#feedback-readonly
1 messages · Page 75 of 1
So... Cu uncensored?
no, to make it that no one can use emotes during night i mean
That's what I was referring to. Sorry, didn't ping.
that's against the rules
What
it is gamethrowing
Where can i see the rules?
that's why i suggested to make it that we can't use emotes during night 😂😂 @split coral
That's a very unclear rule
you can find it in game
@white jolt heyo ^^ it already has been suggested to change this, but emotes are a funny feature, and if you disable it, you can also just remove them completely m
And yes Emote code is against the rules.
Press the blue ? in game to check the rules
Lmao, rules need to be more specific in-game
You mean be able to pull rules up during game?
Also
Would be nice
Brb
I found it
Thx
"emote code" is forbidden, now i know.
Oof. Bout to uninstall wwo :/
@hollow vector Why?
Always targeted 😂😂 I use the cool skins for my avatar, the seers check me and I die. If I look plain, for somereason I get checked and die. Always night 1 or day 1. If I talk, I die, if im silent, I die. Usually always day 1. Or get this, just had 3 games like this. Day 1 and day 2. There was no info, and everybody just started voting me for no reason. 1 time i was a ww. Other time * was sherrif or med. I get its the game, but if I cant even make it past night 2 the I really dont see a point in trying yknow?
I tried everything lol. Like I said. Avatar skin. No skin. Talk. Dont talk.
My feedback is that sheriff should be able to find also villager killers as suspects.
Jailer,marksman,beast hunter and witch are roles that when they kill they’re not confirmed (unlike gunner/priest does) so it would be cool that if sheriff selects a player killed by some of these roles sheriff gets info.
Even if this seems a bit useless,it’s better than get no info,which is exactly what sheriff does now in these situations.Sometimes it could be helpful to confirm a beast hunter,for example.
I’m not sure that if a red lady dies from visiting an evil player and sheriff is watching red lady,he gets info or not.
If sheriff does not get info,I would suggest to change that too.
Or the easy way that would be change the sheriff description because rn it seems like if sheriff is able to find every kind of killers and he’s not
I thought Sheriff picked two people that might have killed the victim, one that actually killed and one random?
Yes sheriff does that why asking that @sacred sable?👀
Was just confused since Spirit Seer is the one that shows red/blue if the two people checked killed.
@glacial warren Might wanna see this
@runic dragon no it's not. Please report them in game and to a guardian via dm ^^'
Oof that guy is gonna get banned 😂
I recently had a match where I got killed during the first day, because of a Spirit Seer. I was a Werewolf Seer, and didn't resign, so I couldn't be picked up, right? Wrong, I was detected and lynched, and in my opinion it doesn't make any sense, unless, it's that WWS get to kill, but not vote
Yeah, never got why wolves are grouped as one attack for Spirit Seer/Sheriff to see who killed/visited the victim. Maybe because otherwise wolves would be OP?
Maybe, but just because one did it, doesn't mean the whole group has to take the blame
Hey. I think you could 'unbroke' zombie by giving them 2 or 3 life days. So if you are zombie, you will die by descomposition. Maybe that could be contrarrested by making another zombie bite u. This way zombie wouldn't be broken. Original zombie not affected by descomposition.
Another thing. If you get sected, zombified or coupled you will see a great icon on screen (just in case, i suppose). I think the same must be done with cursed.
@forest rover Regarding your suggestion about sheriff: Those 'killing' villagers basically prove themselves by killing. I like the idea, but it is a little bit pointless. This way sheriff will get useless info instead of no info at all (which happens too much now). Better think of a way to buff sheriff.
Well being realistic they don’t prove themselves at all unless they claim that they’re going to kill someone.The problem here is that
description says that you will know who killed the selected player but if a villager kills,you don’t know it (even if they will claim later) so imo it needs a change,either the ability or the description. @peak knot
@forest rover Well, killing rv roles 9/10 claim that they are rv. I agree that sheriffs' ability needs a buff.
Let me think of something
I don’t want a buff at all I just want that the written things are correct.I don’t get why the sheriff’s description is wrong,so I would want either that the ability gets changed to fit the description or that the description gets changed to fit the ability.
Sheriff is too weak
So the ability needs to change
I don't care about a description, that is literally the easiest part of a role
You guys on ranked?
Earlier I predicted sheriff would be a good role, but my experiments in customs proved me wrong
Sheriff is a forkman at least 85% of the time
I’m going to ping @runic dragon because he’s on 👀
But anyways let me suggest:
Now I’m going to ask @runic dragon opinion about this.
https://discordapp.com/channels/414179354814185498/416576750991048705/646809328367697930
I let you suggest
@forest rover Ain't that a feature already? 👀
Sheriff adjustment
I think the sheriff should be able to tag a 'victim suspect' every night. These add up, until one of them dies. Then it will be reset, and the process starts over again. This way the sheriff has more chance to check potential suspects. It will only show info from one of your targets as follows:
'You visited x, who was attacked by either y or z'
@runic dragon you’re sure about that?As far as I know,this doesn’t happen.
I checked it when I checked a player that got killed by jailer 👀
I'm just asking cuz I thought it was like that 🤔
I think the seer needs a nerf, like a 1/20 chance of seeing the wrong role
Wining as ww is proving much harder in better ranked games ;-;
@split coral I don't think that is a good idea, you are basically telling seer not to trust their own info
Then the role has no point anymore
Maybe it’s a bug but I think that sheriff is just able to see ww/solo attacks @runic dragon
Or we could have a new class of ww that shows some other alive role instead of its own?
Like a wolf shaman replacement
Kind of
Go #role-ideas-readonly @split coral 👀
@split coral In high ranked, seer is already replaced. Seer is a great role for getting new players started.
Ok ;-;
Ehy ^^ sorry I was a little bit busy, I am going to go through your suggestions now
I think that sheriff is neither weak nor op atm and it's ok as it is, it is a high skill cap role after all...
@forest rover I didn't really get your suggestion tho ^^'
@peak knot your suggestion would make the role op.. and what if multiple selected victims die?
High luck role, too
Yeah but you also need to play your cards in the correct way😉
Fair.
@runic dragon I don't think that is OP. You would still not get info each day and if you do, it's only from 1 person
Idk if you understood it exactly
Yes I got it, but what happens if two selected players die the same night?
you would know who you get info from
it would show
'you visited 5 who was killed by either: x or y'
and how that is decided would just be random
Mmhh ok, fair ^^ could you add this last part in the main suggestion so that I can post it ?😀
Okay!
(You can repost it here if you want )
Sheriff adjustment
I think the sheriff should be able to tag a 'victim suspect' every night. These add up, until one of them dies. Then it will be reset, and the process starts over again. This way the sheriff has more chance to check potential suspects. It will only show info from one of your targets as follows:
'You visited x, who was attacked by either y or z'
Oki, thank you for your time and for the suggestion!😄
Np
So basically you pile up watches until someone dies, then it resets?
That's pretty much it yea
Deffo sounds better than having to guess who wws will kill
Kind of like security instead of a stakeout
I think that would be a fair buff. Not too strong, just not a forkman lol
i posted something ignored long ago i gonna repost
Also can solo voting roles (
/
) not be able to be killed d1 by ww or sk?
Because if they die first night it’s likely due to random and they’d just lose like that for no good reason, unrelated to their skill
They could still die afterwards... by village or by ww or by killers... but at least they wouldn’t be killed accidentally due to random, they’d have a chance to play their role as well
I’m not including zombies because zombies basically form a team, I don’t know about sl though.
Ehy @runic dragon,
Sorry if your message got ignored (probably due to the flooded chat btw)^^
This sounds very fair to me but I will have to talk about this with the other staff members since it's a neat buff to those roles!
What would the message be in case of a failed kill 1st night?
Wouldn’t show that wws or killers attacked a voting role, more like how it is with protected people now
“5 PlayerName could not be killed”
Sounds fair since this way wws or solo killers would not know if they tried to kill a solo voting role or they just got protected
i hope this really gets noticed, too many fools and hhs die n1
@runic dragon happens to me 5/6 games
That would also buff wws/solo killers indirectly.. it's a tough topic to discuss
Yeah. Passive solos dying by ww or sk and ww dying by sk night 1 is basically just a thrown game
It's extremely hard for bad roles to recover from that
@runic dragon Is a ww buff a bad thing?
I don’t see how it’d buff wws and solo killers with that...
Fool, maybe, but not hh who always reveal target d1
Not much
Of course it does
Just a bit la
It prevents a disastrous scenario for them
Some throwers literally go for checked fool n1
my fking gold
All gone
Aii the thing is that they random fool or hh when they check someone deemed “useless” like bg tg fork sk whatever
And they random fool and ends his entire career
And fool just stays on for the whole game to watch himself lose and just get that 15 XP hhhh
Just not fair if they don’t get to at least fake something or just play the role
dumb fk 5 gold
I agree
By the way
This brings me to my next suggestion
Sk adjustment
At this moment, sometimes serial killer has to random kill because of a lack of useful information. Chances are they hit werewolf where they don't want to. Maybe it would be a good thing if serial killer could actually see who are villagers and who are werewolves?
That’d be a really useful buff lol then you’d see sk auras a lot
Then they could even sell werewolves...
And SK gets 250xp for winning as it is
Imagine an sk aura who claimed to have found four wws
hahahah
Because of this buff
but people will get the hang of that eventually
I wonder how it would affect the gameplay
Sk gonna dominate
Yeah
Maybe the sk should have ability to check whether someone is a villager each night
SK: I found a ww, am seer
votes off ww
another ww dies at night
SK next day: I found another ww, am seer
Yep hahaha
Actually there’s usually not much “lack of info”
Sk just stab an informer or unknown when no good person is checked. Or kill priest, usually the “lack of info” is just first day
I do that yeah
That’s gonna help so many throwers to throw the game and a bit too op
But with safe protectors, it is hard to be useful
I major in sk I should know
I am pretty good with sk too
Reducing the number of village is generally useful
Evil alliance late game remember?
But people tend to go random instead of det for example
If someone’s checked unknown sk usually can stab em too in hh game
If they go random then it’s their problem...
Most of the time there is a good target for sk yeah
Ya so the buff isn’t really needed... it’s a bit too op
Might need some adjustment to actually balance the suggestion
well there is something to say for going random instead of a ballsy kill attempt
Although I don't, but I see why you would prefer to secure a kill
targets are:
Random n1,
Aura in hh game, det in fool game/any checked unknowns/priest/claimed and proved rv (not popular bc tg might be ig) and confirmed goods
You know, speaking of roles being able to see others' roles
Is there any specific reason Cupid can't see their couple's roles?
True @runic dragon
If Cupid sees his couple’s roles as all vil he’ll just ditch couple win and help vil
I mean I don’t get why he can’t see his couple’s role either, but that sounds like a buff😂
Well ya true
Now the cupid is just like 'ok I am here so now what do we do'
actually, with some simple deduction, Cupid should know his couple’s roles in around n3
true
But I expect too much from sandbox I guess
Sandbox has too much random though
when I tried sandbox I almost fell asleep
Basically ranked with ppl who played less than 50 games
nobody says a word
And sandbox is too peaceful
There’s no tea, when they see more than one rv claim they’re just like “ok, you both are village now what do we do”
hahah true
Think we’re going further and further away from the suggestion lol
Ack
Back to Cupid buff pls
Hahaha okay
Also cupid is a little bit alike hh in the sense that they are either a separate team or village, depending on the situation
Now I personally think it’s more of a buff in early game, bc Cupid can guess their role from how they speak or so and everything, I think he’d know around d3 under normal conditions I’m assuming, like if the couple doesn’t throw and talks from time to time, plays his role correctly
tru
and if cupid has brain, it’s also a condition I’m assuming
not unimportant
I think the suggestion is legit, but it mainly helps new players more
||Gtg, cya youp ||
Cya
To Spanish translators
In the tutorial English version it says:
The games ends when all the Werewolf are dead or they have the majority
But Spanish version says:
The game ends when all players from one team are dead
It can make that people think that to win as Werewolf you should kill ALL Villagers which isn't like that.
It should say:
El juego termina cuando todos los hombres lobos mueren o cuando los hombres lobos tienen la misma cantidad que los aldeanos
@runic dragon Thanks for pointing it out, I’ll pass it to spanish translators, also corrections won’t immediately take place so they will be applied on the next patch 
@dreamy lion Ty 
Also in the English version it says: games ends when ww have the majority (Majority = More players than villager afaik), it shouldn't say that the game ends when they has the same amount of players than villagers?
@runic dragon About your hh/fool idea, I thought I had seen a discussion about this topic before and did some digging through the chat history.. turns out it was a slightly different idea 😅 Anyway, I am usually not in favour of adding special immunities and exceptions to certain roles. But depending on how this would actually take shape in the game, it could be troublesome, or perhaps a great tactical improvement, at least over time...
How would the werewolves see their failed attack on a fool/hh? Most likely the exact same way as attacking the solo killer; 'your target could not be killed'
The next day, one of the werewolves reveals this person they tied to attack, thinking they're the solo killer. If this was a fool game, you would lose to fool getting lynched :/
But once people get used to this option, that the impossible to kill person could be hh/fool and not just the solo killer... it would be a solid buff to solo killers, since it would prevent werewolves from constantly revealing this solo just to save their own skin.
Did you actually have similar ideas on how this special immunity should appear in game? What exactly is your reasoning for it, besides avoiding an instant loss for them (if any?)
@runic dragon Majority doesn’t necessarily mean to outnumber, still that’s really a fair point I’ve been questioning quite a lot too at the beginning, in my opinion it should be added to in-game faq in the “how to win” section. As since we’re already discussing about faq and rules changes, better than giving it a post, we will surely take this into account ^^
@sacred sable I think it's fine that Cupid does not see the lovers roles. It would shift cupid's loyalty too much, if they are both villagers he could confirm them as good, if one or both is a ww/solo he could reveal them and go for the village win. I know those would be reportable as gamethrowing, but this already happens too much without knowing their roles...
I think Cupid couples people, following the idea of 'love is blind' ... he should help them because they are coupled, not because of their roles.
You know, you raise a valid point.
Is feedback solely for game? Or for anything involving server as well?
Server feedback is also welcome here, it is listed in the channel description
Cuz I wanna suggest possibly a second #off-topic channel in case of too many peeps chatting on one, or so people don't have to sit and chat around others talking about something they don't like or aren't comfortable with.
And no, Unicron - this has nothing to do with what just happened >>
You are free to request a change of topic, or take it to dms if your convo with someone gets flooded out... I dont think it's necesary to split it up, since there is also a lot of quiet moments in off-topic, and it would require more moderating too.
Fair enough.
Minor thing but I would suggest Grumpy Grandma and Corruptor to also disable the target to use their abilities
Repost of an old feedback:
When you click on a badge a small explaination appears but when you click a second time on it, the explaination should disappear.
I think the explanation covers the badge...?
??
What do you mean by badge?
@cedar hinge heya! This does already happen, when you get glitched/muted you can not use your ability for the rest of the day 
@normal wyvern do you mean you want to add a bigger explanation than there is now? I would honestly dont know how to make them bigger
Noo, I meant when you double click on the same badge, the explaination doesn't disappear

Oops.
The explaination from the badge should disappear/covered when you double click on this badge 
Oooh my bad than , i probably read it wrong 😅. Anyways, i just checked and it seems like it was already posted in july. But i will repost it for you. Thank you for your feedback 
Thank you 
Make sandbox require a certain level to play in (like 15 or something like that). This would decrease random killing alot and make the gamemode alot better. You will probably get better bug feedback too. Also the gamemode isnt really new player friendly with RRV and all.
Setting a level requirement for sandbox is suggested before, thank you for your feedback 
I see more random killing in Sandbox from lvl200+ than I do from lvl2-40 >>
dunno. sandbox used to be fun for me but recently i only run to lobbies full of new people and trolling people
I play sandbox like it's quick game but with more fun roles.
@quaint bramble The message wws receive on attacking hh/fool d1 would be the exact same as one that would appear upon attacking a protected player... it’s not likely that wws would know exactly that they attacked a solo that day until later on... Besides, it’s already a widely accepted fact that wws and solos are teammates and should not reveal each other completely, the situation you mentioned does not occur often😅
Plus, I should emphasise on the idea because you seem to be misunderstanding... they would only receive this immunity on first night, they’re still killable later on...
Besides wws and all solos would need a small buff if you want all teams to have similar win rates in general😅
I kinda agree with @runic dragon.... that would help at least increase ww win rate by 2% or 3%....
75% Village Win Rates
23% Werewolf Win Rates
2% Solo Win rates
Village is too OP in general actually😂
Wws or solo only win under a few conditions:
- Med dead d1/ nightmared until death
- Ww and solo has high skill
3. Village is dumb and slow - Has a lucky rv combination, for example 3 rvs that can’t prove
Solo voting roles not be able to die n1 is not a big buff but it can help a little...
It’s not even a buff for wws or killer for the case of hh
เจอทักได้ชุดสวยป่าว
@runic dragon hey maybe use #avatar-catwalk for that? Or talk English here in case you wanted to give some feedback?
For speaking thai you should move to #thai 
Hey. I think you could 'unbroke' zombie by giving them 2 life days. So if you are zombie, you will die by descomposition. Maybe that could be contrarrested by making another zombie bite u. This way zombie wouldn't be broken. Original zombie not affected by descomposition.
2-3 days is enough for zombies to spread to half of the vil
2 days would be more reasonable ig
Can we have a confirmation when I decline friend request?
I legit accidently click a cancel for someone named unicorn when I wanted to check profile(If you somehow see this I'm Afk)
So I think it would be nice to move the location and/or size of the exit blocker acheivement/reward notification badge, because it covers all the of the buttons. It rather annoying trying to leave and having to wait for it to go away amd then comeback again for a sec , especially on an old and slow device
Maybe it could move upwards , or downwards as to not cover the win/lose badge
Maybe just make it smaller
Or maybe just change the shape
Make it possible to send a message when you send friend request cuz maybe people forgot who someone sending them a friend request is and then u can tell who u are
@ripe stirrup Heya! I'm extremely sorry for the late reply, but lowering the life time of zombies already has been suggested. Thank you so much for your feedback and suggestion ^^
I also agree with the fact, that zombies are really strong and need a nerf
it actually is to prevent using clickers/bots to endlessly farm ads, wont get removed for sure
I didn't know either until like a month ago👀
@iron girder heyo ^^ this already has been suggested before and was posted in #feedback-devs by min on 1. November ^^
Here is the link: https://discordapp.com/channels/414179354814185498/452605920233652224/639887302423871511
Thank you for your suggestion anyways 
Well, devs should make it change position becuse it wouldn't take much for an evil-doer to bypass it if its always in the same place
@fierce shale hello to you too ^^ to move it sounds like a good suggestion and I couldn't find it that fast ^^' do you have anything to add?
@split coral people, which want to bypass it, will always find a way and it ^^'
What is wrong with humanity
@charred kiln had to check it ^^ it sounds like a good idea and it happened to me a few times already, that I declined someone accidentally because I didn't know it's them^^' would you like to add anything?
Yes
If it is a really big deal that people can make use of it to say bad words and shit like that you can make also a report button over there if sb does bad language and doesnt use it where it has to be used for
@glacial warren nothing I can think of thank you
@charred kiln oay ^^
As Marksman you need to wait 2 nights to shoot your target at day. In the late game you don't have a chance to shoot a ww at day as mm. Please make it that you need to wait only one night except of 2 to shoot at day..
@fierce shale okay ^^ I will just take your second picture, because the other is extremely full ^^ thank you for the suggestion 
Heyaa @normal wyvern
That indeed does sound fair, so you mean like the bh trap? It only needs the night you tag someone and you can shoot on the next day? ^^
I did not see this having been suggested before or atleast posted into #feedback-devs
does sound fair that mm can shoot after one night, i agree that late game it leads into difficulties.
Thanks for your suggestion! Have a nice day
❣
So i was just testing the warning and if you just ignore it and click spin 4 times it works anyway
Should i put it in bugs instead?
And can someone else try aswell? So i can confirm it?
@lament knoll Yea it should be like bh then. I mean you can already shoot in the following night when you selected a target before. So it would be just fair to make it for day either
I literally didnt even know you had to wait 2 days , and always thought mm was exploiting a bug or something to shoot at day time
I'm noob
@normal wyvern @lament knoll Because MM CAN shoot the next night, or day and etc until they DO shoot
??
You mark n1, yes?
Next night you can shoot target, after the day
And you can also shoot the next day if you didn't shoot at night and so on.
No you can't
Really
Lemmee go test rn
Are you suggesting that if you select mark in day you can shoot next day
And if you select mark at night you wait til next night?
@sacred sable you don't always mark on n1 and then keep that tag until eternity...
If you choose a target to tag at night, you can't kill it the following day but the day after that ^^'
Or the night after that whatever you want to
But you have to wait 2 nights, the night in which you tag + the following day and night
Doesn't BH trap take all day to set up too? Then it works at night?
It's not used at day
And yes, I know yoi set up at night
Ahhh, that's what they mean
Wants Marksman to be able to shoot mark from marked night to the exact next day.
Yes
https://discordapp.com/channels/414179354814185498/416576750991048705/647102199444406312
I would like to suggest this
Mmmmh, I find it difficult to esplain what MM does when I play it
Like:
Mark N1 > Wait D1 > Shoot N2 if target didn't die > Shoot D2, etc
Yes exactly
And suggestion is
Mark N1 > Shoot D1 if target didn't die > Shoot N2, etc
Me neither lol, I'm just trying to unscramble my brain
@split coral yeah you can basically click anywhere for it to go away, that's already enough to stop most people from using auto-clickers, of course it doesn't stop all but frankly there won't ever be a solution that will completely stop it... :/
But yeah guys that's what the suggestion was about ^^
If you switch the spin button's position every time?
Yeah, sorry for flooding with it, and is nice to solidify
@split coral the spin button position already changes from time to time
It moves up and down
Nah dw Übergoo you weren't flooding👀
I would stop you if you were, you were doing just fine ^^
You're welcome Shadow 
There should be a way to give gold to people tho
Like, for helping a friend create a custom game or buying roles for a custom game
Actual feedback:
Saw that Google has a new Points thing in play now and this game isn't on the big list for using points for in-game $$$
Maybe that's coming up in the future?
yea that has already been suggested before and posted into #feedback-devs
The link to it is -> https://discordapp.com/channels/414179354814185498/452605920233652224/628280581440143370
If you want to add a
to it!
I am personally not that much of a fan of it tho👀
As you could easily transfer your amount of gold to an alt if being banned or moving it back to your original account once being unbanned etc
@split coral ^
It has so many likes, why was it not added?
@sacred sable i think that has also been suggested before like somewhere around last month!
It was also posted in #feedback-devs , so maybe, who knows it might be coming up in the future yea ^^
Still thanks for your suggestion and i could try to get the link for you if you wanna?
Or i can simply add a +1 for you in the database ;)
Sure, thanks!
It'd be nice when literally none of the games in the list rn are ones I play, and I only play 2, 3 mobile games lol
Well Shadow... many likes =/= it'll get added
The devs decide whether to add something to their game or not, they got the final saying and if they don't want to add it they dont have to ^^'
;-;
Also yea i get that Über👀
This is so sad
When you are wolf and are trying to fit into the village.
You can't put all wolfs on the suspect list because you get auto reported for that.
You can not fit into the village. Please undo the auto report system when you "reveal" your teammates. You need to suspect them in order to win.
If someone really reveals their teammates they get reported by everyone anyway.
@runic dragon Your reply shows you only considered it from a ranked perspective... in other game modes it will for sure result in fools getting lynched because of wolves 😅 And yes I did understand it only applies to the first night.
I will add it to #feedback-devs; your original post + the specification that it would be the same message.
Is there an auto report for that??
Come on remove those auto report things for gamethrowing
Is there somewhere i can post screenshots of people teaming?
Its ridiculous
Teaming is an ingame report reason only, unless it was done by a big group/clan.
;-;
And yes you can get an auto report message if you would say 5 is ww, while you are ww yourself
Teaming and targeting
So if u want to sell out ww as fake aura?
Or say like 8 is ww cuz bla bla bla
Those are tactics
Im not a guardian so I dont know exactly how they handle it, but since they would see its ranked, they might try to remove the auto reports before you get banned :/
No
Auto report you get auto banned
I saw a friend of mine doing that
Then got kicked out of the game🤣
But anyways put it in #feedback-devs
This is important
Yeah auto report can get you auto-banned, if it stacks up high enough. But guardians look at those reports as well whenever they have the time.
I suggest asking for specifics from one of them first. In the general rule, revealing a ww team mate is not allowed, and this auto system is there with good intentions to prevent massive gamethrowing.
Oof, namechange costs 100 gold now
I love it.
Now people can't dodge reports by changing name
They already couldnt, the reports are stacked on their acc, not by username only 🤔
I see.
I never change my name anyways
Also heard that they plan on adding being able to take inactive names
Would like to be able to use my name since the sccount using it's been inactive since August
Some people are already able to, so I think it's version 0.39.1 but not entirely sure
@sacred sable idk what u saying but i dont have to pay gold for changing name
New update
Please read #ingame-reports-archieved
@split coral here are all info what you should know ^^ do you know how to report in game? And well, #questions next time 
Ill put in questions nvm
Oh oki 
Hi guys, idk what you are trying to do with the new roles but they suck. Please don't bring them to ranked.
What is wrong with new roles? @peak knot
Kitten wolf: killing someone + converting someone is literally even stronger than berserker.
Fortune teller: give your cards to rv claims to prove themselves and insta solve the game. This is a buffed paci and paci is OP as fk
Illusionist: the only role I find interesting, sort of like a shaman but solo
Don’t worry yet they’ll need a lot of time being in sandbox before they reach ranked tho.Even fc,gww and sheriff are not yet 👀
^^
Okay, just giving a warning because red lady and mm were also in ranked kind of abruptly
I still dislike mm as rv, by the way
Probably kitten werewolf will get changed because that ability seems to be even better than zombie.
Yeah, fc and gw are broken lol
Red lady would be a great standard checking role. In my customs I replace aura for red lady.
High skill players love it
@runic dragon .can I send send an invite for the sandbox server?
Hmm ye but every role can be weak or strong it just depends how you play with role ^^ @peak knot
?
@runic dragon All roles are generally strong or generally weak
Ofc potatoes can always manage to fk it up
But if you are good with an OP role, there is nothing you can do against it
@runic dragon sure, i check something first 
K I'll wait
Can I send it in other chats too?
@runic dragon where you wanna send it?
In general is the best I think
Or off topic idk
Bc I love the sandbox server
I'm 3rd place on it
^-^ ye i like sandbox server too 
And sure you can post it, but remember ping me with link^^ @runic dragon
I can send the link
And ping you with it?
Yes
K I send it in general and off topic
If a bh and one we are left and the bhs trap is on themselves, I believe that it shouldn't count as a ww win. I encountered this just a moment ago. But if one ww is left and it's also a bh left, if the ww triggers the trap they will die, so I believe it should only be fair that the tow wins at that point, as there is no way so long as the player is still active that the ww could win if the game continued. Has this been addressed or is this a possible thing that could be potentially changed?
@brisk cipher the werewolves winning condition is to equal the number of villagers and that won't get changed ^^
If there is a bh with trap on himself left the ww could also not try to kill the bh at night and it would cause in an unnecessary tie
The village and ww winning conditions are different, that's why it is that way.
Villagers need to kill all enemies meanwhile werewolves only need to have the solo killing role dead and then equal the number of villagers.
Wws are already very weak and hard to win so there won't be added another nerf to them, especially because that is one of the main game mechanics that has been there since like forever.
Still thanks for your suggestion it's appreciated!
Outnumber, or match village number?
Being the equal number -> my bad
The spamming report option shouldn't have explanation as a requirement. Spamming is spamming, regardless of whatever the spammer writes.
Having to explain it is annoying and time consuming let alone 'pointless'. Coz often we write "spamming" itself in the explanation box.
So in summary we should be able to select spamming and then report without necessarily having to write an explanation.
Heyyyy @vivid blaze
I actually agree on that, it should be optional whether or not you want to add a comment onto your report for spamming or actually.... it's not even necessary, if a person spams, the guardian won't really be able to overlook it in the chat as spamming is something penetrant.
And it's indeed pointless just writing "they are spamming" in the explanation as,, well...
Of course they are you wouldn't report them for that if they weren't.
I'll post that into #feedback-devs for you 
Did not see it having been suggested before, thanks for your contribution!
I dunno, I used to be able to blank report stuff like spam and random killing, but being forced to explain helos me solidify WHY I reported it in post
Kind of like when I report people for inappropriate usernames and I can send those blank
If u report for spam just write nth right?
Sometimes the spam is confined to one day, i would use it to write 'spammed on day 1' or to clarify that it was hateful spam or something like that (But I do agree with the suggestion, the message should be optional)
Can someone dm me a ss of the descriptions of the new roles
Havent got the update yet
@vivid blaze Don't ping the whole role, if you see what you posted was overlooked just ping one of the Helpers
It was posted in general, it's not a channel where staff usually looks for things to respond to. And you can say you;re tired of staff repeating the same things, but that's the procedure. report them ingame or send them to a guardian.
And the rules are currently being re-evaluated and going to be more specified in an upcoming update
Such a typical answer from u guys
Yes, because that's the procedure we work with, if you want action against these people, they need to be reported.
You know the worst part is that u guys claim that u help people, but in fact it's totally ironic. Literally none of my problems and feedback have been solved here.
Your feedback has been posted in #feedback-devs multiple times, and some ideas about changing rules I have passed straight to Lisa. And the one about the new report channel I have messaged to 2 guardians.
And as I literally just said, the rules are currently being updated.
For your sake, I DID REPORT THEM IN GAME. It isn't my fault that village is biased and since if someone doesn't get enough reports he won't be banned. Our gameplay was ruined and we will have to get it sorted out one way or another
This isn't about the rules suggestion thing, this is about you guys totally ignoring us here.
Did you ban that gunner? Lemme guess and answer that myself. "No"
We dont have enough guardians to get people banned with 1 report, but a random shooter will surely shoot villagers too, and probably break other rules. So he will get banned soon.
If u say so, lemme go and forward this issue to a guardian as well. And watch still nothing will budge
I have no influence on the guardian's work, they are their own unit. Some of them do accept smaller reports, but we simply cannot offer it as a guaranteed service, since we severly lack the manpower.
And yeah you can suggest just add more guardians, but it's a slow process, and again, completely secluded to their own unit.
The worst part is that you're supposed to help people but u ignore them. Like I said, literally none of my problems here have been sorted out.
We come here with a serious report asking to ban people but you dont. And u know what that does? It makes the victim feel even worse, and in turn it let's the game spoilers get away with it.
It's totally an irony effect
And in the long term tbh you're just indirectly encouraging people to play badly like gamethrowers do since they won't be affected like good players do
We give everyone the same answer because thats our procedures, and now you make me repeat the same things.. I 100% admit we need more guardians, but it;s beyond my control.
We encourage people to report players ingame, cause thats our system, and while it;s slow at times, it does work fair and square.
Yeah yeah whatever. If it's working, why am I getting randomly killed again and again??
And it isnt even reducing.
Which is the proof that it isn't working
You have no idea how it feels when your gameplay is ruined, then people don't report coz they're deluded and furthermore they start insulting on u also.
A few times is still kinda ignorable but now it's so freaking happening again and again its beyond all limits
You can’t do anything really
They’d just shoot random again after being banned if they’re really intending to throw won’t they
I'm not blaming the staff here for people who spoil obviously coz it isn't their fault. I'm talking that they don't react to these problems at all
And “getting random killed” also happens when you act suspicious and you are unconfirmed🧐
A lot of gunners I know shoot from a suspect list, the suspect list includes some unconfirmed villagers as well but they only shoot on instinct, you can’t just report them for random killing if it’s that
Yup staff members never play this game and we never report people ourselves, thats basically what you're insinuating here. Ofcourse we do. Ofcourse we see there is always rude people and gamethrowers and so on. ofcourse we are tired of it too.
But we too, have to follow the procedure, we report them ingame. or to a guardian directly if its extreme.
Suggestion:
Maybe make a notif for gunners that wanna shoot a known role, say Seer was revived and everyone can see the role, that they'll be reported for gamethrowing if they proceed.
[Confirm] [Cancel]
You can't just use the procedure as an excuse. If it isn't effective it must be fixed.
though, the only guardian i see in ranked which is a kinda good player is alisonn
people i know got banned for strats
it must be fixed by getting about 50 more guardians thats my opinion..
If I have a restaurant and it's getting poisoned food, people will complain. And I can't just say "it's the procedure" as a dumb excuse
@sacred sable why don’t you simply just not allow them to shoot said revealed player
WWO is like a big restaurant chain getting poisoned food, and only 4 people who have to check all this food before it gets delivered, if you wanna go with metaphors...
Like, gunners wouldn’t be able to shoot a revealed good player
So then deal with the ranting that's happening
I love this game and all but I gotta say that the game experience isn’t always so great😅
Stop victimizing yourself
In sb, the gunner 'needs' to be able to shoot revealed people, cause he could be in a couple, or the revealed player could be turned into a zombie.
Good question, but I can see the trolls suiciding and taking ten-minute bans and watching ads, over being able to be reported over intentional gamethrowing
And on a really serious note though, don't judge or blame us for feedback we give
Empathise on “good player” on your point about zombies @quaint bramble
Speaking of zombiessssssss
Oof
I am dealing with it, you just dont like the way how, and I am sorry to get blunt on you now, but you will have to deal with that too.
I do not claim that my answers solve everything, but i do everything in my power to help, and yeah that isnt as much as both of us would want to see, you and me agree on that, Knight.
Could someone link me feedback on zombie opinions and suggested fixes/nerfs?
Yeah sure... all that excuses instead of a simple expected answer which should've been "we'll look into it and solve it"
Because we cant solve it, needs more guardians to ban people faster. We cant reduce the 12 report minimum, needs more guardians.. thats what all of it comes down to.
And as I said 2 times before, the other problems you brought up we did answer adequately, by posting them in fb-devs and by rewriting some parts of the rules.
Actually we have a official thrower list reported by members in our discord😅 if that would help lol
@sacred sable Someone once gathered up just about every zombie nerf ever suggested, here's a link;
https://discordapp.com/channels/414179354814185498/452605920233652224/622048683722014720
Well the thing is that you tell us the same thing everytime. When tf are u planning on getting more guardians then?? We keep waiting and waiting
They are currently going through applications.
And nothing's changing. We keep getting affected by the same problems each and everytime
Well I'm literally sick of this nonsense, surely you are too. So let's end it here. I hate to be toxic.
I dont expect many people to get picked, as they need to be 18+ and be considered reliable by the other guardians
I am indeed frustrated as well by this procedure I keep referring to, and I know staff is trying, but there isnt an easy way out of it
Picking guardians and getting them worked in takes time, and cant be done in big amounts at a time, because then it would be harder to detect corruption amongst them for example. And 4 guardians cant mentor 10+ new recruits, but they also cant be expcted to do everything right on their first try
And thats just one of the many complications. If we can actually grow the team now, it should be able to grow expontentially though.
@runic dragon Doesn't Alison deal with that thrower channel?
@vivid blaze If it means anything to you, there is at least 1 guardian of good quality, she's in our community too :)
If all guardians grinded ranked, banning system would be soooo much better
Now, I’ve seen other people want this, so I am gonna suggest it: for whatever character you are playing with in-game the voting arrows should match the skin tone of your character.
You mean the hand ?
Yea
I would like to be unbanned please?
If you think you were wrongfully banned, you can message one of our Guardians
Message one of the following guardians and make sure you include your in-game name and name any reasons why the ban is invalid in your initial message. If it comes to discussions do not be rude or your ban will not be taken away.
List of guardians:
- Kem => @crisp thistle (@KemTrangTien#9980)
- Alisonn => @naive whale (@Alisonn_#4655)
- Boy => @arctic nova (@BoyHanQuoc#6473)
- KoreanKing => @last tiger (@KingK#2236)
@quaint bramble Their offline for two days now
How can i contact them if their not even online for two days straight...
Howd i know their offline? Cuz their not answering my messages.
2 of them are online right now 🤔
I know its weird that his not even answering my messages
well, they are only 4 people for a game with 100k+ users, so they reply whenever they can, in order from oldest to newest, guess there's a lot of people before you
just send them a gentle reminder
The other two is invalid user
i will be unbanned tomorrow.
But to be honest i didnt deserve this punishment
The invalid user thing is a discrod bug, you can also look in #ingame-reports-archieved for their id's
Well thats against the rules.
Not literally teaming up
you should not share info with them outside of the game chat, because its unfair to the rest of the players
We didnt share info outside
Either way, your options are messaging a guardian or accepting and waiting out your ban. Arguing with me is not an option that will help you at all.
But their not even replying.
my friends r playing right now and im missing them
just because of this auto ban
I cant help you with it, I explained everything I can, please just stop.
This isnt the right place for this.
im leaving since complaints are useless
They really are. You can message a diferent guardian if they arent respnding, thats the best we can do for you.
Discord staff like me cant take your ban away or check your reports, so youre talking to the wrong person here.
Can someone look at my suggestion a little bit earlier please? 👀
Please increase the amount of times you commit suicide before you are banned. I played 3 games and committed suicide, one was because I was hh and had no Target and would lose no matter what, and the other two were because I legitimately had to go in the middle of the game and was banned. I personally think it should be a little more than 3 times.
If you had to go then it doesn't matter you got auto-ban cuz u wasn't to play anymore 🤔
And if you know you should to go just don't join a game
There's many thrower that suicide as if nothing, it will increase the amount of suicide players a lot
Honestly you don't have to commit suicide. You can just be "off" and that doesn't ban you.
@thin dome I'm sorry for the late reply and the over reading ;-;
I checked out your suggestion back then and was wondering what exactly you mean. You mean the "arrow" so the finger, which points at you or others?
So it would be this fo you only?
@bronze scarab heyo ^^ Toon answered and I would like to agree with them. If you know, that you have to go, simply don't join a game. Also how can it be, that you have to go in 2 games in this short time? You can count 10-15 minutes for every game you play.
Maybe add recents tab? A recent tab shows who did you played with for the last two matches. So we can easily add or report him.
Hi, I realized that a lot of old feedbacks which had a large majority or upvotes had never been put in the game. Is there a special reason for this?
asking here because concerns feedbacks, and maybe we have to repost some
@graceful skiff heya! This got suggested before, but a long time ago. So i will repost it. Thank you for your feedback 
@woeful mesa the votes dont matter in what the devs will add, it is just fun for us, the community. The devs choose what they want to add
Oh okay, thanks for the answer^^
@glacial warren yes and yes
Guys.. Will we get a level requirements on Sandbox? There's no way experienced players can have fun in the game with newbie players... Game throwing n committing suicide.. We should seperate quick game (for new players) SB (for experienced players) 👀
Hey @sharp stirrup !
Level requirement has already been suggested a few times, we don't know if it'll be implemented in the future.
Thanks for suggesting anyway 
What about an arena mode?
Meaning that there are floors, which need a specific quantity of wins/win streak to enter, meaning that if you start to go higher, you are paired with better players, and have less chance of winning because another person is a noob.
It looks like a lot ranked👀
maybe add the current season rank to people‘s profile
@serene lotus isnt this in the ranked leaderboards? 🤔
Ehhh idk but is there a possibility to find out somebody else‘s rank? i think not
2 feedbacks in one, add a search option xd
I just see my own rank normally, and ofc the Top 100 on the highscores thingy
Or a search option would be nice as well, yes 👀
To search for other players if they have played in the season?
Gimme a second
I like the idea of this but maybe we could add an option to hide their rank visibility?
Just wondering what's the poing in hiding it since the only thing that could hinder players would be being focused in ranked games, but the profile is already hidden there👀 But why not
Sometimes people dont want to have their rank searched you know? :0
So you mean hiding it even if searching for the name?
like it would show "not disclosed"?
If you’re worried about players being focused in ranked just dont let players have their name in ranked and stay anonymous, the focus is unavoidable
There will always be players focusing on some specific respected players and killing them whenever possible. Nothing you can do against it. Just deal with it
You can see the Top 100 players usually, and when you click on „Your rank“ you find people who have +/- 100 ranks from you. They‘re all in the same skill range as you are. When you add a search bar, people could look up certain usernames and find out their current rank
But when people don‘t like that you can see their rank, why would they be okay with their skill points showing on their profile? 🤔
No ^^. Which i think this should be an option to toggle in settings
@woeful mesa yes ^^
You cannot stop certain players from being targeted more often unless you hide their clan tag or give us the option to pick „pseudonyms“ before entering a game anyway in my opinion
Game should update clan's gold withdraw function
and transfer between players 😆
Oh what
How can you do this? I just know that clan leaders can hide it for the whole clan, but can you do it yourself?
You can’t...
Ah see
Bc PR always targeted now our clan tag isn’t there and we don’t get killed that often anymore
the only way is not having a clan tag👀
Well that‘s what I mean, any kind of attribute that helps to identify a player is kinda making it worse
Yes, being able to identify players encourage metagaming
You’ll know what tactics said players always use as well and be fully aware
But it also encourages said player to try new tactics
Same goes for people who u just meet very often in general or who are in top 100 idk its annoying but i think there have been plenty of posted feedbacks already
E.g. hiding clan tag in ranked completely or picking pseudonyms as IGNs
Read above, the votes in #feedback-devs doesn’t matter, the devs have the final decision ^^
Rip
Just posted a feedback
So I don’t see the point anymore. I just shut up
👀
^^
it's always good to give his opinion though
Upvotes doesn’t matter, if the devs don’t like it then the idea wouldn’t be taken into the game ^^
@runic dragon will add you aswell
I didn’t do a lot
You contributed
Considering, if you hid your rank
The leaderboard would kinda be like
1, 4, 10, 13, 25
Because people hide
Its only for the top 15 rewards anyway
oof..
which means the easy fix would be to enable it right before ranked resets?👀
I don’t want to reveal my rank but I still want to get the rewards
Or we can do it so we set it when you play ranked the first time
well yeah, but we all know they will disclose it one day before it finishs, and very unfair for all the efforts given👀
And it will give false hopes because the real ranking will be shown right at the end, and those that just entered top 100 would realized that they aren't part of it
Them let me change it so you choose before the season starts
which means this suggestion has a big loophole eh
So you choose either you get the rewards or not show your rank? Ok that’s good
I think the ranking can be "1)amazinGplAyer 2)unknown 3) unknown 4)IamGreat..." with unknown being not disclosed usernames. It will show the real ranking but with the name being shown or not
so that the rewards can still be given
Yea
Okie 😄
Is enabling player profile on ranked again heavily suggested?
I just disagree with rewards not being given since the ranking will just show unknown but will still be the real one👀
If it’s heavily suggested I won’t waste time typing a lot
Okay then I’ll type a lot
ai
This wouldnt be allowed
Because of targeting
||how long will it take for people to please realise that targeting cannot be fixed by hiding your profile?||
Oh I think I read wrong, but does your feedback devs means after the first game you can choose if you want the rewards or not? useless if you can still hide your profile and showed as unknown in my opinion
Before
I think you’ll get the rewards no matter what
Nice to have an option to choose
who would choose to not get free rewards?
and back to targeting...
names may change but personalities don’t...
If a player wants to target another player then just hiding the profile will not help because you still see the ign and even if said targeted player’s ign is changed, their personality won’t
they’d just get found again and targeted again
~~Some people change their username👀 ~~
Like I said many times the only fix to targeting is to make ranked players all full incognito and have no username
Yikes, some gamethrowers changed name and we still know who exactly said gamethrowers is
The same with targeted players
^^ Which links back to hiding 👀
What’s the point in hiding full profile if they’re already known
To give some privacy really
can’t they choose like what they can do in the last feedback
Choose to hide or not hide their profile
If they feel targeted they can go back to hide their profile
I suppose. I dont think having profiles in general is good in ranked tho lol
Because of what it says usually
Yikes, as I said many times if you want to avoid metagaming please just disable all usernames for ranked
Some people are fine with showing off their profile, not like if they’re targeted anyway lol
What exactly is the difference between having names you choose yourself and have a username
??
Well you said, like masking names
I meant like just show “1” for the player. Lol
It’s the only way to avoid metagaming but it’s just unrealistic so🤷🏻♀️
I could post it as a seperate feedback devs, but it is the devs choice really
I actually just wanted to put that as an elaboration of how you cannot avoid targeting
Will do once i head on my pc, or my lovely friends @glacial warren or @dreamy lion here could post for me 😉
Yeah. Its sad really
And so people should be able to choose if they hide their profile😂
But I guess nvm, it’s gone too far
Brb 😄
May I help you Necrie?
posting a feedback about totally hiding his name(like 1. only shown) in ranked if I'm not wrong
actually i just wanted to say how targeting is impossible to avoid and it was just an example of how banning metagaming completely is unrealistic
my main point is that people should be able to choose if they hide their profile but i got too carried away yikes
@runic dragon sorry I had to read up ^^' tbh I like the number feedback 😉
The choosing to hide profile is.. Hm.... The problem I see on this point is, that I'd players hide it, and others don't they could start to target players, which hide their profile. Also I don't think Profils are necessary in ranked.
Nooo! We always appreciate feedback and ||also talking about it but psht :p||
I will post the number feedback for you, since Necrie asked me to 👀
Thank you for your nice ideas!
I just wanna say I have lag since the beginning I started playing that game and I just cleared the cache of the app today and now it works well! (for those who would have the same problem)
@runic dragon I'm happy it works for you now! Happy hunting 
Ty ^-^
now that u put the suggestion in #feedback-devs @glacial warren, can i suggest to modify a bit bc people aren’t understanding
maybe add that the avatar would still be there but only the number is shown on top on avatar, and it’s to avoid metagaming and targeting yikes
Hi guys.
I was thinking about a little ww buff.
During night 1. Maybe ww seer should have the power to decide if he wants to find a
a) info giver
b) rv
c) good unk (- med)
d) bad unk
regarding of their ww set up this would enable various tactics and luck wouldnt be that big of a part.
After day 1 the seer will check the way he always checked.
This is a suggestion for high ranked not for sb.
It should also be doable in terms of programming.
Any feedback is welcomed
@light edge Heya, thanks for suggesting! Hmm, we usually say that ww need to be buffed, but I don't think you're idea should be applied, as luck is part of all games and shouldn't be removed. Making sure a strong villager can die during the first night isn't really "fair", imho 🤔
hi i’m new so not sure if this has been mentioned before but yeah
so like sometimes i play and i see my friends or sth like that but i forget to add them as a friend on like the players thing and so i will need to do in on the main page the “find friends” thing but i don’t really remember the exact username like which letters are in capital etc. so like maybe it can be like showing different results for like similar names so u can check their profile or something? idk
also there could be like an advanced search thing where you put in their level or like clan so it’s easier to find them?
i’m not sure if this has been mentioned before or anything just a tiny problem i have
pls give feedback if possible i’m not too sure about this thanks!
Hi so I have a few suggestions for getting more xp:
- more xp if our abilities are used correctly and effectively- so maybe gunner gets 15xp for shooting a bad guy. Or werewolf berserk gets 15xp if the frenzy kills a protector. Ect ect. But of course it might be unfair to those with no abilities like the normal villager or normal werewolf.
- more xp if less then a certain number of your team dies- so maybe if less then 2 werewolves die, and the werewolves win,they get extra 15xp. If less then 5 villager dies, and village wins, they get extra 15xp. Ect ect.
- more xp if you are the leader of your team- so maybe sect leader will get extra 15xp if sect wins, first zombie will get extra 15xp if zombie wins.
Another suggestion I have:
There should be a way for fool to win with village, like how there is a way for headhunter to win with village. So maybe if there are 3 werewolves left, with 2 villagers and 1 fool, maybe the fool will become village team? So if like werewolves outnumber village team, the fool will switch to village team.
Sect wdym? They’d be able to decide what kind of role they want to find and then the system chooses a random role of that kind and reveals it?
@uncut tusk
it's just for night 1. Killing rvs/ docs early just helps the village solve the game faster.
As med is excluded from the good unk list it's not and op buff as well.
Ww can still go random ofc.
This little buff would enable the wolfs to win by brute force. By perfect ww play.
It's the buff ww need to have actual chances, cause unless the village fks up big time wolfs/ solos have no chance.
I understand you for not wanting to take out the "luck". But still this would improve the gameplay of the wolfs by a lot imo.
And @meager fjord the winning conditions of fool means no helping village if he wants to win, I don’t see how fool can win with village😂
Sect how exactly do wolf seers check first night in your suggestion setto is confused
I was suggesting a change to fool's winning conditions. Like if there are more villagers then werewolves, then fool have to win by getting lynched. But if werewolves outnumber villagers, fool become a village. Like how headhunter becomes normal villager after his target dies another way (not getting lynched)
If werewolves outnumber village fool already can’t win
Wws win means fool lose as well
And I mean I understand what you’re thinking but don’t you think that it’s too unreasonable? Like yes hh wins with village but it’s only under the condition where his target dies, hh still take the lose if his target doesn’t die before him, making fool win with village “if wws don’t outnumber village” is just making fool a regular forkman, those people who get fool will just play village and wait for the win
yes @runic dragon
what if two wolf seers and check same category
will repeat the info or-?
i mean if there’s a chance they’ll check same
double seer set up idk.
it was just an idea.
but they don't like it so 😅
ws just picks a category
@runic dragon
imagine 2 jr set up. finding a info giver and tagging the other is huge for woofs. but yea. idc just sharing thoughts.
😁
@light edge Yeah but uhmm, it means that if you're doc, rrv or seer, you're most likely gonna die the first night? Not really good either :/
Sorry for the other people, I do not have the time right now to answer you all 😓
As med is excluded from the bad unk list, info (useless anyway) or whatever gets revived unless sk has a lucky med kill.
It's not about specific roles dying it's about giving the ww the chance to come up with a plan to win on their own and not be dependent on mistakes by the village
The game is about confirming 3 rvs and a doc.
Killing them makes the claim space for wolfs smaller
I like @light edge 's idea of the ww seer buff, you can adapt your checks based on your ww set-up 👍
I think usually a good unk will be killed tho
Potatoes play silver ranked, sandbox and quickplay
Role mechanics and strategies are not important to them because they don't know how to play anyway
Hard to rank up if you can't people that know how to play, either
A v i c i o u s c y c l e .
I only suggested it for high ranked and not for sb or seer hell
@sacred sable Then that's for thr best
Better play seer hell once than each and every season eh?
There should be a option to clear the donation list after a quest.
So the leader can check if everyone donated enough.
@light edge I highly doubt suggestions like that would directly go to "high ranked" (regardless of how exactly you would define that)
Imo it would improve the game a lot. at least to thinking players.
Because there are ways for a ww win by force due to the new roles added.
I also would like to add suggestions on how to play different evil roles.
Most potatoes keep quiet and die doing nothing. It's not about ranked only anymore. But evil roles keeping quiet are just weak...
@uncut tusk there should however be a way to "train" newcomers. Especially being evil.
"high ranked" aka det games
So what is your exact suggestion about how to train newcomers?
A gunner shot a confirmed priest today but most village was like it's ok coz he was annoying lol what a joke
This keep getting funnier and funnier
@runic dragon heya! Would this option only be able for leader or also for co leaders?
Being ww means you and your team should fake specific roles.
One should go info, one rv, one doc and one info as well or countering specific claims.
Like when you are alpha let there be a suggestion on how to play it. like "claim rv or claim aura"
When you are jr something like "try to do damage and die before your teammates"
Keeping quiet is the worst option
Something like tutorial messages before the game starts. How to play specific roles @uncut tusk
Hey sonnie!
Yes.
So the "donated"
Things are for everyone to see howmany they donated.
But the "quest-donation" orsomething
Should be for the 6 co(leaders) that resets every quest
@warm helm
@light edge itll confuse many players lol
I think its more important to learn first how the role works some jwws dont even tag🤣
Maybe some toturial for “expert player”
Or “experienced players”
@runic dragon ah i see, i will post it to #feedback-devs. Thank you for your feedback 
No problemo x
I think a good way of getting to know strategies is simply by players sharing them. There should something like a 'study' section where experienced players can post strategies and game situations and how to handle those. The quality of this depends on the way it's implemented and how many things the system allows to show/teach.
Also, I think it's good if the game promotes youtubers like JackFwwo and (and ForTheSect 😘) that help players improve tons.
The doctor should protect the Bodyguard from attacks.
1 (doc)
2 (bg)
3 (mayor)
4 (sk)
Doc is on bg, bg is on mayor, and the sk stabs the mayor, the bg shouldn't get attacked this way since the doctor is protecting the bg.
@light edge There's no "official" way to play as evil role, in ranked or not, it's up to the players to learn it themselves, imho 😉 That's part of the game.
@peak knot Heya, I don't think it would be accepted, as such a section would need to me reviewed and controlled, which would take a lot of time. We cannot really afford moderating such a section in the game. Plus, promoting youtubers would not be accepted either, as devs don't control those youtube channels, what if one of these youtubers goes mad and shares bad stuff?
This could also get posted in bugs
Still thanks a lot you two for your idea ❤️
No? Why? 🤔
Jack would love this a ton
@median elbow Doc can protect a bg who doesn't have his shield anymore, so I don't see the point in that?
@runic dragon sorry for the late answer, I were at work. I edited the message, do you think it's better now?
It's just the PewDiePie and Disney scenario. PewDiePie did some iffy things and Disney cut all connections with PewDiePie. @peak knot @uncut tusk
Yeah so we cannot accept that idea :/
@uncut tusk it's because the doctor is protecting the bg from incoming attacks. If the sk attacks someone like the doctor should protect the bg
Attacking the mayor defeats the protection on the bg
@median elbow I don't think combining abilities like that would be accepted 🤔
But it's still logically correct and could be interrupted as a bug
@median elbow your logic makes no sense. doc protects bg from direct hits. bg dies however while protecting
The doctor is protecting the bg so it should protect the bg from incoming hits
Anyway you're correct as doc is for direct attacks only. Or we would overbuff him with being able to protect from jww's killing when dying, avenger, etc. etc.
That's too powerful, imho ^^
Maybe it is I'm just saying what logically would be correct
Another idea..
There should be a YouTuber rank on the discord server. If these people do some fishy things they get there role removed.
To qualify for the YouTuber rank they must meet these requirements:
- 500+ subscribers
- 50+ average views per video
- Uploads WWO at least every 2 weeks
And they should upload WWO for at least 1 month
There was several roles for social media - all got removed due to being pretty much useless
@median elbow Don't you think that's a little outscaled? The most famous wwo YTer only got 1k+ subs. Pewds and disney is some big boy stuff
I dont understand, 100 gold to change username but for add new place in inventory is 6250 (250 roses). in general, the prices are too fixed oddly, without any sense. a mouth can cost 15 roses but a pair of glasses 150 ....
@uncut tusk There is literally 0 risk in promoting your own fking game... reputation damage for a game with a community this small? Don't let me laugh lol
People shame others that self-advertise though.
So good thing if the game does it
@cinder rivet These are very basic mouths, which shouldnt cost much since the slot is new and didnt have a lot of basics yet ^^
The new glasses are a bit pricy imo, but a lot of them are very fancy and high quality ^^
@peak knot Regardless of how small the community is, it is still something devs can't control and certainly won't allow to be promoted like that in the game...
@uncut tusk Well the devs clearly think differently than you, since there is already something like a 'YTer badge'
So there is something already
But I'm just saying
Ytber badge isn't the same as promoting videos.
If there is FOCUS on channels that show how to play the game properly
The game itself will improve
Should people in same clan be able to play ranked together?
There was a role - it got deleted
If people are willing to learn and search on YouTube, they are free to search via themselves 
Or go with the other option of a separate study section
But at least
Be aware of the fact that people need to be able to explore strategies and game situations
@sacred sable I think they could also be together in a game by pure luck, it can happen. If people want to ruin the game by teaming up, then being in the same clan doesn't matter ;)
@peak knot As Arnaud said... They can check themselves on Youtube (or in #wov-chat here) 😉
I know
Some people do
But it will be even better if it's promoted
The opportunity to learn about the game is still lacking
So work on providing that opportunity
That is what the main focus is here
I am not even talking about anything youtube related, that's just an option there is to improve this
@sacred sable ign name pls. watch how PR plays ranked together while always suspecting each other
I wonder if I qualify for the yt badge...
lemme check
Look at the picture lol
@peak knot Hmmm... What would you think about something like adding a button somewhere in the main screen, named "Strategy/Advanced tactics", which would list potential ways to find out strategies for wwo? Like "Searching on YouTube, sharing your personal tips in #wov-chat channel in wwo's Discord server ([link]), ..." ;)
It seems obvious to search on YouTube but maybe some people are missing out #wov-chat or other things.
@uncut tusk Want to report ig player for calling me toxic over something I asked on here.
If someone insulted you, you should report them in the game, not here 😉 @sacred sable
@uncut tusk Sounds good!
I did
I wanted to report on here too since they harassing me for something on here @uncut tusk
For harassment in a game, you can contact a guardian about it. You just need to tell one of them the name of the person who harassed you ;)
Contact one of them (below). Please be patient, they receive a lot of DM 😉
Message one of the following guardians and make sure you include your in-game name and name any reasons why the ban is invalid in your initial message. If it comes to discussions do not be rude or your ban will not be taken away.
List of guardians:
- Kem => @crisp thistle (@KemTrangTien#9980)
- Alisonn => @naive whale (@Alisonn_#4655)
- Boy => @arctic nova (@BoyHanQuoc#6473)
- KoreanKing => @last tiger (@KingK#2236)
Alright, ty
@sacred sable Did they sexually harass you? I think there may be a misunderstanding here, "just" insulting is handled by in-game reports only.
No sexual harassment, but it was repetitive and was more than simple "you noob" comments
And involved more than one person
Was it spam? Otherwise, even if it's repeated insults, it should go to simple report in the game 😉
Mmmmh, alright.
I should report to Guardian on here though if it keeps up?
Nope :/ Please go to #questions next time 😉
My apologies
@peak knot 500 isn't small tbh
@peak knot you aren't wrong btw for this game to strive to great heights this game needs to take support from content creators to be successful
It's like saying why should someone like Pyrocynical promote an app like raid shadow legends, he does controversial things all the time but has probably helped raid a shit ton with that sponsorship
i am thinking about make this skin show at night to the wolfs (my draw) this is the default Wolf, i am making the alpha, shaman, and seer wolf
#avatar-ideas @vocal needle
I post on avatar ideas but they Said its a game feature not avatar
And they Said to me post it here
🤔
No offense, but try to get feedback there first, the style isn't really fit to the game 😅
@pallid merlin They were in dc and I said it might be more for here, because I thought they meant it like. When its night the ww skin will change to this, this would only be visible for the ww team
Still, the style doesn't fit 🤔
@pallid merlin any tip to fix the style?
Go to #avatar-ideas and listen to feedback?
@median elbow I think that, and improval of the competitive scene for keeping people hooked.
This game has so much potential
That's why I waste so much time writing feedback here
Same
Then, what is a 'waste'?
Add a "Shopping" button where you can see/purchase all of the items you haven't bought yet.
Why not adding a language filter to ranked, ranked is a serious game mode and people talking in other languages really gives them a unfair advantage, my idea is that when someone says something in another language the game should warn them, like a strike, and if you get 3 warnings the same day you get a temporary ban (don't know how much time for the ban), I think this really is necessary and anyone who played ranked probably can relate to my problem
I know this has probably already been brought up but I want to bring it up again just to make it known that it is wanted, the ability for leaders to de select people from clan quest would be a great addition to clans 😁
@pallid merlin Writing useful feedback that's either dealt with poorly or completely ignored 🤡
Not saying all of my feedback is dealt with poorly, but some cases... oh jeez
It's sort of better lately
There is a wrong German translation in the message, you get if you don't play for a few days🙈
Correction: Wrong Grammar
@sudden dock hey ^^ it already has been suggested to add an option to review/see all available items.
In my opinion it could be a cool feature, and you could see it easier, but on the other side you can easily see it in the shop too. Then there are still battle pass items etc.
Thank you for your suggestion anyways
also I'm sorry for the late reply...
I was thinking of it becuase you can't see the items that you purchase with coins or bp items in the shop but thats okay🙂
@sick mesa hello
in my opinion this is a really cool idea. Basically not speaking the right language is report- and bannable. In ranked bans are longer than in other game modes and to be honest, we currently have a warn system, which has much problems, so I don't think to add a second system would help ^^'
Also in english and other languages you sometimes use other languages as a mix, which is, because it's "gamer language" or what else can I call it?
Thank you for your feedback anyways, we really appreciate the time you spent to describe it and it's still a cool idea ^^
@sonic glacier Heya! We already talked in #wov-chat 😉 I told you, that it has already been suggested before and I think it was many times ^^ I will add your feedback as a +1
in the database!
Also thank you for the reminder, that players still want it 😉
@signal flame Hey! What is the mistake? I will redirect it then 👀
@glacial warren hey, that is true people use other languages as "gamer language" then how about adding a filter to other types of alphabets (I don't know how to call it) for an example, the most common for me to see is people talking in Thai, so why not filter these other "alphabets" like Japanese Thai and so on
I know it won't filter all other languages
But it would at least help
Hm that's right. But there are also "emotes", which are based on other languages alphabets too
Yes sorry @glacial warren I just wanted to bring it back up in feedback is all, my apologizes
🉐㊙️㊗️ like these you mean?
Yeah, that would be very hard to filter (I can't think in a way to do it)
@sonic glacier ont apologize for a reminder! It's a nice thing ^^
@sick mesa yep but also other emotes.... Like I do '^^' pretty often
Yes
Ok thanks for the help, if I come up with a better idea I'll be sure to let you know
Sure ^^ we always appreciate feedback and suggestions 
I have a suggestion
Role name changes for April Fools
Like Doc is "Healy Guy"
Or Jailor is "Bar Boi"
And Tough Guy can be "FLEX"
Noobs will get confused
And me too acctually
You cant play fluently if you have to look the whole rolempage every time u wanna say some shit
Are you calling yourself noob?
Technically is because I use sheep avatars in the game.But yes I call myself sheep 👀
Call yourself Ovi instead
stay on topic, please
It's a funny idea, but I agree it will be too confusing and too much impact on the game.
Fair enough
make headhunter's target unable to be jailer
What's the point of that tho 🤔
Trust me, it's more difficult when your target is aura!😅
HH's worst target is Gunner.
Lmao gunner can't even be target
6 bad!
shot by gunner
"The Headhunter only targets villagers, except for Gunner, Priest, Mayor and Cursed." the official wiki. aint no way the headhunter will win against jailer, paci, witch, marksman, (apparently president???), and grandma
i also dislike how the seers can be a target but ig it COULD work
Pacifist is missing from that list. Witch cannot prove at day. Mm has to target the hh at this moment, grandma has to use ability this very day...
Fc is being suggested for being excluded from the list of possible targets
"look see? gww protected"
Only once though
marksman not impossible
only requirement is that the marksman is a potato
mm claim is often suspicious
I don't think "Potato" be a good argument at all tho
Please go to #wov-chat though if you don't have any feedback to suggest or to discuss about ^^
as marksman, there should be a confirmation,
“Are you sure you want to shoot X?”
because its really easy to shoot without knowing when you’re trying to move your target... 8 was confirmed jailer and when i went to move my target, i accidentally shot
@next escarp this sounds fair and simple, I will add it for sure ^^
yay^^
There isn't an option for that already?
Thought you could turn off confirmation notices in Settings
Oh, I guess there isn't
Blue dot hints and role hints
New suggestion:
Make a checkbox for Role Ability Confirmation notices to be enabled/disabled
Allow spectators to report players before and after game starts.
Allowing spectators to report sounds good, but Im afraid it will result in more false-report-floods than actual usefulness... They still have the ability to screenshot severe bad behaviour and message it to the guardians though.
😁
Oh, so THAT's why spectators can't report
Suggestion:
Make spectators able to report anyways so us peeps that proeprly use report system can report
👀
Also want to suggest the game have a feature to choose between HH or Fool game modes for ranked games. Since it is a norm for game leavers due to this reason.
@sacred sable I just explained why not.. so no.
Oh, I know
Cursed can be hh target if there is no other good role available, hence only in custom, same with all other roles which usually "can't be hh target" they'll still get hh target if there are no other roles left to be hh target because otherwise the hh would legitimately sometimes be with and sometimes be without target👀
that's why there is no point in making too many unable to be hh target because then in the end none will be unable to be a target in some set ups
Also @coarse cape what exactly do you mean? Like you get a pop up showing either "join a hh lobby" "join a fool lobby" ?
Wouldn't it come in more handy instead being able to see the role set up before joining?
You already got that option for quick and sandbox if you join a lobby with friends and then check the role list and join, you'll usually be in the shown set up if the lobby isn't full before
There has been suggestions int he past to actually make people unable to see if it will be fool or hh, I think that's a more effective solution to this.
Well it could still lead up to commiting suicide once seing if it's fool or hh which still gets punished but eh
suicide bans aren't the most effective ones as you can watch your time free and even one suicide can already ruin the game for one team
They could also keep hh/fool hidden on the list during the whole game 👀
For how AMAZING berserk is in ranked it should be moved to sandbox for now until all the bugs get cranked out of it, and with berserk moving out guardian/fc can move in.
Several people leave from Rank because there's Fool.
I think the solution it's Hide the Solo Roles until the game starts, when the game starts everyone will be able to see which Solo are in the game
it would apply only for rank
@lament knoll There's people that also leaves at the last second, when they leaves in the last second they're off at the whole game, so there's not too much difference
Not even just off whole game
It's an entirely empty slot for the game
@sacred sable Yes that too, but what I meant is that some players when leaves at the last second his Avatar stay in the game off and suicides after 2 days
Oh, I see
I honestly like maje's idea of it being hidden the whole time👀
Because it doesn't matter whether it's hh or fool it follows the same idea -> don't random vote or you'll hit fool/hh target
And hh and fool could be discrete
Would also allow more strategics such as claiming hh when being fool and saying some random target, if that turns out to be bad they won't believe you anymore and might vote you
Or also vice versa, claim to be fool when ur actually hh
It would also allow space for wws to claim
Like if you claim hh with one of your mates as target, but they kill your mate seeing you lied they might also be like "wait if they aren't hh they are probably fool" and leave you alone
So making random solo voting role show as unknown the whole game just like random solo killer, random ww etc
Yes maybe that can be the buff to Werewolf that everyone is asking for
If u want to post it I would say to post it like:
A:
Solo Roles will be hidden only at the lobby, once the game starts everyone will be able to see them.
B:
Solo Roles will be hidden the whole game.
And let People vote with 🇦 , 🇧 ,
instead of

That looks better than a and b oof
Just a concern I have. I was playing ranked and it say random voting, random killing and suiciding will not be tolerated. People in sb will random kill (like gunner for example) and we tell me that we are reporting them. They then say, well this isn’t ranked. Like it makes random killing ok since it’s not ranked and I think it’s because of that message. I do like that message tho, so that way people won’t do it in ranked, but people still think it’s ok to do it in other modes, which is it. I don’t have a suggestion for it, just a concern that I wanted to bring to ur attention.
Sorry for the paragraph 🙈😂
I think we recently had someone pointing out the same thing and we passed it on to the devs. Some of the staff is working on adjusting the rules, I am pretty sure this message will also change, so it will no longer imply that it;s ok in other game modes ^^ Thanks for your concern! 
@twilit fjord
@quaint bramble oh ok awesome, thanks for responding :)
Cupid in ranked please?
Please?
Corruptor, cannibal, guardian ww and fc can be taken out of the sandbox experience.... cupid too
They seem pretty balanced balanced
cupid is actually still buggy sometimes, and also really not suited for ranked imo
cannibal is a bit too new to move on as well, and corr also still causes some problems
Bomber too?
Bomber isnt a sb exclusive role
Think you could find how many victims are killed in a frenzy?
Ahh
Hey i would like to suggest under reports that there should be a section for teaming. Recently in ranked i met a gunner that kept trying to not shoot arso that was more or less known by everyone and instead shot someone that was literally checked and also known as good. After the end of the game village still wom but arso denied knowing the gunner having just met him, but they were both from the same clan just that the clan didnt have an emblem.
Also i dont think i have sufficient screenshots to prove they were teaming but i wouldnt mind speaking to a guardian or smth since teamers are ruining ranked mode and hopefully a report section under teaming can be added soon
@quaint crescent You can always report Teaming under "Other" even without a category
Hi, for the last feedback devs, would it be possible to also have a confirmation message while changing target? One day I clicked on it instead of shooting😅
Its 2 uur not 2 uren sorry @warm helm
Maybe this is belgium langauge but in dutch you say “over 2 uur” not “over 2 uren”
😅 my bad. I will correct it. Thank you for reporting 
@woeful mesa i will send that to #feedback-devs, Thank you for your feedback 
No problem ^^
hi anybody mind to take a look? sorry bout this 🙊
I think its suggested before but imo if its suggested before it deserves a repost
lol ok thanks
This is really a fair point
@sleek creek Yea that was already suggested but as arsonist said it deserves a repost 👍 thanks for your suggestion
That's the point 🤔
But a knife it’s not a mouth
Why didn't they just put the mouth and knife in the mouth section only? I don't know.
And yes it is a mouth holding a knife, it should still be a mouth 🤔
Because you can wear the mouth with or without a knife if you want to 🤔
In the outfit there is only shown with the knife though, so I don't know why they made two versions
@runic dragon heyy, sorry i fell asleep while responding/my wifi stopped working...👀
Well i don't quite know about the A, B ,
voting👀
i would have to add them manually myself and wouldn't be able to vote on my own favourite :( well then again ig i could just remove my votes on the ones i don't like after someone voted for them
Basically both of them were already suggested before a while ago, hmm i'll see how i'll do it once i'm formulating the post for it, logistic-wise as i'd still specify the two options further
However thanks for your suggestion and the nice illustration!
It's highly appreciated

Sorry for the ghost ping toon i forgot to include the image👀
👀
@rigid bronze ok thanks a lot!
👍
So,I been thinking about how to make ranked more balanced and imo,one of the best ways will be replacing priest with beast hunter,at least in gold league.My reasons are:
-In ranked,priest’s use is to confirm aura’s info and prove that the aura is real.Without priest,aura cannot be proved.
-This also happens with det when jww/fool claims to be det too.Without priest,village needs to risk.
-In ranked rn,there’s a lot of village killers.Gunner,jailer and priest.Also,normally a rrv it’s a killer too (between witch,priest,avenger or marksman).Even if beast hunter kills too,he doesn’t choose who to kill and just can kill werewolves.
-Replacing beast hunter with priest will make werewolves death slower.
-Unlike priest,beast hunter cannot prove himself.Also,it has a unknown aura,that makes him more suspicious and it’s a good role to claim for sk/ww/fool.
-If there’s a bh and a rrv bh,this will make confusion between villagers,like doc and rrv doc does.
However,not everything is bad for village,because:
-Beast hunter cannot throw holy water in a villager and die (a thing that everyone hates from priest).
-Imo ranked needs more protectors.With just doc (and jailer for gunner) is not enough.
-Beast hunter ig will make werewolves not to risk voting random because they can lose a mate.
When priest throws water to a village (even if it's by accident), just make that he/She can't vote, talk or both because imo being priest is a risky role and people rarely uses it's ability
If cani stays 6 days without eating, what happens?
Suggestion:
Couple with fool should win if fool is lynched.
It’s not like if I want to ping a helper to have an opinion @vernal dune
Oops I did it,sorry.
||And he changes the state into do not disturb 👀||
@lament knoll Don't worry for the ghost ping, I voted all the reactions so u can vote on ur favorite 
That looks cool
@median elbowWould you like that design to be posted in #feedback-devs ?