#general-feedback-discussion
1 messages · Page 673 of 1
Ahh I see what your saying.
my point being, we dont know. Its a video game at the end of the day. It can be literally anything they want it to be because we do not know how dinosaurs really acted.
yeah, as i said i made that really lazy and fast, even clarified that it shouldnt drain the color that much
But anyway, my main gripe with baby carrying is i think the babies should be confined to the nest for their hatchling stage. The parents should have to focus on keeping predators away from the nest rather than keeping babies away from the predators. I feel like that would be more interesting anyway
I do like this idea as well. Im not disagreeing at all. :3 I think the main focus would be to remain in the nest and for parents to come back and provide. My suggestion is merely that, a simple suggestion that i thought may create more of something to do when the game is well and finished.
not to mention that that way babysnatchers and eggeaters have a chance of getting a meal
Ahh nature.
@strange wave sorry for not completely understanding what you suggested but do you mean that only while smelling the surroundings turn more grayish or that the vibrancy of the environment should be toned down ?
while smelling the color would drain out of the environment so you can see the particles easier
Like it does in Evolve basically
or wolf quest
Or Styx
Although it isn't really scent in styx
Thx
Smello vision
Saurian, too
snow just doesnt make sense in general
at least
not if its just sorta in the wild
if its in a biodome then thats fine
but this is a tropical island
well
its not exactly "fine" but its better than having snow on a tropical island
a snowy winter would look weirder than just having a snowy area somewhere
@strange wave could have it be much like how it works in the witcher where it focuses more on NPC sounds and the screen becomes black and white and a bit blurry
so by NPC sounds by that i mean calls and footsteps becoming louder and other sounds are muffled
@strange wave I dont necessarily disagree with your piece about scent particles being more obvious but Im not really sold on the grey scaling effect. I fear that outright grey scaling of the environment is going to obscure visual acuity too much for players (carnivores more specifically) in general in order to actually see other potential prey/threats. I don't think delegating the ability to distinguish other dinosaurs apart from the environment to a special ability to specific creatures is a sound idea as well... picking up scent doesnt make your vision worse lol (unless im misreading your piece on that). I personally just think making the scent clouds way more apparent when smelling is a better and simpler approach to an easy problem
as stated in the suggestion, dont judge the effect from the images, that is far too drained of color, the color drain is more needed that just better clouds of scent, herbivores would still struggle to locate smelled food, etc, drain environmental color also gives way to other abilities like the mentioned advanced perception
right, i could see it being helpful in a more toned down effect i spose. It definitely would/will be interesting to see how/if the devs tackle that problem
I think slight color drain would be nice (as someone with color blindness/deficiency with red/green it would help the green particles as an herbi be easier to see) but I think if it goes too far it would make it hard to see predators/prey while using scent
Overall, not at all a bad idea though imo
im prob late to the discussion of it but, that gore suggestion with the different stages of decay would be really good for sauropod corpses. it would turn into a real feeding frenzy with alot of carnivores compeating to get as much food as possible from it before it decays to a point they cant eat it any longer.
@golden iron Tropical areas don't really have 4 seasons like the rest of the planet does. They just have wet and dry seasons
@strange wave why not let dryo single out animals that are walking, along with running? If that makes sense
people didnt like it singling out all movement
@cosmic lake That doesn't make much sense, since you wouldn't be able to see the message appearing in the chat you wanna send it to (along with any replies to it) if it keeps you in global. Also global's being removed so idk if that suggestion will matter anymore
oh well i guess nvm if global is actually going away i just meant that whenever you do /gr to type in group chat it forcibly moved you into that chat anyway, since i can see local and group chat all from global i wanted to just use the /gr to type to group without shifting to the actual group chat
Oooooh I gotcha. I forgot it shows messages from all the channels at once in global
But yeah, global's being removed next update and I don't think it'll be a server option since Amarok said it won't be back till mod support is in
@cosmic lake global chat is going, however, server owners will be able to change their settings to put global in or not. 🙂
Read what I said cough cough
shhhshhshshh
Lol
i rewrote it to have slight hope (dont care too much about global) and to redeem myself for my bad writting lmao
don't listen to what Amarok says about stuff
Why
He was the one who removed global chat. He even did it on stream
I know
Every inch of globals chats code is gone
i was talking about the "I don't think it'll be a server option"
It’s not going to be a server option
heard different 
Well then you heard from the wrong source
good
Yeah because Amarok said word for word "it won't be back until modding support is a thing" I feel like if it was a server option, he wouldn't have said that
and Amarok said update 3 will arrive around mid to late Jan
Lol no
lol
He guessed it would
and it led to an influx of false news
But Amarok doesn't decide when the update comes out, but he was the one who removed global chat
well more really Dondi
It's a bad comparison. If I'm a construction worker and I say "I think the Mayor will be this person" and I'm wrong, it doesn't immediately mean I'm untrustworthy if I say "We aren't going to make this building using steel"
Ya get my point?
it's not like I really have a personal care about global.
My point is that Amarok made a guess about something he has little involvement in and he was wrong, but that doesn't make him untrustworthy when it comes to him saying global chat won't return until modding since he was the one involved in its removal
yes
Last thing, but when Amarok said about January, I'm pretty sure he straight up said that he's just guessing. So if people took that date and ran with it, that's their fault
and where that led to, wasn't great
Yeah. But it wasn't the devs' fault that it happened. People like to take everything as fact even when it's stated clearly that it isn't
personally I like devs giving their opinion on work.
But it easily creates false etas, which leads the community to a date that will have nothing but quiet patience for an update
Amarok literally even basically said he’s just guessing
Yeah, that's why we don't get etas at all, and it's why the devs rarely do that. Amarok was still new to the team and he didn't know how the community is tho so
people take it out of context, and false news is spread throughout social media
Then thats their fault, not Amarok’s
If its false news its false news
(The guy literally deleted its code on stream)


you don't need to say it again and again
We're not really talking about global chat anymore btw cough cough
He guessed wrong(haha optimist), doesn’t make him untrustworthy in my book but you can sus him all you want
Otherwise Filipe would be one of the most untrusted devs ever
honestly it doesn't even matter anymore
we all agree global chat should be removed
Yes
It really won’t impact much besides more active vcs(thank god) and discords being used more
however, I don't take fully take gospel to Amarok on Global not being an option for server owners
so we'll have to wait and see for the server admin update
Sure that whole schtick could’ve changed, but so far we have no other reason to think it will come back as an option
Oh no I don't either, I'm just saying I don't think it'll be a server option. I wouldn't be surprised or upset if it was tho
🦀
just, as we know things will be selectable on and off for server admins, Global chat is on the line to be in that function (with it automatically being off)
Why they didnt make it a server option is beyond me
@haughty cliff there are no ticks in evrima, plus deino takes 8 hours so sitting in a tiny log for 8 hours isnt going to happen
You just get bigger over time
We want server owners to be able to customize their servers as much as possible! haha hypocrites
lol

Yes, so if you grow you'll get stuck regardless of ticks or smooth--and it's not just for Deino; I'm saying if they start making hiding spots for any babies
and Amarok's the guy who is doing all the admin-power side of stuff
You wont be allowed to sit in one spot for a long time though, they are planning thag
That*
pins and needles mechanic
then get out before its too late, sucks to be you if you got stuck inside
You don't need to be, your timing would just need to be bad. I HAVE had it happen before, and I'm not the only one and if they start deliberately designing hidey-holes it might be a good idea to bear it in mind, that's all.
So sitting in a small spot will come with debuffs the longer you stay there
I wish it would be toggleable, because I don't join vcs because of my hearing loss, turning up my volume in discord for people talking, doesn't do anything, it just makes the muffled sounds louder.
People might still get stuck. I am only bringing it up for the devs in case they hadn't thought of it
If you get stuck relog and move before everything renders
you'll be able to sit for a long time as any creature you want.
But if you were to AFK, you will grow at a much slower rate than if you were running around and eating either a neutral diet or a positive diet

So if you have an ssd/good pc you’re fucked
Or ask help from an admin
I'm not asking for alternatives, I put it there so devs can (hopefully) see it and be aware, they can do w/e they want with it
I was told to put it in that chat, so i did.
I mean, if you get stucks its your own fault for trying to get in a tiny spot when your too big
Or you'd have to be EXTREMELY unfortunate to get stuck on the 1 second of an 8 hour growth where you become too big. But then if you were close to that size why would you try to get in a small hole anyway
@haughty folio Well said, I agree.
@compact hare i think they definitely will add woman mercs but probardly later down the line because well i suppose they would want to spend time on more urgent things maybe but then again it could be really easy to add idk
I see, thanks for letting me know :)
women mercs good
its like how there is only the male of each dino model out yet they are focusing on other things first
like more dinos or new mechanics
Similar to Valheim?
Also different face presets and adjustable skin tone to include different races
Pretty sure punch said this was all planned
an 'unsavoury taste' is already a garbage defense against KOSers, making magy have to stick to a certain diet on top of that for this pathetic excuse of a defense would make it even worse lmao
Tribals don't fit because they're weird looking mutants? You mean like the dinos that are also modified mutants? Servers will be able to toggle humans and tribals if they don't want them anyway.
The tribal concepts look a lot more intimidating than many of the ‘scary’ predatory dinosaurs
@sand widget
The isle is not a 'Jurassic soul' game, it has never been from the beginning.
It's a survival horror game whichc revolves around Genetic creations and mutations. Mainly Dinosaurs.
Tribals bring another horror aspect to the game, alongside lore.
^
@compact hare Of course they'll need female humans(mercs) how else are they going to reproduce? They are animals, are they not?
humans arent getting nesting or growth or anything like that
You think humans are getting a reproduction system
if I'm correct they mean female mercs more in the name of diversity in the human playables
Tell that to hypsi. It doesn't make sense, it's an animal. It's also a unique animal. Just make an animation to grow the belly for its incubation period and that's it, it really not that hard.
Unique animal being that its a mammal.
it isnt happening. this conversation is over
Hypsi is a playable dinosaur, Not a human
They are animals but they are different
Just because they are both animals doesn't mean they should have the exact same gameplay
Wtf does this dude really want human pregnancy in the isle
Nothing graphic has to be shown, just that they reproduce wth. They are animals 
So what, You could be a child ingame
I dont understand whats appealing about being a juvenile human in the game
Cause it makes sense?
By that logic would you start out as a baby/child?
;-;
Not at all wtf
Humans are either mercs or some weird tribal mutants, and why would you want to have kids in the game
are you some creep, perhaps?
^
These are mercenaries hired to carry out tasks not populate the island
or what other good excuses do you have
Bruh don't get on me with "baby humans won't survive" kid anything thats a baby will die if left unguarded by the guardians/parents/
Didn't say that
Im saying when you join the game will you be a baby human
you will be a juvenile omg
Because if your able to reproduce it only makes sense
Wy
Why would you play human so that you could be a baby
cause it makes sense
That doesn't mean it should be added
humans and dinosaurs are different factions
I can’t believe someone unironically wants human reproduction in the isle
ikr
Creepy much
the aim of a mercenary is to fight or obtain shit from a rival for cash
omg bruh i just said nothing graphic has to be shown tf is wrong with ur perception
literally just the reproducing aspect
Why do you want it
Hey let's get pregnant and have kids on this remote island filled with 8ft tall mutants that eat people and dinosaurs that eat people and mutant kaijus that eat people
Class, end of story. These are mercs on a mission to complete tasks on the island, not to play Adam and Eve. Tf are you on about
Makes total sense
cause these are mammals and its a unique animal ;-;
Bruh
Sounds more to me like someone wants to be doing creepy things in the isle
maybe i wanna play adam and eve tf are these tasks?
having kids on an island filled with numerous predatory species is definitely a good idea...
Yes, as adults with guns
it isnt happening. dev confirmed and never considered. end of discussion.
No, no, and no.
or pointy weaponry like spears or knives
Yes
They are there to carry out tasks not to start a civilization
Go play sims or something if that is your thing
it wont make sense if don't allow a animal to reproduce cause yall think it is creepy, this is a animal and it shouldnt be treated any differently 
now add "child" in front of "dating".
Humans are not supposed to survive in the same way as dinosaurs reproducing anwhatnot for survival, They are there to complete task and collect intel as I understand.
It should
If you add children, you have the potential of opening up sexual abuse.
Humans are for the most part valued above animals
i am confushion
What the fuck.
Its not really accurate to plant them on the same plane as a dog for example
someone wants to add kids into the game
This conversation is making me lose braincells.... Punch has said that they're not gonna have humans reproduce.
theres nothing to be confused about. humans will function completely separately from dinosaurs. juvie humans arent happening.
so instead you take away the dogs ability to reproduce ;-;?
DUDE the dinos reproduce because they live there and are following instinct. The humans do NOT live there and are just doing a very dangerous job that would be idiotic to get pregnant while doing. Hard to understand?
boring
Theres a difference between something being a "necessity" to development and something being unnecessary. Humans reproducing in TI is unnecessary, end of story. They're animals, yes, but they're Mercs. If anything, Tribals make more sense to reproduce but that shouldn't happen either
Gameplay including technology will be super borning im sure
The point of merc isnt survival as much as the dinosaurs
Survival ofc is still anaspect but isnt as great
okay give it to the tribals, holy fudge, stop discriminating mammal species
wtf?
"Discriminating mammal species" mkay bud 
u are tho
this is starting to sound like flamebait
Not really
I am convinced you are trolling at this point
But do go on
Flame baiting is confirmed
Hypsi is unfinished
i'm not trolling im defending my viewpoint/opinion
Punch has said that they won't have humans (Mercs or Tribals) reproduce, there's no point in arguing about it.
Definitely bait, not worth sacrificing more brain cells on this
tribals are unfinished aswell according to y'all then ;-;
Tribals aren't even added what are you on about
ofc they aren't finished
So by this logic, Humans when spawned in as you are a juvenile
dk
Yes but human gestation and child gameplay would be so uninteresting
What do you do
You don't hunt as a merc most likely
a human juvie would NOT be viable
^
idc if its in the humans(mercs) or tribals at this point
@turbid mauve
We're not getting into that.
Tribals are mutants, They are not human.
very well i rest my case
How do you not understand
Humans are generally as a species elevated above other animals/species
So having them give birth in a game where survival isn't their highest priority is just strange and unviable
Nah, We're not gonna deal with these thoughts of human(oid) gestation and reproduction.
alr
Could you please elaborate as to why you won't allow me to have a general discussion regarding this? Thanks.
No conversation about mating mechanics.
It's a deep seeded and well documented thing in this community. It's not going to happen, don't even bring it up. It creates the kinds of discussion we don't want.
I'm not talking about mating between two dinosaurs or two mammals where those kinds of graphic details are commonly followed up. I'm speaking about the right to prohibit such mammals (tribals are mammals) to reproduce, in the sense of having offspring. However, if you wish to diminish my voice just because what I am talking about maybe regarded in a different way in your lenses then guess I'll cry myself to sleep cause I in no way brought those kinds of remarks in my discussion.
woah woah woah
what in the goddamn shitter did i just read
Ehhh, wut
And that cry yourself to sleep thing ain't gonna work.
I don't care the gradient or classifications you put on it.
We do not discuss mating in this Discord.
if it's directly related to mating, don't even bother talking about it
simply as that
And these are virtual, fictional entities. Their 'rights' end when the code says it does
Well... okay then
ah yes, well known video game "the isle" in which you are able to play as a 2 year old human and get murked by dinosaurs straight away
I’m sure there’s a sim mod or something out there that better suits there needs 💀
I don't think it's really fair to compare dinosaur and merc/tribal/whatever gameplay and thus expect them to have similar things. I don't think they're about to go giving the dinos guns after all
but "juvie human gameplay" is a hilarious concept, I'll give it that
pretty much
I preferably wouldn't like to grow from a baby human to a full grown adult tojust have the chance to use guns
Oh I missed the mating discussion
😦 so sad
By the way I like that alberto re-remodel, it's a proof that devs did listen to the community 🙂
(And I'm not trolling, I genuinely like it)
I like the basic gist of the ourano suggestion (also biased because I love ourano). A herbi that's able to stock up for long journeys is a neat idea
oruano could potentially be an interesting application of a sort of "two-forms" dino. when slimmed its faster but weaker, however when fattened up its slower and stronger. Takes a lot of food, maybe even something specific, to fatten up though. so depending on whether you'd rather play it as a skittish, runs away herbi or a defensive stands it's ground herbi is a choice you can make
Not in the right way
The only change was the position of the head being adjusted and some minute changes, but nothing new
Its head was slightly too large, and its hips slightly bothered me. The last remodel fixed those two issues
It's not even a perspective shot, because then the head would be tilting downwards
they listen, sure, but it's still not ideal
and again, why have we still not got a side view? We can get a whole remodel but not a slight rotation
I really don't see why people hate this model so much
Especially when compared to legacy alberto
But it's true having a side view would be way better
deep state theories say we don't have a side view because they're afraid we'll still think it's bad
Why can't Jake put TI models on his Artstation page, or better yet, why can't The Isle have it's own page for the site in order to get a 3D view?
another question added to the list
If we can see the model in 3D, then we can have more accurate criticism on what we want to change.
And I knew a dumb convo would start about that suggestion
(mine)
The drawing looks adorable, why do I want that thing now
Holy shit i want to forget nearly everything I just read above me ;-;
@vagrant solstice it will be optional
My guy, it's legacy
At this point this almost looks like a troll
But I don't wanna make assumptions
The salt tho
Its April Fools lmao
But ngl it did made me wheeze when you complained about not being able to tailride
@barren zephyr
To answer your little rant over at general-feedback, you do realize they won’t update legacy, right? They are remaking the entire game so crying about rexes being broken and whatnot ain’t gonna do much. Legacy will shut down at some point once they see evrima as updated enough.
.
People still do April fools jokes?
okay..

You're never safe from it
nice
I like April Fools, shame people forget about it alot
Lol tbh I forgot about it. People mess with me all years so It’s kinda just another day to me.
I hate it because I get caught every time x)
I whole-heartedly agree with your suggestion zote 
D'oh
:(
@vagrant solstice Far as I know, there are plans for server toggles for playables, humans included. There will probably be a ton of community servers that have humans disabled.
@vagrant solstice I would suggest a channel on youtube called “The Isle News Updates” they take screenshots of Devs responding to important questions such as yours which was actually posted in one of their recent videos
Also looking at streams dev blogs etc
Interesting, I will check them out
@distant osprey I would suggest removing those tags on Commander Aronj question as they have all ready stated that answer to be yes in Isle Discussion
@snow mantle Similar animals as skins will likely be DLC when the game releases. The devs even mentioned having a carchar skin for giga as DLC. Personally, I think this would work better than perks
Paid dlc?
Yeah. But it'll likely only be like $5
Hhh, not a fan of that
It makes sense from a monetary standpoint, but it’s much more engaging to unlock them through gameplay
Well it's a pretty good deal, considering making a skin like that would cost a lot of money
Yeah, but the skins aren't meant to be part of the game. It's not something that you'd unlock, it's more like "You wanna play as this instead of this? Sure"
I understand your viewpoint, though I’m still staying firm with mine
Dakotaraptor has been booted, as well as Corythesaurus.
@pure vigil i think female mercs will def be a thing but actual famous people? no. but yeah have some good lookin women mercs.. i wouldnt say as buff as the men but yk.. def make em look cool. they could be toned and kinda buff.. but not like full on hulk women.
Yeah, I know ^^
The suggestion would be a way for the models to be utilized, as opposed to fully integrated
Though they would likely get a remodel
Corytho booted? Injustice
@toxic mantle if you want the devs to listen to your feedback calling them liars doesn’t help your case
@turbid mauve Human growth and animal domestication wouldnt fit the game very well or work. I dont see why humans should ever have growth and why they should be able to domesticate animals?
They didn’t lie to you tho they didn’t have to do anything to the model
It’s just another way to not get taken seriously tbh like they aren’t going to hear anything you tried to say
They said, they were going to show us the a side model constantly. Kept making excuses saying *oh we can't get in touch with our modeler but we will show it first thing we get in contact * paraphrasing of course. Well clearly they got in contact and refused to show the sid review model.
If they don't take me seriously oh well. Not like they taken many posts seriously in feedback anyways
Gab is the only exception I've seen in literal months.
If I see BS, I'll call it out. I dont sugar coat things. That's just how I talk.
lol juvie human
God imagine lol.
Dropping kids on the mutant dinosaur island with nothing but a bowie knife and a granola bar
Tribals enslave their AI dinosaurs. Humans give food to their dinosaurs(humanplable).
It’s just not that big and like I said it literally doesn’t help at all to accuse them so that whole feedback message is falling on deaf ears if you communicate with people like that @toxic mantle
speaking of alberto can we just draw attention to the fact that the only things changed about it were;
- tail length (made shorter)
- belly line (brought down)
- head angle (tipped downward but size wasn't changed)
Wait did they make it thinner around its stomach
Instead of fixing its out of balance head/neck
Also ew its hips are still jutting out
the thinner stomach was in the original model
the one in the dev blog is the one with the head pointed more downward and the lower stomach line
Oh ok
Still kinda ew
So does this guy want human kids on the isle taming dinosaurs or what
size of the head wasn't changed, but the neck definitely was. take a closer look, definitely not as beefy as before
It'll be very rare, not every person that's playing a dinosaur will accept the human's peace offering of whatever their offering in the sense of food or water. They could retaliate and kill the human.
dont forget the hips. they smoothed them out on the newer model as well
it's still the same as it was, it just looks not as beefy because of the angle of the head
I mean this will likely happen regardless, people like to mixpack
not true, i'm looking at it right now. the picture angle wasn't even changed and it looks less beefy
the head might be dipped downwards but thats not the reason for it
But what would the benefit be for a dinosaur to hinder itself with a juvenile human (that shouldnt be on the island anyway) that it could just eat and move on
Silver is right
mixpacking is inevitable, but you could give dinosaurs and humans incentive to kill eachother via perks, so its less likely to happen
I main stegosaur so if a juvenile human could climb (humans can have limited climbing) a tree and grab me the fruit I would help it as long as it gives me tasty stuff.
i dunno what 'perks' you could give to mercs for hunting dinosaurs, maybe the meat can be used to set traps n shit like that?
Aside from the sick humour standpoint i also don't see the appeal of juvie humans either
What would they do aside from getting killed, even adult humans are fodder without weapons
And still very vulnerable with weapons
Its a challenge but its not impossible.
kid mercs is stupid
kid tribals could happen
Thats like juvie dryo with a broken leg the whole way, doesnt sound fun at all
tribals are humanoid but they're also very animal. they could have growth stages
Humans are slow, humans are squishy, humans lack physical defenses against many things even their own size range on the isle
Juvie tribals make sense since they are inhabitants and not mercenaries hired to carry out a job
ye
Why would AE send in child soldiers for any reason aside from pure cruelty it doesnt even make lore sense
hey lets send children to a remote island to kill dinosaurs
Tribals are primates, of course, they are smart but their techniques of domesticating animals are outdated and they have to be bigger (8 feet) whereas homosapiens (humans) are smarter.
smarter in the sense that the humans have developed weapons and gear
but in terms of gameplay, both are being controlled by a player so they are equal in that sense
Noted.
@toxic mantle You think now that you called them a liar they will give new alberto angle 
Tribals would also probably have an easier time keeping their ‘tamed’ dinos fed than a human would too, so that method doesnt stand well
mercs should be discouraged to 'tame' in all aspects possible
it doesn't make sense at all. you were sent to the island to kill dinos not befriend them
Taming would be kind of interesting but I feel like it would end with people just teaming with their friends in the other faction
Humans could make a serum that boosts an animals growth rate (adrenaline).
Humans can get bodyslammed and killed by a fcking dryo lol how are they going to tame these wild animals that would all be apex tier in a modern ecosystem
Like a rex pack grouping up with a merc pack and being unstoppable
Maybe they can chill with some of the smaller herbivores but taming? No
Steal a baby egg from a raptor and imprint it.
Have fun keeping it fed
That shi doesnt mean its loyal only to you
Use all your resources just to keep that pne raptor red lol
An animal is an animal
an animal that is larger then you and can hunt will most likely do that
stuff like that exists only in the realm of roleplay
The utah player can just say fck it and kill you when it gets hungry anyway
For example, you can raise a polar bear but that doesnt mean it won't kill you
Ofc thats an example nobody is raising polar bears as far as I know
sounds like a twist on the saying "you can take a horse to water but you cant make it drink"
Beipi unfertilized eggs will be good for humans and if they have enough beipis they could ward off utahs or something of that nature.
How do they get beipis
roleplay
They weren't going to anyways sooo
tribals.
mercs should be actively discouraged to raise dinosaurs
Steal the egg and imprint it, the beipi duck will follow you everywhere and attack those are unfamiliar (ducks do this).
And how do you feed the beipi
you really want mercs raising beipis like chickens
it'd be cool if the tribals can grow a beipi from birth, sure, but mercs? mercs should not even be able to hatch the eggs
So you go through all this shit just so you can raise a utah, which can be eaten/gunned down in seconds
Guns are a scarce resource, you have to play smarter and think long term.
he wants to be owen from JW
maybe mercs can have a homa or something else at the bottom of the food chain hang out in their camp and eat canned beans with them lmao
This is the same guy who wanted human pregnancy and the ability to play as a human child
oh god wait it is him
what 
wait wtf
incubation in the womb gameplay
sounds like a fetish
lmao
i totally forgot about this conversation and i wish it had stayed that way lmao
Anyway thats not what we're conversating atm
Also what would be fun in the gameplay of a tamed creature other then roleplay?
You just get controlled, Probably stay in a pen until your used, You're given food and water
Then you die
and restart that cycle?
humans shouldnt really tame shit, they have equipment they can find and use. at most they can have symbiotic relations with some of the animals, emphasis on some
that's domestication, taming can be done by raising a wild animal
People didn't just see a horse and start using it
but on the isle hell no
Domestication yes, got that mixed up lol
A day cycle takes 24 hours and yet in this video it emulated it within a span of thirty minutes.
Ok
Let me do math realquick
Ok this many minutes to domesticate an animal by your logic
10950000
Figure out how many minutes or hours because I don
t want to
Wary cats don't accept food from humans if their strays. However, when I was 13, I would crotch and make myself as small and non threatening as I tried to give it milk/food and it built confidence around me.
Alright
Great story
Can we get back to discussion
Those are still domesticated
Theres a difference between taming a leopard and taming a stray cat
small and non threatening will have the exact opposite effect on a dinosaur. it'll make you seem like an easy meal
Stray cats have been domesticated for I dont even know long utah raptors habe not
humans could "tame" a compy or a homa, humans will get eaten by their bored "tamed" dilophosaurus
Then don't try to tame something that will immediately kill you.
Simple as that, there is no risk without reward.
t Thats your suggestion?
Wdym
Did you just switch sides
However, if you succeed, you'll have one of the most powerful animals at your defense.
So literally every dinosaurs larger then a hypsi?
i want you guys to know that this conversation will never end
You just said not to tame something that will kill you
What side are you on
I said if you offer food to a carno(player) it could reliate and kill you or accept the offer and assist you.
Probably accept the offer then kill you
These aren't animals, They are people behind screens
stray cats come from domesticated cats. they have gone through generations of domestication, but through unfortunes they wound up on their own. its still their nature to be household animals. wild animals on the other hand, are completely different
That's why you don't want to gamble with carnivorous animals. Try herbivorous, they're kinder.
lab-created dinosaurs controlled by players are a matter all on their own, as well
They are still players, will probably still kill you
Bruh this aint ark lol
this guy thinks herbivores are peaceful lol
a deer will literally charge and stamp a cat to death if it doesnt like the way it looks at it
Gallis are herbis and they go kick down juveniles of any species all the time
"try herbivorous, they're kinder"
Well, you could just wander by yourself in the vastness of the isle and hope that predator doesn't spot you until you reached a building you can hide at.
Thats kind of the point of the game
hippos will literally kos an impala trying to escape lions in a river and just leave the body to rot
herbis will kos humans just like the carnis do
Hope a predator doesn't spot you so you survive longer

i know i will
same lol
what even is this discussion about
Man wants ark with better graphics
And human pregnancy
taming mercs as dinosaurs! wait thats not right
roleplay
Basically ^
ye pretty much
I know I won't, so maybe if that lucky juvenile human comes to me by luck, it may have a chance. It all comes down to chance.
No it doesnt
it isnt chance, multiple devs have said its not happening
juvenile human wtf
There's no human juveniles
@barren zephyr you are in the wrong channel, but to get sandbox dinosaurs in survival you will need to be on an unofficial server where there are multiple methods to get them. join the server's discord and ask them
oh god back on the human juvie subject
This isn't roblox roleplay this is a survval game
best to just end it here
I really dont think taming would be worth the time implementing and liked by the community all in all.
Taming wouldn't work anyway
class can you explain your logic behind children mercenaries
mercs and dinos will probably mix pack on unofficials anyway so just leave it at that if you want your JW roleplay
The only way I see how it could work is a suggestion I made a while ago
However, if I'm an adult stegosaur and I'm in a herd I won't probably kill any human that comes within range. Do note that I usually wander when I become elder though (as old buffalo bulls do so I aswell want to mimick that behavior).
People can roleplay all they want but i dont think that is the way the games development should be headed.
buffalo bulls are very aggressive
that's you, you're roleplaying. a ton of other bloodthirsty herbi players like myself will impale any merc we can just for funsies
ok, thats your decision to roleplay
Why wouldnt you kill them, do you lose anything if you do?
you lose a potential friend 
You might make the choice not to kill them but there isn't a reason not to
Old buffalos that wander off from their herd become easy pickings for hyenas and lions...
he just siad that they were aggressive not that they are invincible wtf
in fact its probably beneficial for the stego to kill the merc so it can throw the corpse at the next hungry predator that shows up lmao
I really dont understand this discussion. Just roleplay how you want. Leave it at that
nah this is entertaining
Agreed.
ok go on then
i still want to know what your logic is behind children mercs
Not that it really matters to me anyways lol
They're common in anime
@turbid mauve I found a game where you can tame dinosaurs and they have designated roleplay servers!
https://store.steampowered.com/app/346110/ARK_Survival_Evolved/
As a man or woman stranded naked, freezing and starving on the shores of a mysterious island called ARK, you must hunt, harvest resources, craft items, grow crops, research technologies, and build shelters to withstand the elements. Use your cunning and resources to kill or tame & breed the leviathan dinosaurs and other primeval creatures roamin...
$49.99
330242
70
yeah well shooting lazers out of your hands and flying is also common in anime but we aren't getting that either
An elder stegosaurus does not usually kill things that aren't threatening. So, I would probably mimick this behavior.
Ew its not realistic.
Too bad 😦
we call that roleplay. you can do that on your own time.
The isle is?
and the isle is? 
lmao
These aren't animals, they are players if they can kill something usually they will
remember that one moment where the stegosaurus impaled a baby diplodocus in walking with dinosaurs
yes but see, we are humans controlling the stego so we WILL kos mercs for 3 seconds of giggles
^
The isle is the closest thing to realistic gameplay with powerful graphical effects in my opinion.
That includes dinosaurs, of course.
How is the isle realistic
First of all there are dinosaurs from different periods living together
yeah. so dont taint it with stupid things like human impregnancy and children taming dinosaurs
Second half the dinos don't look like they did
Third people are controlling the dinosaurs
fourth the dinosaurs are results of genetic testing
he speaks of realism but then wants human mercenaries working on the deadly island full of carnivorous mutants to make babies even though they went there to do a job
idk what world you live in where this stuff is "realistic"
and then have those babies fend for themselves on a dinosaur island, because it will be 'interesting gameplay'
That they are all being balanced in a specific niche to be viable? I consider that realistic.
Wherever it is I'll remember not to go there 
Mercs are dude kicked out of a helicopter on dino island, you ain't thinking about banging a girl merc.

Ok so theres a single trait of the game thats realistic
no, thats called making the game fun to play. balance is in every game. literally every one of them
also does he know how much of a hinderance pregnancy is? doe she want preggo mercs running around in the woods fighting dinosaurs or what. realism!
oh god
just play on semi-real/roleplay servers
The isle is one of a kind, if you can't see that I don't know why you support the game.
bruh
im sure some weirdo will make a mod where we can have babies with machetes on the isle just wait for that
The isle is survival not, "Tame dinosaurs and get pregnant" simulator
lmao that made me laugh more than it should
Actually proposing babies for tribals would've made more sense
But nobody talks about tribals
Agreed it would make more sense but I feel like it wouldn't work too well
Maybe it would idk
of course it wouldn't
I'm not speaking about mating as I've been already told not to so please don't bring that up. Thank you? As for taming, I think thats an ability us humans have learned to acquired and should be something worth discussing about.
It's already been discussed a lot of thimes tho
As far as I'm aware we haven't tamed dinosaurs or really any large carnivore
Taming dinos was planned for TRIBALS only, but it's still not confirmed because it has a lot of flaws
itd have to be ai dinos only
^
it simply wont work with human players unless theyre on a rules/semireal server
Idk why you can't see features past roleplay
You can tame a large herbivore though. It seems feasible.
Well I've got the solution about that and I like to rant about it so here it is
#general-feedback message
About taming and AI*
Taming AI will be for tribals(primates), basic stuff like enslaving that they can do because they're a bit more robust than their (homosapien) human counterparts. Taming dinosaur(player) will fall under the category of roleplay, the human offers food or water, the dinosaur(player) either retaliate or accepts the human and protects it.
The fact is you're not supposed to be able to tell human players apart from AI
I wouldnt call it taming when you pack with dino players. Its kinda just co operative teamwork
But as long as it's only a roleplay feature, who am I to judge
Think of it as having a dog for human players but in case it's a Utah.
Play ark
Ark is just ew in my opinion, so no.
Can we discuss AI behavior?
Will I see actual herds of stuff when AI dinosaur gets introduced into the game?
hopefully
What's that in suggestions? Oh it's just minmi but modern and worse 
Actually I didn't really look at it
I just read "I know you're gonna put X's" so I put one to make him happy
I susually do that on every suggestion that says "You are gonna put an X"
yea lol
Whats it gonna eat tho lol a drowning conpy? A fish?
well its obviously gonna eat fish
Also its so modern it wouldnt really fit
Its like putting an elephant in instead of trike
people out there really wanna play rock simulator
the only modern animals that we should have are birds and rodents
^
Not new York sewer rat sized rodents? 
What are your guys thoughts on some sort of anole niche for the tree climbing raptor
Anoles can be green or brown
and can change between them
If youre talking bout herrerasaurus it isnt a raptor
oh mb
also
i like the idea, activate an ability where your whole skin darkens
isnt herra based on an anole in the first place? at least its skin is i think
idk maybe
it is, sort of anole/iguana
anoleguana
I think it would also compliment its tree climbing ability
When its on the ground, green to blend in with foliage and in the tree brown to be harder to see
Why didn't I think of this?
speaking of trees and darker colors for camo, wut do u think of having the underside of treetops being dark?
like in a jungle with a thick canopy that lets little to no light through
I like it
Would make it scarier to think that a herrera may drop down on you at any instant
I used them as examples of styles and looks. I'd rather not have famous people either.
Since there are gonna be humans you think they'll add animals from the Cenozoic era
no
the humans are mercenaries that were sent to the island to fulfill a contract
we arent getting tribal humans (although we are getting tribals, but they arent humans)
Ok
Any thoughts on Ultra-thick jungles?
thats the point
@rotund silo
Y'all don't like anything 😂
Arch is tiny af
yeha
What would he do eat bugs?
Add shanag or changyuraptor instead lol
yeah
Its like crow sized
shanag bc its easier to type
Shanag has a funni name and is around velo sized so he is a better option
I just like playing as the under dog of the Dino world
arch isnt the under dog
its the ant
its a fucking ant compared to everything else in the roster
an underdog is smthn like troodon or velo
or beipi
I know that's why I chose him out of all the others 🤣
Arch wouldnt even be worth killing it is completely inconsequential to the ecosysten
It wouldnt be able to kill anything either
Maybe but compy players will likely be scarce and compy ai looks like it groups up so the arch would get lynch mobbed
yep
Arch AI would be neat.
why
Just adding to the atmosphere of the world, is all.
thats not a reason to spend thousands of dollars to add smthn the size of a robin
compy already does this in the same way
Eoraptor🤣
see?
arch is literally just a bird
what about it
Arch could just be an ambient ai
You can see them moving around and chirping but they disappear out of your line of sight
@hybrid matrix is worth it
brb
gotta change my mouse battery
id unironically play as arch
Laptop nerd, speaking of Laptops I wonder if Mercs will have some form of electronic device besides radios
@vale pawn see he gets it
What would you eat? What would hunt you? May as well make the firefly ambience playable
Okay okay, to be honest, I like the idea of a gliding / arboreal creature.
But maybe slightly bigger. Perhaps between the size of the velo and herra
yeah
shanag
Hence Changyuraptor or shanag
They could be scavengers but that would be hard life to try an live
arch is tiny
thats just compy
Yea basically
oh yea
Well then lets rather make a suggestion about that, because we already have a nice niche and a cool mechanic
I made a shanag suggest a bit back
Maybe it went a bit under
only way i could see archy getting added is if it replaces those 2D wings that fly out of trees when you roar
uh
from where
Someone also suggested fictionalizing balaur to be a glider which would be a bit weird but still better than micro or arch lol
yeah
but again
only way that i could see micro or arch getting added is to replace the 2D birds that fly out of trees when u roar
A small or medium size Dino that isn't in the game
Balaur is a cool looking guy so i wouldnt complain if it was fictionalized well. Micro and arch are worth no more than ambience at most
all of those dinos are shrinkwrapped jesus fuck
THE TRIKE
ITS NECK
that trike is seconds away from fucking collapsing
OH MY GOD THE REX'S ARMS
thats disgusting
Naked ovi
Naked ovi
pachy is skinny
shrinkwrapped to the point where they dont even look like they can function as actual animals

The para lol
idk what it is, but the taco is giving me an uneasy feeling
all of them are giving me an uneasy feeling lol
these are worse than the Jurassic world designs

That eoraptor is small enough to steal secrets from you while you dream
Why you guys hating on this person's drawing at least he tried 😂🤣
because it says its from 2014 but looks like 1980
lmao
yup

is that supposed to be a brachi? its a giraffatitan
its neither
no
Yes😂
rex offender
The onion is gold and this is why
Why does it have a butt on top of its head
omg it does
@barren zephyr It's been confirmed that humans will be locked to first person
Mercs at least, don't know about tribals (Even tho they're barely humans)
if tribals aren't humans then merc = human
anyway. I'm just suggesting that they add third person
Oh I thought oyu were saying please DON'T give us third person, my bad can't read
that's okay hehe
But nah, third person is a bad decision
It lets people look around corners and stuff and would really ruin the horror aspect
dont give us third person for mercs, anything with a gun should never have third person
I disagree, I think it'll be nice
it ruins the horror aspect
If I'm playing a game, and I can just look around a corner without something seeing me, I'm not gonna be nearly as scared to look around that corner lol
herbivorous dinosaurs can "look around corners" too, I don't see the point
because they dont have guns to shoot the guy at the end of a hall
That's different. They don't have guns
not like there are many corners anyways. it's usually trees, the dinosaurs tend to stay away from the buildings
tell that to the inside of buildings (and the utahraptor inside)
Yeah there aren't many corners now but humans are going to be going in buildings and stuff
ur the one that brought up herbis lookin around corners
it's not going to give humans an advantage though that literally has no bearings on it
also troodons and dilos and every small carnivore is gonna be hunting ppl down in buildings
trust me it will, when humans are spending 30% of their time inside buildings, or traveling underground (which might be a thing) it will give them a huge advantage
i think a better idea is giving humans the ability to peak to the left or right (if u peak around a corner ur able to be seen if there's something around the corner)
And again, it ruins the horror aspect, which will be one of the fun things about playing as a human
like what you can do in a fps game
yeah
Wouldn't be surprised if that's a thing, since the devs say they want something like Tarkov, and iirc you can do that in Tarkov
ok I'm not incredibly articulate right now but no it won't
and if it does, it is a positive thing. ammunition will be scarce
I mean we're playing as mercs
something like that would be HELPFUL, very helpful and would certainly fit
Can you explain how it won't give humans an advantage?
yeah
its helpful but it isnt cheaty
3rd person means u can look around corners without exposing urself even a little bit
are we going to have 3rd person as a merc?
Honestly, I prefer 1st person
there are plenty of ways to work around that
peaking means u can look around corners but u do have to expose urself a little
No, we're not
it would definitly be realistic to peak, but the problem is the utah at the end of the hall now knows your there, where if you had third person you could peal and the utah doesn't know
how
thats the point
its helpful
but its not OP
thought so
collision boxes on corners so that you can't look around them
be creative
dude this is the reason that peaking is better than 3rd person
But then that's a pain cause if you're trying to navigate a room your camera will go all over the place hitting those collision boxes
well than
What's the point of a horror survival game if you want to diverge that away from the game?
adds fright
yup
again. be creative
i know, that is what I was saying you can peak, and now you have a problem, and that problem is a utahraptor.
there are ways to work around it. you could make it like deadspace where the camera is sorta behind the shoulders of the player
also why go thru all the trouble of making 4rd person viable when u can just add peaking
Or.... hear me out..... we can just lock humans to first person 
^

Sorry for the passive aggressiveness btw

you are being incredibly dismissive and rude
"again. be creative" ?
WE

i didnt mean to click enter
The game scum has 3rd person and they don’t let u peek corners

Real players just don’t show up
would not say that's dismissive or rude
That's why I apologized. But I don't see the point in adding a ton of things to stop people from looking around corners when you can just lock mercs to first person
see this is what I'm talking about, there are ways around it
its dismissive of our ideas
it's being obnoxious
we're giving you suggestions
just. because it adds depth to gameplay and it looks nice
and doesn't fit the horror survival genre
First person can look nice too tho, and it's more immersive
your suggestions are "keep things the way they are," not a suggestion at all
its less terrifying to see a utahraptor jump on your character, rather than it jump onto you and then it biting your screen
yeah but isnt it just more efficient to add 1 mechanic instead of spending a ton of time and money to make a different mechanic work?
my suggestion is that we add peaking and keep in 1st person
because it is already what targets the genre and brings a better experience
dead space is a horror game and it works fine
or or or
if it pounces on ur back then u should go face down on the floor
dead space isn’t survival horror
I mean, peaking is fine if it's exclusive to 1st person. but I think the game would benefit from having humans in 3rd person
how would it benefit
no seriously
tell me what the benefits are
this is The Isle though
1st person makes everything bigger in size, when you're in that perspective and play it works better with the gamer as they can 'relate' and be the character (understanding size). It brings immersion to the audience. Alongside fits the bloody genre more effectively
why are we so horny for genre labels
if a feature is nice, then it's nice. it doesn't matter the genre
i mean, punch already said nothing that has guns should ever be in third person, soo...
That is a very false statment
it rlly fucking does
u cant have blood and gore in minecraft bc u think its nice
thats not part of the genre
the genre isnt just a label, its a restriction
the game is not scary the majority of the time and I doubt that will change for humans. gathering water, hunting, etc. in 1st person is visually ugly
humans wont hunt
no lol it's because it doesn't fit the game
why are u splitting hairs
The game isn't scary right now
ok
because if something takes a game away from it's genre... the audience doesn't get what they want.
The original genre wont be as effective onto the audience
the game is in Alpha rn
they're building up to their genre
okay to bring it back. having third person for humans will not make it any less scary
it will make it less scary
it will
everything will look smaller and thats bad
ur supposed to feel tiny as a human (thats part of the horror)
It would make it less scary. Also using a flashlight with a third person camera can be a bitch
I have played many third person horror games, and them being third person does not make it any less scary
name them
Those games are built with third person in mind tho. This game isn't
i guarantee the monsters werent bigger than you
that's because the isle is also a survival game
your arguing for a lost cause, mercs are going to be 1st person
notably dead space. which I have mentioned multiple times
...and I'm suggesting that it be different
and are the monsters bigger than you?
yes lol
some are, some aren't
I've been playing a lot of Red Dead recently, and when I first saw the wolves I thought they were waaay tinier than they should be. Upon closer inspection, turns out they're a pretty accurate size and they look smaller cause third person
do they look bigger than you?
yes
look, please research filmic techniques
camera angles especially
alongside a POV shot
for your sake Lydia, and ours
i mean like do they look like they're as big as they should be
human gameplay isn't really built at all. the rest of the game that the isle is, though, is built around third person
Not true. A long time ago bushes used to be huge because humans weren't in the game and the size didn't matter. Now they need to take humans into account when making the size of things
I am sleep deprived and this sounds like computer noises can you dumb it down for me pls 
dude the monsters in deadspace arent bigger than you
i looked it up on steam
if u look at smthn from rlly far away then it looks smaller
also
that's why I suggested the camera be closer to the model
if u want evidence that 3rd person makes things look smaller, compare a utahraptor to a t rex in legacy
lower field of view or something. the camera would be very close
or it can be closest to the model, by being in its eyes
things will still looks smaller than they actually are
its bc ur perspective is above ur actual model
you're really not adding anything to the conversation by being like that
Also first person could make a VR mode possible in the future
I think it should be toggleable, 1st and 3rd perspective I mean
Bad idea. Cause then the people who like first person over third person would be at a disadvantage because of the lower FOV. Hence why barely anyone plays GTA in first person
fair enough ig, still think humans should have third person. it just looks better to me
also
no one would play 1st person bc they dont have to deal with the spookiness
we're playing a horror survival game
sometimes an understanding on how camera angles and camera shots is more effective than other angles and shots
Firstly- 1st person (POV - Point of View)
- a POV shot would be used to bring the audience/player into the game (figuratively) as they ARE in the game. Playing the game from the POV of the merc.
Secondly- POV shot effect on a low angle shot (camera, low, points up)
- This camera shot is used to make things big... BIG. Alongside creating an idea for the audience that this thing is much larger and therefore very dangerous. For example, watching a trex run at you- this brings immersion and creates fright for the audience.
there is your explanation
Out of curiosity, what first person games have you played? Cause first person can look better than third person
I love making movies for the isle. I use them as they bring meaning to the game and my videos.
filmic techniques is important
with obvious exceptions
like little nightmares
Little Nightmares isn't first person tho
Mercenaries will definitely be first person. Something that has access to guns should never be able to use third person (this was hell to find and is copy and pasted directly from punch's message)
yeah but theres a mod for 1st person in LN 2
third person can be spooky too. I don't think it's fair to make this call without seeing an example
Oh didn't know that. Interesting

there are a lot of in-game mechanics that sound bad on paper, but that people don't really complain about because they are taken for granted
didn't even acknowledge my block
I'll think of an example
Third person horror games don't work well with large creatures tho
not true at all, ever played god of war?
a good horror game can have 3rd person
but depending on the game's other genres, 1st person helps a lot more
God of war isn't a horror game tho?
ever compared a utahraptor to t rex in legacy?
um... they are carnivores
in size, not diet
just because it doesn't have the word horror slapped onto it doesn't mean it doesn't make you feel small. which is the point
it makes you feel small. third person perspective can work to make you feel small and emphasize how big other things are
but it isn't effective in this genre
dude
compare a utahraptor to a t rex and tell me that doesnt look out of proportion
yeah but only if those other things are FUCKING GINORMOUS
I genuinely do not understand the point you are trying to make
but it lacks the feel of being there
you're figuratively just watching your character, not being it
which, in a horror, is a big need
my point is that 3rd person screws up size
God of War is a lot more cinematic than The Isle tho. Shadow of The Colossus is another good example of a game that makes you feel small. But it's the camera angles in those games that do that, those angles wouldn't work well in The Isle
I feel like I am my utah when I'm playing in third person as a dinosaur
take botw for example, you play in third person and you don't get to grasp the actual size of the enemies your facing, but they are really much larger than you. much larger.
No Man's Sky is another example. My own ship freaked me out the first time I played in VR
if u compare a utahraptor to a rex in legacy and then you compare the first person size of a tribal to a rex then u can see that the rex looks tiny compared to the utah but huge compared to the rex
you can feel like you're anything honestly.
that's the point of a game
but using techniques can boost the feeling of being there
if it's done right, and with purpose
I do not just feel like I am there but also like I am the animal. it's just a matter of how your brain works and I don't think it's worth arguing about
many would beg to differ
Third person for the dinos makes sense tho. They use melee attacks and they're meant to be more in-tune with their environment. First person for mercs makes most sense cause it makes it easier to aim, and limits their FOV to make it harder to see around corners and through foliage
third person would work fine if done correctly. it wouldn't mess up perceived scale if the camera was close enough and it wouldn't make it any less scary
i can confirm that aiming is easier in 1st person than in 3rd
it would but ok
this doesn't even matter, it* clearly isnt going to be swayed and we can just come back in 3 hours to point out his inevitable 50 X's
I agree to disagree
yeah
This whole argument is pointless tho. Mercs will be in first person, that has been the plan for years now. Dondi in particular hates when long ranged characters are in third person
what does this mean
fine then
that's what a suggestion is for. for things to be changed from how they are
It*
Yeah, but that's a feature that isn't going to be changed
as the devs don't even care about it as we know we're getting 1st person
and a 3rd person camera could always be brought into via mods
It likely will be. I'd be surprsied if it wasn't
not point arguing about this anymore really, as lydia said they are tired
and we're honestly getting no where XD
it's just a discussion like
fine how about this
imagine ur in the jungle and its night time
u hear a bush rustle
you look around, seeing nothing
Bro why you gotta mess it up
What are you even trying to spell
then suddenly you fall to the ground, a sharp pain in ur back
QE Keys
Oooh
ur face in the dirt as u scream in pain, but its too late
ur already dead
e should stay as interact
Well that wouldn't work since E will likely be the interaction key
F
also q could be like a compass thing
Q and f would be awkward and F is a call button so it'll probably be used for a hand signal
guys
F and E interchangeable
q should pull out a compass
K compass
could make it crouch + direction like in alien isolation
I'd like a compass button
a lot better than just sniff sniff
that makes sense 2 me
i say q bc thats the sniff button for dinos and it brings up a compass, so it should be the compass button for humans
however, Q and E would feel a lot more better if you're trying to peak
then you either cant move or cant look around
yeah thats why i changed my mind
humans arent getting calls per se, punch mentioned hand signs
so its possible f could be interact and qe can be lean
wut about alt + mouse button
man i forgot alt existed lol
f should be flashlight
yea alt is already used for other abilities so itd make sense
You guys are missing the obvious solution. Just hold down Left Alt and press Q/E to peek
yea
Omg
or
The timing
ohhhhh nvm