#feedback-discussion
1 messages · Page 242 of 1
Seems like they panicked a bit causing them to miss
i guess they did
meanwhile my duo was camping in the bush outside bcs fuck bounty 😄
why is it using all the cpu? why does it use so little video card power? Only discord is open while playing games. and this is the result. The update made the game even worse.
Berthier - 3/6 - 130dmg - 590ms - 36rf - 3s R - 356$ // Lebel - 10/5 - 132dmg - 630ms - 34rf - 18s R - 397$ // Mosin - 5/10 - 136dmg - 615ms - 34rf - 4s R - 490$ - Berthier should be arround 290$ maybe 312$ with 3/9
hmm its says 3/6 on my game
i can just go play it, i never bought it because of that lol
but why buy it when u have lebel xD
i mean its much cooler than lebel
and as a short-ish distance long ammo rifle its very good
reloads almost instantly
imo at that price it does not compete with Lebel, maybe that's just me
and doesnt have that slow ass lebel cocking animation
I honestly dont really think that lebel is any competetive
sure... 10 rds mag... but does anyone really need that much bullets in bolt action rifle?
and it just feels horrible with that dumb animations
like seriously... they should have just make it slightly better than mosin
that feels extrabad
i prefer lebel over nagant as well xD maybe its the iron sight , but i land more shots with Lebel over any over weapon, i don't have problem with the slower bolt action, anyway, check the bug reports, i posted a screen there 3/6
lebel just looks so much better than mosin
i have to do a full day of berthier then, but still i feel it overprice for what is competes agaisnt
and is nearly as overused in games
no seriously... berthier feels great imo
i mostly shoot at <30
but it feels great imho
well, since day one, i still think, in Hunt, any weapon is viable, so in the end of the day its just a preference thing
that is true...
@queen jungle I'm not sure what you're bitching about? The 100bb is only if you want that last chance immediately and it has the same loot pool as all the rest. You could have got the Hunter skin or you couldve gotten the low hunt dollar reward. It's random and if you dont want to spend the bbs then just play another few rounds
@outer wedge how is berthier overpriced? it is the cheapest long ammo repeater
@steady prism
1- level can't be better than mosin cause it's cheaper
2-the only strong element of lebel is the projectile speed. Lebel is almost an hitscan under 100m and that's why it's good (specially the marksman version), nobody cares about the 10 round magazine.
@digital nacelle for what it offers, i feel its should be like 300$ tops, if they increase the ammo pool or it realy is 3/12
it's 3/12
15 bullets total
just like any other repeater
lmao
if anything it should be more expensive imo
i just take lebel over it, 40$ its not worth imo, like i said its all preference in the end of the day, and when i look to the 3 options, i won't take it over nagant or lebel
maybe if it was a bit cheaper
I'd say it's better than lebel
10/5 is a terrible ammo economy
I need an uppercut to play lebel, but not for berthier
and yet the clip reload is so fast it might as well have a massive magazine
It's literally free money. For the lower star people thats enough for a budget loadout
You wasting a lot money for pc and still got shit fps
one thing I hate this game is that when you crouch you don't really aiming better than standing and walking left and right... unrealistic
What do you mean, it does affect both hip fire reticle with most weapons as well as weapons sway in ADS
try stand and walk left and right and shoot a real rifle or pistol, you will see what I mean
what I mean then is that this game is better for those who play good with shooting but not good for those who play with hidding style
@digital nacelle NO
spitfire is just too good
NOOO,
ur not getting my fav new gun nerfed
it's strong
no way it doesn't receive balancing
uppercut needs a nerf as well
that is separate from spitfire
it won’t get one
ur absolutely jerking that knee
think about it
the only bad part compared to scottfield is slightly worse recoil and hipfire?
I think that it should have reduced damage or mv since it has a shorter barrel
the base scottfield is trash though
it’d be trash that low
even 60 rpm would be a 50% increase in firerate
I highly disagree
77 is almost double most single action revolvers!
and?
what downside does the spitfire have to warrant a ~85% fire rate increase?
officer is even faster
yes, officer has other downsides
it has poor range and damage
only 30 meters two tap range and can't even one tap someone revived who has resilience
you’re on copium
frankly, I don't think it helps your argument to just say I'm on copium when I present valid points
literally first day give it some time too see where it pans our
instead of knee jerk crying for nerfs instantly
NERF NERF NERF alternatives to mosin uppercut aren’t allowed to be good!
you clearly don't see the point...
I mean i agree it might be too strong
I don't understand how a shorter barrel doesn't affect dmg or velocity
but i really don't wasnt to see it overnerfed too fast either
I mean, I agree
that happened a lot in the past so i'd say give it at least 4-8 weeks before doing anything
let the hype of it being new die down and reevaluate then
I'm open to suggestions to balancing
1 day and you already want it gutted into worthlessness
I never said that...
however stat wise it definetly has the potential to be very very strong, being a single action so no extra sway and can use fanning, with a RoF to nearly rival the officer and dmg currently exceeding Dolch dmg
I think it should be 130 hunt dollars and that’s it tbh
just that it's a bit too strong
the tone of my post was not "omg overpowered nerf now"
but I do think it needs a little balancing
what really bugged me today when playing it was that it's got such a great firerate with barely any drawback to it as well as making a lot of other stuff obsolete
like scottfield P on it's own is cool - and it'd be a great higher Rof version - if the spitfire didn't exist
spitfire is also only 8$ more than a pax for nearly the same stats everywhere but nearly 70% better Rof
And It's not like it gets the extra sway they added to semi autos to discourage spamming them either, because technically it is a single action
That's what i see with a bit of worry - but pls no hasty nerfs again. Let the hype settle and then evaluate it
yeah, it's barely been a day, and people already asking for nerfs for new things, it only seems strong cause everyones using it
give it a bit of time to find its place in the game, then we can know if it may need balancing or not
I think its strong potentially even too strong
The stats are bonkers and it played accordingly for me today
But still i dont wanna se it overnerfed like the bow because they react too fast to early complaints
the bow is fine
MooseGoneMade raises a good point. Chary is nothing but loot boxes reskinned. The servers and performance continue to degrade while Hunt continues to be ever increasingly monetized. EU Parliament has posted various studies on the negative effects of loot boxes.
I mean, both on paper and in game it’s really good
I think it’s pretty clear a single action revolver with 77 rpm and only worse hipfire is not very balanced
It's not lootboxes in the least. You don't pay for them, it's simply a small reward for earning XP in the game
The last step you can pay blood bucks that are real world money equivalent.
shrug don't care
it's a loot box, skinner box, roulette wheel for loot
Well, then we need to ask ourselves, "why is that a feature we can pay for towards the end?"
It might not be a straight up 1 for 1 transaction for random goods. But things gets implemented for reason.
It's option for those that want it I guess, but it's not worth 100b.
And it's only available at the end of of the progression from my understand Available for the last 1500-2000 xp of the line
So it's not like you can pay BB at the start of the line to progress
Mhm, that is where people would be the most tempted to spend the money.
The system is set up to make people think: "I come so far, but it will reset soon enough, so I guess I'll drop a 100bb to max it out".
I think it is important that we take a hard look at this game and see how many venues it tries to make us spend bloodbonds, big and small.
It doesn't make you spend bloodbonds in any way.
You make the decision to spend blood bonds. The game doesn't force you to
There are options to spend bb for those that want it, bc you can passively earn bloodbonds every match
It doesn't force you no.
But it does damn try to make you spend them and it hopes that you would spent a little more money on buying those bloodbonds.
This is a business not a charity.
And you and I might be able to gauge what is "worth" spending these BB on and if we wanna buy some more. But in any case with these kinds of monetization models, we are not the target then.
Except it doesn't try to make you spend them. Nowhere does it say that you should spend you bloodbonds on these things. You spending bloodbonds is a you decision. Not the game's
It's simply an option. An option you can easily ignore
An option that many do ignore.
Again, we are not the target then. But you can't say they implemented this whole system without intending to turn a profit over.
Sure. It's another option to make money on. But many games do this. So long as it doesn't force you and doesn't provide a gameplay advantage, there is no issue
I feel that just because other games does something, should make anything free of criticism.
On the contrary, I do think it is quite alarming that a game that sells itself as 40EUR and have over 200EUR worth of DLC also sees the need to nick and dime its users for basic services such as loadouts slots and "cleaning weapons", a feature that was implemented with a BB solution in mind.
Not to bring up those people who lives compulsive gambling behaviour which the new system for sure will prey on.
Well, you earn BB every match, enough to clean a weapon
And the DLC is just skins. Completely optional
It's not like they're pulling a paradox and locking core features behind DLCs
I also suspect that game sales is not enough to keep the game afloat.
It's understandable that multiplayer games nowadays need a more reliable income than just game sales to keep afloat
Bc game development has gotten a lot more expensive
Servers especially
Sorry this is a lot of statements, so I'll do them a little systematic:
1: Sure you earn BB to clean weapons, but the idea is bleed players out on BB with all the many small services, so the eventually would consider spending money to buy BB.
2: DLC skins are completely option that is true and least of my issue, it is more to point out there is plenty of ways people can support Hunt if they wanna spend more money.
3: If you create a service/business that can't keep itself afloat, it shouldn't be the customers that suffers for that.
4: The server expenses of Hunt sure ain't reflective of the gameplay experience.
I get that Crytek wanna earn money, that is a given and I get Hunt is a life services, so it needs a ongoing team of developers that of course should be compensated fairly.
But I can't say my enjoyment of the game have gotten up over the years when I just have seen a visible more aggressive monetization push down on the players because of that.
It is a factual truth that opportunities for earning BB have gone down and venues for spending them have gotten up. More so have the amount of time limited events, which eagerly presses the player to compulsively spend BB on various offers.
Either you are wilfully ignorant to see what kind business practices that are being pulled or you just are ignorant on how these kind of models and practices works. In either case I would happily provide the information needed.
Well said
Especially for number 3
And by all means, I mean no ill for Crytek and especially the team that works on this and I do hope they get compensated fairly for all this hard work they are doing.
@elder elm Your post in #feedback is being deleted because it is a bug report, not actual feedback. Please use the correct channels, thanks.
So many no skill ass bitches wanna keep explosive bolts in the game lmao
@crystal hemlock Your post in #feedback is being deleted because it is a Suggestion/fanart and not actual feedback. Feel free to repost it in the correct channels, thanks.
@ruby magnet if the suggestions just so happen to coincide with the dev team wrecking what this game used to be, it’s still a suggestion
I/e nerfing aim punch on a OHK weapon is pointless
I/e nerfing everything expect the actual damage of explosive bolts is a pointless move by the dev team. Reducing the ammo count too, you don’t need to run util when you have it, you can just run 3-4 ammo boxes anyways. So uhhhh? Fuck this update and the devs for that shit
explo bolts aren’t 1 hit kill
What game you been playing
@fringe herald Your post in #feedback is not feedback at all, instead a question. Please use the correct channels, thanks.
they literally just aren’t
explo bolts aren’t even particularly strong
skill issue tbh
Lmao I had a 9 kill game backed by a 6 kill game step off kid
@mossy sonnet Your post in #feedback is a bug report, please use the correct channel for bug reports, thanks.
they can if you hit an enemy hunter
If you hit them dead on it’s OHK
not splash damage, but direct hits will
Yup
same thing with regular and shot bolts
Kayot is the crossbow user
you’re complaining about something thr crossbow does regularly
regular bolts have a lot better firing trajectory
It completely nullifies the bomb lance
bomb lance is a whole seperate issue
Yes if you use regular bolts and you miss then you’re SOL
@trim ingot You are posting a a question in #feedback where #feedback is for actual coherent feedback, not game questions. #game-questions can be used instead. Please use the correct channels, thanks.
But explosive bolts even if you miss it’s still dmg, so it’s low risk high reward
well you're not supposed to be using the bomblances harpoons as it's main use in pvp
Kayot is the xplosive bow user
Didn’t say you should
Lol you have a .5 kd
my most used weap is nagant officer carbine cope kid
coping mad kid who’s mad coz he can’t aim and gets rekt by crossbow
then y r u complaining
Because it’s unbalanced
That still does not excuse you from properly formulating your displeasure and actually stating that you're questioning someone's sanity.
Or stating that as a hard fact.
Criticism can be negative as long as people keep it tidy. You're allowed to be angry but at least have the politeness not to borderline bash people for your anger.
I can bash whoever I want
Unlike the devs I live in a country with free speech
And the wrecked this game with broken guns
it's called being respectful bruh, not restriction of freedom of speech lol
rule 1
I'm literally right here
complaining about a weapon that’s pretty far from meta is yikes
Mistaking freedom of speech for freedom of verbal assault.
the newsfeed repetition after initial game launch is a little wearisome. I only need to see it once. Having it pop up everytime i return to the lobby seems odd.
@sullen zephyr Dolch? Bomb Lance?
Talking about 3 slot weapons
And bomb lance is 150$
@twilit zephyr Your post in #feedback has been removed; please use the proper channel for bug reports
Im talking about a huge weapon about 1-2k$
I don't think we really need more 1k guns, because that implies some form of great power
The Avto is a beast when aimed and controlled at CQ. The Nitro, same but at longer range.
Where do you fit a 3rd weapon into that?
Tbh it's getting bored when you read new weapon and it's just a new Version of a already existing weapon ingame
I mean a semi auto rifle could do it but everyone would hate it and it'd ruin the game, frankly
There could be a shotgun for 1k hunt dollar like a shotgun that blasts a shell and out fo that shell 3 other shotgun rounds
That is so horrifically OP I can't even visualize that
Do you play with the Avto and Nitro?
You'd know they take skill tveo actually be very strong with them
Like the shotgun mode from roadhog (overwatch) he shoots a bullet that frags on hit behind the enemy or if he doesn't hit he shoots a shell and it doesn't hit at 15 it frags into 3 shotgun shells yk)
You need a skill cannon, not an OP machine that a forknife noob can wipe a server with.
Thb the nitro is kinda noob friendly if encounter people only under 30 meters lol
Same for the avto
No noob will ever use the Nitro because it hard to use. The sights frankly suck (on purpose) and you get 2 shots with a slow RoF
And the Avto has a lot of recoil and it's prohibitively expensive for new players. And it takes 2 uppercuts just to make it viable.
Neither if these is noob friendly
Well, I learned to use both of them quick af
That's you.
You'll find that most noobs go for Winnie levering
The c&k is the noob shotgun of choice
Fact is, neither the Nitro or the Avto are noob friendly
And your idea is so horrifically OP it would dominate cqb with no room for counterplay
@cerulean wraith interesting 44 x l shot i found some pictured but i can not find one source that would detail when they first poped up i knew snake shot were around for ages but would have never guessed its that old that it came in wax carboard boxes
have you got some source that would know a rough estimate what yesr they first appeared
Well I read it was contemporary with .410
And .410 was introduced in 1874
This likely belongs in another forum...so while I have the urge to write, I'll post it here (which is somewhat appropriate).
Mrs. Anderson (my 1st grade teacher) would roll over in her grave if she knew the use I put here lessons in paper machie.
Sometimes can find old single shot smooth bores...
Referenced in bri'ish publications in the 1880s
@rocky orchid is the "Berthier 58" a real weapon?
The avto is absolutely noob friendly. You can fire a three round burst non stop until the mag is empty. I'm not that skilled at the game and just kept blasting people without needing to aim.
You can spam the Avto but you're gonna empty the mag, not hit shit and die
You may get (or may not lol) one cheese kill that way, but is it worth 1.5k? I think not.
no.. it is just a fictional name because the original first cylinder-out revolver were invented in 1858 by french/british cooperation and i really dont know if crytek wil have the name rights to use it..
the name is just irrelevant, as it is more the gun idea by itself
The Uppercut doesn't need a reserve ammo increase, I can tell you that much
the avto should never get lowered by the price.. the game where you die often on one bullet, there shouldn't be as much automatic rifles.. therefore they can increase all the prices .. even i would raise the trait costs for levering and fanning from 7 up to 10 or 12
it was just for the fairness of the new gun idea.. i am not responsible for tweaking 😄 so just a little bit more ammo for the uppercut, but double or triple the price
The state of the avtomat is pretty good atm. It's not to strong and it's not to bad either. A fine balance between strong and weak depending on the distance.
If they're gonna be adding a swing out revolver, I'd much prefer it to be the Winchester 1876 Centennial revolver. Turkey allegedly ordered a number of these but it's unknown if they were ever delivered (making it a nice exploitable grey zone for justifying them being here even though only like 13 are known to exist).
This gun is also .44-40, so compact ammo. Kinda just a compact version of the Scottfield. Also no speedloader is known to have existed.
Agreed
yeah.. this could be also a thing.. i really would love to have a fancy flip out animation throwing away the old cartridges and than putting in the new ones with the speedloader.. that looks so damn nice
It really is a nice gun, shame it never entered production (as far as we know)
And the right side swing out is pretty unique too. I only know one other revolver that did that
The pieper
also i would like to have a "silcenced scottfield"... with a silencer so big, like the silencer of the sparks.. this would look actually pretty funny and silencer prototypes where quite big 😄
Can't work due to how revolvers work
The nagant is an exception there (and the Pieper too, it uses the same kind of mechanism)
The nagant's bullet is seated in the case, and the gun has a forcing cone that seals the gap between the cartridge and barrel. That's why it can be suppressed.
yeah.. but like everone else often complains.. it is a game 😉 not everyone needs real life mechanics
We do here.
I get fucking passed every time I see a suppressor on a revolver when it legit just can't fucking work
So stop that
A bigger one, given that you suggested a suppressed scottfield.
yes, because of the fact, realism isnt taken as serious, as needed in this game 😄
otherwise i would not take this in my mouth
This game takes realism pretty seriously with its gun mechanics
Which I love about it
So stahp

or some red dot?
Grubb sight.
@mint estuary, your post below has been deleted, as it doesn't follow the required format.
You can find all guidelines pinned in the ideas channel.
Please feel free to re-post your idea using the correct format:
Matched regex in message in #game-ideas (#suggestions-ideas, 524577494863708180):
Get rid of the fucking cain skin how is that for a suggestion```
@mint estuary not a very good one 
that skin is broken af such bs
ok fair enough
i was about to buy it cuz hey if you can't beat em join em
but not if it will get nerfed at some point
i mean there's no other way to even the playing field
i don't even like the skin but it gives players a ridiculous advantage
well to be fair.. there are many hunter models which look very ugly
Recruit this man
Or woman idk
When is 1.8?
Some character model are pretty bad ye
"soon"
Idk, it's the next major update
i mean if i can use the broken cain skin for a month i'd be fine with it
but not if the update is in like a week
that surely will not happen
i am guessing now into the open.. 1.8 will be in march '22
paying for something you feel is broken is just gonna encourage them to make more broken stuff
I've played a lot of games in my life and me refusing to buy broken stuff doesn't change it either so
whether it's video games or card games they don't gaf, there's always enough people who will buy them and then when other people start getting pooped on, they have to eventually buy it too
Seems pretty extreme, especially given that this will now be the second pass they have done to improve the skin's visibility
But I suppose if it bothers you that much, you gotta do what you gotta do
well actually what would really help is to implement some colorblind-options.. because for me personal, cain is just the ice peak
i often have issues (mainly desalle) with T1 modells also 😄
That's actually how many hackers justify their hacking
Despicable
To be fair, you're comparing a very mild advantage to basically paying for wins in violation of all ToS in existence
what triggers me on cain more than his visible, is his invisible leg holster.. the revolvers just flying at his leg... this looks so stupid
Yeah sure, i was just talking about the general mentality behind it
maybe cain should stay as he is.. but only can equip 1 3-slot weapon 
It's sorta a question of what the general consensus of fairness & access is, which is kinda interesting to consider
lol let's not pretend crytek is acting urgently to fix stuff like this. cain been around for how long now? 4 5 months?
how many times they nerfed dolch and how long did it take? :d
same with dual wield, spam, etc
yeah but the dolch change was just stupid..
As I mentioned, they already made a pass 🤷♂️
Before Cain, it was Felis & Blackcoat
Which were largely unfounded
bonedoctor
im mostly happy with crytek updates, but everytime it's like a year too late and we've all accepted the circumstances
I think it's poor development philosophy to respond to community feedback too quickly
they act like nowadays goverments

just 15 days til the next update
two years later
Oh I remember that 
cAtGiRl bAd
mE nO lIkE
am ANGY
the average bone doctor experience
these cain mains croping their hands 

@queen jungle they’re still meant to be useable weapons not complete worthless trash...
Everyone explaining about cain being p2w (he is no daught) meanwhile me enjoying my best life with the girl that the white top and long skirt, I forget her Name she's one of the spanish hunters
You probably won't sit in a bush. I've quite enjoyed the revenant lately.
I take whatever looks cool and almost never buy legendaries
Ghillie lad/lass best skin
I would love it if crytek added the female hunter on the cover with her black coat but that'll probably never happen :/
God fucking dammit people are still whining about dual wield. Will this ever end? We'll all die of old age before they'll stop I swear.
for some funny reason hunt is the first game where the female have actually accurate bodies, not like some other game where you have like a plastic doll as females
Mostly agreed, although imma level with you
They're pretty flat
(Doesn't bother me much, just an observation)
People will always complain about shit because they suck and can't counterplay
Maybe back aches in the bayou lead to natural selection?
Don't think that's how that works
The rng on dual wield is just kinda wack sometimes otherwise I didn't see any real issue with it
Rng will be rng
the solution should be to get rid of the crosshair.. without ADS there is no marker for perfect aiming 
problem solved 😄
I wouldn't even be opposed to that
not gonna lie, I'd give dualies a better first shot accuracy but worse spamming accuracy
That'd only increase frustration when players get killed by them because "it's got no crosshair, he must be hacking!!!!1"
that would just be a buff really
but isnt that the real issue? that often RNG leads to the first shot -> headshot?
that'd make it not RNG
without any aim
dUaLlIeS OP pLs nErF!!!!!!!!!!!!@@!!!@+262462&==_#&
buff cain 💀
Sick of this shit
i've gotten sniped by duals before so i'd rather not make them more accurate. I think they're fine how they are for the most part but no buffs pls
the only thing you can do is to make a normal higher sway which can't be controlled probably and if you ADS the sway stops.. but this would drain slowly stamina.. or something like that
are they fine now or before the nerf 
Not needed
my take is that the biggest problem with getting killed by dualies is it being more RNG than aiming, so if the first shot is more dependent on aiming it'd be less frustrating to play against
@wispy folio refrain from spamming the same idea
Wtf it was entirely a different idea did you even read the text?
The only nerf Duallies still need, I'll tell you that much right now
Is a NERF bullet to the face of everyone who keep complaining about them!
I guess, the first part being the same tricked me, my bad and apologies, I will DM you the text so you can post it again
Maybe with a different title though as to show that it's a different idea
You threaten me with deadly force ?
If this is deadly force, then yeah
if you get good enough RNG to hit me with that bullet
Would make them even stronger and wouldn't solve the problem. It's not just about the RNG that kills people. It's more or less the RoF. Even with the actual nerf: Dualis are strong. Maybe a little to strong, but that is my personal opinion. If I would touch them for another balance-idea I would decrease the RoF.
Thanks for clarifying
Yeah lower the RoF to just 2x that of a single pistol and we're golden
Idk why the RoF is listed as higher. Could just be the listed stats being fucky
Exactly. For me that would be great.
I've always been an advocate of making dualies much more accurate but with a firerate barely higher than a single pistol
Hunt isn't fun with spammy gunplays and gets better when shooting is precise and deliberate
The ol' switching guns thing?
Somewhat
ngl, this
Shoot one gun, bring the other up, repeat
Yes
whenever I use the dualies, a part of my soul dies when I miss multiple easy shots from RNG
whenver I go against dualies, a part of my soul dies when I get domed from 40 meters
hipfire starts at 8MOA at 10 meters and geos 80 MOA the faster you shoot if you ADS you use the irons
with other weapons, I have noone to blame but myself
I could see the switching guns as a duallie ADS rework, but I'd keep it as-is for hipfire
Super inaccurate as it is
I even made a whole ass video about it
Eyo folks. This is current culmination of ideas for the reworking matched pairs to be less RNG-based. Duallies are a bit of a hot topic right now so I felt the compulsion to jump in on the bandwagon. Feel free to argue nonstop about this (probably) non issue in the comments lol
Great thanks to the numerous Hunt Discord members, namely CrazyLasa...
id say one tweak to it , hipfire to avoid the RNG Jesus jackpot is feasible only within mas 15 meters thus the reticle has to be bigger and grow every shot if single gun can shoot every 2 seconds then dualies can every second with out affecting opening hipfire but if you spam the accuracy decreases drastically pretty much like dolch
Iirc duallies have the dolch sway now, no?
@finite ruin @lyric jacinth Your post in #feedback has been removed; please post bug reports in the proper channel, thanks!
whats the proper channel then? there is no bugs-and-issues for pc players ...
don't see that channel ... maybe I'm 2 stupid ... sorry
did you took the pc-role?
Doesn't look like you have the PC role
I see those two channels ... and I think I took the pc-role
It appears you did not
@lethal oyster you can put jump and vault on separate buttons
that way you wont have that issue
No i can't. I play console.
well then nvm

RNGsus ? 😳
@ivory scaffold, your post below has been deleted, as it doesn't follow the required format.
You can find all guidelines pinned in the ideas channel.
Please feel free to re-post your idea using the correct format:
Matched regex in message in #game-ideas (#suggestions-ideas, 524577494863708180):
A suggestion : please dont put updates through on Friday nights ! Cheers```
@queen jungle, your post below has been deleted, as it doesn't follow the required format.
You can find all guidelines pinned in the ideas channel.
Please feel free to re-post your idea using the correct format:
Matched regex in message in #game-ideas (#suggestions-ideas, 524577494863708180):
one additional thing
4. remove the ADS, permanent hipfire accuracy
this will go a long way in reinforcing their close range ability```
When the Duallies are not OP amogus music plays
Not many guys are into memes that hard
Well I also had a poison hammer to post but I guess I don't need to.
I played with a lvl 50 hunters got 9000 exp and I only got about 3000 in the Chary system in a single game, is this a bug?
I just don't think a flaming swords fits hunt very well. It's not the large slot melee thing i have a problem with.
Wacky foldable spear with a harpoon launcher. Big sword+fire. Unno, didn't seem that out of place, and the hunter's association is pretty old according to lore. What did they use before guns ya know?
But that's fair I guess.
A halberd would be sweet. Light melee swing, heavy melee poke. Huge swing arc and range to just cleave shit. Would meme with that. 😂
I'm actually kind of curious why they called it a Bomb Lance as it is definitely more of a spear/halberd.
As you were already told i think most people take issue with the weapon not fitting the setting. Hunt is far far beyond sword combat, and while melee definetly has a place lore wise, big flaimng sword might be out of place for many because in the setting it'd more likely be a tool like a machete or axe, or in the bomblances case a device made to hunt some of worlds largest animals.
And interestingly enough the Bomblance isn't all that far from the truth - highly stylized but rooted in real inventions
that's an IRL patent
The Calvary saber and machete would like to have a word. And no I didn't doubt the authenticity of the lance. Just like the chain pistol, there was a real one, but it was a rifle rather than a pistol.
I just want a different option from the bomb Lance .. and I happen to like swords. 
cavalry sabres were a thing back then in american cavalry regiments, but they were by no means main weapon for combat
to my knowlege
and a machete is primarily a tool
Right and it's something far more easily found. I put the price as expensive because of the difficulty of acquisition.
I have no issue with the sword
The oil thing was a call to Naptha/Greek fire
but i could see how many think it doesn't fit the setting

I personally would love to see melee get whatever it takes and is fun
as the weapon slot melees are just kind of bad
because tools and bayonets can do everything they can but sacrificing so much less utility in the loadout
Well the hammer idea is a modified Sledge with a slot on the back basically to shove a poison bomb into, B button flips which side of the hammer you're swinging with.
sounds fun. I doubt many would play it but it sounds fun
I feel like any melee that takes a weapon slot should 1 hit kill easily. No idea why machete got done so dirty, it's basically a heavy knife
Since bayonets can do that and talons to a degree - yes i absolutely agree
melee wepaon balance is all over the place but even the best ones, like the sabre are overall pretty bad
TTK has really been shortened over the years
I think that while not great for the power of melee, is still fine
But melee brings nothing, like actually nothing unique or even a range it dominates to the table
Making 1 hit kill and making silent killer cheap could do it imo
And what even is the purpose of the heavy knife?
it gets countered by dualies, fanning shotguns and is on pretty much even ground with bayonets and talons
Clearing concertina 😆
I still think melee needs smth unique to make it worth using more
Agree, bayonet is the closest thing I'll take because the knife is already good
and that it didn't get any customisation when all other weapons have it didn't help either
Heavy knife is a skin dump, cause almost all of them are cool lol
Traps in compounds are a big melee killer imo. Never know when you'll snag a wire and get stuck
Like gimme some customisations, like carry more ammo for the second gun, or a unique throwable, maybe a unique trap, or even smth as basic as applying poison to the blade
I play it a lot, ain't good but I like it anyway
heavy knife has some of the absolute best skins
i love them
But the tomahawk has replaced the heavy knife in any aspect for me and brings cool and useful stuff on top
like silently and on range dealing with AI
Yeah .
Melee slot weapons can block, allowing you to parry bayonet/talon/etc variants and grunt/armored/immolator attacks?
The amount of times I've right-clicked with an axe to try and block a hellhound...
I fear theres a few issues with blocking, the biggest one may be it being janky with lag compensation, and that it still doesn't help with it being outclassed by just about everything people tend to bring
and a back and forth of blocking and responding might just be too slow to keep up with hunts pace and the TTK of many guns
I'd assume attachment melees couldn't block but dedicated would but yeah, likely just get sideswiped by their teammate with a rival. Lol
How is the daily xp calculated? For the Chary event stuff? Me and my teammate weren’t collecting the same amount of xp, and I received 3k hunter xp one match and it didn’t show up on that xp bar
That would be the idea, because rightclicking with an attached melee is just ADS/hipfire aim. So you try to stab, get blocked then slashed. Is the concept. Obviously gun beats sword, but maybe it'd at least make melee shine in the melee range.
If it worked well it could - but i think there's a lot of potential for that to go wrong with lag compensation
Yeah, that's true. Lag compensation would probably make it either unreliable (and bad) or super forgiving (and unfair).
That's the big issue. I don't know if you played bf4, but on bf4 was added a feature that allowed players to counter attack (and insta kill) a player who was trying to stab you from the front. I remember that a lot of times, while playing against high ping players, i stabbed a player from the back and he immediately counter attacked me cause i saw him not looking at me while he was cause of desyinc. It was pretty annoying and i think that this is going to happen, and on hunt this could be even worse.
Really happy with the changes coming for the Winnie. Getting really tired of fighting long ammo snipers and not really being able to do anything but throw paper wads at them
What does "max blood bonds" mean in the chary rewards list?
Probably highest BB reward
I have no clue. Where do you see that?
which is 100 I think
We've already had events with exclusive DLC locked behind a bar. Scrapbeak. Light the Shadow. Halloween. Halloween 2. Christmas. Christmas 2. So how is Mr. Charry a problem @rocky orchid ?
Charry himself may not be
But his lootbox is 
I hate that on principle even though it's honestly not that bad in execution
Also DAY 13 OF ASKING CRYTEK TO FIX NIGHT
I ain't afraid of no unlucky number
I don't hate it specifically. Rather I hate that this is what Crytek is focusing on instead of positive game changes both in balance, and just overall gameplay and functionality. Like... The sun both sets and rises in the south.
How hard is it to make the sun rise in the east and set in the west? Gotta be easier than making a whole ass lootbox mechanic.
Probably takes like 20 minutes of fuckery in the map editor smh
So do I hate the lootbox? No. But I hate that they'd focus on it instead of quality improvement.
I hate that they added it at all
And it made me lose respect for the CM
The way he built hype for it when he must have known exactly what it was
I know it's his job, but if I was him? I'd fake a positive covid test
Just ti get out of having to promote a fucking lootbox.
Have some integrity.
@thorny dawn so basically a full sized Mosin Drum.
I dunno. I preferred BattleGnome's suggestion for the "Bertheir Extended"
Making it like the bornheim extended. You gain 2 more rounds in a mag but have to single load bullets
And lose 2 ammo type functionality
Chaushit mag is cool but it's Avtomat grade anacronistic-ish
The berthier is pretty much a carbine tho
No point then
Then no one would use it personally I dont mind the idea mainly because the empty reload speed for the berthier doesn't seem that much longer than cycling the bolt
Unless you give it a RoF slower than the lebel which would just make it pointless
My concern is that it would make it the highest capacity long ammo bolt action the 2 others only carry 15 total same as uppercut
I can't remember how many long ammo bolt actions there are
Uppercut has 9+6 loaded
18+0?
Mosin 5 +10
Lebel 10+5
Obsessed drum 15+0
Berthier 3+12
The consistency feels like a balancing reason
As why would you not bring a second full load for uppercut and lebel and breaks over
Because the uppy is very strong as is
And it's also great for ammo combos
Imagine if your thingy went through
That would give le average long ammo enjoyer 5+22 rounds of long ammo (with mosin and 1 uppercut)
But the berthier is 3 slot
As opposed to 5+18 as it is now
And it would also give me
The Avtomat noob
A total of 15+24 rounds
(Avto + 2 uppercuts)
Do you really want that
Mmmmm
You have to take the bigger picture into account
You cant take a berthier and a avto at the same time thou
. . .
You're suggesting a reserve ammo increase for the Uppercut from 9 to 12, right?
No
What then, I'm confused
I'm just saying you cant take two 3 slot weapons at the same time
I'm confusing myself
Okay we are on completely different wavelengths right now
This is a rollercoaster
Yeah so I got confused by this post
And assumed some shit
Anyway
Carbine Avto + lebel
The point that needs to be made is that 18+0 isn't a good idea for the chauchat thingy because long ammo load consistency
Every gun has 15 long rounds cap
Except the long pistol
oh i see
then limit the chauchat mag to 15
It didn't start out this way, I remember the drums originally held 20 rounds and had like 20 more reserve but that was nuked for balance
they even fed it to not exactly full irl since it was failure prone
Fairly certain the chauchat wasn’t created until early 1900s. Magazine probably wasn’t either
true but does it matter?
Yes
Mags as a concept existed in the 1880s and possibly before. The first model chauchat was created on 1913, the war model came out in 1915.
The Avtomat isn't a huot.
It's very similar but it's not
I like to think Mr. Huot (and Lewis) got his hands on an Avtomat.
were a product of ww1
Pretty sure the Avtomat that we know in hunt was never real.
It's a fan theory that explains why it looks so similar to the huot
The man that designed the Huot got his hands on a Lousisiana vintage Avtomat.
1917 air service rifle. Because the American bu-ord though that giving an airplane observer bolt action rifle in a plane while everyone was already using machine guns was a good idea
Yea. I’m cool with creative things like that. But other stuff, I prefer accurate era. glares at Mauser
Da faq
Colt 1855 revolving rifle
Certified hood classic
@vocal ore what's wrong with it?
@rocky orchid >banish Chary
YES.
Another man who sees sense.
That's exactly where this shit is going and it needs to be called out and stopped before it takes root.
Welcome to Hunt, big boy
Holy shit this is perfect
Play it side by side a lebel marksman or mosin sniper. The recoil isnt even comparable.
they're not supposed to be - the devs said specifically that they left in the high recoil in the devstream IIRC
It's a short "carbine" and as such it kicks like a mule
Cheers brother
damn people on here complain a lot
Read my suggestion post. Im talking about the negative recoil. Uppercut and nitro have high recoil but it still returns near the same spot. Berthier deadeye has recoil like crown or dolch. The base iron sight berthier doesnt do this either.
Thats a better way of describing it thank you.
@cerulean wraith watdya think... Wanna be terminator? 😏
saber need to be nerfed
@autumn crow I've suggested the same over and under rifle idea, and still do every month or two so dont get upset if you see me one day in the suggestions with the same idea. im glad to see other people want one too
Currently Scotfield Precision icon on the Arsenal and Equipment section looks bad.
On the Arsenal section is the only Precision pistol pointing upward left, instead of downward right, texture looks low resolution and lightning is affected too (first screenshot).
On the Equipment section the scale looks wrong, granted is a longer medium sized pistol, but at least its barrel could be aligned with the name of the item, as other similar weapons seemed to be (second screenshot).
Hope this is the right section to post this
I disagree with the lower pic
It's vertically centered
And it's zoomed more out because it is longer than the nagant precision
@cerulean wraith what are the differences between the avto and the huot, oh great sensei of gun knowledge
One's a gun, the other's a gun.
True, still smaller than the rest, would compare with Dolch Precision when manage to get one in that view
@hardy cliff, your post below has been deleted, as it doesn't follow the required format.
You can find all guidelines pinned in the ideas channel.
Please feel free to re-post your idea using the correct format:
Matched regex in message in #game-ideas (#suggestions-ideas, 524577494863708180):
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD. make Hellfire Bombs look COMPLETELY different than Fire bombs. im sick of blowing myself up. i dont have time to squint and stare in mid combat.```
The change log litterally says "significant" increase to recoil
Except now dual wielding isn't as it's expensive in both money and trait points, whilst being outperformed by singlehanded pistols. Also the Centennial has now become competely irrelevant and non viable (already was at a disadvantage vs the Vetterli), with the Win 73 getting FMJ. Why ever pick it?
Recoil is irrelevant to whether you will hit someone if you are aiming center of mass. The only effect it has on accuracy is whether you can re-center before your next shot
@grizzled mural your post in #feedback has been removed as it did not contain feedback.
I said they decrease accuracy AND increase recoil
if you think increasing recoil has no effect, then why the heck did they do it?
And my comment is that they didn't decrease accuracy except while crouching 
Ofcourse it has an effect
Not on whether your shot lands while aimed center mass
they made it HARDER to aim
But if you don't care to discuss it, that's alright with me
follow up shots are now a lot harder
the changes were unnecessary. It wasn't remotely OP before, esp. not for the price in money & traits
it was a good match for the officer pistol, trading capacity for accuracy. Now the Officer just dominates
and dualing is pointless
I'd never pick it now
I'm not sure it's been long enough to make that claim, but fair enough 🤠
Well if it was already a match, and now one has been made significantly worse, then logic tells us things are now skewed
By this, I mean that it's too early to say whether the nerfs were significant at all imho
But at any rate, that's all I have to say on the topic. Take care 
Here's my prediction: Dual wielding will very rarely be used now, same for levering. The Officer and Scofield Spitfire are going to become std. side arms, only rarely replaced by the Uppercut for those who want some extra long ammo
Probably. The Spitfire is gonna need a rof nerf
Also the scotty swift is probably gonna need a reload speed nerf
One exists, one doesn't
That's the clipnotes version
The Avto is built off a Mosin, the Huot was built off a Ross Mk3. Which would be significantly easier, seeing as the Ross has a straight pull bolt and fires a rimless cartridge
The Avtomat appears to have a completely custom-made straight pull bolt, since there is no visible bolt turning mechanism like a cam plate
alsoo the reload animation is bizzare and I have no idea how this straight pull bolt is the TURNED and stays to the back during reloading, what ze fahk crytek
But yeah I have a fan theory
That the designers of both the Lewis gun and the Huot got their hands on Louisiana vintage Avtomats.
The Lewis because the cooling jacket on the Lewis gun is pretty much identical, and the Huot because duh, it looks exactly the same
It would explain the seemingly anacronistic nature of the Avto
Without invoking something too unreasonable
Gun Lore
and the normal Scofield is gonna need an increase, it currently does less dmg, has a lower MV AND shoots slower than the Pax. That's some pretty damn poor balancing
No, not really. It compensates with the faster reload
but it seems to be par for the course atm, the devs have no clue how to properly balance atm
except it isn't faster unless fully unloaded
Yeah, that
hardly a compensation
I also prefer the sights personally
But this is a me thing
I'd have to check the stats to comment more
same issue with the Centennial vs Vetterli, another example of piss poor balancing
https://youtu.be/BNZVVV5WUqk
This is the better "lore" music
Finally got around to finishing this thing. Not exactly perfect, but it was nice fiddling around with Audacity just to see how it works. Someone with actual mixing experience will probably make a better one eventually.
Original video: https://youtu.be/SGZJnLYvio0
Old WIP version I made: https://youtu.be/sqCPEonpY80
Music:
Somebody I Used To Kn...
and now the Winnie 73 with FMJ has just completely removed the viability of the Centennial... which was already pretty unviable after the Vetterli got HV ammo
Centenny had a higher RoF tho, right
nope lower RoF than Vetterli, which is the insane part
should the very least have a slightly higher RoF
Again I'd have to check stats
44 rpm ROF would balance it vs the Vetterli
currently it's 123 dmg / 39 rpm vs 130 dmg / 42 rpm
Me, explaining why the Bomblance is the ultimate form of weaponry and the pinnacle of thousand years of engineering, science and culture.
Oh right, vetterli RoF is 42 (listed, 48 with IS) while Centennial has 39 (listed, ? with IR)
Which it is 
The Centennial feels very slow, it's actual RoF would probably be close to the listed. (like the vetterli does)
Indeed 🙏
The Centennial just has no place atm, it's outperformed by the Vetterli and normal Winnie. It needs a buff to its RoF, it's the only thing that makes sense
^
^
I really enjoy it but hey that's just me
I just checked stats, it has a higher muzzle velocity and better mag cap. And allegedly a faster reload
But everything else is worse
And levering is garbáge
Thicc winfield, best winfield
I agree
Probably the best sniper variant if you play sniper more aggressively too idk
I don't play scopes because I suck
@rocky orchid, your post below has been deleted, as it doesn't follow the required format.
You can find all guidelines pinned in the ideas channel.
Please feel free to re-post your idea using the correct format:
Matched regex in message in #game-ideas (#suggestions-ideas, 524577494863708180):
** Title: ** "the right monetisation" -> for Hunt: Showdown
** Description: ** As i mentioned yesterday, get rid of the Mr. Chary idea (see other suggestion).
I know that crytek needs to earn money to pay their employees and the game as a life-service.
So i have 3 different possible ideas, which could be used for the monetisation:
(1) microsoft is planning to build a game service, as netflix is for movies in the future. I guess that will be game pass. They want that you pay an amount of money per month and get access to a libary full of games. That's why crytek could just sell the rights of Hunt to microsoft and maybe offer "staff leasing" from the hunt team to microsoft. -> * not my favorite option *
(2) more buyable merchandise, DLCs, NFTs, maybe an Hunt EFT, a.s.o. to fund the game
(3) *my favored option*
you can book an option ingame (via credit card, paypal, etc.) of 3-5€/month and get full access to all DLCs (minimum 1 hunter, 2 guns, 2 equipments per month). You can book this option monthly. If you dont pay for one specific month you dont get the DLCs which are offered in this month and can't get them ever again, so these things are "unique" and people have to think about, if they want to pay or not. On the other hand crytek will guarantee to put the game into new server infrastructure or cloud service to better the server performance.
just throwing some ideas.. i just hardly don't want this lootboxes implemented!!! (but i know many of the people here just can't see it, what will happen, with this!)```
@rocky orchid fuck right off with the NFTs

was thinking the same
A premium subscription for legendaries and BBs might be decent though
but thrown it into the idea, because i really dont know what to think about that shit.. i dont understand it
need to re-post it either way... because the bot cant understand the "fat" format
well this ape picture made 12 million dollars.. so some stupids paying a lot for this
I don't want them anywhere near gaming. I play games to play games, not to fucking invest
also i heard about some star ships for star citizens where people pay 30 grand for one digital ship
for a game which will NEVER be released 😄
That just makes it even better
Honestly the legendary subscription is the best idea, as long as it isn't pay to win in any way and it's just a subscription for legendaries, BBs and unique cosmetics
yeah
thats what i am thinking of.. so we could get rid of BBs..
It's super disheartening to see 50 downvotes on a post suggesting the removal of a lootbox mechanic.
I think BBs are fine, though they used to be way better when the game gave you more if them
but thats because people only see "negativity" in the post.. they are maybe too young or too stupid to really think of, where this CAN (and probably will) end with Mr. Chary
It's super sad
But then again
People upvoted stupid suggestions like the Alofs and winnie 1895 so...
The average voter here is pretty clueless
in germany we would say "bauernfängerei"
i hardly disagree on implementing new guns, till we get a new "arsenal UI" where the selection of guns is not by always typing the name or scrolling down 500 miles through 2000 different skins..
I object to those two specifically because they would be a balancing nightmare
But yeah fuck Mr. Chary's lootbox scam
And FIX NIGHT (day 14 of asking Crytek to do that)
what again was the alofs?
That tube mag strapped to the side of the Romero
whats wrong with your night?
aah
no semi- or automatic guns in the game anymore..
• appears at a rate of only 8%
• can be abused through reshaders
• minor visibility issues
I'd pay top dollar for Hunt music vinyls
An artbook
Or tarot cards even though I don't play tarot
A poker or rummy/bridge deck would be lit too
ok
me for a hat, cool tshirts or hoodies (the current offered clothes are really bad)
and of course maybe some real gold coins which are imprinted with Hunt logo or something like this
Starting a savings fund with irl blood bonds would be lit as fuc
So many wholesome monetization options that Crytek refuses to take
Hunter models
Like, figurines
imagine.. imprint a gold coin edition of 1000 gold coins and 10000 silver coins.. ONCE.. and offer them to the community..
you would get a shit ton of money..
Imagine owning a Cain figurine lol, you lose that shit you'll never find it again 
well.. do you know that you dont have the cain figure already?

So many merchandising ideas lol
Sell fucking displates idfk
I'm gonna make a post of those
Best monetization would be In game Weapon replicas that work
A replica LRR Sparks that looks like Firethorn or LULU
Tooth and claw MHI
a 50 laurel winfield replica
even if they would be just decorative replicas
A FUCKING NERF GUN SET... Hunt Showdown edition!!!
your neighbors will love you for that
i want nitro snek with those 50 cal NE blanks
Well the ideas are cool, but none of them would really fund the game enough to keep it actually going
sry.. what are you talking about?
a gold coin can be sold between 300-800€ per coin.. this is more than any DLC could do in 4 years
Well if i read it correctly this eveolved out of your better monetisation post
It did
But not everyone - actually vaer few people would likely be willing to buy that
I would argue that basically everyone would buy a deck of Hunt cards
You need to make 300K€ in three sales .
Get three H&H in .500Ne have them look like the in game models put them out in a auction
Not to mention processing fees to actually make the coin... There's little overhead to make any actual money
And at 8$ for a DLC you only need to sell 100 for each gold coin
There is a market playing cards given that someone is selling them on The Game Crafter
I have 2 pairs and would 100% buy 2 more
Ask how many sales they've made
but thats ok i guess? if a few people will buy those gold coins.. it helps ALL...
Brb
and monetisation should be done in several ways.. gold coins, silver coins.. cards.. merchandise..
Not if they've spent the money to make 1000 of em and only sell 10.... Then they're in the hole
Well only if the fees and possible regulations of selling whats essentially gold ingots but fancy isn't too big
@unborn smelt all it takes a partnership with swish ingot mint they make custom bars and coins , take 5% cut on sales you dictate the price can have them mint one at a time with a higher cut , they have the licensing and they ship it
literally cheaper than the pax because of this
as someone who invest in gold i would not care to buy 1-5 coins per month.. and if i hold ALL coins of them after some years.. well i have something special i guess
however, it has fmj
All it takes

GOLD will be sold ever...
I don't understand the 'buff scottfield' when it has a purpose with where it is in relation to pax
Debateable
sorry.. BS.. in all history there was never a time where gold wasnt bought by anyone
gold is raising in price since ever
When a brand of czech cooling creme can have 1 gram bar put in the creme tub and not even increase the price of the tub i guess it must require nuclear scientists figure it out and the minted bars had custom engraving
gold will be ever a solid money investment
and gold and silver coins fit so perfect in the hunt scheme
Just checked, gold is actually down quite a lot historically in the last what, year?
I don't think we have the playerbase for a branded investment fund, frankly.
sorry.. you clearly dont know how to read these curves..
getting financial advise from hunt 
gold is long therm investement.. look at the last 5 years.. 10 years.. max.. it is raising like crazy.. and if it is lower than before year.. it is the right time for investment
Right right, sorry... When it dips it's obviously gaining momentum to go up, silly me.
What are we talking about? Crytek investing in gold coins or something? 
I'm not saying gold isn't a good investment for you to buy, I'm saying it's not a viable source of income for Crytek to sell
more or less
Something a very limited part of the community would care about?
Therefore meaning Crytek would probably be at a loss with?
we are talking about options to get rid of Mr. Lootbox (eh chary) and get some valid options
Just because you want it, doesn't mean the community wants it.
huntcoin crypto?
Charry isn't even a lootbox...
Yeah I don't think that's a super good idea given our payerbase
Y'all just throw around buzzwords when you're angry about something
you would prefer something electrionical which you can't really have in your hands?
Yes he is. The last one can be bought with real money, making it a lootbox.
I would prefer lootboxes over that payment plan you had. And the gold idea wouldn't work for Crytek, it's just something you'd like. And i'm sure you could go commission something on gold if you care that much for it. I'm sure it'd be a good investment for you 
So battlepass' with a "purchase next level" is a lootbox?
Imagine preferring literal gambling over a subscription service lkl
It ain't a battlepass, it's a lootbox with extra steps
I do. I hate subscription services 
can i pay u in gold to ban people @dim heron
it is gambling.. with the "pay 100 BB" to make a deal..
An investment! I like it!
Per your description though it is
moving this to dm for the negotiations
Lootboxes are something you buy for a random chance at a drop you might like. Can't you only spend bloodbonds on the last part of it?
Yup
I get the precaution against the future of lootboxes, but I don't think Hunt would go that direction.
Battlepass, sure. But not lootboxes.
No it's not. The first 3 are random rewards, but since that last one can be paid for with real money, it's literally a lootbox.
I quite like the free pass we get with events, I'd hate to see it change
Every event so far has been a battlepass in a way and I don't mind those
guys.. you still dont get it.. it is NOW implemented as a trojan horse..
You mean like a pass, not a lootbox
This
the mechanic is now here.. lets see in a few months
you will have to grind through 1000000 XP instead of 10000
but.. no issue
This is just a Slippery Slope fallacy
you can pay 100 BBs.. 1000BBs... 10000000BBs.. to speed it up "a little"
Keep it civil.
🙄
Oh no 😱 I'll have to play the game
other companies made the same shit
and yeah they will absolutely increase the reward grind and offer tier skips for every reward very soon. That's how this works every time.
why you are all blind of this?
i want to clearify... I love this game.. i play since alpha..
i am now more than worried about
I'm laughing that you guys are complaining about this, and not the fact that you can literally buy hunter refreshes, upgrade point exchanges, healthbar changes. Stuff that actually affects gameplay 
Imagine defending lootboxes in 2021 lmao
Oh no, the lootboxes
imagine its 2022 already 29 days
is this what people call the loud minority?
Will it tho?
I'll reiterate - Slippery Slope Fallacy
They will. It happens every time
Could it potentially be - sure.
It ain't a fallacy when it comes tk gaming monetisation
Yup
ok.. maybe... @cerulean wraith we should stop to warn people/community..
let the game and devs do what they do.. we warned enough
we can say.. "we said so" in a few months
The only thing I want changed is the ability to buy gameplay functions with bloodbonds.
In no way is paying the 100 blood bonds for a daily complete once a day a loot box, and you really shouldn't be paying it anyway, 10k xp is exceedingly easy to earn
Cosmetics are fine.
Yeah. Your defense of this system is gonna age like fine milk
They've done fine without your warnings tbh for about 4 years now
But lets not be too hasty with accusations. I am not a big fan of the changes myself either
I'm trying to figure out what made them think about the buy the last tier thing, though. Maybe they thought people average out around 7500 XP a day, and give them an opportunity to buy the last bit as a just in case for the next day?
But were still far from it being predatory or even monetized in a profitable way
Feedback is fine, but yelling about something and using hypotheticals to fearmonger is pointless...
Would be interesting to find out the thought process tbh
It's not fearmongering when I can prove the trend.
Marketing teams be like: Bloodbonds
It happens over and over again and I'm tired of it
Same! I have a couple things I've been curious about in their changes and additions. One change I am curious about is the change to selling.
I'm trying to figure out where they are going with these little changes over time.
I want to know what led them down this path too. Ksenia get over here and tell us why you chose to implement a quasi-lootbox
just save your energy.. i will do the same..
Look, if the day comes, I doubt the community will be quiet about lootboxes.
And I'm sure with 10 min of research I could prove the opposite... Lootboxes are not the enemy, the implementation of them is
sry.. thats by far the worst comment i ever read... did you work for EA for a while?
Lootboxes are the enemy 99% of the time. No game known for good monetization has them.
That's not true at all
To be more specific selling loot boxes for money is an issue
You wouldn't be the only ones there. But like Jesse said, this is fearmongering. While this might follow a trend, you don't know it will be the case. When - if - it will be the case, then I almost guarantee the community could change crytek's minds.
Just out of curiosity, what are some good monetization from live service games
i also dont like the trend, that the game is more and more overflooded by some fancy markers, progression bars, etc. in the main menu..
we are not in a f***king f2P game
Exactly, random rewards are fine but as soon as there is a monetary component we've got a problem
For sure, quite easily, by just not buying them
hi nixa 🙂 i made some ideas
Warframe. Literally everything they did
Cosmetic DLCs, especially with community made suggestions.
The way hunt mobetizes it i dont think so - yet
Stuff people want. Making polls might help with getting DLCs out :)
Hunt's monetization is actually very, very good
Because they locked the money buyable part behind 70% mandatory grind first
I feel like including the community with more buyable things might make people happier and want to buy the things they want.
Used to be before Mr charys lootbox scam
Iirc warframe is pretty p2w or was anyway
you should be more frustrated at FOMO 1k BB than 100 BB daily spending
And you cant just bulk buy them with money because of it
for now..
Paying to speed up creating things
Still is.
Yup
Not sure that's great
I think the Officer skin @ 1k BB while being FOMO was a really awful mistake
Predatory FOMO is not good in the slightest
and I would appreciate it if hunt avoided it in the future, but I understand that fomo works from a sales point of view
Must have changed since I heard them praised. But as for good tactics, paid skin DLCs are the best way. Premium currencies are perfectly fine if you can purchase any amount of them you want. And of course external merchandising
Honestly. There's no easy solution to keeping a live service up, and there is always necessary evils. I trust Crytek, mostly, with this sorta stuff because I know they tend to listen to the community about issues.
good way for crytek to start making some real money
start selling the KD Farmer Pack
Comes with the base game, Through the Bone Briar and The Wolf at the Door
Were not pro lootbox
just buy another pack if you die once
I don't understand where you think we're pro-lootbox, my dude.
For a second there I was like wtf does mac and cheese have to do with hunt.... >.>
You get a "remove the lootbox" suggestion that gets 20 upvotes and 50 downvotes. There's the pro lootbox stance in this community.
Wer just dont think this is comparable to actually predatory lootboxes yet
the three piece combo 
It's not a lootbox but you are open to your opinion
It is a random reward which can be bought with real money. That's exactly what a lootbox is, by definition.
No it isn't
And i dont think its fair to treat it like those at this point in time
but 
So stop it with the "it's not a lootbox" bull, it literally is
but it has to be discussed RIGHT NOW.. before it escalates
Well but they buying part is heavily resgricted
Doesn't matter, still a lootbkx
And by design i'd even say discouraged
To be fair , MR chary is a Loot box ,
" is a consumable virtual item which can be redeemed to receive a randomised selection of further virtual items "
I earn Blood line press button consume and get random reward , last step is a loot box that is monetized
that the animation is not opening a crate does not change it is a loot box
👆
Because you got downvoted?
Would have been simple to state that you'd like the bloodbonds to not be able to be spent on the tiers for XP instead of going on the tangents that you went upon. People aren't downvoting you for the idea of preventing Lootboxes. They're downvoting you because it seems like you are suggesting removing the Dark Tribute entirely.
Yes - but the part that makes lootboxes predatory is missing
I'm not saying it's a loot box, but if it were to be considered one, it is nowhere NEAR a conventional loot box
For now
I would be fine if they removed the 100bb payment
Yeah I suggested removing it because it's unnecessary and a step to bad monetisation
Same.
Not even fine - quite happy
Yeah, and I disagree with removing the Dark Tribute. As I like the idea of being rewarded for playing. Which is what the service is trying to do.
I too would love to see the bb purchase gone.
But I am not going to call it a loot box - it is nowhere near as predatory as a loot box
Get more people to play and keep playing.
and also the implementing and coding for this kind of shit.. had be used for real issue fixing or something worth the time (and money)
I agree, but that's that's whole point of why the system was added. It's not happening because they WANT it. And we're gonna see more of it unless we get them to yeet it.
Gimme bb hunter customisation instead for example
Remove the bloodbond payment, not the Dark Tribute. Simple as that.
excatly this
They are right it is a lootbox - just not a predatory one
Agree to disagree?
Hell. Make it a buyable DLC to unlock hunter cosmetics, and give us the ability to buy certain cosmetics we want to customize our hunters. especially if we get bundles.
if you get hunter customisation and pay BB for every part of the outfit.. i am totally fine with it
The Issue is people that are on the offensive against this is the facts this can easily turn to bad ,
All it takes to ad a 0 at the end of every XP threshold , remove and make it 50bb each and woala what looks so harmless is now what we are against
yeah like traditionally, lootboxes are purchaseable, multiple items, not time gated for # purchased
It has the potential to go bad - true.
But its not yet
you really dont get the point of the whole discussion.. sadly
And just because other games do it doesnt mean hunt has to
This is exactly it.
It's a trend in the industry. I don't like the odds
I understand what you are trying to say. I don't agree with it.
For example hunt did keep DLC strictly cosmetic where other games said the same and then monetized content
The point of the discussion is that you fear it turning bad. We aren't there yet.
We all would prefer the bloodbond part removed, and we don't want payments to happen for gameplay mechanics like that.
That's where we all agree on.
I don't even want to GET THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE. I WANT TO PRE-EMPT IT
if people always wait to shits getting bad.. we are back into 1939...
We don't know what Crytek has planned. You guys are opting to remove something just because you fear of the possibilities. That's the difference here.




