#history
1 messages · Page 114 of 1

all for 4 x 2 14" guns
After Santa Cruz, Enterprise was the only operational carrier until ~August 1943
even very heavily armored things like g3 have very small immune zone vs lexington guns, but lexington in return is vulnerable to essentially anything above cruiser caliber (which was not uncommon for many parts of bc protection, buuuut for lexington it was not 'many parts' it was 'basically all parts')
Saratoga is busy being Sara Maru and is sitting at a drydock repairing, after she got mauled by I-26 back in 1942
wait can I have a comparison of this to the uh Iowa's
All other Pacific Carriers at this point were under the sea
Which is why the US requested HMS Victorious to be loaned to the US for some time
So was Hornet being lost a fault of anyone particularly or was it just something that kinda happened?
Like you can't point to any particular avoidable factor and say "this is what condemned the ship"
Wait Silver what is that long ship pic that you sent supposed to be?
She was under concentrated attack, and with the Japanese surface force approaching quick, she was abandoned
Monograph page on a 1912 US Navy ship design
Shokaku and Zuikaku survived until 44? Jesus...
WAIT
You telling me the 2 carriers couldn't supply enough air cover

Against a determined attacker and still early CAP, yes
Eastern Solomons was a good example, the radar detected incoming planes, but wrongly guessed their altitude, and with 40+ planes sharing one radio channel
so CAP failed to shoot any of the attackers down before they reached Enterprise and disabled her
as for how the lexingtons would fair against the amagis, both have essentially newspaper armor (amagi has essentially equal deck over mags, and slightly more armor here and there, but not by much, e.g. sub 10 inch belt, basically same belt slope angle for both too) vs the other one, similar dimensions and similar weight, so whoever landed a decent hit first probably wins, the ships can absolutely stand up to each other because neither can survive each other at... virtually any range
the main differences between the two are lexington's guns are significantly stronger and is 3 knots faster but amagi has one extra twin turret
armor seems okay tho?
that's pretty good yeh
rather lacking in the firepower department, though.
for 1912 it's not that bad, but for a ship that size it's supremely under armed and under armored even if the armor for the period is good and the armament is alright
if you can build two ships for the weight of one and each of those two ships can beat it in a fight, you might want to tone it down
#안승범 #소닉PD #유승식 #디펜스타임즈 #전차 #현대로템
소닉PD의 밀리터리 토크쇼.
광고 협찬 및 방송출연 문의/ supersonictv@naver.com
this one kinda interests me, how good were the Bismarck Class BBs really
they're a ship that is recognized heavily by reputation, but is said reputation warranted or was it really just a lucky circumstance that earned it.

Again, a complicated topic
It's easy to either say she's good or just floating scrap iron
searching "Bismarck" in this channel should yield you many results, some very comprehensive
search with from Jaba would probably be better to narrow it down
#history message
Dug it up
Granted this is 2 years old and slightly out of date
So it’s not necessarily reflective of everything I believe now
But should be a decent basis to start from
I don't understand how people think the Bismarck is the best BB ever?
propaganda
and plus Bisko's story
people see "1 BB against the entire Royal Navy" as a romantic idea
She got crit by a bi plane
Wasn't it only a handful of CL and BBs?
It's the idea that the Royal Navy wanted her hunted down
So like a David vs Goliath moment
something about the swordfishes having a rather low operational altitude and slow speed that complicated the jobs of the AA gunners aboard busmarck who were trained for much faster and higher aircraft
Apparently the Bismarcks crew was trying to knock them out of the sky via hitting the water and splashing it up
I wonder
can you attach anti-ship torpedoes on fighter jets
like more modern day fighters
Like a ww2 torp?
yeah
or rather uh
a modern day reimagining of the torp bomber instead of using AShMs
Torps are no longer optimized for ASuW anymore
Torp subs can carry ICBM's, right?
torp subs?
torpedo subs
there are generally 2 distinctions for subs nowadays, Ballistic Missile Subs and Attack Submarines
There are ASROC, Ikara, Vikhr, etc
MPA also just drop torpedoes from altitude
ah i gotchs
If you are asking if SLBM subs carry torps, yeah they do carry some
im not well versed in history out of early cold war era
Thought Vikhr as an ATGM
but that's not its primary role
anything before that i am golden in
Vikhr/Vyuga/Vodopad/Veter series of ASROC
Ah
I wonder why the US Navy decided to name all their new Subs after states instead of Aircraft carriers. Im guessing bc those are just reserved for presidents?
It was more than just the crew, technical problems, and weather, all contribute to the failure to stop the swordfish from making their runs.
Didn't the Bismarck blow its own range finder off as well
It would have been very embarrassing too had the magnetic exploders worked, as the swordfish initially made their run on HMS Sheffield, mistaking her as the battleship.
Carrier naming is more people and politics nowadays
Bismarck damaged her own radar due to firing on extreme angles, yes, but this is not a problem inherent to Bismarck only.
Radar is finnicky technology, and do badly against shock. Massachusetts and New Jersey also disabled their radar in this manner.
Fair still embarrassing
Not that difficult when the dangerous thing about such a plane is not the age of the plane (and with 1934 being the first flight of a Swordfish, it wasn't as old as you might think) but the torpedo. Just like Prince of Wales was effectively sunk by a plane that was a mere year newer than the Swordfish.
Doesn't shock me tbh. Whoever gives the most money i suppose
Bismarck was also hit in a weak spot
wasn't Hood sunk in a similar way by Bismarck as how Bismarck sank?
No.
There's a good argument to make that Prince of Wales was sunk by a single torpedo
And all the other torpedoes were only speeding up the inevitable
The significance of Ark Royal's torpedo hit is disabling Bismarck long enough for Tovey's battleships to catch up to the ship
She was sunk by Japan right
And although Bismarck retailiated, Rodney shot off her director early onwards
just curious but could aircraft have carried long lances?
like would it be possible to integrate long lances into torpedo bombers?
Something, something, naval battles involve luck like there's no tonorrow
So Hood go shot unlucky as Bismarck got bombarded? I knew Bismarck was a fortress, butjesus
I don't think so they were super heavy and massive

Type 90s was the areal torp if I remember correctly
If I had a cookie for every freak shot that happened I'd go fat
Which still was super deadly
Type 95 maybe
The destructive ability of the long lance is not just its warhead alone
It was basically a 93 but smaller being made for subs
Speed range and the lack of foam
Rangefinders are the long bar-like optics seen here (the middle box is the director, the long horizontal bar is the rangefinder, and the mattress thing is the radar). Bismarck knocked out her own forward radar, yes, but the rangefinder was perfectly fine, and her gunnery was perfectly adequate without that forward radar. It’s important to be specific here because knocking one’s own radar offline was very common early war (Massachusetts did it at Casablanca for example), but knocking out your own rangefinder would be quite remarkable.
But rather, its oxygen fuel system which emitted less air bubbles compared to carbon dioxide or general compressed air propulsion
okay thought so. Torp bombers under heavy fire carrying long lances would have been a disaster right?
Therefore, the torpedo trail of a long lance is harder to see, and combined with Japanese night battle doctrine, became something very scary to the Allied forces
Tbh, I will say this, I am not well versed in Naval history. Army history, yes sadly
Yeah but later models had pure o2 systems
Torpedo bombers can’t carry “long lances” because they’re way too heavy
Other used air to start
If we believe Ryan then New Jersey also achieved that radar suicide
As Tassaforonga would show, a competent admiral at the helm can do some heavy blows to the Allied ships
Also if my memory is correct Texas also knocked out some of her radars during bombardment missions
A Type 93 is about 6000 lbs and an aerial torpedo is about 2000 lbs, for comparison
its incredible how far they can launch being that weight. so much firepower
Type 93 and 95 don't get enough love over looked by the Mk44
how far can it launch?
Short is, shock bad for electronics
that's insane
Type 93
cant image the firepower it had had under it
But to be fair japanese DD weren't meant to be seen just launch torps into enemy fleets
or let alone the cost of one of those
was that the farthest torp made in ww2?
I think the mrk 44 had a longer ranger
I will note that Hara, Japan’s only surviving DD captain and a torpedo expert, considered torpedo launches from more than about 3-5km to be a waste
That's what 4ish miles?
1.6 km = 1 mi
Which does match the hit rates of Japanese torpedoes
Java Sea was the Japanese firing over 100 torpedoes for what, three hits?
Idk if any of you heard about this, but wasn't there a guy in Florida who found an abandoned nuclear torpedo and powered his house with it? Pretty sure he got arrested because of it too, lol
To be fair ww2 torps sucked
92 for 1, IIRC
A large wave can knock them out
Poor Kortanaer blown apart from a hit
true, they couldn't do much, but at least they did a shitton of damage when they were on target
During the action the IJN ships executed 38 separate launches of a probable 164 Type 93 torpedoes, scoring 3 hits which sank the RNN CL De Ruyter, CL Java and DD Kortenaer. This is a probable hit rate of 1.8%, dismal for such a massive expenditure.
Mogami on her way to have one of the highest torp kills but on her own ships
And then there's Mogami
So a dozen destroyers emptying all they have for one hit
Forgot how many hits on Shinshu Maru
Must've been worth it
Sunda Strait
It's like 3rd or 2nd best torp Salvo ever but also one of the worst naval friendly fire too
6 torpedoes, 5 kills
2 rams, 2 kills
I believe it was initially blamed on Houston, then on Fubuki
Leave poor fubuki alone IJA
Only the Mark 14
And once that is fixed, the Japanese merchant fleet dies
16 launched 0 det
2,000,000 tons of shipping alone in 1944
Kinda sad I wish we still had Japanese ships alive
Only York and Hammy were killed by the same torpedo right?
No, if by same salvo
I-19's the most incredible one
6 torpedoes, 3 hits on wasp, which sunk
The remaining torpedoes continued, finding another task force
Type 95 were really good too
North Carolina ate one, was relatively fine
Three torpedoes, not one torpedo. Two to York and one to Hamm
O'Brien ate another one, survived for a few weeks
Then suddenly died from the hull stress
AH
Think the one that hit O'Brien very narrowly missed Helena by her stern
No bulli her
Didn't Helena get super lucky multiple times
That launch at 0127
Kinda? Helena was a victim already at Pearl
Oh yeah
Then was also at Cape Esperance and Guadalcanal
When did Helena sink?
1943, Kula Gulf
I know she had a bad magazine hit
She ran out of flashless powder, so was targetted
The deadly part is that two of the hits were right next to each other
was there a ww2 navy that rarely used flashless powder?
Which meant her structure just instantly failed
Probably japan
Didn’t her magazine explode?
was there any disadvantages of using flashless powder vs non-flashless ones?
Flash as in the guns themselves don’t spark and emit fire when fired or as in less likely to explode?
No, that was Juneau
Yes
Helena observed her 5" turrets thrown skyhigh
And therefore presumed no survivors
Ayanami on her way to get a direct hit by a BB and not sink and needing to be scuttled
(there were survivors)
Like legit?
Flashless as in not emmiting bright muzzle report upon firing
Earlier flashless powders are usually not exactly smokeless, and vice versa
The observer on Helena saw his counterpart get flung off the ship
The Juneau was, as I recall, off our starboard quarter. I just happened to be standing outside, getting some air. I was looking at her and saw her blow up. I didn’t see the torpedo track, but she just went up like you see pictures of an atomic bomb explosion. I started to step into the hatch that led into the control station because I knew crap would be coming our way, and I was blown right against the bulkhead by the shock wave, the concussion. I didn’t get hit by anything. Nothing hit the ship either, but a 5-inch mount from the Juneau sailed over and hit the water on the far side of us.
From Helena’s crew
What hit her that hard to cause that
the Death of Juneau gave a lot of people aboard Helena Insta Shell Shock
Ah makes sense then
So wasn’t spotted
A torpedo hit in an area likely compromised by a previous torpedo hit, likely allowing blast from the torpedo explosion to reach into the magazines directly
Didn't San Fran get a above water line hit by a torp
Juneau irl: dies to torpedo hits
Juneau in AL pvp: Pls die to torpedoes for us
like no one actually saw her slip beneath the waves
0253 No more targets Available
0254 Speed now 28 knots. Course 290
0255 HELENA is Dropping Back
0308 Heavy Underwater explosion Felt
0313 Two of our Tin "Cans" are being sent into the harbor to look for ships.
Can’t locate the HELENA
0319 Surface contact on screen off port Bow at 5000 Yards.
0323 Bow of a ship has been s ighted, sticking straight up out of the water. It May be the HELENA.
0324 Standby to illuminate with searchlights, to look for the HELENA.
0326 HONOLULU is illuminating with searchlights now.
0327 Fifteen miles from N. Georgia Island.
0330 Searchlights have picked up object in water and report states "Sorry to report object sighted is CL-50 HELENA
0331 Standby for 28 knots
0332 RADFORD is investigating what is believed to be the wreck of the HELENA.
0333 It is HELENA, she is believed to have been sunk by torpedoes
0334 No survivors picked up yet HELENA is thought to have sunk at 0308, when last large underwater explosion was felt.```
Can’t locate the HELENA
Thats sad ngl
Indeed
the panic they must’ve felt
the just existential dread
knowing she might be gone
fucking hell
Ayanami had a similar fate
She got separated due to poor radios
By time her fleet realized it was too late
It's why she doesn't like be alone in the game
old Invincible
Entire Grand Fleet was cheering at what they thought was a sunk German ship
brought down the newest ship by herself
Ah
Damn
then the bow and stern stuck out with the letters invincible written on it
Oooof
not a good feeling
Mikasa
I want the WW1 Aimbot
Fuso
I mean more of them ya know
Where be Schlesien
TenGo was a sad mission tbh
The Horde of aircraft
She was sent to be sunk
We're pretty much scraping the bottom of the barrel for Germans already, so
it’s painfully ironic that Yorktown would be the one to finish Yammy off
Derfflinger and the likes are a a matter of time
Schle-si-en
We already have best girl Seydlitz
I really love The Derfflinger
ship that will not die
Kinda wish Britain kept her as a war museum
took so many hits and made it home
Won't happen, the crew scuttled her at Scapa Flow
Germans didn't like that idea and sank her instead
Shame
Scrapping of the enterprise makes me so mad
but I can understand it
and if she survived, she'd likely be turned into a floating target anyway
ik
see: Ostfriesland, Baden
whatever happened to Bayern
Crews of the ships are at times not as favorable towards the ship becoming a museum ship as we are today
scuttled, naturally
Example, Enty
There were parts of Enterprise's crew that hated the idea of her becoming a museum
Even now, Museum ships come with controversy
I can understand the reasoning
Colbert was parked at a terrible spot, so people chanted for her to be disposed of
And disposed of she was, sadly
Barry's another one
Seeing people mistreat your ship, especially when your war buddy may have died there
oops, gotta build a bridge
Still a damned shame
Also a lot of museum ships simply rust away
I feel like If USA got to keep any IJN ship as a museum ship I'd get vandalized alot
Right, she's gone
At the very least allow them to be artificial reefs
USS Clamagore
I hope i get to see Mikasa before the deem it a waste
Mikasa is a pride symbol for Japan as well
So was the yamato and you Saw what they did to her
Being flagship to beat a European power
Mikasa being encased in concrete helps, though one can't help but wonder if the situation that happens to Victory will happen to her
i.e. the ship collapsing under her own weight
Mikasa wasn’t fighting the Allies either
Yamato didn't need to die
There's a reason why Mikasa is left in an absolute shit condition
or making last ditch runs for the emperor
turned into an aquarium and dance hall at one point
The Soviets wanted her gone
Nimitz struggled to kept her there
It wasn't until later that she finally got encased in concrete and got the museum ship treatment
I mean Japan barely has the funds to keep their current navy
Damn
I doubt they'll be able to keep a 1800s BB safe
I think a full enclosure in concrete is better than just resting on the keel with some planless supports as it was done with Victory
after all the shit Mikasa’s survived
Just a loss of bouyancy forces, but at least a very even distribution of weight
Why does our little ball of dirt have to be covered in 90’ percent of liquid hate
Mikasa was also basically a leaky faucet before then
the Kanto Earthquake broke her and she started leaking
Poor girl
Significantly shittier condition
Texas is lucky
Still couldn't find the digital version of this photo
She got the publicity to get the financial aid needed
But yea, don't ask about Mikasa's past
Meanwhile there are rows of museum ships that get nothing, and that no one gives a rat's butt about
Especially not the time she blew herself up because some of the crew had an illegal booze party in her magazines
didn’t she also have Two magazines explode
What?
That’s horrifying and also mildly funny
Party so hard you accidently blow up your ship
It was reported that some members of the crew had decided to hold a party in the powder magazine. In order to remove the poisonous part of some methyl alcohol (used for flares) they had stolen, they set light to it in the corridor to the powder magazine and there was a spillage that led to the explosion. The story was told to a medical orderly by a heavily injured member of the crew immediately before he died. The medical orderly initially regarded this confession as confidential and did not immediately report it to his superior. The account was therefore not considered by the investigation committee but emerged later.

Bruh
how was Mikasa not broken by that
that is a sentence of all time right there
Fuck
Ships survived ammo racks before
Just you hear the ships that uh didn't very well
Orleck was so bad to the point that she was reported scrapped in 2020
Fortunately survived
Mutsu and Arizona being well know
Poor Mutsu
Sullivans is now the worrying one
listed what, twice now?
it’s why Japan was able to keep Mutsu
So like most crowdfunded projects, then
Lol
You want humiliation
Gneisenau's state post detonation was not as catastrophic, she generated a blowout panel over her bow and forward deck so it didn't crack her in half
what they do?
only for them to be "possessed"
oof
without refunding
yoink
and that's how you got HMS Agincourt and HMS Erin
What ya gonna do FIGHT ME?
much to turkish outrage
I got your Battleship nerd
7 turrets
then Germans played the right card and gave Turkey Goeben
Poor Yavuz
Turkey originally wanted to donate Yavuz to West Germany for preservation, but no money
I still don't get why they had to have 7 turrets
angry
More fun
took the American approach
it’s like a Wyoming
Also
I stumbled across some images of Hood’s interior
They are pretty damned blurry
Most likely an issue with the site itself
Why is Yukikaze considered lucky?
Agincourt is just in general a rabbit hole of terrible design decisions
I think cuz she was either a sole survivor a bunch of times or she was the only ship not to be damaged
Keep in mind the ship was originally intended for Brazil, where there is an arms race going on
With Chile and Argentina getting their own dreadnoughts, the answer is to get a ship with supreme firepower above all
yeah but why 7
what was the reasoning for that many turrets
cuz more guns more chance of hitting
triple turrets are not a thing back then
More guns equal better
Most of her barbettes below the main armor deck are outright unarmored, meaning even fragments can reach the magazines unimpeded
not necessarily
wait
hold on
when you have too many guns, it messes with observing the fall of shot and directing gunfire
There's a limit to how many guns you can effectively use
It’s such a fucked design
the hull is also extremely stressed
Fubuki class still best looking DD
Hence why, say for Italy, when you go up to beyond 12 barrels and the like
the better solution is to upcaliber the gun instead
cough Venezia cough
I love the drach video about the last ride of HHF
Even above the main armor deck, the barbettes were only 2-3” thick up to the weather deck
the more I look into how Brazil designed their BBs, the more I think they were crazy
Agincourt “only” has 3 turrets remaining functional
Agincourt went to Jutland still carrying some 1890s shells aboard
That's sad
looking at Agincourt's armor scheme
the armor scheme is super cursed
armor as thin as BCs but can't go as fast
Also yuuge and poorly arranged compartments
Lemme copy paste a 1918 Wyoming vs Agincourt analysis I wrote up a while back
In 1918…well, Tony DiGiulian believes Agincourt never received the new “Greenboy” shells, since she seems to have been low priority for new equipment and had been issued some shells from the 1890s(!). Most of her outfit will probably be pre-Jutland design shells, then, which is rather an unfavorable state of affairs given the soft caps and non-delay fuzes—though she should mostly have 4crh shells at least, not the old 2crh, as many of those were expended at Jutland. If, for whatever reason, we decide to change history and give Agincourt Greenboy shells, that does give her a significant upgrade, though the original 1918 12” Greenboy had rather uninspiring performance. If we assume mostly 4crh pre-Greenboy shells, which seems most probable, then most shells should be reliable at 10-15 deg but unreliable at 15-20. These shells also struggled significantly at penetrating heavy armor.
For Wyoming, there seems to have been an effort to replace the old pre-1916 shells with the Midvale-only 12” AP Mark 15 Mod 6 (the only 12” AP manufactured for the USN after early 1916 until the Alaska class large cruisers), which did not have the issues with 10 deg obliquity that the Bethlehem shells had (the 14” would not get up to this new standard fleetwide for all manufacturers until the early 1920s, but the 8” and 12” AP got there earlier). These shells could reliably penetrate thick armor at up to 15 deg obliquity fit-to-burst, though they still had soft caps and thus weren’t reliable at 15-20 deg. However they were fairly good at penetrating thick armor with minimal shell damage against most armor plates of the period (the sole contemporary exceptions being Austro-Hungarian armor and Midvale Non-Cemented armor). The fact that the shells have an extra 175 fps of muzzle velocity over Agincourt also helps. They still have non-delay fuzes, giving no advantage over the British pre-Jutland shells in that regard. Explosive D does carry a bit less “oompf” than Lyddite, so the shells will probably inflict slightly less damage than the British shells, though arguably it’s most important to penetrate in the first place.
In terms of armor, Wyoming is generally more heavily armored, with 11” over most of the main belt and 9”-11” over the upper belt. Agincourt by comparison has a 9” main belt and 6” upper belt. Likewise the protection for the armament favors Wyoming—while turret faces are 12” in both cases, the Wyoming faces are inclined a more appropriate ~45 deg backward compared to (as best as I can estimate from historical photos) ~15 deg backward for Agincourt, which means that for a typical 10-15 deg angle of fall for the period the turret faces are not particularly well protected. Barbette armor will only rarely be directly hit belowdeck (since the shells on both sides will be non-delay, so mainly at risk of duds), though the superfiring barbettes are more exposed. In that regard Wyoming’s 11” exposed barbettes and 10”-4.5” barbettes behind the casemate, upper, and main belts beat out Agincourt’s 9” exposed barbettes and 2-3” barbettes below the forecastle deck (rather alarming, in my opinion), with most barbettes being entirely unarmored below the main deck(!), leaving them potentially vulnerable to fragments from main belt penetrations.
Agincourt was late to the party regarding Royal Navy fire control, but by 1918 she has most of the needed equipment (including a Dreyer table and director). Wyoming has the Ford Mark I rangekeeper since 1916, and received another in early 1918 (backup or improved model?). Thus the two ships should be roughly on par with fire control (in theory the Ford Mark I should be superior to the Dreyer, but at this stage the Dreyer’s associated systems in the overall fire control process were more developed, and the QC issues with some of the early Fords were not yet resolved, so I believe these limiting factors nullify any theoretical advantages in the fire control system). Wyoming has FTP in train, though whether she has it in elevation (implementation starting 1917) I’m not certain of. Agincourt I assume has FTP for both, though whether this was installed on the least-favored deadnought in the Grand Fleet I have no information on.
By 1918 most of the upgraded flash protection and handling practices in the Royal Navy should be implemented, and most older cordite should be swapped out—clearly the fact that magazine explosions still occurred means there were some lapses, but I can only assume Agincourt was probably not a bomb by 1918. Wyoming benefits from the typical USN devotion to ordnance safety and thus has inherently safer powder and shells. Thus I will assume that neither side is likely to explode by flash-fires from turret or barbette penetrations, though Agincourt is still slightly more at risk of this. Direct magazine pens are unlikely for both ships due to the lack of delay fuzes. Thus neither ship is likely to outright destroy its rival with a few hits, relying on the cumulative effect of many shells gradually destroying the enemy’s watertight integrity and firepower. While Agincourt has a turret over Wyoming, Agincourt’s turrets are more likely to be lost when a turret or barbette hit occurs, and she is less likely to penetrate heavy armor. Agincourt also has unusually poor subdivision due to her Brazilian Navy origins, which makes progressive flooding even more serious. Overall I suspect Wyoming will have an advantage over Agincourt, primarily due to superiority in the armor-shell balance.
what's crh mean again
in RN shell terminology
Funnily enough, the Gin Palace is kinda popular around modellers

just because being a "turret farm"
Idk any of these ships
was there more turrets in a ship planned?
Agincourt takes the cake for most on a battleship
otherwise, Colbert is the other one I can think of in terms of how many primary armament turrets on board
the ironclad?
what about dreadnoughts?
the cruiser of post WW2
Wyoming
None I can think of for dreadnoughts, but a couple on top of my head that outbarrel Agincourt
oh right Wyoming had 6 barrels
Cute girl
Just remembered because I was stuck on her for a while in WoWs
including the ridiculous original Tillman IV
4 x sextuple turrets, why the fuck not
iirc they were 16in guns right?
yes
how the fuck are you gonna fit 6 guns in a turret
Then they got sensible and upgraded it to a much more reasonable 5 x triple 457 instead
unless the ship was like wider than Yamato
wait
@eternal veldt how would they have fit 6 16in in a turret if the BB was not that much larger beam-wise than Iowa
vertically is my thought
4 mount had a shit tons of problems 6 would just not work
you called?
yis

just turret design shenanigans
New visualization of the Hyundai Rotem K3 tank.
130 mm gun, unmanned turret, KAPS top attack active protection system and RCWS, composite tracks. Capsule for a crew of three.
Source:https://t.co/62NHlc0GVQ
474

Happy (late) anniversary to the pig war
They're from a series of studies done by Ansaldo on quadruple turrets arrangements, at some point in the 1930s up to 1940.
I've been to the battlefronts of the pig war, brutal conflict that was...
I love these absolute memes
Why is the Charles De Gaulle the only non-US carrier to utilize CATOBAR
You'd think these countries would wanna standardize a bit more
For emergencies
Because expensive
China's newest carrier has CATOBAR
beyond that its a mixture of costs and development time
its far easier to develop and build a STOBAR carrier than a CATOBAR
You also don't just develop a catobar-capable aircraft for funsies
@delicate beacon
The ship in the picture is Imperial Marinheiro
And for some reason, it is bearing the dutch flag
France's carrier has a clear role in doctrine and national defense strategy
most nations don't require a full blown super carrier
May 28, 1970, La Spezia. Former French destroyer flotilla leader Châteaurenault (Italian light cruiser Attilio Regolo until 1947) awaits for her dismantling to commence.
Also much much easier to build a stovl carrier if you're friend with the US
I smell... a 105mm L/65 C/33

six, in fact
six too many

Holy shit Korean KF51 
the gang is all here
Yipee Little Rock 78th birthday 
shiny
It’s unlocked
scanned slide: “Buckingham Palace Flypast, June 1980”
(https://t.co/kwp2SQFsZC)
3621
380
Where is the Vulcan simp
Sponsored by Blinkist: Get a 7-day free trial and 25% off Blinkist Annual Premium by clicking here: https://www.blinkist.com/perun
Long before equipment reaches the front, it must first be ordered, designed, produced and fielded.
This is a process that nations have been going through for centuries. That doesn't mean they're always good at it. ...
bottom is coolest
Has there ever been a destroyer-sized warship designed with triple turrets?
(Destroyer-sized being max around Spahkreuzer or CRomani)
Does monitor counts?
Guh 💀
Depend on caliber, 5'/38 dual mount is pretty large and heavy, anything more heavy like a tripple might cause top stability issues
I guess
Well, not American designs specifically
There is a tripple mount for DD size gun but it was on a BC
That one above is the exact same thing from Renown
Renown gun
Ah, perfect
You know what? TIL it was 3-gun turret instead of triple gun turret
Yeah, it was pretty bad mount
I remember Drach give a fit over it, he really hate that mount
A little stupid but weirdly cool
I like it
Need to find a quad mount for DD 
General Dynamics Electric Boat christened PCU Iowa, the 24th submarine of the Virginia class, on Saturday, June 17, 2023. Ship Sponsor Christie Vilsack performed the bottle break that christened PCU Iowa with a bottle of sparkling wine from Fireside Winery in Marengo, Iowa.
If we include the CRs then there is a CR preliminary with triple turrets
Also a version with 3x3
They also installed triple 135mm turrets on the Duilio-class battleships when they rebuilt them at teh end of the 1930s.
Finally found WiFi, i have connected back to humanity 
Also yeah
There is no DDs with triple guns
Its like universal Law not to do
should I break the law? 
Based off of German WWII jet designs, the F-86 Sabre would compete against the near-equally matched MiG-15 over the battlefields of Korea, marking the beginning of a new era of air combat. The RAAF would also operate the aircraft, using a special design which increased performance.
CONTENTS
00:00 Introduction
00:044 Beginnings
01:50 XP-86 Proje...
does this youtube channel just constantly cut between a American narrator and a Australian one?
I would duo a video on the sabre with hit
Depend on what law you intend to break

Y yu lie

Git fukd

A mild amount of tomfoolery
The blackbirds are the pizza delivery girls
What kind of oven need titanium lol
When you order a pizza to bumfuck nowhere and require superdonic delivery
i mean...
Doesn't shock me, though it is not their navy that I am concerned about in the slightest. they have a green water navy, which at best, gives them 400 miles of length off the coast of the mainland. Well, at least for where I live that is
A weapon to surpass Metal Gear
wdym?
I have a name suggestion.
“Target Practice.”
Bold claim when you have the current largest warship

True but that warship is specialized to do exactly one thing, handle aircraft.
It has some improved point-defense capabilities but these are secondary given that other ships in the CVBG are its primary defense.
Single “do everything” ships are bad because they waste resources on a ship that can maybe do a couple roles at a time. More ships= more flexibility in most circumstances.
There are cases where size does come with advantages. Managing aircraft is benefited (to a point, iirc anything more than like 120-140 aircraft and you start seeing problems). Larger cruisers can use bigger sensors and have deeper VLS magazines.
But each if these have tradeoffs and the law of diminishing returns is a thing.

I see
, I offer cute Deutschland
Hold on, shitzig had baltic stripes as well at one point IIRC?
Probably still can"t save her 
Shitzig is like a foundation made of sand
Doesn't matter what you build on it, the result is crap
Dont diss sandcastles like that
Shitzig is Leipzig right?
Why Shitzig
ask our dear Sirene here and he shall lay it all clear
Because design wise she was a (significant) downgrade from the Königsberg class, with worse armor and worse propulsion for no measurable benefit, ruining the amazing groundwork the K-class laid out.
Sand, with the right reinforcement and layering can be a useful structural material. It is one of the base materials for many structures
To insinuate that Shitzig is at all like sand is to insult sand.
Sand can become many things in its journey. From the stained glass windows of a cathedral to the lowly aggregate for concrete. It has higher purpose above its lowly station.
Shitzig has no such redeeming qualities. She didn’t even serve as a prepackaged coffin for Nazis.
I mean, sand is used to make glass
Service history wise she was more hindrance than anything, they didn't even bother repairing her fully and then she lunged herself in front of Eugen trying to end her misery (and also failing at that, while causing damage to what was at that time one of the most important surface naval units)
So I haven't touched my German CL book yet, but what exactly were the designers trying to accomplish with her?
they tried to fix the issues with the K-class
most notable that the K-class needed to stop for a few minutes to change from diesel to steam propulsion, and vice versa, by having a third shaft on Shitzig with dedicated Diesel motors. As a result her cruising range was significantly reduced, and she still had to stop for coupling processes when entering or ending cruising (which resulted in the infamous collision)
not sure if they were hoping to improve her survivability by introducing that meager turtleback, but with how hard they fucked up the belt and bulkheads it's safe to say that whatever they wanted to improve armor wise, it failed
This is Leipzig's belt
Meanwhile Königsberg, not 100% to scale, but the idea comes across

Are you not entertained?!
Then stick around for K-class
Very smooth
Unless the refit happens
Then it gets wild
But until then, very straight forward
very wild indeed /s
Narnia closet
Why hate Leipzig?
@maiden citrus West Virginia 1944's booklet of general plans are now finally available in full

sorry, still no side profile for some reason.
very nice
I'm surprised they didn't try to clutch the reduction gear input shaft
Y'now, just like what RENK usually do
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/warships1discussionboards/new-longest-hit-by-battleship-uss-massachusetts-ne-t44680-s30.html an interesting read on the 28,000 yard hit claim by Massy on Milan, albeit with shit-flinging included 
Quite a number of people are not convinced due to "vanishingly small" chances because Massy's FCs and some guns were out of action
Because of expectations. One would hope that a successor would either be just as good or better as the predecessor. Leipzig is not. If Leipzig was the first modern ship the Reichs/Kriegsmarine would build, a lot of slack could be cut. But she's not, and as a "Königsberg, but better" she sucks
Oops, meant to reply to
Love how the first counterargument to the Massa his boils down to "it's unlikely to have happened, so it didn't"
Jeez what a shit flinging contest
If I had a cookie for everytime an unlikely event happened during a naval engagement
I'd weight 150kg
both
Le Malin was at the harbor, Massy's shell landed in the quay, exploded, and smacked Milan a bit, who was at sea
Milan herself ate a 16" directly, and so did Fougueux, the latter then getting beaten even harder by Tuscaloosa and Wichita
This should help

anyone know what the gun on the left is
Don’t
mass
open the image and the first words I see are ‘au meme moment’
mass and jb kiss
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com
Today we are taking a look at a German G1 pattern FAL. The initial purchased of the G1 were actual made by the German Border Guard (the Bundesgrenschutz...
Remind me again that Gibbs had an entire series of hybrids? or just Pr 1058 Design B and the downscaled C?
A and D to my knowledge are conventional, with A being 8 x 18"
Don't have the book
There are signs hinting towards Massachusetts holding the longest hit on a moving warship record
some people refuse to believe that Warspite is merely shared second place, and fight tooth and nail against that
I don’t know why it matters that much
The Massa -> Milan hit is hard to prove definitively in any case
I mean, the argument concerns whether Massy is the No.1 in the longest hit department
Bound to stir up some discussion, just like the White Plains vs Yamato thing
still remember seeing it on the War Thunder forum and watching it devolve into shit-flinging and arguing what and what isn't a "hit"
Idc I just want my DD’s back

The longest hit in my headcanon is the hit on milan anyways
I know I’m not making a lot of sense rn but I just don’t see the importance
I'm happy to leave it up as "debated/contended"
Headcanon
Then mine is Tashkent

The U.S. and Canadian Coast Guard are searching for five people who were aboard a submersible that was reported missing Sunday afternoon, officials have told USNI News. The submersible was reported missing around 6 p.m. and was carrying tourists on an expedition for an undersea tour of the wreck of RMS Titanic about 1 hour …
Mark 38 25 mm anti boat training
A Sea King has been placed on static display on São Pedro da Aldeia (state of RJ) this friday
What BCs and BBs other than Tirpitz and Scharnhorst have deck torps?
(pocket BBs uncounted, paper designs included)
O-class's torpedoes are internally fitted ala Trento/pre-refit Myoukous, I think.
Nagato and Mutsu had something similar as well albeit removed in their final refits.
The Amagi class as designed also had 8 tubes
A good book on China Lake and the early post-war missile programs there.
👍
Nagato-class got four single tube above water launcher just below the aft funnel, but I won't exactly call it deck launcher
Neither does the O-class fit in this case, to be honest
But the Germans are tired of Shitzig, so might as well cannibalize her for parts
Hence the deck swivel launchers
I don't have them, but they made at least a half dozen proposals to various navies. USN was smart to laugh them off.
Im only aware that the RN had a couple wacky designs. Any of these proposals I can read on?
Design B and C, Im aware of. Others, not do much.
I've seen discussion of them at various points, but don't have them myself either.
That’s a shame.
Wdym? This is only one of just 2 pieces of her still in existence with the other being her rangefinder
1 rangefinder too many
It belongs in a museum
Just give it to the British as a trophy
Since it’s often credited as their kill
They can put it in a museum explaining its historical significance
it’s not like the British museum is particularly picky about where its artifacts come from
Maybe, something are better left at the bottom of the ocean
Wait, why stuff from Graf Spee is being salvaged? Isn't she a war grave?
Not really a grave, all crew abandoned her before she was scuttled
Oh, so she is open for salvage?
She's property of the Uruguayan govrrnment
Because she's located in their waters and not a war grave
Why do I have a bad feeling? Something about how what left of Graf Spee in the future will just be an indent on the sand where she were.
Yes that’s what all shipwrecks will be eventually
Some of the wrecks are already immediately removed due to being navigational hazards and a general pain in the ass in shipping channels
For example, Nachi was blown to smithereens in Manila Harbor
What caused the fire of SS Normandie?
welders torch ignited flammable materials causing a fire
Then incompetence burnt the ship down
The ship designer was on site and telling the firemen where to go
"nah bro we can handle this ok"
(they can't)
to be fair, the technology for a interior attack didn't exist at the time and the incident commander probably didn't want to risk his men trying to flood the ship to stabilize it
Or just a gross underestimation of the severity of the fires and what ingress of water does to a ship
counter argument, the SCBA we all know and love, hasn't been invented yet, the FDNY isn't well versed in onboard ship damage control, the insides of ships are confusing enough already, nevermind this one is full of smoke and fire.
When USS Bonhomme Richard caught fire an Interior attack and counterflooding damage control was done and although the ship was a loss it wasn't sunk because the San Diego FD and USN FD had SCBA, they were well versed in onboard ship damage control and the technology was avalible for an interior attack
All ships sinks
FDNY Firefighters from 1940 those coats are rubber, designed to keep water from soaking Firefighter Fred's underpants, the helmet is leather and could save you from a bump on the head but it's mostly for letting the water roll down you back like a duck. there's no protection from the heat, there's no breathing apparatus, there's just you and your massive firefighter balls
wasn't it also due to the admiral in charge?
who didn't listen to the ship designer
Andrews, yes
compared to Sand Diego/US Navy Firefighters on Bonhomme Richard. aside from the blueberry in front, no skin is exposed, the suits and helmets are made of kevlar, they do have SCBAs and fireproof gloves in addition to their massive firefighter balls
yeah the commanding officer himself probably wasn't well versed in onboard firefighting too and probably didn't want to risk people going down and counter-flooding even though that was the right thing to do or he thought the fire could be contained through a exterior attack alone.
double trouble
basically most BBs and BCs up to the Washington Naval Treaty were outfitted with torps
ah yeah, my bad
I believe she was initially salvaged bc her wreck was blocking access to port
or something like that
So the USS monitor... Everytime i look at it, i get the feeling it wasn't at all meant for open water... It sits very low in the water... To me it seems to be more for river combat...
Historical wise...
Name me a CL and CA that has a potential if being in AL, being a cross fleet barrage dealer
A CL or CA with long range capability?
CL/CA/CB
Alaska class
Just anything from the cruisers that able to do cross fleet barrage in AL, historically
so one day, we will see full fleet consists of the cross fleeters
That’s because it wasn’t. It’s a littoral vessel.
We have so many cross fleet backliners but we lack the front ones that it is just Kron and Shima all over
Honestly, i feel more CVs than just the URs need a cross-fleet barrage... If we're dead set on accuracy, because strategically, CVs weren't meant to be positioned at a close enough distance that the enemy backline could immediately shoot at them
Where could I find this rangefinder?
For research purposes of course.
Kitakami, Stalingrad, Project 66, Worcester, Des Moines etc
Could add Italian 203mm projects
What is cross barrage about?
Just a powerful long range salvo?
Entire Deutschland class would be suitable for that
Hmmm... Oh okay... I will take the info
Found a pic of Yat Sen 

Ah yes, one of the worst RN mutinies due to absolutely idiotic rules set by the captain.
Geez, I wonder what would happen if I set a rule to punish the slowest rigger by getting him flogged
men falls on deck and turned into a blood splatter
pavehawk
Emergency steering compartment on USS Pennsylvania BB-38 in 1936.
In case of a loss of rudder control from the bridge or conning tower, crewmen would man these ships wheels to manually turn the rudder.
A similar compartment can be seen today on USS Texas.
Awfully optimistic but yeah
I guess any of the Panzerschiff/ Large Cruisers really
@tough quail here cool copy paste about Borodino's origin
Essentially the CNII-45 suggested, that instead of one very big very costly superbattleship like Project 23(Soyuz)/24(Krem/Slava/Ushakov) from wows), several smaller ships could be build, carrying the same size armament but with less guns per hull. Basically, they suggested to "divide" one superbattleship between 2-3 smaller units, operating together. While individually, each ship was inferior to full-sized battleship, as a squadron, they surpassed full-sized battleship, especially in durability (damage to one ship would not affect others).
Twenty-one designs of such "small battleships" were prepared. They were armed with different combinations of 406-457-mm turrets (like one triple 406-mm turret per ship, or two twin 406-mm superfiring turrets, or one twin and one triple 406-mm turrets, or one dual 457-mm turret, ect.). It was hoped that progress in fire control systems - especially in data exchange between ships - would allow several small battleships to fire at one target as efficiently, as one big battleship could do. Since 1-2 big gun turret weren't enough for self-defense, it was also assumed that small battleships would carry intermediate armament in terms of 180-mm or 220-mm guns. Armor was limited, air defense mainly in terms of short-range autocannons (it was assumed that such ships would be protected from air attacks by cruisers and destroyers with DP cannons).
@humble mulch this can be cool Voltron concept
When 3-4 CNII-45 sisters are together they turn into a super battleship
well that's creative
Sadly, the project fell through, because the small battleship simply could not be made "small enough". Even the most limited designs still assumed the 30.000-ton ship, costly and lenghty to construct. The gain was not good enough. Navy didn't like them also, arguing that they are limited and overcomplicated. So, after Stalin death, the whole project was quietly abandoned.
But yeah I do like this "datalink" idea from 50s
A pile of life jackets caught fire from sparks produced by an area where welding was going on. Normandie hadn't yet been stripped of all her decor and it rapidly became an inferno. Her firefighting equipment was worthless and so much water was sprayed on the ship from other ships that she became uncontrollably unstable and capsized. All while in port.
oh, no
Normandie had a pretty good system for firefighting
It was just disconnected during the conversions and the pumps were turned off
Because fucking geniuses
just need to emphasize that its not a ship design fault
but instead glorious third naval district incompetence
Nagato before got nuked in 1946
No, this is prior to nuking, when US insepctors were on board at Tokyo Bay.
Nagato did not survive the second nuke. She developed a minor list, but was expected to survive
Then she slipped under the waves overnight with nobody to witness it
By 1946, Nagato is practically dysfunctional
Also, something a bit more lighthearted, not sure how trustworthy
ah thanks
Are they expected to make a post treaty BB that weight less than 30k ton, carrying 16-18inch gun, have the machinery to achieve desirable speed and have enough armor to survive a hit from a Standard? I know Soviet are prone to a bit delusional but that take it to a whole new level.
30k ton
18" guns
Might as well as design a battlecruiser instead like the Incomparable class BC
The hull form would be fucked though. You’d need a good amount of beam to mount and fire 18” guns effectively, which means you’ll need a long ship to make good pace. This goes beyond delusional and right into bad idea territory
That sounds like Incomparable Class BC. A battlecruiser hull mounting 508mm guns.
Made by yours truly, the madman Admiral Jack Fisher
It was never designed with 508’s
hms irresponsible
Fischer never designed it with 508mm guns
What he did was send a letter to the Elswick ordnance company (EOC) asking what the largest and heaviest barrel was that they could make
EOC answered him that the heaviest that they could do was 200 tons
This would be a 508mm/40 caliber gun with only about 27 km range at max
This was not sufficient, so Fisher made his HMS Incomparable designs with 16” and 18” guns
Which would have a longer barrel relative to the caliber

Aren't the 18" ended up on the Furious instead?
Those preceded the 18” fisher wanted
Ah okay so i take it that Fisher wants the biggest gun for his dream BC but reality hits and he had to settle to 18" instead of 20"
He never specifically ask for 20" in the first place
I get it, the 20" is the biggest available when he ask for recommendation i take it
What ship is this?
Wait so they wanted built Russian Richie on less displacement???????
“By November 1915 Fisher is President of the Board of Inventions and Research and he makes enquiries of A.G. Hadcock as to what was the largest possible gun that Elswick could manufacture with existing plant. The answer was a 20 inch, 40 calibre, 200 ton gun, firing a shell weighing 4,500lbs (with a 400lb bursting charge) and with a muzzle velocity of 2250-2300 feet per second. Range at 30 degree elevation and a muzzle velocity of 2300fps was estimated at 17.5 miles (30,800 yards). Elswick at once began design work on the gun as well as single and twin turrets in which to mount it (d’Eyncourt’s papers confirm that this design work was completed). The 1915 designs of both ‘Citadel’ and ‘Incomparable’ were updated to take the new weapon and the precise details of these 1916 designs are still whistling in the wind. This, however, was the final design of ‘Incomparable’. Although Fisher was serious about building her, to do so, he needed to get back into power. As that event failed to materialise, ‘Incomparable’ passed into legend; and quite a mangled, misunderstood legend it turned into.”
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/alltheworldsbattlecruisers/incomparable-project-t8624.html
Seems to argue that they at least intended for the final design to mount 20” but not sure as to the veracity of the statement
When you have zero infastructure limitations, anything is possible
if you want a gun caliber contest on the "thinking" level, the US wins, hands down
What book is that screenshot from?
@maiden citrus I bring gifts
Norman Friedman's US Battleships: An Illustrated Design History
Thanks! I'll try to find it online now.
mmmm the goodies
The Tillmans?
Looks like the US equivalent of H-class designs
When size is needed, the US will throw hands with you
dummy thick ships
Don't worry, just put 56 boilers into this ship
it's fine
Bruh the French wrote about a 84cm gun tho
I just wondering what would Iowa-class look like if the cold war program of conversion into a guided missile Battleship came into fruition
Care to share?
Morosini in Japan
Next to Kumano, which tbh is a pretty similar design
127mm gun, ffbnw VLS
No
(It was a study on the effects of shell weight)
(I have to find it again)
It's a Japanese training ship, Nippon Maru
It's now a museum
did you end up visiting yokosuka
Looks so cool
or just stayed in yokohama
Please say you also visits Mikasa in the meantime
I went to sakami in december and left a note
also visited the naval base and got some nice shots
In any case keep in mind we only ever dipped our toes into 18” guns in terms of real life battleships
20” would be impractical beyond measure
My parents tried to fit everything under a week, so sadly I might only be able to visit the ship science museum in Shinagawa and Nippon Maru
Yamato museum is so far away
yeah that's fair
any chance to visit yushukan?
First hotel stay is in Akihabara
yushukan is way better than the yamato museum
when I went to kure I got to see kaga getting her square bow fitted though
Woah
How much of warship history is there in Yushukan?
Oh shit just checked out how close Yushukan is to Akihabara, I should've told my parents sooner when we were near there
I'd say like 60% of the exhibit is naval stuff
Worth it 👍
there's english text too if you don't know japanese
not in kure
Oh damn
I regret not planning a little, but as a first timer, I guess it's alright
(and besides that, it's already quite great)
Today we are very lucky to talk with Steve Mclaughlin, an expert on Russian and Soviet warships, about a group of ships that might otherwise have had little accurate information about them published in the English speaking world.
Get the book here!
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Russian-Soviet-Battleships-Stephen-Mclaughlin/dp/1682477266
https://www....
Quick question (because the internet never gives me the answer I'm looking for): What Japanese carriers launched the aircraft for the Attack on Pearl Harbor?
6 carriers
Akagi Kaga
Shoukaku Zuikaki
Hiryuu Soryuu
Ah, so all six fleet carriers
No way that info isn't in internet
it's in the internet
This is the attack on Pearl Harbor's order of battle for both the Empire of Japan and the United States.
Wikipedia even has a page on it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_battle_of_the_Attack_on_Pearl_Harbor#References For the more reliabe sources
I mean you can check the references in the bottom 
I wonder why the carrier divs go from 1st, 2nd then 5th
Like why was 3rd and 4th used for seaplane tenders
by year of commission, likely
Ah
Yeah later ones are the funny conversions
1st is Akagi/Kaga
2nd is Souryuu/Hiryuu
3rd is Houshou/Zuihou
4th is Ryuujou/Taiyou
5th is Shoukaku/Zuikaku
There's more division formed by CAVs, but it's fluid (I think)
CAVs is what again?
Seaplane carrying heavy cruiser
After Midway it was
1st Shoukaku/Suikaku
2nd Junyou/Ryuujou
3rd Chitose/Chiyoda
4th Hyuuga/Ise
Why wasn't Hiyou there
Hiyou was in 4th for a while before Midway, and 2nd after Midway
firing of the Sea Skua anti-shipping missile
demonstration of the AM39 Exocet
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com
When Estonia declared independence from Russia in 1918, it had no formal military. After winning a 2-year War of Independence, the nation needed to set ...
Just
Think Hms Furious with 2 457mm
But larger body
It doesn't sound impossible
In this episode, we're on board USS Little Rock talking about Zuni Rockets.
To support the ships in Buffalo:
https://buffalonavalpark.org/support-us/donate/
To follow the Buffalo Museums on Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/BuffaloNavalPark
To send Ryan a message on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RyanSzimanski/
To support this channel and...
18” mightve been the most practical but we all know the US probably wouldve gone for autoloading 24” just to laugh at everyone with their absurdity /s
No
Or else Montana would go with 457mm too
does anyone ahve any footage on the capitani romani class other than this clip on youtube?
The Capitani Romani class was a class of light cruisers acting as flotilla leaders for the Regia Marina (Italian Navy). They were built to outrun and outgun the large new French destroyers of the Le Fantasque and Mogador classes.
Twelve hulls were ordered in late 1939, but only four were completed, just three of these before the Italian armisti...
@ivory ridge may

@chilly osprey or the flamin bird
Is it me or is turret B really high up?
its the angle
Are we capable of restarting the manufacturing of battleship grade armor plate and 16inch gun in a couple of yrs, even decades or is it lostech?
you can't just sneak in Battletech terms like that you inner spheroid
Oops, got busted am I
more seriously, I guess it's not lostech per se since I'm sure we still have all the blueprints, we just need a lot more political willingness and years of construction to actually restart making battleships
I mean, there's probably enough blueprints and even instructions floating around in the internet's entirety that if you had permission, manpower and money, you'd probably even make a replica
Brazilian Army stronk
You haven't seen Vietnamese "military channel" yet


In that case it would be the Air Force
Since the army aviation don't have fixed wing aircraft
And when it tried
The FAB made so much fuss they didn't do it
The news btw
Is that the FAB and EMBRAER has started the studies for a MLU for the A-29s
This post will be updated as new information is available. The remains of the Titan submersible were found 1,600 feet away from the wreck of the RMS Titanic in what the Coast Guard is calling a catastrophic implosion. Speaking at a Thursday afternoon press conference, Rear Adm. John Mauger, commander of the First Coast Guard …
All evidence is the central tube shattered. Don't use carbon fiber for submarine hulls.
Lol
Battleship idea should just die







