#history
1 messages · Page 67 of 1
Suzuya is longer, has more torpedos, 2k hp more horsepower
From ten to eight boilers, my bad
Shit
That's Oriskany, not Sao Paolo
Sao Paolo has only one bridle catcher, fell for that one today
I have been thinking and
What superiority Abrams A2 has over LeopardA6?
Faster acceleration and more silent engine for %100 parts
But armor or penetration is a classified info
Leo 2 is faster irrc. Both has 42 ammo
Superiority? None really.
Thanks to MagPul for sponsoring this video! I was happy to use one of their new Daka Grid rifle cases today - it's a very cool system that will be of great use for me both because of its modular configurability and its excellent security.
https://utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons
http://www.floatplane.com/ch...
does this countas the f-22's first A2A?
yes
Over Latin America
China's done this before
It's just the longest it's been over the US
fr?
Yes
You got anything from the other ones
Nope
Right now? None that the US knows of/has announced, besides the Latin America one
ah ok
F15E was also there
Could be her as well
Video, and now official comms state F-22
F-22 with an AIM-9X
When USS Independence encountered a full-rigged ship in 1962, the carrier signaled to ask the vessel to identify itself. “Training ship Amerigo Vespucci, Italian Navy,” was the response.“ Independence replied "You are the most beautiful ship in the world.” #SeaStorySaturday
507
106
Soviet Union buying 406mm blueprints from other nations for Soyuz development
The 406 mm/52 gun designed by the Schneider company was initially conceived for the Soviet Union as a part of the "Franco-Soviet Treaty of Mutual Assistance" signed in 1935, which entailed military and technical cooperation. While France never produced 406 mm guns, it was interested in developing them due to an emerging global trend towards increasing the caliber of battleships' main batteries. In the spring of 1938, the Schneider company handed the gun designs over to the Soviet Union, and that was the end of the story for the project.
How does it compare to the 406mm of the Soyuz's
Irl wise
Well wouldn't be possible for Champ gun since they weren't build. So I will compare their wows stats
Champ gun gas better velocity as 850m/s while Soyuz is 830m/s
But Soyuz has heavier AP shell as 1,108kg while Champ is 900kg
Same deal with HE
Are these stats based on theoretical stats from the irl designs
No clue. Should ask Rich about it. Not sure if anyone has blueprints public like WG does
But shell weight and velocity of wows is usually correct to irl stats or planned ones
But shell weight and velocity of wows is usually correct to irl stats or planned ones

WG mfs dont leak stuff
we WT mfs do
Not a SINGLE Dutch ship has a set of correct shell weight and velocity.

San Diego with the same guns
fires shells like 30% faster than Atlanta
usually correct, my ass
ISU-152 and Kv-2 has same gun and ISU fire way faster
That can be due to loading arrangements, crew space and ammunition storage locations.
Though it's still used as balancing factor.
i'm talking about
the shell velocity
just
no
WoWs armor schemes usually line up fairly well with reality
but even then
PLENTY of exceptions apply
My kV crew is way high level
my crew skill: french
are they fries
can reload a bb shell in 10 seconds one handed
Wish I had one of those mfs in my T-34-85
.....
Qwerty
You realise Velocity is not reload right?
Both has 792m/s..
Atlanta's arcs are way smaller
resulting in approximately 30% less travel time than Atlanta
you play wows right
you shoulda worded it better
like Shells travel faster instead

except their air drag coefficient is also different somehow
so actually, yes their shell velocities do diverge midflight
it's a fucking arcade game, never cite ballistics for it
Duh

Rich do smh
muh sap
What kind of alien auto loader yall stole from Area 51
when austin gets real reload for a few seconds
maka
this is .9sec reload
that's >720 rpm
it's firing faster than a browning
and what's closer to the 40rpm
0.9 second reload
or
7.5 second reload
.9 Would be more effective
because it would be broken if it had irl reload?
they gave it the mbrb gimmick so it can temporarily be powerful, and have to play passively for the rest of the time
sounds like their problem for putting it in the game
doesn't really matter anyway bc malta just kills you
at least the aa is good unlike le sherman
Malta,the CV?
malta in wows basically deletes any CL it sees on sight
because CLs were being too oppressive /s
Is it CV malta
yes
sherman aa is pretty good though since dds have a higher multiplier, even if wows aa values are just 'whatever came to me in a dream last night'
CV when in Wt
I do play air
Other than the fact that in ARB mfs press their funny buttons
and fucking yeet me from 5kms away
fr
mfs cant aim for shit
but theres no fun without Shvak cannons
Rate my China tree
eh, dd aa as a whole is still mediocre imo since it means you're being spotted
even a halland is scared of my midway
and now, louie louie
Highest i ever got was 50k
nice, very impressive
let's see paul allen's plane shot down count
(it's 80% fighters)
love how they finally nerf midway uu once i decided to get it
The homie who brough a Mig-29?
how do you play chi-ha without dying to stuarts
stock chiha
i hate stuart
I die to everything
Using the Soviet side feels natural to me so I just Soviet main china
maka, you play wt?
I find it the most fun part
How do you feel about the BP boat?
the br compression is just stupid tho
I don't play enough to know current things like that, I just have some US destroyers and gunboats
They Could improve the part where Early jets have to fight late cold war all aspect 30g jets
i mean
I didn't really have much interest in higher as the realism and balance is poor yeah
well, to paraphrase the captain of the Emden
"in land, an inferior force can hold back a superior force through tactics and land"
"on sea, you're fucked"
great quotes
like, in air you can at least leverage game knowledge to beat better aircraft
same thing in ground
what can you do in naval
in wows HE, fires and conceal help you even the gap
all 3 are irrelevant in WT, you are just gunnery target if you're smaller
gl with that
Snail bias
if your going to grind Israel
I'd just wait for a sale
and pick up the merkava II premium
I'm going for the J-7d or Mig-23ML
ah the top tier air premiums
J-8 is basically Mig-21 with extra engine
in regards to China
ballon
I'd wouldn't bother with the J-7D
I would just save money and torture yourself with the A-5C
where you can just bully A-10s
until you reach the F-16
yea fuck A-10s
then suffer with that until you get sparrows
99as
and the ATGM vehicle that would be good if you didn't get better in other trees
ground specifically
Sweden
best stock grind
and you get everything

No russian Bias
oh yea they get those
want a Leclerc or a Abrams in the near future
it will have it all
generally put
China I would avoid like the plague since its mid the tree
USA, Russia, Sweden and Germany
all good starter options
Thanks snail
top starter tree is probably Sweden tho
You get some russia and germany
you get the best leopard 2
with a better AA system
actual light tanks
and a good IFV
you also do not have to deal with stock HEAT
only on the CV90120
for some reason
because its a export vehicle

yeah it doesn't have the Swede doctrine excuse
oh right the finnish 2a6 has heat too
man what is up with the F-16s MFD
a single 7.62 to the rear of the plane will knock that thing out for no reason
Bias
also help me fix my air tree please
bombers are pog
Soviet bombers got big boom
Bomb bases
im pretty sure people in rank 1 don't know that you can manually shoot backwards in a bomber
yeet those bitches
in terms of Soviet jets
so they just tail you and fly perfectly still
not my hottest area
unironically have higher a2a kills in my sb2u than my fighters
I'm decently good at soviet jets

tho I'd bum rush the MIG-21
well, the ones without 12.7\
Mig-21s good
praise the m2
then go for the aircraft you need for the MIG-29
we dont get countermeasuers untill 21
I have more kills on my Il-2 than la-5s because it refuses to die
then I didn't start actually having fun with top tier air RB until I got about here with the F-4J
is rb like more popular than ab for air
what aboot props
Shvak mfs
war thunder ace combat but with worse controls
duly noted
prop RB
Unless godmode farming
i played ab and rb ground and it feels more or less the same imo
true story, i was about to kill this LVT controlling a plane until he kamikaze'd it into me
I don't really like arcade ground
since you can't really hide
and it just makes the issue with light vehicles getting to the best spots immediately even worse
You gotta spade you tanks some how
i heard someone claim, while listing a list of reasons why f-35Bs cant land on arleigh burkes in practice, that the thrust would damage the deck
\
ships have to be modified to be able to use the F-35B for that reason
🤨 tho if your considering flying F-35Bs off of Burkes at that point you might as well be turning cargo ships into makeshift aircraft carriers
Iran: Hold my beer
Imma try that with my spaded 2u let’s see
The crew of the U.S.S Texas in 1918
Remembers me of this picture here:
We really need to Texas in Azur lane

Cali, the ditzy battleship
burke flight decks arent heat resistant
you could theoretically put a heat resistant cover on the deck like a lot of US LHDs do
but you wouldnt be able to fit the aircraft in a Burkes hangar
so you'd be having a great time with sea spray effectively destroying the aircraft the moment the ship enters slightly worse and a flat calm sea states
im not talking about landing it im talking about keeping it there after its landed
if you're modifying a burke with a heat resistant deck you're clearly intending to operate the F-35
theres a big difference between the usn not giving a shit about sea planes getting washed off in heavy weather during ww2
and several fuckmillion dollar stealth kets in 2023
i was just considering how feasible it is for an F-35B needing to emergency land on a burke
doable in an emergency yes
the deck will need repairs but it can be done
The Alraigo incident occurred on 6 June 1983, when a lost British Royal Navy Sea Harrier fighter aircraft landed on the deck of a Spanish container ship. Its pilot, Sub-Lieutenant Ian Watson, was a junior Royal Navy pilot undertaking his first NATO exercise from HMS Illustrious (R06), which was operating off the coast of Portugal. Watson was lau...
after all
a harrier landed on a cargo ship
Lol

Operation Satanic II when?
@tough quail The Soviet ЭШ 6/45 Walking Excavator 
Not quite, out of the 250 years of history since 1772 Poland hates russia for at least 173 years of occupation, plus notably for communists - the war in 1920.
That said however, the significantly more relevant part of the period indeed is 1939-1989, it is not though "something russia did 30 years ago" but "something that ended 30 years ago and lasted for prior 50 years"
Now, you seem to be saying quite weird or drastic things. I don't blame you if you don't quite know the characteristics of Polish national identity or the modern-times direction course in relation to other countries or modern Polish perspective towards some of them, as horse doesn't seem to know either 
So to address some of the things above:
rare fox alo appearance
he heard polish
- Starting from the simplest - I take it that Sweden part was mostly a joke, as it should be. Indeed the Deluge is right up there with WW1 and WW2 as the most devastating events for Polish lands, people, and culture. However, XVII century is significantly more distant from the other examples and is the only historical period when there even were any negative interactions between Poland and Sweden at all, before or since. In fact XVII century is probably the only period when Sweden was a major European player in the first place. So due to lack of bad blood Sweden is very much absent from any modern anti-national rhetoric and is just a country and economic partner as any other
"I am a Pole" - Fox
I decided to visit ALO history instead of your mother for a change
ba dum tss
(Norway and Finland though both exist more in common consciousness as Fins are the based wódka friends, while Norway is a great seasonal working destination)
- Now, the Germans... the Germans - The memory of Nazis and what they had done obviously exists, as it should. However, there is a a general awareness that Germany has been in fact denazified years ago (you know, unlike the country that made you mention Germany in the first place). And a subtle distinction between economical cooperation and political one - by the end of the day Germany is the European economical powerhouse and is right next to Poland, the direction for decades has been to firmly establish and expand economical cooperation/import/export of various sorts in various sectors and Germany is Poland's top market partner. And that is how it should be and that isn't ass licking. Political relations meanwhile have the catch of Poland always conceal-carrying a knife in case Germany gets any weird idea or just stares at them wrongly.
So is it like sticks and carrots thingy?
Say if Russia had a economic "closeness" with Poland starting from 1995. Would you guys still carry this hatred or choose to forget/forgive like Germany?

Would've helped Russia if they hadn't spent decades trying to hide just how much they were involved in the invasion of Poland
When did they finally admit to the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact?
1990?
Well if it's was 1990 then it's Russia as you said. Soviet Union was at its end
That said though there are political groups in Poland that rely heavily on anti-German rhetoric for one malicious reason or another. One of them is a fringe right-wing group that might even have monarchist elements, heavily populated by nutjobs... and also displays uncanny russian bias and is generally considered to have had a number of high-rank members on russian payroll, so go figure.
The other is the current (not for long) ruling party that has strong totalitarian tendencies/desires. From there are for example the guys suddenly flaunting the "germony big 1 trillion reparations". The malicious reason to use anti-german rhetoric and bring up nazis is really to conceal their own totalitarian desires - they hate the fact that EU looks at their hands so they have to have anti-EU/anti-German attitude politically, at least when dispensing propaganda (because by the end of the day they don't and won't resign from economic stuff with Germany actually, but they just need the nation to believe that they can not be made accountable by EU in any way, even when it comes to the money coming strictly from EU)
No
it is not like that

Without dipping into modern politics too much, there are still defenders of that pact in high ranking Russian politics
"the pact never happened but it was beneficial"
yar har har
I mean, is it really hypocrisy to try and get every bit of benefit?
Bean
Scheider did rebore a 340 into 406 tho

but did they rebore deez
Ilulu is cute but you like lasagna 
Ww2 started 1939 and ended in 1945
WW2 started in 1937 and ended in 1945 
The Battle of Shanghai (Chinese: 淞滬會戰) was the first of the twenty-two major engagements fought between the National Revolutionary Army (NRA) of the Republic of China (ROC) and the Imperial Japanese Army (IJA) of the Empire of Japan at the beginning of the Second Sino-Japanese War. It lasted from August 13, 1937, to November 26, 1937, and was on...
There are a few options for the start date of WW2, depending on what aspects you want to emphasize. I just like to use 1937 because it makes people think about what is meant by the start of WW2
Me thirsty

thank you random individual very cool
Most people don’t talk about the war between China and Japan as it relates to WWII
they dont but they should
WW2 starting in 1939 is eurocentric and overall poor historigraphy
define "most people"
people who for some reason intentionally omit it
or people who simply don't know because their education failed to mention it
I’m pretty sure the war in China only ended with the collapse of Japan at the end
something something 1949
in history classes in the west, WW2 started in 1939
in Western countries involved in the Pacific war you might see a mention of Japans invasion of China in 1937
but it isnt the start date of WW2
like... yea... but I can quite remember from my own education that Sino-Japanese war was brought up (and some context for China in the interwar period, but not earlier) and it being a possible alternate date
japan invading china wasnt as important because china wasnt a neutral country
there are certain two countries where some people seem to believe that the war only started in 1941 
thats why 1939 is the widely accepted date
?
It wasn’t a neutral country?
ill explain better
belgium was agreed upon in the 1800s to be a neutral country
nobody can invade it
poland was a country that had already been split several times
so when both of them were invaded, europe responded
Poland wasn't in a state of diplomatic neutrality before WW2
whereas china was a country on the other side of the world that nobody really cared about
There it is
The invasion of Belgium was in 1940
yes thats my point
There’s the Eurocentric mindset lmfao
Lmao
people saying that 1939 is the start date of WW2 is eurocentrism
but by that logic... Poland was a neutral country as well because they still had valid in 1939 non-aggression pacts with Germany and russia from few years prior
belgium and poland response is eurocentric
im agreeing with yall 
Oh, I see
people acting under the erroneous belief that China is somehow less important than Europe
I thought you were disagreeing lol
Yes, you’re correct
if you agree then I don't understand your point
i get your point now
WW2 started in 1941 because the war in Europe and the war in Asia were only unified into one larger conflict in Dec 1941 
no i agree that 1939 is the eurocentric date because poland and belgium were invaded around that time
the eurocentric view of WW2 is being challenged in historical circles and I'm sure that we'll see history curriculums rewritten in 10 years or so
or maybe it wont happen because of 2nd cold war tensions
we'll see
It would be nice
poland and belgium are in fact in europe
WWII started in 1931, who’s with me
what the fuck happened in 31
Ww2 started with WW1 
Beer hall push?
WW2 started with the unification of Germany

what the heck is up with Belgium
Isn't WW2 1939 because other nations didn't really give a fuck about China's suffering while waged war on Germany for invading nation?
are you mistaking WW1 Belgium with WW2?
Pretty much
both are similar situations
so you were talking about WW1 Belgium?
Nanking
I don't understand
I thought it was 1939 because it's the moment the wars weren't regional anymore?
after belgium gained its independence france and uk both wanted control over it, so they proposed a neutrality similar to switzerland's
Then again the US did still call the wars regional 
Japan conquers Manchuria
im still talking about wwii
ok, but Belgium in WW2 was invaded right before France, 8 months after Poland
Or, rather, a rogue part of the IJA overruns Manchuria and Japan decides to keep it
WW2 started at the Battle of Tsushima
...
so why do you even mention it
there is like 3 other countries invaded in between Poland and Belgium even
i mention it because it happened much later than the japanese invasion of china
but is not considered a date by anyone
and it was the most influential invasion after germanys invasion of poland
because of the truce that germany broke
so poland, then belgium
but it is not a relevant date for any consideration of the beginning of the war and is way apart from the date in question, so I just don't get why you list those in a single breath
Polands gets invaded
UK and France declares war on Germany for it
= WW2 
While there was a China vs Japan thingy before but I doubt anyone making war declaration like this for China
The only reason to hold 1939 over 1937 is if you think any war involving the British Empire is inherently a world war
The Japan vs China ‘thingy’ is a pretty big deal imo as it relates to the war
ww2 started in 1914 because it was just a continuation of ww1 after a temporary ceasefire 
im just quoting foch, ofc
But let's say Germany didn't pulled a funny. Would that conflict spread to other nations still?
im not sure how Poland being invaded by Germany is any more global in scale than Japans invasion of China
most likely yes
since japan wants to nom
Let's say Japan didn't fight with China in 1937. Would the European conflict become a world war?
Japan started shit in the pacific without any substantial pushing from Germany
If any war involving the British Empire is a world war, then you can make that argument that 1939 has priority over 1937. But you then need to list a lot of other wars as world wars
the only reason why people consider 39 the start of WW2 is because they saw WW1 as a european conflict - except for the fact that WW1 also saw combat in Africa, the Middle East, Pacific and Asia

Fair 
7 years war is the WW0
World war season 3 when

I could try to make a point about only from September 1939 the war actually being "world" because only then were countries from beyond a single continent
...except it kinda falls apart due to the fact that the only reason for that intercontinental involvement being French and British overseas territories and dominions, where fighting didn't even take place (until Italy joins)
and it being then inconsistent with other conflicts whose dates are from inciting incidents and not from the day Brits or French join in
nowadays I often see the term "Beginning of the War in Europe" rather than just "Beginning of the War, period"
Clearly the Falklands War was WW3 because Britain was involved
which at least doesn't elevate it above "Beginning of the War in Asia"
ARGENTINA WORLD POWER
The empire was no more
no more world wars
It all eventually became an interconnected conflict. It didn’t start that way. Only in 41 did the pieces get lynched together
because british empire doesn't exist?
They still had HK

well they had that island still, which is in South America, so it was an intercontinental conflict
Not anymore
I meant at the time of the Falklands
But a part of that conflict started in 37, so we should say that the war started in 37
Not today ofc
True
Ok so
Argentina was the last to join ww2
in august 27th, 1945
Therefore, WW2 started in 1945?
No that’s not what I’m saying
so major powers only?
I’m just saying that a piece of the conflict (that eventually became connected to all the others) started in 37 with the full scale Japanese invasion of China
There were two main theaters of WW2, the European and Asia-Pacific. The former did not merge with the latter into one overarching conflict until 1941. I think that’s a valid point of view
should we change the start date (when all major powers became involved) to 15?
Ww2 gang
I’m not at all saying that we should say the war started in 41
the funny thing with not mentioning 1937 in USA is that it is considerably more relevant to the context of USA entering the conflict than 1939
In regards to the eventual US entry into WW2, 1940 is more relevant than 1939
I’m saying that the sino Japanese war is connected to all the conflicts that make up wwii and that we should call that the start of the war
WW1 is only really called a world war because there was no counter to eurocentrism at the time and the name has never had a serious challenge
But the Second Sino-Japanese War started in 1931 
I mean
wwii start date as 1941 because thats when us got involved 
it really was for all intents and purposes a localised European conflict with a relatively minor theatre in the middle east
And USSR
the war saw frequent guerilla conflicts, the palestinian conflict, the siege of tsintao, the seizure of various pacific islands, etc.
like, ok, in Europe obviously 1939 is way more relevant, I think we can agree on that. But for USA it is like... might pick from either, one certainly makes more sense for the context of their own start
well it was initially just called The Great War, so
it wasn't really Eurocentric at first, because it didn't claim "World"
WW1 in the Pacific and Asia ended in 3 months
So rename WW2 to ww1?
it was barely a front
it had no impact on the war whatsoever and absorbed almost no resources for any combatant
I feel like wwi should just be called the Great War
Wwii is, in many way, the sequel to that war. And it was much bigger, and actually on a global scale. Ww2 was a world war but ww1 was not
it was retroactively renamed into World War 1 after the second war was legit a World War
Is iraq not in asia?
In Asia
the middle eastern theatre, as mentioned, was a more significant front and more relevant to the combatants of WW1
imagine a different timeline where they are in fact called "The Great War" and "The World War"
Would make much more sense lol
instead of shorthanded to heck "WW1 and WW2"
gw and ww
what next, WWW?
Either way people died

WWE
World war,season 3
the actions in Africa were again minor and relatively uninvested in by the major combatants
wkwk
The US dropped Batista Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
world wars grass
WW1 remains a European conflict first and foremost
relatively minor, yes, but also somewhat unprecedented to even see them involved in an otherwise eurocentric conflict
Europe= The world 
that is in fact the idea im challenging here
also America joined in in 1918, which would explain why postwar people called it a WW since the Americas also got themselves involved
.
and where did the Americans fight
im not debating the fighting took place 90% in europe
not just post-war, basically until WW2 it was The Great War?
Ain's that coming from "civilized world" being the true world or smh
i'm just trying to explain why people called it a World War
not necessarily trying to justify it
because it is pretty incorrect terminology
I feel like it was only called a world war after the Second World War
it was, actually
Gallipoli is in Asia right?
depends
Is turkey asia?
yes and no
yesn't
Past Istanbul. Yes
it is on the eastern side of the strait, so when Turkey controls it it is Asia 
if it was on the western side of the strait it would be in Europe
so the town of Gelibolu is located on the European side of the Dardanelles
or if Byzantine Empire controlled it, then it would also be considered Europe still
7 years war
however the Gallipoli campaign was fought on both sides

World war,the prequel
the French fought on the Asian side and the Entente fought on the European side
the point i'm trying to make here, Hit, is that you have the Chinese, Japanese, Europeans, Aussies, Americans, Ottomans, Arabs, and Africans all fighting in one war
mostly European, and mostly in Europe, yes
but the diversity of combatants made people after WW2 call it WW1
so Europe it is
Y’all bozos
that, along with the fact that it's pretty obvious WW1 led to WW2
the French abandoned the Asian side after a few months and redirected their forces to the European side and to other fronts
Feel like this is the main reason they call it wwi
Franco-Prussian War of 1871 led to WWI
unfortunately in my trip to Gallipoli I wasnt able to search for the abandoned French Gallipoli memorials
wasnt there nearly long enough
Thx for trying 
i wanted to spend a few days on the peninsular but i was overruled by family
would Japanese say it is a town of ||Gelb00ru|| 
The migrations of humans out of Africa 200000 years ago led to ww1
that and like 30 other things
but most people attribute WW2 in europe starting because "hitler and germany angy"
go to #memes
👀

fox has been gone for quite a while i see
Say. If Earth and 3 other planet was against 2 other planets
What war would that be called
Space wars?

Great space war?
Krem
Solar war 1
it would probably end up being called "[something] revolution"
Didn't Reagan did Star wars
one of the abandoned french memorials at Gallipoli

WW2 started because Japan was broke after the Russo-Japanese War
theres a decent few there as far as im aware

Right I was in Drach’s server a couple days ago and they literally said Britain carried ww1
does france have an equivalent to the commonwealth war graves commission maintaining french war graves overseas
Not sure
There are a lot of reasons for the start of wwii lol
We could start by saying that human beings are terrible
because if so y'all need to get them to do their fucking jobs
Bazinga
it would just be a difference between direct reasons and indirect reasons and context of the situation that led to certain developments prior
Hitler had a bad sandwich and he was feeling grumpy
Homie went broke cuz he didn’t draw anime titties
chatgpt sucks at analyzing ballistic data
Shocking
The H-39 battleship would be relatively effective at resisting the South Dakota's main armament, with the immunity zone stretching out to 36,000 yards. However, it should be noted that the immunity zone calculations are based on certain assumptions and may not accurately reflect real-world performance.
Unbelievable
crappy ai
cant believe i paid 10 billion dollars for this
do you think best buy takes refunds
Sounds like it
10 dollars of store credit at best
What happened here
was eating in a restaurant and one of the owners came up to us and told us our ancestors were very brave
thats Anzac cove
where the Australians and New Zealanders landed on the 25th of April 1915
The ultimate take away from all of this should be that war fucking sucks
The beach has shrunk in the last 100 years
I though I saw a mammoth

seeing rows and rows of graves was an experience indeed
thats just like a tiny amount of the graves at Lone Pine
I get the war is hell tho I can’t really agree with the bigger loser and smaller loser take since there’s conflicts you can apply that to and conflicts where you cannot
i got more pictures on my dslr but 6 months later i still havent been assed to get the pictures off it
i mean, plenty of wars had pretty clear winners, who were ultimately better off in the long run because of it
for example most of the colonial conflicts during the age of colonization where the Europeans made off with all of the wealth of the natives at little cost
or WW2 where the US ended off in a much better place than it started
that is not a takeaway, that is a basic reaction of an intelligent being that is not dependent on the war in question
it forgoes the analysis of why a specific conflict happens and how it is carried, which are more relevant takeaways for actually hopefully reducing the amount of conflicts in the future
I shoulda have worded it better
it is like saying "this movie sucks" and leaving a one star review
I meant in world war 2
The tragedies of war do no override its occasional necessity. But nor does necessity alleviate its tragedies
Yeah but there were definite winners in WW2
and the 407'000 dead americans were not winners
But the cost they paid
a cost was paid indeed Im not denying that
But for what it gained I’d argue the US was a definite winner
WW1 was really a fuck
60'000 dead in a foreign land for a few islands in the pacific
All infrastructure destroyed, no repayments
a cost paid indeed

don't you do tabletop ww2 games
why do you not know this
The soviets and Chinese took the biggest hits for WW2
well
as a percapita analysis,
Well USSR had more after effect
chinese maybe (but then, proportionally to their absurd population those big hits still look small despite their sheer numbers
The former USSR hasn’t recovered from the population loss to this day
but russians, just no lmao
Very big oof
the ussr was in control of a massive communist empire that challenged the americans up to the 80s
Shit came crashing down
they suffered greatly, but they also gained quite a bit from ww2 since they were effectively elevated to one of the top 2 world powers
Still never understood what British did with their Lend Lease. Since irrc they got more than Soviets did
honestly the USSR I’d say is a case of losing less
We got mitilda tanks
Or how ever tf you spell it
I mean as British getting from US
Sherman’s and Stuart’s were literally some of the main tanks in the British army
Planes food tanks
Alone – long before visiting these battlefields had become something of
a rite of passage for many young Australians – I wandered around, awestruck at the savagery of the terrain, how the cliffs rose all but straight from
the shore, how the trace of the trenches meandered in parallel lines so close
together, how some of the gullies they’d fought in and for looked rather
more like abysses to my eyes.
Standing on the beach below the spot known as The Sphinx, I noticed a
great deal of erosion in the landscape all around, and wondered about it
until I suddenly realised. That was not mere erosion, it was the scars of
thousands of artillery shells hitting those hills!
At Lone Pine Cemetery, amid all the gravestones marked with such
words as DUTY NOBLY DONE, HE DIED IN A FAR
COUNTRY/FIGHTING FOR/HIS NATIVE LAND, A MOTHER’S
THOUGHTS OFTEN WANDER TO THIS SAD AND LONELY
GRAVE … I noted an epitaph that quite shocked me, going something like
DIED IN A FOREIGN FIELD. AND FOR WHAT?
And American aircraft made up large proportions of the RAF
i'm still hyper mad about BFV getting canceled because in BF1 we had the Russian CW in 1920
i don't think any other fps covered that conflict
and i was holding out hope for a Chinese Civil War as a DLC to BFV, it fit perfectly

Did BFV died because of trailer and community shitshow or game was bad?
game was bad
Game ended up good in the end
game is good
worse than bf1, but still good
the initial release was a shitshow with the gamers having a gamer moment about women, and the devs basically acting like dicks inr eturn
I get sent to the gulag every match in wz2
BF1 was the peak I guess. Bf5 and the 2042...
but, they recovered all of their bad PR when the pacific DLC came out
people were loving that shit
then they canceled all development promptly after al marj encampment
the one smart thing maine ever said was about Australian reverse lend lease to the US
I personally can't choose between 1918 or 1931
because they needed to go smear feces on their brand in 2042

Fuck ea
we had fucking soviet soldiers in the files
Command and Conquer 
this is #history not #other-games
we literally had a French tiralleur campaign
imagine if they kept the gallipoli campaign in bf1 story
and then never added turning tides
Hit, have you played bf1 btw?
do you know for the gallipoli mission, there's actually an italian flag
top like 0.5% or something
m95 is just for noobs who can't aim
I was on console
so true
I think my best rifle was the Gewehr 98
SMLE sights always fucked me
just switch to carbine or radium
Machine guns? Perino, browning, or Chauchat
radium is also iron sights
scopes only if necessary
Chauchat fired slow but it hit like a truck
and if you want a hyper ptfo rifle pick carcano

I always send scopes
i loved the carcano
Okay
"oh but no straight pull bolt" fuck you just aim better

Hit
Dp27
you are talking to a person who spent like 2 hours talking about wt here the other dya
you are not mod

Agreed
yeah i know and you should have gone to #other-games
go cry to your gf tea if you want me to stop
I was talking about bf1, not irl pepega
hey @humble mulch
oh shit
Snitch
snitch
Silent help
yeah im a snitch but i want history talk in the history channel
if you dont want history talk then why are you here?
Chauchat was not bad
Reliability speaking
it had good and bad
shut the fuck up
but exposed magazine, yikes
about Battlefield
THE CHAUCHAT IS A REAL WEAPON YOU IDIOT
Spoon, chill
I'm. Not.
Fox was just thinking we were still talking about bf1 because he has internet explorer
I'm talking about the real Chauchat
Soviet airship memories
Imagine that but with modern jets
so the suicide blimp?
So am i
Never played red alert
And it did not have reliability issues beyond yikes mud
I don’t think your gonna have a good time trying to recover a modern jet onto a zeppelin without making massive sacrifices in that jets design
ITS FIVE INCH FRIDAY EVERYONE COME PACK UP YOUR BAGS AND HEAD ON DOWN TO AL FAW WEVE GOT SHOTS SHOTS AND MORE SHOTS
ah
sorry, i can't go
It’s actually Sunday
It’s too big?
Shame nobody speaks about this proposal https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
Operation Northwoods was a proposed false flag operation against American citizens that originated within the US Department of Defense of the United States government in 1962. The proposals called for CIA operatives to both stage and commit acts of violent terrorism against American military and civilian targets, blaming them on the Cuban govern...
The proposals called for CIA operatives to both stage and commit acts of violent terrorism against American military and civilian targets, blaming them on the Cuban government, and using it to justify a war against Cuba.
If you can find a better price on any stocked item we'll invade your country under false pretences of the discovery of WMDs
I see that brought up all the time
yeah, standard CIA stuff
virgin american 'noo therer are WMDs we need to protect for world safety' vs chad british 'give us oil'
The CIA wanted to make a fake gay porno with a fake cuban Castro

as if I haven't heard that a few times already from another person
man for invading a country for its oil weird we didn’t get control of their oil
Question
Does Australia has a king
i was talking about the brits
we are unfortunately members of the British monarchy yes
F
not for long though
Y’all let’s talk about the communit balloons
unfortunately, hit will always be briitish
What’s the deal with a Chinese spy balloon? I’m ootl
not going to go into specifics because of politics but the republican movement has never been stronger and the current government even has a minister responsible for hashing out the details of a republic
tldr balloon floated from china to ak to canada to us
assuming this government wins the next election there will be a referendum on the monarchy question within 6 years
it's happened before
Pentagon said they found a third one
media just made a fuss out of it now because
and they shot it down with a raptor
Change of flag as well? 
they gonna be renaming HMAS into "His Mates Aussie Ship"
yeah
Damn
Lol
We missed twice
it's modern politics so i'd really
can't keep a british watermark if we arent under the poms anymore
rather not talk about it
new flag would be nice anyway
I mean the Brit’s did create a independent Kurdistan just to destroy it for its oil so I’ll give you that
I saw a meme that was comparing the f22 to a mig and it was like “mig: 0 balloons; f22: at least one balloon”
we havent changed our flag since before WW1
laser kangaroo
you don't want those zealanders fuck one-upping you lot, do you?
Seeing Indian Navy's new flag. I really hope you guys hire good designer
They actually painted a balloon on the f-22
a republic is effectively inevitable at this point
It looks like PowerPoint with 2 copy paste command
libs wont win the 2025 election because their leader looks like voldemort and labor has (finally) unified around a republic
Wish they added some kind of cross or borderline
couldn't they have just put the naval sigil in the middle of the normal flag?
They haven’t
It’s a photoshop
labor had unified around a republic in 1996 too but unfortunately two australian republicans cannot exist within 5 metres of each other without violence being involved
Let me check again
Tho I wouldn’t be surprised if a kill marking on a F-22 appears soon
1996 failed because the plan was stupid and no one could agree
the net referendum wont make the same mistakes
are you even allowed to make those markings anymore?
Yes
wouldn't that mess up the stealth coating?
...I realised there is more planes with a F22 kill marking than F22 has marking 
Coat over it
These look like Minecraft pickaxes
There’s also this one since a A-10 managed a F-22 kill during a exercise

yes, because if the f22 had exercise kill markings it'd look tacky
Sorry tato
Wonder how badly that 22 pilot got bullied for that
I can hear the wasted money
And Eurofighter
Helium balloons kids lost while leaving amusement park
I though he said the kids themselves

I hate it when my kid lose their bus sized balloons
Three bus*
Gtg launching more balloons
Red Alert Kirov was realistic all along
The F-22s combat kill record will succeed the F-15s by the end of the week
All balloons
🤨 thinking about it up until ukraine most of the MIG-29s air to air kills were Cessnas
I don’t think the J-10/11 has any
Most of the Mig-25 kills were F4s irrc
On 24 February 1996 a Cuban Air Force Mikoyan MiG-29UB shot down two unarmed Cessna 337 Skymaster aircraft operated by Brothers to the Rescue, an organization opposed to the Cuban government. The Organisation of American States (OAS) reported that no warning was given; Cuban government sources said "These people knew what they were doing. They w...
F-22 vs Mexican Cartel when
Then the only F-15 technically shot down in air to air combat was a Japanese F-15 shooting down another Japanese F-15 during a exercise
22 November 1995: F-15J, 52-8846, of the 303rd Tactical Fighter Squadron, Komatsu AFB, JASDF, during air-intercept training over the Sea of Japan, flown by Lt. Tatsumi Higuchi was shot down by an AIM-9L Sidewinder missile accidentally fired by his wingman. The pilot ejected safely.[6][97][100]
NAAHH
there’s been multiple attempts at new AIM-9X blocks
Blocks instead going Y?
most have been cancelled for various reasons
Can it still shoot land targets?
I was joking
AIM-9X is in the bracket of being good enough while the budget needs to go into AIM-120 upgrades and ultimately replacement
I feel the only reason wt ain’t added more new shit is cuz mfs are gonna leak the manuals and shit
Wait till they add F-117
So with the war thunder classified shit
You can literally get that shit off of a U.S. government website most of the time
Some of the stuff are classified
Only shit of value was the Chinese, French and Brit leaks
I can’t access it
You can literally get the F-22s flight manual and it’s perfectly legal
Wasnt Chinese shell was on web years ago but got attention with WT
Yep
Some mf put a shell on the picture
The bp
Also





