#Media (General)
54600 messages · Page 55 of 55 (latest)
AI is not comparable to that because its omnipresence, and while huge amount of the public think "wow, cool AI is a chatbot" very large amounts of the public also do have associations of slop with it. To repeat the point I already said: This is distinct from many boycotts because it isn't exclusively about indirect matters regarding production processes or who profits in the end. Lots of people dislike AI simply because it's slop.
Also boycotts don't universally fail and some things are very much worth boycotting and we should still make an effort on
Lots of people dislike AI simply because it's slop.
I agree with this, but maybe not in the way you might think. Because I think the people who feel this way may not be as opposed to AI once it reaches the point where you would genuinely struggle to tell the difference, which is has in some realms
https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report/public-opinion
looking at this, it seems that AI usage has 55% approval and rising- in comparison, Nestle has 66% approval which is not hugely higher, nobody associates it with high quality products, its scandals are extremely well known and yet boycots have consistently failed since the 1970s
like, if there's a quality control issue, if it looks bad, absolutely people will stay away, for that reason. But not necessarily because of a fundamental problem with the way the sausage is made
there are certainly people who would stay away for those fundamental reason, but that set of people is smaller
looking up success and failures for AI data centres would be more useful tbh
I don't think AI's capability of making things indistinguishable from what's real is as important to this as people generally say, and I'd say it's for the most part been at that point anyway for a long time. The problem with AI is not that it inherently makes things that are bad (although it does), but that by existing so you can lazily get a quick result without putting effort into craft, it consistently leads to low quality results because the prompters do not care about quality. AI will continue to be slop because it exists for the use case of making slop, and will keep being used to make slop.
taking a swing at popularity numbers off a quick search isn't super compelling
boycotts wont even do anything because the problem is capitalism not some individual product
that's kinda the point I was trying to make, that the real opposition to AI expansion comes from community opposition to building data centers, not getting consumers to avoid it
I think the fallacy here is that 'many people use it to make slop' does not necessarily mean 'it can only be used to make slop'
Nestle is a food company, that's a much harder thing to boycott
it's all part of the same movement, i don't see the point in making this distinction
you could define 'slop' in a way to make that case but it's beside the point
At no point did I imply that the former is the reason for the latter
The latter is, in fact, the reason for the former
I think it can only be used to make slop because when it comes to any creative field, what actually creates works of quality is the choices made in the process itself, which requires direct manipulation of the elements of the medium itself. This is something AI is fundamentally unsuited for. It's as much a matter of human behavior and how brains engage in the process of making art, as it is with the technology of LLMs.
i don't think that's the same as the definition of slop most people use though, slop means "low quality" most of the time
I fail to see how that distinction is relevant to my point
I obviously don't disagree that opposing data center is a core and central part of it, and my point is not to argue that a boycott of consumption of AI products will singlehandedly succeed at taking down AI companies. My point is that I don't think that consumers choosing to avoid AI products is just an irrelevant factor because that's a boycott and boycotts always fail (which they don't, anyway). Boycotts do increase pressure which compounds with other parts of the effort, and a lot of anti-AI consumer behaviors are real, affect the revenue of the companies involved, and are a matter of overall anti-AI sentiments, not a motivated boycott spurred by online people shouting about it.
because you're trying to say "AI is disliked it produces slop" but jmc said "it's also used to produce not slop", but your argument is now "everything AI produces is definitionally slop"
I have yet to see a single example of good art made by AI
It is slop both definitionally and empirically
there's a lot of work that needs to go into, for example, film production special effects, that is inherently not creative in any way, and where any sort of creativity is unwelcome, and work is done for-hire by third party contractors based on some material and direction by the studio. If the computer can deliver as advertised and without mistakes, there are absolutely uses where I wouldn't use the word 'slop'
I would easily use the word slop for that
If it can be replaced by AI, it is most likely already slop to begin with
okay but you're sort of rendering the word meaningless then
Not really
that work is fundamentally required to make, say, any Marvel movie. You could call any Marvel movie slop, if you wanted to. But it's just beside the point
Special effects requires a lot of technical work in the background, but that doesn't make it not overall creative. There are creative visions behind how the end result is meant to look. There are special effects experts who make really cool effects simply out of pure passion even if it's going beyond what the director requested. It's absolutely creative work. And if a film production does not care about those elements, and just wants generic looking effects, then yeah, it probably is an uncreative studio-driven rather than creative-driven work, and I don't think it's unusual to call that kind of thing slop.
not every little component of art needs to be art
tbc i don't think AI companies will go down, nor do I want them to, at least not moreso than other tech companies. AI has some very real applications- the current hype is very much a bubble though and I do think it will pop, as the costs of AI become less justifiable
you can call something like the mcu slop (and i'd agree with you) but its slop that makes 1 billion so obviously there is demand for it
Right, so it's not art
so is it okay then if a movie replaces CGI or animators with AI? since the technical work doesn't count as art
if it looks the same or only slightly worse, i don't think consumers will care
should we distinguish between machine learning and generative AI at this point? because if you're talking about reducing technical time like lighting rendering, I think that's different than generating animations
I hope that every single AI use case that you personally use specifically becomes no longer available to you when the AI companies go down
It'll build character
some of my AI uses are bad but others are very good and important for society (grad school)
that's sort of where I started, like there are going to be aspects of it where people tolerate it, and aspects people don't, and I suppose for those aspects people tolerate or like, they'll just use a different phrase
in my work meeting this morning the devs talked about how their AI usage (copilot I think?) is now per token instead of whatever it was and my boss quipped to a junior dev to maybe spend less of them on writing emails. It sounds like that guy was using it to summarize his blocks of code for end users and then manually editing to make them shorter because he said they got wordy... which I can kinda see, but I think it's a good skill to be able to summarize your work for a non-technical person
inside thought that I did not say: my long emails are bespoke brain droppings with no digital input
I'm fine with explosives being used to carve paths through mountains to build canals and train lines, and I'm not fine with explosives being dropped on hospitals, even though they're both explosives. I don't think that making these distinctions is an indication of hypocrisy or anything. There are meaningful differences that are the causes of why some things are tolerated and others are not.
that's fine? But that point is that when people like the outcome, they'll be fine with the technology. When the outcome looks bad, they'll dislike the technology. It's not any deeper, it's not any more fundamental than that
I don't disagree with that statement, and frankly I'm not sure which part of my statements you think that statement is going against
Its in petit bourgeoises interest as a class generally to be anti AI so i wouldnt be surprised if anti AI wins out
I was paywalled on the NYT article so I found the Variety one re: Scorsese, and it sounds like he was testing out tools for storyboarding
so when it's something like that for preproduction- like I think he's ultimately still coming up with the plot and dialogue, but maybe it's like doing a randomizer on "make me a set for these characters to walk in"? https://variety.com/2026/film/news/martin-scorsese-supports-ai-company-storyboard-movies-1236765037/
oh I see aaks already talked about this earlier re: like, digital mood boards
nevermind the fact that concept artist is a real job
everyday I feel more empathy for the luddites
I think it's depressing in part because it's missing the point of creative collaboration
No one person can do every job involved in making a film, but communication is inherently imperfect, so you have to find ways to bridge that gap, and enjoy the fact that people will come up with their own ideas based off of your words rather than give you exactly the thing you had in your head. They'll probably come up with something more interesting anyway since it's their area of expertise.
To say you need AI to storyboard the visions in your head is essentially just to say you're a super special auteur with the one core vision and nobody else's contributions matter
It's a real job, and it's also one of those starter jobs that are good on-ramps into the industry.
When AI is being used to stop creative thinking or processing, it is inherently damaging. Say people keep using AI to draft emails, then they become untrained in those essential skills of communication and are overly reliant on a technology that may vanish.
People should put in work and time for themselves so they can learn and grow
And yeah, if you are using AI to storyboard things then you are not thinking yourself, you are off-loading the burden of thought and are lazy
idealism icl
Call me an idealist, idc. People should put in the work themselves.
When people no longer work for themselves, they lose the ability to think for themselves critically
So true labour is the source of all wealth and culture
That's not what I said
Brains are dynamic. We adapt to the challenges we face. A life without challenges is a life without growth. Someone who never has to think (because AI does it for you) will adapt to be unable to think.
That is the very real danger of offloading creative or critical thought onto a machine
What is lassale?
forgot what server this is damn it
I don’t really have an issue with a highly skilled person like Scorsese using AI for efficiency, because I assume he knows what he wants and he knows what quality work is. The issue is with students who don’t know what they want, don’t know what’s good or bad, and also need to learn but use AI to cheat themselves
Yeah I think focusing on the end product (wealth, culture, etc. ) does burry the ledde a bit. It sucks because that's the focus of our capitalistic society, our productivity and products.
What is the end of this though? What good is possibly attained when the very cost is the ability of most of society to freely think?
Imo a better world is one where we do things for the sake of doing them.
Wealth and culture come about not necessarily because of labor but because of luck. You can labor away and never see what you might have worked for. But… in not working or thinking you surrender the learning process of overcoming challenges and you become easier to control. That’s how I think about it at least.
I think AI reveals a deeper issue though which is that fundamentally a lot of humans don’t enjoy the act of labour and don’t value it as a good in and of itself
Also he's denying others the chance to work with him and improve and develop their own skills. Imo that's a rather selfish way for him to go about it, again focusing on the end result (his storyboards) and not the process of actually making the storyboards.
I don’t think enjoyment of labour should be seen as the end, but the result of the labour should be. It’s not about enjoyment, it’s about learning and growing.
But hey, that's the brilliance of the trap that is AI. People will want to cheat to offset the burden from themselves. They want it to be easier and to not put in the labor or effort or process. If they can skip from A to Z, why learn the alphabet?
It's undeniable though that if you lose the ability to do things yourself, you are relinquishing skill and knowledge. You are allowing elites to hold power over you. It's a convenient gilded cage and society is walking right in.
Sorry I'll stop 🫡
I don’t mean enjoyment in the “ohh this is so fun” sense, I mean they don’t find fulfilment in labour
i was saying thinking that all wealth and culture come from labour as an insult
I understood that
Well someone’s labour is lmao
I think it's similar to going to the gym. It might not inherently feel fulfilling to do a workout, but the impacts on your body and mental health are very positive.
Genuinely feels like we’re too used to pleasure on demand
Yes and no
Different types of enjoyment are appropriate at different times
You need a healthy balance
Next week
my local theater was scheduled to stop showing Obsession after tomorrow but I'm guessing they'll extend it since NBC postponed the digital release
(it's a big theater, plenty of screens)
That sucks. My local theater doesn’t even show obsession entirely when it released (it’s a Cmx that’s in a shopping center)
doesn't show it entirely meaning like, it cuts off part of the movie?
I assume they meant 'didn't show it at all'
ooh, okay
https://www.tumblr.com/zoesupreme/818340547441885184/well-the-thing-is-thats-an-extremely-reasonable
Pattinson is never escaping the unfathomably based allegations.
He’s learned the hard way about being in bad movies and how it impacts your career
IDK, he seems to be doing pretty well for it
Well he is now. But in 2013? Not so much
Also it took Kristen Stewart a while to launch her directing career and Taylor Lautner hasn’t been regularly employed as an actor since Breaking Dawn Pt 2
I mean his name might not have been big or popular as an actor but he also had infinite money to just go and choose whatever wacky job he wanted
the Radcliffe approach
I wonder if he asked to read Tenet's script beforehand
if not, that may have been a learning moment for him
I'm glad hes growing as a person
should've just watched a "tenet explained" video like everyone else smh
This is all assuming it's supposed to make sense
Which I am of the opinion that it is not
I second making GDT the new Absolute Cinema guy
ignore the fact that he's my fav director
Alright ladies and gents
Who wants more Man of Tomorrow set photos
This time of Lex Luthor in his armor
Video of the armor moving around, can barely see anything but looks amazing
rippppppppppppp
I wonder if this is a stray caught from Mando and Grogu's performance
I’m not sure if they would be quite that reactionary, it might not have helped but there were probably other concerns
Sounds like they worried the audience was going to be too narrow
That’s an impression that will probably scare Expanse fans, like there’s no way the last arc will get picked up unless they can convince Amazon they can sell it to people who aren’t Expanse fans
dam
rip
I feel like the language here points to them doing all the right things for what I would want in a show but that is always a risk. Given the current state of things I could see them having issues with it from multiple directions depending on exactly how they tackled it.
He’s genuinely so funny
S/o to the one Star Trek episode which boldly asked “what if a conventionally attractive woman wanted to have heterosexual sex with Riker but it was illegal?”
Got a MUCH more clearer shot of Lex on the MoT set
In his power armor
man of tomorrow filming at the fox theater in atl #manoftomorrow #nicholashoult #dcu
SO much color
Genuinely amazing how stuff like that gets made
oh I love how hard they committed to that
really looks like the promo art
I love how bulky and colourful it is
It looks very goofy, but I assume the color grading will smooth that over
I think most movies look bad if you just look at pictures/videos of the set
I suggested him first because he's one of the loudest anti-AI voices in the entertainment industry I know of. But also because he's an incredible filmmaker who's frequently responsible for ABSOLUTE CINEMA in his own right.
I love how now the ABSOLUTE CINEMA guy is now pro AI himself
That circles back to why I was saying that to begin with. It's because of that that I think GDT should be the guy for that instead from now on.
Welp, I reckon that pretty much kills the potential of the franchise coming back in any lasting way for the foreseeable future. :/ Maybe they'll make something, probably a reboot, maybe it will even be good, who knows? But the core fan base is going to be extremely bitter about this, and a reboot of an old franchise has an uphill climb to get positive attention regardless.
I had a petty grudge with Scorsese ever since I learned how The Departed won best picture despite being a remake of Infernal Affairs which wasn't even nominated for international film
so this is a bit of Schadenfreude cause I found The Departed to completely piss on the soul and themes of Infernal Affairs and yet get more acclaimed
Yeah, and the thing is I don't know what the worry about broad appeal would be?
Stargate: deep space nine Atlantis Station would work just fine too.
I almost fear they didn't like the continued evolution of the series that government is messy and full of bad/bad-faith actors... Which I think would have a great appeal these days...
Now I fear we are going to get "oops a teenager found the Stargate" or something.
Maybe "a teenager found a ship and collects a crew of friends" which could work as it's a successful formula. But we are already getting a Skyward adaptation so I don't see a need for that either.
Franchises with “Star” in their name dying 😭
Isnt star trek on hold?
No
All Star Trek shows have been canceled and they’re only making and then airing the already contracted for seasons
Then no more Star Trek for the foreseeable future
it's on paramont+ right now, I guess it might go to hbo eventually in some unified streaming service
never heard of hold, who owns that?
Corporations: “surely this means people hate sci fi”
maybe hold is some european streaming service
Star Trek is owned by the Ellisons 😭 😭 😭
It also got taken off Netflix 😭 😭 😭
RIP
I’m actually so mad about that
Any major show is an expensive risk, and worries about reaching a big enough audience are always at least somewhat well-founded, though the show was being written specifically as a jumping on point for new watchers. New execs always want to make their own mark though, without much context of why decisions were made before, and with the execs who were championing the show gone…
It’s still a very bad decision if they actually want to do anything with the franchise. A reboot in the first place would have been disappointing, but I reckon a fair chunk of the fan base would have given it a chance. But after announcing and then cancelling this? They’ve strongly alienated the existing fan base and reaching a wider audience would still be a big uncertainty with any reboot. Obviously the online fan base paying attention to things in development is a minority of total viewers, but they do help set the tone around things.
I need an Orvillized parody that turns into the real thing I guess. It's a formula I know would work and just a bit of distance might improve it.
I don't want them to make the mistakes of seasons 9-10 of SG1 where they try to recreate the dynamics of the team with the cast of farscape.
i hope they make a stellaris show and its just every star related franchised mashed into one
trekwarsgate crossover
Orville is soooooo good. I love that show so much
Truly a great example of making fun of a franchise with love
It was intresting I feel like over Covid every late 90s early 2000 sci-fi got approved for a reboot and then got dropped
Oh wow I kinda disagree I think those were some of the best team dynamics
The dynamic in S9-10 was different, but I enjoyed it. After eight seasons I think I'm good with a refreshed team dynamic. 😅
SAURON
It's not that I didn't like it but I have issues with reboots, or forced continuations trying to keep the same type of team makeup rather than truly changing things up.
I also have structural issues with those seasons that I think the casting choices did not help with.
Supergirl feels like female Star Lord
I think it looks great
I think they’ve just dropped the ball with marketing
The colour palate etc look uninteresting and supergirl in the trailer seems like someone combined every action hero girlboss with every quirky-depressed James Gunn protagonist
I think Supergirl being an action hero girlboss is a good thing
And she’s very obviously not gonna be depressed the whole movie
I do intend to see Supergirl but I can imagine the movie struggling a bit, it's a crowded summer
I like the look and feel of Supergirl a lot, that is not starlord coded
I’ve read the comic and yes, I’m disappointed with the palette they decided to go with for the movie, but I think it still looks visually interesting
I feel like it was always gonna be a losing game with the visuals
NOTHING, and I mean literally NOTHING in live action can compare to Bilquis Evely’s art
It’s why I think a LOT of comic stuff needs to be in animation
There’s nothing to make it stand out from the blur of 2015 marvel movies tbh
I know Millie Alcock is a fantastic actor but her character and presentation feel so uninspired
starlord vibes are inseparable from chris pratt vibes for one, and for two, my god there HAS to be room for multiple kinds of unconventional heroes without them all getting put in a pile with the stylings of Chris Pratt. she doesn't even come off like any kind of loser, just someone angry and throwing her life away
It feels like a shot for shot captain marvel remake at points
girl failure, maybe
Like she’s very obviously not going to be angry and depressed the whole movie
The quirky vice ridden failure with a secret traumatic backstory and a heart of gold has just been done before so many times
Has it
Well I mean that’s just what Supergirl is in the comics
She’s a quirky character, with a heart of gold, and a tragic backstory
Starlord, every character in TSS except Peacemaker, even Thor lowkey became that
as opposed to what kind of character trope 
i haven't seen TSS but I don't think Starlord or Thor are comparable here
what's been underdone and why should that be Supergirl instead
I don’t know but it doesn’t feel like supergirl has anything original to add
I like girlfailure Supergirl 🥺
and the personality is SO different from captain marvel, i don't see any similarities except they're blonde women?
summing them up as "vice-ridden" is imo conflating more straightforwardly comedic characters like Starlord, whose flaws are mostly there to be Haha Relatable, with how Supergirl has struck me like a more sincere (while still comedic) depiction of someone genuinely troubled and a mess
Oh I meant the cinematography
I don't see what you see
Starlord isn't portrayed like he's truly in a bad spot in his life, he's chilling and having fun
Though my favorite part of the new Superman is probably Krypto being a chaos gremlin because that's how my own dog is 
I wouldn't feel comfortable passing judgment on this one way or the other until the movie is actually out
Honestly that’s my take
I’m waiting till the movie comes out
I’ve been avoiding a lot of the recent TV spots, I don’t want to be spoiled
I think Superman stood out as a movie for its sincerity and straightforwardness in comparison to the irreverent quippyness of what the MCU became, and I think Supergirl gives me the sense that, hopefully, it'll provide a counterpoint to that with her flaws mirroring Superman's perfection, while still working toward the same sincere thematic point
Time will tell if it does it well
But it certainly strikes me as something new and worthwhile to do, for current superhero movies
yeah I vibe with that
Superman to me had that spark that a lot of CBMs have been missing recently
The movie might turn out to be great but the marketing isn’t selling it
WB’s marketing just sucks unfortunately
A lot of movies rely on good word of mouth nowadays to do good in the box office
for me that's true. i've only gone to movies weeks into their runs if i hear they're getting LOTS of good responses
Almost as if the marketing has strayed into a potent mix of untrustworthy and full of spoilers that ruin the experience
That both are true is somewhat paradoxical but here we are
i used to go to the theatre all the time in college and for a time after, often just by myself just because i wanted to see something. now a theatre trip is too expensive to be anything other than a social occasion, and i see things with my siblings
Captain Marvel + supergirl trailer ||the train scene reminded me a lot of the captain marvel scene, just vibes wise and because there’s nothing really interesting going on stunts wise so it’s just “fight on a train”||
PHM, Superman, and Barbie are probably the last things i saw in theatres in that order
reverse order
i still don't see it. it just feels like saying, they're both action scenes so they're the same! but like...
That's so peak!
almost as though "normal" adverts are no where near as useful as the appearance of grassroots popularity in the era of social media
noice
*era of streaming
era of not-trad-TV really
I will say Clayface trailer was legit peak
with how wild theatre prices are in US and etc, I am not surprise people are less inclined to go
my PHM ticket cost 1.85 dollars
Absolutely
That movie looks great
which is like
1 day's meal for me
My obsession tickets costed 8$ each on amc app
For a total of 22$
I think it’s like the first ever time we’ve a horror comic book movie too?
at 8 usd, I can get for 4 people and also get popcorn
okay maybe not exacly popcorn for all
I'd almost certainly go more if that was the cost!
and even cheaper at certain days!
well it's just 1.63 from 1.83
also the clayface trailer was very hype, pretty unbelievable. but that's also the difference in genre, scary movie trailers can still hit these days. current guys cutting THOSE trailers I guess :P
It’s for the amc stubs Tuesday deal so I had to act fast
Where it’s 50% off
well we don't get good movies as much as yall do
like even Obsession is barely coming here 3 weeks later
I didn’t get amazing movies when I went to amc for my bday other than Marty supreme
But I Chose primate
Wrong channel
What?
Yee
Oh.
I'm so hyped for Supergirl ngl. Woman of Tomorrow is one of my favorite comics
Idk how to feel about it! I do like kara but hmm... superman didnt change my life the way it did others apparently 🤣
Sp im sure thisll also be a good superhero film imo
I mean its just refreshing to have comic accurate DC characters again lol
Mmmhm
superman didn't change my life either, and wasn't the best cbm that month but it was a joyful movie
filled me with joy
While the Supergirl trailers have been ||very brown planet, I have seen marketing that confirms they are doing the others and that they will all be visually distinct.||
Which was the other one?
"The supergirl trailers look boring"
Uhh, did y'all miss the puppy? There's a puppy! Look! Cute puppy!
I liked the comic. And
Favorite page from Woman of Tomorrow. I am every character on this page at once
Why is this IGN channel posting a video with resolution from the 90s?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiGh7-SVdyY
Captured live at London’s Vaudeville Theatre, SIX the Musical Live! brings audiences an electrifying, one-night-only cinematic event starring the six original West End Queens, each returning to the roles that helped ignite a global phenomenon.
Seen by more than 3.5 million people worldwide, the Tony Award®-winning smash hit SIX has...
One of my favorite musicals
As much as I am skeptical about some of the things in the supergirl trailers, I enjoy her characterisation enough that it will easily carry the movie for me if it has to
Who's the guy on the left?
Matthew Bennell, the lead character in Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978)
I don't mind Supergirl but it did reminds me too much of GOTG both tonally and visually
(I hate GOTG)
ok maybe the last one was wathcable
I suppose I liked GOTG (and Suicide Squad The for that matter), so I'm certainly gonna watch this
I liked gotg2 a lot but haven’t watched gotg3
Tss was fun too
I’m just not sure I need more of it
I HATE ADI SHANKAR I HATE ADI SHANKAR I HATE ADI SHANKR
also hes one hellf oa person to talk about secretly loathing the source mateiral
"I am a generational talent" wut
I dont know who this person is but that seems a bit much
It is, and im the biggest Castlevania + Nocture glazer out there 😭
Hes not a good director either
hes horrible
Especially when you put out the DMC SHOW of all things
utter insanity
Yeah all of my friends who have played the games cannot STAND the show 😂
I think id like it a lot because i havent played DMC but I want to
i DNFed it
And I love castlevania + especially nocturne but I've talked to people who've played the games not like them
its honeslty not even a good show
outside of being so horrible to the source
I broadly liked DMC the show. Pretty self contained. Castlevania into that show is impressive. Self congratulating yourself on Facebook is less advisable.
i know adi shankar more from people hating on him on social media than anything he's actually done lmao
I don't know who this is but it does not at all surprise me that you hate this person
This is the person who writes and directs the (very hated) Netflix Devil May Cry show
Nick will activate an unskippable cutscene on how bad it is if he were here
I feel like I might’ve heard of his existence from Nick actually
This man has made nick so angry, I feel so bad but its zo funny 😭
actual rent free
Nick is right
i hate that
i cannot put int owrods
how much
i just
hate adi shankar
you cannot believe how much hatred i have the DMC show and his smug little attitude
Adi Shankar is an idiot who deserves the hate
And I like the Castlevania show
One of the biggest narcissists I’ve ever seen
He said he was making a Duke Nukem show (not sure if that’s actually happening or not) and then started tweeting at the actual developers of the games saying “your games aren’t canon, my show is canon now”
Publicly proclaiming yourself a generational talent is kind of icky. I'd think this was excessive glazing if it was someone else, but how full of it do you have to be to glaze yourself like this? 🤮
I don't even follow the source material being talked about, I'm just put off by this guy being so narcissistic.
This is so wholesome ❤️
When I first saw the Backrooms movie, I left the theater feeling very disturbed and uncomfortable, as I knew I should have been from a movie like that. But ever since then, I've reflected further and been thinking about just how good that movie was and how I just want to see it again.
I've been following Kane's stuff since 2022, and I'm really happy for how far he's made it.
hes not a generational talent when hes one of theworst showrunners to hit TV in a decade
What in the helly hell
Dude I don’t care if you’re Christopher Nolan
NOBODY should have that much ego
bringing up nolan of all people is funny for this
but
if it was like tarkovsky sure
itd be fine
but ADI SHANKAR
Is it only me who thinks this might be sarcastic
Adi's post
its not
hes a huge egotistical asshole
with no idea on how to run a show
who deserves to be blacklisted
Doesn’t he also hang out with not good people too
that too i guess
Huh. Every word I hear about this guy makes him grate on me even more.
In that case, better to just ignore him, I think.
Bag 2 of Arkham Asylum
Having been on the internet for a while, this feels like the kind of post where you can double down if everyone reacts positively or say, "y'all it was just sarcastic, you fell for the bit" if everyone reacts positively
🔁 garashir
hey friends where is that picture of boromir with the gondor flag except its a pride flag?
lesbiansforboromir
Couldn’t find it so I made another because you’re right that it’s a crime and it’s definitely my duty to remedy it
-# #boromir #chats
I saw Backrooms yesterday and I gotta say, I would not have done things the same way Clark (the main character) did
For starters, ||I would have walked into the Backrooms and immediately checked the opposite wall to the breaker box to see what was up with the weirdly positioned breakers.||
I need to watch Obsession and Backrooms. I’m so curious about them. No idea what they’re about so I plan to go in blind
I wonder if I could do back to back showings on Tuesday 🤔
Day 1 is usually the day allowed to be posted, and then nothing until the final week. But since TheFlatLannister did not offer…
I’m looking at supergirl numbers and they say break-even point is 315 mil worldwide on a budget of 175 mil but that can’t be right can it?
2.5x of 175 is 438
Marketting's been kinda low, so maybe that's why? Idk, I don't really trust any of the numbers studios say
Well the lack of marketing is true LOL
There's a pretty girl and a dog, so I'm sold I don't need any more marketting
No just tickets
Today Masters of the Universe movie goes live in theaters 
-# My favorite Destiny 2 Characters!
no, they're trying to predict box office numbers based on pre-sales
IIRC its normally ~2x not 2.5x, which is about what we see here
it's 2.5x for international box office, i think
Ive seen 2.5 recently

2x is a longstanding rule of thumb, if that's changing its likely OP hasn't heard it either
Damn that color matching on the stickers is bad.
#ReleasetheTomChristieCut
New clip from Supergirl || https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s9s-m1wIyt0&pp=ugUEEgJlbg%3D%3D&ra=m||
See how Kara first comes to earth. Be sure to catch Supergirl in theaters June 26th!
||Supes is such a dork||
anthony head (giles in buffy the vampire slayer) has died
these past few years have been terrible for the buffy cast
I was full on crashing out
Masters of the Universe is somehow really really good
Don’t know how many of you are on Letterboxd but https://boxd.it/3Ae6d
Drop me a lil follow
Starting to use this a lot more to log films
nathby_s uses Letterboxd to share film reviews and lists. 294 films watched. Favorites: The Stuff (1985), Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (2010), Punch-Drunk Love (2002), Mulholland Drive (2001). Bio: A Short meme reviewer who is a youtuber/ aspiring filmmaker Rating’s 0/10: It’s A Monster kill it!!!! 1/2⭐️ 1/10: it’s an abomination bu...
Been using it since 2021
Also you gotta log all 5 of the other films you have if you watched em
Made that mistake now I use my diary as my log
This is what I am hearing a lot of
Somehow the curse of Jared Leto is broken? 
i mean lets see the box office before saying that
started one recently
roast my taste idk
only have rated things seen since the profile was made
and spiderverse bc that is obvious
You don’t have bad taste (yet)
Same
Also I got 3 days till I see this!
Welcome to Letterboxd @dusk hound and @oak ivy
Hope you enjoy making your personal film diaries on here
I don’t use Letterboxd much but I really like the lists feature
i just rate things, i am less interested in recording everything
also is there a similar site for tv shows?
Only 1 and it’s called serialized
:(
He was likely the next Buffy main cast member to pass away just based on age, but I didn’t expect him to pass away for another 10 or 20 years
Rewatching Daredevil Born Again and you know what
I feel like a Nightwing show in this style would go unbelievably hard
I imagine you've seen that godforsaken Titans show?
That's the first thing that comes to mind when I think "live action Nightwing"
Only good thing was || Batman casting ||s1 end
Oh I couldn't disagree more
Titans ||Worst Batman to ever play the role, not close||
Alrighty but we can do better than that
Just find the guys who did Netflix Daredevil
ive been so bad with maintaining consistent interest in movies/tv lately 
I keep starting movies and not finishing them
In any medium* lately
🏃♂️
I have been very good with books thank you 😔
that seems to have come at the cost of everything else though
Challengers ~half way ||This is the guy from Wake Up Dead Man? How is this the same dude from Wake Up Dead Man||
I watched backrooms
Good movie
Cannot give an accurate rating because I spent 50% of it staring at my boyfriends shoulder
I’ve been hearing good things and people hating the movie because
“It isn’t like my Roblox game!”
Rewatch while spending less time eyeing up the boyfriend
It was scary 😭 😭 😭
Scary means good
I can pretty much only watch scary movies with my boyfriend
I know I’ve said it like 500 times but
David Corenswet is literally Superman
Like this is PERFECT casting dude
They genuinely ripped Superman from the comics and made him real
Oh for sure
I don’t think any Superman casting for the rest of time will come close to Reeve
No love for Superman and Lois supes
He’s for sure my favorite live action TV Superman
Mine was Dean Cain. Open to new ones
i've seen clips of this and it looks super good lol
Linda Carter was so pretty
An og diva 😌💖
She really just ran around looking like that
Power move
THAT'S WHY TOO MANY COOKS DOES THAT!
I wanna watch the actual show because ww84 is an actual disgrace to movies as a whole
It was fun but ok. I suggest not trying to binge it, as the plots get repetitive
Ahh i see
I used to record reruns of every superhero tv show, live action or cartoon, and watch them after school
New Opening i made for Season 2 with the original theme!
Exclude. I was focusing on DC & Marvel
Never found a rerun of the 1990s flash show or the 1950s Superman show tho. Guess those didn’t make it into syndication
I assume this Paradise Lost is not the one about Satan's fall from Grace?
It is not 
It’s a prequel show about the Amazons in the DC Universe before Diana came along
Ah
He looks like he's gonna put some dirt in my eyes
Is he?
Oh no he isn't Maguire
RIP
this is so so so good
oh my god
i watched it recently
I have some criticisms from how it looks at history pesrpective but its an amazing show
There’s an among us tv show coming out?
Theres an among us tv show out now!
@novel bear one of the craziest quotes i have seen if you think about it
hey guys what if we wrote the film first
Nah that's stupid
Gotta have several years of CGI hemming you in with no other script to work with
That's how real art gets made
im imagining tom holland walking onto a nolan project going wait, ive only been in slop, actually
needs to be spoilered
Spider-Man nwh
Tom Holland spent one millisecond with Christopher Nolan and went back to Marvel and said “wtf are we doing”
its actually an insane quote
its a shame because like Marvel clearly wasn't always this bad in this regard
You know which cinematic universe is actually taking time with their scripts and not rushing production??
I am kinda fascinated to read the tell-all book in a few decades about how the marvel train started going off tracks behind the scenes. they were doing insane for a while there
Exploring all of the behind-the-scenes drama, poor decisions and bad luck that led to Marvel's fall from grace
Special thanks to @ImplicitlyPretentious @cosmonautvarietyhour and @Mulletman_Comics for all their wisdom
00:00 - What Actually Happened?
03:06 - Marvel's Massive Risks
06:21 - How Marvel Destroyed Everyone
08:34 - The Secret Ingr...
Amazing video
Victim of their own success
i mean they were pretty sucessfull through endgame
Which functioned as a natural off ramp
Ive had a sneaking suspicion that the covid years and move to disney+ caused a lot of background changes in executive decision makers and other high level staff. either in the actual people or just in thier mindset/priorities
Almost all the big stars left with Endgame amd they started putting out tv series which you had to watch to understand the movie
nolan inst even a particularly good director
hes like a mid tier one
As someone that hasn't really watched the movies since, my understanding is that it's worse than that. They started putting out TV series that everyone assumed they'd need to watch to understand the movies, when the TV series were fairly silo'd.
other than the wonderman and the first 3 epsidoes of wandavision
the TV shows were also pretty bad
And in like the big case where you should've needed to watch the show to get the movie, the movie was made with zero consideration for the show, and went in basically the exact opposite direction.
Seems like it functioned as something of a creative offramp though too
I think people wanted a reason to stick around and Marvel did their damnedest to not give them one
I don’t think they created one mistake I think it’s a combination of many factors. I do think one understated is they lacked the oversight the first movies up until avengers had while all being in different genres
But Covid, a natural off ramp, and Disney+ def didn’t help as well
I honestly think trying to watch everything makes things more confusing right now
Because there's no cohesion. Different projects will do the same concept/arc differently, and you're stuck trying to figure out how they fit together
I heard it's worse than that. I didn't watch nearly everything, but as someone who watched Multiverse of Madness but not Wandavision, (MCU MoM) ||The way I heard the story, the writers didn't talk to each other much, and there were just a lot of continuity and character development clashes that just made MoM worse if you had watched Wandavision. I thought the movie was fine, as someone who didn't watch it||
But like, why
Why did they just turn off the oversight
Bizarre choice
i liked wandavision and agatha all along
I tagged that as safety but it's really not going into any story details
I think the only MCU series I actually watched were what if season 1 and Loki season 1
I watched about half of the Falcon/Captain America thing, and probably something else I don't remember
like one episode of loki season 2, one episode of moon knight, probably one episode of a couple other things
i think they never really figured out what they wanted the tv shows to be
it some combination of
- its own self contained marvel universe 2 that may cameo in the films
- necessary material for future films
- follow ups on existing films
- random projects
defenders was very clearly slotted into the 1st type
something like hawkeye and ms marvel were confusing at the time
yeah it is somewhat disjoint
Bruh moment
Gee I can’t wait to see this scene on screen when Supergirl (2026) is released
@topaz oyster ironically i think the mandoverse side of star wars shows actually did do a good job of carving out what it wanted to be, distinct characters, its own area in the timeline, and a distinct aesthetic, but then M and G gets released in theaters and its like eh
Step 1: Meet your only living relative from your home planet which has since been destroyed along with your entire culture
Step 2: Immediately drop her in an orphanage
Step 3: ???
Step 4: Profit
Beats some versions where step 2 is “debate self outloud on the legality of first cousin marriage on Earth & Krypton•
A strangely recurring theme in the golden age
Yep. That was my experience. I really wanted to keep up with the MCU but too much stuff post endgame was just awful quality.
Not even like, mid out entertaining like some stuff they'd done before. But actively unfun to watch.
i think hawkeye had 2 or 3 watchable episodes
Modern Superman comics: “I need to stop Doomsday from destroying all of Metropolis!! This is life or death!”
Silver Age Superman comics: “Lois I turned into a lion so now you must act out Beauty and the Beast with me”
The troubles started before that, Mando had a crossover with Boba Fett, two random episodes in the middle of that season that if you didn't watch them Mando s3 made no sense at all
BoBF ||And Ahsoka is in those episodes too, and Luke||
execution wise it ran into trouble but conceptually it was pretty solid
i read matt fraction's hawkeye omnibus so i was already biased enough against renner's hawkeye to never touch it
i dont think people care as much about BoBF having these crossovers if the show was good at baseline
it had the same... jumpsuit guys
They need to give me comet
I demand supergirl’s horse who is a centaur but also a Pegasus but also a human man but also a human woman but also an angel
First version is preCrisis, second is postCrisis. (1985’s Crisis on Infinite Earths was DC’s first continuity reboot)
I like how DC reboots every 5 years
Meanwhile Marvel has had the same comics continuity since the 60s
Not true, or their Nick Fury would still be White Nick Fury and not a Samuel L Jackson inspired version
Besides MCU synergy is wrecking the same effect as a reboot on most of the characters who suffer from it
The only undisputed glow ups have been Iron Man & Nick Fury
Well Nick Fury Sr still exists, the black version is his son Nick Fury Jr
Not the same kind of retcon as DC’s full universal resets
Tiger Batman with prep time
Her boyfriend?
Batman with prep time always wins
Yeah, Comet is also her boyfriend
That’s true but DC has two full reboots in like five years
Imagine if we had an app to discuss renners portrayal of hawkeye
Tbh I liked the Hawkeye show a lot
It was a pretty good show
Much discussion beyond this probably deserves relocation but BoBF ||the idea of using two full episodes of BoBF to pull the punch that is the end of s2 because they don't know how to continue the show without baby Yoda is I think just a conceptual misfire||
sw all ||i think there is layer of insecurity with not ending plotlines. mando s2 (havent seen it but i know the jist), not letting ahsoka kill vader, not letting maul rest, and so on, is a large reason why it all feels directionless||
And also Loki
I love the Loki show. Was my favorite Marvel Disney+ original right from episode 1 and it stayed good. I daresay it kept getting better.
Yeah I loved it too
Finished the Digital Circus movie. I have one big thought. ||I actively dislike that they don't undo the Abstraction. It would make perfect sense that undoing the Abstraction is just "touch the person's abstracted form, comfort them, and they'll come back". It would have been more satisfying because Jax would be able to apologize to Ribbit and Kaufmo, it felt like that's what they were setting up for with Pomni going in for the hug, and it would make sense that this wasn't learned before because Caine just gave everyone the basement treatment so nobody could ever try it before||
I am also surprised at how. Surprisingly not focused on the ||trans Jax reveal|| was. ||We only got the single scene with Ribbit putting the ribbon on Jax's ear and then it never comes up again.||
