#help-with-3dprinting
1 messages · Page 9 of 1
Bre Pettis lied about a number of things.
Um, thats more or less the entire purpose of shapeways...
yeah it's basically plastic let's not kid ourselves. then you get into ABS which is really toxic stuff. i'd love to print it just don't have the setup for it.
yeah but they do spray gold/silver over a resin so it's not worth much
Ya think? Ha, i had to develop fixes to make hsi silly printers actually work
I used to watch the stream of a professional jeweler who did that for viewers
gold is too malleable to work in 3d printing
has to be alloyed
some of the chrome coatings on plastic for automobiles is pretty convincing and lasts for years.
usually jewelery is printed in wax then case. but they do use the direct metal prints too. there is an EOS prescious metal printer for gold and platinum
But at least saying "PLA is corn" is nowhere near the level of irresponsibility required for the resin companies to make claims about their stuff being "nontoxic" and "water washable" with a picture of it being washed down a drain.
I fear Prusa is going in the same direction now.
yeah umm putting resin down your drain sounds like a plumbing disaster waiting to happen.
AND IT'S STILL JUST AS TOXIC
they sayd that for my clay too
All fun and games until the city and insurance charges you 30 M$ for causing floodings and damaging people furnitures/homes
or in a high rise building where water starts leaking in every apt
basically one day it's going to dry and clog everything
think voidstar just had to deal with that last month... maybe his upstairs neighbor was putting resin down their drain who knows.
pottery workshop have devices to prevent that so it's better to just show up at thge community pottery non-profit place
also jewelry school are fun 🤣
as much security as a bank
bah offtopic again sorry
got a little carried away
Construction workees were washing their mixers down the storm drains here. yay
Resin is more toxic.
resin is toxic yes. clay blocks all the pipe
this is all fine, we're chatting about 3d technologies, definitely on topic. resin, clay, silicone molds, all relevant ways to make things.
all bad
linus got some form of metal clay printer. i wanted to develop one of those ages ago, glad to see the idea wasnt dumb
basically if you want to pass 2 security guards and have a rfid card with 3 picturs of you and bank style vault. Then take a course at a jewelry school
pretty serious stuff
clay you can break up, resin can turn hard as a rock. i'd rather have clay in my pipes than a chunk of resin.
Just for a 300$ 4h class
Nobody told me so I asked them I must have taken a wrong turn and ended up at the canadian CIA and where the school was but it was the right place 🤣
there was a place around here that did platinum wire? i forget exactly. but the employees needed to change clothes on the way out. cause even the dust on their shoes would be worth a fortune
alright i'm done for the night it's getting late here.
sleepy time
we didnt work with gold at my level but it was stored in the school so theft measures were pretty strong
By the way I have multiple 2.5L containers full of resin-mixed IPA that I still don't know how to get rid of.
kinda stupid to waste gold on newbies
we couldnt bring stuff from outside and had to buy it at the jewelry school
one guy i shared my shop with had a mental breakdown of some sort, and his friend came to take his stuff. packing it all up i found a literal 1 lb bag of gold.
even if you can find silver ring blanks easily on the internet
Paper towels and gloves you can just set out in the sun for a few hours to cure the residue. But evaporating that much IPA would take a very long time.
resin in ipa is broken down. i dont think it will cure after that
what are the pads, rafts?
oh ok
oh. built in modeled rafts i guess
Yeah but you can evaporate the alcohol and end up with a white slime that can be thrown away.
hm
youtube slime video?
:x
you need an ipa reclaimer. i guess thats just destilling
they dont seem to come of so Ill have to ask here later I guess 🤷
well, if you have to cut them there should be little snips that came with your printer
although they are kinda poor quality
Sorry I can't find my picture of it (if I took one)
In the final assembly clearly the pads are gone on all parts
but the guide said to print it without rafts and didnt come pre-sliced so clearly they are part of the model
so not sure
yeah they like to build in tehir supports and rafts so there are less issues
if they left a gap you may be able to peel them off. but it seems maybe you need to cut them
they are there to help prevent the corners form curling up
Is there a way to figure out how big the pieces were before import in cura ?
It's smaller than what I expect and I feel like I should check if cura didnt scale it down without telling me
even thought the M4 holes are 4mm and the M3 holes are 3mm
.stl files don't store their scale. They just use a number without any unit. How teachers like to say "20 What? 20 Potatoes?"
So if the stl was exported with cm but cura expects the unit to be mm (or something, idk what cura actually expects), the file is scaled wrong
You can open stl in windows 10+ 3D builder. I don't really like it but you can measure stuff in there and afaik it doesn't scale anything, it just displays the file. And when opening the file you can select the unit
Ok seems like the size I have. Also I guess my 3d printer aint so bad 🤣
Making screw holes way larger than they need to be would be unlikely, so if they are the right size, your model probably hasn't been re-scaled
If any other prefix-metre was used in the CAD software, you'd have a deviation of at least factor 10, so that'd be fairly obvious. Inches to mm would be a factor of about 25.
You could still measure some known distances, though. It is possible to miscalibrate a printer and get dimensions that are slightly off.
well cars are like 74 inches wide on average
and this is supposed to be 1:10 and wider part is 7 inches so I guess it's ok
just didnt expect that the wheels parts would be such a small width
What I mean is that even a slight deviation, especially when multiplied along the whole car's length, can be substantial enough to make non-printed parts not fit
I'd definitely check the accuracy before printing a whole bag of parts. But there was some chat earlier that I only skimmed, so maybe you already did that.
yeah Ill get a lipoly/lipoly bag/class D fire extinguisher to test the size
if it doesnt work anyway there's always the option of hammering it in 🤣
It's so weird using 10% infill for r/cparts...
first thing people said to me is to uses petg instead and like 75% infill
you should also have a scale factor for shrinkage usually. 2-5% with pla. but this is usually only important if it has to mate with pre existing parts
base plates now i need to cut & filler the circle pads off
look at that! looks wonderful!
Could someone with a Pi Zero (any version) please try printing this and letting me know how well it fits?
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/936502000521187375/1122320314609713233/qtqwiicliq-pizero-stud.3mf
printer not set up right now
I think I've got a Pi Zero that I can test with. Please Stand By...
Final version is in #show-and-tell
The board clicked into place fairly easily. Works well enough that I left it in place and stuck it to the back of my "angel" picture frame.
got a new printer but the filament wobbles around when we try to print
designed for thicker filament? driving movement too fast, loose thingies?
defines wobbles. wobbles on the spool holder?
resist putting bearings on the spool holder, it will spin too freely. spool holders are designed to be offset so there's some tension on it. no tension will cause the filament to come off the spool when the extruder pulls it down quickly, it can unravel.
you do not want a free spinning spool, bad things will happen including knots when it retightens after unraveling.
this is the main cause of people complaining about receiving spools with knots in them. most don't realize it's due to the spool holder spinning to freely because they "upgraded" the spool holder with smooth free spinning bearings.
while not impossible from the manufacturer the majority of the time it's a self-inflicted wound.
at slow speeds usually not a problem. faster speeds with fast printing and faster retractions on a custom non-offset spool holder is more likely to cause unraveling, retightening, and knots.
offset spool holder good
free spinning spool holder bad
this is one of the biggest misconceptions for beginners, the offset spool holder is by design. it's tempting to want to make a free spinning holder but it's a bad idea.
knots can still happen with offset spool holders but not as much as a free spinning ones.
It's the same concept as one of these types of fishing reels. If you don't cast with your thumb on it to provide tension it will turn into a spaghetti mess.
and then you'll spend an hour pulling out the line and respooling it. same concept. stick with the offset spool holders.
my friend's 3d printer makes tons of extruder feed drive slipping noises, only reason I could imagine for free-rolling dispensers
the clicking from an extruder means it either can't feed more due to a clog, issue with extruder gears, or too much tension from the spool.
I think this whole friction-free spool holder issue is more relevant for direct extruders, because they might pull themselves up if there's a lot of friction which in turn changes layer height. And in a very random way, which is even worse. Probably not an issue with a bowden extruder mounted on the side of the printer.
backpressure inside the hotend which can't push out filament also normally caused from too low of a layer height, overextrusion, miscalibrated esteps, etc..
it can happen for any setup that's trying to go fast. the faster and longer the drive & retraction move on the spool the easier it is for the spool to free spin. if anything i'd expect it to happen more on a bowden because they have much longer retraction moves than a direct drive.
bowden has the tube itself to add some friction though.
one of the nice things about the creality filament runout sensor is it also acts as a backlash stopper. unlike a normal guide the runout box has teethed gears that engage in a backlash condition.
the filament will just loop in the air until tension is relieved in the proper direction and the teeth disengage.
Yeah, the downsides from spinning too freely affect all kinds of extruders, but if you can somehow manage those, then direct extruders might very well benefit from them while bowdens probably don't. That's what I mean 🙂
yeah, anti-backlash mechanism could help any fdm printer. it won't help a free spinning spool to stop spinning though. would have to design some kind of tension or brake on it.
it's more about the spool and bearing itself than direct drive or bowden.
motorised spool holders synced the to extruder is the only sensible choice
oh, not sensible, i meant insane.
😛
I mean, if you want to over-engineer it all, probably the way to go would be to have a buffer motor system that would keep a loop of slack filament in a buffer.
Spring-based filament rewinders do exist
precision force feedback to keep exact tension on the spool
Gravity-based rewinders, too.
There should be 1 way bearings. Why overcomplicate
Imo even 1 way bearings are overcomplicating
1 way bearing would not accomplish anything
you need a friction brake whihc is easy enough to make. something that rubs on the spool
My prusa mk3s has crashed on the last two prints (same file). What are some good debug steps.
?
Pictures? Is it crashing on the print or on the bed?
Unclear. Came back to it and the print is a huge mess and the head is in the corner
Ah, your first spaghetti.
My guess is that the print detached from the bed. It's likely due to either warping or infill issues.
oh, i though you mean software crash.
yeah, detaching from bed, warping up and hitting nozzle, or seeing as its the same spot, maybe theres a feature in mid air that cant print.
Here's the model I'm trying to print. And where it fails.
Is that 100% infill?
15 I thought but I'll need to check after lunch
Also what layer height and material?
Pla .3mm
That should be ok. The only issue I can think of is if you have a corner lifting up. That can be caused by a variety of things.
Try reducing the bed temp by like 10C.
I usually find it enlightening to be really close up watching while something fails. Many things are quite obvious while they happen, but turn into a mystery as the print continues (or fails, in this case)
I'll see if I can try that. Thankd
If it's a 24 hour print that method won't really work. If it's a 15 minute print i'll watch the entire thing to see if there is anything the slightest bit off and try to figure out why. This is part of taking it in baby steps from small prints to full volume prints.
For bed adhesion issues I go the opposite route and raise the nozzle and bed temp in increments.
and also will print with a large brim because if it does start to lift you can use tape on the brim to tape it back down to the surface in a pinch.
but again, that's usually due to too low of a bed temp and the tape is an emergency band-aid.
Hi all! I need to design a simple enclosure for an esp32 and a DHT-22. I've never done any 3D modelling but I am a software engineer and fairly practical. I know onshape is the hot new thing, but I'm wondering if anything has any tips for a YouTube series to follow so that I don't feel like a monkey clicking on random buttons trying to make something appear.
If you want to learn and are willing to invest, Prusa research just released their fusion 360 course.
It was around 40 45 euro
Disclaimer. I have not used or seen contents. I have good faith in Prusa research and their track record is reliable for a company
OnShape has their own video tutorials. Some are lightning fast so you wouldn’t spend more time than you need. After watching once, I tried recreating their piece - reviewing when I got stuck - and that worked great for me. If you don’t need a particularly good looking case you can be in business pretty fast. The tutorials instantly go beyond what you will need (presumably- creating the drawn plans was outside my hobby needs anyway)
Keyboard shortcuts are excellent. No bloat on the computer.
Just something to consider: Onshape is really expensive, so if you ever need to apply the many hours you spend learning it in a situation where you need a paid license, you'd better be rich. Fusion 360 is a bit better in that regard.
They offer some of those courses via printables prusameters.
Everytime I try to print something it ends up layer shifting
I've leveled so many times
But then again I did change to new filament . . .
Idk if that'd effect it
Would it?
layer shifting is usually caused by belt tension or worn belt teeth in a specific spot. Since most printers start in the center those teeth get the most use. Center your axis then slowly manually move the axis by hand checking the teeth. Depending on which direction your layer generally shifts should give you a clue as to which belt to inspect as well.
typically x axis but i've seen some y axis shifts happen too. if all the teeth look good tighten the belt a little, don't crank down the belt tension or you could cause unnecessary torque on the motor and eventually burn up your motor or even in some cases... break the motor shaft.
do small tension adjustments in increments once you've identified the axis belt culprit. do small test prints until the shifts stop happening.
In my case, layer shifting was loose pulley
Due to costant fails, I ended up throwing my printer in the junk
Do you have any suggestions for extruders and beds?
My bed is wrapped, the extruder keeps failing
Or any printer that doesn't need constant troubleshooting?
What printer do/did you have?
First a ctc i3 wood, then an i3 mega, the lastest didn't break apart while printing but endless troubleshooting as the first
AnyCubic i3 mega? AnyCubic is... not great. Also large bedflinger designs are all problematic.
The Prusa i3 MK3S+ is a reliable workhorse.
The commonality between those two is their really low price. Not every cheap product is bad, but you should ask yourself why Prusa asks so much more for essentially the same product.
I don't have experience with it, I always thought it was due to the lower volumes then becoming some sort of luxury kind of brand
May be wrong
Well they would be stupid not to charge extra for their good name, and part of the price also goes into non-tangible things like support. But a lot of it goes into quality components that are then checked for tolerances, so that printers are very consistent in quality and specs
Volume has almost nothing to do with it. Branding has some impact, but a lot of the additional cost goes into getting genuine components from reputable companies.
And what venture said
Also Prusa does their own R&D rather than just copying other designs.
The i3 mega at least looks better than a lot of the other cheap printer designs out there (it uses linear rods rather than v-wheels), but large build volumes are still problematic with bedflingers due to the weight of the bed and issues with warping.
Anyhow anything else? I'm bored by cartesians by now
Any core xy or something faster? If I'm going to spend 1k, I'd like to not be still slow, although with less troubleshooting
Prebuild that is
Well, I recommend avoiding creality at all costs.
I've heard... mixed results about BambuLab. Scumbag company but they make some decent machines.
If you want to spend 1k, get a Prusa.
As a general rule CoreXY will be higher maintenance. They're more complicated machines.
How so? They do not look that different
In comparison to a bedflinger?
First, x and y are coupled together via a system of belts and pulleys. The "x" and "y" motors do not individually control x and y motion (running a single motor results in diagonal movements). The x/y axis is set up as a gantry that moves only the toolhead. Second, the z axis is independent. Most CoreXY machines raise/lower the bed, but some (such as the Voron 2.4) have a stationary bed and move the entire xy gantry.
They are completely different motion systems.
So you want a prebuilt CoreXY machine that is very fast, works out of the box and costs 1k or less?
Closest you're going to get to that is BambuLab, but I can't recommend them in good conscience because of their treatment of several open source projects (although to be fair Prusa's take on open source is getting worse).
That's either bambulab or Prusa xl and last I remember xl was not cheaper than 1k
Or build a
Voron
Ratrig vcore
Both really nice machines
Ratrig being complete kit from ratrig company and open source (idk how satisfiable to herr_brain tho. I have limited understanding of Aspen source but I always prefer and support it some way when I can)
Voron is a much bigger community and has many kit options available
You'll get some amount of fiddling to get things work well but it seems like you are used to it
Technically is licensed under CC-BY-NC, but they make it clear that is what the license is.
And for the extruder and bed, I have similar printer. I have graber i3 with some Prusa bear parts and they are serving me well so far. With a clone e3d v6 (recently added bimetallic heatbreak I am unsure if it made any difference but it looked way better part than "stock" parts I had) and bed was mk2a double power heater with glass and magnetic pp plastic bed. The heater PCB warps but meh its fine because glass is pretty okay, and plastic bed is not that rigid anyway. I thought about epoxying PCB to
Aluminium sheet
Glass
That could be solution to warping problem. Tho won't really solve warping just get a "decent" abl sensor and increase number of mesh points (mine is 16 points 4 by 4 square). From my modding experience warping is not much of a bed issue more of a mounting issue. Iirc reason why prusa is able to use glass fiber PCB (mk52 bed) as bed is because they added supporting screw on the middle and edges. And rigidly couple bed with spacers instead of commonly used springs (I use cloth pin springs for my bed 😅)
The v6 clone really served me well, had no issues other than too much retraction cloging it. I was gonna upgrade to mosquito mostly because I liked the idea of their mounting system (9mm grove mount feels like prone to vibrations) but never went with it yet because of money issues. My suggestion for the hotend is to just use good quality heatbreak. With quality heatbreak even the mediocre cooler and heater blocks work well. Nozzle is considered consumable by majority. Its mass produced and even cheap one is sufficient for bed slinger. I have never had problems with my cartridge never bought a secondary one so I have no idea on it.
Aluminum heat beds are what Vorons use. They are good as long as they are cast, not extruded.
They tend to be thick and can take awhile to heat though.
They are better than glass
Glass is pretty bad due to conductivity
afaik glass beds were the reason they added decreasing bed temp after initial layer
You may remember when I recently asked about that horrible, wobbly mesh. I thought that the cause was a warped metal bed and that this in turn led to bad first layers and a constant need for Z offset readjustments. I have since solved this and I've learned two things: First, the glass bed didn't result in a better mesh, because something else on the printer is definitely bent, but it's still awesome, especially at releasing parts. I wouldn't go back. Second, whatever part is bent, the mesh actually takes care of it. The issue apparently was a bad nozzle all along. After four swaps, I've now got a high quality hardened steel one and all of my first layer issues are gone.
Heya question: I'm designing something that has multiple parts that will be joined by a bolt and will slide together via straight dovetails. What's a good clearance to allocate between parts? I tried searching for this but everyone says to print a tolerance gauge and set it to whatever passes, but I'm wanting to publish this and I don't think everyone will have the same print quality
Either post it paramedically or publish 0.1 0.2 and 0.3 tolerances
If someone has excellent printer or willing to sand it can print .1 and someone that has mediocre printer prints .3
Oh, it was a couple of weeks ago. The prints were actually fine after the first layer was down, but the mesh had some very consistent grooves along the Y axis. I believe the printer's X profile is bent a little, but the replacement from China doesn't even lie flat on a table so that's even worse. And since it's working now, I'm not changing anything until it breaks 😉
Perhaps time for a linear rail upgrade
Yeah you did suggest that 😛
But as long as it works with ABL, I'm honestly fine with it. The deviation isn't that big.
anyone got recommendations on how to 3D print gears? specifically ones that can do a 90 degree turn, I found geargenerator.com but it seems like it'd only be useful for geras used on the same plane
The keyword you are looking for bevel gear
fusion 360 has a plugin for gears. it is pretty useful
it does worm and bevel and regular helix/straight
example (obviously with more parts modelled to the gears)
There are different tooth profiles just as planar gears (spur helical herringbone etc.) But generally called bevel and you can add different geometries in later revisions
Hmm alright. I was trying to avoid fusion 360 because I don't have a huge budget for projects so I don't want to lock myself into a paid platform (I've been using TinkerCAD and KiCAD) but that does look very nice
for hobbyists & students it's free
even if I'm prototyping something I might make into a commercial product later?
idk but I would guess maybe not 😭
do a lot of people use Blender for 3D modelling? I know it's usually more for animation but I've heard it's possible
You can try freecad but idk if it has gear stuff
Yes, but it does mesh modeling. It's not really good for mechanical designs.
yes, sure
the terms are if you make over 100k you need to pay full price. for hobby free. and in between you can "apply" for a start up license. basically in your case, if you sell the product, pay for a lic.
Gotcha, thank you so much!
I did a foolish thing and got myself a Vyper, thinking the strain gauge would be a great thing to tinker with... turns out it isn't. And it also suffers from huge extrusion problems that I can't really explain. Both the stock and their replacement motors are skipping even at very low extrusion speeds (both with the stock extruder, which also grinds, and a Micro Swiss Bowden Extruder). But there doesn't seem to be any blockage in the hotend (non-stock, E3D V6 with .2 nozzle) and it extrudes perfectly if I help the motor by pushing the filament manually.
Is it possible that their motors are just really, really bad?
@keen raft why strain gauge is not a great thing to tinker with?
I was planning on buying creality strain gauge and adapting e3d V6 to it
My luck with diy touch probe was bad (high range and standard deviation)
I thought it would make things easier overall, compared to a BLTouch, and it kind of does, but it also comes with a bunch of drawbacks that the BLTouch doesn't have. Like:
- You have to heat the nozzle a fair bit. The idea is to make it warm enough to measure heat expansion and to also push any filament out of the way that may be stuck to it, but not so hot that it starts oozing. That's a difficult balance though.
- Any cables tugging on the hotend or the hotend moving quickly can trigger the sensor or push its analog output into a different range (Not sure what consequences this will have, probably less precision?)
- It pushes down on the bed pretty hard while probing, to the point where it damages PEI. Since the bed is mounted on a single rail, it doesn't put up much resistance and this can cause two major issues: First, it generates results that are too low, making the mesh useless. And second, if it triggers way too late (which it sometimes does, for no apparent reason), then the Z retraction for a second sample will not put it back above the bed. Instead, it will still be under tension when the second sample starts, but the electronics think this is drift and compensate for it, resulting in a second sample that pushes even harder.
- To counteract pushing down the bed, I moved it really slowly (0.5mm/s). Generating a mesh at that speed takes forever.
- To counteract the occasional hiccups in repeatability, I took a bunch of samples for each point, slowing things down even more.
The BLTouch, in comparison, is more accurate, more repeatable and generally easier to handle. The only downside is that you have to determine the X and Y offset once and then occasionally readjust the Z offset.
I've used (genuine) CRTouch and BLTouch probes and they are both really good in my experience
Thanks for the insights
Sounds like solvable issues
But maybe a good diy touch probe is better
Rn thinking about buying a replacement needles and creating rest of the probe myself
Or somehow adapt klippy, klackender to my machine
Solvable, absolutely! But it is a bit fiddly and I think to do it properly, it would require both knowledge about and access to both the printer firmware and also the sensor electronics (and possibly firmware, if it has any).
Pushing a rod through a light switch is a lot easier than getting a binary result out of a drifting analog value
I have all those at my disposal since it's custom printer and ramps 😄 but I'm not that crazy, yet.
My chance on that is not good so far but I will keep trying
I probably should just give up everything and convert myachine to voron legacy but I am not ready to jump on that boat yet
Rollers/bearings are expensive
Sounds like a real strain.
Yeah, puts the user under a lot of tension
Hello, I am in need of some assistance. I’ve had my printer for about 2 months and sometimes when I print stuff it doesn’t stick! I can’t figure out why it does this. I level it before the print and it’s at max heat. Can anybody help me with this?
Some things you might want to try:
- Make sure your Z offset is correct. Maybe go a little lower. The first layer has to be squished a little, the extrusions can't lie on the bed like cooked spaghetti.
- Make sure the bed is clean.
- Make sure the nozzle is clean (wipe it with a folded paper towel at >180°C). Also make sure it isn't clogged or damaged (when you extrude in mid-air, the extrusion should go straight down, not curl back up onto the nozzle)
- Let the printer sit at the desired bed temperature for a few minutes before beginning. You want any heat-induced deformation to happen before you start printing.
- Create a new mesh before each print, especially if your bed has tramming screws that might inadvertently get turned.
- Increase mesh resolution (helps more if your bed is very bumpy, but takes much longer)
- If all else fails, try using adhesive (but that's kind of a workaround for other problems in my opinion)
Can recommend cleaning the bed, we had bad adhesion and then we spritzed some IPA on it and it was perfect!
You can also use stick glue or hair spray to stick stuff in the bed
Just be aware that stick glue is a pain to remove
Glue stick is water soluble. It's only a pain to remove if you try to use IPA.
A fresh PEI sheet just needs to be clean and oil-free for good adhesion. A worn bed might need a little something extra to get a good stick.
Also a good thing to check occasionally is the the heater pad under the bed surface. Ensure it's adhered correctly and evenly all around. This can sometimes be a hidden contributor to uneven bed heating which can lead to bed adhesion issues in specific spots on the bed.
If you're using auto leveling and mesh probing with every single print as others have said, clean the bed, increase the bed heating and nozzle temp.
Higher nozzle temperature decreases viscosity of the melted filament and makes it stick better to both the bed and each layer.
Higher bed temperature helps ensure at least the initial layer adhesion is better. The taller the print the less of a factor bed temperature becomes... like at layer 100 bed temp plays almost no part in your print except if you have warping issues on the inital layer during a long print. At higher layer heights nozzle temp/cooling become the thing you'll end up trying to dial-in the most.
So if you're having issues with layer 1. Higher nozzle temp + higher bed temp + less cooling is usually the solution especially if you're using auto probing every print.
For PLA if you're printing with 205C nozzle temp & 50C bed temp, raise them in 5C increments until the first layer sticks. That is done in your slicer settings while slicing the model. If need be, raise them, reslice, and try again. That's usually the way to go. 😉
and yes definitely clean your surface, can see finger prints on it, which will absolutely destroy adhesion from hand oils. IPA, rubbing alcohol, or just soap + water, and plenty of drying time are all valid suggestions.
usually after i clean with soap + water it takes a couple heating cycles for the detergent to evaporate, so my first couple prints after cleaning will not stick... but once it fully evaporates the amount of adhesion I get would take 100lbs of force to remove a heated print from the bed. always be patient after a print and let the bed fully cool down before attempting to remove a print. impatience and trying to remove a warm print from a warm bed is how most people end up taking a chunk out of their bed surface while removing a print.
smear it with glue yes
(well, only where the print will go)
wipe with alcohol first if you have some
you can also use elmers white school liquid glue, brushed on. same basic stuff, PVA
Have you done a paper test, followed by a first layer calibration print?
I'd still guess that your nozzle isn't low enough.
I haven't. I've really only had my printer for like a month so I'm a newbie to all this stuff
Well then that is probably your main issue at the moment.
Hold off on the glue, then heat the printer up and wait a few minutes, then do a first layer calibration print. Adjust your Z offset while it prints and save the result. There's plenty of resources online on how the first layer should look.
Since you're already close enough to the bed to make some prints stick, you can probably just skip the paper stuff.
Also, not related to your first layer: Your bed heater cable (or the strain relief, at least) is mounted at a weird angle, you should check that it's firmly connected.
Ok, will do
this made me smile because in french tension is basically voltage and this is saying to put the user under voltage 🤣
"They'll talk, just increase the voltage."
Haha, I didn't know that! That's a whole new unintentional pun 🙂
I just learned that you can use Windows's CMD and PowerShell to ssh into a Raspberry Pi running Klipper to compile the printer firmware and also to scp the compiled firmware back to the Windows PC for transfer onto an SD card. No extra software required. Very neat!
Doing a live z cal on my prusa mk3s. Does this seem too close? Or not quite there?
Might be a little close.
try uhu stick if all else fails
i find stick glue really easy to remove, i just take to a sink with hot water and let the glue melt and wipe it clean with a towel - then isopropyl alcohol and if i'm unhappy with tramming use uhu stick
takes 5 mins 🙂 and i'm set for a month of printing
i usually run a calibration for my printer before commiting to prints after this
but i just keep that on my memory stick, others may be fortunate with a wifi printer 🙂
Hello! Having some weird issue with slicing a model for a case for the macropad.
When printing the upper part of the case, it seems like the outer visible part (top) is not sliced correctly and almost looks unfinished or “internal”. I have placed so that part is down to the bed ofcourse, but it’s very strange. Have not come across this before.
The finish is way better on the “inside” of the model, and this is the finish I normally get. Not quite sure how to explain it, hope you can get a idea from the pictures
My best bet is that I’m missing some slicing setting
Assuming this was printed upside down, it looks like some sort first layer issue. Could be a slicer setting I guess, but more likely the nozzle is just too far from the bed.
Yeah I’m leaning to slicer issue. Because the bottom half printed “normally”
So for some reason the upper half is not sliced the same in regards to first layers compared to the bottom half. And no clue why 😅
Setting a Z offset in the slicer would have the same effect. Or maybe a different first layer extrusion width. But these don't just change by accident 😉
Yes it’s highly likely that I have done something, however I have sliced both parts again with default, and the top come out the same and not the bottom which come out great
Lets see if I can find something
If it is a hardware issue, then it should affect everything you print. Have you tried printing something else? If it's a first layer issue, you can stop during or after that, so it won't take a lot of time.
And if it goes away during that test once you move the nozzle down, then that's your solution 😉
Yes so, for example, the bottom half of the case, prints perfectly against the bed. I have only experienced this issue with this specific file and the upper half of the case
Did you print the upper half in the same location on the bed where the lower half worked?
Yep, center
Can you take a picture of the bottom of the lower half?
is that file really completely flat on the bottom or is it trying to do some weird bridging? 🤔
Looks flat in the Printables preview
I will take a picture when I get back!
My initial thought was that there is something causing it to think that it is not really part of the outer layer so to speak
The model has a slight chamfer to it
The chamfer is just an overhang to the slicer. This may slightly affect how the layers are generated, but not how they are actually printed.
What makes me think it's somehow revolving around the nozzle height is that you have some overextrusion in locations where the nozzle changes direction (e.g. at 1). These are the only spots where the extrusion is actually flat against the bed. Everything else is just lying there, not squished against the bed at all. This overextrusion is something you'd usually want to prevent, but in this case it's probably what's saving your print. You can see at 2 that straight extrusions have so little adhesion that they are actually dragged away from where they should be. And because the first layer isn't where it's supposed to be, it takes a few layers for everything to "normalise", as seen on the chamfer at 3, and then the print continues normally.
But I'm interested to see what the first layer of the other half of the case looks like!
Here we go! Don’t mind the “bubbles” they are air bubbles from my bed adhesive. Didn’t take the time to properly clean it before running this as a test again
This shows the big difference between them
Mh, can't deny that there's a difference
This is always a bit hard to tell on photos, but I'd still say printing just a single layer and making sure that's perfect would be a good idea. There seems to be a gap between the individual extrusions even on the better half.
But I'm not quite sure why they would look so different if they were sliced with the same settings.
Actually in life it’s even more difference. The good part is almost difficult to feel, meanwhile the other is hysterically bad. So I think this is more than just some hardware adjustment. The hardware might need some adjustment for sure, however, this is something else I think
Otherwise the printer produces good stuff I think. This is the inside of the part. Think it looks really good
Did you print the upper half first and then the lower half?
I have actually printed both parts two times, just to confirm if something happened with the printer
But it prints the bottom half as good as the first time
So something strange is happening during slicing
I just don’t understand why 😂
Indeed. It would benefit from pressure advance, that would get rid of these bulges on the corners, but other than that it looks very consistent.
Thanks for the tip! Will look in to that, and what it might be called in the slicer!
Appreciate that
What printer are you using? Does it have some sort of probe?
Its the Creality CR-6 SE
It does have bed leveling
function
Never had much difficulties with it. This is actually the first issue I had so far. And it looks very isolated to this use case
That printer has a strain gauge. If they did a good job with the software, it shouldn't even require a lot of tuning for the first layer.
I feel like I'm quite focused on the first layer nozzle height, so I might miss something else here. Maybe someone else has another idea that goes in a different direction!
I did print one with a wide brim as adhesion aid. Did not notice something weird with that. I guess that would come in to play also regarding nozzle height
What I can further test is to skip the bed leveling feature of octoprint, and just run the printers internal one as a debug
maybe its something up with that
still strange for it to experience issues with just one case though
Pressure advance is a firmware thing, most manufacturers ship their printers with a variant of Marlin which has it disabled, unfortunately. It's called Linear Advance there, but it's the same thing.
So that is not a value that can be adjusted in the slicer? Not much for me to do there then 🙂
No, you would have to flash a different version of Marlin for that. Stuff like that can usually be found online, lots of people want the feature.
Ah I see. Yeah, i know that there is a "community" firmware available for the printer. Have not bothered to check it in to much since everything has been working good so far
Brims help with corners lifting off the bed, but not so much with adhesion in general. But the mesh definitely has a huge impact.
I believe Creality uses glass plates with some sort of surface treatment. I've got something similar from a different manufacturer and PLA sticks to it so well you can practically lift the whole printer after printing two test cubes. So a need for glue is also indicative of something being wrong with the first layer.
Not sure what you mean with Octoprint's levelling feature, I don't use that.
That is interesting
Yeah octoprint have a function to activate the bed leveling feature that the printer has built in
So you can either activate it from octoprint or from the printer interface directly
You could try to heat it up, wait for a bit (glass doesn't transfer heat well, so a uniform temperature will take a few minutes) and then make a new mesh, just in case something is wrong with the previous one.
Especially if you don't make a new one before every print
You're welcome! I still hope someone else chimes in and gives you a second opinion 🙂
If you're using creality's slicer or cura look for "adaptive layers". There are many things that can cause changes between prints to affect layer heights but I've found that setting does the most amount of "real time adjusting" to the layer heights. Adaptive layers can be a good or bad thing depending on the result and it's highly dependent on your bed mesh accuracy.
Also if you create a new bed mesh prior to every print I've found the results may vary as the CR touch will rarely provide identical results for every probe point between bed mesh creations.
...this might not mesh with your expectations of how it works, of course
Until you start reading the marlin FW docs all the cura settings are a mystery until you start experimenting.
You really need to be the cura-us sort.
Today I'm going to clean the heat bed and want to know which strategy I should try with an Ender 3 V2 neo
- Smearing it with a glue stick (what do I do after that??)
- Rub some alcohol on it with a sock
Which one should I use?
can someone let me know how best i should configure making this 3d print: https://www.printables.com/model/418381-webcam-project-using-an-original-apple-isight-cam/files
specifically what material is best to use...
i think vero or abs like
Glue is not for cleaning 😉
Have you done the first layer calibration? Did that still not stick when you were done?
There is 2 until in that sentence which confuses me more than slicer settings😅
is that where you use the paper and then use the cog wheels, set the Z axis and then like preheat the bed and move the cog wheels down until it touches the paper and you repeat that like twice on all sides?
No, that's a way to tram the bed. It's related, though and it's good if you've done it.
The next thing you need is a bed mesh. There should be a button called "levelling" in the main menu, just press it, the rest should happen automatically.
The last thing you need is a correct Z offset. You can use the paper test to get a rough value, but the fine tuning is much easier to do while printing.
And your bed should be clean, of course, otherwise even a perfect first layer won't stick.
Guess I should have said once you start correlating Cura settings to Gcode. https://marlinfw.org/docs/gcode/G029.html
Ok I just cleaned it with Isoproply Alcohol on a sock, and I’m leveling it now. I’ll let you guys know if it worked or not 👍
Really de-motivating
lower the head
until it scrapes the bed. then back off 0.1mm
looks to me like the filament is not even touching
gonna make some pizza dough
mmm
try to get it close enough so that when it print it looks like a blade of grass, flat. Not enough squish. z-offset is too high.
a little squish is good. provides a flat top surface for the next layer to adhere to.
Well yes but preferably while NOT moving to not actually scrape the bed. Scraping is very bad.
yes obviously not while moving haha
Anyone with a resin 3d printer looking for some extra cash? I have a small 3d printing service and wanted to expand my production possiblity. As you know a fdm printer can't make a miniature the way a resin can. Basically if someone ever want's something that may be best suitable for a resin 3d printer, I would contact you and see if you're up for it.
I'm wanting to get rid of my resin printer.
are you comfortable taking this to the dms @vivid helm
We have flashforge creator 3 at work and it loses steps (y direction specifically) for high detail stls. Any guesses what could be the problem?
Bought secondhand from another business. It probably has 4000 or so hours on it.
Issue that is related to this is some y axis movements are noisy. The printer vibrates quite a lot compared to my custom i3 with minimal near none wear (a4966 driver 0.9 degree motor). While it prints if I touch (not so gently but neither too much force) one of y carriage sound/vibrations decrease significantly.
We have not tried anything other than oiling smooth rods but no luck
Sounds to me like one of the bearings is shot.
Also could be related to belt alignment.
That's what I thought as well but the bearings on that machine is very well fixed. I didn't want to jump onto that without taking second opinion
Have you ever greased them?
How so? (I am trying to understand how can I identify if that's the case?)
No, we haven't disassemble the printer. As I said looks tedious linear bearings fixed with spring rings
Well, you can start by feeling the belt tension. If possible watch during the vibrations and try to determine if it is jumping. A misaligned pulley or idler could definitely cause that.
I've never seen a flashforge in person, and I don't know much about them. But I would definitely start with the belts and bearings.
At first I thought maybe belt tension but it seemed fine to me. Then I guessed y axis has a pretty long shafted motor (like 30 40 cm long shaft) and maybe it was bent but the pulley and 2 bearings (that shaft is supported with them) is within couple of cm.
The creator 3 (discontinued version) is pretty bad but the price was good on it and we had a person that we could blame if we didn't manage to get it working
Well, that could also definitely be an issue. Basically if anything is bent it can cause 
On high detail prints only?
Low quality ones seems to be printing good
My first thought actually was a lack of torque during microstepping but that doesn't really make sense, because it will microstep either way, no matter what's being printed. But if you print something really simple like a cube, it might always snap to the same wrong position and hide the problem that way.
But if the printer is modular enough to allow stuff like that, then swapping the X and Y connections might be worth trying, to see if the problem stays on the same physical axis.
If it's got 4000 hours on it then there could be wear and tear anywhere. Belts are rubber and stretch over time while under tension naturally. Motors, rails, basically anything mechanical can wear. Give the entire thing a tune up.
Double check all axis are square, look for worn teeth on the belts that would be very common for missed steps. Can also try to calibrate esteps but that won't miss steps. The only thing that will miss steps is worn belt teeth or motor gears. It will likely be one of those.
If it's only missing microsteps that's probably a motor issue more than a potential belt issue.
Can't change y carriage it's diecast
I only meant the steppers, cables and drivers 😉
If the motor current was insufficient, for example, swapping these would very likely move that problem to the other axis.
Yeah y motor probably too expensive and/or not feasible to get it shipped and the motor drivers are embedded to motherboard not willing to change it since it really just works
You can it's just not easy. That's part of the challenge.
Check the nozzle for wear, maybe? Less obvious than the motion system, but if the nozzle is malformed it could cause some defects as well.
And that’s usually an easy replacement
I recently upgraded to marlin 2.1.2.1. in my configuration I must've made a mistake because my printer homes at z=5 always. Even if I abort sd print. It drops nozzle into the model and then homes x y which breaks all the mechanical calibration. Do you guys have any idea which setting I may be configured wrong?
Hey!
While doing some maintenance on my cr-6 se I noticed some play in one of these (not sure of the exact name) .
It’s for the Z and it has one on each side. The right one does not show any play at all, but the left one is showing.
The nut was a bit loose also, probably from factory, but tightened that down. The play seem to be “internal” in this part. Not sure if they are replaceable and what kind of play is acceptable?
It's probably not a big deal. The lead screws just determine the height on the Z axis, but they don't "guide" the movement. The wheels in the profile slots take care of that. There are actually lead screw nuts that intentionally allow movement along the X/Y-plane to counter lead screw wobble. And play in Z direction doesn't matter, because gravity conveniently keeps everything settled in the lowest position of whatever amount of play you have. The Z axis doesn't have the acceleration to rotate the thread out from under the nut before it can follow.
Ah I see, makes sense for sure!
Thanks a lot.
And @keen raft , thank you for all help a couple of days/week ago with my first layer issue.
It turned out that my Z offset was just a little bit high exactly as you said. Everything looks great now!
The z-screw holders are intentionally designed with a little bit of play to a point... the amount of play should be identical if you have dual screws. I've seen plenty of cases where the holders break and the lead screw starts to wobble. The straight "trueness" of your z-axis screws play a part too. If one isn't perfectly straight it can introduce issues and will likely break the holder over time. Keep an eye on the top of the screws for out of round play. If there is an out of spec wobble you'll see it at the top of the screw. Some FDM printers have a belt across the top that keeps both z-screws connected in parallel... which is a nice feature as it ensure boths screws are going up/down at the same rate.
Here's a good video on z-wobble, why it matters, and why you should care when checking your lead screws.
To anyone with the ams unit dose it have to be directly mounted on top of the. Printer
This thing isn't a core xy right?
https://m.it.aliexpress.com/item/1005002553743610.html?gatewayAdapt=glo2ita
Ignore the pricing, I found it at around 270€, although dunno if worth it
Bambu Lab AMS is an intelligent system that communicates with the toolhead to guarantee smooth feeding and automatic mid-print filament switching. It can detect the tension on filament and actively adjust the feeding pace. With RFID technology, Bambu Lab AMS identifies filament loaded inside and automatically configures the most appropriate prin...
This guy has it next to the printer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW9CUGIUVBY
3D printing Bowser and one of the filaments is causing trouble.
3D model: Bowser - Super Mario Bros - Fan Art by printedobsession https://thangs.com/designer/printedobsession/3d-model/Bowser - Super Mario Bros - Fan Art-877567
Projects and affiliate recommendations:
https://bio.mihaidesigns.com/
Bambu Lab X1-CC 3D printer https:/...
alr thx
It says cartesian on some random website
I highly doubt it's corexy. Also I enjoy the fact that sermoon is using creality branding.
Also that printer has sketchy written all over it.
Cartesian just means it uses X/Y coordinates instead of polar ones. Could still be a CoreXY setup with that description.
Sermoon is one of Creality's printer series, like the Ender series.
According to https://www.creality3dofficial.eu/files/html/20211125/Sermoon-D1_02.jpg, found on https://www.creality3dofficial.eu/de/products/sermoon-d1-3d-printer, it's an XY head design.
Anyone know of a 3D slicer that can do molds of STL's (other than cura, it's method doesn't seem to appear for me, even after enabling it)
Printer style, such as Cartesian, Delta, CoreXY, or SCARA
Straight from marlin firmware documents
cartesian is actually a style 🙂
in 3d printer world context
I think there is a bit of ambiguity to a lot of these terms 😛
"Cartesian" has developed some additional meaning over the past few years in the 3D printing context, but I'm not sure if that was intentional from the start.
yeah first picture clearly shows that it is a cartesian type. kinda looks like replicator (i think it was that one) motion system
Klipper does the same. The reasoning behind this is probably that a lot of the cartesian variants, while looking different in hardware, can actually be treated the same in software. Differentiating between these would create a bunch of duplicate settings. Or at least that's what I think why they do it like this. I think it's misleading.
it refers to motion system
and it named as cartesian even tho it can have other names
its just a technical term no need to think too much about it i think
tbh i wouldnt know anything better with 😄
I care about these things 😛
So to sum up, is it stil slow as a standard cartesian, or not?
After 2 cartesian style printers I am very bothered
I want a second one
Dunno if to get that creality thing for 270€ or if I can get anything better that's mostly assembled out of the box
//I haven't yet decided what to get
Honestly, I think for 270€ you would be lucky to get something that works well out of the box at all
You do really get what you pay for and you can only ever have two out of these three: Cheap, fast and good.
nods in ender
Cheap fast?
Well, if you pick the first option you can only pick one.
How about something with a powerful hotend that you can use with a .8mm nozzle? That should speed things up while keeping it mechanically simple. And the models might even be "just" ripply, instead of coming out as semi-melted high-speed blobs.
I usually preface all 3d printer purchasing advice with two questions:
- What do you want to print?
- Do you want a printer or a project?
Eh I asked the same question a while ago, I got exhaustive answers, but I can't yet decide if to get some cheap crap or expensive
If you're going expensive then don't get crap.
Also creality is not actually good at printer design. They sometimes make printers that are passable with sufficient modding, but in general I recommend just avoiding them.
If you get an Ender 3 for $99 that's fine, but don't expect it to work well long term without investing at least another $300 in it.
My Ender 3v2 was a good starter printer, learned waaaaay too much about 3d printing, but I agree on the Creality comments
My Ender 6 is serving me well to this day, but that’s also in part thanks to my awareness of its shortcomings.
Talking about cost cutting
I see a lot of AliExpress stuff like laser cutters using the same flat cnc cutted casing
Where could ai source similar solutions? Cuctom cnc cuts are expensive
Laser cutting services like send cut send are actually pretty practical in low volumes.
Cheap mini CNC machines can be had for a fairly low price, but as with all of the cheaper machines, there are a lot of hidden costs that come with the operation of these things.
Assuming this is still regarding a printer: The first cost cutting measure here would be to ditch the enclosure entirely and print easier materials, but whether that's an option depends on your use case, of course.
For CNCs, you’ll want a well ventilated workshop at minimum, if you don’t have a proper dust collection system. Things get messy fast.
... Those laser cutters are all dangerous and should probably be illegal.
For laser cutters, anything under 1000 is grossly unsafe due to high power lasers and potential fumes with certain materials. A proper enclosed unit is the way to go, unless you have the means and know-how of enclosing it yourself.
Yes that's for the printer
Maybe but using some mass produced thing, I could save a buck, since those things are like very cheap
What exactly is cheap?
Spending money on stuff you don't need is never cheap 😉
So what do you need?
Do you prefer a small printer ready to use out of the box, or something that takes a bit more effort to print a bit more stuff?
Is there something in particular you want to make with said printer?
A budget is also probably a good thing to know when selecting a printer, as it’s better to have one good machine you’re happy with over three pieces of junk you can’t get working.
In reality something that just prints, but I can't decide how much to spend. If to go again cheap 200~300 or under a 1k. But for what I am sure, I don't want yet another cartesian
I'd like to avoid investing time to buid a 3d printer, because I need it in the first place to build another thing, and I am yet wasting again time insensibly over being undecided
The story of my life, endlessly wasting time over overthinking and not doing actions huh
Kingroon KP3S Pro is a solid sub 200 printer that’s mostly pre assembled. Cantilever designs aren’t particularly scalable, but the reviews suggest it prints just fine.
On the upper end of the scale, you got the BambuLab printers. Prebuilt P1S is fast, functional, and works right out of the box. Cant say I’m personally a fan of the closed source software among other things, but it’s a perfect fit for the less technically inclined, from the guys that basically defined the current generation of 3d printing.
What's wrong with cartesians?
That should’ve been my first question haha
😂
Wait @shy kelp what printer do you have now, and what don’t you like about it?
Oh, so you have experience with the early 12v printers from 2 or 3 generations ago. That’s an adventure. Let’s just say I’ve long set my anet a2 aside for a diy project in the distant future…
If you’ve exhausted yourself with the endless maintenance of an old i3 and just want it to work, BambuLab is a great upgrade pick. X1CC and P1P really made me regret my Ender 6 for a moment. You don’t need that bottom-tier beginner nonsense, unless you really want it.
While the Ender and Kobra printers are strictly upgrades from a Mega i3, they’re not going to feel as fresh as a flagship from the next gen.
And potential to blind you/random people walking up/pets.
Covered under “high power lasers” lol
Other fun honorable mentions for fun printers in 2023: flsun’s delta printer, ankermake m5, and Prusa xl.
Creality K1 may look tempting, but it’s honestly full of software issues you don’t need to hassle with. Stay away.
I think there’s the proforge 4 on kickstarter, if you have a LOT of money to spend on a really fun machine.
Basically a slightly cheaper Prusa do.
Are you sure v grove roller is upgrades to linear rods? 🤔
In my experience I probably prefer linear rods to bed probe or 32 bit controller
Though unless something bad happens to the rollers, you’d be hard pressed to notice a significant difference between the two.
Creality rollers do kinda suck, but the motion stays smooth enough for long enough.
The linear rods are so reliable
Barely maintained them for 10 or so years
And it's mostly repeatable
I didn't used it for 6 months no maintenance just dusted off and worked (my printer similar to mega i3 maybe much older design)
But you might be right it depends. My usage is non typical compared to most people
Not even mentioning the hardware issues.
A lot of people have liked bambu, but I don't like them as a company due to their treatment of multiple open source projects.
Any printer in the 200-300 range you will end up printing your own upgrades eventually or modifying it in some way. The build volume will likely be average or small at that price point and they'll skimp on quality components. Most printers today are fairly easy to assemble unless you get a completely unassembled kit for cheaper which is a valid option but I wouldn't recommend that to a beginner.
I'm against making any recommendations as a helper now. I don't want someone to be unhappy with a recommendation then come back to blame me or this community for it. Before becoming a helper I might have a long list of recommendations. It's not that I can't do it, I think it's just not a good idea for me to make recommendations now that I'm in a helper role.
What I can recommend is doing a ton of research yourself, possibly weeks of research on 3D printers, before settling on a decision that is the right fit for you and your goals.
I bought a used FlashForge Finder from someone who acquired Amazon returns and fixed them up as necessary. (Many were not broken at all -- they were just returns). FlashForge has other models. The sw is not open source but I have no complaints. The Finder does not have a heated bed so I just use PLA. FlashForge printers have a very solid plastic frame. Only addition I have is a full-sized reel holder
not the best, but has been reliable and easy to use
I've been thinking for a bit and here's what I'm going to do (from what i've learned)
- Clean heat bed (did it, tried a print and failed. should i re-clean???)
- Level printer
- Offset Z axis BEFORE PRINT
- Slow down the speed of the printer
- Make sure heat is max
I stand by my advice to adjust the Z offset during a print.
I adjust z-offset during tramming, and then tweak it during purge line and first print with large brim. Gives you enough time to ensure the bed is trammed properly and z-offset is tweaked on the purge line and brim if required.
as the purge line is printing i have my z-offset menu open to make small tweaks to ensure i get the proper amount of squish. too close to the bed and it'll eventually build up pressure in the nozzle causing a clog, too far away and you'll get surface adhesion and layer adhesion issues. even with a bed mesh you'll still want to tweak your z-offset to be just right.
you'll still want to do this even after tramming your bed perfectly and making a bed mesh. the z-offset adjust in real time during purge line and/or brim is the last step before letting it go. if you did everything right your whole print should turn out nicely.
typically i only have to do this about once a month (every 100-200 hours of printing time) as long as I don't move or touch the surface or printer to throw it out of calibration. it'll use the same bed mesh and z-offset settings every time after initial setup.
if you have a cat or kids that mess with the calibration you'll find your next print is way off and you'll wonder what changed. once it's set up and working well on a test print like a benchy then don't touch anything, and just keep your prints flowing one after another.
especially if you have a cat, get an enclosure, cats love sitting on the bed surface.
Huh also, are bambulabs, the only to integrate ai stuff?
Like if there are issues in the layers the printer should try to edit values to make so it doesn't print badly?
Either by using cams, lidars or whatever
I don’t think they’re the only ones, as the spaghetti detective used AI and a camera a long time ago to detect print failures and stop prints. That being said, using ai to tweak values is something else entirely that I can’t speak for personally.
A few days late on this. The AMS is connected to the printer through 2 things:
- The power/data connector
- A ptfe tube for the filament path from the AMS to the printer
You can mount the AMS anywhere within reach of those.
To add more support to that - I think the P1P supports the AMS and by default there isn't anything on top of hte printer you could put the AMS on 🙂
excuse me sir, in this group is there a teacher who can teach 3d machining programs and parameters in fusion 360
We do not offer personal tutors in parametric design if that's what you're asking. The main Adafruit 3D designers are Noe & Pedro Ruiz who do have parametric design videos on Adafruit's youtube channel called "Layer by Layer".
Here's their entire Layer by Layer playlist https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zwEyZs0kdE&list=PLjF7R1fz_OOVsMp6nKnpjsXSQ45nxfORb
i mostly throw up my hands and scream at fusion 360 machining....
like what the heck is this? haha
Looks like cake decorator mode if such a thing exists. 🤣
does exist an hotend/nozzle or the kind that's one block with the throat? something alike?
That design appears to be missing a heatbreak
And a heater, for that matter
that drawing was quickly made to visualize what I meant. the revo e3d seems to be close to what I wanted. but it is somewhat expensive, clones seems to not be present yet
you wouyld never want something like that. the hot end is steel/titanium etc and the larger finned part is a heat sink. aluminium etc.
there are extended hot ends "all metal hot end" that extend well up into the heat sink. for use usually with high temp plastics wehre the PTFE tube will burn
they usually have an aforementioned break (an area where there is a tiny cross section) so not much heat transfers
the point being, you do not want heat to travel out of the melting zone. otherwise the filament gets soft and buckles and everything clogs
Ah, you mean nozzle and heatbreak being one piece! Yes, it does exist - you answered your own question with the Revo example 😉
But personally I don't really see the benefit. Doing it like this combines a non-expendable part with the expendable nozzle, so you have to spend more money and replace more stuff once it wears out or clogs. Most of the advantages E3D lists don't really have anything to do with that combination of parts.
ah yeah. i see. yeah then you are stuck basically with very expesive nozzle wwhich will still clog and be ruined in the same ways.
hm
so their one block solution, isnt actually one block? it was mostly my preference to not have to tightly screw different parts together, and so having like lesser probability to have stuff to leak
No, it's a threaded heatsink and you screw the heatbreak-nozzle part into it. But I guess you do save a minute doing that, because you don't need tools. You will have to re-calibrate your Z-offset again though, unless you have a strain gauge.
And since the threads are in the cold section, you don't need to heat the thing up to tighten it, but whether that's a big deal probably depends on the shape of your extruder. A regular V6 type has more than enough room in my opinion to grip the block with some pliers (adjustable pipe wrenches work well) and slip a (ratcheting/socket) wrench over the nozzle. No need for burns.
Dose anyone know why my ender 5 is doing this fyi it’s not the sd card the second card is from my ender 3
Are there .gcode-files on there? Does it work if you power cycle the printer while the card is inserted? If so, it may work without a power cycle if you run M21 (e.g. from Octoprint) or by using a card-refresh option in the menu if one is present. If the menu doesn't have options to manually eject/refresh the cards and it doesn't auto-detect them, then Marlin might be misconfigured.
Ya there is g code on both sd cards I power cycle it does not help
Then it's not what I thought 🙂
And there was something that showed up prior it was like something that reality must have put on the SD card but none of the other folders are showing up that creality put on there
Manuals and example GCode probably
Make sure the GCode is on the root directory of the card
that and other files
Yeah then I really don't know
I'll be on my Klipper, sailing away into the sunset, in case anybody needs me 😛
its gunna be getting klipper soon
the dam issue was the file name was to long
Wow! Well things like that feel like issues from the past that you don't really think about anymore!
Glad you found it!
ya
Anyone here a DesignSpark Mechanical user? I stepped away from 3D modeling for a yearish and come back to find that my favorite modeling software has put some very basic features (like STL import) behind a paywall, and nuked all the licenses for the formerly free version to force upgrades.
Looking for recommendations for a new modeling software, preferably something with similar features to DSM that isn't tied to the goodwill of a large commercial company
What a terrible business decision
Anyway freecad might be what you want
But if you want complete cad experience you still need those goodwill of large companies. Fusion 360 is pretty good in my experience
i have never really had problems with fusion but for what you want freecad
I have never quite been desperate enough to use FreeCAD. I use Fusion 360 and I'd probably revert to using SolidWorks if Autodesk takes too many more pieces out of it
I am a fan of rhino
It's cheap and you can do everything
In the end they are quite the same, so I would download everything and then pick what I like most
One of the benefits to using the free fusion 360 is every model created by adafruit is directly importable and editable. It's easier to follow their layer by layer tutorial videos using the same software they do. Also helps avoid file export/import issues with other programs that might cause artifacts.
Mah it's all bools
I can't recall what's called that open design with 3 z axis, so you can move your bed as with a delta printer with the nozzle
But outside the "perfect bed leveling", is there any special slicers that allows more stuff?
Voron Trident?
This one by Denis Herrmann and Oliver Tolar from ZHAW?
https://www.zhaw.ch/de/medien/medienmitteilungen/detailansicht-medienmitteilung/event-news/zhaw-masterstudenten-entwickeln-neuartigen-3d-drucker/
probably a bed level isue
Could also be a partial clog or part warping
What hotend/filament?
Seems more nozzle temp and cooling related to me.
Printing too high of a speed vs its ability to cool at that speed is also a factor.
If we're looking at the top surface, then I'd say yes to that. Question is why. Bed levelling and Z offset are definitely not the issue after so many layers.
If you haven't changed anything, then a clog seems like a plausible cause. Check this by extruding in mid-air. If the extrusion bends sideways, this is a strong indication of a clog.
Alternatively, it could also be misconfiguration in the slicer - extrusion factor too small, nozzle temperature too low (resulting in high viscosity and less flow). Or misconfiguration of the firmware - Z steps/mm too small (resulting in layers that are higher than expected; this would also result in wrong Z dimensions of the printed parts), E steps/mm too large (resulting in underextrusion).
setting the infill density a little higher will give it more interior walls and less bridging to deal with though it looks like a fairly small part
clog definitely possible. bottom/top layers look good but infill and circles look oddly out of proportion. raise temp by +5C, lower cooling, and slow down the speed.
this is fairly common with going too fast.
now if you tell me you're printing at 25-30mm /sec already then you've got other problems and should probably run some calibration towers.
calibration towers?
... going to go search for those ...
oh nifty - calibration temperature towers... new things to learn!
Sorta
I meant like a non planar printing/slicing while using 3 axis extra
Although actually dunno if there's actually a difference or not
Yeah nonplanar printing on any 3-axis cartesian machine is going to have inherent limitations. In order to actually do it well there will need to be dedicated 5 axis printers not unlike the 5 axis CNC mills. In practice on a hobbyist budget such machines will likely have to be smaller and sacrifice print speed for normal parts.
Iirc nonplanar printing/slicing is patented
Not actually sure if that's the case.
evcerything has been patented at one point, but a lot of these were patented in the late 80s or early 90s, so they are expired now
I used cura and simplify3d and they both gave the same results. I think it's under extrusion
so i figured out the issue, my feeder gears and teeth are slipping on the filament and not extruding the filament at the correct length. I tried tightening the spring, no luck, i tried replacing it with the original feeder, no luck. I cleaned the hot end and still slipped on both.
my temperature tower printed amazingly well, the stringing stopped at 220 with the bridges and arches looking great between 215 and 195. All in all I am very happy with this printer! Especially now that I'm storing my filament properly and cleaning the bed between runs ;)
Probably a partial clog right
yeah and some bottom warping from it lifting. Bottom layer warping can be minimized by raising bed temperature.
When bottom layer warps it starts lifting upwards which then makes that corner lift up a little and the flat plane of your part is no longer flat. You'll notice some nozzle scraping which can lead to clogging and in the worst case with a huge corner lift... a giant blob starts forming around your hotend.
Warping causes over extrusion issues on the one corner and in extreme cases can knock your print off the bed and turn into spaghetti.
with warping, use a brim and raise bed temp by +10C
in this specific case the warping was minimal and the print was able to relevel itself which means you aren't too far off the optimal bed temp to prevent that from happening.
@bitter adder When extrusion gears slip you'll often hear a click. Clicking means too much pressure in the nozzle and the extruder gear cannot feed filament into the hot end. It's not necessarily a gear issue but a pressure vessel issue. Having too low of a layer height can cause backpressure that eventually fills the hotend (and clogs) not allowing more filament to feed into the hotend.
All FDM printer hotends work based on pressure. The pressure of feeding filament into the hot end is what allows melted filament to squirt out of the nozzle. If something gets in the way of that pressure balance like putting your finger over a water hose, by having layers too close, backpressure builds up.
The amount of melted filament and pressure starts to rise inside the hot end, past the heat break, and a clog occurs. Sometimes having z-offset too close and layer lines too close is a bad thing and will cause just as many issues as having it too far away. There is a goldlilocks zone and it's unfortunately in hundredths of a mm.
@bleak flare how is your 3d printing journey going? I recently started again after a few months with nothing. Definitely need to follow you with calibration towers for each roll of pla. It will save more plastic instead of ruined prints and what was it like 5g of plastic for the calibration. I also need to retram my bed. Ahhh the joys.
@faint sky full of tips!
I've seen this type of thing. Possibly layer shifting, don't rule it out. Different causes for later shifting. Could be the hot end going out the build area and compensating, could be corrupted firmware (which was my case because it was on all 3d models I tried)
Also was that on a support at all or did it come right of the bed with the arc? It's pretty pronounced arcing and looks more printed than warped. Just my opinion
However without seeing what you were intending to print it's hard to say
thx
I ran it at an elevation of 100mm so there was no back pressure. The teeth on the actual extruder got gummed up with some old filament and caused some slippage
That might mean/indicator to too much tension on extruder gear. Worth observing in the long run.
I think it was because the printer sat for 2 years not being used and I had some old filament. I ran it through some isopropyl alcohol and used a fine pick and was able to remove some of the gunk. I also adjjusted some settings to help. slowed the movements, raised the hotend temp, calibrated the E steps and changed the extrusion multipler
The journey is going well, after a flurry of printing everything i've settled into a groove of printing what I know I will use. The calibration towers used very little filament, much less than the dozens of failed runs because I was using too cold of a temp for the hot end.
I've also started to explore combining 3D printing with laser cutting, but the laser cutter requires a much larger work space than I currently have so it's on pause
Aren't there any solenoid/extruders? Like the extruder works like a solenoid, so it can move up and down, so it can compensate for uneven surfaces? I haven't yet bought the so cursed printer
Has anyone tried using the exhaust of a refrigeration-type dehumidifer (about 30°C and 30% RH) to dry wet filaments?
anyone used a metal filament before?
nope, but usual descciant works
also an AC with dehumidifier
Refrigeration-type dehumidifiers work like an AC, they just don't move thermal energy outside 😉
I'm asking because every drying procedure out there recommends using heat. I think this is just to increase the air's capacity to hold water, which means using colder and dryer air would yield the same result, but I'm not sure.
Uneven surfaces? I don’t think I’ve ever heard of that before. An FDM machine uses it’s freedom to move up and down to compensate for a non-flat bed mesh, so I’m not sure where the solenoid comes in.
I also don't know why some sources differentiate between "drying" and "keeping dry". I think a procedure for keeping dry has to either fully seal the filament or be just as effective at drying, otherwise it would pick up moisture again.
You’re not totally wrong, but there’s more to it than humidity. To effectively dry a filament that has already absorbed moisture, the heat provides the moisture with the ability to escape the filament.
Actively drying a filament requires the addition of heat to the plastic to pull moisture from the plastic, while keeping dry only requires some form of humidity control.
Aha! So that would mean a dehumidifier on its own is actually not sufficient!
uneven bed surface* ; I mean using the nozzle part itself as probe, so it can also slight move up and down to compensate for uneven bed surfaces;
Ah, are you thinking the type of bed leveling where the nozzle itself is the probe? Not many machines ship with nozzle touch leveling, but the ones I know of are the cr6-se and Prusa MK4.
Those use a strain gauge to measure the force applied on the hotend assembly, not to be confused with a solenoid used to physically move a load up and down.
You can already do that with normal Z movements
Other notable examples are the Voron tap kit, which uses an optical sensor instead of a strain gauge to detect contact with the bed.
Sorta, but by adding something like a solenoid to physically move the nozzle up and down to compensate the offset between bed and nozzle and maybe using it as a sensor itself
Ventrue is although right I can already do that with normal z movement
The tricky part with bed leveling is detecting the bed surface accurately and precisely. Once the bed mesh is taken, the printer compensates for it with the vertical axis in software.
What does it bring to the table other than add complexity? You can already move gantry (or table) up and down.
yep definitely going to run some calibration towers, and bed levelling but I feel i gotta tighten some screws again (i might even put a layer of tape here or there) which I hate on the lead screws, build plate and gantry. Worth it though, absolutely worth it. 3 months this is just the type of thing you really should do imo.
i still really like Eryone PLA if anyone wants to try a new plastic. does a good job with layer lines being fairly seemless at times and colours and finish usually accurate. i especially like their matte series
I run mostly Polymaker.
I like Extrudr filaments. Made in Austria! 🙂
i've been thinking about trying some matte finishes
yeh the mattes are cool, especialy on side finishes. top and bottom layers naturally are different and they really show on matte pla. for example if you use no glue the bottom layer with a glass build plate it turns out shiny which isn't matte at all, top layer you see the lines more naturally so it provides a different finish leading to 3 finishes which isn't ideal. shiny bottom, totally matte walls (the best parts) and then the top layer which is more akin to the sides but notibly different
with that all said the matte black is a good looking matte black so even though the finishes are different it's a kind of carbon black colour (talking Eryone specifically here)
If a uniform surface finish is very important, it might be worth considering printing the model at an angle. Putting a cube on one of its corners, for example. That way all the surfaces are vertical overhangs (in this particular example, anyway), so they should look similar.
The downside is that this will probably require supports, which may introduce new problems.
To what end? If you want to attach something, it might be easier to make a mould of the contact area and either cast that or use it directly. You could also scan that cast, if you have to have a 3D model.
There's a phone app called widar that might be able to scan that. Also kiri engine.
Is there a way to assure dimentional accuracy in resin prints?
I was thinking a traditionally printed mold to prevent expansion but I'm not sure about preventing shrinkage
I was thinking of making the mold with clear filament and installing uv leds into that mold before pouting in the resin and just curing it in the mold
Calipers. Print something with a value you expect, measure, and tweak your settings to compensate for the dimensional inaccuracy.
This is the same concept for FDM or anything related to mechanical engineering. You input a value and measure the expected output vs real output. Compensate and calibrate.
I'm using a print I found on line that they claim is as close to the original part as they could get it
You will need a set of good calipers though, a ruler will not suffice. 3D printers and calipers go hand in hand.
I actually have a digital and analogue set so I'm definately good there
I'm also not using my own printers so I can't calibrate them
If there are problems with the model you can attempt to scale but if the model is off in multiple directions for little things then scale won't help, you'll have to edit the model.
Would my mold idea work?
Then all you can do is request to whomever owns the printer to calibrate it better. Chances are the model you found online might have dimensional inaccuracies. There's no guarantee of accuracy unless you make it yourself or throw it into a 3D program to measure the dimensions and compare them to what the output is.
You can make mold with 3D printers sure, the accuracy of those molds are up to you to measure, test, and verify.
I'm more concerned with the print staying in accuracy and combating the resin shrinkage than the models dimentional accuracy. I'm hoping pouring resin instead of printing resin will be more accurate
oh you want to cure the resin with UV LED's manually. sorry i have no experience with that. a quick google search should show some results if that method is viable.
dimensional accuracy questions are kind of universal, manually curing resin not so much. maybe someone here has experimented with that method and can jump in. i have no experience with it.
you can make molds with conventional resin no problem, I do have experience with that, UV curing resin I have no experience with.
So normal resin is more dimensionally accurate
If you're going to cast it it'll be more convenient
I've casted some dices with resin using 3d printed molds
I needed some post processing on it
Mainly sanding and stuff
But that might be eliminated with good mold release and better resin
My mold release was literally lip balm😅
And I eyeballed the ratio
What common 3D printing materials would be good for getting primed and painted with exterior latex paint?
The version that was printed long ago I think was PLA, and it seems to be holding up OK, just wondering if there is a better commonly-available paintable material for long-term outdoor use (midwest US - weather extremes).
i made some house numbers with black PLA, northern exposure. They are about three years old and seem fine. Not painted. I'm thinking that if you paint with good paint, the base material matters less. There are UV-resistant materials (e.g., ASA). ASA gives off bad fumes and can shrink like ABS. I know nothing other than what I read here: https://www.matterhackers.com/articles/the-best-3d-printing-filament-for-outdoor-use and elsewhere
Thanks, dan. Yeah I think as long as the primer sticks it should be pretty good. The underlying material is then protected, from sun though not from temperature).
PETG has good UV resistance as well.
PETG is also probably the hardest 3d printed material to apply paint to.
Hmm yeah not much sticks to it
I've had fairly good results with PETG painted by Krylon Fusion paint.
There's this guy who put some black PLA in the hot sun and it started drooping awful fast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2910kAJXao
🖨️ My 3D Printing Gear: https://kit.co/AllYourTech/my-3d-printers
Is PETG or PLA filament the right choice for outdoor, functional 3d prints? Today we take a look at the melting point of each material and help determine which one is the right filament for your print.
But, yah, I've had some PETG stuff painted with Krylon Fusion out there for quite a while now and it seems to be fine-ish, although we don't have freezing winters here in California.
PLA will warp in the sun yes, PETG and ABS are better for outdoors. You can use acrylic enamel and clear coat with an airbrush like you would paint a car. A good primer can help.
ABS is sensitive to UV, so you don't really want that outdoors. ASA is fine though.
He said will be using primer and paint so that's uv resistance.
I think your best bet is abs. I am working at a startup, and similar question arised what material to use, do we choose mjf pp12 or fdm abs or some exotic carbon fill. In the end to get presentable surface finish we are getting the prints post processed (sanding filling and painted).
We make industrial grade devices that can stand harsh conditions (welding shops, lots and lots of uv, and outdoor health and safety divisions). Consulted both industry specialists and academic professors.
Thanks all, good info as I now explore commercial print services. On the plus side, the prints will never be in direct sun (soffit under of the house eaves).
Hm I guess I'll get the cheaper option the p1s it's cheaper than the voron clone...
Also with a bank promo I get a discount of 100€, besides I also rebought a 3090 for about 650...
excuse me master, how do i make a surface like this in fusion 360 . great guidance
yo generally dont. that is something better done in a program like zbrush
He could also use bump maps and bake those
in fusion? i didnt know it had that feature
Ah idk
On rhino it's present
yes, you can do this in many other apps
im not sure how you reintegrate it into fusion (assuming to make work with a solid model that will then be printed)
What would be an effective method for modeling globs of wax running down this fake candle?
If it were me, I'd import it into Blender and mess with the model in sculpt mode.
could try a fluid sim, but probably not worth the effort
(thats also in blender btw)
If it was me Id run globs of actual wax down this fake candle and pretend I modeled them in blender
this is why you get paid the big bucks
Five ways to model candle drips. Everybody is waxing ecstatic about number three.
im modelling a taser 😛
If it's for an LED candle I've used hollowed out real candles in the past. My only advice against that is from personal experience a wax candle kept over many many years can deform and is hard to clean and rejuvenate. An opaque white plastic or 3D printed candle should last a lifetime and is easier to clean. I do it in PETG to ensure it has a longer lifespan against UV too.
This does not surprise me, at all. 😛
ha
bzzzt
i need to 3d print some of my cg props one day. but i dont have the energy to repair all the models and make them "solid"
That's been an issue I've dealt with in Fusion 360. I'll make a simple model, import it into Cura, and Cura complains it has leaks.
i got a couple of complains from JLC avout shells etc.
but i check over the model and it is fine
something is triggering faults that arent there
maybe a tolerance for triangle width?
Yup, I could make a simple box, create a shell, and cura will say it has leaks. Either an issue with the file export or somewhere in the process the 3D model ceases to be airtight. It's really easy with Fusion360 for things to misalign by a thousandth and create a leak.
but VFX models are usualyl a big mess of garbage haha. surfaces, self intersections, etc. it tool a lot of effort to make a 3d printable rocinante
They are there but you'd have to zoom in like 100000% to see the misalignment.
there is some of that. non stitched edges. but ive checkd in other software and found no errors
yup and scanned models or complicated geometry makes it almost impossible to be airtight. I'm sure there's a way to check for that kind of thing but I haven't learned enough yet how to do it to the point cura won't complain at least.
meshmixer is supposed to be able to fix these things, but in my experience it just crashes when you try to do anything useful 😛
exactly, there's a mesh fixer in fusion360 but i've found it causes more problems than it solves.
anyhow. i want to print the unsc longsword, but i dont think id be allowed to send it to jlc for "security" reasons. not sure. have to ask.
that one i made in fusion, so it is "solid"
and anything over 10K triangles in fusion360 and might as well require a render cluster... oh wait you can't because it's all rendered online through their servers...
unless it's printed in metal i don't see why a longsword would be a security issue, it's a prop.
but 10k tris? i have models with tens of millions. fusion is weird with meshes.
security as in microsoft not wanting the model at a printing service.
since technically they own it
not sure if cloud is optional for the free version.. haven't looked into it.
printing trademarked or copyrighted objects i have no idea about.
not copyrighted, this is the actual longsword model i made for the show. haha. it is "their" model
yes but requires those diamond point things to do locally
diamond point. i never looked at that before. i dont "render" in fusion. only do interactive. any real rendering i do in 3dsmax/arnold
i just usually take screenshots with snipping tool and call it a day. i don't need professionally rendered prototypes of a prototype.
the interactive render is all i need. i am not doing animations.
That's still copyrighted, and I'm sure your contract made sure that they are the ones who own it.
sure. what i meant is it is not ambiguous. i need their permission to do this. (they probably will want one too haha)
sounds like a question for adam savage... i have no idea about prop copyrights. i've never printed a prop. i only do original industrial design stuff.
i want to print it maybe 1 foot long. paint it up.
could always print it in sections. ruiz brothers just did a great zelda sword in sections. same for their lightsaber builds. it's sectional not printed as one piece so technically no single piece is copyrighted?
i think the jlc limits are 280mm. so maybe wings, fuse, tail.
and if prop copyrighting was so over the top disney/marvel wouldn't allow any ironman helmets out there. and printables is filled with that kind of stuff.
like i said, this is different. this isnt a guy replicating a prop. this is me, the persona that designed the prop in the first place 😛
it would still be a replica though
if you're the one working on it then there's probably someone higher up you could ask if it was ok to do. i have no idea.
yes. i need to just ask and see what the rules are. if im allowed to send it to a service etc.
very pretty
i'd put the main air intakes more far forward, being so far back might as well be behind the engine. i mean it has a tail so it seems to be sub-atmospheric.
ah, very cool, that makes a lot more sense. well done!
(and it is fictional :P)
it also kinda needed to at least look a little like the game versions even thoughg everyone hated it
yes yes i know just something that jumped out as being too unrealistic but now there is an air of believability to it.
ahh that is a very satisfying design
yup was my first thought, stealth but from the top the intakes looked wrong.
its also not a turbine. some sort of ion thruster. (whihc makes no sense but whatever)
stealth vtol sounds really neat. for stealth though a v-tail is typically used.
oh ion thrusters of course, naturally. 😛
hehe
well i think it's gorgeous and very well done.
thanks
it deserves more than just being blurry in the background haha
print nice and big
sometimes i guess it's like that. i do watch adam savage a lot and sometimes designers will work for days for something that just a box of wheaties, in a cupboard, that isn't even shown.
it's a beautiful ship design and should be highlighted but that's just the way it goes. director gets the final decision on what gets shown and where i suppose.
is that the internal engine assembly?
no thats a drone
the pivots are interesting
yeah. supposed to be made of junk
its really thin and intricate with many parts. not sure if its easily printed
yup. tie rods. heim joints
oh you want to 3d print that small? good luck.
no, i want to print it life size
whihc is about 1M centre to centre on the engines.
hang it form the roof
oh wow, that might be doable... in many many parts.
3d printed tie rods sounds challenging enough.
it might be viable to just make those real. its a real part after all
perhaps but adjustable tie rods would require threading
i has a lathe
theres a little lcd screen that goes on the front of it (not in the render). could wire that up with a pi and play videos
now there's an idea, kind of like odd jay's personal should robot except it's a little flying contraption that follows you everywhere.
we wanted a 6 ft roci as well. but determined it was not a model suitable for printing and would take a lot of actual paid hours to fix.
could have a lot of uses, out of cell signal range? send your personal drone up as a relay.
haha
even in a city, that would be neat to incorporate into a story
i highly doubt this drone would fly. for whatever reason they wanted only 2 engines
"sci fi"
but it'll work with ion thrusters and a simple 9-dof sensor 😛
haha
i mean if you want to make a good example of ridiculous 2 engine flight look no farther than star wars pod racing.
if it's got anti-gravity all the rules go out the window
but sometimes its hard
Yeah they basically took the concept of chariot racing from the Roman and Byzantine empires and replaced the horses with jet engines.
zoom
city sized star trek ships hovering over volcanoes is a thing
well yes. that makes sense
the engines don't have to be the primary means of flight, only directional control like thrusters.
alright enough of the brain exercises, that's too addicting. nice models.
Sounds like you need more than a bit of additional space
Enough room for a few more byte-sized jokes 🙂
no jokes about hard drive size
What might cause lift up with Asa?
But more seriously, lack of adhesion may play a part, but shrinkage is probably the larger contributor. Basically the upper layers shrink, while the lower ones don't, because they are heated by the bed, so the whole thing turns into a banana shape.
Less of a difference between bed, print and ambient temperatures (ambient being the one inside the printer enclosure) would probably help.
asa is like abs. it will lift (though not as bad) if you do not have an enclosure and a strong bond to the bed (abs acetone slurry usually)
Can increase bed temp but that'll only get you but so far. Warping can happen at higher layers unaffected by bed temp in which case you have to turn down cooling. it's not particularly a filament issue and it can happen with any filament type if the ambient air is drastically cooler than the filament temperature (during winter or under an AC vent). it happens more often with filaments that require higher temperatures.
and as Ventrue said, the cause is shrinkage.
it is party a filament thing, abs and asa (and nylon) shrink a LOT more than PLA
because they're printed at higher temperatures which makes it easier to have an ambient temp vs filament temp difference to cause shrinkage.
it is not impossible to have the same effect happen with PLA
other than fumes this is the primary reason why enclosures are recommend if printing higher temperature filaments, it helps prevent warping.
CTE of abs/nylon is double pla though
its not just the marginally higher temp
anyhow. get one of them printer grow bags, the bed heat will warm the chamber up to 50-60c and that generally seems to solve the issue
🙂
Here's an example. I print PETG and it warps. I turn off my ceiling fan and it doesn't warp. The marginal additional cooling of my ceiling fan provides just enough additional cooling to create shrinkage.
sure.
im just saying with abs and asa is is a lot more than marginal. you need that extra 20-30c
(i print a lot of abs and nylon)
and by example I mean this actually happens to me during winter, with no enclosure. i just don't have the space for an enclosure. had to learn that one the hard way.
Oh I have a computer in there. I just overclock it and let the room heat up.
hehe
exactly. my room is the enclosure. i close off the HVAC vents and let the room heat up.
also the reason why i can't really print during summer. my house leaks too much. it's 83% humidity and every print fails. so printing for me in this house has become a seasonal thing. 😦
ew
yeah i have to wait for winter to print cleanly. which is fast approaching! 🙂
dont remind me. i have a lot of work to do before it gets too cold
250sqft of concrete slab. a shed roof, and a ceiling
bleh
that's a big project. i need to install insulation because obviously this house has almost none.
i had a wood floor, but it flooded then rotted. so im just gonna pour a slab. (this is in my shed/workshop). and the roof asphalt peeled up and it leaiked and rotted. so that needs to be redone. sigh. haha.
kinda same, my shed is rotting and has a wood floor i want to slab. not 250 sq ft though, that's a huge shed.
oh, mines only 100sft. the other 150 is my porch which already has a slab but it needs to be covered over with new. technically it is called "screed mud" but it is still 3" thick so it is basically the same amount of work
i'm probably going to tear it down and make one out of concrete blocks because hurricanes.
we make sheds very different down here. not sure i've seen a shed with a porch, that's basically a mini house.
ahh if i could screed thick concrete on the outside and put an AC unit inside might be able to keep the humidity out and use the shed for printing instead of the house. id' have to run the AC 24/7 year round though. There is no cheap solution for a well insulated house. :/
i built it like a proper building. block foundation on the bedrock. but then....
haha
we get these little flash floods. and my floor is below grade (10 ft ceiling in a 9 ft tall building
so at least with concrete, it cant be damaged, and it can have a drain
note to self. do not bump fdm printer mid print. especially if it means the belt and gears slip. this of course will ruin the print then on with layer shift
Dumb question, do I risk into putting printers here?
It's a water pipe
Either by increasing the temperature too much (I doubt but who knows), or by the humidity (as you can see from the black mold, I guess?)
There's not ventilation here
that does not look like a workshop kind of space to put anything and if you do you'll restrict access to the plumbing. if something happens with the plumbing then you'd have to move everything electrical out of there again. too much risk.
This is certainly unexpected
Did you turn infill down to 0%? Amazed it bridged that far.
On a positive note you now know how to DIY a whisk broom.
That stuff was supposed to be support material. It all looked fine from a distance until the interface layer went completely off the rails 😄
What's interesting is that the actual model printed just fine. I had variable layer height on, maybe that caused it. I'm checking that.
Without seeing the slice of what the supports were supposed to look like underneath i can’t even make a guess. That one has only happened to me when I completely disabled infill and the bridges were too far. Your bridges are 3 times longer than my max length before turning to spaghetti. It’s really impressive.
Ah but what speed are you printing. I usually print slow. I might be able bridge that gap with about 120mms.
It's just PrusaSlicer's rectilinear support pattern, nothing fancy. Support speed was 60 mm/s I think.
To be fair, the extrusions were probably lying on top of each other to some extent, so I'm not sure this qualifies as true bridging 😉
thats the default in cura actually. it just is obscured so it looks weird
just a linear zig zag
Thought grid was default?
maybe it is now. ive uses the zig zag alot
Cura has the same style, it all just looks hairy once you start pulling the extrusions apart like a broom 😛
i thought it was default
Its been so long since ive used defaults on any setting I honestly dont even remember what they are.
ayhow, im gussing it is heavily under extruding the support and it isnt bonding? not sure.
I was just about to write that. I'm trying something similar right now and that definitely looks underextruded - but only on the supports, nowhere else. And I've already got it at 120% extrusion for the supports, because my organic supports have holes in them at anything less.
odd
I find it neat the part printed fine. So why even include the supports?
ha
Indeed. PrusaSlicer's supports have been strange since 2.6. They seem to consistently underextrude and it also keeps knocking them off the plate because it moives the nozzle through them after they're printed.
the top laye of support is meant to be underextruded of course. but not all of em
haha
Unsure if prusa slicer has z-hop?
The video shows what's left of the underside, the first layer and a bunch of these strings stuck to the plate. It's a top cover for a case and the economical way would be to print it upside down like a bowl, but I want the nicer top layers to actually be on top.
It has, but I prefer not to use it because it causes stringing.
Oh i thought that was the top. Wow thats even worse than I thought. That becomes an initial layer issue possibly and not necessarily a support setting.
And even more impressive it finished. 🤯
3D printer Gods smiled upon you today for sure.
But the rest of your print look great. So strange.
Yeah thats what I mean. PrusaSlicer must be doing something weird with supports in general. First layers are fine though, except for some irregular patterns in my glue residue that I don't want on the visible model surfaces, hence the idea to print it like this 😉
That's the top. I cancelled it at that point because it was obvious that it wouldn't work.
Excuse the dust 😉
Must be the filament 😛
By the way, I finally got around to print this cap here from a few weeks ago in TPU. Kinda put that off because I had never used TPU before but apart from the fact that it was wet, it's really quite easy to work with. I was very surprised. And the results are amazing, layer adhesion is off the charts. I literally can't pull this apart.
I have yet to even purchase TPU. I'd love to find an excuse to try some, just haven't come across a project that's really needed it. Glad it finally worked out for you that's awesome. I know you were having an issue with those breaking with other materials. Print quality looks excellent.
how big arte those. they look clean
Try it, it's really fun! Seems like a great material not just for parts that have to be flexible, but also for parts that just need to be robust.
Diameter is about 18mm, but all the sparkles on the TPU are artifacts from the wet filament that go away with drying. The shape is also unnecessarily hard to print, I'll remove those ridges for a later version.
ah. they seemed smaller.
I’ve always wondered if my 2-meter Bowden tube would be able to print TPU, but it’d be a darn shame to open a full spool just to experiment…
Here's an interesting video on TPU with bowden. It is possible but there are potential extruder and bowden tube related issues compared to a direct drive. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSfZlNCaMCo
Have you been looking for a way to print with flexible TPU? If so, you're in for a treat! In this video, I'm going to show you everything you need to know about flexible TPU printing with a Bowden 3D printer. I cover the basics of TPU extrusion, including how to set up your printer and print your first flexible TPU object.
If you're interested ...
The bowden tube itself can be a source of issues. Since direct drive doesn't use a tube that's one less potential problem but direct drive isn't a guarantee it'll work either. Your slicer settings and printing some calibration tests would be very important for any new filament... especially flexible filaments.
I've upped my extrusion width to 200% (!) for the supports and that finally made them fuse. Seems weird.
That seems like it should not be a thing. There's some other kind of setting that's limiting it then.
There's an option for not supporting bridges. If your top layer is filled with long bridges then at some point it might stop printing the support in favor of only bridges. Due to the gap distance this could show up as a bunch of long drooping lines.
What are your top and bottom interface layers set to? Having one of them be 0 could do it too.
"Don't support bridges" is off and "interface layers" is set to 3.
It's definitely support related since your print came out otherwise very nice. Try grid next time?
Honestly if 200% extrusion works, I don't mind keeping that. I just think it's weird.
I think it's weird too but I've learned not to temp the 3D printer Gods wrath by changing settings when everything is working correctly.
True!
does the support print at a faster rate than the walls main print. i wonder if it might be going fast but not compensating for that speed change
Supports were printed at 40 mm/s, perimeters at 60 mm/s and infill at 80 mm/s. So yeah, excessive speed might definitely cause this, but not in this case.
Was just playing with a design printed in TPU to see if printable tactile bumps for membrane keyboards were feasible. The answer is: Maybe?
The question would be how long they would hold up, and also whether they would be satisfying to use.
Of course, if the answer to either of those is 'no' you can certainly design and print a silicone mold.
The prospect of creating something completely impractical never stopped me before. 😄
Seems as if the walls make it a little more rigid than say a latex membrane. Can try to oversize the membrane button so the center is easier to press or perhaps chamfer or angle the button walls more so it's not a straight 90. That should provide just a tiny bit less vertical wall rigidity.
It looks like you do have an angle in there but it might need more if the outer rim of the wall is causing too much uneven feedback.
Great looking print though!
does the membrane button even have to look like a cylindrical button with walls all around it? Like, could you make it a bridge? (just throwing out a random idea)
Typically a membrane is either for use with a resistance button pill, make it easier on the fingers with hard clicking buttons, or at attempt at water/debris proofing. Depends on the goal.
If the goal is to hold the carbon pill you'd design the membrane as a holder.
conductive tpu filament exists as well (it's just extremely expensive 😭)
or as a soft keycap for a tactile button
You can't really tell what the intention is with their membrane just from looking at the top. Either method might require a slightly different approach.
I would say definitely doable, but you may have to redesign the geometry to get the actuation distance and force you want.
If TPU doesn't work out there is an option in Fusion360 that will automatically turn your model into a mold casing. It's pretty neat. You can print it in PLA and just pour silicone into it. It's a bit more work and requires purchasing two part silicone for molds but a valid technique and would be far more waterproof and squishy.
I was just thinking about that. Next iteration is a square opening with a + bridge and an actuator in the center. If I print this upsidedown, it'll print flat; no bridging. Intent is to close a crosspoint switch (one wire crossing over another with a small gap) but, yeah, as @faint sky pointed out, it could be configured to hold a carbon pill.
Or, at least for the sake of testing, any small bit of conductive material.
The issue I see with the proportions in that design is the lack of constraints that ensure the center piece pushes straight down. Hopefully that won’t cause any issues for your actuation reliability…
I'm trying it out right now using PETG, partly because it'll be more likely to press straight down, but mostly because TPU is such a pain to work with. 😄
if possible I would oversize the cylinder so no matter what it'll make contact. bigger is better with that type of design. otherwise a small dimple might start forming on your finger where you're pressing the button while gaming or typing for example. have to think about the ergonomics of it too.
it'll work but after a while your fingers will probably start to hurt.
Grid's PETG; key's PLA. Can easily get 1mm deflection out of it. The key could stand to be thicker and a bit more stylish. 😄
oh that's nice
didn't expect that kind of design. how to stop the keys from falling out?
Magic! Actually, it's just press-fit. There's a + shaped notch in the keycap's post that grips onto the center of the bridge. It holds fairly well, but I might want to deepen the notch a bit for a firmer grip, then scale up the actuator to compensate.
The crosspoint switch (similar to the one in the 2nd image) would sit beneath the key, and be activated when the actuator presses down on it. I've already done 3x4 keypads using an array of these crosspoint switches, but the tactile feedback is unsatisfactory.
Ultimate goal would be a fully-customizable qwerty keyboard where everything but the wiring is 3D-printed, then use a Feather or similar microcontroller to scan the keys and output keyboard messages via USB.
oh wow that's neat.
looking forward to seeing more, please post updates as you work on it. very nice design.
O_o
Will do. I should probably push this over to #general-tech or #show-and-tell \
If you would like but there's not a lot of action in here so posting 3D printing poject updates in here is perfectly fine to me including the good and the bad. This is a place unlike coding where we can learn from each others successes and mistakes.
Well, I certainly have a lot of mistakes to report. 😄