#history
1 messages · Page 48 of 1

ive heard the puma is good is that true?
every PUMA sent to a firing range broke
lmao
They are broken down
worse than bmp???
German complexity is a habit I guess
PUMA breaks
BMP just kills you
but I guess you still get to the fight to die in a BMP
which counts for something
You know shit is wrong when you compare one of most modern IFV to decades old Soviet one that actually can go to locations
why does such a powerful country have such a bad tank force
that's where you're wrong
about the powerful part
and the answer is the same
end of cold war rot and negligence
well it is one of the top economies in the world so i assumed it
is their navy any good? ive heard they dont even have a carrier
why?
The big spending they announced at the start of the year (and that people thought was becoming the biggest military in Europe) was cut in half and was meant to be in 10 years span
Average Idiot: germany Is coming back! The old war machine Is waking up!
The Truth:
We Need Money to rebuild something pls 
So lmao
its never a waste of money to protect your country, what else is the money going to?
It's very bad
stop me if you've heard this before
one of their newest ships is
overweight
underarmed
below spec
bragging rights of certain various things they have 1% better than other countries while having entire industries floated for them
it seems like the germans dont even care about germany
which army is better germany or austria?
German navy exists entirely as a tech demo for German firms to advertise their exceptional diesels
germany be like; paying that 1% of gdp into nato
'b-but we have x in our country' (debatable if better than the alternative)
The Luftwaffe could be beaten by the RAF
The army uses broom sticks in place of HMGs on exercises because they don't have any
what does the luftwaffe even have, skyraiders?
Wot
Eurofighter
isnt eurofighter ok?
It is
no good aam?
But RAF has F-35s
Which is the only reason why the Luftwaffe would lose
how did they get f-35???????
Money
RAF is the 2nd most pathetic air force in europe
are you talking RAF or RAAF, im confused 
what is best? russian?
The F-35bs on the Queen Elizabeth class are owned and operated by the RAF

Uh
America
Italy or France I guess
what about europe?
so the mirage would beat su-57???
SU-57 can't fight lmfao
it's true I picked up my country and put it there
i heard the russians had a scary plane in production idk
10 test 7 serial*
That's China
Because China gets something new every week
While most pictures come with leaks or civilian photos
media reporting on defence sectors is very much flawed
the reality distortion field became hard to maintain so it switched to china as a scapegoat
the only people less trustworthy than politicians are journalists
yeah
but yeah European defence sectors have kinda been eating shit in the last few decades
i mean
why doesnt europe care that they are easy to invade?
mfw my former colony with 1/3rd the population now has an air force better than me
who is going to invade?
if you dont include actual readiness the Luftwaffe is bigger than the AMI
They are part of Nato so likely knowing America would carry them?
they rely on certain foreigners to pick up their slack
and we only have 19 of our planned F-35s because we build most of our own
the Russians certainly aren't getting any closer to Europe
and that leaves uh
Serbia
and one of them crashed in texas
as hostile nations in Europe
Belgrade will be ash again inshallah
im pretty sure all of the balkans want to kill each other
that was an American F-35 not an Italian production one
and also
planes crash
it's simply how they go
especially new planes
Crashes are normal
23.06.2014: USA F-35A
• 27.10.2016: USA F-35B
• 28.09.2018: USA F-35B
• 09.04.2019: Jap F-35A
• 19.05.2020: USA F-35A
• 29.09.2020: US F-35B (3,4)
• 17.11.2021: UK F-35B (2)
• 5.01.2022: SK F-35A
• 24.01.2022 USA F-35C
Then there was 3 more later
RAAF lost 6 of their Hornets in the first 5 years of operating
and 1/3rd of all their mirages
and dont ask the Germans what they think about starfighter
germany should buy an f-35 it seems like they are falling too far behind
They did
they have bought F-35
oh
a whole 35 of them 
why so many?
hey a squadron and a half isnt that bad (it is)
thats not a lot
Less than 50 fighters. It's not many
Australia is getting 100
couldnt they buy one and reverse engineer for cheaper?
that isnt how it works

China will grow larger
firstly the Americans wouldnt let them do that
????
secondly its massively more expensive
to reverse engineer something
especially with how cheap F-35 is
how much do they cost?
100 mil?
what about f-22?
they don't have anything to make it, they don't know how to make it, and letting them operate them to defend themselves is being nice, when you break trust like that with the only thing giving you a military, you forfeit all future of that deal
that's what happens when you make it the official alliance plane and sell it to like 20 different countries
F-22 isnt in production it was also massively expensive
US forbid export of F22
is it better???
F-22 is an air superiority fighter
and will wipe the floor with just about anything thrown against it
F-35 is a highly networked multi-role fighter which will use its friends to help it wipe the floor with just about anything thrown against it
and also drop bombs on ground targets
and in a few years when the US stops fucking around with older software, fire anti-ship missiles too
Cmon F22 can do that too. It's what she mostly did ironic enough
not F-22s primary role
Well ye
Will need to see how that works
something something drone swarm
F-35 has the most powerful radar ever mounted to a plane of its size, effectively equivalent to a previous generation AWACs
it can use this radar to act as an AEW aircraft from European flat tops through data-link with those ships
it can use its radar in "stealth mode" to allow more heavily armed aircraft to vector onto a target
its EW suite is more capable than just about anything else available in any air force, bar the E/A-18G
Find a partner that speaks with you like how Spon speaks about F-35 
F-35 can also data link with ground forces allowing for faster, more precise strikes
just sell the australian military some hardware and this comes included
I'm wondering if Europe will go full American fighter export mode if FCAS and Tempest fails
future F-35 software blocks will also be able to communicate directly with LRASM helping to guide the missile onto target with it's own radar until the LRASM gets close enough to guide itself using passive emissions only
They already suffer from lack of fifth gen experience
They will try to long jump Sixth gen
Whatever Sixth gen means that is
networked capability is the future and armed forces like Russia and China would be best to stop treating it as secondary to other requirements
logistics and decision making speed improvements = win
giving commanders and combat personnel such as pilots, MWOs, and platoon commanders access to information regarding entire battlefields allows them to make decisions that are wide reaching and significantly better coordinated with their peers
networking allows this information to be delivered quickly and clearly so that responses can be formulated in the shortest possible time
This does not carry the danger of whole thing collapsing if this network gets cut off right?
data-linked emissions are stored and transmitted from the hardware itself creating effectively a local network
it's incredibly difficult to cut off and if it were to be, traditional methods still exist
Skynet will be real after all
yeah at worst if you somehow take it all down it just puts the bad guys back to communication parity with you
but now with numerous resources spent to take that down temporarily
but given that western EW capability is significantly greater than any peer adversary i find it hard to believe that data link could be effectively interfered with for any amount of time
right
all you need is a flight of data-linked growlers or even F-35s with EW pods and your networking is secured
You don't even need that, with just something as "simple" as a secure spread spectrum it's mathematics itself that guarantee your link is secure
What developments would take place instead?
The need for commercial communication will naturally push for such capability
anti aliens
That's kinda based ngl
Nasa does work on anti meteor weapons
I think
But
You need to have something to counter it
No funding
You wouldn't need stealth if radar didn't existed
F
honestly
I can forgive the germans for their 2000s rot
especially post great recession
considering how bad their economy got at certain points in the 2000s and the 90s
tho the complete negligence of the German army post 2014 is just
a absolute failure of German Foreign and Security policy
anyone has good reads on the norman-sicilians?
or the hautevilles in more specific case
those ppl sounds based as fuck in AoE2
is it just me or did Ägir have some goofy turret designs
It was pre-dreadnought I think
But I may be wrong
The Germans were still wondering how Britain figured out how to do dreadnoughts
Plus Agïr is a heavy cruiser
Yes
@kindred reef one other thing when comparing soviet to German was that soviet equipment really wasn’t that notable in the air aside from a few standouts
It was a pure industry war in the east
Grand strategy of the eastern front in world war 2
We’re talking equipment
nah bro look up Ivan Kozhedub
there were several very good soviet planes in ww2 tho, especially in regards to low altitude fighters
In air to air the Soviets consistently struggled
and they basically had the only actually good anti-tank CAS
everything else was a bunch of flash with little effectiveness
The Germans built their dog fighters with spitfires in mind
soviet planes were good at dogfighting, and they had good planes for intercepting bombers too
They were good but against altitude fighters like the FW-190 and ME109-K they struggled
im not saying that soviet planes were the best, but they just dont get enough respect and are overshadowed by p-51 and such
By war’s end they definitely closed the tech gap
just do what i do and circlejerk how PTABs made all other CAS look like shit
They could definitely compete with their German counterparts
well technically erich hartmann had more
But it took loss after loss after loss
For the Soviets to learn anything, and this translates to Russia too, they have to lose over and over before they get it
They didn’t have a staple fighter like the brits did
With the spitfire which had 26 variants
hurricane is epic
spitfire bad ong
the brits didnt just use spits either
The Soviets had to try a lot of different fighters before they could stick to the La-7
My point being that the premium dogfighter was the spitfire
the best one was the hurricane
The hurricane shot down bombers and did better CAS while the spitfire gained air superiority
Tempest gang
ok tempest and typhoon look great except for the giant ugly radiator in the front
They did their job
So fucking well
And I’m so proud of hawker for that
But also
Did you know that the P-51 wasn’t made for the Americans
yeah didnt the brits have a clipped wing version or something?
The brits helped develop it
Basically the idea was for the brits to acquire a bomber escort fighter
But nothing the Americans had would work
we also lend lease the p-38 to them
So the North American made the prototype P-51
But it had a shitty pratt and whitney engine
Which couldn’t produce the power
So what Britain did was they strapped a rolls-Royce Merlin to it and boom
The OG p-51 was born
The P-51D was the clipped wing, drop tank, 4 .50 cal monster of a fighter
tank fucker 69 has logged in
pretty based of the soviets to just casually turn yak 9s into better CAS planes than the majority of dedicated aircraft in the west
why does that look like tiny bombs coming out of a yak
because it is
The P-51D was exceedingly similar to the spitfire MkIX
When the spitfire got the gryphon engine however
It left the P-51 in the dust
PTAB cassettes are fun for the whole family
i hate the clipped wing spitfire almost as much ugly as the firebrand
We don’t mention it
?

what is that
This was the replacement for the spitfire
a ptab, tiny HEAT anti-tank bomb
slightly less effective dropped from an aircraft
Vacuum bomb has entered chat

little boy has entered chat
it never actually outlawed nukes, and the nukes saved the lives of hundreds of thousands of U.S. and Soviet soldiers
We know this
Anyone who knows WW2 knows that
I would have preferred if the USSR collapsed much earlier
But alas
😭
well some people say we should have not dropped them
some people also say the moon landing was fake
lmao
That’s a debate for another day
they are probably soviet trolls
Nukes are a thing and we can’t stop that
World War Two is fun and all
But ww1 history and pre-great war history is interesting too
1850-1900 is a really fucky time period
yeah i like the part where france lost in that time period
the next couple rounds didnt really go so well
when the neighbors fuck around and need to find out
Von moltke my beloved 🥺
what is that gun lmao
Notoriously bad gun
notoriously bad by people with surface level knowledge, anyway
French infantry equipment is so fucking weird dawg
Like it’s weirder than soviet equipment
and conflate it for the horrendously awful AeF rechamber in 30-06
And that’s saying something
which is the worst thing since leukemia
The French are the worst thing since cancer
sounds like loser speak to me
french are pog
but yeah the chauchat gets a really bad rap from the 30-06 rechamber which has the wonderful combination of being a
poorly done rush job, on an already fairly bare bone, war-expedient gun, to chamber it in a round hotter than the fucking sun
very not good combination
because they read a book in their life
because the french are my allies so I won't talk poorly about them in a serious manner
the british however
im hoping i get to talk about how Fritz X is actually a french invention
Also the Hispano cannon
me using them messing with the fritz x stolen tech as an example for CA to not just copy siren bs
was a masterful moment I still think about
The French are the enemy and must be treated as such
Just ask the Germans
They know France like the back of their hand😋
yeah, ask the country that invented world wars and ended Europe's reign as the largest power in the world
the germany have only personally gave me one thing of value, admittedly it's very valuble
but france gave me freedom from the bri*tish and the statue of liberty, so that's at least two things
As a British/Chinese person living in Texas, I feel you
Fuck the British
also tasty bread
Yes brioche is based
A sandwich is a food typically consisting of vegetables, sliced cheese or meat, placed on or between slices of bread, or more generally any dish wherein bread serves as a container or wrapper for another food type. The sandwich began as a portable, convenient finger food in the Western world, though over time it has become prevalent worldwide.
I...
it also gave me richie
Hawaii used to be called the Sandwich Islands
and then i ate them
yeah thats about right
world of warships balance parameters
aka cheese and boloney
World of warships now is just "could have" "might have been "it can be assumed that" flavours, sorry
I'm not letting them get away with the Colombian Wooster and Polish Mogador, sorry
man i wanted to circlejerk some more
someone be my outlet for bitching about "universal machine guns" in ww2
machine guns are cool but what about human guns
is that just a guy throwing rocks really fast
It’s a gun shooting humans
true
Death by high velocity stoning

u see we invented a medium machine gun we can take off the tripod and fire on the bipod
sure its an uncontrollable piece of shit when you do that that melts its barrel and blows up if you dont use specialty ammunition for it
but its universal
👁️
death by saying Jehovah one too many times
That's just a gun
Stronger blunt trauma, maybe
Eighty years ago today, one of the most iconic images of the war in the Pacific was captured by chance; George Silk’s photograph of a blinded Australian soldier being led by a barefoot Papuan on Christmas Day 1942. Read article: https://t.co/CIUarR5R4N
bro
german fighters had a clock in them
thats dumb af
unnecessary
there was no reason to have it
they had a fuel gauge
but yet they had it anyways
Almost all combat aircraft since the development of modern aeronautical instruments have included clocks
It's for far more than just monitoring fuel
Coordinating strikes on a target in coordination with artillery at a set time so you don't get blown up by your own sides shells for example
Could be worse, his AA video
tea rolling up with niche Romanian rangefinders
AA video is rock bottom, even Quora struggles to get that low
the mark 1 eyeball was invented in romania in 1932 and can track an enemy aircraft at any speed out to a reasonable distance
Is the implication here that Romanians didn't have eyes until 1932
Or that nobody did
Prior to 1932 only the Mark 0 Photosensitive Tissue was employed on a wide scale, though after 1888 the Mark 0 Mod 3 had some of the precursor developments necessary for tracking moving objects
post war romania moved on from such organic devices and began entering the cyberpunk timeline, employing the enhanced m3 binocular instead of the mere dated mark 1 eyeball
Romanians are all vampires and only use bat echolocation as sensory inputs, actually
They do not have eyes
Care to explain what’s wrong with it?
that's why it took them so long to evolve eyes, natural selection put pressure on them as plane speeds grew, making echolocation less effective
is the mk2 just the mk1 with eyelids so you can squint
that's a mod applied to most mark 1 eyeballs yes, with notable exception such as those on uss fish which are unmodernized
Mk2 eyeballs commonly known as four eyes are actually just retrofitted mark one eyeballs with a layer of glass over them
Interesting fact
that's the m3
the m3 bifocal, it's a mod of the m3, m3 binocular
god this is complicated
the only difference is the distance to the eyeball on the cyborg
The entire range of errors is in there. Starts with inconsistent standards when getting realistic RoF values (to the point where a clip fed weapon gets rated worse than a hand loaded one, because... ???), to the point where he literally makes up flaws.
but since the inventions were close together, it resulted in a dispute and both sides claimed m3
This is his table that he used for his ratings
and it's loaded with double standards, misinformation and myths
So what were the most egregious of errors there?
- German 37mm M42 has only 60rpm, instead of the 140-160 that primary documents give
- he includes FCS talk for the USN 3in, but doesn't do it for other guns (most importantly for the IJN 100mm, for which he then pulls up praise of it being lightweight, which was in part due to it being behind most contemporary guns in that regard)
- he claims that the German 88mm was often used in double heavy caliber secondary batteries, you will find no ship to which this applies, he made that up
- he claims that the German 105mm mount breaks all the time, which not only is not backed by any of the sources he listed (plus the number of sources and primary documents I went through), he fails to think far enough to realize that the 88mm gun on the light cruisers had the same mount. And he did not try to make that point there.
- he only selectively includes on-mount stabilization, and disregards it even on some prominent examples
His general reliability talk is very much inconsistent, he rides on alledged reliability issues of some weapons like a mad man, and will happily turn a blind eye to others
the reliability of the chicago piano is another example I see on the chart as mythological, the vibration issue was fixed pre war, and it had an off mount director
he repeats one and doesn't mention two even though it's a big plus for its period
I am not too versed on stuff outside Germany, there's more on that chart for which I don't have the citations to back it up when pressed
the 5.25'' was quite a meme in the video for sure
phoenix mentioned that the Italian 90mm gun is also getting misrepresented
So what did he say about the Italian 90mm gun?
Reliability talk of course, and the practical RoF being way too low
just because you don't think there's a reason to include something in a piece of military equipment doesn't mean there isn't a reason to include it
How heavy would a clock even be back then? Half a kilo?
Can imagine worse things to spend that on
You mean, 10 nautical miles of range for an A6M2
timing is one of the most key things regarding air missions
Shinano would have had 20” primaries and 18” secondaries 
it's true, the m1 was made by a 1 year old male
you ever just
think of something incredibly stupid and figure out someone has actually done it
Whoa there, Colorado with 30” of belt pen at 20k yards
that’s a new one
colorado but it's Parallel Superimposition and my turn on the dream machine
MURICA!
quick someone needs to get this info the WG and fix the US BB line.
Please don't, they might actually believe it 
history under clubs again it seems
So it seems
wondering if permissions are messed up in general too, for various reasons
We need to be isolated
I recently read Yamato's record and like........damn. For such a great ship she is she kinda.........didnt do as much as I thought she would
The fate of many ships in war
unfortunately
Most IJN BBs spent a lot of their time doing little, minus the Kongous, those were deemed expendable
thought she would go guns blazing like my beloved biscuit but no
well, at least she was cool, I guess that counts
Aw man, I gotta mute all channels again
Yamato did kinda go guns blazing, and left the stage with a big boom
Just not the way she was built for
But battleships aren’t workhorses, they are naval power made manifest.
They can accomplish their job merely by showing up and forcing the enemy to cancel their mission, causing them to abandon a landing force to transport or whatnot.
In WWI, the battleships of the Grand Fleet and High Seas Fleet only engaged one another directly in one battle (Jutland), but the battleships were nevertheless integral to naval strategy—by keeping the German capital ships bottled up, the Grand Fleet kept the many small ASW vessels safe from German guns, so that they could keep the U-boat threat at bay.
So even if their battle records are not flashy, battleships can nevertheless do their jobs, and play important parts in a war.
Be Tirpitz, sortie once a month, British panic, Soviets claim to have sunk you, go back to port, get bombed again
well, its the Queen of the North we're talking about
True, that is very true
The chemical smoke used to shield Tirpitz from air attack have caused chemical damage to the rings in Norwegian trees that persist to this day (and can be measured from tree rings)
Really? I didnt know that at all
Mhm
A chemical fog used to camouflage the ship impacted the trees, limiting ring development
Guess the Germans tried to turn the ugly sisters into workhorses, in lack of workhorses themselves
I'll have to give that a read later then, how interesting
It's worse 
ah there you are, I didn't get to say you could have extra cookies
will give those extra cookies to Soyuz
were you not the man in red in my house a little bit ago
🎅
Oh that red
need a full list of all the dumb shit he says in those videos
That would take a whole separate YouTube channel
Bah, no one in ALO would ever make something like that
Just collect the most memorable stuff
yeah true
Mods needed something to do
what have i missed in the last week
At least they didn't ban Sang

server seems to have been restructured to where you can pick and choose any channel like a club
ehh? What's going on here
the 5.25'' was the best aa gun of the war because it range big
Should have used me in WW2
My love has unlimited range
And ammo
German fire control cables in superstructure bad, because 406mm shell from 10km cut them
didn't pretty much everyone have them
Shhhh
Shut up with those weird questions
Or else you might ruin one of the main circlejerk points
What was his response when questioned on this btw
That was his response
The question was if he could elaborate on the fire control cable stuff
And from Bisko getting her cables to the director on the foretop cut by that hit from Rodney that smashed the entire everything around the bridge he extrapolated that the cables must've been more vulnerable than on other ships
He didn't really bother to actually dig up the arrangements of cables and the protection of them from various ships to make a proper comparison
Granted, that's very specific information that's hard to come by, but could at least be honest about it and say that you do not know
Mm, that seems to be a recurring issue
It's fine to not know something, but not to fail to make clear where your knowledge ends and where your speculation begins
Anyone here well versed in Aztec or Mayan Mythology?
sorry never studied them
im not that much into mythology
The funny thing is that the Shinanos are technically more streamlined Yamatos
15.5cm mounts begone, belt thinned down from 410 to 400 IIRC
Probably @maiden citrus
I am somewhat
Is there anyone who's like the Tiamat of Aztec Mythology (Earth mother who went to war against her own sons and daughters after they rebelled against her)
I believe that would be similar to Tlaltechutli
Tlaltecuhtli (Classical Nahuatl Tlāltēuctli, Nahuatl pronunciation: [t͡ɬaːl.teːkʷ.t͡ɬi]) is a pre-Columbian Mesoamerican deity worshipped primarily by the Mexica (Aztec) people. Sometimes referred to as the "earth monster," Tlaltecuhtli's dismembered body was the basis for the world in the Aztec creation story of the fifth and final cosmos. In c...
One day, the gods Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca descended from the heavens in the form of serpents and found the monstrous Tlaltecuhtli (Cipactli) sitting on top of the ocean with giant fangs, crocodile skin, and gnashing teeth calling for flesh to feast on. The two gods decided that the fifth cosmos could not prosper with such a horrible creature roaming the world, and so they set out to destroy her. To attract her, Tezcatlipoca used his foot as bait, and Tlaltecuhtli ate it. In the fight that followed, Tezcatlipoca lost his foot and Tlaltecuhtli lost her lower jaw, taking away her ability to sink below the surface of the water. After a long struggle, Tezcatlipoca and Quetzalcoatl managed to rip her body in two — from the upper half came the sky, and from the lower came the earth
a bat related spirit who serves the underworld
How important is he in aztec mythology?
well, Camazotz is Mayan as I recall, and rarely appears anyway in stories
Ah okay okay. In the stories he does appear in, what does he usually do?
well one did tear off someone's head to use it as a ball for the god's next ballgame, it's also plural, basically how we think of demons in hell is what Camazotz is, so they are more used as symbolism than actual story relevance
Ah
that's the only story I know it appears in
@maiden citrus is there anything related in mayan or aztec mythology regarding "nine layers" or smth
yes, the Aztec underworld has 9 layers
Why does it have 9 layers? (Sorry if I'm asking too many questions and disturbing you. I'm really interested in Aztec/Mayan Myth right now as FGO's latest chapter is loosely based on those two)
as soon as you asked the timat question I figured, hehe

and it's just how the underworld formed based on the shape and age of the universe supposedly, kinda like the world tree in norse
I asked the Tiamat question because Kingprotea has an alter version in Lostbelt 7, and since Kingprotea is made up of earth goddesses I was wondering if the Aztec had a contemporary
Oooo
Tlaltecuhtli did survive that encounter too, so technically even still alive
Oh ok. Does the Aztec underworld have a hades equivalent?
In a scale of good to evil, how is he?
What does he look like?
he's a little less good and reasonable than hades would be for example, as he's somewhat reasonable but also fickle, can be reasoned with though
Does Aztec myth have a female hero?
Like in Aztec or Mayan myth is there like ala female version of Herc or smth?
he's a skeleton covered in blood with a skull containing eyeballs only
sometimes depicted as having a body but still 'wearing' a skull
Huh
yeah most depictions of him in media are freaky as a result
personally like onyx equinox' general depictions of this mythology
@maiden citrus Who's Kulkulkan?
ironically you could kinda consider Mictlantecuhtli's wife Mictecacihuati to be one somewhat, as she is the god of the death who was sacrificed as an infant to gain these powers, she rules over the bones of the dead who died of natural causes, and protects them
I'm not aware of any exact heroes though but I'm also not an expert, and to be blunt a lot of hero stories (outside those of the gods) did not survive
the serpent diety, comparable to those like quetz, but older than that in stories
Oh god...
what ships are these?
That image feels like it needs a Jpop song playing over it
Make a guess. 
I got nothin
whoever could it be
Hood in the background, Repulse in the foreground.
I wonder
pretty likely given that they both participated and Repulse is pre-reconstruction
Repulse actually likely received her reconstruction already
You can see the HACS Mk I near the top left
Likely taken post December 1933, no catapults in sight on Hood
Given Repulse's lengthy refit from 1933-1936, picture must be taken later than May 1936
Most WW1 capital ships in the RN received substantial refits between 1920-1939
The Revenges are supposed to be next in line, then came the war and they're told to go fuck themselves because all docks are busy
and the most modern of them all, Royal Oak, got torpedoed with heavy casualties in the opening year 
Repulse at one point had something funky going on though, let's see if anyone can spot it 
Don't see it. What happened?
Death to Samurai 
are these the roomba AA in the game
Yes.
00:00:00 - Intro
00:00:43 - What was the reason for the Germans’ decision to use the 11” and 12” guns on their capital ships at a time when the Royal Navy had begun to use 13.5” and 15” guns?
00:06:30 - How do you rate the Leanders?
00:10:40 - Why do battleships explode when they capsize?
00:16:14 - Why did Shokaku so consistently outperform...
Rich 7th question is about French navy
@maiden citrus Who's Tezcatlipoca?
He's trying to shit on the French the first two questions already
brother of quetz
Is he always angry or something?
any of his stories tell of him being a warmonger or angry dude or smth?
hm, not in particular, though the two did squabble in the past, he teamed up with quetz in the story above to battle the earth goddess I posted about
oh. so he's not crazy then
huh
most Aztec dieties are neither wholly good nor evil
oh ok then
he does look pretty cool though, has a fake foot since he lost his in battle and often has a magic mirror on his attire (often on the chest like an arc reactor), is referred to as a sorcerer and smoke would come from him like a locomotive (sometimes from the mirror he wore)
some say the mirror let him see everything
to show how he was neither good nor evil, he was the one that introduced and most enjoyed human sacrifice, but he also protected slaves, and if slaves were treated poorly he would cast magic on their masters to cause sickness
I'm gonna take a gander and guess you're currently on LB7 of FGO
I'm reading thru the story rn yes
I did say that way before that the reason I'm trying to learn because of FGO
only fgo I watched was the one with quetz in it
Grand Berserker
I'm still confused how he's grand berserker
he is rooting for you
I mean he did destroy the world once, must count for something, and is a patron of warriors
he likes to sit at crossroads at night and challenge traveling warriors
btw Tlaloc, Kukulkan and Camazotz are in the LB too
Oh he's the patron of warriors and challenges warriors? Make sense now that he's a berserker
and oh boy Kukulkan
I'm not super versed on fate myself, but I knew this event was coming
Why does she look like a more adult Medea
her face reminds me of Medea so much
Answer to same question
What is reading
Less than 200 lb filler, too weak to even destroy the shell
for reference, a stick of dynamite is roughly 0.4 pounds
yeah what's 500 sticks of dynamite going mach 2 going to accomplish
Did you know that if you have an electrical circuit fire all your guns at once, all your shells will also land at about the same time
wouldn't this be like shit for aiming or something?
we could even call it a control of firing system, or fire control for short
Not really, it’s standard practice
Ah wait yeah
but also don't BBs even in Dreadnoughts time did this?
Like full broadsides
I specifically remember something related to even pre-dreadnoughts doing this
The South Dakota would have outclassed Nelson. Faster, and better fire control. With similar firing ranges, the Nelson wouldn’t have been able to get close enough to fire at South Dakota, since SD could turn away and outrun the distance of the Nelson’s shells. While the Nelson would have been running into SD, basically extending the firing range of the SD. This would have been an issue with Nelson against the NC as well.
Ah yes, ‘outrunning’ 16 inch shells 
Nagato might have been a good fight, but I think the Nelson would have had a good chance against her. Both were built around the same time and had the same technology. Nelson, however, had a longer effective firing range. Nagato’s slight speed advantage may have given Nelson some problems and probably would have made up for the range difference. Remember, Nagato is why the Iowa class was built, and Nelson would not have done well against an Iowa.
Being faster than Colorado, it could pick when and where, but it would have to be firing at max range. It was not fast enough to move in closer, fire, and then get out fast (it was only 2 knots faster than Colorado). That being said, it could employ the same tactics that an SD or NC would use against the Nelson. Against Nagato, the exact same situation was reversed.
The South Dakota and North Carolina were both 5 knots faster than Nelson and that makes a difference. They could jump in closer, fire, and get out faster. They could also just sail away from Nelson, near her max range, and constantly out run the shells.

"outrun shells"
yes this is how ships fight
South Dakota travelling at 2,600 fps
deja vue
ram into Nelson and just slices her in half
I AM the shell
What was the largest shell ever used on a dreadnought?
weight
Still Yamato’s 46cm Type 91/1 APC, though if you count HMS Furious as a ‘Dreadnought’ for some reason then she has heavier shells
wait HMS Furious's 18in shells were heavier than Yamato's?
Yes
How much heavier?
Why did Furious even have such big guns for a small ship
Fisher
ah of course it had to be Fisher
He figured bigger guns have better ballistic properties, giving them greater effective range that would allow them to disable enemy warships from outside their effective range
But that involved having ships that have basically paper for armor?
Well, that part was political
They were wartime designs and due to the long lead time of capital ships, he was not authorized to build any more during wartime besides the stuff already started
So he had to sneak them under the radar by calling them "Large Light Cruisers"
This limited their armor and tonnage
Armor of capital ship thickness has to be specially ordered so ordering thick armor would have gave away the game
Also something had to do with the Baltic project?
As for guns, he just illegally bypassed the necessary authorities
The shallow draft of the Courageous class would have made them ideal picks for the Baltic Project, yes, though Fisher was more interested in the draft minimization out of a probably misguided belief that shallow draft minimized resistance and thus increased speed
The Baltic Project was only one justification for the ships. Admiral Fisher wrote in a letter to the DNC on 16 March 1915: "I've told the First Lord that the more that I consider the qualities of your design of the Big Light Battle Cruisers, the more that I am impressed by its exceeding excellence and simplicity—all the three vital requisites of gunpower, speed and draught so well balanced!"[2] In fact they could be considered the epitome of Fisher's belief in the paramount importance of speed over everything else. Fisher's adherence to this principle is highlighted in a letter he wrote to Churchill concerning the battleships of the 1912–13 Naval Estimates. In the letter, dated April 1912, Fisher stated: "There must be sacrifice of armour ... There must be further VERY GREAT INCREASE IN SPEED ... your speed must vastly exceed [that of] your possible enemy!"[3]
He wouldn't build them if he was allowed to build better things
From what I hear about Fisher, if he was alive around the time of Guided missiles he would have probably pushed for a BB sized arsenal ship
It's unknown what their exact use would be. Could be support vessels for their firepower, very big monitors (Furious only have 2 guns), or dunno smh to fight with Pre dreads of Germans
Probably SSBNs tbh 
Would Fisher be more willing to do the funni than LeMay of SAC?
Who knows
Then again
And then in my remarks I went on to observe, as is stated by Mr. Norman Angell in the "Great Illusion," where he holds me up as a Terror! and as misguided - perhaps I went a little too far when I said I would boil the prisoners in oil and murder the innocent in cold blood, &c., &c., &c....```
the courageous class makes more sense when you read into their actual purpose
they're not really built like or intended to be real surface combatants
they're just monitors that can sprint
main draw iirc so they don't get mulched by submarines or other intercepting warships while leisurely shelling the coast
heh
Supercarrier
From Medal of Honor and Max Payne, to Saving Private Ryan and John Wick, the Colt 1911 is a pistol with over 100 years of service, a veteran of two world wars, and a weapon that boasts some of the most iconic appearances in movies, TV and video games.
In this episode of Loadout, Dave Jewitt visits the Royal Armouries to talk through the history...
History club, merry Christmas
if I do remember, WWI there was an unoffical truce because of Christmas and exaustion
I hope im not wrong on that info
it did happen yes, but limited to 1914
subsequent years would see much more intense fighting along the front and thus much reduced Goodwill between the two sides, in addition to command actively preventing such incidents to prevent treason
Where chonky CFTs

This year's Warship includes features on the secret battleship design that Mussolini's Fascist Italy sold to Stalin's USSR, the little-known German flak ships of World War II, the French aircraft carriers Clemenceau and Foch, and the development of electronic warfare in the Royal Navy.
Warships 2023
pretty hype
ITALY SOVIET FREN YEEEEEEEWEES

Marco Polo time
Why did US ships have a more flatter shape to their BBs compared to the other nations that have more concave looking ships
Turkiye stronk 💪 🇹🇷 💪 🇹🇳 💪 🪳
day 1 of posting Undeappreciated Cold war vehicles, Super M60 Patton
best tank
also, found some new stuff in passing on Dutch tanks.
Amongst it the LTH-1
And a potentially tankified M39 
As well as Russian spoils of war from Finland 
that sure is a secondary battery
at least for now
much better
Coom
Got a new book to read for Christmas
Isn't that the ship that got lost a lot or something? Or am I thinking of an inside joke from KanColle for that?
Canned Coal joke
Gambier Bay is the carrier that got fired upon by the Centre Force at Samar
I am curious of the damage assessment, since Yamato likely fired on her
And we know a near miss on White Plains basically knocked out her electricity grid and shook the whole ship
She was a Casablanca-class that had the dubious achievement of being the only US aircraft carrier sunk by surface gunfire during the war
Ah, after action reports only suggest Yamato fired on White Plains, never mind then.
Is this channel for pure history or is history in the context of the game okay too?
channel has a rather wide reach of what's discussed here
tho if its game related it probably goes in #al-lore unless its discussing the historical nature of the ships or comparing the ingame events to IRL ones
Ah, I was just wondering if USS Midway releases, would it be a stretch to reference its 1950s angled flight deck?
after this shitfest of an event anything is possible
Essex already references her SCB-27A refit when she says "When we'll get jets"
Yorktown II is in the sus zone, may or may not have received SCB-27A already
This year is overall a shitshow for AL in terms of historical consistency if you ask me, but I digress
Wait what parts were inconsistent?
Well, besides the kriegsmarine events
… and the Soviet event…
Okay yeah
Kinda cringe

Ships in AL usually stick to two criteria:
Serves in WW2
Planned to be built in WW2
Keel laid down in WW2
This year, we had
-2 Chinese DDGs with 60s tech
-"II" namesakes
- A fucking 40 gun pirate frigate of the 1700s
70s tech
Look it’s a fucking Chinese gacha game
I’m not very uptight about it

If they wanna add crazy shit I’m all for it
I’m fine with the “II”s tbh
But yes, as hit said, anything is possible
And I'm not going to have the II argument over here, we have enougu meltdowns elsewhere
What’s this II argument?
As things stand, Yorktown II is either in her WW2 configuration, or 1950 SCB-27A configuration (which may justify UR), take your pick
Ah right, when I saw her initially that extra bit of rigging almost looks like the second flight deck
No, that's perfectly fine and in line with an Essex class flight deck
or rather, "design liberties"
This, however...
Mfw on take-off to attack Japanese mainland positions I hit a random piece of steel sticking out the end of the flight deck
... is perfectly in line with SCB-27A modernizations that eliminated the "Long Hull" and "Short Hull Essex" differences by elongating the bow into a clipper form
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c1/USS_Hornet_(CV-12)_damaged_flight_deck_1945.jpg either that or Manjoob somehow confused in the process and I'm just delusional
Looks more like a design element, the angled flight deck of the Essexs are very subdued
A deck edge elevator also sits right in front of the angled flight deck, so it's a hard no for me
and, it's unmodified in Yorktown's CG, so SCB-125 is not yet applied
I always thought that the SCB-125 flight deck seemed somewhat ‘detached’ from the main ship
Unlike later deck layouts with the angled deck laid in to the design and placed closer to the fore
Hence my initial impression that it was the SCB-125 deck
Tbf, I don’t think we have any other depiction of a deck edge elevator present afaik
Weren’t those only a thing after the war?
while I originally thought that this stubbed bit was the angled flight deck, it simply isn't, it's on the Essexs their entire life
No, USS Wasp CV-7 had the deck edge elevator, and arguably one of the most successful things the USN did with what's left of their carrier tonnage in the LNT.
It's why the Essexs immediately used it, and with great success
This here is clearly trying to portray a deck edge elevator, half arsed as it is
and of course Hornet II doesn't have it 
reeee
Ah you’re right, there’s also the lack of catapults
Bro I swear, none of the Essex class have the depiction in game
I just told you Yorktown II has it 
Except her
Intrepid gets the "There was an attempt" star
Uhhh are you talking about the little protrusions?
There’s like a full sized elevator right there
thus "there was an attempt"
In general AL's rigging is...not that good in terms of accuracy
Better than some other competitors out there, at least
cough Victory Belles cough
I mean I can generally tell what it’s trying to do ig
Sometimes I wish there was more superstructure representation
Although a lot of Royal Navy battleship superstructure looks pretty terrible imo
there is an example of good looking british bb, don't worry
Inb4 Revenge
yis
Alright but no one wants to see a block
Blocks worked fine with their overhanging platforms
I just have issue with Vanguard's block
Monarch’s rigging is great
Exactly
QE and Renown are good though
I don’t really like the KGV superstructure
The real RN moment is leaving the entire compass bridge out in the open, exposed to the elements
Because "muh night battle visibility" 
Admiral's bridge is below, I'm afraid
Well I guess I can see why the Royal Navy wanted it there
Just read a real life story of a British phantom testing out the skyflash missile where the missile did a 180degree turn and locked onto the phantoms radar illuminator...
Yeah, basically it didn't have a warhead so once it passed under it's target it flew near vertically until it lost all energy then proceeded to dive back down again where it regained lock.onto the phantom that launched it
I would say those are the REALLY late ones judging by the engine housing
Sorry, should have stated that this was in the really early days of the skyflash testing
Dear god, another shit meme 
Sure, let's just disregard VB-3's effort at Midway
What light carrier tf
Not even Wasp
Or R*nger, god forbid
time for some teaching
@spring briar off to bad start
talk about Montana class, shows pic of Tirpitz leaving the Fjords
and then gaze upon this 🤡
third pic and it's this already, jesus
help
How do you want me to take this fucking seriously
TIL that the military March often used for Godzilla movies was legitimately a March intended for the IJN to use, only Akira Ifukube didn't get to submit it before the war ended
no no no no no
same goes for a lot of people that worked on Godzilla, most were employed by the IJA/IJN in some capacities
one of them even ran a brothel in Manchuria for the Army
wasn't exactly proud of it though
Why yes, just write off the whole prolonged discussion of KGV's gunnery, from 14-16" guns, from considering obliging the LNT, to the laughable reason of "excellent service of the RN" and boil it down to just "bad decisions"
Almost close to a badly copy-pasted paragraph from Garzke and Dulin's H-class section, possibly with even worse collocation
and here we go, just copy-pasted wrong values, no values over the uniform 120mm turtleback even too.
Right, of course, just simply rule the A-150s as unable to be built because of poor Japanese industry capacity, rather than intentional halting of Shinano at 50% due to prioritisation of resources to ships that can be thrown into the gauntlet in 6 months, and following the disastrous results of Midway
Soyuz is based on VV 🤦
It's based on the 1935 version of Ansaldo UP.41, Successor of VV, not VV herself
and if those "Soviet elements" are meant to be the 180mm Secbat guns, the Soviets themselves never wanted to use them in the first place
I mean to be fair
That's not what he said
He said "the design provided by the italians was based on the VV"
Not the soyuz
He's saying UP41 is based on the VVs
That's fine then, "Soviet elements" just doesn't seem quite right, or at least, requires elaboration
no reasons provided for the thinning of the belt, of course
Nor the reason for halting Belorussiya was provided
hahahaha, I'm sure someone here will disagree
H-44?
"German guns were noted for their accuracy"
Gotta need some sources here, buddy, running quite dry
Especially since Bismarck needed corrections from the gunnery officer, and required 5 salvos to hit Hood - which by RN standards - is just perfectly mediocre
There's the tomfuckery at Barents' Sea from Luetzow as well, but I think that's under dispute, so I'll leave that be
The H-39 possessed excellent firepower

"WEAK HORIZONTAL PROTECTION"
MR. STILLE, IT'S FUCKING 150MM + 50MM DECK ON SOYUZ

It's literally fucking poor man's Garze and Dulin's Axis BBs
with even less detail than wikipedia
Well for 10 dollars
Literally one of those science books for children
With 20 pages
That analysis part is pretty dangerous
You know what, let's throw this fanfiction in as well
Also can I just uhhh
This is the kind of shit I'm writing when I was an edgy teenager 10 years ago, shit you not, just with less detail 
Wtf is thiiiiiis
artist credit, me
I have made the ships chonkier on purpose
and this just shows a complete misunderstanding of the Matsu class DDs
Matsus are convoy escorts, not a BB escort vessel
You want someone to escort A-150, you're calling up people like Yukikaze, Hatsushimo (Type A Long Lancers) or Suzutsuki and Fuyutsuki (Type B AA ships)
not Type D Matsus 
hey colorado does have good firepower
oh, in comparison to
montana
oh
Super shimakazes surely
Shimas got canned for more ducks
the turrets are now spring loaded
But man, what a take
"H-39 is better than Lion"
Did Berci sponsor this book?
No mention of the 1945 Lion proposals either, it stops dead after the 1938 Lion discussions
Whole book feels like bad wiki article
Worse than Wiki
It's for the very very basic layman, maybe with a side of wehrbs
The Yamato gensis article literally has better quaity than the entire A-150 section
He could have complained about Soyuz's 425mm Barbette which is very low compared to others but noooo
Embarrassing
Alsace already has a very good book on it
you know what's it called?
French Battleships 1922-1956
writes book about Super Battleships
includes Soyuz and Lion
does not talk about the A-150 design lineage
mentions the fucking matsu class

Jordan would take a 380mm APC shell and shove it up Stille's ass
actual quality research


















