#history
1 messages · Page 132 of 1
missouri is just a very stinky ship
Wisconsin’s got a plaque detailing how her sailor drilled NBC procedures in preparation for the gulf war
josef bily is pretty based ngl
he refused to wear a blindfold during his execution and his last words were “Long live the Czechoslovak Republic! Dogs, fire!"
NBC is a valid concern there, but lorf at the idea of a chemical warhead silkworm
How large is a tank main gun compared to the guns used on ships (aa gun, dd main gun, cl main gun, etc.)?
Of what period?
WW2
Taking the US as example then, the ubiquitous M4 Shermans are mostly armed with 75mm M3s or 76mm M1s, or in some cases, the 105mm Howitzer
On a small ship, let's say a destroyer escort (DE) like Cannon-class, their primary armament is also a 76mm/50 caliber gun
But said DEs could also carry up to 127mm as their primary armament, as with the John C Butlers/Rudderows
And going up from there, you have light cruisers - anything from 127-152mm are the US' favoured choices of primary armament, with the 127 as secondary armament.
Then, up another notch, you have the heavy cruisers - 203mm primary, 127 secondary. For even heavier/larger cruisers like Alaska, they go up to 305mm.
and finally, the exciting battleships - US operated ships ranging from 305mm up to 406mm - as seen on the last US battleships, the Iowa class. These ships also carried 127mm as their secondary armament, albeit with different calibers on different ships.
Oh. Tyty.
Each nation differs, but the largest ship mounted naval rifle goes to the Japanese with 460mm on the Yamato class.
As for AA, the US opted to use the 12.7/20mm as the light AA, 28/40mm as medium, and 127mm as heavy AA battery. The 127mm was further augmented by the introduction of VT fuzes later in the war.
The first mini-skirts in Vilnius, Lithuania, 1965
Super assault fast dreadnought carrier
We can go way worse

Well that solves my problem of it looking like its ready to harvest my soul
wtf happened to that US flag
I am not sorry
Quick question: If a photo was taken at a Kriegsmarine naval base around 1943-1944, would the color of the photo be black and white or full folor?
Colour photos are already available back then, albeit in short supply
This picture of Idaho in 1942, for example, is true coloured and not added later
So its a matter of "is it available at the moment"

Also the fact that color film was more prone to damage overall, including fires.
This is why so many pieces of film have been destroyed and are referred to as lost media.
Because the original and only copy was lost in something like an archive fire
Some reel footages show information contrary to what we know, at least when it comes to paints and camouflage as well.
Whether that is a damaged reel, or the ship appeared in such manner, is up to debate.
Could be also just shitty res
Unlikely, when nearly everyone else in the formation has the same standard.
The only deviation other than the pictured destroyer is Richelieu.
No I mean like the film
Like it's not good quality
You need to be because the mount in this image is a Mark 32, not a Mark 28 used by the Iowa class 
U r now the get keel
Very similar from a visual standpoint, but I understand
Though it is rather fitting considering New Jersey always does that :3 face
idk why but my first thought at the mass of people at the bottom looks like some kind of sea creature like a coral or smth
those corals that clownfish hide in
with those somewhat hair like thing
tbh me too lol
yes that is indeed a bote
https://twitter.com/RyszardJonski/status/1693381023470428498
https://twitter.com/RyszardJonski/status/1693381025097801731
The hull of the American Lynx OMFV will have passive, activated protection and additional reactive armor plates on the sides. Allison Transmission will provide electric hybrid propulsion and electric silent maneuverability.
https://t.co/aza4hk3j3f
https://twitter.com/DefenceAust/status/1693518328755577087
https://twitter.com/DefenceAust/status/1693518352998703541
im terrible at names but i love he
god its so dorky
I think it's literally a cute joke design, no name too
Does anyone have a better quality version of this image? couldnt find anything with reverse search
Design X? Ask Krem, he post a better quality one before Kursk event
@manic latch i am in dire need of Project X documentation, got anything higher quality so i can properly zoom in?
My Kursk simping shall now reach new heights
Her mini subs she use during her skill
was the flea especially designed for her, or was it a previous design?
also i presume this drawing cuts off the waterline?
Yup
The Blokha design was more of a submersible torpedo boat designed by the engineers at TsKBS-1. This design appears to be rather simple in nature and was to be mounted on swing-out davits on Soviet warships. Two blokhi would be carried by the Project “X” Large Cruiser project then under development. This was a very large vessel, carrying up to nine floatplanes, making it a hybrid seaplane carrier-cruiser
Aren't those semi submersible?
In 1939, another midget submarine design was submitted as the M-400 by the same designer as the Blokha, and also known as the Flea. This was a more advanced submersible torpedo boat intended to operate as either a semi-submerged torpedo boat or a full-fledged midget submarine. Information of both “Blokha” projects is currently lacking
im trying to make Kursk in ftd, and its rather difficult with the lack of 3d reference material
but the higher quality images are a big help
@tough quail Project 1231
I call it "Khrushchev's dream"
originated with the Soviet premier, Nikita Khrushchev, who during a visit to a naval base in Balaklava saw submarines and missile boats next to each other. He conceived of an entire fleet able to submerge and thus ensure secrecy in the event of nuclear war. Khrushchev originally ordered the creation of a vessel that could fly, swim and dive. The designers convinced Khrushchev that the construction of a practical aircraft with the surface and sub-surface characteristics he required was impossible. Project 1231 built on the results of work on Project 662, a previous submersible ship: in particular, experience of Project 662 led to the use of hydrofoils for greater surfaced speed.
Work on Project 1231 was ceased after Khrushchev was deposed in 1964. No prototype was built and the design was closed. According to E. A. Aframeev, Project 1231 had no chance of practical implementation, despite the herculean efforts of designers.
whacky corn man
All forms
Your brain on corn syrup
So, what was NATO and Soviet solution to counter wake homing torp?
I remember a US sailor said that his ship was trained to go full speed when a wake homing torp is spotted, try to outrun the torp until run out of juice.
About 1967, the U.S. Navy deliberately aborted a wake-following weapon because no countermeasure could be developed.
The Soviets apparently adopted wake-following sometime in the 1960s. It first attracted Western attention when it was associated with their huge 65-centimeter (26.5-inch) thermal torpedo. Recent Russian sales literature makes it clear that all their antiship torpedoes use wake-following, and the Soviets never
understood why the United States did not adopt the same technique. Presumably the Soviets were willing to produce a weapon that they could not counter because they considered it more important to counter Western surface ships than to protect their own.
Wake homing is scary, once it lock on, you’re dead
I know CAT was developed post Cold War but not about what they intend to do when it was in Cold War
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/browse?type=author&authority=907b8620-2109-49aa-93b6-6e3f3a72b2c2
The Australian National University's open access library program has lots of lectures and ebooks available for free reading. Here's the stuff for Rafe de Crespigny, who writes extensively about the Later Han to Three Kingdoms period, if anyone is interested
Also, one wake-homing countermeasure that I'm curious about is the idea of turning a full circle to trick the torpedo into running along the circular wake

thinking about that one Allosaurus fossil who got its groin area pierced by a Stegosaurus thagomizer
here it is, direct hit to the balls
poor thing
Analysis of an Allosaurus fossil from southern Wyoming shows that the giant meat-eater died from a painful wound that appears to be unique in the fossil record: a deep stab to the crotch, delivered by the spiky tail of a stegosaur.
The injury is “emphatic and unambiguous” evidence of a fatal encounter between Allosaurus and the stocky herbivorous Stegosaurus, said paleontologist Robert Bakker, who made the find with his colleagues while studying the 150-million-year-old allosaur on display in a Wyoming museum.
Close inspection revealed that the meat-eater had suffered a “terrible wound” directly to the pubis, the distinctive boot-shaped bones that form the lower-front portion of the pelvis.
The deep, cone-shaped wound completely penetrated the solid pubic bone — a sign, Bakker said, of a powerful blow.
artist rendition of the incident
Ouch
US Marines wearing the somewhat rare “T-pattern” MOUT camouflage during Operation Urban Warrior, 1999
Urban warrior? 1999? Where is that
where's the guy with the skateboard?
most important image from that exercise
Operation Urban Warrior was a United States Marine Corps program created as an exercise meant to plan and test Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT) and urban warfare in general. It was developed in the mid 1990s by the Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory partly in response to growing problem on inner-city fighting, and especially made...
So basically training for a stalingrad i see
The first of 44 Leopard 2A7HU tanks purchased by the Hungarian Army is already on the way its destination.
📸Source: https://t.co/vSUO3FStS7
284
In Paul's 2022 paper, "The Tyrant Lizard King, Queen and Emperor: Multiple Lines of Physiological and Strategic Evidence Support Subtle Evolution and Probable Specification Within the North American Genus In Tyrannosaurus“ 。he listed the measurement results of the femoral circumference of all specimens of Tyrannosaurus rex that had preserved their femurs. The table shows that Cope's femur circumference has reached an astonishing 630mm, far exceeding Sue and Scotty's 580mm and 590mm, which also dwarfs Giga's 520mm femur circumference (which is already the largest among theropods except for Tyrannosaurus Rex) and makes it the only theropod with a femur circumference exceeding 600mm.
Unless there is a serious measurement error, Cope is highly likely to be a much larger Tyrannosaurus Rex than Sue and Scotty. If the measurement is accurate or the error is small, Cope is also likely to completely end the discussion on who is the largest theropod. Because if the same weight measurement method is used, giga needs to grow to over 14m, or even close to 15m, in order to reach Cope's weight. And this is almost impossible. For Spinosaurus, the same situation is similar. To achieve such a weight, according to current estimates, it would be almost impossible to perform amplification
TLDR, we've been sitting on a humongous Tyrannosaurus specimen that's been overlooked for decades
much larger than sue is wew
it's a phat one, but largely overlooked since its pretty incomplete
“Ground-launched hellfires aren’t real, they can’t hurt you”
#OTD in 1945, Admiral William Halsey hosted several senior U.S. and Royal Navy officers aboard USS Missouri to toast the surrender of Japan and the end of WWII. Halsey used a Ka-bar to cut the cake at the reception.
weak
you are like little baby
watch this
Today is the launch day of my favorite british ship
Hood completes her 105th years of launch day 
Picture from the HMS Hood Association
fantastic
@tough quail MiG-21PFM "Fishbed-G" was a modified low-speed, fixed-gear Soviet STOL (jet-lift) testbed and a predecessor of the "Faithless" STOL fighter

To understand life we must go back to the beginning. From executive producer Steven Spielberg and the Emmy® Award-winning team behind Our Planet, this is the story of Life on Our Planet.
SUBSCRIBE: http://bit.ly/29qBUt7
About Netflix:
Netflix is one of the world's leading entertainment services with over 238 million paid memberships in over 19...
@maiden citrus wdyt?
imo the CGI is a bit weaker than Prehistoric Planet
same, at the bare minimum I hope it pays attention to details
Wake up guys, new Drach video about NC development
It is bit low production, granted it was one of his first content
And yeah, a fight is a bit of an understatement
Get Entered to WIN this legendary FG 42!
https://go.getenteredtowin.com/forgottenweapons
DEADLINE to ENTER is 08/31/23 @ 11:59pm (PST).
If the FG-42 was such a great gun, then why didn't it get used after the war? Well, two answers...
- It was crazy expensive to make and there weren't very many lying around for people to use in quantity afte...
T44 (Basically a Americanized FG42)
War?
Predominantly Vietnamese comments, chinese education tend to skip those time while Vietnamese get first hand experience from relatives who are veterans.
It became cringe after a while
M60
Well I checked Wikipedia and what the Chinese called that war is uhhhh, very cringe
"Self-defense" my ass 
Don't even need to be Vietnamese to know that Vietnam would never attack China right after 30 years of continuous wars
Like who the fuck would dare to do that
Definitely not Vietnam obviously
Everyone seem to love CV90 now
they always did
90 has always been one of my beloved 
Following on from our previous episode on duelling pistols where we pronounced there isn't really such a thing - we bring you actual duelling pistols. How do we know? Well, these have been duplicitously designed to hide its rifling from prospective inspectors in order to give the user an unfair advantage in a duel.
Subscribe to our channel f...
neat!
What’s that?
Uss Gerald Ford class nuclear aircraft carrier
It has new EMAL system with lot of new technologies over Nimitz
cool
This smaller bridge helps her to store more planes on deck
Yup
Sigh

You know
This is interesting thing of danger of YouTube videos
Now lost believes this is bridge of Gerald ford class because I said so with giving some info about Gerald's features
When you do half truths it becomes so easy to Fool people after all
Oh
well shit
I’m not well versed
in modern carriers
not my thing to learn about
I mean, it should be easy to spot the different between a Soviet style bridge and an US one, you would think.
If given reference images, sure, but most people don't have those in their memory
The easy tell is that the islands on American carriers aren’t that rounded off
They’re more blocky
Been on my mind since yesterday but can anyone tell what bote dis be? 
Hull number checks out
Delivery of the F-111 to the Royal Australian Air Force was held up until General Dynamics could iron out a fatal flaw in the wing pivot design.
Contents
00:00 Introduction
01:20 F-111 Background
03:03 TFX Program
04:15 Features
04:55 Fatal Flaw
07:24 Wing pivot fitting crack
08:48 Recovery program finalised
Love the F-111? Check out the F-111...
@subtle prawn
What 0bbox sent looks more like a New Mexico/Tennessee
Definitely neither. Neither ships have their yardarms that high up.
Its either a Portland/Northampton, based on that clipper bow and the absence of an amidship anchor hawse.

Also the superstructure
A new 1,000 page book on Romania's involvement in the war came out

Looks like I really do need to learn Romanian
On July 29th 1967, on the flight deck of the supercarrier USS Forrestal, a rocket from an A4 Phantom misfired, smashing into a Skyhawk opposite and starting a fire that led to huge explosions that threatened all 5000 crew onboard. This is the story of how it started, and how it was fought.
0:00 - Intro
0:30 - The Forrestal's Mission to Vietnam...
In 1958, McDonald Aircraft Corporation delivered a prototype, twin engine, supersonic, all-weather, long range fighter - a design the US Navy could not ignore. The F-4 Phantom was designed for a new age of warfare. Rather than nimble aerial dogfighting, the F-4 would use advances in radar and missile technology to engage enemy aircraft from bey...
The F-4E is based
Barrel
My classmates drawning guns be like:
I love fallout
USS Leyte (CV-32) crewmembers swimming over the carrier's side, using her deck edge elevator as a diving platform in Augusta, Sicily, 27 May 1950.
#OTD in 1942, 30 Japanese dive bombers attacked USS Enterprise (CV-6) during the Battle of the Eastern Solomons, scoring 3 direct hits and 4 near misses. The Enterprise suffered severe damage and the loss of 74 sailors, but swift and effective damage control saved the carrier.
Apart from USS Enterprise CV-6 was USS New Jersey’s the only other naval ship in US navy history to earn more battle stars than any other US warship
Do you mean most battle stars of all time or in WW2?
Though NJ isn't near the top for either of those categories
ww2 I think cause i was searching and it said enterprise had 20 nj 19
NJ got 19 over the course of her entire 50 odd year long career
In WW2 NJ got 9 IIRC
After Enterprise's 20, O'Bannon, San Francisco, and Minneapolis are all tied at 17
If we are looking at total careers, the top should be USS Nicholas, got 30 battle stars, 16 of which were in WW2
Is the reason why it constantly says nj when i search because it’s talking abt surviving us warships
I also recently heard laffey survived 52 kamikazes and was used for nuclear testing and survived it and was temporarily put back into commission for a few years if the story is true
So I would first note that this is a different Laffey from the one in game
But Laffey DD-724 did barely survive a massive kamikaze attack, that did involve somewhere around 50 Japanese aircraft
As for the nuclear testing part, she was at Bikini collecting scientific data rather than as a target ship, though they still had to decontaminate the ship afterwards
Laffey would later fight in the Korean War, was decommissioned in 1975, and is currently a museum ship in South Carolina with Yorktown CV-10
Why do so many people say that Yamamoto said stuff about there being a gun in every blade of grass on american soil and stuff about the sleeping giant when apparently from what I’ve heard he never said it or something if those people rebutting it are telling the truth
Which warship do you think was the most impressive of every warship during world war 2
People say lots of things, a lot of quotes are apocryphal
That's a very subjective question that can be answered in a lot of different ways
DD-724 Laffey does exist ingame, but she's currently in NPC jail
Some people seem to think it might be ijn yamato or kms bismarck
While both might have gone down in a blaze of glory, I wouldn't call their careers impressive
Actually, being sunk by carrier borne aircraft the way she did isn't that glorious…
I'll say ZG-3, but that is partially biased
Tho giving love to underappreciated ships is always good
Did Yamamoto actually study in America because i hear people say he knew what America’s response to pearl harbor would be and the American mentality because he studied in America and even objected to attacking Pearl Harbor and knew after the attack they’d only have a few months of victory and then have defeat after defeat once the American war machine was up and running
Yamamoto did study in the US, as for the rest of it that's a lot more complicated and frankly not a subject I can do justice to
I also realized recently how archerfish played a decently important role with how she sunk the shinano even if it wasn’t fully completed but it could’ve been potentially dangerous if it was completely and how lucky the crew got with their torpedoes
Eh, by the time Archerfish sank Shinano things were very much a foregone conclusion
And Shinano wasnt a very good carrier, nor did Japan actually have the pilots to give her a reasonable air group
I feel like to me the main reason it feels semi-impressive is how lucky they got cause apparently shinanos sister need like 19 torpedoes and a couple bombs to sink while shinano only needed 4 that just happened to hit vital and important areas
So there are a few things to remember here
Firstly, Submarine torps are a lot larger and more powerful than aerial torps
Secondly, all 4 torpedoes hit on one side, while the air attacks were hitting both sides
Hitting one side caused Shinano to list and capsize
also Shinano was pretty much still incomplete as well
yeah damage control in IJN ships wasn't that great to begin with and then we have Shinano with a very inexperienced crew
Also to remember that overkill is a thing, and that the probable torpedo hit number on Yamato is actually around 10-12 torpedoes
And again, 10-12 aerial torps
Which is still a lot, but there were instances of more torpedo hits on a ship, even with ship launched ones
Scharnhorst was what... 11-14?
In your opinion do you think japan surrendered because of the nukes or the Soviets and were the nukes justified in that situation because i feel like it isn’t because the soviets because apparently their navy and air force wouldn’t have been as capable as the us to bring in tons of troops to invade mainland japan and in that situation it would’ve been millions die or only a couple hundred thousand die so even if it isn’t completely justified it’s better than millions more soldiers and civilians dying right and a lot of people seem to say there was internal conflict on whether to surrender and also regarding the conditional surrender and the coup as well
Hornet took like 16 torpedoes, though probably only around 8-10 actually detonated
This is again a very complicated issue, though there is a pinned essay that I think does a good job
I feel like the main reason people argue about the nukes is because we don’t know what went on back then so the Americans might not have even known that japan was coming to a consensus on unconditional surrender
its been a very long while since this was needed again
glad it can still helps folks
I feel like, had we not dropped the bombs
people would be asking to this day why we didn't
it's what I'd call an unsatisfying issue
also yeah Yamamoto studied at harvard
though something tells me they don't list him among their famous alumni
Shattered Sword gives a pretty solid breakdown of Yamamotos personality doesn't mention his study in the US as particularly influential in his decisionmaking
He was just opportunistic to a fault
A fault that destroyed his country and killed millions
he apparently got a C+ in English
Yamamoto was against war with the US, but he wasn't against attacking Pearl Harbor if war was chosen. In fact, he was the one who helped ram the idea through in the first place—he pulled his usual stunt of threatening to resign if his plan wasn't approved.
Archerfish's story is historically interesting as Shinano was the largest warship ever sunk by submarine, but as others have mentioned, the IJNAF was a dead duck by the time Shinano was sunk. Recall that even Zuikaku was sacrificed as bait during the Battle of Leyte Gulf—the IJNAF's pilot quality was shattered in the 1942 Guadalcanal campaign and never recovered, and after the 1944 Battle of the Philippine Sea it never recovered quantitatively either. Add on the fact that Shinano had a smaller airgroup than most other Japanese carriers (she was intended as more of a Unicorn-style support carrier) and it's clear that by the time she sank she was being built for a navy that no longer could benefit for her as anything aside from air strike bait.
And yeah, as others have mentioned, overkill is very easy with naval warfare. Ships, especially big ships, don't just blow up and sink immediately like in a video game (most of the time). They can take hours to succumb to fatal wounds; Kirishima for example was fatally damaged in less than 10 minutes of shelling but didn't sink for almost another 3 hours. So the total amount of ordnance used to sink a ship is a poor metric for its survivability; the Japanese light cruiser Yahagi for example (around 6700 tons standard) took six aerial torpedoes and several bombs before sinking—firepower that would sink most battleships, let alone a light cruiser a fifth of their displacement.
You could write entire books (and indeed, people have) on each of the separate questions of a) how important were each of the nuclear bombings to the final Japanese surrender, b) was using the nuclear bombs on Japanese cities the "best" option the US had for ending the Pacific War given what they had and knew at the time, c) what was the state of the Japanese government before and after the events of August 6-9, d) how many people actually died at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, e) was it morally justified within the context of the world in August 1945. New documents continue to be discovered and new books written on individual topics within the debate. Nowadays the pro-bomb side seems to have the advantage in historical circles (as the post-Cold War archives worldwide have opened up and their contents have been sifted through), but go back half a century and you'll see a different academic consensus. I have my own particular stance, and I believe it's a stance that is well-justified by the evidence and defensible using both primary and secondary sources—but what's more important to me is that people know the facts and sort out the misinformation and come to their own, reasoned conclusion based off a full understanding of what the realities were in the summer of 1945. It's time-consuming, but over the years I think it's given me a lot of perspective in many other aspects of history, so I feel the effort was worthwhile.
Because the topic has so many layers and so much depth to it, it is very easy for people with an agenda to collect a lot of technically true statements (and, if needed, false ones—there has been more than one case of an author on the topic outright falsifying most of his citations) to make all sorts of slanted or outright nonsensical arguments about the topic. YouTube, as usual, is even worse, which is unfortunate given how many people think they're getting factual information from online "edutainment" these days—but I digress. It is important to read a variety of sources, and to understand the content moreso than just parroting what the writer's conclusion was—for example, the US Strategic Bombing Survey (done just after war's end) has conclusions about Japan's food situation that are entirely contradicted by the content of its own report, in part because the authors were writing when the USAAF was trying to justify being its own military branch by emphasizing the role of strategic bombing. You will need to create (and revise) a mental model of how wars end and look past the specific arguments of the sources you're reading to see how the puzzle pieces from all the (reliable) sources fit together
Alternatively, I can just tell you my opinions and you can take them as your own. Maybe less fulfilling, but we all have finite lifespans and it is certainly faster for you.
So just let me know if you'd rather I give you sources, or my own past summaries and arguments.
Kirishima's mighty last stand against Washington
Lazers go br
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com
Johnson M1941 rifles were used in limited numbers by the US Marine Corps in the Pacific theater of World War Two, but they were used - and generally wel...
Today we commemorate the 81st anniversary of the Battle of Milne Bay. Milne Bay was the first decisive defeat of a Japanese offensive on land in the Second World War and a major Allied victory.
Learn more: https://t.co/pY1gk5bZOD
Why is Hiei there too
She's being supportive
A pilot of a Marine Corps F/A-18D Hornet flying from Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, Calif., died after a crash late Thursday night, service officials confirmed to USNI News. “2nd Marine Aircraft Wing (MAW) is aware that an F/A-18D Hornet belonging to Marine All-Weather Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA (AW)) 224 crashed in the vicinity of […]
Any explanation for the lack of depression on Soviet tanks outside of they like it that way?
just boils down to their turret designs
since most Soviet designs preferred smaller turrets with good protection
I love the incredibly cute love detail ka-27
Very poggers indeed
A website made an article and quoted an excerpt of participation that one of my favorite History YouTuber made on a podcast
Which was about the route that was used to ferry the B29s
The only problem though
They called the B29 a Fighter
And "B59"
Instead 
27 fren
@spiral cedar are all your sources on hiroshima and nagasaki the same or have you come across more?
Will be replaced with Ka-65
65's design changed alot over the years
This was early one
Why does it look French? 
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com
The AMELI (which is a contraction of "ametralladora ligera", or light machine gun) was introduced by CETME in 1981, and adopted by the Spanish military ...
There are more
Can you dm me the reccs?
Le funni 5.56 MG-42
They should have also made the 5.56 FG-42
Thanks to Conflict of Nations for sponsoring this video - Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile: 💥 https://con.onelink.me/kZW6/sl9lcv76 Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days!
In the first hours of the Air War of Operation Desert Storm, RAF Tornado crews launch dangerous low level attacks against Ir...
How are ship lengths measured? her stated length is 214m but the drawing makes her 228m
Can measure keel length, waterline length, overall length, and some others
Here you probably read waterline length, and then measured overall length
also to note that sometimes overall length changes, especially when bows get modified
Then I think the drawing is wrong since they indeed are ~215 metres long
Sent
could you dm them to me too?
Sure
thanks
Though there's no reason I can't send them here actually
I mean works for me lol
I'll give a list of authors and their areas of specialty, and then I'll send some specific book or article titles (and a few PDFs I have downloaded).
In terms of general completeness on the specific topic of ending the Pacific War, I'd suggest Richard B. Frank. He leans towards the military situation and the US perspective, but overall he's good at both thoroughness and completeness.
For the internal situation in Japan's government surrounding Hirohito, I'd suggest Herbert P. Bix as an excellent modern expert on the topic. His specialty is in the Japanese political side, rather than the nuclear physics or military side.
For Operation Downfall and the potential of a Soviet invasion of Japan, D.M. Giangreco is the foremost scholar on the topic. He specializes on the military side primarily, though political considerations play an important secondary role.
For Japan's general political and domestic situation, I'd suggest Jeremy A. Yellen. Yellen's a bit more specific but has a lot of insight into how Japan's domestic politics influenced the thinking of the government ministers.
For the actual physics of the nuclear bombs, and in particular Truman's role, Alex Wellerstein is an excellent choice. He also runs a website, nuclearsecrecy, and created the famous "Nukemap" tool. His focus is the scientific side and on Truman's role in the nuclear bombings specifically.
For insight into the role the USSR had in ending the war, Tsuyoshi Hasegawa's research has much valuable insight. Hasegawa focuses on the political side and Japan's perspective.
On the relative importance of various factors that weighed on Japanese decision makers, I recommend Sadao Asada. Asada's focus is on the political aspects and Japan's leadership.
For Japan's internal political situation, especially near the top, Robert J. C. Butow still remains a classic. However, his work is older, and as a consequence he lacked some important archival information when writing, in particular on the topic of Hirohito's role. He focuses on the political side and Japan's situation.
As for specific works, here are some.
"Ending the Asia-Pacific War: New Dimensions" by Richard B. Frank (Article)
"Ending the Pacific War: The New History" by Richard B. Frank (Book chapter)
Downfall: The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire by Richard B. Frank (Book)
"Japan's Delayed Surrender: A Reinterpretation" by Herbert P. Bix (Article)
Hell to Pay: Operation Downfall and the Invasion of Japan, expanded edition by D.M. Giangreco (Book)
"The Specter of Revolution: Reconsidering Japan's Decision to Surrender" by Jeremy A. Yellen (Article)
"How many people died at Hiroshima and Nagasaki?" by Alex Wellerstein (Web article)
"Did the Japanese offer to surrender before Hiroshima?" by Alex Wellerstein (Web article)
"A 'purely military' target? Truman's changing language about Hiroshima" by Alex Wellerstein (Web article)
"To demonstrate, or not to demonstrate?" by Alex Wellerstein (Web article)
Racing the Enemy: Stalin, Truman and Surrender of Japan by Tsuyoshi Hasegawa (Book)
"The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan's decision to Surrender: A Reconsideration" by Sadao Asada (Article)
Japan's Decision to Surrender by Robert J. C. Butow (Book)
"The Historiography of Hiroshima: The Rise and Fall of Revisionism" by Michael Kort
"The Starvation Myth: The U.S. Blockade of Japan in World War II" by Christopher Clay
I have downfall by Frank, read it a while ago
While I have restrained from editorializing about my opinions on the above authors and sources, I do feel obligated to suggest staying away from Alperovitz and his crowd. The "atomic diplomacy" faction has been fairly thoroughly discredited for outright inventing sources and references for decades and they should not be taken seriously.
ok thanks
With an increase in engine thrust by 150% the F-4X would have featured dash speeds of Mach 3.2, cruise at Mach 2.4, and flight up to 78,000ft (23,775m) altitude.
Back in action after what feels like an eternity with many new seasons to share. Micronesia, Marshall Islands, Austria, Japan and Peru, plus a few others along the way. Enough for over a year and a half uninterrupted, I think.
Today's episode is the first in our Micronesian series (Chuuk/Pohnpei/Kosrae), which in my opinion will be one of our b...


Why does this look THAT wrong??
Three Marines were killed in a Sunday MV-22B Osprey crash off the coast of Darwin, Australia, according to the service. The tilt-rotor with 23 Maines aboard crashed around 11 a.m. local time on Melville Island while Marines were participating in Exercise Predators Run, according to a statement from Marine Rotational Force – Darwin. “The incident...

Good ol 1920s

Tbf, it was more about developing contingencies in case they ever ended up in a war with the British
The British looked into the same problem in the 1920s from the other end, though generally less seriously than the Americans.
Up until the end of WW2 Britain was the U.S.’ theoretical opponent when planning for war in a European theater
Well, not just the British
War Plan Black was for a war against Germany, Gold for France, and Grey for Italy
the Canadian plan was whackier
they planned to invade the East coast, burn everything they came across and retreat to slow the Americans down till the Brits could come save them
Is that an amphibious landing through the Great Lakes and Niagara Falls? What the fuck
Not sure if those are general arrows or actually indicative of specific operaitons
But basically the idea was to sieze all the major cities and major ports to prevent the British from being able to reinforce Canada or use any Candian ports as bases for the RN.
The British were not confident that anything could be done to save Canada, and the Canadian position was that in the vent of conflict between the US and Britain they'd just declare neutrality and not get involved.
Unfortunately for them, the American plan basically called for them to consider Canada a liability no matter what they did and invade them at the outset of a conflict, even if they declared themselves neutral.
Here
I mean, yeah
"Disable Niagara power grid"
Treat on borders
are aussie helicopters just fucking cursed
i dont mean anything against them but it feels like every three months there's an australian helicopter disaster of some sort
including a lot of those horrendous bushfires iirc
Speaking of Ausi. Someone find an article explaining why Aukus is bad in most unexpected way possible for Human mind
I don't know if I have the strenght to share it here
Yeah I better just DM
is it the one blahaj posted in drach's discord?
Almost certainly from the description alone
that was quite the article lol
Project 1331M small anti-submarine ship "Aleksin" at night 
Beautiful
Would look prettier on the ocean floor.
Why?
I swear you people are weird
Do I have to always share an American ship for someone to not wish it to sink randomly
its probably just because of modern politics
plus the russians not having a good history with ships
No, the Parchims are pretty ships. The Indonesian ones have a nice charm to them, especially given the interesting aesthetics of East Germany left over on ones like Sultan Nuku.
But uh, that particular Parchim up there...
I think there's a pretty nifty saying from last year for it... Can't quite put my finger on it... I think they put it on a stamp? Something about a Snake?
oh, right
i thought it was the ships Vasily Bykov and Moskva that did the whole snake thing?
?????
She is Baltic...
its mistaken identity then i think
Yeah like most extreme thing she did was ASW training
Correct, but not my point. You know what the quote said.
And yes, I know it's in a different fleet. I still make fun of the Kuznetsov for being a gargantuan smoghouse.
???
So you hate this ship because it's Russian?
INS Trikand, that's a pretty ship. The Talwars have a loveliness to them with the way the bow design goes.
seems just like that, or they don't like how it looks in russian service?
I think he is under influence of 2022 trends. Very doubt he would say this to Aleksin in 2021
Because it literally just floats around in Baltic
yeah i get what you mean, its kinda related to politics though so im gonna drop it 
The Kirovs in their original configuration are handsome bastards
The Kiev-class looks like dogshit
true yeah, but ive been thinking about the bunch of aircraft carrier designs they had, but never actually built
iirc they had 36 seperate designs for just one hull
What like Project 1153?
Any project you want I can find it 
stuff like the komsomolets and project 72, i think thats how you spell it
72 is original hull
Inspired from Illustrious class
i found this one "article" ig that mentioned a bunch of designs
The Nanuchkas are ugly as sin and there is no point in time I would think otherwise
I'd take any "Secret Soviet Projects" article with a grain of salt
thats fair, but it has some projects ive already heard of
and its posted on a very odd place
a website for a wargaming company
either way, it has a few interesting ideas
I doubt that too!
But it's 2023 and there is a big, big crater where a cafe in Odesa I used to get coffee at once stood. So yeah, forgive me if I'm a little "irrational" and "picky" when I see a ship operated by the same country responsible for that incident.
oh i get it, yeah id say your reaction is fair
Wargaming company as in one that makes like, TTRPGs or the one that makes the WOT/WOWS series?
Because the former type probably did some research, the other is uh... slowly omnomnoming their historical credibility away.
But you said from wargaming
they make those hex and counter wargames
Tachi said "a wargaming company" so I wanted clarification there
sorry, physical wargames, like boardgames
Ah, Avalanche Press
Ohh
but yeah, ill list some of the ideas they say the soviets had
Avalanche Press is interesting in just how much they've kept up being in a niche market. Their site design's ancient too, as when I went to see if Blue Danube might have been worth getting
The wargaming club at the university (who would've thought there would be one lol) was looking for something and, oh well, guess we'll have to keep looking.
At least we can still pass our save files for RTW3 around.
My god this one fella built so many destroyers I couldn't keep count
converting the unfinished battlecruiser izmail, or the damaged battleship frunze i assume in the early-mid 20s
supposedly the third five year plan had plans for two aircraft carriers, aka project 71
an essex-like project 72 in 1943
an aircraft carrier on the unfinished hull of kronstadt
and a weird mention of finishing graf zeppelin, but it was "never seriously considered"
rtw3 mentioned, fun game
no sources or anything ofc
Bro that's so easy
Izmail and Frunze conversion proposal
ive heard of a few of them on stuff like wikipedia, but not the others
the izmail/frunze one is very interesting though
oh i didnt know that lol
Kronshtadt conversion proposal was post war on what to do with the hull called Project 69AV
do you have anything on the planned conversions, or no?
yup, the weird article said the same
Just don't play Austria in 1895
i thought about getting it, because i love alternate history and ships ofc, but idk if id actually like it
whats the gameplay like?
"Britain's fighting Russia. Germany's fighting Italy. I'm fighting my government and for my fucking life."
I'll take this DMs if you don't mind
sure yeah
oh shoot, thanks man
anything about the aircraft complement?
i might be able to find stuff like that by myself tbf
Design study date: 1928
Displacement: 36,000 standard tons
Length: 228 meters
Beam: 29.9 meters
Draught: 9.4 meters
Propulsion: 4 sets of Franco-Russian turbines with 25 Yarrow boilers
Power of propulsion: 66,000 HP
Speed: 26.5 knots
knots/endurance: ?
Complement: ?
Armament: 2x 76 mm (2x1), up to 10 other Flak guns and 4 Torpedo Tubes
Number of Aircraft: 75
Catapults: -
Hanger: 4
Aircraft Elevators: 2
Armor: belt 238-100 mm, deck 38 mm
There is also flush deck design
where do you get this stuff?
It's my life
anything on any possible aircraft? i know there was the SHON prototype, but i dont know of anything else
You usually make the planes after the work begins
Work of these never began as carrier so
oh yeah, fair
No carrier plane
i like writing small alternate history stories, so stuff like this is a goldmine for me
thank you again
they planned to convert poltava?
Wrong pic oops
lol
Here
oh right, poltava/frunze
the renaming always confuses me
im guessing you have stuff on the complement too, right?
Design study date: 1926
Displacement: 28,800 standard tons
Length: 181 meters
Beam: 26.8 meters
Draught: 8.3 meters
Propulsion: 4 sets of Parson turbines with 25 Yarrow boilers
Power of propulsion: 42,000 HP
Speed: 23 knots
knots/endurance: 1800 nautical miles at 30 knots
Complement: ?
Armament: 2x 76 (2x1), up to 10 Flak guns and 4 Torpedo Tubes
Number of Aircraft: 50
Catapults: -
Hanger: 4
Aircraft Elevators: 2
Armor: belt 250 mm, deck 100 mm
25 less than Izmail
And 3.5 knot slower
frunze is a good bit smaller tbf
which one do you think the soviets were leaning towards, if any?
Starting with these would be great. It would be like Bearn of France
Izmail easily. It's faster and larger
Carriers need both
oh that makes sense
i was thinking frunze, since it mightve been cheaper
especially since from what i know (correct me if im wrong), the navy was essentially under army control, and they didnt like their budget size
Yup
They sold 3 Izmail for scrap to Germany
Scrapped Izmail their own
Conversion of the training ship Komsomolec (ex-OKEAN)
She would be Langley of Soviets
yeah, ive heard of that one
Tier 4 in wows
i wrote a little story about them, but turns out i got a good bit of stuff wrong so ive been thinking about rewriting it
isnt it also incredibly different in wows lol
A bit
Project 71A. Chapayev hull
Serov in Wows
that one looks
a lot more like a modern carrier than the others
71A was mid/post war right?
1936
Propulsion: 2 sets of geared turbines with 6 boilers
Power of propulsion: 130,000 HP
Speed: 34 knots
knots/endurance: ?
Complement: ?
Armament: 8x 130 mm (4x2) initial design replaced in final design by 8x 100 mm (8x1), 16x 37 mm (4x4), ?x 12.2 mm
Number of Aircraft: 30-45
oh wow
now im just imagining an alternate history where the soviets went into aircraft carriers instead of keeping their battleships afloat
Ah find where I get these briefly
@wise vessel https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/219445-ussr-carriers-carriers-of-the-soviet-union-up-till-1949/
Russian and USSR Aircraft Carrier Design Studies from 1900 till 1949 It goes without saying that WOWS will see several of the USSR Aircraft Carrier design studies introduced into the game, probably around May in either 2021 or 2022. This topic presents an overview of what little reliable data is ...
There is much more as you see
do you know the most about russian designs? or do you know more?
and thank you for the link
i found a few notes about a possible conversion plan of the ise class to a full aircraft carrier in ~august 1942, but ive found nothing on any actual designs
I usually try to know most blueprint of warship designs
i found a website with some preliminary american ship designs, split into 1911-1925 and 1939-1944
you might already know it though lol
The "Spring Styles" books were a series of project books maintained by the United States Navy's Bureau of Construction and Repair (C&R) and contained plans of potential warship designs for Navy leadership. Called "Spring Styles" by the Preliminary Design staff after the term for ladies' fashion catalogs, they fulfilled an important role in the d...
You will never find the 1925-1938
yup lol
and whys that? it really annoys me ngl
oh nevermind, just read the wikipedia page
thats sad
"It is curious, of course, that the Book 1 collection was titled
"1913-1918" on its binder when in fact the mass of loose drawings
included extended as late as 1925. I can't explain that. When we
received Book 1 it was an unorganized stack of loose drawings in no
order. I rearranged them into a single sequence in chronological
order. It had some drawings as early as 1911 and some as late as
1925. So it seems possible that someone at BuShips, probably back in
the 1940s, moved some Book 2 plans into the Book 1 stack. Or maybe
the added 1918-1925 material came from another file, and was not taken
from Book 2 at all. We will never know."
if only it wasnt seemingly lost
i got a theoretical question for you @manic latch, if the soviets did get a carrier pre-ww2, where do you think it wouldve been deployed?
it might sadly explain why there isn't really much known on what would come after the sodak 1920s, despite them being around half completed
Flip a coin between Black Sea and Baltic
Pre 1918 files are also gone
it would also explain the odd gap between carrier design plans ive noticed between ~1923-1930, ive noticed multiple designs are mentioned on the wikipedia page of the uss ranger that have semi-evident roots in the post-treaty 1923-1925 designs but ive never seen the actual designs mentioned
ie a 13,800 ton plan being mentioned (presumably) turning into ranger, and there being a 13,000 ton plan in 1925
several other such design file collections that have disappeared
there (e.g., 6487 with all the pre-war aircraft carrier design books),
in addition to those stated to have been destroyed.
that just sucks, nothing else to say about that really
Of course, there were preliminary design books before 1915 as well
(when the PI 133 Entry 449 collection begins). All those disappeared,
with the sole exception of one BB38 volume (one of a series) that
accidentally got misfiled with weight books (much less important)
that did survive
i wonder how they have disappeared/been destroyed anyways
BB38 info survived by luck
I mean
Think someone deletes youtube 40 years later
When it's replaced by something else and now obsolete
sounds right, or some intern swiping what they think are non important books into their trashcan
All the videos there will be scattered
Important or not
That's why museums are valuable
Their job is to keep these safe
Or archives supposedly
mhm, i want to see at least one of the museum ships in the us, preferably uss wisconsin
Not jersey huh
im from wisconsin so i have some bias 
if there was a uss wisconsin in azur lane, theyd be my pfp
hope it's fun, I've seen a few
it'd be a pretty long roadtrip for me to see any of them
Get a plane
brilliant
Fun fact
Ticket will be cheaper
Than firing 127mm
New Jersey museums wants 500$ if you want to fire from her 127mm
Likely some kind of safe explosive inside barrel
worth it imo
if im gonna go see new jersey, im 100% gonna pay to fire one of her guns
i see
You can get her deck pieces as well
Smallest 10$ largest 250$
What I wouldn't give to buy Soyuz's deck pieces

Wisky is in Norfolk, I think?
I have an nc deck plate
jesus its a 15h drive for me 
if i go see the ship, im buying all the memoribilia i can
Arizona sells flags as well
at least you don't have to fly so yeah
same, I bought a lot of posters etc at nc including the tech book
it'd probably be cheaper to fly tbf
Also yeah please see Wisky
I've used it here for a few things as a citation lol
she’s under appreciated
im from wisconsin so i have a huge bias towards her lol
if she was in AL she'd be my pfp 100%
since it shows neat things like the internal engine layout and shows exactly what they did to fix the vibration
Iowa’s famous for being the name ship, Missouri’s famous for the surrender, and New Jersey’s gotten pretty well-known for her recent publicity
Ever tried Monk's?
what's that?
Wisconsin’s not talked about as much as her sisters
I do hope we get her in AL eventually
wisconsin fired at the north koreans 
though at the rate we’re going it’s somewhat doubtful
Only known from temper temper meme
exactly
you know what would be baller
hm?
if her art had a little drone fren
like the sumners
since their little cat robots are a nod to the DASH drones they carried later on
oh right one of the funnier things I bought was a juice bottle made from mc grapes
jeez, how much did you buy?
Wisconsin also fired at the Iraqis in 91
yup
at this rate wisconsin might be in game by 2046
probably like $200
Was the first recorded instance of a drone accepting an enemy surrender
Krem when there is a Soyuz Merchandise:
i wonder if there will even be another iowa class ship in the game within the next 5 years lol
probably not
Best I can do is Tirpitz II
nah most cursed one is amagi II
Murm chan
mini murm
what's the weirdest ship they could realistically add?
as in, one that had a chance of existing irl, or was briefly considered
imo the planned full conversion ise class wouldve been pretty weird
game has ships that didn't even receive names all the way to ddgs
montana class when 
it's hilarious that we have reached a point where montana wouldn't even be pr and would be amongst the most normal things to add
nah, she'd be the first uur
Honestly, I'd like a post-war ship that was completed before the missile age
like what?
Cancelled Essexes
Bismarck II was the point they went no history but lore. Since blueprints have history as well
But Bismarck never had such refit
bismarck 2 being in game is such a blur to me due to the absurdity that I forget about it near daily
honestly they should add all the essexes
, even add post war versions as retrofits
they could do scharnhorst retrofits
Mitscher-class, Forrest Sherman, USS Norfolk, Neustrashimy, Skoryy-class, Project 56, T47, T53, Des Moines, Worcester, Daring, etc.
they've already dipped their toes a bit into post-ww2 ships/retrofits, i wouldnt be surprised if they have events based around it
like iirc one daring class could straight up be added to the game
im glad i was taking a break when bisko 2 dropped 
Shima being UR DD is hard to judge. It's either because of firepower or because being Experimental
des moines and worcester were building during the war
I think the United States class could be funny
Oh and Stalingrad
Daring could be UR because of her strengths
one of the darings were laid down december 1945 yeah
you could probably scribble it in
honestly i only know shima bc shes super op
Assuming they actually add them and not just rerelease more rainbow Essexes
Stalin laid down post war. We don't have such ships yet
shima is due to experimental yeah
Lex II
firepower is not impressive

me reading how Shima sank
They did ask me what I would like to see, so I gave them my answer to that
js add a nuclear submarine lol
how long until they add the amagi aircraft carrier
tbf that can describe every destroyer
not many of them were known for their durability
shima died to machine gun fire
Shima dies to machine guns
oh thats just sad oh my god
paper hull with wooden superstructure 
are there any other weird ship sinkings? i know surcouf disappeared off the planet of the earth and hasnt been found
the soviets have a great history of their submarines randomly exploding/imploding or running into each other
like tech spec wise she's... ok
but she's ur due to being last in the dd line basically
Impressive, now let’s see Paul Allen’s submersible
Wow, 300 comments, did I miss something?
"she was a mangled wreck" 😭
just some talking
not really, we just were talking about soviet aircraft carriers, turned into talking about the iowa class, now we're dunking on shima
No controversy I presume?
nah
not really, no
Ah, did you ask about Izmail conversion plan?
yup, now i got a bunch of information on some soviet aircraft carrier plans that never happened
they were on the wows forum so i copied them into a google doc for safekeeping
Better print it out into paper, I nearly lost my google doc bc acc was hacked
i have a few gmail accounts i use
i can just copy and paste the doc if i really need to
Yukon was due to be scuttled by explosives, but sank in poor weather with the explosives intact before the scuttling could happen
Hm today I shall store these priceless Royal navy schematics in my attic (clueless)
U-2540 UR copium
lol ofc
ive never heard of that im js being dumb 
Tbf, that either happen at the end of Union where budget is low and training was bad or when they test new tech and try to push boundaries
yeah fair, i just find it funny in a morbid sense
She had already been decommissioned by that time, but was purchased by a group to be used as an artificial reef
one of the later Type XXI U-Boats, and perhaps the only intact U-Boat that became a museum ship
named Wilhelm Bauer
oh that just sucks in every sense
werent a few uboats (i dont remember if they were ww1 or ww2 era) sunk then refloated a decade later and put back into service?
Well, there is a Liberty ship wreck outside of Brit coast rn that are a hazard
she was one of those yeah
U-2540 I mean
oh thats interesting, i know there were 1 or 2 british destroyers that were cut in half due to damage in combat, and the halves were just welded together
and the Type XXI became pretty much a blueprint for postwar submarine developments
ww1 era i believe though
One of the tribal class
Can’t remember the name but yeah, a frankenstein ship
yeah, im so used to being the one that knows the most when it comes to ships in a discussion 
Lol
ive been in and out of this server a few times and ive always watched this channel, but never actually talked in it
Speaking of Tribals
I want my maple-syrup drinking, Hockey stick-swinging Canuck Haida.
commonwealth navies as seperate factions when 
manjuu u cowards
Prob never
yeah i know, they've already made a precedent with leander i think? idk i forgot the name
i have bad memory related to any azur lane ship that isnt meta
Aussie want their own navy but the Admiralty doesn’t like Colonies to have their own independent command
i mean, weren't the aussies closest to having an independent navy during ww2 anyways?
Canadian, well, Quebecois often vote against anything that remotely benefit Canada as a whole
sounds right
i don't know much about commonwealth navies tbh, besides that they existed
SA also have their own Navy, a quite sizable one during ww2
And speaking of the topic of weird ships to be added earlier, De Grasse since her specifications as designed and as completed were significantly different
From regular CL to CLAA
how long until they add something completely oddball like a brazilian battleship
@autumn sorrel Soviets also had a Frankenstein Destroyer. But lack of research makes it very unpopular or unknown should I say 
really? what was the name of it?
They want to have a much larger navy with capital ship unit to deter the Japanese but:
- Washington naval treaty prevent Brit from transferring capital ship to the Commonwealth and then take it back if war happen.
- It need money and the admiralty won’t approve the expenditure if Aussie have independent command
- The Great Depression hit hard
Storozhevoy, she gets head/bow section of unfinished Ognevoi class after a damage
very interesting
right, that makes sense
the washington naval treaty kinda messed everything up
It actually did what it was intended for
It did save everyone from an expensive arms race though
Stop the naval arm race for a while
and most navies followed the limits
i find it really funny that on some prelim design papers for us aircraft carriers, theres a real tonnage and then a treaty tonnage
Only when later that you see blatantly lie
maybe im misunderstanding it, it seems like theyre just planning to lie on the tonnage before the ship design even gets approved
i mean, the us navy lied a bit about the lexington class carriers back in the mid 1920s, didnt they?
it's because it doesn't count a lot of item weights in the treaty
so there's a 'what this weighs under the treaty' and 'what this would actually weigh'
feed water for example
oh yeah, i forgot about that
yeah that makes a lot more sense lol
god im supposed to be fixing my sleep schedule not up at 12:30 talking about ships
And then there's the IJN who would have attempted to build as many Ryujos as possible since any aircraft carriers below 10,000 tons wouldn't have counted towards their aircraft carrier tonnage had they not patched the loophole
They would be shite tho
how did the ryujo class perform anyways? im assuming they essentially blew up the second they got touched by a bomb, since they were that light
Which bite them in the ass at the end of the fay
Never said they wouldn't
i mean, wasnt the japanese plan to essentially hit the americans and just hope they didnt fight back?
They US would foil like Imperial Russian
id hope theyd be used more like escort carriers than full fleet carriers though, for the sake of the poor crew
Prob is, you are hitting them at their own land not a far away colony like Port Arthur
And they aren’t fighting the ruling class, the Tzar, they pissed off American people
Any backing down or even mentioning of peace talk early on to any politician is career suicide
plus they didn't hit the actual main fighting power of the american fleet in the region, they thought they were going to but they didnt
They did
Most of US line of battle was knock out
US carrier group barely maintain control
only two of them actually stayed down though, but most were out for a long time
it was just two, right? or one?
yeah two lol
the carriers were actually based at pearl harbor though, werent they? i know they were thought to be
Oklahoma was lost
(as in their base was there, i know they werent there at the time of the attack)
Arizona is a total lost
right, yeah
They are, but the carriers was out to ferry aircraft to Wake or training
One of them was saved because of bad weather
i wonder what would've happened if they were stationed at pearl harbor during the attack
Prob sink
A stationary ship is a dead ship
then wasp and ranger would be the ones holding down the pacific for a while, if they wouldnt be blown up during coral sea and/or midway
Wasp, maybe. Ranger is questionable
wasn't ranger too slow?
Ranger's too slow
right, but if all yorktown ships are gone (or if enterprise is gonna enterprise, 2 sunk and 1 out of the fight for a while), wouldn't they risk bringing ranger along anyways?
If they are desperate enough
Maybe not but wasp doesn’t have the strike capability to dmg Kido butai
that could be an interesting timeline though, with what, 3/5 of america's effective carrier striking force out right at the start of war?
The war gets extended by a few more years
but then again, yorktown was in the atlantic when ww2 began
Essex class was starting being build when Pearl happen
oklahoma was raised but not considered worth fixing, the only bb really down for good was arizona
it's also funny they talk about ranger's speed as she's like
3 knots slower at worst and still has a capable airwing
ranger was just a slightly worse yorktown class lol
ranger carrying as many planes as kaga and is faster: idk she's too weak for the pacific
its why she was placed in the atlantic, so people just say it as fact im guessing
but in any situation where there were more carrier casualties in the coral sea/midway, ranger would 100% get called to the pacific
perhaps, she was the slowest of them so least common denominator, but to say she's bad or can't fight in the pacific is uh
pretty incorrect lmfao
she had a strange history though pre-war
she was originally built as a flattop
her flight deck supports also couldnt handle modern air group in late 1943 supposedly
so that mightve been a major reason she was mainly used to ferry aircraft around
yeah that's when heavier aircraft etc started being used
now im thinking about a pacific war without the enterprise, bc of the conversation before
its too late for me to go full writing n stuff
One of the reason why Ryuujo is suck
i thought they did in mid/late 44
She can’t handle next gen IJN aircraft
I mean fully in a refit for more modern aircraft
the ryujos were js a horrible idea lol
iirc most ijn carriers had that issue except for certain ones like taihou
It seemed like a good idea to exploit the loophole to them
the concept probably couldve worked if they cared a bit more about survivability, in exchange for a smaller air group imo
probably
wasnt taihou an oddball for japanese carrier design though
She is more of a evolution in carrier design
i mean, they were also building a class of what was essentially budget hiryus at the same time
i kinda wish those warships did something instead of get bombed
taihou was overall a sound design philosophy, just had 'pudding is in the details' flaws
Japan don’t have the pilots to replace their losses
So even if those Carrier are operational, they can’t effectively use them
right, was there any way they couldve had the pilots?
besides just poofing more of them out of thin air?
like slacking the requirements or something?
Alter their training program and lower the standards
Too late by the time they did actually loosen the standards
But that is more of a culture thing
makes sense, the unyru class ships that were built had their air group sent to fight in iwo jima anyways
that was pretty much what the Lustys were built with in mind
i mean, the lustys also had over 10,000 more tons to play with in comparison
There was apparently hazing and you could not be accepted for even the most minor imperfections as if you wanted to be an IJN pilot
jesus, so it was a military role and a frat house 
Japan military culture and discipline is borderline abusive and sadistic
so what, they p much had a self sabotaging culture?
i knew it was bad but not this bad
No wonder their forces committed as many war crimes as they did besides the factor of racism
They copy Brit discipline but forget the carrot part
i see why they were kept disarmed for what, a decade post war?
i bet the american command was horrified of a militarist resurgence
JSDF do away with that culture, they are a professional volunteer force now
The JSDF is more modelled after the American military now
No? They are concerned with commie
was there any real way the japanese couldve won anyways? i doubt theyd be able to bring the americans to the negotiating table after what they did with pearl harbor
Lol, no
oh yeah, right communism
they didn't have a chance
they tried at least lmfao
1944/45 america cancelled an entire uk worth of ships when they saw how hard they were winning
As usual, Mikasa worth mentioning.
Her crew took the risk to distill alcohol in her magazines to have a booze party.
No booze, but boom instead.
not long after the end of the russo-japanese war, right?
Glatton's also another curious one, as in that the insulating cork between bulkheads was not properly installed and was instead filled with newspaper
Boilers get hot next to magazine, ship goes boom
Mutsu's cause is indeterminant, mostly attributed to angry crewman
not like she would've done much except explode if she was kept afloat anyways
She could have done something, be target practice for the USN
maybe take down an escort carrier 
One more ship does help
i mean yeah, mutsu would've helped a lot
there were plans to fully convert the ise battleships not long after midway
to convert fuso to a carrier?
Yes
i wonder if theres any blueprints left of it, probably not
The full conversion plans were met with resistance from the admirals that advocate BBs
And Hyuuga's turret no.5 conveniently exploded in 1942
So, refit Ises instead
ive only heard of the plans with ise, where they wouldve been able to carry up to 54 aircraft
do u have any more info on the fuso plans or no?
That would require a complete rebuild and a lot time and workforce
At that point, just finish the Unryuu instead
do you think the japanese wouldve been better off finishing the unryuu's instead of shinano? they had to cancel a few to convert her
They would’ve been fucked either way
Probably, but it really wouldn't have mattered by that stage of the war
do you have a book with this or something?
As it stands, Shinano is 50% complete when Pearl Harbour happened
Try Shizuo Fukui's work.
just more ships to scrap lol
Scrapping takes time, so not ideal
Honestly they probably would have been better off finishing Shinano as a battleship
thanks for letting me know
Doubtful, Shinano herself even as a Bb is a sub-class of the Yamatos
also i accidentally found this while looking for photos of various aircraft carriers
But like at the end of the day none of it actually matters, because by the time any of these ships are getting built it's already way too late
Imagine, Chiang Kai Shek have his way and Japan carrier enter chinese navy
Most things had to be altered anyway
it wouldve either gotten bombed, scuttled, or taken over by the communists lol
And Japan's air situation after Midway is truly neck deep in shit
akagi couldve gotten out of midway before the battle even started iirc
The crew and planes are still there, the ships are not
And in a few months the crews wouldn't be there either
And Eastern Solomons, and New Guinea too
Akagi was the flagship of Nagumo, she'll be there
The whole South Pacific was just bad for the IJNAF
And up until 10AM, the fleet was doing fine
a bomber almost rammed right into her command tower iirc
Until the zeros were too fixated on the TBs, and both YT and EN's airgroup arriving dramatically at the same time
Narrow miss from a Marauder, correct
But Enterprise had multiple similar close calls in her life regardless, so I don't see it as a argument of "in trouble"
Well....more so enemy blunders
itd just be an interesting idea of at least one japanese carrier surviving midway
Enterprise narrowly avoided sinking at Eastern Solomons
She was crippled and unable to steer after the first attack
The second TB squadron got lost due to botched radio communications and nobody bothering to tell the flight leader updated positions
Though honestly I have some doubts about how much the Zero's would have accomplished against the DBs even if they weren't distracted by the VT-8
Otherwise, Enterprise would likely be under
IGN called it "historical revisionism" when they depicted that in the Midway movie in 2019
its ign though lol
IGN is dumb
I feel Midway is a cumulation of a bunch of misfortunes and blunders
The movie still a mess
The 10AM situation otherwise could have been averted
It's worth noting though that the USN had its own share of bad luck
The biggest problem on hand is Coral Sea being a massive fuck up
And depleting Nagumo of the 5th Cardiv entirely
Nimitz had been hoping the subs and Midway aircraft would actually do something
And Hornets air group went to lalaland
The launch sequence of TF16 was also botched, though I guess it is in hindsight a blessing
Nimitz was going to fight Midway even if Zuikaku was there for Japan and Yorktown wasn't for the USN
It was, but the scales would not be in favour of the USN
what would happen then, if zuikaku was present and yorktown not? a japanese victory?
Lacking Yorktown would have been problematic, especially if Hornets air group again fucks up
Their way of doing things regarding carrier divisions will not allow that
Parshall had a paper on it
do u have a link to the paper?
they wanted to keep the air groups to the individual carrier, didnt they? or is that not related
I meant that 5th Cardiv would not rejoin the Kido Butai until after Midway
New sources of information reveal that in the run-up to the crucial Pacific War Battle of Midway, Admiral Chester W. Nimitz was willing to fight a potential five enemy carriers with two of his own, if Yorktown could not be repaired in time. Why would Nimitz accept those odds, and what likely would have been the outcome had such a battle taken pl...
Because Shokaku has a hole in the middle of the flight deck, and Zuikaku needs new planes
that is a GREAT title oh my lord
I thought you were referring to the airgroup thing for some reason
Well that is another valid problem
oh shoot shattered sword, i might have that book downloaded somewhere
Rigidity of the personnel to their ships






