#networking
1 messages · Page 324 of 1
that should be auto negotiate
alr thanks
Ik Ik it sounds dumb but I just heard a thing on tik tok about it and just wanted to know what it is their for
wat xD
Lol they said u can get more speed and I got confused how
@buoyant shell https://i.imgur.com/jTaWTSs.png
Yea i shoulda used common sense
you can't lol
@buoyant shell auto negotiate just picks the best available speed for the link
oh ok
if both sides are gigabit, it will do that
@buoyant shell if say, one of the 8 wires in the cable was broken
I apologize if this isn't the place to ask this but I'm having some I think its networking issues with Forza Horizon 4, and when i go to check Xbox Networking it says something about Teredo is unable to qualify, and I can't fix it with Microsoft's reccomendations?
50 down and 10 up
it wouldnt be able to do gigabit, and it falls back to 100M
fast ethernet needs 4 wires, gigabit needs all 8
10Gbit is another standard, and so is 2.5G and 5G
Darn yea I just CAT 6 installed in my room and im blown away
I used a wifi extender before
anything above 10gig use fiber
yeah 10G on cat6a ~ up to 25 meters
or even 10gig
beyond that, use fiber optics.
use fiber
Fiber optics can go for many kilometers
and go up to insanity speeds
10G, 25G, 40G, 100G, 200G or even 400G
and thats a single color of light
you can then put 96 colors on a single fiber, for practically infinite bandwidth
with 100G, that's 9.6tbit/s
this is mostly used for trans-atlantic fiber optics and long haul fiber
@buoyant shell 10G can be nice at home, if you have a NAS that is very fast
its still somewhat affordable
once you go to faster link speeds, it gets expensive really quickly
@peak cloak btw, for short distances, copper is actually faster than fiber
those DACs have less latency
because there's one layer less of electronic switching logic
nothing is faster than light
oh
ok
xD
@peak cloak actually that is not true either
electrons move at quite a snail pace
but charge potentials can spread way faster
huh
Drift velocity, the average speed at which electrons travel in a conductor when subjected to an electric field, is about 1mm per second.
the change of the electric field traverses the wire much faster
@peak cloak its not really electrons moving per-se
its more that there's an imbalance in charge
and this causes current to flow
but the actual movement of electrons is really slow
this imbalance in charge
is electric potential
and that's measured in Volt
I’m just happy I have 50 down and 10 up I had 10 down and 1 up before
Nicee
@buoyant shell I was on 4/0.6 for many years
and I've worked with dial up systems before xD
and yes, this is still operational, though I no longer work for that company
@peak cloak https://i.imgur.com/j1UhoUs.png
Old Speedtest but still gold
speedtest slow
can barely keep up
@buoyant shell https://www.speedtest.net/result/11253160776.png
🥜
fastest access I have
CAT 8?
Darn
has nothing to do with the cable lol
Idk bro
@buoyant shell copper is just consumer market
I see fast internet and it makes me happy
enterprise is all different technology
but uses same standards as the home stuff
just different connectors and cable types
Yo
Glad I could help. Hope it works out. I work in fintech aws-based shop myself, feel free to ask things if you have questions
I do hope so! how hard is it to work with aws?
well. it's not. in onprem you would be ordering and assembling and maintaining hardware whereas with cloud it's a click of a button (or more accurately a line in your terraform code)
consider signing up for aws free tier
Okay this is a rea dumb question, but with a cloud hosted OpenVPN can I bypass streaming restrictions? If so how? Please @me if you could…
You could, but if you use a really well know cloud provider it couldd detect that you're using a VPN and I suggest using Wireguard over OpenVPN and changing the default port
As for setting it up, there are plenty in this server who can help
especially in this channel
Hey!
Can someone please check where's the bottle neck.
I am using a CAT5 cable (30m) to get connection from one room to another. I have routed the cable from the exterior of my building.
First of the connection being established is 100 mbit full duplex. Both the routers are gigabit. I can understand this may be due to poor quality of the wire
Next for local file transfer via SMB or FTP, I am getting full 100mbps but for internet, I am getting only 20mbps
I have a 200mbps connection... Checked it n-number of times, it is working great.
I tired changing both the primary and secondary routers.. still the same.
Tried connecting one end directly to the Cable modem and other end to my pc, still getting the same 20mbps speed
Can someone please tell where might be the bottle neck?
If i am getting 100mbps for local file transfer. I should get 100mbps net speed too. But I am getting 20
What’s the difference?
Wireguard is. a newer protocol, with higher bandwidth, if that's what you're asking
@rose sparrow have you tried going into your admin access via you IP address and mess with some settings in there?I had an issue where my wireless adapter wasn’t connecting to my Verizon AC router. As it turns out there was a setting in my router preventing a proper connection with a specific band for the WiFi. Once I turned the setting off I was able to get my speeds from ~60 ish mbps to ~230 mbps on a Verizon Fios 500 mbps connection. This was because the setting was limiting the bands that the ac WiFi was putting out. So instead of properly connecting to an ac band it connected to an N band resulting in lower speeds. Of course this was over WiFi so if you are talking about a wired connection this information may not be relevant at all.
Pretty much. I hate companies having my data, but I also hate streaming restrictions so I just want to either pay for a decent VPN or create my own. I’m using PIA right now, but it’s honestly not my favorite thing for bypassing restrictions
I mean if you really hate companies having your data, I wouldn't say PIA is your way of going. Yes they claim to "not" safe or have data. But remember they're a US base company and if government wanted information they're at will to collected / share.
Yeah, my time with them is at an end and I want to be able to bypass streaming restrictions and still have a good VPN. I was looking at either doing my own using Linode or using something like PrivateVPN. Thoughts??
If anything, I would recommend hosting your own vpn 😄
Cause doing that your at well... At your own risk / will 😄
Lmao, that is the dream, but I’m like which would be better in the long run?
Hosting your own is a fun project, but remember you're one trouble shooting / doing maintenance.
I sometime host my own, but then I get lazy to maintenance it... So I jump from that to ExpressVPN
How is ExpressVPN compared to PrivateVPN?
Speeds for one, are alot better on ExpressVPN
If you want pre-speed NordVPN wireguard tech is good. But has it down falls I'm sure you're aware of.
Like them storing your IP.
What’s the streaming restrictions bypass like?
Sorry I ask a lot of questions. Just would rather have a customers opinion than a company
Nah you're good hehe. In my point of view its good, it has it's ups and downs, but I've notice alot better output on ExpressVPN vs PIA when it comes down to netflix.
I use it all time for HBO and netflix 😛
Lmao, I was jus about to ask. PrivateVPN is looking like a good option, but like idkkkkk. I want as little of my data out there as possible, ya know? What are you thoughts?
I mean most paid vpn's will always have their own hit or miss. If your data means alot there isn't anything like hosting your own VPN.
I mean I’m fine giving up some data, but when it comes to reliable streaming restrictions bypass I wanna know it’s secure and it will work
Nord bad. Nord very bad right?
Morning
Ivacy sometimes works for bypass
Last time I used it it worked perfectly fine
@ancient osprey nordvpn one of first to host wireguard protocols. They call it "nordlynx"
@lean pebble I do that, I sometime forget about my vpn lol
But the only issue I had with them is configuration on Linux because they don't have their software for Linux.
That's why I started to use private proxy server on my own server
Squid
I tried expressvpn was awful
hehe
Ivacy offers you dedicated IP if you need it
yea I've used nordvpn dedicated for awhile
I tried from Hong Kong was awful ping 😆
oh yea, that firewall tricky on vpn. You need find one that works well 😄
I didn't noticed that they included it in the price of the sale.
So I asked them to cancel only the dedicated IP address
Oh gosh my full stack teacher compiling html file
😂
oh boy hehe
Anyone here have a VPN setup that you use a idP wth SAML for authentication (with 2FA)? And in case you have, which product do you use?
Dual 5gb ethernet next to my school desk
looks great
almost as good as the ethernet ports kids in my middle school would stab to death and open with pencils
Whyyyy
Unfortunately cat 5 cant do 10gb
it was usually around 80-100 megabit
nobody used the school ethernet anyways
i jacked my own internet to the school computers so i could get past the website block
they didn't even allow us to play flash games
Ouef
10kV anti-tamper system
zap dem kids
What does a ubiquit controller look like with non-unifi switches? Does it break anything?
Or would it still see clients on the side of the switch?
@vestal surge depends
if you are using vlans, you might want to get a managed switch
brand doesnt really matter
Yeah I've got a managed switch on the way because unifi is out of stock
its all standardized anyways
Uplink will have two vlans, managed switch will send one out to one client and the other out to three
i cant login to to my nas anymore
OH
What type of internet access do you have rn
Dsl?
Check you existing network
Is there a modem?
What type of cable goes into the current router
If it's ethernet your good
If it's something like a phone line then the setup could get a bit more involved
I have fiber too
But the ont converts it to ethernet
So no fiber to the router itself
Our router dirctly does fiber fiber however that goes to our swich and is then converted to ethrnet so the oposite
can someone please help with my nas
Wats the problem?
its a netgear readynas duo v2
Try admin admin

didnt work
Google your specific model, there are usually websites with common usernames and passwords (default)
Do you have data on it?
i just got it 2nd hand
Factory reset it
Chck the stickr on the bottom
doesnt say anything special
just the model
i already pressed the reset button
5gb? doubt
rate limiting and qos exists
and a school prob has 1 10g link
networking in schools is almost always shit
y e s
because you have like a 10g or less upstream for like hundreds of devices
plus it usually goes over a dedicated fiber to the main school first
before being routed to the internet
and it always looks like this
Hey now, someone tried!
to make it look bad 😛
there's this cool web ui at like http://10.128.128.128
yup @peak cloak
I'm blanking on the other address but yah, you can see signal strength and other stats of the connected AP
ahh yes, nothing
24 mbps
yes, it's a private ip
only if you are internally connected
Anyone know if it is possible, to use this ONT https://www.goamt.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/7368_ISAM_ONT_G-240G-A_AMT.pdf
for pure telephone service?
instead of plugging the ONU directly into the ONT, we'd have it in a switch, doing VLAN offhanding
and use it only for POTS
Stupid Telus' 1.5G service
on a device with only 1G ports.
@dusk oasis routing is done in software.
Is it an actual router
yes
@dusk oasis https://i.imgur.com/m4IU8ex.png
My connection is Fiber optic cable!
but do you have an ONT?
or does it go directly into directly current router
an all-in-one
@peak cloak I called Telus lol
asking them what this BS is with 1.5G service on a 1G ONT
They wouldnt give me any details without a stupid customer reference.
Pricks.
ah
and if they plug the GPON directly into another device
they loose phone service
so its either 1G + phone, or 1.5G and no phone
@peak cloak basically: https://i.imgur.com/Sp9CIe9.png
but with indian tech support (sounded like it)
you are kinda hopelessly doomed.
unless there's a literate senior support person
useless.
Doesnt even support LACP
Hi! So i have an old TP-Link Access Point that supports multiple SSID mode. In order to use 2 SSIDs on different VLANs, do I need a switch aswell to make the 2 VLANs work? Because I tried to set it up and got wifi on one SSID/VLAN but not on the second one
@austere veldt does it even support vlans?
you need a vlan capable router
and switch
Yes, on the setup page of the AP, it allows me to choose the VLAN for each SSID
vlans are just a header in the ethernet frame
some unmanaged switches strip these vlan headers
so its usually best you use switches that have explicit support for vlans
you need to set up a trunk to the AP
'aight, thanks for the tip! I'll look into it
basically, you need a switch, that has the vlans you need configured on the port that goes to the AP
and then the other port to your router, also needs those vlans configured
the router, then has a subnet and address on each vlan
so it can route packets out
I might just do that! sadly i wont have this laptop for the whole period so signing up would a challenge itself. I do appreciate de recommendation!
also
I have to say that cloud/devops is free money as a job
The shortage of qualified personnel made the salaries skyrocket.
If you're semi-decent companies will be at each other's throats with competing offers to get you.
I'm also following up this guy on youtube called NetworkChuck that given me the first insights of cloud/devops
I have noticed that with interview, they are willing to hire people to little to no knowledge but with the condition of being determined to learn and cooperate (entry level as they also said).
what AP?
I might have the same one
As a team lead who's hiring for a member, I approve of this approach.
It's a TL-WA701ND
same with my recent job interview
we mostly used business terms and didnt talk much about technical skills
I was asked if I was willing to learn full stack development, ontop of my existing backend experience
to which I agreed
FREE TRAINING
milk it
work paying you to learn something? fuck, I used pay for this as a student. Sign me up

which one of you said hardware offloading routers were better than pfsense ones for gig speed? you were right from the beginning. I upgraded to 800 mbps plan at a reasonable price ($69.99) compared to last year ($129.99) and I couldn't even get more than 350 mbps.
I connected directly to the modem and was pulling the full speed. I went ahead and bought a new Edgerouter. I want my full speed...
@waxen scroll omg ever since the new local fiber company rolled out their cheap internet access in the neighborhood, Comcast prices actually make sense again!
thank goodness for competition
some how internet only prices in my area make sense too
theres no real competition yet
I think I did
which edgerouter?
make sure to turn on hardware offload
for full speeds
@little schooner that would be me
@little schooner join the dark side, get a mikrotik
edgerouters barely get updates
@little schooner i said that
i said that pfsense = crap
i said why use clunky dells to run your home network that burn power
i said it all
@little schooner you saying i was right?

I was implying that my decision to go pfsense was bad lol
@little schooner run a packet flood test to the pfsense, you'll see the CPU spike 100% and the throughput is awful
iperf might work, i had specialized tools when i did it
@waxen scroll were those tools expensive?
Hi guys. I’m in a bit of a need. I have a networking setup atm that contains some unify products and some own-made. The setup is as follows. A modem connected to a pfSense-box that has a whole system vpn connection. To this pfsense box I have a ubiquiti USG Pro 4 connected. To that I have a 24 port poe switch from ubiquiti. To that I have a cloud key gen 2 plus and a nanoHD access point. Then everything is connected to the switch via cable. What I am trying to do Is remove the Usg pro 4 from the equation. I feel that the pfsense box is more than enough. The problem I have is when I remove the Usg by bypassing it and connecting the switch to the pfsense-box the everything gets inaccessible and I can not access anything. No interface or anything. What am I doing wrong?
:facedesk:
@little schooner unifi expensive. for $199 you have 10G router
@waxen scroll the 10G is kind a lie really
in realitty, you get at most 5G
if you use SFP+ as uplink
that's terrible
because each of the 5 ports is a switching group connected at 2.5G
@little schooner but it has a 2gbit/s hardware offload for VPN
and a quadcore at 1.4GHz lol
if you use fastpath, its completely offloaded
but I've been able to do a bandwidth test to the router at full 10G
@clear igloo i know $8000 cisco routers with all gig interfaces that only do like 200mbit out of the box
so you were double NATing?
is the pfsense doing dhcp?
Yes it is.
Double nat?
you know what NAT is?
basically translates the one IP you get from ISP to your many LAN devices
Yes I know that. But it is in a hierarchy. Modem with its own 192.168.0.1, pfsense with its own 192.168.99.1 and UniFi with its own 192.168.100.1
Maybe I have set it up I a over complicated way.
is pfsense doing NAT?
yeah...
It is outbounding yes.
ok what happens if you get rid of USG and just connect to pfsense?
show output of ipconfig /all on windows
Everything is killed and I get no internet access on anything going out from the pfsense box.
well there must be a reason
@little schooner you know pfsense?
I think the problem lies in the UniFi setup.
but you just said you got rid of the USG?
I did and it didn’t give me internet. When I reconnect the Usg everything is working fine.
Maybe I have given the unifi setup a predefined ip? Is it possible to dhcp from the pfsense box?
ok, but for one just saying "it doesn't work" isn't really how you troubleshoot networks. For example you may be connected, but dhcp may not work. Or that you may have connection to the router, but not to the internet
what do your NAT rules look like
I have no connection to the modem, pfsense or UniFi when I disconnect the Usg.
you said pfsense has 192.168.99.1, on what interface? LAN or WAN?
and the WAN interface address is a global IP?
ok, so you have like triple nat lol
The wan is given on .133 from the modem.
ok so in this configuration your "modem" is acting as a router
My modem is just the provider isp one. As it is internet over coaxial I can not remove it from the setup. It is just a dummy. Coaxial to Ethernet. Just sending the signal to the unit next in line. In this setup it is the pfsense box. I want all the routing to be done through the pfsense box as a base and the switch for connection.
but it's not, it is clearly doing NAT and DHCP at least
what you want later is to have the modem in passthough mode
to get rid of all it's routing
but that's not relavent right now
@short condor try changing NAT mode to hybrid
This is the “modem” setting
So if I turn it off, what happens?
pfsense
Yea I understand that.
pfsense won't get an IP
what you need is for the modem to just passthough all it's traffic
for it to act as an actual modem
but first let's fix pfsense
Will that kill the “routing” possibility?
wdym?
If I connect the computer to the pfsense box directly everything works fine.
ohh
then what doesn't work?
@short condor I want you to try something, connect the pc to just pfsense directly on it's LAN interface and do ipconfig /all
in cli
Let me explain. If I connect my computer to the pfsense box directly I get internet. If I connect to the switch via the Usg connected to pfsense I get internet. If I connect the switch directly to the pfsense box and bypass the Usg then I don’t get internet on the lan ports of the switch.
Problem is everything is in the rackmount atm. I’ll have to reconnect. Give me a few minutes. 👌🏻
Can’t access my windows machine for some reason. VNC won’t connect. No screen connected to it.
What do you want me to give you? Some of the addresses are not supposed to be public on the internet right? 😅
I have a print-screen of the /all command on my windows machine.
the output of it
yes they are called private ips
not routable over the internet
So a print screen is the output does not contain any personal information accessible from the outside?
no, it shouldn't. At most domain name, but if you didn't configure it it's not there
This is now connected with the Usg in place.
192.168.102.10 - 192.168.102.254
And “enable dhcp server on LAN interface” is checked.
Is it possible to make the UniFi setup to get a ip via dhcp? Maybe I have assigned the switch a static ip range.
switch should get IP by dhcp by default
but switch's IP shouldn't matter
even if it's invalid
show this, but directly connected to pfsense instead
yes but the IP shouldn't matter to the actual functionality of switching. Yes the managment will be inaccessible but it should still switch packets
Can’t. I don’t have a screen on my rackmounted hardware. It is all over VNC. 😕
“Connection type” ipv4 is use dhcp
yes
Strange that it does not work.
Would not mind redoing everything
This is what be the ideal setup
@short condor
modem is in passthough mode
pfsense does all routing
what all-in-one modem do you have?
That is no problem. Easily done.
Then the output in pfsense should be dhcp as it is now.
now I'm not too experienced with pfsense
wdym by output
LAN interface?
Yes sorry. LAN interface that will connect to the switch.
yeah
you can use any private subnet you want
Just you need to change the dhcp range as well as the router's ethernet interface IP
I think I have messed up something in the UniFi setup. I have given the UniFi setup 101.1 and pfsense is 102.1. Maybe that is making things messy.
Well, I’m already invested. I like their protect capability with the cameras and such.
Well, it is possible to turn it off. But still.
What would be a good alternative then?
Well, I have pfsense so I only need a switch and a access point.
Only reason I use it is because of whole network openvpn
I mean that can configured in linux
It gives me the full 500/500 that I pay for from my isp, even over vpn. So I am happy.
Btw! This is the “lan” interface config. Should it be static ip under ipv4 or should I check dhcp? 🤔
nah you are statically configuring the IP of pfsense
on the LAN interface
what are your dhcp settings just curious?
let's try something, disconnect the USG and directly connect the switch to pfsense
now on a computer do ipconfig /all
@short condor
Can it be done on Mac?
idk the mac eqivalent
Do I reboot any networking gear?
try ip a
or ifconfig
that's the linux eqivalent
ifconfig -a is the command.
Wifi
ok shows it's active
I restarted my cloud key and I am restarting the switch. They still show the old ip 101
you aren't doing any vlan stuff right?
try pinging 192.168.102.1
Now that I have restarted the cloudkey it shows the 102 ip. I’m waiting for the switch to boot
@tame carbon arp issue?
@short condor does everything break when you plug in a switch?
Okay, so I rebooted and now both switch and cloudkey get the 102 ip. I can access my VNC machine over internet no problem. Seems to have been the reboot that did it.........
wat
All of them got removed from my account...
why I avoid unifi
I removed the USG and now my devices are not adopted to my account anymore... I can’t access them.
Maybe ask in a unifi discord? I really don't know anything about unfi. I just keep my unifi controller on the same network as my usw flex mini
You know what
Maybe because the ip changed
Completely new network
@short condor maybe reset all of them?
-.- Reconfiguring everything is not what I need right now...
You know what
I think I have a solution
Throw everything in the garbage?
@short condor change the dhcp range, as well as the pfsense ip to the 192.168.101.x network
So I would do dhcp range: 192.168.101.100-192.168.101.254
And change the proxmox lan ip to 192.168.101.1
Yea, problem is I can not access anything anymore. All the wireless stuff are down.
No ethernet port on the MacBook. 😅
Well...
I always also keep one interface on my router untouched just so I can access it in case I lock myself out
I reinstalled the USG.
Someday I’ll wipe everything and then reinstalling. For now i at least know that pfsense is ok, the isp modem has pass through and that a reboot will fix most things. 😅 thanks for the help!
Work has wifi for employees because service sucks at the location... the wifi allows me to message and post on discord but not join chat rooms... how can I bypass this?
things have been good here. It's highly likely they are making me full time very soon
Anyone here know wholesalers in Canada that sell the UDM?
UDM...
Never used them myself but some Maple Syrup friends of mine says they good
@peak cloak
@tame carbon
Is mikrotik hAP ac2 designed as wifi router?
@peak cloak
I just want to use it as a normal wifi router
I'm not going to buy mikrotik hAP ac2
It's an access point!
Not a wifi router
Good job on making the distinction that most dont regarding Router vs AP
It can run routerboard and do routing
so its capable of being both
Umm
It can handle the routing or just be an AP
Does the ISP's stock router enough for 300mbps?
Thats a [need more information] question but "Yes" and "No" depending
I call their stock "routers" "AIO's" or "All in ones" because they are.. all in one units
They can do everything, but they do it all badly
Basically a "Jack of all trades, master of none" sorta situation
If you tack on 10 Devices, 4 streaming lets say, about 50% of these AIO's choke from my visual experience.
If you have them where they get little to no airflow, they will choke regardless
So what should I buy for normal uses
Really the question is: is the AIO doing fine right now?
If it is, seems like its fitting your normal uses fine
Exactly this
But they are more like the 5th down from Jack of all Trades
4 mobile and a laptop on wifi, a tv and a pc on ethernet!
But it's expensive
Rental fee?
I think you missed it, but thats what I call an ISP Stock router, an AIO.
So i was asking: is it working fine right now?
I'm going to...
If the stock ISP router is working fine
then dont change it
If its causing problems, then we need to change it
But until then, leave it be
thats why I left it open ended. "Is the ISP Router doing fine?"
That question has to be answered first
@plain siren btw I tried helping the guy with his Telus 1.5G
and he's not gonna get 1.5G service if he wants POTS
telus straight up ^
they dont have a better ONT for at least a couple months
Yeah, I didnt realize he wanted POTS..
it is a VLAN actually
my idea was to get one of those mtiks ONU SFPs
and then using his mikrotik switch he bought
You cant extract it however,
fuck
@plain siren another person used those nokia/alcatel ONTs in bonding mode
to get ~1.5gbit
with ports 1 & 4
VLAN 885 is the VOIP and then you need the logon SIP creds
I did manage something really fun the other day
@plain siren what about bonding?
I dont see how that would work out unless its bonding happening on ISP Side and Gateway
@plain siren no I ment, between the ONT and the switch
it has 4 LAN ports
this is the one
someone on reddit claimed to have done it this way
OH
but I couldn't find any evidence to back this up
They bonded the copper + fiber link?
speedtests lol. fuck
@tame carbon
But the setup is so complicated
@plain siren https://i.imgur.com/YgpoE2R.png
@plain siren "Bonding doesnt work" vs "It does work" in the same sentence
and unifi xD
ok so this would not give full 2G
yeah except give you aggregated 1G
yeah itll split the speed between the outputs 1G each when they negotiated 1g
but it wont properly bond switch
@plain siren and I spoke to Telus tech support, they are actual idiots
I just need a good router for home uses , not a complicated network switch
they gave some cheap excuse that "you dont get more than 930mbit because our network is overloaded"
and
"1.5G is only when you use multiple computers" which is a fucking lie"=
ONT only does 1G
930Mbit because their speed control on the GEM Ports cant get that detailed of resolution and they trim off the top headasses
I know but it should be 1000 although its not 100%
I seriously do not understand who thought it was a good idea to deliver 1.5G service to consumers
they can't handle the sp33d
if you just had an ONT with 2.5G negotiation
If you calculate the additional overhead tacked on by streaming to normal use
Its almost dead on
Idea was good execution was
uhh
less than
you can say trash
I was going for garbage
rubbish?
road kill
@plain siren what I dont understand is... an ONT doesnt need to be complicated lol
it has to have two ports
a 1G ethernet for IPTV, and a 2.5G for data
Actually an ONT isnt needed anymore in reality
GPON is just.. convolluted
@plain siren is there any "difficulties" with just delivering active fiber?
just good old DHCP over a vlan?
why is it always money
always.
@plain siren I get to deal with another fiber ISP soon in germany
delivering business internet
I am really curious what kind of connection itll be
if my hunch is right, its probably just SMF/AE
since they run a 4km dedicated fiber
I can give you a technical overview of the whole gPON system but yeah its convoluted
@plain siren oh yeah ^ makes tonns of sense 
Oh man it gets fun
@plain siren lol I really wonder what a geomagnetic storm would do to the 'ol copper network
So with AE you need switching/routing hardware for every "block" of subscribers
With gPON, you can have 1 switch GEM port serve 64 customers
okay, and is CWDM not an option ?
or wait
you have a complicated demux at the exchange
AE will be found in high SLA, high throughput networks
gPON will be found in super high density
@plain siren I was quoted 40 grand for my fiber line
either that
or get a 2 year dataplan and pay 13,50/month for fiber upkeep
@plain siren GPON is TDM right?
isnt there a way to do GPON with various wavelengths?
they need to make a lovechild of WDM and GPON
So GPON Encapsulated Model
GEM
Its how Voice, TV, Management, and Internet (ethernet) is packaged into the single feed
so tagged traffic
Tagged at a higher encapsulation basically
Its like the ISP level of a VLAN Trunk
And guess what, if you really want to, you can sniff this traffic and compare it to the currently accepted GEM Model and further extract it
VLAN 1000 on AT&T Fiber is used for ONT Management
Which is just SNMP
@plain siren when deciding on GPON or AE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwiqg_dq1Ek
Pretty much what I think of when anyone rattles off a load of numbers or stats...
The math for non-assured bandwitdh
That reminds me, some person made a video about how ISPs break mathematics
basically ^ the better the S/N ratio is, the more banwidth.
@thick minnow minutephysics
Get a free trial of Audible at https://audible.com/minutephysics or by texting 'minutephysics' to 500500
Support MinutePhysics on Patreon! http://www.patreon.com/minutephysics
Link to Patreon Supporters: http://www.minutephysics.com/supporters/
MinutePhysics is on twitter - @minutephysics
And facebook - http://facebook.com/minutephysics
This ...
Yup
here is best effort
@plain siren how much bandwidth even goes down the fiber in total?
"Guys, lets build a fiber network. And make sure it is total cancer for our customers"
ITU-T G.984.3 is the Regulative Standard on gPON
https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-G.984.3-202003-I!Amd1!PDF-E&type=items here is the 1 amendment made so far
I only know ITU-T E.164 from the top of my head
Thats ENUM right
Phone numbering scheme yes
Sorry not ENUM then
E.164 can be distilled into a regular expression
which you stuff into your DB to make sure you dont get invalid phone #
It was E.164 DNS that was ENUM hehe
routing bread
BreadOS
BreakfastOS, Bread based Nic's
@plain siren fucking callcenters
lol
just got called by another callcenter
from my old ISP
asking me the same question
AGAIN
if I was willing to switch to their fiber service.
this is the third time
Can you sue them for that?
@plain siren then he got sidetracked, and I told him: I'm not switching back to KPN, and I wish you a good day
"Im pretty sure you are busy with bothering other people, have a nice day"
@thick minnow not yet
come July the 5th, new law goes into effect.
No more cold calls.
Companies cannot call you for business purposes, unless you had dealings with them prior
I told him that on the phone
and he said: yeah thats only for energy companies isnt it?
to which I replied; no no, those are a different breed of time wasters, equally annoying
the new law applies to all marketing
Thats a switch
YES
(If I lived in the netherlands)
wait what
@plain siren detour
Was the keystones not close enough to the PC and they still wanted a clean way
So they shoved the PC's connection into the rail
This is like the only way I can see this being a REMOTELY valid thing to do
You'd get bonus points if you did this with a switch
and then hidden the switch inside the rail
@plain siren I always reply rudely to telemarketing. Though I stay respectful to the person doing it
and when I 'cuss', it is at their company, not the person
cynicism. I love it.
OMG finally
Dies anybody know if this can be used for wifi
It's a NTL box
Or is it just cable? (I'm in the uk)
People still use Itanium?
Replaced the switch today with a managed netgear switch, fixed every error I've been having 🙌
wat do you think?
Wifi? Or internet?
I meant internet xD
Ethernet is exactly what i needed. thank you
Do you have any good moca suggestions? cause some are 100 and some cost 30
moca 2.0 for gigabit
moca is expensive
you need 2
one for each end
the ones for 100 bucks are a pair I'm pretty sure
oh ok thank you!
@hidden socket cheaper alternative is pulling the cable and running ethernet
MoCa is a bit of a bodge
I like to think of MoCa as what you get if you stuck a wifi AP and WiFi Client's antenna's together.
Would there be any signal degradation if I used an extender like this to join two 20m ethernet cables? It's not powered.
You do it only once you are prob fine
ok cool
Are you running Adtran ONTs? We tested them and are decent for their dirt cheap price but lacking on their chassis.
Dirt cheap is the only reason I actually have some toy equipment like this to play with.
I have a lab environment with some Adtran equipment tucked away, and I find lots of compromises for what it is.
Build quality is really what kinda scared me tbh
"yes"
Everything of theirs just feels...... flimsy
And im not sure what model my stuff is
5004 19-Inch, apparently first generation with like 1 602X and 1 374
For toying with it, it works fine, but its configuration is totally a PITA, I had issues getting the thing to "see" my "Subscribers", and like noted: it felt built like trash
served its purpose
we have a TA5004 in the office but haven't done anything with it yet
our initial rollout is active ethernet only to a limited number of customers even though we ran a lot of fiber, we put in mikrotik sfp+ 24 port switches temporarily b/c we didn't have active ethernet cards and the fiber guy waited too long to order them
I hope I didnt just start worrying you
its not to say they dont work, but they "just work" imho
I would say less of build quality and more limitations in AOS. Last place we had a ton a 5ks from GPON to DSL and while overall solid stability wise, visibility, tshooting and some odd config limitations were a no go. All our equipment here for GPON/AE is all Calix
we haven't done too much with the configuration of the units.. I know the CLI mimics cisco IOS
AOS and IOS is a true to life meme of "let me copy your homework but change some things to its not the same"
We do use Adtran IADs here though for SIP/PRIs which out of the vendors has been the most robust
I do know Adtran sent us their beta test for their new ONTs for their SD-WAN solutions that coworker was testing. I know he sent it back like 4-5 days after receiving it so thats not a good sign. Ill have to meet with him to see what he thought of it as its their reaction to compete with Calix's AXOS platform
I can't even find that SD-WAN thing on their website
Let me see if I can get the model. Like I said it was a "beta" ONT so I am not sure how much they are advertising outside major customers
I found press releases for it.. the model is 934
but it isn't on their website from what I can see
Its under the SD-Access for more info https://www.adtran.com/index.php/sd-access
SD-WAN/Access, same buzz words
@toxic chasm was this a serious problem of yours, or purely theoretical?
Can anyone help me with this wifi problem. So with the wifi card Archer (TX3000E) i have i get 410 download and 0.55 upload but i was 400 down and up and i have tried Ethernet and i get 500 download and 75 upload and my school pc with Ethernet gets 500 up and down are there a reason for this?
i have tried to update the wifi card and did not help too
Here the pc parts that i have:
Cpu: AMD Ryzen 7 5800x
GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 3070 GAMING X TRIO
Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK
Ram: 2x G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4 16GB KIT 3200Mhz
Storage: samsung ssd 970 evo plus 500gb
Seagate SkyHawk 2TB 3.5'' HDD
Wifi-card: TP-Link Archer TX3000E Wi-Fi 6
because it's wifi
ethernet is better
ya but i would still get slower speeds than a school laptop with the ethernet
i want to know why
ok, that still dont help me
@ me if you can help
have a look at this: https://mikrotik.com/product/audience
It's a real problem
@toxic chasm this thing has 1x 2.4GHz wireless, and 3x 5GHz
You can use one of the 5GHz channels as a backhaul, to smaller units
It comes with an app to configure them
Mikrotik is carrier grade quality, most people here would recommend it
so it has 3 radios in total
Something with a few more ethernet ports would be good. Already running 2 switches
@toxic chasm if you'll indulge for a moment... let me show you something
as @peak cloak said
Honestly the biggest thing is how well it handles >700 active connections
@toxic chasm how much bandwidth do you have in total outgoing?
and do you have any heavy local traffic?
how many devices?
I have 200x20 to the outside world. I have moderate to heavy local traffic
and you just need a switch to add ports
thinking about what might be best...
there's multiple solutions
Bandwidth is not the real problem. The problem is latency with a ton of active connections
are they concentrated?
or in different rooms/
700 active connections?
what
700 devices?
xD
They are in direct places. My router is next to my entertainment center with 5 devices connected, I have a switch in my room with 3 devices, and there is a switch in my roommates room with 3 devices
ah so not too many
@toxic chasm so wait, you have wired access in most locations? :o
No 1 local device with >700 outgoing connections
Yes. I do wired when I can
connections don't really matter right? or because of the NAT state table size?
@toxic chasm https://mikrotik.com/product/hap_ac3 this is a very powerful home wireless router. it runs RouterOS which has many many features.
Idk, when I have that many outgoing connections my ping goes to like 400
@toxic chasm now the cool thing.
yeah probobly router ran out of space for NAT state table
Btw my current router is the asus rt-ac56u
Only a 650 sqft place
only one Access Point would be fine then
@toxic chasm yeah but if you put one of these in each room, everyone is on their own 5GHz channel.
Yeah
Isn't that going to cause spectrum congestion?
I get 1ms latency on 5GHz with those ^
@toxic chasm 5GHz has a LOT more channels that dont overlap
2.4GHz only 3
not really if properly configured with right TX power
plus it's one SSID
only one name
There are over a dozen 5g networks in range of me
5Ghz doesnt have that much range
when the device next to you starts signalling
it drowns out the signal
@toxic chasm multiple radios is the only solution
you put them in different rooms, the phone connects to the closest one
and the idea with the single central router, is that they are all managed by the same device
so you dont notice it when it switches from one radio to another
its seamless basically
@toxic chasm thats way overkill for your purposes
I have that one, but not with the wireless. that's waste of money
That's an RB4011 ^
but its for 10gbit/s
that one goes to my switch
@toxic chasm these cost $60
I just want something that works this time. The specs of the one you linked looked rather close to what I already have
I'm tired of file transfers to my NAS failing 8 TB into them
I have one of these to get my NAS and PC to be highspeed
one is connected to the router as well
connections on the same network though a switch would not go to the router
tiny 4x 10gbit/s switch for $120
and that switch runs same operating system as all those other devices
I like it for that reason
those asus things have almost no features, never get updates
and are very buggy
Hum, maybe I should upgrade the switch in my room too
It is just some random crap I find laying around
@toxic chasm depends on what you need
ports and speed
$130
24x gigabit and 2x 10gbit
though wait
I wouldnt actually get that one
SwitchOS meh.
I would like to do 10gb to my NAS, but I would need a crazy adapter for my laptop
router does not need to be 10gig if you just want 10gig over the same network without routing
@toxic chasm if you are on the same network, it doesnt route
I don't use a desktop, just a laptop with a 4c/8t cpu 64gb ram, and a 2070
lol
it just switches.
ah rip
what you want is a sfp+ adapter
@toxic chasm those 10G interfaces are not RJ45, they use SFP+
its a modular interface
can do both copper and fiber
Looks like it would need a $200 huge network adapter
For 10gb over USB?
he said he had a laptop
Like I said, laptop
@toxic chasm what kind of interfaces do you have?
