#Starship Flight Test 4
1 messages · Page 5 of 1
it goes nuts
decided to watch thunderfool's video on IFT4, and the amount of times he was just completely wrong is amazing
why would you give that jackass a view
"what is that which came off the top of the booster? thats not right?" (it was, in fact, the hotstage ring)
"the booster is out of oxygen, its gonna make a big splash" (it was not, in fact, out of oxygen)
"the booster is done for" (it was not, in fact, done for)
Do you not watch stuff that is wrong?
"oo we have an image.. of one of the grid fins" (it was, in fact, a flap)
"there's something wrong there" (it was, in fact, night time)
I think it's more the "no need to give this guy youtube clicks"
Though I'll admit I watched it for the lolz
he unfortunately has 1mil subs so kinda past that
For sure thought s29 was done for
Have we got a pic of starship
Love how we're all talking about that one flap when we dunno if the other flaps burnt through
Post entry
Well id imagine so
No
i feel bad for the other flap if so💀
other forward did
Is there pics
They exist but spacex obviously doesn't wanna release them
from eda’s insta
Probably suffered the same fate as the other camera though
I mean from the ground when they went to go disarm the tanks and pick it up
I think they don’t have anything to go and sink it
Why’s the door open
Oh
If only flickr
This is so cool and all but there's little things that make me so mad like not streaming on YouTube and now high res photos or anything
They have really good cameras on the ground
They have the photos might as well release them in full resolution
No way they can't spare some social media person to do that real quick
Who is Rhi and why is her supposed to be on there last year matter
pretty sure she was one of the dearmoon crew
The last 2 sentences are so weird
he mentions her specifically probably because she did rant about it a bit on twitter when it was cancelled
Ok… but who cares. It wasn’t ready for people then and people still aren’t on it
who is that
Joe Petrzelka has returned to Starbase
did he do something specific?
💀
He’s probably on there for the flight all high ups would be there
how's less than a month for ya? 
Imagine
Looks like rear flap burn through?
I think that's the engine chill vent
Ohhhhh
Burn through looks a lot more violent given what we see from the forward flap
Why did one of the raptors fail on the booster
We don't know
Good thing is SH has engine out capability on ascent and descent and it demonstrated that today
I’d say that’s never gonna happen but under 2 is doable
We demonstrated that on ift1
oh yeah there's absolutely no way it happens
but they'll get a lot closer with no major hardware failures and no mishap investigation
Yep it’s gonna speed things up gonna get through these last few ships quickly hopefully
its spacexs style to always do better on the next launch and speed of launches
my guess is July 17th atm
Flight 1 demonstrated that the whole engine section was in danger lol
fuck you mean, 18 engines on fire with no fight computer or TVC can't carry on to orbit?
can't be
oh yeah some dude set up a remote in the mudflats and holy fuck
these shots are gonna be great
We have yet to hear anything about hip location
The sea
That's crazy
I thought the flap was never gonna move again and then I saw it moving for the skydiving maneuver and I was like WHAT?!
I was certain I was about to watch the flap just fly off
Yeah
I literally said out loud and in multiple chats "oh fuck that ullage has to be going crazy right now to counteract loss of flaps" only for me to get multiple pings of "THE FLAPS ARE STILL MOVING!!!!?!!!!!!"
Do you have a chat with spx employees or some
It was incredible the landing shouldn’t of happened yet S29 powered through
I will plead the fifth
yeah absolutely not
should have happened with 4/20 stack
That thing shouldn’t of even lasted as long as it did but I’m surprised within 4 flights we’ve gone from that to a successful re entry
lol
Flap flying off would've been kinda funny
But it ignoring the fact that half of it is missing is more
Do we know the condition of the aft flaps?
Who knows what other damage ship has too
Just gotta hope it wouldn’t of sunk by then or that they even saw it
hm we will see
oh THATTTSSS...
I may have been closer than i thought
@sivanithu @SpaceX @AndyLapsa @Erdayastronaut @DJSnM Actually, I'd say the biggest winner of today is humanity! Every single day we test and get closer to 100% reusable rockets 🚀 is a huge win for all of us! #teamspace
no fucking WAY they got views holy fuck
I desperately want pics or video of the ship post entry
yess
well it was dark, so I wouldn't rule it out-out
What?
It would be insane though.
The ship is gonna look so beat up
So close
yeah a bit but once we get more exact location ill do it more accurate
I really do think that the Ship will look okay aside from the melted flaps
fall over and blow up bc it wasn’t fast enough or high enough
I mean it went up without a lot of engines
if there was a proper burnthrough in the hull then there would'nt have been a landing
if it survived that shockwave
debatable
What side did it fall over on, like would we be able to see the tile side or steel?
and as soon as that would happen it would be joever
i think it fell on belly
you can see it fall over in the video
cand camera seems up
whatvers left of the camerea
prob would’ve been loss of control to
definately
FUCKING PLEASE
well if it fell off during landing burn that would be funny
doesn't need all tiles or whole flaps to have a chance at landing safely, sure
I wouldn’t expect much tbh
it pushed through and the flap held on for dear life
in the same sense as flight 1
in something like say
peak solar activity, where the re-entry is slightly longer in duration
i wanna see where all of the missing tiles are
put airtag on each one
that’s not engine out capabailirt
The ocean
fish in the indian ocean dealing with a surplus of black hexagons once every few months
Probably seeing the fwd flap floating away
thank you
i’m going to put my tile in a proper container tomorrow
little fragment
i need to put mine in a fram e or something idk how tho
oh btw EDA tour is wrapping up now
filming outro
probably gonna be at least 2-3 weeks before it drops, knowing tim twice that
you have eyes evrywhere
you may refer to me as the goddess whenever you wish
mr ohare
second time this week I've had to say that lmao
?!!??
I think I’ll pass on that
absolutely not lmao
a single chunk
from IFT-1
i’ll take a pic when i get the anti cancer jar
Knowing SpaceX's legal teams, probably three months until it drops lol
Don't ask me how I know
lmao💀
I'm hoping they can fast track it a bit lol
you absolutely did not have to say that
Eda seems to think it won’t take to long so maybe some agreement with Elon or something
EDA is the king of soontm
possibly even more so than Elon
actually I'll revise that
the king of scope creep
once he gets started he never stops
what ever happened to the EDA van
he used it today lmao
He ain’t that bad lol
Everyone's reactions to the booster catch idea is basically the same as how people used to react to reuse
It's impossible and stupid until someone proves it might actually be feasible
Doing it on flight 5 is just stupid
meh
not really
as long as they don’t hit the tank farm or the mobile home office buildings i’m not that worried
but at the same time if it was a center engine out instead of a middle ring out on landing idk if it would’ve been as nice of a landing
Wasn't it one of the centres like right at the end as well
Even though the pad needs to be fully replaced it can’t be damaged yet especially if they plan on catching above it
And that landing was not as smooth as I would’ve liked
I think if it fails the landing it'd be more of a crater in the beach kind of situation
Yeah
I suppose but it could easily hit the pad as well, either way the environmentalists will go crazy if it hits the mudflats
honestly my line of thinking is if it works well enough to not ditch it'll probably get close enough to not destroy anything important
Not if it just slams into the pad
what are you gonna store yours in
ohh
RIP turtle eggs
Environmentalists when uh there's more locations in the world
nature preservation makes sense but its not like theres gonna be boosters landing in the mud flats or beachfor the next 5 years straigh
maybe a couple times
idealy no more than once or twice
but once its working its gonna have ocean abort modes or something
Funny thing about nature is it recovers and grows
yeah eventually but one or 2 boosters of damage will recover in not to long probably
if it was a constant
For some reason I really want to see a booster Crater though
sad we never got a stream of a ship impacting the ocean at terminal velocity
Why
wait was that in view of the side booster cams
Yeah there's a video of it from booster
yeh
thats the flap
i thought they meant there was more
he flipped the image upside down
You can also see the flap fall off yeah
wdym by "see the HSR failing" tho?
You can see it here
W stoke
Live Nova 2nd stage test flight onboard reentry video...
(Who's thunderfool?)
OHH THAT ONE DUDE?
this flight landing cleaner than any of the suborbital hops the funniest thing
Idk what the suborbital ships were complaining about S29 was clinging on and did better lol
ok I'm gonna pull a Von Braun here and say that IFT-5 shouldn't test a catch
the SH landing should at least land with all engines relit first
the FAA isn't holding them back here, they can easily get another launch done in like late July/early August
Fr
they could also use the flight to see how the flap hinge improvements - whatever they may be - work out
or maybe any tile pattern adjustments?
the problem is an easy fix
i’m not worried
I know that "better safe than sorry" isn't exactly spacex's philosophy
but I just think another rehearsal makes sense
They need to fix landing in the designated zone as well too lmao
wait-
were they actually?
booster left no crumbs today
huh.
okay I didn't know that
hm.
I still think that another water test is preferable
but I'm definitely more receptable to the idea of a booster catch attempt next flight
i don’t think itd be that bad if it failed ngl
eh? it depends.
the booster would have next to no fuel at that point...
...
ah.
yeah you're completely right it wouldn't be too bad.
Really?
Sources?
Or was where it landed the actual target point?
[redacted]
Casue I was under the impression that they were still attempting landing like 20km downrange?
Oh like insider?
[redacted]
Ah so it's [redacted]
idk any more
so? Anymore news?
I’m still in utter shock that this thing still worked
Wow it even rotates forwards and backwards too
I see no difference
i gotta watch this later
VIZIO
I still have a relic Vizio tv
From 20010
It's a champ
I have one but the backlight died in the middle
the BPS one?
similar story
our old TV was a CRT
got all fucked up color wise when lightning struck the power box behind my house while watching spongebob
Noooooooo😭
I still have a CRT from '93
i found mine on a sidewalk
mf got a tv from the future
Hopefully they managed to get some footage but it would’ve been dark so unsure
updated
i mean with the plasma, i would have thought it would be easier in the dark, bc it would be a huge bright streak
unless youre talking about the flip and burn
What is this about?
launch providers of the artemis program?
idk
superheavy launch vehicles maybe?
but then itd include FHeavy
wow
that is.. wow
right between two prongs of the exhaust
(speaking of, anyone know why the exhaust plume went out in a star shape?)
Legs of the OLM
oh yeah that makes sense
i havent seen any pictures of the olm, has it held up well?
seems so
there are images but you gotta scroll way up
yes
RGV has a top down photo, so far best condition yet
top panels got blown out again but that's a given
SpaceX and FWS are gonna be soooo happy about this
Yeah well that's what gets you cameras being bagged
at the end of the day, its someone trespassing, so if they got torched, their fault
unless it was set up by a SpaceX employee
it was not
no burnthrough on the experiments
at least on the bottom of the ship they literally do not need tiles there lmao
or at least can have a fair number missing in theory
i mean it can land with at least half missing one flap (probably more, only one confirmed to be half-missing)
thing is resilient
You can see the spacex sign where the property line starts so wasn’t trespassing
huh
so it was actually quite far away
it looks so close
given a 10 degree angle and a height of the tower of 146m, the camera was 828m from the pad
SHLLVs in the last few years (excluding FH)
Oh, ok
Raptor startup sounds>>>

The noise the stream made was awful
Love 50 hz buzz
I remember back in the mid-2010s we had an old CRT TV in my room because my dad got it for cheap and it still worked fine, I was so excited to watch the new episodes of Gravity Falls whenever they came on it.
Man I feel old now that "back in the mid-2010s" is an actual phrase I can use.
stop it.
I wish I could
h o w
sensors
ohh
https://vxtwitter.com/esherifftv/status/1799101674138579381?s=46&t=9j2-lzDcIbRK6McrWkEb9g
Apparently Ship 29 only landed 6 km off target!
NEWS: Elon Musk gives a thorough update after the 4th launch of Starship.
Will we see a catch for Flight 5?
How will Starlink be even better on the next flight?
These are some of the questions Elon answers …
💖 650 🔁 136
6km is... well, close enough to see the target
To land on the tower they need to be accurate to within like half a meter though no?
hate the thumbnails she maeks
I’ve just never liked her at all
same
atleast she relased he rinterview right away tho
shouldve asked more about the flight tho instead of random stuff
I don’t expect an attempt for the ship to land on the tower to happen for quite a long time
1/2 years minimum in Elon optimistic mode, and IMHO 2+ years is possible, if not even plans being completely changed.
Still 6 km is probably more precise than almost any capsule coming back from space, and an error AFAIK that Space Shuttle Orbiters can easily deal with during the gliding phase. Especially considering probable serious structural damage on S29 after re-entry
assume damged flaps would decrease crossrange
only thing of value here is 6km off lmao
yeah
imagine getting an interview with elon musk on the day of the flight and not aksing anything useful
Oh my b I misread that the booster was the one 6km off lol
Have the shuttle performed skipped reentry before?
I imagine its not a Orion/Apollo exclusive profile
two idiots perfectly captured in the same photo
"did you see a soft touchdown"
yes actually I did, they hit the water slower than any of the suborbital hops lmao
most crew capsules touch down faster than starship did lol
I can fall faster than that easily
I saw about 20km/h before the big jump down in velocity from the water impact
But it's still slow
Capsules normally touchdown at that speed (about 5m/s)
visually based on the shitty cam it's ~15km/h (4.166m/s) -> 2km/h (0.55m/s)
the on screen telemetry isn't always the best though
didn’t they hover?
then cut off the engines
it didn't show the engines lighting for landing burn on ship oddly
the raptors
How come it stayed at 68km for so long I thought it had frozen
gliding for a bit I guess idk
plasma interferences with starlink connection probably
Nah cause then it started counting down again
What altitude did starship break up on flight 3 as they said 65km but there’s no way it made it that far
it did
it got to the start of peak heating
65km as said
48m into the flight
so S28 was a bit steeper as S29 was at 70km at 50m
49:28
are they what was on fire at 11km?
Ah that makes sense then as getting to 65km was much longer and harder then it seemed on flight 3
idk if anything was actively on fire but something definitely fucked up to just not show the engines on the overlay lol
Twitter being hell like always, its like 10 guys echoing at each other let them be
i mean something was making orange adjacent light
and there were tiles intentionally missing around the engine bay
the fact that sparks were still flying well after the plasma dissipated confirms that something sub-optimal was happening to the ship
I mean there was definitely glowing well before the raptors lit
so something was on fire (or at least superheated)
Meathane vent lit ?
maybe?
In case you are wondering. The FAA is still asscessing the operation and will determine if a mishap investigation is warranted, regarding Starship Flight 4.
Well obviously no
(one of the commentators who flame torch'd a marshmallow at the end of the IFT4 stream)
could the engine explosion on booster landing burn count as a mishap?
No as it wasn’t a failure
according to the FAA exceptions, the failure of raptors (such as an explosion) during reentry and landing burn might only apply to the Starship, not the Superheavy Booster, depending on the reading, but i may be wrong, and if i am, feel free to correct me
Ye it does only count for the ship but the booster having an engine out didn’t result in a failure and didn’t effect the mission so it shouldn’t cause anything
it was an engine failure that’s for sure
Wasn’t a vehicle failure though
Which way
Can you send the thingy
Even if it was the ship that had the problem they would still be fine
Failure of ship LB would require one, single booster engine out on LB does not
It literally saids failure of the ship landing burn wouldn’t require a mishap
Maybe not, but it’s certainly wrong to say it wasn’t a failure like in a message that says
No as it wasn’t a failure
Oh I'm stupid lol
huh okay so they're like more than set
I likey
Ye it’s quite good so no reason a mishap report is needed and the license covers the next flight as well unless they go for catch which might need a amendment to it but I’m unsure
me when I can't fucking read
that’s called dyslecsia
Dyslexia lol

Me
well iirc the raptors on lb worked well?
One failed on ascent one failed during the landing burn from the telemetry (and visuals)
For the booster
Now whether that failure for the landing was caused by something upstream we dunno
yeah but that’s booster not ship
yeah, it was
an engine out with a successful landing very likely isn’t gonna trigger a mishap investigation
I feel like if it were from that timeframe we’d get better technical info
1059 went engine out and failed a landing and it didn’t get a mishap investigation so
Maybe not, yeah
Rockets aren’t planes after all
in fairness falcon was a well understood system by then and it was not integral to the flight plan
(most of the time)
it was integral to the level it was yesterday ngl
it still completed the mission without endangering the public
that not gonna be a mishap investigation
idk why it would be
I reckon the landing burn engine out was intentional
I don’t
there’s not much reason to believe it would be, and something down there exploded
it wasn’t lol
i’m like 99% sure it was an energetic failure
engine shielding flew past the gridfin right when it went out on the graphic
why would they intentionally kill an engine on LB...?
redundancy testing idk
there's really no benefit to that
It never turned on according to telemetry
could have very well tried to
^
ending in an energetic explosion
it certainly turned, turned on is a different story
well no it did
really depends how you define turn on
did it ignite? Yes
did it go well? no
I mean not really but you can make an argument lol
they’ve gotta stop with that💀💀💀
You sure I didn’t think it even ignited
again define ignited
Well why would it not try to ignite
i don’t remember what the root cause on 11 was though
It’s literally programmed to
That it didn’t even attempt it
ancient ass bodged together engines
there was an attempt✨
To test redundancy
so it wasn’t [redacted]?
Not necessarily
sure maybe ascent (which is a far fetch in itself) but landing burn
completely not
it lit lmao
Yes necessarily
i know that with certainty
I use [REDACTED] way too much for me to know which redaction you mean lol
dm me it
nah ascent wasn’t a planned failure
yeah i don’t believe it is either
some people do
i’m just saying it’s more viable but still not
possible really
If they want to try a catch then it’d be good to make sure it’s still possible even with an engine out, bit like how they left some tiles off
engine out, sure, engine explosion? more questionable
it was energetic
their goal is to make a soft landing, they’ve never done that before, why risk it with an engine out?
there were chunks of engine flying past
why not wait until B12
if it was planned they would’ve said it on stream
There goal was to also have a controlled re entry and descent and they risked that with some tiles off
in non-critical areas
exactly
this engine shutdown could have very well been critical
it just wasn’t in this case
thanks to engine shielding
and they were going to lose tiles anyway, they just wanted to see the effects of one where they knew where it was
which prevented the shrapnel going everywhere
the goal was to fly all 33 on
I do love that we've euphemised engine go boom to energetic event
Ye and the engine wasn’t in the center which wasn’t critical technically
it FINALLY worked lmao
yeah it only went a little bit out there
IT WAS NOT ON OURPOSE 😭😭😭😭
Btw this conversation is complete pointless if the engine did “have an energetic event”
this is another level of coping
iirc it’s what spacex used and i like it
it was an energetic event lmao
watch that post flight blog post and remember what i’m saying
I was joking lol
at relight
whuh

if SpaceX doesn't I will be very disappointed
hey Maddie you do know people with message logging on can see deleted messages right lmao
what did she delete i’m not on PC
dw
fuck u
mean

it was a joke about raptors being picky eaters bc on flight 3 it ate some stuff and got constipated (a filter got blocked)
tf
it’s on the spx website
idk what caused the energetic event but would not be shocked if it was something similar
it was me
Filter blockage is really an issue for it
It was in a nasa thing if I remember correctly
Something similar eas said on the IFT-2 update
‘During this burn, several engines began shutting down before one engine failed energetically,’
Ice constipation 
Tim said it was during his launch stream and thered be "more details" when the musk interview drops
spitter in shambles
oh he did say that? Do you have a clip/timestamp
yeah lemme get it rq
huh interesting
[TIME SUBJECT TO CHANGE] This is the fourth fully integrated full stack test flight of Starship and the mighty Super Heavy booster, the largest and most powerful rocket to ever fly. It produces over twice as much thrust as the Saturn V that took humans to the moon.
The goal of the test is to get further along than IFT-3 in March, 2024. If all ...
Yeah
IFT-2 vs IFT-4
MP4.mp4
Its the same thing as like if there is an engine out on falcon ascent, but the rocket still meats all mission requirments and objectives right?
I’m still mad about the fact it didn’t get decals
depends how early on the merlin shuts down
In asking in terms of a failure investigation
I just had a thought
If S29's flaps are from S21, does that mean that S21 is technically the first prototype to successfully re-enter?
bold of you to assume it didn't
it broke off after landing
i mean by that point starship’s already completed its flight
Yeah I too noticed weird out of line movement from the flap
I thought it was just a weird camera angle
I think that's what happened to the flap after the splahsdown, not how it was the whole duration 💀
It actually looks like the pods from 2001
Obviously not but definitely like the last 5km for sure
Did you notice how weird it moved
HOLY SHIT
Super Heavy landing burn and soft splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico
💖 357 🔁 77
That’s insane
checked past 30km and I saw nothing unusual
only when it splahsed it started doing weird shit
Super Heavy landing burn and soft splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico
It started doing weird stuff like during the landing, and a lil bit like seconds before the landing burn
lol bad cell service go brrr
That vapor cone is so amazing
There's no way that's real
Also finally the SpaceX buoy is real 😛
One thing is sure - that booster certainly landed pretty accurately given the ship’s right next to it
Yeah ntociingtthat too
It also looks like it did a little slide maybe simulating it getting caught by the arms?
The engines look like they’re fighting for there lives
GOD DAYUM THATS BEAUTIFUL
footage from 1/2 vehicles released ☑️
bro I thought that was a render at first looking at the thumbnail
that is amazing footage
Same bro
That looked sick af
I wonder if the boat there was unscrewed or creweed
Probably uncrewed right?
unscrewed lmao
boat would've gone under
No way they catch next flight the engines were fighting to stay on
It's not a boat, it's a buoy
was all that fire from the kablooed engine?
The SpaceX buoy that a lot of people were asking for Falcon 9 landings
Please release the ship footage now lol

imagine if there was no clouds...

OH MY GOD
THIS IS INSANE
That's so cool but I'm mad they didn't show it falling over
Real
Like I wanna see it tip over so bad
They could've lived streamed this if starlink was on the bouy
I wonder if we will get S29 footage
If it was an accurate landing where they wanted maybe but I about you'd see anything good because it was night time where landing was
because if s29 made it close to where it should've then surely there were some buoys there
still u could see the flip cuz of the light from the engines
Oh true yeah
the conspiracy theorists are going to go WILD with this one
I think I saw someone already say something about it
apparently it exists
according to rumors anyway
idk anyone who’s seen it
arguments in 5 4 3 2 1
there was an airplane
and bc it entered the keep out zone it’s probably spx
which lends to the rumor
but also there might not be anything bc it was dark
but hopefully the rumor is true
✨semantics✨
wouldn't be any other way from space twitter
high-hydrostatic pressure mobile water tower
THAT'S WHAT I WAS THINKING WHEN I SAW IT IM SO GLAD SOMEONE ELSE NOTICED THIS
noticed it lol
I just found it funny
compression artifacts go brrrr
good luck convincing them that it's compression lmao
btw, barely any soot (and steel "shadeness")
Starship booster makes soft landing in water, next landing will be caught by the tower arms
#1025052459447619614
It's a part of flight 4
well, looks like they'll need to work on tower 2 for flight 6
@DJSnM Booster landing was on target, ship landing was several km off due to flap damage, but both were soft landings
how close does he mean by "on target"
that could be 10cm or 10m
one is vastly preferable for tower catches
close enough for the team to be confident in a booster catch
and considering that there is only one tower and a failure essentially puts launches on hold for as long as a few months
i'd say the team is pretty damn confident
Wouldn’t be the worst thing if they had a break in flights
They’ve done ours they can with block 1 if they had a break they’d just go straight onto block 2
I mean, sure?
I'm just thinking about the schedule they're on.
Given that the HLS is to be ready for an unmanned test next year, and that requires a Falcon 9-esque cadence
Granted, the schedule can just slip further down, and Artemis will probably take the flak for that instead of SpaceX, but still
Yes which means they need to move onto block 2 very soon and get the 2nd pad up and running
Block 1 they’ve done the main objectives the main last one I’d say is doing the de orbit burn
just me and the buoys
Oooo
You failed
literally is tho
several km off
only
several
km
Not very much for the first attempt and with the flaps destroyed
six of them specifically
6*
At this point just put everything in #1025052459447619614
once the launches match starlink cadence 
No
But yeah make a flight 5 thread
Nah the threads aren’t usually made until we’re relatively close to launch
Did it launch yet
Nope
Yes a few days ago
Domi207 is lying
It never launched
Ship 29 got too scared and chickend out of the flight
OMG
Your right!
I've been asleep and dreaming this whole time
GUYS LOOK AT THIS!
The moment when a hole appeared in the flap looks like a freaking LAZER STRIKE!
What do you think?
Just like a beam of heat
That literally made a hole in the flap.
Yeah but it really looks like lazer tho
So I can call it a lazer?
technically yes but not really
yay
you can think of it as a wall of lasers rather than a single beam
sure, that works too
that’s what reentry will do to ya
"lazer" will never look like a correct spelling of the word to me
I absolutely agree, but "lazer" sounds much cooled that "laser".
I... strongly disagree
Lazer is too close to "lazy" and also simultaneously looks like it's trying too hard to be cool
in like a gen z spelling their name weird way
Also Laser is an acronym so like
yea
no that's #1025052314848997396
maybe when we're a week out
a directed precision stream*
that's because laser is an acronym
light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation
You can always tell whenever Haylee gets on discord because she just fills every channel with replies lol
I have a lot to say and I'm not on here super frequently
this means we should be writing LASER in all caps
Actually technically yeah because iirc laser is actually an acronym
"Light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation"
mfw lasing is a commonly accepted verb in the literature
Autism discussion
This guys a wizard https://fixupx.com/mcrs987/status/1800189756346954224?s=46
#Starship S29 Flip and landing burn recreation.
External perspective w/ audio.
ITS HERE ITS HERE ITS HERE https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wZligwZMODU&feature=youtu.be
Enjoy this incredible audio and video from around the launch pad of the most powerful rocket to ever fly, SpaceX's Starship on its 4th orbital-ish flight test, #IFT4! 4K slow motion captured on various ZCam's, Freefly Ember, BlackMagic 12K Ursa, RED Komodo X and G2 4.6K with SIGMA lenses and Meade Telescopes.
SpaceX's 4th launch of Starship too...

Was mykul in mission control
Why would he?
Idk one of the people talking sounded like
Do you have a timestamp?
"vehicle is supersonic" but I listened with headphones and nvm doesn't sound like
Fair enough
Engine ignition and liftoff of Starship on Flight 4 as seen from the launch tower
GIVE SHIP REENTRY FOOTAGE
COPIUM they are slowly building hype to drop that absolute bombshell of footage
saturn vibes
The True Successor to the Saturn
BREAKING: FAA will not require mishap investigation for IFT-4 of Starship
"The FAA assessed the operations of the SpaceX Starship Flight 4 mission. All flight events for both Starship and Super Heavy appear to have occurred within the scope of planned and authorized activities."


LESS GOOOO
STARSHIP GOOD!
FAA LOSES
LET'S FUCKING GO
sorry but did we not know this already
I mean, kinda, its just the official confirmation
Yeah like they would've told us a while ago if it wasn't the case but now it's been confirmed it is the case
Still worthy of celebration
huzzah
ayoo
flight in july maybe
Flight tomorrow 
they're flying it on July 1st 
they will fly july 4th to make a big firework display at the OLM
real
real
real
real
real
I cannot wait to see this https://youtu.be/RpIOayd0zCQ?si=Z2WerYbWLmKJd2RI
After the failures we endured during IFT-3... we came back prepared. We placed a total of 12 Cameras. Some close. Some far. Some destroyed. Some not. This was only a test.. we have something ALOT bigger in the near future.. This is only the beginning for us.
@GoPro Give us a call. Let's get to work.
Yes GoPro 11's and 12's are raptor proof. ...
Season 1 - Coming Soon
After many months of filming, equipment creation, talent searching, rendering hours, and countless days of sweat and sleepless nights.. the time is coming.
Beginning this Summer, Season 1 of The Interstellar Gateway will consist of a full no expense spared CGI Immersive experience headed by Izan Ramos and Directed by J...
Man didn't know starship hotstaged in LEO
Any reason why that name isn’t as silly as it sounds
Bigger stage boosted the whole stack up there 
That's so high up it looks dumb
Cool transitions through the booster but then they are goofy animation
STARTING NOW https://youtu.be/RpIOayd0zCQ?si=kY7qOWp0hV_gO7II
After the failures we endured during IFT-3... we came back prepared. We placed a total of 12 Cameras. Some close. Some far. Some destroyed. Some not. This was only a test.. we have something ALOT bigger in the near future.. This is only the beginning for us.
@GoPro Give us a call. Let's get to work.
Yes GoPro 11's and 12's are raptor proof. ...
I was expecting a lot higher quality
Looks like a GoPro hero 7 stuck in the bushes set to 4:3
Cool views though
it pretty much is lol
I saw some of it early, crazy shots
they're cooking
Yeah the close ones especially
next flight 
Now if only everyone was allowed the same stuff that'd be great
They were the only ones allowed to do that?
Them being that close they had to be right inside of the SpaceX property line
And you can only do this kind of thing if allowed by SpaceX
Idk
they didn't lol
🇨🇳💬
Some very nice footage, I feel they’re being a bit to overhyped currently
RECAP
Starship’s fourth flight test launched with ambitious goals, attempting to go farther than any previous test before and begin demonstrating capabilities central to return and reuse of Starship and Super Heavy. The payload for this test was the data.
Starship delivered.
On June 6, 2024, Starship successfully lifted off at 7:50 a.m. CT from Star...
new views of Starhip in space as well
no new re-entry views
MISSON CONTROL FOOTAGE THO
ayyyy
and obv the sneek peek for the booster catch
no new re-entry views, 2/10
the HSR view of the booster coming down through the clouds is hella cool
Ok so kinda disappointing
Cool but disappointing
Didn't show the booster fall over
No other re-entry views
No images of either after landing
(probably didn't have post landing images, only re-entry footage)
Showed it to a friend who's not really into rockets and he said
"cool... but it's not the Saturn V so I don't like it."
valid
tell him its bigger than the saturn V
nah
Based friend
Saturn V has irreplacable vibes
There will be bigger, there will be better, but the 747 will always be the queen of the skies and the Saturn V the king of rockets
just to add another sort of vibe
I'd say the Saturn V and the Shuttle
no lol
the shuttle was horrendously dangerous, and nowhere near as good as Saturn V, but it did build the ISS, and it had an instantly recognisable silhouette
SHUTTLE KING OF ROCKETS 
seethe miranda
seethe
Atlas V
not the same
shuttle was always talked about with female pronouns, therefore Shuttle is Queen of Rockets, and the Saturn V is the King of Rockets
This shot tho
Yk what they could do is stream a clean feed exactly like that
But noo
SpaceX try not to gatekeep media challenge
Wish they would show the camera that's on the back during re-entry
The shiny side
dudes literally got to capture MFS20 ahh clouds
Fr
Seems we will never get any other ship descent footage
Anyone can figure out what's the music it is? Tried to remove the lyrics and still nothing 
It's either (1) a requested unpublished music, (2) a few combined tracks or (3) just my software can't detect the track
We were able to get music on past Starship SpX vids, worth to note
tho it's hard to remove cheers and engine noise
so ig we are getting the catch
ik there was a public meeting like a week ago where they still weren’t sure
Oh?
The E man has been touting the whole booster catch attempt thing since mid-June
and there were some plans even before F4
She wasn’t very reliable tbh
I wouldn’t take much notice of what she said
False, Delta II king of the rockets : )
❤️
worlds biggest unintended firework
Awesome
such a king it put on the worlds best firework display
Have you seen the largest firework?
We live in a world where soon falcon 9 will be the king of rockets
seems like all they got
Has anyone got like really high res re-entry screenshots
This doesn't look so good
Compared to this
unrelated but do you happen to know what it was for IFT-1 recap?
The preps or recap? Cuz they did 2 promo vids
This one's really cool actually
Is that fight 4?
Witch part of the vid
that's flight 3
yea sure
Wo orang
Very orange
Thanks
Wish we had higher res photos of re-entry yeah
Kinda sucks having x quality wallpapers
Does anyone got an ai upscaler
goes hard
erffli do you have a pixel now
Im thinking of getting a used pixel in like a year or so
recap specifically, but both ig
I will send it sometime soon once I get time (too much work & stuff to do
)
I think u can run music recognizer and it'll work
nice
what
What
how was there that much fuel left
Which image
Yeah it's a leak
He's got the whole video
He has footage of booster falling over
And bragging about it kinda
"yeah I have it but nu uh" basically
Im assuming for good reason but if you can't share something don't say you have it????
michael paul is a fucking idiot but he gets little snippings here and there
