#history
1 messages · Page 107 of 1
hope we get cool features like a machine gun this time
Just do something like this
Vls for Trident instead helipads
Is the Iowa hull tall enough to carry the Trident?
Then make the hangar space taller
My idea is basically turn the Iowa hull into an Arsenal ship but with Trident SLBMs
sorry too advanced for Italy
pensive

Just build the arsenal ship then
Best thing I can offer
Just use an Ohio.
It’s more survivable.
It's not the "it's more survivable" that I'm aiming for
Just wondering how many Tridents could you stuff in an Iowa sized hull
Convert Kitty Hawk into Trident carrier 
I want to put it out of its misery
its ok in like a year gaijin will randomly redo the vehicle like they did with the CV90105
Le Malin is better
do not fight
ofc not, Le Malin would win
no fun when you already know the result

still looks cute tho
Le Malin going ~45 knots
@spiral cedar
Austro-Hungarian 305mm shell
they deadass put a ballistic cap over the smol AP cap
May as well
Richie. Any of these you're interested in?
https://calmview.twmuseums.org.uk/calmview/TreeBrowse.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&field=RefNo&key=DS.VA%2F6%2FPL%2F4
Only have single nemesis here
All of them? 
It's like 10 requests per daypart so I don't think there's enough to go around for that. 
This episode is a close look at some rarely seen footage of Battleship New Jersey's 1943 Commissioning.
Join us on Battleship New Jersey on May 23, 2023 for our 80th birthday celebration: https://www.battleshipnewjersey.org/event/uss-new-jersey-commissioning-veteran-banners-unveiling-ceremony/?instance_id=904
For our previous deep dive into w...
If I didn't know better, I'd say this is information leakage 
First War Thunder, then Minecraft, now Azur Lane.
Leaking documents for big-tittied ship girls.
Bruh
Sounds about right
leaking 80+ year old material
guys I've got my hands on some war plans
the americans will be landing in France on June 6 at-
Creator(s): Department of Defense. Department of the Army. Office of the Chief Signal Officer. 9/18/1947-2/28/1964 (Most Recent)
Series: Orientation Films, 1942 - 1949
Record Group 111: Records of the Office of the Chief Signal Officer, 1860 - 1985
Date: 1943
Scope & Content (Historic): On the war activities and the esprit de corps of the Bri...
I love these old videos
BREAKING NEWS THERE WILL BE A LANDING AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE DARDANELLES GUYS
TOP SECRET JUST OUT OF LONDON FROM THE FIRST LORD OF THE ADMIRALTY HIMSELF
Yamato is actually 70,000 tons and armed with 460mm guns.

Eugen was actually not 10,000 tons
tldr the rex, while not adapted to swimming, is hypothesized to be very adept swimmer and can easily chase down swimming prey
it also probably swims much faster than humans because of longer gait and larger body size
aka don't run to the water if you're chased by one
I will noted that down and prepare for my next trip back in time
o7 soldier, remember don't run into the water
Wish I can dive to Soyuz's arms 
But can you dive underneath the belt armour?
If Soviet had made a Carrier before ww2, will they use task group tactic and if so, what will be the possible escort ship in the task group?
Joke's on him, the huge depth of the TDS of Soyuz tells Kremlin to go away. 
What a sad turn of events

Really depends on location in my opinion
I think it would be most useful on black sea since Luftwaffe did make lot of harassments there. She can be a floating airbase for defense of Sevastopol.
You can also do this for Leningrad but she will be in much more risk there.
She can be safest at Northern sea. But she won't do much except joining convoy escort duties or searching for subs for asw
Super useless on Pacific since Japan and Soviets won't wage war to each other until end of ww2
Black sea fleet then, who would be possible escort ship?
If you can build what you want then Chapayevs or Udalois would be great. But if not possible then you will pick Kirov or Gnevny class
Udaloy before ww2?
Not possible sadly. She was planned to be laid down in 1941
She would have twin DP 130mm/55
So there is a Udaloy class pre ww2?
Since Tashkent class canceled, and Kiev class was deemed inferior to this design. Decision was made to lay down Udalois in 1941
Biggest feature of change was guns being DP and longer barrel
Only after lot of consideration and insistence of Kuznetsov
But no CV got laid down before ww2
Hmm, it would be interesting to see a alter timeline where Soviet navy adopt carrier task force
The Project 71 ships approved for this plan were fairly small, 13,000-ton ships with a 630-foot flight deck, based on the same hull as the Chapayev-class light cruisers. They would have been almost identical in size to the British Colossus-class light carriers. The design specifications called for an air group of 15 fighters and 30 torpedo bombers, to be launched by a pair of pneumatic catapults. She would have two elevators, downward-turned funnels in the Japanese manner, and a heavy anti-aircraft armament.
Italian shipyards had given immense technical assistance in the battleship, cruiser and destroyer programs, but the had no carrier expertise to offer. The Soviet engineers received a tour or blueprint? of the German carrier Graf Zeppelin, but seem to have realized that the Germans knew only slightly more about aircraft carriers than they did, and that that knowledge came second-hand from the Japanese. Project 71 proceeded very slowly, and the authorized ships? one for the Baltic fleet, and one for the Pacific ? had not been laid down when invasion began in 1941
Volga in AL is Project 72. She was inspired from Illustrious class of British and started development around 1943s? Not good with carrier history 
But yeah 71 was a light girl highly based on Chapayev hull
Chkalov is 71B, she is much larger I think
I mean, Stalin loved big ships and could not lie. Of course he wanted a carrier.
just kindly ask to buy an Iowa from FDR 4head 
Without Gibb's delusion
Except Spam, I never known Soviet have Spam equivalent
Through the Lend-Lease Act, Spam became a truly global commodity, and was soon feeding Great Britain and the USSR during and after the war.
Truly the best food ever made
I never understand the stigma of eating it mean you are poor, food is food, and a badly cook caviar doesn't entice me like a grilled Spam
spam egg spam spam bacon and spam
So project 71 use Chapayev hull and Power plant so I guess speed isn't the issue then, problem at the cata?
Is that an I-16? I suddenly have a bad feeling about it if it actually get into service
Which carrier took more damage: USS Franklin CV-13 or RF Admiral Kuznetsov?
Speed is no problem yet. And catapult isn't necessary if you use the whole deck but welcome additon
You can upgrade it with Yak sea variants if you wish. Or just buy lend lease carrier planes like British and uhh France?
What you think
She barely survived sinking
And this damage was likely reason she didn't made it to cold war 50s
I mean didn't they (Franklin and Bunker Hill) get really expensive total rebuilds
And then because of that they didn't get the big modernization package
Despite severe damage, Franklin was eventually restored to good condition. The story of this aircraft carrier's near-destruction and salvage was chronicled in the wartime documentary, The Saga of the Franklin (1945), and the 2011 documentary, USS Franklin: Honor Restored
But. They mothballed her in 1947. Then uhh she never sailed again
apparently the USN wanted to do some ultimate modernization on the pair since they were in good condition, but never got the money to
She and Bunker Hill – which also had sustained severe damage from aerial attack – were the only carriers in their class that never saw any active-duty postwar service, though their wartime damage had been successfully repaired. In fact it was their like-new condition which kept them out of commission, as the Navy for many years envisioned an "ultimate reconfiguration" for them which never took place.
yeah exactly
Weird justification ngl
I mean you typically bundle modernization with major upkeep and repair jobs
cuz its cheaper that way
So they never got slated for SCB-27 or SCB-125
Not all of the Essexs received SCB-125 anyway
I could see some Hellcat operate off it, though, would the Soviet even allow it to undergo refit in US like some of Allied ship?
Lake Chaplain's one of those that never got the angled flight deck/hurricane bow
and over the years, the limitations of the Essex are really starting to show
The Essexs can't operate F-4s as I recall
and well....you have this
Only LC got SCB 27 but not 125, and only Franklin and BH didn't get 27
And yeah the Essex class mainly flew ASW aircraft and Skyhawks and crap
The money for the ultimate modernization of Franklin and BH didn't materialize until the USN was no longer interested in doing it
That's strange, because Antietam never got the enclosed Hurricane bow as prescribed in SCB-125.
Neither did Boxer. SCB-125 from what I'm aware of were limited to a select few carriers.
Of course. Soviets really valued US technology
And refit in US would be another way to get those
Tho they wouldn't allow it for modern battleships. Soyuz had shitton secrecy
Not Yamato level but closer to it
But things like refits of Gangut by US? Hell ye
What does Soyuz have that they have to go to that length?
Armor stats of BBs are always classified
Or mostly
So enemy just assumes if their guns can penetrate or not
Iowa's armor was secret. So Soviets believed her belt was 482mm
Get Entered to WIN this legendary PTR44 Sturmgewehr!
https://go.getenteredtowin.com/forgottenweapons
DEADLINE to ENTER is 05/26/23 @ 11:59pm (PST).
It is often said that Hitler personally cancelled the Sturmgewehr development...could that really be true?
Yes! He actually nixed the program three separate times, and the German Army General Staf...
OK I was wrong Boxer and Princeton got a different modernization package that turned them into LPHs
Antietam didn't get SCB-27 because she was being played around with as the prototype for the angled flight deck in SCB-125
The SCBs ngl are a bit of a headache
And it appears that Tarawa, Leyte, and Philippine sea were only commissioned after the war, and saw service for about 15 years before being scrapped with no modernizations
Oh and Valley Forge also became an LPH with Boxer and Princeton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGo17SIvMRM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNmcRoNMC5E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5RlWxirYYM
1972 was the bloodiest year of the Troubles. But as the violence reached the new heights, all sides in the conflict were beginning to change. By the mid-1980s the British Government would try to step away, the Provisional IRA would enter politics and Loyalist paramilitaries would begin to rise.
In our last episode we explored the origins of th...
For thirty years, the citizens of Northern Ireland lived through the Troubles. Many were born into the conflict, and never knew anything else. By the 1980s, the situation was getting worse not better, and violence was escalating. With devastating attacks such as the Remembrance Sunday bombing in 1987 and killings at two funerals in 1988, public ...
The Good Friday agreement is one the most celebrated peace deals ever signed. In April of 1998, its 34 pages helped put an end to a 30-year conflict that killed over 3,500 people. The deal was a major achievement, but the road to its signing was an arduous one.
The 70s, 80s and 90s had seen a number of peace talks and negotiations , but thanks...
Are we bracing for the IRA coming back
You forget Gadaffi 
The ultimate in hidden, personal defence weaponry, the 'Zerfallkoffer' was developed in a time when the briefcase was a common accoutrement to the discerning businessman.
Join Jonathan as shoots one of our whackiest, What is this Weapons, ever.
Subscribe to our channel for more videos about arms and armour
Help us bring history to life by...
#OTD in 1945, Marine pilot Bob Klingman used the propeller of his Corsair to chop off the tail of a Japanese plane. Because his guns had frozen in the high altitude, he turned his fighter into a buzzsaw to down the enemy. With damaged blades, he still managed to fly back to base.
284
Marines are crazy
The last video from my trip to the Ordnance collection in what was then Fort Lee, VA. (It has since been renamed as Fort Gregg-Adams). I'm sure I'll come back to film some more vehicles which caught my attention, but this is a bit of a teaser of some of the other things which are present.
I really don’t like that boxy bridge
Italian make port call in Vietnam, I hope they don't get mad over how we cook pizza
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8x6KJG8sJk
Italian patrol vessel ITS Morosini, with a crew of 132 officers and sailors commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Giovanni Monno, docked at Ho Chi Minh City port on May 9, starting a four-day visit to the city in order to strengthen the friendly cooperation between the navies of the two countries.
They officially chose the name for the AH-249 it seems
it was Phoenix as expected
Melee kill.
And I really don’t like you.
Learn to love and embrace CUBE.
Cook?



#technology or here?
Here is fine
Okay the pdf is 20mb
While berthed at Leonardo Pier 1 of the Naval Ammunition Depot Earle, New Jersey, being discharged of ammunition on April 30, 1946, the USS Solar (DE-221) met with tragedy when a crewman dropped a hedgehog charge causing three consecutive explosions on the ship. Both sides of the ship were ripped open and the deck was in flames. Although the order to abandon ship came after the second explosion, seven sailors lost their lives and 125 were injured.
What era do the DDGs come from? Cold war?
Yeah
Is the term CG/DDG only for Area defense capable ships only
I mean excluding PLAN's "DDG" like the 051B at this case
It for Destroyer with main armament are guided missile so even Russian Udaloy is a DDG
I have finally got out of teaching (on Australian naval ship design!) and had time to read the ANAO report on the Hunter Class frigate. A 🧵of few highlights and thoughts 1/
https://t.co/5yjJ2DrH8V
347
'G' means 'Guided Missile' and generally refers to ships that have some kind of medium range AAW capability or greater. When this was originally introduced this meant something like the RIM-24 Tartar, but the definition is a bit looser now with how far so many SAM systems have come.
As a strict convention it's not really followed anymore
thx
Realistically we should cut the Hunter program and mount CEAFAR2 on a FREMM but the time and expense is just too little too late, RAN needs a new frigate and the Hunters will have to do
Mounting CEAFAR2 on a FREMM would give government an opportunity to reconcile with the French after the failure of the Attack class, and provide RAN with a capable low risk platform delivered sooner, but unfortunately the design work needed would have been needed to have started years ago
Where is that cursed austrlian fremm render again
You'd need a more extensive re-design of the French FREMM, since it was smaller than the Italian variant. That's why it was up for the third shortlist spot along with the Type 26.
The ther two shortlist spots were already decided between the two top contenders for the program, which was the Italian FREMM from Fincantieri and the F100 from Navantia (Spain).
Which is kind of part of what makes the whole thing so egregious.
Absolute 9head
Why did US order these instead going more for their Constellation class
I love CEAFAR such a capable radar but also fuckhuge
Order what
Fremm
The Constellation is a fremm
Not only did they pick up the Type 26 over the French FREMM offering for the shortlist and then 'lose' whatever paperwork was involved in that decision, but then also tapped the Type 26 again over the two other bids that their own process acknowledged as the better offers overall .
Oh, yes, and then applied a 10% discount on the price that had not been negotiated with the tenderers, just to make it look better.
Tbh I didn't realise the French and Italian FREMMs were radically different
Yeah, in spite of being the same basic platform the Italians had a greater requirement for aviation facilities and AAW capabilities, which grew the size considerably.
Country Specific equipment ye
Doubt it has anything to do with Scott Morrison being a massive Anglophile and monarchist
Commonality between the two types is only about 10%, from what I've heard.
Interesting
Which is actually still quite a lot for these kinds of things, but that's still not a lot in an absolute sense.
It was reported that Italy would then order two additional FREMM frigates to replace those transferred to Egypt with the anticipated delivery of the replacements by 2024
For the differences in size between the various major FREMM variants.
Old news. They cut steel on those back in 2021, they should be delivered in 2025, though, not 2024.
This is from earlier this month. You can see the two FREMM building here, with a PPA on the far right
I personally think that's a load of shit they just don't want to cough it up
At the time there were a lot of rumors that there was a lot of lobbying from BAE and the British government that basically made them choose the Type 26 and push it through regardless of the tender process.
This ANAO report kind of seems to give evidence to that.
Commonwealth ties
Better ASW and "less noise"
as they said
Because Type 26 clearly was the most risky option at the time, and has continued to generate issues,
'EXTREME RISK', sounds like fun!
It's worth noting to that at the time the T26 design was not complete
What is FREMM
And the British then also seem to have hidden exactly how incomplete the design was until late 2020, after there was a change in BAE's senior leadership
A jointly developed Franco-Italian ASW frigate
Frigate of France and Italy
different hull tho

What is it with Navy and having terrible acquisition experiences with everyone except the Spanish
Swedes? Fucked
French? Fucked
Poms? Fucked
Navantia meanwhile provides great ships at good cost and its honestly worked so well for us
Half of the fleet is Spanish built at this point
Navantia's dealings in Australia did have a number of rough patches, it has to be said
Lots of back and forth over issues between design and manufacture on the Hobarts
But they did sort it out eventually.
Hobart's had some problems but it's to be expected for such a design
Canberra's and Supply's both went pretty smoothly iirc
Honestly, that's kind of what made them a favorite alongside Fincantieri's offering in the end - the F100 may not have been designed for ASW, but Navantia being a known factor kept them relevant.
No doubt Navantia was more than willing to mate their ships with CEAFAR2 as well
Honestly they probably would have had the easiest time of it out of anyone. F100 is an AAW-focused design and would have had the most topweight to spare for the radar system to begin with.
They've been excellent suppliers tbh and while Navy Surface Review is yet to come, I think it'll either recommend we take up Navantias offer of 3 more Hobart's in exchange for shrinking the Hunter class fleet, or it'll shrink the Hunters and we'll acquire a smaller frigate as well
A massive budget blow-out on the Hunters just isn't within governments willingness to fund considering the nuclear submarine program
I find it hard to believe that we'll maintain the current Hunter order
Tbh, if you were willing to eat a delay on getting the ASW frigates in service I'd kind of be tempted to build three more Hobart's in the short-term and then long-term get CEAFAR2'd Constellations, and just canning the T26.
Not entirely sure that's a great option with how tensions are in the Pacific, governments desire to maintain a persistent shipbuilding capability and the state of Henderson shipyard right now, being prepared for Hunter class construction
The Anzacs are not only long in the teeth but they're also very lightly armed and simply weren't built for the threat environment they're expected to operate in going forward
As great a platform as the Constellation will be, the Anzacs need to go sooner rather than later
I think that DSR is a rather poignant reminder that while Defence has always acted on a 10 year rule for leading up to a potential major conflict, we are likely a bit closer to or a bit further along in that 10 years than we'd to admit
Mmm, but at this pace the first Hunter isn't going to be completed and delivered to the RAN until mid-2032.
Repeat Hobarts might actually end up being available sooner.
Repeat Hobart's is undeniably a good idea, whether the experienced personnel gained during their construction are still around though, is a difficult question to answer
Since having to regain those skills is going to slow down a repeat of the class
Afaik there's still some experienced personnel who were retained after the Hobart's ended, but the half a decade since their completion and the starting of the Hunters has meant a good number of experienced personnel were left to either move away, either to one of the two yards in Western Australia, a civil yard like Austal, or out of the country or they've retired, been laid off due to lack of work or just lost a lot of experience over time
Most of the people working on the Hunters are relatively new hires afaik
talking about Australia and Fremms
Psst. 🇦🇺 When you have a moment, we really should talk.

MIC Twitter beef.

1 in 8 hill out of Cromford, and some classic overtaking by two fowler ploughing engines, passing a Ruston road engine!
SUPPRESSORS ON EVERYTHING
Yes
Cursed Yamato vs Ticonderoga YouTube ad
@humble mulch @manic latch Anyways yes I move here 
Military loves its acronyms
AGM-154 JSOWs use the BROACH warhead : D
Not like it’s always needed since you can fly em through an open hangar door if you really wanted 
You pinged the wrong Kawa LMAO
I'm tea, pin changed my nickname lmao
Yes
My pfp matches my name. Kawa likes unicorns design so I picked it cause I don't like lusty
RIP YF-23
She asked for it with this thing
The U.S. Navy considered using the production version of the ATF as the basis for a replacement to the F-14, but these plans were later canceled.

the y're
was wasted on a single program that failed
The McDonnell Douglas/General Dynamics A-12 Avenger II was a proposed American attack aircraft from McDonnell Douglas and General Dynamics. It was to be an all-weather, carrier-based stealth bomber replacement for the Grumman A-6 Intruder in the United States Navy and Marine Corps. Its Avenger II name was taken from the Grumman TBF Avenger of W...
Too expensive lmao
Stealth, naval, and variable geometry wings

Reminder that one of the world's best maritime radar sets is literally called CEAFAR
SCANFAR
Which is the funniest double pun
now I'm just reminded of the X-47B 
Very creative names
modern navy aviation procurement is a joke
Avenger 2 my beloved
And only a single pun
I’m still waiting on F-4 to come to DCS so I can prove that it’s not as bad as most people think
PLANES WERE NOT MEANT TO GO ON SHIPS
THEY HAVE TREATED US FOR ABSOLUTE BUFFOONS
I mean I get that an unmanned refueling aircraft is probably handier than an unmanned strike drone
but

Unmanned refuelling is a vital capability for the USN given the strain that it puts on Super Hornet airframes
Ok somehow looks good but it’s Jolly Rogers so not surprised
a lost capability
Rhinos had to go under upgrades early to extend service life 
the X-47 was also capable of refueling
as it always does
It will never not annoy me that USN calls Super Hornet a Rhino
But then I remembered that we called the F-111 the Pig so I guess I can overlook it
I was gonna post the F-35 edit but beat me to it
Well doesn’t Aardvark or Vark translate to Pig in some language?
I intended to post them together
Can’t remember
F-111 my beloved though
Sad
it also flies low to the earth
like how an aardvark sniffs around
Pigs can't fly
Super Tomcat 21 would be more capable than the Super Hornet but too expensive
Who said?
-Bad Piggies gang
And also Australia doesn't really have aardvarks so no one knew what they were in the 60s
THE NAVY WHEN IT HATES MONEY! GO SUPERTOMCAT GO!
So we just called them pigs
Muh digital cockpit pls
no F-111C
Cringe
God this reminds me of my mom telling me that before she came to the United States, she thought Chipmunks were something Disney came up with. Didn't realize they were a real animal.
ok then go find me Australian posters for the F-111C and go put into my thread
LOL
Navy F-22*
god it truly made for the best ads
I still hate Dick Cheney for retiring the F-14
made sense to retire it
the airframes were maintenance whores
expensive to upkeep
true
rapidly coming upon their max service lives
swing wings look neat but
Hangar Queen

alongside just being massive
make maintainers want to kill themselves
Close enough 
F-14 required a whole assortment of tools just open a single access panel
Also the main threat for them to counter kind of committed die
THROW IT INTO THE THREAD!
But man they were good
true
Iraqis were scared shitless of F-14s
Yo
Tomcat out of a coldwar context stops making sense especially for a navy tight on the purse strings
Haha… cries
BUT IT ISNT ORIGINAL
Oh look Blacklions Tomcat
AYOOOO
A flight of F-14s managed to chase some Iraqis and led them to an ambush by some Hornets during Desert Storm 
ya boy has received his interim clearance
Don't leak docs sir
are not like the other
I know an F-14 RIO irl. He told me a story of one his squadron’s jets getting over-G’d. It sat in the hangar for months and became known as the hangar queen
Waiter! more F-35 manuals please!
Iran keeps them flying despite having no access to F-14's parts
Smuggling go brrr
Iran got a bunch of parts when they retired them
I like this server I don't want it nuked by CIA/ASIO
I swear I didn't do anything with it
Posts F-14 NATOPS

where is my YF-23 flight manual
hmm today I shall post documents regarding US operational plans in the SCS in the discord for a chinese mobile game (clueless)
Holy book


I recall talking with a volunteer at my local aviation museum who said that the reason the F-22 wasn't allowed to be exported was because it has a big red button in it that makes everything more powerful
A lot of its tech is classified
Was certainly an interesting conversation and I was 13 so I believed him
A lot of aircraft have that I think
F-15 has a switch that can allow the engines to produce more power
It FUBARs them after usage though and need to be replaced
did you know the master arm when triggered makes your plane 100% more combat effective?
Tool me a few years before I realised his whole thing about there being no F-22 cockpit photos was a load of shit
💀
it's like one of those 3rd party video game controllers
with a giant 'TURBO' button
I can understand why they wouldn't sell F-22 to Australia due to the uh... complicated security arrangement the two countries had in the 90s but I'm sure other countries like Japan would have been interested
Tech for the F-22 is too sensitive
Japan was interested, in fact
They must be hiding something really good if they’ll export the F-35 but not the F-22
^ Asked and got rejected lol
Gotta push the more Gs button when dogfighting to win
That they couldn't get the export was why they started their own stealth effort
Hornet paddle switch 
Pull like .33 more G
Rips wings off
I think the whole RAAF hacking scandal didn't help America's concerns with exporting their newest plane
the F-35 had investment from a number of countries
F-35 was a joint project, so most of the major partners had some fingers in the pie.
Not nearly as sensitive, especially relative to when it was done, as the F-22
Isn't Japan and UK making a 6th gen together?
true
With Italy, yeah
'GCAP'
Since well, America had restricted the radar and IFF systems so that only America could decide whose aircraft could be flagged as hostile
Spun out of the British-Italian 'Tempest' program
Interested in seeing how that goes
And America wanted good relations with Indonesia in the 90s
Fcas is Germany, France, Spain
Gcap is Italy, Japan, UK
Oh Germany and France
someone really went "spell it with a y, it'll look cooler"
Named after 2 MoH recipients iirc
First I've heard of that one
Australia meanwhile was on the brink of a potentially very bloody conflict with Indonesia (which later turned into INTERFET) and so they had to hack into the F-18s radar systems to allow them to assign their own IFF flags
Lmak
Well have to see. It has to be said, they're the three countries most experienced, outside of the US and China, in working on stealth aircraft.
Britain was the primary foreign partner in the JSF/F-35 program, and both Italy and Japan have the only Final Assembly and Check-Out facilities outside of the US
The Future Combat Air System (FCAS), French: Système de combat aérien du futur; SCAF; Spanish: Futuro Sistema Aéreo de Combate; FSAC) is a European combat system of systems under development by Dassault Aviation, Airbus and Indra Sistemas. The FCAS will consist of a Next-Generation Weapon System (NGWS) as well as other air assets in the future o...
ah
Mig-29 manual?
you're correct there
RAAF had an interesting habit of just ignoring their importers in the 20th century

named for Stuart Stryker and Robert Stryker
want it?
Well I have it
I'll take it
that makes more sense
Like the time France literally made an arms embargo against Australia because we were giving Israel spare parts for the Mirage 2000s
Warthunder server
Whacky shit
lmao DCS gang
Germans want you to think that's a real word
Lmfao
We know better than to trust the Germans though
I have half of it
Germans on their way to have a peaceful conversation while sounding pissed off
there's a quote that's been living rent free in my head for the past 2 days
Afterall, that's what strategic bombers are built for
"there are no men or women in germany, only germans"
I don’t get it
Holy shit nonbinary Germany based
their choice of pointing finger is killing me
wtf just put an arrow
I've met several Germans and can confirm this
I like the hands ngl
Having been to Germany yeah there were lots of Germans there
joke about folks there generally behaving very similarly
Weird
oh lmao
idk it's a funny quote
Me posting NATO propaganda in a Chinese mobile game server
oh it shipped
Chinese propaganda on the US is amazing though
any time I see those funky ngad renders I wonder
Have they seen how badass they make us look
“Ha!”
Interestingly this is not a German
It is a plane
Yeah it's an OSSIE mig
On a Chinese funded messaging app

If you're ever in Western Germany, go to both technik museums
like any time I see this my brain just goes
Amazing places filled with some awesome stuff
tf
"hmm yes we all know how skilled we are at predicting the future"
The one in Speyer is the only place in the world with both supersonic airliners on display
Skill issue
It can also swim
Wait what
One of the reason head is shaped like that
Okay makes… sense
point is those renders always get me thinking
Anytime Soviet aircraft actually being useful it usually wasn't near Soviet airspace or piloted by Soviets at all
if it's just the industry being cracked out
Quantity has a quality of its own
or if that's actually close to the final product
Yesn’t
Especially in naval warfare where current doctrine for all sides is boiling down to throwing so many missiles at the enemy that they simply can't stop them all
Me bring 20 T-34 to fight a single panzer because the Germans can't bring more
Having 100 bad aircraft is gonna be more expensive than 10 really good aircraft because cost for maintenance and training adds up
proof that Americans solve things by just giving it more power
American muscle cars in a nutshell
Soviet pilots kinda peaked in the mid 70s
Well they were great in the 50s too
The 60s and 80s were both kinda shit
regal what
Soviet advisors yes
Pilot didn't see much action
Even in the 1950s
MiG Alley 
richy are you unfamiliar with
80s less so but the 60s were atrocious
the funny NGAD renders
no
I'm not
but
the art...
USAF had the Vietnam experience to kick its ass into gear for the later 70s and 80s
why would NGAD ever be that close to its target
We overcompensated way too much and it paid off
Soviets not as much
Soviets got their asses kicked in Afghanistan
Just like us
At least for the occupation part
it's using DE countermeasures to take down missiles
The Soviets actually did have a similar awakening in the wake of Vietnam which led to a major reformation of their pilot training
I wouldn't really call fixing foundational issues overcompensating
oh was that supposed to be a missile?
Yeah S-75 vs F4 wasn't good experience
Imagine not having gun and the Vietnamese got behind you
that wasn't really a bad war for the Soviet Airforce
that image is from NG btw
missiles made up majority of the kills
it was a training issue
not a having a gun issue
northroop grueman?
^ Gunpods were available
that as well
It’s just US pilots were not trained for BFM/ACM
Good SAMs are very much a PITA for aircraft
Pierre Sprey is happy indeed
the vast majority of air to air kills in Vietnam were achieved with missiles
gunpods were made available but did not have a significant affect
Pierre is the first part of my name
This is why there is such an emphasis on SEAD in the US and some NATO and other Allied air forces
the USAF and Navy both suffered from training issues on properly using said missiles

The F-4 dominated MiGs in the two-circle and uphill dogfights

But US pilots early on didn’t know to take advantage of this and force the two circle and vertical fight
yeah like literally
the navy's fighter weapons school (known was Top Gun) was made in response to experiences in vietnam
What about SAM and anti air gun?
bc pilots weren't familiar with how to use newer missiles
Eh, the biggest thing holding back US performance in the air in Vietnam was actually the lack of good command and control
USAF's experience in SEAD at the time is a completely different story
The Soviets had a massive awakening in the early 70s after a confrontation between Egypt and Israel, where everyone expected the Soviets to kick Israel's ass, only for the Soviet squadrons to get obliterated leading to the Soviets instituting very similar reforms that the USAF and USN instituted during the same time period
The problem was less the lack of BFM training and more the lack of good SA due to poor C&C
I think it would be easy to say it was a variety of issues
SEAD was pioneered during Vietnam
When the USAF got ground control stations, K/L ration skyrocketed
It was
post more NGAD art regal

That compounded to create a very large and complex problem
Anyway napalm sticks to kids
Goodnight
from lockheed
devil has 3 heads
unmanned right?
No
it could have a crew up to 4 or more
of course
they've been talking about pairing NGAD aircraft with unmanned drones as a complement though
Tho I agree with Richel. Pilots are cringe.
Sadly AI isn't good enough for replacement
Yet
Yeah they anticipate the Ewar environment requiring either large scale daisy chaining or people on the spot
Hush
it's a concept they're trialing with the F-35
so 4 man NGAD lol
No but like
you do realise that with pilots, the thing will only really be able to fly in straight lines
or what's the envisioned speed like
Who needs to turn anyways
no clue
Like Mach 2 or something
Chad AI doesn't do stuff like these
NGAD is also planned to be a family of systems
I mean the airframe won't necessarily handle that level of stress a lot better either
NGAD is like AMX?
neat
Yeah NGAD also includes loyal wingmen
with the centerpiece being F-X, the manned fighter
complemented by loyal wingmen drones yeah
Ngad might not have any agility at all, they might do missile carrier smaller B-21 approach
F-X is a very sus name
And some cool engine development
well it's supposed to replace the raptor so I would assume some agility
Navy one is F-XX
They also call the fighter component PCA (penetrating counter air)
like, comment and subscribe if you got the joke

In September 2020, Roper stated that a full-scale prototype of the NGAD fighter aircraft has been flown.[17]
This video is sponsored by
- 25% OFF -
Use code MILAVHIS to receive 25% OFF: https://www.usni.org/press/books
My reading list: https://www.usni.org/press/books?f[0]=subject%3A1959
Strategic bombing to win a war doesn’t work, we’ve figured this out after about 50years of trying to make it work. Whether the United States Air Force (USAF), the Royal Air Force (RAF) or ...
*NGAD, but commonly called by its old title F/A-XX because its stupid to have two different projects called NGAD
Does this give the Next Generation Air Dominance program more momentum, or does it open it up to more scrutiny?
Likely to get Congress support. Air force wants to retire 300 planes and get more money for Ngad
No it wasn't a prototype, it was a testbed for technologies that would be in NGAD
Like it is still big news, NGAD is far ahead of any other 6th gen fighter program
but the US isn't flying NGAD prototypes around right now probably
open article for more concept designs
aerial photographs of what look like airframes

Bonus fun is that Tempest was also called FCAS before it evolved into GCAP, so Europe had two multinational programs called FCAS simultaneously

the proposed light fighter fifth doesn't really sound like that bad of a idea assuming the USAF has the room for it in its budget
low-observable test shape spotted at LM in october 2021
Tiktok leak ye
Wonder what happened to recorder
and then this
Shouldn't take these seriously tho
You would cover them up instead leaving them open like this
Likely fun science projects
I mean my take's like
they're obviously from the program
but we don't know what their part is
could just be looking at rejected concepts, etc
I see them as Bird of Prey
I think I might have done something wrong
I seeing recruitment ad for US air force in on youtube
no
in regards to NGAD and F/A-XX
the satellite images are likely of mock-ups
tho there's likely airframes in various states of completion out and about
Possibly airframe test items to test the aerodynamics and rcs of various shapes
This is picture from F-22 program. So ye don't trust any Ngad images until real product
biblically accurate NGAD
shape
BROACH is just the warhead of the Stormshadow
and the JSOW
not sure why you would name the warhead in particular with a cool name
You could probably do a good bit better (possibly 200, maybe even 300 kilowatts) depending on generator structure and if you want to fill the weapons bays with fiber-optic cables.
F-35BL would be very based.
Supposedly this system could reload 15 VLS cells an hour in Sea-State 5.
Safe to say it was a good bit better than the usual crane approach.
Tonight on top gear
Hamman!
Gony crashed it into James car mate
Hallo, am new~ How active is this channel? It being the objective best in server
Yes
Sometime, expect spon and phoenix long thread of "leaking" RAN info
Krem for soviet stuf
For retro stuff, check Tato
I mean I am down to talk modern military technology for daaaays
Like the navy's list of requierments for a gen 6 fighter
No, it stick a bit too close to modern politic so we will talk about it sometime, modern navy is still allow
Fair ^^ I mostly like stuff from interwar to late cold war anyways
modern you see it you can kill it is boring
I'm not that active nowadays but the old-timers still mostly talk about first half of the 20th century
Lately the channel has undergone...demographic changes that has shifted the typical sort of discussion here
It barely has the first night capable aircraft carrier... I find this acceptable
I love my Capital ships with Big guns
I Like Big Guns and I Cannot Lie but also flat tops look beautiful
probably apparent, but I like my aircraft
Fair
I do like some of the developmental notes of big ships tho, like the fact the first dreadnaughts had ramming bows, then they dropped it, then brought it back in a more subdued way
incredibly generalized i know
Battleship torpedoes:
Actually afaik HMS Dreadnought did not have a ramming bow
I am talking a more broad line of design trends
In fact Dreadnought herself was I think one of the first capital ship the royal navys had without the ramming bows
~~It did do a ramming kill anyway ~~
It's just that her only kill was a ramming
She also almost rammed a HMS Temeraire while ramming the sub
pretty much I am talking about the development of the bulbous bow

the bulbous bow extending past the main bow helps create the bow wave in front of the ship, the bow will also create a wave and the sine wive is offset so they cancel each other out reducing drag
Proposal for a bulbous bow on the Burkes.
Incredibly cursed.
Note that the sonar dome≠a bulbous bow.
Hey I've got a question
Yes
What would be a good book for Learning about the British Battlecruisers
From Invincible to G3
Norman Friedman: British Battleships
RA Burt: British Battleships of the First World War, British Battleships 1914-1945
Thank you
I love Battlecruisers and I wanted to see how they got from Invincivble to Hood to G3
Quite the long story
G3 is an interesting vessel itself because it is probably by far the closest vessel to be "laid down"
I.e. keel blocks were laid down, but the keel itself isn't
G3 is the 16 inch armed BC right?
Yes
Paleontologists have unearthed four cervical vertebrae of Jurassic pliosaurid in the Kimmeridge Clay Formation near Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England. The specimens are noteworthy for their size, with a maximum width of 27 cm, maximum height of 22 cm and maximum length of 10 cm. Simple scaling and comparisons with cervical vertebrae of other Jurass...
Paleontologists have unearthed four cervical vertebrae of Jurassic pliosaurid in the Kimmeridge Clay Formation near Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England.
The specimens are noteworthy for their size, with a maximum width of 27 cm, maximum height of 22 cm and maximum length of 10 cm.
Simple scaling and comparisons with cervical vertebrae of other Jurassic and Cretaceous pliosaurs suggest a total body length of between 9.8 m and 14.4 m for the Kimmeridge Clay pliosaur; likely the true length was towards the higher end of this range.
absolute unit
among the largest known Pliosaurus
@spring briar Colbert is here

The ship was designed with an eye on the Italian Trento-class cruisers, in comparison with which the French cruisers Duquesne were literally stripped of armor. The increased protection, however, was no match for the Italian cruisers. The magazines and the engine room were covered with plates of a narrow 50mm armored belt; the cruiser also received an upper deck reinforced to 20-25mm. According to the project guidelines, the cruiser had to survive one torpedo hit, as well as destroyer main battery fire, so in general the design was able to meet these guidelines.
The Colbert cruiser is presented in the game in her latest upgrade, during which the AA armament was improved. 8 x 90mm single-barrel mounts are responsible for covering the ship from aircraft at long distances, while an orchestra of 37 mm and 13.2 mm flutes shreds any approaching aircraft to pieces.
It’s kinda redundant to mention armor on any french CA’s that aren’t Dupleix, Algérie or the Saint Louis class

Also
Lmao
AA
A VF-1 “Wolfpack” Tomcat flies inverted over another Tomcat belonging to the same squadron
What was French navy plan for their colony pre ww2?

Depends on the colony
If you're asking about naval defense.
Also, depends on who is attacking.
Indochina then
Against the Germans or Italians, it was sort of expected that they would only have to deal with the odd raider or something like that, if it was ever threatened at all. Either local forces could deal with it, for a cruiser reinforcement.
If the Japanese came knocking, though, the French had no intention of trying to hold Indochina against them. They realized it was beyond their resources, given the requirements for continental Europe, North Africa, and the Mediterranean as a whole.
Learning about the Halifax explosion, it is so weird that the SS IMO was not the one held responsible
And that even when a re-investigation was initiated, it was both parties given equal blame, even tho it seems like from the chain of events, the IMO was clearly in the wrong
Especially with the double blast reply to not yield
Get Nebula with 40% off annual subscription with my link: https://go.nebula.tv/realtimehistory
Watch Red Atoms on Nebula: https://go.nebula.tv/redatoms
The question about the first modern war has caused lively debates among historians and YouTube comment sections alike. In this video we take a look at a few candidates and some arguments why t...
In 1938 Soviet tank designers came up with the best heavy tank design in the world - the KV-1. Far from perfect, this 45 ton rolling behemoth would kick start a series of hugely impressive and incredibly influential vehicles, going from the KV-1 all the way up to the KV-14 and beyond. Seeing extensive combat in the Second World War against the i...
I want one
they are probably rare as all hell
And thousands of dollars
I love the fact KV-2 can actually be a decent tiger killer with 107mm gun
I don't think Tiger can stop her normal 152mm either
Not very well
That's a six inch howitzer slamming into her
If it hits dead on the mantlet
That Tigor is fucked
I mean
KV-2 assuming its able to get the first shot off
but uhhh
I'd rather not be a KV-2 crew for rather obvious reasons
Ye better use Su-85
Or Su-100 for overkill
In this video I interview a former Leopard 2A6 / A7 gunner about thermal sights, particularly his experience with WBG-X and Attica. Additionally, we also talk about Russian thermal sights, strength and limitations of thermal sights, how spotting is done in a tank, the different roles, identification, recognition and detection, etc.
Cover: T-72B...
She could become the most upgraded bomber of history
Likely is
70 years by now?
omg a wellington
oh that's so cool
Interesting mounting spot. I know they tend to mount a lot of that sort of thing on the old ADR-8 pylons between the two engine nacelles.
But I guess weight might be an issue.
ADR-8, basically a radar-reflective decoy rocket they could shoot ahead of them.
Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC, iOS or Android:
💥https://play.conflictnations.com/kZW6/BNJV01
Receive a Unique Starter Pack, available only for the next 30 days!
This episode is taking a look at ship preservation and why some museums were saved and others were not.
Join us on Battleship New Jersey on May 23, 2023 for our 80th birthda...
Aye thats pretty fucking clean looking
NORAD’s 65th birthday is today! Over the past 65 years, NORAD has held the watch 24/7/365, ensuring the skies above and around 🇨🇦 & 🇺🇸, and the maritime approaches to North America, remain safe. Wish us a happy anniversary! #NORAD65
184
NORAD my beloved.
Tahlea Aualiitia speaks with Tarcisius Kabutaulaka, associate professor at the University of Hawai’i, about growing calls for the Australian Defence Force to recruit citizens of Pacific Islands nations. Subscribe: http://ab.co/1svxLVE
ABC News provides around the clock coverage of news events as they break in Australia and abroad, including the...
Australian Pacific Islander Ghurka regiments 
Frens
Took my friend to the USS Iowa yesterday. Not my first time seeing an Iowa class but definitely my first time being on board one. Beautiful ship and a day well spent.
ill be there soon
In observance of Genghis Khan Day, I talk a little bit about Genghis Khan and his friendship with a Taoist monk called Changchun.
SOURCE
There are two English translations of 長春真人西遊記 (Changchun's Journey to the West) that I am aware of. Both are in the public domain and available online:
- Emil Bretschneider, 1888: https://archive.org/details/m...
Robert Smalls was a chad, they are renaming a Tico after him
@spring briar
Idk if you’ve seen this one but kind of a neat little round.
It’s a guided 60mm shell for a CIWS concept.
arent they building guided shells for the 57mm bofors
It had a K-band uplink with a E/F (S band in IEEE) downlink (this is the operating band of the SPY-1 and SPY-6 multifunction arrays).
Yes
My understanding is that it’s for slower targets.
I don’t know how well the 57mm round would perform against VAMPIRES.
They also got this
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2019/07/video-darpa-mad-fires-anti-ship-missile-self-defense-for-lcs-ffgx/
The Multi-Azimuth Defense Fast Intercept Round Engagement System, or MAD-FIRES, is a missile but it comes out of a 57 mm caliber gun according to Raytheon (who is working on the project with DARPA). It is designed to combine the guidance, precision and accuracy generally afforded by missiles with the speed, rapid-fire capability and large ...
Someone really working hard to come up with those acronym
Oh of course
It wouldn’t be a DOD program without a forced acronym.
MAD-FIRES is supposed to be for cruise missile defense
I guess I was getting all the programs mixed up.
Hard to keep track sometimes.
nah ALaMO is for slower targets
MAD-FIRES is a newer program
Gotcha
DOD has multiple guided 57mm programs running in tandem
Shame they killed HVP.
ALaMO (aka HE-4G, aka Mk.332) is for surface targets because the 3P rounds did not perform at all like BAE was promising they would
MAD_FIRES is your 'this gun can now do CIWS' round
Has a sabot too for some reason
Probably for stability
ah that makes sense
A lot of guided rounds use sabots given their long and tapered airframes even if they theoretically might not need one.
And protecting electronics and control surfaces is also important.
I wonder what kind of guidance it has.
My guess would be command guidance using an X-Band receiver.
They've been keeping details about guidance very under wraps
Yeah but it’s fun to speculate
Current status 
Hell yeah!
Ive read that
ALL NEW Horrible Histories Song | The Monarch Song | CBBC
WATCH FULL EPISODES 👉 https://www.bbc.co.uk/tv/cbbc
SUBSCRIBE TO CBBC 👉 https://bbc.in/3gH3ioU
Join Horrible Histories for this fun song that takes us through the British Kings and Queens that have reigned, from William the Conqueror to King Charles III.
I’m William the Conqueror, my ...
Sixty Australian Minesweepers (commonly known as Corvettes) were built during World War II in Australian shipyards as part of the Commonwealth Government's wartime shipbuilding programme.
The Bathurst Class Corvettes were workhorses rather than ‘glamour‘ ships. Although some sources claim that the design was a variant of the British Bangor Clas...
Never forget the Armidale
Timor campaign is definitely underrated
she took quite the pounding given her small size and a VC was awarded to Teddy Sheean, who the submarine HMAS Sheean is named for
there's even a song written about him and her by Lee Kernaghan
I had to draw her in AL form too
pretty sure they played it at an ANZAC dawn service I did a few years ago
I see
good song for sure
Provided to YouTube by The Orchard Enterprises
Teddy Sheean - Forever Eighteen · Lee Kernaghan · Colin Buchanan · Garth Porter
Spirit of the Anzacs
℗ 2015 Mirabai Pty Ltd exclusively licensed to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Released on: 2015-03-13
Music Publisher: Perfect Pitch Publishing, Universal Music Publishing Australia
A...
why is Hood represented with a clock? I mean a pocket one in AL is it's augmentation module and in wows it's the Hood flag
or not represented idk why of the clock in general
a nothing chat gpt told me XDDDD
Wild guess, because the chronological part of the Denmark Strait battle is disputed. Usually cited is five minutes before Hood was sunk, but there's reason to say it was a mere three minutes
Boo
Beg your pardon.
BTW got confused her I remember it being a pocket watch but in AL it's not it's a medal
or to be exactly the emblem of HMS Hood
this?...
Ship's crests are commonly displayed aboard a lot of Royal Navy's warships and are often well maintained throughout the second world war, pictured here is Duke of York's.
Hood nicely chose to put hers on the gun tampions rather than anywhere else.
https://stefsap.wordpress.com/2015/10/21/cassones-large-battlecruiser-proposal-1921/
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/669133963864047626/1107321784757403658/image.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/669133963864047626/1107321548202852362/image.png
Bonjour
Armor edge
PR6 PLS

Today is when enterprise was hit my a kamikaze in 45
https://twitter.com/NavalInstitute/status/1657769521904492544
https://twitter.com/NavalInstitute/status/1657769524777689089
What Battlecruiser had the thickest armor?
Hood
What even is a battlecruiser?
Iowa
Let's just refer to them as Ships of the Line
Schnelles Linienschiffe
Frégate
Fast ironSteelclads?
Neat
I've got a question
A friend sent me this image
I was wondering if anyone knows the history behind it
I know that's Hood, but idk what the context is
Oh I have that image too
On 14 May 1944, French Cardinals appeal to clergy in the USA and Great Britain to influence their governments to ensure that the bombing efforts spare French towns, works of art, and churches.
The recent intensification of Allied bombing across France in preparation for D-Day under the 'Transportation Plan', which we covered in a post on 9 May, has undoubtedly affected German war logistics. Still, it has also destroyed significant parts of French towns and cities despite Allied efforts to target rail infrastructure precisely. French civilian casualties have been a regrettable side-effect of the campaign, although they have not reached the catastrophic numbers predicted by Winston Churchill.
Today, French Cardinals appeal for a more humane air war via radio address:
˝The bombing of France fills our hearts with sadness and anxiety.
Thousands of civilians have been killed and wounded, and their homes, as well as churches, schools, and hospitals, have been destroyed.
We ask you to intervene with your respective Governments to ensure that the civilian population of France and Europe may be spared as much as possible. We are convinced that with more care military objectives will not be confused with humble dwellings in the neighborhood.
We believe that our towns, our works of art, and our churches in particular should be spared.˝
Will we see a repetition of the horrible destruction of Italian towns or have Allied air commanders changed their tactics sufficiently to ensure higher precision bombing?
Picture: Aerial view of the city of Vire after the bombardments of 6 June 1944.
Source: Wikimedia Commons

It was me Barry








