#feedback-discussion
1 messages · Page 244 of 1
what if I don’t like mosin
Semantic disregarded
no one considers that maybe just maybe different players like different guns
People aren't going to just use the most expensive weapons cause they can, not unless they like the feel of those weapons.
lots of players prefer, for example, winfield over mosin
yup
yeah I don’t see a lot of avtos around even though everyone should supposedly have enough to run one every game
variety in the game is good
to be fair it’s just a worse dual conversion fmj
I can't seem to hit anything with a Mosin. I stick with the Vetterli.
Okay, not every game. But you can absolutely do that with a Mosin.
vetterli > mosin gang
if you win regularly sure
And people complain about that all the time
if you almost never win you can’t really
and yet people use other weapons
surely if everyone can afford mosins every game they’d take them
Semantic disregarded due to point made above
how is that a semantic?
"Some players prefer other weapons"
so then clearly it’s not an issue
Immediately asks "then why is everyone not running mosin?'
who cares if everyone can take mosin if not everyone wants to
I’m trying to show you why your point makes no sense
Because weapon balance.
mosin is not objectively best
I know
price is not the only factor of weapon balance
cheap weapons have advantaged situations over more expensive weapons
what are you upset by? the ability for players to choose weapons they prefer?
What I'm trying to say here is that the point of budget (How expensive of a loadout you can constantly take whitout losing money) is in the wrong place. Right now it's basically at Long ammo rifles and frag bombs, which people complain about all the time.
It wasn't always like this, and maybe we should lower the point of budget down to say, Medium ammo.
but why? since people don’t all take long ammo
people complain about everything
including me, I am not innocent of this
So that there is more of a point ti taking cheaper weapons, and engaging with more of the game's arsenal.
besides their already advantageous characteristics?
Well, the most commonly used long ammo gun is the sparks, and it's not expensive.
I think you’re complaining about an issue that just doesn’t exist in reality

No way.
I see a wide variety of weapons at 5 star mmr
I hear at least one sparks used nearly every match I'm in. It's cheap, it's accurate, and it OHKO's anyone who's been scratched lately. Several streamers consider it the most effective gun in the game.
attention mosin nerds enjoy only having 15 bullets
not chad vetterli having more reserve than if you take an uppercut
a budget load out is really going to apply to a small amount of people you where able to make plenty of money running free hunters before besides a lack of skill the budget load out means nothing people take what they want to take in ive only played off and on on pc and i have over 30 k and im still low lvl and not even prestige 1 yet lol and on console im sitting a wad of cash im not seeing the point of money is the root of evil loadouts most people playing are are sitting on a mountain of cash if anything i think this extra money stuff is going to help bridge a small gap between weapons and skill this extra money is a buff not the downfall of hunt as you see it to be

Again what im trying to say is, the price is only really a balancing factor for the dolch, Nitro and avtomat
Maybe it should be a factor for the mosin and lebel as well. Idk
And if it isn't a problem or a factor, why don't we just remove hunt bucks?
Wouldn't change anything, right?
number go up
sounds good to me
lol, I mean if we're making things more expensive, sure, Mosin and Lebel could do with a price increase.
Mosin and lebel are fine where theyre at in price
Having too much money is the problem, especially after 1.7.2
It was okay before, even if I'd have like it a bit lesser. But is definitely not okay now.
it is a problem before this last update, this update seems like it is ment more for to help new players bridge the gap
I'd like to argue to give the Bornheim a bit of love and either lower it's price, or give it a slight buff.
Not really? Given that the new rewards are only applied if you extract with the bounty iirc
Chary does help new players a little bit with his random rewards, but I bloody hate him and his stupid tier 4 lootbox
On that we agree. It could do with a few bucks of cost less
But I think it's pretty balanced otherwise
Bornheim match is my baby, but Schofield Precision has stolen her thunder, so I feel even less justified now putting money into her.
The matcheim is good, yeah
But like all semi autos, a bit too expensive
I mean, the Spitfire is a Dolch for a 5th of the price
I've been playing about 8 months now, and I've never once bought a Dolch. I cannot get past the special ammo issue.
I don't see it as that big a deal
20 rounds
Bring an ammo box and look for supply points on the map
@sharp arrow good idea, definitely 2 points imo
^
can i know 10am CET update until what time ?
@dusk lion the game used to have something like this. https://youtu.be/6Zqk_X9-he8
In this tense match-based first-person PvP monster hunter from the makers of Crysis, you will face off against unearthly horrors in the forgotten corners of the world. You will hunt, and you will die. But without risk, there can be no reward, and when the water runs with blood, you’d better hope it’s not your own...
Buy the game now on Steam: h...
@hallow robin, your post below has been deleted, as it doesn't follow the required format.
You can find all guidelines pinned in the ideas channel.
Please feel free to re-post your idea using the correct format:
Matched regex in message in #game-ideas (#suggestions-ideas, 524577494863708180):
I had over 120 rounds fired at me and 3 friends with all wall bangs we died 5 times with maximum cover and little moving about for sound reduction We had not picked up bounty. ALL ammo needs a chance to deflect after hitting wall in game. This fixes hackers, espers, and people that just bring FMJ on the most spamable gun, Winchester line in game and just shoot till they get kills. Also the bullets should slow down drastically making it hard to wall bang and nothing should been more than 2 walls period.```
@torn escarp this has been suggested before and I don't think it's necesary. Look around and explore a bit.
And given how much moolah the game already gives you, I don't think a "find me more money" trait is necesary.
I agree that the game should be a bit stingier with money
I'm sitting on $40k right now without too much effort
When you don't die in 9/10 games you need to actively try to spend your money. There's a reason why the guys who don't prestige sit at 500k +
these extraction points 
I've made like 25k in a single night imediatly after the patch was released.
The game has no more an economy and it's a problem
Cause all the shop system is based around an economy that no longer exists
If we wanted to have the same ratio between the money earned and the price of the weapons that was in the beta, the mosin should cost now at least 1000$ or even more.
I don't want the reduced earnings like in beta, but after this patch is really too much imo
Even in EA the higher level players played what they wanted all day long
What we're saying is that the new awards only made that problem worse
In ea higher level players played with all they wanted, now everybody plays with all they want
☝️
The issue there is that the economy is very symetrical making it hard to nerf anythi g without condemnig new/lower end players to permanent poorness.
There is nothi g to give lower end players a little boost nor the whales hoarding mony a little dampener
Just revert the 1.7.2 additions lol
It would objectively make everything better.
Every match is at least a nitro, or an avto, full of tier 3/ legendary, i have struggle to find even tier 1 players.
Every gun has a cost, but if prices rise too high, the cost of weapons completely loses value
This is exactly what I've been trying to tell everyone today but nobody gets it because "hehe number to up good"
why should i save money using a springfield?
so what i hear is let the vets keep taking in what ever they want and screw the new/less skilled players?
if i win i win 2000$
No - some people might just not agree with you.
The game is made to not be balanced. A mosin shouldnt be so common, for both veterans and new players
b r u h
You get like 200 bucks for losing. You can't run out of money, you will always have enough for the basics unless you are terrible at basic game sense
And the average winrate is what?
1 in 4 for trios and 1 in 6 for duos very roughly.
Atm there is 0 diversity in weapons like it was before. A player lvl 5 p1 uses the same weapons as a lvl100 p100
Could try and make prestiging more appealing. That gets rid of that banked money
Cause lobbys are full of top tier weapons
Like back when dolch was used for everybody. After the dolch nerf i was playing matches where EVERY player had a dolch, and i'm not exagerating. Literally every player.
If everybody uses high tier weapons everybody is going to have one cause of looting
For example i've NEVER bought a dolch, but if I wanted I could use it every game for a week cause i have like 40 dolches saved on my inventory
The "point of budget" (the price of a loadout you can constantly bring to a match without losing money overall) is too high.
It lets everyone take whatever the flying fuck they want and make cheaper guns irrelevant when compared to more expensive counterparts. That's why games of all mosin all the time happen.
i've like 15 mosins, 8 avtos ecc
Just revert the easily monetizable 1.7.2 bullshit and it'll be fine
Thats 1 win having to cover 3 losses in trios, lets assume we gethe safe 150 every time +500 from the previous win.
Thats a Mosin +150 for everything else for example
The problem is that there is a lot of people that not prestiges (me too) who has a lot of money and keep taking everything they want. And they actually are giving free weapons to "low tier" players.
And at the end of the day everybody is running a mosin -.-
i could see your point but my self i think to balance they would have to wipe every1 cash pool then i could see the argument about to much cash flow thats why i mentioned before that this is more of an attempt to bridge the pay gap if every1 had no issue with money then the average kda wouldn't be under 1.0
I have a friend with 3k hours and 0.95kd and he has like 500.000$, if he can make all that money i think that almost everybody can reach that. But it migh be an exception idk
Make prestige more appealing = more people do it = more people with less money
Nobody will willingly wipe their hunt bucks unless they receive something huge in return.
The fact of the matter is that there are people who have occasional issues with money in the game, and it is not even because of their game sense or anything like that
I do it because I hate myself and it’s more of a challenge
It has literally happened to me while I was prestiging, my friend had it happen just couple days ago as well
And we are both "above average"
What, running out of money?
Sometimes you just have bad days
Of course you can help avoid it happening with super cheap loadouts
Sometines you have good days more like 😝
But where's the fun in that
True fact. Had a weekend where we couldn’t get a win and had to roll free hunters
I mean, wouldn't a "low money earning multiplier" that boosts your rewards if you have very low money be more appropriate than ruining the economy for everyone? @crystal plume
i my self have hit my soft limit for the game around 20k because for the last 2 weeks ive had a w/l ratio of 1in10 free hunters are fun and all but that fun is only so long
Now i have so much money that even if i die for a week straight I would still have at least 100k
And thats the problem i think
i mean, im part of the problem
Or hard cap how much money you can have at like 20k
1.7.2 was a terrible solution to a problem that does exist, however small or large it may be
^^^^
They didn't use a hammer on the nail, they used a sledgehammer and broke everything.
You keep giving the 1.7.2 additions different reasons for existing than what the actual reason is
They're for player retention, nothing else, there's other benefits from it such as extra money, but that was not the reason it was added
It's not for monetization either
Yet.
And I don't think we needed the extra money.
its weird seeing people complain about too much money and nerding that, when i sit here with not having had over 25 k in 2 years
increasing money in the game was not the intention, but it was the conseguence
and is still a problem
Exactly
Right? I never have more than like 8k
I held 17k when I was a 0.1 k/d. This may be a budgeting issue
i lost my post event money in a blink
I prestige as soon as I can, always take the exp boost and by the time I have a fair amount, it’s prestige time
isn’t your complaint that people never have to budget? clearly not the case then
Idk how you manage that, honestly
i mean it doesn't matter. i play everything budget, meta, meme. none give me an edge
I really don't know then
How do we reconcile people sitting on 500k and people with less than 8k the same time
I still think a reversion to 1.7.1 is necesary
Won't happen
I’m happy with 8k
i think you're creating solutions in search of problems that may not even be problems in the first place
well obviously it wont happen... but he can at least voice his concerns
It should
Using cheap guns is fun. When you beat a Mosin you get a giggle and a free gun
Not when you do only cheap guns for couple months straight
Maybe after we get a new nail and a new wall, they can use a hammer instead of an axe ti hammer it in.
As I have been doing to grind to 1 million for another milestone after reaching P100
I don't enjoy running only cheap loadouts
Especially only 4 weak vitality shots
Dunno what to tell you, I don’t use expensive guns unless I steal it from a corpse.
Honestly, if people are running out of money, give help to those people specifically. Call it welfare.
Give the players with, say, under 3k cash a multiplier that increases their cash earnings to help them out of the hole.
And for player retention, give players a small conciliatory award if they lose several games in a row.
That is not the goal of player retention 
They want people to play as much as possible and for days in a row
That is player retention
The growth has been good, especially during events, but the numbers drop a bit after each event again as there's no more special grind to do
So a game demanding that I play for several days in a row to get a special reward is a good thing? Way to suck the fun out of playing and wear players out.
"Special"
Playing at your own pace is always superior.
well thats how almoest every online game works
its all about grinding something
I usually don't play more then 4 games per day. And I don't want to have the "oooooo play more ti get a reward" ghost dancing in my mind any more than it already does.
As for the dark tribute, for that you just play normally and you don't need to keep up a streak for it
you dont have to care about it
You can claim them whenever with no difference if you do it 3 days in a row or couple times every week
just play whenever you want
I don't, but I hate that it's there because some players are addicted to that scheiße and it's causing them harm.
thats sadly how every game works. There is no other way to retain players
Speaking of harm, please stop defending the lootboxes. It's actually baffling how people are defending that crap in 2022. It makes me sick and not want to be part of the community.
Here's one. Good gameplay.
I don't see them as "lootboxes" at all
They are. The last one is paid. By definition, it's a lootbox.
So I am not defending "lootboxes"
the game can retain player with his features only for some hours. Devs now are trying to retain old and veteran players
I dont give a fuck about gameplay cause i have more than 2k hours
The only way to retain a player with a lot of hours is by giving him something else to do
the only thing i dont like about the dark tribute is the hunter being completly random unlocked
Specially something daily or something to grind ecc
I would say that's a good thing. Games shouldn't incentivise players to binge the game because it leads to burnout and is unhealthy IRL.
Noone in their right mind is going to pay for the last one, and it is not "paid" as it can be easily acquired with just 3k xp
id wish it be more like a seal 10 deals or alike kinda thing
@vocal blade, your post below has been deleted, as it doesn't follow the required format.
You can find all guidelines pinned in the ideas channel.
Please feel free to re-post your idea using the correct format:
Matched regex in message in #game-ideas (#suggestions-ideas, 524577494863708180):
Got 3 Ideas:
bouncing betty
proximity mine, doesn't kill but causes bleeding(low damage, high bleeding or other way round)
good to escape with bounty, when beeing chased
Hoenig Rotary Round
Maybe high recoil but 2 rounds kill?
Could be high priced like nitro
Szecsei & Fuchs Double Barrel Bolt Action
Love that gun, would love to see it implemented in the game
Just don't know how excatcly,2 rounds don't kill but cause bleeding damage?
after that rest is figuring out how not to make it too OP, velocity+accuracy
But could be managable```Attachments:
<https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/524577494863708180/938393948890750986/unknown.png>
<https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/524577494863708180/938393949553442866/unknown.png>
<https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/524577494863708180/938393950451019776/unknown.png>
thats it
It’s a business, why should they care about health?
Won't yet, not yet and not yet. This system is abusable as fuc
Ok mr crystalball
They can just pretend to stop caring about their players then.
That's proven to not be enough for the attention span of modern gamers though.
not denying that
^^
Welcome to the world
Playing games for 8 hours straight is not good for you, it's addiction-generating and this should not be incentivised.
What isn't unhealthy as shit in the modern age
even breathing is unhealthy atm
And I'd rather honestly play for 8 hours than spend a single hour on twitter or other traditional social media which is much worse for mental health
Lesser evil is still evil.
but that depends on you
Very black and white view
i hope they will touch upon these charys contract animations. Right now they look super amateurish imo
is not a companyes fault
At this point let's just agree to disagree because this is unproductive as shit.
True that, The company is there to make money
I like it this way. It's not too shiny and is therefore unlikely to generate lootbox sales.
If i made a videogame is not my fault if a player decides to play 15h a day
Yeah but they shouldn't encourage it. Like how they shouldn't sell asbestos.
But is a company fault if they incentive to play more than x hours, or incentive to buy loot boxes ecc
^^
fair point, but i don't want my current favovite game to look like it's a mod of another game
And the current incentive systems are promoting videogame asbestos.
To torture a metaphor.
yes but no, not that much i mean. I think that atm is not a problem on hunt
we'll see if they are gonna add something more like this 100bb thing
Oh, they will. Unless we scare them away.
Companies don’t care about how they keep people, they should, but they don’t. Truth be told, arguing about it here won’t change it either.
I honestly won't really care much as long as actual content is not behind a paywall
Which they have said won't happen
^
second that.
Even though I love my skins and want to have all of them, and don't really love the fact that I have to wait until I finally roll the new exclusive one, I know I will get it eventually for free
What all they said won't happen...
I'm sorry but I have 0 trust in this industry. Even in the good actors.
Nobody is immune to the corruption of the Church of EA.
i mean yes... but neon has a point it does no good to already fragile economy
cuz having lots of money may sound good... but it will severely limit variety of weapons we will meet in game
Thanks for the gif btw
I've been trying to tell people this all day but "haha funny number got up good"
i am personally prestiging, so i idrc too much about having money, with my playstyle i keep about 5000 monnis in my pockets most of the time, but i play a lot of free hunters
anyway... im sure that Crytek has statistic tools to see how much monnis people have
Also now that I'm back, I'll start working on the doc again.
so hopefully they will notice in few months that theres A LOT more money spinning around => expensive weapons having much more playtime than before
I'm pretty sure they have already noticed some players having 3 million hunt dollars
Yeah they have statistics for weapon usage. They'll notice, I'm just worried about what they will do to address it
im just bit afraid that they will go the obvious rabbit hole and nerf the standart income for bounties and clues, so that you d be more dependant on this new lootbox mechanic, which is random...
Imo we just need more things to spend money on
agreed
Dolch got nerfed to the ground, Avto is shit, Nitro has shitty sights => noone plays "superweapons" even if they could, bcs they feel horrible to use
I'm afraid they'll go
The avto is good if you stuff 2 uppercuts up your ass
ye but thats still inconvenient weapon to use
Since when was dolch nerfed to the ground
i dunno like few patches ago?
And avto still upper tier with the right playstyle
dunno exactly when
yes... with the right playstyle... but its shit anyway 😄
Right playstyle as in aggressively pushing and treating walls as paper
id much rather take standart winchester than avto
Which is far from shit
@vocal blade, your post below has been deleted, as it doesn't follow the required format.
You can find all guidelines pinned in the ideas channel.
Please feel free to re-post your idea using the correct format:
Matched regex in message in #game-ideas (#suggestions-ideas, 524577494863708180):
found a great animation video aswell```Attachments:
<https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/524577494863708180/938404642960842792/EachGroundedDaddylonglegs-mobile.mp4>
95% of the weapons in this game are very much usable and not shit but some are better than others, which is where price should come in, only its a bit meaningless right now.
that is true...
everything is usable... but there are weapons that simply dont feel satisfying enough to play
like Chain Conversion or Nitro
sure you can use it... but it just feels dumb and you take that only if you are in mood for some trolling
im not saying thats bad.... we were nearing prestige once so we both took Nitros, just for the sake of having some fun and we blasted away 90% of Meatheads in session 😄
I find the occasional little bit of trolling to satisfy on a sublime scale like no other though
which was definitely fun.... but i cant imagine anyone serious taking Nitro to go club
If the nitro was fun to play and easy to use they'd have to reduce the damage to normal long ammo-levels. And at that point it wouldn't be the nitro anymore
i mean its already shit... most of the time you hit arm or something so you need 2 shots anyway
I love how shit the nitro is as a 1tap cannon
The blur isn't that bad on it tbh, I used to run it in a way where I would essentially aim with the blurry bit and flick on the target
it makes it feel good to me
blur is OK, but the zoom is too bad
it just feels odd aiming with that
it feels like a border between meme weapon and op blaster
which is what makes it work
Working as intended 😄
the it being bad to hit with part while being so good is the only thing keeping the post nerf gun on life support
btw am i the only one whos triggered by Cryteks adaptation of aperture sights?
thats true actually 😅
I like the toggleable ones a lot
which SHOULD be bad
this
(all but nitro)
nitro aperture sucks balls but other ones are honestly pretty good
and that’s how it should be
i dont like how bad they look on screen tho... thats not how optics work
how so?
no but it is how they can replicate the visual help affect of having one eye closed and the other squinting through a fuckin microscope sized peep
they were specifically designed, so that you can see most of the stuff around when looking through one
thats the thing, you can (and should) aim with both eyes open
yeah for sure but they're more used as a pseudo scope and if it just zoomed the screen I would never use the pane scope in any situation
non blur aperture would be hella op and bad game design
I mean fair but scopes need to have an advantage as well
it doesnt really work with standart iron sights, since you have to line the front piece with back piece (im not native english speaker so i dunno hows that called)
'let me have better irons but not a scope pls thx'
the hunter as far as a screen really only has one eye that matters, too
it's not like he actually has independant orbitals
in terms of mechanics
lemme try to find example
I know what you mean in terms of real life application and I definitely agree
I just think they ran into balance issues with making apertures a thing that literally zooms you in to be more efficient but also aperture sights don't really just zoom the world in when you have both eyes open irl
if there was no blur i feel it would just be irons in the shape of a circle
with no zoom
this is perfect example of what i meant
and that'd suck ass
word
1st is the back piece (you never focus on that) 2nd is the front piece (u rarely focus on that) 3rd is the target
I absolutely see wym, I just like what the apertures do for me
it lets me focus on ONE thing
and by focusing on the target, everything else loses focus so it appears blurry
all I can see is the one dude I see
so it helps me line up the proper shot and ignore periphery
I feel like the aperture interpretation is because of the MASSIVE swathes of open area
@vocal blade I think the Fuchs was produced after the events of the game. But something similar built off a Lebel or similar would be interesting
@whole tendon Hello, your suggestion has been removed for being low effort, adding a description with your reasoning behind it and benefits would help 
Fixed sorry about that. I figured it was self-explanatory, but definitely can provide more details
Thank you 
They won't do it and I'll thell you why: it would move the focus on PvP because the bounty would become pointless and that's something that's never gonna happen.
tru
@whole tendon I found your Idea 5 times reposted before
I would hate loot traits. It is now horrible enough.
You had a long hard fight have both bounties and cleared the lobby?
Have fun running around the whole map because Teammates want to loot every body, every compount, find every event point possible.
@cerulean wraith It isn't important if the gun has been produced in the time of MeatHeads and big ass spiders, it should just fit into the game with the mechanics and other weapons
I would never run around the whole map to check every compound for bodies with this trait. This is simply a small buff for when you just showed up to a compound that had multiple gunshots and you know there are bodies around somewhere. Or as mentioned in the description where you kill someone in a field/water/from far distance, and you are struggling to find the body.
no reason to be this condescending...
Cain is definetly hard to spot - which i don't think is even debatable at this point.
who is harder to spot however, and if it's reaching problem or P2W territorry that's a diffrent story
I know that you wouldn't do that and what you have in mind but the others would do it even more after that buff because it becomes easier to loot
There are far harder hunters to spot. Why haven't they been nerfed?
that's very subjective
People are just upsetti spaghetti that the ugly man killed their imaginary swamp gf.
So then you can debate Cain is hard to spot.
I do agree that people overdo the Cain OP, and i disagree with calling it P2W or OP in any way
I've not noticed cain inside dimly lit buildings sitting in front of me but for prodigal daughter her coat a navy blue and a lot of the colours in the game are washed out
I'd even go as far as to say it's to a degree hardware based
on my old righ i couldn't spot white ass revenants in a building interior, on my new Rig i can spot Cains in the Woods and dark corners rather easily
My point is: If people cared about legendary hunters being OP (which they don't); they would also be asking that other hard to see hunters get adjusted (which they didn't).
The downvotes on my consistency suggestion are cut and dry evidence that people don't actually care. And using the guise of balance as a smokescreen to obfuscate the fact that they can't handle the fact that Cain looks ugly to them.
It's not "cut and dry" evidence
It matters a lot. The Auto-5 and Avtomat get shit for it all the time
people might simply not agree with your sentiment that those are harder to spot than cain
lets not open this can of worms as that's not helping the argument nor should it be discussed here
The point is you feel they are harder to spot, others don't.
Thats likely were the many downvotes come from
Yeah let's not
They are arguably all well camouflaged and i do agree the cain complaining is way overdone.
But smth that subjective and situational doesn't make sense to try any pass it off as a fact that's the same for everyone
Yeah. Indicating people don't actually care about legendary hunters are actually OP or not. Otherwise people would be advocating for other hunters to get reworked, too. But... crickets.
They don't.
they do, especially for headsman and reptilian
they did both face the backlash too altho not to the same extent as cain
Yep
I've seen a lot of that
I understand it for Headsman, but the Reptilian stands out like a sore thumb to me
My biggest issue with the headsman is where his hitbox actually is
I'm never sure whether I'm shooting his cloak or him
Its the shiny skin of the reptilian that makes him easier to spot as I mentioned earlier a lot of the colours in the game are dull and muted vibrant and shiny stand out, all I can think of is brickworks and the reddish bricks grey and brown buildings surrounded in mud
And some people seem to be malding a lot about an unwashed man in loincloth getting brighter, to each their own
80% of Cain players don't play him for the looks, and it will be shown after the "nerf"
I don't even own him. I'm just calling the rest of you out for being total hypocrites.
I think cain is unreasonably well camouflaged
So we can make Gater and company brighter too, right?
Sure
Sure, I care not
Give plague doctor a white mask as well
He's already pretty bright imo
Make gator neon green if you want
Cause its not Brighter/darker
But Cain will need to be brighter
Its what color they are versus your average bayou color
Like just because one skin is a bit strong doesn't mean you have to nerf every last one. That's just pushing the issue down the line
Cain could stand being less beigey brown, give him blood spatter rather than mud
Or white warpaint
glow in the dark eyes
Again, its users are not in for the aesthetic
@odd rose hope you don't mind me reposting this here
Pink bath robe
Problem solved 
Felis is a non-issue imo
Same for gator, but Headsman's head could be made a bit more distinct. Maybe make his hood or mask just a bit brighter.
Otherwise another non issue, like dual weilding 
@warm gazelle is Cain in the room with us right now?
No.
I'd smell him if he was

Dunno, maybe in the dark corner lmao
Crouching
Oh my sweet summer childern
every skin could do that in pre-release.
The game was so dark back then
They should make Cain completely clean, like the Alive Revenant skin, and he gets mudier and mudier when downed :V
Ez fix
But speaking of crouching in dark corners (and bushes) this is the best
There, mudy Cain available
Haha, not at all!
bs hitreg wtf. and that happens pretty often.
i dunno, looks to me like you shot just right of her head
I assume that you are just a troll. Learn some manners and stop your provocating answers. If you don't like that your easy win legendary is getting nerfed I suggest a different game that fits your style. Fortnite for example.
got a question for you lonewolf, why do you downvote everything?
I am not downvoting everything, there are in fact suggestion I upvote. They are not suggestion I personally like, they are suggestion who are well thought through. 99% of the suggestion are just half baked feelings and some are just a wall of words.
If you're a Hunter you camouflage yourself. Why are people up in arms over Cain? The f*cking army wear camo.
dunno, you downvoted a lot of my stuff that I thought was pretty well thought trough.
this is the dumbest argument for cain i've ever heard.
There is a difference of camouflaging yourself or just beeing camouflaged doing nothing.
You're allowed to do nothing if you paid for the game.
Alot aren't. They just aren't.
In what way?
That sentence makes literally no sense.
I does though. Camping is a valid strategy. Its just boring, unfun to play against and suboptimal in most cases.
Camping=comouflaing. Doing nothing=just standing around.
You are allowed to just stand around by paying a game. Makes just no sense in the Cain topic. Not a single one.
i think he meant bush camping with cain or something idk
It's like answering"I think a Ferrari should be red" with "Yellow is fine". It is, but wooot?
I think that's because Cain often blends in better than other legendaries and Tier 3s (although this is fiercely debated upon and I have no strong feeling either way). The fact that a real military uses camouflage is irrelevant when discussing the balance of a yeehaw 1895 shooter vidya.
Just looking at the past few suggestion: Pax pricing (is fine), seeing dead bodies in dark sight (often enough told that it's abuseable mechanic and they come up with it over and over again), animal traps? uh?, virs shot? uh?, selling contrabands? even Dennis said it would cause alot of problems and people still come up with it. And so on.
Every legendary hunter gets a bright, rotating caution light. Just fixed all problems. Check please
most suggestions are either reposts or worthless, usually written in 30 seconds with no thought put into them whatsoever.
And me and Zapper are sorting through them.
Exactly, that's why I downvote them. The very last one got an upvote. It's something good.
Well thought through and would do any harm to anyone but the toxic players
👍
You called my explanation that dark cloaks are harder to see than naked people a joke and I'm the troll? Lmao cope harder.
Because no other hunter looks like mud and can stand in the middle of the road unnoticed
Except he can't.
Here is a simple test . how many times have you faced a cain where you could not tell where the f are the bullets coming from if lets say a redshirt would have been in the same spot would he been same invisible
if the answer is no i would have instantly spotted redshirt there then cain the problem
redshirt is analogous to a Tier 1, cain is analogous to a Tier 3, its not exactly a fair comparison
Redshirt legendary
the moment you pull the trigger.. right above right.. just a few pixels, but enough to no hit properly
Choosing the easiest to see to support your argument, I see. Switch it to Prodigal Daughter. She’s legendary. Or Felis. Also legendary
Does not mater Cain is the resolution of Emotional damage and failed failure management .
its the progression of stupid and the Apex of mount stupid
both of those are much easier to spot than cain imo
Your spelling makes me cry and your logic has more holes in it than Swiss cheese.
And I find Cain easy to spot. I’m for making them all bright pink or something
My logic is perfectly fine , and atacking some ones spelling just shows you level of intellect
well, I think the general consensus is cain is harder to spot than other hunters
as a colorblind person i can confirm that nearly any hunter is an issue to spot for me.. there are green or even redshirts (level 1/2) which are hard for me.. Cain is just the tip of the iceberg
ouch. hunt while colorblind sounds like an absolute nightmare
But all you said to my argument of using someone more akin to Cain than Redshirt was basically doesn’t matter. And it absolutely does. Which is harder to spot, this camoed man or this clown?
it is.. i am very sad, that they never gave us a colorblind option.. but in nearly 1000 hrs and after 3-4 years of hunt.. i am playing a little bit slower and look just more if i see something move.. but yes.. it is hardly crazy for me to spot people ..
…what? I’m confused
colorblind mode is much needed I agree
well because if you are colorblind you can still focus on movement which is harder and slower... but if pixels move.. in a common way, which you learn by experience you can guess if there is an enemy hunter.. 😄
oh I replied to the wrong thing
I meant to reply to @solar monolith
apologies
your message makes sense
I’ve been replying to @sick anvil with my recent answers
Lets go then ,
What is hunt a PVPVE game that is supposed to involve some skill that is acquired by playing meaning there is an expected pattern to be recognized even when enemy is located at a hard to spot place in which a any hunter would be barely visible no matter put a Phantom there or a T3 in this case the enemy knows that this location is difficult to be shoot at from but not impossible to be spotted . Queue Cain which is equally to difficult to spot placed in a place any other hunter can be identified by some manner from easy to difficult .
Saying Cain is as much invisible is as much a smoking pile of bullshit as saying that is as visible as any other hunter.
Cain has a distinct advantage no other skin gets plenty of situations.
Justify that advantage just by the fact that is a DLC skin is the weak argument here.
Failed Halloween Ghost costume and Lacoste Hand bag should also get the same treatment as Cain face lift them to not excel over a T3 bush Wookie
I should not be able to ahead spend money to get an advantage it was not part of the game it was implemented recently and that is it . does it divide the community yes because every community will have people that want to pay to win .
And just because your Monitor or the way you set up your game makes it easy for you to spot Cain well that is a different argument to be have and it connects directly to how fat the wallet is
Dude you acting like Cain is uniquely hard to spot is outright delusional at best. And intentionally dishonest at worst. Plenty of DLC hunters are as hard, or harder to spot.
Because i have not just named 2 other hunters that should get the same treatment but I guess Failed Halloween ghost costume is to hard to decipher and Lacoste hand bag is to much of a riddle
should still be a hit in your screenshot
not really because it is slightly of and if i see it correctly there is a shotbolt
jep its a shotbolt but iam not off i dont know how you aim it but as far as i know i aim with the middle spike and thats where it hits and the spike is still on target maybe not dead center but still on target in your screenshot
Yeah. You haphazardly made an offhand remark about a couple hunters being kinda good is nowhere near close to the amount of whining people like you have been making about Cain. So by highlighting Cain, you're intentionally downplaying other Hunters' issues and using Cain as a lightning rod or sacrifical lamb to divert attention so that the others don't get touched. If you and those who share your opinion actually cared about some kind of legendary power creep, you'd be yelling about all the hard to see hunters equally. Not solely focusing on Cain.
Because one step at the time once Cain be wearing a clown rainbow wig and a big fat red nose , then next on the shit list is Lacoste and then boo the coal ghost
so this is about where you are aiming when the shot starts, (its pretty quick flick so its hard to pin point the exact spot)
which lead to you hitting the door by a tiny fraction
isnt there an arm in the way of my projectile ?
shes flicking up to shoot you, by the time it reached where her arm was, its already move out of the way
which iirc, shotbolt has 100m/s velocity
so its pretty slow
this is the exact moment the bolt gets shot out of the bow
thats just visual effct
whats important is where your shot starts
ok well then i learned something new
basically from what I understand when you click the game starts the projectile in that direction with the damage and speed values
The game is already pay to win with Felis, Bone Doctor, Black Coat (less so), Weird Sister, Prodigal Daughter, Executioner, And Gator boi as well as Cain! The point @late wind and myself are making is they are all pay to win and Cain is no different. I have the same difficulty seeing him as I do any of the others and my eyes are awful. Instead of just focusing the entire wrath of this discord on one P2W hunter, why not do it to all the problem children? Or do people not really want to lose P2W and rather use Cain as a scapegoat to say something was done about it?
with the crossbow it seems delayed because of how slow it is but in truth its like every other projectile in the game, meaning its going the direction of the spot you clicked
played the crossbow for nearly 500 hours in my early times of hunt. never noticed that so idk
never felt like it behaves that way
I mean the clip is a very good way to see that being the case, as the spot on the door where the shotbolt lands, is where you begin making that shot
@jovial flint please post suggestions for 2 different weapons separately so that proper voting can be done
Thought I could hit two birds in one stone
Ok fine
Next time.
yeah
here's the thing, what if I'd like the Murata but wouldn't like the Kropatschek?
can't upvote one and downvote the other
Thought of having the both rifles to pass initial trials and then decide which to pick specifically later
don't think that's how that works
Lore tangential, but Japan has historically been intensely strict about importing and exporting weapons. Perhaps so much so in this universe that even the Carcass Gunrunner couldn't smuggle those rifles out.
@maiden pelican
I missclicked while browsing on my phone and deleted your suggestion by accident 😭 please repost it
Title: Give Pax A Consolation Prize
Description: It deserves some sort of buff, especially with the variants added and teased for the scottfield (spitfire brawler). The scottfield is better than or about equal to the pax currently, while costing less and coming on free hunters anyway. Maybe give it 6/15 or a deadeye small slot variant.
Pax Carbine with dum dum 🙂
Truely the pax suffers forever
Hope for it springs eternal though
pax recoil is too rich for my taste when the cheaper options are so good
the range where the pax is better is not the range you want to be using a pistol really anyways, and at that point id rather just have an uppercut
#moderatorsagainstcaldwellpax
pax long barrel; worse ads, better hipfire, good muzzle velo, maybe slight damage up!
It's an interesting idea
@primal holly, your post below has been deleted, as it doesn't follow the required format.
You can find all guidelines pinned in the ideas channel.
Please feel free to re-post your idea using the correct format:
Matched regex in message in #game-ideas (#suggestions-ideas, 524577494863708180):
On the kill summery menu at the end of a match can you add a number next to someone you killed multiple times so you have a better understanding on where the kills came from and on who?```
This game dodge exploit needs to be looked at I think
game dodge exploit?
People will ready up the leave instantly and avoid the penalty. People are using it to a with friends for the team modifier.
There is an exploit when you ready up to leave instantly to avoid the penalty.
That would certainly explain why people are leaving so quickly
@nimble lion, your post below has been deleted, as it doesn't follow the required format.
You can find all guidelines pinned in the ideas channel.
Please feel free to re-post your idea using the correct format:
Matched regex in message in #game-ideas (#suggestions-ideas, 524577494863708180):
Ranked mode.```
wuts the next "OP" thing the community will parakeet out of existence?? my guess is shotty slugs next I can already see SG OP!! SLUGSOP!! as a good copy n paste
so true
Fanning and or slugs, anything that has an elevated RoF or that dominates in close range. Or on the other side of the spectrum, long ammo snipers. I personally think the game is in a decent spot balance wise.
why not
would mean you have a way of knowing when the map is empty, the game keeps it vague on purpose
@visual owl I like the chokebomb tripmine idea, would have a hard time competing with the other trips unless it came with 4 of them though. The utility would be cool! Maybe slightly the price of the alerts/poison trips to $50 and make the choke mines the budget $30 option?
@round vapor Deleted your post in #feedback as you didn't really provide any kind of description with your video, and if your intent with the video was to show some kind of issue with the shotgun you might want to watch it in slow mo or frame by frame since your first shot was way off
Also, it's Butcher, not meathead. Meatheads are the big boys that aren't bosses.
yeah thats a brain gone moment
500 hrs btw
It's alright :P
I'm not a fan of the idea, personally, as it tells you when the lobby's empty.
whats wrong with making extracting harder
I ve already suggested something similar once....
People dont want the game to be harder it seems...
@steady vapor regarding the "more world object" suggestion. While i tend to agree that would be cool to have way more kind of interactive things and weapons, there is an important balance to keep. Too many items scattered around can become a problem imho. But yes, i would love to use a meat cleaver or a stool as a weapon.
maybe let people play how they want
theres no point in making extracts harder or inaccessible
people have enough reasons to extract early
you cant and shouldnt force the players to a certain playstyle.
hunt is not a battle royal, and that has been a very positive point for it.
^
It’s a short form
it is considered a slur
it has been used against japanese people, to devalue them
especially in war times
@jovial flint its a slur
good point about making Cain the scapegoat actually
I didn’t mean as a derogatory statement
It’s taken out of context
If you want a correction fine,
I can make it happen
its obvious that you didn't mean it in a derogatory way but i suggest you change it
There changes made
Of course,
The whole paragraph wasn’t a patronising/hate statement on Japanese guns but of promoting the overlooked guns of the time period
@jovial flint that last image is interesting. The gun's appearance, with a full length barrel with no stock, is reminiscent of a Tanegashima (Samurai flintlock musket).
i personally like the idea, i wanna see more guns from around the world
I personally think we should get more American guns. A Baby Rolling Block would be very appreciated, as would the Colt Lightning.
How many of the guns are non-american?
Isn't Colt/Caldwell and Winchester/Winfield the only two that are american?
Rolling blocks are good, maybe high-velocity, mid tier dmg
Let's see. American guns we have rn: Derringer, conversion, scottfield, pax, Winfield 1873 and 76, Springfield, Sparks, Romero, Rival, Specter, 1887, auto-5. And possibly the Nitro.
Mosin
Nagant pistol
Lebel
Berthier
M. Henry
What about the Dolch?
Oh yeah those
The nitro is inspired by a british rifle iirc
No clue about the flare gun, that one is bri'ish iirc
I feel like we've got a near equal mix of american and non american guns. I personally prefer non-american guns as they tend to get funky, and interesting. But I really do want a Colt Lightning/Caldwell Thunder
Another gun that could use iron devastator
I just find bizarre the absence of the Krag/springfield 1892
The LeMat supposedly is french too, although the one in hunt is somewhat fictive
Yeah the lemat ingame is a strange cartridge conversion & cartridge+breechloading conversion (shotgun barrel) of a lemat. The conversion is American made in all likelihood, but all the guns were manufactured in france
I guess the Bomblance is also American
rolling block would be nice, an alternative to sparks
What niche would it fill though?
The romero is fictive too, although it's name implies it's american
I suggested the baby rolling block specifically, so as to not intrude on the Sparks, Martini or Springfield. It would be a compact ammo single shot
Sort of a generic single shot shotgun. There were dozens of different designs of those.
i feel like guns not always have to fill a niche
They must not fill other weapons niches, that's the issue
people dont just play guns for the niche they will, they also play them for their feel history aesthetics
look at the cult of martini henry
if two guns fill the same niche then people will pick based on feel
A baby rolling could be a 2-slot given its size
mosin and betheir iron sight are quite close they essentially fill the same niche
berthier does everything mosin can but has 2 less shots and it even shoots faster
That's a very optimistic view of weapon balance. It doesn't really work that way unless you want to make the gun a reskin of another with identical stats. And at that point, why bother?
and vetterli (swiss rifle I believe)
They're still pretty big. 3-slot (although 2 and 1 slot variants are very possible)
because you can monetize them
how
Better sights. Less obstructive on screen profile. Less intrusive animations.
no they definitely do
Subtle shit.
Indeed they do.
martini is better than sparks in a few ways
id rather they sell 800bb skins that do nothing to the gameplay than they add other sketch monetization shit
Indeed
I prefer the sights (subjective)
and those who use lower velocity guns may actually prefer the 400 m/s because it’s more similar to what they are used to
would you guys agree that mosin and betheir are very similar in the niche they fill?
Yeah
I also gravitate towards guns with a lot of reserve ammo due my Fallout habit of hoarding ammo
It's not a stretch to start giving those skins Stat modifiers. And there you go.
Also you can't just reskin one weapon as another because the different guns behave differently irl and their depiction wouldn't have that realist that we have now.
mosin is for those who prefer the extra mag size, berthier is significantly cheaper and has more reserve so easier to resupply
I'd say that the mosin is a better and more expensive berthier
yes they’re similar but they have important differences
To me berthiers are quickchangers, meant to be aggressive
namely the like $150 price difference lmao
thats wild conjecture that somehow addings skins(whichb they already add) will lead to them messing with stats
personally I actually prefer the berthier to the mosin because of
a. the sights
b. it reloads so fast it’s like it’s a drum except with high reserve for resupply purposes
oh yeah and c it’s not $500
honestly berthier is practically better than mosin
It's not wild conjecture. It always starts out small and innocent enough, and then they twist the knife.
How many game companies have broken the "no guns in lootboxes" promise? Or the "no p2w" promise? Its not speculation, it's a trend and I'm tired of pretending it's not
Same with lootboxes. Fuck Mr. Chary
neon youre just spooked by mr chary
You're right. I'm scared of what they'll do with the bastard.
tbh mr chary and I are best buds now
he gave me something other than $100 yesterday
Heretic
75bb
this is heading into tinfoil hat zone
so we’ve made up our differences
i personally thing mr chary isnt bad for the game, it has no pay to win implication
mr chary is chill with me as long as he gives me bb
And im tired of explaining it to every other person who seems to have completely missed the last 10 years of gaming developments.
THAT ISNT A VALID EXCUSE
games arent just made by passionate devs they also have suits and investors who only care about how profitable the project is

when one company does something scummy it puts pressure on other companies to do so as well or theg risk being seen as a unprofitable project
do there is real pressure on crytek to make hunt profitable
and id rather they do it in a way that is harmless like skins and shit
then later being in a situation where hunt is either ded because its not profitable enough or has sketch monetization
Neon's back on his Mr. Chary is bad debate. You arguing will get you no where.
Okay here a better one, you'd go "this is what battlefield is now" when Dice launches the 2nd broken shitass game in a row, wouldn't you?
The status of the industry isn't an excuse. It's a scathing criticism and a call to do better
also the germany comment is weird af
Same logic really
You mean "This is what Battlefield always has been" 
no what im saying is if you think we are in an era where games can survive without monetization youre delusional
its already happened
But enough talk you lot seem to enjoy the thought of spanking real money on literal gambling, so I'll leave you to it. People like you are ruining the industry and you'll be to blame when Hunt gets fucked with f2p, lootboxes and gimped progression.
Have fun
i dont im setting realistic expectations
Realist expectation is 2022 are "whey will fuck it up" because most of the time that is exactly what happens.
i want them to add non invasive monetization so hunt DOESN'T turn into some f2p shit
Whorse, I'm telling you, you're talking to a brick wall
Even if you agree that you don't want money spent on gameplay things, he'll keep debating and trying to talk you into removing Chary entirely. Look at the past chats.
So why are you advocating for the fuckibg lootbox system then
maybe you have a point piston
Enjoy
Yes.
cus honestly as it stands mr chary has no implication on actual gameplay
What would it even be? Medium or compact?
and if it stays how it is , im cool with mr chary
Yet.
Remove the pay for progression part, and I'm gucci too
I like him, just not quite with that part as it does make me uncomfortable.
noone really even has to get that
Honestly I'd be fine with that, but it's there for a reason and we all know what that is.
They won't remove it because money. That's a realistic expectation. if they do, it's a pleasant suprise.
3k xp is ezpz and there is nothing youd want, last reward also doesn't have higher chance for good stuff or anything
We don't know this for certain, from what I know.
We don't even know the chances of each thing, or if it's flat across the board.
ig ill wait and see so far it seems like its same for each milestone
Ye, we just can't say that you don't have greater odds at the end for better things or not. Cause it is essentially misinformation since we don't actually know it for certain.
but ill admit my sample size is about a week so idk
Yeye. Anyways, Ima dip out and go continue rock and stoning. You have fun, lads.
also lets say last one was better
it would be in their favour to tell us that to incentivise us to spend 100bbs
compact
why would they keep it a secret
and give it fmj
I'm pretty sure it got mentioned on stream that they all have the same chance
if anything my 2500xp rewards have all been consistently better than my 10000xp rewards
but it’s only been like a week so I’ll put that down to rng
Did they :o Well, then I stand corrected if that is the case
Why not both medium and compact they did come chambered in .44-40 and .50-95 express could either be like the winnfields and have two separate trees or the the Caldwell conversion and have it start compact and unlock the medium much like the uppercut
True, currently the only weapon chambered for different types of ammo is caldwell conversion...
Wouldnt mind another gun with 2 calibers
Well they aren’t touching any of the other legendary hunter, and while, Cain may be hard for people to see, so are others but they are totally ignoring that. You don’t have to nerf them one at a time. Just do it across the board
there's definitely a reason or two for that 
@glass vale, your post below has been deleted, as it doesn't follow the required format.
You can find all guidelines pinned in the ideas channel.
Please feel free to re-post your idea using the correct format:
Matched regex in message in #game-ideas (#suggestions-ideas, 524577494863708180):
When queuing into trios as duos or solo, or duos as solo, a dialogue box should appear. "You're a man/two men down! Are you sure you wish to queue?".```
I certainly would not want the map to be cluttered either 👍 Crytek plz 😭
@jovial flint Love your suggestion with the Japanese weapons. Hunt is obviously not WW2 but the bolt action Arisaka rifle in CoDWaW had the best iron sights ever, would love to see something similar.
Crytek fucks up iron sights all the time. You think they'd get this right if they added it?
If they stretch the timeline, they could have the Arisaka Type 30 at 1899 
If we get another bolt gun, it really needs to be the Krag.
they were better than a lot of the hunt irons but it's a WW2 era bolt action so irrelevant I guess lol, gonna take a look at the Ari Type 30
Yeah what they look like is kind of the point here. Because while there it is, if it was added, Crytek would intentionally mess it up.
I don't actually know what arisaka sights look like irl though. So I'm no expert.
I would love more boltys but what gameplay niche would the krag or arisaka fill?
me neither I'm lookin right now tho
The krag would be a cheap long ammo option with low damage but high rof. And no need for bulletgrubber.
"The Type 30 rifle Arisaka (三十年式歩兵銃, Sanjū-nen-shiki hoheijū, 'year 30 type infantry firearm') is a box-fed bolt-action repeating rifle that was the standard infantry rifle of the Imperial Japanese Army from 1897 (the 30th year of the Meiji period, hence "Type 30") to 1905." This is an earlier model than the WW2 type 99 model so maybe that one has diff irons I'll check edit: type 99 has a circular sight as well as a box sight like the silenced sparks.
30-40 is kind of a weak cartridge compared to 8mm Lebel or 54R. So it would be weaker shooting and less recoiling. But the bolt is super smooth. And the gate would mean you don't need bulletgrubber.
Higher than the Vett? Would be pretty fast but I'm all for it if balanced well, love me some bolt actions
A Krag is way easier to work than a Vetterli irl.
Way easier.
Like. You breathe on a Krag and it cycles.
Fuck irl a Lebel is easier to bolt than a Vetterli.
Thinking of gameplay niche's for new bolt actions, they could always go the CS:S scout way and give one higher movespeed like a side arm. Trying to think what else they could do
Higher movement speed while ADS could be a cool mechanic.
Speaking of sights, this is how the Mosin's sights should look like. That shit on the sides is the sight base.
Add the hood to the front sight. Then it's perfect.
M91 mosins didn't have it. That's an M91/30 thing.
not a fan of those scottfield style flat sights, they are good for body shots but harder to click heads with (in my opinion), I hate how thin the mosin and winfield ironsight tips are, they blend with too many surfaces, while the winnie centenial has that thicker iron tip that doesnt get lost.
Good point. Either way I'd rather see this than what's in game.
Yeah the sight isn't modeled correctly. It's too rectangular and too tall
Also too open.
and it doesn't look to be set to the cca 100m battle zero, but to a higher elevation
And the bolt handle should be straight.
i think its made open to be more usable. it's difficult to model sights correctly in games.
fun fact, a dev diary video shows it with a straight bolt handle.
Lmao yet they made the Lebel's sights artifically narrow to make longer shots with irons extra difficult.
They did the Lebel dirty. Especially now that the Berthier exists.
i have yet to find a still of the lebel's irons
may have to skim over the C&Rsenal video
Above is a late lattern. Below is an early pattern.
The lower picture is a bit fuzzy, but the front post is a barely corn style front post. Triangular.
fun fact it got the bent bolt handle because of scopes
I guessed that was why
Those are the battle sights of an early pattern.
ingame le belle sights
rounded around the edges, but generally okay
they also seem too tall or set to an elevation greater than battle zero
My thoughts exactly with my Danish friend
Nah see the in-game is using the full size rear leaf, which is fine on its own. But then they've gone and inflated the size and width of the front post. So it occludes more of your view.
i would like to see a kar98k ^^
thing is, do we really need another long ammo gun? and one that can be reloaded at any time without bulletgrubber?
anacronistic by over 40 years (adopted in 1936 iirc)
the kar 98 went into the army in the year 1898 as a long variant later in ww2 they used the kar98k
as far as i know
could add it after other ammunition type rifles have been added
its not like there's a cap on how many guns there'll be
true but at some point you run into weapon oversaturation and balance issues.
not really
there is no such thing as a "Kar 98"
there is:
- Gewehr 98 (still anacronistic by 2-3 years)
- Gewehr 98A (WW1 era carbine)
- Gewehr 98B (WW1 era Gewehr 98 with G98A style sights; later adopted as the "Karabiner 98B")
its actually the very same weapon that they used in WW1, tho they had to do some renaming sorcery to make them pass as nonmilitary rifles
the Gewehr 98A and the Kar 98K are distinct guns, and both are anacronistic as of 1895/6.
Karabiner 98 Kurz actually means Carbine mod.98 "Short"... even tho the rifle was standart full size military musket, germoney got banned from producing large amounts of military equipment so they did this renaming crap to make these rifle pass as a "police carbines"
You've got it a bit mixed up
Ye it has some new parts here and there but its still the old system overall
there's more anacronistic ones than a gewehr tho
The K98K is a universal short rifle. What you're describing is the Gewehr 98B, renamed into Karabine 98A so they could keep them because the length of "carbine" was not determined by the Versailles treaty.
anyway
if y'all want a Gewehr you're stuck with the 88.
or some other mauser gun
and honestly why would we want that
Who are you to judge that ?
you can play literally any other WW2 game to do so
the regular G98 is perfectly fine seeing as the Auto5 is also a thing
the Auto-5 was prototyped and produced since 1892 in-lore. you can see it on the back of the gun.
lets just hope that they WONT add any more bolt action long rifles and do something low end instead
you could go with a Spanish Mauser, 1893 model. it's close enough to a guhwehrhrhrhr ninteyeit
and yeah, Zapper's right
enough long ammo boltguns
In lore
(for now...?)
so we could just as well change the G98 lore wise...
but why would you when the Spanish Mauser exists
honestly I think backdating the auto-5 was not the best idea
sure, one can, but is it a smart decision?
hrmpf well then the gewehr 98 are completely different idc. but if you are completely precise about that topic then kick out the awtomat
Well there's not much against it
other than some might be upset because 1895 not 1898 - but then again we already have that "issue" with other ones
I'm for removing anything made after 1895.
the spanish mauser looks like a gewehr 98 carbine, and you don't have to do timey wimey stuff to get it to fit in-lore.
i'm for progressing the game's date to 1896.
(and changing the auto-5's markings to 1896 to make it less bad lore-wise)
They can add a steampunk M16 for all I care if it's fun, balanced and thematically fitting
how about no?
If we do that go full send and make the years change as long as the game is in service. 1896. 1897. So on year after year.
nah, the event probably didnt last that long
Eh. Dipshits can ensure plagues last years.
More guns is more guns to me as long as it fits thematically a few years here or there can be fudged I enjoy the gunplay in the game and variety never hurts
im a bit of a lore nut so this shit bothers me
I even cooked up a whole fan theory to explain the Avtomat's existance
tell me the difference between a german mauser gewehr 98 and the spanish one pls
gewehr 98 is longer, has different sight, bolt handle, and cartridge
caliber for a start
and the date of production ?
1893 vs 1898.
is there another bolt system in it ?
You could easily make the argument that something like zombies and demons and whatnot would most likely ramp up weapon development
The Spanish mauser would probably be better, since it's in 7x57mm as opposed to the 7.92x57 of the Gewehr. The lower damage could be used to make it distinct from the other 8mm guns.
that's my working theory for the Auto-5, the guns are Browning's handmade prototypes and the 1892 date is a spoof.
The spanish mauser would fit very well, both thematically and balance wise
i just don't think that's a good reason to not add a G98
well I think it would be too similar to the Mosin, and hence be a poor candidate when other, more distinct guns could be added
cant find anything special about a spanish mauser could you send me a website or something i can read about it especially its date of production ?
The Mauser Model 1893 is a bolt-action rifle commonly referred to as the Spanish Mauser, though the model was adopted by other countries in other calibers, most notably the Ottoman Empire. The M1893 was based on the experimental M1892 rifle, which Paul Mauser developed for the Spanish Army as part of a program to correct deficiencies in the earl...
thx interesting.
as far as i can see it would make not difference if you add the spanish one or the kar98 /gewehr 98 (both are basicly the same shit . there are just minor differences and these are not really that interesting for a game like hunt). so i dont get the point u are trying to make here
its like telling me na i dont want a minimi in squad i want an m249 saw. basicly same gun just other names
caliber is not important in hunt.
or not that important
you already have it
le avto
Instead of the Mauser a Mannlicher 1888 would be a straightpull bolt action
and iirc has also en-bloc esque mags
O.o that was just an example. if could decide it i would kick the awto out of the game
I just want this and a martini pistol
since lebel and mosin are not straight pull bolts you got a slight (maybe enough) divergence there to make the gun feel distinct
This drilling may be interesting. The Martini pistol is a genious idea and I have no clue why we don't already have it
i'd prefer an over under shotgun with internal hammers though over external ones.
aesthetics!
if we're gonna go straight pull, I'd rather go with the M1894 Mondragon or the M1895 Lee-Navy. Both could be either Medium or Special ammo.
The Mondragon itself is very interesting because it has a "slamfire" fire mode
so it could be made basically full auto in hipfire
I'd say that's not true, you have 3
compact ammo only has 1.
long ammo has 5 already
Update 1.7.3 > Krag, Mauser, Arisaka and Gewehr 98 added 🥰 🥰 🥰
i would like to see a musket that would be funny
need more compact ammo rifles
I play centennial. I enjoy it a lot, and its the gun im learning to snipe with.
@feral roost nah they upgraded the muskets to cartridges already. springfield would've been the case otherwise XD
Yeah a musket would be cool, part of hunt is just the sheer variety of cool old guns that aren't in other FPS games. I don't care if it's bad just would be cool to have even if a meme weapon lol.
but i would like to have one anyways 😄
that is one step away from having a blunderbuss with kitchen hardware shots
i'm all for shooting knives
Probably the most outlandish thing I've ever suggested was a wristblade sorta like assassins creed but steampunk, would allow you to use knife while still holding another weapon. Everyone hated and downvoted the shit out of it lol.
just make it look steampunk/1890 style lol, idc what people say I think it would be fuckin sick. Yeah and of course you could shoot the knife
hmm maybe u could make it a one shot at 30 meters or so with high reload time and big smoke cloud also you have to stand still to reload. think that would balance it
better example, bring on the hate lol I think it would be so cool
Could allow you to use your knife while holding a pistol without having to switch weapons or something? idk but I want it
(I know this has a 0% chance of ever even being considered to add to hunt but I think its cool and could fit)
true true
compact ammo is the only ammo type we dont have a single shot for
aside special, but the nitro is just 2 single shots welded together lol
would be funny but pretty useless i think
10 dollar gun
i take 10 😄
nobody cares about my wristblade 🤬 lmao
but, say, best compact accuracy and range (I have an entire suggestion for it)
idk, it doesnt really fit imo
make it do 125 dmg hahahaha
totally fair, I know it's a stretch, but so cool
1s reload
i wouldn't enjoy players having the Assassin boss special melee as a tool XD (which is dual wristblades + shooting them)
this one looks more 1890 appropriate
I'd give the Rem BRB the best reload speed of all single shots. Maybe 115 damage, best accuracy and range for the ammo type. And give it Winnie's FMJ.
better idea: knife with handle, that you can hold
would be a nice addition
. . .
no 125 dmg
yes that is way less hindrance @digital nacelle
and 1s reload
i think 125 is a bit too much for compact, that is medium territory
ikr ima genius
next we get weird kusari-gama for the eastern inspired hunters XD
long ammo single shot 143 - medium ammo single shot 136 - logically, small ammo single shot 129
but I’ll be generous and say 125
there's a world of differentce between the Springfield's round and .44-40
exactly which is why I say 125 and not 129
the already existing .44-40 guns do 107 and 110 damage, respectively.
yes and cent does only 123 but springfield does 136
centennial's damage is weird.
yes but that’s the way it is
not to mention sparks does 149 and berthier only 130
so clearly you have a lot of play with dmg
it’s not that clear cut
Spark's bullet and powder charge are much greater than the Berther's
that makes sense
I mean agreed
but so would this compact ammo singleshot thing
my point is even though it’s technically the same bullet it’s 19 dmg more due to other factors
so surely a 15 dmg bonus from winfield is not that bad
Imagine how many thumbs down the bomb lance would have gotten if someone posted it in #game-ideas before it was added lmao
yeah no you can't fudge that.
?
I mean yeah
not many I'd imagine
I disagree.
what’s worst then
it depends on what you're doing.
they need to fix the accuracy of the projectile or make it a 2 slot
and combat axe should be a 1 slot but more expensive
that’s true blance is great if you’re a pve farmer
i think its okay as it is. everything makes sense size-wise
I mean it makes sense because of how big it is
you've obviously never zerg rushed a team with the spear and lived.
but it sucks ass as it is rn
I mean, I have, but not often, because they can shoot at me with guns lmao
you're bringing an explosive crossbow with a blade strapped to it to a gun fight. you've gotta play smart.
no you aren’t
and when you do the enemy stands to chance against your massive as fuck blade
comparing blance to explosive crossbow is just not it
its a slower firing explosive xbow with no ADS. but it's also a melee weapon
or maybe they can stay like 10 meters away
lmfao
it really isn’t though
explosive crossbow has way more ammo and splash damage
not to mention its way more accurate in hipfire than blance
I really enjoy the concept itself. It reminds me of RWBY, if you ever watched that.
and yeah its more balanced for PvE.
I haven’t
it’s the worst 3 slot you can take
again, not if you play it right.
obviously it isn’t useless against players but it’s damn close
because melee is damn near useless against players in general
what does this even mean it has the lowest skill ceiling of any 3 slot
not really just and axe issue but the axe feels it the most
probably the lowest skill floor too LOL
*highest skill ceiling and floor because playing melee in an FPS is tough as balls
yeah definitely not
it has very little potential
compared to other weapons
bomblance needs to have better projectile accuracy and work with bolt thrower
then it would actually be pretty good
imagine bomblance but crossbow hipfire acc
I’d love that
that's it exactly, because its hard to use against players it has a high skill ceiling
there reaches a point where the weapon is to simplistic to have high skill ceiling no matter how hard you try
the axe is like that
kinda hard to work with bolt thrower when the bolt explodes, dont you think
that’s not what high skill ceiling even means
not at all
bolt thrower is a reload perk
it would just have him put the bolt on while he pulls the thing back
oh, right yeah
no reason why that doesn’t work with bomblance
xbow has 1/4 now
the bomb lance is a worse crossbow and a 3-slot axe, but it's both at the same time and that counts for something.
I think neon may have been thinking of blade seer when they mentioned the exploding bolt
yeah that was my mistake
that’s half
that's all the explosive you get, and in a comparison with the Bomb lance that says a lot
like I said, worse crossbow and a 3-slot axe, but both simultaneously.
@wanton carbon no prestige exclusive variants. that is bullshit
@cerulean wraith why so you cant sit at p0 with 200K ?
because some people just don't wanna start all over again
ive played for what, 400 hours?
and I still don't have all the variants unlocked.
therefore I'm at P0.
and I'm not even considering prestiging because I like to use all of my arsenal.
I'm all for more prestige incentive, but prestige-to-win is not a good way of doing things.
how is that even possible i have been on p 100 for less than 150hrs and have everything -_-
because I don't prestige?
also my first 100 or so hours I was complete trash
but yeah
