#history
1 messages · Page 90 of 1
True
What is being discussed?
how much better T-80Us are than challys

also dude im me
i rag on the US constantly
I mean if we really wanna settle this argument all we have to do is wait a few more weeks
i would be literally the one leaking it
That is true
i am excited for cr2s to sink into eastern european mud never to return
tho I don’t really think the chally 2 is gonna see much tank on tank combat
I’m waiting for someone to inevitably recreate that one part of the Bradley promo where it TOWs a T-55
do I tell you?
in terms of threats main one’s gonna be artillery
Ye
im already aware unless there's like
even more lore to it
James Burton, wherever he is, is going to be crying tears of salt
it’s funny to think the chally 2s are going to the air assault brigades
also real talk i dont expect any of the big boy MBTs to actually be deployed
You want Challenger 2 in action to see what happens
I want Challenger 2 in action to make Lazerpig mald

Leopard 2s definitely going to be deployed
chally 2 is being deployed with the air assault troops that previously operated T-80BVs
Funny how troops supposedly being air assaults are getting one of the fattest MBTs
honestly it’s the sensible thing to do since you know no one does combat drops anymore
It's more funny that the CR2 will be deploying without applique
they're going to try to drop them on the front line as kinetic bombs
wh
wha
It didn’t get the add on armor
That or we just haven’t seen them with it yet
I’m assuming it’s just gonna end up getting covered with era regardless
Yeah it’ll get the obr 2023 treatment
We won’t know until they hit the actual field
hopefully they can at least scrounge up K5 for them jeez
You will work with 3BM12 and you will enjoy it
ukraine is the one with weird hyper experimental ERA that doesn't work though

I mean opposed to the sheets of rubber and cardboard we were seeing photos of a year ago
man if your tank is unable to penetrate the unuparmored LFP of a western MBT your ammo designers are beyond incompetent
Cr2 %100 gonna have Kontakt-1
While I will not discuss [Current_Event] for rules reasons, horse the LFP is easily pennable by a T-34.
the cr2 lfp is
enormous
It's 76mm and completely flat.

they "fixed" it with enormous amounts of applique that... yeah
They didnt put all of them?
rolling coffin moment
Ukrainian ones haven’t been seen with the appliqué
The applique doesn't totally cover it
The more I know about Nato more I believe US is doing %90 of the work
I LOVE ABRAMS I LOVE ABRAMS!
Depends on the metrics
even the abrams ufp isnt this bad
Abrams one has angle
I totally didn’t just type up a literature review on NATO defense spending last night
1944
The M1A2 V3 also increased the LFP protection I’m pretty sure as well
Yeah Abrams has Obj 279 moment. Godly slope
bricc
Thank you to Morgan & Morgan for sponsoring today’s video. Visit this link if you’d like a free
consultation: https://www.forthepeople.com/SimpleHistory
Check out our other Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPdc6bs3I8s6Y4QE_3g3MZw
Become a Simple History member: https://www.youtube.com/simplehistory/join
Support us on Patreon: https://w...
If you are wondering why the lower hull is so bad, the Brit'sh have not developed a new one in decades.
It's all chieftain
There is no way they carry babies like this as bullet vest style
im in this horrible flux of
"man the cr2 is so shit"
and
"man the cr2 is so fucking cool"
whenever i look at one
Sadly I was spoiled alot by Apocalypse tank of command and conquer
So I really don't have favorite looking MBT
I literally need something like this to like it
It has BESH so it's rad
Now THIS I love
That up there is the OG. Vickers Mark 7, the starting point for the CR2's turret.
ye
Brits then got very close to buying the Mark 7/2 (it is in fact what won the order that became CR2)
Challenger 2 always looks to me like some sort of uncanny valley Abrams
It’s the cheeks
Those with even a passing knowledge of tanks will recognize that hull.
Then I offer you Falcon 2
ive got the reverse
abrams look like mishapen cr2s to me
the lines flow better on challys
(For those who don't know the 7/2 is on a Leo 2 hull)
The ideal chally 2
The original Mark 7 used a modified Vickers Mark 4 chassis, which had durability issues. Vickers didn't have the time and money to improve it before the contract deadline, so they just licensed the Leo 2 hull as a quick answer.
New Abrams...cheek armor?
But well, using the Leopard 2 hull meant that Germany would have export controls on potential Mark 7/2 sales - and the Brits dreamed of exports. So the Leo 2 hull gets ditched, and the Challenger 1 hull is brought back out of the drawing bin.
M1A2 V3 increased both the cheeks and the LFP
It’s why it’s 80+ tons when it’s equipped with maximum protection
And of course, the great irony in this tale is the only country that the CR2 was ever exported to... is one the Germans have cleared export sales to.
So ditching the Leo 2 hull was quite pointless.
Bruh ain't European bridges are 70 ton max
the US can bring its own bridges
Hmm
also depends on the type of ton you’re using
Base SEPV3 is only about 66 in European tonnes
overall while I think there’s still plenty of weight savings that could be potentially done with the abrams if you want a tank as well armored as the maximum protection abrams it’s going to weigh like one
First step
Banish the loader, autoloader with smaller manless turret
Replacing the wiring with fiber optics and replacing the gun with a newer 120 would shave off like 5 tons
Smaller and needs less armor for having no crew
No need for turret
In particular
Become casemate instead
XM360E1 would be a nice replacement for the L/44
In terms of turret a new redesigned turret something along the lines of K2 type design would likely save further weight
Ah reference to Object 490's earliest designs?
Swedish doorwedge
I don’t know if the army would go for an unmanned turret off the bat
tho if we do end up seeing a fully revamped abrams hopefully they’d redesign the hull front to allow for more UFP protection
I don’t think unmanned is a viable option for the army due to both doctrine and concerns regarding redundancies
What about being future proof. Especially the potential of passing to 130mm
I imagine they’d be able to make some good design changes just with modern modeling tech
You think about how 3d modeling has come
A crew-less turret would fundamentally change the way Army tankers fight vs a two man turret or a one man turret HSTVL style
Yeah the most I could see them doing is future proofing it
Leave the door open but not go for it immediately
I don’t really think 130 MM is necessary
And if it’s about future proofing you might as well just go back to the 140s
Do tell
Oh I was referring to an unmanned turret
"I really don't think 120mm is necessary"
-105mm of old
The 105 outperformed the 120 MM for quite a bit
Yeah until 120 shells got better
again 120 MM still has growing room and new tank threats haven’t really materialized to justify larger guns
I was always egging korv on and giving him ideas for his arguments. And Korv's the guy who got fear_naught to make the leak to counter his argument.
I can't take "korv" name seriously since it's the name of this cutie
Korv not reporting
You should always go for more velocity over a bigger gun until the gun reaches its maximum growing room
In terms of 120 v 130 tho I agree
you look at who the army anticipates having to fight
If this was the cold war still where everyone was making a new tank every decade then sure go with the bigger gun it’s gonna make that tank better against the tanks of the next generation
But tank development has kinda stagnated
Yeah Soviet 152mm MBTS would change many things for Nato
Also less of a priority in s hypothetical pacific conflict
Not exactly foreseeing an armor arms race there
A ACV with a 105 would likely be more usable than a abrams in the pacific
I don’t really think Taiwan’s tanks would be seeing much action beyond a worse case scenario
If they survive from China air force ye
I mean they likely would
If Serbian and Iraqi tank forces can survive somewhat intact against NATO air forces I don’t see why the Taiwanese can’t
Throw in standard deception techniques like decoys, camo netting so on and so on

Oh yeah that reminds me, about the MPF
was interviewing a general who has a hand in some procurement stuff
Air power isn’t really the best for taking out full formations unless you have absolute air dominance, it’s better to utilize it against more static targets like logistics centers, command centers so on and so on over individual tanks
Kinda lame sounding
We’ll have to wait and see
Starry’s the one behind AirLand
Starry would likely be more appropriate
But at the same time it doesn’t really have the power behind it like abrams, Bradley, Stryker or Patton
Is the MPF meant to be airborne?
it’s meant to be airlift able
could always go Gavin
And is going to airborne units
What if we lob a cruise missile at it
Taylor, Custer, Marshall
Schwarzkopf should be reserved for the next MBT
Bruh is does feel too German
Why are you using cruise missiles for single tanks over actual valuable targets like command centers, airfields, air defense systems so on and so on
I would imagine they would go more modern
Abrams was in charge midway through Vietnam
What about good ol Petraeus?
David Howell Petraeus (; born November 7, 1952) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011, until his resignation on November 9, 2012. Prior to his assuming the directorship of the CIA, Petraeus served 37 years in the United States Army. His last a...
Bad wording on my part again
Like one of those old ass DF-3s
why are you using DF-3s against tanks that might not even be there when the missile gets there
In January 2015, officials reported the FBI and Justice Department prosecutors had recommended bringing felony charges against Petraeus for allegedly providing classified information to Broadwell while serving as director of the CIA.
Nevermind I guess
You’d have bigger problems then
again
in the phase of the war where the first strike cruise missiles and ballistic missiles are being flung
every enemy unit is going to be scrambling to relocate to new locations where they aren't gonna be hit in the first strike
why are you wasting valuable missiles on individual units over the things that enable said units to fight and are far more static than they're
Kids named Patriot and THAAD:
So basically
We’re supposed to lob cruise missiles at Taipei
Like the command center and president house
Got@it
ngl there's probably in the first day of a war like that the Taiwanese Patriots are gonna be scrambling to relocate before going to new firing locations
Surprise attack em
good luck at that
its gonna be down likely to whatever F-16s can make it off of the runways before they get cratered to protect airspace in the initial hours/day alongside more lower-level air defense systems
the block 70s could likely hold their ground against the 15s
its not really like
the mainland is really in a place either to mount a invasion of Taiwan currently
ah I forgot Taiwan had the ground-launched RIM-7s
I don't think the tens of thousands of military and civilian dead are particularly worth it for either side
nor the value and cost of having to maintain a destroyed Taiwan to the mainland
its a island of 24 million people where 50% of the population have some form of military training/experience
The only stuff I see em using is airsoft BB guns n shit
in which a war would destroy any economic potential of said island, likely plunge China into a decades-long recession and likely destroy large chunks of the Chinese military in the process even in a victorious war
on top of likely plunging the entire globe into a recession as well
Eh what’s another 20 years of build up again
literally the war is not worth it for either side since it would devastate both the US and China, fully cripple Taiwan and likely take the global economy with it in the process
Let’s hope who ever is in charge of the CCP in 2027 doesn’t go mad shit
Taiwan has like about than 50% of high end semiconductor production
Any war in Taiwan is gonna fuck up that for at least 20 years
Because of how long it takes to rebuild the supply chain for that and the fact that only 1 company makes EUV as of rn
The netherland thingy?
yeah ASML
ASML only makes like 2 EUV machine every month or so
Those shits hard to make
those machines are massive af actually
I know
You have been warned in Azur Lane Official. Reason:
Please refrain from conspiracy to commit a federal crime
Fear had to wipe his internet accounts but had no other crackdown. Is still in Bri'sh army esports even.
bruh
Why the heck is there a guy talking about invasion of Taiwan and using "we" to refer to the communist side
do you need a reality check or something?
They won't name it Schwarzkopf because then Schwarzkopf would sue them for copyright infringement
#OTD in 1968, the battleship USS New Jersey (BB-62) was recommissioned after spending ten and half years in the "mothball fleet" in Bayonne. Six month later, the New Jersey began to conduct shore bombardment in Vietnam.
isn't he already dead?
what
Oh wait I thought you mean the general himself would sue

didn't know there was a company named Schwarzkopf
That guy has a strange hate boner towards the nationalists
he's a mainlander living abroad
^what he said
anyways now that I'm done taking my foster dog for a walk
in terms of a invasion of Taiwan is probably also good to note that likely any form of ground-based warfare would be the great equalizer
all Taiwan has to do is hold the beach heads and push out any breaches that do happen
the Island of Taiwan itself is a natural fortress that can be only invaded at certain times of the year due to weather conditions
I just finished touching grass
Yea I know
you sure don't look the part
Even with Chinese naval and air supremacy, the Taiwanese would likely be more than able to deal with beachheads, again they have been preparing for this type of war since the 50s
Guess who’s also been preparing since the 50s
naval invasions are the hardest type of operation to pull off
and the Chinese military despite making great strides in modernization is still heavily inexperienced and relatively green when it comes to combat
Taiwan is a peer threat that has the much simplifier task of merely being the defender
yea I know
you have long since pushed away from the topic of tanks into modern politics so you better just disengage Tato instead of indulging the twat
all you will earn from this is a warn

I am aware
tho considering our types of discussions I don't really think this is gonna draw too much ire
since this isn't really touching into the politics or anything merely just the military component
if it crosses the line then I will be happy to cease if asked
👁️ I don't think arguing a theoretical war would be horrible for everyone involved is necessarily line crossing
Let us cook
Tato, nah, you haven't said anything wrong, the other guy though seems to have wet dreams about a genocide
anyway I'm pretty much done with the topic
Wha-

its a photoshop slapping the F-16 conformal fuel tanks and drop tanks on the F-35
I just thought it was funny looking
what's with Italians and SAP guns
it seems like the Italians were the only ones who focused a lot into SAP
It looked like a F-35 so I just guessed
Are you basing this out of wows
not really
Plenty of nations use sap

yeah but from what I've read Italy seemed to focus a lot into it more than the other nations
Not really
The only case where you could say that is looking at BB guns
Where the only 2 shell types for the 381mm was AP and SAP, with no HE
Cruisers and DDs didnt really have SAP
That's a gimmick wows went with for no reason
Not even CLs or DDs with HE + SAP?
Cruisers didn't use SAP
Destroyer ammunition was an SAP, however
The structure of the shell was similar to the American 5" Special Common
why no HE?
Shore bombardment with the big guns wasn't really a core mission, so while one was ultimately developed for that role, it was never carried.
SAP is basically HE for against targets with some armour.
It actually wasn't that uncommon for new battleship gun designs to not have an HE shell put into service with them.
The British did so with the 16"/45 Mk.I used on the Nelson-class, as did the French with their 330mm and 380mm.
The British 16" and French 380mm did eventually get HE during WWII, pretty much explicitly for that shore bombardment missions.
Britain's cruisers liked using it
What was called "Common" shell in other navy is technically a "SAP"
They often lack the special steel/hardening process, but nonetheless not a high capacity shells either
Would the 7th fleet battleships have been able to fight Kurita's central force if they were able to break through the Taffy's and the 3rd fleet wouldn't have arrived fast enough?
as far as I understand it in the 7th fleet referred to, it would have been Yamato, Nagato, Kongo and Haruna + 15 destroyers and 8 cruisers
vs
West Virginia, Maryland, Tennessee, California, Mississippi and Pennsylvania + 15 destroyers and 5 cruisers (plus some other ships in the area on duties such as picket patrols; 11 additional destroyers and 3 additional cruisers, which brings the total to 26 destroyers and 8 cruisers)
so, yes, they could have
I dont remember if any of the ships were running low on ammo, or just a myth
hm, west virginia only fired like 15 or 16 salvoes iirc, so probably myth
77.3% HC, 22.7% AP according to USNI
The principal anxiety on the part of these flag officers was shortage of ammunition, especially of 14-inch and 16-inch armor-piercing projectiles for the battleships. Owing to the fact that they had been loaded for bombarding Yap rather than fighting a fleet, the battleships’ main battery magazines were initially filled 77.3 per cent with HC (high capacity) bombardment ammunition, and only 22.7 per cent AP (armor-piercing), the only projectile that can penetrate armored decks.1 Moreover, 58 per cent of their HC had been expended in the shore bombardment at Leyte. The battleships, therefore, placed enough AP in their main turret ammunition hoists for the first five salvos and were prepared to shift to HC if they encountered anything smaller than a battleship. And it was agreed that Battle Line should hold gunfire until it could shoot at ranges between 20,000 and 17,000 yards, in order to obtain the highest percentage of hits.
If this is true, 5 salvos is a bit 
I see that makes sense too
Slinging HC against Haruna isnt daijoubu
But, I'd argue that the smaller vessels could do the heavy lifting
true, though it's 5 salvoes against inferior enemies and one big boi, and many ships in the prior engagement didn't expend any ammo or very little
Phoenix will beat the fuck out of Noshiro any day
yeah on the cruiser and dd front they're out quantitied and qualitied for this fight, e.g. a lot of the dds are fletchers
Get fucked by 6" machine gun fire
just even for bbs it's a very uneven fight of 6 vs 4, and only one of the four can fight any of the six one on one, let alone outnumbered, even if we hard limit all the ships to only 5 salvoes they initially have prepped, that's a dangerous game
especially considering what wv was doing just prior
I'd also argue that in general Kurita was exhausted
3 days without sleep IIRC, and after a few harrowing escapes first with Atago sinking rapidly, then Musashi going down
like I'm not certain of the formation, but if anything but yamato is the lead ship

Hence Kurita's belief that Taffy 3 was a significantly bigger force
The Centre Force was undergoing formation change when Taffy 3 was spotted, IIRC
1984 was banned in the ussr for being anti-communist and it was banned in the usa for being pro-communist

From cruising formation to battle formation
3 days without sleep sounds awful
found it
oh
When spotted, Kurita's force was in a AA defensive circle
kongo's about to die
At 7:03, Kurita ordered an "All-out Attack"
Basically, no real "organised formation"
which probably means the kongos steam out ahead of yamato even further
pretty unfortunate for them all around it seems
thank you for getting information like the fleet locations and bearings to each other
by 0710, it's this
0750
Organisation: no
Taffy 3 remains organised, at least for the carriers that are running away the best they can
Rip Gamby, I guess
So if the 7th fleet battle line did arrive to do battle, Central Force would have been disorganized af?
and in a poor position to engage them
their weakest ships are the closest to the retreating taffy
Well, 1984 technically is a authoritarian wet dream and handbook, Orwell may have warn people against that kind of dystopian but he basically laying out the entire “how to do it yourself”
yeah but afaik Taffy 3 was retreating to the east while 7th fleet was closer to the coast of Leyte
I think it partially depended on whether Kurita issued out an all out attack or not
yeah so if 7th fleet would have engaged, they would have come from the west of central force right?
Can't believe I have to use Canned Coal for fleet formations, but here we are
Formation 1: ASW formation
Formation 2: Alert/Cruising formation
Formation 3: AA formation
Formation 4: Battle formation
For Ten-Go, for example, Yamato started off as Formation 1 as she exited Kure, then gradually went into Formation 3 by the time US planes appeared
and of course my book on the combined fleet only covers the boats but not the formations 
they're retreating to the southwest by 0850, so probably towards the 7th fleet actually, going by all the movements and maps it does seem the 7th fleet is likely, logically, to the southwest

they went east into the wind earlier to launch aircraft it indicated
There is one thing
If the Japanese decides to bug out, the 7th isn't technically in a state to pursuit
Because 21 knots 
but seems like they completed a 180 to go back south (originally were headed north)
yeah, just if they do sail into them the odds aren't good
so Kurita retreating was probably the best idea
Overall though, I don't think the odds are good for Kurita if Oldendorf is involved
it saved his ships, since certain other ships were also beelining towards him
if they ran into the 7th fleet, the 7th fleet could have engaged them long enough for TF34 to arrive
Especially if the surrounding Crudivs and Desrons are involved
a fleet that would have not had odds, but a fist to show him
And in a disorganised formation, no less
so while he didn't really accomplish his objective, there really wasn't much he could have done and he made the right choice
Portland, Minneapolis, Lousville, Denver, Columbia on the left flank
Phoenix, Boise, Shropshire on the right
I guess there is Crudiv 7 to contend with, along with a few more CAs
Wait what ships were supposed to be in TF34 again
Halsey sent Iowa and New Jersey back if I recall, don't recall what were the accomanying ships
that was supposed to guard San Bernandino strait
BB New Jersey(FltF, FF, GF), Iowa
CL CruDiv14: Biloxi, Vincennes II, Miami
DD DesRon52: (Cap J.P. Womble):
DesDiv103 (Cap J.P. Womble):: Owen, Miller, The Sullivans, Tingey
DesDiv104 (Cap W.T. Kenny): Hunt, Lewis Hancock, Marshall, Hickox
More Clevelands join in the fight
wait only 2 BBs
thought the other Fast BBs would have been in there
Those two are the fastest
33 knots, haul ass back to the strait once "The World Wonders" was received
Oh no not the one that was sent back
the one originally planned to be left behind
Did sink Nowaki along with Chikuma's survivors IIRC
There wasnt one, that was the miscommunication, I believe
Halsey said a formation would be created if enemy forces were sighted
HQ believed that the formation was already created
Hence "Where the fuck are my boats?"
yeah afaik Halsey planned to have 6 of the fast BBs in this formation if it was necessary
then didn't detach
http://www.navweaps.com/index_oob/OOB_WWII_Pacific/OOB_WWII_Cape_Engano.php Just take what would be at Engano and take them back to San Bernadino if that is the case
Sibuyan II: Japanese Boogaloo 
actually have read that if TF34 didn't stop to refuel their accompanying destroyers and ditched them to rush towards Leyte Gulf, they could have caught Kurita's force as it was leaving
Ditching your DDs is very no
You're charging towards a significant enemy force who could be very well organised and in a position to launch a torpedo attack as soon as you are on scene
How to lose your mint capital ship quickly
or worse, a repeat of Indianapolis 
And speaking of alternative samar
Obligatory reminder of Drach magically refloating the ships sunk at the Palawan Passage to fight Oldendorf


Beautiful
nothing, both bring liberty
Coming soon: what's the difference between Hood and a carley float
one is much less explosive
He is gonna do infinite variant of these
what do uss New Jersey and flips through notes hidden valley ranch have in common
no, you're doing it wrong
it's USS New Jersey vs Bottle of Hidden Valley Ranch
the winner, of course, is the ranch because it's amphibious and can hide in kansas
Just found a Chinese post claiming that if this shell exploded in the japanese ship it hit instead of being a dud, the beiyang fleet would’ve won yalu river

What
maybe if every other japanese sailor committed sudoku simultaneously
and the fleet doesn't sink itself on the way home
it gets much more interesting when we get to "What is USS New Jerseys views on the Holocaust?" and the video is an hour and a half long
both are power flexes of garden items
"...but"

how real was Brest irl?
do not read patton new Jersey's diaries
Dunkerque preliminary design iirc
or modeled after one
quoting silver
Historical Authenticity: 3/5
In WoWS, Brest has 8 pairs of dual-purpose 139mm mounts astern, which were never utilised for such a role. The ship also has an older superstructure, similar to the older Courbet and Bretagne-class battleships. This is highly unlikely as the heavy gun directors of this age are innovatively stacked on top of each other to maximize space use on the superstructure
reminder that new jersey is obviously new jerseyan and new york is 18% jewish

oh coolio
I honestly totally forgot about the 139s
so aside from Alaska and Guam for US, who else had designs for large/super cruisers, at least for what could be added to AL?
Japanese shells at the battle of the yellow sea, french shells at dakar, american shells at gunnery practice moment
strausburger
some other designs are already present in the pr system as no one really built any
The British had a few large cruiser designs, including a Greek Export cruiser with 10" guns
The Ansaldo Cruiser-Killer project for soviets, also armed with 10" guns, are also viable candidates.
The Italians also have a 17,500 ton "Pocket BB" design, if you wish to add that as well.
France also has the "Croiseur de Protege 23,600 tons", also a feasible ship.
cool cool thanks
Alaska is now on my stinky doodoo list for that stupid bow stem extension
aesthetics all ruined
Always has been on my stinky doodoo list
dw alaska I like you
Biased
CA2-D my beloved

the underfed monty?
I do dig Payto Rico
same deal
would you like to see a shipgirl oc of her
Not interested in shipgirl version
No
Stalingrad, if going by precedent of using the WoWS classification as her ingame classification
it's a shame no one has done the scs
Russian disc shells
Like “Alaska was good”
Alaska would be good, if, uh...
-not a massive cost sinkhole
- has actual things to fight
-catapult not amidships
Am I allowed to think it's cool at least?
- dunkerque class didn’t exist
And was build half a decade earlier
and has virtually no aa or equipment in comparison
also...Germans being a major inconvenience

Eh, Dunkerque's BoGPs show the 37mm ACADs, at least
If I can take a Dunk and give her the american industry treatment you’d be agreeing
hang on


This but swap out the 130’s for 127’s
now we're talking
but yea, the dream
Strengthen the bow a bit
that camo scheme also looks good
And finally add full radar fc and upgrade her RPC
well, it's not an accurate scheme
while true for what they want to do, cruiser killers do need to be somewhat fast to stay in range a while
huff
Ok we simply upgrade dunkek to have surals
Bang
34 knots
Dunkerque doesn't have Surals? 
She has indrets
Right. Sural just compressed the size more.
Yes
And perhaps the space we gain from installing the smaller 127’s can fit another sural or two

Don’t forget Maka
One nation cannot create perfection
It always takes two
🇺🇸🤝🇫🇷
the red white and blue mix
Huh. Stras with a mack looks surprisingly proportionate, too.
Just need to cleanse what's behind it and squeeze more AA/guns.
You were busy with many things
Should have sealed off the Ardennes with the Maginot too, but thank you Gam*lin
🇬🇧
Am I doing this right
Maka do you have any idea how little those colours narrow it down
Return of Skoda navy 🇨🇿
oh, and off to a slight tangent. Atlanta and Juneau differences, anyone?

A certain island also has red, white and blue, but can't say more than that.
🇵🇭
Flag contains yellow
Wink wink
Disqualified
Twin 130 and quad 130 do look nice though
They do. Unfortunately it jams like a bitch.
Would be interesting if Le Hardis had Dunkerque's twin mounts.
Suffering from being the first DP mount ever mounted on a bb

and tbh, 130mm wasn't enough to stop menacing DDs anyway
haven't seen you in AL for a while now
a return to the 8'' secondary
weight was a suggestion anyway
I miss her.
After my research,
Patrie vs HMS Dreadnought honestly sounds like a semi fair fight as long as dreadnought stays close enough

Wat type of ship is seigfried?
Battlecruiser/Battleship.
and I'm certain you know Midway's original requirements called for 8" guns.
Missile Stalingrad my beloved
Actual blueprints actually called O-class as a battleship - something concurred by Siegfried Breyer.
must be a large cruiser
Is Kronshtadt with 6 380mm BB to you?
Actually, speaking of Kronk yet again
Trash(ip)
Hoo Project 66 too
Kron is 69 ye
69 and 69-I, yea
nice

Kronk looks alright, just not a fan of the bow
305mm shell from Dingyuan
Also, you know how model kits always has the vehicle looking great and all that
Try this person, how to sell your kits fast
Here is story of Project 66 
I know. I also know of the variant with the quad 130s.
"Stalingrad is too precious to chase 203mm cruisers. Build a 220mm cruiser to chase them instead"
-Stalin
And that’s how not to gamble with ships
Yeah it was a proposal for all ships using twin 130mm BL-109
That's why Super Krem and Nakhimov also has them

who dat?
Project 66
Mad at you krem
dat alot of guns
ah, finally had the time to check that video game for WV44
honestly quite incredible, pathetic if you will

One fucking job..
i feel like this is a questionable decision
It’s literally gambling
you're a brown water navy, why are you chasing american cruisers presumably into open waters with carrier aviation and submarine likely stalking around
Well he does mention the danger of chasing
So if you have to kill it
Use something less expensive
Cutie
Oh
I mean
It's wrong but really need to focus on it to see it
Most whales barely look at their ships
yea nah, most people know WeeVee for being an actual sniper IRL
definitely catering to the naval history people...but.... WG being smoothbrained as usual
5 minutes of coding will literally fix it, but brain damage is too hard for them, 
tbh, might even skip this entirely knowing the state of the game, will see what happens 
War thunder will do better job
Strong too
Thanks to Maka though, I can just simply nab the model and no need to pay anything

and honestly wows state is fine, it's fun
wt nevada is super pretty though, I have it saved for refs
Eh, each to their own. the teams and subs piss me off lately.
Wish there's more operations, then I'll play more.
WT got the rof nerfed, right?
ofc
Currently it's uhh 48 sec reload I think
I meant Duguay Trouin
Oh
Penetration mostly
Duguay is 14 sec reload
a 1.x BB RoF is actually pretty reasonable tbh
Even Iowa's were on a ....30+ second reload cycle, I recall
I wonder if they fixed Mogami's stupid 6m rangefinder yet though.
What was the problem
Mogami's E2 turret should be using an 8m rangefinder, not 6m.
Not sure about the US and UK, actually. 
it's at least in the band of historically accurate
being the lowest possible value without falling out of it
and this being wt one can imagine other vehicles not adhering to such a thing being the general rule
heard someone claim he was switching to WT because there isn't HE spam there
I don't play top tier naval myself but doesn't helena like
just like how even with maximum crew skills nevada secondaries aren't historically accurate reload speed, still too slow
eat every BB ingame because the HE just murders the crew
like instead of staying in the citadel, the crew just run around on deck and in unprotected sections of the ship and get spalled to death

Uhhh
Jordan's book, I presume?
Helena is more broken than Des Moines
But thank you
Because of the fact she pumps 15 152mm 
hm general having another history session i missed?
Until she overheats her barrels
Littorio's ones are surprisingly small. 
Des Moines suffers because she is 6.3
So sometimes have to vs BBs
But Helena?
Comfy at 6.0
switching sides
Sushi Pizza time

DISGUSTOSO
unsurprisignly, from new jersey
Is dat a kabab?
made myself a hot dog at work today, it was a good day
Man DM was such a good design Project 66 had very hard time against her during war games.
Now Project 66 has like 20km more range than DM
But
-
Long range is sus, since there is barely hit chance and Project 66 may end up without ammo by all the shots she makes at DM
-
Medium range is better but DM has fire rate advantage and Soviets consider her fire control as superior. So risky for 66
-
close range. 66 has much superior balistic for penetration but DM is at full potential for her reload advantage
Thats my gf;-;
Wat
i like women with big beards
THATS A FACEMASK
sure it is buddy
DONT GET THE WRONG IDEA
i changed it now shut
t-35 is convergent evolution
My gf now
me
my Swedish post-World War II main battle tank, designed and manufactured in Sweden. with the Swedish military abbreviation of stridsvagn, Swedish for chariot and tank (literally combat wagon), and the 103 coming from being the third tank in Swedish service to be equipped with a 10 cm gun.
Ok yeah
Virgin Nevada crew reload 52 seconds
Chad one reload 40 seconds
Her biggest problem is she doesn't have SAP
the problem with US BBs afaik is they use IRL sustained reload speeds while other BBs use optimal reload speeds
USN line as a whole is horribly imbalanced, top tier is dog while low tier is horrifically op
and moffet is just omegalul what
Yeah US DDs are next level
Dreadnoughts will be pay wall for Whales to speed grind it for fast BBs I guess
Maka gf
Looking at navweapons

Nevada reload is true I would say
Navweapons say 1.5-1.75 rounds per min
Good ol Colorados will also be 1.5
Didn't even realize they do, and all of them do
I should read the blueprints instead of just counting rivets and stuff
It only gets better with 406mm Mark 6 of NC
2 rounds per min
Sirene 
should i roleplay as a IB skk?
Roleplay is against rules
Hi Richie
OH FUCK
correct, and then even in the sustained reload speeds it's the minimum, as I said
NIGERUNDAYOOOO
Yeah max crew training should make her 35 seconds not 40
Honestly, if US BBs are their actual historical ones
your AA would be shredding any planes coming at you
looking at O's blueprints, ugh, my head hurts
Where 
Not even get close
Just a 127mm VT fuse tearing your wing off as soon as you spawn
sadly, though I'm semi a lot of the time
why would one put the combat medic center within the citadel
and it's not even small
it's huge
Protection

I got warned for pretenting to like QE
their aesthetics are nice, I just think they are a strategic deadbirth
Strategic deadbirth
everyone knows the reason hood detonated was because an officer's teacup's saucer was destroyed by the shell, and rather than face the humiliation of drinking tea without a saucer he chose to self-immolate
Like Spahkreuzer?
hence why regular storage rooms have to be in the citadel

wait, the word is stillbirth
just...not as protected
Aegir as a faster Scharnhorst with less protection kinda makes sense if you want to double down on convoy raiding
Biggest plus are the 305’s
305s mean more ammo and better volume to slap aside cruiser escorts
though the auxiliary armament is still in need of some love
at least one extra pair of 105 twins, if nothing else
I think one pair was already on the weather deck
And arguably less ammo needed per target
with the enclosed C/38 mount that's less of a concern, but still would prefer raised mounting
since even the enclosed and raised 5"/38s on the SoDaks had their issues in heavy weather
The 15cm mounts are the same as the Spaehkreuzer ones, if I recall?
The hull sucked...can't do much
too large of a mount for a DD
Took just shy of 2 hours to sink Glorious with only a short break in the engagement
Mf 11” bursters

Just take more torpedo tubes off Shitzig and use it to finish the job
I just need to teleport Atlanta class and Sumner class to Soviet Navy during 1941 
Those DP VT fuses would help alot
Yeah it's weird cold war ammo they slapped to all 130mms
You need to teleport stalin away in 1941 and put someone with a sense of urgency in charge
Cola factories in Soviet Union
I prefer dr pepper
Send this to a SHS simp without context
send this to shell enthusiast
How bout this
Duh
Thanks I hate it
to be fair by sticking shells into enemy armor you can stick nasty messages inside them
“Thine breath smelleth from across the ocean”
Put a strongly worded letter inside the shell to convince them to retreat
sticking missiles into enemy planes is also how to kickstart soviet missile programs
written on the shell is; 'you suck and will be distracted as you disarm this'
instead of putting your shell design in shells, send them strongly worded death threats
to be historically accurate the shell pamphlets should include incorrectly labeled condom sizes
something similar to this:
||"What the hell kind of knight are you: the devil shits and you and your army eat [it]! You Alexandrian beerbrewer, Cossack quiver, Podolian hangman, Armenian pig, swine's snout, mare's asshole, butcher's dog! You're not fit to command the sons of Christians, we'll fight you on land and sea, unbaptized brow, fuck your mother! We don't know the date, we don't have a calendar, but the day with us is the same as with you: kiss our ass!"||
just a cold war funny
Operating a Macrocannon is extremely taxing and tiring, and the sheer size and weight of the components makes any mishap that occurs almost always a fatal affair, crushing the life out of the poor wretches involved. Life expectancy amongst such crews is often measured in mere weeks.
that's why you eat a hot dog and transform into popeye before you operate it
Just as the Founding Fathers intended
He'll buff out
this beef is so pure it has 40g of iron
you ever wonder if richy's bathtub is a hollowed out HE shell
Rich. How large I need a Man o War to be so I can have Tsar cannon broadside?
Short answer: no

Ship of the lines at 80 guns were already at their maximum limit, in fact, they hogged very badly due to the weight
France had prototype sabot’s for their 155 and 203mm guns
Which they never used so no
actually how stupid is if Sabot was use as the armament in like 15in guns

Without modern construction technology, trying to put somewhere around 30-60 of these things on a ship of the line will just cause the ship to break in two
wooden ships were kinda at the material's limit
Yeah no
That's why even 80 guns were not that popular
74 was the best they could do, and only one deck of 32 pounders at that
This big lad....yea.
Also the recoil would not be able to be contained

The gun would just become a battering ram
Impossible, you want to reenact Lepanto?
or Salamis?
But really, if you want actual weapons against ship of the lines
try a mortar ketch
or the good ol' fireship
Soleil Royal 
wait what actually was the reason why older BBs have like straight fronts while newer classes like Bismarck has like a curve
Why would you use sabot in ships tho
If you mean the US standards, look closely at the bow area
You’d have a thin rod of steel that couldn’t do much damage after penetration anyways
there's usually a bunch of casemates there, sealed off or not
Unfortunately, casemates bad
Naval sabots are basically mini shells
They have a small burster
actually not really the Standards more like the british BBs
Look at QE. Also a bunch of casemates near the bow area.
Didn't Izmail had sabot looking shells. Or something close to her caliber
Which were quite wet too if I recall.
Even the Nelson and KGV class? those bows look flatter than the other corresponding size BBs
If we're talking about that, then it relates to block coefficiency and hydrodynamics
the sleeker the ship, technically the faster it goes
ah it has to do with hydrodynamics
If you want one of the greatest examples of sleek ships, look no further than the good ol' Clipper
Extremely thin hull, as long as possible for maximum speed
For closer examples, see also Iowa and Hood
so the clipper bow is because to make the ship as sleek as possible
both are ships that are extremely sleek and long to ensure the ship goes as fast aspossible
Lexington?
You mean those 305mm HE sabots?
Slight problem: Their seakeeping sucks omega dick, as it usually happens to fast ships
I think so
Lexington got turned into a carrier, so it's not as visible as an example
Fat = turn fast
Slim= go fast
Iowa's design for speed is very easy to see
Which is fine and dandy until mother nature tells you to eat shit 
or worse, Dunkerque
bow broken and dangling off from heavy weather
and turret 1 basically being a submarine
Izmail's shells @thorn trail
I presume it's also why British ships were not as streamlined as the US ships since they were meant to mostly do battle in the stormy North Atlantic?
Atlantic conditions were a major consideration, yes.
Even then, the KGVs were not satisfactory with seakeeping.
woah didn't really expect Sabot shells for BB guns to exist
and then there are the Northern Seas


















