#Starship Flight Test 4
5067 messages · Page 6 of 6 (latest)
Why'd he get footage
"sorry you don't get the footage" is just

It looks kinda fake tho
The problem is the way he interprets the snippets
Remember when the KSC OLM was gonna be replacing the one at Boca?
well, the main problem is him being a schizophrenic
And somewhat of a pedo but that's a huge big rabbit hole
oh I've had him blocked since pretty much day one I missed that
ocean scam I knew about obv
good times
(is the /s necessary?)
there's also the "fake person" incident where he basically said TSE didn't exist, that was fun
Are we sure this isn’t just an edit
quite
That’s cool then
He better give us something of the ship now
Surely this makes it even easier for spacex to find who it is cause I’m sure they won’t be happy with this one
Turns out it’s probably someone high up leaking it all as they want to
God damn it i want the vid so bad
people involved with starbase/starship on twitter be good people challenge, demon difficulty
I want the god damn footage
cant lie I dont think we will get it
the recap video was the last chance to get any new footage
I will get a job at spacex just for this footage
chad
Even then this guy must be high up so it’ll take you a while lol
clouds have moved, just not that much
just threw this image and the og into paint.net and overlayed them, and yeah, the clouds have moved but very little
still dont get how it had enough fuel fr a mushroom cloud
explosion doesnt appear to be at the landing point
It’s just a fireball mainly
But like even 10 tons of residual would be enough to get that I’d imagine
Take it with a quarry of salt but I remember Elon saying that falcon had in the order of tons of prop left off after landings
my point is stil that the explosion doesnt appear to be directly at the landing point, or at the engines, but closer to wear the top would be after tipover
perhaps after landing, the water pushed igniting fuel back into the tanks, with a "smaller" explosion detonating the FTS directly (idk how fts works, but if an explosion happens next to it, could it be set off even if "safed"?)
by the explosion
It’s not FTS
The booster basically fell 70m and landed on a brick wall
so whats the current theories on what happened
it hovered and then fell into the ocena
it didnt slow down enough and slammed into the ocean
in which case the clouds would have moved far more in the time between
Why are people so surprised it went boom? That's literally what happened with all the early Falcon 9 boosters that splashed down
That could explain why they didn't show it fall
But even then sad they don't wanna show ruds anymore ig
But I'm it's probably pr because all the news as article would be mentioning that instead of the accomplishments
one thing i dont get is it clearly happened after tipping (telemetry showed a minimum speed of 9km/h and a final speed of 102km/h, with an average acceleration of 6km/h^2 (1.7m/s^2)), but here is no part of the booster visible in the picture, which would be expected even in an explosion like that
i say after tipping rather than a straight drop, bc 1.7m/s^2 is well under 1g
although i might be wrong and it was with 1 or 2 raptors on
Salt water does funny
like thinking back to say, SN9 or 8, the explosion would launch chunks of it along the water, and would be clearly visible in the picture, and the other thing is no isible splash or spray that would be expected which i find strange
i may be completely wrong with this, but just thinking
No, when it tipped over it just exploded
Let’s not forget this…
https://fxtwitter.com/ScottLikesSLS/status/1809436619792896163
Tanks can take load axially, not laterally?
Was the engine that caught fire inner ring or center
middle ring, E8
fts just unzips the tank
i’d expect FTS was safed at that point
Kadengaming