very few Luftwaffe pilots who survived to fly operationally through the whole of the war period 1939–45 until he was severely burned during a failed take-off. Steinhoff was also o...
Yup, this guy
30 Super years in flight!
︀︀
︀︀Thirty years ago, the first F/A-18 Super Hornet took to the skies for the first time. We're thankful for the thousands of #TeamBoeing employees, partners and suppliers who keep the Super Hornet modernized and evolving, delivering unmatched capabilities to naval aviation for decades to come.
What does it mean to be a citizen soldier in Australia? This 1972 documentary takes you inside the world of the Citizen Military Forces (CMF), the part-time soldiers who balance civilian careers with military service.
Through candid interviews and vivid training scenes, Citizen Soldier explores why men and women volunteer, the challenges they f...
Definitely some interesting insights into the views an attitudes of a post-Vietnam Australia
Can i question what if here?
Sure why not, as long as it's above 20 years ago
Thanks brother
What tactical outcome if Japan win Midway
I know that Japan would lost but idk how much tactical victory would bring Japan if they won Battle of Midway
Depends on what they lose in the process and how much the Americans save
Presuming a complete victory: All of Kido Butai survives and their pilot corps doesn't take too much damage while all three Yorktowns sink: Morale (and maybe FDR's reputation) takes a hit, the remaining Wasp and Saratoga try to do hit and runs on Midway while the Essexes and Independences come online (and presumably more Clevelands are converted to Independences to cover the near term gap), possibly Ranger isn't dedicated to Operation Torch
Guadalcanal is also most likely delayed
Japan on the other hand would struggle to hold on to Midway due to how far it is and how difficult resupply would be
They would probably try to take the Aleutians and Hawaii next and fall flat on their face
In best case scenario for IJN where they won with minimum losses, delay on USN operations in South Pacific. US Convoy route to Australia are most likely will be under threat of being cutoff by IJN but unless IJA succeed in Papue New Guinea, threat of invasion on Australia mainland is negligible.
That's is only if USN lost more than 2 Carrier in that battle, Saratoga is almost done with her repair and depend on how many carrier survive Midway, USN still have enough force in the Pacific to deny IJN Command of the Sea
and even if they succeeded in Papua New Guinea, most of the Australian pop is on the east coast anyway
Would there possible for Japan to launch attack Indian Ocean ?
At least Raid on British?
What happened to Australia Navy?
Will Australia Navy destroy?
Still it seem not good for Australia
and not good for Japan either because the logistics needed to even invade is ridiculous
it's either a very long winding route through the eastern coast or trekking an entire mini-continent away
It would been possible for Japan to launch some raid on Australia
Maybe target some strategic locations
I want to be in the IJN logistic department room and hear the rant of the admiral in charge when he was informed that he now not only need to plan new supply route from Trunk to Port Moresby but somehow scramble enough oiler, merchantmen, troopship and organize escort for naval invasion of Port Douglas 
which are all still mostly around the east coast and a continent away
Likely but the West Coast will experience some heat
Maybe some isolate island like Cocos (Keeling) Islands would been colonised by Japan
Battle of Coral Sea show that if even one USN carrier still out there, and raid or planned invasion are under threat of being flanked
colonised not so much, it'll just get retaken or cut off anyway\
HAHAHAHAHA
Good luck
Could possibly
But it doesn’t mean Japan will not take advantage of this
They are sparsely populate for a reason and even if they build a base there, it will be an even bigger drain on IJN limited resources
They would however gonna find solutions
But for me it would been good for defensive
It will be even funnier if IJA build a base there bc IJN will outright refuse to provide escort for IJA convoy
Hmm i wonder if IJN and IJA was in fact more corporation than ever before
How much would change
Possibly better code breaking and intel sharing first
Those 2 service outright refuse to tell the other of anything that might be useful to each other
It would been tougher for US to fight
Even in some case witheld intel so that the other service get shafted
Not really
I mean yeah US have many things
But for other allies it would tougher fight especially Britain
the other Allies had fairly minimal contributions in the Pacific anyway navally speaking
the bulk of the fighting post 41 were more or less US ships
I mean many focus on Germany
well, yeah?
Amusingly, this would actually be bad for the Japanese
Due to how much the US had penetrated their cryptology
Wider sharing would mean fewer sources are needed to get a full picture
I've started the timer for the arrival of him lol
Who?
ah yes
The Spoon 
The RAN was generally deployed alongside USN task groups
It rarely sailed as a combined entity in the Pacific with its assets distributed among various task forces
A raid on where? The raid on Darwin, while tactically successful, did not change much beyond pushing Allied shipping South, where it could be better protected, but that shipping was heading that way regardless, Darwin simply accelerated the process
What on the West Coast is worth bombing? There's absolutely nothing North of Geraldton worth a carrier group deployment, and South of Geraldton is a swarm of Allied airpower and submarines, far too dangerous for 1 or 2 carriers and definitely too far away to take away from other areas of the front
The RAN was pretty crucial in the dying days of the Dutch East Indes but beyond that retreated Southwards before moving North with the USN to Guadalcanal
Hi
I know, hence I said fairly/relatively, since the lion's share is obviously the USN, but other nations had their contributions still
anyhow any Japanese fleet trying to attack the east coast of Australia would have likely get savaged
The East Coast is even more dangerous than the West
There's a major airbase reliably every 2-300 kms South of Cairns, Townsville being the most dangerous by far
Pretty much the moment you're within range of the air bases on the East Coast, which is not as sparsely populated as popular culture would have you believe, you're going to be under constant attack from 2-3 airfields coordinating strikes to keep you away
American B-24s and B-17s plus RAAF Catalinas and Beaufighters are going to out range any IJN strike package well before it can launch a strike
So basically you're either bombing sweet fuck all on the West Coast or you're getting bombed to high hell on the East
I don't see any winning that fight
Could Japan used as defensive?
Tbh the only alt history divergence point for Japan in WW2 is Savo Island
And it's only a delaying action.
What do you mean?
Japan isn’t invading Australia if that’s what you think
Maybe at most a limited occupation of Darwin that would be swiftly defeated
Keeping in mind that the Australian interior is incredibly harsh, no landings outside of a major population centre are viable
Even if you had the supplies they won’t last long against the indigenous long ranged patrol units or the AMF
And the major cities are far too well defended
I mean can Japan used whole Papua as defensive zone?
Er
It'll just get cut off
Seriously
They dried doing it with Rabaul and what happened is that the Allies completely skipped it over and went straight for the Home Isles
If Japan wins in the Coral Sea and takes Moresby it’s just going to result in a guerrilla campaign that’s going to sap resources
Moresby itself is strategically useless to Japan because it’s too vulnerable to air attack to be used as a port for supplying troops which makes the prospect of an aerial campaign over Northern Australia quite tenuous
What more viable option for Japan?
Yes taking Moresby deprives Australia and Australians of some security but it does not drastically change the strategic calculus of the South Pacific
The more viable option is not bombing Pearl Harbour
There’s simply no way for Japan to take and hold the South Pacific
It’s too vulnerable to isolation
The merchant fleet is too small
Airborne logistics are not viable
Enemy interdiction is too easy
Australia is perfectly positioned as a jumping off point for campaigns in the area while also providing an insurmountable strategic road block
This is an actually interesting one
But you'd have to get Yamamoto to resign earlier or get him to slip on a banana peel and fall down the stairs before 1941
You’d have to get the Meiji restoration to not result in a disgruntled former samurai class creating a military that only hated its own government more than itself actually
Would have saved a lot of headache in the 30s I imagine
And in turn you need to have it so that the Tokugawa didn't win after Sekigahara
Likely would have resulted in a lot of Chinese people keeping their heads at that
Honestly just get the Russo Japanese war to go exactly as the British predicted
The Japanese gets pushed back on land but win the sea battle
That’s almost exactly what happened
They won't get Korea that way. Korea was what massively boosted the army's stocks
Actually yeah if the Hideyoshi supporters won at Sekigahara wonder how long before Hideyori gets booted off
Cause he's far too young a ruler
Probably causing another round of warring states period in Japan
Japan was basically incapable of continuing the war while the Russian army was very ready for a counter offensive
Political considerations prevented such battles however
It'd have been interesting if the Russians counter attacked earlier and made the war more of a convincing draw
Wagering that Mitsunari Ishida probably could have made his own regime on the other hand as commander of the western army
A lot of Japan's issues starts off with winning the Russo Japanese war.
Going THAT far back has the potential to change a bit too much than just "avoid WW2" lol.
Japans issues start with Meiji being literally insane and completely spineless
Could have easily be so if you just change Nicholas from being far less mercurial and wishy washy
I'd blame Taisho more
Had he been capable of taking a more proactive approach in the restoration things may have gone differently
By the time of Taisho the damage had been done
No Japanese emperor was ever all that proactive. Meiji was one of the more active ones anyway.
You mean Taisho? Cause Meiji was far from spineless and basically dictated the government from behind
Meiji was anything but powerless imo, he was a grasping autocrat
His cabinet did most of the work, no?
Basically the problems with the meiji restoration is impossible to avoid. You have to get it to blow up on everyone's faces before 1941
Under his desired direction and personality
Depends, for himself he's done a great job
There's probably a shit tonne of potential divergence points but
Usually the Russo Japanese war is a place to start.
While records of his own personality is scarce he at least was seemingly a proud nationalist and didn't see the direction the country was going as a problem
Or you can have like
WW1 go differently
I'm mostly drawing on Herbert Bix's work which argues both Hirohito and Meiji are far from powerless or spineless
They're very willful people who willingly guided the country to a more nationalist, imperialistic bent and sees nothing wrong with conquest
Supported by how a lot of the Imperial household's members were actively in support of war and served in the armed forces, such a thing is unlikely without the consent of the Tenno
Meiji died in 1912. It's a bit of a stretch to link him to WW2
He didn't participate in politics much. I mean just look at the number of kids he had
Dude straight up didn't have time
I'm referring to Hirohito on this part
For Meiji I'm mostly referring to how he's not recorded as having any personal issues with Japan's war with China in 1891 or its conflict with Russia, nor did he try to steer the cabinet against it when he did have some capability to influence government decisions despite his ceremonial position
Meiji is said to have expressed some concern but he didn't try to do anything.
That implied Tokugawa will give up after Sekigahara
Hirohito jumps between trying to stay off everything and trying to intervene. Usually at the worst possible moments
True, Ieyasu was crafty enough to potentially win even after Sekigahara
The only good decision he made was ending WW2.
And gave tacit approvals to blatantly horrible acts like the Kwantung Army's provocstions
Though at least his marine wildlife research is legit
I mean, he have the legitimacy but the majority of his force by the end of Boshin War is still make up of majority Satsuma and Choshu domain. The Imperial Army that was needed to suppress those local Warlord was built by landless and disgruntled Samurai class that you just lamented on.
Basically Meiji have little choice in the matter unless he want to come back to being a puppet
For the toppling of the Shogunate and the making of the Republic, yeah I'd agree, not so much for the expansionist phase of Japan though
Sekigahara was decisive bc many of Toyotomi Loyalist lost their lives or surrendered there. Ieyasu is crafty enough to ensure that even if he lose the battle, he can safely disengage his army and fight another day.
If the bird doesn't sing, wait for it, as they say
True but then Meiji have little choice in the Naval matter seeing how much of them come from Choshu. By the time IJA and IJN take shape, the Emperor realize that he cannot fully control both branch without another civil war and possible coup so he more or less tacitly encourage the interservice rivalry to make sure that both service will be lock in a power struggle with no dominant winner and both will have to come to him for legitimacy.
Samurai clan politics was like, gone by the time the 1st Sino Japanese war ended
Doesn't matter, the next generation already inherited the rivalry and blood fued already formed.
In military yes, but not political arguably. He was highly influential through his council of advisors, and did have soft means to request something be done
I mean, when you indoctrinated everyone into believing you a living God, a polite request will be perceived as a command
That's why Westerner really don't understand why Hirohito was both so powerful but so powerless at the same time
I generally disagree that the post-Restoration Emperors are fully puppets, sure they're not supposed to legally rule and had limitations everywhere, but they have considerable soft powers, and they contributed to the path Japan fell into by instead implicitly approving an expansionist, aggressive path in collusion with the increasingly prominent members of the military
Yes, IJA and IJN do shit without even consulting him and even pull shit like staging mini civil war on Japan soil but at the end of the day, they still have to come to Hirohito for his approval.
You could sum it up that the Japan royal family has perfect the art of subtle influence over millennia being puppet of Shoguns.
If it was China then you would see new dynasty and Imperial Family rise but in Japan, there still only one family
Too be fair, pre-Meiji Emperors kinda do sucks dick lol
None of them particularly figured that much post-Kamakura outside of Go-Daigo
Chinese dynasties rise and fall but they're super active like Taizu, Shizong, Taizong (of Tang) and Hongwu
Also speaking of Huangdis, always loved the theory that Eastern Han emperors died really fast because there was some unknown flooding of toxins in their palace

Gee, I wonder that and literal river of mercury flowing inside the palace have any correlation
Nah couldn't be because of the sacred immortality elixirs of the Taoists
It obviously gives you true immortality
Tbh I guess Japan doesn't really hate its current state lol
I can come up with a dozen timelines where they don't fight the Americans but
In all those timelines Japan ends up as a declined empire like Russia or Turkey
A functioning democracy with crazy cultural exports is pretty good
The functioning democracy part would have been very hard without someone forcing their hand like the US did
Even today Japan's democracy is "democracy with Japanese characteristics"
Could be worse at least, if nothing else it's better than Democracy with Southeast Asian characteristics (thinly veiled Feudalism)
LoL that's a bit of an insult for Japan
Again like
Very few countries successfully democratized
Korea, Taiwan both got lucky in that they had enormous economic growth
Uruguay just... did it
stares at the Treaty era Bakufu and contemplating what happens if they're not even at that level of stability when Perry and the Europeans come knocking
Mfw both a Chinese and Japanese century of humiliation ensues
#OTD in 1799: The frigate USS Chesapeake is launched at the Gosport Navy Yard in Virginia. She was one of the original six frigares whose construction was authorized by the Naval Act of 1794.
I mean that's kind of what happened to Joseon Korea
Tbh East Asia in general is a pretty crappy place to go colonizing but
Korea did survive until 1910
Even retook some territories from the Qing
But by 1910 the government was riddled with Japanese agents
IDK, maybe it's just geography but it seems like all the "colonization" efforts in East Asia was concentrated on China for some reason. Maybe it was just a juicy target.
It was
But also some goofy shit happened where the US got super invested in stopping actual outright colonization in the region
Which the European powers actually wanted
But in the end settled for unequal economic treaties
Because somehow US diplomats of the time convinced them a "Scramble For China" would be so egregiously expensive any gains wouldn't offset the losses of fighting both the Chinese and other European powers
in fairness Japan modernized fairly fast and the Joseon tried closing itself off (didn't work in the end)
like you said China was big, which means a lot of difficulties by the central courts to monitor hinterlands, and the Qing at the time had severely atrophied
so it was easy to nibble bits of it off
like even during the Song the central government's abilities to govern something as far as Guangzhou was severely limited
Modernization yea but Japan straight up didn't face that much colonization threat
Everyone was more interested in China and Japan was at best considered a staging area
Heck, even Korea didn't face any real colonization threat from western powers... for Korea, the Qing and Japan were the dangerous ones.
Got Try Some LMNT: https://drinkLMNT.com/fatelectrician
Merch Store & ALL Other Links:
https://thefatelectrician.com/
Seriously EVERYTHING is on my website
Other channels:
The Fat Files
----------------...
It’s been a while since I posted something in this server but I have some good news
My museum got an upgrade. We now have a Mohawk. A recon aircraft from the Vietnam war
My grandfather seen plenty of them while stationed in Germany
We have one as a gate guardian, heh.
Same with another at my museum
<@&460646206851252224>
A Republic ad showing four P47Ds: USAAF, VVS (USSR), RAF and FAB (🇧🇷)
Hey gotta make 'em operator-proof.
Up to 50% off at USNIP with "HOLIDAY" at https://www.usni.org/press/books
Check out my books
- Ju 87 Stuka - http://stukabook.com
- STG-44 Assault Platoon - http://sturmzug.com
- German Panzer Company 1941 - http://www.hdv470-7.com/
- Achtung Panzer? Zur Panzerwaffe der Wehrmacht - http://panzerkonferenz.de/
Support
- Patreon: https://www.pat...
Why has there been more talk of Alsace Lorraine on Twitter as of late?
https://x.com/UnionNatioPop/status/1996518612492767300?s=19
L’Alsace-Moselle était française avant 1870.
L’Alsace-Moselle fut reconquise 2 fois au prix de 2,2 millions de morts.
Ne comparez pas ce territoire qui fut volé, qui n’appartient pas à Israël , et ne lui a jamais appartenu, avec le sacrifice héroïque de nos martyrs obscurs.
Le
Well, they are transition to being a game studio now so all is good
Not going to get mod'ed answering that one
If you ask someone to name a Japanese aircraft carrier...Kaga is almost certainly going to be the first to come to mind. This ship was unique, in a lot of ways. A battleship conversion, for one, which puts her in company with only two other ships.
(Eagle and Bearn)
But also one of the most well-traveled of all Japanese carriers. Kaga would alm...
The wife got a new video!
Best to avoid such controversial topics but it would be difficult to argue that the legacy of colonialism didn't directly contribute to the wars of the early 21st century that created the crisis
It happened again...
https://x.com/mrjeffu/status/1996078047997689970?s=19
Not even a year apart from the last incident
A reminder: it's historically accurate, meaning everyone likely just... dies.
Get Nebula with 40% off annual subscription with my link: https://go.nebula.tv/realtimehistory
Watch Epic History's WW2 Series: https://nebula.tv/videos/epichistorytv-road-to-ww2-1931-34?ref=realtimehistory
The Marine and US Army landing on the Tarawa Atoll's Betio and Makin islands were the first operations in the new Central Pacific front of...
Announced by Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) John C. Phelan on December 5th, the United States Navy and Marine Corps has chosen Dutch shipbuilder Damen’s LST 100 landing ship for the Medium Landing Ship (LSM) program 🇺🇸 🇳🇱
www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2...
-# U.S Marine Corps Selects Design for New LSM Landing Ships - Naval News
Announced by Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) John C. Phelan on December 5th, the United States Navy and Marine Corps has chosen Dutch shipbuilder Damen's LST 100 landing ship for the Medium Landing Shi...
wtf is this dogshit AI slop
all history channels are just AI now, you have to read books or else you get bad information
the video content is also dogshit, the AI narrator literally says nothing, "the japanese had more ships, they bombed the allied fleet, and although the allies sank a few japanese ships, in the end they were outgunned and overwhelemed"
and then the last part is the worst, verbatim "this battle was significant because it led to the fall of Singapore and the liberation of Indonesia. It's also the dealiest naval battle in history, with over 3,000 men killed" (literally every part is wrong)
btw this is about the Battle of the Java Sea
Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Daryl Caudle, and Commandant of the Marine Corps Gen. Eric Smith outline a reshaping of how the Navy builds and fields its Fleet. On Dec. 5, Department of the Navy leadership took a major step by selecting the design for the Medium Landing Ship, prioritizing an operationally drive...
Book
Tribals, Battles & Darings; The Genesis of the Modern Destroyer https://amzn.to/2H2yVvb
Support This Channel
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ACNavalHistory
Paypal https://paypal.me/ACHistory?country.x=GB&locale.x=en_GB
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCE2x09tU0GwAGiSbFPEhIwQ/join
Ko-Fi (If you j...
TIL of Saionji Kinmochi
It's even more remarkable that he died right after the triparte pact was signed, and that his last words was essentially "where is this godforsaken country going!"
#OTD in 1941, LT Ichiro Kitajima briefed torpedo bomber pilots aboard the aircraft carrier Kaga about the plan to attack Pearl Harbor the next morning. Planes from the Kaga would score hits on the battleships Nevada, Oklahoma, Arizona, California, West Virginia, and Maryland.
Get 5% OFF all Holafly eSIMs + 10% OFF Holafly’s new monthly subscription plans for 12 months with code MENTOUR: https://holafly.sjv.io/WyekPO
This is a story of small decisions and system gaps stacking up into an outcome nobody expected. On the 28th of November, 1979, Air New Zealand Fligh...
The last Japanese participant in the Pearl Harbor attacks (crew on board Soryu) died last year btw
I don't think any of the actual pilots survived the war
The Armchair Historian may have been the internet's anchor being
What convenient timing
Anyways before my next exam on Monday EST anybody wanna talk about the Second Boer War or the Spanish Civil War?
boer... ing but franco v commies is fun stuff...
Im waiting for this book to come out
Fair. But I really hate african post-colonial conflicts as a genre. Gets way too loaded with modern baggage.
I was more hoping to talk about colonial troops because there's not really any videos about it on YouTube
local auxiliaries?
Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders, Indians, South Africans, Rhodisans
No videos on YouTube about any of them
Not all the same, depending on the conflict.
Second Boer War and their participation
SA and Rhodesia are in a different category than the regiments from other parts of the empire.
Literally the most famous Japanese pilot of the war Mitsuo Fuchida, who led the first wave of Japanese aircraft over Pearl Harbour, who wrote and defined the Western understanding of the IJN for decades before finally being discredited in 2005, died in 1976
Are you American?
Also what about the others?
Why was he discredited?
Why is there this assumption that everyone dies?
Ah
The entire book is dedicated to dismantling the myths he created
And correcting the Western historical record
Was he very samurai like in his explanation?
Fuchida had been discredited in Japan for decades prior to Shattered Sword
No he just lied about the things that happened and when
Particularly about Midway
Reminds me of when potential history talked about western misconceptions about Japanese weapons
Politics of the time. CA/AU/NZ are one category, IN another issue (we'll talk about it post ww2) and SA and Rhodisians are locals to the conflict.
He single handedly created the myth of the 'five minutes of fate' where American bombers screamed down striking the Japanese carriers right as they were preparing to launch their strike on the American carriers
Canada actually had an interesting divide
Locally, sure.
English speakers were pro war, French speakers were anti war
lol quebecois are their thing. ❤️ canadia and all that. And I can literally be from hongcouver ...
The French are the reason why Canada never built a navy of any note until WW2
A lot French newspapers compared the Boers to the French being conquered during the Seven Years War
The French are now even more dysfunctional
always has been. (apologies for the stereotype)
Secularism laws despite a Catholic majority, separatism despite rising patriotism, boomer occupied government
A mess
Like completely and utterly
Wow, a modern western democracy being
Shock horror
Secular
The world should replicate French secularism laws
Its more about working against itself but that will be a long explanation
Recently enough, Rheinmetall opened an office near Detroit, and they have been expanding rapidly. I swung by earlier this summer to see what was what, and also to check out their HX-3, their contender for the Army's CTT program to replace the HEMMTT.
Public facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/TheChieftainArmor
Financial donations:
Patreon:...
Also like, I'm obviously talking about French Canadians not actual France
Anyway, boer war.
And I'm obviously not talking about modern politics because I'm not a fucking idiot who wants to be banned
I know im just saying, the generation in power is now completing with a younger generation who's returning to the Church
But again
Looooong
Story
Very
Long
It's just post colonial tropes for the most part.
Like back to 1500s long
Basically, and this plays into the boer war debate in Canada at the time
Older generations in France are predominantly more religious while younger generations are showing a strong trend away from religious affiliation
This is the case in all Western democracies as well
Which is why I would rather talk about franco v commies... (and yes, intentional framing)
In Quebec the opposite is happening slowly and in France young people are slowly going to church again apparently but again, long story but this one only goes back to 1792
In fact the only demographics which show trends towards religion are the ones which were involved in the European refugee crisis
Not a long story there
No they are not going to church again, don't believe everything you read on the internet
There's a historical neglect in the western world's youth trending away from religion, tbh.
Something something values something idk.
Again, long story for another time and how Gen Z is different in two ways
Again, trends towards religion in France are directly related to the events of 2015
Da.
To sum up, men in America are more religious than women now
And in Canada, most Church attendees are young people
And long story
very demographically divergent.
Yeah let's get back on topic
America, shock horror, has a different culture and attitude towards religion compared to Europe
What's that supposed to mean?
Who would have thought that different countries would have different cultures
CA isn't the US
I'm saying the basis of your argument is wrong but explaining why would get me warned for discussing modern politics
Ok back on topic
Basically English Canadians were pro war and French Canadians were anti war
*boer war
Irish Canadians were caught in the middle but surprisingly sided with the English because because they were competing for influence in the Catholic Church
Yep. The Second one
I mean it's an english colonial adventure. That split is kind of given.
The Irish expatriate population generally supported liberalism in most countries
So what happened? The French Prime Minister was being tugged all over the place by the citizens and his cabinet
So he was like "Ok, 1,000 men go over and they are all volunteers"
Again this is Canada, very big mess
Even back then
And like I said above, everyone's tugging at the PM
One side is like "DO SOMETHING!" and the other side is like "DON'T DO SOMETHING!" and his cabinet is like "war. War! WAR!"
And Quebec responded like the eldest daughter's own... daughter...
By rioting
Violently
For 3 days
@desert agate so to sum up, the PM tries to please everyone but still pisses of his own people
tbh .. that's a canadian thing. you can also locally examine the NZ and AU contingents.
Ok let's do that then
Because what I said above sums up the domestic Canadian situation
Likely the same things to some extent.
I know that Australia wasn't unified
Like multiple states
But still empire. To me, the more interesting things are the SA and Rhodesia bits.
They were not states they were self governing colonies
it's funny, I have a midway book that talks about Shattered Sword talking about Fuchida, it's the source-ception
Yeah
The colonies became states on the 1st of January 1901
During the war
Not a huge difference.
I am aware that was during the war thank you for educating me on my own history
Kinda because state is usually independent
Usually
(Looking at you Independent State of Croatia)
There is a pretty big difference between being a state and a self governing colony
It's a spectrum. I mean who's in the commonweath?
Americans think Commonwealth members are colonies
Au still has a governor genreral ...
So does Canada
Federation moved the leadership of the Australian continent away from London towards Melbourne
And Confedation was to protect against American expansion and the Fenians
Australia has a governor general, said governor general has no power and if they tried to take an undemocratic action in the avenue of 1976, Australia would immediately become a republic
You guys anti monarchy down there?
again, spectrum with varying degrees of actual independence, from full and 'we like this club' to .. idk, diego garcia.
Let see if anyone can translate Morse code
dit dit dit dah dah dit dit dit
.- .. .-. / .-. .- .. -.. / .--. . .- .-. .-.. / .... .- .-. -... --- .-. .-.-.- / - .... .. ... / .. ... / -. --- / -.. .-. .. .-.. .-.. .-.-.-
1976 was an anomaly and the political institutions of Australia were unprepared to deal with it
The majority of Australians support republicanism but the political impetus for a republic fell after the referendum in 1999 failed
constitutional monarchies with varying amounts of deference towards the monarch, functionally.
Im sorry my country is so dysfunctional
Sweden
In the words of Malcolm Turnbull, John Howard broke Australia's heart
sorry. Also .. I want to talk about the spanish civil war more tbh. 😄
That had Republicans too
And religion
And controversy
Regardless, Australia is functionally a republic, the governor general has no power like they do in Canada
Canada is what happens when the French and the English have a child
1976 caused such a shock to the Australian political establishment that actions were taken to prevent such a crisis happening again
Um... pretty sure france didn't consent
If Canada had its own constitutional crisis in the avenue of 1976 and Gough Whitlam, its constitution prevents it from making the institutional reforms that Australia was able to make
No and that's why the Québécois didn't wanna send troops to South Africa
We had communist terrorists send children to blow up military instalations
They also kidnapped two diplomats and executed one
Cool I don't know what that has to do with a constitutional crisis though
Historical discussion isn't just throwing around random unrelated anecdotes for no reason
Possibility of civil war, the fact that the constitution got violated famously for the first time against a domestic enemy and some other stuff
Yes but that has no correlation to the 1976 constitutional crisis in Australia
My point is that if Canada were to have a similar crisis, it wouldn't be capable of making institutional reforms to prevent it
Ah. Well that's true
I have no faith in our politicans
The only reason Canada is an independent nation is because of the good will of the monarchy and governor general, theoretically the Canadian constitution, unlike the Australian one is irrevocably entwined with the monarchy
Speaking of Canada and Australia @peak mango you know about the International Brigades right
Ja (depending on context)
Obviously in practice you can just rewrite the constitution but doing so legally is dubious
Canadian's volunteers suffered an extremely high fatality rate
And Australia... 1/6th I think
to which?
Mackenzie Papineau
Fun fact, only one being is above Canada's constitution
Australia, as the birthplace of the modern labour movement and workers rights, of course had people go to fight in Spain
Only about 70 people did
There was an entire Finnish Canadian unit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilkka_Machine_Gun_Company
1/4 were killed
Depending on the estimate, Canada had the highest fatality rate
66 Australians are thought to have served in the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), not counting those of Spanish descent that returned home to fight. All except one of the 66 fought for the republicans, as opposed to Franco's fascists, and around a quarter were killed.
Also foreign units had high fatality rates for the same reason as foreign units in "current events"
So one fought for Franco?
For Canada idk of any fought for Franco
Hey what's that supposed to mean?
It means what it says
Ah
Catholics predominantly supported Franco
You that explains a lot...
Protestants and anglicans predominantly either didn't take a side or supported the republicans
I know someone who has a relative who fought for the Republicans, despite being an Irish Catholic, he was ostracised from his community as a result
Same with Canada apparently
The great thing about religion is that it tends to go beyond national borders
Catholics supported Franco because Franco was a Catholic, he supported the Church and had death squads roaming the country shooting protestants and atheists
I mean, my mom once told me that despite the divide between Catholic and Orthodox we are all brothers and sisters in Christ
Speaking of
Russian orthodox fought for Franco
That's a modern ideal
