#history
1 messages · Page 12 of 1
h39 'I'm a kinda bad colorado, I'm fast tho'
musashi 'I am literally yamato'
wg: eh, same tier
wows, the game where the more armor you have, the more damage you take
at least they indirectly got it right with bisko
where instead of eating citadels she just eats full pens hand over fist from literally anything
That’s
All the German BBs
im aware
H39s also eat cits if you turn
I think what really benefits the Germans is how fast paced turning can be
Which makes most combat at 18+km ranges irrelevant
Since even in the slowest bb you can easily dodge
French BB's don't even take cits after about 10km+ range
meanwhile the german bb's take tons of cits
just don't armor your ship and get constantly overpen
I devstruck a republique at 15km once
that's the secret to being invulnerable, that and armoring your bow
Republique I can believe
trust
I remember there was a clip where it was Cleveland vs Massa in brawl
Alsace, richie and JB no
And the Cleveland just sat broadside and farmed
Literally nothing the Massa could do
She couldn’t ram because BBs lose more points when they die
I have shot furutaka's with new mex and had it bounce off the bow
Up to
Not including
Anyways we better stop before mods gulag us
High quality Texas panties

😤
- splinter deck below the belt
How much development was made into armored submarines btw

Maybe enough armor to resist 5 inch gunfire would be enough to aid in convoy raids?
And also, I noticed most subs didn’t have deployable smoke?
Why so? They have a small profile so you don’t need much smoke to conceal yourself from pursuing DDs and to make a quick dive again
the dark side has some schemes considered by some to be
...unnatural
❌ angled belt
thick main deck on top
❌ splinter deck below belt
but yeah you don't want your TDS to vent into your citadel either

toilet tds
toilet tds
☑️ angled belt
☑️ thic main deck on top
☑️ splinter deck below belt


obey the wheel
they tried ok
at least bismarck counts as having a splinter below belt
funny sims cartoon
precisely
lewd
the big pog, fixing texas up nice and clean
so she can sit high and pretty like nc and others
poor NC sits in the mud
what if we visited the nc museum together, haha, unless

that sounds lovely, it's a date
Bottom suction!
She ain't moving without dredging the entire silt around her for sure.
but yeah pretty sure she's on wooden struts and they can drain that water from the section
since when I was there it seemed very thorough
Can I just talk about how much of a scam intrepid is compared to hornet
The food on intrepid is highway robbery
They want like 10 dollars for a hot dog
how good are they?
Hornet hot dogs cost like 5
They looked like average New York hot dogs
So like
Not really
isn't NorCal basically set up so she never has to leave to get drydocked
I thought it was common sense not to order food from inside any venue huh
iirc as of like 2008, yeah
bc all the bridges in the area already prevent that
My hornet experience was great
I got to enjoy some discounted brisket while listening to tainted love on the flight deck
And since it was 7/4 I also saw an f-18 flyover
New York prices
When I have enough money I want to start one
naval archives might have something
I visited nc in nov 2020
alright that's a date, jaba
Meh, Corrosion will still find a way as long as there's some part of her that's wet and other part that's dry
wisky's cafe was also closed when I went last weekend
I'll be the curator
yeh, just she seems to already be set up where they can work on her
Do you think Richy would mind if Jaba would like to introduce his shell to richy’s collection

Hopefully no decapping occurs
yeah norcal literally can't be moved from her location so they have her set up so she can be worked on there
base slap it is then
I remember NJ had like
NC has one of Alaska's 12" SHS iirc
richeblieu
Wasn't that one full of weird numbers
ye
Missed opportunity to match them to the war plans 
You mean this?
spmeed
Is
Armor
Not that specifically but other numbers

comically hanging right above the childrens play area
Which is literally just an aegis
teaching them young
They lucked out with the treaties for sure
Wisky had a set of kill markings on her turret from desert storm
lex was by far the best cv conversion
this would literally be me if I were an 18" naval gun
heck I'd argue lex was the best cv of the time period
While NJ had this painted in the A turret
idk about best but the akagis are kinda neat
they took much longer to get good
they were also worse than the lexingtons even after getting fixed to be useful
based
my dad's got a model kit of OG CV akagi that he hasn't started yet
you hold triple deck akagi like hamburger
by ww2 time yes
If only Izmail..if only 
28.5 knot tho but still
but them being so huge also let them absorb changes to stay good quality for a long time

what
no
krem
hon
please
lex had the advantage of being large, so in a time where cv technology mega sucked, they just were so big it didn't matter as much
Béarn smol
I'm sure they are super effective that the carrier after them will also have it 
that center casemate gonna haunts me for sure
akagi had 8'' guns
on the back of the ship
that face the water

lex's main bat at least could be used as guns
Oh it's not a casemate but a turret
Turrets are inside those cute spaces
Kinda like Germans
But more near
countersunk, so eh potato-pohtato
"prolly not, give em 8-inch guns just in case"
USN be like
the landing auxiliaries are even more ridiculous
Ye
tbf, a CV are more likely to get away from contacts, not like the arcs are super bad or something
Should be Zeppelin layout
this is also
after akagi's rebuild, ofc
Guns on both sides

Facing backwards on an inward section
Izmail's CV conversion
Armament:
8 180mm
8 102mm


lexington can bring 8 guns to bear at most angles
akagi can bring maybe 1 gun to bear at some angles from the waterline, 3 guns if you're at the perfect angle

so akagi has worse protection, less planes, is slower and has less armament in a far worse position
on the same tonnage
dimensionally lex is a bit bigger
but like
man
Ah. Project Kostromitinov. Result design of Soviet Graf Zeppelin study
Armament: 8x 152 mm (4x2), 24x100 mm (12x2), ?x 23 mm
Adopted big Soviet daughter of Zeppelin let's call her
I like them ok, but I don't love them or anything
Tbf I like some carriers
But I’m not gonna gush over the more famous ones
I love the old ones
And smol ones
Other than that
Maybe CdG but only because she french

ranger is underappreciated
Ranger is JB’s friend
Ranger is horrible
14.5k tons and she's on par with any other carrier afloat
Now tell me Maka
What US study said about
Minimum weight of CV
To be efficient
Now as I know. It was 20k tons or 22k
So Ranger was obsolete from the launch

as constructed ranger could operate more aircraft than refit akagi
why not

ranger has more aa, radar, more planes
Alright but
No torpedo bombers
Now already starting with oof here
Less surge capacity, which was her main complaint
Tho against Japanese doctrine it's a bit wash
For being very light?. Her sea keeping is bad. So making it harder to launch planes if sea is rough
by jan 42 ranger had torpedo bombers
If we’re talking early war, not having torp bombers isn’t the worst thing
If you’re American
Hmm true
by late war is when ranger had trouble due to outdated elevators
which is fixable but they didn't refit her
What about her being cramped. Ain't that making launching planes harder
she had a small engine but it was placed well, I don't think she was cramped
she's 1 knot slower with less than half the shp
smaller flight deck
and to some extent simply smaller ship being easily tossed around
I actually am surprised ranger could make 29-30ish knots on only 53k hp
Rather sleek lower hull
the magic of folding wings
She would go 36 ish if had 130k
gotta be, the yorktowns are around 2-3 knots faster with over double the shp and only have 4 feet more draft
"only" 4 feet...
22 feet ranger, 24 feet design yorktown, 26 heavy load
US has more population and money to spend on her navy
Navy is bigger so more experiments can be done
More experiments lead to more succesful concepts
More succesful concepts leads to better performance despite similar displacement
USN 
4 feet difference is huge hydrodynamic-wise
Izmail would go 26.5 knots with 66.000hp 
it is, but on a ship with similar dimensions (yorktown is 1 foot longer, 3 feet wider) it's surprising it barely gets you any more speed with more than double the power
then again 29 knots ish is when you start hitting pointless returns in engines
but ranger was going to have a 100k engine and they figured out how to do it on 53k so good on them
yeah in this case it's both draft, block coefficient and hull fineness is way different

idk, that's a massive difference
the tiniest of boiler
The smaller the boiler the bigger the spoiler
I wonder if there's data out there for some silly thing like engine room air intake rate, overpressure difference, funnel draft, etc
Wonder what “50 per cent accuracy” means in this context 
that'd be cool to see
hm, hard to say, maybe only half were calibrated properly to hit targets aimed at
without knowing the distance it would be hard to quantify what it actually means
you assume the barrel was even rifled
Tiny iron apfsds
I mean, engines can only work so far as to the design and the dynamics allow it (as ard pointed out). you can reach the same speeds with the same power yet different displacements , but design and dynamics of the vessel also determine the maximum effective speed and how to reach it.
tbf, Ranger design advantages allowed her for that kind of speed with such a smaller and less power engines.
It's kinda like the aero cars that were in the vogue in the late sixties NASCAR.
i hate the fact i kinda wanna play WT again
dont
but they added the coolest looking soviet tonk
and that trailer had really good musics
:(
Tbf for 730ft lwl displacement hull, the hull speed is 36kn
there's still room to go
i got cool looking Centauro with gen 2 thermals and 🪳 helicopter this patch so it's nice
- a BB and the first Navigatori class DD but >naval

yeah this seems like a pretty good patch in general
even if after seeing the speed of the main ATGMs on the Atak im uh

180m/s, hellfires go at 475
even the laser guided rockets are 450m/s, but i guess those have a better trajectory
creeping death
how much power is available?
they could've added the F&F version instead and put the heli at top tier instead of a premium but
only nation allowed to have fun is germany

i want die
Some studies have shown Bismarck to be unsinkable by gunfire. Something the Royal Navy found out.
(same dude)
ngl I want a hypothetical Mamie/Alabama vs Bisko just to prove a point for this dude
throw Bismarck into Ten-go instead of Yamato and see what happens
but those were mostly air raids. muh armorNgl she wouldn't even last an hour
Enjoy your stay
I read the first two paragraphs and regretted it.
His first and last few sentences makes me wanna puke
same...
The different riflings were mixed on each ship and even in each turret. According to "Naval Weapons of World War Two," this was unique as "such differences were totally at variance with the usual British policy for heavy guns in important ships" whereby every effort was made to ensure that each ship had guns of uniform characteristics. As completed, both ships had all Mark I rifling. Nelson in May 1944 received guns with Mark II rifling for "B" and "X" turrets, but "A" turret was not changed until March 1945. For Rodney, in December 1937 "B" turret was changed to two guns with Mark II rifling and one gun with Mark I rifling. In 1938, her "X" turret was fitted with three new guns with Mark I rifling and "A" turret received three new guns with Mark II rifling in February 1942. This mixing on Nelson and Rodney caused initial dispersion problems due to the differing muzzle velocities, but these reportedly became less pronounced as the guns wore.

Britain why
oh yeah I remember this
Ah well.
Understandable.
Rifling eventually becomes balanced as they're more used.
The only issue I have is that Commonwealth ships tended to have different rifles on their barrels, And I despised that
Muzzle energy (WWII AP shells)
------------
Units are in mega-slug•ft²/s²
Using new-gun muzzle velocities
JPN 46cm/45 - 327.6
JPN 41cm/45 - 228.9
JPN 36cm/45 - 147.2
US 16"/50 Mark 7 - 262.2
US 16"/45 Mark 6 - 222.0
US 16"/45 Mark 5 - 221.1
US 14"/50 Mark 7 - 169.9
US 14"/45 Mark 8 - 157.6
US 12"/50 Mark 8 - 110.7
US 12"/50 Mark 7 - 113.7
UK 16"/45 - 212.8¹
UK 16"/45 - 217.5²
UK 15"/42 - 182.0³
UK 14"/45 - 152.3
IT 381mm/50 - 235.8
IT 320mm/44 - 133.3
FR 380mm/45 - 224.6⁴
FR 380mm/45 - 200.8⁵
FR 380mm/45 - 208.9⁶
FR 330mm/50 - 156.3ⁿ
GER 38cm SK C/34 - 198.4
GER 28cm SK C/34 - 96.4
GER 28cm SK C/28 - 91.6
¹ With original Mark I rifling
² With later Mark II rifling
³ With 6crh shells
⁴ With original M1936 MV
⁵ With reduced M1936 MV
⁶ With M1943 MV
ⁿ not AP (SAP/SAPC etc.)
Turns out, if you creatively round up in any way you want lie, you can claim anything is true
@tough quail
i hope this guy loses his house to an airstrike
Those Kido Butai aircraft carriers were only ever used to damage ships, after all
Never to destroy them
They were polite like that
if only the japanese didn't put the highest percentage of their naval resources into naval aviation out of the big three
if only the Imperial Japanese Navy™️ knew planes were good
r/that_happened
It concerns me this man made it to officer
assuming he isnt lying
Ah yes, all those American battleships, losing their ability to escort(?) from 8” fire in May 1941…
I mean the thing is you can work in the navy for years and the only water you see is at the cooler between long hours on watch steering the USS Desk
speaking of desk drivers, why does Nixon in the Navy somehow look less trustworthy and shifty then when he was the president doing shifty things? also why is there no USS Nixon yet?
Hood, the All or Nothing ship
See, if I just make up higher muzzle velocities and higher shell weights, I can say whatever I want! Brilliant!
The Iowa had no protection over her entire buoyancy reserves. She could be sunk by a tug boat and a bazooka if allowed to get that close.
No WW2 Battleship ever beat another Battleship. The Bismarck beat two (Hood and Prince of Wales, or two against one), while being attacked by planes.
Ah yes, all those Swordfish attacking at Denmark Strait…
The beating that the Bismarck and Tirpitz took was equivalent to what sunk the entire fleet at Pearl Harbor. The Brits had to invent a special bomb (6,000 lb explosive) just to sink the Tirpitz.
Clearly, earthquake bombs were intended to destroy a battleship
Which are famously attached to the ground
these things are so wrong on so many levels that it's just entertaining
“What you call counterexamples, I call fantasy”
Guy: I only deal with reality, not gamer fantasies
Also guy: Well in a true one on one battle that would never happen…
Fact. Bismarcks’ armor scheme made her immune to cruiser guns.
Hey, did you know that 60mm of armor is immune to cruiser guns? By golly, why did they ever bother putting 150mm belts on cruisers? Could’ve cut half of it off and saved loads of cash
Oh shit, I forgot this is 300mm Bismarck deck armor dude

In fact some aspects of Bismarcks’ armor concepts are still classified today due to use in modern American carriers (blast control)
Hey now, I’m getting this strange feeling that this person may be copy pasting again…
earthquake bombs are baddass
Yamato’s and Iowa’s cruising speed was around 15 knots and they did not have sufficient stability to shoot on the run.
Also, did you know that Iowa cannot shoot while moving
There is a uss Nixon, but she’s been subject to a
A
A cover up

lmao
we should just Rename USS John C. Stennis and then gaslight everybody into beliving it was USS Nixon the entire time and always was
The Yamato needed speed to maneuver because of the way the rudders were orientated.
To turn, you must have speed

Astounding
This is unlike superior Russian monitors
Which are round
And do not require speed to turn on the spot
Glorious soviet Monitors (with T-34 turret) can use the power of the ghost of Mikhail Koshkin to turn on a dime! any and all evidence to the contrarity is captialist western propaganda 
Wait… 
Okay
Who copied who

Man, imagine wasting 20 years of your life like that
Couldn’t be me
Guns. The Bismarcks guns were of a high velocity design firing an 830kg shell at nearly 3000fps making them arguably the most powerful 15″ guns ever mounted on a battleship.
Eh, what’s a few hundred extra fps here and there? No one will notice
Ok iirc
Didn’t Bismarck’s turtleback armor lower the displacement of the citadel
To the point where citadel penetrations weren’t even needed to sink the ship
So you could actually sink a Bismarck, with cruiser guns
"arguably" if you're a lobotomite
cue the french and italians laughing in actual competent naval design
I'd argue that Suriago Strait was won by the destroyers and PT boats before the US battleline fired even one salvo, but that the fattleships managed to steal most of the credit
The PT boats perhaps not, but yes, the DDs did the bulk of the damage
However, the battleline nevertheless presented the main tactical obstacle preventing the Japanese from just eating the losses and bulldozing through the strait past the DDs
I forgot who sank Fusou, so just included them all
And Yamashiro was like half dead when the battleline opened fire
Both sank to DD torps primarily, though Yammy ate a lot of gunfire too
Yes, my point is more that the battleships take an unfair amount of credit for that victory
At 03:20 explosions flashed, McDermut's torpedoes hitting three destroyers. Yamagumo sank immediately, while Michishio and Asagumo were disabled and drifting, the latter having lost her bow.



I will beat your ass Spon
Think Fusou was fell by Melvin?
Lemme check
Melvin has a claim
but there were a lot of torpedoes
meanwhile McDermut with the triple strike
McChad
thats alot of bismarck fan boi
not the place to ask
Shut
Yep
the internet has ruined me, I saw "L'EMBT" and was expecting a
Oh my that is blessed
I love the French tradition of sticking a Auto cannon on the roof for the commander. also it looks fuckin' badass
blessed fromch
now hopefully it doesn't pointlessly have some shite kraut engine
nope nevermind they downgraded the engine to the german one
motherfucker


High pressure best pressure
300% mad
that and the brainrot 4th crew member im praying gets axed as soon as possible aside
good content
always a shill for slapping autocannons on MBT
I can’t imagine it not being able to take either a French or German diesel
even the leclerc can do that
Odds are the French will adopt it with their own engine
Abrams: But you need 4 for reload slave I mean faster maintenance.
I mean
It’s 4th crewmember
Or it’s have a entire maintenance platoon following you about
One day Abrams will get autoloader and crew will be 3. Then I will see their faces 
i mean they already have the autoloader coming
Abrams had a autoloader option for awhile
but this is also a topic so brain rotting i dont want to have it again
so lets talk about the super legreg some more
Next gen abrams we know next to nothing about so
Ah Leclerc. The least known European tank after Ariete
did you miss the info that came with the initial renders
Yes. It's Leclerc
they confirmed the autoloader with the dipshit hull layout
still not clear if this is something the army was asking for, or if it’s just GDLS saying “we did a thing”
i mean it doesn't actually matter
yeah there’s still not anything really that clear on it beyond what it looks like
With the arrival of larger guns. Autoloader will be necessary 
congress is incredibly unlikely to fund it
I kinda doubt considering how army tankers like to fight that they’d go with it
yeah usually autoloaders have been reserved for lighter projects right?
that and the stryker mgs
not really the autoloader more the crew less turret
when literally the entire rest of the planet is moving to autoloaders its time to admit you're wrong
For now Germany used the 130mm gun for Kf51. But I'm sure more new models will appear in time
British with rifled guns
Americans with guy loader
Army tank commanders again prefer to fight head out where there able to look around
I doubt the armies next MBT won’t have a autoloader
Do we know if NG Abrams uses a bustle autoloader or a carousel
looks at other tanks lumped into this rest of the world thing
Chally 3 doesn’t even have a autoloader
Type 10 
bc the bustle looks real small to fit an autoloader, and given current events I doubt anyone at GDLS believes that carousel is the way to go
It's a Challenger 2 with cooler turret
both the ijn and hms are using cordite why aren't we, so lame
except in this case its uh
And all of the western projects besides leclerc outside of Asia with auto loader are like a entire decade or two out
M1 THUMPER M1 THUMPER M1 THUMPER M1 THUMPER M1 THUMPER M1 THUMPER M1 THUMPER M1 THUMPER
I’ll laugh my ass clean off if this whole thing turns out to be a response to the armata
also the marine nationale, the kaiserliche marine, the regia marina (at least i think they're buying into the EMBT thing), the vmf, whatever the fuck china's theoretical navy in ww2 was called, also korea and india...
Like
It is
it's literally everyone but the americans and the british
and the british only because they're poor
they have built autoloaders before but just didnt have the budget
the EMBT was announced like the day after the Victory parade when the T-14 first appeared
The next gen American tank will likely have a autoloader horse
im talking to maka
Americans see the T-14, go ‘oh shit’, and build one that actually works
130mm also not so after
if that is the case, then hopefully when it'll be effective and fit into the puzzle of the army instead of a paper checklist for some big dude to smile at and then needing to shuffle things around because uh, reasons
the french are still playing around with the 140 yeah, though it's about as likely to go anywhere as the 130 or the russian 6" meme blaster
i.e
not at all
Just pray
unless someone suddenly invents Armor 2: Shittribution
I swear the only export customer for the next gen abrams is gonna end up getting that thing turret popped worse than a T-series if that thing has a carousel loader
they wouldn't dare
...would they
Abrams already pops in Yemen. So no autoloader won't change it. Just put some APS on it
I mean it doesn’t turret pop outside of like IED explosions
usually it’s just blowout panels going
But if they penetrate the crew side? 
I mean if they hit the hull ammo
lets please not get into an argument about how well blowout panels work
this isnt gonna go well for anyone
and is guaranteed to give me an aneurysm
Ok what about Armata solution. Autoloader is carousel but crew is in their own room
I mean either way
Not very flexible
Tanks combat ineffective

And the crew now has to escape the exploding tank
same thing with a turret blowout
Yeah but the abrams ammo all isn’t in one place
Crew can go back to the hull ammo if the tanks still operational
i dont think the tanks going to be operational
Damn
bring back the 138.6mm
tho it all depends on how the hit goes down
A T-14 being ammo rack and the turret going flying off to space is probably not gonna be too good for the crew especially if the tank catches fire towards the crew compartment
But if fire doesn't reach. Can they still drive the hull back
No
So it's a focus for crew safety only

both of them are going to be knocked out
the blowout panels aren't magical miracle equipment
your tanks getting deepfried either way
I never denied a blowout panel going won’t potentially fuck the engine as well
[rebuttal expunged]
again if this was above the engine it won’t be having a fun time
though i do wonder if you could engineer a similar thing for the carousel
Wait what is the main purposes of blowout
- giving tank chance to continue fighting by using hull ammo?
- saving the crew by giving them chance to escape?
given the one on a T-14 is kind of teeny (and not really a carousel anymore in the sense of how it got its name)
and the turret is tiny above it
the latter
What if you cover Carousel with composite armor. 
i really want to see a T-14 next to an MBT-70
turret scale at 0 to turret scale at 100
would need a landship for the required space

wait no
fuck
it's brilliant
we have to combine the dumbest traits of both the east and the west
take this
put the autoloader in the hull
and when it takes a hit and pops
the turret becomes an emergency escape pod for the crew
👏

just have the turret be the projectile, pop your own turret at the enemy and kill them, tanks can just be multilayered turret stacks
just do it like mario odyssey
what armor is going to protect you from a 15 ton turret on fire coming your way at mach 2
Man tanks are flawed despite being decades old 
it's a missile tank but not what you think
all military equipment is
nothing is invulnerable
everything is a compromise to achieve a requirement

but as a trick. Some of the wiesels will be manned ones. So you won't know which ones are drones or human
machine gun drone but when it is compromised it flings the machine gun off itself like a t series and into the enemy, where it explodes
ok I will 50 cal all of the wiesels
even in death it cannot be stopped

just replace drones with those like
weird floating platforms the us tried for scouting
and just put a dude with an atgm launcher on it
just get enough and put the entire tank on it, the treads are just magnets
so switchblade 600 regarding the drone thing
yeah those
shoots atgm
hits rotor
Speaking of drones
I like how you can use scout drones in War thunder to take down helis
Just ram into their blades
Anything can be a loitering munitions if you try hard enough
This is why I will camp the point in my HSTV-L and kill KA-50s with my drones
there were a few cases of planes cutting up enemy plane tails/wings with their propellors after they ran out of ammo iirc
And they are small af so it will be hard to hit them
And currently radars can't see them
I mean again
Free kills for the ADATs
Especially now that there’s two more Russian attackers to shoot down
In the early stages of World War II the tactic was employed by Soviet pilots, who called it taran, the Russian word for "battering ram".
Aleksei Khlobystov hero of the Soviet Union who committed 3 aerial rammings
Yeah SU25s will be popular for a while
you see the ideal james bond weapon is a puller plane that can deploy a push prop when a button is pushed, so when someone is tailing you you just slow down and blender them
Yekaterina Zelenko on 12 September 1941 supposedly performed a diving ramming attack in her Su-2, which tore a Messerschmitt Bf 109 in two as the propeller of her plane hit the German aircraft's tail. She remains the only woman ever alleged to have performed an aerial ramming 
her record is safe as long as I'm not in the air force
these?
the 1950s were such a weird time for the US Army
Leave this sort of stuff for france
cyberpunk 2077
for everyone alive

But good thing Rich
Protection analysis is also coming to navy and planes
So you can now see how shells react to ship's armor
Guess in time you can test Bismarck AP against Rich's armor

I will watch over it
Will they implement differences in shells and armor

Will see
It's in public testing now
It shows the armor penetration then does it hurt the interior etc
Wasn’t that already a thing?
Only for tanks
This looks like an alcoholic bastard of the mbt-70 and the chieftain
alcoholic post-retirement mbt-70
longest of dongs

Very pretty
Elbing was ordered by the Imperial Russian Navy as Admiral Nevelskoy from the Schichau-Werke shipyard in Danzig. She was laid down in 1913, requisitioned by the German Navy on 5 August 1914, and was renamed Elbing. She was launched on 21 November 1914, after which fitting-out work commenced. She was commissioned into the High Seas Fleet on 4 September 1915


Tell me Rich
Did French ever experienced something similar
Where the ship they ordered gets yoinked
40 pound depth charges from WWI
Sometimes for me
It's kind of "mind-blowing" (no pun intended) to think that depth charges went from 40 lbs. to 300 lbs. from WWI to WWII


you have better odds shoving a sailor overboard with a limpet charge and a snorkel
Anyone been to the US Navy Museum in Washington Navy Yard? Pretty sweet
very cool
Allen M. Sumner bisection, showing various compartments and machinery
Love the boiler tubes
Twin 5" gun from USS Reno
Oh neat
Ok, last one for now. That one torpedo that didn't work



Sounds about right for early war American torpedos
They’re building a new one iirc
like a permanent museum
Fun fact: Nigeria rates their new T72Ms as less reliable on the battlefield than their Vikkers MK3's
I mean
there old T-72M1s
that were bought from the Czechs as a emergency purchase
Yeah I'd rate emergency T-72s as being rather less capable than uh... basically anything that can drive and shoot reliably
The words emergency T-72 purchase do not fill me with confidence as to their capabilities
Is this even something shocking?
Vickers Mk3 isn't just some random half assed design, it's based off proven techs.
Especially since it got the DD-71
based
Please Gaijin 
S-67 Blackhawk
Closest thing West had as Hind equal
Attack helicopter and can transport troops
Only 1 was build Destroyed in 1974 crash 
Gaijin be like: Event Vehicle
Likely
Prototype vehicles usually turn into event stuff
Where MN
Lynx???
Troop transport, decent carry load and scary fast
My big: Gaijin whens are the tornado F3 and a version of the buccaneer with decent loadouts
The vikkers mk3 were gained in 1981.. so they are older than the t72s they have bought
I mean then Black Hawk is also since she can carry atgms too
What I mean as something that was designed from base to be gunship and transport. Having Attack/assault helicopter as role like S-67 and Hind
What the
Richelieu my man, you clearly haven't seen what happened to Nelson in another game.

Ew

the power of H E X A G O N

massive radar arrays you got there

If only Project 24 existed 
Could have prevented loss of Vang and Jean
Reminds me of something I heard from some company making sail boats
And calling it a new idea
Wasn’t Jean Bart also in rough shape
JB was commissioned in 55’
Then took part in the Suez crisis of ‘56
Then was decommissioned in ‘57
And she was in pretty rough shape for what was basically a ship under construction when she was moved out of France
And who also took part in a battle
And was partially canibalised for spare parts to use on Richie
she limit broke rich
Something USN BB’s are all too familiar with
True 
War thunder Drones gave me idea
What if this for naval. But unique to Japan only
You can't research it, it only appears in battle with points
Similar to drones
Then you ram into enemy ship going at 930-1000km/h carrying 1200kg warhead
This thing can also be good UR in AL as well
probably about as likely as them putting an oplot in the soviet tree this year
Especially after brand new T-80UK? Hah
that's uh
not the real consideration there
would be a political shitfest for both is what i mean
True
I feel like if the soviets gained a adequate battleship threat it would of likely prolonged the service life of most of the western battleships
tho I only can see that resulting in Western versions of the Soviet anti missile doctrine
with the western powers likely favoring larger missiles able to defeat battleship armor (think western P-500s)
Well main reason of Project 24 in 1950s was the assumption of West going with BBs (2 Iowa under construction, Jean Bart getting better stuff, Vanguard still around)
So 2 Project 24 was going to be laid down in 1955
If West heard this. I do think they would keep their BBs more
I kinda doubt Kentucky and illionis would of been completed unless the Soviet battleship fleet was large enough to justify it
2 Project 24 and maybe 1 Soyuz class.
Yeah I don't think so 
there's not really much of a point in battleships unless there's other battleships to fight
Ye. 24 designed against Iowas
Which stayed for a long long time
Iowa's spent most of their post war careers in and out of mothball until the 80s
in the 80s they were glorified naval fires support for ground forces
And Korean War in 1950s
@shrewd pecan would this work against H class
A naval version of the Felix, the ASM-N-4 Dove, was approved in 1944; in 1946 the project was transferred to Eastman Kodak, and in 1949 a contract for 20 prototype weapons was issued. Dove's infrared seeker was expected to be capable of correcting 400-metre (1,300 ft) aiming errors; trials took place through 1952, but no production was undertaken
POLAND MAXING
Ah PL-01
How to be next gen tank
- Have cool looking lights in front of hull
- have smooth edges
- cover the barrel with something even if it's a plastic cube
- some cool looking muzzle attachment
- mini drone or long antenna
tanki online moment
i remember those days
How to be a next gen tank in 2022
muh drone operator in the vehicle
Truuu
Current Next gens
Japan 
"decisive lethality"
Decisive Lethality Platform (DLP), the replacement for the M1 Abrams main battle tank.

centauro 3 with a bunch of ballistic vests strapped to the front to replace the ariete
Legend says that my sanity is located on oak island
The return of the Foch
She'll be returning to Brazil
based

Ariete best pen in wt
both because they released stronger shit
Kronshtadt
and because they nerfed it
Well thats disappointing
went from 625 to 589mm
so now DM53, the american round, the type 10 round (called type 10), the top merkava 4 round and the same round as the ariete but fired from the cv90120 have more pen
actually, the old abrams round has more pen as well
i think the old is 598 and the new over 620
and not the strv122 received the same round as the ariete as well
while having the best armor in the game

still a pretty old one but around 580mm as well i think
575
OFL 120 F1

c h o n k
only the 2F it seems
But rest still got the armor buff to turret no?
Ok Naval fixes are nice
37-47mm AA AI will not shoot destroyers
100-155mm AI will shoot BCs and BBs
AI attack range for 100-140mm is 15km instead 10km
For 150-155mm, 20km instead 12
For Ansaldo 120/50 mod.36 APHEBC
Fuse delay is 0.005>0.025
And more Shrapnel
Also for APHE as well
And SAP
Italy Navy getting some love here

Also German 283mm SAP shell now fuse on water
Any BBs that historically have good AA and have shot down many aircrafts, but besides US BBs?
not really, no
british BBs that i can think of only really came under mass air attack (outside of dumb glide bomb shenanigans like warspite) in the very early war when everyone in the world had fuck awful anti-air
the french couldnlt really continue AA development under occupation so were also stuck with early war AA (and what they had sucked)
and italian/german BBs were just fuck awful in this regard
i guess the ganguts technically might have just due to sheer duration under air attack
Tirpitz should've racked up a good number of plane kills, by virtue of having been subjected to like two dozen air raids
Too bad that her medium AA sucked
the only two nations with decent AA on their BBs were the US/Royal Navy
If normalized for their tonnage the German pre-dreads should be looking good in their final fit
Six 105s, 9-11 40mm and 22 20mm on a 13,000 ton battleship
The IJN BBs should have gotten plenty of plane scores
Alas their fire control was whack
And uh, often poor choice of guns, although they didn't want for quantity
25mm jams and dies


Praising on a low level
If they had actually developed a belt feed and belt for the 25mm it wouldn't be half bad
The round is fine, the ballistics are fine, mechanics are fine, RoF is a bit slow but still serviceable...
Fire control as mentioned was still pretty shit though
something something, guy with a stick
And even had they decent FCS, and solved the feed - the mounts were all slow
Well... the Japanese even gave a bucket list of issues with that gun, with rating on how bad each issue was
And the magazines rated only fourth, behind excessive muzzle flash, excessive vibration and slow mounts
So I wouldn't say that just fixing the ammo feed would turn it into a decent weapon, it needs some more
A 20mm gun would've probably been more useful to them, since then it would at least be feasible to rely more on muscle-powered mounts
@spring briar
He was also the one of the main designer of Izmail sisters 


























