#history
1 messages · Page 79 of 1
It was also one the books burned by the Nazis
And it was heavily censored upon release
The sex scenes between him and Catherine
Curse words like fuck, shit, whorehound, cocksucker, etc
seggs 
The N-word with hard-r was left in, but given the time period, not surprising
Unfortunate it was included at all but yeah
Interestingly the British edition of the publication was even more conservative than the American one
That's honestly surprising

Like this one
“Miss Van Campen,” I said, “did you ever know a man who tried to disable himself by kicking himself in the balls?
Balls was replaced with scrotum like this
“Miss Van Campen,” I said, “did you ever know a man who tried to disable himself by kicking himself in the scrotum?
arguably worse
The priest is teased with a masturbation joke
“Priest every night five against one.”
Did you know Tuscan bread has no salt in it because of its history of Pisa giving salt taxes?
The sexual content of the book also saw it banned in Ireland in 1939.
let's ban it again
Early in the story, Henry picks up a fellow American infantryman fighting with the Italians. He’s trying to concoct a scheme to avoid the war. He tells Henry:
“Fuck the war.”
reading fighter combat-tactics and manuevering on a pdf rn to improve in air RB
i have new appreciation for missiles
And reading about Hemingway as a person also highlights how racist and misogynistic he actually was
"ok calculate your own velocity, bullet drop, enemy velocity, enemy turning speed, your own harmonization, bullet speed" vs "put reticle on plane until beep loud and shoot"
Ww1: Spray and pray 
He was not at all faithful to his wives
And yes I mean plural because the motherfucker had 4 of them
is that a famous book btw?
A Farewell to Arms? Absolutely, yeah

It was challenged by parents in US schools in 1974 and 1980...
The list goes on and on
British ration in 1951
Meanwhile Qwerty here is reading A Farewell to HARMs
We need a mf chernobyl map that disables all mf radars and heat trackers
There are reformers knocking on my door what do i do
I'd say use a gun but that's exactly what they want
I own a 5”/54 for air defense, since that's what BuOrd intended. Four bandits enter into my airspace. "What the devil?" As I grab my powder case and close the breech. Blow a man sized hole through the first bandit, he's dead on the spot. Point my Unrotated Projectile at the second man, miss him entirely because it's an unguided rocket and nails the neighbor’s wife. I have to resort to the 46cm gun mounted at the top of the barbette loaded with Sanshiki, "Tally ho lads" the incendiary rods shred two aircraft in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off flooding alarms. Load Bofors and blast the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on search and rescue to arrive since 40mm wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the Bureau of Ordnance intended.
i must draft a presentation on R&D pipelines and chant DARPA while waving around an aesa radar to make them go away
thank god ship reformers don't exist because they actually have a slight point with the fords and zumwalts
Yall can get aesa radars
Fords
I own an OTOMATIC for self defense, since that's what God intended. Unfortunately for God, the OTOMATIC is quite capable of killing God.
Unless the reformers extensively argued for the continued use of traditional plumbing systems
the plumbing thing is a meme
but it's more the fact that she introduced multiple new technologies at once
EMALs had teething issues sure
I dread to think what the reformers would think about ships
Given one of them was pointing out that the Brooklyn-class was terrible compared to Japanese DDs
Fucking powerpoint from hell

But they’re operational now and working much better than their competition
I remember that
something something aviation battleship quote
where is that thing, can't find
https://1sttac.blogspot.com/2020/03/ijn-44-fatal-ambush-for-undisciplined.html
WHAT IF the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) in 1944 had pilots & seaplanes for their Aircraft Battleships Ise & Hyuga when confronting idiot Admiral Halsey?
LIVE, DIE, REPEAT--History will REPEAT if the U.S. Navy doesn't wake-up and get large & small seaplanes to sea i...
no there was a quote about how aviation battleships are an unresolved wet dream between 1914 battleship fleets and modern carriers
still can't find it aagh
EMALS's issues tbh have always been somewhat overblown, even when they were truly problematic.
If people had been holding steam catapults to the same standard as EMALS people would have been bitching about how we needed to ditch steam catapults in favor of ramps
Or maybe someone would have argued for an aircraft trebuchet
You never know
order my submarines to torpedo the enemy aircraft carrier group, misses entirely because they're mark 14s
Ditch catapults for ramps

God save the Queen
qe finally got her curved chest
Catapults are better smh
Qe has F-35s No?
and nails the neighbor’s wife.

they dont use rams????
f-35bs
Technically speaking, you can operate the F-35B without a ski jump
VTOL moment
It just helps reduce the take-off run
Which helps you use the deck space for other things
Like lining up more aircraft
Well
money
They could not afford to maintain a CATOBAR carrier force
empire collapse does that to a mfer
Especially since their government was also generally resolved against strike carriers
Post-1960s the RN was effectively evolving into an ASW-focused force
Come to think of it what’s the status on the British F-35s
29 in service of 30 delivered
Are the QEs still operating with marine corps aircraft or
CATOBAR>SATOBAR
ah gotcha
Three are with No.17 squadron in the US, which is for testing and evaluation.
Twelve are with No.207 squadron in the UK, which is the OCU squadron
And fourteen are under No.617 squadron, which is the operational squadron and has at this point twice detached 8x F-35B to operate on QE
TIL early aircraft armor was to put a iron stove lid on your ass
Next squadron to stand up should be 809 Naval Air Squadron, this year in fact
Early aircraft armements were pistols and gernades soo
They're expecting to take delivery of seven F-35B this year (then four in 2024, and seven in 2025, at which point they'll hit 47 (48 delivered, one lost)
are F-35Bs capable of flying backward?
Reverse thrust?
what is the differences between Northampton Portland and Pensacola classes?
With sufficient headwind?
Anyway, the extent of nozzle and vanes deflection do allow backward movement
Pensacolas were meant to be protected mostly against DD 5" AP, and had 2 twin and 2 triple 8" mounts. The Northamptons were meant to have some protection against 6" shells, and had 3 triple 8" mounts. The Portlands bumped protection up a bit again and also used a 3 x triple 8" layout.
It can be summed up as the USN slowly realizing they're severely undershoot the treaty limits
Pensacola was a very spartan design, all corners cut to fit the target displacement. Result: terrible boat that's 900 tons underweight
Northampton changed the gun arrangement and add better armor design. Result: better boat, one less gun, one less turret, but now 1000 tons underweight somehow
Portland adds even more extensive armor. Result: displacement on target
The Portlands also added a bunch more fuel bunkerage if I recall, giving them more endurance
Bunkerage actually goes down,
Is that so? I recall something about the Portlands being used for longer range tasks because they had more endurance
Wonder if they got newer machinery?
The latter ships can be loaded down more without compromising stability, maybe that factors in the equation?
okay so bascially they look the same but under the hood they are all different
other than the nevada like gun setup on Pensacola
I'd say the other way around actually
Main internal subdivisions were practically the same between the three
so they are more identical than most ship classes...
New Orleans class I take it came out later and could do a lot more?
New Orleans were a pretty radical change yes
Submerged magazines, rearranged machinery, much more armor over machinery, barbettes, and turrets
is Orleans oil burning
All these are
with a... great showing off the Falklands
when there was only one submarine with broken torpedoes shadowing them

This morning, after several days of foul-smelling smoke pouring out of the house at 21 Rue le Sueur in Paris, one of the neighbors calls the police. The officers discover that the house belongs to Dr. Marcel Petiot, who informs them during a phone call that he will arrive soon. With the smoke becoming more intense, firefighters arrive to clear the house. They quickly emerge, visibly distraught, and tell the police to take over. The police find a large stove burning in the basement, surrounded by charred human bones and parts of at least ten dismembered bodies.
When Petiot arrives, he claims the bodies belong to Germans and collaborators and that he is the head of a Resistance group on the run from the Gestapo and thus needs to destroy important documents at his other apartment. The police, sympathetic to the Resistance, allow Petiot to leave.
Nevertheless, Commissaire Georges-Victor Massu takes over the investigation. He discovers a pit filled with quicklime and bags filled with more human remains, and at Petiot's nearby apartment, large amounts of cyanide and various other poisons. The official investigation will be put aside after the police learn that Petiot had been jailed and tortured by the Gestapo from May 1943 until January 1944.
But Massu will piece together the story in the following months. Petiot had set up a fraudulent escape network, under his equally fraudulent medical practice. He offered Jews, resistance fighters, and others safe passage to South America through Portugal for 25,000 francs. Petiot would claim that the potential escapees needed a vaccination. If they accepted, he would inject them with cyanide, take all their valuables, and destroy their bodies.
Petiot will continue to hide using false identities until his arrest on 31 October 1944. He will continue to claim that his victims were 'enemies of France', but the jury will find him guilty of 26 counts of premeditated murder. He will be executed by guillotine on 25 May 1946.
Picture: Transportation of remains found at 21 Rue le Sueur.
Source: Murderpedia```
World's third naval power in 1941, the Empire of Japan deployed arguably the best unit of Aircraft Carriers, building many from 1921 to 1945.
the IJN had, a lot

even had some converted from passenger-cargo ferries
Go away with that piece of trash site that rips my forum posts
I kinda find it, unorganised
It very much is.
imma find some other websites
While there were a lot of conversions particularly from liners, I don't think there were any that came from ferries nor cargo ships
yeah, I am referencing liners.
Ik it's been brought up already but naval encyclopedia is genuinely one of the worst websites on the topic of naval warfare on the internet
I see why
hella unorganised imo
It's utterly full of factual inaccuracies, weird claims and utterly absurd typos
Cue the picture of HMAS Australia photoshopped with a queen Anne's mansion
nevada labeled as arizona
Why is the Dutch flag upside down
Maps of Russia and Japan from the German Archives 
"You may be a king or a poor street sweeper but sooner or later you'll dance with the reaper."
At SHOT Show 2023 we got our first look at the Individual Weapon System, chambered in .264 Lightweight Intermediate Caliber Cartridge (LICC) - a round developed from .264 USA. Developed by FN America in response to a requirement from the Irregular Warfare Technology Support Directorate the new rifle looks to address many of the same questions as...
Hello
@manic latch square rifling 
Mega based
The worst i found on topic of Brazilian Naval History
Its the claim that our DEs served in the Pacific

lol
yaes

at 137km
wouldn't they be beyond the earth's curvature?
how much radar bouncing off horizon
would that entail
Inshallah turkish fighter will outrange the gods 🇹🇷 🇹🇷 🇹🇳 🇹🇳
i wanted to make the usual turkish emote joke but i dont think i can do it here
Turkish fighters much better than any western aircraft but also please sell us F-16s pretty please
Otto Dix was a German artist known for his unforgiving depiction of the Great War and the society of Weimar Republic. His works in the series Der Krieg (The War) are among the most well known depictions of the horrors of war. Together with George Grosz and Max Beckmann, he is considered one of the most important artists of the Neue Sachlichkeit ...
What is the name of the WWII German ship that snuck out of a Mexican port while a US ship was waiting for it to leave so they could blow it to kingdom come. The germans left the lights on a boat and snuck out in the middle of the night leaving the boat behind.
Like was it a Sea raider like the ship that sunk Australia's light cruiser in the Pacific or a Destroyer IDK what ship it was but I want to find its name lol
Bro I have no idea what you're talking about
The only part I understood was the sinking an Australian light cruiser
Oh ye that's the other 1 lol
Did any of her class stop in the Mexican port of Manzanillo?
Basically looking for another German ship that was in the Pacific and to tell historians something 90% of them claim is impossible and didn't happen. Other than the german tech finding its way to Japan and the "cruiser" Kormoran they deny Germany was ever there
SMS Havelland
H-51
Ohre class
Strange I cannot even find a pic of its class
I heard about it from people visiting the port of Manzanillo we found a newspaper article of the ship name and the only other thing I can find is its hull ID name and class with nation of origin
The US ship in Port was USS Erie PG-50
You're probably confusing their identity, The Ohre-class only started being built in 1983
Another note, I doubt the ship being SMS Havelland by the time of WW2
It wasn't an SMS but it was kriegsmarine
Idk it just says Havelland. Wikipedia says that name is registered to the Ohre class of the Kriegsmarine
We got Havelland from New York times
Same with USS Erie
Oh my bad just says german ships... so not sure what class then
Yeah strange how the ship has no written history on the internet other than a New York times article and a local story. I wander what kind of ship she was or what she did
Do you have a specific date that it left this Mexican port, or any other notes about its service history?
Also, which port?
Details are helpful for tracking this kinds of things down
Do you happen to have a picture of the article or a transcription of the original text?
There is also a wesser that has a similar story I believe
The germans left this as a distraction as they snuck away in the night
There was a mention of freighter Havelland
No mention if she was of any particular significance, nor if she was affiliated with kriegsmarine
"WWII German ship" from what I recall I am trying to find the NY times pic
Yeah, this is what is consistent with what I'm finding. We'd be talking about the steamship freighter Havelland, of the Hamburg-American Line (North German Lloyd). She was engaging in shipping 1,000 tons of sugar from the Gamboa, Rodriguez, Rivera Co., Inc., in the Philippines, intended for the Imperial Sugar Company. Upon the outbreak of war between the UK and Germany, she initally put at Punta Arenas, Costa Rica, but then Manzanillo, Mexico.
Prewar, and Erie left station months before Havelland left port, according to the link
The IJN Aoba, had an interesting history
Bombed thrice, sunk in the shallow waters of Kure Harbour, salvaged, than scrapped, rather than instantly sinking after being bombed twice.
also ordered war crimes
literally just got that book today as a birthday present
Nice, its a very good book ngl. I just finished it today and I already wanted to read it again lol.
yeah not too many good books on the RAN out there so hopefully it'll be to my standard lmao
There is like non out there lol
Ahhh yes
Write your own.
im planning on it


Maka 

Maka chan 
friendos
I was so excited to get email replies today.
But then I got to work
And it's a grind 
Lemme know when ur gonna get it published so that i can buy the first copy
Don't tell him about Collaboration horizontale
Twitter, no sign of intelligence
gone, reduced to atoms
There's also no wikipedia page dedicated to revisionist idiots on twitter
It's a long term thing probably years away
15-20
Sure there's pages about 5th collumnists, isnt it? 
I think i already told here a case of failed sabotage on the Parnamirim airfield
What if the Pearl Harbor attack still happened but no ships were lost
Most likely same shit, but the US has more ship
👍
Japan is having a very bad 1942
Indeed 
More marines and sailors would have been angry
I mean define lost
But no ship was sunk so
Doubt
Anger comes for revenge
If the difference is that Arizona gets sunk like the Colorados but is still recoverable, then the main difference is just that American naval bombardments in 1944 get to be a little bit spicier
More booms 
The thing that helped the USN was the nicely concentrated pool of samples they had to perform damacon studies on
And having a very sizable and solid destroyer and cruiser fleet
Being able to throw the Brooklyns into the yasen meatgrinder was helpful
Has to be said, it's not like the USN didn't have other battleships in 1941
It's just that they didn't really have the tanker capacity to support them in operations in the South Pacific, at least not until late in 1942 - and even then, they were focusing on using the fast battleships.
i doubt it tbh
the standards are effectively fodder in 1942
if they get meaningfully deployed at all the most likely change is the air fleet gets deployed to finish the job at sea instead
arguably worse in the long run, though that doesn't matter that much when you're the usn
No ships sunk
and the japanese battle line isnt?
it is
thats why they didn't do anything of real value
well, the kongos are nice because they can just run around with cruisers, and they dont have "never deploy these" syndrome
but fuso through to nagato is just... they exist
the massive cruiser engagements of the south pacific like the meat grinder of guadalcanal just cannot happen with an intact american battle line
i dunno, i see the most likely scenarios being the standards are kept well in reserve and rebuilt as normal or they're deployed early and the japanese carrier fleet dives on them at sea instead
i dont really see them making it to guadalcanal
or they get force z'd if we want to get really goofy
especially if you consider the context of >lmao dumb asians ambushed us with toy planes and got jack shit done, battleships are invincible
Eh, assuming midway goes normally
The Americans would have an active air presence in Guadalcanal compared to the Brits having
Hermes
what's the yasen meatgrinder
guadalcanal
night battles
or the wild AU where modern russian SSGNs show up in ww2
Again, for the reasons I stated above (tanker availability), it wasn't really feasible for the USN to deploy battleships to the South Pacific until late in 1942, and even then, it was only the fast battleships. This was in spite of having Standard type battleships available - not all were KO'd by Pearl Harbor, after all
There was also fundamentally not a huge amount of pressure to do so while Japan was holding back their battleships, which they were unwilling to risk before any 'decisive battle' appeared imminent (hence why they only made use of the Kongo-class battlecruisers).
Guadalcanal, the meatgrinder where Helena managed eating two torpedoes into nearly the identical spot in a single engagement
On top of another torpedo mauling her forward turret group
Or the engagement where ships suddenly got within a few hundred meters
where her damaged report used wording like her "hogging and sagging like a caterpillar" and that she was actively breaking up like a plane after getting hit by a missile
it was not a good time to be on helena
Well, usually that’s classified as the overall Solomons campaign, given the Japanese evacuated Guadalcanal about 5 months before Helena got triple teamed
Can't blame Lena, she lost like 3/4 of her bottom plating in that section
Ah well, but point stands that the USN had lotsa boats to throw at those hell holes

Also known as MQ-1 ye
Yeah was wondering why Yasen because the only Yasen I know is the Russian Submarine
“Hey my friend over there wants to talk to you but he’s nervous”
Andrei Pervodzany
uhh
its just a richelieu shell covered in knives
R9X but in a battleship shell?
ribbed for your pleasure
Nah I know one
gimme a minute
also there isn't anything scary about R9X
@manic latch my scariest shell picture
Super based Gangut
Today’s video is going to take a look at the discovery of E.R.A or Explosive Reactive Armour.
Used widely on tanks today particularly less developed nations… Its discovery dates back much further than is conveyed in most media sources today, Its origins have been forgotten.
This video will explore the truth and highlight who first made it and ...
Cool and good

Kam

Best of her class
🤝 

If you ever feel like a ship design is bad:
Remember that the Furious existed before her conversion
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/702690182184304691/1084594763078058105/image0.jpg
SAN DIEGO – The leaders of Australia and the United Kingdom will join President Joe Biden at the Navy’s submarine base in San Diego, Calif., Monday morning to mark a historic trilateral agreement aimed at bolstering security cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region. The plan to eventually sell Australia a handful of Virginia-class submarines – the...
oh shit yeah the aukus announcement is going rn

In September 2021, Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States announced AUKUS – a new security partnership that will promote a free and open Indo-Pacific that is secure and stable. The first major initiative of AUKUS was our historic trilateral decision to support Australia acquiring conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines (SSN...
auksus

can finally talk about aukus details now that they're public
this ship is the one that carried HMAS Canberra from Spain to Australia
Together we will deliver SSN-AUKUS – a trilaterally-developed submarine based on the United Kingdom’s next-generation design that incorporates technology from all three nations, including cutting edge U.S. submarine technologies. Australia and the United Kingdom will operate SSN-AUKUS as their submarine of the future. Australia and the United Kingdom will begin work to build SSN-AUKUS in their domestic shipyards within this decade.
US, UK, and australia are co-developing a new SSN that'll become the new standard for both the UK and Australia
in the meantime the US will sell 3+ Virginias to replace the Collins class
In order to deliver conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines to Australia at the earliest possible date, we intend to pursue the following phased approach, moving through each phase based on mutual commitments from each nation:
Beginning in 2023, Australian military and civilian personnel will embed with the U.S. Navy, the Royal Navy, and in the United States and United Kingdom submarine industrial bases to accelerate the training of Australian personnel. The United States plans to increase SSN port visits to Australia beginning in 2023, with Australian sailors joining U.S. crews for training and development; the United Kingdom will increase visits to Australia beginning in 2026.
As early as 2027, the United States and United Kingdom plan to begin forward rotations of SSNs to Australia to accelerate the development of the Australian naval personnel, workforce, infrastructure and regulatory system necessary to establish a sovereign SSN capability.
Starting in the early 2030s, pending Congressional approval, the United States intends to sell Australia three Virginia class submarines, with the potential to sell up to two more if needed. This step will systematically grow Australia’s sovereign SSN capability and support capacity.
In the late 2030s, the United Kingdom will deliver its first SSN-AUKUS to the Royal Navy. Australia will deliver the first SSN-AUKUS built in Australia to the Royal Australian Navy in the early 2040s.
well the US and UK are going to be forward-deploying submarines out of Australia
and SSN-AUKUS isn't just a new sub designed for Australia, it's a joint design with American tech that'll go into both Australian and British service

and Australia also gets 3-5 Virginias to replace the Collins, so if for some reason things don't pan out they still walk away with SSNs
so, the anglo accords were successful?
seems like it
also, I'm calling it the anglo accords because it kind of is, not because hurr durr angry french
it also sounds funny
A new gen. 🇰🇷optionally manned stealth tank with a remotely controlled turret with a 130mm gun and multi-role drones and missiles, and a new gen. wheeled IFV with a remotely controlled 30-40mm turret.
https://t.co/okNpLcyitK
they will never reach service
Isn't that the PL-1
o so the Aussies are getting second hand Virginia's
nobody wants wants a SK branded PL-01 either
there's no real point in low RCS ground vehicles
unless you plan on having your entire military be low RCS vehicles
I don't think they're going to be second-hand from what I've heard. would have to ask
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/102087614 could be new builds tho I've just seen it reported as secondhand in Australian media
"The Australian government will take three, potentially second-hand Virginia-class submarines early next decade, pending the approval of the US Congress."
Yeah I was under the impression they'd be new builds
hence the 2030s date
The US is gonna be investing a lot more into sub production capabilities but it'll take time to raise production rates
tankie online looking ass
Bruv it's literally Pl-1 v2
Starting on the mast and gun directors, just want to make sure, waht did Clev hav by 1942? 
Mark 34 director, no radar antennae as far as I recall.
Mark 37 director for secbat, need to examine if the Mark 12 radar antenna was installed yet.

So
Today i discovered the existence of Battleship Division 9
Until today i thought the only US Dreadnoughts sent during WWI were Nevada and Oklahoma
And maybe remembered of Texas
Something i liked learning about is that the ships of said division were all coal fired
Due to oil shortages
Which i can probably use as an argument against people who trash talk the DNOG saying its ships were crap because they were coal fired 
not much oil in europe at the time, but lots of coal
And they were roughly on the same age
All ships of the DNOG, except for Belmonte
Had already 8 years of age
Curious, where can I read more on the US logistics for the campaign and the like?
There's a US Military reported often stated that during the Pacific War, it took, on average, 6 men to keep 1 fighting and that grew in numbers and complexity with each difference.
Actually, the reason for the shortage wasn't a plan design failing, but a Germany First Policy and that included the Italians with the Royal Navy by that time actually being hurt up for Battleships and Carriers (sorry, playing the game as I type), hence the raid that destroyed the Normandie Dock.
I would note I didn't claim it was down to failure in planning - just that the capacity available for operations was insufficent to deploy the battleships. There were other priorities - namely, you have 'Europe first', but there's also just a higher priority for supporting carriers and cruisers, and less of a reason to be brininging the fuel-hungry battleships.
This paper talks about it to a degree;
Thanks.
I think I should've specified I was asking abt which radars were on the masts, and it does seem the radar antennas on all four directors are present in her 1942 config 
A wee bit hard to see and at work: but from stem to stern:
Mark 37 director w/Mark 4 radar
Mark 34 director w/Mark 3 radar
Foremast: SG
Main mast: SC radar, faint traces of HF/DF
Rear directors as same as forward.
I see thanks 
I wonder what the point of darkstar would be
Economic deficit.
Cool factor
From Sireneracker on wows, apparently Dulin passed away
youch, o7
I hate twitter
(this was machine translated and i just fixed a couple of words so that's why they look weird)
whoops looked like we bombed ourselves with hundreds of japanese planes that the japanese admitted were theirs
My brain melted reading that, and now I am crippled 
I mean, even if it was indeed a bait the onus is still on the Japanese...
Italian flag in username

Gaslight him into saying Pearl Harbor was done by the poles
If he’s dented, at least have fun with it
they ended up claiming that the president supposedly knowing that the attack was coming is the same as doing the attack themselves
it was a self attack because I did it
Nanking would be good example
Pearl harbor is odd one
Ever seen a US battleship explode? No? Then how did Arizona explode? Checkmate
Do american export bb’s count?
I dunno how it is on the oversea people
But usually i know some twitters users with half a dozen flags on the user name

Nerfed
Ngl
I thought that the people saying "US attacked first because they sank a midget submarine near Pearl Harbour" were crazy
Now my "Crazy people" definition was updated
Su-27 didn't crash
It rammed prop of MQ-9
Didn’t they both crash?
US report said "almost causing crash of both planes"
Ah
No, only the MQ-9 ditched in the Black Sea
Yeah
I don’t have twitter
I've
It's been like
Months since i don't use
I promised that i would return
Because i've a dedicated profile about Brazilian Naval History
Aaaand
One month ago i was supposed to make my first post of the year
And i didn't 
Well
At least today i found something that gave me a little giggle
I was reading an edition of the RMB (Brazilian Maritime Magazine)
On an article about the life of Fábio de Sá Earp (well, part of his live, when he was a naval aviator)
And there was a small moment when he and other two aviators went to the cabinet of Admiral Alexandrino (minister of the Navy in that time)
To ask for a permission to dismiss the use of uniform on a health inspection for a volunteering for the UK
They had to wait for Alexandrino to arrive on its cabinet
When he did, he entered all smiley and happy and asked
"What's up, young men?"
Literary, (O que há, jovens?)
Mfw I’m a sailor on a great lakes freighter in 1913 on the middle of lake Huron when a November storm hits
true
Interesting how pi day is shortly followed by murder prominent italians day
clemson class ahoy
Fellow fourstacker DD
Maine in shambles
well, idk if she's literally a battleship, but she's indeed literally in shambles
Maine was an armored cruiser
we don't talk about the 16 battle stars that Portland has
Tfw you end up everywhere because you were just needed everywhere at all times
24kg at 825mps iirc
I estimate it's from 1910 or so but I have no info
Will parse the pictures at a later date

stunning wisdom from the usn in the late 60s
"dont put a jet with a nonfunctional radar into rotation"

http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-093.pdf
projectiles mass detonate?" The apparent answer is NO, they will not. If you
consider that there were a total of 18 possible acceptor projectiles on all
six shots, and that only two reacted in any way, an estimate of the
probability of reaction is 2/18 or 11%. (NOTE: Because of the limited number
of shots, this is, at best, a crude estimate).
In order for a reaction to be self-sustaining, i.e., propagate, the
reaction probability must be at least 25% (PD3 greater than 1/N, where N is
the number of nearest neighbors). Since our estimate (11%) is less than this,
the reaction chain is not self-sustaining--i.e., the reaction would die out.```
This has to do with the 16” HC being hit by shrapnell and exploding?
And if it would be able to set off other HC projectiles?
The 16"/50 round is shown schematically in Figure 1. The projectile empty case weight (including base plug and gas check gasket) is 1720 pounds. The projectile is filled with 154 pounds of Explosive D (Ammonium Picrate). The average wall thickness is 3 to 3 1/2 inches.
Previous NESIP (Naval Explosives Safety Improvement Program) work has investigated the sympathetic characteristics of 5"/54 projectiles loaded with both Composition A-3 and Explosive D. Those loaded with Explosive D failed to detonate even when in contact with a donor projectile; those loaded with Composition A-3 sympathetically detonated, even out to significant separations between donor and acceptor. The same held true for pallets of the ammunitionthose loaded with Explosive D do not detonate, those loaded with Composition A-3 do.
The 5"/54, 8"/55, and 16"/50 are a family of HC (High Capacity) shells, which have been loaded with Explosive D. The similarities between these three shells should afford a reliable way to estimate the 16"/50 behavior, based on the 5"/54 and 8"/55 data. A comparison of all three projectiles is presented in Table 1.
If one HC shell confined in a magazine exploded high-order, would it cause the other projectiles in the magazine to also detonate
As in, the shells are all right next to one another
But was this really a surprise?
It tracks from other wartime data I know
So not a surprise per se, fits my priors
But more evidence in a more consistent test environment is pretty interesting nonetheless
Is there a listing of cap weight
“Sympathetically detonated”

Composition A-3 is a later war filler used for AA projectiles for a greater lethal radius (~50% greater)
But less safe compared to Explosive D
97 lbs
Just the AP cap right? Not the windscreen?
positive

@spiral cedar don't be brittle
But it seems pretty clear that Japanese AP performance was still poor. Brown strongly criticizes the Royal Navy, which observed this war closely from the Japanese side, for failing to recognize the implications of the Japanese shell failures.```
TL;DR
what sank Russian battleships at Tsushima was -as I have long been saying- flooding damage caused to unarmoured sections close to the waterline of Russian battleships by large caliber (12") shells in combination of overwhelmed damage control due to the fires set by Japanese bursters
Moreover, because of the long range at which the Russian BB's opened fire (14-15k yards!!), British observers argued that British ships should open fire at 20k yards! in future combat
comparably, the USN wasn't considering battle ranges over 6k yards as relevant, as did the MN

at the time, right?
in 1905 ofc yes
also
using the performance of the russian fleet at the tsushima as a baseline for comparison is ehh
I am only looking at the performance of the shells and armor
Richy
If all Russian shells penned their hits during battle
Would battle change
Russian shells, closely modelled to French shells (331.7 kg light shells) using wet pyroxylin (guncotton)
penetrated Japanese heavy armor and detonated behind the armor as well
(ofc the dud rate was significant, but nothing unusual for that era)
after this
Russia also wrongly concluded that they needed heavier bursters and ships with more spaced armor and a more armoured waterline
quite sad

also
that brings up another point, actually
to what degree did the revolution influence ship design
or more specifically, the mass purges following the revolution
apparently Mikasa was firing AP with the left barrel and HE with the right 
Soyuz is still carrying this Tsushima lessons.
Armored waterline belt, larger armor belt for magazines
the waterline belt is more of an icebreaker krem
Aint that kinda high for that
ice is deep
Damn

it influenced Russia to seek help from foreign navies
particularly the Italian navy
Soviet shipbuilding is sort of a mixture of the 1914 Russian navy and the Italian navy of the interwar
we literally set up your largest shipyard
and gun manufacturers

Obhukov beloved
refuses to make BB guns
how to CV a canarias
ngl that looks cool as fuck tho

one of the few things which did
British design right
Tsesarevich had an armoured waterline
French Fren
and I believe some of the older Russian pre dreads had them too
I want someone to draw a manga of the battle of Tsushima
with a manga pannel showing the penetration and bursting of a 12" shell in a crew compartiment

AOT won't have shit on that
Since when eaten Alive is less scary than a 12" shell death
btw
Nisshin was hit by 6 12" russian shells
and of her 4 8" gun barrels, 3 were cut by the shells

She still survived?
yes
Hacker
She was running Last Stand
What if
disarms the ship literally
makes boarding party to capture

honestly
if the russian bb's had had armoured waterlines (specifically oslyabaya and Aleksandr III), the result would've been a lot different
(probably)

(can't say for certain as the fires are still a factor)
Do you have a good book/paper on the Tsushima damage
Campbell's from warrior to dreadnought has some great detail
but I've been looking for a project to do in my free time
and I think I will make a detailed breakdown (including plans of the ships to show damage)
kind of like the Sodak damage analysis on navweaps

Tsushima is a beautiful case study of good vs bad shells as well as good vs bad armor (with bad armor I mean lack of armoured waterline)
having an armoured waterline in the pre dreadnought age is simply too important since the lack of TDS forces you to focus on improving the protection against shells hitting directly
we all know what a mine/torp would do to a pre dread anyways
look at Irresistible, Bouvet, Ocean 10 years later
and look at Navarin, Sissoi Velikiy at Tsushima
(although Sissoi sank after scuttling herself)
it's important!!!
what's TDS
torpedo defence system
ah ok
(don't tell the germans this, but Lutzow's sinking was also due to having too little waterline armor)
(100mm is not enough for stopping lyddite whompers)
I find Tsushima fascinating
cursed image
K-1000
don't
Cool

found ballistic test results on the nickel steel/compound armor plates of the Italian ironclads

Yes thats the article
Goalkeeper better
Canberra moving into position for the International Naval Review, in Hampton Roads, Virginia, United States, 12 Jun 1957...
Oh yeah, some thing from my visit today.
There was a treasury room with among it a complete set of Kabuto samurai armour set up.
You know how those always look imposing in many media
Well, it's different in real life.
In movies they're always viewed from low angles to look as imposing as possible.
For a Dutch person looking at something medieval Asian sized, it looks very cute.
it was one thing I considered when making maka the character and I was afraid I might make her seem too tall if she was my height
since she would tower over japanese soldiers
ngl I always get confused when I read anime character hights.
'and here is our protag, skullfucker mcgee, height: 5'1'
be 6 foot tall asian
"bro why aren't you in a basketball team?"
"you're so tall for an asian"
See
It took me a few seconds to get what you meant Qwerty
Because 6 foot is perfectly average.
In my rural area that's even on the short side.
it is, but not for asians
Not even that, my forehead is flat from constantly bashing against metro door
Heck, the ad display/screen thing on the carriage is even lower than 6 foot level I think
The door is nominally 1850mm high, but your gait most likely account for more than 50mm when you're disembarking into lower platform

Is she...a Tennessee?
No , it's a spud.
Ah
Those are single 5"/38s.
Just arranged in a manner that appears like a twin. Cool factor.
Doubly confusing is that one of the single mounts is hidden inboard.
Always thought it was four mounts per broadside and then
Concealed weaponry smh
Oh that's goofy
Interesting that ejection chutes are used too
..which are apparently common on the single mounts. huh.
The Mark 28/32 twins typically only had hatches.
It me 
Long range math

years have we waited
while wargaming jebaited
delivered at last
(also yes it has the thunderbolt mount)
colo... but secondary built
Unfortunately very inaccurate in game.
yeah, wg moment
The better the "sigma" value, the better the dispersion over range.
Colorado is at 2.0, WeeVee is at a pissing...1.7.
though wv being t7 was like, uhhhhh
so I guess???
So no trashing Fuso over long range memes
idk, wack decision dominoes
Instead, sail closer and hit them with your sword 5"/38s
mmm yis battleship that showed some of the best accuracy of the war
1.7 sigma
you all do know that the citadel on WV 44
is easier to hit
so like GLHF up tiered
it should be harder to hit due to amagi tds syndrome
fair point... put let's be honest
there's going to be a lot of whales for that
who will sit broad
You already have two over here
Good, more whales the better
Give a monkey a WV44, I want to do good in her
well time to bring out the CV and make them even happier
@slow raft obligatory ping, if you are the same person I knew back on KNTAI.
hm, they're not in the kntai discord, but maybe they just left
oh yeah anyone who currently plays wows... how's CB's going?
He was Tashkent if I recall
poggo
restricted overmatch BBs kinda bs XD
but i mean... gotta have less people getting full to 0'ed in CBs ig
When WG is lazybones about most of it? Yes.

Idaho my beloved
with wv 44 I am eating well, and lots of standard pics here
I also found a new picture of Lorraine
Experience the final moments of the Queen Elizabeth Battleship, HMS Barham, when it was struck by torpedoes from a German submarine during World War II which resulted in a terrifying explosion. This archive footage was remarkably captured by Pathé News cameraman, John Turner, on an adjacent ship.
For Archive Licensing Enquiries Visit: https://...
this hits different, seeing a real ship go up in flames
When we going to get Wyoming where they replaced the 356mm turrets with 127s
Wyoming at that is AG-17 focused on training AA personnel
Even her armoured belt is stripped, so sending her out to any actual combat scenario is just very no
Same with the Wolverine and Sable
Make it T3 premium
Strictly for training
i know 
would be fun to see it used how it's not supposed to be used... like half the boats in wows...
Most naval vessels in WoWS are actually designed for their role, dumb as their design/in contradiction to their nation's respective doctrine may be
so worcester rushing cap... is it's design? jkjk
Can't fix idiocy.
lol yeah but I hear ya..
Uss Wolverine’s original form
ah
This is why I hate all carrier conversions from civilian ships
hmm what was that river boat that like sort of sank in the chicago river then was bought by the US navy and turned into a gunboat??
that got turned into a CV???

that... disgusts me...


The great lakes
Cyclops is a collier anyway
Honestly, the wackier conversion is that italian one
Strap 2 DD hulls together, paste a flight deck on top
French ship Supremacy
please tell me this only stayed as a napkin sketch
Naturally.
so i figured out it was the SS eastland that got bought by the Navy and turned into the USS Wilmette
Don't hold your breath, catamaran CV design concepts still coming back from time to time
wasn't there some stealth catamaran vessel design thing??
You’re probably thinking of Toulon, and even then that was barely half the navy and mostly cruisers and DD’s
Alexandria and Dakar forces eventually joined the Free French Naval Forces.
And hence the lengthy refits in the US in 1943.
PT boat radar
I can’t believe it
Its definitely just for manufacturing the 152mm shells, trust me
Not going to Dahlgren
What naval air force in ww2 used air-to-surface rockets other than the USN?
The RN
Did the axis use any?
British RP3
German WGr 21
BR 21
Soviet RS82
Ohka is technically a rocket, but ...
Tashkent reporting!
Yeah I saw the post on reddit, and I'm pretty pissed they made her a secondary battleship.
Mhm. Things arent looking good.
Gonna have a peek at her when people get their hands on her model.
Because you know, the ship that hit Yamashiro on the first Salvo at Surigao, the pride of the gunnery competitions in the Pacific fleet....1.7 sigma and 235m dispersion
I stopped playing warships and uninstalled when Renown 44 was announced, I'm still pissed about that
Both Renowns' models aren't accurate either, if it's any consolation...
War Thunder datamine has her, but somehow someone was stupid enough to use fridge doors for the tubes instead 
And laughably, neither is Repulse

I'm more upset that they decided to use Renown 1947 for both her A and B hull and pretend that AA mattered enough to not give us her full complement of DP secondaries
Truly repair and refit needed
Should be Renown 1945, her secbat was gone in Jan 1945
And B hull...yea, no.
She was scrapped in 48 so I just picked a date between 45 and 48 tbh.
Her camouflage tried to mimick that of the Pacific Fleet, so 45 should be about right
But yes, incredibly stupid
At least back in the day the devs and the balancing people at least pretended to give a damn about history and tie it into the ship in some way.
And while Maka loved the new branch of US BBs, can't say I do, even if I love clipper bows and the like
Kansas and Minnesota just burns my eye
They're OK, but not what anyone asked for or needed
Well, that's WG for you.
Still, figured I'd give you a headsup.
And if by chance you're interested in some standard goodies, I recently got my hands on the booklet plans of a couple of them.
Shame that only the hull lines of WeeVee was found.
Here, FYI.
Only top deck view 
Likely as the booklet was for the yard, detailing the modifications made to her upperworks?
Just guessing
Or likely didnt survive - some pages are pretty badly damaged on some booklets.
Some parts of Pensacola and Nevada's were either torn or very badly faded.
yeah they did them dirty but I like them too much to be entirely offput
Understandable
I wish I could find a solid set of plans of USS Narwhal or Nautilus
I know HNSA has one of them as built but I really need to find ones that detail some of the interior.
Or the equipment under the gun deck
Sadly I don't know if I can contact Mare Island to see if they would have it or who they would have sent them to. Maybe whatever became of BuShips?
Aha, it appears I'm on the right track.
Yeah, finding anything on them original is very difficult
Been building a 3d model of them (and Argonaut) and it's been a slog collecting references
Need Argonaut's? I've got hers.
Well, I'm going to guess this isn't far from her keel laying date
What is the Most Unknown Battleship ever made?
Depends on where you're from
but really, none. Battleships by default are expensive assets, with extremely wide media coverage.
Aquidaba
@maiden citrus Pennsy 1945 BoGP
Brazilian ship?
and now if you'll excuse me, I'll get the eye gun
Just found a Baltimore's BoGP, regarding this discussion
Of course it's Helena 
@eternal veldt
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/53484613
The online portal to the records held at the National Archives, and information about those records.
grumbles in having to email or call the national archives
Don't live in the US unfortunately, so no dice for me. 😛
My wife and I were planning on going to Washington DC anyway....Maybe I can convince her to go archive diving with me
Peek around and see if Spring Styles book 2 is buried somewhere, will you? 😉
They found Spring Styles Book 4 recently afterall.
Yes
This is especially useful since V-4 through 6 had similar towers as built, and one of the hardest references to find has been how the deck is laid out behind the fairwaters and how they correspond with the hatches.
It's also interesting to note that no reference is made on these plans of the auxiliary periscope located on the for'd part of the tower that went to the control room that was supposed to be used for specific scenarios, hence why the main scopes are labeled #2 and #3.
It was deleted from the V-5 group, as it was completely useless
Glad it helped then. 😄
I emailed the archives about SS-168, there seems to be a lot of plans for Nautilus lying around
Thanks to Factor75 for sponsoring today's video. Go to https://strms.net/ConeofarcFactorMarYT50 and use code POGCOAMAR50 for 50% off your first box!
Today we look at the infamous Porsche Tiger. Widely regarded as an abysmal failure prone to fires and unable to even climb a slight slope much of this tanks legacy is made up of myths and misconcep...
Naisu
The U.S. Army's ITEP engine is delayed again, raising questions for the Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft program's schedule.

Across Europe, non-Germans are filling the ranks of Heinrich Himmler’s forces. These foreign fighters certainly don’t meet the racial standards of the SS but times are tough and the Reichsführer-SS needs warm bodies. So, does that mean Himmler’s given up on the idea of a Germanic master race? Not at all. And he uses all sorts of twisted esoteric...
Damn he actually made a video about it
This one?

In that day that Aquidabã exploded
The minister of the Navy (Admiral Júlio de Noronha) was on board of one of the cruisers at the bay
And one of the casualties was his own son, Midshipman Mário de Noronha
Magazine explosion
That was on January 21st, 1906
But how
Well
The causes of the explosion were never fully elucidated
One hypothesis point for a cordite explosion

-- GET 25% OFF THE STUKABOOK HERE: http://stukabook.com --
(15-20 March 2023)
The Junkers Ju 87 Stuka dive-bomber is popularly remembered to be an extremely accurate aircraft, able to lob bombs straight on bunkers, tanks, and ships. But how accurate was it really? Thanks to new data from the archives, we are able to figure this out and answer t...
She sunk at the Baptista das Neves Sound
https://www.naufragiosdobrasil.com.br/naufaquidaban.htm
Did you also know that she was torpedoed during the Armada Revolt? 
@spring briar
Why is the French naval ensign 30-33-37 parts blue white red and not equal
i thought that was a fork
It's to make it appear as if the flag is equally proportioned when seen from a distance
Optical illusions
Oh because of the blue being attached to the pole?
I think so, yeah
The "culprit"
Torpedo boat "Gustavo Sampaio"
In a new deal with Sweden, the British Army will receive modern artillery platforms to replace those supplied to Ukraine.
"Archer fires further and faster than any artillery system previously in service with the British Army."
Read more: https://t.co/vb1WxY5Ejp
1200
135
The State Department authorized the potential sale of Tomahawk missiles to Australia, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency announced today. The deal is for as many as 20 Block IV Tomahawks and 200 Block V Tomahawks for $895 million. “This proposed sale will support the foreign policy and national security objectives of the United States. Aust...












