#history
1 messages · Page 108 of 1
A carrier based Ho-229.
The plane with wings made of laminated fucking wood is going to perform well on landings.
And not just fold up like a piece of paper.
The Reich’s finest wood glue holds it together, made by malnourished 13 year olds that managed to avoid being sent in a suicide charge against a Soviet Machine-gun.
It never even fucking flew on its own power.
It’s not even fucking stealth.
How the fuck are you supposed to fit an He-111 on a fucking carrier?
You should care. I literally got warned for posting that earlier today.
skill issue
I also love how they don’t have the carrier conversions in the “Planned and Paper ships” category. As if there was some chance they’d actually be built.
Well they were built... But yeah I get what you mean
Ok fair, the ships existed but they didn’t see any real progress.
Also FL I was going to be larger than a Midway and have a smaller air-wing than an Independence.

Check plan Z where they call H-39 larger than Montana/A-150
I know German ships are relatively obese but that's just eksdee.
You're kidding, right?
BURN EVERY REMAINING HO-229 TO THE GROUND!
Iowa, probably, Stalingrad definitely, the rest of those, hell no.
Nope, you can read it in the image.
Besides, the Germans routinely proved that displacement ≠ capability with their chonkers.
Even if they mixed up displacement types it's so wrong.
I don't think the plans from the German archives even agree with that...
World of Warships has done more damage to naval history than any other actor.
In their defence they weren't really designed for displacement efficiency. So a direct comparison per weight gets partly skewed against German ships. Though despite this they were still overweight besides the different design approach.
Also, the Emden mentioned is different from the two previous SMS Emdens...
Drach has had a few questionable takes from what I've heard
very
The Ho-229 did fly on its own power IIRC
kancolle was the first to start damaging naval history in ways that are still felt today in a way I'd say wows doesn't try to
Except it crashed and burned hard thanks to the fucking Jumo 004
And wooden construction
I haven't inquired further other than a few of them included something about HMS Hood and another had to do with WW2 AA guns
Kancolle had some minor contributions
Served with a large portion size of revisionism, granted
Other than Yuudachi, what else?
drach found the 5.25'' british secondary to be the best dp of ww2
and the british 15'' the best battleship gun of ww2
both of these things are extremely far from true
Just toss whatever war crime ship that I mentioned before
Never mention their stuff, but always mention how the other ones are good girls for rescuing people
Nooo you see shipgirls arent tied to their histor-shut the fuck up
I mean, he did show the method he used to come to those conclusions in a fairly transparent manner, so it’s not as egregious as a lot of things.
It’s fairly easy to show his methodology was flawed.
Partially true, I've seen WoWS being used as a source more and more recently
The amount of wehrbs crying for "omg where mommy schlieffen" gave me a headache
yeah but at least wows doesn't present an entire story for a ship that's a fabrication and entrench it into culture to where people believe it and other games copy it too, they just say it's a plan whatever that wasn't built
To this I should add that while I understand his motive (time) to away away from mounts and FC systems, the mounts that weapons occupied and the director systems that influenced them are inherently inseparable from their effectiveness.
Yes and no, the recent Pan American line's amount of justification requires high level of mental gymnastics
there are many, many guns better than britain's 15'' in ww2, some in ww1 even
and we of course know what the best dp secondary of ww2 actually was
Why yes, the Americans loathed the British helping out the Pan American nations, that's why we'll sell them our most advanced cruisers
Mexico ordered a few gunboats, it is therefore reasonable that they will order a new big 4head cruiser after that
And now the descriptions for older ships are also getting revised, including my favourite Mongrel
even if it's an attempt at a justification that's pretty clear it was a plan and that this ship could have been the result in a perfect scenario of dominoes, not that it existed
To be fair, some of Kancolle's conversions/Kai Nis at least had some historical what-if basis
The Fuso K2s, for example
The biggest mistake the companies make is they try to make individual lines for each nation other than the U.S., U.K., Japan, and maybe Italy.
Instead of having a grab-bag with minor axis/ally/neutral navies they try to make WWII Germany, a minor naval power (with the exception of subs, which are of only a couple different classes), into a major one and with similar effect on other nations.
Hello, what about the French?
too few stats accounted for and some majorly fudged to make tiers all that accurate
trying to make nations with few ships of a type, or none of them, into lines
so yeah, agreed
The major problem is that WoWS is an online game
You need to keep expanding no matter what
No but you don’t get it
Big land power obviously = big navy power
Some people were also quite salty, rightly so
The devs said IJN and USN first, then RN, then others
WG: Germany and Soviets first
Look, I know there is a Germany first policy
lol
It shouldnt apply to a boat game
Reload times are just… arggh.
It never ceases to annoy me. Like I could be fine with the adjustments but at least be transparent about the base stats and how you’re adjusting them.
Transparency is another one of those massive problems. They don’t list sources to the degree they probably should.
I'd also pile a bunch of "promises" in, but WG basically said "hurr durr never promised, fuck you/Acktually our game development needed it, oops", and that deviates hard from actual history discussion, so whatever
And WoWS compression in general makes things extremely hard to play, looking at you, USN CA ballistics
Hipper is about as fat as a Baltimore, skill issue /s
Stop eating so many hotdogs smh
Wth am i looking at
the 500 tons of iron in the bottom of witchita is actually my hot dog storage, it was just listed as iron
I open discord to see what looks like Rodney on crack
north carolina prelim, but it's argincourt
I ought to get jaba's treaty violation emote

Rodney ON CRACK
specifically chooses Helena as the US T7 light cruiser
doesn’t give her radar
It's St.Louis
bruh what
Helena was sunk before receiving any SK radar
interesting opinion: all HMS ships are drug dealers to the Chinese ships
Nor did she receive any dazzle pattern
The ship in the tech tree is without a doubt St.Louis herself
Get fucked
They still selling that poppy
she was one of the first to be fitted with an SG surface search radar though
See if I care - WG
You havent seen the salt from Warspite when first released
The long range sharpshooter being fucked by being the shortest ranged T6 BB
(Gun accuracy being ignored here)
Poor Warcorgi
WG explaining why Helena has no radar (during the battle of Cape Esperance the position of the approaching Japanese force was revealed to the crew in a dream)
could be worse, could be closed beta us bbs that had short range
funnily enough the turning was accurate and they toned it down as it looked cartoony
33 second reload on Colorado, literally dogshit AA
Unironically used her as a 21 knot fireship
Fun times
but us bbs are extremely maneuverable, even the nonstandards
to the point the british comment on it in a nc visit
All BBs turning circles were nerfed in a patch
5.5 IIRC
Iowa should be able to turn on a dime, but "gameplay balance"
We’ve heard your complaints about CVs
So we’ve decided to nerf them in a way that affects all of them except the new Soviet ones
gameplay balance, the same reason azizuki 3.9'' shells kill you as fast as a nuclear reactor
despite being very ineffective surface weapons
dw we won't give them dfaa though
Your ship taking 9 torpedo hits in a row: I'm OK
an 100mm incendiary shell hit your hot dog locker on the very stern of your ship: magazines explode
Very epic
only shell is a time fused aa he one
kill battleships at the speed of light with rof based on the hoists, not the gun
Its arcade, so tbh, a bit nitpicking here
And in any event its the boat models that give me brain damage
WeeVee 44 STILL has the fucking Mark 3 radar
Tie me to a missile and launch me at WG Headquarters. I am ready.
i dont even like playing this game anymore im just playing for collection
Subs just dont make it fun and I keep constantly getting my fingers burned because history told me the pan is hot but in wargaming land it's the handle.
most of my games are coop for dailies, operations for dailies and credits and ranked for steel

Design information on the Hypervelocity Projectile.
@spring briar
I have to say it looks incredibly similar to the 60mm guided CIWS projectile developed in the 90s.
Similar guidance, similar control mechanisms.
Here’s the 60mm for reference.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/AIAA-92-2751-HYPERVELOCITY-PROJECTILE-TECHNOLOGY-(-Bischer/3cce2bb892f0459d51d0174d0efa20f37290cc0b
??nrS? {»^goaty projectile program 1S P° by the Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDIO) United States Army Strategic Defense Command (USASDC), and United States AmvKmem Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC). The pdnicoatSs^A^^^m Sc fnSm n ^' ,i "* SRBMS md TM be d from a^ESo M^netic w?TM T -^ ° V°}ectile is also a candida...
Here’s the full DTIC report.
Shit I realize that is, in fact the 60mm design.
I’m an idiot.
Albeit it is a different version of the shell.
Lmao, hydrazine + fluorine
Gotta be in the WCGW category
why not use borane at this point
so i just found out the "beehive" gun was a real thing and.... why and how???
Sanshikidan (三式弾, "type 3 shell") was a form of ammunition: a World War II-era combined shrapnel and incendiary anti-aircraft round used by the Imperial Japanese Navy. The type of layered construction of the warheads were generically referred to as Beehive rounds. The shells were intended to put up a barrage of flame through which any aircraft ...
How?
They filled an 18.1” shell with long tubes containing pyrotechnics
And gave it a time fuze
So it would basically act like a big shotgun to shoot down formations of enemy planes (on paper)
In reality it mostly damaged the gun and was more of a liability
in practice:
"oooooooh pretty fireworks"
Yup
it legit just looks like fireworks
japan.... whyyyyyyy
u know whats even worse? the germans outfitted TIRPITZ with this type of shell at one point
During repairs after Operation Tungsten, the 38 cm SK C/34 naval guns of the Bismarck-class battleship Tirpitz were modified to allow their use against aircraft, being supplied with specially-fuzed 38 cm shells for barrage antiaircraft fire.
Desperate times
how fucking desprate must u be?
One of the last of the Navy’s Flight IIA Arleigh Burke guided-missile destroyers was commissioned in a ceremony on Saturday. USS Lenah Sutcliffe Higbee (DDG-123) formally entered the fleet during a ceremony in Key West, Fla. The ship’s namesake Lenah Sutcliffe Higbee was the second superintendent of the Navy Nurse Corps during World War I and …
What? Do you want something less credible?
Tirpitz was good old blast frag (flak), not incendiary
It is worth noting that 14" San Shiki turned out to be quite useful during the bombardment of Henderson Field
Also damn I missed shitting on WoWS and wherbs last night
Oh great, this is yet another wiki quotes that doesn't even exist on the cited source....
Would be stupid not to do that. Can allocate some space for AA shells, and major threat came from planes
It’s not optimal
It was normal HE shell with time fuze chucked up front
Remove tirpitz’s turrets and replace with rotating AA platforms
Pretty much an enlarged version of this
So type 3 exist for which caliber? I know about 460 and 410 but any sub caliber and does the 155 use normal time fuze or type 3?
460mm, 410mm, 203mm and 127mm
Why 127mm? Isn't just better using time fuzed?
Time fuzed is better regardless
Doesn't it exist for the 14" guns as well
I'm fairly certain the Kongos used it during the bombardment of Henderson Field
Yeah
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com
The British Sterling firm designed the SAR-80 (specifically, their engineer Frank Waters) as a very simple rifle to sell to countries outside the main N...
It’s never too late.
OK, H-39 immunity zone lol
its actually not immune to ww1 era 16" guns at 20k yds
and thats ignoring the weakness of the upper belt
Against what tho
Deck or belt hit
Hmm
Hope this is the true figure
I mean sure at certain angle that turtleback will be just a flat 120mm
But
Shell has to pen through now angled 180 or 300mm belt first to hit it
might have been belt then
300mm flat belt?
With 120mm Turtleback after it
So shell will likely lose high penetration levels after penning 300mm then hit the turtleback with less effective way

The belt seems less tall than contemporary designs though 
And by relying on your last line of deck armour you have nothing to catch spalling.
ucp and its consequences
Then you make it IFV not Apc 
Oh no
@shrewd pecan not promo material, but close enough IMO
put it into the thread
With a US Navy lieutenant at the helm, five Soviet Sailors enjoy a ride in a miniature aircraft carrier during their visit to the base. In Norfolk for a five-day goodwill visit are the Guided Missile Cruiser MARSHAL USTINOV (CG 088), the Guided Missile Destroyer OTLICHNYY (DDG 434) and the Replenishment Oiler GENRIKH GASANOV. This is the first time that ships of the Soviet navy have visited an American military port. July 1991
Its a uniform 120mm turtleback across H-39 IIRC.
I wanna see penetration tests on P1047 armour
you need to know where the sub is to hit it with a hedgehog so sonar is pretty much mandatory. it has significant advantages over depth charges.
https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Hedgehog_(weapon)
Operation Chastise, commonly known as the Dambusters Raid, was an attack on German dams carried out on the night of 16/17 May 1943 by 617 Squadron RAF Bomber Command, later called the Dam Busters, using special "bouncing bombs" developed by Barnes Wallis. The Möhne and Edersee dams were breached, causing catastrophic flooding of the Ruhr valley ...
Play World of Warships here: https://wo.ws/41WjAkE
Thank you World of Warships for sponsoring this video.
During registration use the promo code WARSHIPS to receive a huge starter pack including a bunch of Doubloons, Credits, Premium Account time, and a ship!
The promo code is only for new players who register for the first time on the Wargamin...
Our circumstances have changed. The Australian Army is enhancing its power projection in the region. We are modernising how we train, doing more with our regional and global partners. Together, we are increasing our potency and sophistication.
We generate land power to be ready to fight tonight. Alongside our partners, we are embracing new oppo...
bruh
Curious question: What are these weird hatch looking things on top of the turrets
probably to assist with loading ammunition
Ah
dunno
Thought they a lot bigger
I was just listening to Drach’s St. Nazaire raid
the poor bastards in Cambletowns bow as she went off
it happens
anyways ironclads
ironclads in AL would be interesting since it would shift around which faction is major and which aren't
Dutch Ironclads 
No
That is photoshop right?
yes
yo a fellow botes sufferer
On the 4th of July 1918, an Australian-led offensive commenced around the village of le Hamel.
Such was its success that it led to being used as a model for future combined arms offensives.
During this battle, the 21st Battalion, 2nd Division captured a German 7.7cm Feldkanone 96. It was sent home as a war trophy and wasted away in a park in...
Isn't there are that SPAA system that use Oto Melera 76mm?
Mind explaining exactly what it is you posted here?
Two men enjoying their company, clearly.
And how does it relate to History?
one of those men is Saddam Hussein who is objectively a major historical figure
Yeah, that's one
couldn't trace from where that exact photo came from, but it's not exactly rare in forpol, the other side of the curtain did it quite often
It's called Socialist kiss yes, Chkalov kissed Stalin once in that way
aye
The first 100 people to use code HISTORIGRAPH at the link below will get 60% off of Incogni: https://incogni.com/historigraph
It’s 9pm on May 31st 1916, and the Battle of Jutland has raged for the last six hours. With more than 200 ships involved, it has been the largest clash between fleets of battleships in history. As the light now begins to...
@ivory ridge
nice
Do USN have a better crew training for AA than IJN? I remember USN use an old dreadnought as a gunnery school for AA training, do they train sailor there or gun battery master?
Preliminary armored flight deck CV design I found while dicking around on the NHHC site
This is very much an anti-riot gun that's had two lives. That of which it was intended from it's development in the late 70s, and then it's popular culture life as a wholly different weapon altogether.
Join Jonathan as he examines both of these stories as well as some incredible promotional footage from the team at Enfield.
Subscribe to our c...
The Propeller of U-20, the submarine that sank Lusitania
Reconstructions of various Viking ships at Roskilde, I kinda forgot to take pictures in the museum of the original ships
The keel of another ship they just started constructing
It was the evening of October 1st, 1943, when German Police and members of the Danish SS descended on Copenhagen with orders to round up and deport Denmark’s Jewish population. It was the night of the Jewish New Year - Rosh HaShanah - and the German Police were expecting to find Jewish families at home celebrating. What they found instead was em...
Rich
War thunder changed 356mm Type 91 APC and Common Type 0 explosives types from shimose to Type 91
Is it better

Lmao Tea appears when Romania is said
@tough quail
excellent

Bruh, do you have some sort of Romania detector or something?
Romanian shill
Yo we aren't still under that stupid "avoid modern vehicle" rule right
Since it clearly reverted back to normal 
That rule didn't even last a day here
technically it's just anything from more than two decades ago
so basically nearly every modern vehicle in service
but it was also a case of bored power trip modding so who gives a shit
I don't know man
They don’t need to
As you can see
The range at 30 degree elevation is already 21km
23 seems feasible at 45 degrees
Which was their max elevation
Wait is that from naval weps?
Coolio, that's probably more accurate then my romania shit then, can't remember what the numbers were when we last talked about it
I just find it weird from a fire control standpoint
Like was Karkhov even moving lol
Yeah they were both moving
Aim small, miss small
But navweaps does believe the numbers at 30 degrees of elevation to be exagerated
And I feel the same
12cm Mk 5?
Yes
Wait where are you looking on Navweaps?
But it is mk.5
Wait what
But Bofors didn't use Mks.
Where's the numbering from?
What weapon was on the Regale?
Regina my love


Oh yeah, I don't think there's shell data for this either
Speak for youself
Done cross referencing
The breech is most definitely that one of the 12cm SK L50. And the extra hoop matches too.
The Bofors values for this gun were 24kg 900mps 30elev/10depr 19.500m.
Dutch values go in quite more detail except range
Where did you get 21,5km from?
Navy weps
That's what richy was looking at first
Wait which page
Zero idea
Were you looking at the 21,3k yards?

This is what he posted so whatever one has this
Kanon van 12cm No. 4
120mm cannon of 6390mm (53¼ cal) in total length and 6000mm (50 cal) in barrel length. The gun weighed 4060kg, the mount with aiming devices 1490kg. Sleds weighed 1450kg without shield and pivot 1300kg. Shields weighed 310kg. Total weight was 8610kg. Elevation was +30°/-10°. Recoil force was 30.000 and length 580mm. Rifling was 4915mm long of which the 36 grooves were 1,5mm deep and 6,97mm wide with 3,5mm lands. Twist rate was 1 in 3,6m or 30 in calibres.
The following fixed rounds were used:
HE Springgranaat L4,2 of 24kg filled 20,17kg empty with a 18,67kg filled casting for a 42,67kg round to be fired at 900mps.
Exercise steel shell Granaat voor Schietoefening (staal) L4,2 of 24kg filled with a 16,92kg filled casing for a 40,92kg round to be fired at 800mps.
Exercise cast iron shell Granaat voor Schietoefening (gietijzer) of 24kg filled with a 12,60kg filled casing for a 36,60kg round to be fired at 500mps.
Starshell Lichtgranaat L4,2 of 23kg filled with a 12,57kg filled casing for a 33,57kg round to be fired at 500mps.
Bofors cannon for use on the Admiralen-class destroyers. Planned elevation was +30°/-10°. This 12cm “L50” cannon fired a 24kg shell at 900mps using smokeless gunpowder macaroni No. 16. Max pressure was 3100 at 15 degrees or 3200 at 28. Bofors publications gave a 8900kg weight firing a 24kg round fired at 900mps at +30/-10 elevation for a maximum range of 19.500m.
Kanon van 12cm No. 5
120mm cannon of 6310mm (52½ cal) in total length and 6000mm (50 cal) in barrel length. The gun weighed 4265kg, the mount with aiming devices 2240kg. Sleds weighed 2010kg without shield and pivot 945kg. Shields weighed 310kg. Total weight was 9770kg. Elevation was +30°/-10°. Recoil force was 30.000 and length 500mm. Rifling was 4915mm long of which the 36 grooves were 1,5mm deep and 6,97mm wide with 3,5mm lands. Twist rate was 1 in 3,6m or 30 in calibres.
Rounds fired were as No. 4
8 models were produced by HIH and fit on Banckert and Van Nes. Elevation was +35°/-10°. Born from a need for local production after the first world war. The cannons were interchangeable with No. 4 and their fire control, crew and aiming devices were operationally identical. Munitions were produced by Bofors and Artillerie-Inrichtingen. The raw material for production was tested thoroughly and with modern equipment. Although barely passing the minimal requirements, the end product turned out to be highly qualitative. Eight guns were ordered for Banckert and Van Nes.
Specifications of a by HIH described export 12cm L50 were as follows: 24,0kg HE shell with ca. 2,7kg burster fired by 9,0kg propellant charge in 9,5kg case for a 42,5kg cartridge fired at 900mps for 991mt muzzle energy. Piece weighed 9000kg; 4265kg for the barrel with breech. The jacket was screwed on the breech. The 120mm calibre 6310mm long had a maximum pressure of 3200 atm and constant twist of 30 calibres. Mount weighed 4735kg with an elevation range of 35°/-10° and traverse range of 360°. The gun was mounted 1475mm above the lower base plate side and the recoil length of 500-540mm. Brake reaction was 30.000kg.
Oh hey need to fix the elevation for No. 5
Remind me tomorrow
So yeah, if the Mks are following the Dutch scheme it cant be Mk 5.
It's probably just a Bofors M/1924 aka No. 4.
#OTD in 2006, USS Oriskany (CV-34) was sunk off the coast of Florida to create an artificial reef. Navy engineers estimated that it would take 5 hours for the carrier to sink after the charges were detonated, but the ship slipped beneath the waves after only 35 minutes.
122

*TIL wreck of Titanic still being studied to this day
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2XtefrMNhg
The world's most famous shipwreck has been revealed as never seen before.
The first full-sized digital scan of the Titanic, which lies 3,800m (12,500ft) down in the Atlantic, has been created using deep-sea mapping.
It provides a unique 3D view of the entire ship, enabling it to be seen as if the wayer has been drained.
The hope is that thi...
Of course
We have to study it as much as we can. The wreck is located in what amounts to a giant sand dune... Eventually it's either going to rust away into nothing or get buried in sand
@tough quail Abrams with Russian Arena APS systems, 1998 
Arena already exist since 1998?
Designed in 1993 yes
it's one of those dissolution era projects that's been played around with ever since
British aircraft carriers will soon have, in addition to their F-35 jets, "highly capable, long range and long endurance surveillance and offensive strike platforms".
1154
125
glad they're finally paying attention to the health of these frigates and put them on intense exercise programs
after years
of people thinking the only pic we had of this vehicle was a photoshop
we got a second pic
the rambo lambo
After more than two decades of peace in Europe and complete air superiority in its deployments, western air forces now confront a renewed peer-to-peer adversary with Russia and China. How has this period of peace impacted Air Forces, what are the main problems on recruitment, platform-centricity and focusing on efficiency over resilience and fle...
I think the discussion about efficiency v resilience really gets to the crux of the issue that Western militaries are having in a variety of sectors, the years of focusing on counterterrorism and the cost cutting post Cold War have led to us being in a very poor position to react to an actual hot war, as has clearly been demonstrated by how slow we have been to ramp up munitions production in response to Ukraine.
Is that a fucking lm002
What gun is that???
@spiral cedar
KBA 25mm
General Info The story of the Lamborghini LM 002 (nickname 'Rambo Lambo') starts in the late 70's, Lamborghini wanted to tap into the Military market whilst also tapping into the civilian market, they had decided to work on a few very unique designs for off-road military vehicles, mainly made to ...
Holy shit that's awesome
British 12" APC and German 12" APC looking
EXTREMELY
similar
Ryuho is a different class of submarine tender converted into aircraft carrier
and Chitose and Chiyoda weren't even submarine tenders before they were converted
And I checked fleet tech, this isnt just the wiki being silly

Absolutely surreal, the 🇯🇵 ShinMaywa US-2 💪💦https://t.co/n4U8HgVLyN
3307
494
Never
"If the US was so good why isn't there a US 2?"
Japan:
The Royal Australian Navy faces the greatest challenge of the Australian Defense Force as it pursues a nuclear-powered submarine fleet, according to the nation’s latest defense blueprint. Building the new boats under the AUKUS agreement is central to Australia’s new strategy of denial to meet the increasingly aggressive threat from China. Austra...
Captain Eric "Winkle" Brown, renowned British test pilot and naval aviator, had a high regard for the Messerschmitt Me-262. Brown flew a captured Me-262 during his evaluations of enemy aircraft during and after World War II.
He considered the Me-262 to be a groundbreaking and impressive aircraft for its time. The Me-262's speed and rate of climb...

Sure, it's performance was good during a battle
But why people act like allies would just watch Me 262 instead start doing their own eventually
germany, putting a new fighter into the war in the final days in small numbers: this will change the war
the allies, who have been winding down war production for 2 years due to the war being all but decided: oh?
5 years? 
Even if Allies literally doing nothing I don't think it'll be any different...
The allies once tried to make an aircraft carrier out of special ice
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWeapons
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com
In the 1950s, Remington decided that it needed an inexpensive new .22 self-loading rifle to add to its catalog. In looking at how to reduce the cost of ...
How much bigger is the UltraFan compared to the GE90
Video footage of US Navy destroyer USS Floyd B. Parks DD-884 on 13 September 1951 during the Siege of Wonsan in the Korean War. Shows 5"38 gun mount crew loading, cleaning, and firing the gun. Toward the end of the video, the crew loads and fires faster.
Subscribe to see more interesting film!
5 38 
Croatian soldiers defending Livno using a naval mine against Serb forces in 1992.
This isn't a music translation, but while I was editing footage for a song (the song has no music video) I came across this. I found this extremely interesting so I thought you might too. I will still continue to translate music, but also might translate more non-...
bro wtf is this
the latter
The yugoslav breakup wars saw a truly fascinating mix of weapons
including the above naval mine rolled down a hill
This episode is about the ship's secondary battery.
To support this channel and Battleship New Jersey:
https://www.battleshipnewjersey.org/videofund
Junior Sailors on USS George Washington Endured Some of the Toughest Living Conditions in the Military, Says New Navy Investigation - USNI News
https://t.co/D8RUGnp0gD
257
Not a cellphone in sight, just people living in the moment.
@alpine onyx need some help with two things.
-
Any clear photos showing this section of Spee, top down like so?
-
Any clear photos of her late 1938 neutrality markings, especially on the turret front plates?
Wait neutrality markings? What was that for?
Was that due to the uh Spanish Civil War?
@tough quail Mommy Flanker feeding little Tejas 
slurp

Also congrats on getting first spike equipped vehicle
Not a looker but
Nah I dig it
Using the chinese QN the F&F is a gimmick, but at least the freccia in on a much better platform
Good ol Puma should get it soon as well
Wish Germany did BMP-2M style
2 launchers of both sides
It wont
It will be a new vehicle
I dont know why the fuck people expect gaijin to modify the existing one
That's not how this game works
You do realize this is #history right?
Or... Is there an actual Bismarck II ship out there?
No
Doesn't make sense
You might be better off asking that either in #al-lore or #al-general there though
Pretty much as long as it doesn't get political and was something that isn't considered as certain recent events, it should be okay
If anything just check the pins
As voted for by our Patreons - In 2000, the Arleigh Burke guided-missile destroyer, USS Cole, docks in the Yemeni port of Aden for a routine refuelling stop. Unbeknownst to her captain, a small boat heavily laden with explosives approaches her port side. A new enemy is making himself known.
Subscribe to our brand new channel The Intel Report no...
so have we still been talking about new equipment I can't remember
Whats there to talk about again
uhh
New gearlab stuff?
Just Gimme these 
There's the UR 100mm dd gun frin Sakura
irl stuff I mean
well that's what I was gonna post
funny dragoon redeemed
kumnuts was too tall and goompy looking imo
Richie, what was that that I just saw?
The General-Admiral class, armoured cruisers of the Imperial Russsian Navy, are today's subject.
Read more about the the ships here:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Conways-Worlds-Fighting-Ships-1860-1905/dp/0851771335/
https://www.amazon.co.uk/British-Cruisers-Victorian-Norman-Friedman-ebook/dp/B00TGBP8SI
Naval History books, use code 'DRACH' for 25...
@manic latch

Not a fan of this old but
Good
Wdym not a fan of this old
You mean you do not like this ship comrade?
Are you a foreign spy?
I dont like ships that old Rich 
My limit is 1910s, anything older is just OK at best for me 

…
Disappointment
So you don’t even like the pre dreads?
Finding ship from Bureau Scheepsbouw is hard
Yes
They are ugly
Predread more like prebeauty
Silence, Dreadaboo
Some predreadnoughts are pretty
Most are
If not all
They are cute and beautiful
Steam Iron
Petition to ban krem from having soyuz until he appreciates pre dreadnoughts
A mild amount of tomfoolery
Then there's the Charles Martels
The patchwork fleet

If predreads were so good why they got replaced
I prefer age of sail
Signed.
Ah yes, the only ships we should care about are the newest and greatest ddgs and ssns lol
Congress: True
Anyone have details on the new fw190 variant used in the game? (A-6/R6)
Apparently it's a "bomber destroyer" equipped with rockets (well, finally another german fighter with rockets that's not a PR exclusive)
Just a quick question: Anyone have any high quality blueprint-esque images of Bismarck? I'm modelling various ships in Blender, and Bismarck's on my queue
@there you go
I suck at pinging.
here you go
Thanks
210mm HE rockets designed for anti infantry, no clue why Manjuu added for navy
Likely a testing for Tiny Tims
It's either very good against light targets or heavy targets depend on thinking of Manjuu
ah, it's supposed to be anti infantry rockets, how odd.
it's most likely the same rockets as the bf109g since it's a german plane.
Uhhh no
Bf109G in game use AP panzerbrechend L/4.8
86mm AP rockets
While this rocket of Fw 190 is 210mm HE
i mean that was my hypothesis for the ingame version, not the irl one
maybe you're right, seems likely it's a HE rocket
German designs are usually overweight for their purpose yes
Still weird choice to do 1937J
more likely Z52s are hidden for UR
I think this design is not even in wows as well, I do admire Manjuu's wider research on designs now
Their wider research seems to be only for a selective country though 
Perhaps
Though to be fair, the information world is littered with references to the wunderwaffles.
It could do with more attention for the rest of the R&D projects.
Like BUSTER 
We got Kursk, Project X cruiser, one of rarest projects for a naval fan to have knowledge of
So I highly trust Manjuu now
We should make "blueprint iceberg" for navy meme
Deeper= more unpopular projects
Montana/H class is surface level
In the Depths we acknowledge the Dutch are in AL because of all the 40mm mounts, the Yat Sen gun and Snorkel. 
Dutch is like at deepest ye

Or African battleship design we won't ever know

59°59'33.8"N 30°31'39"E
Maybe I should tattoo this coordinate
Only thing left of Soyuz on this world after all


You should
what is that anyway
406mm gun in a single turret
I did wanna go to Leningrad someday so I'll put that on the list of NEAT STUFF to look at
She was in defense of Leningrad
Soyuz fought without existing 
with the unfortunate face of a really goofy gun house
Intersting fact someone keeps painting the gun every few year or so, sometimes it's rusted, sometimes it's white, sometimes it has camo
Reading back and found out Krem don’t like pre dread and ironclad 
I can understand ironclads but predreads are funny
me and the boys after a few drinks at the bar
And Habbakuk too
wows has the regular type 1937 (gustav julius maerker) and type 1938 (felix schultz)
and also, is the new purple AA gun the oerlikon mk v?
Kaneda 500k when? 
A classic
mostly ended yeah
I really should obliterate my old Quora account cause my email keeps getting these ridiculous questions
pretty sure I saw one asking why Hitler didn't just paradrop into Washington, London and Moscow to end the war quickly
Average HOI4 playewr
Something is deeply off there, because the photos I see of Spee don't have the markings like that...
Because these are her 1937 cruise pictures.
The photo I posted was after International effort to the Civil War suspended.
Deutschland's front plates also have no paint
Thing is, those stripes don't extend all the way to the edge of the side plate. Spee's is, for some reason.
I'll just have to put my faith in this.
I'm afraid I can't find pictures of that aft platform either
Forward control post, or side positions
Easy
But the aft platforms are usually not photographed in detail, neither on them nor on the ugly sisters
That's unfortunate, because I'm trying to confirm if that section is bare-steeled or planked
or a mix as presented somewhere else.
those dots on the hull are windows right
Dots on the hull?
Naturally, yes
So why were there a lot of them
actually why did Cruisers have a lot of windows
I'm looking at some BBs as well and the more modern BBs had lesser windows on the hull
Because it started to be realized that they are a watertight integrity hazard
Helena as launched was full of port holes, after Pearl Harbor, she was immediately sent to Mare Island and almost all of her portholes are welded shut with ocatgonal pieces as shown on the right
Coupled with the implementation of artificial air ventilation on US ships, it made the ship unpleasant, but not completely devoid of fresh air at the very least
Oh
The IJN also went the same way
Weld the lower row shut, blank a few on the upper row
Yeah but it seems to me that at the same time the British and the Americans had less portholes, the German kept the same amount relatively speaking
You'd be surprised how fast flooding can be exacerbated by portholes
The German surface force....not that active after the debacle of Barents Sea
Yeah the only large german ship I can see that had relatively less portholes was the Bismarcks
Don't think that the portholes were really recognized as an issue by the Germans
Lützow's report after she got torpedoed and took a list didn't mention portholes
Neither did Eugen's or Lützow's report on the respective stern torpedo hit
looks like a cruiser, which ship was this
The aforementioned Luetzow and Eugen, after both got torpedoed
torpedo dmg is crazy. Pretty impressive that eugen managed to survive the war after that
That's fairly minor compared to some of the beatings some ships received.
Don't worry, they'll buff out
Eugen didn't like the idea of getting sunk during war
So she just refused
Can't be legally sunk without consent
Hey all, I have to do a class presentation project of the HMAS Melbourne collisions with HMAS Voyager and USS Frank E Evans (I got allocated the topic), does anyone have good resources about it beyond Wikipedia? Also ideas of interesting ways to present it?
Wiki's Bibliography is pretty comprehensive already, official reports is already listed (and linked) at least
You may also want to familiarize yourself with COLREGS first
@desert agate
Rules of the road? Sounds like a good call, I’ve got a copy lying around already
spon is very educated on the topic, I'd await his response
Here's a brilliant Horrible Histories new song called 'Cousins'.From the Horrible Histories World War One special episode 'Frightful First World War'.
For more CBBC Games, Horrible Histories clips and things to do, visit http://www.bbc.co.uk/cbbc/shows/horrible-histories
For more fun, play CBBC games and great makes visit http://www.bbc.co.u...
Gimme a few hours I'm at work
sweet thanks for that
The American extremely early morning shift vs the Australian night shift
Now that I'm reading more into these accidents, seems like the COLREGs are definitely quite important to get an understanding of

@humble mulch Soobrazitelny II 
Project 20380 are likely my favorite corvette class especially by looks 
Krem, what was soviet assessment of Kiev class aviation “cruiser”?
Huh, USS Mindoro (CVE-120)'s Insignia kinda looks like... a Minnie Mouse shipgirl?
Soviets actually wanted a supercarrier that would be similar to Kitty Hawk class of US. Project Orel was designed as a Soviet Kitty Hawk in some way. But she was way too expensive for Soviet liking so they went for a much smaller beings like Kiev class. Good thing it allowed passage of Turkish straits for being cruiser, so Black Sea was easy to enter or out.
They weren't fully satisfied of course. That's why Kuznetsov class and later Supercarrier Ulyanovsk projects were borne. Unlike Kievs who is forced to use Vtol Yak-38s, they would have much more plane options
So Kiev class is when you are going to a wedding for dance, but you can't have the beautiful girl as partner so you go with someone much more "humble"
The Sea Cat anti-aircraft missile system failed to lock onto the attackers, who also outmanoeuvred the 4.5" gun by carrying out their run out of its arc of fire.
Ok why didn't the US go with wing turrets on early dreadnoughts? and why did it take a while for the British and German dreadnoughts to remove wing turrets
I think it's only modern ship that was lost to dumb bombs
what CA guns had the fastest fire rate? and how fast were they
The US was a little late to building dreadnoughts, having embarked on a fairly significant pre dread building program in the 5 odd years before Dreadnought was built, and Congress was thus slow to appropriate money for US dreadnoughts, and when they finally did so they implemented a significant tonnage limitation to save on costs. The USN thus wanted a ship with similar capabilities to foreign vessels in terms of armor and firepower on the broadside, and at least decent speed, and on less tonnage than other country's entering dreadnoughts. The solution the USN arrived at was placing all the turrets on the beam, and making them superfiring over one another, something the USN had already been experimenting with before.
Probably the Des Moines class’s 8”/55 mk16
How fast
Oh ok ok
I thought the Des Moines class got up to around 12 rpm with burst?
I wouldn't say that the US was late with building dreadnoughts
USS South Carolina is actually one of the first
and predates the Nassaus
Did Atlanta class have the most guns of a light cruiser?
Or was there another light cruiser with more 5in guns?
Also AFAIK the Brits and Germans stuck around with using wing turrets for a bit because they gave significant firepower in the forward arc, though I could be wrong about that
I thought the Nassaus entered service before the SCs?
yes
but that doesn't mean the USN wasn't early with Dreadnoughts
ok
And the Worcesters had 6 inch guns
I'm asking because I have this weird ass monstrosity in UAD
12 5in dual gun turrets
Was wondering if any CLs of any navy had more guns than the Atlanta class
CA is also pretty weird
however what the USN was quite late with was Pre Dreadnoughts
yeah we only started building modern ships in like 1890
they didn't build any oceangoing ironclads either really
1865-1888 in the USN was just sleepy time

She was already suffering
Her sub class removed 2 side turrets
In a broadside Mogami has more
in cl form, yeah the brooklyns too
Mhm
Ooo
Atlanta can only get a 14 gun broadside, while the Mogamis (in cl form) and the Brooklyns get 15 gun broadsides
Dream job
Nice rust
I think rust looks worst on Zumwalt because how flat her surface is

How far from each other was Beatty and Hipper from each other when they started battle Running to the South?
The nuclear-powered Project 949A Antey (Oscar II class) submarine K-141 Kursk sank in an accident on 12 August 2000 in the Barents Sea, during the first major Russian naval exercise in more than 10 years, and all 118 personnel on board were killed. The crews of nearby ships felt the initial explosion and a second, much larger explosion, but the ...
@limpid flare
That doesn't look very healthy
118 dead people tend not to be
Whenever a new technology is developed a new domain becomes accessible, there's often a brief window before it's weaponised.
The first computer predates the first hacking attack, the first aircraft were not armed, and the first satellites were blissfully immune to any targeting or attack.
But humans are humans, and if there's a target to hit,...
one of the few Perun videos that i can actually post here
Nuclear Space Lasers!
Another based Teller project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Excalibur
Project Excalibur was a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Cold War–era research program to develop an X-ray laser system as a ballistic missile defense (BMD) for the United States. The concept involved packing large numbers of expendable X-ray lasers around a nuclear device, which would orbit in space. During an attack, the device wo...
The Polyus spacecraft (Russian: Полюс, pole), also known as Polus, Skif-DM, GRAU index 17F19DM, was a prototype Soviet orbital weapons platform designed to destroy Strategic Defense Initiative satellites with a megawatt carbon-dioxide laser. It had a Functional Cargo Block derived from a TKS spacecraft to control its orbit and it could launch te...
The Cold War was such a meme
It was
Not for Europe though
Soviet sailors look at the American command ship Catoctin (USS Catoctin; AGC-5), which arrived in Sevastopol during the Yalta Conference.

Thats fair, the cold war was generally a bad time for anyone caught in the middle, I just meant a lot of the wacky tech the US and USSR made to combat one another is a meme
Probably a stupid ass hypothetical, but as I was reading about naval logistics and how underway replenishment was pretty vital in the Pacific theatre for the US, what would change if the British Navy had perfected underway replenishment back at the start of ww1
I mean AFAIK most of their ships were still coal fired in WW1
Yeah I know
But throw that into the air and assume that somehow they were able to perfect it even with a lot of ships using coal
Britain was probably the best in the world and underway coaling
and had a massive fleet of colliers
What would change in the strategic picture for the British Navy? Since afaik they rarely did underway replenishment in WW1
Since in my head the idea was that they could put the Grand Fleet into sea for a long ass time relatively speaking
but coaling while underway was just not practical technologically, generally ships stopped to do it because its just way more efficient
I don't imagine it would change the strategic picture all that much either, if its only Britain with the capability
If Germany had the capability somehow tho
Let's switch then
If it was Germany that had it
Would probably make German raiders a lot more annoying to deal with
Wouldn't change the picture for the North Sea I presume
no
Britain may invest more in cruisers and battlecruisers
but the Grand Fleet was never at sea on operations for that long, because they only ever needed to sortie when the high seas fleet was out
Okay another stupid hypothetical. Let's say the main battle line of the Grand Fleet was replaced with the BBs and BCs that were in WW2. Would the British have the advantage? Assume all the tech for the WW2 ships were in well working order
So basically the entire battle line would be replace by the Nelsons, KGVs, Vanguard, R-class, QE class, Renown class and Hood
Well yeah, ww2 battleships were just better than ww1 ones, tech marches on and all
But they'd be outnumbered by the High Seas Fleet right
Oh nvm
the High Seas fleet would be outnumbered
They will score more hits and fire faster while also having better armor
thought the British had less than the High Seas Fleet had in ww1
Britain would actually still have more battleships
No I mean i thought Britain in WW2 had less BBs/BCs than Germany had in total in WW1
but I counted wrong
Britain had a total of 20 or so BBs and BCs
though if you also take away the British battlecruiser squadron, then they are in a serious hole
You'd only lose Hood and the Renowns tho?
that's only 3 ships relatively speaking
No I meant if you take their ww1 battlecruisers
Ah
Yeah no I meant the entire British capital ship line
I counted something like 18 BBs in WW2 (well not all at once)
ok yeah then while the Brits lose a couple ships, its probably a net benefit because the new ships are more capable, and also substantially faster than the High seas fleet
5 QEs, 5 R-class, 2 Nelsons, 5 KGVs, 1 Vanguard
Most they had in commission at once would be 15 I think
US had 26 iirc
wait no I forgot about Royal Oak
Wait 25
I mean
They did lose 3 BCs because of lack of armor no?
I meant that Britain had far fewer battlecruisers in WW2 than they did in WW1, if they lose their ww1 battlecruisers than they are in a deep hole, 3 battlecruisers is not enough, and while they could send the KGVs to fill out the battlecruisers, then the battle line starts getting thin
none of them
any HSF ship is very dead if it encounters a treaty battleship
if Hipper's line met the theoretical fast line of Hood, Vanguard, Renown class, they'd still be outclassed right
None
Isn't largest guns they have is 305mm
Hood, Vanguard and the 2 Renowns would be 4 ships vs Hipper's 5 ships of the Scouting group
Yeah probably, having 1 extra battlecruiser will not deal with the substantial firepower advantage the british ships have
Yeah no this is a massacre for Hipper in this theoretical
yeah
Ah
Ok yeah what's the smallest group of WW2 battleships from any nation that you'd be comfortable with winning Jutland against the HSF's battleline
Smallest group?
I mean which specific ships
I mean they are designed to each fight two or three standards, but in this case they are way outnumbered
But they aren't against standards however
This is assuming that the screening force for both sides still exist aka the "theoretical" replacement fleet still has the British cruisers and destroyers by their side
Most of the HSF aren't Superdreads tho
I mean they might run out of shells before dealing with the HSF
they only had like 2 ships classed as Super-dreads
Ok the assumption as well is that the British escort forces are still with them
So basically only the BB and BC lines get replaced by these ww2 ships
I think the Yamato's are still at a disadvantage here, for starters even if you only expect them to sink the enemy BB and BC line, they still have to be sinking ships faster than 1 ship every 10 salvos, assuming they are carrying a full load of AP
and any German BBs or BCs not engaged could be tearing up the British cruiser and destroyer fleet
So just 2 Yamato's are a no go?
which could snowball into them having to deal with significant light forces as well
4 Iowas and 4 Sodaks stomp them IMO
heck even just say the 2 Yamatos and 2 Nagatos ought to be able to do it, unless like Bayern gets a lucky shot on one of the Nagatos
4 Iowas should be able to do it as well
I mean fully upgraded to ww2 spec QEs may be able to do it
Ok while we're on the topic of ww2 ships in Jutland, would adding the Scharnhorst into the HSF change anything?
I presume the Scharnhorsts would be with the scouting group of Hipper, which would be now a 7-6 advantage for the HSF
in the run to the south
Yeah, Beatty isn't going to have a good time, not that he was already
it would be way worse if I said it was the Bismarcks lol
yeah, Bismarcks would be a real problem, though I still think in the end the Brits probably would have had a strategic victory at Jutland
The reason I'm asking this is because there are too many alternate what-ifs of "what if modern ships sent to ww2"
I want to know if WW2 ships sent to ww1 that aren't carriers would change anything
I mean I think the upshot for WW1 is that unless it allows the HSF to decisively defeat the RN, its not changing the course of the war all that much
In my personal opinion anyways
The reason why is because the only ships at Jutland that had the same caliber of guns as the Bisko's are the 4 QE's and 2 Revenge's
And yes I am sleep deprived rn that I'm thinking of these wild ass scenarios
yeah, but thats still 6 15in gun ships to the German's 2
me too lol, I got to head to bed
Bisko should have the speed advantage against the entire battlecruiser line tho
and also the firepower advantage
Yeah, if the Biskos go with the battlecruisers its trouble for Britain, in that Britain is gonna have a real shitty time in all the battlecruiser actions
battles like 2nd Heligoland Bight are going to be a shitshow
yeah but this theoretical only assumes the timespan of Jutlan
didn't want to think of the strategic consequences for the entire war in this theoretical
Ah, then yeah Beatty is getting chewed up and spat out, but if a main fleet clash does occur, it probably still favors the british
weight of firepower and all that
Ok another stupid idea
What if the Hipper had the Alaska's
lol
and not just the 2 Alaska's built
assuming all the Alaska's ordered somehow joined the HSF 30 years ago
Again, bad news for Beatty, but probably doesn't swing the battle, the Alaska's wouldn't fare any better than the rest of the HSF when they run into Jellicoe
So unless we throw any of the bigger BBs to the HSF, nothing is changing the numerical superiority of the British
yeah probably, though if the HSF got something like the 2 yamatos, that probably gives them the edge
1 Yamato is probably enough tbf
If the Yamato's were designed against 2-3 Standards, then the Grand Fleet would be in serious trouble even with just one Yammy
How about the Iowas?
How many Iowa's would be enough to tip the balance into the HSF's favour
probably also 1 or 2
While they aren't quite as well armored or armed, radar directed gunfire is OP
Honestly if 1 or 2 Iowa's would tip the balance into the HSF, then I am confident that the 2 Bisko's would tip the favor into the HSF's side
they did still have radar
and they did have 8 15in guns
I mean with the Biskos you are looking at a significantly worse protected ship, with significantly less ability to do very long range shooting
bisko is optimized for close in fighting, which gives the QEs a real shot to gang up on her
Then again, they're only fight would be the pre-refit QEs
which means they would still have the range against the QEs even if they had the same amount of 15in guns
Iowa and Yamato can just sit at range and be basically immune to anything coming at them
British estimates for the IZ of their WW1 ships against WW2 guns, they are probably not entirely right (they especially seem to underestimate the performance of the rebored Italian guns), but they are decent enough estimates
ngl I still don't know how to read these type of tables
Someone already taught me how
But my brain still can't process
The upshot is that the QE's and R class's armor probably wouldn't fare too well even against Bisko's guns, and Iowa and Yamato would probably punch through at any range.
Later pair of graphs estimating immunity zones, may be a bit easier to read
Its worth noting that these are the QEs with improved deck armor, they got an extra inch of deck armor after Jutland
damn
Slay
Damn
Maybe the old girls can rest easy now
Oh, yeah, these are kind of a meme. They just sort of assumed the same performance from the Italian 320/44 as from the British WWI-era 12" guns.
With, you know, the 850 lbs APC that was far lighter than the APC used by the 305/46 used by the Italian dreadnoughts pre-reconstruction.
@maiden citrus PREHISTORIC PLANET IS OUT, I REPEAT PREHISTORIC PLANET IS OUT
did you know david McCampbell the highest scoring us navy ace flew from the uss essex
he flew 4 f6f hellcats the last one being named "minsi iii" where he reached 34 victories
This is painful to see.
watching it right now yeh friend

Hmm, why did they reject the polymer case 6.5?
sorry for the delay, I've had shit on here's a few documents
I can't access the JAG report on Evans, unsure if its because it's region locked to the US or because it's been removed but I'd recommend digging into it
First document is the Royal Commissioners report into the loss of HMAS Voyager
Second document is a paper written by the Sea Power Centre which has some Voyager related info
Third document is Melbournes log for 1964, fourth document is her log for 1969, in the time periods of the losses of Voyager and Frank E Evans respectively, haven't read them but they should have useful info
The final document is the last recovered ships log for HMAS Voyager, it doesn't cover the collision itself (the collision was in Feb, this log ends in Jan) however should have some useful info as well
There's other stuff around, AWM is a good port of call I'd suggest contacting their archives for anything specific, Navy also has some in depth documentation on their website
The Royal Commission should be the definitive source you need though, since it basically had precedence over any Navy investigation
Anything that the Royal Commissioner didn't know and Navy does, is either not important or Navy isn't willing to provide to civilians
Yeah I saw your comments on the Twitter thread I found the chart on, how good is the second paper that the later graphs I posted are from?
if you want added headaches when dealing with the RN's claimed IZ's, I can relay something from Okun via Jaba
Such a face-hardened plate is within, though near the edge of, the typical plate-to-plate quality variations of most such armors at that time. Indeed, British acceptance tests had TWO minimum striking velocity values where no through crack must be made in the plate: The regular one for the desirable standard plates (the one I use in FACEHARD) and a lower one where the plate would still be accepted, but at a lower cost to the Admiralty (the US Navy had no such double standard). This does make it more difficult to analyze British warship protection, since there is no way to tell what quality plate is mounted on any given part of any given ship. If the plate is one of the low-cost plates that they had at the proving ground and decided to use up in these tests, which is reasonable, as this is not a test of the latest 7" CA armor, then it can very easily be at 0.88 quality without any need to fall back on older, inferior armor types. Note also that the quality of the HT plates can vary somewhat and thus this can soak up some of the needed variation otherwise being applied to the 7" CA plate.
"roll for sub-standard but still accepted plates"
Much as what I said in the post I linked on twitter, these kinds of calculations are best used to illustrate what each nation thought about their IZ's versus other navies and vice versa. They show us how they might have been thinking about how best to deal with an opponent - but unless we know their methodology for sure it's not advisable to take them as gospel, because they may or may not be a lot wrong with their assumptions.
http://www.sfu.ca/~dmunro/images/KGV_Tirpitz_IZ.pdf This is the paper I got it from
It talks a bit about the assumptions they made












