#history
1 messages · Page 124 of 1
Because of a certain film
i thought that was a nightmare blueprint thing
You don't know the twin 152mm? It's a variant of Koalitsiya
genuine question
And someone further doing a fucking youtube video on it
how did russia manage to fight ww2 without collapsing
i didnt know they got off the blueprint stage
due to people not wanting to die
the discussion can be easily wrapped up with this one video that presents both sides arguments rather well
https://youtu.be/xG4ks5f31Wg
A review of the academic debate for and against the use of the bomb, and whether it was in fact the deciding factor in the Japanese surrender. Views presented do not necessarily represent my own.
The dropping of the Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki have traditionally been held to be the cause of the end of the Second World War in the Paci...
by being a very large country
Wait. How many were built, and how often was it used if it even was?
determination, defense in depth & lend lease
Stalin
Thanks god they rework it back to 1 barrel for reasonable sake
stalin or stalling fr
because they knew that surrender meant death, thus the only option was to fight with the hope of survival
Both
waIT WHY ARE THERE MULTIPLE IN THAT PICTURE
as for the bombings I still think jaba put it 10/10 well
and nothing can really top it
Likely few, but it was deemed to complex so single barrel happened
aid given to the Soviet Union
Keep in mind that the Russians also basically moved their industry deep into the Ural mountains with the German invasion
I thought so.
ranging from military equipment to industrial goods
to the whole of the allies, not just the USSR
when a daddy country and a mommy country love each other very much...
Imagine picking up your entire industry and moving it
since often early on it would also go us -> britain -> ussr
wasnt soviet tech in ww2 behind?
It still able to do 3 round burst fire
It births Poland, the subject of divorce papers
belgium???
didnt lend lease help the soviets alot cause like russian tech was behind
No in most cases
kremlin dont
Its something you would do when your country is on the brink of destruction.
when fatherland blitzkriegs the motherland
Not easy as it sound, tank quality gone very bad during that period
the only country to send more in lend lease back to the USA than it received was New Zealand
Soviet tech wasn’t behind in some areas but they definitely had a metric fuckton of material losses immediately after the start of Barbarossa
the only other country to come close was Australia
Truth
The ROC did the same with relocating their capital deep into the mountains of Chinese proper where guerilla warfare would hope to stop the Japanese advances
fuckton of mat losses yet they managed to keep making tanks
the Soviets only really lagged behind in electronics and computing
Counter point, Argentina
It build up Soviet logistical system
No, they don't have enough numbers
Who doesn’t like beef
wat
not a combatant, only declared war for like 5 minutes
Molotov was the only ship with air radar before invasion for example
But Beef
to be fair most ships in the world didnt have air radar
Remember
only thing i know bout argentina is that it waged war with britain for an island
Name me a country which solely donated beef of all things
then gave up
Be Poland
molotovs more of an early adopter than anything else
Get your war declaration rejected by Japan
its just, yknow, all that work cut immediately cut short
I am interested in the answer to this
If anyone was wondering Jaba talking about the surrender, it's in pins or this link #history message
LMAO
i love how japan actually did that
Mongolia iirc
though it wasnt solely beef
I need beef
goddamnit now i want a steak
Maka seeking the country to contribute hot dogs only
Argentina’s sole contribution to the war was fucking beef
That was literally it
You need Pork
Nothing else
i guess argentina is similar then
hey random whacky fact, Australia exports more wagyu than Japan does
but yeah
The Soviets going into the war were caught in the middle of a massive expansion & Reform of the armed forces with most units either lacking equipment or being stuck with lower quality equipment
the mongolian support of the USSR is cool as fuck
Hell Soviet computers were also very comparable to West until 1960s. The massive gap began in 60s
uhhhhhh
Don’t forget the officer corps was gutted the previous yrs
yeah chat is too fast for me to touch most of this at work tbh
Some soviets held up rather well against the initial slaughter, most famous one probably being Rasienai, I think?
And good leaders since Stalin’s purges
the officer purges
i dont know enough about 1950s computers in general to tell you if kremlin is full of shit or not
the Soviets shot their own computing industry in the foot when they decided to start importing IBM machines which basically destroyed their R&D
but also that's not the jaba thing I was thinking of
while having a impact
In 1936, an analog computer known as a water integrator was designed by Vladimir Lukyanov. It was the world's first computer for solving partial differential equations
is honestly given more blame
than the fact the army was just generally
not ready to fight a war
Remember Krem
Your precious Soyuz is considered a wrecking because of the purging and the tomfuckery over the TDS
Good job
MESM (Ukrainian: MEOM, Мала Електронна Обчислювальна Машина; Russian: МЭСМ, Малая Электронно-Счетная Машина; 'Small Electronic Calculating Machine') was the first universally programmable electronic computer in the Soviet Union. By some authors it was also depicted as the first one in continental Europe, even though the electromechanical compute...
Literally could be first in Europe
neat, ill look into it soon
German has been on war footing since 1939, they already fix all their mobilization problem by the time of Op Babarossa
I will fix her
I would argue the disinterest of most of the Soviet Government to actually utilize computers to their full advantage alongside the lack of a civilian sector to make up for the lack of government interest in computing largely killed whatever systems the Soviets were able to make
Nah soviet computing was already pretty far back by the 1950s
Bro MESM exists in 50s
The eastern bloc fell behind hard in the semiconductor race
I have quite a few things I could say about the Russian Navy, but I’d rather not risk hurting Kremlin’s feelings at this point.
It's very easy to be USN fan yes 
you and your post soviet rust buckets
I will shit on Kirov as built though, fite me
Same go for their chip industry, there really isn’t any demand from a non existent civilian market so they lack competitive
@tough quail Oh God.
You still use cold war Ticos and Flight 1 Burkes tho 
she's basically the most aesthetic cruiser of the war though so it makes up for her guns being turboshite
The eastern bloc actually tried to catch up to the west in semiconductors
If its only the guns it wouldnt be a problem would it
East Germany was one such nation
and let's just say their entire industry was built on quicksand
I mean the newest Tico
Torpedo cutting off a prop blade and your whole deck buckling from firing is not diejoubu
is still decently newer than the bulk of the Russian capital fleet
shhhhhhhhhhhh its fiiiiineeeeeee
Links:
- The Asianometry Newsletter: https://asianometry.substack.com
- Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Asianometry
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/asianometry
also kremlin please dont actually start a fight
Hey @tough quail Any thoughts on the Kamchatka?
In 1986, the Soviet Union had slightly more than 10,000 computers. The Americans had 1.3 million.
At the time of Stalin's death, the Soviet Union was the world's third most proficient computing power. But by the 1960s, the US-Soviet computing gap was already years long. Twenty years later, the gap was undeniable and basically permanent.
Why ...
shitpost barge
Ah yes
Better video
the drach watcher has arrived
but that's late stage tsarist russia in general
GDR botched their first batch bc they don’t want to spend few more buck on slippers 
also yeah im pretty sure half of that is fake
but i dont care because its funny
can you breakdown how much of it is falsified?
I will make a Bingo on "yes I hate Russian/Soviet Navy because only info I have about them is internet memes"
Its written by a communist who has a bone to pick with Rozhenestvensky
more comedically, the funniest part of computer history between the two is when civilian computers in the us reached a point where they were classified as super computers by law and so could not be sold to the ussr and that had to be rethought
would be very difficult to prove without access to original sources
I will defend the one thing Russia does well when it comes to naval procurement
their frigate designs are pretty alright
just take it all with a graind of salt
Yasen or Gorshkov?
I’m also pretty sure a fair bit of the records on all the ships were lost. But yeah, the stories are funny as hell
And yes, I unfortunately dont have primary access
also their ships have like, actual shapes going on
ah the traditional "it came from one source and im not gonna check if theres any other sources which backs it up"
Gorshkovs
But from my understanding the accounts do not match up with what was described
Pretty sure Avrora was fine though.
Anti Commie does make a fool of themselves time to time
Alexei Novikov-Priboi (aka Alexei Zaterty): Tsushima or Tsushima: Grave of a Floating City: Steward aboard Orel/Oryol, and an open revolutionary (was in fact imprisoned for revolutionary sentiment pre-RJW but was released to serve). Despite the fact that his account is incredibly suspect (he insists he found his memoir notes in a beehive after hiding them there decades before, and studies by Westwood and McLaughlin note that he contradicts his own anonymous publication under A. Zaterty shortly after the RJW, and that there are INSANE discrepancies between the 1937 1st Edition and later revisions), it is applauded and often cited (perhaps with bad judgment) because he is the ONLY comprehensive testimony written from the perspective of a common sailor, and combined reported "reports" from other sailors he met while a prisoner-of-war. Pro-revolutionary, very anti-officer and anti-Rozhestvensky (he is cited as a possible origin of the "Rozhestvensky throws binoculars when angry). His book will be insanely hard to acquire; I got lucky and found one for sale in the US for $12, but the next copy was $120. Lived and became a famous Soviet author.
Gepard
maybe aurora was fine because it also served the communist regime
Yasen cute
Never mind the fact majority of the wikipedia article came from a single fucking website
its something Russia is actually able to both afford and build while being rather well armed for a frigate
vs the uhhhh
super cruisers designs they keep shitting out
then never end up building
But hey, throwing binoculars is funny, I guess
I honestly thought this was one of those futuristic trains you see in movies
like futurustic tram carriage
Frigate with Cruise missile strike capability, I will take ten
submarines are just water trains
Just next to a French officer tearing his wig off, throwing it and his telescope off a ship of the line
behold, snowpiercer
🧠
they build better frigates than the Germans
dw guys Russia can totally afford a new carrier
Then subsequently restrained by his fellow officers
Meko 300s:
For being absolutely angry at Villeneueve

I'm sure there is only 2 I know, Lider and uhh Project 21956
tato i build better frigates than the germans
Tbf, German keep building pocket battleship
its a low bar to cross
but Russia has failed to cross a lot of low bars as of late
(I AM REFERRING TO PROCUREMENT ONLY!)
aren't German frigates big but kind of underpowered in terms of armament lately?
tbf like
Builds only Fifth gen in Europe instead buying it
Gets bullied by Europeans for it
the entire world sucks at procurement
yes
I will have my revenge on Fcas and Tempest procurement
the only one doing "well" at military procurement is poland
I think someone here has a bone to pick with the Baden Würtemburgs
and they;'re going to bankrupt themselves
honestly
its okay guys the Hunter class will still work we just need to wait longer
because iirc it was meant for low-intensity conflict
Easy when you are buying it from others

as long as they chill on their
they think its too easy
MLRS numbers
They have a legitimate threat to sink the economy under just to buy weapons
and somehow think they can uhhhh
You know what I find funny
they'd be basically operating a South Korea sized army
have a military larger than the combined whole of western europe
with a South Korea sized budget
Both Prince of Wales has issues with their shafts
its doable
Bad namesake do be bad /s
Turkey still has more tanks than Poland since M48s lmao
But not a SK size economy 
man i want an m48
I mean tbf we kinda can't do the hilarious counterargument since current events
South Korea had to maintain that defense spending level for decades before their economic miracle
poland is not going to keep their fleet of bullshit
Reject egg
She is fixed
Embrace Centurion
as soon as the maintenance periods start rolling in
polands military is going to eat shit hand over fist
but everything else I think its reasonable
That is kinda wishful thinking
Yea, an unfortunate coincidence
I generally
I support it, imagine the maintenance funding those things will suck it up
because they have more spaghetti logistics than the entirety of italy can produce
do not know how the fuck you keep that many 227 MM systems operational

I rather have the capability to manufacture ammunition for the weapon system than buy more of it.
there gonna have the South Korean rockets on license
I’m reminded of a time when Willis Lee wanted the Bureau of Ships to install a bunch of AA guns on all ships in the USN, but they were very hesitant to do so because they were worried about how sea worthy the ships would be with so many guns on board. The guy that Lee sent had clarified to them that the letter had only said “the procurement” of AA guns, and the Bureau signed the letter.
However, when Lee’s guy came back with the signed letter, he made one last edit “the procurement and installation”.
but I don't think that includes 227 MM rockets
@desert agate I just realised
no LRASM-SL? 
When I said the Italian navy was crippled at Taranto
I was wrong obviously
But not completely

J-20 without canards is sexy af
(it didnt)

for a few weeks lmao
^^^^^
But still crippled 😕
the battleships were mostly repaired very quickly
...Littorio was quickly repaired
The only true loss is Cavour
And even then, she was salvaged and work was done on her
They had a broken leg
ok finally finished reading the 10 reasons why japan wasnt close to surrender
You need crutches
To get 65mm AA guns and DP 120mms
guy drops a spanner: OH GOD THE NAVY IS CRIPPLED
MORE POWERFUL
wasn't Taranto very shallow and pretty easy to recover from
god
Yurd
It is
2943?!
why is italian AA so fucking based
Yes
it was rad in the late 30s all the way until now
I mean the Italians DID lose a whole battleship
But, Littorio sank in mud
it was like Pearl but the damage was minimal and easy to recover from
Which I mean isn’t a whole big deal but
Again
we did it guys we got their battleships
-nevada shows up with boom sfx-
2943 Cavour? Someone to fight SB Yamato
I thought the story I told a few minutes ago would get a laugh here.
It is not a hull loss like Oklahoma and Arizona
Join this channel for exclusive videos:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzIZ8HrzDgc-pNQDUG6avBA/join
Check out D-Day 24 Hours https://www.youtube.com/@D-Day24Hours-sm5pe
Chapters:
00:00 - What was the USS Nevada?
01:58 - How the USS Nevada Changed the Grand Fleet
03:30 - Amazing stories aboard the USS Nevada
06:14 - Salvaging the USS Nevad...
I also was brushing up and the reason why the Royal Navy struggled so hard to beat the Italians was because the Italians were specifically ordered not to engage in pitched battle
everyone thinking we gonna end up with rad looking space battleships
yeah thats fleet in being
The RN in general is fucking strained in resources
the royal navy can pitch deez
Fleet in being is still a valid concept back then
but deep down we all know we're gonna be stuck with the space combat cylinder

Uss Elon Musk
please die
can we get Project Orion battleship
It will happen
As you can see I need to read more
James Webb
i will blame you for it personally kremlin
I used to know this like the back of my hand
I should also note that Matapan's disaster had to do with Sansonetti
if it happens im shooting it down
We need more pylons to help the protoss
everything is gonna look like this 
you have to be notable to get a ship named after you
my man
reminds me of something
Same
not just buy companies and rename them with your x brand
USS Zendaya
we dont have a USS Ford so we wont get a USS Elon Musk
Yurd
See, the solution is to have Earth become a radioactive wasteland
Then you need to design a spaceship that needs to land on another water type planet
i like how this guy didnt know enough about france to know anything past the suffrens
Ez
Yup
no armor
poor france and italy always gets screwed despite being the major naval powers
sufferings
I mean, that's pretty much the Suffrens
2nd rate power
and only or
yeah i mean
world class armor
There is high compartimentalization and ER/BR separation
I do have a question regarding the Regia Marina
But that and French metallurgy in 1920 is
or god forbid fucking richelieu
Die
Did they ever at all see the need for aircraft carriers
Aquila
I mean if we're going off by just a few ships most memes break
Impero
well they were working on a few so yeah
compared to fucking germany or russia? they're leagues above them lmao
Interesting
problem was uh
that said i would argue carriers for the RM is
regia aeronautica
completely useless
I just never really heard of any notable ships
Yurd
Aquila, Sparviero for Italy
And the war being so close to home that it really wasn’t needed
This is fascinating, I had zero clue about this. Thanks
Joffre, Painleve for France
RM/RA rivaly puts IJN/IJA rivalry to shame
France even had Bearn, but she...didnt work well
because they dont really have the resources to completely commit to a full carrier fleet without severely damaging the rest of their navy
and
yknow
its the med
incorrect, it allows sailors to sleep there at sea with all its bunkbeds, in case the city is bombed
they have land planes
As expected of a first carrier
you know what
fair shout
You are comparing them with some one who don’t have a navy until just a few yrs prior and the Russian
@desert agate did I tell you that my great grandpa served on warspite
Like Unironically
it's not a cv, it's actually a barracks ship
okay, valid
The spotting and recon being sucky is what costed Italy Matapan
but i still fall back to the earlier point of
you did mention it
they dont have enough to commit to a large carrier wing
My only claim to inheritable fame
1-3 carriers as an investment is basically worthless
If you have a full fledged carrier to do the spotting, things may be different
Göring pretty much single handedly fucked over Graf Zeppelin
And Sansonetti not being a dumbass
Plan Z could have been everytbing
well
Graf Zeppelin was uhhhh
"Bait the enemy cruiser squadron into BB range"
fucked over by a lot of things
okay, yeah, i suppose recon has an argument
they probably need 4 or 5 to not get lonely yeah
but as a striking force its kinda stinky
chases the squadron down
some fish are like that
italy could've make their CV by putting engines and propellers on Corsica or something smh
based
Let me get Phoenix
Plan Z also assumes that the other nations don't plan to rearm their navy to compete with Germany
I keep 6 aircraft carriers for home defense
And also competing with Britains home fleet was practically ALMOST suicide
But British commanders are dumb
plan z is germany if they had the space battleship yamato time dilation shipyard
which really doesnt invalidate my point. still major navies.
Literally only sin of Soviet Navy was starting construction of +300 too late
“For Germany, a navy is a luxury. For Britain, a navy is a necessity”
British naval officers when you provide them with a plan that assumes a competent enemy rather than the enemy making the worst possible decisions in a given situation (they just lost most of the Pacific fleet)
Here, Regarding Italian carriers
I stand by the statement of “British soldiers are lions led by donkeys
they got caught in the middle of a massive military expansion
if you told me britain didn't test its own guns against its own armor for immune zones I'd believe you
one, because of what spon just said
tbf for germany a navy is a necessity too
and the navy had to abandon the most in the process
its part of why they died
two, because uh, yeah it kinda be like that sometimes
T-34M 
They didn’t need a surface navy
Just wondering: How would the N3s or G3s have faired in a WW2 scenario against if the H-class ships were actually built
They just needed to be decisive in what they wanted FROM their navy
man if that T-34M render with the hull cheeks is real im incredibly mad we lost that
Dosnt N3 has
9 457mm
Pointless to compare on paper
g3s would have been fine, they're basically nelson but faster
Towards the end definitely
n3 is quite strong and probably elicopses anything but the memey H classes
no, always
G-3 is Fishers wet dream and therefore kinda sucked
But Atp why even have a navy if you have both Britain and the US bearing down on you
legendary sub 5% allied shipping sunk....
less than 1% per month on average 
I mean both options would have led to defeat either way
Simply because the allies could put produce
I don’t know nearly enough about WW2 subs as I do surface ships.
thats my point though
it was almost 2% but not quite yeah
How not to lose the war
its a donkey led by fancier donkey
Dont start a war
its an absolute necessity to protect their shores
Fuck around and find out
they just dont have the means to obtain it
i.e
they were doomed to lose
i.e
don't piss off most of the industrialized world with your crazy nazi expansionism bullshit
And if you want to talk about Germans, really, I feel Panzerschiffe are the peak
Truth
though to be fair with how much was being shipped even 2% really sucks
correct
Hard to find one, absurd cruising range
Random Siberia jumpscare
AAAAAA
Why is that a dope af photo though
And absolutely bricked firepower that would fuck over any merchant protecting auxiliary cruiser
that looks like a russian album cover
iirc the casualty rate for 1943 at the peak was 4% at max
never reached any higher than 1% after that peak
I still don’t know why devs haven’t put HMS Dreadnought in the game
A bit of an exaggeration maybe
but yeah it's nothing like ww1 and is often overstated, because people read it as tonnages and not percent of tonnages, though... like I said tbf it still does suck you lose that much, just because you have a lot doesn't mean it doesn't suck you lose some
One ship every 17 days
not an exaggeration
Because Dreadnought is fucking outclassed in the matter of years
I meant Japan’s response
us ended the war with a bigger fleet than pretty much the whole world combined and cancelled an entire britain's worth of ships in 44 when they realized, wait, it's basically over lol
Well yes, but you wouldn’t even HAVE modern battleships WITHOUT dreadnought
That would supersede Dreadnought in nearly everything
yes you would
every time i see this footage i notice more RAN ships
I fully believe in the industrial might of the American war machine.
the 1900s-1910s is naval warfare development on hyper steroids
shipbuilding advanced at warp speed
Literally every place in Siberia feels like that lmao
Idk man I still think dreadnought was pretty monumental
tfw this came from the same organization that designed the type 1934 destroyers😂
dreadnought wasn't the first designed 'dreadnought' even
not really. Satsumas and South Carolinas were already on the slipways when Dreadnought was launched
We went from sailing frigates to guns that can fire over the horizon in a short 50 years
Ik
oh hi Canberra
in terms of F-16XL & F-15E, the right aircraft won
Still
Satsuma is not a dreadnought
The gun shortage meant she is a semi at best
but fisher made them build dreadnought on steroids and that's why it finished so fast
iirc he even had stuff delivered to the docks before approval
Even Kawachi is debatable if you are a dreadnought purist
it annoys me that some of the best footage of RAN combat operations in the Pacific is used by Americans to wank their navy
Hey I didn’t make the video
Even if it was outclassed
im pretty sure fisher built like
15% of the royal navy with his bare hands
strung out on various drugs
You know whats fucking hilarious
I'm happy with 4 R-33 Mig-31. Tho shame Mig-31M died, she would have 6
Homie was too angry that they weren’t miles ahead
I saw a documentary talking about Midway once
The stock footage used is a US plane strafing Shimakaze at Ormoc Bay
lol
Imagine tiktok existed in ww2
you guys still remember when WT put shimakaze in with only two turrets
sorry Krem, this is a Sukhoi channel
must be working with some 1950-era secret documents
one chance at life
lmao that's funny
Canard Aircraft on top
Gripen
'we put her in historically accurate'
The gripen is possibly one of the best aircraft in its price range
The fuckbuckets did that, the Kageros did that
So surely Shimakaze would do it as well, right?
which Gripen?
F-35 exists
that argument falls apart when you're talking about
it's still funny to imagine the sekrit dokuments had a smudge and they couldn't make out the turret
PRICE RANGE
the top end of the Gripen family
Who would win
The most advanced Japanese DD that is essentially the next evolution of the torpedo boar with enough torpedoes to match the name
Or
One fletcher class destroyer where half of the weight is made of it’s captains balls of steel?
DO YOU KNOW HOW EXPENSIVE THE F-35 IS
well, did the yugumos exist when they added shimakaze?
35 is still more cost effective lmao
Gripen is about as expensive as an F-35 per unit
This is true yes
CHEAPER THAN A NEW F-16
However
the F-35 is actually as cheap per unit
I'll tell you how to sink shimakaze
Ok the Johnston was sunk, but Shimakaze still missed all its torpedoes
its somewhat cheaper in operating costs but the capability gap is worth it
Very easy, .50 bmg
yeah
I’m thinking of block 1 f-35
And a couple bomb near misses
the JAS-39E is 89 million per
block 1 F-35 isnt even combat capable
while the F-35A is about 80 million
Shimakaze is so lightly built, she just flooded herself to death
shimikaze is worse than fletchers in many, many ways
Didn't Finland recently select the F-35 and they found the Gripen to be more expensive per unit
Shoulda made Shima more sturdy
I name thee, Yak-38M1M
Lets be honest, Fletcher is basically cheating compared to everyone
Tfw a Fletcher has more broadside AA weight than your fucking dedicated AA cruiser
I remember the Finnish report saying that the Gripen was no more cheaper than the F-35 while losing in capabilities
Don’t fuck with the tin cans
Yurd
yes but it's still funny people might thing they weren't very good just due to how many got built
Though my all time favourite aircraft is still the euro fighter
didnt even get the opportunity to face the man of steel since she was damaged in a collision and was stacked with survivors from sunken ships lmao
reminder fletcher also has more aa throw weight than bismarck
being able to fling 8 meteors is honestly
Industry skill issue
quite a nice feature to have
Yurd
Thats why you dont build the Sims in hordes
I wonder what was the worst DD to be mass produced
I fucking love those little ships (relatively little)
*DD class
clemson
Many contenders here
good question
she was strafed to death, it wasnt just two near misses.
Ehh...wouldnt say Clemson
clemson? what
just gotta wait on JATM to actually be a thing thats in service

Strafes and near misses caused her boilers to flood and explode
Hatsuharu, until they realized that at least a third of the armament had to go
A dead ship in the water then just dies
Also, time to piss off Sirene since he's here
My secret form when Soyuz gets hurt
I was going to ask if the german ones count as mass produced
Do I need to get my bingo chart?
I’m trying to find a point in time in which I know a huge amount about
stop this schizophrenia please
Be humble then
Ok I know Sirene is gonna wack on me but was Shitzig really the worst CL of ww2
it's more interesting to always be learning than always show off
Actually you know what
not everyone knows everything
my SME is Australian history so god help me when the chat talks about other stuff
I’m a business finance major
1934s weren't truly mass produced, they were this sort of first badge of botes
Its the Type 1934 I think he may contend with
I’ve still yet to learn every detail about my favorite ship (Enterprise)
I can tell you the ins and outs of any type of loan, mortgage or financial agreement
I mean yeah you said a clemson is the worst mass produced dd when they're so solid they were used for tons of jobs even in ww2, but I forgive you
military economics is based
And I'd argue the Type 1936As as well
which one, if you need NX-01 schematics I have some good ones
Here’s how you finance a war
So was Shitzig the worst CL of ww2 or was there another ship that can contend this title
Go into debt
id just argue that theyre pretty underarmed for the time
yeah they have shittons of torpedos
but thats about it
My hatred for Shitzig is too strong to accept any other contender as worse
most dds at the time only have a few 4'' popguns
japanese CLs👀
TIL you can make space ship designs for cheap by just pulling the masts off of SSBNs and using those
Even tho Agano should be just as bad
Was about to say Agano
most RN DDs of the period have at minimum 4 guns, some as many as 5
I was about to fucking confuse Benson and Clemson
clemsons have 2
Wouldnt really count the 5,500 tonners
everything will all eventually become space cylinders
and clemsons have good range, good asw design, and the ability to be upgraded to have a 6 gun broadside
oyodo is worse
space subs
Never
built for something so niche that they never could use her for her intended purpose
sorry, 4, 2 on the wings
which like
Circle Five my beloved
for a class coming into service in 1919, against a V/W class which is not only younger but also more capable
idk
correct take
Speaking of AA, would it have been possible to just remove the superstructure off a CL hull and just slap all the guns on it
fellow 10cm enjoyer
Like use it purely as an AA barge
No
removing the director?
you wouldnt be able to aim it at anything usefully
goodluck hittinga nything
A turret weighs much heavier than a supersrructure
And without directors your guns are useless
But why
The 20mm is dogshit by 1945 against Kamikazes
more capable how? it's less sturdily built, has less range, far less torpedoes, and in correct configuration also has less firepower
So much so even the 40mm is barely acceptable
And more importantly, cramming that many assets on a single ship is putting everything in a single basket
kitakami moment
Better to split it between ships
Soviets used the hull they created for Soyuz class torpedo system testing as AA platform
oh my god i forgot about that thing
See I Unironically know more about tanks than I do about ships
as for aa they both suck but its also equal
Even built for her niche role, Ooyodo as an individual ship was significantly better than Agano
Kitakami, what a shitshow
is a Clemson really more sturdily built than a V/W?
clemsons have reinforced structure yeah
Agano was just an awfully designed ship, using awful pieces
Ye
When your 40 torpedos are so bad they took half of it off and delegated you to TRANSPORT duty a few months into the pacific war
Ooyodo may have a botched plan in mind, but the end result is still a workable ship
Truly Bantai Kessen
I actually feel sorry for that.
She never sunk and did her mission lol
tfw they cant even give you all the tubes and torpedoes you needed to be the overhyped torpedo cruiser
Yes, Yamada, this is a 40 torpedo tube ship
No, we are not fighting, get into the fucking oil drum
see this is why im baffled when people go "but the ww2 soviet navy isn't interesting :(" when they do batshit insane shit like this
'we did it!'
-crowd cheers-
'so anyway, time to undo it'
-crowd sighs-
id argue that an all centreline armament of guns and torpedoes makes the V/W considerably more space efficient and also gave them considerably more reserve displacement for upgrades and the like
can I ask what V/W means
literally V/W class
V- and W- class destroyers
the names start with v, then w
I was trying to find what the British navy was good at routinely, because my opinion on the Royal Navy is pretty negative
Oh British
I mean, uninteresting Soviet Navy
I thought V/W was a single class
Vampire is most famous one probably
You guys proposed a soviet montana
wait till you hear the j/k/n class
JKN
I thought it was an abbreviation for a class or smth
it was
ah mb
LM are their own
that's possible, though the clemson does have large superstructure facilities (that are strong enough to mount 4 guns and 2 aa guns on!) so it's not as if it doesn't have mount points
I don't know what the full load of a v/w is fairly
the V/W class is a single design, all the names just start with the letters V and W
Like I thought V and W stood for some words
Volkswagen
The ship
Yes
british dds are often named after letters
Most British DDs follow the alphabet system
Nowadays it’s just type xx destroyer
Exceptions to ships like Tribals
tribals are kinda based
I do hate my memory Tho. Sometimes I forget the anchor weights of Soyuz or her wooden deck weight 
Why would you need to remember that
It’s such a specific detail
Yeah I get that the british did alphabets. My brain is just dead af rn that my first thought was that V/W was an acronym like how WV is for West Virginia. Brain first defaulted to reading that as Virginia/West
It's equal to knowing your wife's shoe size
Which is an 8
It will be very useful for gifts

depending on her time period, at her maximum Vampire fitted 6x2 pompoms, 5 .303s (1 Vickers, 4 Lewis), 1 12 pounder,
now I just imagined west virginia sailing into battle backwards due to turbo electric shenanigans
I look at my fiancées feet a lot because I always look down
causing the japanese to identify her as virginia west class

Exactly
she also at various stages fitted 2x2 Breda 20mm guns
Wait what?
Nishimura's last vision at Surigao on Yamashiro's bridgr
hold on only vanguard had the sextuple bofors mounts right
West Virginia steaming at him , butt first
in fact you can actually see her Breda guns in this picture
there have been so many clemson modifications I'm unsure where to start
Breda guns which are entirely unnoficial
but that is cool
"I'm trying to sneak by but I'm dummy thicc and the sound of my stern is alerting the enemy"
Clemsons also have the funny of being
APDs
(and subjected to war crimes from an IJN favourite)
this looks more like a transliteration of the japanese name for them tbh (unless they just phonetically wrote it as virginia west)
very strong flush hulls and super asw shape/design, love me some clemsons
Someone answer this question for me
Why is it that using oil as ship fuel was something revolutionary
weight
I even searched most of CIA archives online to find the documents about her. Which I did
In context of the arms race between Britain and Germany
Oil burning is efficient
it holds a lot more energy than coal per weight, and is easier to work with
looking at a random Clemson, HMS Chesterfield, fit 3 76mm guns and 1 .30cal for AA
also it doesnt produce terrible smoke
And somehow the Germans just never thought of this
but tbh it wouldnt surprise me if someone squeezed a bunch more on
Coaldust ignited by HE, setting whole ship ablaze
No more like Germany didn't have the resources to do that
Germany didn't have that much oil while coal was pretty abundant
germany is rich in (admittedly shitty compared to british) coal
That makes more sense
@random trench Sovetsky Soyuz's CIA file

LMFAO
Germans...literally went straight to diesel
For maximum cruising range
So much so that even Japan considered Diesel for the Yamatos
standard clemson for the time was like, the 3'' and four machine guns
Im also a firm believer in that a 76mm tank gun is better than an 88mm
but sometimes
Six 3-in or 76mm/50 Mk 20 were installed as well as two 12.7mm/90 or cal.50 Browning AA HMGs.
Unfortunately the Japanese diesels sucked dick
sometimes you just throw caution to the wind
well that explains why they only gave diesels to the second-line destroyers and kaibokans
Sherman tanks always fun
A4: No
Yes and no
A4 sucks
Nisshin, a seaplane tender, uses diesel
Wait quick question regarding AA: Which ships carried the octuple pom-poms and the sextuple bofor mounts
Do you need a maid of honor? There’s a Sherman for that
Its the ones on Taigei that is an absolute shitshow
Yamato had less cruising range than battleships built twenty years before her.
And those are the ones intended in the Yamato design
And uhh how much heavier Yamato is
ah, not really familiar with the japanese auxiliary, good to know.
Also
Doesn’t help her case.
Vanguard had sextuple bofors
Octo pompom is widespread, many ships had it
only vanguard had it?
clemsons were truly versatile
which ships notably had it?
...nearly every famous vesel of the RN
a lot of the troop ones basically took the front two engine rooms out and installed living space for hundreds of landing troops
they're so quirky
ah s o they basically slapped it eveywhere
Its the equivalent of the US bofors except sucking much harder
actually, do you have anything about this one? might read it up someday
Only have it in Japanese language
thats fine
And a small excerpt only
wait what was the issue with it
pompom is a mediocre chicago piano, don't at me
@flat copper ok what do you believe Yamato's endurance range is by nm?
Well I didn’t memorize it sorry.
On Prince of Wales at least, the Pom Poms had no tracers, so they could not see the shot, nor deter determined attackers
Her trial results. It's around 3000NM better than her design requirements
her actual endurance is some 10,141 nm at 16.6 knots.
And once power to that ship was lost, the pom poms just straight up died
It speaks volumes when the AA director said the lone bofors on the back was more effective than the octuple pom poms
pompom shell is slow, not very destructive either as I understand it, and range for the weapon size is very meh due to the slowness, also some build problems and the director is poor
Ooo
Ah yes, HACS
Daring?
is the pom pom the same gun that the japanese mounted on the hatsuharus and shiratsuyus?
No it's British 40mm
the 40mm they found terrible that they swapped it for the 25mm?
I find it funny how the brits refused to drop the pom pom
And decided to just glue the bofors on instead
5.25in was the largest "practical" AA gun right
Wonder how much of a logistical nightmare it is
"shells for the 40mm please"
"Which one"
152mm
Right, that would help
naval gun?
Practical wise, I think 127 is the limit
Tiger and Worcester
The 133mm is pretty awful
I'm searching 152mm AA guns and all I've been finding were army guns
Search Uss Worcester
without automation 5'' is about it yeah
France tried ™️
Oh the Cleveland guns
even the 5.25'' had weight and loading trouble
No
it's why the fire rate is so low
Worcester guns
oh right the cleveland ones weren't DP
Japan planning for 140mm/55cals for AA, on their treaty designs, was for that dp turret capable pf elevating 80 degrees,
casemates being able to do the same
Any gun is dual purpose if the attacker flies low enough
County class main armament was theoretically DP
correct
Canberra even took down a bomber with her 8in guns
fubuki moment
I think I heard somewhere Haruna/Kirishima was using their 36cm guns to make water columns on the SBDs after they made their runs during Midway
wait speaking of low: What's the highest altitude torp bombers can realistically drop their torps
Nelson and Gremyashchy also did it irrc
because why not
Water bad
a few hundred feet at most
des moines and iowa also have official anti air charts
but in practical use how high were they when they drop?
I’m seeing everything aboht battleships and I’m still of the mind like “rest in shit battleships, get dunked on shitheads”
"dual purpose casemate" on Kongou Daikan
With 70 degree elevation
but also based
not as bad as houston supposedly using her main guns for AA duty in one encounter because the ABDA fleet were literal rust buckets
Yea, I know
This post was made by aircraft carrier gang
Remember when US had 2km barge concept
Excerpt you requested
let me just leave this here, cya
thank you very much
Oh this shit again about the bombing of japan
Hull sagging: yes

Ice cream ship ice cream ship
catamaran too, based
Not this bullshit again
ICE CREAM SHIP
Mini Soviet Fren
It's a mini carrier
it's short and stout
Would be funny if supercarriers went catamaran hull
I know are many terrible fucking engineering issues with it
But a catamaran hull carrier looks goofy
i consider posting something this stupid a war crime
you called?